Slashdot Mirror


Future Samsung Phones Will Have a Working FM Radio Chip (androidpolice.com)

A few months ago, LG announced a partnership with NextRadio to unlock the FM chip in its smartphones. Now, Samsung is doing the same. Android Police reports: NextRadio made the announcement, rightly explaining that FM radio is essential in areas with low connectivity and in emergency and disaster situations where a connection might be difficult to obtain or maintain and where access to information could be a matter of life and death. With the chip unlocked, users will be able to listen to local radio on their phone using the NextRadio Android app. The press release mentions that "upcoming [Samsung] smartphone models in the U.S. and Canada" will have the FM chip unlocked, however I did find several existing Samsung devices with their FM chip enabled on NextRadio's site.

215 comments

  1. Wait I want AM radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Most of the shit on FM is fake news. I need the good stuff.

    1. Re:Wait I want AM radio by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Sure, find a place in the phone to put an AM antenna

    2. Re:Wait I want AM radio by swan5566 · · Score: 1

      Actually you'll get AM better in remote areas. For this purpose it would make more sense to have that.

      --
      In debates about Christianity, there are two groups: those looking for answers, and those looking to just ask questions.
    3. Re:Wait I want AM radio by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Yeah.... isn't that what FM stands for? "Fake, Mostly"? It's right there in the name...

    4. Re:Wait I want AM radio by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      For iPhone users that probably wouldn't be much of a change from the other accessories they routinely plug in.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    5. Re:Wait I want AM radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we can get cell phone manufacturers to stop bullshitting us, I propose these additional ideas:

      1) Don't drop headphone jacks until it's determined that nobody handicap or otherwise won't be missing them.

      2) Open source all silicon and hardware designs. Don't trust cell phones until they do so.

      3) On time updates without cell phone middlemen pushing their way in, making updates take longer.

      4) Updates for all Android versions, even past the version they were sold with. (In other words, Android 8 for Android 4.4 phones.)

      5) When the above "new Android versions to older Android version phones" can't be done because of hardware limitations, then mailing and calling all past Android customers and letting them know a few times a year which security flaws they are exposed to by not upgrading.

      I'll be standing by also waiting for my share of unicorn farts. Not hopeful.

    6. Re:Wait I want AM radio by dryeo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Depends on how remote, at least during the day, using a standard radio. Where I am right now, I get a lot more FM signals then AM even though the transmitters are about as far away.
      If you're really remote, you should have a good multi-band radio, though I believe shortwave is being used less and less, a strong AM signal can cover a good chunk of the continent at night.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    7. Re:Wait I want AM radio by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, good old Art Bell and Alex Jones; quality integrity, and truth. Radio as it should be.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    8. Re:Wait I want AM radio by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, good old Art Bell

      Whatever you think about Art Bell personally, he was a master of the craft of late night talk radio, covering the off-beat and odd. His program wasn't carried on just about every AM station (okay, a lot of them) if it weren't successful. There were nights I could scan the AM band at 2AM and find ten stations carrying Coast To Coast AM.

      He had (has) the ability to draw out his guests by pretending to be listening and accepting what they say, while making it hard for the listeners to know if he's promoting the ideas or secretly pulling the guest's leg.

      He is also an amateur radio guy who is sticking to the AM format there, who puts out an amateur signal that sounds better than AM broadcast stations.

  2. antenna by mschoolbus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    for antenna, just plugin your headph..... crap.

    1. Re:antenna by olsmeister · · Score: 2

      Ummm...OK.

    2. Re: Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You obviously never had the experience of building a crystal radio as a kid

    3. Re:Antenna by eclectro · · Score: 0

      AM antennas could be done, they could be embedded in the back casing of cell phones. They don't need to be "iron bars" aka ferrites like the oldyn days.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:Antenna by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Walkman-type radios used the earphone wire as an antenna, which is probably what the phones are going to have to do.

      That's what they already do, if they have FM radio.

      The smallest workable AM antenna is a ~5 inch bar of iron with a super thin wire wound around it hundreds of times.

      Am I the only one old enough to remember car radios and the whip antennas they had, which provided AM coverage? I have an old car radio in my office right now that works fine with nothing more than a 3' piece of wire.

      The "magic" is that the impedance is very high with such a short antenna, so the radio has to be designed to deal with that.

      IF there were an AM radio chip that matched the size of the FM chips they have for cell phones, the earphone wire would work for that, too.

    5. Re:antenna by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      for antenna, just plugin your headph..... crap.

      Samsung phones have them, at least for this year

    6. Re:antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use your special antenna adapter with your charger. In the future, FM radio will be a "cool new feature" just wait... "listen to this Spotify like music service without using any data serivces at all with iRadioMusic, just pay $9.99/mo."

    7. Re:Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are small AM/FM radio chips available, but cellphones don't use a separate chip for radio. Both Broadcom and Qualcomm add FM receivers and transmitters into their combo Bluetooth/WiFi chips to cover use cases like car kits that broadcast to the factory radio on FM and portable Bluetooth speakers with FM radio built in, and because the incremental cost to add it to a chip that already does significant portions of the WiFi and Bluetooth specifications in software is negligible. They don't add AM radios because there is no demand for it, and even if you can get an adequate antenna, AM radio is very sensitive to noise, and there is going to be a lot of that in a complex digital device like a mobile phone.

    8. Re: Antenna by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      That would be the one with 300 metres of wire from a bedroom window, down the garden. And an earth wire to a bathtap? Good luck getting those in to a mobile phone

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    9. Re:Antenna by twosat · · Score: 1

      You can't fit a decent FM radio antenna inside a phone

      Yes, you can. Literally in the last few minutes, I have been listening to FM radio on two feature phones without using earphones as antennas. They both have built-in antennas. https://www.thewarehouse.co.nz... https://www.thewarehouse.co.nz...

    10. Re: Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. That would be the entirely handheld one that was powered by the radio waves themselves and uses the earbud cable as an antenna.

    11. Re:Antenna by JBMcB · · Score: 2

      Am I the only one old enough to remember car radios and the whip antennas they had, which provided AM coverage?

      The whip antennas were for FM coverage. Inside the head unit of the car radio is one of those bar-type AM radio antennas. I'm 100% sure because I used to work for a company that did TA/QA testing for car stereo systems.

      The "magic" is that the impedance is very high with such a short antenna, so the radio has to be designed to deal with that.

      Impedance doesn't matter. The length of the antenna needs to be an evenly divisible fraction of the wavelength of the middle of the band you wish to receive for optimal reception. For FM the shortest you can get away with is a few feet, which is the length of a whip antenna, or the wire for a pair of headphones. For AM it's several hundred feet.

      See here:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    12. Re: Antenna by DewDude · · Score: 1

      They were pocket sized...but they were not portable. You still needed to connect to a proper antenna and earth ground. A radio signal on its own did not provide any real current or voltage.

    13. Re: antenna by DewDude · · Score: 1

      The radio industry has done a fantastic job of commiting suicide. It's not local anymore. It usually contains nothing of relevance to the market. Its just an over commercialized wasteland where ads outnumber the actual minutes you listen to music...which doesn't matter because its the same 25 songs all day every week.

      Instead the reason for the push is to make sure you can get emergency alerta when you have no cell coverage. And...of course..the new FCC keeps adding alert systems for every little thing. Like the new one wants to alert people whenever there is "a threat to law enforcement". The regs are so thin someone with a gin could be considered a threat...triggering an alert 40 or 50 times a day locking you out of your phone the same way EAS locks you out of your TV.

      Its the FCC pandering to the failing radio industry. Break the internet...force people to listen to radio. Make vague alert system...control flow of information by making everything an interrupting alert.

    14. Re: antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you get outside of the major cities local radio is actually very relevant. As for the rest of your post, well, maybe you need to apply more tinfoil.

    15. Re:Antenna by Jodka · · Score: 1

      You can't fit a decent FM radio antenna inside a phone...

      Yes you can.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    16. Re:Antenna by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The whip antennas were for FM coverage. Inside the head unit of the car radio is one of those bar-type AM radio antennas. I'm 100% sure

      I'm 100% sure you are 100% wrong, because like I said I have an old car radio that relied on one of those whip antennas. It's an AM ONLY RADIO. Gee, it had a whip to do FM? Really?

      And just to drive the nail further into your coffin -- an AM ferrite bar antenna INSIDE A METAL CAR isn't going to pick up jack shit. A car makes a pretty good Faraday cage for AM BC signals, and the chassis of the radio along with the dash helps kill anything that does get through.

      Impedance doesn't matter.

      You really don' t know what you're talking about. You should study up on what happens to RF signals when they attempt to cross an impedance mismatch. Even DC. I've seen a very interesting explanation of DC signals on open and shorted wires that fit with reflections from discontinuities.

      For AM it's several hundred feet.

      Bullshit. I've got three feet of antenna here in the office and it works just fine. That's because the radio was designed to work with that size antenna and the impedance it presents.

    17. Re: Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By any chance have you done potato batteries? The only question is how it is relevant to smartphones... unless you build all the circuit from potatos.

    18. Re: Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had ELECTRONIC WRIST WATCH with AM 30 years ago. It was pretty AWESOME and PORTABLE. I used it in train and bus. When I had it, I wondered, when I will have PORTABLE TV.

  3. One Word: by no-body · · Score: 2

    Super!

    (Apart from that, why the FUCK was that locked in the first place and who was benefiting from that an/or who paid them to have it off ????)

    1. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goodie they are not tweaking the firmware qcom gave them and less than 1 cent of wire to use what is already there.

    2. Re:One Word: by olsmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the carriers wanted people listening to streaming services using their data plans.

    3. Re:One Word: by no-body · · Score: 1

      OK, that may be the reason, but the manufacturer of a cell is not really related to the service suppliers or - we use your phones to con our customer to buy them when you turn off the FM chip..

      Who wins there and who looses. Seems the 2. part is getting more and more overhand and the abuse increases.

      Really gotta put a stop on this, the only goal and focus here is $$'s, other values are gone out the window...

    4. Re: One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are. A carrier could easily refuse to subsidize (or even lockout in ultra extreme cases) a minor cell phone vendor (anyone who is not Apple or Samsung) from their network. Carriers have most cell phone manufacturers by the balls. Apple is probably the only exception, and MAYBE Samsung.

    5. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm shocked that this is news. I've had working FM reception on my cellphones for the past five years. One of those was a low-end Lumia (running, yes, Windows Phone), another was a cheap Oppo (Chinese-made, low-end Android).

      Why the FUCK is a supposedly-premium brand like Samsung lagging behind brands that are so cut-rate, they hardly even qualify as competitors?

    6. Re:One Word: by bobbied · · Score: 0

      Super!

      (Apart from that, why the (blank) was that locked in the first place and who was benefiting from that an/or who paid them to have it off ????)

      You where the one to benefit. Do you have any idea how much space you need for an FM antenna? Without a reasonable sized antenna you won't pick up squat unless the transmitter is literally in the next block. You got a smaller, lighter cell phone with a bigger battery and never had an issue trying to keep your favorite FM station coming in clearly...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:One Word: by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Oh, I couldn't guess oh, wait:

      Slacker Radio
      RadioTunes
      Jango
      AccuRadio
      Others.

      Top 25 Free Internet Radio Sites to Stream Music at Ease

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    8. Re:One Word: by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      most of the smaller devices that have a FM tuner (like a Sandisk Clip) use the headphones as an antenna. I'm not sure if that's something that's possible with a micro USB/USB C connection

    9. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably saved a penny by not including the resistor to link the chip's FM antenna pin to an external antenna. Things like this do happen. It's a game between popularity, consumer demand, and safety requirements.

    10. Re:One Word: by fizzer06 · · Score: 2

      I went from a Samsung S4 to an LG G6 and it has a working FM radio as long as the headphones are plugged in. LG isn't Apple by any stretch, but it's still pretty big.

    11. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, shut the fuck up. You keep posting this like you have some super accurate insight that no one else has. I've been living in China since 2009. ALL the Android phones sold in China, from crap to flagship, support FM radio out of the box. The headphones are the antenna. Works fantastic. You don't know what you're talking about.

    12. Re:One Word: by kriston · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The real reason is less interesting. The FM radio needs a reasonably long antenna to work, so wired headphones are required. Market research supposedly showed that nobody wanted to have an FM radio in their mobile phone.

      Pretty much every mobile phone sold since the late 1990s has had a fully implemented, but disabled, FM radio chipset but no provisions for an antenna and no way to turn it on.

      --

      Kriston

    13. Re:One Word: by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if they unlock it wtf for do you need an app for it though? can't they have a tuner app built in..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re: One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so the app co. can use your location, other identifying info and what station you're listening to more effectively sell you.
      If the app works with your phone in Airplane mode and without a Wifi connection, you know, like a real FM radio, maybe not so bad now.

    15. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words. Upcoming models. What about the older models?

    16. Re: One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was an os update about a year ago on Verizon that opened up the radio and installed the radio app for almost all samsung phones.

    17. Re:One Word: by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      He's just astroturfing for them. If consumers in the US realized that everyone in other countries had native FM radio support in their cellphones all along and why that was the case, there would be massive outrage.

    18. Re:One Word: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seems to have been a US thing. A lot of phones released in Europe and the US differed in the mobile chipset (bands, GSM/CDMA) and that the FM radio was available here.

      More recently phones have had world band chipsets so Europe gets disabled FM as well.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:One Word: by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      What about HD Radio? Does HD radio require the same kind of antenna as FM radio? I'd like to see HD radio on cell phones instead of vanilla FM, because there are a lot more station choices. I've got an old MP3 player that has HD radio and it gets all the local FM stations and a lot more. Great quality, too.

      I'm not sure if there's HD in the rural areas, though. I live in what would be a rural area, except we've got tens of thousands of students here nine months of the year, so there's very good broadcast infrastructure for what is really a small, Pacific Coast town that's spread out with population sprinkled around mountains and the ocean.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem with digital radio is that there's a number of different systems in different countries.
      HD radio is actually called NRSC-5
      The UK uses DAB
      Continental Europe uses DAB+ (and current receivers aren't backward compatible with DAB)
      Japan uses ISDB-TSB
      South Korea uses T-DMB...

      Some of these broadcast in frequency ranges around the normal FM bands, some within them. They all require an aerial of similar size to FM radio, and many are more sensitive to travelling at speed than FM is.

      It'll be difficult to make a receiver that works worldwide.

    21. Re:One Word: by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      What about HD Radio? Does HD radio require the same kind of antenna as FM radio? I'd like to see HD radio on cell phones instead of vanilla FM, because there are a lot more station choices. I've got an old MP3 player that has HD radio and it gets all the local FM stations and a lot more. Great quality, too.

      HD Radio requires the same antenna, it uses the same bands after all. But the problem is HD radio (it doesn't stand for "high definition", it stands for "hybrid digital" and refers to the fact that the station is sending both an analog and digital signal.).

      The problem with HD radio is it requires a proprietary chip as it's using a proprietary codec (and is basically owned by a single company), which is why people are starting to shed HD radio reception to save on costs.

      And audio quality used to be good - you get around 96kbps out of it, but many HD radio stations now are really using it as a way to serve up more ads by stacking 2-3 channels on that 96kbps stream.

      As for general FM radio, I don't care. Most of the FM band is Clear Channel crap, which is generally why most people don't care for it. But adding an AM radio to the mix (where there are sports and news and other generally interesting things) to a cellphone is nigh-impossible because of all the interference. And because AM radio uses ferrite rods (headphone cords are too short) you can even use them with wireless headphones.

    22. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What other countries?

      Over here our politicians are discussing the next step: Closing down the FM transmitters. I believe Norway already did close down theirs (much to the detriment of drivers whose car radios now no longer warns them about congestion and traffic accidents).

    23. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Europe, and my phone came with a combined headphone / FM antenna, taking up about a quarter of the box the phone came in. Never even unwrapped the thing.

      And now our politicians are discussing when to close down the FM transmitters.

    24. Re: One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much every multimedia phone had a working FM radio, as well as many if not most smartphones.

    25. Re: One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is HD radio? Is it an advanced FM radio feature? Never heard of it before.

    26. Re: One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a good start:
      LG's Stylus 2 is the first phone to support DAB+ radio (Mar 2016)
      https://www.engadget.com/2016/03/14/lg-stylus-2-dab-plus-radio/

    27. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Apple's, because they make their own chips and don't waste silicon on a feature they don't want. http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/09/fcc-asks-apple-to-activate-iphones-secret-fm-radio-chip.html

    28. Re:One Word: by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I think the carriers wanted people listening to streaming services using their data plans.

      That's what I do. Generally, the sound quality is much better than FM, especially when walking between buildings.

    29. Re:One Word: by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      The real reason is less interesting. The FM radio needs a reasonably long antenna to work, so wired headphones are required. Market research supposedly showed that nobody wanted to have an FM radio in their mobile phone.

      Pretty much every mobile phone sold since the late 1990s has had a fully implemented, but disabled, FM radio chipset but no provisions for an antenna and no way to turn it on.

      Huh? Every smart phone I've had, starting with the 2012 Google Galaxy Nexus, has had a working FM radio.

    30. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Europe, and I have never owned or heard about a phone without usable FM.

    31. Re:One Word: by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The real real reason was that many years ago when they were designing the multiband radios they didn't know what features the future would want and they had existing IP blocks for the FM radio. And it only takes a tiny bit of space on the chip. So the chips were designed with the feature.

      But these chips were mostly designed years before the cell phones using them finally made it to the masses, and the carriers didn't care about that feature, they never asked for it, it was just an extra thing the chip could do. Like maybe your computer has two different video connectors, and one of them you don't use.

      Then later on some models users figured out how to activate the feature. People blather about the antenna but FM doesn't need much and the phones do have an antenna; which is already conveniently connected to the radio IC. ;) You don't need a good FM antenna in most cases, unless you're in a really remote location.

    32. Re:One Word: by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The problem with HD radio is it requires a proprietary chip as it's using a proprietary codec (

      Ah, that's definitely a problem. I had no idea.

      As for general FM radio, I don't care. Most of the FM band is Clear Channel crap, which is generally why most people don't care for it.

      I've been lucky enough to have lived either in big cities or college towns that have good FM stations outside the mainstream. But yeah, you get into rural America and you're limited to three types of FM stations: Country, Western, or Right-wing talk.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    33. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real reason is less interesting. The FM radio needs a reasonably long antenna to work, so wired headphones are required. Market research supposedly showed that nobody wanted to have an FM radio in their mobile phone.

      Pretty much every mobile phone sold since the late 1990s has had a fully implemented, but disabled, FM radio chipset but no provisions for an antenna and no way to turn it on.

      Huh? Every smart phone I've had, starting with the 2012 Google Galaxy Nexus, has had a working FM radio.

      Are you in the US? Because only really old or really cheap phones had the FM tuner functional.

      And as far as I know, pretty much nobody gave a shit.

    34. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just astroturfing for them. If consumers in the US realized that everyone in other countries had native FM radio support in their cellphones all along and why that was the case, there would be massive outrage.

      I doubt it. Nobody seems to give a crap about FM capability on their cell phone. I quit listening to FM 18 years ago due to the overwhelming commercial load and lack of quality programming. With the ability to store 1000s of songs and stream anything you want nowadays, what's the point of having FM on your phone?

      I guess a few people might care, but my guess is most people couldn't care less about having FM on their cell phone. I know I don't.

    35. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait I thought carriers were throttling streaming services, which is why we "needed" net neutrality.

    36. Re:One Word: by kriston · · Score: 1

      It's almost like there is a lot more variety in the mobile phone market than you realize.

      --

      Kriston

    37. Re:One Word: by kriston · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. The iPhone 6 and earlier used a WiFi/BlueTooth chipset that featured an FM radio. In the iPhone 6, at least, it's the Cypress CYW4339.

      --

      Kriston

    38. Re:One Word: by kriston · · Score: 1

      He's either lying or is misinformed. All of the WiFi/BlueTooth chipsets in all iPhones have the FM feature. The part in the iPhone 7 and 8 are made by Murata and feature Cypress chipsets can't be had without FM on them.

      --

      Kriston

    39. Re:One Word: by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Uh, pot kettle? :)

      I wasn't choosing them for FM radios, but they had them. Working.

      Merely observing that I guess I got the three exceptions to "pretty much every mobile phone sold since the late 1990s".

    40. Re:One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many European countries are phasing out FM analogue radio broadcasts.

  4. Wait a minute by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    Didn't Norway just do away with FM radio. I keep seeing articles about how FM is dying and Digital is taking over. Great timing for doing this.

    1. Re: Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore Norway.
      Uncle Joel has 5,000 nukes headed their way.

    2. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An add on FM dongle could transmit data and voice, although bluetooth already does that.
      I guess they figured like real letters and live TV, nobody really listens to the radio these days.
      In theory FM should have a greater reach, but I think those days are gone and going with DAB+.I prefer software receivers that can pick up airport information so delays and vomit affected seats can be avoided.

    3. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thankfully most countries are ignoring Norway's "courageous" decision in the same way that most countries ignored the phasing out of AM - a fact for which, as a collector and restorer of vintage radios, I am eternally grateful.

    4. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FM is going no where here in Canada, nor is it in most other countries.

    5. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell phone manufacturers: Hey... nobody is even using that. Let's trim it from the list of features we were supporting.

      FCC leaders: Hey... we were using that as some sort of post-apocalyptic backup plan...

      Cell phone manufacturers: Uhm......

    6. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Officially yes but now is the kingdom of pirate FM stations... better to call then "viking FM stations".

    7. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! A single use case where it doesn't work! Better scrap the entire idea!

    8. Re: Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analog FM radio is on the way out. The spectrum is being reused to broadcast digital audio (DAB). Still a broadcast radio signal.

    9. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Single case? Pretty much every country is planning to abolish FM in the coming years.

    10. Re: Wait a minute by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 0

      DAB is on a different frequency band.
      The future use of the FM spectrum (when FM is totally closed down, which is a few years away still) has not been decided.

    11. Re:Wait a minute by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      FM is gone for the nationwide channels. Local channels will be on FM a few years more.

  5. Yeah, well OK by willoughby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's nice but if the carriers disable it (I'm looking at you, Verizon) what's the point?

    1. Re:Yeah, well OK by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      That's nice but if the carriers disable it (I'm looking at you, Verizon) what's the point?

      Get unlocked, unsubsidized phone. You'll get faster update as well

    2. Re:Yeah, well OK by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      A common question posed to Verizon subscribers.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re:Yeah, well OK by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      You could try going for a real carrier rather than a toy cellphone company whose service sounds like it's delivered through a rubber hose, and that only sells locked down toy cellphones.

      Try at&t or T-Mobile. They sell the real thing.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Yeah, well OK by RevRagnarok · · Score: 1

      My Galaxy S7 works with NextRadio. It's rooted, but I have the standard VZW-provided OS still loaded on it.

      --
      I should put something clever here. Maybe someday.
    5. Re:Yeah, well OK by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Sprint too. My Sprint LG V20 has FM unlocked. Not rooted or modified in any way, it came with FM out of the box.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    6. Re:Yeah, well OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Galaxy S8 with Verizon firmware has the FM Radio unlocked. No rooting required.

    7. Re:Yeah, well OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No update is still no update, no matter how fast it is.

  6. Radio? Pfffft! Bwahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear they’ll also be packing in a buggy whip for your carriage, too.

    1. Re:Radio? Pfffft! Bwahaha! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Yep! There it is, right beside the plug in headphones they need as an antenna, but have no way to actually plug in...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  7. Great! by AVryhof · · Score: 1

    I want a feature where I can enter my callsign, and use it on HAM bands! Sure, I can use Hamsphere, or one of my handhelds, but if I have an FM chip, I want to actually use it.

    1. Re:Great! by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

      Of course the bandwidth filters between broadcast FM and ham are completely different (100kHz broadcast vs. 12500 Hzfor NBFM ham/public service voice).

    2. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difficulty would be the antenna mostly. The rest is basically a software defined radio, but you still need an RF front-end and antenna that can cope with whatever band you're trying to use.

    3. Re:Great! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Nice, but unless you can attach some kind of reasonable antenna for transmitting what's the point? You will have to be standing directly on top of the repeater to get the squelch to open.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Great! by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The FM radio chip will have a hard time getting to 2m, if it could even do narrowband. You're thinking of maybe this?

    5. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I can think of one difficulty even before being able to say: "Everything is a software defined radio already"

      Closed source => People care (hardware hackers) but there's nothing you can do.

      Open source => People care (hardware hackers) and make a difference when they have the time.

    6. Re:Great! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      OK, but I wonder where you're going to put that antenna...

  8. Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just tried it on my Samsung Galaxy S5, and it works, but it appears to be using WiFi. How do I know if it's using the FM chip?

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    1. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn off your fucking WiFi? Jesus H Christ.

    2. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      Perhaps turn off the phone's wifi and data?

    3. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Turn off your fucking WiFi? Jesus H Christ.

      Yes, of course I tried that already! And the signal stopped. Then I tried connecting without WiFi on, and it worked. My network icon doesn't show activity, but still I wonder. Going to airplane mode disables the app, so that test is out.

      There's no obvious indicator in the app that shows an FM chip was found. I suppose I could try watching my data usage after a few minutes of listening, to see whether my provider is streaming the signal to me.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

      Next Radio will use either if memory serves. You have to set it up correctly. Google is your friend on that.

    5. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

      Go out to the boonies outside of wifi range.

    6. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Informative

      It turns out that the Samsung Galaxy S5's FM chip is supported by NextRadio -- provided your mobile provider hasn't disabled it. Mine has (Verizon.)

      There's more information on supported devices and networks here.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    7. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you aren't using wired headphones (which act as an FM antenna), then you are definitely using wifi. Some Galaxy S5s are FM enabled and others aren't. I'd like to use Nextradio, but I connect via AT&T which disables the FM radio.

      You can see which phones have FM radio enabled here: http://nextradioapp.com/suppor...

    8. Re: Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just tried it on my Samsung Galaxy S5, and it works, but it appears to be using WiFi. How do I know if it's using the FM chip?

      The WiFi chip used in that phone is an SoC with many different functions, including an FM demodulator tucked in the corner of the silicon.

      You need WiFi enabled only in the sense that the WiFi chip needs to be powered up. Your not using WiFi, but the dedicated FM demodulator.

    9. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with NextRadio. It works even if you don't HAVE an FM chip. This is very misleading, and may cause users to experience increased data usage and overage charges.

    10. Re:Does NextRadio use the FM chip, or Wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the NextRadio app menu has a "Basic Tuner" entry, then it can use your FM chip. Both my Note 4 and Note 8 on Sprint had/have FM enabled.

  9. You could have AM radio. by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Informative

    My Galaxy S7's FM radio has worked with NextRadio (FM broadcast band) for quite some time now. AM is possible, if they are so inclined to make that happen. Because...

    Also interesting is that for an FM radio to be practical, you need an antenna, and so far, that's been the wire to the earbuds / headphones, which is decently longish. So very likely implicit in this "there will be FM radio" lies an "there will be an audio jack", and also, "if we want AM radio, we can do it." Ever since low power software defined radio has been possible, this stuff can be done. Particularly in a high-power availability device like a cellphone. It can be done the old way, too, but not nearly as well.

    I suspect the whole "there will be FM" thing is known somewhat gleefully in the hallowed corporate halls at Samsung as "taking advantage of Apple's... courage."

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re: You could have AM radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks sammy, you can pretty much bet I'll be getting another galaxy phone. Fm = win.

    2. Re:You could have AM radio. by bobbied · · Score: 4, Informative

      Me thinks you severely underestimate the size of the required antennas. FM at about 100Mz has a wave length of about 3 meters and AM frequencies are between 400 and 500 meters. FM is doable in a cell phone's size but it's going to be a tight fit. AM is going to get pretty big and heavy pretty quick and I doubt that even a ferrite core antenna will make it in your average cell phone successfully. If you don't have some minimum fraction of a wavelength in your antenna, your receiver will pick up almost nothing so I'd expect that nifty AM receiver to struggle even if you have a 50KW station a mile away.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:You could have AM radio. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You can run the antenna up the earbud cord. I've seen that done, anyway.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:You could have AM radio. by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      As bobbied has already said, a 1/4 wavelength antenna length for FM is a bit less than a metre. A bit shorter than the average length of headphone cords. The shield of the headphone jack is connected via a low-pass filter so it can be used as an FM antenna.

      Trying to get a usable signal for a 525kHz carrier is going to be quite hard with a headphone lead sized antenna. It's a 570 metre wavelength. The top of the AM band isn't too much better at 180m. That's why portable AM radios use ferrite rod antennas.

    5. Re:You could have AM radio. by bobbied · · Score: 4, Informative

      For FM, sure, for AM? Not so much given the very long wavelength. But you also have to have a headphone jack, something not as common as it once was.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re:You could have AM radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Galaxy S7's FM radio has worked with NextRadio (FM broadcast band) for quite some time now. AM is possible, if they are so inclined to make that happen. Because...

      Also interesting is that for an FM radio to be practical, you need an antenna, and so far, that's been the wire to the earbuds / headphones, which is decently longish. So very likely implicit in this "there will be FM radio" lies an "there will be an audio jack", and also, "if we want AM radio, we can do it." Ever since low power software defined radio has been possible, this stuff can be done. Particularly in a high-power availability device like a cellphone. It can be done the old way, too, but not nearly as well.

      I suspect the whole "there will be FM" thing is known somewhat gleefully in the hallowed corporate halls at Samsung as "taking advantage of Apple's... courage."

      Nice Topic

    7. Re:You could have AM radio. by fyngyrz · · Score: 0

      Me thinks you severely underestimate the size of the required antennas.

      No. I just understand that local AM radio is practical with a short wire like an earbud connection. It won't act like any kind of a DX machine, certainly, but you'll hear locals. I can pick up our local (10 KW) AM station very well by sticking a screwdriver into the PL-259 on my SDR. There are several ways to push a short wire into low frequency resonance, and not all of them require a large actual inductance. Gyrators, for instance are practical at AM BCB frequencies; I've done quite a bit of experimenting with them. The ability to have an ultra high-impedance load that still is quiet and provides significant gain allows antenna impedances that are not typically low to still perform well enough for many use cases. Doesn't hurt to have sensitivities down into fractions of a microvolt, either - you don't need a lot of signal, particularly at AM BCB.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    8. Re: You could have AM radio. by DewDude · · Score: 1

      I hold my current phone next to an AM radio and the results say without a lot kf shielding and other work....it won't work well.

    9. Re:You could have AM radio. by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      If you really must have bands other than FM, you could try connecting a Realtek Software-Defined Radio (SDR) to the USB port using USB On-The-Go. You would have to provide your own antenna, and I don't know if it provides transmit capabilities...

    10. Re:You could have AM radio. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      You miss my point I guess.. AM's wave length is soooo long that the sizes of the necessary wire to collect enough of it for your receiver to actually receive it at a reasonable signal to noise ratio is pretty big. Sure, if you have a 50K Watt station next door, the signal will be great for that station, but you are not going to get the same kind of reception of say the radio in your car.

      I dare to say you won't be happy with the ability of an AM receive function in a cell phone. It just won't be sensitive enough.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:You could have AM radio. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You miss my point I guess.. AM's wave length is soooo long that the sizes of the necessary wire to collect enough of it for your receiver to actually receive it at a reasonable signal to noise ratio is pretty big.

      Yeah, really big. Like three feet. Like the wire on the radio in my office, or the old whips on cars.

      but you are not going to get the same kind of reception of say the radio in your car.

      You mean the car radio which has, at best, a three foot whip, and newer models have small wire things in one of the windows?

    12. Re:You could have AM radio. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      There are several ways to push a short wire into low frequency resonance,

      Antennas don't need to be resonant to receive a signal. They work better when they are, but they can still work without.

      The ability to have an ultra high-impedance load that still is quiet and provides significant gain allows antenna impedances that are not typically low to still perform well enough for many use cases.

      If that is what you meant by "push[ing] a short wire into ... resonance", well, that's not what the high impedance input stage is doing. The antenna is still not resonant.

    13. Re:You could have AM radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1990s I had a wrist watch, that had AM radio. FM was out of question, because of poor strenght and wavelenght was shorter, so probably needed additional work to support it. You don't need to use LARGE ferrite core antenna for AM radio - that is not how things work. I am not an electronics expert, but I suppose miniature ferrite core might work pretty well and ferrite is not the only thing, that could be used to receive AM radiowaves.

  10. FM ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... broadcasting is easy peasy for a lot of techs like ham radio operators and Radio Shack project dweebs.

    This could be the answer to mesh networking.

    That will be the "next radio" step.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re: FM ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We wish, but no. Next Radio is just trying to push their app.

    2. Re: FM ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      We don't need no steenkin' app from Next Radio.

      It will all be underground and illegal.

      This is how terrorists will communicate.

      I'm serious, kinda, except I didn't include white nationalists and sovereign citizens and stuff.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  11. Cigar? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    I want a feature where I can enter my callsign, and use it on HAM bands!

    Pretty close...

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Cigar? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0

      A cellphone already is a two-way radio. Does the author of that link not know how a cellphone works?

    2. Re:Cigar? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      The author of the link knows a fair bit about radio, including cellphone radios, being also the author of non-trivial SDR software and a long-term RF engineer.

      The author of the linked article, OTOH, knew, and reported, that the device in question made available three bands that the radio in the cellphone is (a) not designed to operate on and (b) not permitted to operate upon.

      In light of those facts, you might want to temper your remarks. Or not. Free-ish country and all that.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  12. Headphone jack on s9 confirmed! by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

    At least so far, using headphone jack / headphones for the antenna for FM is the only way. I rag on Samsung for alot of things, but this is really cool and makes me want their smartphone (having batteries that resist degradation s8 onward and SamsungPay working at registers that don't take normal wireless payments are two others).

    1. Re:Headphone jack on s9 confirmed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung Pay is useless until implemented on a Google phone.

      I have an S8, but continue to be frustrated at the rate of timely security updates.

      My next phone will be a Google phone, even if Samsung has a dozen cool new features.

    2. Re:Headphone jack on s9 confirmed! by Geeky · · Score: 1

      I thought that. I bought a Pixel 2. I wish I hadn't. There are so many nice little touches I miss from the Samsung, and the hardware is nowhere near as good. I'm hoping that the S9 will support Project Treble and so make it more likely that it'll get timely updates.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  13. Frequency Modulation by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

    You asked.... AM is amplitude modulation.

    1. Re:Frequency Modulation by mark-t · · Score: 0

      How *DARE* you interject real science into this?!?!

    2. Re:Frequency Modulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the -t in your username short for Traitor Trump?

    3. Re:Frequency Modulation by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I guess that's the problem with trying to say something online that sounds so colossally stupid that you'd never think someone would take you seriously..... some people do.

  14. a quick look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at the comments on nextradio's app install says it still uses data for streaming radio.

    is it really using the chip? and why the hell do you need a third party app for an fm radio?

    1. Re:a quick look by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Just tried it on my phone and it does appear to be using the chip. Either that or they're invested in the radio illusion to the point that they model static and IMD to give you that authentic listening experience.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  15. I dont want FM I want HD Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come On tech folks. I kept my Zune HD *JUST* to listen to HD Radio. WTF, make it so. Seesh.

  16. Antenna by JBMcB · · Score: 2

    You can't fit a decent FM radio antenna inside a phone, especially if the case is metal. Walkman-type radios used the earphone wire as an antenna, which is probably what the phones are going to have to do. This means you'll have to have wired earbuds for the radio to work.

    The smallest workable AM antenna is a ~5 inch bar of iron with a super thin wire wound around it hundreds of times. You're *never* going to fit that into a modern cell phone.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  17. A bit late by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Norway has already abandoned FM completely, the rest of Europe not far behind.

    1. Re:A bit late by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It's a bit like saying that because Apple abandoned headphone jacks that the rest of the mobile phone industry will follow suit.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:A bit late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many have followed Apple’s suit.

    3. Re:A bit late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lower-end phones probably won't, because they're competing for people who want the cheapest solution.

      So we'll get the usual fucked-up situation where you pay more for the privilege of paying more (for either Bluetooth earbuds or an overpriced adapter that prevents you from listening and charging at the same time).

    4. Re:A bit late by zdzichu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually Norway was first, but there are dates set to sunset analog radio in most countries. IIRC around 2024 there would be no FM transmissions in Europe.
      Surprisingly, analog radio sunset is harder than move from analog to digital TV. TV switchover was much quicker, it was mostly done few years ago. But radio 1) is much easier and reliable to use in emergencies; 2) is used in many cars, and a car have about 15 years lifetime.

      --
      :wq
    5. Re:A bit late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is like saying that Europe is going to close down analogue TV (already happened). Same people pulling the strings, same people going to get even richer selling replacements, same people paying our politicians to do something about it.

    6. Re:A bit late by Misagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are generalising. Introduction of DAB radio is not the same thing as choosing to abandon FM radio. Most of Eastern and Central Europe don't have any DAB broadcasts at all and most of the others are only doing trials.
      Sweden has decided not to discontinue FM radio broadcasts for the time being after strong objections from the Ministry of Defence (emergency broadcasts) and because of lack of customer demand for DAB radio.

      People tend to instead replace their FM radios with personalised streaming services on their cell phones, for which there is also more commercial interest.

      DAB does not offer any tangible benefits over mobile streaming and FM. In good conditions, DAB could provide either better audio quality or more channels than FM, but not both.
      In bad conditions, weak reception of emergency broadcasts over FM can still be intelligible where as the same over DAB would just cut off.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    7. Re:A bit late by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      Not completely. Local radio stations will still be on FM for a few years more.

    8. Re:A bit late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      norway is also not representative of most any other place ... so who the fuck cares what a bunch of inbred vikings do on their tiny island?

    9. Re:A bit late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a bunch of inbred vikings do on their tiny island?

      That was a racist conflation of Norway and Iceland. Norway is a peninsula, and Iceland is an island. btw, both are in Europe, but neither is a member of the European Union.

  18. Encroachment ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... via Simple Data.

    Eavesdropping on what station(s) you prefer, what genre music you like, you know ... just like apps do now and stuff.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  19. Will it also come with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a valve operated radiogram and a built in stage coach too.

    WTF do I need FM for?

    1. Re:Will it also come with.. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      WTF do I need FM for?

      Disaster situations where the cellphone service is down and/or saturated.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:Will it also come with.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF do I need FM for?

      Disaster situations where the cellphone service is down and/or saturated.

      That would be a disaster.
      Thank God we'll be able to listen to shitty top 40 stations and the generic morning jackasses so we can suffer an even more painful death from whatever calamity befell us.

  20. Lighting/USB Antenna? by dmurphycan · · Score: 1

    There is lots of talk about headphones used as FM antennas which I remember well. As it is not really an option for Apple and some other phones, could a charging cable be used in a similar way as the headphone cable? I realise this would require phone hardware designed this way.

  21. You mean like every Nokia and cheap phone ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since th first smart phones, and often even before?

    I didn't even think any phone came without it in the last 15 years. So this is rather weird news from another planet for me ...

  22. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A headphone jack and FM radio. Samsung is sooo cool.

  23. Well, an FM antenna doesn't fit either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia didn't care.
    They just invented a shorter FM antenna.

    But year, fuck all that. Rather give me, finally, a good mobile Internet connection everywhere! On self-stabilizing solar-poweded mini balloons, if necessary! And none of those frequencies that donâ(TM)t pass through buildings either!

    Only quick enough to run Vorbis or Opus streams without interruption, websites and instant messengers at 300km/h in a train. I donâ(TM)t need streaming video, let alone 100Mbit. Which will be split between users anyway.

    1. Re:Well, an FM antenna doesn't fit either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather give me, finally, a good mobile Internet connection everywhere!

      Give Musk a few more years and he'll put 4000 satellites into LEO and provide exactly that.

  24. It's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How my Windows phone has a working radio in it yet next to no android phones do.

  25. Full Pockets by dohzer · · Score: 2

    This would be really handy. If I want to listen to the radio commentary at my local sporting games, the streaming services are 30 - 60 seconds delayed.
    They force non-commercial broadcasters to route through their app if they want to stream, but delay it so you can't stream it "live" and commercial-free over the top of the TV broadcast.

    But the AM/FM broadcasts are instantaneous, so I always have a pocket AM/FM radio with me at the game.
    Carrying one less thing would suit me fine.

  26. The HAM in me is wondering... by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

    ...which frequencies? Presumably everything from 88MHz-108MHz, but maybe also NOAA weather broadcasts? (~160MHz)

  27. How could you forget ShoutCast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's Radionomy now,

    but it still get a mention, just out of respect.
    It brought each and everyone of us through the 00s.

    1. Re:How could you forget ShoutCast? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to the 1800s.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  28. The cheap Chinese all do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all Nokia I did, right when they invented the smartphone. Before the iPhone even existed, let alone had 3G and a camera ... or a fucking file manager, for fuck's sake. ^^

  29. My Nokia and Sony phones have them built in? by vsigma · · Score: 1

    All of the Nokia devices that I've ever owned, along with and including the Sony Xperia z5 compact that I'm writing this reply on has a built in fm radio and tuner that uses the headphone wires as an antenna?! This seems so weird to be reading about this.. And no, none of them have ever used data to get information, because that's already embedded in the fm stream!! I just wish that hd-radio was available some how!!!

    1. Re:My Nokia and Sony phones have them built in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two Nokias I owned not only had FM reception, but also broadcast, which was somewhat useful for having music in vehicles without aux inputs or USB on the radio, especially in remote areas.

  30. What they aren't saying... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    is that they are turning on the analog FM for people just when countries are turning it off and switching to digital FM. /s

  31. Digital by markdavis · · Score: 1

    But the followup questions are:

    1) Analog, digital, or both?
    2) And if not also digital, why not?

  32. Re:You could have [dead] AM radio. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, you mean the dead technology I haven't used in years? Yes, years. I don't use a radio you say? Actually, all the time; it's just paired to my phone or my GPS system.

    Radio is dead; let it stay dead.

  35. iPhone case by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Will be interesting to see what Apple does. Will they follow in the footsteps of LG & Samsung? Apple has always been reluctant to include a radio in their iPhone that would compete with Apple Music and Store.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:iPhone case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the radio uses the headphone jack for the antenna, Apple would need to start selling bluetooth radio antennas...

      In which case buying a radio that can stream over bluetooth to the phone would probably be easier and cheaper.

  36. Nope. Chell phone towers broadcast too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disaster messages are usually broadcast. The tower can't oversaturate on them, and since they are higher prioritized (remember: real-time OSes make guarantees), normal traffic can't ever drown them.

    It would take a huge catastrophe for everything but FM to die.

  37. so much static... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Providing FM radio chip is a good thing. No one seems to complain the phone OS comes with a calculator and that rarely gets used either.

    Broadcast radio is a highly efficient distribution medium.

    It's localized, direct and not subject to delay or blocking (ok, interference, not same). Proven tech that works.

    In the event of a natural disaster, what's going to be faster: repair the entire telecom infrastructure (1000s or antennas) or repair a handful or radio broadcast antennas? Remember, each tower and telco Central Office needs power and connectivity too. Same for wi-fi.

    Norway stopped analog FM radio. But switched to DAB - Digital Audio Broadcasting. It's still broadcast over the air on the same FM frequencies, just more efficiently. But you need a compatible digital receiver. Do the FM chips support that? If not, I'm sure there will be multiple generations of chips before N.A. moves to DAB to incorporate it.

    Small problem regarding an antenna for new phones Is there a USB solution forthcoming? Another sol'n?

    You can't normally be tracked listening to a radio brodacst. The ads are planned and limited, so you don't need an adblocker. Malware free!

    Seems to have a lot of upside. Who knows, you might even discover some new music you'll like (new to you 'cos it's all 70s 80s 90s here but ...)!

    1. Re:so much static... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't normally be tracked listening to a radio brodacst. The ads are planned and limited, so you don't need an adblocker. Malware free!

      What country you from? In the US you can expect 25 minutes an hour of commercials. It's ridiculous and why I don't listen to FM anymore.

    2. Re:so much static... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a different AC.

      So, I'm in Estonia, which is a country of 1.29 million. The local public (national) broadcaster ERR has five channels, of which four are broadcast nationwide, and one just around the capital and the surrounding counties. There are no ads, it's all free of any direct costs, and it's all paid for by the taxpayer.

      28 other channels are privately-run. Of these, four or five are Christian, six are in Russian. Some are only regional. In the north of the country, I could sometimes pick up two Finnish channels. Across Estonia, there's music and great (and not-so-great) content available to all tastes, and I don't know of anyone who'd be complaining about radio.

      With the exception of Norway with only digital radio, I can imagine, that Finland and other EU/EEA countries have a similar radio landscape.

      Because of the large installed base of FM receivers, it would seem really pointless for a country -- as it seems pointless in my view -- to switch FM radio off in its entirety. While digital radio broadcasting has its advantages, then it would be better to implement it side-by-side with FM radio in order to counter planned obsolescence. The side-by-side method is transitional.

      Estonia's switch-over to digital tv in 2010 was a major thing. By then, most people had already transitioned away from Soviet-made SECAM sets to those made in the West because of a need to adopt the PAL standard, so anything with a SCART outlet was good for a digital box.

  38. How Is Going To Work? by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    I live in an area where FM stations are closing in droves. No one listens to Radio anymore, heck my kids have NEVER listened to radio, they have Bluetooth in their cars and play MP3 or Spotify from their phones. They have NEVER turned the radio on. We are down to about 3 FM stations and they are always saying on TV support us, support us, support us, we cannot pay the bills and will be off the air soon. So how is turning on FM going to work in areas where FM is fading FAST! Is NextRadio installing FM sites or taking over these stations that are closing. I have watched contractors take the towers down or sell them to the cell companies which strip them so there is no much to buy. So how is this going to work in rural areas, where I am sure FM is going away even faster???

    1. Re:How Is Going To Work? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Looking at tunein.com for instance, there are thousands and thousands of radios everywhere, and you can hear whatever style you like. So maybe rural areas have poor radio reception, but do radios and phone makers worry about rural areas? Maybe not.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  39. Re:Huh? My $150 Moto 4G has FM Unlocked by dargaud · · Score: 1

    I was thinking the same. I've had Samsung, LG, Wiko, Archos, HTC and other cell phones and all of them have had a working FM radio. I use it daily and find it is one of the required selling points.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  40. Just use the headphones cord as an antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (that is what my ancient Nokia does. The radio only works when you connect a headphone)

  41. This is so obvious. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    This is technology that basically has been around since the steam age. In terms of "feasible and mature" it's way off the carts compared to anything else. I remember building battery-less radio receivers as an 8 year old. Adding radio receivers to modern smartphones is trivial and I personally wouldn't mind if lawmakers made it mandatory for vendors to do this. For people in distress and desaster zones we can only hope that vendors come to some sort of gentleman's agreement to build radios in by default. That would be cool.

    My 2 eurocents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  42. But FM is being phased out by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    With FM being phased out, albeit very slowly, whouldn't they be better including DAB or long-wave AM (which is used for things like world service and reaches valleys, etc. that other broadcasts don't)?

    1. Re:But FM is being phased out by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 3, Informative

      Long-wave AM requires a long antenna to pull in a decent signal. It's a shame, but that's physics for ya.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  43. Nokia N900 has FM transmitter/receiver since 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it worked very well, but for receiver you need headphones. I know people that are using data (more $) to listen to FM radio, maybe this is the reason it was disabled in some phones.

  44. Re:Huh? My $150 Moto 4G has FM Unlocked by twosat · · Score: 1

    For less than 80 New Zealand dollars I can listen to FM radio on these two feature phones without using headphones as antennas. https://www.thewarehouse.co.nz... https://www.thewarehouse.co.nz...

  45. Interesting throwback. by Static · · Score: 1

    I think my last 5 phones have had FM receivers, but I don't use it because I don't like any of the stations here. I basically stopped listening to FM radio years ago when I had had enough of the narcissistic hosts. Plus I lost my taste in pop music.

    The music station I do listen to now is available on DAB, though. But that hasn't taken off as a smartphone trick yet. It doesn't help that DAB coverage is way worse than FM. Especially in things like building penetration or train tunnels (where it completely fails). And leave the big city and there's _no_ DAB.

    So I stream audio over data. Meh.

  46. This used to be a common feature in phones by DrXym · · Score: 1

    About 6 years ago, a lot of candy bar style phones had a built-in FM radio tuner. Normally you had to plug in a set of headphones to act as an antenna. And that begs the question how they intend to get adequate reception if they remove the earphone jack.

  47. Just like past ones? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Wait, what non-Apple phone produced within the past fifteen years doesn't come with an FM radio?

    Of course many need a headphone plugged in to act as an antenna but a few, such as the Alcatel Pop, don't.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Just like past ones? by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      You must be European... in USA the past 15 years were the years of phone locked to death with features removed. Of course the $2 WiFi/BT chip also support FM, but it was disabled so people had to pay data to stream music.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:Just like past ones? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      !USA != Europe

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  48. I am sure the consumers will be fascinated by this by guacamole · · Score: 1

    They actually took time to make an announcement? What a joke.

  49. content is still, FM content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got the app. It worked. Scanned the NYC dial, listened to ESPN talk radio. After listening to Mike and Mike talking about saban 11m per year , and grudens 10m / year, I remembered that it was the content that had me not listening to FM to begin with.

    - I've got a streaming service for music, and
    - talk radio is over ...

    So ubiquity for FM, when the content isnt there? Meh

  50. Re:Huh? My $150 Moto 4G has FM Unlocked by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    My Galaxy S2 had an FM chip and a free FM application built in, made by Samsung itself. My Moto G2 has FM too, my Zenfone2 too. What's the big deal? It's because people who buy $1000 phone will be happy to pay for data and stream music, while people who buy (unlocked) mid range phone, like me, sometimes does not have data plan so the FM is free to use, it's marketing?

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  51. Huh. This is a thing? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    My HTC M7 had an unlocked FM chip. So did the M8.

    I did know of some carriers that locked the chip in various phones. Oh yea, my Sensation 4G did also.

    But My U11 doesn't have an FM chip, which is in the middle of the list of reasons why I probably have purchased my last HTC phone. Time to move on to another manufacturer, with different annoyances, just to break an 8 year streak of HTC highs and lows.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  52. Then explain transistor radios. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the handheld ones in the 70s? No three meter antenna in them. They worked fine.

    1. Re:Then explain transistor radios. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The ones I had required extending the antenna in order to work halfway decently.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  53. Re:Nope. Cell phone towers broadcast too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cellphone reception is spotty even in normal situations and often doesn't work in shelters.

    FM radio has better reception (note I didn't say quality) and range. AM is actually best for disasters (Clear reception, penetrates everywhere, long range so only a few towers need be active), but FM is reasonable enough compromise for a backup system.

  54. Re:Huh? My $150 Moto 4G has FM Unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same thing with my wife's Moto G1, and my ASUS ZenFone 2. Why is this locked when I have this feature in low-end phones?

  55. No DAB on these otherwise digital devices? by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    Come on guys, add DAB. Or is that on the same slow track as IPv6?

    There's no demand? You mean there's no device to use the technology and create the market demand - or it costs crazy amounts, making nobody any money because nobody is buying it until patents expire.

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  56. What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool. Now can we get a regular TV tuner in them as well to watch broadcast HDTV when we're out and about?

    Cause, ya know... phones have these nice big screens and can do video now.

  57. Wow! App- er, I mean Samsung & LG are so ADVAN by SlideWRX · · Score: 1

    I thought it was Apples thing to introduce a 5 year old feature and take credit for advancing technology? I dunno, my old Lumias had an FM chip with app. Plug in the headphones and everything worked well. It raises the question, why was the chip locked? As for antennas, cars have moved to 'sharkfin' units mounted on the roof; those are pretty small and catch AM/FM. Seems an antenna can be in a physically small space and still be effective. Also, considering the multitude of wires a USB-C cable contains, could one/some of those be setup to act as an antenna? especially when just charging, not doing data transmission.

  58. Re:One Word: HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Per FCC regulations, HD Radio runs at a lower power than regular radio. Therefore, HD signals don't go as far as the main signal. Some radio stations have added HD to their signals, some have not. The antenna requirements are the same for both, though; that's not the problem.

    the issue for HD in cell phones is that the HD signal is a patented process/mechanism owned by Ibiquity. Therefore...every cell phone would have to pay the license fee... therefore it isn't gonna happen.
    (Source: I'm a radio station engineer)

  59. Re:Nokia N900 has FM transmitter/receiver since 20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many Nokia phones do like the N72 and even the first N-Gage in 2003.

    I even have an attachment that plays FM radio that plugs into the side of a Game Boy Color into the EXT port from the 90s. You plugged the headphones directly to it and worked as the antenna. It only had one button and that would seek forward to the next strong signal.

    The tech has been around for a long time.

  60. Re:You could have [dead] AM radio. by magarity · · Score: 1

    Video killed radio.

    No, US carriers killed radio.Calling Verizon to ask for their ROM to not block the FM chip in early Notes was met with "all you have to do is subscribe to our radio streaming service if you want radio!"

  61. Korea - TV by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

    When I was in Seoul a few years ago I was surprised to learn that almost all smartphones in Korea include an integrated TV tuner, complete with antenna.

    This wasn't packet data carried over their data plans - This was OTA broadcast-TV.

    You could see all these people commuting on the train watching broadcast TV - Even on flip-phones.

    Picture:

    http://modernseoul.files.wordp...

  62. Re:Huh? My $150 Moto 4G has FM Unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn how to spell, fuckwit.

  63. Yeah but the USA is decades behind so no worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean I still get FM and AM here in the old jalopy USA.

    Now if they would just level the hills around here so I can get a better signal we'd be all good!

  64. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I woke up the morning after the fires in Northern California not noticing I had no cell service, not receiving any SMS about the situation, no being able to receive email to alert me.

    It was just another quiet day, until I stepped outside. The red sky at 10am was the only indication I had.

    Either that or NK had gone ballistic :)

    1. Re:Thank you by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I woke up the morning after the fires in Northern California not noticing I had no cell service, not receiving any SMS about the situation, no being able to receive email to alert me.

      You're welcome. B-)

      Note that (probably a bit before that, when the cells were still up) the officials, regarding the Santa Rosa fire, decided to NOT activate the warning systems, fearing that "panic"ed citizens would clog the roads.

      One advantage of not depending on the official channels, by additionally having access to multiple private-industry radio outlets, is that you have more chances for the information to make it past some decision maker's filter and reach your ears.

      AM might be even more useful, given its typical programming. But FM has the advantage of being trivial to include in a cellphone's radio chip (so it was in the common chips). Add a couple traces to the board and a couple surface-mount components costing single-digit-pennies, to couple the earphone wire (and/or charger cable) to the chip's FM antenna input, and you make an FM radio reception function available to the phone's software, almost for free.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  65. Norweigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    said that they were very happy with this development.

  66. FUCK YES!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SDR on my rooted phone. That's awesomer than just about anything else I can think of at the moment. People, that means your phone can soon be a "walkie talkie" or scanner on all kinds of radio systems. Uniden will be out of business.

  67. Nokia 8310 in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first Nokia phone with a built-in FM radio is Nokia 8310, which was released back in 2001. That was 17 years ago.

    And so in 2017, when a natural distasters struck the U.S. and Puerto Rico, I learned, that FM radios in mobile phones in the U.S. were almost non-existent. I was like, 'Whaaa...'

  68. Exit FM is NOT essential... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people I know never listen to AM or FM. The entire country of Norway eliminated FM broadcasting. Other nations are following suit.