The hardest part is that in the movies everybody dies, unless they have transporter beams and gravity generators. And we don't have transporter beams or gravity generators.
So the hard part is the terrible anxiety of imagining the electrons surviving without a space suit.
The part that worries me isn't just that they can't seem to figure out where the edge of the solar system is, it is that the conditions there do not match predictions, and yet nobody thought, "maybe we should scale back our predictions about things more than 10 AUs away" or something.
If we can't predict Earth's radiation belts, and we can't predict the conditions at the edges of the solar system, why do we think we can accurately see 14 billion years away?
They pre-sell all their cars. They won't go bankrupt at all. LOL
If demand goes down 15%, they're still selling exactly the same number of cars. And making the exact same amount of money per car.
It is a premium car with nameplate value, but they haven't tried to explore the upper end of the tolerable price. Instead they're building up their manufacturing so they can output more, and keeping surplus demand. Everybody already knows they have surplus demand. It is a brilliant and well-funded growth strategy.
I guess you're right, just like, Santa votes on your cookies and if you want good presents you better leave out some good cookies. Just check in the morning, the cookies will be gone, but for a few crumbs, and indeed the firehose will have drained onto the page one way or the other.
It depends on the data. If the data purports to be serious, then it likely needs a serious look to know.
If it is a list of biased sources and he didn't put any disclaimer on it they were biased sources, then no, all you need to say is that it is crap.
I listed the reasons each data source is problematic, no attempt was made to impeach those claims! What he's saying is that he wants counter-citations. No, when your data is crap it is crap, the person identifying the problems in your data is not expected to provide alternate sources of data. You don't have to whip dicks out and measure; you just check if the data in question was in fact crap! Other people will wait and cite their own data when they're the ones making a claim.
A dog that sometimes stays upstairs from me for a few days at a time will start barking as soon as the caretakers car passes out of view of the window. The other dog that normally lives there even whines about every 5 minutes when the other one is barking. It just barks non-stop from the time they leave, to when they pull up in front of the house when they get back.
The more common technique that dogs can manage is to have a square of plastic fake grass inside, and train them to use that. Then you can take it outside and hose it down.
That's what it usually looks like when dogs are "box" trained.
They're like people who argue loudly by themselves in the subway; it's best to avoid interacting with them and quietly move away.
That's right, I'm practicing my presentation and if you interrupt me I might mistake you for that guy from accounting and push you in front of the train.;)
If you understood networks a little better, you'd understand that everything has a local name, and most VPNs have a non-internet-routable TLD. That is normal, expected, and predates the public internet.
It isn't "false" in any way as long as it is known to your DNS server, or otherwise provisioned for routing.
You might even find that machines not connected to a network often have a network address of localhost.localdomain.
For one thing it eliminates the need to explain to laypersons, which is most people, how to tell the difference. This reason alone justified it.
Wait, you're saying that because you believe there to be a bunch of ignorant people in the world, that means you should tell me what network technologies to use? Fuck that!
Slashdot Mirror
The hardest part is that in the movies everybody dies, unless they have transporter beams and gravity generators. And we don't have transporter beams or gravity generators.
So the hard part is the terrible anxiety of imagining the electrons surviving without a space suit.
The part that worries me isn't just that they can't seem to figure out where the edge of the solar system is, it is that the conditions there do not match predictions, and yet nobody thought, "maybe we should scale back our predictions about things more than 10 AUs away" or something.
If we can't predict Earth's radiation belts, and we can't predict the conditions at the edges of the solar system, why do we think we can accurately see 14 billion years away?
If the zombies don't get run over wandering to the cinema then it will be a big box office hit!
Of course linux is full of libtards, go back to BSD already.
systemd forever!!!!
While true, that was also before they rewrote it a bunch of times.
All you need is little pods to sleep in.
They're only $500 per pod.
Thrashing the code and changing paradigms, what else?
Because the Germans are using a Volkswagen calculator.
Tesla's subsidy runs out next year.
They pre-sell all their cars. They won't go bankrupt at all. LOL
If demand goes down 15%, they're still selling exactly the same number of cars. And making the exact same amount of money per car.
It is a premium car with nameplate value, but they haven't tried to explore the upper end of the tolerable price. Instead they're building up their manufacturing so they can output more, and keeping surplus demand. Everybody already knows they have surplus demand. It is a brilliant and well-funded growth strategy.
Right, but you're just not understanding the argument, so you're giving meaningless citations about things that are not in dispute.
Nobody questions that part, for sure. People declared it harmful. Indeed.
That's not the debate.
If you understood networks a little better, you'd understand that ICANN can't invalidate your private network names.
And no, no standards are violated.
LOL
Do you also believe in Santa Claus?
I guess you're right, just like, Santa votes on your cookies and if you want good presents you better leave out some good cookies. Just check in the morning, the cookies will be gone, but for a few crumbs, and indeed the firehose will have drained onto the page one way or the other.
I didn't say, "this has to do with network neutrality." Try reading it again backwards.
It depends on the data. If the data purports to be serious, then it likely needs a serious look to know.
If it is a list of biased sources and he didn't put any disclaimer on it they were biased sources, then no, all you need to say is that it is crap.
I listed the reasons each data source is problematic, no attempt was made to impeach those claims! What he's saying is that he wants counter-citations. No, when your data is crap it is crap, the person identifying the problems in your data is not expected to provide alternate sources of data. You don't have to whip dicks out and measure; you just check if the data in question was in fact crap! Other people will wait and cite their own data when they're the ones making a claim.
You definitely need to get out more if you didn't know that there are real people in the world who believe in social justice.
Shave your neckbeard and check out a "coffee shop," it is likely filled with us.
We also only vote on comments, not stories, so there is no comparable voting dynamic.
I don't think that word, "stupid," means what you think it means.
A dog that sometimes stays upstairs from me for a few days at a time will start barking as soon as the caretakers car passes out of view of the window. The other dog that normally lives there even whines about every 5 minutes when the other one is barking. It just barks non-stop from the time they leave, to when they pull up in front of the house when they get back.
The more common technique that dogs can manage is to have a square of plastic fake grass inside, and train them to use that. Then you can take it outside and hose it down.
That's what it usually looks like when dogs are "box" trained.
They're like people who argue loudly by themselves in the subway; it's best to avoid interacting with them and quietly move away.
That's right, I'm practicing my presentation and if you interrupt me I might mistake you for that guy from accounting and push you in front of the train. ;)
If you understood networks a little better, you'd understand that everything has a local name, and most VPNs have a non-internet-routable TLD. That is normal, expected, and predates the public internet.
It isn't "false" in any way as long as it is known to your DNS server, or otherwise provisioned for routing.
You might even find that machines not connected to a network often have a network address of localhost.localdomain.
For one thing it eliminates the need to explain to laypersons, which is most people, how to tell the difference. This reason alone justified it.
Wait, you're saying that because you believe there to be a bunch of ignorant people in the world, that means you should tell me what network technologies to use? Fuck that!
Yeah, I gotta say, I support Network Neutrality not Network Doitmyway.
Not everything benefits from HTTPS, some things benefit from caching and broadcast distribution!
Ask a businessperson.
And, I would explain it more, but not if you're so confused you think it is "my" theory.
It is the most mainstream possible knowledge. You could learn about it in a 100-level business class at your local community college.
I have no idea what that weird part you spewed at the end about human history is. You seem pretty clueless about inflation.