You spend a lot of words blathering really simple stuff that you'd know I know if you had noticed I made an informed comment already. And you were replying to it to disagree, but you don't have any disagreement in your text. You simply purport to disagree because I used common English and it befuddled you.
My advice, look it up to see if what I said was true. You said a bunch of stuff that is true, but you're simply wrong in claiming that it contradicts anything I said. You may be a lawyer, but you're also kinda full of shit here. The stuff you said is part of what one side will be saying to the Court to try to get them to change things.
Also, you really do not understand words very well.
Note that the prior law is *NOT* that the taxes cannot be assessed, or even that states can't require them, but rather that in the absence of Congressional action, the states can only look to their residents, not the out of state vendors.
That isn't self-consistent. You're trying to play a word game to get around it, but your word game is about something different than what I said. What I said was that the State of Florida can't pass a tax on people in the State of New York. You're arguing against that with an argument that is for a different situation; when a person conflates taxing the buyer vs taxing the seller. What I actually said was that the State of Florida cannot tax people not under their jurisdiction. So no, it is not up the State of Florida, as you contend, to go after the citizens of New York, but rather, as I said, they cannot assess a tax on those people. And it won't end up mattering which person in New York, buyer or seller, that Florida wants to tax.
Congress is welcome to pass a law requiring states who do collect a sales or use tax to require reciprocal reporting with other states that also require it, but you're going to need some very new rulings from the Court before you manage to put requirements on people in states like Oregon that have neither of those things.
You can. It "appears" wrong to you because your hatred of hippies prevents you from understanding any law or rule that you believe hippies might have supported.
The thing is, unless you've got a business presence in that State, they don't have any jurisdiction to assess a tax.
It is no different than if the State of Florida passed a law that said everybody in the State of New York had to pay them a thousand dollars a year, for whatever reason they made up. The courts aren't going to look at the reason, they're going to say no, the laws of Florida don't apply in New York so they aren't allowed to tax them.
This site is full of sysadmins. Technical glitches would either be dead hardware (during an upgrade? plug the old stuff back in!) but they could have already replaced hardware. Or it could be software, which they could have restored from backup.
Multiple days of downtime tells us definitively that the problem isn't some sort of routine "technical glitch" but something more serious, like, "oh, hey guys, all the cookies are gone. I checked the jar and it is just crumbs."
And actual technical glitch that you were trying to solve before relaunch would get abandoned after some number of hours (days) without a successful fix. You don't have to leave the site down for a "technical glitch," you leave it down because the sky fell on your head and there is no reason to turn the server back on. Like, if all the money is gone and you turn the server on, people try to get their money, and can't, and want to know why.
I hope English isn't your first language, because "for all of 2018" means, explicitly, unambiguously, all of the year. The whole thing. Including the part that hasn't happened yet. That's what the words "all of" in that phrase mean.
2018 has the same number of days in it even if humanity is wiped away before the end of the year. It is a well-defined unit, it is not a matter of opinion.
Specific liability factors related to medical equipment in no way supports the hand-wavy bullshit you claimed above though. Yes, medical devices have a lot of liability. No, the tort system in the US is not some sort of "strict liability" system where if something "goes wrong" you lose unless you had a disclaimer. All the disclaimers even do is shift burdens of proof around, and let me translate that for you: disclaimers only make the lawsuit cost more for the other side. It doesn't change who wins, unless somebody runs out of money. You're not "on the hook" for anything, unless. The details are the whole story. A story that nobody teaches to insurance agents, because it isn't part of the job. If you knew about the details, it would be for reasons totally unrelated to having had a shit job once in your life.
Hey moron, we have it spelled out in the law whose fault it is. Nobody is going to ask you whose fault it is, they're going to look it up and find out whose fault it is.
I spend a lot of time on twisty mountain roads, and the speeds are much slower than in the city. Except highways, and those have full size lanes and markings and signs and stuff.
Why do you persist in slandering Marie Antoinette? You've been told before that this is a false attribution. Why don't you look up quotes before attributing them? Is your whole life and all your "knowledge" just a big game of telephone where you believe everything your friends claims to have "read?"
1) It was written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau when Marie Antoinette was 9 years old 2) He doesn't attribute it to her at all, but to some unnamed princess 3) His actual context was that he stole a bottle of wine and felt he was too well-dressed to enter a bakery to buy bread to eat with it, so he bought brioche from a fancier store instead.
Speaking of Paradise, what happens after the water runs out when people watch the waterfall shower scene from the movie Paradise? Does it turn from light human pr0n to hardcore water pr0n?
You should probably check the water supply there first, and see if they're actually using aquifers that are about to run out and turn the middle part of the country into a giant desert.
Adam Smith even has a footnote in Wealth of Nations where he explains why higher education doesn't have in a Capitalist way, because people choose the school with the best education that they can get access to, they don't choose a different University if there is a sale somewhere else. So he recognized that it needed public funding.
No, most of us want law enforcement to enforce the law if it is violated. Their job is not to protect me, their job is to arrest you after you hurt me.
The real real reason was that many years ago when they were designing the multiband radios they didn't know what features the future would want and they had existing IP blocks for the FM radio. And it only takes a tiny bit of space on the chip. So the chips were designed with the feature.
But these chips were mostly designed years before the cell phones using them finally made it to the masses, and the carriers didn't care about that feature, they never asked for it, it was just an extra thing the chip could do. Like maybe your computer has two different video connectors, and one of them you don't use.
Then later on some models users figured out how to activate the feature. People blather about the antenna but FM doesn't need much and the phones do have an antenna; which is already conveniently connected to the radio IC.;) You don't need a good FM antenna in most cases, unless you're in a really remote location.
Slashdot Mirror
You spend a lot of words blathering really simple stuff that you'd know I know if you had noticed I made an informed comment already. And you were replying to it to disagree, but you don't have any disagreement in your text. You simply purport to disagree because I used common English and it befuddled you.
My advice, look it up to see if what I said was true. You said a bunch of stuff that is true, but you're simply wrong in claiming that it contradicts anything I said. You may be a lawyer, but you're also kinda full of shit here. The stuff you said is part of what one side will be saying to the Court to try to get them to change things.
Also, you really do not understand words very well.
Note that the prior law is *NOT* that the taxes cannot be assessed, or even that states can't require them, but rather that in the absence of Congressional action, the states can only look to their residents, not the out of state vendors.
That isn't self-consistent. You're trying to play a word game to get around it, but your word game is about something different than what I said. What I said was that the State of Florida can't pass a tax on people in the State of New York. You're arguing against that with an argument that is for a different situation; when a person conflates taxing the buyer vs taxing the seller. What I actually said was that the State of Florida cannot tax people not under their jurisdiction. So no, it is not up the State of Florida, as you contend, to go after the citizens of New York, but rather, as I said, they cannot assess a tax on those people. And it won't end up mattering which person in New York, buyer or seller, that Florida wants to tax.
Congress is welcome to pass a law requiring states who do collect a sales or use tax to require reciprocal reporting with other states that also require it, but you're going to need some very new rulings from the Court before you manage to put requirements on people in states like Oregon that have neither of those things.
You can. It "appears" wrong to you because your hatred of hippies prevents you from understanding any law or rule that you believe hippies might have supported.
People fall into two groups on the 10th Amendment:
Those who think it doesn't mean anything,
and those who can't agree what they think it means.
The thing is, unless you've got a business presence in that State, they don't have any jurisdiction to assess a tax.
It is no different than if the State of Florida passed a law that said everybody in the State of New York had to pay them a thousand dollars a year, for whatever reason they made up. The courts aren't going to look at the reason, they're going to say no, the laws of Florida don't apply in New York so they aren't allowed to tax them.
You're so backwards, your counties are called parishes.
You're so backwards, you don't even realize they're still counties!
This site is full of sysadmins. Technical glitches would either be dead hardware (during an upgrade? plug the old stuff back in!) but they could have already replaced hardware. Or it could be software, which they could have restored from backup.
Multiple days of downtime tells us definitively that the problem isn't some sort of routine "technical glitch" but something more serious, like, "oh, hey guys, all the cookies are gone. I checked the jar and it is just crumbs."
And actual technical glitch that you were trying to solve before relaunch would get abandoned after some number of hours (days) without a successful fix. You don't have to leave the site down for a "technical glitch," you leave it down because the sky fell on your head and there is no reason to turn the server back on. Like, if all the money is gone and you turn the server on, people try to get their money, and can't, and want to know why.
I hope English isn't your first language, because "for all of 2018" means, explicitly, unambiguously, all of the year. The whole thing. Including the part that hasn't happened yet. That's what the words "all of" in that phrase mean.
2018 has the same number of days in it even if humanity is wiped away before the end of the year. It is a well-defined unit, it is not a matter of opinion.
Specific liability factors related to medical equipment in no way supports the hand-wavy bullshit you claimed above though. Yes, medical devices have a lot of liability. No, the tort system in the US is not some sort of "strict liability" system where if something "goes wrong" you lose unless you had a disclaimer. All the disclaimers even do is shift burdens of proof around, and let me translate that for you: disclaimers only make the lawsuit cost more for the other side. It doesn't change who wins, unless somebody runs out of money. You're not "on the hook" for anything, unless. The details are the whole story. A story that nobody teaches to insurance agents, because it isn't part of the job. If you knew about the details, it would be for reasons totally unrelated to having had a shit job once in your life.
Hey moron, we have it spelled out in the law whose fault it is. Nobody is going to ask you whose fault it is, they're going to look it up and find out whose fault it is.
I spend a lot of time on twisty mountain roads, and the speeds are much slower than in the city. Except highways, and those have full size lanes and markings and signs and stuff.
or it could also be a nuclear-powered ... life destroyer.
You definitely would want to present the local authorities with an iron-clad EULA before approving the contract.
Only if they're so stupid that they stop washing their hands and save all up all their washing water for a silly shower.
Handwashing before preparing food is important for sanitation; showers are not.
Why do you persist in slandering Marie Antoinette? You've been told before that this is a false attribution. Why don't you look up quotes before attributing them? Is your whole life and all your "knowledge" just a big game of telephone where you believe everything your friends claims to have "read?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
1) It was written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau when Marie Antoinette was 9 years old
2) He doesn't attribute it to her at all, but to some unnamed princess
3) His actual context was that he stole a bottle of wine and felt he was too well-dressed to enter a bakery to buy bread to eat with it, so he bought brioche from a fancier store instead.
Speaking of Paradise, what happens after the water runs out when people watch the waterfall shower scene from the movie Paradise? Does it turn from light human pr0n to hardcore water pr0n?
It is hard to find engineering topics more nerdy than civic engineering.
Any idiot can find the excitement in a rocket or video game. It is only nerds who find excitement in civic engineering.
Plus, what is going to happen in District 9 when the water runs out? A sequel will happen, I hope.
The restrictions are on the water usage of devices you sell, not devices you possess.
I can tell just from that mistake that you're a right winger, and all your politics are rooted in hatred of hippies. Pathetic.
Here in the US that is only true if your toilet was manufactured 30+ years ago.
Also, stop flushing every time you #1. It is both wasteful and silly.
You should probably check the water supply there first, and see if they're actually using aquifers that are about to run out and turn the middle part of the country into a giant desert.
Shorter you: "Let them eat cake"
Adam Smith even has a footnote in Wealth of Nations where he explains why higher education doesn't have in a Capitalist way, because people choose the school with the best education that they can get access to, they don't choose a different University if there is a sale somewhere else. So he recognized that it needed public funding.
Yep. feel the warm manna tinkling down on your head! In ancient times it had resale value.
No, most of us want law enforcement to enforce the law if it is violated. Their job is not to protect me, their job is to arrest you after you hurt me.
The real real reason was that many years ago when they were designing the multiband radios they didn't know what features the future would want and they had existing IP blocks for the FM radio. And it only takes a tiny bit of space on the chip. So the chips were designed with the feature.
But these chips were mostly designed years before the cell phones using them finally made it to the masses, and the carriers didn't care about that feature, they never asked for it, it was just an extra thing the chip could do. Like maybe your computer has two different video connectors, and one of them you don't use.
Then later on some models users figured out how to activate the feature. People blather about the antenna but FM doesn't need much and the phones do have an antenna; which is already conveniently connected to the radio IC. ;) You don't need a good FM antenna in most cases, unless you're in a really remote location.
If they pay to launch an empty rocket, that might cost other countries a lot of money searching for nothing! They probably do that.
They didn't say it got into space at the right time or location, they only said the rocket operated nominally.