Sprint Quickly Pulls Video Ad Calling T-Mobile 'Ghetto' (fiercewireless.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Sprint has pulled an ad in which it was calling its competitor, T-Mobile, "ghetto." The ad featured company's CEO Marcelo Claure. "I'm going to tell you a carrier name and I want you to basically tell me what comes to your mind," Claure said in the ad. "T-Mobile. When I say T-Mobile to you, just a couple of words?" Which is when a white woman chimes in, "Oh my god the first word that came to my head was ... ghetto." "That sounds, like, terrible," she says. "I don't know't know. There's always, like, three carriers; there's AT&T, Sprint and Verizon. And people who have T-Mobile are just, like... Why do you have T-Mobile?""We're sharing real comments from real customers," Claure wrote in the aftermath of criticism. "Maybe not the best choice of words by the customer. Not meant to offend anyone."
Ghetto Blaster. Seems funny now.
T-Mobile is by far the best carrier for the money. I don't frequently espouse that opinion because I consider them the "best kept secret" and don't want other people over-subscribing the network.
Maybe racism is just an elaborate ruse by wealthy white people to keep Jazz music to themselves?
Once you go band 12 of t-mobile, they're a 1st class carrier. Anything else though, it's just utter shit.
Cricket on the other hand... That's ghetto.
Throwing your customers under the bus is always a good PR move. Way to go.
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
As the only major carrier that told the Feds to get a warrant before they would provide access to all of your private data, Hero comes to mind before ghetto.
Isn't that bad. I've been with them for a while (7 years), and prices/wifi calling and so on are pretty good.
The only issues I've had is coverage in remote areas (places that A&T/Sprint/Verizon didn't work well either) and inside buildings. Their new LTE
network is supposed to fix the inside building thing, and I've just used wifi inside.
I think some of the pay as you go (burner) phones are way more ghetto.
1. Texting
2. Looking at random articles while on the pooper
3. The occasional phone interview
Couldn't care less about my phone or which carrier I have.
How about "smart"? T-mobile has some features that Sprint doesn't...
1. The biggest being Binge On (Free streaming of YouTube, Netflix, Slingbox, Amazon Video, etc). Yes, this is controversial.
2. Free ASUS Wi-Fi Cellspot router (I get good reception & use it as my wifi router)
3. Free 2016 MLB.TV subscription (this saved me $84.99 to follow my favorite team....the Washington Nationals)
“I don't know't know. There's always, like, three carriers; there's AT&T, Sprint and Verizon. And people who have T-Mobile are just, like... well, you know, they’re like black and minorities and poor and stuff, and those people, like, live in, like, you know, the ghetto...”
MD here and my whole family happily uses T-Mo.
Elvis did a famous song called In the Ghetto. Ghetto Blaster? Ever heard one? What's so wrong with ghetto? Heard they got lots of projects in the ghetto. What's wrong with having lots of projects? And ghetto starts with GH. How many words can say that? Ghastly? Ghostly? Ghana? Ghetto.
Sprint doesn't offer enough bling to bring in the money.
Where you at dawg? Whole city behind you dawg!
East side west side ya dawg what up my nigga WHERE YOU AT DAWG!
What do you mean you associate this brand with the ghetto? Dats racist dawg! Where you at dawg! Yo yo yo my nigga! RACIST!
So, Marcelo, who was born in a ghetto country, grew up in ghetto countries, went on to build a successful business selling to those who lived in the ghettos, is now snobbying the same people who made him a billionaire? Rather rich...
"Don't do crack, it's a ghetto drug" -- Jesse Jackson
(and of course, not a single peep from anyone).
T-Mobile did buy Metro PCS, which has long had the nickname Ghetto PCS.
And knew in 2016 they were headed for trouble.
t-mobile - ghetto
sprint - barrio
at&t - slum
verizon - yeah, they're just a-holes.
So Sprint must be for self-absorbed inarticulate people, if you use their marketing example as benchmark.
Why do you have T-Mobile?
The question is best asked, "why do you subscribe to cellular phone service?" among the providers listed most are indiscernable from one another outside their limited branding. each network has a coverage determined by the wavelength and spectrum allotted the towers by the FCC. each network has a set of plans, terms, conditions, contractual obligtations, fees and fines associated with their services. And finally, each network of cellular systems is susceptible to outages or failures due to interference, underprovisioning, and "act of god." The cellular service must therefore be defined in terms of the lifestyle it offers, not the service.
the question is why or how do these services differentiate themselves in the consumer mind at all from one another? What the CEO was doing was a simple market identity and brand association test performed every single day by hundreds of corporate focus groups from proctor and gamble to general electric. AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint collectively spend multiple billions of dollars each year to promote their product in different ways. AT&T's advertisements may focus on connectivity and family, while Verizon may focus on selling their customers on the perception of advanced or modern living through a superior network and handsets. It doesnt matter the theme, however assuming the target of the question is being genuine and not a paid actress, its a telling statement. Perhaps T-Mobile has spent too much advertising focus on low-cost plans. another common problem, one that marketing and advertisers are keenly aware of, is demographic. Too much diversity in your advertisements and many middle income white suburban consumers will subconsciously associate your product with the negative minority stereotypes utilised by other marketing teams to sell things like music, movies, and clothing. The question the CEO asked to the participant elicited a tacit admission that the participant felt either alienated or confused by the networks product as she hadn't been properly exposed to the correct advertisement for her demographic which, depending on your marketing alignment, can be a sign of trouble.
full disclosure: I work in marketing.
Good people go to bed earlier.
There's always, like, three carriers; there's AT&T, Sprint and Verizon. And people who have T-Mobile are just, like... Why do you have T-Mobile?"
'Cause "like, three carriers" can actually mean four carriers - dumb ass.
[ I use Ting which uses Sprint (and Verizon) for CDMA and T-Mobile for GSM. ]
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
Boost Mobile, the MVNO that targets the urban youth demographic, runs on Sprint's network.
This should've been linked in TFA/TFS somewhere:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
Their latest promotion... Amazon Prime for $10.99 a month on your bill. I'll let you do the math in your head real quick. Sprint has totally lost their minds.
I have used t-mobile for about 5 or 6 years. I have never had a problem with the service. Contrary to what that airhead customer thinks, I don't live in a ghetto.
:)
I love to see the look on the faces of my ATT friends when I tell them I only pay $50/month for unlimited text/calls/data (up to 2GB at 4g then throttled back after that). I also have rollover data, so what I don't use gets put on the next month's "allowance". They just sent me a text the other day showing I have about 6GB of 4g-speed data to use.
And recently they mentioned something about certain kinds of streaming traffic not counting towards your monthly allotment. I haven't really looked into it yet.
On a personal note, the attitude of that customer makes me sick. I have friends and family of different races. I know people who live "in the ghetto". They are not subhumans you can look down your nose at...what a bitch.
In the Midwest U.S, the best coverage is provided by U.S. Cellular and Verizon (where Verizon bought Airtouch, which bought CommNet).
People who use Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile are left sitting beside the Interstates if they want coverage, so I guess you could call them "roadies" or "interstate huggers".
They do understand that neo-nazis, rascists, anti-semitics, bigots, etc are real actual people, not fiction.
Did they think they just existed in the movies? That liberals were just lying when they claimed we needed civil rights?
The fact that you found and interviewed a real slime bag, does not excuse you for sending their views out into the world.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
The first time they asked, she said, "Walmart!" ;-)
I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
Sprint is now the smallest carrier in the US. T-Mobile overtook them some time ago.
I am one of T-Mobile's earlier customers. I signed up with them shortly after they formed in 1999 because they were the only carrier in Metro Detroit that offered GSM, and I thought it would be useful to be able to use my phone in Europe where I worked for a week or two once a year. Indeed, I used my phone in Europe sparingly. Thanks to number portability, I've had the same phone number for the entire 17 year period.
We've had our ups and downs, but for most of those 17 years T-Mobile was the cheapest option, sometimes by a large margin. Their data service is fast, but only if you get a 4G or 4G LTE signal. You don't want to be stuck on their Edge network for longer than brief periods. Edge is not much better than 1999-era GSM.
I haven't gotten a 3G signal in many years, except where T-Mobile has a roaming agreement with another carrier. In these roaming areas, they give you a tiny monthly allocation of data which I normally exhaust in a few hours. You can still make calls and send text messages as normal. This leads me to conclude that while other carriers have wider deployments, T-Mobile has done a great job at providing coverage where their customers actually live and work. Unfortunately, when you go camping and you have roaming coverage instead of Edge coverage, you will quickly not be able to use the Internet at all, rather than have to settle for slower speeds.
I live, work, and mostly travel where T-Mobile 4G LTE coverage is good. Programs like Waze are much better now at dealing with networks like T-Mobile where speeds can go from 4G LTE to no coverage within ten miles by behaving like you would expect. I used to have problems with apps thinking that everywhere the app is being used the bandwidth will be the same, or the developer naively assuming that their offices in Silicon Valley have similar coverage to places like rural Illinois.
To summarize, if you are a rural user, do not use T-Mobile. If you are a(n) (sub)urban and cost sensitive user like me, go with T-Mobile. You won't always get good coverage in rural areas, but you can at least store your pictures and videos and immediately crush the first 4G LTE tower you encounter once you get within range on your way home.
That's funny. I would've said something almost exactly the opposite in terms of brand image:
"Sprint -- oh, you mean you still live with your parents?"
T-mobile has some of the better international roaming-included and no-contract cancellation policies around. And they are significantly cheaper than ATT and Verizon.
That said, I'm also one step away from moving over to Google Fi.
How about spending some of that money to improve customer service?
I guess I am not a racist, but I like T-Mobile's ads and prices.
Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
Oy, the Goyim. ;) Perhaps she should have said something less offensive, such as "T-Mobile sucks the sweat off my grandpa's balls." Then everyone would be happy (especially her grandpa).
Niggers.
T-Mobile had international-supported GSM before anyone else. AT&T added it soon after, when they were losing business from the multi-nationals, but only on locked phones that weren't international. With T-Mobile, there was about 5-10 years where they were the only one that you could buy an unlocked GSM phone that worked on international frequencies. Tokyo to NYC to Paris with the same phone. Just swap SIMs if you like for local rates/numbers, or keep your SIM and pay insane international roaming rates for the convenience. AT&T eventually caught up, but not without having been behind for years. I haven't followed with recent moves who's international compatible.
Learn to love Alaska
I remember about 10 years ago when Sony announced the PSP the claimed that they were going to "will elevate portable entertainment out of the handheld gaming ghetto." No one raised a stink over Sony back then. The only thing people questioned was that idea that the Gameboy Advance, at the time, was a "ghetto."
"We're sharing real comments from real customers," Claure wrote in the aftermath of criticism. "Maybe not the best choice of words by the customer. Not meant to offend anyone."
It doesn't matter if it wasn't the best choice of words by the customer. Somebody at Sprint or their ad agency thought it was okay to run it. The real story isn't that some customer said that, but that Sprint thought it was acceptable to air it.
I'm getting 90 megabits LTE service at the moment from my "ghetto" T-Mobile unlimited data service which costs me $30 less per month than I was paying AT&T on my original grandfathered data plan.
So, how can Verizon win me as a customer? By insulting all of T-Mobile's customers? Yeah, not happening.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
At the end of the day, whatever strange foreign country I land in I get this sweet text message informing me that while roaming overseas I have free unlimited texts, free unlimited (3G or 2G) Internet and that all my calls will be at a fixed rate of $0.20 per minute.
Besides which when back in the US I can also use my mobile phone as a wireless modem to tether my laptop to it, and quite a few other ingenious things like being able to get calls over third-party wi-fi networks while roaming anywhere.
Last I checked, as far as I know none of the other three carriers mentioned offer anything remotely as convenient and reasonably-priced as this for international travelers who roam a lot and live in major urban centers. Some of this might explain recent statistics pointing to the fact that T-Mobile has been accruing customers and poaching them from competing networks at a faster rate than anyone else. Coincidentally, they're starting to bite on the heels of the one ranked #3 (what a surprise!) Sprint!
Of course Sprint will be mad and start the mud-slinging. Is anyone surprised? Corporations are people too (in the US, according the the SCOTUS) and have feelings too, yano?
Similar tactic to Trump saying something really gross to make his point to the base, and then later retracting it. I'd wager there's a lot of customers responding regardless, and what better way to reinforce stereotypes than to use language like this?
Abraham Lincoln: [interrupting] What a charming negress. Oh, forgive me, my dear. I know that in my time some use that term as a description of property.
Uhura: But why should I object to that term, sir? You see, in our century, we've learned not to fear words.
. .
Well, maybe not Tokyo. They're CDMA. (though they use GSM/WCDMA for 3g if you got a 2100MHz 3G phone, there's no GSM to fall back to, only CDMA). Also it was only in the last couple of years you were able to buy/use an unlocked phone there. It sucked. While their tech is great, they're somehow more behind on the mobile sphere than we are. (except in payments, where they kick our ass)
Speaking as somebody who frequently travels (both on business trips and pleasure ones) T-Mobile's free international roaming is a huge deal for me. Until another carrier offers that, or offers sufficiently-cheaper service to make up for the difference of adding that, I will most likely stick to TMo. Being able to get off the plane anywhere in the world and immediately have my phone work is just magical, as is being able to text my girlfriend without even needing to buy a new SIM and tell her the new number.
The unlimited music streaming is also very nice. I stream about 6GB of music per month over cellular data, and it doesn't count against my high-speed data / tethering limit.
There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
But it's really the funding, religiosity, etc. you should be paying attention to. Private or public, schools suck in the U.S. when in the same area, whatever area that is, and given the same level of funding.
Not sure how you didn't get that.
Consider when a 3-year-old calls another 3-year-old "doo doo head". That other 3-year-old gets pissed.
Now consider when a 3-year-old calls you a "doo doo head". Do you really feel insulted?
At some point it loses its power. If "ghetto" hasn't lost its power by the 2200s, all is fucked.
I wouldn't use that word, but I do think of Sprint as a lower class of carrier than AT&T or Verizon.
I'm not passing judgment on their customers. I really don't care who someone's carrier is and the subject rarely comes up in conversations I have with people. Many people have probably sworn off at least one of the big 4 carriers for some reason or another. I will NEVER be an AT&T customer again due to a bad experience and billing dispute many years ago. The other carriers have not managed to piss me off, but I've heard other people rant about all 4 major carriers while plenty of others say they're happy with AT&T.
full disclosure: I work in marketing.
The entire body of text gave me this eerie feeling as I kept hitting buzz words and skipped ahead further. Before I knew it, I had reached the end of the post and had yet to actually find any content. You have clearly mastered the time honored skill of saying absolutely nothing with as many words as possible. I am both amazed and horrified.
Right? because nobody else has ever lived in a ghetto.
Sprint: When "Keeping it Real" goes really really WRONG...
It is comments like this that make me glad the first commercial my daughter ever saw was at the age of 12. She tolerated the first one, had a funny expression on her face for the second, and by the third asked me if this was going to keep happening throughout the show. She had a similar reaction to the first web page she saw without an ad blocker installed.
Now advertising in all its forms sickens her. Made me feel like I had succeeded in at least one aspect of parenting.
Not only black people live in the ghetto so it's not racist...
The advertisement is a little ironic considering that T-Mobile has more subscribers than AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint. Not only is the advertisement unprofessional, but the connotation that T-Mobile is ghetto is completely incorrect.
Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
Watch the one black guy at table's head drop when she says that.