i hate to break it to you that you are not living in anywhere else, but on the face of this world. whether you like it or not, youre in this neighborhood. and on this world, we dont like arrogant assholes who try to force their wants on others. its not even take it, or leave it, you are going to take it. thats the way society works, and you people are just but a part of this society, again, whether you like it, or not.
if i was a fanatic nationalist, i would say that i was one of the undesirables who had been removing and ruling greeks for around 700 years. and also would say that the ENTIRE population of greece (10,706,290) cant even match ONE of my cities, istanbul, with 15 million. and if 1/7 of us spitted their way, they would drown a sea of spit. or, the size of my army makes 10% of greece's population.
but i wont, because that would reduce me to your level - of being a piece of shit.
but not for speed. most of the time we need speedy interaction on the web, be it business or other stuff. spending time with 3d stuff are only possible when going for entertainment.
again my belief is, if the humongous investment (and even a fraction of it) that has been spent on oil since the onset of the century is spent for 5 years on alternative, im sure that we will be far better off with alternative energy sources than we are now with oil.
even the short period of issues we experienced in last 5 years caused much progress on that area.
but to stick the "Proud Member" sticker that EFF sent me after my latest donation to my forehead, and go around living like that. will be a bit hard - its a bit large. but eh....
you miss the fact that oil cost is not tied to supply and demand, but mainly to the whim of some number of countries that are in opec. they adjust prices on whim.
thats because we are not able to produce energy. we have to drill it. limited resource. and heavily controlled.
if we were able to produce from renewable sources, that would mean an unbelievable drop in energy prices - because, just like a toy or a sweater, any country would be able to produce and export it, and noone could be able to monopolize.
its not about believing, its about trying. you have 2 choices, one of which say that those restrictions are good, and even hint they are gonna bring more, there is another choce that says personal freedoms have eroded, and they should be restored.
one would be stupid to go for the ones who guarantee more erosion.
press 4 to understand the reasons for being allowed to post anonymously!
i did, and was told that it had more to do with allowing rude bigots insulting anyone they want than protecting privacy and freedom of speech.
learly, you hate freedom. i must kindly ask you to get the fuck out of america, not for your nationality of origin, but your diametrically opposed to our values views.
i would, if i had been there. since im not there, and dont plan to, (unless the joke your country has been turned into by the shit you voted into power in 2000 changes), your views on this are irrelevant.
initiation of a new industry field always requires manpower and investment. it stimulates the economy.
in current state the accrued cash is just sitting as capital in swiss banks, doing nothing. and everyone is at their whim - wanna make more cash ? just squeeze out prices higher by poking opec, and voila.
you cant invest and produce your own energy in this state. which would create endless jobs, first due to the act of producing energy itself, second, due to cheapening energy costs and the investment that will accompany it.
first, get a clue that anyone who talks about a topic is not necessarily an american, an alien wanting to be an american or any other shit.
im a turk living in a tourism resort in mediterranean coast. my english far exceeds what should i know. therefore im in no way obliged to fulfill your linguistic expectations in regard to english.
another advice - learn to value content over presentation.
this aint no local farmers' market that you can let be. this decides the destiny of mankind. whether you'll live under cancerous smokes and hazardous material, or youll be able to produce as much power as you need, anywhere, anytime.
this is a civilization level decision. free market has nothing to do with it. free market only comes into play after the decision is made, to arrange supply and demand, and fix prices.
well they are not. due to your disillusionment, you people have taken the habit of painting everything in the same light, and agreeing with each other on that.
they arent. democrats, as 'evil' as they may be, are better for you, because :
1 - They are better than republicans in regard to many important aspects of life that directly concern ordinary citizens, EVEN if a little bit, and even though almost all of you are disillusioned with their shortcomings and non-fulfillment of what you would like to have done
2 - They are one of the two viable choices
Rationally, your short term fix is democrats. when they are elected and increasing rights violations of the neocon shit in administration is stopped, you can work on your 3rd party in the 4 years to come. at least, you'll be able to work on that 3rd party this way - instead of getting your brains kicked outta with the boots of swat team your local gop chapter sends to your house to eliminate your 'terrorist' threat. if youre in doubt - they already have done it to people during their convention.
they are some pest that needs to be eradicated for rational functioning of u.s. legal system. they need to be made an example of, for future generations.
the software basically discerns who is a good liar, and who is not ? the fact that mccain and palin believes their own lies and delusions and doesnt twitch while spurting their shit, doesnt make them better people.
if, obama stutters the most, while talking about good qualities of mccain, and this is noticeable, that tells me that this person is not a good liar.
you need 2 things to be a good liar :
a) Be a totally filthy bastard who can totally negate the instinct of honesty
b) Be a mind numbed zealot or delusional kook to believe in your own lies
either case is equally ominous and dangerous. if obama doesnt fit well with the above criteria, its all fine by me.
yes, boost the chances of new party taking of to %15, whilst in the process obliging the world to go through 4 more years of what we suffered in the last 8.
no. illogical. you need to save the situation in the short term, and work for the chances of a new party for the long term. thats pragmatism.
What business was she conducting? Simply receiving email does not make her guilty of anything, and there is no eveidence that she solicited or acted on any of the received emails, or sent any governemt related emails of her own.
she violated a law that required work related emails to be sent from government accounts. there is no need for further 'acting' upon anything on her part to be guilty of anything. its like saying 'yea, she stole a car but she didnt rob a bank with it'.
Hell, I have tons of work related emails sitting in my private inbox simply because the people I work with have a habit of sending them to both my work and private adresses when I'm out of the office. Doesn't mean I replied to them, or actioned them, or that they did not go to the correct email adress as well.
thats very nice. your employer has the right to demand access to your private email at any time as of now, because it involves work related material. legally.
Slashdot Mirror
i dropped another $20. i occasionally jump in and drop some bucks.
i hate to break it to you that you are not living in anywhere else, but on the face of this world. whether you like it or not, youre in this neighborhood. and on this world, we dont like arrogant assholes who try to force their wants on others. its not even take it, or leave it, you are going to take it. thats the way society works, and you people are just but a part of this society, again, whether you like it, or not.
if i was a fanatic nationalist, i would say that i was one of the undesirables who had been removing and ruling greeks for around 700 years. and also would say that the ENTIRE population of greece (10,706,290) cant even match ONE of my cities, istanbul, with 15 million. and if 1/7 of us spitted their way, they would drown a sea of spit. or, the size of my army makes 10% of greece's population.
but i wont, because that would reduce me to your level - of being a piece of shit.
but not for speed. most of the time we need speedy interaction on the web, be it business or other stuff. spending time with 3d stuff are only possible when going for entertainment.
again my belief is, if the humongous investment (and even a fraction of it) that has been spent on oil since the onset of the century is spent for 5 years on alternative, im sure that we will be far better off with alternative energy sources than we are now with oil.
even the short period of issues we experienced in last 5 years caused much progress on that area.
but to stick the "Proud Member" sticker that EFF sent me after my latest donation to my forehead, and go around living like that. will be a bit hard - its a bit large. but eh ....
you miss the fact that oil cost is not tied to supply and demand, but mainly to the whim of some number of countries that are in opec. they adjust prices on whim.
thats because we are not able to produce energy. we have to drill it. limited resource. and heavily controlled.
if we were able to produce from renewable sources, that would mean an unbelievable drop in energy prices - because, just like a toy or a sweater, any country would be able to produce and export it, and noone could be able to monopolize.
thats what we need.
its not about believing, its about trying. you have 2 choices, one of which say that those restrictions are good, and even hint they are gonna bring more, there is another choce that says personal freedoms have eroded, and they should be restored.
one would be stupid to go for the ones who guarantee more erosion.
press 4 to understand the reasons for being allowed to post anonymously!
i did, and was told that it had more to do with allowing rude bigots insulting anyone they want than protecting privacy and freedom of speech.
learly, you hate freedom. i must kindly ask you to get the fuck out of america, not for your nationality of origin, but your diametrically opposed to our values views.
i would, if i had been there. since im not there, and dont plan to, (unless the joke your country has been turned into by the shit you voted into power in 2000 changes), your views on this are irrelevant.
no.
initiation of a new industry field always requires manpower and investment. it stimulates the economy.
in current state the accrued cash is just sitting as capital in swiss banks, doing nothing. and everyone is at their whim - wanna make more cash ? just squeeze out prices higher by poking opec, and voila.
you cant invest and produce your own energy in this state. which would create endless jobs, first due to the act of producing energy itself, second, due to cheapening energy costs and the investment that will accompany it.
growth.
first, get a clue that anyone who talks about a topic is not necessarily an american, an alien wanting to be an american or any other shit.
im a turk living in a tourism resort in mediterranean coast. my english far exceeds what should i know. therefore im in no way obliged to fulfill your linguistic expectations in regard to english.
another advice - learn to value content over presentation.
press 3 to grow some balls to post with own account. thank you.
seriously.
Press 3 to get your butt screwed by a Turk. And lose some bigotry while getting a clue. Thank you.
Seriously. I think im good at it.
but even i use any chance that i can find to piss on microsoft.
well, after all those years of suffering through their shit, my willy doesnt want to miss the chance to at least do something when they come up.
this aint no local farmers' market that you can let be. this decides the destiny of mankind. whether you'll live under cancerous smokes and hazardous material, or youll be able to produce as much power as you need, anywhere, anytime.
this is a civilization level decision. free market has nothing to do with it. free market only comes into play after the decision is made, to arrange supply and demand, and fix prices.
european union, india, japan, south america, africa, middle east.
that basically makes whole world.
well they are not. due to your disillusionment, you people have taken the habit of painting everything in the same light, and agreeing with each other on that.
they arent. democrats, as 'evil' as they may be, are better for you, because :
1 - They are better than republicans in regard to many important aspects of life that directly concern ordinary citizens, EVEN if a little bit, and even though almost all of you are disillusioned with their shortcomings and non-fulfillment of what you would like to have done
2 - They are one of the two viable choices
Rationally, your short term fix is democrats. when they are elected and increasing rights violations of the neocon shit in administration is stopped, you can work on your 3rd party in the 4 years to come. at least, you'll be able to work on that 3rd party this way - instead of getting your brains kicked outta with the boots of swat team your local gop chapter sends to your house to eliminate your 'terrorist' threat. if youre in doubt - they already have done it to people during their convention.
they are some pest that needs to be eradicated for rational functioning of u.s. legal system. they need to be made an example of, for future generations.
the software basically discerns who is a good liar, and who is not ? the fact that mccain and palin believes their own lies and delusions and doesnt twitch while spurting their shit, doesnt make them better people.
if, obama stutters the most, while talking about good qualities of mccain, and this is noticeable, that tells me that this person is not a good liar.
you need 2 things to be a good liar :
a) Be a totally filthy bastard who can totally negate the instinct of honesty
b) Be a mind numbed zealot or delusional kook to believe in your own lies
either case is equally ominous and dangerous. if obama doesnt fit well with the above criteria, its all fine by me.
yes, boost the chances of new party taking of to %15, whilst in the process obliging the world to go through 4 more years of what we suffered in the last 8.
no. illogical. you need to save the situation in the short term, and work for the chances of a new party for the long term. thats pragmatism.
What business was she conducting? Simply receiving email does not make her guilty of anything, and there is no eveidence that she solicited or acted on any of the received emails, or sent any governemt related emails of her own.
she violated a law that required work related emails to be sent from government accounts. there is no need for further 'acting' upon anything on her part to be guilty of anything. its like saying 'yea, she stole a car but she didnt rob a bank with it'.
Hell, I have tons of work related emails sitting in my private inbox simply because the people I work with have a habit of sending them to both my work and private adresses when I'm out of the office. Doesn't mean I replied to them, or actioned them, or that they did not go to the correct email adress as well.
thats very nice. your employer has the right to demand access to your private email at any time as of now, because it involves work related material. legally.
fbi has been given the 'legal' authority by illegal bills that are in violation of the constitution. there is no legality in it.
and no, fbi doesnt post those emails in public, but hands them over to republican administration for them to use at whim.
the gov account that received the mail can be accessed, but whatever her private email received wouldnt be accessed.
if the gov sender doesnt save the outgoing email, or deletes them regularly, that would make any correspondence received on her part, inaccessible.
and even so, it doesnt lighten the severity of her violation.
replying to and sending to .gov email addresses cant be of personal nature. even if you talk personal things.
FBI is already doing it, thanks to the 'laws' that this woman's party had passed.
only, they are using against people not from their party, and not doing anything against their own.