I promise you and this will sound cruel, there would be people willing to die to ensure no RIAA people escape the building as it collapses. Thats how bad its gotten.
Thatis the actual point. You don't invest and neither does anyone else. That the consquences of the person making death threats, the company sinks and its property is aquired by SigHeil inc. who doesn't allow that.
Actually no The limited liability aspect is not a good thing. 'The personhood part of a corporation basically sets up a fake 'fall guy' so that shareholders and investors aren't sued into oblivion if the corporation goes bankrupt. No one would become a shareholder/investor if the risk wasn't just "lose the money you invested" but was "lose the money you invested, and your house, car, and everything else you own". That is the point and what is supposed to happen and why the system is broke. shareholders and investors should be sued into oblivion if the corporation goes bankrupt or fucks up. For example, BP should have been forced to spend all of its liguid assets on cleaning of the gulf coast. Then everything else should have been used to make up the livelihood of those who lost theirs. Its called responsibility. This would be a lesson to others. You need to take risks if you want something. yes, this would mean that a lot of business ventures simply wouldn't happen. This is a good thing because alot would still happen because will happen. It happens in China where if you lose a police officers money you get a bullet in the face. It happens in Iran where if your product some how falls a foul of religious laws you lose your life. Those are the worse examples. All of what you said, your whole argument is a fallacy.
People have inherent rights before they join a company, after they quit and while they are there. What you want is risk management. You want to remove the ability to sue etc. I say let every single person who owns stock in publicly traded company be responsible for that companys behavior.
You would see that would suddenly last for decades again. Yes, you will see less. Less product. less innovation. But you will also see less crap.
But here is the chief problem with your argument and any other. Its the assumption that a corporation is an entity if it has no people. All it is, is people who already have rights. People who can benefit society together without an addition mandate from the government.
Can you honestly give a real reason why its a douche-baggery and assholery comment? Its not that I disagree with you, its that to me it smacks of callousness. Some people have dry humor. Some people handle horror with humor and mocking. But other you were offended why is it wrong? The answer can't be based on emotion.
I see you don't have the scrot to admit you don't like Hacking, eh? Once you legally exchange money for the product, they shouldn't say anything about using the product period. Honestly, I saw nothing wrong with what Geohot and the rest of them did. Its his system. he wanted to tear it apart. He showed everyone how. Problem isn't 'the people who think they can piss wherever they want and get away with it' (because the homeless and drunks will always do that). It's the fact that Sony didn't want anyone to reveal that. They lose that right when they release the object to the masses. As long as no one makes a new one and claims its there, they should have a leg to stand on. This is how bad everything has gotten.
Yet. But someone will. Give it time. The fundamental belief that they own all the hardware even though they already got the money they asking in exchange for it does allow that. Its a decision made by a person with a despotic mindset. A thug is a thug regardless if he's ruling people or making wares.
This is going to sound harsh but as my father was German and an immigrant, and I'm 40 I can say this. The German citizens said the same about the Nazis prior to 1941. Some experiences are better not had. YOU are contributing to a company which deliberately violates laws, manipulates equipment and willingly and without care destroys hardware not theirs for the sake of profit. If that isn't evil, then I am at a loss. The CEO of SONY in my eyes is no better than Honsi Mubarak right now. Mod me down right now. But honestly Sony needs to be taken down a few pegs.
Actually that is the point. The market (the collective group of people who actually buy stuff) simply didnt buy it when it was first released. So they learned there is no money in marketing it. Therefore there was never any industry money in making it. That doesn't mean it doesn't get made. It means you have to fund it yourself. And as we have seen very few vanity project appear and almost all fail. I can name Postal as a video game.
Mel Gibson was the only one who succeeded with 'Passion of the Christ'
The rating system shouldn't die it should replaced with a list of actual events: cursing laced through the movie. sex, drug use, specific violent acts. There is one christmas weekly paper which reviews movies for contect and gives the details. While it pans basically everything that doesn't glorify God, it does tell me what to expect which allows me to pick a better movie. Far better that, Natalies was crazy, you should go see black swan!
and then you can hire copious amounts of pseudo-porn stars to use said machine.
www.fuckingmachines.com (yes, real. YES, VERY NSFW)
and I do believe you cab do that on a cnc. But what about the latex?;)
Actually, you need the last episode of season 5 to be the episode before the final episode of season four. It explains alot. Other than that, yes, don't discuss it.
I don't want that to happen. I want them to continue to back that horse until it keels over and dies. I want to laugh when Apple returns to the place it belongs a tiny niche player with 1% of the market. (any computer related market)
Those who disconnect from the internet won't ever get caught. Surly it can get updated now with a internet connection. Personally I am surprise someone hasn't set up a separate server for it. (I don't have one so this is a thought. I refuse to buy new sony until the apologize for the rootkit. Since it is more likely for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to bathe in pigs blood than this to happen, I don't buy anything they produce. Hell even their movies I get from redbox.
I am sorry Mr. Amish sir but Its a nice try and all. I understand that the computer has to stay in the field house but really in the 21st century there are no actual farmers any more. There's you folks and the Mennonites and the big corporate farms. Anyone else has to make hard choices, and that's what a sacrifice is. You choose to leave in a rural area without basic services. (basic to us, electricity, TV and Phone) Well thankjs anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/02/2222523486_fcc9118fdf_o.jpg
I promise you and this will sound cruel, there would be people willing to die to ensure no RIAA people escape the building as it collapses. Thats how bad its gotten.
Thatis the actual point. You don't invest and neither does anyone else. That the consquences of the person making death threats, the company sinks and its property is aquired by SigHeil inc. who doesn't allow that.
Um wrong. You can still be sued if you dump the coffee on them. If they dump it on themselves that's not negligence. coffee=hot
Actually no The limited liability aspect is not a good thing. 'The personhood part of a corporation basically sets up a fake 'fall guy' so that shareholders and investors aren't sued into oblivion if the corporation goes bankrupt. No one would become a shareholder/investor if the risk wasn't just "lose the money you invested" but was "lose the money you invested, and your house, car, and everything else you own". That is the point and what is supposed to happen and why the system is broke. shareholders and investors should be sued into oblivion if the corporation goes bankrupt or fucks up. For example, BP should have been forced to spend all of its liguid assets on cleaning of the gulf coast. Then everything else should have been used to make up the livelihood of those who lost theirs. Its called responsibility. This would be a lesson to others. You need to take risks if you want something. yes, this would mean that a lot of business ventures simply wouldn't happen. This is a good thing because alot would still happen because will happen. It happens in China where if you lose a police officers money you get a bullet in the face. It happens in Iran where if your product some how falls a foul of religious laws you lose your life. Those are the worse examples. All of what you said, your whole argument is a fallacy. People have inherent rights before they join a company, after they quit and while they are there. What you want is risk management. You want to remove the ability to sue etc. I say let every single person who owns stock in publicly traded company be responsible for that companys behavior. You would see that would suddenly last for decades again. Yes, you will see less. Less product. less innovation. But you will also see less crap. But here is the chief problem with your argument and any other. Its the assumption that a corporation is an entity if it has no people. All it is, is people who already have rights. People who can benefit society together without an addition mandate from the government.
then what we need is a year with no content. (i realize what I said and understand the odds of it happening but still that is the solution)
Can you honestly give a real reason why its a douche-baggery and assholery comment? Its not that I disagree with you, its that to me it smacks of callousness. Some people have dry humor. Some people handle horror with humor and mocking. But other you were offended why is it wrong? The answer can't be based on emotion.
and if Steve finally dies this year? Then what? He's real sick.
I see you don't have the scrot to admit you don't like Hacking, eh? Once you legally exchange money for the product, they shouldn't say anything about using the product period. Honestly, I saw nothing wrong with what Geohot and the rest of them did. Its his system. he wanted to tear it apart. He showed everyone how. Problem isn't 'the people who think they can piss wherever they want and get away with it' (because the homeless and drunks will always do that). It's the fact that Sony didn't want anyone to reveal that. They lose that right when they release the object to the masses. As long as no one makes a new one and claims its there, they should have a leg to stand on. This is how bad everything has gotten.
Yet. But someone will. Give it time. The fundamental belief that they own all the hardware even though they already got the money they asking in exchange for it does allow that. Its a decision made by a person with a despotic mindset. A thug is a thug regardless if he's ruling people or making wares.
That's lazy. Self control is the issue. Nothing on that
This is going to sound harsh but as my father was German and an immigrant, and I'm 40 I can say this. The German citizens said the same about the Nazis prior to 1941. Some experiences are better not had. YOU are contributing to a company which deliberately violates laws, manipulates equipment and willingly and without care destroys hardware not theirs for the sake of profit. If that isn't evil, then I am at a loss. The CEO of SONY in my eyes is no better than Honsi Mubarak right now. Mod me down right now. But honestly Sony needs to be taken down a few pegs.
my guess is one that habitually uses suicide bombers.
Well, then first thing you do is eliminate the e. It took me a while to get my mother onto firefox and chrome.
Actually that is the point. The market (the collective group of people who actually buy stuff) simply didnt buy it when it was first released. So they learned there is no money in marketing it. Therefore there was never any industry money in making it. That doesn't mean it doesn't get made. It means you have to fund it yourself. And as we have seen very few vanity project appear and almost all fail. I can name Postal as a video game. Mel Gibson was the only one who succeeded with 'Passion of the Christ' The rating system shouldn't die it should replaced with a list of actual events: cursing laced through the movie. sex, drug use, specific violent acts. There is one christmas weekly paper which reviews movies for contect and gives the details. While it pans basically everything that doesn't glorify God, it does tell me what to expect which allows me to pick a better movie. Far better that, Natalies was crazy, you should go see black swan!
and then you can hire copious amounts of pseudo-porn stars to use said machine. www.fuckingmachines.com (yes, real. YES, VERY NSFW) and I do believe you cab do that on a cnc. But what about the latex? ;)
Actually, you need the last episode of season 5 to be the episode before the final episode of season four. It explains alot. Other than that, yes, don't discuss it.
I don't want that to happen. I want them to continue to back that horse until it keels over and dies. I want to laugh when Apple returns to the place it belongs a tiny niche player with 1% of the market. (any computer related market)
Yes it is. Steve Jobs is Intellectual Property Ambassador to 3rd world countries. Gates's foundation simply cures malaria.
No he didn't. In retrospect to the whole of the 7 billion, he's made an implant on maybe 10%. He's made a minor impact on western culture.
Microsoft and Google are hoping for a repeat.
Actually, if that is true then the Caduceus should be the symbol of lawyers and Politicians as well.
Those who disconnect from the internet won't ever get caught. Surly it can get updated now with a internet connection. Personally I am surprise someone hasn't set up a separate server for it. (I don't have one so this is a thought. I refuse to buy new sony until the apologize for the rootkit. Since it is more likely for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to bathe in pigs blood than this to happen, I don't buy anything they produce. Hell even their movies I get from redbox.
isn't 7hz the mythical frequency of the brown note. (not suggesting it exists just that if it did that would be the frequency)
I am sorry Mr. Amish sir but Its a nice try and all. I understand that the computer has to stay in the field house but really in the 21st century there are no actual farmers any more. There's you folks and the Mennonites and the big corporate farms. Anyone else has to make hard choices, and that's what a sacrifice is. You choose to leave in a rural area without basic services. (basic to us, electricity, TV and Phone) Well thankjs anyway.