Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Update Removes Windows Media Player (betanews.com)

Recently made available Windows 10 update KB4046355 for the Fall Creators Update disables Windows Media Player from the operating system. BetaNews reports: While it could be argued that Windows Media Player is no longer an essential addition to Windows -- there are plenty of quality third-party alternatives, such as VLC Media Player, not to mention the Films & TV app in Windows 10 itself -- many users still rely on it. The feature's removal came to light when users installed KB4046355 on devices running Windows 10 version 1709 -- the Fall Creators Update. This update, referred to as FeatureOnDemandMediaPlayer, removes Windows Media Player from the OS, although it doesn't kill access to it entirely. If you want the media player back you can install it via the Add a Feature setting. Open Settings, go to Apps > Apps & Features, and click on Manage optional features.

255 comments

  1. Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Templer421 · · Score: 2

    Explain to me WHY this is a useful program?

    1. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Explain to me WHY this is a useful program?

      You mean Windows 10? The jury is still out on that one.
      There is good money to be made helping the victims of the push-update. Depending on the mental state of the victim and the levels of their drug addiction, some back to Win7, some forward to Linux.

    2. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not. WMP has long out lived its usefulness. I honestly thought it was already gone. Imagine my surprise when it opened up the other day on some obscure video format that I had long forgotten about.

      VLC does a whole lot better job.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " VLC does a whole lot better job."

      I love VLC and it is my player of choice...

      Except for 4K content, or lower-bitrate content over unreliable connections.

    4. Re: Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or that obscure file format that VLC won't even associate with...

    5. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I too prefer VLC, but at some point they *REMOVED* support for playing MIDI files. WMP still does this fine.

    6. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      MIDI files? I still get VLC acting quirky for me. Not all the bugs are out of it. WMP has always run like a champ for me, though it is missing a few features these days I'd like back. You don't remember when WMP had all these settings you could tweak.

    7. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Considering that every install needs instrument samples for a format that relatively few people play - it makes sense for it to at least not be in the default install.

    8. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why screw around with garbage like VLC and WMP when you could use the best players in existence? PotPlayer for video and foobar2000 for audio are second to none.

    9. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      VLC does a whole lot better job.

      VLC reigns supreme on the desktop... but is completely useless on mobile. Especially for DLNA. I'm guessing a different team created the mobile version.

    10. Re: Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. What happens when your audio playlist includes music videos? What if your want some nice visualizations to go along with your music for parties or whatever? What do your mean I have to learn two entirely different applications, interfaces, media libraries, smartphone remotes...?

    11. Re: Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when your audio playlist includes music videos?

      Then play them in PotPlayer. foobar2000 handles ALL audio formats ever made, but PotPlayer will handle common audio formats.

      What if your want some nice visualizations to go along with your music for parties or whatever?

      Then install some visualisations. I display Milkdrop through foobar2000 on my projector all of the time.

      What do your mean I have to learn two entirely different applications, interfaces, media libraries, smartphone remotes...?

      Do you also have difficulty walking and chewing gum at the same time?

    12. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It does not seem to be, not even for MS itself. They are constantly outing themselves as the incompetents they are with Win10. Nadella recently wrote something about MS being "sick" when he took it over. It seems to me that state persists and is getting both worse and more obvious.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. You just use a synth library like every cheapo keyboard has done since MIDI first came about. If somebody wants high quality samples, they can add them themselves.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    14. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's still the same point. A lot of bloat for a very small subset of users.

    15. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is no bloat at all. Windows already has a built-in synthesizer and another is included in DirectX. It is just a matter of using the right API.

    16. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I was pissed when they removed Windows Media Center. I LOVED it for years on Windows 7 as I used my older PC as a TV to watch movies and thought the player and built in functions were very easy to use.

    17. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Windows media player is being removed because M$ is sick of being exposed as a huge loser. The worst accepted media player in the industry losing to pretty much everyone, simply better to not have one. It seems M$ is hunkering down, expecting more consumer losses and cutting everything they can to focus on exploiting areas where they have control via content lock it ie exploiting a monopoly to the death of the company. The mass privacy invasion of windows 10 has cost them dearly and likely will kill the company in the end.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    18. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Nope, WMP and Xbox upscale DVD to 1080 like nothing else. I'm not buying everything in blue ray, so I dug it. No other player is close. As in, I can a/b that shit all day long.

    19. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WMP and Xbox upscale DVD to 1080 like nothing else

      LOL. Try madVR, noob.

    20. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VLC lacks the ability to burn a CD.

      That said, the "Creators Update" (1703) nearly broke WMP's ability to burn an audio CD. It's really unstable and basically a coin-toss whether it will detect the blank disc when you insert it, then it's another coin-flip whether or not it will successfully start to burn the CD. Once it gets going, it seems to stabilize, though. I haven't bothered to try an MP3 CD, as they're even more useless than audio CD's are.

      What would be nice is if Windows had a non-janky disc burner utility. By "non-janky", I mean that I shouldn't ever be able to find it on download.com. It should instead be part of the OS. It should support mounting disc images. It should support mounting blank, writable disc images and saving them to a new .iso file. It should support burning any .iso file to a disc. It should also support red-book audio CD imaging and burning, with customizable track spacing and other P/Q subcoding.

      After that, they can ditch WMP entirely and nobody will miss it.

    21. Re: Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have a listening and speaking problem

    22. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should make a media player that plays even the less popular file formats.

    23. Re: Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's APK of course!

    24. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I'm happy with VLC on Android, but avoid it on the desktop.

      In fact I was pleasantly surprised that VLC on Android was both nice looking and easy to use, considering the horrible UI of the desktop version.

    25. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Apart from it doesn't seem to like mkv files which everyone seems to be using these days. I've actually got the situation that wmp will play some files vlc wont. Regardless of if someone considers it useful just flat out removing it in an update is a poor show. What's next, take out the calculator? date and time display?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    26. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      An emulator that runs as a plugin should not result in bloat unless it's done incredibly wrong.

      I suspect that web browsers have forever tainted our expectations of how plugins work and how they can actually minimize bloat, not cause it.

    27. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      If it plays mkv files has to do with what the OS can handle, just like what codec's it can play. On my windows 10 system WMP both opens and plays MKV files just fine. Even mkv files with h.265 video in them.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    28. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Unless that plugin downloads at runtime, it's still bloat as far as I'm concerned. Even if it's not sitting in RAM, it's still wasting my hard drive space.

    29. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      VLC isn't a great music player as far as library management or playlist goes. If you want to use built-in Windows APIs to play, just use a built-in Windows app to do it.

      VLC is also cross-platform, which means linking to a different API for every platform and even excluding some platforms if they don't write their own decoder library. While they're at it, why not just link to built-in Windows codecs for every format? Let's just erase VLCs reason for existing.

    30. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      Yes VLC is great for video's, but it sucks for music.. I use WMP on a daily basis for music.

    31. Re: Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VLC plays everything for me fine, and for those really rare and obscure midi and other formats such as video game raw data files, I use good ol Winamp

    32. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      M$, lol.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    33. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      My feeling is that built-in plugins defeat the whole point, and is indeed the wrong way of doing it.

      Compare to something like the K-Lite codec pack, which is available in a "typical" bundle, as well as a "full" bundle with enhanced legacy support. I'm sick of the current fad that says developers need to strip all legacy support and eliminate as many options as possible to avoid confusion. It's really not hard to make a few easy default choices.

    34. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corel painter doesn't run on Linux.

    35. Re:Windows 10 is a good Idea? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      M$ were the ones that favoured the $ in their coding languages, hence the $ you will not that I always use MSN and M$ and have done so for decades because two characters to type and everyone recognises, were you confused by it, did you believe it represents someone else like perhaps https://www.msaustralia.org.au.... Thanks for bringing it up, I always use it to promote MS Australia because that affliction MS tends to have a real damaging affect on people who value their minds above all else.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so sick of Microsoft and this Windows 10 crap. Worse are the fanboys that defend it.

    1. Re:Enough by viperidaenz · · Score: 0

      Boohoo, they've done something that doesn't impact you at all.

      That is, unless you're actually using Windows 10?

  3. It could also be argued... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...While it could be argued that Windows Media Player is no longer an essential addition to Windows...

    It could also be argued that the Windows 10 data harvesting is not an essential addition to Windows. Yet there it remains....

    .
    Makes one wonder what the real reason is for removing Media Player.

    1. Re: It could also be argued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because the TV&Movies app they want to push you to does even MORE spying than Media Player.

    2. Re: It could also be argued... by iampiti · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real reason is pushing everyone to use the touchy apps.
      I still think it's asinine to force such UIs on mouse users

    3. Re:It could also be argued... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'd wager the reason is the (still ongoing?) Microsoft Litigation with the EU around bundling Windows Media Player with its OS.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:It could also be argued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just try to force people to use Windows store. Or perhaps Microsoft also believes people will start paying a monthly fee for Media player and MS Paint they moved to their store? I guess the notepad is going to Microsoft store next, despite the only reason people use it is that it is available on every Windows without separate installation.

      It is just silly that if one has a problem in Windows 10, it will ask if user if he wants to send feedback. But as the feedback sending requires going to Windows store, creating a account and installing some app from there, they will definitely not get any feedback from other than their fanboys.

    5. Re:It could also be argued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could also be argued that Windows isn't an essential addition..

    6. Re: It could also be argued... by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to include it by default (i.e bundling) and a whole other to uninstall it in an update.

    7. Re: It could also be argued... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      ...because it was bundled in the first place and now they unbundle it, so-to-speak.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re:It could also be argued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is everything wrong with using your customers as free QA. If Microsoft genuinely wants to improve their products and grow their business, then they can stop being such cheapskate deadbeats and start PAYING for QA.

      You're also one of those technically clueless people who think you can't have internet access and security/privacy simultaneously just because you don't know how to do it. Better go tell that to all of the companies and government agencies that specialise in security so that they can close up shop now.

    9. Re:It could also be argued... by n329619 · · Score: 1

      Makes one wonder what the real reason is for removing Media Player.

      Courage?

    10. Re:It could also be argued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lawsuit for Anti-competitive behaviour of course.

      It is not "removed", it is made an "optional component" (in other words the scattered about C functions have been removed from the OS DLLs and moved into the Media Player DLLs) so that it cannot be found to be "integrated".

      Microsoft got away with that steaming lying pile of hornswoggle once already when they claimed Internet Exploder was "integrated" into the Operating System and could not be removed. Now the average intelligence has risen to the point where "deliberately scattering bits to and fro" will no longer pass muster as integration.

    11. Re: It could also be argued... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      pushing everyone to use the touchy apps.

      Mousers of the World, unite!

    12. Re:It could also be argued... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Patents, or the lack of paying them.

    13. Re:It could also be argued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes one wonder what the real reason is for removing Media Player.

      I can guess what it is - at my last job we had a number of folks that worked remote and the managers would "monitor" them by seeing if they were active in chat (Lync). One of them discovered that if he fired up media player in the background on a replay loop it didn't allow the PC to go idle. So their chat showed active and their 2 minute security required screen lock didn't kick in.

    14. Re: It could also be argued... by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      If they simple unbundled it then that would mean that it would not be installed on a fresh install, what they however have done is to actively uninstall it from already installed machines.

    15. Re: It could also be argued... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Could be a part of a deal made with the EU: "remove previously installed WMP to become compliant" or whatever.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    16. Re: It could also be argued... by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, when Microsoft where forced to not install IE by default here in Europe there where no talk about them being forced to uninstall IE from already made installs and I have not heard anything this time that EU should have forced MS to uninstall WMP either.

    17. Re:It could also be argued... by OfMiceAndMenus · · Score: 1

      It feels like they're trying to funnel us toward Groove Music, which would make sense if it hadn't just announced its shutdown.

  4. Microsoft Article? by Merk42 · · Score: 0, Troll

    They removed THING
    M$ BAD! M$ BAD!


    ~~~in an alternate reality~~~


    -Windows 10 Update Adds Windows Media Player-
    OMG BLOAT!
    M$ BAD! M$ BAD!

  5. This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted there are much better out there but I have family who have stuck with Windows Media Player since Windows 7 because it's all they know and don't want to learn more at their age. I've already heard grumblings of why Microsoft does changes like this to ruin their experience. This won't go over well.

    1. Re:This won't make family happy. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Media Player Classic is the solution.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:This won't make family happy. by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      WinAMP

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    3. Re:This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RealPlayer

    4. Re:This won't make family happy. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I stuck with WMP (when using windows) because it plays music and rips to mp3. I don't need it to do more. The windows 10 replacement was a nightmare because it consumes the whole screen in some tablet-mode nonsense.

      I could use any of many media players, but I don't really care. Being familiar with where the play button is and how to get to the playlists is handy.

      It's not a function of age, it's a function of not giving a shit.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    5. Re:This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://mpc-hc.org/

      v1.7.13, the latest, and probably the last release of our project

      It's a dead project now unless someone picks it up.

    6. Re:This won't make family happy. by fisted · · Score: 1

      QuickTime

    7. Re:This won't make family happy. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      So? It does what it's supposed to even though it's a dead project.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    8. Re:This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stuck with WMP (when using windows) because it plays music and rips to mp3.

      VLC and friends can do that, albeit with some additional manual effort is required. The old code is an increasingly better attack vector as MS apparently doesn't want to use resources to plug the holes in it.

    9. Re:This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Victrola!

    10. Re:This won't make family happy. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Can you maybe spend 5 minutes to help them reinstall it then? Microsoft just wants the default packages to be consistent across the non-x86 version of Windows. I can't fault them for that, but I still think that Paint 3D is an abomination.

    11. Re:This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Victrola

    12. Re:This won't make family happy. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      I have VLC. It has a horrible UI for playing music. I don't use WMP online.

      I don't have a problem that needs solving by removing WMP.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    13. Re:This won't make family happy. by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

      > I have VLC. It has a horrible UI for playing music. +1

    14. Re:This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actual people performing

    15. Re:This won't make family happy. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Wax rolls.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    16. Re:This won't make family happy. by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      I'll still take it over VLC any day. MPC has a good, clean interface and all the relevant features. It's simple to use and works great. VLC is a bit of a mess, and is not as fast or intuitive to use.

      MPC all the way.

    17. Re:This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while riding unicycle.

    18. Re:This won't make family happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the older I get, the less I seem to give a shit about things like this. I think there is a correlation.

    19. Re:This won't make family happy. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The windows 10 replacement was a nightmare because it consumes the whole screen in some tablet-mode nonsense.

      You know Win10 apps still have an "Unmaximize" button on the toolbar, right?

    20. Re:This won't make family happy. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Not when first encountered it. It was all or nothing. And the toolbar is hidden! WTF?

      That and the replacement didn't do the basic thing that WMP did, which was index all the music on my network drive and make it available to browse and place. Maybe it does. Maybe its in a hidden menu somewhere. I remember it trying to sell me stuff FFS.

      Music playing software was way ahead of cell phones with dissapearing headphone jacks in terms of technology that gets worse over time.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    21. Re:This won't make family happy. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      All Win10 UWP apps can be unmaximized or resized. The "full screen only" thing was back in Win8/8.1 days, and backtracking from that was one of the big changes that Win10 made.

      If you've last seen the music app in Win8, I'm not surprised. If I remember correctly, it was all about the Microsoft's own online subscription music service, and setting it up to play local stuff was convoluted and inconvenient.

      The one that's in Win10 right now actually asks you which folders to index first thing when you launch it, and then gives the usual artist/album centric UI. Nothing special about it, and I've certainly seen better players, but it's "good enough" for most users.

    22. Re:This won't make family happy. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      You're selling it a lot better than Microsoft did.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  6. "Creator's update to Kthulu's forced upgrade" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There must have been a bivvy of old exploits they just got too lazy to think about fixing. No other reason makes any sense.

    1. Re:"Creator's update to Kthulu's forced upgrade" by DarkLordBelial · · Score: 2

      More likely it didn't have the "telemetry" that the newer app does

  7. Why? by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a shell linking audio/video codecs (which still exist) to a simple set of video controls, perhaps with some mostly useless cruft, but it did a decent job.

    It definitely wasn't anywhere near the best player - but when you went to a random PC, you could be sure that most common videos would play.

    Why would you remove that as a minimal component on PCs? Browsers are OK - but when you're going for a presentation on a random PC, there's all kinds of ways those can crap out in ways that a simple default video player would be fine.

    Seems a very dumb thing to remove, if you want PCs to be useful general devices world-wide.

    And note - probably less than 2% of your user base is going to go onto the 'Windows Store' to try and get ANYTHING to fix this shortcoming. Attempting to profit from your own manufactured problem is not going to pay off in this case, compared to what it's costing you in terms of basic capability.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they bundle applications, they are a monopoly. They unbundle applications, they are dumb. What kind of mental gymnastics are being played here?

    2. Re:Why? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 had multiple stock apps that could play audio/video. In addition to the old WMP, there was "Groove Music" for audio and "Movies & TV" for video. WMP was pretty crashy and bug-prone - and the UI didn't scale well to touch devices. Ditching WMP was a pretty solid move - cuts down on the bloat, all the functionality remains, and serious users will install something better anyways.

    3. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody brought monopoly but you.
      How about you quit conflating issues here?

    4. Re:Why? by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you try to open a file that has no associated application, Windows suggests you go to the Windows Store to download an app to open it.

      Regardless of this, there is already other media plays preinstalled in Windows 10. Windows Media Player wasn't the only one.

      It wasn't just a shell linking audio and video codecs to a UI, it was an attack vector that has been exploited in the past with malicious media files. Files that aren't supposed to be executable.
      Here's a list of 52 known vulnerabilities https://www.cvedetails.com/vul...
      Some of them are remote code execution just by visiting a website: "The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if Windows Media Player opens specially crafted media content that is hosted on a malicious website"

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's being "removed" because one too many people figured out they could change the default media player in win 10 -- and people that *want* to change from microsoft's horrible, intrusive 'apps' is GOING TO CHOOSE WMP as it's usually the only other thing available unless you install something else yourself. then they'll see that and go "oh, that's what i used to use. cool"

    6. Re:Why? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's a shell linking audio/video codecs (which still exist) to a simple set of video controls,

      Maybe 5 versions ago. Now it's a bloated mess.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In addition to the old WMP, there was "Groove Music" for audio and "Movies & TV" for video."

      From wikipedia:
      Microsoft announced on October 2, 2017 that it will be shutting down Groove Music by December 31, 2017.

      Now that is just for the online service, but I think they will eventually kill the app too.

    8. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are both full of hot air.
      CONFLATULENT

    9. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should have been in the OP.

    10. Re: Why? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      I don't have an opinion on whether Microsoft removed it due to litigation, or any other reason. That being said, there have been a few times now Microsoft has been brought to court over software they bundle with Windows. WMP was specifically addressed in EU litigation.

    11. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm sorry the EU isn't very smart.
      Windows is sold as a multimedia OS.
      It only makes sense there should be various media players.

    12. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WMP is a great app!!! If you have less then 500 media files. Otherwise it pukes, looses settings, can't recover itself and continually crashes while simply trying to index my music collection. Don't even get me going on my Video Collection - FLV/RM and even Apple's Video Formats that it can't play. Same for Ogg/Flac and other formats. Simply put, I've never had good luck with WMP after Win2k came out simply due to busted codecs.

      For those complaining about Midi formats and VLC, I have to ask, why in hell are you trying to play audio only files with a video player? Foobar2000 works great though you may need a plug-in for midi.

      For those asking about an alternative OS check out the ports collection of FreeBSD. Lots of stuff there and when I build my next computer, I'll be using it instead of buying another copy of Windows as VLC is available along with a whole bunch of basic music playing apps and you can't forget the fact that VLC offers a FreeBSD version

    13. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lawsuits over bundling are always stupid.

      Lawsuits over bundling, and then preventing anyone from adding their own stuff have merit. But something is screwed up if you can't include one of your products with another of your products.

    14. Re:Why? by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      If you have been forced to spend any time with windows 10 machines, you will know that microsoft has gone out of their way to prevent setting custom defaults for file associations that stick. Doubly true when you are trying to expressly not use win10 "apps". They probably ran the numbers and saw that the biggest competitor to their new, lamer, "store" "apps" was WMP.

      So they extinguished the competition. Extremely easy in this case for them.

      Those in the know use media player classic, or vlc. While the masses will switch to the newer, crappier product. Not that WMP since XP was ever that great in the first place. So history repeats itself, when wmp got forked (so to speak) to mpc, it was primarily because of how extremely unstable and lacking in updates the "newer" WMP was.

      --
      -
    15. Re:Why? by OfMiceAndMenus · · Score: 1

      The browser shuffle is a great analogy. They tried SO HARD to change up IE for Edge, and then they made Edge all Metro-UI, with no plugin support, with no support for activeX or any of the things that were useful about IE.

      And why the fuck is Edge my default PDF reader when I have Adobe installed and Edge doesn't support any advanced PDF features?

      Microsoft fired all their competent Windows devs and now they're realizing(or should be if they have a clue) "Have the customer beta test everything" is not a good way to go.

    16. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your stupid diatribe and stick it up your asshole. They've decoupled some shitty software...who gives a shit?!?! Do you think people are just fucking retarded idiots? "Stupid monkey can't install VLC...Ughhhh me no can make computer to work... Monkey not know what do now. HOW CAN MONKEY SURVIVE WITHOUT MEDIA PLAYER!?!?!?!?! GOD WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME!?!?"

      Fucking moron.

  8. Maybe it's because there already is another media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it could also be argued that with the Groove media play also included in Windows, it's confusing and a waste of disc space having two media players as part of the base operating system.

    In that sense, it makes sense to Microsoft to simplify the operating system and use the media player that's perhaps not as riddled with telemetry. (Seriously, Windows Media Player with all the rights management and ability to call out to internet services is more of a security risk than Groove player.)

    Perhaps, MS are simply simplifying windows.

  9. What next, calculator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems they are making it up as they go along. So much for forewarning. Calc.exe for the chop next.

    1. Re:What next, calculator? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They already replaced that with a modern UI version. With WMP, they just renamed the replacement.

    2. Re:What next, calculator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an occasional volunteer job where I use someone else's Windows 10 PC.
      Even worse than ads on the lock screen is that horrible "modern UI version" of the calculator.
      You CAN'T use the Enter key on the calculator!!! After you enter your numbers and operations on the keyboard, you have to CLICK to get the answer.
      Drives me insane every time.

    3. Re:What next, calculator? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you've used it on Windows 10 in the current version? I use the enter key - both the main one and the numpad enter and they both work exactly as they did in the old calc.exe

  10. What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    If we don't use Windows 10, what other OS can we use instead?

    We don't want to use Windows 8 or 8.1, because they were pretty awful.

    We don't want to use earlier versions of Windows, because support and updates for them are limited or pretty much non-existent.

    macOS is perhaps the only viable non-Windows alternative, but it's useless for those of us who don't have Apple hardware. And we don't want to have to buy new, and rather expensive for what you get, hardware just to use macOS.

    Linux isn't really an option, especially with so many distros including systemd. I hate to say this, but I've found Windows 10 to boot more reliably for me than the versions of Debian and Ubuntu that use systemd!

    Chrome OS is too limited and feeble.

    Haiku is a toy.

    Solaris isn't really viable, even for powerusers.

    Realistically, Windows 10 is the only option for nearly all desktop users who aren't using macOS.

    It didn't have to be this way. The various Linux distros had ample time and opportunity to come up with a real competitor to Windows. But instead of doing that they just wasted time with doodoo like systemd, GNOME 3, PulseAudio, NetworkManager, Unity, and Wayland.

    We use Windows 10 because it's the only practical option.

    1. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I have to choose between Windows 10 "spyware edition" or Linux with systemd, I still go for Linux. Thank you.

    2. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about some BSD?

    3. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's nothing wrong with Windows 8, as long as you install ClassicShell and disable all the Metro crap.

    4. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by JackieBrown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you really had issues with systemd or even pulseaudio or network manager?

      I installed debian on my samsung laptop and it worked without mesing with any files. I have never had it fail to boot. I have it on my raspberry pi as well running homeassistant also on debian.

      I haven't had windows 10 fail to boot either, just saying I hear the systemd complaint allot but I really don't think it's an issue for most home users. Maybe it messes on the enterprise level, but your post is clearly talking about home users.

    5. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Chromium_One · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends on your applications, obviously. It fucking sucks that if you want an alternative, you have to really work at it and there's always some use case that you just can't get around. That said, win8 is probably the least worst option if you're stuck with Windows.

      If your objection to win8 is the UI stupidity, you can fix a large amount of the stupid with ClassicShell and some time tweaking settings. Not all of it, but it's a good start. As a bonus, with win8 it's not that rough fixing the spyware issues, doesn't even require third-party tools. Does require hitting up services and task scheduler and some time reading, and of course you have to re-check everything after every round with windows update, but it can be managed.

      If you have some other issue with win8, discuss?

      Win7 is getting a bit long in the tooth and hit and miss for being able to get support on some newer hardware. It it's not dead yet, but ...

      Personally, it's been easier to just move over to Linux for general use. Slackware here, as it's where I started back in '93. No systemd, and not happening any time soon. Gnome got dropped a long time ago, though libraries are available as needed and last I looked there were two different third-party options for a complete gnome desktop install. Slackware has been infected by Pulse, but since Pulse is no longer Lennart's chew-toy, it's had a chance to get straightened out and by now is usually more help than hindrance. I will say fuck NetworkManager with a rusty spoon. It's not as much of a flaming pile of radioactive dogshit as it used to be, but it still finds new and interesting ways to fall down. Generally I don't install it on non-mobile systems, as it's slightly less of a pain than editing rc files when swapping AP's on wifi.

      Hackintosh is a viable option if you do your research and get well-supported hardware up front. Pay less in cash, pay more in time, and really not appropriate at the office. Oy, wonderful trade-offs there.

      Seriously though, if you're really stuck on Windows, spending the time to unfuck a default win8.1 install is probably a better option than just accepting 10. yes, it'll be some effort on maintenance and paranoia checking your settings (and services, and task scheduler) but weigh that against the forced random reboots and unexpected app breakage or forced uninstalls that STILL happen with 10.

      --
      When you live in a sick society, just about everything you do is wrong.
    6. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by taustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, that's not the choice. The choice is "an OS that runs the software I have to use" and "an OS that doesn't run the software I have to use."

    7. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by taustin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The people that tell you that Windows 10 is the spawn of Satan and a retarded goat seem to be the same ones who insist that systemd will cause the complete destruction of the physical universe, dog and cats living together, and dingoes to each your children.

    8. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      Linux isn't really an option, especially with so many distros including systemd. I hate to say this, but I've found Windows 10 to boot more reliably for me than the versions of Debian and Ubuntu that use systemd!

      Umm... you do know there are distros that don't use Systemd, right? Hell, some were created specifically to NOT use Systemd. https://devuan.org/

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    9. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You missed the biggest contender for Linux desktop worthiness. Linux Mint. Which runs out of the box on just about any hardware I've thrown at it. It's reasonably friendly and reasonably easy to use. I highly recommend trying it. You can even get it on a Live bootable USB so you don't even need to put it on your hard drive to play with it.

    10. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 8/8.1 is superior to Windows 10 in every way. Even the start screen is better than the start menu in Windows 10.

      Windows 7 is still receiving updates for another three years. Windows 8 is still getting them for another six years.

      Updates != security, especially when they come from a company with such a horrible track record as Microsoft. Any OS, no matter how old or out of date can be fully secured if you know what you are doing.

    11. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any software platform that takes away users' ability to control their own computers isn't a real OS. Any platform that further delivers advertisements to users' LOCAL desktop and file managers is scumware. Any platform that also collects users' data is a massive pile of shit that only the stupidest people will want to use.

      That's why Windows 10 has been such a colossal failure. After two and a half years and an incredibly aggressive rollout using malware tactics, Windows 10 still has less than half of the marketshare as Windows 7. Nobody who is even halfway intelligent wants it.

    12. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that's not the choice. The choice is "an OS that runs the software I have to use" and "an OS that doesn't run the software I have to use."

      This is exactly right. People don't care about the operating system, they care about being able to run their programs. That is the whole point of an operating system, if it can't do that then it isn't even an option.

    13. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a lot of dingoes,can we get them thru quarantine, en masse?

    14. Re: What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except various popular Linux distros have done all this and more, and nobody seems to care, or rather they pretend to care but keep using Linux and bashing Windows anyway.

    15. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 0

      Isn't Windows 7 a better option?

    16. Re: What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice false comparison.

      First, I never said a word about Linux. I compared Spyware 10 to Windows 7, but nice strawman. You should have stayed in school because you are illiterate.

      Second, Linux is free and open source. You have a ton of choice as to which distro you want to use or if you want to build your own. You have no such choice with Windows. Also, which Linux distros did this?

    17. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      Any software platform that takes away users' ability to control their own computers isn't a real OS.

      Hmmmm. And here I thought the whole purpose of an OS was to have software that automates control of your hardware.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    18. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Solaris basically went EOL recently when Oracle fired most of the Solaris 10 team. I do agree the situation is not good for the desktop at the moment, with the "best" option (Win10) being really bad.

      It is however the standard thing that happens when customers allow a quasi-monopoly to form: They get screwed. While individually, there is very little blame, as a group the users and companies that "standardized" on Windows are mostly responsible for this mess.

      I do know at least one large company that will go all web-app internally to prevent going to Win10. No idea what they want to use as OS, but it will be a web-terminal and can basically run on any OS were a good browser and a secure VPN possibility exists. Probably will be Linux or one of the xBSDs.

      Side note: If you install Debian with sysvinit, it still works reliably. We have a ban on systemd in our company. Far too costly with the permanent problems it causes and the special needs it has.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    19. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's supposed to be there to do what you tell it to do. When it disobeys, such as in Windows 10, you no longer have a real OS.

    20. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by gweihir · · Score: 2

      With systemd, yes. Basically it crapped out on me the one time I forgot to remove it. Since then I remove it routinely, as my time is too valuable. Hence I have no data. Not with pulseaudio, as I do not use it. With network manager, I don't know. I did have obscure network problems recently, but I fixed them by hard-coding everything. Also with udev, which usually requires some rule adjustments. I actually have seriously considered getting rid of udev as well and going back to static device files. At least they are reliable.

      Systemd and family become really bad as soon as you have something that is not quite standard. Used to be fine before, but now you have to do everything the One True Way.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    21. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by taustin · · Score: 1

      But I can run the software I need to run to, say, do my job, so I can have a place to live, and food to eat.

      Given the choice between being Microsoft's bitch, and being cold, hungry and living in a cardboard box, I think I'll take being Microsoft's bitch.

      Enjoy your cardboard box.

    22. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by taustin · · Score: 1

      If the TSA is running Windows, it shouldn't be a problem at all.

    23. Re: What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statcounter- win7: 44%, win10: 39%. At current trajectory 10 will surpass 7 in 3 months. Which makes you full of shit. Or are you just looking at your personal web server logs?

    24. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, so in other words, the choice is clearly linux.

    25. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If we don't use Windows 10, what other OS can we use instead?

      Troll gets marked +4 insightful.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      There's nothing wrong with Windows 8, as long as you install ClassicShell and disable all the Metro crap.

      Windows user tells us there's nothing wrong with Windows 8, then in the next sentence tells us what's wrong in Windows 8.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    27. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      If I have to choose between Windows 10 "spyware edition" or Linux with systemd, I still go for Linux.

      That's a false dilemma. You don't need either piece of malware, just pick a distribution without systemd.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    28. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you really had issues with systemd or even pulseaudio or network manager?

      Welcome to the darkside of Linux users. its fashionable to shit on systemd, because its fashionable to shit on systemd.

      I have it on a lot of systems, and aside from fsome early burps when it first came out, it's running well.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    29. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between being Microsoft's bitch, and being cold, hungry and living in a cardboard box, I think I'll take being Microsoft's bitch.

      Enjoy your cardboard box.

      Well now Sparky, that's a fine false dillemma you have going there. Be a pity if someone came along and smashed it all up.

      If you want to be Microsoft's bitch, well then BOHICA brother. I made enough money using my Macs to retire at 55 on the salary I was making. And no BOHICA.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC to AC: Troll much?
      AC to Mods: Insightful? Really?!

      I've used Linux since 1997. Been reading Slashdot since 2000. I'll create another account one of these days.

      I could care less about systemd, GNOME 3, NetworkManager, Unity, and Wayland. They've all been fine. Whatever's been in Debian and Ubuntu has always worked for me fine.

      Alright, two exceptions. I had trouble connecting to wifi before NetworkManager.

      And PulseAudio - man, that shit sucks. But I'm recording 16 tracks of audio simultaneously whilst adding effects and I want to hear all that come out the other end of the computer within 5 milliseconds of when it went in. If I didn't need special audio stuff, I'm sure PulseAudio would be fine.

      I don't mind holy wars, but I just can't stand a straw man.

      It'll all be moot when Microsoft starts contributing code to WINE.

    31. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iirc Linux Mint also uses systemd with the recent versions, so that would probably be a no-go for him too.

    32. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux Mint.

    33. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Duckeenie · · Score: 2

      10: Parent: I dislike SystemD. 20: Child: May I bring your attention to Linux Mint? 30: Goto 10

    34. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > We don't want to use earlier versions of Windows, because support and updates for them are limited or pretty much non-existent.
      False. Windows 7 doesn't have the spyware of Windows 10.

      > macOS ... useless for those of us who don't have Apple hardware.
      Translation: You want to continue to make excuses for why your privacy isn't worth it.

      > Linux isn't really an option,
      Linux has always been an option -- you are just too lazy to admin your box.

      > I use Windows 10 because I'm too lazy to learn / use anything else.
      FTFY

      Quite astroturfing. Not everyone wants to be Microsoft's bitch.

    35. Re: What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a faggot....

    36. Re: What other OS can we use instead? by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      "Linux isn't really an option, especially with so many distros including systemd. I hate to say this, but I've found Windows 10 to boot more reliably for me than the versions of Debian and Ubuntu that use systemd!"

      The only Linux users I see complaining about systemd are Debian and/or Ubuntu users, and with issues I haven't seen and in some cases tried to reproduce and couldn't.

      Have you tried one of the other distros that uses systemd? Fedora, SUSE, Arch, Mageia etc.?

    37. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pulseaudio-- sucks. My current desktop starts up *two* instances of Pulseaudio, and I have to kill one. Doesn't matter which one.

      systemd-- Overly complicated, but does the job. Enable syslog, and it's mostly unobtrusive, and sometimes, a unit file is exactly what you need.

      network manager-- Not sure-- the KDE NM applet is horrific under Manjaro (arch). When attempting to add a static entry, it frequently bitbuckets the static assignment. the VPN connectivity is actually really nice, but the Juniper VPN at work wants us to specify the VPN realm-- and that breaks the applet. Makes me long for YAST under OpenSUSE, because at least that worked, and didn't care if you were running NetworkManager or wicked under the hood.

    38. Re: What other OS can we use instead? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      You missed BSD - you sound like an experienced guy; give it a try...

    39. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by rl117 · · Score: 1

      There's always the option of FreeBSD, or one of the other BSDs.

    40. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh... you seem to have missed the fact that those things you're hating on in Linux-land are "Windows-style" subsystems that go against the grain.

      For all the bitching about systemd here, you seem to have missed the fact that it's basically just Service Control Manager (scm.exe), but for Linux. Even though, in the early days of bitching about systemd, that was pointed out time and time again.

      GNOME 2->3 is similar to what Windows went through with Aero and the conversion from GDI+ to DXGI.

      PulseAudio is Windows Audio Subsystem, but for Linux.

      NetworkManager, Unity, and Wayland have similar "just like Windows $subsystem, but on Linux" traits about them.

      Use Linux with those "bad" things if you like Windows so much. You'll feel right at home. It's the Linux old-timers that hate those Windows-y systems because they don't understand them. I would argue they don't understand what is being replaced either, or they wouldn't hang onto it so vocally. They're the type that lash out at change because they're already overwhelmed by the complexity of their systems, and any changes "just make it worse".

    41. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      dingoes to each your children.

      Is that anything like keeping dire wolf pups? That has worked out so well for the Starks so far.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    42. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more of problem with distro, not with the said softwares. PulseAudio, systemd, networkmanager work just fine under *buntu. Yeah VPN connectivity in networkmanager applet doesn't really work. I prefer to just type some command (openvpn for OpenVPN, etc) in console, works like a charm.

    43. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Have you really had issues with systemd or even pulseaudio or network manager?

      The answer is 99 out of 100 cases would be "no". And that one case that said "yes" probably has other mitigating reasons.

    44. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On average Linux administrators make a lot more than Windows administrators. That's because knowledge and skill command higher salaries.

      You also conveniently ignore Android, the most popular consumer OS in the world.

    45. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pulseaudio-- sucks. My current desktop starts up *two* instances of Pulseaudio, and I have to kill one. Doesn't matter which one.

      So what makes you think this is a actual pulseaudio bug as opposed to a distro/config issue?

      For example, this Kubuntu case where a second pulseaudio instance was incorrectly started was fixed by a config file change and was in no way a pulseaudio bug:
      https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-plugins/+bug/1296425

    46. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      You know, I really find it curious that Mint is the go-to distro for "normal people". If you go to their web site to download it, you're presented with an ISO (actually, multiple ISOs depending on what DE you want), and the directions (which must be downloaded as a PDF, of course) tell you to burn the ISO to a DVD. A lot of PCs these days don't have disc drives anymore. If you want directions on how to turn the ISO into a Live USB, you have to go to the forums, and we all know how well that usually goes in the Linux community. If it's so simple to install and use, why is it necessary to tell people to seek help from the forums? Are they so lazy that they can't maintain directions right on the download page? It is seriously not even possible to RTFM because they don't bother to include the info you need?

      The last time I tried Mint from a DVD ISO, it also took about 22 minutes to boot, most of the time leaving me to stare at a blank screen without even a fake progress indicator. At several points I was wondering if my PC froze and whether I should reboot. Running the installer in a VM instead of natively didn't make things any easier.

      Right from step 1, Mint is not very convincing that it's user friendly, just like every other Linux distro I've tried in the last 15 years. These are the things that prevent Linux from being taken seriously (and never get fixed) decade after decade.

    47. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with Windows 8, as long as you install ClassicShell and disable all the Metro crap.

      Windows user tells us there's nothing wrong with Windows 8, then in the next sentence tells us what's wrong in Windows 8.

      Pedant ignores qualifier words to make jibe ;)

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    48. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with Windows 8, as long as you install ClassicShell and disable all the Metro crap.

      Windows user tells us there's nothing wrong with Windows 8, then in the next sentence tells us what's wrong in Windows 8.

      Pedant ignores qualifier words to make jibe ;)

      I even missed what you are talking about, so must be my dyslexic days..... Regardless, making it look like an earlier OS, and dealing with W8's Whack-a-Mole maintenance model, there is a hellava lot more wrong with it than OP's pretend W7 interface.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    49. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong. I agree for the most part win 8 is a bag of shit regardless, but op says there's nothing wrong with it AS LONG AS you do whatever, so if you haven't done that there is (in his opinion) something wrong with it.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    50. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      I agree with you mostly. The Metro UI isn't really that bad on 8.1. I'd take UI changes over an experimental OS I have no control over in a heartbeat.

    51. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong. I agree for the most part win 8 is a bag of shit regardless, but op says there's nothing wrong with it AS LONG AS you do whatever, so if you haven't done that there is (in his opinion) something wrong with it.

      Hold on though. If you have to do something to it, it kinda makes something wrong with it in my book. If I might make an example, in MacOS, there is a feature called launchpad. It's kinda like the W8 interface. The application icons are not little rectangles, but otherwise operate a bit like Metro.

      But it is an option, and no third party apps needed to have the normal interface and what amounts to the taskbar at the bottom. An early Mac user would work their way around really easily.

      And telling that hardly anyone that I know uses Launchpad.

      So yeah, maybe I was being over pedantic, or maybe you were being a little pedantic about my pedantry. Ugh, pedantry sounds really bad!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    52. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      Well, considering all you have is criticism for Linux, and obviously no intention of giving it a fair shake, I'm done with you. Good luck with Windows 10!

      But I have to wonder, 22 minutes to boot, whacha trying to run it on, a 80486 with a MFM HDD?? Puhleeze. I have Celeron laptops right here that will boot Mint in less than 5 minutes. I think you're exaggerating and just dissing Mint to diss. Have fun with that.

      The rest of you skeptics reading, give Mint a try. And if making a bootable USB from an ISO is rocket science, grab a copy of Rufus (for Windows) and use that to put your ISO image onto a USB stick for easy booting. Don't even have to google for instructions, I've given you all you need!

    53. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, maybe, but to me he's putting a qualifier on it being ok rather than out of the box.

      If I was being really pedantic I'd point out you said first sentence ... second sentence ... when he clearly only used one sentence total and point out the irony in you using the same format for your post ;)

      Now you mention it, pedantry does sound a bit too close to peasantry for my taste, maybe there's a word that means the same but sounds like badass or something lol

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    54. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Now you mention it, pedantry does sound a bit too close to peasantry for my taste, maybe there's a word that means the same but sounds like badass or something lol

      Ive been accused of douchebaggery on occasion.....

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    55. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      You're not wrong. Most of us just live in an imperfect world where compromises have to be made. Right now, Win8+ClassicShell is the best of several bad options available to those of us who still have to run Windows for business reasons.

      Once your OS vendor becomes part of your threat model, as Microsoft has, life is bound to be full of compromises. I can't afford to ditch Windows at this point in my career -- and yes, I do consider that to be both a personal and professional failing.

    56. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to do something to it, it kinda makes something wrong with it in my book.

      I have never seen an OS that I didn't have to add something to or tweak in order to make it work the way I want.

    57. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how much do you make being Microsoft's bitch? Because I'm almost certain that I live in a nicer house in a nicer area, drive a nicer car and have a hotter woman than you do and I don't use Microsoft products at all.

    58. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you are wrong, it's not "their" programs... it's Microsoft's program. And as the developer they can choose at anytime to stop developing and distributing it. Regardless of all the fake outrage... just like all those asshole who said they were leaving America when trump won and never did. All these assholes here saying they are looking to switch OS because of a single application are just putting on bravado and ultimately won't do shit.

    59. Re:What other OS can we use instead? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Well you are wrong, it's not "their" programs... it's Microsoft's program.

      What's Microsoft's program? You mean the operating system? The operating system is the thing that runs programs. The usefulness of an operating system is dependent on its ability to run the programs the user wants/needs to run.

      All these assholes here saying they are looking to switch OS because of a single application are just putting on bravado and ultimately won't do shit.

      Who is saying they would switch OS because of a single application? And what is that application that is causing them to switch?

  11. Joins a long line of illustrious predecessors ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Play for Sure, Zune, and countless other "features" ...

    Does anyone remember there was a Windows Multi Media Edition? One had to buy a Soundblaster card to get sound out of the box previously and HP keyboards had play/pause/volume controls on the keyboard ...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  12. ...and nothing of value was lost. by SeaFox · · Score: 2

    (see title)

  13. meh by nomadic · · Score: 1

    I like WMP better than Groove, because it doesn't have the obnoxious marketing thing going, though I've switched mostly to musicbee.

    Though as bad as Groove is, it's better than the pinnacle of incompetent design that is iTunes.

  14. Feature removals by Gilgaron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These feature removals mostly seem troublesome at a locked down PC environment at school or work where you can't install anything. So while not disastrous, it is certainly annoying when you can't do some trivial thing on a computer without admin rights on it.

    1. Re:Feature removals by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      These feature removals mostly seem troublesome at a locked down PC environment at school or work where you can't install anything. So while not disastrous, it is certainly annoying when you can't do some trivial thing on a computer without admin rights on it.

      If the admin wants people playing videos on the machine, wouldn't they just add a video player as part of the standard workstation image? If anything, it makes things easier if the administrators don't have to go through and proactively remove a bunch of shovelware from a fresh OS install.

    2. Re:Feature removals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was all fine and good until video player they had got removed by a Windows update.

    3. Re:Feature removals by dissy · · Score: 1

      These feature removals mostly seem troublesome at a locked down PC environment at school or work where you can't install anything.

      At least for work related environments, such things are far less troublesome, and generally not at all for end users.

      Windows updates get centralized from one internal server which the admins can approve/deny on a per patch basis, as well as push to a testing group of computers to be vetted individually if need be.

      If the company standardized on media player, this KB update would not make it onto your computer until a group policy update was made to ensure it remains an enabled feature at the same time.
      If the company uses another media player, be it in the default image or pushed via group policy, then likely media player was already disabled, and if not it going missing isn't going to be noticed.

      I would like to think a school environment was run similarly but I personally have no experience there.
      I can see if they had an IT department mostly full of students in training to be IT admins, that could certainly be problematic, though I'd argue that problem would run much deeper than just this one issue :P

    4. Re:Feature removals by acoustix · · Score: 1

      That was all fine and good until video player they had got removed by a Windows update.

      You must have missed the part where the poster said "If the admin wants people playing videos on the machine, wouldn't they just add a video player as part of the standard workstation image?". It's not hard, people.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  15. Common by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 0

    Yes, there's a lot of "We hate [thing X MSFT did] because we hate microsoft!" out there. It's childish but common.

    The bottom line is they can choose what they have in the default install, and they'll do that for reasons that don't have a whole lot to do with outrage articles from the technical press and on slashdot or reddit. Sure, they want to support features the community likes, but they also have things that are old projects nobody in the company really owns anymore that don't drive revenue, for example.

    And they will also sometimes replace functionality. Maybe they have a replacement player in the winds that will somehow support AR/VR as well and they're focusing on that.

    There are lots of reasons they might do this. Best to determine the reasons before piling on the outrage.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
    1. Re: Common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody is talking about a default install you shill.
      They did this to already installed OSes.

    2. Re: Common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep. Seattle law? Probably a lawyer for MS.

    3. Re: Common by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 0

      It sounds like they moved it from the default install to something that is accessible via apps >> apps & Features, and that that affected an already installed O/S.

      --
      Real lawyers write in C++
    4. Re: Common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn your brain is stuck on legalese isn't it?
      Do you agree or not?
      You seem to agree but still do not explicitly state it. You keep trying to weasel around and act like I'm making things up, but all your explanations prove me right. And you still want to talk like you're an authority?

      Here's what happens when they "move it from default installation."
      It gets deleted. Not, "it's an option for future users."
      It's existing users that are being affected. Here's how.
      They have to go to an online store they never heard of to get the thing they had last night back. A thing that they already paid for. For no reason. Why should Windows even care what apps are installed?
      When you chose "default" during installation that doesn't mean you want Windows to enforce that list of apps every time you boot or update. That's insane, why let people change things afterwards if all the updates knock you back to your default list of apps?
      That's how Windows 10 works. Every now and then they remove a feature to inflate numbers for their store.

    5. Re: Common by Kaenneth · · Score: 0

      > Why should Windows even care what apps are installed?

      Attack surface, WMP and friends listen on the network, can you guarantee a system can't be compromised through it?

    6. Re: Common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I'd set up a firewall. And I'd monitor my network.

      You know computers are inherently insecure right? They have to be taken care of like a special child.

      You replied to a guy still using 7. I don't have an attack surface or I'd be owned a million times over by now.

  16. Not just Media Player, Media Center, also. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    When Microsoft tricked Windows 7 and Windows 8 users into installing Windows 10, Microsoft removed Windows Media Center, also: Microsoft kills off Windows Media Center.

    More about Microsoft's abusive management: Microsoft's history is filled with abuse.

    1. Re:Not just Media Player, Media Center, also. by Junta · · Score: 1

      Well, it's one thing to remove a function between big updates you opt into.

      It's another to remove stuff by surprise in a normal update.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  17. It's been made a non-default install, not removed by mattb47 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Given that you can add Windows Media Player back in, then title of this story is incorrect.

    WMP has not been removed, it's been made a non-default application ("Feature on Demand"). You can still add it back in fairly easily.

    Maybe Microsoft is planning on completely removing it in the long term, but they haven't removed it yet.

    It's still annoying. Users still use WMP and this is likely to cause a lot of confusion.

  18. Wasn't anything wrong with including a browser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either. The problem was the permanent inclusion of the browser in the explorer shell such that people would have to rely on it because explorer would default to Internet explorer for any URLs placed in the URI bar rather than firing up a third party browser. And since it was already loaded as part of the shell it would seem faster to users than loading a third party browser.

    People often forget that, as well as the Mozilla/Firefox 'preloader' that would keep the browser resources in-memory so the first time you ran it it seemed as fast as Internet Explorer loading.

    Ahh the days of Win9x and the Microsoft Monopoly trials.

  19. Haven't used WMP in years by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    VLC....but I'm sure your typical "mom & pop" that use a computer how it comes out of the box might, but if they are on 10, did it even come with WMP?

    1. Re: Haven't used WMP in years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I literally just used WMP last night on my brother's laptop.
      It was there, it worked, it was fast and convenient. Why delete it?

    2. Re:Haven't used WMP in years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been using mediamonkey instead. But only because WMP has a nasty habit of fucking up my collection of mp3s.

  20. Re: It's been made a non-default install, not remo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't remove the installer, they didn't do anything during installation.
    They removed a feature from OSes that were already installed.

    WTF were you going on about now?

  21. Re:It's been made a non-default install, not remov by OhPlz · · Score: 2

    How do you justify MS removing an application from an already installed Windows system? They shouldn't have to add it back if it was already there to begin with!

  22. Re:It's been made a non-default install, not remov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So arbitrarily removing a decades old program from existing installations might cause some confusion?

  23. Not much to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it wasn't getting much love and they're obviously pushing Grove Music instead.

    Biggest loss was lack of native DVD playback in W10 from the start. Media Player starting to look outdated.

    Things I won't miss:
    - MediaPlayer trying to index my (large) music library when accidentally started to play one track...
    - Using MediaPlayer when ripping (in dbPowerAmp). Rip CD. Play it with MediaPlayer, which then thinks it's a good idea to stop player what I've just deliberately selected to autoplay the next music CD inserted.
    - Using MediaPlayer when travelling. Play DVD. Hibernate. Resume. MediaPlayer remembers what I was playing but not where it was. How hard can that be.

     

  24. Satya Nadella is an ASSHOLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fill in the blank.
    "While it could be argued that ________ is no longer an essential addition to Windows -- there are plenty of quality third-party alternatives . . . "

    Get rid of Notepad, Calculator, Wordpad and anything else remotely useful.
    When does this stop?
    How long until MS offers their "Premium Windows Product"?

    While Satya Nadella is busy promoting his great leadership, is he doing everything possible to kill off the old flagship product?

    1. Re:Satya Nadella is an ASSHOLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is available NOW.

      https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/d/windows-10-pro/df77x4d43rkt/48DN

  25. Re:FTFY? by ichthus · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's nothing wrong with Windows 8, as long as you turn it into Windows 7.

    --
    sig: sauer
  26. What about Media Transfer Protocol? by ebyrob · · Score: 1

    As useless as media player is, does this mean no one will be able to access files on their android devices over USB anymore due to no MTP support? Because Windows 7 can't do it on versions lacking the media pack...

  27. Re:It's been made a non-default install, not remov by omnichad · · Score: 1

    WMP has not been removed, it's been made a non-default application

    That would be the case in a fresh install, but not when you update to this build.

  28. Don't use Micosoft products. by kbg · · Score: 1

    And this is why you never ever rely on any program made by Microsoft because they will either abandon it or remove it from you at some point. Always use open source software for everything, because you can quarantie it won't be taken away and even if it is abandoned you can still download the last version of it.

    1. Re:Don't use Micosoft products. by Megane · · Score: 1

      The same can happen with Google. Just saying. The main difference is that Google's stuff is usually web apps, so you can't even download the last version.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Don't use Micosoft products. by kbg · · Score: 1

      Yes partly, although Google usually gives you the option to migrate to a better product or at least gives you some warning before hand.

    3. Re:Don't use Micosoft products. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 0

      Microsoft gets yelled at when they bundle software, and they get yelled at when they unbundle software.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:Don't use Micosoft products. by kbg · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone will yell when an operating system comes with basic software that makes it usable. Having an OS with no text editor, file browser, sound player, calculator, image viewer, screen saver, e.t.c or basically zero applications is completely useless. I think the litigations where mainly because they bundled the applications so tightly that these applications where no longer applications but a part of the OS and couldn't be removed cleanly. There where also secret API's that gave Microsoft application better integration than competitors.

      I personally would want as many basic applications as possible to come with an OS. I would like to see Movie editors, Sound editors, Media Players, Sound recorders, word processing, spreadsheet to be included with an OS. But you also have to have the ability to remove these if you want and install some other products.

  29. Re:FTFY? by khandom08 · · Score: 2

    While I agree with the +4 moderation, I feel insightful to be more accurate than "Funny"

  30. Re:I hope... by unique_parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...win 10 rapes everybody annually each and every year.

  31. Leave applications alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Microsoft,

    Some of us set up Win 10 machines for family members and relatives. We want a "set and forget" system. It is bad enough dealing with updates, but we don't need you yanking the tablecloth every now and then while we are eating dinner. Applications should not be yanked out like that. This is the second time I know of that you have done something like this.

  32. media player by Veritas1980 · · Score: 0

    CCCP = win..and if you think I am talking about Russia, think again.

  33. Re:FTFY? by Drethon · · Score: 1

    There's nothing wrong with Windows 8, as long as you turn it into Windows 7.

    You can also use classic shell on windows 10. There's nothing wrong with Windows 10, as long as you turn it into Windows 7... except the OS spying on us and able to turn on and off any software at will without users stopping it... er, never mind.

  34. Re:FTFY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's much easier to overcome the negatives of Windows 8 than it is to overcome the negative of Windows 10.

    Windows 8:
    1) Install Classic Shell
    2) Done

    Windows 10:
    1) Turn off every privacy invading hole that Microsoft will allow you to
    2) Disable automatic updates
    3) Install Spybot Anti-Beacon and immunise
    4) Install O&O ShutUp10 and immunise
    5) Add pages of Microsoft spyware domains to your hosts file
    6) Firewall pages of Microsoft spyware domains
    7) Remove Edge, Cortono, X-Box, One Drive and every other spyware resource wasters that nobody wants
    8) Hope that Microsoft doesn't silently reenable anything through hidden backdoors

  35. Many were tricked. They did not "opt in". by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    As I said, many were tricked into "upgrading" to Windows 10. One story: Microsoft is using 'malware tactics' to trick people into upgrading to Windows 10

  36. Use MPV and Clementine instead of VLC by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's much much better, especially on Mac/Linux when it uses youtube-dl to support all these by default: https://rg3.github.io/youtube-.... Need a music player? Use Clementine.

    1. Re:Use MPV and Clementine instead of VLC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here for this. VLC hasn't been a decent choice in years.

      Thanks for proving there's at least someone on Slashdot who knows what the fuck they're talking about.

    2. Re:Use MPV and Clementine instead of VLC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the main reason I use VLC instead of Mplayer these days, is that VLC makes it really easy to switch between built-in audio and HDMI output when I connect my laptop to the TV. Does MPV offer this through their right-click menu or a similarly accessible manner?

    3. Re:Use MPV and Clementine instead of VLC by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

      If you're a Linux user, then you are also probably using pulseaudio like the rest of us. Launch pavucontrol and just change the audio output. You don't need to rely on applications to have special features to customize things when dealing with Linux. When you think you've found a way to do something, there's probably 3 more you haven't thought of yet.

  37. YMMV by DrYak · · Score: 1

    If we don't use Windows 10, what other OS can we use instead? {...} Linux isn't really an option, especially with so many distros including systemd. I hate to say this, but I've found Windows 10 to boot more reliably for me than the versions of Debian and Ubuntu that use systemd! {...} We use Windows 10 because it's the only practical option.

    On the other hand, *I* find Linux to be less of a nightmare whenever I upgrade storage (replace HDD with SSD, replace old busted optical bay with a bay holding an extra SSD, rebalance BTRFS on the fly to RAID1 across the 2 SSDs, etc.), compared to Windows 10 (Whenever you move windows partitions around. Or switch between BIOS and UEFI modes. Or replace DOS-partition scheme with GPT : Windows becomes unbootable and you must yet again get the recovery disk. Or you must do the above action using specially crafted tools by the manufacturer which often are... Linux bootdisks, actually).

    So as the saying goes, "Your Mileage Might Vary".

    In my case, I use openSUSE's Tumbleweed Linux disto because it's a very practical option for me.

    Other users might have even other experiences.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  38. Software I have to use by DrYak · · Score: 1

    The choice is "an OS that runs the software I have to use" and "an OS that doesn't run the software I have to use."

    And in some cases, mainly in "big data" analysis fields, even moreso in bioinformatics, the "OS that runs the software I have to use" tend to be flavors of Unix - so're basically limited to macOS X or Linux.

    (With only very recently Windows starting to be able to run these same software, thanks to WSL).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Software I have to use by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And in some cases, mainly in "big data" analysis fields, even moreso in bioinformatics, the "OS that runs the software I have to use" tend to be flavors of Unix - so're basically limited to macOS X or Linux.

      (With only very recently Windows starting to be able to run these same software, thanks to WSL).

      I have software that I run that is only available on MacOS. I don't brag about it like the Windows users who strut around because they are forced to use Office365.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Software I have to use by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      And in some cases, mainly in "big data" analysis fields, even moreso in bioinformatics, the "OS that runs the software I have to use" tend to be flavors of Unix - so're basically limited to macOS X or Linux.

      (With only very recently Windows starting to be able to run these same software, thanks to WSL).

      I have software that I run that is only available on MacOS. I don't brag about it like the Windows users who strut around because they are forced to use Office365.

      My job insists I run Windows and have MS Office installed. I feel that it ought to pay me extra for this, especially since they're not giving me a cheap way to obtain the latter if I don't wish to pirate it. (It'd need to be significantly better to be worth it.)

  39. apple really needs an $1000-$1500 desktop / gamer by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    apple really needs an $1000-$1500 desktop / gamer system.

    $1,300 for a system with weak video card with 2GB video ram and 8GB system with an 5400 rpm HDD does not fit that bill.

  40. Re:FTFY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Classic Shell on Windows 7. It's better than the standard menu.

  41. Firstly, WTF are people doing using Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they are idiots.

    Secondly.. as if you wouldn't be using WinAmp.

  42. And Audacious Media Player! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Agreed. There is also Audacious Media Player if you miss Winamp.

    http://audacious-media-player....
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...

  43. I know of one peice of hardware that relies on it by bferrell · · Score: 1

    The Silicondust tuners can ONLY play DRM content with Windows Media Center.

    They (Silicondust) is about to be VERY unhappy... Not to mention those who bought the devices

  44. Hackintosh by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    For the hackintosh route you could run a VMware hypervisor with GPU pass through enabled.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Hackintosh by Chromium_One · · Score: 1

      and for those fun times, refer back to the original point with doing your research on the hardware first.

      --
      When you live in a sick society, just about everything you do is wrong.
    2. Re:Hackintosh by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      With a hypervisor you don't have to worry if your hardware is compatible. You create a VM that's tweaked to work with OS X. Hell run Linux and Windows along side if you have enough resources.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:Hackintosh by Chromium_One · · Score: 2

      ... yes you do have to worry about compatibility -- of your hardware with PCI passthrough. Your CPU needs to be new enough, your motherboard and BIOS need to support the proper options, and you need to verify that you have a PCI slot in a useful form factor for a video card that can be separated to its' own PCI control group, and depending on brand of card, you need to verify the drivers aren't going to fuck you over (nVidia has done this in the past, dunno if they're doing it now) ... and then once all that's verified, you get to play fun games with the virtualization environment setup.

      It's been a bit since I've played with this, but no, it's not just a plug and play solution.

      --
      When you live in a sick society, just about everything you do is wrong.
  45. They did what you all bitched for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They include programs by default? They are abusing their monopoly and forcing out competition!
    They don't include programs by default? They are incompetent and destroying the OS!

  46. Minilyrics / SYLT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kept Windows around for the minilyrics plugin, to edit synchronized lyrics. Don't know of anything else on Linux that works. Kid3 is *supposed* to, but never got it to go work.

    Thanks, MS!

  47. Win10 + Linux Subsystem by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    If we don't use Windows 10, what other OS can we use instead?

    What's wrong with Win10 + linux subsystem? I've tended to find Windows 10 a pretty decent OS - which I'll readily admit was a huge surprise. It boots fast, is stable and with WSL I can run a bash shell while at the same time having Adobe, MS and OpenSource software all accessible. Admittedly it is not as good as macOS but I can run it on a desktop which is ~40% cheaper, takes expansion cards and 3-4 years more up to date than a Mac Pro. The same holds for laptops although the CPU+GPU age difference is only ~1 year there.

  48. Re:I know of one peice of hardware that relies on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Silicondust tuners can ONLY play DRM content with Windows Media Center.

    They (Silicondust) is about to be VERY unhappy... Not to mention those who bought the devices

    From what I'm seeing, Silicondust (which I've never heard of before) appears to make set top boxes. If you're watching the content off of those on a Windows PC, surely you're in the minority of a minority.

  49. Re:I know of one peice of hardware that relies on by bferrell · · Score: 1

    IP based tuner boxes for both OTA and cable use... Not *exactly* a STB. The boxes have NO composite, RF or HDMI interfaces.

  50. Windows Server 2016 as a workstation by UBfusion · · Score: 1

    I plan to use this as my next desktop after Win7 x64, since it seems MS is not propagating the Win10 security patches to 7 and 8. I'm running it in a VM and so far it seems very promising. Snappy, small memory requirements and the added bonuses of almost no telemetry, no spyware and no Cortana.

    The main reason I decided to migrate is that Win7 is no more viable for me. I find that the shift to monthly security updates have worsened the update situation. My current Windows 7 x64 just refuses to install the September update (KB4038777) and there is no cure for it, as currently there is no definitive solution but an in-place reinstall (been searching for a week now trying all procedures found in MS and other forums). When the updates were isolated patches one could troubleshoot the offending one, but now with the monthly updates it's an all-or-nothing deal - if it doesn't want to play along you're doomed. Given the number of people having the issue (just search error code 80073701 kb4038777 and see) I predict that Win7 will slowly but inevitably fade away due to the inability to patch it properly.

  51. WMP: the only alternative to Apple's music solutio by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Granted there are much better out there but I have family who have stuck with Windows Media Player since Windows 7 because it's all they know and don't want to learn more at their age. I've already heard grumblings of why Microsoft does changes like this to ruin their experience. This won't go over well.

    It's not merely habit. It's also that the successors/substitutes that come in Windows 10 lack some important features that WMP had.

    Since WMP was a 'one-size-fits-all' application in Windows 7 and prior, one could, aside from songs, even organize music videos into playlist. Imagine that you collected a whole bunch of them from YouTube, or even bought them from somewhere. In WMP, you could organize them into a playlist just like you could w/ just audio music, and you'd be fine: you wouldn't have to have an audio only copy of your music video to have it in a playlist.

    In Groove - Microsoft's music player - audio is all you're allowed to do. If one wants to watch a music video, one has to use the Movie app. But guess what: one can't create playlists in movies, since that's obviously not how one watches movies. And in Groove, where one can create playlists, one can't include music videos in them.

    On my part, I got an iPod Nano - just days before Apple discontinued the product, and loaded up what I could. I need to process my collection to make it into a format that the iPod can use. While I play it in the car - that's where the playlists are really needed - I can also watch music videos on them when I'm not driving.

  52. Just Fucking Trust Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -- satya nadella

  53. Thanks again MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of these fantastic updates has broken my Films & TV app on my Win10 ThinkPad. I’ve removed the app and reinstalled it from the Win Store with limited success. Now it crashes and burns after 5-7 seconds instead of 1-2, though still unusable. No problem I have thought since I still got the good old WMP. Oh wait

  54. Re:It's been made a non-default install, not remov by dywolf · · Score: 1

    precisely.
    and more simply, how do you justify MS removing anything from MY computer?

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  55. Why confuse normal (less-savvy) users? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Of course none of us use it. Of course we all know about MPC and VLC. But the old lady next door, and lots of other basic users (that I help) who just want to email their grandchildren and watch cat videos, will be confused and perhaps afraid that they broke something or they have a virus. Why remove it stealthily when you could have an excuse for MORE ads about the "new and improved" replacements (yes I know they aren't improved, that's why I put quotes around the obvious marketing line). Why treat your customers badly?

  56. good start... keep going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a good start. Now if only the next update would remove win10 completely.

  57. So... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    After the update I have to reinstall it just to be able to use it again. They should have checked if the player is in use, and if, keep it, if not, dump it.

  58. Windows Media Center by BrinkeGuthrie · · Score: 1

    Never use the player, but I still use a terrific Windows Media Center HP PC---I have cable routed into the back and one click brings me cable TV I can record. Works fine except if I program the wrong time! They killed that one, too.

  59. Windows decay into a dumb OS and a Store by Kuruk · · Score: 1

    They want people to use the store so a future windows will be gutted and free or monthly small fee and you buy what you need from the Windows store.

  60. How to re-enable Windows Media Player by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    Here are a couple of methods for scripting re-installation of Windows Media Player after applying KB4046355.

    via Command Prompt: dism.exe /online /enable-feature /featurename:WindowsMediaPlayer

    via PowerShell: enable-windowsoptionalfeature -online -featureName WindowsMediaPlayer

    Hopefully that will be of use to people who still need to use (or prefer) Windows Media Player.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
  61. Just like Microsoft Paint... by iq145 · · Score: 1

    WHO are they to decide what WE want?!

  62. And nothing of value ... by baerd · · Score: 1

    And nothing of value was lost.

    --
    I wish I had a lawn.