I still use it daily to wirelessly move files between my computers at home, while my clueless friends (among them programmers and IT assistence guys) carry USB sticks around the house. Lamers.
No, you aren't. I suggest using the w3m text browser to read/. That's what I use, along with the classic discussion system. Gets rid of all the cr*p and just gives you the content.
BTW, I'm typing this message with Vim in an Xterm. Should they make the site impossible to browse this way, I'd probably quit/. altogether.
...you aren't even close. The absolute worst computer scene in history is from 60's TV show "The Prisoner".
Be warned: it will make you cringe very hard. Then maybe laugh a bit. But mostly cringe. Think twice before clicking, because there's no way to unwatch it.
Incidentally, the show itself was good. But that scene... Oh, the horror...
It is wrong, it's 350 000 from January 1st to today, not for a 12 month period. So it's 350 000 in 67 days or 5224 per day, so 1 906 716 per year 1 905 716 * 0.99 *0.35 = 660 677$
Because OF COURSE his book will continue to sell the same figures for the whole year.
You and the author of this writeup should be forbidden from using calculators.
If he put up a paypal donation link, and a page saying "I wrote Trumpet Windsock. Please donate if you used it without paying", I wonder what he'd take in.
Probably not much. Shareware never really worked for the developers. Most people are just greedy bastards.
The thing is though that she wasn't regularly asking for signs. It was a one time shot that coincided with a power outage.
Have you considered that a very subtle flickering of the light might have preceded the power outage? So subtle as to not be consciously perceptible.
When we ask for a sign, we want the sign to happen. Her subconscious, noticing the instability in the light, might have told her: "This is the right time to ask for a sign".
The concept of ceasing to exist has caused me much anxiety and grief over the last few years, requiring medication to subdue.
As Epicurus said: man must not fear death, because when man exists, death does not; and when death exists, man does not. Basically, we never actually come into contact with the state of being dead.
It's not about making the password on an unknown username less secure, it's about making the password so secure that the publicity of the username is irrelevant.
True security is implemented with a strong password and a maximum allowed number of attempts per IP (see the 'denyhosts' program).
1) unknown 4-letter username + unknown 12 letter password
2) known 4-letter username + unknown 16 character password
#2 is more secure, since passwords can contain symbols... The strength must be in your password! Keep it long and hard to guess, and the fact that your username is known will be irrelevant.
Note that usernames are echoed during interactive login, while passwords aren't. That should tell you something.
False. As they explained clearly in the FAQ, they used to run Apache on Solaris simply because the hosting company who donated server space and bandwidth was Sun-based. Now they run their web servers on OpenBSD, though, and have been for a while.
Well... VSFTPd has had its share of problems, too, y'know. Speaking of... it's actually currently suffering from an exploitable "feature" (as the author insists on calling it) that allows attackers to very rapidly and without restraint mine legit usernames from the host running VSFTPd.
Not much use to an attacker, without the passwords. By your logic, you could deem it a security risk that on any Unix system the super-user is always called "root".
+1 on vsftpd: its config file is so well commented that it's almost a tutorial on FTP administration. Top notch work, both on the server itself and the documentation.
Slashdot Mirror
I know what a memory leak is. Firefox 4 leaks horribly, at least on Linux/X86_64.
Yeah. It's much better at leaking memory.
Atheists are between 8% and 16% of the US population, but just 0.2% of the prison population.
Tell that to people who question atheists' morality.
Despite not being ancient or bearded, I'll take Slackware any day, thankyouverymuch.
I still use it daily to wirelessly move files between my computers at home, while my clueless friends (among them programmers and IT assistence guys) carry USB sticks around the house. Lamers.
Click on Account -> Discussions and you get the option to switch to the classic system.
No, you aren't. I suggest using the w3m text browser to read /. That's what I use, along with the classic discussion system. Gets rid of all the cr*p and just gives you the content.
BTW, I'm typing this message with Vim in an Xterm. Should they make the site impossible to browse this way, I'd probably quit /. altogether.
Yeah, because major religions are soooo fucking endangered with the current ruling classes of the world.
Man, you really need to pull your head out of wherever you're keeping it.
The crappy divx on torrent. What do I win?
...you aren't even close. The absolute worst computer scene in history is from 60's TV show "The Prisoner".
Be warned: it will make you cringe very hard. Then maybe laugh a bit. But mostly cringe. Think twice before clicking, because there's no way to unwatch it.
Incidentally, the show itself was good. But that scene... Oh, the horror...
Let's see...
Gee... I wonder where on earth I got the "impression" you were agreeing.
Because OF COURSE his book will continue to sell the same figures for the whole year.
You and the author of this writeup should be forbidden from using calculators.
Probably not much. Shareware never really worked for the developers. Most people are just greedy bastards.
ROTFL.
That just goes to show that you're a clueless noob.
Have you considered that a very subtle flickering of the light might have preceded the power outage? So subtle as to not be consciously perceptible.
When we ask for a sign, we want the sign to happen. Her subconscious, noticing the instability in the light, might have told her: "This is the right time to ask for a sign".
Point taken. I still think it's a troll, though.
Can't reproduce that.
echo -n password | sha256sum | base64
NWU4ODQ4OT hkYTI4MDQ3 MTUxZDBlNT ZmOGRjNjI5 Mjc3MzYwM2 QwZDZhYWJi ZGQ2MmExMW VmNzIxZDE1 NDJkOCAgLQo=
~> echo password | sha256sum | base64
NmIzYTU1ZT AyNjFiMDMw NDE0M2Y4MD VhMjQ5MjRk MGMxYzQ0NT I0ODIxMzA1 ZjMxZDkyNz c4NDNiOGEx MGY0ZSAgLQo=
Lame troll.
As Epicurus said: man must not fear death, because when man exists, death does not; and when death exists, man does not. Basically, we never actually come into contact with the state of being dead.
Those are C++ programming occultists.
It's not about making the password on an unknown username less secure, it's about making the password so secure that the publicity of the username is irrelevant.
True security is implemented with a strong password and a maximum allowed number of attempts per IP (see the 'denyhosts' program).
Wrong... Answer this: which is more secure?
1) unknown 4-letter username + unknown 12 letter password
2) known 4-letter username + unknown 16 character password
#2 is more secure, since passwords can contain symbols... The strength must be in your password! Keep it long and hard to guess, and the fact that your username is known will be irrelevant.
Note that usernames are echoed during interactive login, while passwords aren't. That should tell you something.
False. As they explained clearly in the FAQ, they used to run Apache on Solaris simply because the hosting company who donated server space and bandwidth was Sun-based. Now they run their web servers on OpenBSD, though, and have been for a while.
Not much use to an attacker, without the passwords. By your logic, you could deem it a security risk that on any Unix system the super-user is always called "root".
+1 on vsftpd: its config file is so well commented that it's almost a tutorial on FTP administration. Top notch work, both on the server itself and the documentation.