Slashdot Mirror


NIST Unveils Chip-scale Atomic Clock

grumling writes "The heart of a minuscule atomic clock, believed to be 100 times smaller than any other atomic clock has been demonstrated by scientists at the Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), opening the door to atomically precise timekeeping in portable, battery-powered devices for secure wireless communications, more precise navigation and other applications. "

172 comments

  1. timing is extremely important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    especially when you're trying to get first psot

    1. Re:timing is extremely important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speed, however, is also of essence, which is quite visible in your spelling, grammar, capitalization, and punctuation. :p

    2. Re:timing is extremely important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you misspelled "frist".

    3. Re:timing is extremely important by quantaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Spelling however, is entirely optional.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re:timing is extremely important by rickshaf · · Score: 1

      We need a thread exclusively devoted to providing definitions for the acronym "PSOT"....

    5. Re:timing is extremely important by falzer · · Score: 1

      Hey, chip scale atomic clocks?
      First TSOP!!

  2. Useful by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

    opening the door to atomically precise timekeeping in portable, battery-powered devices for secure wireless communications, more precise navigation and...

    Video games!

    1. Re:Useful by Gherald · · Score: 1

      >communications, more precise navigation and...

      >Video games!

      No fair! I was pinging 400 ... nanoseconds :)

  3. Yeah... by dmayle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, so I can keep time 5 minutes early more precisely than ever before...

  4. Uses... by Laebshade · · Score: 0

    I want an atomic clock on my wrist.

    1. Re:Uses... by falzer · · Score: 1

      > I want an atomic clock on my wrist.

      Here you go!

  5. Best chance ever to get your story posted by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 2, Funny
    Today CmdrTaco will post any story he gets, just to make the iMac-fake-picture-hoax-debacle go as far down the page it can get :)

    And that doesn't mean that I don't find this atomic clock thingie absolutely fascinating ...

    [Looking at strange spot on the wall]

    What was I talking about?

  6. OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by Atrax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... so my clock doesn't drift by like five minutes a day, necessitating a daily ping to the USNO time servers? anyone?

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    1. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      ... so my clock doesn't drift by like five minutes a day, necessitating a daily ping to the USNO time servers? anyone?

      My MythTV box has a rather old clock that drifts a lot. This could create problems with program scheduling, so I've set up a cron job to run rdate every couple of hours, and keep the clock synchronized with one of the NIST NTP servers.

      If you're on a Windows box, I'm sure that a similar automated functionality can be set up.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by Gerald · · Score: 3, Informative

      So why don't you just use NTPd or OpenNTPd? And why aren't you using pool.ntp.org instead of picking on the poor, overloaded NIST servers?

    3. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out ntpd or xntpd. They are designed to keep your local clock in time, by estimating the drift rate of the local clock from data provided by external NTP servers. They specifically work hard to avoid moving the clock backwards which can confuse many programs. Instead of an inaccurate clock that makes an instantaneous correction every couple of hours, ntpd will give you a clock that works steadily and accurately, and gets more and more accurate as time goes by.

    4. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My MythTV box has a rather old clock that drifts a lot. This could create problems with program scheduling, so I've set up a cron job to run rdate every couple of hours, and keep the clock synchronized with one of the NIST NTP servers.

      Excellent solution.

      Now if only someone could somehow make the television networks become aware of such things as atomic timekeeping and clock synchronization using NTP.

      I swear most of them appear to base their time on a Micky Mouse windup alarm clock and now and then someone forgets to wind it fully.

    5. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by Artifakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are about a jillion clock programs for windows that call the NIST clocks on a regular schedule of your choice and adjust the PC. Most of them are freeware. Some of them work with a clock display on desktop, some with the existing clock in the systray. I recomend Beatnik, at http://www.somedec.com/ free, skinnable, and stable, and no I don't have any connection to the author except using it and some of his other freeware. However, the OP apparently doesn't want to do something like that. I confess, I'm not sure why. If he has a box whose clock drifts by 5 min a day and that once daily ping is eating up substantial time on his connection, the answer is to get a new box or a faster connection. If my clock naturally drifted by 5 minutes a day, I'd want to correct about every 4 hours or so, or maybe I'd just immediatly try replacing the Mobo battery in case that was a sign it was going stale. Maybe I'm missing something there, and he just doesn't want to go through the process manually, but it sounds like he's more wanting to not do it at all.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    6. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      It's a tickbox in the time settings in XP, you can choose to synch to NIST or time.microsoft.time or you can enter in some other address if you so desire.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    7. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      OK, maybe I'm getting way too existential here, but let's say you set this program to check the NIST clock every five minutes. If the time is being kept incorrectly by the local machine, how does it know when five minutes have elapsed so that it can go and get the new time?

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    8. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CPU clock - this is the timer on the CPU, it's used for things like measuring how fast instructions are and for scheduling interrupts (this is the thing that causes the kernel to gain control and schedule other threads to run - it's what makes it appear that programs are able to run simultaneously). It is very accurate and wraps around often. It is essentially initialized to garbage and you can only use it for calculating the differences between two times and you must be somewhat quick about it because of the wrap around.

      system timer - this is a timer managed by the kernel, usually measured in milliseconds and even nanoseconds. It never decreases and only is updated in a specific place (usually the scheduler). You can think of this as the system's uptime. It is initialized to 0 and is updated using the CPU clock by using the difference between the current CPU clock time and the last recorded one. On windows this wraps around every 49.71 days

      system clock - this is the thing we're trying to update. It is usually the number of seconds/milliseconds/or nanoseconds since some constant epoch (for unix this is the number of seconds since Jan 1, 1970). You can change the system clock to whatever you want if you have enough admin rights to do so. It is initialized to whatever the computer reports whatever the current time is (that little CMOS battery on your motherboard helps keep the time up to date when the power is off). You can calculate this number on the fly using the difference between the current system timer and the last system timer value (you have to keep the system clock in synch to the system timer if you ever change the system clock timer).

      What you do to update the system clock is setup a timer. The timer is based on the system timer, not the system clock. So I hope you can figure it out from there.

    9. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the skinnable thing has gone too far when an NTP client is skinnable. Enough with the *)#$#! skins!

    10. Re:OK, so when do I get one in my PC... by SEE · · Score: 1

      I prefer NetTime, even though it's out of active development. Small, light, open source, and supports up to five servers for cross-checks.

  7. ARE YOU NUTS?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I want an atomic clock on my wrist.

    Wouldn't it radioactivate you or something???

    1. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by physicsboy500 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't it radioactivate you or something???

      Cesium is a stable isotope and is not radioactive. The only problem I see with a wrist watch containing Cesium is accidentally jumping in the pool with it or being caught in the rain.

      "hey man... watch my tripple sommersault dive"

      BOOM.

      --
      The original generic sig.
    2. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "hey man... watch my tripple sommersault dive" BOOM.

      I don't get it... Would it make a chain reaction??? Shoudn't it be illegal to wear???!!!

    3. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't get it... Would it make a chain reaction???

      No. It would make a perfectly normal, everyday exothermic chemical reaction.

      Cesium FAQ

      Shoudn't it be illegal to wear???!!!

      If atoms are outlawed only outlaws will have atoms.

      KFG

    4. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

      Here's your armour lets have a snow fight. hehehehehehe cesium muahhahhaha, boom HEHEHHE boom. Snow+cesium boom, water and cesium boom ice[T>-195'c] and cesium boom. No radio action hehehe just chemistry muahhahhah.

      --
      Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
    5. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by wfberg · · Score: 1

      As the poster noted, caesium is not radio-active. Good job you figured out to post anonymously.
      As any one who's had some high-school physics (or noticed the chunk of caesium floating in a jar filled with oil and figured out its nefarious uses) caesium "is highly explosive in cold water" as the wikipedia article notes in red letters.

      You might not have noticed that.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    6. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by physicsboy500 · · Score: 1

      Cesium is in the alkaline group meaning that it is reactive to water. Because it is very far down on the periodic table in that group... it is very reactive to water.

      A pea sized ball of cesium thrown into a full bathtub has been described to me as able to produce a 6 foot fireball.

      --
      The original generic sig.
    7. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks to anti-nuke propaganda, "atomic clock" might cause marketing problems. Watch for some other phrase to appear.

    8. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny
      A pea sized ball of cesium thrown into a full bathtub has been described to me as able to produce a 6 foot fireball.

      Note to self: Get larger bathtub.
      Note to self: For process to do above, see above.

    9. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to self: Get larger bathtub.

      Please don't mention "bathtub" on Slashdot for God's sake! It has very negative connotations. (The link is safe, but use your imagination to know what I see hearing "bathtub" on Slashdot.)

    10. Re:ARE YOU NUTS?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to preemptive war based on false WMD claims, "atomic clock" might cause campaign problems. Watch for some other excuse to appear, like potential dirty wrist watch WMD attacks.

  8. At last... by Aardpig · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...Netgear can start manufacturing routers that don't totally fuck the NTP server at University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    1. Re:At last... by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Hmmm. So, why is it that there isn't a rule that says:

      'all routers must run ntp and any machine requesting time services should communicate with it's nearest routers'.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:At last... by haruchai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How did this get modded up so highly? Yes, it was a boneheaded decision by Netgear engineers to hardcode an NTP server address but they did work with the University and release a firmware fix in a respectable timeframe.
      Unfortunately, without a way to force an upgrade, the NTP flooding may continue for years. The real lesson here, which in this day and age should be second nature, is that HARDCODING is BAD!!
      Especially, hardcoding ONE source that will be used by hundreds of thousands of clients.
      The engineer(s) responsible should have been bitchslapped once per second for every flawed router.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:At last... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The suggested rule assumes that the routers are operated by someone who knows how to configure NTP and how to monitor it for errors and problems. It requires that someone be on the staff that is knowledgable about NTP, has the time to maintain it, and cares about the quality of the time that is distributed. In too many cases, this isn't true.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:At last... by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      India: Where discrimination against Dalits has been acceptable for 3000 years

      Indeed. I deplore all forms of racism, including that against Indians and by Indians. Neither excuses the other.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  9. Mod parent UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, this time it was funny!

  10. Useful-Right on time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPS.

  11. Great for GPS by DustMagnet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With a atomic clock in a GPS you no longer need to solve for time, so you can get the same quality position with one less satellite. There are times where this could make a huge difference.

    --
    'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    1. Re:Great for GPS by Electrawn · · Score: 1

      Right, which makes the first practical application for it military. Submarines, detroyers, etc. A time desync of .00001 can put you miles off course.

      -Electrawn

    2. Re:Great for GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An atomic clock today is a 19 inch rack unit. If a warship needs one, it already has one.

    3. Re:Great for GPS by Detritus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Navy has been using atomic clocks for decades. Much of the technology in GPS can be traced back to early Navy programs for satellite assisted navigation. When you launch an ICBM from a submarine, you need a very accurate fix on the position of the submarine. Atomic clocks are also as timing references for secure communications links.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:Great for GPS by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There will ALWAYS be a need for an outside reference time source.

      Whilst the device will keep track of time with an accuracy of 1 second in 300 years, what it can't do is keep time without power.

      The effect means a video recorder still shows 00:00, just a lot more accurately than before.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Great for GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > With a atomic clock in a GPS you no longer need to
      > solve for time, so you can get the same quality
      > position with one less satellite.

      Not true! GPS receivers calculate their positions based on the difference in time of signals from at least 3 GPS satellites. Any fewer than 3, and the precise location can't be calculated. If a GPS receiver gets 3 signals, then exactly one spot on the Earth's surface could be at the intersection of those 3 signals with the measured difference in time from those signals. With only 2 signals, then many locations on Earth could receive those signals with the differences in time. All those locations are along the circumference of a circle many hundreds of kilometers wide.

      > There are times where this could make a huge difference.

      There are always at least 4 GPS satelites visible from any spot on the Earth. So, even if having an atomic clock in a GPS receiver could make a difference, it would not matter anyway.

    6. Re:Great for GPS by Grym · · Score: 1

      Not always. Remember, not all aplications involving time need to know the actual time with respect to the world. In fact, where this development will come in really handy will be ones where only the CHANGE IN (delta) time will be relevant.

      The first that comes to mind is GPS. With an atomic clock onboard, GPS systems will be able to drastically decrease the range of error and, as the grandparent stated, require one less satallite, for functionality.

      -Grym

    7. Re:Great for GPS by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ok, first a clarification, and then a possible alternative implementation of GPS with fewer limitations if you can assume the receiver knows the time:

      First - if you have only two satellites in the present system, the solution to the distance equation is approximately a hyperbola (it would be exactly one for a flat earth). Three satellites gives you three hyperbolas, which intersect at one point. (Remember, a hyberbola is the set of points where the difference between the distance from the point to two foci is a constant.)

      However, you don't have to use difference in time to implement a GPS-like system. A more direct solution is measuring absolute time to arrival for each satellite signal. This requires an atomic clock in the receiver - which is why they don't generally do it this way. If you measure absolute time to arrival you get a sphere around each satellite you receive signal from. With two satellites the intersection is a circle, but only two points of that circle lie on the surface of the earth. If you have even a remote idea of where you are (within 1000 miles or so), you should be able to figure out which one you're at. since the two points might literally be separated by more than 1000-2000 miles.

      So, the two satellite system might have some use - especially if the software is smart and keeps track of state. For instance, if you are a bomb decending to a target you would use as many satellites as you can - probably 3-4 most of the time. However, if you lost all but 2 as you got close to the ground and some jamming, you can probably bet that you didn't change position much, and so you can pick the closest solution and still have some useful guidance data. So, an atomic clock would be useful for more accurate GPS...

    8. Re:Great for GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
      The Navy has been using atomic clocks for decades. Much of the technology in GPS can be traced back to early Navy programs for satellite assisted navigation. When you launch an ICBM from a submarine, you need a very accurate fix on the position of the submarine. Atomic clocks are also as timing references for secure communications links.

      In fact, the entire history of accurate time can be attributed to naval navigation.

    9. Re:Great for GPS by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Interesting
      With a atomic clock in a GPS you no longer need to solve for time, so you can get the same quality position with one less satellite. There are times where this could make a huge difference.

      Say what? GPS satellites have always had atomic clocks but receivers have had to rely on quartz.

      Multiple signals are always needed by GPS for positioning regardless of timing accuracy. It's called triangulation. The more signals you have the better the accuracy due to timing differentials. Most GPS receivers use at least four satellites. Three are for positioning. The fourth is used to correct for timing differences. Some receivers boast of using 6 for better accuracy. Now if you have a better clock in a GPS receiver, it means you can find your position with fewer satellites and the accuracy of your location is better. Most GPS receivers always have an accuracy of 6-12 meters with some good ones in the 3-5 meter range. Using atomic clocks, GPS receivers could reduce that distance to feet.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    10. Re:Great for GPS by saiha · · Score: 1

      Actually having a very accurate clock would at most change the number of satellites from _4_ to 3. Using the earth as an intersection point would be fine if it were a perfect sphere (or several other regular shapes) or we had a map of exact ground levels for every point on the earth (oops what if you are in the air or on a bridge). To get reasonable accuracy within lets say 15feet you would still need the extra satellite.

      Just a quick aside, there are not always 4 GPS satellite visible from any spot on earth (perhaps a building is blocking one) but usually within a short while another will come into view.

    11. Re:Great for GPS by 6800 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The quality of clock in the GPS receiver makes a big difference in accuracy of the results. This is true both for navigation and timekeeping types. In any case, the time of the gps receiver must first be set to the time from the sat's but with corrections both for the delay to the receivers position and for the true gps time offset (around 13 seconds, if my memory is correct). Then based on the time held by the receiver, the position can be determined by the delay measurments of and position information in the signals. In the case of the 'position hold' mode used in timekeeping receivers, the time can be more accurately derived and produced. This is why some timekeeping receivers have options for the oscilators ranging from cheap (Motorola Oncore) to quartz to ovanized quartz to rubidium (cheap atomic) and beyond.

    12. Re:Great for GPS by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      The amotic clock scenario is only useful if it is in sync with them. Things will run perfectly for as long as your device has a battery.
      Consider after a battery drain event, if your local clock tells you its 8:01 and the once onboard the sat say 8:02 then you are thousands of miles off course.

      Granted some applications require a time interval rather than a period, a race or competition for instance, but at the time scales required, quartz is usually good enough.

      The best place I can see this in use is in remote spacecraft, or long duration environmental sensors where before, the size constraints, or power requirements of the larger device were prohibitive.
      The current timing systems using NTP etc are perfectly acceptable, and I do not see them changing for a great many years.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    13. Re:Great for GPS by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Wow, I even previewed that one.

      Time for either new glasses, or a visit to the quack!

      Of course, I meant Atomic.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    14. Re:Great for GPS by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
      Now if you have a better clock in a GPS receiver, it means you can find your position with fewer satellites and the accuracy of your location is better.

      Exactly. That's what I thought I said. I was trying to keep it simple, but it's clear I kept it too simple.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    15. Re:Great for GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small point, but GPS uses trilateration, not triangulation. Triangulation uses angles whereas trilateration uses distances.
      http://www.trimble.com/gps/triangulation.html

      A GPS receiver measures these distances (or pseudoranges) by calculating the time a signal from a satellite took from transmission to reception. Having an accurate clock or time estimate (which 4 satellites will give you) is key to that calculation.

    16. Re:Great for GPS by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Multiple signals are always needed by GPS for positioning regardless of timing accuracy. It's called triangulation.

      But if you had 100% accurate time, locally, you could get perfectly accurate location reading, using the signal from just 2 satellites.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:Great for GPS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If this thing is accurate enough to be an "atomic clock" then the need for outside reference goes way down. Specifically you could synchronize any time you had enough satellites for an accurate signal. Then when you entered (for example) a canyon and the available number of satellites was reduced, you would still have coverage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Great for GPS by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Actually, if your precision increases too much, you'd hit the barrier of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle :-)

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    19. Re:Great for GPS by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      But if you had 100% accurate time, locally, you could get perfectly accurate location reading, using the signal from just 2 satellites.

      No, the problem with using just two signals is not accuracy. With only two signals, the problem is that you could be in one of two places. If you were to draw two intersecting circles, they connect at two points. You need another intersecting circle to truly place your location.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    20. Re:Great for GPS by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Your telling me that a quartz clock cannot keep accurate time in the frame your talking about?

      On the scale of a day, where you can sync yourself in the mornings only, the quartz or other non atomic clock will not perform accurately enough?

      GPS works because you can obtain your location based upon the timing signals of a number of FIXED POSITION satellites. Without knowing the locations of the reference points, you cannot determine your location. How pray tell do you expect to calculate your location using a time reference of unknown location?

      What this may allow is fixed beacons (long term environmental sensors from another post) on hilltops and on city buildings which as well as linking to the GPS sats above, can also transmit their time signal/location to others, like the radio repeater cells around the world. This will give coverage in those areas where none is present now.

      The smaller device will allow packaging into a more compact canister making impact/payload less.

      I'm not knocking this innovation in atomic clock tech, and I think it has its uses, but placing it into every handheld device just because they can would be a folly.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    21. Re:Great for GPS by sartin · · Score: 1
      GPS works because you can obtain your location based upon the timing signals of a number of FIXED POSITION satellites. Without knowing the locations of the reference points, you cannot determine your location.

      This is not correct. My own experience watching my GPS receiver is that the satellites (and their locations) change while I am in a relatively unchanging location. When I move 10-20 miles over a period of hours, the satellite list, and the relative locations plotted on the GPS, change completely. According to NASA, GPS satellite have circular orbit of 20,200 km. A geosynchronous orbit is usually what people mean by "FIXED" and is at 35,786 km. NOAA is responsible for providing GPS ephemerodes and has historical data.

    22. Re:Great for GPS by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Slight mistake in the wording, but my point remains.

      Your position is established by collating the timing data from signals from a number of known locations.

      You cannot use your atomic signal no matter how precise as long as your position is unknown.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    23. Re:Great for GPS by femto · · Score: 1

      The real application for small accurate clocks is that they can be flown on the GPS satellites. This reduces (or ideally eliminates) the need for a ground control segment (the network of earth stations which transmit time/position correction data to the GPS satellites). In turn, this means the GPS system remains accurate for longer when unattended. That is, even when a hostile power has knocked out all the GPS ground stations the US still has the capability to fly a missile through that hostile power's window.

    24. Re:Great for GPS by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I think you mean two intersecting spheres, where the intersection is a circle (there will be an arc along this circle, near the surface of the earth, that are all valid solutions. The third intersecting sphere reduces the choice of locations to 2, one of which will not be sane (very distant from the surface of the earth and moving very quickly). The GPS receiver, under the assumption that it is operating on earth, can eliminate the unreasonable answer.

    25. Re:Great for GPS by abb3w · · Score: 1
      With a atomic clock in a GPS you no longer need to solve for time, so you can get the same quality position with one less satellite.

      Is the difference in time-rates between sealevel and orbit (due to gravity well position) enough to cause problems with this, or not? For the current system, all of the GPSes are at about the same depth in the well.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  12. The untapped potential for customer products... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...has finally been unleashed! Home users will be able to measure the relativistic effects of using table saws and ice makers.

  13. Sync the AGC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can this be used to sync the AGC simulator so you don't have to reset the clock every day?

  14. Smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely if atomic clocks get smaller they'll have to become quark clocks?

  15. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half of new york was contaminated by what was throught to be a dirty bomb but was later confirmed to be a small explosive attached to a truck load of atomic watches!

  16. Re:Atomic clock? by Toutatis · · Score: 0

    Actually, by definition, something atomic is very small.

  17. This had to come by say · · Score: 4, Insightful
    After all, an atomic timekeeper is just that: atomic. It only needs to measure the radiation of a cesium atom. So the core of the clock is simple to make. All the measuring equipment, OTOH, has been huge.

    But it's only natural that this becomes smaller. Give the rich part of the world ten years, and we're all spending our time wearing atomic _and_ digital watches.

    Interestingly, this could affect our lifestyle. The more synchronized timepieces become, doing stuff in sync and on time gets more feasible. But that also lowers the acceptance for being late and inaccurate. And I know that I always come a few minutes late to every appointment.

    Will people start yelling at me for coming only seconds late? Will the unspoken five-minute courtesy time ("the meeting starts at 2pm" really means "2:05pm") disappear? Will I become more stressful because of all this accuracy?

    So, while this seems to be a step forward for mankind, it does not necessarily create more happiness. Just like an entire host of new inventions.

    What bothers me with this is that it is not really useful in a wristwatch (Yes I know - they aren't making it for wristwatches yet - but just wait!). But because everyone else has one, I'll be forced to get one as well. Just like the cellular phone. And then it starts affecting my life. Scary.

    --
    Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    1. Re:This had to come by physicsboy500 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clarification, Cesium is a stable isotope and deos not emit radiation. It resonates naturally at microwave frequencies which is the oscilation that the atomic clock measures.

      --
      The original generic sig.
    2. Re:This had to come by MichaelFree · · Score: 1

      There's a five minute courtesy time??? And all this time I've been showing up early like a sucker ;)

    3. Re:This had to come by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Will people start yelling at me for coming only seconds late? Will the unspoken five-minute courtesy time ("the meeting starts at 2pm" really means "2:05pm") disappear? Will I become more stressful because of all this accuracy?

      I'd vote that this won't change things much. After all, watches (& cell phones) that receive a time signal by radio already exist, and even if they only sync to the signal once per 24 hours, existing quartz clocks lose several orders of magnitude less than one second per day.

      The "5-minute grace period" has more to do with other factors, like the subway train being 5 min. late, getting stuck in traffic (can't wait for aircars to become popular *grin*), or going to the wrong office in an unfamiliar building and having to ask for directions.

      As people have already noted, this will permit GPS equipment to be cheaper and more accurate.[*] Likewise, scientific equipment which requires accurate timing will become smaller and less expensive.

      -b.

      [*]- which could be thought of as a deletorious effect, if you worry about the privacy implications of ubiquitous GPS devices that have the capability to transmit. However, existing GPS stuff is already pretty damn cheap, so I'm not sure if it'll matter, really.

    4. Re:This had to come by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Our five-minute rule works the other way round: if there's a meeting scheduled for 0900 it's unacceptable to arrive later than 0855.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    5. Re:This had to come by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 2, Informative
      After all, an atomic timekeeper is just that: atomic. It only needs to measure the radiation of a cesium atom. So the core of the clock is simple to make. All the measuring equipment, OTOH, has been huge.
      One Cesium atom? Radiation?

      A Cesium clock operates by exposing the Cesium-133 isotope to microwaves and measuring the frequency of the emitted spectral line. If you were measuring atomic decay and using one atom you'd get one decay. Then it'd most likely no longer be Cesium.
      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    6. Re:This had to come by JDevers · · Score: 1

      The "unspoken five-minute courtesy time" that I've always heard is that you have the courtesy to arrive five minutes EARLIER than the scheduled time.

    7. Re:This had to come by albeit+unknown · · Score: 1

      But it's only natural that this becomes smaller. Give the rich part of the world ten years, and we're all spending our time wearing atomic _and_ digital watches.

      Well, I for one think atomic and digital watches are still a pretty neat idea.

    8. Re:This had to come by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Give the rich part of the world ten years, and we're all spending our time wearing atomic _and_ digital watches."

      The hard part isn't necessarily keeping an eye on the atom, it's all the math needed to approximate what atomic time should be.

      Over the years since the adoption of the atomic second, all sorts of adjustments and clarifications were made to the definition, that include (among others) accounting for blackbody radiation (it's "supposed" to be at 0 K), special relativity (they're "supposed" to be stationary to the observer), and general relativity (gotta remember gravity and centripetal acceleration from earth's spin at your latitude). All this must be done in a relatively controlled environment so that you know what numbers to put into the equations.

      Throw that all in with the effects that swinging your arm will have while you walk, and putting one on your wrist sounds extraneous since you'll still have to correct it from time to time to get that accuracy you're supposed to have with an atomic timepiece. The correcting will probably have to be done by GPS time transfer, which is a lot more complicated than simply asking your GPS receiver what time it is. The light lag involved is very signifigant when you're counting 9,192,631,770 "ticks" per second.

      My radio-controlled quartz watch, when allowed to update itself every 3 days, is at worst accurate to the nearest second, and I've never seen it get anywhere near that far off. If I concentrate a little I can watch deciseconds tick by, but centiseconds are too much of a blur for a mere mortal like me. Why bother with nanoseconds?

      Put one in a computer? Sure. Network validation schemes like Kerberos would benifit greatly by knowing that all the workstations in the domain are all synchronized to a disgustingly high degree. But quartz crystals continue to be good enough for even high-end GPS receivers, so why would I need better on my wrist?

    9. Re:This had to come by srn_test · · Score: 1

      Not to be picky, but you're measuring the frequency of the _radiation_ when you get a spectral line.

      Just because it's not very energetic, doesn't make it not EM radiation.

    10. Re:This had to come by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Will people start yelling at me for coming only seconds late? Will the unspoken five-minute courtesy time ("the meeting starts at 2pm" really means "2:05pm") disappear?

      No. The cause of these, is not an issue of clocks loosing/gaining time. I mean, quartz clocks are only off a second every year, or so, so 5 minutes would mean people haven't re-set the time on their clocks in 300 years.

      In fact, the flexibility in timing is more because of the inaccuracies in how we set the time on our clocks and watches. Maybe I'll set my watch to the alarm clock in my bedroom, but since it doesn't have a seconds hand, I could be up to 1 minute off, and that clock that I'm using as a source of time was set from another clock, which was maybe 30 seconds off, and perhaps I lost another minute or so, in setting the time for that one.

      Even the authorative sources for time aren't perfect. Most people use the time on the TV news, which can be delayed by quite a few seconds, due to relays, rebroadcasting, etc.

      In other words, what might bring an end to the 5 minute courtesy period, and the like, would be if we had a better way to 100% accurately set our watches at clocks. GPS has taken this position already, but it will take years before GPS recievers are cheap enough that there will be one in every clock you buy.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:This had to come by Zcipher · · Score: 1

      A Cesium clock operates by exposing the Cesium-133 isotope to microwaves and measuring the frequency of the emitted spectral line.

      Cesium? Note to self: Do not buy underwater version ^_^;;

  18. They always could - they just didn't. by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Netgear's problem wasn't lack of technological tools - it was lack of thought when they were designing those routers.
    Extra hardware tools can't fix that, I'm afraid. There was one hardware tool that would have _helped_, which would have been flash memory for storing the firmware, so that the attacking routers could have been upgraded. But when you're trying to design a device for $50 retail, you don't have much headroom for buying more flash or atomic clocks or whatever. DNS would have been a much more useful tool, of course, and it already existed at the time they hardwired in the IP address.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  19. Re:Atomic clock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not small. indivisible.

  20. Oh great! by toupsie · · Score: 0

    Just wait till terrorists get their hands on one of these! Way to go scientist guys. Somebody call John Ashcroft.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  21. Does wifi/cellular marginalize this? by theluckyleper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always imagined that the proliferation of wireless communications would eventually replace the need for having any sort of portable timing devices... I mean, my computer updates its clock from some atomic NTP server. A wifi clock could do the same.

    Why carry an atomic clock, when you can talk to an even more accurate atomic clock, through the air? Although I guess the few ms of lag between the request and response might introduce too much error for some applications?

    --
    Visit the Game Programming Wiki!
    1. Re:Does wifi/cellular marginalize this? by interiot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, even normal users sometimes need more precise clocks. The most obvious case is GPS mentioned earlier in these posts. Quote:
      • Currently, the GPS system provides time to the general public with uncertainties measured in nanoseconds.

      GPS receivers are required to synchronize very closely to the atomic clocks in the GPS sattelites in order to calculate position... they have to measure how far RF signals (travelling at the speed of light) have gone. GPS receivers (and the article's atomic clock) are more than a million times more precise than "a few ms of lag".

    2. Re:Does wifi/cellular marginalize this? by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It would be a better frequency reference, which is important for the accuracy of microwave frequency synthesizers used in transmitters and receivers.

      Less phase noise, which improves overall system performance.

      A more accurate timing reference would make it easier for spread-spectrum systems to acquire and maintain lock on received signals.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Does wifi/cellular marginalize this? by falzer · · Score: 1

      In North America you can already get time from an atomic clock via radio. NIST Radio Station WWVB transmits time information on a 60KHz RF carrier at 1 bit per second.

    4. Re:Does wifi/cellular marginalize this? by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      A similar service exists in Europe: http://www.heret.de/radioclock/ptb.htm., via a radio transmitter in Frankfurt (Germany). There are quite a lot of all kinds of clocks on the market who get their time from there (I have two of these).

      The RDS system for FM radio also supports a time signal, but not all stations use it, and up till now I have only seen one radio that's able to show the time from that signal.

      GPS receivers synchronize with the GPS satellites, out of necessity.

      I would have like the designers of GSM to include a time synchronization in the system, so that my mobile phone would always have the correct time too.

      My digital camera automatically synchronizes its time when I connect it to the computer, which on its turn is synchronized via NTP.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    5. Re:Does wifi/cellular marginalize this? by Grail · · Score: 1

      For some people, WiFi is not now - and never will be - an option. Take for example people working in MRI labs, or farmers driving tractors.

      GPS is computationally intensive, whereas a quartz oscillator draws minute amounts of current. A chip-size atomic clock will be an extra option in the size/weight/power/accuracy tradeoff game. An internal clock will be the only choice where the system is placed in a shielded environment such as in a radiation lab or deep underground.

      Although the DARPA Grand Challenge showed that autonomous ground vehicles are a little way off just yet, I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility to imagine that the USA's Department of Homeland Security would be interested in robotic cockroach cameras that can synchronise their movements to millisecond accuracy when infiltrating terrorist cell headquarters over the period of a few days (the time it takes the cockroach cameras to run through the sewage system, for example) while maintaining total radio silence.

  22. Could this be the end of NTP? by feronti · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean, if every device has its own atomic clock, the only time you'd have to synchronize them would be when you bring them up, unless you were doing some kind of scientific work that requires ultra-accurate timekeeping. Most other applications (I'm thinking Kerberos, remote logging, etc) would only need to be synchronized to the second (or even less) to be useful.

  23. And in other news... by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    ...doom! Doom! DOOM! DOOM!

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  24. I'm not late! by sciop101 · · Score: 0

    My atomic watch was affected by a previously unknown subspace anomaly, a Lewinsky, Saturday night.

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  25. So now my cell phone will be able to tell time? by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My Samsung SPH-A460 cell phone only shows the time when it can get a cellular signal. There's also a host of additional phone book software design flaws that make it less useful than my previous, archaic green-and-black phone. Here's to hoping this makes it easier for developers to easily integrate essential functionality into their products.

  26. Re:Great for GPS... and other things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It matters not just for navigation although that is the first time I really noticed how accurate time was getting easier and easier.

    Back in the seventies, our boss showed a video about him sailing across the Atlantic on a small sailboat. There was a shot in the cabin showing his digital watch (a new thing then) swinging back and forth. He pointed that out and said, "That's our chronometer." So at that point you could have the equivalent of a ship's chronometer (worth thousands) for less than a hundred bucks! I'm not even sure if a ship's chronometer would have worked on a small boat that rocked back and forth that violently.

    As atomic clocks became generally available, they enabled faster communications because it was no longer necessary to send as much clock information along with the signal.

    Thus far, cheaper accurate time has enabled us to do things that we couldn't before. On the other hand, I'm not prepared to guess what that would be this time.

  27. Re:Atomic clock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, by definition, something funny is very hard to understand.

  28. GPS Devices by KB1GHC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This device will be excellent for Global Positioning Systems.

    GPS works like this:
    every GPS satellite has an atomic clock, your GPS reciver calculates all the difforences in time and position of the GPS satellites, and based on knowing the distance from each satellite, is able to calculate where you are. Currently, GPS recievers have Quartz clocks that are constantly kept snycrenized by the attomic clocks in the satellites.

    now quartz clock accuracy is nowhere near attomic clock accuracy, so this will make GPS recievers much more accurate. Even though GPS accuracy is already better than 10 feet/3 meters

    1. Re:GPS Devices by RTFA · · Score: 0

      Actually, GPS sattelites contains 4 atomic clocks (scroll down to "internal components"). Also, the basic accurancy of a GPS is about 100 meters (just bellow the second image). You can achieve about 7 meters when using WAAS and even less when using a DGPS beacon like LAAS.

      --
      This comment was written using 100% reused electrons.
    2. Re:GPS Devices by KB1GHC · · Score: 0

      well, now they can make a lot more GPS satellites, if they are smaller, they can launch alot more of them. I still think they need a few more satellites, because sometimes it is hard to get 3 good signals.

  29. A portable atomic clock is an oxymoron by Itstoearly · · Score: 0

    Your atomic watch may have the correct time down to the nanosecond, but after driving around with it, or flying in an airplane, or whatnot, the change in velocity will make it de-synch with other atomic clocks that were once synchronized with yours. I think I'll stick with my quartz wrist watch, which probably starts fixing its loss of time when I travel.....

    1. Re:A portable atomic clock is an oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't be long before they start shoving tiny accelerometers in there, and narrow down the error. But you're right. For people who fly, or truckers who spend a full 8-hours driving, it'll be off. Easily sync'd once a day or two.

      However, this technology brings us one CRITICAL step closer to automatic driving. You'd have to lay wires in all the interstates to do it, but now with everyone having a cheap (hopefully!!!), tiny atomic clock in their car, it will be utterly feasable without tearing up all the roads.

      "Manual drive! Manual drive! Manual drive NOW YOU MICKEY MOUSE PIECE OF SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!!!!"

    2. Re:A portable atomic clock is an oxymoron by physicsboy500 · · Score: 1

      Wow... um I'm sorry to say, but relativistic effects that would be significant enough to matter in this case would not be displayed at any speed a human has traveled at. Yes, there would be a small bit of error due to travel but it would not even compare to that of the magnitude that the atomic clock is accurate to. Instead of being off a second every 3 million years, it may be off 1.00000001 seconds.

      --
      The original generic sig.
    3. Re:A portable atomic clock is an oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What speed a human might travel at would depend on your point of view. Actually I'm sure I'm doing at least 0.3c (if you pick the right quasar).

  30. Those routers have flash memory by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    It's the users not upgrading the routers that is the problem. I have one myself and it's upgraded- and not hammering those NTP servers.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  31. Not only video games by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Funny

    "opening the door to atomically precise timekeeping in portable, battery-powered devices for secure wireless communications, more precise navigation and..." Video games!

    Not only video games. I don't know when, I don't know how, but I am sure that eventually one day someone will somehow use is for pornography...

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Not only video games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not only video games. I don't know when, I don't know how, but I am sure that eventually one day someone will somehow use is for pornography...
      They could use it to measure the short time differential between penetration and ejaculation. You know, for people who get so little sex that they still think anything that even mentions pornography is funny.
  32. BAD advice. Do NOT do this. by vadim_t · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's a very good way of getting blocked at firewall level. It's rather stupid too, since if you need so much precision just use NTP instead.

    It is a wrong use of ntpdate as well. Its point is to set the time to the correct one at startup, since ntpd only makes gradual corrections and won't make time go backwards for example to avoid breaking things.

    So, configure ntpdate to run once at boot, then start ntpd to keep it in sync.

  33. Re:Atomic clock? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative
    Actually, by definition, something atomic is very small.

    Most of the time that is true but in this case, an atomic clock has a very precise meaning in scientific instruments. It is a clock that counts the vibrations of atoms to determine time intervals. Accoring to SI units a second is

    a fundamental unit of time in all measuring systems and the SI base unit of time. The name simply means that this unit is the second division of the hour, the minute being the first. The second was defined as 1/86 400 mean solar day until astronomers discovered that the mean solar day is actually not constant (see day). The definition was then changed to 1/86 400 of the mean solar day 1900 January 1. Since we can't go back and measure that day any more, this wasn't a real solution to the problem. In 1967, scientists agreed to define the second as that period of time which makes the frequency of a certain radiation emitted by atoms of cesium-133 equal to 9 192 631 770 hertz (cycles per second). In other words, if we really want to measure a second, we count 9 192 631 770 cycles of this radiation. This definition allows scientists to reconstruct the second anywhere in the world with equal precision.

    Up until now atomic clocks like the ones used by NIST were large pieces of equipment. They were highly accurate but not very portable. Before, merchanical watches would lose seconds a day. With the use of quartz in electronic watches that dropped to about a second every 2 months. This lowers that bar even further. I'm not sure for what that level of precision could be used.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  34. Another interesting home networking gadget by starbird · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When can I buy a netgear networkable home atomic clock box? Plug it in to your network, and use it to update the times on all your systems, instead of pinging NTP servers.

    Or put it on a pci card, I can just put it in my router box.

    1. Re:Another interesting home networking gadget by MendicantMonkey · · Score: 1

      Similar things exist, though they get their signal from a remote clock using GPS or NIST radio. Take a look at this for example. I swear I've seen PCI cards that do the same as this box, but I can't find one online just now.

    2. Re:Another interesting home networking gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for someone to make a USB or PCI atomic clock antenna like in those alarm clocks that set themselves. Or even build it into the motherboard itself, syncing durring POST.
      That would work great for laptops, being one less bit of power drain on the batteries.

    3. Re:Another interesting home networking gadget by jelson · · Score: 1

      Because an atomic clock only tells you how long a "second" is. Not which UTC second is currently elapsing or when the next one starts.

  35. Checklist by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cell phone with web surfing: $150
    Unlimited web surfing option on cell plan: $10/month
    Cell phone with atomic clock and web surfing (future): $200
    The ability to snipe someone on eBay for that powder blue Elvis jumpsuit: priceless

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Checklist by N3Bruce · · Score: 1

      The network latency problem will have to be solved first. Of course you could do a troute to predict the average latency to get that bid in at just the last millisecond.

  36. Re:Could this be the end of NTP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apart from gravitational effects and velocity effects of course. You have heard of relativity haven't you?

  37. NTP by Detritus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you run a full NTP client on your PC, it will compensate for the drift caused by the el cheapo crystal oscillator. By characterizing the drift, it can correct for it, even if you don't have a permanent or reliable Internet connection. It's like a software version of the trimmer capacitor that is used to adjust the frequency of a crystal oscillator.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:NTP by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the drift caused by the el cheapo crystal oscillator.


      Even the "el cheapo" crystal oscillators are guaranteed accurate to better than 1 cycle per 100,000.
      PC clocks drift by more than 1 second a day because of poor software, not poor hardware

      -- less is better.
    2. Re:NTP by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Frequency errors of 50-100 ppm or greater are common on the PCs that I have installed NTP on, and those are servers and workstations with non-braindead clock handling code in the operating system (Linux, FreeBSD). Just checking the PCs at hand, one has an error of -56 ppm and the other has an error of +141 ppm. Both are from first-tier vendors.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:NTP by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      Frequency errors of 50-100 ppm or greater are common on the PCs that I have installed NTP on, and those are servers and workstations with non-braindead clock handling code in the operating system (Linux, FreeBSD). Just checking the PCs at hand, one has an error of -56 ppm and the other has an error of +141 ppm. Both are from first-tier vendors.


      Did you check that by running the software, or by measuring the hardware?

      -- less is better.
    4. Re:NTP by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
      Discount Mumia!

      You, sir, have the funniest sig I've seen in a long time!

  38. Great for Cruise Missles by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    That's the missing component in ones home-built cruise missile..

    "pinpoint accuracy"

    Now everyone can have one in their back yard.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  39. Clock is ticking by EpokhusMinimalist · · Score: 0

    Now we can be seven minutes to nuclear midnight where ever we go.

  40. Re:Could this be the end of NTP? by GoRK · · Score: 1

    You have to sync atomic clocks every time you move them around a good deal (notebooks/portables); plus if you want a fairly reliable stratum-1 timeserver now, you can use GPS, for which you can buy a reasonable OEM receiver for about $50.

  41. Gravity by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since atomic clocks can be used to measure effects of gravity, it would be interesting to see how mass producing atomic clock chips could be used to create maps of gravity, seeing how they can be used to reveal geological information.

  42. yup by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 1

    this would be useful in games methinks, afterall pokemon gold/silver/etc have those in game clocks that are just great (so what, its pokemon)

    but cmon, wouldnt you like to see awsome features like that in more games? gameplay changing due to time of day?

    1. Re:yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wouldn't have been difficult without chip scale atomic clocks.

  43. Stauer EMC2 Analog Atomic Watch by eegad · · Score: 1

    Ok, not computed on your wrist, but still...

    Stauer EMC2 Analog Atomic Watch

    1. Re:Stauer EMC2 Analog Atomic Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah, I love how that page emphasises that it is under $100 when it's only $1 under it (before taxes and shipping I'd assume).

  44. *true* atomic wrist watches are available now by wayne · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
    1. Re:*true* atomic wrist watches are available now by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      I have a vcr that checks in with the weather channel at least once a day. I also have a clock that recieves a once a day checkup. My computer checks in every 10 minutes for the correct time. As far as I can tell the clock and the computer agree as there is some lag between looking at one and than looking at the other. The fact is that there is absolutely nothing I do that requires this much accuracy.

    2. Re:*true* atomic wrist watches are available now by Guignol · · Score: 1

      This is absurd, who would use a such a useless clock ?
      didn't you see the batteries only last 45 minutes ?

  45. Ionospheric Delay by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I thought one of the remaining large error factors in civilian GPS systems was the variable ionospheric delay. That's why the military version uses two frequencies, so they can measure and compensate for the ionospheric delay. The civilian version just uses a constant.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Ionospheric Delay by KB1GHC · · Score: 0

      Well, i know that one reason there is a military and civilian frequency, is because, the governement can increase/decrease/shut-off GPS service to civilians, for stategic purposes, like during hightened security status, the GPS accuracy goes down a little. But,GPS operates at a frequency so high, i don't think that the ionosphere doesn't effect it that much. maybe it's effected by troposheric bending or something.

    2. Re:Ionospheric Delay by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The ionospheric delay is affected by the electron density in the ionosphere. The more free electrons, the higher the delay, compared to the speed of light in a vacuum. The delay is also frequency dependent, so comparing the delay on two different frequencies can quantify the ionospheric delay.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  46. Maybe now... by Laivincolmo · · Score: 1

    people will be able to have VCRs that show the correct time...

    1. Re:Maybe now... by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1
      maybe my bios clock would stop creeping 4 minutes ahead.

      it loves to do that...creep 4 min ahead and sit there

      msi nforce 2 ultra 400...any comments why it does that?



      p.s. someone help me, please! I have 6 gmail invites and only need 5 people to complete an offer. sign up for infone...no fees and you can cancel it in a week or so.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  47. Portable Interferometers, light field recorders? by mattr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sounds amazing. IANA astrophysicist but it seems amateurs could do some real very long baseline interferometry with these things like the VLBA does.

    It also puts military-level technology again into public hands, this seems pretty dangerous - high school kids's satellites could enable terrorist missile navigation.. oh well I guess this is inevitable.

    Perhaps someone experienced could provide some input into the kinds of things this would make possible?

    I'm wondering if it would enable:

    - distributed seti, heck distributed lots of things.. monitoring of airspace anyone?
    - precise geolocation similarly for vlba? If you can shoot the sun and have a compass, should be able to solve for own location?
    - distributed measurement of environment for atmospheric simulations i.e. on ships at sea to gather wind vectors?
    - high-efficiency use of wireless spectrum, maybe also data transmission in noisy environments?

    from the faq, "atoms are also excellent sensors". Would this enable:
    - teraherz scanners (well maybe it isn't that fast, only 9 GHz) and doppler analyzers
    - portable detectors of acceleration, gravity, relativistic effects, sonar, ..what?
    - also one manufacturer I remember had a very interesting application of very short radio pulses that could be used to make virtual barriers I think the military was interested in it.. Until there page was taken down..

    Also I'm intrigued by the latest computer graphics research into structured light and recording of light fields with distributed cameras. It would seem that an audience with a lot of handycams and these chips could be producing an extremely interesting record of say a sporting event. A camera with a few of these chips might be quite useful.

    What kind of things would be possible with off the shelf hardware and a couple of these chips?

    Would these enable casual interferometry in day or night?

    On the downside I saw a $10 spam sandwich by Dean and Deluca in their Shibuya Station (Tokyo) store yesterday. So some people can already make enough trouble without advanced technology perhaps. Still, the ultimate geek toy? (not the spam.. the clock)

  48. Military Applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the posts I have seen have mentioned PCs and GPS... but this will really find its usefulness in military applications

    it would be nice not to have to worry about the time drifting in radios.

  49. Not everybody has permanent connection! by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    > It is a wrong use of ntpdate as well. Its point is
    > to set the time to the correct one at startup

    This is only true if you have a permanent network connection. Most of us dial out only a couple of times a day, with no connectivity the rest of the time, so running ntpd is utterly pointless. Broadband arrogance rides again!

    1. Re:Not everybody has permanent connection! by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you dinosaurs are now on the way out..

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:Not everybody has permanent connection! by vadim_t · · Score: 4, Informative

      You still can do it.

      Just run ntpdate when you connect instead of on boot. And kill ntpd before disconnecting. You can do this easily on Linux. On Windows I heard some programs exist to do this as well.

      This is not about broadband arrogance anyway. ntpd uses much fewer server resources than ntpdate every second. In fact, many public ntp server administrators often complain about that every hour at :00 minutes they get a ntp version of a slashdotting because people stick ntpdate in crontab.

      There are many NTP servers that are free to access out there. Please keep them that way by observing a simple netiquette.

    3. Re:Not everybody has permanent connection! by Yavi · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember an article recently stating that broadband users now outnumbered dial-up users by a slim margin. Now that you're the minority, it's not arrogance, it's the man trying to keep you down!

    4. Re:Not everybody has permanent connection! by mamba-mamba · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are many NTP servers that are free to access out there. Please keep them that way by observing a simple netiquette.

      Read about DNS round robin sharing of voluntary ntp servers:
      http://www.pool.ntp.org

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
    5. Re:Not everybody has permanent connection! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If these chips get cheap then every ISP will be able to run its own time server, routers will start coming with them, et cetera. In fact I find it highly likely that they will even replace the real time clock circuit on high end motherboards, it would be an extremely desirable piece of functionality on a server board, along with an embedded watchdog timer.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  50. Essence of Man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It also puts military-level technology again into public hands, this seems pretty dangerous - high school kids's satellites could enable terrorist missile navigation.. oh well I guess this is inevitable."

    Gee what do you know? The essense of man, can't keep up with the products of man. Just imagine what happens to a society that can't keep up with the fruits of technical progress. BOOM!

  51. My own nuclear powered watch! by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Her: Hey, that's a cool watch!
    Him: No babe; it's not just cool. It is a nuclear powered watch; the most powerful watch in the business!
    Her: Uhh... So you're a mutant?

  52. Re:Could this be the end of NTP? by Feyr · · Score: 1

    i don't know about you. but on my network, 1 second delay in clocks screw things up.

    when trying to track down a problem on multiple busy server, 1 second is at least twice (most likely more) as much data as you would need

    a 1 second delay in synchronisation between your web application and a TV show is a LONG time (it's for interactive tv. we have to synchronise with the ads, the questions asked in the show, pauses, etc..)

    of course the biggest problem is when dealing with multi networks problems. i don't count the number of reports i've had from server with misconfigured time and timezone informations :\ those are usually unresolvable, unless you get a lot of report for the same problem from different network (so you can cross correlate them)

  53. ObHHGTTG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I for one think atomic and digital watches are still a pretty neat idea.


    How amazingly primitive of you.
  54. Re:Atomic clock? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    I've been keeping an eye on this project for a couple of years. Nice to see they've finally got something to demonstrate.

    At 75 mA, it's still going to draw too much power to be useful in a wrist watch. I'm going to have to settle for my WWVB-synchronized Casio for now.

    While wristwatches aren't a big concern, you've got to remember that these things can't keep time if they're not powered. You could have a system clock on an isolated computer that actually keeps time accurately, but it's going to need a pretty big battery if you're going to have it shut off for long.

    Still, this'll be extremely cool for things like GPS and RF communications.

  55. Imagine... by isny · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.
    Hmmm....
    So what time is it, really?

  56. Re:Atomic clock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually, by definition, something atomic is very small.
    Yeah, and it's a big government conspiracy to make us think that the smallest atomic bomb is suitcase-sized.

    They're actually fitted into all RFID tags as a redundant "security measure."
  57. No resonant cavity? by kgp · · Score: 2, Informative
    Their main page is:

    All the [published] papers are here in PDF form.

    The one thing I can't figure out is how they make a resonant cavity this small ... they obviously have some way around it.

    Others have been asking what's the use as one of their papers says:

    In particular, there has been much recent interest in highly miniaturized atomic clocks ~volume ,1 cm ) for various military
    and civilian applications, including antijam global positioning, and synchronization of encryption keys and communications networks.

    If you know the time precisely you can lock up to the long frame encoded GPS signal without needing CA (more vulnerable to jamming).
  58. Battery operated? Not likely. by unix_hacker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The story claims that this device pulls 75 mw and that it can be run on batteries. Assuming a 3V system, that's 25 mA of current. If one if these was in a typical portable device with a 750 mAH battery, it would last for 30 hours. Less, of course, if you actually turned on the device. Basically your battery would go dead in a day or so even with the device turned off.

    For reference, real time clock chips that are used in portable electronic devices today pull about 3 microwatts of current -- almost 10,000 times less than this device.

  59. After the Little War we'll all have one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...A lifeclock flower implanted in the palm of our left hand.

  60. troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst. Troll. Ever.

    P.S. you might want to lose the purported academic credentials in your future attempts though.

  61. Re:Could this be the end of NTP? by evilviper · · Score: 1
    if every device has its own atomic clock, the only time you'd have to synchronize them would be when you bring them up

    Not likely. First of all, this is thousands of times less accurate than a full-sized atomic clock, so your clock will drift out of sync gradually.

    Even with full-sized atomic clocks, you rarely depend on any one of them to be 100% accurate, rather, they check between a pool of them, just in case one is slightly off, so it's not hard to imagine that maybe your atomic clock could loose a second here and there.

    So, let's say that this makes it necessary to sync up less often. Well, that's assuming a lot. You see, typical quartz watches are more accurate than computers for a lot of reasons. Just because this is more accurate than quartz doesn't mean it will result in a computer clock that is any more accurate.

    So, no, this won't be the end of NTP. Low-cost GPS recievers, now that might cause the end of NTP, or at least a decimation of NTP traffic...
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  62. Whoa! by dot_borg · · Score: 1

    I just had John Titor deja vu.

  63. Japanese Casio Atomic Watch by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

    I am trying to buy a casio watch that it is only available in Japan for a couple of months. I have no idea when Casio will release it USA. Only ugly atomic and solar watchs are available in USA. The model of the watch is WVA-500TDJ-9AJF. A picture can be found at http://www.ari-web.com/shop/watch/waveceptor/L/wva -500tdj-9a.htm. That is not the only colour available. I don't know Japanese. Can anyone help please?

    1. Re:Japanese Casio Atomic Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one of those. It's no better than any other watch. Walk to a store and buy the first one you see.

  64. Windows has this built in by drewness · · Score: 1

    Any NT based Windows already has the ability to get the time using NTP without resorting to 3rd party apps, some of which are spyware. All you have to do is set a timeserver at the command prompt (I'm out of state, so I don't have my little sheet with how to do it. Sorry.) Then you start the network time service. I think XP even lets you do it in the date and time control panel.

    1. Re:Windows has this built in by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      net time /setsntp:ntp server list

      Of course, having done that, users still go to the system clock properties to check a date instead of the nice calendar Outlook provides.

      They occasionally lock themselves out when they click on a new date and set themselves orders of magnitude outside Kerberos's 5-minute window.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
  65. Uhmmm...., 30 mili Amps by Spark'n+Bart+Funny+P · · Score: 1

    Hey, can one of you guys sell me an atomic battery for my new watch :).

  66. One Condition... by Itstoearly · · Score: 1

    The only way I am going to buy an atomic watch is if it has a button that makes the atomic watch double over as an atomic bomb. Then I'd be like James Bond! Andy by the way.... [Homer], "Nucular. It's pronouced, 'Nucular'"

  67. other applications by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Maybe like pure timing-based protocols for communicating over the net?

    Depending on the variability in routing causing different timing delays, I would imagine you could get a fair bit of information across two points without communicating anything that doesn't look like attempted gibberish over IP.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  68. Comparison to high-end crystal clocks by ekc · · Score: 1

    We use a crystal clock in geophysical equipment whose drift is on the order of 1 part in 10^11 if I have my numbers right. That's about an order of magnitude better than the atomic clock. However, this clock is ovenized (maintained at a constant 70 degrees C) and that helps greatly. I wonder if you can boost the accuracy of the atomic clock in a similar fashion?