Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Tackles 'Horrifying' Bing Search Results (bbc.com)
Microsoft has "taken action" to change its Bing search engine after it was found to give "horrifying" results for some terms. From a report: Journalist Chris Hoffman discovered Bing suggested racist topics when he looked up words such as "Jews", "Muslims" and "black people". Bing also ranked widely debunked conspiracy theories among the top suggestions for other words. Mr Hoffman said Microsoft had to do better at moderating its search system. In his investigation, Mr Hoffman looked up racially-themed terms and found that the majority of suggestions for further searches that accompanied results pointed people to racist sites or images. Racist memes and images were also returned for many of the words he tried. "We all know this garbage exists on the web, but Bing shouldn't be leading people to it with their search suggestions," wrote Mr Hoffman. It is believed that the suggestions for further searches connected to these terms have emerged from a combination of user activity and concerted action by far-right groups to skew responses. [...] Jeff Jones, a senior director at Microsoft, said: "We take matters of offensive content very seriously and continue to enhance our systems to identify and prevent such content from appearing as a suggested search. As soon as we become aware of an issue, we take action to address it."
If this horrifies you,you are pathetic
I'd appreciate a search engine that gives me exactly what I search for. I can filter things myself and get better at searching and get what I'm looking for that way.
Just create a list of words for which no suggestions will be provided.
If those pages are the type people are reading most often for those given search terms then Bing is doing its job. I don't expect morality to be a weighting factor for a query (horrible as that may be).
If( searchTerms.isRacist() )
{
Result.rankHigher();
}
reason I sometimes use Bing. Thanks for killing the one advantage Bing had.
These search results are like anudda shoah! Remember the 600 million!
I'd appreciate a search engine that gives me exactly what I search for.
No you wouldn't. You want something that will return the information you are seeking. That is often not going to be what you actually searched for. Furthermore that isn't a valid justification for a search engine returning the sorts of "horrifying" results Bing is evidently prone to in places where they should not reasonably be expected.
I can filter things myself and get better at searching and get what I'm looking for that way.
Even if true that doesn't mean that is the best way to do it and it also doesn't mean other people want to search that way. I sure as hell value a search engine that isn't rock dumb and that can help me get to the information I'm seeking. If I want to seek out some bogus conspiracy theories or racists propaganda there probably should be some extra steps involved in getting to that.
Search engines aren't supposed to return what is the most popular, but what is the most useful. Nobody ever needs to be told what they already know, only what they need to also know.
When you have a positive feedback loop, it's always good to stop the cycle before things get destroyed.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
Why would we want any search engine with censored content? SJWs have killed liberalism. SJW does NOT equal Liberal; it's the opposite.
On the right political spectrum, there was once the "moral majority" with Jerry Falwell that advocated similar censorship. Thank God that moviement fizzled away. But why is such fascist behavior now embraced as "SJW" "woke" "uber liberal" ??? It flys agaisnt all that true liberalism embodies.
This SJW trend is all facism under various guises by people who think they know what's better for you than you yourself.
It is rather amusing to watch this thing that we here at /. 20 years ago assumed would usher in a new era of transnational singularity-driven technocracy. .. ...
Yet it turns out fuuucking /pol/ is always right. fuck. I never wanted to end up knowing all this shit.
And who decides what is the "most useful" ?
Bing search:
Migrate from Windows to Linux
"Useful" results Microsoft think you need :
- 10 reasons why you don't want to migrate to Linux
- Linux is too complicated. Here's why...
- Think twice before migrating to Linux
- You can get fired for choosing Linux solutions
- ... (213 links later) Easy migration guide to Linux
Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
The problem is that anyone who's been awake in the last few years knows that not everything called racist actually is racist, in any meaningful way.
Who gets to decide? Well, in the past, you did (modulo a large bunch of publishers and broadcasters and libraries and such).
Now? Something gets "deplatformed" and you will never see it to decide for yourself. It's too easy now to just "disappear" people and ideas.
I have no problem with filters per se, as long as they are accessible - I generally have Google's safe search on, if using Google, for example. If Bing wants to have a "Filters" panel, and a checkbox that says "hide what Bing thinks is racist", great.
Racist faggot apologist Joey Rox wants to search Bing for racism apparently, that's what he expects when he types "jews" or "black people" because Conservatism today is 100% about being a racist faggot on the internet, now.
For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.
ipfs.io
Google and Bing are very different in wholesomeness.
Googling "Girl Licking Tits" would probably show you pictures of a girl licking British song birds as top image result.
Bing search "McDonalds" would probably show you a picture of Ronald having a threesome with the Hamburgler and that purple blob creature as top image result.
FYI I, for good reason, haven't actually done either of the searches above- these responses are dramatazisations.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
It's not about popularity, certainly not overall popularity. Search engines are optimized towards returning whatever the people searching are actually looking for. If you're the sort who type in a query starting with "the jews", quite likely it's antisemitic material that you're looking for and will find "most useful" (or at least click on, which is all they know). There's no need to assume right-wing manipulation here; I only wish the racist fringe wasted time skewing Bing results on queries made almost 100% by their own.
The algorithm can't be expected to learn on its own that such material is objectively junk, if the searchers think it's good. We probably wouldn't want it to try. But letting humans manually fiddle with specific search results carries its own problems.
xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
You can filter yourself by finding bad results and excluding them. Have you never gotten bad results in your searches before? You do realize that most people filter out results after examining them because they know they don't want them, right? You seem to be using 'filter' to mean that a person should never even know they exist to begin with, as if it's their job to shelter us from even knowing that people might disagree with us about things.
If they hide results from us, we'll never know what's out there. How would you, say, do a report on conspiracy theories if there's an organized effort to hide any such results from people deliberately looking for them because merely knowing the information exists is now 'horrific'?
Or is your point that people have to be completely protected from 'bad' information? Which information is bad? Maybe we should get rid of works that have historically led to mass violence on a global scale? Let's see, topping the death charts on that would be... the Communist Manifesto, Koran and Mein Kampf. Gotta burn 'em all?
And being a progressive is all about being a homophobe apparently
I can see "deprioritize" yes.
But if it comes to full removal filtering from the complete long-list of search results, that seems like a dangerous precedent.
It may be targeting universally objectionable racist stuff now, but it is a slippery slope to make MS, Google, and Facebook the moral police.
What if they start filtering out the postings of supporters of "trade enemy" countries. as being flamebait. Or start filtering out unpopular opinions phrased with strong language. This starts to sound exactly like the great totalitarian firewall of China.
A better solution might be search-user tweakable prioritization / filter settings, with "tame" default settings.
That way, a journalist researching, or a historian documenting, racist crap on the internet could find what they're looking for.
Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
And got back a bunch of pictures of lady boys
Why is it that everything that tells the truth needs to be fixed? Search engines... AI... crime statistics... IQ testing...
I did a Bing search none of those things were on any of the 5 pages I scrolled. The first result was a linux.com 'Windows to Linux Mogration Guide.' So basically, your post is complete and total bullshit.
Someone else is deciding what is, "Horrifying".
When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
It is horrifying because our culture has run amok concerning political matters and it is common to include opposing views with true racism as a means to oppress their political opposition. it is so obvious individuals and tech companies are intentionally and unintentionally interchanging racism/hate with non-racist policies they disagree with. The fact is the behavior of the intentional side is indeed rooted in hate and so completely obvious it is not debatable. This oppressive, fascist behavior is very disturbing to say the least.
I find it hilarious not only because liberals are so unhinged and irrational over the current administration but also because they fail to recognize the other half of the country was totally repulsed by Obama's complete failure to economically strengthen us and bolster national security in general. Not to mention inability to maintain strong, leadership globally and his seemingly ever growing rap sheet of scandals. And it still grows even though he is out of office. Given the fact his legacy has all but unraveled, what little remains his legacy will forever exist infamously.
... words combined with each other: racists nutcases and people looking for something to be offended by.
.....BING is finally human.
Clearly computers do not always distinguish what is racist or disturbing to some. Maybe what's important is how is relevancy determined when in fact people have different ideals of what is acceptable and what is not? As someone else said, the web is full of crap and trying to sift through with good results you may actually want will still probably give you crap sometimes. I find that with Google, DuckDuckGo and of course Bing. Google apparently is better at this given how popular it is over any other search engine.
"Useful" is a loaded term, easily abused. What, for example, would be "useful" to a racist, a sexist, a religious fanatic, or a republican?
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Hehehehe, nice!!
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Swedish media have been caught making the decision not to report on events regarding muslim immigrants because those reports would be beneficial for the (politically) unpopular part Sverigedemokraterna. This wasn't about racist memes - it was about choosing not to report factual truth about things that actually happened because it was not politically correct to do so.
Is that what you want the internet to become? In that case, quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
-=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
Just consult the "Ministry of Truth" to decide if the search result should be returned to the user or not. This is dangerous!
Why does any search engine need to modify it's results for other than ad money?
I get the filtering of "adult" subjects as a matter of convenience, but why does Bing or Google care what their key word searches return? I would think that starting down this road is obviously a bad idea, or do we figure that Google and Bing are somehow tasked with controlling speech? Cause that's where this logically goes... Personally, I think search engines should CLEARLY tell us what filtering they are doing and how they rank results, or provide a way to bypass their filtering and ranking adjustments and return the unmodified results on demand.
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
Trump Search engine. I wonder how much Trump would charge Microsoft for branding?
The last time I used Bing, I was searching for something innocuous.
Every result I got was one of my search words used in "www.<word>.com/", or something very similar. Every one was the root of the website that it returned.
Utterly Useless.
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
I'm tired hearing the whiners complaining about censorship. It isn't censorship if you are trying to design your tool to work how you want it to. If anything, you all are trying to censor Bing devs from making the search engine work how they want.
Nowhere did they day, they we're going to remove the offensive results from any search. They just said their algorithm is not returning the correct result from the search terms. According to them the correct results for Jew should not include anti-jewish racist sites, etc.
Imagine that? Devs that actually want their tools to work the way they want them to.
What a surprise.
All this censorship. This is why we can no longer trust the large tech companies. There should be much more push back to all this censorship we are no different than communist China at this point. SJW are the death of liberty and should be fought against by everyone that values the freedom.
If I search for that phrase on Bing, the very first item at the top is from Wikihow on how to move from Windows to Linux in 8 steps (with pictures!). They even embed part of the list right in the first result. Step 1 is choose a distro. Step 2 is try the "live CD" versions first. Step 3 is about picking the correct applications to use. Step 4 is about backing up your data (maybe the steps aren't in the right order, but whatever). Etc.
The second result is the Windows To Linux Migration Guide from linux.com. The fourth result is 11 reasons why you should migrate from Windows to Linux. The next result is titled "Migrating to Linux From Windows Makes for Good Business".
I don't see a single anti-Linux result on the first page. So, if that list of what you posted is actually the results you see, then that says a lot more about your previous searches than anything about Bing. I don't use Bing at all, so I should have no history there.
If that list you posted is some example you just made up, then you're perfectly illustrating the problem that the article is about - uninformed crap posted online (and modded up!) masquerading as actual information which should not be on the top of the list.
"Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
not even a little bit. It's safe to say that if I go to bing and search for "Jewish" that I probably don't want pro-Nazi propaganda. The percentage of people searching for issues related to, say the Jewish religion is probably a bit higher than the percentage of white supremacists. The same is true for searching for "Black Lives Matters".
You can still find the neo-Nazi sites, but you have to search for them in a way you would expect (e.g. search for "White Power" or "Neo Nazi"). What Bing is trying to fix is that when you search for relatively innocuous terms they don't bring up what are pretty clearly hate and conspiracy theory sites.
What I'd like to know is how did this sort of fringe content become the norm for a Bing search. I know Bing is bad at search, but not this bad. Somebody's been manipulating their search results for a reason. We can probably guess who...
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
While I appreciate where they're coming from, I really don't want my search results to be curated, cleaned up, sanitized, censored, or whatever you might want to call it. Otherwise I'm only given results that represents what someone decided should be let through - and how that decision is made *always* has unintentional side-effects.
A cynic might suggest that anybody stupid enough to use Bing would probably want this kind of thing to turn up near the top of their searches.
I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
Why are there different skin colors? Why does Sickle Cell Anemia exists? Why is Cyctic Fibrosis passed on? Where did Blue Eyes come form?
Nope you can't even THINK those questions or you are "Far Right."
If by "nice" you mean the post is bullshit and made up.
Pretty sure that is the point. 'Useful' is subjective to one's own goals and ideals.
No, I'm pretty sure the point was to lie about what Bing does.
The "horrifying" results are part of why I use Bing. I do NOT want Bing turning into another censored safe space filled only with curated right-think like Google.
I thought being "progressive" was about recycling many of the antisemitic stereotypes, but applying them to Russians now. I wonder what they will invent next year.
How inconvenient than the mainstream media/Democrats/whatever has some of the same problems than the "alt right".
Fake News?
- "Assad gasses children!"
- "We bombed a chemical weapons factory"
- "Look at these pictures of the White Helmets, totally not created by British intelligence"
(I'm just thinking of War lies because those are always the most easy to remember and they're the most disastrous. Well, they're very bipartisan unless you're an outsider)
Hate speech, racism, bigotry
- "You must be a Russian bot"
- "The Russians did it"
- "Russians manipulate the media and Internet conversations so as to corrupt our societies"
- "Russians constantly sneak in and undermine our democracy"
Imagine the storm if they were saying :
- "You must be a Jewish bot"
- "The Jews did it"
- "Jews manipulate the media and internet conversations so as to corrupt our societies"
- "Jews constantly sneak in and undermine our democracy"
Bing is returning search results with questionable content? I really hope people realize this is not Bing's issue, it's the sites with the questionable content that have been indexed by Bing's crawler.
Wagging your finger at Microsoft is pretty silly, they did nothing wrong, they just indexed what's out there, same as any other search engine.
If people want this kind of stuff to go away, perhaps you should thank Bing for exposing it for you, then go after the sites where the content is actually hosted.
That's the point, he's giving an example of what could happen.
Woooooosh
You people are idiots.
I'll leave this hear
Wooooooooosh
Get it, hear ;), no you missed it again.
IdiotZ
Double woooooosherZ
The left have established what the acceptable truth is. Facts against protected victim classes are "racist". Believable opposition to that truth are "debunked" conspiracy theories. All of these things pit victim classes against a designated aggressor class, and you know who these groups are by now.
Support alternatives, create them, but do not empower this! It is a slow march where every step seems ridiculous until it happens: PC -> censorship -> official class based blame -> ostracization -> violence -> gulags -> murder.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=...
Bing Search for Jews. Not horrifying at all.
Hmmm so one side we have a group of racist, and on the other side a group of homophobes.
Interesting.
Why tf are you using Bing? This sounds more like advertising for them (in the "no news is bad news" sense).
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
When you have a positive feedback loop, it's always good to stop the cycle before things get destroyed.
But that's the entire premise of Google search: it filters your results to those that are like results you've previously clicked on. It's call the "search bubble", and they keep you in your bubble. Most people think the results are better; me, I'm horrified at the concept and use DDG.
But the "search bubble" Google traps uyou in is probably why peole think this is a "Bing problem": Google by design would only show racist search results to racists.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
The world can be a horrifying place, and searching the internet should not make any attempts to hide this.
An irrelevant, stupid, N-igger.
It seems that Microsoft does not instruct its spiders to obey the robots.txt instructions I provide. The spiders download parts of the site that I do not want indexed. When I talked with the bing support people on this, they said something along the lines of, "yeah, it's a known bug in the spider." Yet they do not fix it. So I just block the spider now. Microsoft's QA quality problems seem to extend from Windows 10 updates to Bing spiders. Maybe the reality is just that Microsoft is a bug-laden company?
People are growing interested in these things, so they type them into search engines.
If we really live in an open society, the only response is to ignore this and publish your own views instead.
Alternative Right.
Bing users being racist etc conspiracy theory junkies! Correlation or causation... Hmmm
We need to make EVERY search engine as crippled and useless as google because somebody say might see some mean words. Censorship is the only the way!
Because we definitely need more massaging of search results for some reason. Isn't this exactly why Google is in the cross-hairs right now?
Thats not a search product that's just public relations branding.
Let people search for and find what they want. Its their internet.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
I also tried it - bing was different to google. but had less advertising. nice!
Microsoft decides. It's either that or go back to the 90s when search results were total crap, which is clearly not what most people want or Altavista would have been the pinnacle of search engines.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Actually it's because they weren't immigrants, they were the children of immigrants, some third generation, born in Sweden. Unless their religion was a particular factor in their crime is irrelevant, same as when Christians and atheists commit random crimes.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
If corporations gave a shit what the left (which begins at anti-capitalism), the Sioux never would have had to protest the DAPL pipeline, the media wouldn't have shoved Hillary down the throats of primary voters, CNN would have been calling for Obama's impeachment for breaking up Occupy Wall Street, etc etc.
FTFY
We saw this same story with the instant search results in Safari - just more propaganda to allow the media to engage in censorship and propaganda by selecting what you may see. And it's not like they're going to stop at blocking, say, Holocaust Denial when someone searches for "Jews". They'll also block shit like anyone who questions the conspiracy theories that Trump worked with Russia to steal an election, or that Assad decides to gas his own people whenever US politicians try to back away from regime change.
And it's not like the hysteria over fake news is ever going to be applied to mainstream news organizations. If all this hysteria was around in 2002-2003, Iraq war skeptics would have been censored, not media figures and organizations that relentlessly lied Americans into a war that cost trillions of dollars and over a million lives.
Initially I was excited to hear that Microsoft was finally acknowledging their search engine was absolute garbage... until I continued reading to discover they plan to make it even worse.
What bunk. When you have blips inserted into the FAA system, the Pentagon moving the coordination center for the interception network, and moving all AWACS to one side of the country (an unneeded and highly suspicious move) for their exercise that simulated very similar events, and the exercise not taken offline for the duration of the attack, what you have is a NOT debunked "conspiracy theory".
Do a search on google for âoeAmerican inventorsâ and get back to me how hard it made you laugh.
Which is why the database that the swedish government seized, which shows that 80% of the crimes were being committed by 'migrants' or whatever term you europeans want to label illegals as. Sorry, you can try painting this bullshit whatever way you want. In the UK, you've got all those child rape gangs and those are being committed by people who've migrated. In Canada, we just had our first bust in BC of a child rape/grooming gang...again migrants.
A girl by the name of Mirassa Shen was murdered in BC...by a 'migrant' who'd been in the country mere months. They charged him with 1st degree murder. Now here's the interesting part, in Canada there are two ways to get a 1st degree murder charge: Premeditation is the first key element here, meaning they had to plan, know, stalk, and then execute their plan. The other way is by rape and murder. Police have already stated that there was no premeditation, that neither person knew each other. So let's finish up, because I'll keep it in Canada. There are now hotels and motels being used as "migrant shelters" vandalism, theft, assault 1, robbery 1&2, sexual assault(1 - not rape), sexual assault(2 - rape) are clustered around these places. They're not shitholes in the cities, these places are in the downtown core in many cases.
But by all means, keep pretending that importing people who are culturally non-compatible, believe that they can "take" whatever they want, that women are worth less then a man. Are doing great things for society...
Om, nomnomnom...
I've wondered about this recently in terms of all the white male hate. Some of it sounds a lot like jew blaming, especially given most male jews are white males.
He was giving a hypothetical example of Microsoft abusing their search engine, not saying what actually happens...
You're equating absence of signal with absence of noise.
Signal and noise are not the same, never were.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
No, I am equating some guy in the media getting to decide what is politically correct for people to learn, and some guy in Microsoft or Google doing the exact same thing.
-=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
Again, most of the child rapists in the UK were second or third generation, i.e. born in Britain and British citizens. The fact that they were mostly Asian and Muslim has been discussed on major TV programmes extensively, and in newspapers and in Parliament and at the inquest into what happened.
What upsets people is that these discussions don't consider the fake news reports, so they think things are being covered up.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
What "real world"? You mean the one, where everyone plays a role, is fake-friendly, and anyone saying what he really thinks, is considered an offensive nutjob?
Only drunk people and Internet users give you a true view of society.
If you do not like what the search engine mirror shows you, maybe you should change yourself?
The sugar industry lobbied the shit out of this for decades, and you call that little influence??
I read the book of Dr. M. O. Bruker, who lived through the entire times to tell the tale, including the Nazis, here in Germany, and everyone knew what the problem was, even back then. He collected data on 50,000 patients (he was the head of a clinic), and had no trouble curing obesity. Just leave away industry carbs. (Those dense acellular short carbs, we talk about today.)
The lobby groups alternatingly called him a Nazi, then a Jew, then a Nazi again, depending on what could discredit him more, and created bullshit study over bullshit study to manipulate the views on nutrition.
Hell, Bayer (including formerly Monsanto) does it to this day. As do Coca Cola, Pepsi, and the lobby of sugar farmers.
(Remember that hilarious Stevia "study", where Monsanto found that Stevia harmed male reproductive organs in mice... if you fed them *half of their body weight in Stevia every day*! Pure Stevia is 400 times sweeter than sugar, mind you. At that dosage, you could kill a person with nothing but water! Let alone salt! Or five times your body weight in sugar per day! ^^)
As a wise man said: A good con works, exactly because nobody can believe that it is that old and that it is that big.
'Journalist' looking for something to whine about 'finds' something to whine about. Looks like the search engine gave him excatly what he was looking for, so operating as it should be.
Again, most of the child rapists in the UK were second or third generation, i.e. born in Britain and British citizens. The fact that they were mostly Asian and Muslim has been discussed on major TV programmes extensively, and in newspapers and in Parliament and at the inquest into what happened.
Uh...the inquest stated that most of the people were immigrants who'd been in the UK for a period greater then 1 year. The average time they'd been in the country was 4 years. That doesn't make them 1st generation. And being born in another country and immigrating with your parents doesn't make you 1st generation either.
What upsets people is that these discussions don't consider the fake news reports, so they think things are being covered up.
So what's "fake news" about it happening over and over again, the police, councils, and child protection services covering it up. And then when there's an inquiry into it, the inquiry comes back stating that they didn't investigate because they were afraid of being labeled racist. Then a year later, the same shit is still going on...the police aren't investigating, the councils are covering it up, and child protection services are looking the other way. That's the very definition of "covering it up." And then there was the "trojan horse scandal" and...well what do you know, it happened in other cities too and the response was the same. And the police, and councils and education boards ALSO simply ignored it and yet it's still happening.
Man it's like there's systemic failures in the UK, and nobody wants to do anything for fear of being labeled racist.
Om, nomnomnom...
Why not push the raw results out, but if you as the vendor judge the results as 'horrible', provide a curated view or mode.
In curated view, the search engine vendor can apply whatever filter they want, with no apologies. In raw mode, they serve up links to the muck that's the internet.
If those pages are the type people are reading most often for those given search terms then Bing is doing its job. I don't expect morality to be a weighting factor for a query (horrible as that may be).
The results on Bing and likewise DuckDuckGo are loaded with this crap because they are gaming the search spiders to get placed as high as possible. It's like all of the garbage links to crap sites like Quora which touts itself as a worse Yahoo Answers but almost never has an answer posted to any of the questions, yet keeps popping up as a top 5 result in tons of searches.
Stupid American of Swedish descent here. I had to go DDG a Latin quote posted by a Swedish person to find out it meant "who will watch the guards" regarding a political Muslim immigration issue the Swedish politicians foisted on themselves, which I think was suppressed by Google search, even though we're talking about horrible bing results.
Oh the nested irony.
I found this site in my tabs
feels like walking onto dog shit!
Why is this "news"? You search for something and you find good and bad things. So. Fucking. What.
Meh.
"Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
Mashiki, you can keep emoting against known facts all you want, but you can't convince anyone except the most retarded people that you're right. We have data. You have literal fake news, that has been disproven over and over again. Screaming and raving that you're right even when the data irrefutably proves you wrong won't magically make you correct. Why do you have such a problem with dealing with reality?
So, according to your logic, if enough people say "Mashiki is a pedophile" over and over again, you'll somehow become one? In spite of never having done anything with a kid?
That's essentially what you're arguing. We know that more people are in jail for falsely reporting "migrant rapes" than migrants for raping. They admitted to making things up to stir up tension. To get idiots like you to believe lies. Why can't you believe them when they admit to lying?
We have data. You have literal fake news, that has been disproven over and over again. Screaming and raving that you're right even when the data irrefutably proves you wrong won't magically make you correct. Why do you have such a problem with dealing with reality?
So the actual inquiry reports are fake news? And the police reports are fake news? And the court cases with criminal convictions are fake? Who's the one having a problem dealing with reality again.
Om, nomnomnom...
So, according to your logic, if enough people say "Mashiki is a pedophile" over and over again, you'll somehow become one? In spite of never having done anything with a kid?
According to my logic, there have been numerous court cases. There have been multiple official inquiries, and the leaked council, police, and government reports stating that they were not to look into it. I'm not sure what's worse, that you can't understand what I said. Or you actually think that your reply approached logic.
That's essentially what you're arguing. We know that more people are in jail for falsely reporting "migrant rapes" than migrants for raping. They admitted to making things up to stir up tension. To get idiots like you to believe lies. Why can't you believe them when they admit to lying?
So the trojan horse scandal didn't happen? Rotherham and nearly a dozen other cities in the UK that had the same thing going on didn't happen? Canada just had their first 'migrant' child prostitution and rape gang bust, but that didn't happen? The cases of the same in Sweden, Netherlands and Germany didn't happen either? Are you living in an alternate timeline?
Om, nomnomnom...
1. Rename it DeploraSearch
2. Drown in money while the world burns
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
You aren't talking about facts, you are talking about anecdotes. The figures don't reveal a migrant crime wave so any report linking crime to immigration is an irresponsible lie.