then i am to start using other search engines for these searches. lets see what will win. pagerank (tm) or freedom of information and knowledge. i think it will be the latter. even with altavista, i was finding what i wanted. it wont hurt too much for it to take it slightly more time.
the only way he is alive, and there is wikileaks still, because he had done everything to put himself on the spotlight and keep people remembering him and wikileaks, so that assassinating him would be hard.
Someone, or something, is protecting wikileaks and all their team. you think they would come so far, if it wasnt so ? look at the previous shit they released :
random corporation A somewhere would have taken them out, had they not been guarded in some way. look how many megacorps and countries they ticked off.
sorry moscow. there wont be any plane crashes this time.
Nah, I will stick with Amazon. Their decision has no effect on me
do that. people did like that too, in between 1928-1939 in germany. corporations were supporting nazi party, and discriminating against minorities. it didnt affect germans, so they just stuck with the same corporations. household names now, a lot of them, you know ? name a famous german company, and chances are 80% that it was a nazi party supporter back in the era.
then what happened ?
the idiots who just stuck with the corporations which suppressed minorities and supported nazi party, died in eastern front, or in city bombings.
Then there is a public backlash against such a corporation
where is the public backlash against amazon now ? if you have missed, amazon diligently informed lieberman of their action. it would be stupid not to think that there was some pressure involved.
before you even utter out anything regarding 'legality of distributing that information', i have one word to say to you ; watergate.
with the moron logic this administration and senators are using, publishing watergate scandal would be impossible, and illegal.
firstly, read the other reply that someone made regarding being a whore,
second, amazon acting politically means that any of my clients' shops or services can easily be nullified if they do things that some parties in u.s. dont like. leaving aside all these shit, there are a lot of crap going around in the form of dmca or other takedown means even on dubious reasons.
any sane businessman would need to avoid such a pot of crazy like what u.s. has become lately.
the minor companies, small businesses make the bulk of their users and customers. actually, that is as such anywhere on the web. no company which is large enough will sell their products over amazon and give them 2-5% cut. they have the power to establish their own outlets and advertise it quite easily around the internet.
im an ecommerce developer, who implements numerous technologies. from now on, ill be advising my customers to stay away from anything amazon. not to mention that, im now less inclined to use their api to do anything with them.
let them enjoy their a few bucks a sale cut from the right-leaning, democracy-unfriendly hardliner sellers they have there.
not even with thunderous applauses. with some senators prosecuting those who give information to the public, and some private companies obeying. all is well.
are you aware that google, facebook have their headquarters where they pay tax, in ireland ?
are you aware that exxon is a megacorporation that is distributed everywhere, and can switch hq just like how haliburton relocated to qatar, over the course of a day ?
the only ones there are hollywood, boeing, ford, maybe apple. amazon can easily imitate google, facebook, and proably will do soon. ford is almost bankrupt, boeing is being outcompeted by airbus, not to mention future chinese airliner. hewlett packard ? come again ? what's that ?
no, its an empty baloon. and, you just turned YOURSELF out as an idiot, not knowing what's going on with the examples you gave yourself.
currently i am. for, im seeing that the SANE people in america, who we can take as reasonable, peaceful, decent human beings whose mind is not always concentrated on their self-interest, are in the minority.
change that with your votes, and ill be pro-america.
he still thinks an economic life without any rules and regulations can be real. whereas this is actually similar to abolishing all courts of law, judiciary, and laws, and then saying 'people will regulate themselves', in social life.
I was considering buying a BMW for my next car I am no longer considering such a move. In other words I will no longer do business with countries that show little respect for ours.
dont ? you already have no tangible GDP anyway ? all your production is done in china. china is the one who is actually providing your gdp, gnp.
your nation is currently 'null'.
even if it wasnt, your market is not comparable as china, india and the rest of the world. just 300 million, 80% of which is poor, and the top 1% getting 53% of everything. you dont have purchasing power as a market in the first place. only your rich, which actually do not spend much either. and even if they spend, their spending cannot be considered for any market decisions since they are rare luxury.
You assume for some reason that "the enemies" know everything, I see no reason to believe this
thats because you havent had any interest in defense industry, or havent done military service. you lack information.
You might have noticed id did not mention codes, I mentioned security arrangements (that is, letting people in, right?) and the way to activate, which I assume is more complicated (on the silo) then knowing some code.
doesnt matter. it may be the 3rd pimple on the ass of an important mid level military commander. enemy knows it. even in the era in 1950s when communications and electronics were pathetic and there were no satellites, american naval officers sold nuclear secrets to soviets. now, with the advent of these techs, there is no need to even employ spies. all you need to do is surveillance, from orbit, or from nearby. you can even buy surveillance kits you need in the country you go to. actually, you can even construct them from ordinary electronics components.
You should also remember that there are many who can be described as "enemies", which one knows this and which ones doesn't?
all the important enemies know you. you know them. their satellites, know as much as they let them to know. your satellites, same. this is the order in the current age.
Then, why do you think these things are kept secret?
from me, from you, and to be able to keep going with using the 'national secret' as an excuse for doing what they want to do in the shadows. not to mention the inertia, ie, the established habit and military tradition. 'it is important - we should keep it "secret" despite everyone knows'.
This is not a cover-up
it is.
Lastly, what is the benefit to the public from releasing this information, even if we accept that there is almost no damage?
you will have removed the 'national secret' excuse. this is something that anything can be hid behind. it is the very thing that they are able to do filth, and get away. that is the reason why there have been so many laws and powers put out that are based on national secret. or national security. ie, gag orders, censorship etc. and even recently they have been pushing for control of internet, based on these excuses.
if you remove national secret concept, there will be no way to hide wrongdoing. if you remove 'trade secret' concept, there will be no way to fraud, deceive people, and get away.
that is to our benefit. for, the only ones which are not able to access information, are us, ordinary people.
The country that controls it invented the Internet.
u.s. didnt invent internet. it embodied numerous concepts already existing, and put them out as a meshed concept. just like how the first ironclad ever, warrior embodying all the inventions up to date, but appearing as a new class of ship back in 19th century.
and it is ridiculous. if internet was arranged for decentralization, there shouldnt be any country controlling it in the first place.
the enemies already know it. it doesnt matter much if public knows. if, you are readily letting in some schmock who can use those codes if he knew it, inside your base, it doesnt make any difference if you let the codes out or not.
by all means, please. do your 'comeuppance'. forgetting that 200+ other countries around the world have also their 'ups' that can 'come' at any moment.
i would reply, however, im out of energy to wake up a deluded dreamer of 'free market' to the realities of the world today. hence, ill pass. sweet dreams.
why such a thing didnt come into being MUCH earlier. i mean, up till this time, almost entire control of internet in regard to this, has been in the hands of a single country.... isnt it ridiculous ?
Slashdot Mirror
then i am to start using other search engines for these searches. lets see what will win. pagerank (tm) or freedom of information and knowledge. i think it will be the latter. even with altavista, i was finding what i wanted. it wont hurt too much for it to take it slightly more time.
you get that impression from where ? fox news ?
dont get any impressions.
the only way he is alive, and there is wikileaks still, because he had done everything to put himself on the spotlight and keep people remembering him and wikileaks, so that assassinating him would be hard.
get a clue. really. get a clue.
Someone, or something, is protecting wikileaks and all their team. you think they would come so far, if it wasnt so ? look at the previous shit they released :
http://mirror.infoboj.eu/
random corporation A somewhere would have taken them out, had they not been guarded in some way. look how many megacorps and countries they ticked off.
sorry moscow. there wont be any plane crashes this time.
Nah, I will stick with Amazon. Their decision has no effect on me
do that. people did like that too, in between 1928-1939 in germany. corporations were supporting nazi party, and discriminating against minorities. it didnt affect germans, so they just stuck with the same corporations. household names now, a lot of them, you know ? name a famous german company, and chances are 80% that it was a nazi party supporter back in the era.
then what happened ?
the idiots who just stuck with the corporations which suppressed minorities and supported nazi party, died in eastern front, or in city bombings.
well deserved. dearly bought.
Then there is a public backlash against such a corporation
where is the public backlash against amazon now ? if you have missed, amazon diligently informed lieberman of their action. it would be stupid not to think that there was some pressure involved.
before you even utter out anything regarding 'legality of distributing that information', i have one word to say to you ; watergate.
with the moron logic this administration and senators are using, publishing watergate scandal would be impossible, and illegal.
firstly, read the other reply that someone made regarding being a whore,
second, amazon acting politically means that any of my clients' shops or services can easily be nullified if they do things that some parties in u.s. dont like. leaving aside all these shit, there are a lot of crap going around in the form of dmca or other takedown means even on dubious reasons.
any sane businessman would need to avoid such a pot of crazy like what u.s. has become lately.
the minor companies, small businesses make the bulk of their users and customers. actually, that is as such anywhere on the web. no company which is large enough will sell their products over amazon and give them 2-5% cut. they have the power to establish their own outlets and advertise it quite easily around the internet.
im an ecommerce developer, who implements numerous technologies. from now on, ill be advising my customers to stay away from anything amazon. not to mention that, im now less inclined to use their api to do anything with them.
let them enjoy their a few bucks a sale cut from the right-leaning, democracy-unfriendly hardliner sellers they have there.
not even with thunderous applauses. with some senators prosecuting those who give information to the public, and some private companies obeying. all is well.
yeah i know.
there is one proxy to rule them all.
Google, Facebook, Hollywood, Boeing, Ford, Yahoo, Apple, Amazon, Hewlett Packard, Exxon, Valero
are you aware that google, facebook have their headquarters where they pay tax, in ireland ?
are you aware that exxon is a megacorporation that is distributed everywhere, and can switch hq just like how haliburton relocated to qatar, over the course of a day ?
the only ones there are hollywood, boeing, ford, maybe apple. amazon can easily imitate google, facebook, and proably will do soon. ford is almost bankrupt, boeing is being outcompeted by airbus, not to mention future chinese airliner. hewlett packard ? come again ? what's that ?
no, its an empty baloon. and, you just turned YOURSELF out as an idiot, not knowing what's going on with the examples you gave yourself.
currently i am. for, im seeing that the SANE people in america, who we can take as reasonable, peaceful, decent human beings whose mind is not always concentrated on their self-interest, are in the minority.
change that with your votes, and ill be pro-america.
he still thinks an economic life without any rules and regulations can be real. whereas this is actually similar to abolishing all courts of law, judiciary, and laws, and then saying 'people will regulate themselves', in social life.
I was considering buying a BMW for my next car I am no longer considering such a move. In other words I will no longer do business with countries that show little respect for ours.
dont ? you already have no tangible GDP anyway ? all your production is done in china. china is the one who is actually providing your gdp, gnp.
your nation is currently 'null'.
even if it wasnt, your market is not comparable as china, india and the rest of the world. just 300 million, 80% of which is poor, and the top 1% getting 53% of everything. you dont have purchasing power as a market in the first place. only your rich, which actually do not spend much either. and even if they spend, their spending cannot be considered for any market decisions since they are rare luxury.
that would be the golden age of comedy in united states.
You assume for some reason that "the enemies" know everything, I see no reason to believe this
thats because you havent had any interest in defense industry, or havent done military service. you lack information.
You might have noticed id did not mention codes, I mentioned security arrangements (that is, letting people in, right?) and the way to activate, which I assume is more complicated (on the silo) then knowing some code.
doesnt matter. it may be the 3rd pimple on the ass of an important mid level military commander. enemy knows it. even in the era in 1950s when communications and electronics were pathetic and there were no satellites, american naval officers sold nuclear secrets to soviets. now, with the advent of these techs, there is no need to even employ spies. all you need to do is surveillance, from orbit, or from nearby. you can even buy surveillance kits you need in the country you go to. actually, you can even construct them from ordinary electronics components.
You should also remember that there are many who can be described as "enemies", which one knows this and which ones doesn't?
all the important enemies know you. you know them. their satellites, know as much as they let them to know. your satellites, same. this is the order in the current age.
Then, why do you think these things are kept secret?
from me, from you, and to be able to keep going with using the 'national secret' as an excuse for doing what they want to do in the shadows. not to mention the inertia, ie, the established habit and military tradition. 'it is important - we should keep it "secret" despite everyone knows'.
This is not a cover-up
it is.
Lastly, what is the benefit to the public from releasing this information, even if we accept that there is almost no damage?
you will have removed the 'national secret' excuse. this is something that anything can be hid behind. it is the very thing that they are able to do filth, and get away. that is the reason why there have been so many laws and powers put out that are based on national secret. or national security. ie, gag orders, censorship etc. and even recently they have been pushing for control of internet, based on these excuses.
if you remove national secret concept, there will be no way to hide wrongdoing. if you remove 'trade secret' concept, there will be no way to fraud, deceive people, and get away.
that is to our benefit. for, the only ones which are not able to access information, are us, ordinary people.
The country that controls it invented the Internet.
u.s. didnt invent internet. it embodied numerous concepts already existing, and put them out as a meshed concept. just like how the first ironclad ever, warrior embodying all the inventions up to date, but appearing as a new class of ship back in 19th century.
and it is ridiculous. if internet was arranged for decentralization, there shouldnt be any country controlling it in the first place.
the enemies already know it. it doesnt matter much if public knows. if, you are readily letting in some schmock who can use those codes if he knew it, inside your base, it doesnt make any difference if you let the codes out or not.
I also point out that the housing bubble both started and popped in Europe before it played its course in America.
thats because european banks didnt fraud as much as wall street did. they could also extend the bubble similarly.
There will be a comeuppance.
by all means, please. do your 'comeuppance'. forgetting that 200+ other countries around the world have also their 'ups' that can 'come' at any moment.
i would reply, however, im out of energy to wake up a deluded dreamer of 'free market' to the realities of the world today. hence, ill pass. sweet dreams.
eh ? nothing else you want me to confess to ?
why such a thing didnt come into being MUCH earlier. i mean, up till this time, almost entire control of internet in regard to this, has been in the hands of a single country .... isnt it ridiculous ?
He raped dozens of governments which has been raping their people behind their backs and lying to them.
good for him !! we need more rapists like him on this planet !!