how is this much better than using an authenticator or an extra password/sms? This is really one of the dumbest ideas I've heard.. So what do I do if I don't have the object near me? and do I have to photograph is everytime from the same angle?
I agree with you, but as long as countries as the US and Russia still have nuclear weapons (and are even renewing them, and if it's up to Trump even expanding them), then any other country has the right to also develop and maintain nuclear weapons, even countries like NK or Iran. Not that I like it, but at this moment the biggest threat to the world is Trump in control of the US nuclear weapons.
No we don't like cryptomining instead of ads.. I'd rather have ads which don't cost me a thing then having something run in the background eating up my resources even more.. And where does it end.
This is very unresponsible of them, they haven't seen or tested the car, so how on earth can they even remotely comment on the reliability of the car. It seems to me, they are provoking Tesla into giving them a car to test.
Unless they are getting the patent to block everyone from doing so, and also don't use it themselves, then it's Ok, otherwise good luck with your games, as you won't see me buying any of those.
oh please.. We should ban puzzle games, as that would increase the intelligent thinking of a person. Mass shootings have got absolutely nothing to do with FPS shooters. Before you go ban FPS shooters, let's ban weapons. And it's better to get rid of your frustration through a computer game, than having it build up and go rampage in real life..
excuse me? good at design? Have you actually SEEN what they presented? none of that actually looked any good, just like their chromecast which looks awful. Sorry but if there's one thing google's bad at, it's design.
After the update I have to reinstall it just to be able to use it again. They should have checked if the player is in use, and if, keep it, if not, dump it.
You really don't have a grasp at reality or logic, but your logic really borders on the same logic many thiefs employ to try to sweet talk their illegal behavior. It's like if someone's beating you completely senseless and then just says, what you're complaining about, you're still alive..
Within 10 years it will be the ban of selling new ICE cars, and maybe ICE's that are 30+ years old (and don't pass a certain emission standard). It'll take a few decades before the whole fleet of ICE cars have been replaced, you just cannot ban cars as a lot of people still depend on them and do not have the money to buy new ones. Also at this time the technology for batteries isn't commercially viable/good enough for replacing the ICE for long range/offroad situations. But in 10 years that will have changed, just as the ammount of charging stations, because if they thought people having airconditiongs on during the warmer periods is already a problem for powersupply, wait until it also has to charge every EV (which ofcourse takes a lot of energy). So it's great if they want to ban ICE's, but they first need to make sure that range is much better and there is a good infrastructure to charge all those EV's. Both are heading in the right direction. Let's not forget, people still want to drive the old cars as they love them, so there needs to be a plan to let people be able to do so (even if it requires a total conversion to EV).
oh please, you do consume the movie if you watch it. And what's the difference if I hit you over the head from behind without you knowing it was me? You still have a headache afterwards. You watched the movie for which you should have paid (directly or through watching it on regular tv with commercials or whatever). But you just don't want to acknowledge that as it makes you feel uncomfortable doing something illegal/immoral. Try to imagine (yes I know it's hard for people like you) you made a movie for a million dollars of your money, 100 people pay money for it, but millions just download and watch it illegal, how would you feel if people would talk about it as having seen it but didn't pay and therefore made you broke even though they 'enjoyed' it. There is a difference if only 100 people paid money, and no one else watched it, yes you would still feel crap and broke, but in that case you have yourself to blame. Ah well, you'll come up with an excuse anyway to try and sweettalk your illegal/immoral behaviour.. There is a difference in actually just admitting it or trying to sweettalk it.
To the copyright holder, exactly what's the difference between me pirating something and not watching it in the first place?
by pirating you consumed the content (for which you should have paid), by not watching it you just didn't consume the content.. It's not that really hard to understand.
OH MY GOD.... Your intelligence is really low if you really think the displaying at a free exhibition is the same as watching a pirated movie.. there is no sense in talking with you if you really are as dumb as that.. but I think you're just trolling.. If there is someone who doesn't comprehend the ideas even a 6 year old is capable of comprehending, than it's you.. Yes, you are as stupid as a doornail, there is just no talking to nuts like you who don't have even the slightest intelligent in a single hair.
You really are as dumb as a doornail.... Funny, because slander would mean I said something that isn't true, but you have admitted to illegally downloading movies/series and watching them without the permission of the rightsholder. So what I've said is true... go and get a brain because you really are just a real asswipe who is trying to defend his illegal/immoral behavior.
My god, you really have the brain of an peanut... a free art gallery or exhibition has all the work shown there with permission from the creators. If you really don't understand that concept than you really are as dumb as a doornail..
man, you really are thickheaded... watch it without paying means lost sale, how hard is that to get into you thick skull.. it's just that simple. it isn't hard to understand. But go ahead, be a moron and try to defend your illegal/immoral behavior..
you're really as dumb as an ass. you watched the content without paying, legally you can not watch a movie without paying (actually paying or for example through watching it on regular tv). So you watched it and therefore it's an incomeloss for them, as you should have paid for it but you're a f-ing moron and just 'stole' it. The fact you're a software developer yourself doesn't make it better. Movies costs millions to make, and the profits of one movie has to pay for the loss of another (studio system). And it still doesn't matter if you don't mind if people pirate your software (but then again, I wonder how you would feel if one customer buys it, and gives your work to the rest and no one will buy it, so you'll loose all the money you've invested.
And it doesn't matter if someone doesn't have a lot of money to buy movies directly, they can just wait until it's on tv or whatever service they paid for. It's a f-ing luxury product. It's not your right to be able to watch the specific content. But ok, so you don't mind if people will steal your car or whatever, hee they don't have money to buy it so they'll take yours.. It's their content, so they get to decide how they want to sell it, not you.. If you don't like it, then don't buy it, but also don't watch it.. If enough people won't watch it, then they'll have to figure out another way to make money, but now you're just stealing their income..
And that's exactly what wrong with YOUR view. If you consumed the content you should have payed for it, it's just like a shopowner who got stuff lifted, he has to write off the stolen good as the shoplifter has 'consumed the content'. So you watch which means you didn't pay even though you should have (if you didnt' enjoy it or not doesn't make any difference). It's about you having consumed the content, if you didn't consume the content it's not a lost sale, if you did consume it is, as you should have paid for it.
But go ahead, try and justify your immoral/illegal behaviour.
Slashdot Mirror
And why did the finder give it to a paper and not to the police (which is what he should have done). I wonder how much money he got from the paper...
how is this much better than using an authenticator or an extra password/sms?
This is really one of the dumbest ideas I've heard.. So what do I do if I don't have the object near me? and do I have to photograph is everytime from the same angle?
I agree with you, but as long as countries as the US and Russia still have nuclear weapons (and are even renewing them, and if it's up to Trump even expanding them), then any other country has the right to also develop and maintain nuclear weapons, even countries like NK or Iran. Not that I like it, but at this moment the biggest threat to the world is Trump in control of the US nuclear weapons.
No we don't like cryptomining instead of ads.. I'd rather have ads which don't cost me a thing then having something run in the background eating up my resources even more.. And where does it end.
This is very unresponsible of them, they haven't seen or tested the car, so how on earth can they even remotely comment on the reliability of the car. It seems to me, they are provoking Tesla into giving them a car to test.
Unless they are getting the patent to block everyone from doing so, and also don't use it themselves, then it's Ok, otherwise good luck with your games, as you won't see me buying any of those.
oh please.. We should ban puzzle games, as that would increase the intelligent thinking of a person.
Mass shootings have got absolutely nothing to do with FPS shooters. Before you go ban FPS shooters, let's ban weapons.
And it's better to get rid of your frustration through a computer game, than having it build up and go rampage in real life..
Any modern vehicle is vunerable to an EMP attack, cars depend so much on electronics these days.
excuse me? good at design? Have you actually SEEN what they presented? none of that actually looked any good, just like their chromecast which looks awful.
Sorry but if there's one thing google's bad at, it's design.
After the update I have to reinstall it just to be able to use it again. They should have checked if the player is in use, and if, keep it, if not, dump it.
Yes VLC is great for video's, but it sucks for music.. I use WMP on a daily basis for music.
As I said I already answered that many times before.. but go ahead be a moron..
I've already answered your question multiple times but you just don't want to accept my answer.
You really don't have a grasp at reality or logic, but your logic really borders on the same logic many thiefs employ to try to sweet talk their illegal behavior. It's like if someone's beating you completely senseless and then just says, what you're complaining about, you're still alive..
Within 10 years it will be the ban of selling new ICE cars, and maybe ICE's that are 30+ years old (and don't pass a certain emission standard).
It'll take a few decades before the whole fleet of ICE cars have been replaced, you just cannot ban cars as a lot of people still depend on them and do not have the money to buy new ones. Also at this time the technology for batteries isn't commercially viable/good enough for replacing the ICE for long range/offroad situations. But in 10 years that will have changed, just as the ammount of charging stations, because if they thought people having airconditiongs on during the warmer periods is already a problem for powersupply, wait until it also has to charge every EV (which ofcourse takes a lot of energy). So it's great if they want to ban ICE's, but they first need to make sure that range is much better and there is a good infrastructure to charge all those EV's. Both are heading in the right direction.
Let's not forget, people still want to drive the old cars as they love them, so there needs to be a plan to let people be able to do so (even if it requires a total conversion to EV).
oh please, you do consume the movie if you watch it. And what's the difference if I hit you over the head from behind without you knowing it was me? You still have a headache afterwards.
You watched the movie for which you should have paid (directly or through watching it on regular tv with commercials or whatever). But you just don't want to acknowledge that as it makes you feel uncomfortable doing something illegal/immoral.
Try to imagine (yes I know it's hard for people like you) you made a movie for a million dollars of your money, 100 people pay money for it, but millions just download and watch it illegal, how would you feel if people would talk about it as having seen it but didn't pay and therefore made you broke even though they 'enjoyed' it. There is a difference if only 100 people paid money, and no one else watched it, yes you would still feel crap and broke, but in that case you have yourself to blame.
Ah well, you'll come up with an excuse anyway to try and sweettalk your illegal/immoral behaviour.. There is a difference in actually just admitting it or trying to sweettalk it.
To the copyright holder, exactly what's the difference between me pirating something and not watching it in the first place?
by pirating you consumed the content (for which you should have paid), by not watching it you just didn't consume the content.. It's not that really hard to understand.
OH MY GOD....
Your intelligence is really low if you really think the displaying at a free exhibition is the same as watching a pirated movie.. there is no sense in talking with you if you really are as dumb as that.. but I think you're just trolling..
If there is someone who doesn't comprehend the ideas even a 6 year old is capable of comprehending, than it's you.. Yes, you are as stupid as a doornail, there is just no talking to nuts like you who don't have even the slightest intelligent in a single hair.
You really are as dumb as a doornail....
Funny, because slander would mean I said something that isn't true, but you have admitted to illegally downloading movies/series and watching them without the permission of the rightsholder. So what I've said is true... go and get a brain because you really are just a real asswipe who is trying to defend his illegal/immoral behavior.
My god, you really have the brain of an peanut... a free art gallery or exhibition has all the work shown there with permission from the creators. If you really don't understand that concept than you really are as dumb as a doornail..
man, you really are thickheaded... watch it without paying means lost sale, how hard is that to get into you thick skull.. it's just that simple. it isn't hard to understand.
But go ahead, be a moron and try to defend your illegal/immoral behavior..
you're really as dumb as an ass. you watched the content without paying, legally you can not watch a movie without paying (actually paying or for example through watching it on regular tv). So you watched it and therefore it's an incomeloss for them, as you should have paid for it but you're a f-ing moron and just 'stole' it.
The fact you're a software developer yourself doesn't make it better. Movies costs millions to make, and the profits of one movie has to pay for the loss of another (studio system). And it still doesn't matter if you don't mind if people pirate your software (but then again, I wonder how you would feel if one customer buys it, and gives your work to the rest and no one will buy it, so you'll loose all the money you've invested.
And it doesn't matter if someone doesn't have a lot of money to buy movies directly, they can just wait until it's on tv or whatever service they paid for. It's a f-ing luxury product. It's not your right to be able to watch the specific content.
But ok, so you don't mind if people will steal your car or whatever, hee they don't have money to buy it so they'll take yours..
It's their content, so they get to decide how they want to sell it, not you.. If you don't like it, then don't buy it, but also don't watch it.. If enough people won't watch it, then they'll have to figure out another way to make money, but now you're just stealing their income..
you watched it without paying for it, therefore it's a lost sale, it's as simple as that. and the last sentence you wrote is just BS..
it doesn't matter if you cannot get it any other way. It's not your right to be able to watch it, it's still a luxury product.
And that's exactly what wrong with YOUR view. If you consumed the content you should have payed for it, it's just like a shopowner who got stuff lifted, he has to write off the stolen good as the shoplifter has 'consumed the content'.
So you watch which means you didn't pay even though you should have (if you didnt' enjoy it or not doesn't make any difference).
It's about you having consumed the content, if you didn't consume the content it's not a lost sale, if you did consume it is, as you should have paid for it.
But go ahead, try and justify your immoral/illegal behaviour.