"Or the lady down the street who wouldn't get married so she could keep getting here welfare benefits even though her boyfriend lived with her?? " hmmm, Somehow I have my doubts, or your state systems is flawed
That is common here in San Antonio, but usually for when you have children.
You get more money back for being a single mom at tax time and it is a hell of a lot easier to qualify for most government "assistance" programs.
If you were a staunch Nader / Green supporter, you would not vote for the party that prevented freedom of choice at the polls.
And chances are, you would be ideologically different enough not to vote republican.
It's about keeping 3rd parties down. The democrats have done this for decades against the Greens and the Republicans did it to whatever the party Perot started.
I always thought this and it was confirmed after the debates.
Every time Obama would call him out on something, he just smiled and took it.
It made it appear that even he didn't believe in what he was saying (asides from earmarks.)
As a conservative, I am not surprised he lost.
I keep hearing that this is the signal for the end of conservatism. To me, it's a signal for the opposite.
Conservatives want a real conservative, not one that plays one on the campaign trail.
Obama won because liberals had someone to be excited about and they voted in record numbers. Conservatives were taken for granted this election and as a result weren't there when the Republicans needed them.
Couple this with the fact that people can not run the software that they already own, and there just isn't a reason to switch no matter if linux "is better" or not.
I don't think this is an issue for corporations. Most companies lock the desktop down where they make it so that the average user wouldn't be able to install any software they own, either.
Slashdot Mirror
I'd be first in line for the foundation movies.
As long as it was movies. Not the whole thing crammed into a 90 minute movie
No, you are the one who brought up firefox
They would report on McCain's "attacks" and then save Obama the trouble by arguing against the ads.
If nothing substantially incorrect could be found, they would quote so random person who would said negative attacks hurt their feelings.
Or had their top anchors travel with him across Europe.
If you don't do it then you get hunted and it becomes the epic struggle of soldiers destroying each other with cool toys
You think he would do that when it's his own party in charge of congress?
"Or the lady down the street who wouldn't get married so she could keep getting here welfare benefits even though her boyfriend lived with her?? "
hmmm, Somehow I have my doubts, or your state systems is flawed
That is common here in San Antonio, but usually for when you have children.
You get more money back for being a single mom at tax time and it is a hell of a lot easier to qualify for most government "assistance" programs.
It's to get them not to vote.
If you were a staunch Nader / Green supporter, you would not vote for the party that prevented freedom of choice at the polls.
And chances are, you would be ideologically different enough not to vote republican.
It's about keeping 3rd parties down. The democrats have done this for decades against the Greens and the Republicans did it to whatever the party Perot started.
I have issues from time to time in both.
The difference is that I know how to fix issues in Linux.
And killing X isn't a showstopper (or even a reason to reboot)
Hopefully what has been laid to rest is the word neocon.
It's as stupid as neolib
McCain's campaign failed because he was weak.
I always thought this and it was confirmed after the debates.
Every time Obama would call him out on something, he just smiled and took it.
It made it appear that even he didn't believe in what he was saying (asides from earmarks.)
As a conservative, I am not surprised he lost.
I keep hearing that this is the signal for the end of conservatism. To me, it's a signal for the opposite.
Conservatives want a real conservative, not one that plays one on the campaign trail.
Obama won because liberals had someone to be excited about and they voted in record numbers. Conservatives were taken for granted this election and as a result weren't there when the Republicans needed them.
That's why I never ran badapp despite all the good things I heard about it.
How about my Debian updates?
I don't use windows and never had it on my machine.
Couple this with the fact that people can not run the software that they already own, and there just isn't a reason to switch no matter if linux "is better" or not.
I don't think this is an issue for corporations. Most companies lock the desktop down where they make it so that the average user wouldn't be able to install any software they own, either.
Not be be a fanboy, but you can use Debian for a PPC supported distro.
On the other, it would confirm my darkest fears.
That you're from the future?
Why would another country follow our Constitution?
How about an OS that you can install?
I played with MenuetOS for a bit and it is impressive but not something for everyday use.
It is interesting that you find blogs (which is what you used to back your claim) more accurate than the wikipedia.
That's interesting.
To me KDE 5 looks more responsive than Windows 7.
Of course, I haven't tried either one since they are not out (or made?) yet.
In Texas your wages can only be garnished for taxes, student loans, and child support.
Because there are no other browsers besides firefox...
gnash works for youtube and ads.
Not so great with websites that are entirely flash.
Lenny is due to be out soon so Debian will be off that list.
You didn't do very well.
I see 70 % overrated and 30 % underrated.
No flamebait.