No, no... That's like saying John gets his money from Microsoft because Jill works at Microsoft and pays John to shovel her driveway. If that were the case then you could say that John bought a copy of Windows, who paid Jill, who paid John, so John broke even. It's always circular and stupid to take it past the first person. Have you murdered anyone? No? By your logic, you paid the government, which paid the salaries, of the guy who went crazy in Iraq and murdered people. You murder!
See? Stupid. Lots of people are stupid. Don't be lots of people.
I have no idea how that happened. I was going through an older thread that I'd not read and I meant to reply to someone below you but was also checking out your formatting. So, that's how I ended up sending you that. Err... You can safely ignore that.
I was going to reply below but the use of DL and DT made me curious. They say curiosity killed the cat but I am not a feline. Either way, sorry for bugging you.
It isn't a resource that is depleted after I use it. It's a service.
Then what's a better term for "entity to whom a product or service of a producer is delivered"?
For a paid service
Your entitlement to the service is a resource, which is consumed after all months of service for which you have paid have elapsed.
For a service provided without charge
It can't be "customer" if one is using only services provided without charge, such as Gmail (not Google Apps For Work) on a PC, iOS device, or out-of-warranty Android device.
this
Anyone smart will notice that a person's history began at the age of something like 25 and will then realize that they'd changed their name. They'll then trawl through the records (or search on your new name - in areas where your name first showed up) and have that information pretty quickly. For a few personal reasons, I seriously considered changing my name at one point. Except, I'm rather fond of my name.
It's not often that I go a day without mud being thrown at me. I kind of like it. I do my best to state the truth and to accept my mistakes and not repeat them. However, I can - and will, tell it like it is. I'm pretty damned on the socialist side (for *very* different reasons than most) and have figured it's a badge of honor to be called an ultraconservative.
Why? You'll just argue and fight about it and the others are already aware of it. Eich is part of it, certainly but only one of a tiny thing and Eich's an idiot anyhow.
But, statements like this:
“Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech.”
No, Mozilla should believe in making a browser - just that.
I should have made it more clear - it's not just external things. I've known about a dozen people who worked there and another dozen who still do. (I actually get around a lot.)
Nope... I don't even want my browser doing that. The list goes on, and on, and on...
Don't get me wrong, Firefox's developer edition (Aurora) is good enough for me to call it top-notch, almost best of breed. However, I want a browser - not a political statement. Eich? He's just a drop in the bucket. For the next 12 months, read the Mozilla stories and the comments.
You know... In the 1980s, I stopped watching much in the way of television. Things like this? They make me feel good about that. I do kind of miss Nova and I've seen some Independent Lens stuff that was good. So, I'm mostly happy with that and, besides, the 'net has scads of documentaries uploaded.
I'd have to vote for that. I'd have to. There's just bound to be so many laughs and I doubt they'll break anything beyond repair. It might help prove a point that I've been trying to prove for years.
You're fucking retarded. I'm about as socialist as they come. The *average* kid gets free lunch at school, and breakfast sometimes. The average person pays less than their share of taxes. The average person gets to write down their mortgage. The list goes on.
> Thank you for the advice too, it is appreciated.
No probablwn. I did my best to make sure that it was no just for you but for others who might read the thread. I've seen people injure themselves, go back to their regular schedule almost immediately It seldom ends well. There's nothing wrong with using a gym while injured, it's just how you use it, how much you stress yourself, and what you expect to be able to do.
I blew out my right should. I used to be able tot throw a baseball a nearly 100 M/h. I can probably hurt myself and hit the 90s again for a grand total of 3 times. I'm spore at 75 MP/h.
At any rate. Much of what I wrote was for others. Not just to you. You should drop me an email. I know someone who can probably opine accurately.
Thanks for checking. Someone, it'd decided to make a liar out of me. I'd spam and how a different URL with StartSSL and see if that works. Actually, if you have a minute:
That should take you to a HORRIBLE site that's torn down and being rebuilt because I took a look at the plugins I'd installed and I'm not going to name names and be a jerk about it but, oh - my - god... *sighs* Why yes, yes your process *can* take over the cron jobs. That'd be great. Oh, you want to load stuff arbitrarily without my agreeing, that's great. What's this? Oh! So you left a new way to login by setting up a cron that can be acted on remotely by weget - so you can do what? Hmm... Your page says it is a requirement. But it doesn't tell me what you'll actually be doing with it and it would appear to be the same thing on all WP installs.
Why WP? I like challenge. I'm so getting my ass kicked and I bet I've ready 100,000 print-sized pages on the subject. I kind of what to rewrite it. Alas, that's a topic for another day.
Dude...There will be no peanut upgrades - though I might do so to amuse myself. I'm easily amused. At any rate, the it's seemingly happy with Let's Encrypt now - it wasn't. (Noted in my second reply.) It is *NOT happy with StartSSL, not at all.:/ It's a bit of a conundrum - I just went and verified that before posting.
As another alluded to, the it could be a PBKAC. I'l figure the damned thing out eventually.;)
I'll be back in Maine by then. Hopefully... Depends on if the State Department finally gets my application approved. Give me a yell, I'll show you around. It's a terrible, terrible place!;-)
I thought you lived in the US? If you live in the US, it's pretty simple. I've known many who have done it. You don't even really have to have a good excuse, you just can't be an idiot about it. It's like $50 at the courthouse.
No, no... That's like saying John gets his money from Microsoft because Jill works at Microsoft and pays John to shovel her driveway. If that were the case then you could say that John bought a copy of Windows, who paid Jill, who paid John, so John broke even. It's always circular and stupid to take it past the first person. Have you murdered anyone? No? By your logic, you paid the government, which paid the salaries, of the guy who went crazy in Iraq and murdered people. You murder!
See? Stupid. Lots of people are stupid. Don't be lots of people.
I have no idea how that happened. I was going through an older thread that I'd not read and I meant to reply to someone below you but was also checking out your formatting. So, that's how I ended up sending you that. Err... You can safely ignore that.
I was going to reply below but the use of DL and DT made me curious. They say curiosity killed the cat but I am not a feline. Either way, sorry for bugging you.
How do I "consume" e-mail hosting?
It isn't a resource that is depleted after I use it. It's a service.
Then what's a better term for "entity to whom a product or service of a producer is delivered"?
For a paid service Your entitlement to the service is a resource, which is consumed after all months of service for which you have paid have elapsed. For a service provided without charge It can't be "customer" if one is using only services provided without charge, such as Gmail (not Google Apps For Work) on a PC, iOS device, or out-of-warranty Android device. thisAnyone smart will notice that a person's history began at the age of something like 25 and will then realize that they'd changed their name. They'll then trawl through the records (or search on your new name - in areas where your name first showed up) and have that information pretty quickly. For a few personal reasons, I seriously considered changing my name at one point. Except, I'm rather fond of my name.
It's not often that I go a day without mud being thrown at me. I kind of like it. I do my best to state the truth and to accept my mistakes and not repeat them. However, I can - and will, tell it like it is. I'm pretty damned on the socialist side (for *very* different reasons than most) and have figured it's a badge of honor to be called an ultraconservative.
Why? You'll just argue and fight about it and the others are already aware of it. Eich is part of it, certainly but only one of a tiny thing and Eich's an idiot anyhow.
But, statements like this:
“Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech.”
No, Mozilla should believe in making a browser - just that.
I should have made it more clear - it's not just external things. I've known about a dozen people who worked there and another dozen who still do. (I actually get around a lot.)
Lemme see if I can find some public statements. Here's a small glimpse.
https://www.glassdoor.co.uk/Re...
Notice the first comment.
Here's another one - one which you might, initially, cheer for:
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/...
Nope... I don't even want my browser doing that. The list goes on, and on, and on...
Don't get me wrong, Firefox's developer edition (Aurora) is good enough for me to call it top-notch, almost best of breed. However, I want a browser - not a political statement. Eich? He's just a drop in the bucket. For the next 12 months, read the Mozilla stories and the comments.
Wait, what? You mean we can't buy, sell, or trade black people any more?
So does that mean I have to unchain those three fellers in the back yard or do I get to grandfather 'em in?
(I'm part black, by the way.)
You know... In the 1980s, I stopped watching much in the way of television. Things like this? They make me feel good about that. I do kind of miss Nova and I've seen some Independent Lens stuff that was good. So, I'm mostly happy with that and, besides, the 'net has scads of documentaries uploaded.
Do you think history started in 1990 or something? Go read a book.
I'd have to vote for that. I'd have to. There's just bound to be so many laughs and I doubt they'll break anything beyond repair. It might help prove a point that I've been trying to prove for years.
The plural of anecdote is data.
He can talk about it until he's blue in the face, if they're here legally then he can't ban them.
It's your story aspie-boy.
You're fucking retarded. I'm about as socialist as they come. The *average* kid gets free lunch at school, and breakfast sometimes. The average person pays less than their share of taxes. The average person gets to write down their mortgage. The list goes on.
That's a good thing, Spaz.
Not at all. The Eich issue is one of many such issues. You don't need to be convinced however.
> Thank you for the advice too, it is appreciated.
No probablwn. I did my best to make sure that it was no just for you but for others who might read the thread. I've seen people injure themselves, go back to their regular schedule almost immediately It seldom ends well. There's nothing wrong with using a gym while injured, it's just how you use it, how much you stress yourself, and what you expect to be able to do.
I blew out my right should. I used to be able tot throw a baseball a nearly 100 M/h. I can probably hurt myself and hit the 90s again for a grand total of 3 times. I'm spore at 75 MP/h.
At any rate. Much of what I wrote was for others. Not just to you. You should drop me an email. I know someone who can probably opine accurately.
Thanks for checking. Someone, it'd decided to make a liar out of me. I'd spam and how a different URL with StartSSL and see if that works. Actually, if you have a minute:
https://kgiii.gq/
That should take you to a HORRIBLE site that's torn down and being rebuilt because I took a look at the plugins I'd installed and I'm not going to name names and be a jerk about it but, oh - my - god... *sighs* Why yes, yes your process *can* take over the cron jobs. That'd be great. Oh, you want to load stuff arbitrarily without my agreeing, that's great. What's this? Oh! So you left a new way to login by setting up a cron that can be acted on remotely by weget - so you can do what? Hmm... Your page says it is a requirement. But it doesn't tell me what you'll actually be doing with it and it would appear to be the same thing on all WP installs.
Why WP? I like challenge. I'm so getting my ass kicked and I bet I've ready 100,000 print-sized pages on the subject. I kind of what to rewrite it. Alas, that's a topic for another day.
I am, if you notice my second post, I addressed that. ;) It still dorks out on StartSSL. I understand their reasoning, I do not agree with it.
Yup. It appears to have magicked itself overnight and now works with Let's Encrypt. StartSLL? No such luck. :/
(I just checked again on a different site - one not really 'open' yet.)
Dude...There will be no peanut upgrades - though I might do so to amuse myself. I'm easily amused. At any rate, the it's seemingly happy with Let's Encrypt now - it wasn't. (Noted in my second reply.) It is *NOT happy with StartSSL, not at all. :/ It's a bit of a conundrum - I just went and verified that before posting.
As another alluded to, the it could be a PBKAC. I'l figure the damned thing out eventually. ;)
I'll be back in Maine by then. Hopefully... Depends on if the State Department finally gets my application approved. Give me a yell, I'll show you around. It's a terrible, terrible place! ;-)
I thought you lived in the US? If you live in the US, it's pretty simple. I've known many who have done it. You don't even really have to have a good excuse, you just can't be an idiot about it. It's like $50 at the courthouse.
And? It's less expensive than many, many other first world nations. Hell, it's less expensive than some third world nations.
But I have. And, as of yet, NASA has still put more money in than they've gotten product out. Is that or is that not correct?
That makes me question which is for the victory of whom. 'Cause, depending on one's political standpoint, I could see it going both ways.