we couldnt even implement a good man-machine interface using brain waves, or even eye motions, but some people are predicting motive predicting checkpoings in 2020.
ok. ill take that. and add a $5 trip to andromeda galaxy for me in addition to that.
human motives and emotions and behaviour is complex. bodily responses are COMMON. the same physiological reaction of body to two different conditions can be the same. one may be blowing up a bomb, one is anxiety over some serious situation.
yet, a checkpoint will tell them apart. despite the entire science of psychology is in infant stages of analyzing human emotions and physical responses.
technical consideration is the outdatedness and exploitable nature of ie6. not win2k. and win2k is microsoft's own operating system, despite that it doesnt support ie6. google is not obliged to make chrome work with anyone else's product, so its irrelevant.
its rather hard to be able to take lessons on hatred and bitternes or other human emotions from someone who finds the most basic and holiest emotions/actions of mankind as obscene.
im not english, and i dont care much for punctuation, and wont either.
as for the antitrust argument, its as valid as that one, even if win2k doesnt support firefox. the move of google is not out of a filthy trick planning, but out of technological considerations.
probably one of the holiest of acts that mankind has ever evolved to have, breastfeeding, is, OBSCENE ?
a HOLISTIC act of unconditional love and giving in between the mother and child, the holiest of all bonds, is OBSCENE ?
i believe in no religion, but there are some stuff way higher and holier than any religion. what you despise as obscene is one of that.
whats obscene are people like you. i wish we could export you and your kind to mars or moon. there you could revel in your backwardness and lack of compassion, and knock each others' brains out.
excuse me, how many people use msn for searches ? what else can be key to microsoft with ie ? aaah hotmail ? they bought hotmail, and there is no relevance in between explorer and hotmail anyway.
they are not selling ie with cash or they are not making ie hijack pages to generate hits to msn, so ?
they produce and distribute their cd content without any shitty drms. they are a breeze to rip to mp3. thanks to them, i have 24 cds' worth classic music pieces on my computer as mp3 without any issues.
when i acquired my first classics collection set and put on random shuffle continually on my 6 cd changer set and used that way, i blew it off in around 1.5 months. a pioneer 6 cd changer - gone.
then i realized i should rip them. ghastly task, due to shitty drm they place on cds. but when i attempted it went effortless. great quality. only later i learnt that emi does not put drm shit on their cds. they are trying to adapt to the modern times.
and this website, whose sole purpose and means of existence is internet culture, is suing THAT label, instead of RIAA whores ??!?
i wouldnt do anything with mp3tunes if it was the last website on earth, after this point. they can shove all their services up wherever they see fit now.
you probably have balls the size of everest, to be defending tagging people who are pissing drunk in public as sex offenders, then forcing them to reveal their online passwords.
if you are doing that, as i thought, get the F#CK out of my planet.
and yes, this planet belongs to me, and people like me - the people who uphold REASON.
Has HP unknowingly been supplying Iran with technology or have they been trying to secretly get by the US government's export restrictions?"
if some country wants to reverse engineer a f@ckin printer, they just acquire one through a person and do it. or two. or three.
there is no concept of 'supplying someone with technology' in a case of selling printers en masse. you dont need 100.000 units of printers to reverse engineer anything.
those people very well know that prior art can be proven against them. but, they are taking an opportunity.
the same environment which allowed finance companies to make a total wreck of economy, bolsters such opportunism. these people produce nothing, provide nothing for betterment of society or mankind, serve nothing to nobody. instead, they exploit.
you people really need to overhaul your entire country.
there should be no concept like a certain "industry" actually.
as mankind progresses, its needs and ways also change. nothing stays the same. everything has to change in lockstep with the civilization.
remember carriage industry. a lot of people were dependent on them once upon a time, just 100 years ago.
a lot of the corporations went bankrupt, a high number of them moved to other fields, but a goodly number of them reinvented themselves to produce automobiles, automobile parts or supplies.
that is the way that it should be. there should be no stagnant industry that defines our living style, but, our changing living style should define industries.
what should current auto industry do ?
reinvent themselves to adapt to new transportation methods.
hybrid cars, alternative fuel cars are a good start. rail transportation contracts, is a good start. hell, even space transportation IS a start, as you can follow from the recent moves to open up space to free enterprise, and recent successes of some.
no sir. no stagnancy. you cant stand still and expect to be accommodated. if it was like that, carriage companies would have been accommodated.
there is either free market in ENTIRE aspects of a country's economic life, or there is not. there cant be a 'free market' in food catering, but not be a free market in telecommunication. all economic activity is linked together. a broadcasting corporation may choose not to accommodate the advertisements of a food company that is competing with one of its chums, subsidiaries, group members. or charge unbelievable amounts to prevent them from giving an advertisement. power is something that can be leveraged in numerous ways. in the end, what corporations that become prominent in the 'free' market (or the one you think to be free) come up as the ones which are in good terms with the old boyz' network - ie, the established business cartels and community.
and you are rather optimistic. not having a full monopoly doesnt mean that they dont have a monopoly. controlling more than 50% of a market is as good as a monopoly. it makes a company the one that is dictating terms. and p&g is more than that, in many aspects of the industries it is involved. leave aside owning, having a noticeable share in any other company is a leverage in itself, which can be and is used to steer decisions of any affiliates accordingly.
and then there is the group concept. corporations are held by holdings which are still be grouped in common holders' hands, which eventually happen to be the ones to dictate what goes on in life. i said life, because beyond this point, its not market or business anymore, its food, communication, transportation, healthcare, its everything.
observation and research is enough to conclude why the current situation is i am describing. there happens no corporation that sends shudders through any market by exceptional prices and quality, outcompeting others and upsetting the balance in any sectors BUT i.t. (Which is a new one), prices, nature, and the format of the products/services that are provided are almost the same in each and every corporation's offering, with little differences and noone is trying to make a major break and upset the balance, somehow the laws which are pushed seem to be orchestrated by a common hand, which then again benefits the existing cartels/companies in each and every sector, but not the entrants, and so it goes.
there is no reason not to be able to see these. if you cant, then you may be not wanting to see, rather than not being able to.
i do not think that every free market evolves to a monopoly market. every market evolves to a monopoly market. including the markets of western hemisphere, and especially those.
there are supposedly a number of big brands supplying the services and products in every field, and there is a supposed choice of 4 or so to choose from at any given point. yet, many of these brands are owned by the same parent corporation in the end. procter and gamble, is a mind staggering example for this. just read up on that company and what its subsidiaries produce, and youll understand.
most unfortunately, western markets are not regulated. as the examples of p&g, at&t, comcast, vivendi, warner bros clearly show.
Slashdot Mirror
oooooook ok.
"no you arent".
ill be dropping this thread. you are deliberately or unknowingly failing to understand.
crowds will beta test it for microsoft. much better than actually rolling out, and then patching the thing.
didnt hear something that is as idiotic as this.
we couldnt even implement a good man-machine interface using brain waves, or even eye motions, but some people are predicting motive predicting checkpoings in 2020.
ok. ill take that. and add a $5 trip to andromeda galaxy for me in addition to that.
human motives and emotions and behaviour is complex. bodily responses are COMMON. the same physiological reaction of body to two different conditions can be the same. one may be blowing up a bomb, one is anxiety over some serious situation.
yet, a checkpoint will tell them apart. despite the entire science of psychology is in infant stages of analyzing human emotions and physical responses.
technical consideration is the outdatedness and exploitable nature of ie6. not win2k. and win2k is microsoft's own operating system, despite that it doesnt support ie6. google is not obliged to make chrome work with anyone else's product, so its irrelevant.
you need to give a kickstart to the thing first.
its rather hard to be able to take lessons on hatred and bitternes or other human emotions from someone who finds the most basic and holiest emotions/actions of mankind as obscene.
im not english, and i dont care much for punctuation, and wont either.
as for the antitrust argument, its as valid as that one, even if win2k doesnt support firefox. the move of google is not out of a filthy trick planning, but out of technological considerations.
i should have provided citations from cicero's works instead. they would have understood that one as easily.
probably one of the holiest of acts that mankind has ever evolved to have, breastfeeding, is, OBSCENE ?
a HOLISTIC act of unconditional love and giving in between the mother and child, the holiest of all bonds, is OBSCENE ?
i believe in no religion, but there are some stuff way higher and holier than any religion. what you despise as obscene is one of that.
whats obscene are people like you. i wish we could export you and your kind to mars or moon. there you could revel in your backwardness and lack of compassion, and knock each others' brains out.
excuse me, how many people use msn for searches ? what else can be key to microsoft with ie ? aaah hotmail ? they bought hotmail, and there is no relevance in between explorer and hotmail anyway.
they are not selling ie with cash or they are not making ie hijack pages to generate hits to msn, so ?
if it was, google would drop 7 support and tell them to switch too.
the fact is that, IE6 is WAY outdated now, is not supported anymore, is a gift from heavens for anyone writing exploits, doesnt even support tabs.
excuse me pal, ie6 is early 2000s.
its like the tech world equivalent of saying "dont drop 1930 model cars, even if its 1980s".
its so antitrust that win2k doesnt support ie6. i suppose microsoft is reeking of 'antitrust' against itself too....
you were SO enthusiastic to drop a knee jerk comment, you havent even read the 2 people replied to the parent did you.
and get your pitchforks in the meantime.
it's on again...
no cd i bought from emi had any drm on it. when i see emi label now, i buy without any worries.
and im in turkey, so probably we are using the same source for supplier.
they produce and distribute their cd content without any shitty drms. they are a breeze to rip to mp3. thanks to them, i have 24 cds' worth classic music pieces on my computer as mp3 without any issues.
when i acquired my first classics collection set and put on random shuffle continually on my 6 cd changer set and used that way, i blew it off in around 1.5 months. a pioneer 6 cd changer - gone.
then i realized i should rip them. ghastly task, due to shitty drm they place on cds. but when i attempted it went effortless. great quality. only later i learnt that emi does not put drm shit on their cds. they are trying to adapt to the modern times.
and this website, whose sole purpose and means of existence is internet culture, is suing THAT label, instead of RIAA whores ??!?
i wouldnt do anything with mp3tunes if it was the last website on earth, after this point. they can shove all their services up wherever they see fit now.
compare world 1000 years before, to the world today.
then tell me that this world does not belong to people who uphold reason.
the battle is already won, with mop up sessions being fought.
to the contrary of your filth reeking brain, you cant.
just try f@ck and fuck in various postings, and see how people's response and moderation differ for both.
you probably have balls the size of everest, to be defending tagging people who are pissing drunk in public as sex offenders, then forcing them to reveal their online passwords.
if you are doing that, as i thought, get the F#CK out of my planet.
and yes, this planet belongs to me, and people like me - the people who uphold REASON.
Has HP unknowingly been supplying Iran with technology or have they been trying to secretly get by the US government's export restrictions?"
if some country wants to reverse engineer a f@ckin printer, they just acquire one through a person and do it. or two. or three.
there is no concept of 'supplying someone with technology' in a case of selling printers en masse. you dont need 100.000 units of printers to reverse engineer anything.
what is happening is pure export. thats it.
summary is retarded beyond comprehension.
legal and patent system can be THIS exploited.
those people very well know that prior art can be proven against them. but, they are taking an opportunity.
the same environment which allowed finance companies to make a total wreck of economy, bolsters such opportunism. these people produce nothing, provide nothing for betterment of society or mankind, serve nothing to nobody. instead, they exploit.
you people really need to overhaul your entire country.
"shove it"
there should be no concept like a certain "industry" actually.
as mankind progresses, its needs and ways also change. nothing stays the same. everything has to change in lockstep with the civilization.
remember carriage industry. a lot of people were dependent on them once upon a time, just 100 years ago.
a lot of the corporations went bankrupt, a high number of them moved to other fields, but a goodly number of them reinvented themselves to produce automobiles, automobile parts or supplies.
that is the way that it should be. there should be no stagnant industry that defines our living style, but, our changing living style should define industries.
what should current auto industry do ?
reinvent themselves to adapt to new transportation methods.
hybrid cars, alternative fuel cars are a good start. rail transportation contracts, is a good start. hell, even space transportation IS a start, as you can follow from the recent moves to open up space to free enterprise, and recent successes of some.
no sir. no stagnancy. you cant stand still and expect to be accommodated. if it was like that, carriage companies would have been accommodated.
reinvent yourself.
first,
there is either free market in ENTIRE aspects of a country's economic life, or there is not. there cant be a 'free market' in food catering, but not be a free market in telecommunication. all economic activity is linked together. a broadcasting corporation may choose not to accommodate the advertisements of a food company that is competing with one of its chums, subsidiaries, group members. or charge unbelievable amounts to prevent them from giving an advertisement. power is something that can be leveraged in numerous ways. in the end, what corporations that become prominent in the 'free' market (or the one you think to be free) come up as the ones which are in good terms with the old boyz' network - ie, the established business cartels and community.
and you are rather optimistic. not having a full monopoly doesnt mean that they dont have a monopoly. controlling more than 50% of a market is as good as a monopoly. it makes a company the one that is dictating terms. and p&g is more than that, in many aspects of the industries it is involved. leave aside owning, having a noticeable share in any other company is a leverage in itself, which can be and is used to steer decisions of any affiliates accordingly.
and then there is the group concept. corporations are held by holdings which are still be grouped in common holders' hands, which eventually happen to be the ones to dictate what goes on in life. i said life, because beyond this point, its not market or business anymore, its food, communication, transportation, healthcare, its everything.
observation and research is enough to conclude why the current situation is i am describing. there happens no corporation that sends shudders through any market by exceptional prices and quality, outcompeting others and upsetting the balance in any sectors BUT i.t. (Which is a new one), prices, nature, and the format of the products/services that are provided are almost the same in each and every corporation's offering, with little differences and noone is trying to make a major break and upset the balance, somehow the laws which are pushed seem to be orchestrated by a common hand, which then again benefits the existing cartels/companies in each and every sector, but not the entrants, and so it goes.
there is no reason not to be able to see these. if you cant, then you may be not wanting to see, rather than not being able to.
i do not think that every free market evolves to a monopoly market. every market evolves to a monopoly market. including the markets of western hemisphere, and especially those.
there are supposedly a number of big brands supplying the services and products in every field, and there is a supposed choice of 4 or so to choose from at any given point. yet, many of these brands are owned by the same parent corporation in the end. procter and gamble, is a mind staggering example for this. just read up on that company and what its subsidiaries produce, and youll understand.
most unfortunately, western markets are not regulated. as the examples of p&g, at&t, comcast, vivendi, warner bros clearly show.