I feel like you missed the point I was making. And all the democrats in office at the time voted for the DMCA so there is no reason to think the outcome would have been different with a Democrat run Congress.
for matters like this, regardless of who is in power, the outcome is the same.
As someone who used to be a cashier, let me just say that is a shitty move.
Honestly, if it went to email or text receipts, you or someone else would be bitching at the loss of privacy. If it just was the total, you or someone else would bitch about the lack of transparency. But hey, at least you get to give that cashier one more unpleasant experience for their day.
Slashdot Mirror
Because the majority of customer prefer a smooth phone and feel the look of screws is dated.
That doesn't apply to you or me but we are not the majority of users.
Well, if I only cared about one aspect of a country and life, I'd definitely move there.
It's funny how that gets repeated even though the last time we were number 1 was 2008.
What's wrong with them doing this?
They outlined the reasons and they make sense.
Once again, leftist using homosexuality as an insult. Right up there with Bill Maur, Rosie O'Donnel, and chelea Handler
https://www.washingtontimes.co...
https://www.foxnews.com/entert...
http://wbsm.com/homophobes-on-...
Do you work for free?
A code of conduct is not a licence.
They cannot change their licence without approval from all contributors.
We went through this discussion during the GPL2 to GPL3 conversions.
Fake affair? It was very real.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I feel like you missed the point I was making. And all the democrats in office at the time voted for the DMCA so there is no reason to think the outcome would have been different with a Democrat run Congress.
for matters like this, regardless of who is in power, the outcome is the same.
This is something definitely to be pointed to when people say we need more bipartisanship.
Not a single Republican or Democrat in the House or Senate voted against it
Fact, Democrats controlled the presidency when DMCA passed.
Fact: Democrats voted for this bill.
The post you replied to wasn't blaming Hilary. The post was stating for matters like this, regardless of who is in power, the outcome is the same.
It's a different world now. It is much less likely for that to happen now that everyone and their mother can store a copy
In fairness, Congress is suppose to be the representatives of consumers while listening to the input from interested third party experts.
It would look like Word Perfect
Such as how the gay community managed to create a new definition that shows up first or second in response to their dislike of Rick Santorum?
Coupons work well for items you can by in bulk at Coscto and Sams. I time my toilet paper purchases around those coupons :)
Just say no thanks and move on.
You aren't alone on the privacy concern. Just the cashier is the wrong audience for your concern.
As someone who used to be a cashier, let me just say that is a shitty move.
Honestly, if it went to email or text receipts, you or someone else would be bitching at the loss of privacy. If it just was the total, you or someone else would bitch about the lack of transparency. But hey, at least you get to give that cashier one more unpleasant experience for their day.
+1 the essential phone was great not because of it's hardware or clever software, but because of the LACK of crap software.
Looks like this guy is going in the opposite direction now ... So weird
I'd pay for an essential phone 2 but not for this
Did you pay for one? Because it looks like not enough people did even though there were a lot of people saying this is exactly what they wanted.
Like Android?
Andy Rubin, the creator of Android operating system
I have stiff in the 8000 range and have no problems.
If the law is unclear, then the law should be corrected. A judge should not get to arbitrarily change the law to give it meaning.
How would you feel if the judge made the law "clear" by ruling in Google's favor and setting a precedent for this type of behavior?
So I can finally get something out of my g+ account?
The memo doesn't state they are closing g+ due to a privacy breach.
He is stating that these journals look for links and make them without actually know - or checking - if the link is valid.
It's someone making fun of Trump supporters. "power to inspect there algoritms"? Yeah, this is something that comes up in normal folk speak.