think. we already are having a lot of problems with this level of integration we have between a pc and the internet. browse, surf, use mail, and still helluva amounts of viruses, identity thefts, scams, phishing and whatnot.
we would have larger, more varied and considerably more problems on our hands if we go with a web based os.
it aint so anymore. recent bills mandate that every person can only donate $3000. no telco can donate $10 m to any campaign. nobody. thats why hillary sunk in debt - she relied on big contributors whereas obama gathered $6 bucks from everyone from net.
he had a solid reasoning though. he said that if we resisted, it would be a stalemate, and neither we would be able to take down existing situation or place a new scheme in place of it. and in existing situation, there is NO oversight on any wiretapping. in the new bill there is at least judicial oversight.
she has nothing to lose now. she cant make it to presidency, wont probably be making it to vp, so she doesnt need any big buck telcos donating her. she has campaign 'loan debts' which she loaned herself, but hey, she's gonna have another book written soon and just pay them off to herself easily.
a sack of flour is a compound substance that has exact formulae of components known.
yet, no restaurant is required to check every ounce of flour they use in their products. its the SUPPLIERS' DUTY.
it seems to me that you just want to bash google and produce exorbitant excuses for it. and for some reason youre posting anonymous but tracking the thread. really annoying.
it matters. google cant know where a local nevada/chinese/japanese farm plot starts and municipal road ends. yes, it absolves google from publishing those pictures.
google is only guilty if they do not withdraw pictures after the incident is discovered.
its all dependent on investment. if the investment that has been put into oil and oil related technologies were made into ME, you would be even using my humble self as a global renewable source of energy today...
ok, a bit exagerrated. but you get the point. its all about the money. invest into shit, and in 10 years youll be using turd in your car.
to make money for other people. Steve Jobs is not a financial 'asset' that needs to let go of his own persona for some people who put money in that corporation to make assured bucks. or, u.s. citizens are not born into this world to make sure that the faggots who feed RIAA makes money. Being born is not an indentured slavery contract to public or to individuals.
if you want to make money, go make it. if you dont like not knowing a CEO's health status, DONT FUCKING INVEST IN THAT CORPORATION.
and, IF YOU STILL DID, SHUT THE HELL UP. what goes on past steve's shirt, trousers, whatever he is wearing, IS HIS BUSINESS. sell your shitty stock if you are worried that your precious bucks gonna fly away.
how is google to know that their policy has been violated or not without they are being made aware of a case ?
how do you know that whomever discovered this has posted it on the web, creating a stampede WITHOUT first letting google know about it and deal with it ?
i dont know whether youre a fool or you are doing intentionally.
what happens if you hire a contractor to fix your leak, and he comes and without you knowing draws a parallel to your neighbor's water pipe and you start using his water without knowing it ? does it become your fault ?
Slashdot Mirror
unless you want to be taken as an RIAA lapdog.
think. we already are having a lot of problems with this level of integration we have between a pc and the internet. browse, surf, use mail, and still helluva amounts of viruses, identity thefts, scams, phishing and whatnot.
we would have larger, more varied and considerably more problems on our hands if we go with a web based os.
is there any non senile person who can explain me why the hell parent is redundant ?
since when THANKING someone for deeds done for greater good became REDUNDANT ?
or, it might be a case of idiots with mod points. in that case, please, someone deal with it.
why dont more of you, who can join him, join him and make things easier for each and every one of us ?
when i was your age, we used to eat our dung for dinner.
why so serious ?
many people paying $3000 each is not 'big donors'. big donor means around $1m a pop, like it was in the old days.
it aint so anymore. recent bills mandate that every person can only donate $3000. no telco can donate $10 m to any campaign. nobody. thats why hillary sunk in debt - she relied on big contributors whereas obama gathered $6 bucks from everyone from net.
he had a solid reasoning though. he said that if we resisted, it would be a stalemate, and neither we would be able to take down existing situation or place a new scheme in place of it. and in existing situation, there is NO oversight on any wiretapping. in the new bill there is at least judicial oversight.
she has nothing to lose now. she cant make it to presidency, wont probably be making it to vp, so she doesnt need any big buck telcos donating her. she has campaign 'loan debts' which she loaned herself, but hey, she's gonna have another book written soon and just pay them off to herself easily.
is the price of getting put on a mailing list too high to pay for a bit more freedom ?
So you're basically saying government should not regulate internet, but ISPs should be able to ?
What do you say each morning to yourself in the mirror to begin the day - "hypocrisy" ?
fookyuuuuuuu
anyway. im off this thread. you are just stubborn.
coming in 3, 2, 1 ...
Richard Branson sets up EVE Online Guild. News at 11.
restaurant receives flour sacks with proper best before dates. its the supplier that is smuggling in bad flour. what happens ?
the reason for this movie being successful is the fact that it IS good. everyone is recommending it to each other.
a sack of flour is a compound substance that has exact formulae of components known.
yet, no restaurant is required to check every ounce of flour they use in their products. its the SUPPLIERS' DUTY.
it seems to me that you just want to bash google and produce exorbitant excuses for it. and for some reason youre posting anonymous but tracking the thread. really annoying.
it matters. google cant know where a local nevada/chinese/japanese farm plot starts and municipal road ends. yes, it absolves google from publishing those pictures.
google is only guilty if they do not withdraw pictures after the incident is discovered.
its all dependent on investment. if the investment that has been put into oil and oil related technologies were made into ME, you would be even using my humble self as a global renewable source of energy today ...
ok, a bit exagerrated. but you get the point. its all about the money. invest into shit, and in 10 years youll be using turd in your car.
do you know the contract google made with the subcontractors ? what if that responsibility was subcontractor's ?
restaurants are NOT responsible by the malpractice their suppliers do. if a supplier smuggles in foul flour, its supplier's fault.
dont be hypocritical.
to make money for other people. Steve Jobs is not a financial 'asset' that needs to let go of his own persona for some people who put money in that corporation to make assured bucks. or, u.s. citizens are not born into this world to make sure that the faggots who feed RIAA makes money. Being born is not an indentured slavery contract to public or to individuals.
...
if you want to make money, go make it. if you dont like not knowing a CEO's health status, DONT FUCKING INVEST IN THAT CORPORATION.
and, IF YOU STILL DID, SHUT THE HELL UP. what goes on past steve's shirt, trousers, whatever he is wearing, IS HIS BUSINESS. sell your shitty stock if you are worried that your precious bucks gonna fly away.
and im no apple fan
how is google to know that their policy has been violated or not without they are being made aware of a case ?
how do you know that whomever discovered this has posted it on the web, creating a stampede WITHOUT first letting google know about it and deal with it ?
i dont know whether youre a fool or you are doing intentionally.
what happens if you hire a contractor to fix your leak, and he comes and without you knowing draws a parallel to your neighbor's water pipe and you start using his water without knowing it ? does it become your fault ?