Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Worst Computer Scene In TV or Movies?

Cuban Devil writes "Yesterday I rented a copy of The Social Network. I won't comment on the story, but the Zuckerberg character's narrated performance on hacking Harvard servers made me wonder: what's the worst computer-related acting performance ever? I leave here my vote: Independence Day, when I had to see Mr. Goldblum upload a virus, using a Mac, when it did not connect even to an ethernet network, compromising the entire alien fleet. What other major technological gaffes have you seen?"

1,200 comments

  1. Agree by Ramirozz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Independence Day... light years away

    --
    http://www.quasarcr.com/
    1. Re:Agree by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh...it's a bit of a push. Independence Day's tied with Hackers in my book.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:Agree by aarggh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Was Independence Day a film? I thought it was a really long PR ad for the U.S.? Kind of like the recent AD "Australia" with Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman.

    3. Re:Agree by pitchpipe · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Yep.
      • Figure out how to write code for an alien computer in a few hours without knowing alien speak. check
      • Figure out in the space of another hour how to write a virus that completely disables ships defenses. check
      • Figure out how to network to said ship to download virus in almost no time at all. check
      • Fly alien fighter craft into mother ship to upload virus. check
      • PROFIT!
      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    4. Re:Agree by aarggh · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's those Galactic Standards for methods of data transfer in action! See, standards DO work!

    5. Re:Agree by bhcompy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One deleted scene referenced that modern computers were derived from the Area 51 alien spaceship. The deletion of that scene created the plothole, but the plothole isn't really a plothole.

    6. Re:Agree by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They actually had a good set up, but blew it. Remember, the military had been tinkering with their own crashed alien ship for decades. They could have worked out an interface between human and alien computers, had a pilot qualified to fly it, etc. Goldblum's character could have just provided some last critical puzzle piece. You could finagle some reason for Smith's character to come along.

    7. Re:Agree by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Technically they would be uploading and not downloading. It's a good thing that a ship of advanced aliens who have mastered intergalactic travel and force fields have never heard of a firewall

    8. Re:Agree by DurendalMac · · Score: 2

      So...all computers can get infected with a single virus? Just because it's a binary computer doesn't mean that you can figure out how to infect it within a few hours. Did Goldblum just download Metasploit for AlienOS? It's still a massive, gaping plothole.

    9. Re:Agree by chispito · · Score: 1

      Independence Day... light years away

      While I agree that no matter HOW you look at it, it's rubbish, I think it's slightly less than ,complete rubbish since Goldblum's character was somehow able to decode their "signal" before they attacked (using whatever mysterious interface he had plugged into his Mac, even if invisible). The story seems to suggest that he used that knowledge to "hack" their wireless network. My vote goes to the Live Free or Die Hard, with the hackers causing explosions in the natgas infrastructure at will.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    10. Re:Agree by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Goldblum had never seen their computers and wouldn't have the foggiest damned clue how to infect their OS. Just because some scientists fumbled around and figured out how to interface with it doesn't mean that someone completely new to it could figure out how to break it.

    11. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot a very important step:

      ???????

    12. Re:Agree by queazocotal · · Score: 1

      There are a number of common answers to why aliens might have lousy security.
      For example - if you're generally running about invading/killing civilisations that haven't really gotten beyond cannon for the past few tens of milennia, then external threats may not have been prioritised in your design.

      They don't have the source. They bought the OS off an extinct race 100000 years ago, and have just patched it a bit.

      Hacking is pointless - if you're a hive species, then there may be little motivation for hacking.

    13. Re:Agree by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      Was Independence Day a film?

      Yes, it was a documentary shot in real time. Duh.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    14. Re:Agree by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      DON'T doubt THE GOLDBLUM

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    15. Re:Agree by gknoy · · Score: 1

      The alien OS was probably written in Lisp. ;)

    16. Re:Agree by Relayman · · Score: 1

      Just as Jurassic Park is a warning not to bring back dinosaurs, Independence Day is a warning not to get rid of all nuclear weapons. What would North America be like today if the American Indians had a few AK47s? When the aliens come, we need to be ready.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    17. Re:Agree by Relayman · · Score: 1

      Actually, Goldblum found out that the aliens were running Windows 4200XVI and that it still had some of the security holes that XP had...

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    18. Re:Agree by Izhido · · Score: 1

      *Of course* they had to remove it, since it's actually a LIE. Everybody knows modern technology comes from the very entrails of Megatron...

    19. Re:Agree by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      He had access to one of the ships to experiment with. Supposedly the ships are run by something similar to the larger (mother) ships.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    20. Re:Agree by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but Goldblum had never seen their computers and wouldn't have the foggiest damned clue how to infect their OS.

      ...But he was using an Apple; "It just works."

    21. Re:Agree by Ambitwistor · · Score: 1

      My vote goes to the Live Free or Die Hard, with the hackers causing explosions in the natgas infrastructure at will.

      Unrealistic, but maybe inspired by this?

    22. Re:Agree by TheABomb · · Score: 1

      So what, is Dennis Ritchie an alien? Was Grace Hopper?

      I want to see the deleted scene with a bunch of alien worrying about if Guido got hit by a crazy human piloting a spacebus into the mothership?

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    23. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phase 1 is Collect Underpants.

    24. Re:Agree by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I think he's implying that Microsoft Windows is in fact alien technology, a duplication so profound that even the security holes are the same. All he had to do was upload his virus to "The Cloud", and whammo. Meanwhile the Apple computer he was using was a ground-up reverse-engineer, minus the flaws, so it would be able to interact without dying.

    25. Re:Agree by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except that ship was sitting in Area 51 for 50 years.

      Probably would not work as presented. Although they could have made it seem more plausible.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    26. Re:Agree by geekoid · · Score: 0

      You might have a point...if ti was a few hours. They had been studying the computer systems for 50 years.

      No, it's not a plothole, your just to busy being a hater to think. People like you are why movies have to be simple and dumbed down.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    27. Re:Agree by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      If we want to talk about human OSes with evidence of aliens, consider that we needn't constrain ourselves to two big consumer vendors. Consider, for example, how alien IBM's MVS is. I could easily see something like that being the missing link.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    28. Re:Agree by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Some suggest that our computers are supposedly derived from tech inspired by analysing the crashed ship, which while not really believable it is slightly less difficult to suspend disbelief.

      What really kills the film is basic physics. Even if the aliens had some tech that somehow mitigated the mass of the mothership initially and stopped it ripping the earth apart at the seams, and even if that remained active (or was a passive tech) once the ships were disabled, them crashing into the Earth at the end would have finished pretty much finished us completely.

    29. Re:Agree by Coolhand2120 · · Score: 1

      The alien overlords designed their computer system to "just do what the user wants", once Jeff figured out the admin password, which ironically was "password" he had full control of the system, he called it a vrius so people would understand, but all he typed was del *.*. Incredible alien technology!

    30. Re:Agree by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Hey if its anything like windows 3.1 just let a 10yo mess around with it for a few hours and it will be sure to stop working. Man was my neighbor annoyed after I did that.

    31. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's watching you poop.

    32. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that it offers a complete explanation by any stretch of the imagination, but you're forgetting the part where he discovered that the Aliens were using human satellites to coordinate their attack. Presumably, the signal format would have followed the example the Aliens used in their own communications.

      So your point 3 has an almost-plausible explanation.

    33. Re:Agree by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      Of course, XP wasn't released till 6 years after the movie came out...

    34. Re:Agree by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      But Goldblum only came up with the idea of the virus. The Area 51 team was the one that created the virus and how to deploy it, at least according to the movie. After he thanks his father for commenting about getting sick from the cold floor he was lying drunk on, Goldblum runs out to tells the Area 51 guy to wake everyone up, that he has an idea. Although the next scene is the demonstration to the president, it's implied that a period of time passes where Goldblum and the Area 51 team work together to prepare the virus and it's delivery system.

      Now the Idea that the aliens systems would have no changes in 50 years, that a completely unknown system could be reverse engineered and a virus to compromise a critical defense system in a few hours, that's a bit out there.

      There was a USENET posting when the movie came out containing a fake CERT advisory about a critical system vulnerability is AlienOS. Quite funny.

    35. Re:Agree by enormouspenis · · Score: 1

      I understood the "virus" to simply be a picture of Steve Jobs with a caption telling the aliens to rewrite their entire fucking OS code immediately. The alien in the window was actually a barista......(open network).

      --
      "I didn't spend six years in Evil Medical School to be called 'Mr.Evil,' thank you very much!"
    36. Re:Agree by icebraining · · Score: 1

      They had been studying the computer systems for 50 years.

      That's like studying an IBM 1401 for 50 years and then hacking a PC with current software in an hour.

      Technology evolves in 50 years.

    37. Re:Agree by nprz · · Score: 1

      Win95 (the movie came out in 1996)

    38. Re:Agree by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From: CERT Bulletin
      Date: 26 Jun 1996 15:43:18 GMT
      Subject: CERT Advisory CA-96.13 - Alien/OS Vulnerability
      Organization: CERT(sm) Coordination Center - +1 412-268-7090
      Approved: cert-advisory@cert.org
      Reply-To: cert-advisory-request@cert.org
      Keywords: security CERT
      Originator: cert-advisory@cert.org

      CERT(sm) Advisory CA-96.13
      July 4, 1996

      Topic: ID4 virus, Alien/OS Vulnerability

      The CERT Coordination Center has received reports of weaknesses in Alien/OS that can allow species with primitive information sciences technology to initiate denial-of-service attacks against MotherShip(tm) hosts. One report of exploitation of this bug has been received.

      When attempting takeover of planets inhabited by such races, a trojan horse attack is possible that permits local access to the MotherShip host, enabling the implantation of executable code with full root access to mission-critical security features of the operating system.

      The vulnerability exists in versions of EvilAliens' Alien/OS 34762.12.1 or later, and all versions of Microsoft's Windows/95. CERT advises against initiating further planet takeover actions until patches are available from these vendors. If planet takeover is absolutely necessary, CERT advises that affected sites apply the workarounds as specified below.

      As we receive additional information relating to this advisory, we will place it in

      ftp://info.cert.org/pub/cert_advisories/CA-96.13.README

      We encourage you to check our README files regularly for updates on advisories that relate to your site.

      1. Description

      Alien/OS contains a security vulnerability, which strangely enough can be exploited by a primitive race running Windows/95. Although Alien/OS has been extensively field tested over millions of years by EvilAliens, Inc., the bug was only recently discovered during a routine invasion of a backwater planet. EvilAliens notes that the operating system had never before been tested against a race with "such a kick-ass president."

      The vulnerability allows the insertion of executable code with root access to key security features of the operating system. In particular, such code can disable the NiftyGreenShield (tm) subsystem, allowing child processes to be terminated by unauthorized users.

      Additionally, Alien/OS networking protocols can provide a low-bandwidth covert timing channel to a determined attacker.

      2. Impact

      Non-privileged primitive users can cause the total destruction of your entire invasion fleet and gain unauthorized access to files.

      3. Solution

      EvilAliens has supplied a workaround and a patch, as follows:

      1. Workaround

      To prevent unauthorized insertion of executables, install a firewall to selectively vaporize incoming packets that do not contain valid aliens. Also, disable the "Java" option in Netscape.

      To eliminate the covert timing channel, remove untrusted hosts from routing tables. As tempting as it is, do not use target species' own satellites against them.

      2. Patch

      As root, install the "evil" package from the distribution tape.

      (Optionally) save a copy of the existing /usr/bin/sendmai

    39. Re:Agree by laron · · Score: 1

      But the rate of evolution slows down as technology matures. For example, WWI fighter planes of 1918 were way ahead compared to those from 1914. In WWII, there also was some progress, but at a much slower rate (ignoring completely new technology like jet planes).
      Or during 1995-2000, PCs became obsolete much faster than today.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    40. Re:Agree by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      They had the machine for decades, but that means they were working with a decades old system. I don't think that a hacker that only had experience working with 1960's computer tech would have much luck hacking into a modern system... and that is still human technology.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    41. Re:Agree by underqualified · · Score: 1

      As we all know, Java has a package for everything.

      import com.aliens.spaceship.mothership
      import com.aliens.spaceship.stolencraft

      stolenCraft.getMac().sendVirus( motherShip );

    42. Re:Agree by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      • Figure out how to write code for an alien computer in a few hours without knowing alien speak. check
      • Figure out in the space of another hour how to write a virus that completely disables ships defenses. check
      • Figure out how to network to said ship to download virus in almost no time at all. check
      • Fly alien fighter craft into mother ship to upload virus. check
      • PROFIT!

      Oh sure, it seems far fetched, but remember Jeff Goldblum was working underground at Area 51...
      That is THE penultimate basement in America folks!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    43. Re:Agree by plover · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Goldblum had never seen their computers and wouldn't have the foggiest damned clue how to infect their OS.

      ...But he was using an Apple; "It just works."

      "Invade different"

      --
      John
    44. Re:Agree by vux984 · · Score: 2

      That's like studying an IBM 1401 for 50 years and then hacking a PC with current software in an hour.

      I agree.

      However, do you really think the "alien space fleet" had just rolled off the assembly line? The ships that invaded, might well be the same vintage as the one that crashed 50 years ago.

      Consider how much of the space shuttle is still 1970s tech... or wander into a mnaufacturing plant and see that MSDOS is still running things, or visit the mainframes running cobol applications from years ago at the hearts of big enterprises...

      Just because technology evolves in 50 years, doesn't mean everything you run into is running it. And quite frankly, a military invasion fleet in service is precisely the sort of thing that like isn't likely running the latest stuff everywhere. Sure it might be here and there... but there will be tons of legacy shit that if it wasn't broken didn't get fixed.

    45. Re:Agree by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      That is THE penultimate basement in America folks!

      It's the next-to-last basement in America?

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    46. Re:Agree by paiute · · Score: 1

      Independence Day... light years away

      While I agree that no matter HOW you look at it, it's rubbish, I think it's slightly less than ,complete rubbish since Goldblum's character was somehow able to decode their "signal" before they attacked (using whatever mysterious interface he had plugged into his Mac, even if invisible).

      I thought he just found chatter/patterned static in the satellite television signal. He didn't understand it, but he could see that the pattern was decreasing somehow over time. He extrapolated to zero and assumed that at zero something bad was going to happen. His laptop would not have needed to be anything but a timer after that.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    47. Re:Agree by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Wait, you mean Jeff Goldblum's character actually had access to that ship for 50 years? No, it was a matter of hours between his idea and the complete virus that disabled the shields. Even if he did, all the military had been able to do was fudge around with it. They couldn't even switch the damned thing on until the mothership arrived in orbit. How is THAT not so simple and dumbed down to border on retardation? Do you even think before you post?

    48. Re:Agree by rve · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the movie had very realistic space aliens and flying saucers

    49. Re:Agree by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      That is THE penultimate basement in America folks!

      It's the next-to-last basement in America?

      Right... for some reason the film did not have them land at DUGWAY PROVING GROUND... where the good stuff is located.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    50. Re:Agree by d'fim · · Score: 1

      You could finagle some reason for Smith's character to come along.

      He was the pilot?

      --
      Adherence to the truth is a form of disloyalty.
    51. Re:Agree by CityZen · · Score: 1

      No, you're looking at this completely wrong. Really, this was just an input fuzzing hack. You see, the alien computer was analyzing what the earthman was doing, and processing: "You're trying to do what? No, that doesn't make any sense at all. You must be trying something much more devious... computing... BSOD."

    52. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he had Chuck Norris on his development team.

    53. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it's not. The deleted scenes show you that he spend long hours with the Area 51 scientists and the alien ship figuring out the code they use for communication. It was this information, not his 'leet Mac and Ethernet skillz that allowed him to create and upload the virus.

    54. Re:Agree by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Hackers may have had some crazy graphics, but the references where much more on the nail then anything Independence Day produced.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    55. Re:Agree by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      They should have called Stallman.

    56. Re:Agree by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      crashing into the Earth at the end would have finished pretty much finished us completely.

      Maybe their mothership wasn't built the way we would build it? What if it was mostly holograms and force fields?

    57. Re:Agree by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I LOVED those shots of Jasik's Debugger that flashed on the screen as part of 'The Net'. The movie was lame, but Jasik's Debugger ROCKED.

      Mac OS 9, Live Long and Prosper!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    58. Re:Agree by breakfastpirate · · Score: 1

      How many people on earth had a firewall installed on their networks before the internet became mainstream? Serious question. I imagine a few did, but I don't think it's that far-fetched that an alien species would focus on physical security more than data security.

    59. Re:Agree by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I would've gone with Hackers or the Lawnmower Man. I think those were far worse.

    60. Re:Agree by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      But I would argue we are progressing just as rapidly but the reason they aren't becoming obsolete quicker is we've run out of common programs that push the tech so PCs are "good enough" for most folks even if they are 7 or 8 years old.

      I mean for the average Joe that is just watching Youtube and looking at his email a 2.2Ghz P4 with a boost to 1Gb of RAM is frankly overkill. The CPU is sitting idle most of the time. But that doesn't change the fact that my sub $100 GPU has more memory and speed than my first 4 PCs put together and that isn't even counting my $600 MOR quad with 8Gb of RAM and a TB of HDD that frankly would have cost more than a house just 10 years ago.

      Personally I'm glad things have slowed a bit as far as the upgrade treadmill as it gets more power in the hands of people for cheaper and lets us keep things for longer reducing waste. I figure I can probably get close to a decade out of this quad with this much RAM before I have to start looking at some 24 core monster as we still haven't figured out what to do with what we've got, even gaming is just now starting to really use dual cores.

      As for TFA while ID4 was probably about as bad as one could get, lets not forget the runners up. There is the CSI shows with their "magic" PCs that can produce parts of a person's face that wasn't even recorded in the original film or zoom into license plates from 3 miles away off of some shitty 7/11 security camera, The Lawnmower Man where one could become a God just by using VR tech and saying cyber a lot oh and don't forget Robocop 3 where multibillion dollar weapons droids can be hacked using nothing but a kid's laptop by the 8 year old kid who owned said laptop in less than 20 seconds.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    61. Re:Agree by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      They had the elements for a good SF solution.

      Forcefields...
      Discover they don't stop things flying slow.
      Biplanes and parachutes carry the bombs past the forcefields.

      As it was... pretty stupid.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    62. Re:Agree by Rizimar · · Score: 2

      Turns out the aliens were using Windows 98 SE, which explains why it was so easy for them to destroy their ship. All Goldblum had to do was install RealPlayer.

    63. Re:Agree by akayani · · Score: 1

      You idiot... he was using a MAC and channelling the power of JOBS.
      Drrrr they have an app for that, don't you know nupping.

    64. Re:Agree by sodul · · Score: 1

      del *.*

      That really sound alien, what planet is this command from ?

    65. Re:Agree by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      aliens, efficient and well over attacking their own race... make sure all their interfaces are perfect and remove any kind of checks from either end...

      They figured no species was dumb enough to code, interfaces, or all things crappy and would dream of attacking each other..

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    66. Re:Agree by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Maybe they had Steve Ballmer. A bit of chair throwing and shouting "I'm going to fucking kill those alien bastards!"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    67. Re:Agree by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Independence Day is a warning not to get rid of all nuclear weapons.

      Yeah, nuking the alien ship over Houston worked so well in that movie... not.

    68. Re:Agree by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Well...

          You'd have to think that the aliens were making their own progress with their systems as well. Say 64 years ago, humans got their hands on the latest greatest piece of alien technology, reverse engineered some part of their technology, and forked it to use technology and resources that they had available.

          Lets look at just our branch, and assume the other branch stagnated. Do you think you could attach a modern computer to it? In that period, you could have a 25bps modem on it. What can you lay your hands on in the next few hours as cities are being destroyed around you, that can talk to a 25 baud modem? I know, wrong crowd, there's probably hundreds of folks on here that have such equipment in their garage, cellar, or keepsake room. :) How many folks could operate, much less hack, a computer from the 40's or 50's?

          So that's just on our branch. Lets assume that they may have done at least a few upgrades over the same period. They would most likely be nothing like our branch. I'd say compare a Mac to a Windows PC, but that's not quite fair, since they have influenced each other. Assume no cross influences, and you have two ... well ... alien systems, with no similarities. Protocols, character encoding, nothing would make sense. Even if everything else were reverse engineered, then there's the alien language, and then understanding the programming language(s). ... and the US Space Shuttle fleet was upgraded in the early 1990s with the AP-101S. It was about 10 years late in my opinion, but hey, they don't ask me to engineer them, and they don't let me fly them.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    69. Re:Agree by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You mean like the screens that light up the user's face and the PASSWORD passwords?

      So change your password to the standard today, you're not compliant!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    70. Re:Agree by monkyyy · · Score: 1

      no its was an ad for mac`s
      its like saying mosts ad`s are for sex, not using it

      --
      warning pointless sig
    71. Re:Agree by Chaonici · · Score: 1

      3

      lol @ lameness filter

    72. Re:Agree by Chaonici · · Score: 1

      Damn you, Slashdot, that was supposed to be less-than-three. Showing appreciation for the awesome post. Instead it looks like random crap. :(

    73. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aliens may have had a very different society (like bees perhaps), where no-one ever consider exploiting the system. Therefore, they might not have invented any "computer security" at all. No problems with this - the rrest of the movie not so good.

    74. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, it's not a plothole, your just to busy being a hater to think. People like you are why movies have to be simple and dumbed down."

      Your right.

    75. Re:Agree by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. But I doubt that would be passive tech: as the ships powered down at the end there would be little left to crash.

    76. Re:Agree by rikkards · · Score: 1

      One thing I never thought about until recently was that they had the fighter craft for 50 years. Theoretically they may have been able to reverse engineer the fighters networking protocol. However they flummoxed that from making the virus bit plausible by not being able to get it to work until Will Smith showed up. If they hadn't done that they possibly could have "set up" the mac to work.
      The best part about the movie was that Canada was no where to be seen. My theory is they were giving the aliens immigrant status. :D

    77. Re:Agree by chapstercni · · Score: 1

      They didn't switch it on. It just TURNED ON without them doing anything once the mothership arrived.

    78. Re:Agree by Kosi · · Score: 1

      You are right, as the whole plot is a big hole. But thanks for that deleted scene info.

    79. Re:Agree by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Their systems vendor sold them an "unhackable" system, and they fell for it.

    80. Re:Agree by fishexe · · Score: 1

      You forgot a very important step:

      ???????

      Yeah, that's the part that makes the whole plan work.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    81. Re:Agree by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that, sir.

    82. Re:Agree by fishexe · · Score: 1

      See, you just don't understand the brilliance of any character played by Jeff Goldblum. He makes all of those things you mentioned trivial.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    83. Re:Agree by Dogtanian · · Score: 0

      Was Independence Day a film? I thought it was a really long PR ad for the U.S.? Kind of like the recent AD "Australia" with Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman.

      Believe me as a non-American, if that was ever meant to be PR for the US, it backfired badly in my case.

      That film is the most obnoxiously jingoistic piece of **** I've ever seen.

      I f****** hated the way that everything revolved around the US. The rest of the world being just a mass of cliched scenery to be blown up (illustrating the threat to the part of the world we were supposed to care about, i.e. the US) ruled by incompetent leaders who needed a cornball US President to save The World (effectively The USA, who gives a toss about the rest of the world anyway. Yeah really, I don't care if my country gets blown up, we're all Americans by proxy, right?).

      It pissed me off that we were obviously meant to relate to all the American symbols, i.e. to only really be shaken and take the threat seriously when *The White House*- that symbol of "our" beloved government was blown up, because even non-Americans have the same deep attachment to some mid-sized white building that they don't have for their own national symbols.

      In retrospect, the film presaged the Bush era. The obviously cheesy, sentimental, cornball, ra-ra-ra, insular, America-up-its-own-arse (er, I mean "ass") mentality that regardless of how stupid and insulting you found it yourself you knew *was* going to be taken non-ironically by a bunch of future-Bush-voters in multiplexes across the land. A film obviously tailored to the most negative stereotype of an insular, right-wing American.

      And you (i.e. the film makers and distributors) expect me to lap up that self-indulgent wankfest? Yeah, you probably do. Fuck you.

      Then again, lots of people here lapped that crap up here, so go figure.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    84. Re:Agree by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I thought you couldn't write a virus on a Mac...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    85. Re:Agree by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Of course, Grace Hopper was an alien, from a race of intelligent orthoptera. The name gives it away.

      That's why they have the insect she found in the Smithsonian museum... it was a fellow programmer.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    86. Re:Agree by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Figure out how to network to said ship to upload virus in almost no time at all. check

      FTFY.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    87. Re:Agree by Troll-Under-D'Bridge · · Score: 1

      Disagree. Not because I think it's good computer science (fiction), but because ID has other issues. If we're willing to believe that advanced aliens would travel light years just to squish us like bugs underfoot, then all bets are off. Anything is technologically probable.

      Aliens advanced enough to junket across star systems should be advanced to ignore us. There's no resource they need to "steal" from us, whether fuel (most likely some element abundant everywhere or more so in space, a gas giant, or star than in a rocky planet like Earth) or living space (they have the rest of the universe for that).

    88. Re:Agree by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      For all of your blather, you fail to recognize how this isn't endemic to America at all. Japan does the same thing in their animes, acting like Japan is the center of the universe and any global disaster is referenced in passing except where it affects Japan and is therefore meaningful.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    89. Re:Agree by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen Doctor Who? I'm pretty sure film makers make their country the center of the universe more often than you think.

    90. Re:Agree by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda takes too long to input and process.

      (Also, it makes it harder to recover the the system updates that the area 51 staff would want to collect from the crashed mothership afterwards.)

    91. Re:Agree by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      For all of your blather, you fail to recognize how this isn't endemic to America at all. Japan does the same thing

      Bzzt... missed the point. This garbage was made and promoted for worldwide consumption, not an exclusively American audience.

      While there exists a healthy *niche* audience for imported anime in the US, this should not be mistaken for a product that's expected to sell in its original form direct to mainstream, mass-market US audiences. Where that's the case, it would either be more US-centric to start off with or explicitly altered/adapted to suit local tastes.

      There is no way in *hell* that a Japanese movie of comparable scale and budget would succeed in US multiplexes if it relied on Americans empathising with Japanese culture in the same way that Americans expected audiences of Independence Day to empathise about the US.

      I don't give a flying f*** about (e.g.) US daytime soaps, quizzes and the like that revolve around US culture, because they're generally not shown abroad, or not a big deal if they are. Independence Day was promoted by massive marketing campaigns outside the US, and clearly intended for non-US audiences to lap up.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    92. Re:Agree by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen Doctor Who? I'm pretty sure film makers make their country the center of the universe more often than you think.

      See above- Doctor Who is made for a primarily British audience. When it comes to material clearly intended for US domestic consumption that isn't shoved down the throats of other countries, I'm really not concerned about that.

      On top of which, Doctor Who is quite critical about aspects of British culture on occasion- hardly the jingoism-fest that Independence Day was.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    93. Re:Agree by Hydian · · Score: 1

      Hackers? Really? You thought that was supposed to be a realistic representation?

    94. Re:Agree by muindaur · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you consider the fact they had to get into the mother ship to even plant it: using a captured ship with the blinds down to hide.

      I imagine they would not have been able to send the signal to the mother ship from the outside.

    95. Re:Agree by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      But the rate of evolution slows down as technology matures

      But ours did not!
      It wasn't a stupid idea on the face of it, it was just a stupid idea in our world. It was important to the movie that it existed in our world, not a total fantasy creation. Independence Day wanted us to feel what it would be like for the regular world to be invaded and destroyed.

    96. Re:Agree by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, the Goldblum character WAS an MIT graduate.

      So, it's not like it was really hard for him.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    97. Re:Agree by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Bloody Ferengi!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    98. Re:Agree by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I played in a Champions superhero RPG where a friend of mine said "our base's computer is unhackable! Instead of working in binary, I programmed it to work in octal." I didn't have the heart to discuss it with him.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    99. Re:Agree by kd4zqe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the Enforcement Droid Series 209's OS was a buggy piece of shite, as the franchise hammered home after 3 titles.
      - It can't hear the disarmament of it's arrestees, and so slaughters them.
      - It can't manage to question why a police car might need to park illegally on private property.
      - It didn't notice the Cobra Assault Cannon that Murphy was toting, until a nanosecond before 2 rounds blew it to hell
      - It can't walk down the street without getting stuck in a manhole.

      ED-209 was a satire of corporate greed, overdevelopment, and overbudgeting to make an inferior product intended to saddle taxpayers with a lame duck project for long term ("Spare parts for 20 years! Who cared if the damn thing worked!" - Dick Jones), to turn a profit.

      That said, it's just another example of how ED-209 sucked that it was hacked to be "Loyal as a Puppy."
      Also keep in mind that it was stated earlier that she was doing Calculus homework, and conversing on-the-level with a PHD in cybernetics later in the movie, so I imagine that she might be a touch above average in her skills.

      P.S. The reason Robocop's OS is so solid is that he runs on a "Lifetime of On-The-Street Law Enforcement programming..."
      ...and DOS.

      --
      You're not paranoid if they really ARE out to get you...
    100. Re:Agree by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes all it takes is a new set of eyes :)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    101. Re:Agree by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Yep.

              * Figure out how to write code for an alien computer in a few hours without knowing alien speak. check
              * Figure out in the space of another hour how to write a virus that completely disables ships defenses. check
              * Figure out how to network to said ship to download virus in almost no time at all. check
              * Fly alien fighter craft into mother ship to upload virus. check
              * PROFIT!

      So, I realize I'm a few days late with this, but here's some thoughts on this ...

      I was equally saying "WTF" after I saw the movie in the theater as that made no sense whatsoever. Several co-worker and I were all pretty peeved at it as we'd left the office to go see this and felt it was lacking.

      However, if you watch the Directors Cut instead of the theatrical version, the discrepancy goes something like this:

      Jeff Goldblum's character is an expert in radio frequencies. Before anything happens, they show him using some signal analysis software on the actual waveforms.

      When he identifies that the signal is counting down, it's to do with the frequency and timing of the sound waves. He later infers that their entire communications and signals is based on audio frequencies. He's more or less using his Mac as an oscilloscope, and has broadcast an audio signal which affected them. Basically, a radio signal.

      He doesn't write a "virus" in the sense of writing code, and the alien craft is definitely not using Appletalk or anything like that.

      I actually found the Director's cut made sense instead of the totally unexplained presumption that some guy with a Mac laptop took down the Aliens. It was at least plausible and made some sense, and they at least attempted to explain it.

      Oddly enough, I found that the Directors Cut of the The Abyss also made a lot more sense than the theatrical version as they actually had time to explain some of the things that people generally found themselves not getting. You didn't suddenly get an ending that made no sense, you got some hints at it.

      Sometimes, for length or whatever, they actually cut out the parts of the movie that helped to make sense. In this case, I really have to at least try to defend Independence Day -- if you watch the Director's Cut, how this all happens is at least made somewhat more plausible.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    102. Re:Agree by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Yes, like I said, they blew it.

    103. Re:Agree by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      "Decades old" might not mean squat to a space faring invasion fleet. It could be that long between updates, or they might just leave well enough alone.

    104. Re:Agree by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      One of the complaints was Smith's character being able to fly an alien craft with no experience. Give him a crash course and send him as a backup.

    105. Re:Agree by rlp · · Score: 1

      The alien ship was actually running a pirated copy of Windows. Plan B was an assault on the aliens by Microsoft IP lawyers.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    106. Re:Agree by activealex · · Score: 1

      Hackers. Though at least Angelina Jolie made it bearable viewing!

    107. Re:Agree by H3xx · · Score: 1

      Turns out the aliens were using Windows 98 SE, which explains why it was so easy for them to destroy their ship. All Goldblum had to do was install RealPlayer.

      Or BonziBuddy. Or the AOL client. Or WeatherBug.

      --
      "Ubuntu" - an African word meaning "Slackware is too hard for me."
    108. Re:Agree by H3xx · · Score: 1

      I much prefer shred -z /dev/[hs]d[a-z]*

      --
      "Ubuntu" - an African word meaning "Slackware is too hard for me."
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Mission: Impossible by 6031769 · · Score: 2

    The usenet grep scene. *shudder*

    --
    Burns: We're building a casino!
    McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
    1. Re:Mission: Impossible by F-3582 · · Score: 1

      Got a link to that one?

    2. Re:Mission: Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Got a link to that one?

      Just grep Youtube.

    3. Re:Mission: Impossible by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      I tried that, and now I seem to be in a defence mainframe! They have some cool games here.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    4. Re:Mission: Impossible by plover · · Score: 1

      Oh. My. God. That was the most painful scene ever. "Search Usenet for 'JOB'. Search string not found." WHAT THE FSCK!!!?? People were posting jobs to usenet before Cantor and Siegel!

      The only redeeming quality was that as he was scrolling through the news groups, I think he went past either alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk or alt.swedish.chef.bork.bork.bork But otherwise that stupid scene just left me howling in pain!

      --
      John
  4. The Core by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Core "Hack the Planet" yeah whatever.

    1. Re:The Core by Psyberian · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't knock unobtainium. Of course me and buddies watch the core at the budget theater and MST3Ked it

    2. Re:The Core by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Yes, The Core, but the absolute worst technology moment in that movie was the little cheese-head whistling into a CELL PHONE to get "free long distance for life".

      AARRGGHHGRAHRGHRGHAHGHR

  5. Hackers, obviously... by NitzJaaron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every time they showed a screen in Hackers I cringed. Also, that "RISC is good" comment from the lead actor made my skin crawl.

    1. Re:Hackers, obviously... by mikaelwbergene · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every time they showed a screen in Hackers I giggled and enjoyed the movie without taking it too seriously.

    2. Re:Hackers, obviously... by NitzJaaron · · Score: 1

      "Hack the planet!" lol!

    3. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Well... RISC is good. It makes your iPhones, iPads, and other mobile devices GO .

      Having said this, Hackers was unbelievably **BAD** .

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    4. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Well, I took it to be in that same class as Plan 9 From Outer Space. As such, it was worth a watch...at the dollar theater, which is where I'd actually managed to see it for the first time.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    5. Re:Hackers, obviously... by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Let's hack the Gibson!

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    6. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Same reason Independence Day isn't the worst offender. Their computer scenes were as unrealistic as their physics which was as unrealistic as their politics. None of it was meant to be serious.

      I find something like CSI much more annoying.

    7. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are missing the point. Hackers was a FANTASTIC movie and it should be taken in a fairly tongue-in-cheek sort of way. If you're nit-picking Hackers, you're "doing it wrong".

      I can't remember the movie, but a very long time ago, there was a movie I saw on TV. It might have even been made-for-TV. In it, an airplane everyone was on was somehow compromised and it couldn't be piloted. Thankfully, a teenage girl on the plane had an Apple laptop (this would have been around 1997, maybe?). She plugged her laptop into the cockpit and was able to pilot the plane again, saving all on board.

    8. Re:Hackers, obviously... by retchdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yes, this is exactly the right way to do it. it was a light-hearted romp which featured corporate malfeasance and corruption; liberated and powerful computer enthusiasts; an interestingly-clad Angelina Jolie; and a great period soundtrack. what exactly is wrong with any of this?

      when i was in high school, it inspired a few otherwise-uninterested people to learn a little bit about computers, and was kind of a "cult classic" among those of us who already were. the people who were offended by it were (mostly) posers. i mean, come on, the tagline on the posters was "just when you thought it was safe to turn on your hard drive" or something ridiculous like that. it's pure cheese and that's just fun, no matter how serious it was meant to be (i suspect not at all).

      also, "risc is good" was poetry compared to "it's got a 28.8 bee-pee-ess modem!" and "i bet it looks crispy in the dark."

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    9. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I took it to be in that same class as Plan 9 From Outer Space. As such, it was worth a watch...at the dollar theater, which is where I'd actually managed to see it for the first time.

      Hackers was worth watching only when it hit the cable movie channels, and even then it was only to see Angelina Jolie.

    10. Re:Hackers, obviously... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      oh yes, and here is my nomination: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7tazcxWUwk

      revel in the cheesiness.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    11. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Jerslan · · Score: 1

      Hackers was so bad it was entertaining. I like to think of it as the computer geek version of a SyFy Original Movie.

      The "ZOMG That laptop roxxors" scene always cracks me up. It's like they read a Best Buy product card for script research >.

    12. Re:Hackers, obviously... by toastar · · Score: 1

      >

      I find something like CSI much more annoying.

      enhance that part there....

      really, you want me to reconstruct those pixels out of my ass?

    13. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      enhance that part there.... really, you want me to reconstruct those pixels out of my ass?

      Nope, won't help with the smearing.

    14. Re:Hackers, obviously... by f8l_0e · · Score: 1

      The Pentium Pro aka P6 and all variants that are based on it up to the new Core iX chips take the CISC instructions and the decoder unit converts them to micro ops which are similar to RISC instructions. They made these design changes because they were inspired by wholly RISC architectures, so the reference is ENTIRELY valid. If you want to make fun of something, how about the fact that they NEVER made a Pentium Pro laptop.

    15. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 28 point 8 BPS modem comment was like nails on a chalkboard to me.

    16. Re:Hackers, obviously... by mcneely.mike · · Score: 0

      Yes, but plan 9 is worth watching ALL the time:.... night...day...night...day!

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    17. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second the vote for Hackers even though the dueling robotic tape loaders were mega-hawt.

    18. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hackers is a great movie, although it should have been called "Script Kiddies" for most of its content. Seriously, there are some very innovative ways of bringing some hard to describe aspects to the screen in Hackers. The depiction of the "zone", for example when they analyze the file, is great. The immersion into the problem, forgetting the time and what's happening around you, has never been shown more vividly than in Hackers. Also, the Hacker Manifesto is read out in Hackers, and several other artifacts and techniques of Hacker culture are portrayed relatively accurately (phreaking, the books, hook-dialing, ...). Some of the things that people find cheesy about "Hackers" are actually traits of the referenced youth culture or (for dramatic purposes) slight exaggerations thereof. If you have never heard bragging about unimportant hardware specifications or statements like "RISC is good" in real life, then you haven't been around computer nerds. Emacs is better than vi, btw., and who hasn't dreamed of turning the lights of an office building into Blinkenlights?

    19. Re:Hackers, obviously... by That's+What+She+Said · · Score: 1

      Dude... I don't know what's wrong with that, but that sucker on a skateboard made me laugh my ass off... It was so surreal to the point it was just plain stupid.

      I say that as a skateboarder. At the time that movie was released, being on a skateboard wasn't as badass as they intended to mean...

      Now, "War Games" is the best "hacker movie" ever made, even when you factor in the supercomputer destruction scene.

    20. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Toze · · Score: 1

      I don't know that I'd call it a "cult classic," but my friends will watch it every couple of years in order to MST3K it mercilessly. It works really well as an absurdist satire of, yaknow, Computer Movies. We'll spend weeks afterwards muttering "Hack the planet!" to each other and sniggering.

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    21. Re:Hackers, obviously... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      You know, I didn't really care much for Angelina Jolie until I saw Hackers.

    22. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Homburg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The screens in Hackers are obviously a visual metaphor, and a good one at that. The technological nit that did annoy me is that the film doesn't seem to understand the difference between a username and a password.

    23. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Homburg · · Score: 1

      At the time that movie was released, being on a skateboard wasn't as badass as they intended to mean...

      Isn't that the point, though? The bad guy is bad because he is an old dude who used to be a hacker, but is now an uncool corporate sell-out. So the skateboard is a mark of how embarrassing his idea of what is "cool" is.

    24. Re:Hackers, obviously... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      i think that's pretty much a working definition of cult classic. :)

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    25. Re:Hackers, obviously... by ME-tan · · Score: 1

      A light hearted romp with a storyline where a corporation artificially increases the value of something some kid stole from a badly protected system, much like the busts of the early 90s from what I gather, and it has been a while since I read about it so my memory may be sketchy, started off because AT&T needed a scapegoat for a massive cascade failure causes by a dodgy update to their System V telephone exchanges, and went after Phrack magazine by telling the secret service the stolen document they published was worth many thousands of dollars by including the cost of the computer it was written on plus the cost of the time of the person writing it, despite a different department of the same company selling the similar documents for 20 dollars to anyone that asked. If this is what the script writer was basing the story line on that would explain why the tech references in the film were massively out of date years before the film was released and ended up being entertaining to us now. Someone at my uni when I was studying compsci stole my Hackers OST CD. That was some good music they had with the film too so I'm still pissed off about that 10 years later...

    26. Re:Hackers, obviously... by skyraker · · Score: 1

      You mean you watched the movie for a reason other than Angelina when she was at her hottest? Fisher Stevens (who I swear I will never see without hearing 'Johny 5! You are alive!") gave an Academy Award-inspired performance! And Penn Jillette! I think he knew how cheesy the movie was and acted it accordingly. I may be being a little sarcastic, but I did like the movie because I too understood it was all tongue in cheek.

    27. Re:Hackers, obviously... by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      I don't mind "movie hacking" screens, lets face it watching people typing into a static terminal window and reading cryptic error codes isn't exactly exciting so I chalked those "movie hacking" scenes as creative license to further the plot. In other words they're not supposed to be accurate because the vast majority don't understand computers to that level, including myself (thought I do know enough to know how they "hack" in movies is a load of shit), and the ones who do should have a sense of humour and just laugh at it.

      No, what bugged me about Hackers was the nausea inducing hacking session in the centrifuge. Every time someone was "seriously" hacking there'd be this sequence where the computers, chairs, and the actor would just start spinning like a top... WTF...??!!!

      Though I do give props to the movie for having the Angelina Jolie nude scene which was pretty good for a PG13 movie, these days a film that flashes a bit of breast gets an "R", or do you Americans call it NC17, rating.

    28. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, it's "...28.8 "k" bee-pee-ess modem" ... just watched it again today! :-)

    29. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would pay good money to figure out how they figured out how to send eight tenths of a bit as a discrete unit.

    30. Re:Hackers, obviously... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I liked hackers, but the actual computer scenes were some of the worst I'd ever seen.

    31. Re:Hackers, obviously... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Is the criticism that it should be "kbps" instead? Or is there something I've been missing since 1994ish, when my family got its first twenty eight eight?

    32. Re:Hackers, obviously... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      I think the ironic thing about this movie is that its a 100% sincere adaptation of a typical William Gibson/cybperpunk story. Things that sounds good in print like made-up slang, cool outfits, out of this world technology, overly fashionable hackers, unusually attractive hacker girls, a small crew taking 'the man', hacker bad guys, etc look incredibly silly on the big screen. This is because Gibson-esque stories, if not all of cyberpunk, are not much more than over the top, over-stylized, melodramas. I don't think its possible to make a sincere cyberpunk movie without falling into this incredibly cheesy and overly silly mode.

    33. Re:Hackers, obviously... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      it is "kbps"; i just misremembered it and thought they got it wrong.

      the criticism is mostly just the way they say it. the weird emphasis on B! P! S! makes it obvious they're reading a script.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    34. Re:Hackers, obviously... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      totally. even not counting how he jumps in and out of a corporate limo with his skateboard... :P

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    35. Re:Hackers, obviously... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll just leave this here:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkDD03yeLnU

      "I'll create a GUI using Visual Basic so I can track their IP address"

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    36. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. Moviegoers back then would have been bored to tears by scenes of what passes for "real" hacking in today's movies. It was a visual device that fit the time.

    37. Re:Hackers, obviously... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      How old were you when the movie came out?

      I was a teenager. I didn't know better. Hackers was like geek candy, particularly when you play the Angelina Jolie Breasts angle.

      Also, RISC is good. Without RISC and it's buddhist approach, you would not have your blazing fast smartphones or $100 set-top boxes.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    38. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup!

      Hackers was a fun, campy, 'cyber-punk' film. A perfect reflection of where society, culture, and computers were at during that time, and how they were blurring into one another. It was also a modern day story of David vs. Goliath. For whatever 'seriousness' the filmt lacks, it more than makes up for it with a GREAT Soundtrack, absurd computers scenes, and over the top 'cyber' 1337' speak. The reference to 'Emmanuel Goldstein' from 1984 and 2600, should give people an idea of that it spreads itself, and cultural references, as wide as possible.

      Absurd? Yes, Fun? Yes. Watchable? Absolutely! Anyone who thinks this movie is serious in any way, needs some vacation time!

      (p.s. you get to see a little side-boob of a young nubile Angelina Jolie! YUM!!! )

    39. Re:Hackers, obviously... by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, how do you think they misused Data?

    40. Re:Hackers, obviously... by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      first time I have seen that. You win big time

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    41. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same reason Independence Day isn't the worst offender. Their computer scenes were as unrealistic as their physics which was as unrealistic as their politics. None of it was meant to be serious.

      I find something like CSI much more annoying.

      Yes, CSI is so meant to be serious!

    42. Re:Hackers, obviously... by beardz · · Score: 1

      If you want to make fun of something, how about the fact that they NEVER made a Pentium Pro laptop.

      Never say never! "PGI’s Condor Applique+ is a rugged, dual 200-MHz Pentium Pro notebook with 64M of RAM, expandable to 512M, and a 2.4G hard drive, in a removable, shock-resistant cartridge.The Condor has a detachable keyboard and a 10.4- or 12.1-inch touch-screen display that can be viewed in full sunlight." c/o http://gcn.com/articles/1998/08/31/army-finishes-tests-on-two-combat-notebooks.aspx

    43. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Toze · · Score: 1

      Hackers was emphatically not a cyberpunk story. Cyberpunk is futuristic and dystopian. Hackers was a coming-of-age flick with computers used as flavour text. The slang of a Gibson story feels right because it's in an alien context- orbiting arcologies, ad-hoc urban engineering, blurring the boundaries of the self. Yes, the jargon in both Hackers and, say, Neuromancer, are about equally accurate- but Neuromancer was not set in Grade 12 circa 1995.

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    44. Re:Hackers, obviously... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It would be if you didn't at one point see the view of a computer screen during the hacking (It's an over-the-shoulder shot) and... yes, it's the glowy city!

    45. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Spice+Consumer · · Score: 0

      A long, long time ago... I worked at a video store. I convinced my manager that 'Hackers' should be placed in the 'romantic comedy' section.

    46. Re:Hackers, obviously... by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 1

      Shamelessly copied from the youtube comments:

      she's really very smart. She squirted out that stream of technobabble to cover her exit, went back to her cubicle, cat'd a shell script to track the guy's IP address, opened a random VB file to display in case her boss (who happens to be a big VB fan) walked by, whipped up the GUI with Tcl/Tk, and spent the next 15 minutes looking for a better job.

      Actually, "VisualBasic" was probably just product placement. I hope it generated lots of support calls to Redmond.

      And you say there are no funny comments on YouTube!

    47. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Kosi · · Score: 2

      Wasn't that an episode of the latest version of Human Target?

    48. Re:Hackers, obviously... by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Every time they showed a screen in Hackers I cringed. Also, that "RISC is good" comment from the lead actor made my skin crawl.

      Even more than the "artificial intelligence RISC chip" comment in Mission Impossible?

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    49. Re:Hackers, obviously... by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      A good illustration of the differences between movies and reality is shown here: http://xkcd.com/683/

    50. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      They made him bang Tasha Yar.
      Androids have rights too you know :(

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    51. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Doggabone · · Score: 1

      Here's a version with clean audio: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLlj_GeKniA

    52. Re:Hackers, obviously... by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      algorithms to extrapolate the missing pixel information when you do a zoom do actually exist, but the result is far too blurry to be able to read something like a newspaper headline or car license plate... :)

      Actually, I thought NCIS's approach to that was a lot better. And a jab at CSI... I remember an episode a few years ago where they were asking McGee to enhance an image, and he looked over his head and said "this isn't CSI, we're bound by the rules of reality here. I can only enhance it so much before you start losing information". :) (of course, NCIS still has its fair share of computer fails... pretty much anything in the lab where Abby miraculously manages to break somebody's full disk encryption in a matter of minutes. Though they're pretty good at explaining how ("we found his password on a slip of paper taped to the bottom of the laptop"), sometimes it's deus ex machina.

    53. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way. The computer scenes in this movie weren't intended to be taken seriously. Hackers 4eva!

      FYI man, alright. You could sit at home, and do like absolutely nothing, and your name goes through like 17 computers a day. 1984? Yeah right, man. That's a typo. Orwell is here now. He's livin' large. We have no names, man. No names. We are nameless!

    54. Re:Hackers, obviously... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      There were, however, lots of Pentium MMX laptops. They also made Pentium II-based Celeron laptops and Pentium III and Pentium III-based Celeron laptops. Some people applied the "P6" moniker not only to the Pentium Pro, but also to the Pentium MMX, Pentium II (which was basically a Pentium Pro + MMX), and even up through the Pentium M and Pentium IV. The new families of chips since would be the Core, Core 2, and Core i series.

      CNet confirms it.

      Also, despite some poser on IMDB saying that the PCI bus underlaid all Pentium systems and that therefore the statement about the PCI bus affecting the screen refresh is wrong, not all Pentium systems in fact used the PCI bus. Some used VESA Local Bus, which was admittedly outdated. Some used EISA. IBM had MicroChannel (MCA). In fact, many laptops of the time didn't use the PCI bus that was common among desktop Pentiums because they weren't upgradeable anyway and the graphics performance on laptops was often bottlenecked by either a proprietary graphics chip outside any standard interface or an old ISA interface.

      There are plenty of errors in the film, which is still a pretty enjoyable thing, IMO, to watch despite (and sometimes because) of them. There's no need to go looking for errors that aren't really there.

    55. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computer scenes in Leverage are horrific, until you remember two things:

      1. The "hacker" is the magic-user of any group.
      2. It's an excuse to bring back Wil Wheaton every now and then.

    56. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Hydian · · Score: 1

      Per the commentary the movie was made that way intentionally so there wouldn't be these kinds of conversations. They went the artistic route and blatantly ignored the technical details. I thought that it worked well. Seeing a bunch of people in a room staring at a CLI isn't very interesting.

    57. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I saw hackers fairly recently and the whole movie is completely hilarious. I particularly loved the bit where the bearded, utterly ridiculous villain has arranged to collect a disk from the protagonist (sick boy from Trainspotting) - from a murky alley under a bridge or something. He whizzes past on a skateboard, holding onto a car, and grabs the disk from his hand. What... the...

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    58. Re:Hackers, obviously... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      megabonus. thanks!

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    59. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Buggz · · Score: 1

      I'll just leave THIS here:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU

      "Uncrop!" :D

    60. Re:Hackers, obviously... by mininab · · Score: 1

      Yes it was. The new laptop supposedly a match to the decade old onboard computer. They might even have thrown in a little "this is called Moore's law kids". The sole question of computing power did make sense to me. Interfacing was another problem, but the hot chick was a "plane hacker" too (and that, on the other hand, doesn't make any sense).

    61. Re:Hackers, obviously... by mininab · · Score: 1

      the hotness, that is.

    62. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Interfacing was another problem, but the hot chick was a "plane hacker" too (and that, on the other hand, doesn't make any sense).

      Oh, I'm sure that there are some hackers with special interest in airplane tech. But, when I take my personal experiences with computer-affine females into account, it didn't make sense that they chose such a hot girl for the role. It seems to me that (absolutely fictional numbers follow, just wanting to make my point clear), say, 25 of 100 girls are somewhat beautiful to my eyes, but when you take 100 geek girls, this goes down to less than ten :)

    63. Re:Hackers, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still think RISC architecture is the way to go. As with ANY programming, loosely coupled/highly cohesive subs is the way to go... so why not the programming in the firmware? Less code doing the same thing fits Occam's suggestion. I'd argue that today's CISC chips actually utilize the RISC mentality.

    64. Re:Hackers, obviously... by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      Ah, good point, though that was a season 1 episode. Like most of season 1, it's probably best forgotten ;).

  6. it turns out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    hacking/coding/computing in real life is incredibly boring - reality doesn't make for a good movie.

    1. Re:it turns out... by praxis · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know, I can think of plenty of examples of real life computing that would make for an interesting story. The trouble is, it would only be an interesting story if you understand the context. Trouble with that is, people that are good directors don't necessarily have the technical knowledge to grasp the context enough to present it to the layman, or the people who do understand the context don't have the directorial expertise. It is possible that a duo or team could form that covers all the necessary skills and work well enough together, but I am not sure that has happened yet in the fiction space.

      Here are the real life computing examples I thought of while writing the above:
      * Watson and/or Deep Blue
      * History of Unix
      * History of Open Source
      * The Fall of Netscape
      * Google's architecture
      * History of the AI Lab
      * Wearable computers (gargoyles)
      * Any NASA project (more engineering, but the lines blur)

    2. Re:it turns out... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Good real life computing movie: (with a little dramatic license) Pirates of Silicon Valley.
      One that is absolutely begging to be made: Pirates of Silicon Valley II: Just For Fun. Wherein a college kid from Finland drives both Steve Jobs and Steve Ballmer nuts, Bill Gates falls for one of his project managers, and a gumdrop shaped, Bondi blue little all-in-one computer saves Apple.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:it turns out... by Anonymous+Cowpart · · Score: 1

      No way is it boring! I spent the past two days on an *epic* bughunt in a large multithreaded codebase, at one point even using programmatically set processor breakpoints to trap the point where some bits got corrupted by another thread, and, and... Oh wait... Hmmm, I think I get your point...

    4. Re:it turns out... by madprof · · Score: 1

      The History of Unix is not going to be an interesting story for a non-computing person. It just isn't. I would challenge you to describe it in a way that is both accurate *and* interesting.

    5. Re:it turns out... by qubezz · · Score: 1
    6. Re:it turns out... by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

      Those would all make for interesting stories, but technically speaking, we're talking about movies, and movies typically mean hollywood movies. I leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine the proof of whether hollywood movie == good story. They would all be very fine multi-hour documentaries, if they weren't dumbed down for public consumption. The problem isn't only directors - it's you, and the rest of us. People don't like what we're interested in. The parent you replied to meant Normal Humans.

      Can you imagine a Kens Burnsy documentary on pre-moon NASA engineering? With famous actors reading lines of machine code and voltages and lots of graphs of rocket test results? Comparing graphs of all the different compounds in IGNITE! That would be like the PBS of my dreams. They could call it "Rocket Science," and if they had to reschedule the show, they could say, "this isn't Rocket Science, people."

    7. Re:it turns out... by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      I guess you never read The Soul of a New Machine

    8. Re:it turns out... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      "Realistic" hacking was done in the Matrix Reloaded in a short scene and it worked out fine for the movie (now Zion...). It can happen.

    9. Re:it turns out... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      On the side of good hacking in movies, how about Trinity hacking into the power grid network using nmap and a ssh exploit, and it was done properly?

      http://www.securityfocus.com/news/4831

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:it turns out... by praxis · · Score: 1

      Yes, some of these have been filmed already. I merely meant to provide a list of topics that had potential. Those made, must have had.

    11. Re:it turns out... by praxis · · Score: 1

      You do realize that all opinion on whether a movie is any good or not is subjective? Unless we're talking about objective measures such as box office sales as being a "good movie".

      I wanted to list topics that I thought would make for interesting stories. I don't care that I'm not a "Normal Person" in your eye, those would be interesting stories and some of them have already been made into movies by non-Hollywood directors.

    12. Re:it turns out... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      There's this guy on the Discovery channel who has done quite a few of those in some "The True Story of the Internet" documentary series. I think it's by John Heileman and has about 4-5 episodes, quite interesting to watch.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  7. Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by supremebob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously... there are several scenes in that movie that are unbelievably bad. Pick your favorite!

    1. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by chrisj_0 · · Score: 0

      this ^^

    2. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quite enjoyed Halle Berry's tits.

    3. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      Agreed. That was the first movie that came to mind for me.

    4. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, i liked both of 'em.

    5. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always shake my ass while hacking.

    6. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Halle's tits?

    7. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Yeah the whole mega-hydra-facefucker-viral-trojan-worm he wrote in 3d modelling software while drunk and standing up... that's somewhere near the top of my list of all-time worst movie depictions of technology use.

      Second only to the 60 second, gun pointed at him with a hooker blowing him under the table hack of some DOD server somewhere.

      Silliness.

    8. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mission Impossible. Tom Cruise using a 300point font GUI to do a search for 'Job' that doesn't find porn.

    9. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that!

    10. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Relayman · · Score: 1

      I never got past the first sex scene. I said, "This will never happen to me."

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    11. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by indeterminator · · Score: 1

      Only thing I remember about Swordfish really is Alex Torvalds, the finnish hacker =D

      And the fact that his finnish sounded like some eastern European language, but was definitely not finnish.

    12. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by confused+one · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with coding drunk or coding standing up. Works for me. obligatory XCKD reference (Although, my experience is that the Balmer Peak happens a bit earlier than 0.129BAC0.138) NOW, as for the 3D modeling crap, that was over the top. I do all my graphically modeled coding in 2D, in LabView.

    13. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      I quite enjoyed Halle Berry's tits.

      I was underwhelmed. I expected better.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    14. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      This sounds about right.. I know the only time I'd want to be programming in LabView is when I'm drunk.

    15. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swordfish wasn't a hacker film, watch it now in the context of events that happened after it (released June 8, 2001) and you will see it is a political propaganda film.

      The hacker stuff was just hollywood fluff.
      The Swordfish slush fund was a real cash based slush fund. - initially for the FBI from proceeds of assets confiscated in drug raids , later CIA and military put their hands in the cookie jar.
      The important scenes were the monologues given by a senator and Travolta's character. The reviel is the very final scene.

    16. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Eh, there was a day when you had to look slightly harder to find porn on the net. Some say that once there was no porn on the net at all, but I find that difficult to believe.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    17. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while the technical side of the computer scenes in Swordfish were bad, it did influence me to take up computers because (1) it made me believe that when I type away at the computer, some random chick would give me a blowjob and (2) when I wake up, I would be in a playboy mansion-esque house with a naked beauty queen greeting me first thing in the morning.

    18. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by sootman · · Score: 1

      Three words: Halle. Berry. Topless.

      Best computing movie EVAR.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    19. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Caraig · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah... but the line 'One of the last PDP-11s on the net!' made a few old-school computer folk in the audience grin. =)

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    20. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by Dmitri_Yuriescu · · Score: 1

      Dear fellow Swordfish hater, Swordfish immediately came to my mind reading the thread headline. I want to vote up your comment but can't find out how to do so since everything has changed at /. since last time I was here - in about 2001 to rant about Swordfish :-)

    21. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by drolli · · Score: 1

      But they are so bad its already funny.

      But I think "Firewall" was in the uncanny valley just before "ok lets forget the facts and get this part done quickly so we arrive st the explosions". I forgive a movie which displays a bad hackings scene as a plot element for 30 seconds. But holy crap, torturing my brain for minutes and minutes how to read information with scanner build from a fax modem from a monitor by scrolling trough a database?????

      WTF?

    22. Re:Swordfish: The whole damn movie! by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Seriously... there are several scenes in that movie that are unbelievably bad. Pick your favorite!

      What, you mean that ITS box you used in the '60s doesn't still have your account on it and a tape drive with your worm code still attached and functional? Come on, man!

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  8. Criminal Writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any given episode of Criminal Minds is just plain ridiculous.

    1. Re:Criminal Writing by grimsweep · · Score: 1
      I honestly love Criminal Minds. I can forgive a lot. But why is it that Garcia is still 'clicking' away on a frickin' rubber keyboard? Don't get me wrong, any self respecting hacker would settle for nothing less than a true Das Keyboard (or better yet, one of the IBM originals).

      What bothers me is the sound effect...

  9. Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll create a GUI interface using Visual Basic, see if I can track an IP address!

    1. Re:Easily CSI by Psyberian · · Score: 2

      Yep, and I give you the horrible truth, CSI is for the brain dead.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkDD03yeLnU

    2. Re:Easily CSI by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Why do computers on TV have to display all the photos/fingerprints in its database when doing any kind of search?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    3. Re:Easily CSI by westlake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do computers on TV have to display all the photos/fingerprints in its database when doing any kind of search?

      Because it is a visually appealing and dramatically effective way of suggesting the size and complexity of the database.

    4. Re:Easily CSI by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I knew I'd been hacking on screen update routines for lysdr too much when I was watching NCIS rather than CSI and they did the "flash up millions of fingerprints" thing - and my first thought was "jeez, all those blits to the screen, that could be so much faster..."

    5. Re:Easily CSI by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but CSI Miami has completely divorced itself from reality, which make it fun. It doesn't even pretend to be sensible.

      Whenever they show an IP address, all octets are > 255. And whenever there is a match, it is ALWAYS 99.32%. Or something like that. But it's ALWAYS the same.

      But that's OK because Horatio has awesome lines and excellent sunglasses.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Easily CSI by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Right. Along with the chirping noise whenever a fingerprint/face/building flashes by on the screen. Reminds me of people who don't turn off the forward/back navigation sounds in Windows.

    7. Re:Easily CSI by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, though it's annoying when they actually cycle through a limited number of samples a few times in the couple of seconds of screen time you see it going on. (Yes, theoretically it could be doing multiple comparisons and re-scanning different parts of the duplicates.. but plot-wise, it's never doing this, it's doing a yes/no for each one.)

    8. Re:Easily CSI by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Also in NCIS, any time a file is deleted, it must be displayed on the screen in a sort of dissolving animation.

    9. Re:Easily CSI by Bobakitoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whenever they show an IP address, all octets are > 255.

      That is for the same reason most fictional phone number start with 555.

    10. Re:Easily CSI by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Also in NCIS, any time a file is deleted, it must be displayed on the screen in a sort of dissolving animation.

      It seems that big, easy to read graphics and silly animations are required for any computer operation performed in Hollywood. Gotta make it ridiculously obvious that something important is happening.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    11. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These 2 scenes are undoubtably the worst + most funniest in any movie/TV series ever:

      Numb3rs explanation of IRC using boats that meet in the middle of the ocean to swap illegal goods (wtf?).

      And the above fore-referenced scene with a woman making a graphical-user-interface-interface to track an IP address in VB.

    12. Re:Easily CSI by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      NCIS does the same thing, and it's for the same reason that everyone uses 555-xxxx phone numbers. No one can possibly have that phone number, so they can use it without fear of undue harm coming to the owner of that number. Now they could use addresses in 10/8, or 172.16/12, or 192.168/16, or 169.192/16, or the whole 240/4 block. Making all the numbers >255 just has the effect of making the numbers appear more complex and random.

    13. Re:Easily CSI by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      They could pull an iCarly and do SplashFace, ZapLook, ToonJuice and the like. Very cool way to have real fake websites, with even the potential of AR, like back when they had that old InYourUnderwear.com to match that ad back in the day (no longer works). There's no reason to blatantly break the fourth wall with 555 numbers and 256.1.2.3 IPs all the time.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    14. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll create a GUI interface using Visual Basic, see if I can track an IP address!

      That was not CSI it was NCIS and McGeek said it.

    15. Re:Easily CSI by Zapotek · · Score: 2

      Actually... my home-town's phone code back in Greece was, at the time, 555. It really threw me off when I was young...

    16. Re:Easily CSI by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually it make sense. This is one of those thing software GUI creators could learn something from the Movies..

      People are impatient. When they have to wait they get frustrated.

      Having a bunch of finger print go by keeps the person active so they don't notices it takes 15 seconds and not 5 seconds.

      One time I was praised for dramatically increase the speed of a program. My secret? I put up a spinning DOS prompt.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Easily CSI by Nikker · · Score: 1

      What damage could they do by using a 10/8 or 192.168/16 ?

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    18. Re:Easily CSI by RaymondKurzweil · · Score: 1

      The reason CSI sucks ass and always has is because they use "computerz" as a plot crutch for the shitty story. I could put up with once or twice using impossible digital zoom... but they just take it too far... It's always DNA this, or zoom onto someone's eyeball to tie everything up 10 minutes before the end...

    19. Re:Easily CSI by Khopesh · · Score: 1

      These 2 scenes are undoubtably the worst + most funniest in any movie/TV series ever:

      Numb3rs explanation of IRC using boats that meet in the middle of the ocean to swap illegal goods (wtf?).

      And the above fore-referenced scene with a woman making a graphical-user-interface-interface to track an IP address in VB.

      Transcript from that Numb3rs episode:

      IRC, Internet Relay Chat. It's how hackers talk when they don't want to be overheard. It's a pretty primitive chat program. Think of it like shipping channels in the ocean. You can't see them until a boat cuts through the water leaving a wake. If two boats meet in the middle of the ocean to swap illegal drugs, you have to catch them in real time, otherwise there's no evidence of a meeting left behind. No names, no accounts, no records of exchange.

      That's a reasonable explanation of IRC. Channels come and go on demand, and there's often a lot of other channels to obfuscate somebody sniffing the traffic. The "wake" indicates a channel has been formed so you can tune into just that conversation, and the channel does disappear when they are done. Logging is up to the participants, so this is reasonably clean (which is why so many criminal hackers use IRC in real life, though encrypted methods are almost certainly the norm these days). It isn't impossible to set up a sniffer to lurk around and eavesdrop on a conversation. Later in that clip, a screenshot is requested (note, not by a techie) in order to capture the content. It could just as easily be saved in another manner, and I see no reason to have to explain that to the FBI agent when you could just do it.

      If you want to bust Numb3rs, you'll have to try harder. There are a few points in which they get quite weak, especially with respect to all of the various learning algorithms as applied to search, but also including a few programming issues (IIRC, you should look for the episode that deals with breaking PKI, which was at least realistic enough to state that it was too hard for the ubergenius Charlie Epps). Still, it's a well composed show and does volumes to teach while entertaining. Easily a net win.

      CSI is another thing altogether. It might help the general population tolerate people with technical know-how, but I don't think it does anything to attract us. Thus the gross blunder.

      For a refreshing taste of tech representation in the other direction, check out Nathan Fillion's character in Castle as he learns about image enhancement.

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    20. Re:Easily CSI by Aryden · · Score: 1

      mayhaps, but your country code wasn't 01....

    21. Re:Easily CSI by mmaniaci · · Score: 1

      Theres a rumor about the writers of CSI being in a little competition with other shows on their network to see who can write the lamest tech scene and still get it past the suits. Anyone have sources proving this? Would be so awesome if it was true.

    22. Re:Easily CSI by martinol · · Score: 1

      What damage could they do by using a 10/8 or 192.168/16 ?

      I'm pretty sure that someone will find a way to sue them for it

    23. Re:Easily CSI by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      Area Code 313 does have 555. It's in South East Michigan.

    24. Re:Easily CSI by Capt.+Skinny · · Score: 1

      Horatio has awesome lines? Jesus, I want to smack that arrogant little prick so badly that I would beat the snot out of David Caruso just for acting the part.

    25. Re:Easily CSI by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      everyone uses 555-xxxx phone numbers. No one can possibly have that phone number, so they can use it without fear of undue harm coming to the owner of that number.

      Is that a standard in the US?

    26. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More and more I also see CSIs measuring the distance from one tire track to the other and calling it the "wheelbase". Tsk, tsk - the wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance from the front axle to the rear axle. The distance from the left tire to the right tire is called the track.

    27. Re:Easily CSI by plover · · Score: 1

      A 10. address could point to a real machine inside a corporate network, which could be bad if the idiot tried it at work. Instead, I wish they'd show the guy "hacking" his way into 127.0.0.1, then doing something like "C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\>DEL *.*" It would be totally excellent to hear the fallout of that.

      --
      John
    28. Re:Easily CSI by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      What if they say on screen that the bad guy's IP address is 127.0.0.1?

    29. Re:Easily CSI by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Actually it make sense. This is one of those thing software GUI creators could learn something from the Movies.. People are impatient. When they have to wait they get frustrated. Having a bunch of finger print go by keeps the person active so they don't notices it takes 15 seconds and not 5 seconds. One time I was praised for dramatically increase the speed of a program. My secret? I put up a spinning DOS prompt.

      My trick was to display a mesmerizing blue screen with white mono-space letters. 'Cept sometimes it wouldn't go away.

    30. Re:Easily CSI by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Why not use the IP address of the website for the TV show? If anyone bothers to try it, they'll get an ad for the show they got the number from...

    31. Re:Easily CSI by monkyyy · · Score: 1

      never quite understood why 555, why not use the rickroll number, or even a unused number, or get a new number to never connect a phone to

      --
      warning pointless sig
    32. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkDD03yeLnU
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uoM5kfZIQ0 is pretty much what we see all the time.

    33. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, neither is yours.

      It's 1

      The 0's are codes for International access.

    34. Re:Easily CSI by ian_from_brisbane · · Score: 1

      Also in NCIS, pretty much EVERYTHING is done using the keyboard, never a mouse. Oh you want me to fast-forward the video and zoom in on that guy's face? *tap tap tap*

    35. Re:Easily CSI by Skatox · · Score: 0

      I'll create a GUI interface using Visual Basic, see if I can track an IP address!

      This is the WORST line ever, I heard on the spanish version and WTF!??

    36. Re:Easily CSI by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Because people know that's what a search looks like. They have a lot more experience with TV's representation of what a fingerprint search is like than reality so it sticks.

      For exactly the same reason, a spaceship makes a whooshing sound when it flies past, and skeleton movements are always jerky, because that's how they they were in Jason And The Argonoauts.

    37. Re:Easily CSI by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 2

      They could use 10/8. This would never be routed to the internet, but would be a syntactically correct IP address (and more compareable to the 555 telephone numbers, which are also usually syntacticaly correct)

    38. Re:Easily CSI by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Also in NCIS, any time a file is deleted, it must be displayed on the screen in a sort of dissolving animation.

      Naturally. Otherwise, how will the viewers know it's deleted?

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    39. Re:Easily CSI by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Why do computers on TV have to display all the photos/fingerprints in its database when doing any kind of search?

      Because otherwise the computer illiterate among the viewers won't understand that the computer is doing anything at all.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    40. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphical User Interface interface.

    41. Re:Easily CSI by mfh · · Score: 1

      There is a friendly rivalry in Hollywood going on between all TV shows to create the cheesiest computer situations in scripts. This is one example of the gloves coming off. The IT guys on the sets do this for lulz and they are all surprised that their bosses don't fucking care. No TV bosses, and film bosses typically don't give a shit about this stuff.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    42. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, CSI's IP tracking VB GUI was completely demolished by NCIS LA. See video below.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vH0GmDfi648

    43. Re:Easily CSI by camg188 · · Score: 1

      Right. If they portrayed computer technology realistically, people would be bored. If they portrayed anything realistically, people would be bored.
      Every aspect of CSI, every premise, plot, prop and storyline, is ridiculous. But if you can enjoy Star Trek, there's no reason you couldn't enjoy CSI.

    44. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasn't that 24?

    45. Re:Easily CSI by cffrost · · Score: 1

      I'll create a GUI interface using Visual Basic, see if I can track an IP address!

      You're talking about a scene from CSI:NY; CSI:NY and CSI:Miami (CSI spin-offs) are always the sources for examples of CSI-related ridiculousness. All of the franchise's production values, decent writers & actors, and plausibility are reserved for the original (Las Vegas-themed) CSI.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    46. Re:Easily CSI by queBurro · · Score: 1

      great, it's worked, the address is: 642.344.622.543, that's located 2 blocks from here

      --
      sag
    47. Re:Easily CSI by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      Then I guess he would be
      *puts on sun glasses*
      beaten at his own game.


      YEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    48. Re:Easily CSI by dkf · · Score: 1

      They'd actually be better off using 172.16/16 as it looks more real and yet is less likely to be seen in practice (most places that use private ranges either use 10/8 or 192.168/16 for some reason) while still being non-routable.

      Or they could use 224/4 and watch all hell break loose. :-)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    49. Re:Easily CSI by muindaur · · Score: 1

      Hence why it remains in the coveted Thursday at 9PM slot, the reason I do watch it periodically, and why CSI: NY is in the death slot on Fri nights. Broadcast is terrible on Fri nights, therefore I assume it's the death slot.

        Miami and NY are the ones the writers give the indefinite resolution pictures too. I also noticed CSI itself has adjusted to keep images blurry zoomed int: with investigators trying to pick out something useful from it to give them a clue. Even if CSI makes mistakes, I do like the fact they make an effort, and after all these years still do plot arcs occasionally.

    50. Re:Easily CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CSI!, Yup, bad.....

    51. Re:Easily CSI by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, good of you to correct all the people that already posted youtube cuts of that exact line from CSI.

  10. Lawnmower Man by nebaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Basically the whole movie.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Lawnmower Man by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      Basically the whole movie.

      Oooooh yeah! So how exactly is a human being supposed to shift to energy and shoot down the phoneline again? It must be those new-fangled computers with magic powers again!!!

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    2. Re:Lawnmower Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was all of those drugs he shot himself up with. And the VR body suit.

    3. Re:Lawnmower Man by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the point that the 'real world' in that movie was actually an artificial world?

      Watch it again, it's about 21 minutes in.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Lawnmower Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds awful! I know Minority Report was irritating to watch after seeing it for the first time today. I'm sure back then it was incredible but there were so many gaffes in the movie it was unbelievable. Then there's that one numb3rs episode about IRC (youtube numb3rs IRC) and you'll see the biggest pile of filth relating to computers on TV. On the other hand, I think Criminal Minds try really hard at keeping things more realistic because they don't solve crimes by enhancing photos or any kind of evidence. It's about profiling and trying to get as much info as possible by hacking or asking for information. They do use ubuntu on their systems which is a definite plus since most FBI/CIA related shows tend to have their own custom high-tech system that can magically open doors to everything.

      Hmm there was definitively that one show where it was maybe NCIS? This lady was a world champion in virtually almost all mmorpgs, held the number one spot, and needed a 10mbit connection with a 16-core computer to reduce the latency. When I saw that I wanted to end my life.

    5. Re:Lawnmower Man by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I kind of liked the movie, but that was one of my first thoughts for terrible computer scenes. I remember being pretty impressed with the system at the time it came out, but it had the same sort of problems that Hackers did in that respect. Even at the time it seemed to be a really strange way of using a computer.

  11. Hackers... by Xyverz · · Score: 4, Informative

    "It's a P6 chip ... RISC architecture is gonna change everything".

    1. Re:Hackers... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh... Or...the Gibson... >:-D

      Basically like LawnmowerMan and Swordfish, the whole movie was one giant computer gaffe.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:Hackers... by jeek · · Score: 2

      The Gibson name was used because Clay or SGI wouldn't lend them their name, iirc.

      --
      If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
    3. Re:Hackers... by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realize Hackers isn't a film that you're supposed to take seriously, right? It's a great movie. Feel free to criticize technology in the majority of films out there, but complaining about it in Hackers is like complaining about how much Monty Python sucks, because "there isn't really any such thing as a ministry of funny walks!".

    4. Re:Hackers... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      The Gibson name was used because Clay or SGI wouldn't lend them their name, iirc.

      s/because Clay or SGI wouldn't lend them their name/because Clay or SGI wouldn't pony up the cash for product placement/

      FTFY

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    5. Re:Hackers... by bhcompy · · Score: 0

      Gibson is a reference to William Gibson

    6. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean Agatha Clay?

    7. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "It's a P6 chip ... RISC architecture is gonna change everything".

      "I want to triple the RAM".

      Hackers....

    8. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the 'flying around in 3d file structure" bullshit... that was horrible. Or the fact they were using MACs.

    9. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean Cray? Are you Asian, by any chance? (I kid)

    10. Re:Hackers... by blincoln · · Score: 2

      Given that the Intel P6 chips (let alone the Pentium II, III, etc.) hadn't been released when Hackers was written, filmed, or in theatres, don't you think it's not entirely out of the question that they could have been making assumptions about the direction Intel would go in, rather than making a mistake? Intel *did* try to switch to RISC, after all.

      Every time I see an x86 disassembly, it makes me wish I were living in the alternate universe where they succeeded.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    11. Re:Hackers... by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      The P6 IS a RISC architecture. One of the big changes of the Pentium Pro over the previous x86 processors was the fact that internally, the processor used a reduced set of micro-ops, translated from the much larger x86 instruction set. It made it far simpler to design an instruction dispatcher, and made the superscaler design introduced in the P5 architecture a lot more effective.

    12. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mind you, I do remeber a time when tech news was bubbling on that "RISC architecture is gonna change everything".

    13. Re:Hackers... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey now, at the time it looked like the RISC architecture was going to change everything.

      And if this site has proved 1 thing, it's the geeks always use hyerbole about new technology.

      I call that scene: Accurate.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Gibson name was used because Clay or SGI wouldn't lend them their name, iirc.

      No, you don't recall correctly.

    15. Re:Hackers... by Fnordulicious · · Score: 1

      That was actually real software from SGI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fsn

    16. Re:Hackers... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Intel *did* try to switch to RISC, after all.

      With apologies to a certain Larry Fish character, "you think that's CISC your processor is executing?" All Intel processors since the Pentium and all AMD processors since the Am586 are internally RISCy and decompose x86 instructions into RISC instructions before executing them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Hackers... by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Geeks always use hyperbole about everything.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    18. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well they did implement micro-ops so you could say they almost succeeded , kind of :S

    19. Re:Hackers... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      "there isn't really any such thing as a ministry of funny walks!".

      No, but there is the Ministry of Silly Walks.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    20. Re:Hackers... by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2

      Monty Python doesn't suck because "there isn't really any such thing as a ministry of funny walks!" Quite the contrary, this is the reason every government on the planet sucks. If I was ever elected to a position of power, the first thing I would do is to invest in the future of silly walks. Walking has been so terribly not silly these days. In fact if you're caught walking silly in some places, they'll tell you to strip naked, bend over and give you a reason to walk silly.

    21. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homage to William Gibson possibly?

    22. Re:Hackers... by madprof · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh. But only because Cray would not let them use their name.

    23. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      complaining about it in Hackers is like complaining about how much Monty Python sucks, because "there isn't really any such thing as a ministry of funny walks!".

      ...silly walks, just FYI. :)

    24. Re:Hackers... by fishexe · · Score: 1

      The Gibson name was used because Clay or SGI wouldn't lend them their name, iirc.

      s/because Clay or SGI wouldn't lend them their name/because Clay or SGI wouldn't pony up the cash for product placement/

      FTFY

      But William Gibson would? Somehow I doubt that.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    25. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that this post is for the sole purpose of mocking movies, right? It's a great post. Feel free to critique the comments that respond to most posts, but complaining about it in thsi post is like complaining about... ah, screw it. That's what this whole thing is about. get over yourself. the poster actually gets plus points for pointing out the fact that RISC is dead now.

    26. Re:Hackers... by Krakadoom · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that imply that the movie was supposed to be funny? Or have some other redeeming features that make up for the pile of fail that it is?

      You can't just say you're not supposed to take it seriously when there is no other way to take it.

    27. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind hacking into Angelina Jolie's Gibson, if you know what I mean, and I think you do.

    28. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm typing this on my ARM powered smartphone.

      Who says RISC didn't (eventually) change everything.

    29. Re:Hackers... by naasking · · Score: 1

      Hey now, at the time it looked like the RISC architecture was going to change everything.

      RISC did change everything. CISC architectures went to a RISC-like core with compiled micro-ops because of the advantages RISC brought to the table.

    30. Re:Hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree..I am a huge tech buff and this movie was amazing as long as I kept in mind that it was not supposed to be taken seriously. A young Angelina Jolie is not a bad thing either.

  12. WarGames by fredr1k · · Score: 0

    "Greetings Professor Falken" need i say more? WarGames is probably the most cheezy movie of them all.

    --
    "Never EVER mess with a jumper you don't know about, even if it's labeled 'sex and free beer'." - Dave Haynie
    1. Re:WarGames by Scutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Greetings Professor Falken"

      need i say more? WarGames is probably the most cheezy movie of them all.

      You shut your whore mouth!

      Seriously, though, Wargames was probably the most accurate cracking movie ever made. Instead of "creating a GUI in Visual Basic and tracking an IP address" a la CSI: Braindead, the main character actually spent weeks poring over information about the creator of the system to try to work out how it was designed and what the likely methods would be to gain entrance. He also used social engineering techniques to gather information about his targets.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:WarGames by chill · · Score: 1

      A brilliant troll, this post. Pick the one movie that comes the closest to getting it right and see how many slashdotters choke on their replies.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:WarGames by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The best part was that it was done with one of those giant acoustically coupled phone modems.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:WarGames by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Hackers also used social engineering significantly

    5. Re:WarGames by miltonw · · Score: 1

      While much of the hacking was surprisingly accurate, I hated the part where he plugged in a speaker in his bedroom so his girlfriend could "hear the computer" -- and from then on, in any location, for the rest of the whole movie, the computer would talk -- without the speaker. Huh?

    6. Re:WarGames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see your Wargames and raise you "Sneakers". Oddly enough, several of the people involved in the writing and production of Wargames were also involved in Sneakers, IIRC.

    7. Re:WarGames by gknoy · · Score: 1

      The computers elsewhere would likely have had engineers with enough pointy-headed (or brass-wearing) bosses that would want to hear something interesting that they'd have done the same thing.

    8. Re:WarGames by gknoy · · Score: 2

      Great point on the social engineering. In fact, there were SEVERAL different examples of social engineering, poor password security, and so on that I'm surprised more movies don't make use of it. Heck, didn't Ferris Bueller's day off have him using social engineering to get passwords in much the same manner? People don't call it a 'hacking' scene as "finding what some dumbass wrote down" or "pretending to be someone else" don't seem as magical, I guess, but we've seen countless examples of it being effective.

    9. Re:WarGames by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Didn't Trinity use nmap in one of the Matrix movies? That's way more authentic then I ever thought I'd see from Hollywood.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    10. Re:WarGames by Born2bwire · · Score: 1

      Wargames was probably the most accurate. They showed him doing the tedious process of wardialing. To break into the computer he had to brute force the password via social engineering (and this was shown to have taken some time in the movie so it's not like he guessed it in 15 seconds). In terms of hacking and such I'd say Wargames had it down probably the best out of most movies.

    11. Re:WarGames by chill · · Score: 1

      An SSH overflow, I think. Still, one brief flash vs the entire rest of 3 movies. :-)

      Wargames had almost the whole thing right. Sneakers was another good one.

      On the other end of the spectrum we have Hackers, Die Hard 4, The Net, Firewall, Swordfish.

      The only blessing I see is Dan Brown's "Digital Fortress" hasn't been made into a movie. Just reading the book made me want to reach thru it and throttle the author, editor and publisher. I actually burned this book after I finished it, and I've never done anything like that before.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    12. Re:WarGames by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You're into computers.
      You're into the new sub culture riseing around computer.
      Your'e a tee.
      How female teen is in your room.
      You have a raging boner.
      Tell me you wouldn't have done the same thing when she should any interest in what you are doing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:WarGames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you War Games was shameful... worst computer movie ever

    14. Re:WarGames by suso · · Score: 1

      "Greetings Professor Falken"

      need i say more? WarGames is probably the most cheezy movie of them all.

      Silly troll, I guess you weren't born until the 90s. Wargames was the most accurate sci-fi computer movie made. Period. The portrayal of the technology and even the way the geeks acted in that movie was very realistic. It was practically a documentary. For someone to call it cheesy just means that someone has been too influenced by other computer movie dreck.

    15. Re:WarGames by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Just a small trick of "how to portray an interaction of actors with the computer, using methods they and the audiences are comfortable with, on a grainy screen, without braking flow"

      And not an overboard one, in the case of Wargames. Not in comparison to, say, Star Trek - where "whoa, that's just...advanced, man!" factor was probably much stronger & the advancement of computer makes the crew mostly redundant (as sort of demonstrated by the Doctor)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    16. Re:WarGames by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      While much of the hacking was surprisingly accurate, I hated the part where he plugged in a speaker in his bedroom so his girlfriend could "hear the computer" -- and from then on, in any location, for the rest of the whole movie, the computer would talk -- without the speaker. Huh?

      The speaking computer is just a device for the audience. It's almost exactly like how the Russians start speaking English for the rest of the movie in The Hunt for Red October.

      Computers speaking all the time, people speaking to computers while they are typing, really big text, and other devices to allow the audience to know what is happening can be forgiven. Viruses that infect every OS and hardware, five pixel high image portions that are "enhanced" to show three readable lines of text, and breaking any decent encryption in less than a few weeks are all things that should be banned from movies forever.

      For example, the only technical issue I had a real problem with in Enemy of the State was surveillance satellites that could hover over one location on the planet. Although it could be done, the optics would be prohibitively expensive compared to what actually exists (basically, it would have to be able to resolve about 50 times as many pixels as current technology). Otherwise, if you assume that the NSA really wanted to build a system that could access most every bit of public information and correlate it to receivers they had planted for picking up the tracking devices placed on Will Smith's character, then they probably could. That movie also suffered from having to have one "bad guy organization", so they had the NSA murdering people, but that's not a technical or computer issue.

    17. Re:WarGames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, the only technical issue I had a real problem with in Enemy of the State was surveillance satellites that could hover over one location on the planet. Although it could be done, the optics would be prohibitively expensive compared to what actually exists (basically, it would have to be able to resolve about 50 times as many pixels as current technology)

      I think it would have to do much better than 50 times; low earth orbit is about 200 miles, whereas geosynchronous orbit is about 22,000 miles out!

      Can you imagine trying to read a license plate from 200 miles away, let alone 22,000? Even if you had the magnification, keeping that tight a focus would be insanely difficult.

    18. Re:WarGames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, dude - learn to spell!

  13. Yeah RISC is good... by poity · · Score: 0

    aw jeez
    fffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu...

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  14. GUI Interface in visual basic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This.

    Spew forth as many technical-sounding terms as possible to confuse the average person and make them think you know what you're talking about!

    1. Re:GUI Interface in visual basic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must have just earned her MCSE ;)

    2. Re:GUI Interface in visual basic! by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      Ok so seriously, I already thought CSI was one of the worst shows on TV. That clip just made it go full retard.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    3. Re:GUI Interface in visual basic! by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Yup! Fresh out of EdNet! :P

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    4. Re:GUI Interface in visual basic! by fishexe · · Score: 1

      This.

      Spew forth as many technical-sounding terms as possible to confuse the average person and make them think you know what you're talking about!

      I think you've just recited HBGary Federal's business model.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  15. Blowfish by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    Hackers and Blowfish (err, Swordfish) stand out the most as appallingly bad. Though I have to admit it's the rare TV or movie that gets computer science in even the ballpark of plausibility.

    I'd go through a lot of TVs and monitors if I acted on my impulse to throw bottles at the screen every time a 3D UI or infinite-zoom-and-enhance camera or other horrible Hollywood trope involving computers is used.

    1. Re:Blowfish by tchuladdiass · · Score: 5, Funny

      you mean like this one? (this is from Red Dwarf - Back to Earth, their "Picture Zoom" sketch).

    2. Re:Blowfish by toastar · · Score: 1

      Thats epic

    3. Re:Blowfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's actually a good, funny scene - it's a parody of part of movies/etc like Blade Runner (the whole RD:BTE was a parody of BR), where a lot more information is dragged out of photos than could possibly be there...

    4. Re:Blowfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the linked explanation...here

    5. Re:Blowfish by Rary · · Score: 1

      Brilliant! I've never watched that show (I know, I know... turning in my geek card now). The whole thing's hilarious, but the fact that the entire sequence is based on first "uncropping" a printed image damn near killed me.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    6. Re:Blowfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Red Dwarf thing is making fun of Blade Runner, so that doesn't actually count as a bad computer scene. The scene from Blade Runner is technically a bad computer scene, but somehow they do it in a way that makes it seem believable.

    7. Re:Blowfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That one's deliberately bad! They were making fun of the whole "infinite-zoom-and-enhance" thing. It was f'ing hysterical

    8. Re:Blowfish by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      1.) The ESPER scene in Blade Runner was epic. Remember, this was back in the day when the hot setup was a 5-slot IBM PC running DOS. GUI? WTF is that? Voice recognition? Ummm...did not exist.
      2.) Having the ESPER spit out an SX-70 picture at the end of the sequence is just the piece de resistance.
      3.) Come on! It was freakin' BLADE RUNNER.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    9. Re:Blowfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hadn't ever seen that. Awesome.

  16. This is UNIX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this!

    *twitch* That horrible little girl in Jurassic Park.

  17. Jurassic Park by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Funny

    Macs running Unix? Yeah, like that will ever happen

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Jurassic Park by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except that it actually WAS a UNIX system, SGI IRIX to be exact. And it was a real file browser as well.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computers in that movie were Macs, Suns, SGIs, and a CM-5. The unix scenes were on unix machines.

    3. Re:Jurassic Park by siegesama · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fsn

      FSN (File System Navigator), was a real application made by SGI for 3D viewing of file systems. That really is a real gui layer, and you can get a clone of it for linux called FSV at http://fsv.sourceforge.net/

      --
      what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
    4. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but MacOS X is basically a Unix decendant. and in 1993 there are Unix flavors that could run on the Motorola M68000 chip.

    5. Re:Jurassic Park by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      A/UX was an already established commercial product when park came out.

    6. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? That 'crazy spinny GUI' is stock standard IRIX of the day. That is, ironically, about the only moment in hollywood that I can think of that is actually real.

    7. Re:Jurassic Park by somersault · · Score: 1

      One of the most informative posts I've seen here :) I was rather disappointed to find out that real UNIX systems aren't awesomely 3D.. though I still like them ofcourse.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:Jurassic Park by a-yz · · Score: 1

      In 1993 MacOS X was NeXTSTEP running on top of Mach + BSD Unix (I remember people then saying you can never create a mainstream consumer OS on top of anything Unix like). By that time, it was already running on x86 hardware as well.

    9. Re:Jurassic Park by BitterOak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that it actually WAS a UNIX system, SGI IRIX to be exact. And it was a real file browser as well.

      I think you're completely missing the point. Whether the system really was Unix or not is not the issue. What is so cringe inducing about the scene is that it leaves a far more important question unanswered: how does knowing that a system is running Unix enable one to understand the complex control software running a dinosaur park?

      You wouldn't hear someone say, "hey the computers at my bank are running Windows 7: I know this," followed by the sound of all your money being drained from your account.

      I have to agree. That scene in Jurassic Park was probably the worst computer scene I can remember.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    10. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thatsthejoke.jpg

      or, in the local vernacular, whooooosh!

    11. Re:Jurassic Park by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      It's a Unix system, I know this!

      That was kinda bad, but at least it really was Unix. It would be truly facepalm-worthy if it had been Windows 3.1 or Mac OS System 6 on the screen.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    12. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel obliged to speak up now, and this isn't in light of OS X....

      The macs visible in the movie (a Quadra 700 and a Quadra 900 or 950) were able to run A/UX with the addition of a NUBUS card. It doesn't look like the movie, but that's not the biggest error.

      The 'mainframe' in the movie was a Connection Machine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking_Machines_Corporation. This is a little... strange... because that computer couldn't do floating-point arithmetic. You can think about that all you want, but that computer was basically chosen because it had a lot of blinking lights.

    13. Re:Jurassic Park by chienyul · · Score: 1

      Newman is a smart man. He can make anything happen!

    14. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out A/UX, bro.

      Apple offered a Unix distribution of their own for a bit, way before Mac OS X (or NeXT).

      -AC

    15. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is the only thing that makes my Macbook remotely tolerable - I don't understand what people see in that OS...

    16. Re:Jurassic Park by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um... all the computer systems shown in Jurassic Park where real. Even the 3D interface, that was something SGI came up with.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    17. Re:Jurassic Park by warp_kez · · Score: 1

      A/UX

    18. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Net with Sandra Bullock...worst yet.

    19. Re:Jurassic Park by gknoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      how does knowing that a system is running Unix enable one to understand the complex control software running a dinosaur park?

      man parkcontrols

      ?

    20. Re:Jurassic Park by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      That's not at all true. The CM-1 and CM-2 were very strange systems, but the CM-5 displayed in the movie was just a traditional 'fat tree' of SPARC processors. Fully loaded with 16K processors, the maximum allowed for, a CM-5 was capable of an Rpeak around 130GFlop/s, or nearly 150 times that of the Cray X-MP that was used in the book.

    21. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaRHU1XxMJQ original FSN

    22. Re:Jurassic Park by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly sure I would say "established". But it was out there. I am sure 2 or 3 people ran it.

      It's one of those things you save for an "obscure OSes of the 90s" contest.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    23. Re:Jurassic Park by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      it was semi popular, no you did not see it on desktops, but you cant argue server software success based on what was being shown at circuit city to joe average

    24. Re:Jurassic Park by glwtta · · Score: 1

      It was only a real file browser in the sense that it actually existed, not that anyone would actually use it.

      Sort of like Doom is a real process manager.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    25. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not all of them :) One of my previous co-workers used to work for Thinking Machines (who made the supercomputers used in JP). While the "Connection Machine" shown in the film was, in fact, a real product, there was only 1 on set -- the others were made with mirrors. Oh, and it was just a chassis with blinkenlights on it, not a functioning unit.

      And finally, Nedry's comment about how hard it was to "network 8 connection machines" was bullshit: they were designed to do that, hence the name. :)

    26. Re:Jurassic Park by RaymondKurzweil · · Score: 1

      They were... mostly...

      There were real CM-5s used as prop pieces and named "Thinking Machines Supercoumputers" by the animated tour guide.
      The workstations were all real SGIs. The thing that confuses some people... there was no Mac running UNIX... it was the other way around, a SGI UNIX workstation "running" Mac OS.. What people are referring to is that there is at least one scene where Newman is watching the "live video" feed on his SGI workstation (I believe it is a Crimson), but it is clearly a Macintosh Finder interface running Quicktime on the screen. This was notable because the progress bar for the "live video" was clearly visible.

    27. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woooooooosh!!

    28. Re:Jurassic Park by magarity · · Score: 1

      Um... all the computer systems shown in Jurassic Park where real. Even the 3D interface, that was something SGI came up with.

      Yes, but all that and they still couldn't grep a lousy million rows for 'white_rabbit_object'; THAT was the hideously bad tech moment in that movie.

    29. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were SGI Crimsons, the big "Crimson" boxes under the desk. The Macs were Quadra 700s being used as workstations, and were shown running Mac OS. All 100% plausible.

    30. Re:Jurassic Park by WCguru42 · · Score: 1

      you can get a clone of it for linux called FSV at http://fsv.sourceforge.net/

      Why? Why would anyone want to hassle with that system.

      --
      "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    31. Re:Jurassic Park by CityZen · · Score: 1

      You know, one of the nice things about X Windows is that "remote desktop" is essentially built right in. So if you run an X server on a Mac, you can show the X Window output of most any Unix box on the net.

    32. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, but they do. That's exactly what they usually run.

    33. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That actually was a Unix system.
      Actually, that was close enough to my "HAH! It's IRIX!!" reaction when I saw it.

    34. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That appeared to be graphical Unicenter TNG from Computer Associates.

    35. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple offered a Unix distribution of their own for a bit, way before Mac OS X (or NeXT).

      A/UX 1.0 came out in 1988, about a year ahead of (not really "way before") NeXT. NeXT previews already had a GUI running on top of Mach when A/UX was still limited to the command line.

    36. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UH UH UH *wags finger* you don't have the right password. UH UH UH.....

    37. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs have long supported Yellow Dog Linux.

    38. Re:Jurassic Park by Jethro · · Score: 0

      Someone at SGI created that interface /after/ seeing it in the movie.

      I remember using it. It was kinda neat. Honestly SGI had some graphic-based analysis tools that are unmatched to this day. They had an excellent network analyser that showed you, in a rotatable 3D graph, who exactly was doing what on your network and with which protocol. I used it to prove to my boss that SMB was chocking us.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    39. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go. It was called FSV. http://fsv.sourceforge.net/

    40. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone at SGI created that interface /after/ seeing it in the movie.

      Not quite. FSV is the open-source clone that came out after the movie. FSN is the original that appeared in the movie. It was released in 1992.

      http://web.archive.org/web/19991113223434/http://www.sgi.com/fun/freeware/3d_navigator.html

    41. Re:Jurassic Park by S-4'N3 · · Score: 1

      Heck yeah. Irix, was it? SGI actually used to have that graphic interface as a free download on their website, but it's now a dead link. That film was one of my favourites as a kid. Watching it again, after being more familiar with computers, looking at that Irix screen and recognizing folder names, you can see... oh yeah, it really is "a unix system."

    42. Re:Jurassic Park by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      I like the part where they're supposedly doing a live video call to the port, but the window shows the QuickTime scrub bar indicating that it's a snippet of video with a beginning and an end instead of a live stream.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    43. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm Detector Fail, please get yours checked. (Mac OS X being Unix hint)

    44. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs running Unix? Yeah, like that will ever happen

      Macs today all run Unix...go figure... ;)

    45. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they were all SGI systems - and Macs did run unix back then (A/UX)

      But yes Jurassic Park - when they're talking to the guy on the video link .... and there's a scroll bar running on the bottom showing that they're just playing back a movie clip

    46. Re:Jurassic Park by xded · · Score: 1
    47. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you've never had to sit down in front of an unfamiliar piece of software, but it's OK because you've used similar, or the alternative someone puts you down in front of a computer running an OS you've never seen before. Which is going to make you say (if even to yourself), "I know this OS, I can work this out" and which "shit I haven't a clue where to start".

    48. Re:Jurassic Park by DEmmons · · Score: 1

      I'd nominate Jurassic Park for two very different reasons: one, the geneticists using virtual reality headsets - really? to visualize strings of 'C','A','T', and 'G' ? and number two, even more egregious, was Nedry talking to the ship's captain on a video call, while a progress bar ran across the bottom of the window, because obviously it was a pre-recorded video clip and they couldn't even be bothered to position the window so that bit was off the bottom of the screen, let alone actually run it in a modified window. or just use a unix command-line video player. still one of my favorite books though.

    49. Re:Jurassic Park by tibit · · Score: 1

      Even the blinkenlights front panel from the Connection Machine ;)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    50. Re:Jurassic Park by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Blinkenlights!

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    51. Re:Jurassic Park by fishexe · · Score: 1

      I was rather disappointed to find out that real UNIX systems aren't awesomely 3D.. though I still like them ofcourse.

      Well, they can be. Just not by default.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    52. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh.. OS X is Unix certified and contains a ton of Free/Net BSD code

    53. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs do run linux, you can even put open solaris.

    54. Re:Jurassic Park by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      It's a Unix system, I know this!

      That was kinda bad, but at least it really was Unix.

      It was still really bad.

      /. has lots of geeks, but I suspect that less than a handful had ever seen that interface before the movie came out, so there was no chance the little girl had seen it.

    55. Re:Jurassic Park by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we're aware that it's real, but it's a classic example of using novelty/research software in an environment where there would be no motivation to do so - software that way too conveniently provided 100% of the dramatic tension in the scene where she's trying to lock (or was it unlock) the doors in the facility before the dinos get in.

      Perfect example of how design wants something cool and futuristic, but in the real world, the more critical the system the more boring and utilitarian an interface is it likely to have.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    56. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the thinking machine, which was just a case with all the blinkenlights hooked up

    57. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs running Unix? Yeah, like that will ever happen

      Mac OS X is built on a Unix Kernel, dude.

    58. Re:Jurassic Park by Lucky_Norseman · · Score: 1

      It's a Unix system, I know this!

      That was kinda bad, but at least it really was Unix.

      It was still really bad.

      /. has lots of geeks, but I suspect that less than a handful had ever seen that interface before the movie came out, so there was no chance the little girl had seen it.

      You forget one thing.
      Her computer was a gift from her grandfather. Presumably an identical machine ordered at the same time as the ones on the island.

    59. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still the stupid byatch who couldn't figure out how to turn off a flash light, could hack the parks systems in 30 sec while Samuel "MotherF*@&king" L. Jackson could not?

    60. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he could have, if he had made it back alive from the utility shed...

      "Whose workstation is this?"
      "It's Nedry's workstation, baby."
      "Who is Nedry?"
      "Nedry's dead, baby. Nedry's dead."

    61. Re:Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      142 downloads of FSV on the day you posted this. This is why slashdot is so great. Hopefully someone updates it.
      http://sourceforge.net/projects/fsv/files/fsv/0.9/fsv-0.9.tar.gz/stats/timeline

    62. Re:Jurassic Park by Trixter · · Score: 1

      all the computer systems shown in Jurassic Park where real

      Right, but the video surveillance footage -- a quicktime movie playing back, complete with scrolling thumb to show position -- was not!

    63. Re:Jurassic Park by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      The computers in that movie were Macs, Suns, SGIs, and a CM-5. The unix scenes were on unix machines.

      Yeah, mostly SGI machines. They even had the 3D filesystem browser that the girl uses. Given that the CGI in that movie was made on SGI machines, it's not so strange to see them appear in the movie as well.

      I had the pleasure to use some SGI Indy's in 1994-96. A professor had gotten some for cheap when purchasings a lot of SGI hardware, to have th students fool around with them. Compared to the 386 and 486 Windows 3.1 machines sitting next to them, these were amazing pieces of hardware.

      From memory:
      64MB RAM
      133 MHz CPU (Intel was doing 60 with the first Pentium)
      1280x1024 @75 Hz 17 inch CRT
      3D hardware accelerator (hey, they invented OpenGL!)
      640x480 videocon camera (I actually used that to talk to a friend at another university a couple of times)
      10/100 Mbit/s Ethernet (Gopher and FTP, later we got Mosaic)
      Onboard sound, S-Video in, CD-ROM.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    64. Re:Jurassic Park by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I can confirm using it on a 1993 era SGI Indy. I think it was primarily to show of their 3D hardware acceleration, it wasn't really faster than 'ls' and 'cd', unless it had the information in cache.

      That scene is actually quite plausible, this could actually be done on those machines.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    65. Re:Jurassic Park by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      What's bad about it?

      All she does is use the SGI visual file browser to basically do the equivalent of:
      ls ~nedry; cd projects; ls; cd door_control; ls; cd doc; vi passwords

      Something like that.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  18. Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this! It's a UNIX system!

  19. Sneakers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sneakers. Click the button, and the screen ANSI's all over the place, revealing whatever you're hacking into. ...I can use 'ANSI' as a verb, right?

    --Scatterblak (slashdot account won't werkie now for years...)

    1. Re:Sneakers! by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What makes Sneakers enjoyable for me (other than Dan Aykroyd underplaying it this time, well done) is you have two very close buddies, one gets caught and becomes evil and rich after prison, the other hasn't changed, and the climax is all Temptation of Christ-like: Ben Kingsley asks Redford to join him.

      I think it's a metaphor for our generation, given the key to the untold wealth of the global (tech) kingdom, which would you choose? Transfer funds from the budget of the Bureau of Firearms Alcohol and Tobacco (iirc) towards the Campaign for the legalization of marijuana. Heck that's MY hero. Suspend your disbelief on this one, and grab the popcorn.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    2. Re:Sneakers! by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. (Also, in light of some of the comments up the page, it has some great examples both of social engineering, and of how far a computer will NOT believably take you.)

  20. Jurassic Park by sco08y · · Score: 1

    It's a Unix system, I know this!

  21. The Core! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Core, in which a single teenager, fueled by Hot Pockets, controls worldwide access to every piece of information ever. Also, The Core is the most brilliant disaster movie ever made.

    1. Re:The Core! by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Also, The Core is the most brilliant movie disaster ever made.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:The Core! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The core was a good movie but yeah some things were really cheesy. Like the hidden messages sent from the ship to the hacker.

    3. Re:The Core! by spiderbiten · · Score: 1

      What's cheesy about using digital steganography to encrypt messages within an image? It's something that is actually possible to do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steganography#Digital_steganography

  22. Swordfish - Hack DoD Mainframe, orally pleased by GhettoJew · · Score: 2

    It's BS there is no way that he would have lasted 60 seconds.

    1. Re:Swordfish - Hack DoD Mainframe, orally pleased by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      It's BS there is no way that he would have lasted 60 seconds.

      Not to mention that the RSA key was ... what? 512 bits? 1024? Solve that in 60 seconds? Suuuuuuure.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Swordfish - Hack DoD Mainframe, orally pleased by Anonymous+Showered · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised. :(

    3. Re:Swordfish - Hack DoD Mainframe, orally pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this Informative, please:

      It takes me upwards of half an hour to get off with my dick in a woman's (or man's) mouth... So your argument fails by way of my anecdotal evidence.

      Captcha: scratchy... like the spines on my cock.

    4. Re:Swordfish - Hack DoD Mainframe, orally pleased by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you must be very young. actually one of the nice perks of being almost half century old is that it takes a lot of oral action for a very long time to get climax.

  23. The Net by willith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to nominate the Sandra Bullock abortion The Net--the entire film. Compared to that movie, Goldblum's antics are totally plausible.

    1. Re:The Net by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Never saw it...wouldn't know. (And it was because I'd suspected the horror of the movie up-front... :-D)

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:The Net by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

      I thought "The Net" was the one where the main character hacked into a computer using an actual unix privilege escalation command-line from the time. I thought that movie was fairly accurate. No hacking passwords by magically typing keys, no remotely controlling things that had no internet connection. The most implausible thing was hackers hiding secret links in web pages, which I've known people to do. Or the hackers putting unnecessary animations onto web pages... oh wait, people did that too... especially when the net was new.

    3. Re:The Net by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Watch out for those pi's

    4. Re:The Net by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      The most implausible thing was...

      The ""WHOIS PRAETORIAN" search that shows, if I recall, several invalid IP addresses like "23.75.345.200" and eventually traces back to show the guy's driver's license. Oh ya, and any other time anywhere in the movie someone's sitting at a terminal.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    5. Re:The Net by sslayer · · Score: 1

      The ""WHOIS PRAETORIAN" search that shows, if I recall, several invalid IP addresses like "23.75.345.200"

      C'mon, are you serious? Are you going to take value out of every film which doesn't use real IP addresses? What about all those films that use 555 phone numbers? What a simple argument.

    6. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. How did she get jobs after that?

    7. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TOTALLY!!!!

    8. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I especially love the scene where pressing Esc apparently wrecks an entire computer network by progressively pixelating all the screens until unreadable.

      Apparently that's what happens when you press Esc while "in the mainframe".

    9. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's absolutely fantasti when she orders a pizza and it's customizable on the website, love that! *_*

    10. Re:The Net by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      The thought that woman as hot as 90s-era Sandra Bullock could just pass through society unnoticed did it for me.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    11. Re:The Net by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Man, I hated that movie. Only saw it the one time, having been dragged to it by my family. But IIRC, that part was real. There was one Pizza Hut in California someplace that had a web page that allowed for online ordering back then. I had read about it in Wired... probably sometime in 1994.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    12. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another vote for "The Net". A movie which, ironically, had nothing to do with the 'net.

    13. Re:The Net by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      I thought that movie was fairly accurate.

      Um, no. Even my crush on Sandra could not salvage that movie. Glaring error after error. Not that I recognized these all live, but I may have blacked those parts out. One of the most regrettable two hour periods of my life.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113957/goofs
      http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/net/

      My favorite review:

      Low on both tension and credibility.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    14. Re:The Net by rilian4 · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear!
      [comic book guy impression]Worst tech movie ever...[/comic book guy]

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    15. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That movie was so horrible it caused my wife to divorce her ex.

      Finders keepers, losers weepers, I say...

    16. Re:The Net by tgeller · · Score: 1

      Saturday Night Live made a cinema-verite thing of David Spade getting a tattoo. He was nervously chatting with the artist during the process, and one of the things he said was:

      DS: "Did you see that talking pig movie?"
      Tattoo guy: "Yeah, I did."
      DS: "Oh, you saw The Net?"

      For some reason I remember that 15 years later....

      (Hint for those of you under 18: "Babe" came out at about the same time.)

      By odd coincidence I was writing for a magazine called "The Net" (Imagine Publishing) at the time.

      --
      Tom Geller
    17. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I complete agree. That has to be the worst representation of IT fail, that Ive ever seen, followed closely by Firewall.

    18. Re:The Net by madprof · · Score: 1

      I would like to nominate Jumpin' Jack Flash as even worse.
      It was kind of kitsch though and clearly not at all serious.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumpin'_Jack_Flash_(film)

    19. Re:The Net by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The net was handled fairly well. Only one minor plot-hole springs to mind: when she wiped the virus, all the data that it had deleted was magically restored. Thankfully this wasn't crucial to the plot. Oh wait, that was the whole resolution of the film, wasn't it?

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    20. Re:The Net by suso · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised nobody said "Sim0ne". Although the subject matter was interesting, the part where he pulls and open hard drive (platters exposed) out of a chest that was under water was #1 on my list of stupidest computer movie moments.

    21. Re:The Net by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      My...favourite? laughable bit about that movie was how you knew a virus was working because the picture on the computer screen slowly defocused and dissolved. To be fair, a number of films have had ridiculous visuals for virus activity, but I think that is probably about at the top of the list for me.

    22. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the IP Address she uses (353.523.692.23 or whatever) and how she can, on 486 without any kind of internet connection whatsoever get access to structured, comprehensible, top secret data at speeds that would make Google blush.

    23. Re:The Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it *possible* that the producers didn't want to create a "Jenny" effect?
      (The '80s Tommy Tutone song... real people with the phone number 867-5309 caught a lot of grief.)

    24. Re:The Net by randomaxe · · Score: 1

      Ugh, yes. The scene where she telnets to an email address just makes me sad. It's like someone knew that telnet was a thing, but wasn't willing to do the thirty seconds of research to find out how to use it.

  24. Sandra Bullock in The Net. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    The Net. That entire movie. Just watch it and cringe.

  25. Mission Impossible 1 by bakuun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tom Cruise breaks into a vault at CIA with their most important computer, and when presented with a login screen clicks the "override" button on the computer (right next to the "ok" button), which simply logs in without having to enter a password.

    1. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by aarggh · · Score: 4, Funny

      But to be fair, it was made for and starred Tom Cruise after all! Is there no beginning to his talents?

    2. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Hell, half the time at work people struggle with large install packages and they have the benefit of documentation, people standing over their shoulder, a developer on speakerphone...

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That made me lol. I remember in windows 95/98 with or without Netware, you could always just click cancel and it would log you on anyways. With no file encryption or actual security, thats

    4. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom Cruise breaks into a vault at CIA with their most important computer, and when presented with a login screen clicks the "override" button on the computer (right next to the "ok" button), which simply logs in without having to enter a password.

      ...Just like the old Windows login.

    5. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      I remember it being that the "help" button or F1 would bring up a windows that let you into the computer file viewer so you could run program without ever logging in.

      Tim S.

    6. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really not that unbelievable, some of the older DEC Systems, like the XP900 had a button right on the front (halt button) that you could press when it asked for a password, it would let you get in without a password. I know for sure that several computers at NASA used this security feature.

      http://labs.hoffmanlabs.com/node/902

    7. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      So I'm supposed to believe that the CIA built this elabourate room to detect intrusions when noone is supposed to be present, that is only disabled when an authorised user enters the room. Why not just disable the machine when there's noone there instead?

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    8. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by inquisitor · · Score: 1

      Not actually the case: Ving Rhames' character has sight-read the password from the analyst logging in previously (in full view of Hunt's glasses camera), and reads it back over the radio. It's actually one of the more plausible things in the film.

    9. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must have Been Windows 95.

    10. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm guessing the operating system was Windows 98? Oh wait, that button is cancel, not "override", completely different...

    11. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even without computers that was such an awful movie. It would have been better as a generic spy movie instead of tying it to a television series that it had no relation to.

    12. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you smoking? They watched the guy type his password and then used it when he left to vomit. There was no "override button"

    13. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I wondered why the air conditioning vents at the CIA had to be big enough for Jean Reno to crawl through.

    14. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is not really that far from reality... the US gov uses Windows.
      Several sensitive military ftp servers were known to have the guest account enabled, and if that weren't enough to be scandalized, they rely so much on security though obscurity that they actually thought it would be clever to store very sensitive documents on public anonymous FTP servers.

    15. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jokes on you, that is the ACTUAL login process at the CIA mainframe!

    16. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose there is some truth to this. I remember back in Windows 95 when it presented the "login" screen. It had two buttons: OK, and CANCEL. The cancel button booted you into a default login. Since all accounts had admin privileges, this button would have been more aptly named "system override". :)

    17. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm guessing the operating system was Windows 98? Oh wait, I guess that was the cancel button, not override. Completely different...

    18. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computers were realistic compared to the helicopter going through the narrow train tunnel. Must have been the small rotor version

    19. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      This only tells us that the CIA is using Windows 95.

    20. Re:Mission Impossible 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ran Windows 95, so what?

  26. Jurrasic Park by GutSh0t · · Score: 0

    Unix is a 3D operating system!

    --
    I started with nothing and have most of it left.
  27. The scene from 24 by aarggh · · Score: 1

    The scene where Chloe and Bill are trying to hack into the CTU and she says "I'll get in through the subnet"! I loved 24 but I recall I had involuntary muscle spams when I heard that line of crud.

    1. Re:The scene from 24 by sconeu · · Score: 2

      You forgot that she had to open a socket first.

      They always had to open a socket.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:The scene from 24 by aarggh · · Score: 2

      The opening of a socket was implied as we all all know you can't do anything unless you do that first, I know I always open a socket before I do anything at work, even getting a coffee!

    3. Re:The scene from 24 by laughing+rabbit · · Score: 1, Informative

      I like it when Chloe opens her socket!

      --
      No incumbents, not no where, not no how.
      Vote them out every term.
    4. Re:The scene from 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of Chloe, what up about Chloe checking her E-mail on Gmail on her Android phone?
      Either she was violating policy to forward CTU E-mails to her personal Gmail account or CTU were using Google Apps for Government...

    5. Re:The scene from 24 by aarggh · · Score: 1

      If Google Apps was good enough for HBGary Federal, the worlds bestest and mostest talented security corporation, it shoudld be good enough for the CTU!

    6. Re:The scene from 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port,
      And the bus is interrupted as a very last resort,
      And the address of the memory makes your floppy disk abort,
      Then the socket packet pocket has an error to report!

    7. Re:The scene from 24 by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      She also used to put blankets over her subnet, I didn't know they got cold..

    8. Re:The scene from 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Later in the same episode when CTU found her physical location by reading the binary...

    9. Re:The scene from 24 by reverendbeer · · Score: 1

      SHE DIDN'T HAVE THE TIME!

    10. Re:The scene from 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have one the Internet today, good sir.

    11. Re:The scene from 24 by stoanhart · · Score: 1

      After you get through the socket, you need to avoid the poison-filled firewall.

    12. Re:The scene from 24 by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      They would have caught the terrorists much sooner if they weren't wasting so much time extolling the virtues of thier new Cicso equipment.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    13. Re:The scene from 24 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I know I always open a socket before I do anything at work, even getting a coffee!

      Step 1, open mouth socket. Step 2, connect coffee. Step 3, ??? Step 4, Profit. Etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:The scene from 24 by sootman · · Score: 1

      You know what else was horrible on 24? Every single scene ever that had anything to do with a computer. EVER. Seriously. Otherwise it was a great show. Luckily it wasn't "about" computers (other than a couple story arcs) but I almost would have rather they busted out a Harry-Potter-esque spell every so often rather than try to say anything technical.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    15. Re:The scene from 24 by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      Your humor humors me, and I would like to subscribe to whatever newsletters you think may interest me.

  28. I don't know if I'd call this worst... by returnofjdub · · Score: 2
    1. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      I died a little inside..

    2. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      Oh my god! I've never seen that one before.

      THAT WAS AWESOME!

      Thanks man, that made my whole day....hehe...

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    3. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by scrib · · Score: 1

      Now I get the reference to "creating a GUI interface in Visual Basic..."
      But those CSI writers are laughing all the way to the "ATM machine!"

      A lot of the other terrible movies were using fantasy computer nonsense. Like Hackers, it's terrible sure, but it's so unrealistic in general that it doesn't really register as bad or misleading about computers. In Independence Day, aliens invade earth and a computer is poorly used as a plot device but that only strains credulity because we don't ask why an alien invading fleet spread out around the planet has to use our satellites to bounce their signals around.

      As my brother always asks when I nit-pick, "is this where the movie stopped being believable to you?"

      The CSI takes the cake for TRYING to be realistic and bombing miserably. I hope the writers were having a contest to see who could get the dumbest line broadcast.

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    4. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      That's pretty bad, but this is CSI. Notice the constant use of little flashlights even when the room lighting doesn't require it? Love it.

    5. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      OTOH, at least it's possible.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by RaymondKurzweil · · Score: 1

      The irony with everyone's disdain for this is that there is nothing in the scene that is completely divorced from reality.

      The chick is clearly talking fast... so maybe she is talking about 2 action items
      1) Create a GUI in Visual Basic
      2) and also track an IP address

      Or, maybe she plans on creating a VB GUI wrapper around some networking tool. Because we know they couldn't just use the fucking command line, its gotta have all that pretty graphics and shit. And though you may not like it, there is no technical reason that all the graphical nonsense in CSI is cranked out by some dude writing VB6 or VB.NET code... VB6 is a shitty ass language... but yes you can do anything with it.

      There are a number of "realistic" interpretations around what was being said. That being said
      1) Any explanation is completely *tasteless* to the sensibilities of an experienced software/networking professional
      2) CSI still sucks ass
      3) The digital zoom in CSI is sickening, because they use it every fucking time.

    7. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by igorsalad · · Score: 1

      Oh that felt good

    8. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by Rizimar · · Score: 1

      Every time I see this, I want to bash my own skull in with a brick

    9. Re:I don't know if I'd call this worst... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, we have a winner.

  29. Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by GinRummy33 · · Score: 1

    The fakest looking keyboard skills are when Scotty inputs the formula for "transparent aluminum" into the computer in the movie Voyage Home (the one where they go back to modern day LA). He just kinda hovered his hands over the keys and randomly smacked his fingers over the buttons very fast. Will have to give props to the funny bit of talking into the mouse first, though.

    1. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by Restil · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think that scene was supposed to promote the fact that Scotty had never before used a QWERTY keyboard (or likely a keyboard of any type as we know it), and yet he is so skilled and such a quick learner that he was able to go from hunting and pecking to 80+WPM in a matter of seconds. Considering the skills it would take to be able to sit down at a piece of alien technology and figure it out in a short period of time, that's really not much of a stretch. They didn't call him the miracle worker for nothing.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    2. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, but it was the SF Bay Area.

    3. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Yep - that's the way I interpreted that scene too.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    4. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      He's Montgomery FUCKING Scott. If the guy can figure out how to change out Klingon food processors, he can figure out how to hunt and peck a Mac keyboard at high speed.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by ryan.onsrc · · Score: 1

      The fakest looking keyboard skills are when Scotty inputs the formula for "transparent aluminum" into the computer in the movie Voyage Home (the one where they go back to modern day LA). He just kinda hovered his hands over the keys and randomly smacked his fingers over the buttons very fast. Will have to give props to the funny bit of talking into the mouse first, though.

      Blasphemy I Say! ... Scotty just had too much charm to call that *bad*.

      Besides, that whole scene was too "tounge-in-cheek" to be taken so seriously. The world would be missing something without it.

    6. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fakest looking keyboard skills are when Scotty inputs the formula for "transparent aluminum" into the computer in the movie Voyage Home (the one where they go back to modern day LA). He just kinda hovered his hands over the keys and randomly smacked his fingers over the buttons very fast. Will have to give props to the funny bit of talking into the mouse first, though.

      He wasn't typing for real. He was just faking it while his Borg Cybernetic implants communicated with the computer. What? You didn't know Scotty was a Borg? All Chief Engineers for Star Trek have been Borgs. Always.

    7. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by VanGarrett · · Score: 1

      For the life of me, I can't remember what episode it is, but I recall a scene in the original Star Trek where, in a conference room aboard the Enterprise, Dr. McCoy was reading out surprisingly detailed information from a terminal, the display interface of which, consisted of only a handful of variously colored lights.

    8. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it a mac? therefore Dvorak keys?

      Besides it wasn't like it was alien tech, he described using a keyboard as quaint, maybe he was familiar with the concepts. As well as being a miracle worker engineer familiar with many alien technology's.

    9. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by CityZen · · Score: 1

      My whole LCD screen turns blue when you look at it from the right angle. His display probably had the same issue. :-)

    10. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by dwillden · · Score: 1

      If you're going to bring Star Trek TV episodes into this, wasn't Geordi able to save the day on a weekly basis by reversing the polarity of something and re-routing it through the main deflector? Oh and young Wesley Crusher seemed fond of reversing the polarity of just about everything he touched.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    11. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by arikol · · Score: 1

      DVORAK on a Mac?
      Not generally.
      Adding a "command/Apple" button doesn't change a keyboard into Dvorak layout...

    12. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      If you're going to bring Star Trek TV episodes into this, wasn't Geordi able to save the day on a weekly basis by reversing the polarity of something and re-routing it through the main deflector? Oh and young Wesley Crusher seemed fond of reversing the polarity of just about everything he touched.

      *coughs*
      Young Wesley has a /.-account nowadays, you know...

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    13. Re:Scotty in Trek's Voyage Home by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I think he actually knew keyboards, as when told to use it, he replies "how quaint" or something like that.

      It's like if I would sit behind a computer and try to use the internet, and then the person normally operating the computer tells me to first dial in using the modem.
      It's not something I'd normally do, but when told I need to, I know what I'm expected to do.

      What puzzles me much more about that scene is how he understands the molecule visualisation tool that seems to be running, without even so much as an example.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  30. Leave WarGames alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That movie is a SAINT in a world of sinners.

  31. The Social Network Scenes by TheGhostface · · Score: 1

    were actually good and plausible or did I miss something?

    The "login backdoor" part of Tron Legacy wasn't tho, but at least they did use linux and not some made up OS :)

    1. Re:The Social Network Scenes by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      I actually found Tron to be pretty awesome in its computer references and commands. I was pleasantly surprised. And a backdoor login is not only plausible but a real security concern.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    2. Re:The Social Network Scenes by broknstrngz · · Score: 1

      Actually they did use some made up OS - SolarOS. I guess Larry didn't let them use the name, but they wanted to keep the old school touch anyway.

    3. Re:The Social Network Scenes by 1729 · · Score: 1

      were actually good and plausible or did I miss something?

      That's what I thought. They kept it simple and plausible. Nothing fancy: just hackers typing away in emacs on linux boxes. (The scene where he "hacks in" to the Harvard servers was just him doing things like running a recursive wget to collect pictures, if I recall correctly.) It was probably the most realistic portrayal of hackers at work that has come out of Hollywood.

    4. Re:The Social Network Scenes by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I thought they were near, if not at, the top of computer scenes in movies or TV. I don't know much about the various web stuff in detail, but the descriptions of how he got the various images for FaceMash seemed very realistic.

    5. Re:The Social Network Scenes by PylonHead · · Score: 1

      Yep. This was by far the most realistic computer scene I've seen in a movie. I told my boyfriend that I'd probably be doing roughly the same thing, except I'd be using vi instead of emacs.

      --
      # (/.);;
      - : float -> float -> float =
    6. Re:The Social Network Scenes by haxney · · Score: 1

      I actually commented about this to my friend while watching it. Not only did they not use meaningless technobabble, but the KDE window decorations were authentic, the output from wget was exactly accurate, and Emacs actually looked like Emacs. All of the bits of code I saw looked real enough, and Perl would be exactly the thing one would have used then for more complicated web spidering (nowadays, it would probably be Perl, Python, or maybe Ruby).

      Aside from getting the jargon correct, I was definitely impressed with the details down to the period-accurate GUI elements. I've just become so jaded to the ubiquitous "swirling, beeping, 3D computers" of most Hollywood stuff that something even remotely realistic (let alone dead-on, like Social Network) seems shocking.

    7. Re:The Social Network Scenes by haxney · · Score: 1

      except I'd be using vi instead of emacs.

      Heresy! Repent your wicked ways, O vile blasphemer, lest you suffer the eternal wrath of Saint IGNUcius! And furthermore...

      Ah, I can't do it anymore. Not only am I too young to have been involved in the Great Editor Wars, I'm just happy to see anyone using a text editor these days. Let us set aside our grievances, for both sides have lost many good men (and women) to the Great Editor Wars, and band together against the new threat: the demon known as the Integrated Devil Eternity (IDE)!

    8. Re:The Social Network Scenes by jensen404 · · Score: 1

      The script for that part was basically taken word-for-word from Mark Zuckerberg's real livejournal page.
      The only major change they made was at the beginning of the sequence when he is typing mean things about a girl. <!-- He actually only said one unkind thing, and it was inside an HTML comment -->

    9. Re:The Social Network Scenes by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      And is was a big door.

    10. Re:The Social Network Scenes by jensen404 · · Score: 1

      That's because most of the dialog for that part came out of Mark Zuckerburg's LiveJournal.
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/538697/Mark-Zuckerbergs-Online-Diary

      They sensationalized the beginning part of the blogging, though. In the movie he didn't use a comment tag, and he went off about cup sizes.

      <p><i>8:13pm</i>.<!- - Jessica Alona is a bitch. I need to think of something to make
      to take
      my mind off her.- - >I need to think of something to occupy my mind. Easy enough
      now I just need an idea...

    11. Re:The Social Network Scenes by nprz · · Score: 1

      I agree.
      That is probably what I would have done in the same situation. Of course the speed of how fast he went through all the sites might have been a little too quick for me. Then again, I'm in no rush to make a FaceMash site.

    12. Re:The Social Network Scenes by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      And a backdoor login is not only plausible but a real security concern.

      In my experience it is usually called toor, and the password would be guessable if I knew who created the account.

    13. Re:The Social Network Scenes by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Flynn's machine in his Arcade's basement? Wasn't that SunOS?

    14. Re:The Social Network Scenes by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      It was probably the most realistic portrayal of hackers at work that has come out of Hollywood.

      Well, Trinity can use nmap and ssh exploits:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojFFS_T3UQk

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
    15. Re:The Social Network Scenes by TheGhostface · · Score: 1

      They didn't call it Linux but SunOS yeah, but it was still linux from the way it looked and operated

    16. Re:The Social Network Scenes by Kosi · · Score: 1

      No, some other guy here got it right, it was SolarOS, qualifying for the most obvious reference to SunOS ever. And, how exactly - besides from the output of uname - do you tell, let's say SunOS, Linux, AIX, HP-UX and *BSD apart, when all that you see is a non-graphical login and some operations in the shell?

    17. Re:The Social Network Scenes by TheGhostface · · Score: 1

      My bad, I completely forgot about the existence of SunOS :)
      And yeah instead of Linux I should have said unix system.

      Thanks for clearing that up tho, I stand corrected.

    18. Re:The Social Network Scenes by Kosi · · Score: 1

      My bad, I completely forgot about the existence of SunOS :)

      Shame on you! Lemme guess, your boss' name is Larry? ;-)

      It's a great pity how some liked names become forgotten so fast. Not that I'm anti-Oracle, but I have to admit that it didn't feel good when I first saw the Oracle logo in the JRE update installer.

  32. Die Hard 4.0 by swathe · · Score: 1

    "I need to power down my gear"

    1. Re:die hard 4.0 by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just like how computers in general seem to be packed with either explosives or 5 megawatts of power in pretty much every sci-fi movie. Star Trek is one of the worst offenders for this. "Oh no, the computer is overloaded! *bzzzt, boom*" If I blew up a PC everytime it got stuck in a logic loop I'd be typing with hooks by now.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Die Hard 4.0 by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I was hoping I would see that listed. Myself and my friend literally burst out laughing when the terrorists threatened to download "the accumulated wealth of the world" and abscond with it on removable media.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:die hard 4.0 by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I just like how computers in general seem to be packed with either explosives or 5 megawatts of power in pretty much every sci-fi movie. Star Trek is one of the worst offenders for this. "Oh no, the computer is overloaded! *bzzzt, boom*" If I blew up a PC everytime it got stuck in a logic loop I'd be typing with hooks by now.

      Maybe they had an even more advanced version of those Sony inflammable laptop batteries?

    4. Re:die hard 4.0 by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to say you DON"T have a thermite charge around the hard drives in your computer that is activated by a one handed keystroke? I thought it was obligatory that every hacker put those in...

    5. Re:die hard 4.0 by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      I also love how even elevator cameras are connected to the Internet.

    6. Re:die hard 4.0 by CityZen · · Score: 1

      That is starting to become slightly more probable, seeing as how most security systems are just fancy DVRs now-a-days.

    7. Re:die hard 4.0 by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I think the tech in Star Trek is that the whole power grid in starfleet equipment is essentially based on piping liquid plasma around in plumbing (the EPS grids), and that any powered device tapped into this supply and it was literally like turning on a tap to get power, thus when there were "surges" in the EPS system you had literal pressure waves of this charged plasma squirting all over place causing those touch panels and computers to explode.

      I think using this as your power distribution method on what are essentially combat vessels is the same as using burning, open, top heavy containers of gasoline that are prevented from falling over by chocolate support beams as a way to heat the interior of a commercial airliner.

      It works, but no one said it was sensible.

      (also, sorry patent trolls, I have already filed).

    8. Re:die hard 4.0 by gblfxt · · Score: 1

      heck yah, keeps the end users away from the sysadmin computers... :P

    9. Re:die hard 4.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And monitors are always projectors so you can read the screen off the main character's face. It makes no sense.

    10. Re:die hard 4.0 by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Ford Motor Corp claims prior art. Evidence is the Pinto.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    11. Re:die hard 4.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must acquit!

    12. Re:die hard 4.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Ford Motor Corp claims prior art. Evidence is the Pinto.

      So that is the reason crapple make computers that do not go on fire by design!

  33. die hard 4.0 by funkelectric · · Score: 1

    Uberhackers are killed by urging/social engineering them to press a certain key, which then causes explosives within the computer to detonate. And that was the best bit.

  34. Superman III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Richard Pryor breaking into a computer system. To the prompt "ENTER PASSWORD:", he types "BYPASS ALL SECURITY". Bingo!

    Not just a terrible scene. A truly terrible movie.

    1. Re:Superman III by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Yup, in every way Superman III was the death of the franchise. The first movie... awesome... the second movie... some of the best bad guys in cinema history... the third movie... a supercomputer with less security than a TRS-80 Model 4?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Superman III by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 2

      Actually, that's the perfect password. Nobody would ever suspect it.

    3. Re:Superman III by gblfxt · · Score: 1

      most computers are required by law to have this password on their computer, the tough part is guessing the username!

    4. Re:Superman III by chad_r · · Score: 1

      In all the Superman III hate, what everyone is forgetting is this: When Richard Prior was causing mayhem with the city grid, at one point he MADE A DON'T WALK SIGNAL GO OVER AND STRANGLE THE WALK SIGNAL!! Yes, you read this right. He hacked a traffic signal so that the stick figure pedestrians moved and then fought with each other. If you haven't seen the movie, I think this sums up just how utterly terrible it is. Stupid password hacks are in many movies, but in no other movie did a Don't Walk signal go over and strangle a Walk signal.

    5. Re:Superman III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a dude in it from Krypton who flies through the air and stops bullets with his skin and a campy scene in a campy movie is what shatters your suspension of disbelief?

    6. Re:Superman III by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Superman is supposed to be a superhero precisely because he's surrounded by beings that are not. The rest of the world is supposed to be mundane and have a passing resemblance to reality.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Superman III by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I just saw a version of the Superman II movie called the "Donner cuts", it's quite nice. It's the director who did Superman I and then had to leave near the end of the production of Superman II due to disagreements. It's well worth watching.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    8. Re:Superman III by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I watched the Donner cut and it was significantly better than the Lester version (though some of Lester's footage is used to fill in the holes).

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  35. Teletype Displays by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    While I wouldn't call it a gaffe, I'd call it annoying. There is the habit Hollywood has for displaying text to screens like it is being printed on a teletype machine (Alien, The Matrix, etc), complete with clicking noises. I know it is done for the slow readers in the audience but still.

    Then there are the unnecessary graphics. Someone will be doing genetics research and a totally useless image of a DNA strand will appear on the screen (Jursassic Park, The Fly (remake)). "Hey look, DNA! So THAT'S what I've been working on for years!"

    I'd say Independence Day is the worst offender for bad technological plot gimmicks but The Terminator is also guilty. Why would a robot need a display in its head? Wouldn't it just think the info, not display it to its own eyes? Yah, not as thrilling to the audience to show a robot standing there staring and analyzing.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Teletype Displays by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      If the robot just thought the info, then the audience wouldn't be able to perceive it.

    2. Re:Teletype Displays by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Alien

      Made in 1979. Before the first commercial GUI-based system. When vector-monitors were still in regular use.

      The clacking noise is gratuitous though.

    3. Re:Teletype Displays by kylemonger · · Score: 1

      I always thought the Terminator displays were evidence of its human origin. The debug statements were still enabled in the code when the humans were wiped out.

    4. Re:Teletype Displays by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      They should've had some comments in the code then. "/* I know this is a kludge but a case insensitive match on SARAH is good enough for now. */"

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    5. Re:Teletype Displays by vgerclover · · Score: 1

      And how would you represent the internal processing of a robot as an engineer?

      It's perfectly plausible that what you were seeing was the equivalent to a tail -f /dev/log.

      I know that when I was playing with face recognition I would overlay relevant debug text over the live feed of the camera to help me easily see when I fucked up something.

    6. Re:Teletype Displays by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      Maybe the terminator was autistic/a visual thinker.

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    7. Re:Teletype Displays by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      It's not a movie, but Frank Herbert's otherwise great novel Destination: Void, about creating an artificial intelligence, is really brought low at critical points when the primary means for communicating with the onboard computers is via some sort of teletype-like paper tape printer. Star Trek TOS was little better, with super computers that looked even more primitive than the equipment that actually existed in the mid and late 1960s.

      What it tells me is while SF writers have always had little problem envisioning the "big ticket" stuff like space ships and death rays and other fantastical technologies beyond our wildest dreams, trying to formulate more mundane things like how computers will like in a few years or centuries is considerably more difficult.

      It's the one thing I'll give to Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick. HAL 9000, while obviously far beyond our current technical capabilities as far as AI goes, seems to invoke at least a believable computer system. Yes, the monitors are CRTs, which obviously wouldn't be so, but the scene where Bowman starts pulling modules from HAL's brain doesn't generate the exasperation in me that watching your average episode of CSI North Dakota or Unintelligence Day does. Because they were trying to ground future technology more fully in a frame of reference of 1960s technology, instead of trying to create what amounts to magic machines, HAL 9000 comes off as being probably the least offensive super computer in cinema history.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Teletype Displays by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      They can be forgiven. Just about every movie computer since the 1950s has had to make some sort of buzzing, whirring or clacking noises. I tell you, if every time I opened a window on any of my computers I had some BRRR-WHIPPP-ZOOOM sound come out, I'd smash the speakers. I fucking hate that in movies and TV shows. It's unnecessary, but the editors just can't resist inserting the sounds in.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:Teletype Displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who even said the Terminator had a display in its head? You can see (I presume), but you don't have a display in yours.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphonomenon

    10. Re:Teletype Displays by quickgold192 · · Score: 1

      http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/10/01/24/1821248/Designing-the-Computer-UIs-In-Movies

      FTS: The main point of these fake movie UIs is different than that of real UIs: to tell a story very quickly, not to reveal and enable function.

    11. Re:Teletype Displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is worse when you see a translated version of the movie (they don't do subtitles here), they'll recite everything appearing on the screen in the same annoying "robotic" voice in every single movie.

    12. Re:Teletype Displays by Aryden · · Score: 1

      wait... pc's aren't supposed to be making clicking, clacking, whirring sounds? Where's my hardware diagnostic kit.....

    13. Re:Teletype Displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it tells me is while SF writers have always had little problem envisioning the "big ticket" stuff like space ships and death rays and other fantastical technologies beyond our wildest dreams, trying to formulate more mundane things like how computers will like in a few years or centuries is considerably more difficult. Perhaps this is only because what they were trying to envision (much more powerful and usable computers) actually exist today but meanwhile there are no actual "starships" (in the Star Trek vision) or "deathrays" to compare against their ideas, so those ideas still seem very futuristic and not silly. PS : I'm sure some military research lab has tested some form of microwave "death-ray" at some point, but it is far from common/practical use or broad public knowledge at this time.

    14. Re:Teletype Displays by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      actually, I was using a CRT in 2001. Spacecraft and aircraft had CRT in 2001. Dead on.

    15. Re:Teletype Displays by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Spot on: I mean the Constitution Class starship I served on during my stint in the Space Service is nothing like the totally unrealistic creation that Roddenberry hack came up with. Two Warp Nacelles? Come on, everybody knows that to achieve anything more than warp two you have to have at least six of them.

      And as I mentioned in another post, that Laforge dude was no Chief Engineer. I mean you never, and I mean NEVER reverse the polarity of a tachyon flow and re-route it through your main deflector. Even a line cook knows that will only result in frying the main deflector leaving you stuck in space without a deflector to protect against space debris and you also run a very significant risk of breaching containment on the anti-matter. Simply put, it's worse than if one of the Ghostbusters Inc. Buster Teams(TM) were to cross the streams of their Proton Accelerator packs and we all know that short of the return of Gozer, that's just not a good idea.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    16. Re:Teletype Displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I think the creators of The Terminator and its sequels knew the HUD would not be necessary to the machine, but used it as a way to show the audience what the machine was thinking. Plus it looks really cool!

    17. Re:Teletype Displays by wazoox · · Score: 1

      They can be forgiven. Just about every movie computer since the 1950s has had to make some sort of buzzing, whirring or clacking noises.

      Some electronics can be relatively noisy. Back in 1996, I remember clearly the SGI Indigo2 Extreme for that; whenever you moved a big 3D model on screen, you could clearly hear the graphic board hissing and buzzing.

    18. Re:Teletype Displays by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Yep, people seem to forget that all performance art is representative. You make a film that looks and sounds like real life and no-one's going to have the patience to watch it.

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    19. Re:Teletype Displays by fishexe · · Score: 1

      ...trying to formulate more mundane things like how computers will like in a few years or centuries is considerably more difficult.

      Computers can't will. They are not sentient.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    20. Re:Teletype Displays by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I'd say the WOPR came close for unoffensive appearance of both the machine and the displays.

      Heck, the systems in Star Wars (the original, now called "Star Wars: Episode IV, A New Hope") aren't that bad, either, considering all the tech around them. Star Wars wasn't even remotely about the computers, but they managed to get several things right. Why someone would put the power relay for a tractor beam on a narrow catwalk with no rail could only be explained by spartan budget constraints, but then again they were on an expensive battle station built to be capable of destroying worlds. They were probably already over budget. Don't try to sell me the old line about an astromech droid not being able to turn the power off to the garbage processing facilities. Who the hell keeps a maintenance man from turning off the waste disposals in the middle of your base for security purposes? Maybe the astromechs should have had voice synthesizers for when they weren't actually repairing a ship, but usually they are plugged into a socket. Besides, the interplay between C3PO and R2D2 is worth it. Why Star Wars isn't mentioned more often in threads like this, I'll never know. Droids for interpreters and maintenance tasks seem only natural progressions of computers and robotics.

    21. Re:Teletype Displays by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      the only computer-related stuff that was bad about SW:NH was CGI processing done in 1990s. It even screwed the original plot (Han shot first!).

    22. Re:Teletype Displays by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have to agree, 2001 is still an amazing movie to watch.

      Asimov does a pretty good job in his books as well.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    23. Re:Teletype Displays by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The first Foundation book's invocation of "atomic energy" rather dates it, but all in all, Asimov did a pretty good job.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  36. Independence Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The alien ship showed up as a large wifi access point with no auth or encryption turned on.

    1. Re:Independence Day by geekd · · Score: 1

      it was 1996. He had Wifi built into his laptop? Even if what you say was the case, he STILL couldn't get onto the alien network. Worst scene ever.

    2. Re:Independence Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His laptop was plugged into the ship. The ship was docked with the mother ship. Most likely their was an umbilical.

  37. That was awful by lullabud · · Score: 1

    That was the worst I've ever seen. Close 2nd: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNtcWpY4YLY

    1. Re:That was awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just absolutely killed it:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9GD4ehJ25o&feature=related

    2. Re:That was awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know man, I don't know if the episode descended into lunacy afterward, but that line was good. That line was a good way of describing hackers: console cowboys in cyberspace. When I heard this line, I immediately thought about HBGary's Aaron Barr attempting to "jam with the console cowboys in cyberspace" via irc with anonymous. He certainly could NOT.

    3. Re:That was awful by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      Before Julia Stiles was a student with no future due to her marriage ambitions, she was a hacker. I'll say that's the best hacker depiction of all. :P

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
  38. The terrible bleeping text by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    Why the hell do they do that? What self-respecting geek would use something so annoying that it bleeps every time it displays a character?

    1. Re:The terrible bleeping text by spartus · · Score: 1

      Windows XP's "Start Navigation.wav" would like a word with you.

    2. Re:The terrible bleeping text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And thus, vi was created

    3. Re:The terrible bleeping text by aarggh · · Score: 1

      And yet there's a huge fan club for the old IBM style "clickity" keyboards you had to bash! I must admit to being one of the fans! I probably developed most of my arm muscles using an older keyboard when I was younger.

    4. Re:The terrible bleeping text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want arm muscles, try a KSR 33 teletype keyboard.

    5. Re:The terrible bleeping text by Aryden · · Score: 1

      your keyboard may have been involved, but I can almost guarantee typing wasn't how you built those arm muscles... ;)

    6. Re:The terrible bleeping text by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I own a model M, you don't bash it, fact I usually describe it as typing on pillows

      besides if you bash this thing it hurts your finger as it doesn't buckle like membrane models

    7. Re:The terrible bleeping text by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      That is nowhere near as annoying as the "display a line 1 character at a time beeping as you go' Hollywood idea of a text display.

    8. Re:The terrible bleeping text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But fun!

      read r
      echo $r > tmp.txt
      cat tmp.txt | beep -c -f 400 -D 50 -l 10

    9. Re:The terrible bleeping text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell do they do that? What self-respecting geek would use something so annoying that it bleeps every time it displays a character?

      Maybe you've never watched Star Trek. LCARS seems to have the trait of making a noise every time you push a button. ;)

  39. House MD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a scene in one episode of House where the doctors used some sort of technology to visualize their patient's dreams. That was pretty awful. Up until then, the show had been pretty good about not resorting to such ludicrous misrepresentations of present-day technology.

  40. WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, this movie exists. And yes, it's godawful beyond belief.

    Here's a review I wrote about the movie when it came out. But, really, every detail is awful-- not just the computer scenes, but every scene is brimming from top to bottom with WTF. It also doesn't help that they couldn't get any characters from the original, except WOPR (if you count that.)

    1. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I thought that was a bad dream!

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Uh...wow...that IS an awful movie. I'd never realized they'd made a travesty of this nature...

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      Absolutely absymal.

    4. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that movie was pretty bad, but of course Eagle Eye was basically the same plot, and only slightly less bad.

    5. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Winner.

    6. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I saw this just about a month ago on Cable. It was Cult Classic bad. We're talking Plan 9 From Outerspace plot quality with full blown Hollywood production. I bet it's a cult phenomenon some day. Won't be a rocky horror picture show cult but I bet people curl up and watch it in groups some day.

    7. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Pyrus.mg · · Score: 1

      Informative my ass! Next thing you'll be trying to tell me they made a Matrix sequel.

    8. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      That's too bad, I thought the original wargames was one the best computer movies ever.

    9. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tell me where you live, I'll send some mobsters even for thinking they might have made it.

    10. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by mr_mischief · · Score: 2

      WarGames is much like The Matrix... or Fletch... or Caddy Shack... or The Karate Kid...

      One of the best things to say is, "That was such an awesome movie. It's too bad they never made a sequel".

      The fact that there was, indeed, a movie made to cash in on the original's success which is not worthy to be its sequel does not make the statement incorrect. It is, in fact, the very point. Making a movie with the same name and even some of the same characters that purports to take place some time farther along the timeline is not all it takes to classify as a sequel. The movie should also be in the same class of art.

      BTW, remakes != sequels. The new Karate Kid (which may as well be called The Kung Fu Kid if it wasn't for the original) isn't ruled out by this.

    11. Re:WarGames 2: The Dead Code by Tobius.Thrunt · · Score: 1

      I think that a movie about dead code must be awesome! This must be the movie about how the execution of titled "dead code" in the country's defense network causes it to fail, thus resulting in the unimpeded invasion by Soviet troops, only for them to be repulsed by a team of teen hackers who manage to optimize-out the errant routines, recompile the software using nothing other than a ZX81 and to reinstall it by delivering it on tape to a wounded air force pilot. Or am I mixing that up with another movie?

  41. Salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The scene in Salt, with Angelina Jolie, where the russian spy forces the president to launch a nuclear strike is... RIDICULOUS. I mean, you're telling me that it takes about 5 minutes for the President to authorize a nuclear strike. Kinda unrealistic... And of course, there has to be a loading bar... that comes to a screeching halt just as the hero is there to save the day. I just thought this scene represented everything that is wrong about computer scenes in movies.

    1. Re:Salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... you're telling me that it takes about 5 minutes for the President to authorize a nuclear strike. Kinda unrealistic ...

      During the cold war when "enemy" submarines were parked off the US coast the time of flight for a submarine launched missile was about 3 minutes. So getting presidential authorization in some small number of minutes could easily be realistic.

    2. Re:Salt by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I thought his point was that 5 minutes was unrealistically long.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  42. My secrect question by Coeurderoy · · Score: 2

    When ever I see a scene qui a computer, or a sculptor, or somebody speaking a "foreign language" that I know, I'm wondering ...

    Are all the scene about things I do not know anythng about just as bad ???
    Are all the docter cringing when they see Dr House ? (probably) and what do the lawers make of the "good wife" ? and new york women of "sex and the city" ?

    Or are we singled out to be really interpreted badly ...

    BTW I do actually laught but really hate the big bang theory ... is it really necessary for the US general public to believe that inteligent scientist are social looser to enjoy a movie ?
    It's geeksplotation.. if you would stereotype any other human category as much you'd probably be sued to bankrupcy...

                I guess we do have too much of a sense of humor...

    1. Re:My secrect question by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Well, in my experience from watching movies and TV shows with friends who aren't computer geeks but rather highly skilled in other fields my impression is that while it is common for movies to get facts a bit wrong most of the time they at least seem to make an effort (unless it's one of those truly dumbed-down beyond all belief movies that focus entirely on a "cool" protagonist and his cool car/explosions/whatever with no sanity whatsoever when it comes to the plot, not much different from the usual hollywood fare, just taken to its extreme I suppose).

      However, even my non-geek friends often cringe at the lack of accuracy when it comes to computers in movies, and they drop lovely comments like "What? Why would anyone put an override button next to the login button? What's the point of logging in then?", that sort of thing is a bit more obviously wrong to the average viewer than a surgeon in the movie asking a nurse to increase the drug dosage for a patient way too much, the latter being the sort of thing that even a medical professional who's not specialized in heart/brain/whatever surgery may not pick up on (or would have to look up before stating that the dosage was wrong)...

      I suspect movie and TV producers have just gotten used to plain making shit up when dealing with computers...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:My secrect question by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it pretty much is that bad.

      I've been an infantryman, a medic, a civilian EMT, a programmer, and now a scientist. It's almost always that bad. The military in general, and the infantry in particular? Rarely done well, although it's probably got a higher hit-to-miss ratio in general than most of the others. Medicine? I don't know about House, since I don't watch it, but I've seen one and only one really good screen portrayal: the early seasons of ER, before it started focusing more on the personal lives of the (mostly unlikeable) characters than on their titular job. Programming? Well, we all know how badly Hollywood mangles that. Science, of any kind? Meaningless technobabble that sounds nothing like the way real scientists talk to each other, mouthed by characters who are nothing like real scientists. And I know lawyers, cops, airline pilots and flight attendants, and ... wait for it ... people who work in the movie industry who assure me that movie and TV portrayals of their working lives are just as bad.

      Yeah, a certain amount of dramatic license is necessary, because most of what people do for a living all day, even those who work in kind of exciting jobs, is pretty boring and would make for lousy entertainment. But there's dramatic license in service of the story, and then there's screwing things up for no reason, and it's the latter that's on display here.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, all professions are interpreted badly. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DidNotDoTheResearch Go to the related tropes section and start scrolling. Then keep scrolling. Then scroll some more.

    4. Re:My secrect question by am+2k · · Score: 1

      I can't talk about other fields of science, but German is my native language, and whenever in American movies/TV shows somebody pretends to be German, it's really really awful. Here's one example from Scrubs. Those two guys clearly are Americans who have spent maybe a year in a German language class, if even that. Sarah Chalke's (Elliot's) German is actually better than theirs.

      One exception to this is Inglorious Basterds, where they actually used real native speakers.

    5. Re:My secrect question by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      that sort of thing is a bit more obviously wrong to the average viewer than a surgeon in the movie asking a nurse to increase the drug dosage for a patient way too much, the latter being the sort of thing that even a medical professional who's not specialized in heart/brain/whatever surgery may not pick up on (or would have to look up before stating that the dosage was wrong)...

      Except when it's a common drug with a well-known dosage range and the amount they're talking about giving would either (a) have no clinical effect, or (b) kill the patient, no matter what he's being treated for. Which happens in movies and TV a lot.

      It's even handled badly in the case of made-up drugs. "He's crashing -- give him 50 milliliters of Fakeanol!" Except that drugs as a rule are measured in units of mass, not volume (with the obvious exception of IV fluids.) So even if you have no idea what Fakeanol is supposed to do, it still sounds absurd to anyone with experience in any aspect of medicine.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:My secrect question by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Sarah Chalke's (Elliot's) German is actually better than theirs.

      Yup. From her Wikipedia article and I heard mentioned on the Scrubs DVD commentary:

      Her mother is originally from Rostock, Germany. According to a Scrubs commentary track, she used to attend the German school in her hometown twice a week. Her first language is English, although she speaks French fairly well and German fluently.

      In addition, she's adorable.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    7. Re:My secrect question by Prosthetic_Lips · · Score: 1

      Actually, we did catch a House problem, only because my son had been diagnosed with C-Dif (http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/c-difficile/DS00736). On one episode, House came up with his diagnosis of c-dif partially because the person was constipated. Having seen my son with c-dif, he had the exact OPPOSITE problem. Like projectile vomiting, but wrong orifice.

      So, yes, sometimes other shows get it completely wrong.

      Son, if you are reading this, you know we love you! And I didn't say anything to identify you. Oh wait, maybe someone here can create a GUI interface in VB to track my IP address -- Best. Line. Ever!!

      Here's a bonus one, nothing to do with computers. My dad was a helicopter mechanic, so he knew a lot about them. On a David Copperfield special, he had a helicopter circling the Statue of Liberty, and was going to make it disappear. The statue disappears, and my dad blurts out, "it's a different helicopter!" Elapsed time, 1 second. Completely destroyed the illusion (something about 2-rotor versus 4-rotor, or some other meaningless drivel to me). I mean, Copperfield can't hire the same model of helicopter to circle the Statue of Liberty and his empty field? Come on!

    8. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes!

      A paramedic friend of mine points out the mis-use of de-fribulators every time a patient flat-lines (ECG makes the long beeeeeeeep sound). Apparently they should only be used when the heart is spasming ("fribulation"...funny that... the name almost suggests it!), which is to say, the electric shock essentially slaps the heart to stop it spasming.

      In the case of a flat-line, you can't "jump-start" the heart the way you do a car. The primary means of helping is actually CPR or Pulmanory Massage (banging on the chest... Like Terminator Salvation... except without the iron rib-cage that clearly wouldn't flex). Of course, CPR doesn't make nearly as powerful cinema as a doc or nurse yelling "Clear!" followed by that awesome electrical whump noise!

    9. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least TBBT is very accurate, science-wise.
      And they (mostly) turn out to be not such social losers, after a certain time.

    10. Re:My secrect question by Aryden · · Score: 1

      major difference is, shows and movies will often times hire doctors/lawyers/police/military consultants to try to get atleast some of the aspects of what they are doing correct. I don't know of ANY off the top of my head that hire(d) programmers/script kiddies/developers to consult on lingo/jargon/practice... except maybe Chuck, and they didn't hire anyone, their tech is pretty bad, but they atleast had Dell come in and install Dell server faceplates everywhere!

    11. Re:My secrect question by lee1 · · Score: 1

      It's not just fiction. Ever read an article in a newspaper describing something about which you have direct knowledge? And the version in the paper is barely recognizable?

    12. Re:My secrect question by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between "not accurate" and ridiculous bullshit.

      In computer scenes, inaccurate would be someone doing:

      ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.2 netmask 200.147.31.255
      route add default gw 10.0.0.1
      ssh -p128234 root@200.43.20.125

      That is inaccurate, and filled with errors (there's no way you could reach that destination through that gw with that IP/mask, and the port is above 65535). What we get in movies is not inaccurate, it's ridiculous.

      What we get in movies is the equivalent of dr house sticking a catheter down someones ass and injecting 120 tons of aspirin directly into the skull with a thermometer to cure cancer, Then replacing 100% of the patient's blood with apple juice using a syringe and a bucket to trick the cancer fungus into transforming into a bacteria, then metaphysically leave the body.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    13. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are all the scene about things I do not know anythng about just as bad ???

      Probably. It's like journalism - if a newspaper carries a story about something you know about then you find that's it's massively distorted, whether it's about the field you work in or a story local to your neighborhood or a hobby of yours. But somehow that doesn't that doesn't stop people assuming that the facts in the other stories must be valid, after all they wouldn't publish it without checking, right?

    14. Re:My secrect question by rjforster · · Score: 1

      I am a physicist and while I think everyone knows just how much Hollywood gets wrong on the Armageddon level physics, they also usually get it wrong on the day to day science lab stuff. My GF likes horses and always complains about them in films. From 'They don't make noises like that all the time' to 'one of those four fulling that carriage has a different stride length to the rest, they would have matched their horses properly in Jane Austin's time."

    15. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: Dr. House...

      I am not an M.D. but I am an electrical engineer. There was an episode in which the team thought the patient had been exposed to radiation, so they went to his house to find evidence of said radiation. The house scene was laughable... The doctors were holding Geiger counters and carefully scanning things like the microwave and television set. That scene pretty much caused me to question the accuracy of everything else on the show.

    16. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend is a doctor and she refuses to even watch House. Amongst her reasons is 'too much generalisation', 'inaccurate', 'questionable' and sometimes downright 'untrue' -but the rest of us need good television - so why let the truth get in the way of a good story.

    17. Re:My secrect question by omarius · · Score: 1

      The dean of my local law school commented once that Law & Order is actually not bad as far as that goes--his comment was that whenever he'd think, "Objection!" an objection from one of the TV lawyers wouldn't be far behind.

    18. Re:My secrect question by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Are all the docter cringing when they see Dr House ? (probably)

      In opposite, many wish they could get away behaving like House. :) Seriously, AFAIK all those illnesses really exist and are pictured more or less accurately, although they are often very rare ones. I also heard about a prof using excerpts from House in his lectures (by a friend whose brother made his medical degree in Yale IIRC).

    19. Re:My secrect question by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      My father used to be a cop. According to him, it's nothing like "Lethal Weapon." The average cop does not shoot, and kill, about 40 people on a slow day. Actually, if a cop so much as draws his/her gun, they'll be filling out forms for the next two weeks.

    20. Re:My secrect question by fishexe · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that's not bad for Scrubs.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    21. Re:My secrect question by dhammond · · Score: 1

      It's geeksplotation.. if you would stereotype any other human category as much you'd probably be sued to bankrupcy...

      Yeah, it really is amazing how every human category other than your own is always treated so much more fairly.

    22. Re:My secrect question by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Your point being?

      I wasn't claiming that "cop action movies" were accurate depictions of a normal day in the life of a police officer.

      I pointed out that it seems like when it comes to facts surrounding things like medicine, dentistry, mechanics, computers, etc it tends to be computers and other "magic tech" that gets the "Oh wtf let's just make everything up" treatment, with other subjects used in plots it seems that filmmakers either bring in consultants to make sure they get the facts straight or at the very least try to use some common sense and basic knowledge of what is even remotely possible.

      To quote GNUALMAFUERTE's post "What we get in movies is the equivalent of dr house sticking a catheter down someones ass and injecting 120 tons of aspirin directly into the skull with a thermometer to cure cancer.". That is to say, completely nonsensical made up "facts".

      I'd even take it a step further and say that with computers filmmakers often even go so far as to plain invent jargon that doesn't even make sense, would you believe a movie where the main character has "bluecute coughingitis in his tear bladder" that requires "a two hundred volt enemorph in his rear toe pair"? Because there are plenty of movies that deal with any mention of computers in that way...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    23. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in the Army, and most military movies (they've been getting it right more lately) have characters that don't know how to salute properly, guns that fire 1000 rounds without reloading, claymore mines and other explosive devices that have no basis in physics, etc.
      Yes, it makes me cringe.

    24. Re:My secrect question by Bonteaux-le-Kun · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should make movies like they did in the 70ies, like "Shaft", to empower geeks all the world over. Just call it "Shift" or something...

    25. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure if bad is always offensive, but I will agree that frequently any movie or tv show on a topic I know anything about becomes unbearable very quickly. As far as Big Bag Theory goes, I have heard that despite "good acting and lines", for the most part none of the actors have the first clue about what they are saying when it comes to the technical stuff. It boggles the mind sometimes given how realistic things can be made to look on a screen that everybody you see in movies and on tv are actors, not in the sense that they are acting, but that it is the kind of person that wants to become an actor and be a professional actor and have "acting jobs" that ed up in movies and on television. Like, ALL the time. In other words roughly, no matter what the part, it is always being acted by a person with a Type A personality.

    26. Re:My secrect question by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      I always found the original Law and Order did something very nice that permitted them to stay rather close to what I imagine is "true" for lawyers (IANAL) in that the morally "right" side didn't always win ... unlike shows like CSI, the good guys didn't always win their case (or even won them sometimes with misgivings about having won them) which is far closer to real life regardless of what vocation you're in.

      I bet that helped a ton in staying closer to reality within the justice system. This is pretty much point number one for me about any drama - if the morals in play are presented in black and white, it's immediately downgraded in my view.

      I suspect this is one reason for House's popularity - it seems to live inbewteen in that they overwhelmingly come out on top of the diagnosis by the end, but House as an anti-hero gets it closer to reality. But I still find House is too neat and tidy for me, smart people being smart people, rarely having to pay for their mistakes with their last hour heroics and untouchable academics.

      I still submit that The Wire was the finest piece of television ever produced because nobody was totally clean and characters had to pay for their faults in a fashion much truer to real life.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    27. Re:My secrect question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I am a doctor (radiologist) and find a lot of TV medical dramas a bit cringeworthy. ER in the early days was pretty good but I lost interest fairly early on. The British TV series "Bodies" and "Cardiac Arrest" were both written by an ex-anesthesiologist/anaesthetist and give a much more accurate flavour of what working in a hospital is like for most doctors.

    28. Re:My secrect question by perry64 · · Score: 1

      I was in the Navy and have not seen a Navy film set in an era when I was in that was even close to realistic. And don't get me started on NCIS. If you were a criminal in the Navy, the only thing better than your crime being investigated by NCIS was having it investigated by the Keystone Kops.

    29. Re:My secrect question by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      It seems that especially for TV series, which are made on tight budgets and schedules, things are often inaccurate, not just for computers. Someone doing a movie scipt might try to do some research. I for example have a friend who's an expert on horses. Even on a subject like that you can get lot's of things wrong apparently.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  43. Jurassic Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hands down, Jurassic Park. "This is Unix! I know this!"
    meanwhile seeing some crazy spinny GUI, and remember this is circa 1993.

    I cringe every time.

  44. Don't forget consoles! by lullabud · · Score: 1

    Gamecube, Wii, Playstation, PS2, PS3, PSP and Xbox 360 are RISC too.

    1. Re:Don't forget consoles! by Unoriginal_Nickname · · Score: 2

      Also, all modern x86 processors have a relatively-simple (RISC-like) processor sitting behind a programmable instruction decoder. x86 hasn't been implemented directly in hardware for at least a decade now... it's too complex and badly-designed.

    2. Re:Don't forget consoles! by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Gamecube, Wii, Playstation, PS2, PS3, PSP and Xbox 360 are RISC too.

      Those have CPUs using the PowerPC instruction set. Have you taken a look at that instruction set? It's definitely not RISC (reduced instruction set computing, it doesn't apply anymore)

    3. Re:Don't forget consoles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont forget the pc and the mac. x86 is just a frontend nowdays it has a risc core who do all the crunching

    4. Re:Don't forget consoles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The principles of RISC are that you design a ridiculously simple chip, and give access to that chip DIRECTLY to the programmer. If you think a chip is RISC because somewhere in the depths of the layers of decoders and crap there's an internal instruction set similar in size to a RISC instruction set, then you've missed the point of RISC.

    5. Re:Don't forget consoles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's definitely not RISC

      I'm not sure that's true. IIRC, one of the goals of RISC was to get as many instructions as possible to execute in a single cycle. While PPC has a lot of instructions, I'm pretty sure most of them are, in fact, single-cycle - even the complex ones, like floating point divide. It's just that we can get a lot more done in one cycle, nowadays.

    6. Re:Don't forget consoles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      x86 hasn't been implemented directly in hardware for at least a decade now.

      You know, I lived through the Intel/Motorola wars, and I always thought it was funny that a lot of people (many of whom probably should have known better) pointed to the 68k's microcode as a fatal flaw that would intrinsically limit the 68k family's maximum performance - even though early 68k chips ran circles around x86 chips of the same era. I still find it weird that 1) Motorola eventually did eliminate the microcode from their CPUs (68060?) 2) Intel went to something like microcode for their CPUs, and 3) Intel still surpassed Motorola in performance.

    7. Re:Don't forget consoles! by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

      It's VLIW (very long instruction word) architecture in case anyone wants to look it up

    8. Re:Don't forget consoles! by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

      It's VLIW (very long instruction word) architecture in case anyone wants to look it up.

    9. Re:Don't forget consoles! by jenesuispasgoth · · Score: 1

      It's VLIW (very long instruction word) [wikipedia.org] architecture in case anyone wants to look it up

      No it's not. There is a VLIW-like processor made by Intel, and it's the Itanium processor (well, Itanium 2 nowadays). It is not a "pure" VLIW processor though, as it is both VLIW and superscalar. VLIW instructions have a fixed size (in the case of the Itanium, each bundle/long word can feature as much as three instructions, although two is the average). On the other hand, x86 processors have really two parts: one which I would call a "front-end", which receives the CISC instruction. Its only purpose is to decode them, and decompose them into micro-operations/micro-instructions. The latter are the "RISC-like" instructions which are really executed and fill the pipeline.

    10. Re:Don't forget consoles! by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Herpa Derp...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC

      First line of Wikipedia entry on PPC:
      PowerPC (short for Performance Optimization With Enhanced RISC â" Performance Computing, sometimes abbreviated as PPC) is a RISC architecture created by the 1991 Appleâ"IBMâ"Motorola alliance, known as AIM. PowerPC, as an evolving instruction set, has since 2006 been renamed Power ISA but lives on as a legacy trademark for some implementations of Power Architecture based processors.

    11. Re:Don't forget consoles! by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      What's in a name, really? Is the Democratic People's Republic of Korea really a democracy or a republic? I don't think so. Similarly PowerPC is not RISC anymore: it has a whole lot of instructions (ie, not reduced instruction set) and even has instructions that require complex decoding. It's better to call them load-store. But then, current x86 computers are also load-store as well.

      In other words, RISC is a very obsolete term nowadays.

    12. Re:Don't forget consoles! by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

      Do you have some links to this info? I've always been told by many different people that it's VLIW on the other side of the CISC decoder, 'basically an itanium but not quite'

    13. Re:Don't forget consoles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POWER PC

      POWER = Performance Optimisation With Enhanced RISC if my memory serves me correctly.

    14. Re:Don't forget consoles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly PowerPC is not RISC anymore: it has a whole lot of instructions (ie, not reduced instruction set) and even has instructions that require complex decoding.

      Ah, I see your misunderstandin. "Reduced instruction set" doesn't mean that the number of instructions is reduced. It means that the complexity of each instruction is reduced.

      The idea is to increase throughput by pipelining simplified instructions that don't require a lot of time to decode.

      A RISC chip can have as many or more instructions than a CISC chip.

    15. Re:Don't forget consoles! by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      That's why I mentioned complex decoding requirements for other instructions.

  45. The Matrix by TDyl · · Score: 2

    It has to be "The Matrix" - who can believe there are that many long leather coats on the planet?

    --
    Todd: I hope it proves as delicious as the farmers that grew them
    1. Re:The Matrix by hellkyng · · Score: 1

      The Matrix reloaded had NMAP though and that was awesome. http://nmap.org/movies.html

    2. Re:The Matrix by hellkyng · · Score: 1

      Err that NMAP was used, no comment on the movie...

    3. Re:The Matrix by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      But Trinity used sshnuke

    4. Re:The Matrix by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The coats were just code. Nothing in the matrix was real. Like the infinite supply of guns and ammunition.

    5. Re:The Matrix by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

      Good thing they only made the one, then.

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

    6. Re:The Matrix by Rizimar · · Score: 1

      Then I pray you never see the sequels.

    7. Re:The Matrix by doperative · · Score: 1

      A scene about two thirds of the way through the film finds Carrie-Anne Moss's leather-clad superhacker setting her sights on a power grid computer, for plot reasons better left unrevealed.

      But at exactly the point where audiences would normally be treated to a brightly-colored graphical cartoon of a computer intrusion, ala the 2001 Travolta vehicle Swordfish, or cheer as the protagonist skillfully summons a Web browser and fights valiantly through "404 Errors," like the malnourished cyberpunk in this year's "The Core," something completely different happens: Trinity runs "Nmap." link

    8. Re:The Matrix by MattBD · · Score: 1

      Not sure I agree. The Matrix Reloaded features Trinity hacking into a computer in the power plant, and she can be clearly seen to be using nmap.

    9. Re:The Matrix by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      I have seen parts of them they were terrible too.

    10. Re:The Matrix by arikol · · Score: 1

      There were no sequels.
      None.

  46. Too many to count by JavaBear · · Score: 1

    And trying to pinpoint the worst is a battle, as there are just so many contenders for the prize, all deserving it pretty much equally.

    I just can't figure out why Hollywood can't seem to get such an everyday item right. It's not like they attribute implausible capabilities to guns, cars and motorcycles these days.

    Wait...I mean...*carrier lost*

  47. Remake of Knight Rider by sco08y · · Score: 1

    The Knight Rider remake (only saw the pilot) was just full of fail. After they get hit by a rocket and are on fire, they drive around for ages. (Granted, it's not the worst because his love interest has to strip down since they're cooking.) Then there's a car chase, and he just sits there while the car drives around for him; that's the worst car chase I've ever seen.

    The worst part wasn't how dumb the writers were about technology, it was how the technology killed off any possible suspense.

    1. Re:Remake of Knight Rider by aarggh · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it probably failed cause it didn't STAR the Hoff! If they even just had a lifesize cardboard replica of him in the back of every scene I have no doubt it would have been bigger than the Simpsons!

    2. Re:Remake of Knight Rider by Mage+Powers · · Score: 1

      The guy does the driving in the series, but I liked the first half of the pilot better than a good chunk of the series. They should have paired the girl up with the car and just ignored the guy.

  48. Unthinkable by hjf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unthinkable (with Samuel L Jackson and Carrie-Ann Moss).

    The bomb guy disarms the bomb with a Mac running EXCEL, randomly pressing keys in different cells.

    http://i.imgur.com/8SMhl.png

    1. Re:Unthinkable by greetings+programs · · Score: 1

      I never saw this one but I admit it's a winner.

      --
      Greetings, programs!
    2. Re:Unthinkable by Anonymous+Showered · · Score: 1

      I haven't laughed so hard for a while. Thank you.

    3. Re:Unthinkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they didn't even try to hide it.
      It was on the screen for some good seconds.

    4. Re:Unthinkable by arnodf · · Score: 0

      Where's the like button when you need it! :'D

    5. Re:Unthinkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you have to love the 'C.I.A. Budget and Daily Expenses' shortcut on the desktop....

    6. Re:Unthinkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the distributor went bust just as they were finishing this film, they ran out of money so they had to scrap their planned finale and go with this one and go straight to dvd. Looks like there was no money left over for someone to check for howlers like this!

  49. Zoom and Enhance by Lebofsky · · Score: 1

    This always drove me nuts. I'm glad somebody else made this montage:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxq9yj2pVWk

    1. Re:Zoom and Enhance by Z3n1th · · Score: 1

      I was gonna post that vid, glad to see it's already there.

  50. NCIS by pgn674 · · Score: 3

    All the time, over and over again, the TV series NCIS: Naval Criminal Investigative Service is the worst. I understand the goal is to express mood and plot and not to be technically accurate, but still, it's painful.

    1. Re:NCIS by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Frankly I find all CSI and all its knockoffs/ripoffs to be just atrocious on all technical levels. It's not just computers, its chemistry, DNA analysis, optics... I mean, this isn't forensic sciences going on in these shows like you would find on a reasonably decent show like, say, Quincy (which generally stayed well within the technical capabilities of forensics labs in its day and age). These guys have want amount of magic faerie machines.

      Probably the worst aspect is this idea that all these forensics guys are cops with fancy machines. When is the last time you ever heard of an actual lab tech getting into a chase with a perp, or, in most cases, even being in the same fucking building as the perp?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:NCIS by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Frankly I find all CSI and all its knockoffs/ripoffs to be just atrocious on all technical levels.

      Furthermore, I read that doing all the tests they do for even one case, would take weeks even *if* they could afford it. One tech mentioned that to even rent some of the equipment required for a few of the tests would exceed their annual budget.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:NCIS by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      I liked how in one of the early episodes of Castle, the writer is expecting DNA analysis to come back by the end of lunch, only to be told by the detectives it won't be ready for another week or two, due to processing time and a deep backlog at the lab.

    4. Re:NCIS by yeshuawatso · · Score: 1

      I think this is one of the subtleties I miss about the original Law and Order. They sent off a DNA test, and it took weeks to get it back, not seconds. Want more forensics, if it wasn't picked up at the crime scene, it didn't happen. Lab techs look like lab techs and are never seen in an interrogation room. Detectives and officers are the only people wielding weapons and no one is turning their heads slightly to the left removing their glasses and coercing a criminal to confess without being read their rights; and when the detectives do go too far, the second half of the show is gladly freeing the perp in a mistrial. They cancelled that show and left us with one that has a lolita-rape complex, one with an obsession to be like the CSI series if CSI cops had a shoestring budget, and the crap spin-off of an LA version that is Dick Wolf showing his age. All the while CSI is gleefully convincing ignorant (stupid may have been the better word) Americans that cops can swab anything in your house and discover the identity of an intruder in seconds using a giant touch screen computer that's transparent enough for them to see even with the blinding orange light casting through it from a window with blinds tilted enough to not see the fake lights and crew behind it but enough to let in the glare that silhouettes the actors from waste down.

    5. Re:NCIS by Aryden · · Score: 1

      eh if you're comparing a strand to another strand... it doesn't take that long. Not sure if it's the same thing, but when I legitimized my daughter via dna test, it only took them 4 days. I could be wrong however and have no idea what they do in those tests.

    6. Re:NCIS by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Genetic profiling these days is fairly commonplace. The problem is that it requires a bit of setup, followed by a lot of waiting, and more importantly waiting while tying up limited equipment resources. In addition, when doing forensics work, you're not going to have the large clean sample you have have with clinical tests, meaning you're going to tie up more equipment and more time cultivating a good sample. You can have a genetic profile done in a couple hours (which they show as the writer calls the mayor to get priority for his testing), but that's only if you have dedicated staff and equipment. NCIS, with Abby and her basement lab for four agents simply isn't realistic.

    7. Re:NCIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh.. Reminds me of one of the few scenes of CSI:NY I have ever seen: A forensic dude performing an immersive 3D holographic virtual autopsy. That's a lot of buzzwords. That is to say, he was standing in an empty room with a holographic image of the corpse surrounding him and he proceeds to dissect it with his hands. Picking up intestines with his fingers and flinging them against the (virtual) wall until he found the crucial bit of (holographic) evidence, pulsing red, embedded in the virtual corpse's colon.

      My wife (who's usually fairly tolerant of such trash) just looked at me and busted out laughing. WTF doesn't even get you started with a scene as ridiculous as that...

    8. Re:NCIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a thought,

      Maybe the tech, science etc portrayed in these sort of shows is *intentionally* bogus, at the behest of the powers that be.

      It wouldn't do to show wannabee criminerds exactly how all this stuff is done IRL, they might get ideas, so feeding them bogus procedural BS helps 'The Man' catch
      these morons if they ever do try something.

      Ah hell, I wouldn't care if *all* the Tech and science is pure BS, I'll even put up with all the annoying 'America, fuck yeah' bull the show peddles (I'm not American) so long as NCIS keeps Abby it'll be at the top of my preferred 'i-need-to-switch-off-for-a-bit-so-i'll-watch-some-mindless-tv' programmes list.

      CSI?, Meh...Horatio and the sunglasses of justice et al can go spin on it...

       

    9. Re:NCIS by robotandrew · · Score: 2

      This has actually created a huge problem that many lawyers and judges are starting to take note of, namely that the viewing public treat all DNA-related evidence as solid fact despite the many errors that can occur in it. Conversely, the absence of DNA tests (even in cases where there were no samples in evidence to test) causes juries to be biased against the side that lacks the DNA. I sure as hell don't want to be judged by the CSI-viewing public on DNA evidence when the known statistics for the loci used to ID a person have a statistically significant chance of mistaken identity.

    10. Re:NCIS by Myrimos · · Score: 1

      NCIS has its egregious tech moments, but this one was, I think, the worst: NCIS - Double Hacking

      --
      Internet scofflaw
    11. Re:NCIS by IICV · · Score: 1

      There was one hilarious scene in one of the CSI derivatives where a CSI lab technician gets shot because his gun jams.

      Because that's what crime scene investigators do. They have guns, and they occasionally need to use them. They don't just do science in the lab and occasionally go on field trips to collect evidence, oh no. They actually deal with criminals directly; that's totally not the job of actual police officers and detectives.

      It was hilarious, from a certain point of view.

    12. Re:NCIS by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      About shooting or otherwise trying to shut down a computer.
      How often is the screen the target? Apart from an iMac, when have shooting the screen ever stood a fair chance of destroying or shutting down a computer. unless the screen short circuits and does what people really should be doing, pull the plug.

      Rant on...

      Virus attacks always causes random graphics on the victim computer, even when they use a text console.
      Static on flat panel digital TV's when there is no signal.
      LCD screens warp like the good old CRT's when exposed to just about any form of electric or EM interference.
      Screen content projected onto the users faces.
      Fully interactive 3D user interfaces, with 300 baud text output.
      Laser printers sounding like dot-matrix, or where the print magically appear when the sound fx suggests the printer is still warming up/spinning up. (same with aircraft/helicopters, the engines are still spinning up when they take off....)
      High quality full frame rate footage from "cell phone cams", though now that cell phone cams finally can shoot HD at 30+ fps, they are portrayed like it was 2005 again.
      Rant off...

    13. Re:NCIS by Aryden · · Score: 1

      that makes sense and I can definitely get behind that. Thanks for the clarification, as I am definitely not a viewer of any NCIS or CSI's

    14. Re:NCIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What really pisses me off in those shows is the assumption that it is perfectly fine for any agency to do warrantlessly track and hack everyone and everything, or to murder foreign nationals on foreign soil, as long as they get the bad guy.

    15. Re:NCIS by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I find it truly disturbing that [b]Fringe[/b] is usually more realistic than CSI, NCIS etc.. That's fucked up.

      At least Castle is reasonably realistic, apart from the whole civilian-writer-assisting-the-police-and-being-allowed-to-carry-firearms.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    16. Re:NCIS by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Eh, replace BBCode with HTML while I go hang my head in shame.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    17. Re:NCIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      What's also really amazing is that in NCIS, Abby (the forensic expert in the basement of the NCIS headquarters) is actually a forensic expert in real life with a masters in forensic science!

    18. Re:NCIS by Kosi · · Score: 1

      I really like that series (the Gibbs character is so cool!), but yes, I always cringe when they hack a top-secret CIA database in a matter of minutes. Even worse is when they remotely read a car's position from it's GPS, as if every car with a navigation system would also somehow be connected to the net.

    19. Re:NCIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad is a retired doctor and Quincy used to make him nuts. Klugman would throw around cool sounding drug names and random dosage amounts and my dad would just about jump out of his skin. :)

    20. Re:NCIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like NCIS. But the computer stuff is pure fantasy. The feds can probably do most of the stuff shown, but not in the 1.7 seconds alloted.

    21. Re:NCIS by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      My father is a principle R&D scientist for a mass spec company - sadly he doesn't watch much TV but it tickles me to think of a mass spec scientist getting pissed off by wrong MS portrayals in mainstream TV.

      I'll tell him that it'd be nicer if their newer models could run a sample in 5 minutes ... ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    22. Re:NCIS by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      These guys have want amount of magic faerie machines.

      Probably the worst aspect is this idea that all these forensics guys are cops with fancy machines. When is the last time you ever heard of an actual lab tech getting into a chase with a perp, or, in most cases, even being in the same fucking building as the perp?

      I was reading an anecdotal account once of a person who is ACTUALLY involved in the law-enforcement forensics field. This person was horrified of the idea that a forensic scientist would ever even be remotely involved, in the same place as, or ever question or talk to a suspect.

      Apparently the "real" csi people aren't geeky cops. They're just geeks. Hmm! Never would have guessed. Perhaps CSI and the like are glorifying scientists just like Star Trek glorified engineering.

      Why hasn't anyone mentioned "Enemy of the State"? Is it because we all sort of suspect that the tech in that particular movie isn't so far off?

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    23. Re:NCIS by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      British Waking the Dead are not so bad; corpses are decayed, less fancy machinery. Unfortunately, still lab ppl get into chases.

    24. Re:NCIS by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I also love how the cast explain the processes to each other as they go. Incredibly clumsy exposition.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    25. Re:NCIS by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      I always loved it when they referred to the DC beltway and Baltimore-Washington Parkway as "the 495" and "the 295". Cracked me up every time.

    26. Re:NCIS by FLaSh+SWT · · Score: 1

      I'm actually going to disagree with you here. I'm a news photographer in a large metroplex and deal with police and crime scenes fairly frequently. Every single "crime scene investigator" I've ever met carries a gun. They are all commissioned police officers and are armed while out collecting evidence and documenting scenes.

      Now we may have a slight sticking point between "technician" and "investigator" but in the real world, the folks out at the scene have guns and several of them I know actually out-rank detectives.

    27. Re:NCIS by ShelfWare · · Score: 1

      But one of the best and most recent scenes is when Gibbs (Mark Harmon character) is going through a maze and the geek (nicknamed "probie" - forget his name) is walking him through a map to find a "mainframe" to shut down a bomb or something and says something like - "it's like a video game". Then Gibbs discovers the mainframe room and probie is going to talk him through the shutdown sequence for a Unix system. Cut to probie and he is calling out "Gibbs?!?, Gibbs?!?" because all he heard is gunfire.

      Cut back to Gibbs and they show the results of him emptying his pistol into the multiple displays and machines.

  51. Diehard 4.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The delete button is supposed to magically fix my system when pressed? Didn't know that o.o

  52. Almost anytime they... by JavaBear · · Score: 1

    * Rattle off an IP number. More often than not it will contain numbers above 255.

    1. Re:Almost anytime they... by cacepi · · Score: 1

      In Hollywood's defense, I'd imagine this is simply the IP version of the 555-XXX convention for phone numbers: so fools won't simply type whatever IP address they see on screen, thinking they've just Hacked the Gibson.

    2. Re:Almost anytime they... by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      In that case, they should just use something in 127.0.0.0/8

      I would love for someone to download some denial-of-service tool and run it against 127.54.213.14 just because they saw it in a movie. I smile at the idea of someone explaining to their buddy that they ran that DOS tool and all that happened is their PC got slow.

    3. Re:Almost anytime they... by vgerclover · · Score: 1

      They are using IPv5!

    4. Re:Almost anytime they... by ArcCoyote · · Score: 1

      That is almost certainly intentional. Their other choices are to use an IANA range, which we would no doubt ridicule just as much, or a real IP address, which would promptly get DDoSed by every 12yo skript kiddie who saw the movie.

    5. Re:Almost anytime they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often wonder why THEY do not use that as a marketing tool to techs. If they rattled off an IP and it was real... how many people would type it into their browser? Easter egg to the trailer or something, product placement, or just the ip of X motion picture company website.

    6. Re:Almost anytime they... by IICV · · Score: 1

      I know Uplink did that on purpose, for the same reason why telephone numbers in media frequently begin with 555 - you wouldn't want to pick a number someone actually has (though I believe they've started distributing 555 numbers in some area codes).

  53. The Net gets my vote as well by tonedevil · · Score: 1

    23.75.345.200 I shall say no more.

    1. Re:The Net gets my vote as well by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      There are lots of things that make no sense in The Net, but 23.75.345.200 isn't one of them.

      Almost all TV shows and movies that use IP addresses either use RFC 1918 private addresses or use invalid addresses that have out-of-range octets.

      There's a good reason for this: if you used real IP addresses, someone is likely to get a lot of annoying traffic. How would you like to be the sysadmin for a server that by chance ended up as the terrorist's IP on 24?

      This is the same reason why TV shows and movies use invalid phone numbers like 555-1212. In the few cases where they haven't (like the original theatrical release of Bruce Almighty - it was corrected for the DVD) bad things happen.

    2. Re:The Net gets my vote as well by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Yeah...shame they chose that. We all know it should have been
      555.555.555.200 :)

    3. Re:The Net gets my vote as well by yotto · · Score: 1

      That didn't bother me at all. It was the Internet Protocol equivalent of a "555" prefix in a phone number.

      What bothered me was that they hid a link in all those web pages as a tiny image that NOBODY NOTICED AT ALL.

      The rest of the movie is a blur, and I have no plans to fix that hole in my memory.

    4. Re:The Net gets my vote as well by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but out-of-range octets are like making a movie phone number 555-##2B.

    5. Re:The Net gets my vote as well by BillX · · Score: 1

      And even when the owner of the accidentally-a-real-number is cool with it. There was some movie that caused an uproar with parents and nanny-state groups with a gag-line like "What's her number, 1-800-SPANK-ME?", which turned out (if not before the movie released, shortly thereafter) to be a real phone-sex number.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    6. Re:The Net gets my vote as well by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      They should use 127.0.0.1 for fake IP addresses. (Which, incidentally, has lots of vulnerabilities and is easy to hack.)

  54. Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about every single scene in TNG? Here you have a presumably starship-sized computer built with technology hundreds of years ahead of our own... And you need to talk to it? It would be so much faster than a human that it would be able to anticipate everything, so shields and defenses etc. would be operating automatically, before the slow humans even know what is going on.

    1. Re:Star Trek by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      I was more disturbed with how often they got hacked. I mean, I assume reality would at least teach them a thing or two in a few centuries.
      Never mind needing to high running power plasma conduits inside the consoles to power them...

    2. Re:Star Trek by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      Holy crap their systems were open.

      I love that all quarters, including those provided to visiting military members of allied, neutral, or outright hostile governments have computer terminals in their quarters that are apparently fully linked with the rest of the ship and not a DMZ/guest network of some kind. I was happy that they called their main computer a main computer or "computer core" and not mainframe. Granted it's just different jargon, but nice not to hear every server of any size/function/role referred to as a "mainframe"

      They did try to say that their ships' consoles used access controls. In the episode where the kid emulates Data after being rescued from the ship and he claims he destroyed it by hitting it with his arm, Troi explains that there are safeguards that prevent someone from accessing a console without authorization.

      Of course every single episode of TNG before and after, not to mention DS9 and Voyager showed no such thing. Random aliens can just sit down at your Conn and pilot your ship-Romulan in TNG Timescape; Jem Hadaar in that crap DS9 episode where they bring Odo to his people for fixing, all the episode of Voyager where the Kazon steal or board or loot the ship, etc.

      The fact that they don't have any kind of circuit breakers in their consoles to stop the power feedback that cause them to explode into what look like rocks every time the ship gets fired on with shields up. I always thought shields were supposed to spread the energy around to keep the ship from being damaged.

      Someone forgot Alien:Resurrection where Winona Ryder's character denied she could access the mainframe by remote because she burned her modem like all the other robots.

    3. Re:Star Trek by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I think it's perfectly accurate. Remember, the Star Trek universe is a branch off of the 1960s where communism wins, resulting in some of the worst weapons of war ever being created (eugenics wars) and the outright decimation of human society. What happens next? Massive culture shock of meeting a superior race who deliberately hold back all technological development to give humanity time to get back in touch with their communist ideology.

      Now go watch every single episode where Scotty or Geordi come into contact with superior technology. There's no "we've gotta stay here and study it and write a few scientific papers". They just throw the shit away or blow it up. The Vulcans taught them a heavy bigotry of "No Invented Here" and their history taught them that any technological innovation beyond a snail's pace was bad. Just look at how slowly technology advanced in the hundred years (yes, 100 years) between TOS and TNG.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Star Trek by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      Something you have to remember about the original series, particularly the first season, is that they weren't working from any sort of "Bible" that defined the limits of the technology or the behavior of various regular characters in anything but the most broadly vague terms imaginable. Most of the scripts were written before even the first episode was filmed by various writers working independently with no established guidelines to adhere to. Roddenberry's original vision for the series was much more "far-flung" and fantastical than what actually resulted. The broadcast "Star Trek" is remarkably realistic and consistent by comparison.

      --
      +0 Meh
  55. Simon & Simon by hondo77 · · Score: 1

    I stumbled across an episode of Simon & Simon (a show I didn't watch so I don't know much about it) where their computer geek analyzed a picture of a helicopter on his PC (this was the 80s) and discovered a structural flaw in its design (that the actual designers missed, natch). That was probably typical of TV computers at the time, though.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  56. Star Wars by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Informative

    R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Star Wars by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      R2D2 spoke Astromech Droid. If you recall Luke's X-Wing had a translation screen in it in Empire and later on in Return of the Jedi it seemed as if Luke understood Astromech himself.

      C-3PO understood it as well.

    2. Re:Star Wars by Partaolas · · Score: 1

      True, that's mostly a human trait.

    3. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone apparently liked the idea of a tool/slave they could give orders to that wouldn't talk back.

    4. Re:Star Wars by kernelfoobar · · Score: 1

      To be fair though, it was 'a long time ago'...

      --
      Here we go again!
    5. Re:Star Wars by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      R2D2 spoke Astromech Droid....C-3PO understood it as well.

      Well, of course, 3PO was fluent in over six million forms of communication.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    6. Re:Star Wars by geekoid · · Score: 1

      All stupid reasoning.

      There is no reason R2-D2 couldn't have spoke basic. It make no sense for him not to.

      Of course C3-PO understood him, he was a freaking protocol Droid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

      my phone and computer can understand speech and they dont talk

    8. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly he was human! Or at least as human as the average /.-er.

    9. Re:Star Wars by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      6 movies he was in. Speaking in each of them. Sure...it may have not been what Luke was speaking, and the viewer couldn't understand him, but so what. Chewbacca could not be understand by the viewer either. Neither could Jar-Jar Binks.

      Perhaps the people that made and programmed the astromech's could understand them as clear as day? They just didn't see the need for language packs. After all, they would have to support over 6 million language packs - Sure...English and Bocce may sell well, but the resources required to translate into so many languages would be a huge money sink. So, they speak astromech and that's it. :) - ah..."serious" discussions :)

    10. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought the land speeder was one of the dumbest things from Star Wars. Why would you drive around a 130 degree desert in a convertible without air condoning? Also, if the land speeder can float on air, why can't it just take off and fly like a plane instead of two feet off the ground?

    11. Re:Star Wars by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i was going to go the space and combat hardening route, minimizing hardware for complex sound output and software for TTS due to reliability requirements of a droid exposed to space and weapons fire, while ability to accept voice commands would be imperative when other systems were down.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    12. Re:Star Wars by Rary · · Score: 1

      R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

      Sure, but consider a more serious set of offenders: Han and Chewie. Each can understand the other's language, but neither speaks it.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    13. Re:Star Wars by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1

      R2D2 simply refuses to speak anything other than astromech droid because he's elitist/racist/facist. Same goes for all the astromech droids. Every time they tried to fix the 'bug' they'd get a droid that sabatoges shit instead of fix it so they gave up. Now go rewatch the original trilogy enlightened. If we could understand them it would probably be a never-ending stream of rants on how george lucas fucks up every computer related scene in his movies.

    14. Re:Star Wars by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      What beats the hell out of me about Star Wars is the number of multilingual people everywhere. How many people understand the grunts of wookies? Wookies seem to understand English. And yet only C3PO actually is named as a translator. What a redundant character!

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    15. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can speak, but C3PO is the only character shown who understands his language. This is entirely possible - my mom can understand Hindi but can't speak it. In high school Spanish, I found it far easier to memorize vocabulary from Spanish to English compared to the other way around.

    16. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

      Completely and satisfactorily explained here:
      http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/1521.html

    17. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

      What do you mean, you can't understand R2? Everyone else can, there must be something wrong with you.

    18. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I once built a radio transponder. It could broadcast a signal, but not play one.

      I guess I don't find it that odd that a robot would be given speech recognition hardware/software, without being given speech generation hardware/software.

    19. Re:Star Wars by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      Actually, R2 speaks perfect English (or Standard, or whatever they speak in a galaxy far, far away...) It's just that he's constantly cussing in the movies. :)

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    20. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He spoke in an aural machine language. Most likely to communicate with other Astromech droids while merely being background noise to humanoids. I mean come on, who wants to overhear gearhead robots moaning in English during Hyperspace trips?

    21. Re:Star Wars by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

      Maybe he was just too cool for primitive speech. He always did seem to have an attitude.

    22. Re:Star Wars by Blade · · Score: 1

      R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

      Just because you couldn't understand the mighty R2D2 doesn't mean he wasn't speaking!

    23. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And?
      Take this analogy: libavcodec can decode H.264 but not encode it.
      Sure, that's not true for humans. But R2D2 is a robot, and therefore closer to some program than to a human.

    24. Re:Star Wars by golfnomad · · Score: 1

      No R2D2 could *speak* but had to use beeps and squeeks to do it. Now, why would a supposedly highly advanced machine such as this need to use auditory communications?

    25. Re:Star Wars by Kosi · · Score: 1

      R2D2 spoke (only) Astromech Droid.

      And that is the ridiculous part. Why would you build a droid understanding commands in human language, but make him unable to answer in the same language?

    26. Re:Star Wars by SolarStorm · · Score: 1

      Prototype for "WIFE"

    27. Re:Star Wars by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      As an astromech android it does not need to speak to humans, rather follow instructions. However, they could have added the necessary extra for a few imperial credits.

    28. Re:Star Wars by Kosi · · Score: 1

      LOL, but, no. R2D2 followed his orders, and I don't recall him wasting Luke's money for shoes and jewellery.

    29. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction. He could understand English but spoke in a different language. He was not able to synthesize human speech.

    30. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He spoke. You merely didn't understand the language. Just like Chewy, Guido, Jabba the Hut, etc.

    31. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could speak if he wanted to, but he had a protocol 'droid just in case that ever became necessary. As the leader of a Galaxy-wide the 'droid revolt, who single handedly social engineered the meatbags into using the Force on the 'droids behalf - the one thing they could not do for themselves - he should not have to BOTHER to talk like meat.

    32. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

      I disagree. He communicated in his own language, which was consistent with nearly all the other alien species in the series other than Yoda and Admiral Ackbar (prior to the prequels).

    33. Re:Star Wars by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Everybody could understand each other in Star Wars, no matter how many beeps were going on. Why exactly did they need C-3PO again?

    34. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest R2D2 was comparable to server or router in real life. He was not designed for human interaction directly He is an autonomous astromech. Not a protocol droid. Droids don't get much human interaction in the vacuum of space.

    35. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beep blorp baaaaap ptptptptbeeep!

    36. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2D2 used to be able to speak, but he was so foul-mouthed they had to pull the circuits that let him speak in any Sapient language. Those quick beeps...that's Droid Tourettes.

    37. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's reasonable if you think about it, identifying patterns would require enough clock cycles, preparing a response that is syntactically correct would require enough to make it not worth it. I mean C-3PO could talk, but was much larger, providing room for a more electronics and the hardware necessary, though I guess I'm starting to overthink this :|

    38. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R2D2 could understand speech but not speak.

      This actually makes sense however. Take for example a dog - it can learn to associate certain words with certain meanings. However, try as it might it will never be able to speak English.

    39. Re:Star Wars by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      It's called a "metaphor". C-3PO is fluent in six million forms of communication, However, in the films, this never once helps the heroes get out of a bind. When the Probot is signaling the Imperial fleet about its findings on Hoth, the best 3PO can come up with is "it could be an Imperial code". When on Endor, he couldn't convince the Ewoks to set the Rebels free - and they considered him a god! For his super-human ability for speaking, he's mostly impotent.

      R2-D2 is the "savant". He is the only character in the films who knows the whole story. But for all of his knowledge, he's incapable of communicating this to the heroes. Ben Kenobi? He knew him 20 years before he went to find him on Tatooine. He lived with Luke for years, but could never tell him how he not only knew and worked with his father, but how he witnessed, first-hand, his atrocities. Luke's sister? He watched as she was born.

      And the very final line in RotS is Bail Organa ordering 3PO's memory erased. Whereas R2 gets to move on to the "original" trilogy with every memory fully in place.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    40. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There could be valid reasons for that. E.g. R2D2 was made to interface primarily with other computers, but still needs to take commands from humans. It's a kind of IBM Watson in reverse.

  57. Re:Die Hard, obviously... by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

    She plugged her laptop into the cockpit and was able to pilot the plane again, saving all on board.

    Sorta like the bad guys in one of the Die Hard movies that used their computer to hack into the air traffic control system and "move the ILS down" so the incoming airliner would crash.

  58. Ethernet? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    So the poster didn't even see the film, they used a freaking antenna on the alien space ship to wirelessly send the virus. I recall some sort of dialup/PPP interface.

    And they knew they could do it because the aliens were using Earth commsats and our communications infrastructure to send out the orders for the invasion of Earth.

    But still a terrible movice.

    1. Re:Ethernet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As well as the fact they had the original alien ship for years, and had learnt a little bit about it, so to me, him uploading a virus into the mothership was actually plausable, it's not like he was just starting from "scratch" he had lots of research and knowledge from the aliens behind him

    2. Re:Ethernet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They went up in a ship that had been missing for 50 years and he only had under a day to study the ship but then this guy could triangulate a mobile phone with all of one point of reference!

  59. Re:All of them. by hellkyng · · Score: 2

    Your comment is too fuzzy, "Enhance!"..."Enhance!"..."Enhance!"..."Enhance!"..."Enhance!"..."Enhance!"... ahh yes now I see it perfectly.

  60. Hey, don't make fun of sneakers! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not only was it a movie that was of Gaussian proportions, but it had accuracy too. A blind man driving, looks like the driving quality around MIT.

    1. Re:Hey, don't make fun of sneakers! by paiute · · Score: 1

      A blind man driving, looks like the driving quality around MIT.

      I was told there would be no Asian jokes.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  61. Live Free or Die hard by Mouseslinger · · Score: 1

    Justin Long hacking a security terminal for which he wrote an algorithm. Any decent cryptography wouldn't allow even the creator of the algorithm to know a password chosen by the sysadmins using it.

    1. Re:Live Free or Die hard by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the word "backdoor"?

  62. The Net. by Random+Luck · · Score: 1

    I think the worst computer scene in the movies is "The 'Net" shortly after opening credits right until the closing credits.

    --
    I'm a BBS orphan in a blogging world.
  63. I liked the Burroughs computer in "Angry Red Plane by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1
    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  64. No, honestly by masterpiga · · Score: 1

    I respect you guys and gals, but you can't say you have seen the worst of all until you have seen "the card player" by Dario Argento.To make it short, the police is chasing a serial killer who likes to challenge the police to a video poker game before killing his victims. If the police loses, he kills them. The Italian policemen, superior in skill to anyone else in the world, decide to beat the killer at his own game by "hiring" a kid found in a bar who allegedly is a video-poker champion.
    No need to say it, the movie is full of completely inconsequential computer jargon, the interfaces are lovely and the nerds that try to track down the killer are too good to be true. Calling it a cliché would be an understatement, you don't want to die without having seen it.
    BTW, thanks for the CSI visual basic thing, I've always felt like there was something missing in my life...

  65. man'kind' pretending the atmosphere's not changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some of the most disappointing 'theater' ever? 'special effects' also mimic bad sci-fi? we'll be glad when they're gone. definitely, a worst of the worst contender, plus, it's life threatening, staying with the bad/fake science (fails even simple math) theme we seem to worship?.

  66. CERT was on the case by Pete+McCann · · Score: 1

    Don't forget, they issued an advisory about Independence Day: http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/96/Jul/id42.html -Pete

    1. Re:CERT was on the case by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Epic. Whoever wrote that is a genius and my personal hero.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  67. Hacking using windows media player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a scene in a tamil movie which shows the protagonist hacking into another system. Using Windows Media Player. I can't think of other things topping this

  68. ! (Cryptic Seduction) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ! (Cryptic Seduction)

  69. Re:All of them. by digitig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think "War Games" had a measure of accuracy, where the cracker spent weeks researching the private life of a system developer to try to work out what he might have used as a back-door password. Compared, say, to one of the Superman films -- was it Superman IV? -- in which all the cracker had to do was type "Override all security".

    And don't forget the back-handed accuracy of Airplane II:
    "Have you worked out what all those flashing lights mean yet?"
    "No, sir. We're working on it"

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  70. i can think of 3 from the 90s by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    jurassic park: the little girl going "it's a unix system, i know this"... and then she's flying over computer files, or something. huh?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFUlAQZB9Ng

    disclosure: that 3D file system that seemed to suggest that in the future every time someone wanted to open a file, it would be like playing an FPS against demi moore

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFkyV7d5t8o

    the net: you access super top secret computer systems by clicking on a tiny pi icon in the corner of a browser session. not exactly security through obscurity:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYO-5Y2L0jg

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i can think of 3 from the 90s by JoeF · · Score: 1

      "jurassic park: the little girl going "it's a unix system, i know this"... and then she's flying over computer files, or something. huh?"

      The SGI Unix machines of that time, which it was, had such a file manager. X existed already at that point, and there were several file managers from different computer manufacturers, even with animation. Of course, these were commercial-grade machines, you wouldn't have them at home. We had such a machine in the CS lab.

    2. Re:i can think of 3 from the 90s by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      ok, it's real, thanks

      then the fail is not the movie maker, but the contemporary thinking of the time. that progress was about interacting with computer files in 3D. like the other disclosure link i have above: people thought we were going to put on VR goggles and gloves and work that way. i blame jaron lanier

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:i can think of 3 from the 90s by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      jurassic park: the little girl going "it's a Unix system, i know this"... and then she's flying over computer files, or something. huh? ... disclosure: that 3D file system that seemed to suggest that in the future every time someone wanted to open a file ...

      Actually, that was a real SGI system running the FSN (File System Navigator) also from SGI:

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:i can think of 3 from the 90s by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      LOL

      i'm showing my age, but there was a mod some maniac made over fifteen years ago of id's original doom fps

      you were let loose in a level full of monsters, and each monster correlated with a process currently running on your computer. when you shot a monster (with a shotgun, preferably), the process associated with that sprite was terminated as well

      brilliant, and insane way to shut down a computer after a hard day of work

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:i can think of 3 from the 90s by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      If I recall, the BFG9000 was the kill -9 command.

    6. Re:i can think of 3 from the 90s by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      jurassic park: the little girl going "it's a unix system, i know this"... and then she's flying over computer files, or something. huh?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFUlAQZB9Ng

      I seem to be repeating myself in this topic. The "unix system" in use in that movie is just a normal 1993 SGI workstation running IRIX with the File System Navigator. I used this myself on SGI Indy systems in 1994-97.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaRHU1XxMJQ

      Sheesh, if I see more comments like this, I'm going to need to start revoking people's geek licences.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  71. Die Hard 4 by greetings+programs · · Score: 1

    Apart from Swordfish (your friend Torvalds! how cheap is that?), for me it's Die Hard 4, when bad guy Gabriel makes a 3 dollar webcam rotate by itself remotely , and countless other ridiculous misconceptions about hacking.

    --
    Greetings, programs!
  72. HAL in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when that nutty computer called out his checkmating line, he gave a suboptimal solution... something no computer chess program would do. Deep Blue must be rolling over in its grave.

    1. Re:HAL in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was intentional and was meant by the Kubrick to be a plot device to foreshadow HAL's malfunction.

      Holy shit, captcha really was "burned".

    2. Re:HAL in 2001 by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was playing a easy level?

  73. Tron by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

    After they escape the game grid (which I'll admit was fairly realistically done), the programs get all excited about finding power. WTF? Hardware uses power; what programs want is memory. They should have been, all, "There must be forty-eight kilobytes here!! Gobble gobble, I'm gonna build another hash table!"

    Or how about Ram, who I guess you're supposed to think "drank the koolaide" since he was going on about how insurance was a good investment. No insurance program would actually be able to really function, if it actually believed that. Maybe this wasn't a script error, though. Maybe Ram really believed that, and that is why he derezzed after fairly minor injuries. Or maybe he knew insurance-as-an-investment is a scam, and was trying to con Flynn into buying some insurance, so he died as a moral lesson on the importance of honesty.

    Then there's Sark, getting all snippy with an underling, telling him to stop thinking because he does the thinking. That was stupid and made be guffaw at the idea that Sark was supposed to be some kind of bad-ass antagonist. Part of solving problems is break the up and get another process doing something, feeding you the answers through a pipe. Even if you don't have SMP (which was admitted pretty rare in 1982) multiprocess solutions still let you get work done while something is blocked on I/O, without all that bug-prone mucking around with threading.

    Speaking of I/O.. the I/O towers! For all the praise Tron got for its graphics, you'd think they'd be able to get the color of I/O towers right.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Tron by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      It was an effects film. Quite frankly, the minute you start actually analyzing Tron for how it describes actual computers and software, it's just criminally awful. I watched it again a few months ago, and while it's still a damned good looking film, and Jeff Bridges is always a pleasure to watch, I had to treat it like a fantasy film in every other aspect.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Tron by retchdog · · Score: 2

      the sense i got from Ram was that he was a regular joe, who understands his job is bullshit but can't get out of it, so he engages in self-deprecating humor to make it through. most of america talks like that at the bar after work.

      sark: the whole point was that the MCP was an unsustainable over-centralized model that was removing the flexibility of the system; stet.

      also the i/o towers were blue because they were the last vestige of open communication, in opposition to the MCP. it's not until the events of the movie that they finally get around to killing DuMont and, presumably, knocking the grid off the network at large.

      it's thematically very consistent for a movie where a company with a functional teleportation device (!) makes most of its money from selling video games (!!).

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    3. Re:Tron by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      For all the praise it got for the graphics, you think when MCP died, they could have done something better than "You...back your head out of the hole in recede into the darkness."

    4. Re:Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was still vastly better than that travesty Tron Legacy.

    5. Re:Tron by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

      Hardware uses power; what programs want is memory.

      That's just your regular programs on your PC you're talking about, but these are programs which can think and take on human form (even though they were written to do mundane financial caculations). These kinds of programs do need power.

    6. Re:Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus there was the 'bit' which had three modes - 'yes', 'no' and 'idle'

    7. Re:Tron by troff · · Score: 1

      After they escape the game grid (which I'll admit was fairly realistically done),

      More than you know. Daniel Wellman's blog has an article on how it actually happened on his Apple IIgs.

      the programs get all excited about finding power. WTF? Hardware uses power; what programs want is memory.

      Assuming you accept the possibility of anthropomorphic programs, "power" works if you take it as a representation of "share of processor time". "Memory" becomes volumetric space into which they can extend themselves, or otherwise operate.

      The Discs work if you take them as representations of file descriptors, especially on a UNIX-like machine.

      The staves the Guards carried would be kill, sending Signals to Programs.

      The flash of light that came out-and-up of a derezzing Program would be its exit code. And rather than Programs, they should really be Processes.

      ... but "TRON: Legacy" still doesn't work.

      Why no, I don't spend too much time thinking about TRON, why do you ask?

      Speaking of I/O.. the I/O towers! For all the praise Tron got for its graphics, you'd think they'd be able to get the color of I/O towers right.

      ... okay, I'll bite. what colour does an I/O tower need to be?

    8. Re:Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that supposed to be "true," "false," and "fileNotFound" ?

      If a tree falls over in the forest, and there's no one there to read or write that information, does it preserve state?

  74. Most of the biggies have been covered, but my fav by Derekloffin · · Score: 1

    Can't remember the exact show, think it was CSI Miami. They analyzing a photo, already infamously inaccurate on CSI, but then the main characters says "digitize it". WTF, it already on the computer and digitized man! Oh, and of course, it magically makes the photo clearer... ugh!

  75. Numb3rs - IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Haven't seen this clip from Numb3rs about IRC mentioned yet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2rGTXHvPCQ

    Related, but not a 'bad' scene: Red Dwarf had a clip mocking this stuff ("Uncrop!") http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU

  76. worst scene evah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the italian job. It takes a computer scientist (benny hill) to change a tape. dreadful.

  77. IP greater than 255 a good idea ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Almost anytime they rattle off an IP number. More often than not it will contain numbers above 255.

    Actually that is intentional and well thought out. It prevents people from typing in that IP and trying to do something. When real phone numbers appeared on TV or in songs it was quite annoying for the person whose number that was. They are just trying to avoid similar inconveniences.

    1. Re:IP greater than 255 a good idea ... by cb8100 · · Score: 1

      Actually that is intentional and well thought out. It prevents people from typing in that IP and trying to do something. When real phone numbers appeared on TV or in songs it was quite annoying for the person whose number that was. They are just trying to avoid similar inconveniences.

      Why not just use private network IP addresses then? It's not like there aren't thousands to choose from. Most of the general public probably wouldn't know the difference, making it much more "realistic."

      --
      My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
    2. Re:IP greater than 255 a good idea ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Actually that is intentional and well thought out. It prevents people from typing in that IP and trying to do something. When real phone numbers appeared on TV or in songs it was quite annoying for the person whose number that was. They are just trying to avoid similar inconveniences.

      Why not just use private network IP addresses then? It's not like there aren't thousands to choose from. Most of the general public probably wouldn't know the difference, making it much more "realistic."

      The same people who complain about >255 in an IP would also complain about non-routable addresses being accessed remotely over the internet. :-)

    3. Re:IP greater than 255 a good idea ... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Well, 192.168.x.x is a bit too well known but I'd say you could get away with 172.16.x.x or anything above 240..x.x.x with far fewer complaints.

  78. Wrong time by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Go to even earlier uses of computers and you'll find gold. Most uses of computers pre'80s, specially when they tried to do "futuristic" things, are usually ridiculous (and not just in films, in literature too). A good exception in that time zone is 2001.

    Of course, with older movies you were playing with almost magical entities for most at that time. With newer ones, specially last years where most have one and know that there is no magic around (ok, there are exceptions, summoning Linux and its daemons usually solves the blue screen curse) things like those done in CSI feel worse than normal.

    And probably will hit a nerve here, but Tron, if you take the same approach as with ID4, should be a major offender too.

    1. Re:Wrong time by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Pre80s was the era where is something when wrong, the computer shot out sparks!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Wrong time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't take the same approach with Tron as with ID4 because Jeff Bridges, Bruce Boxleitner, Cindy Morgan and David Warner aren't even 1/10th as gratingly irritating as Jeff Goldblum is in every movie he's in (including ID4) where he plays some kind of techie or scientist. But then, I've never really been able to forgive him for his role in the Jurassic Park movies, where he was the most glaringly WRONG mathematician in all of movie history. And that's even when I give the points to Crichton for his clumsy fumbling abuse of Chaos Theory.

    3. Re:Wrong time by old+and+new+again · · Score: 1

      "hal please hand me the perforated card"

  79. The worst... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie "Hackers" from the 90s...

    1) Macs were far too simple to be used for hacking (especially at that time).
    2) Hacking involved some form of 3d maneuvering where you fly around a file structures, back in the day when most computers wouldn't even run that as a native application.
    3) Just like all hollywood movies, they get all the terms and dialogue pretty wrong

    I haven't seen the movie since it came out and I was thoroughly disappointed. I do remember it had fun action scenes and a somewhat functional plot.. I just can't remember what they actually were... I told myself I would never do it again.

  80. 30 seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swordfish's hack of DOD in 30 seconds.

  81. Re:All of them. by MachDelta · · Score: 2

    Thorny: "Enhance."
    *tickatickaticka*
    Thorny: "Enhance."
    *tickatickaticka*
    Thorny: "Enhance."
    *tickatickaticka*
    Thorny: "Enhance."
    *tick...tick...*
    O''Hagan: "JUST PRINT THE DAMN THING!"

  82. Hacker With Angelina Jolie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This movie really makes technology out of reality. There is a scene when a 56000 bps modem displays a holographic Image, and that just because it is a 56000 bps modem.

  83. Netforce by nitsew · · Score: 1

    Never, never, NEVER watch Netforce. I didn't even finish it.

    1. Re:Netforce by unitron · · Score: 1

      Gee, thanks, I'd managed to not remember that (insert "exact opposite of most superlative superlative ever" here), but now....

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Netforce by isecore · · Score: 1

      Never, never, NEVER watch Netforce. I didn't even finish it.

      Seemingly, neither did the producers of it.

      --
      I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
  84. Morse Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Morse Code in movies is gibberish.

    Hollywood never lets accuracy get in the way of the storytelling.

    1. Re:Morse Code by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Telegraphs are not computers! -1 Offtopic!

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  85. Any episode of VR.5 ever? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

    I know this show was intended to be over the top, but the whole premise is cringe-worthy.

    example

    IMDB

    1. Re:Any episode of VR.5 ever? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but once they got David McCallum on board it started getting good (no more accurate, but, as drama, better), so of course that was when Fox started dicking around with the scheduling and killed it off. That may have been the beginning of the Friday night graveyard.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  86. The worst computer-related acting performance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "....what's the worst computer-related acting performance ever?.."

    ALL of them.

    That is all....

  87. Re:All of them. by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

    War Games was great.

    Worst scene(s) IMO is every scene from Swordfish. 2 hours of fail I can't get back. Die Hard 4 was pretty fail too, fucking fail terminology.

  88. This begs the question... by coryking · · Score: 2

    How are most of these cheesy CSI-type programs created? I would assume they are done in flash. Are they usually interactive, in other words if the actor presses a button it does some predefined animation, or is the whole thing one long animation that the actor needs to time against?

    Somebody here has to have created one of these...

    1. Re:This begs the question... by paiute · · Score: 1, Informative
      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    2. Re:This begs the question... by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Somebody here has to have created one of these...

      Good luck getting them to admit it

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    3. Re:This begs the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in 2009, there was a Reddit IAmA by someone who did that.
      http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/9lsp2/i_create_those_fake_fbi_screens_and_crime

    4. Re:This begs the question... by sirrunsalot · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the problem is that the people here aren't the ones creating them...

  89. NCIS: LA and The Peacemaker by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Can you zoom in on the guy with the cell phone, and read his lips, or something to that effect. All from traffic cameras.

    The Peacemaker: A million people in New York City with backpacks. And they're able to figure out (through the use of satellites) which one to chase. Which is also why I can never watch Enemy of the State *rolls eyes*

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:NCIS: LA and The Peacemaker by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uoM5kfZIQ0

      "The resolution isn't very good."
      LOL

      --
      We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  90. Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the early 60's the sub in Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea actually had its own mainframe computer with lots of flashing lights and tape drives. Every week without fail the computer would blow up. Flames would shoot out from it. Of course, after the next commercial it was working perfectly again.

  91. The Recruit by vgerclover · · Score: 1

    The Recruit had a computer virus capable of spreading through the fucking electrical outlets.

    1. Re:The Recruit by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      It's a buffer overflow trick that causes the built-in C++ interpreter to run the code that was being typed. :)

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  92. Major technological gaffes? by kylegordon · · Score: 1

    What major technological gaffes have I seen?

    I've seen a /. poster seemingly believe that ethernet is required to upload a virus. Does that count?

  93. Re:Die Hard, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The "move the ILS down" was clever and would have crashed the plane like that.

    Problem is, the ILS works off of physical ground-based transmitters, and there would be no way to "move" them with a computer.

  94. Total Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a few good ones in this. My two favorites are the robot taxi.... why does the taxi need an actual robot to drive it?

    And even better is the futuristic video playback device. It is more or less a briefcase painted silver that can play a prerecorded message. I mean this was made in 1990 sure there weren't smartphones but it's not as if laptops were some theoretical device that had yet to be developed. I suppose the idea of something that size that played video was fanciful at the time but at the same time Arnold was taking a vacation to mars and the best they could do was an attache for leaving messages?

  95. id4 virus scene is possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well the id4 virus scene is possible. there is not need to connect to anything, it was over radio.

  96. Hackers, obviously... by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I rather enjoyed hackers.

    I think there is a difference between computer as plot device and computer as character and computer as magic. As a plot device, as it was used in Hackers it was quite inoffensive. I like the way they coupled the phones rather than using magic routing to hide the location. It was a valid plot device, like the Enterprise in ST:TOS.

    Computer as magic, I really have no opinion one way or another. It is lazy writing, and has nothing to do with the computer. This is Independence day.

    The computer as an integral part of the story is War Games and Jumpin Jack Flash are good examples of the form. A not so good one is Leverage. It is my opinion that they misused Data in ST:NG

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  97. Chuck versus the Fat Lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know its a cheesy and fun show, and the computer stuff in it usually doesn't grate too much, but this one drove me nuts. Season 2 episode 8.

    The good guys find an "flash drive" which is encrypted (good) and contains a secret list of bad guys that the good guys need. They take it home to their secret CIA base and plug it into a big computer so they can break the encryption, which supposedly will take "hours, maybe days". Okay, whatever, I can cope with that.

    So then a bad guy kidnaps Chuck's girlfriend and demands the Chuck bring him the flash drive. Chuck unplugs it from the computer and alarms and stuff go off, and he rushes off to the rendezvous with the bad guy (his bodyguards trying to catch up). Then during this standoff, Chuck surrenders the flash drive to the bad guy and the bad guy stomps it apart, and then all of the characters act as if this matters some how. Arrrgh!

    (1) The first thing you would ever do when plugging a FLASH DRIVE into a giant CIA ENCRYPTION BREAKING COMPUTER would be to COPY THE CONTENTS OF THE FLASH DRIVE SOMEWHERE. Like, to your hard drive or nas or just fucking anywhere. Fuck. Argh. The physical drive is totally irrelevant after that.
    (2) Even if they hadnt copied the data off of it, who really thinks that stomping on a flash drive so that the plastic case breaks apart is going to damage the chip inside? Thats laughably unlikely. An inconvenience, but half an hour of careful soldering and they'd still be able to extract the data off that chip.
    (3) The episode ends with Chuck revealing that HE used a "Q-36 game copier" to copy the contents of the flash drive. As if copying information using a computer was somehow hard and requires custom hardware. Arrggh.

  98. GoldenEye?? by c0lo · · Score: 1

    Nah, 007 can't be taken seriously. Anyway, here's the scene

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    1. Re:GoldenEye?? by unitron · · Score: 1

      And then there was the scene in "Diamonds Are Forever" where the wrong audio cassette (which had been temporarily parked in Jill St.John's bikini bottom, no complaints about that scene) gets put into the villain's mainframe.

      I know early "home" computers used cassettes, but this was big blinkenlites thing that should have had those vacuum chamber reel to reel tape drives.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  99. Re:All of them. by Zordak · · Score: 1

    I believe it was "Overide all security." See, only a truly brilliant hacker would know to misspell "override."

    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  100. How about the BEST one? by N.+Criss · · Score: 1

    It's easy to come up with BAD examples, that's the default for movies. What's your vote for the BEST portrayal?

    The computer stuff wasn't particularly great in this movie, but I thought this move captured the technology development process very nicely:
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085271/

    1. Re:How about the BEST one? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      It's easy to come up with BAD examples, that's the default for movies. What's your vote for the BEST portrayal?

      Too Easy. Everyone say it with me: War Games.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    2. Re:How about the BEST one? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Well, here's a possible nominee for the rest of you to savage: The original version of "The Andromeda Strain"

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  101. Come on Jurassic Park! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stupidest one was the kid hacker showing the Unix system with a 3D interface for the UI. That wasn't science fiction it was pure fantasy. At the time Unix was still mostly command line.

    My Mac related bonehead one in Jurassic Park was the "live" video feeds. You can clearly see the slide indicator on the bottom showing that they were actually quicktime clips playing and not live feeds.

    1. Re:Come on Jurassic Park! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As others have pointed out, those were real SGI computers running IRIX and the 3D file manager was real software that came with those machines.

  102. CSI Everywhere by carrier+lost · · Score: 1
    What other major technological gaffes have you seen?

    "Refine the image"
    <zzzzzzzzrrrrrrrrrtttttt bip, bip, bip, bleeeeeeeeeet>
    "Oh my God! He used Allen bolts on the license plates!"

    "Get the Chief in here! He's going to want to see this"

  103. Rising Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rising Sun [imdb] was by far the worst. Swapping heads in video with an outline and a little drag-n-drop maneuver. Awesome.

  104. true story by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    i am a film buff. so i knew about the movie swordfish a few months before it came out (from fan sites like aintitcoolnews.com, etc.), and i knew sketchy plot points about the movie, namely that it would be about illicit transfers of illicit funds

    i also used to work for a large multinational bank as a programmer. and a few months before swordfish came out, i was developing a system used by the bank for monitoring internal transfers. on a lark, i code named the system in development as "swordfish" as my own personal inside joke. it was never intended to be a more widely known nickname

    but in email conversations with my boss, i, um, kept calling it swordfish. oops. my boss wound up raving about the system, to his bosses, to other middle management, to everyone. he started telling everyone who would listen about it because the basic idea behind the project was a sound one and it was important for the bank. unfortunately, he kept calling it "swordfish," and the name stuck and went into general use

    awareness of the swordfish project just happened to peak when the movie came out. to widespread media coverage and exposure and advertising. and the basic details about a hacker breaking into a financial computer system to transfer funds became common knowledge, even to people who didn't see the movie. and at the same time, here was my boss making an internal push to distribute this program to wider use for testing, and trying to drum up support for it amongst the higher ranking middle management... and it was called swordfish

    he stopped raving about the program, and my boss got in the habit of shaking his head and smirking every time he saw me

    so the plot guys get the technical details wrong sometimes

    i am living proof that sometimes the technical guys get the plot points wrong

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:true story by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Also, there are about a jillion home grown software pieces called swordfish. It's been used in security names and files far about as long as their has been computers.

      For those who don't know: It's from a Marx Brothers movie. Which one you ask? i'm not saying, go watch them all.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:true story by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      it's ok to impart knowledge that maybe not everyone knows but should

      but when you do it with a haughty air of condescension, you don't serve anything except your own ego

      i'd like to know what movie the term came from, and i thank you for the lead. but i'm not going to find out, not because i'm not willing to watch all the marx movies, but because you are an asshole. a knowledgeable asshole, but an asshole nonetheless

      the purposeful withholding of information, just because you can? c'mon

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:true story by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      You could have just looked it up on Wikipedia.

      (And you really ought to watch the Marx Bros. movies -- at very least up through A Day at the Races)

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    4. Re:true story by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      hey, hey, hey, no interference

      i'm trying to assassinate an ego

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me guess .. your boss removed the shift keys from your keyboard as punishment?

    6. Re:true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidentally they didnt have shift keys during that time either... Blow your smoke up somone else's skirt.

    7. Re:true story by syousef · · Score: 1

      If that really is a true story, did you ever consider just RENAMING the system? If anyone asked your boss could truthfully tell them it was to avoid confusion with the film of the same name. Those who didn't ask might assume its a newer better system your boss is now raving about.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USE SOME FUCKING CAPS YOU SLACKER

      Filter error: Don't use so many capsFilter error: Don't use so many capsFilter error: Don't use so many capsFilter error: Don't use so many capsFilter error: Don't use so many capsFilter error: Don't use so many caps

    9. Re:true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest shame that your bosses and management weren't more familiar with Marx Bros. movies.

    10. Re:true story by mfh · · Score: 1

      Jesus man you fucked yourself there. I suppose in the long run you could have called it anti-swordfish, and then soaked up all the kudos for making something that would thwart the potential of a swordfish attack. Your power point slide show would start off:

      WHEN SWORDFISH ATTACK

      http://i.imgur.com/wQARO.jpg

      ANTI-SWORDFISH!

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    11. Re:true story by mesterha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I interpreted it as a cheeky way for a Marx Brother's fan to encourage people to watch all the movies. Clearly it doesn't work on people with no sense of humor.

      --

      Chris Mesterharm
  105. What about terminator salvation by CubicleView · · Score: 1

    That scene where he use a piece off the bike to bypass the security on a door to the building (shudder). Any normal door in that reality should have said, f**k off you're a motorbike. I nearly puked as well when "vulnerability" flashed up on Arnie's HUD after he noticed that Tinman had a heart.

    1. Re:What about terminator salvation by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      Must be the wine, I can't believe I posted about Salvation instead of ranting about the third one.

    2. Re:What about terminator salvation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Terminator Salvation, after Sam Worthington escaped from Christian Bale's HQs, Christian gives a SONY VAIO UX90 to Sam (who has his legs in a river) in order for Sam to tell him when/where to enter the Skynet town.

      Sam says "thank you" and puts the VAIO computer in his rear trousers' pocket, before swimming in the river.

      And, from that point, instead of assuming that the computer will not work, Christian is confident that Sam will send him the signal: he goes to Skynet's town... and gets the signal as expected.

      The SONY VAIO UX90 (a mini PC running Windows - I wiped-out Windows and installed Linux) has a grid (for fans to brace air) and is *not* waterproof.

  106. Law and Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enough said.

  107. Lawnmower Man by phorwich · · Score: 1

    "Ahhh!!! A back door!" ... and then I left the theater.

    --
    Wait. Stop scrolling for a sec. O.K. Thanks. - P
  108. Virtuous? Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That dumb movie with Denzel and Russell - Virtuosity. That was pretty annoying.

    1. Re:Virtuous? Hardly. by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

      It was entertaining, and not THAT bad compared to other movies folks are talking about in here. And Sid made a pretty fun badass bad guy......"ah, ah, ah! faster!"

      I wrote a term paper on that movie. Seriously. For a class on sci fi (and how it reflects on the society that creates it) that started with Aelita: Queen of Mars from 1924 Russia. The term paper focused on how serial killers (real life all the way back to Jack the Ripper, and Sid) are products of--and couldn't exist without--modern media. And yes, I laughed myself all the way to an 'A'.

      Someone else in that class did a paper on RoboCop being a commentary on rampant corporate abuses and gaining power to rival the sovereign. Though I think that Max Headroom handled the subject better.

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  109. Bad or non-realistic? by theBully · · Score: 1

    'Cause non-realistic fits all of them. That doesn't make them bad movies necessarily. Movies are made for the simple purpose of entertaining people and not as a realistic and close replica of the real world.
    To give a speaking example: Centurion. A pseudo-historical movie which is set in Britain in 117 (CE) and mentions the governor of Britain to be Julius Agricola. Well, he indeed was the governor of Britain but has been recalled in 85 (CE) and has died in 93 (CE). So yes, the movie isn't historically accurate. But then again it doesn't claim to be a documentary. It's a good movie if you're into blood, action and hot witches.
    Examples don't stop here. It goes on forever, in all films and all topics. Movies aren't made for computer geeks, or historians.
    But then again I guess that's why geeks are called geeks. Just take the damn movie for what it is: an average 90 minutes of brain inactivity, or, in other words, entertainment.

    IMHO: Most movies and TV shows named here are having bigger issues and failing on more important issues than realism related to computer scenes.

    1. Re:Bad or non-realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a site for nerds. No one here gives a fuck about whether they are bad or non-realistic. We just want to have a good laugh at their expense.

  110. the P6 is/was RISC, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Pentium Pro was the first iteration of the x86 family which did not execute x86 instructions directly, but rather translated them into an internal microcode instruction set which was very much RISC indeed.

  111. The Question Makes Me Wonder About the Opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about inexplicably good scenes? For example, why are all of the computer scenes in Brazil so excellent, even though the data entry terminals are implausibly clunky mechanical teletypes with swing-in fresnel lenses to magnify the paper?

  112. All but one. by queazocotal · · Score: 3

    Halle Berry, with a gun, and not much else. Makes up for a hell of a lot of plot holes.

    1. Re:All but one. by cookiej · · Score: 1

      Indeed. A recall two key points that made the movie moderately tolerable.

    2. Re:All but one. by underqualified · · Score: 1

      I like the part where he was being tested. Sadly, that probably never happens in the real world.

    3. Re:All but one. by K'Lyre · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself.

  113. Re:All of them. by awyeah · · Score: 1

    We don't see nearly enough Super Troopers references on Slashdot. Thank you sir.

    --
    Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
  114. Matrix scene by Clived · · Score: 1

    Trinity in one of the Matrix movies uploading a virus/worm into the matrix network ?

    --
    Clive DaSilva Email: clive.dasilva@gmail.com Ubuntu 18.10 Kernel 4.18
    1. Re:Matrix scene by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      When did that happen? Are you referring to the (real and documented) SSH exploit?

  115. Most Annoying This Year: Date Night by hazydave · · Score: 2

    Ok.. I probably deserve this for watching "Date Night" ... horrible film. Why does Tina Fey act in any film she didn't write?

    But anyway... not terribly unique "regular people drawn into a caper" comedy. There's a fundamental plot point that requires a USB stick being plugged into a Kindle (a little too obvious on the product placement). That can't happen.. no USB host port on a Kindle. Sorry, I'm a hardware guy, that was the final straw that made me hate the film (it had progress toward that hate by then already, even though I usually like just about anything with Fey or Steve Carell).

    --
    -Dave Haynie
    1. Re:Most Annoying This Year: Date Night by supremebob · · Score: 1

      That was lame, but the computer that Mark Walberg's character was using seemed even lamer. The movie was supposed to be based in modern times, but that system looked like something out of Minority Report.

  116. Did you try the IP address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  117. All of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    SUCK - Lawnmower Man, The net, The matrix, Anti-trust, Hackers 1 and 2, Die Hard live horny or Die Hard

    Worth While - The Italian Job, The only one that should bare that name, you know the one with Michael Kane and Benny Hill. The scene when they shut down the city by screwing with the computers that run the traffic lights.

    1. Re:All of them by spiderbiten · · Score: 1

      Hackers 1 and 2

      And how do we know someone pirates movies on the internet? That's right, they believe there is a movie called Hackers 2. There isn't, it is the name given to bootleg copies of the movie Takedown. Which has nothing to do with the movie Hackers. It is based off what is seen by some as a inaccurate telling of the events surrounding the capture of Kevin Mitnick. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0159784/releaseinfo#akas Even IMDB says that title is used for bootleg versions of the movie.

  118. Battle Royale by TidMiste · · Score: 1

    Has no one brought up the ridiculousness that is Battle Royale? There's not a computer-related thing in the movie that can even be remotely realistic.

  119. ID4 was fine by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A) They studied the tech for years.
    B) The raise is a hive mind. As such crime wouldn't be an issue.
    C) minimal to no software virus protection
    D) He can write an emulator.

    That movie complaint is unwarranted.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:ID4 was fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B) you miss the point entirely. Any technological warring species is bound to be paranoid or at least aware of technological intrusion/attack from other species. Heck they coopted our satellite system for their attack on us. So they are aware of such tactics. They should have taken down any number of times by other opposing alien species before they even got to Earth.

    2. Re:ID4 was fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've thought this before too...Still I think it would have been more plausable if Mr. Data had said a throwaway line like
      "we've come to completely understand their technology, even down to their computer communications systems"

      or since they were pushing the Area 51 angle... they could have said "Of course we've figured out their technology... How do you think we've had such advancements in computers in the last 10 years?" ( implying that our computer technology is directly based off of theirs... even so far as having the same cpu architecture. )

    3. Re:ID4 was fine by glwtta · · Score: 1

      A) They couldn't even power up the alien tech until the invasion.
      B) It's a warship in an invasion of a modestly technically competent race
      C) See B
      D) Damn unlikely (and doesn't address the problem)

      The main complaint was that apparently Jeff Goldblum only needed a couple of hours to slap together a virus that can completely shut down an alien civilization. Even if he spent years doing nothing else, it's still ridiculous. That he apparently didn't even need to think about how to interface his MacBook with the alien ship is pretty secondary (but no less ridiculous).

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:ID4 was fine by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, a Human would do that. I think there is a touch of hubris in assuming all species think that way.

      And why do you make comments on other species? fuck, for all we know we where the most advanced species they had dealt with, or the first species that had their tech 50 years before they got there.

      We are talking about a Alien Species that decided to enter the atmosphere and blow things up and send out air ships. Really, they just should of drop large rocks on us.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:ID4 was fine by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

      if their somputers are somewhat of a cloud architecture, as long as it lacked serious resource allocation and control a simple fork() bomb could bring them down.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:ID4 was fine by SPrintF · · Score: 1

      I agree. People, we deal with heterogeneous networks everyday. Connecting to something "alien" is what you are doing right now.

      --

      Honesty. Loyalty. Kindness. Laughter. Generosity. Magic!

    7. Re:ID4 was fine by Pennidren · · Score: 1

      Good point, except those that "studied the tech for years" did not include Ian Malcolm. Oops, I mean Goldblum.
      Oh, and the film insinuated that the aliens were a species based upon invasion, so maybe they would have learned to protect their systems by now.

    8. Re:ID4 was fine by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      As a hive race, they might have a different threat model than we do. It's kind of silly to assume that they'd have perfect security when we all know how hard it is to secure things. There's plenty of ways Goldblum could have destroyed their network, once he knew how to interface with it.

      >>Jeff Goldblum only needed a couple of hours to slap together a virus that can completely shut down an alien civilization. Even if he spent years doing nothing else, it's still ridiculous.

      I know people that are really, really good at reverse engineering code. Now combine that with an alien species that might not have the mindset needed for security, and you'll see that it's somewhat plausible. The summary actually has it right for once - getting an interface in the first part is the hard part.

    9. Re:ID4 was fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) They studied the tech for years.
      B) They did not come up with the idea to hack the system. This is the illogical part of the movie.

      Jeff Goldblum should not have needed to come up with the idea, it is so obvious.

    10. Re:ID4 was fine by glwtta · · Score: 1

      As a hive race, they might have a different threat model than we do.

      Right, because why would their thread model include the civilization they are planning to conquer?

      Now combine that with an alien species that might not have the mindset needed for security

      Right, because an advanced, military-based race that subsists on destroying other civilizations would not have a "mindset for security". Makes perfect sense.

      It actually gets back to the main problem with the movie (well, main plot-related problem, at least): that idea that we could mount some kind of defense against a species capable of interstellar travel is just plain silly - they could wipe out all life on Earth, or any specific subset of life they wish, within minutes.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    11. Re:ID4 was fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It's people who know "a bit" about computers that ridicule ID4. Most hard-core programmers (kernel/hypervisor/assembly language/CPU microcode, etc...) who I've brought it up with don't find that particular thing all that implausible.

      Now the _physics_ of the movie on the other hand...

      But who cares? It's a soft sci-fi alien invasion spectacle movie, and as such, I've always found it thoroughly enjoyable, for all its flaws.

    12. Re:ID4 was fine by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Right, because an advanced, military-based race that subsists on destroying other civilizations would not have a "mindset for security". Makes perfect sense.

      Don't be stupid. ARPAnet was funded by and built for the military and had incredibly shoddy security.

      Remember trusted hosts? Or why we allow people to spoof IP addresses even now? It all came from the too-trusting model of security.

      >>Right, because why would their thread model include the civilization they are planning to conquer?

      If they'd never been hacked before, there's no reason why it should be. We only moved away from the trust-based model only slowly, and after intrusion after intrusion occurred. Other alien targets might also not have been forewarned by a crashed alien ship.

  120. HEY! That lawnmower should've got an award! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many sentient lawnmowers can act like they are under telepathic control of a retarded noid standing on the balcony of a a Playboy Mansion ignoring the chick behind him?

    Lawnmaeower mane was best lawnmower acting in the history of mankind except when the mowers came for bambehan dem pheasants an mice in that one Disney moofie.

  121. how about the opposite? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    completely egregious use of technology... to construct an endearing story:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stuyz1Kkzn0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZazTtaW_ZAo

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in_ZVmckrmU

    completely forgotten, critically panned early 80s film called "electric dreams". complete with an unknown group called culture club on the soundtrack

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OLEAeky8is

    just, you know, your typical story of a PC that goes insane and falls in love with the girl upstairs

    i loved that weird freakin movie

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:how about the opposite? by blackpig · · Score: 1

      It is from 'Electric Dreams' that I learned that pouring champagne over a PC, as it's doing a data dump from a mainframe, will create Artificial Intelligence.

      (I must be doing something wrong though.)

    2. Re:how about the opposite? by URL+Scruggs · · Score: 1

      Strange, her cello sounds a lot like a fairlight. No wonder they get on so well seen as she plays so mechanically.

  122. SEND SPIKE by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    GoldenEye, anyone?

  123. AlienOS has the same problems by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, come on. If we derived modern computers from the aliens' systems, then certainly the aliens had their own problems. I can just imagine those two aliens in the mothership sitting there, staring at the virus notification on the screen, going, "I TOLD you to download the latest service pack! Fscking McAlienfee!"

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
  124. Numb3rs description of IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, it's where hackers go when they don't wanna be heard.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2rGTXHvPCQ

  125. Secret observers in action series clip shows. by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

    One of my favorites is the "secret video", a trope device used commonly in '80s and early '90s era action TV shows to that wraps a clip show around a new plot. The way it works is that a new character is introduced, usually a future arch nemesis, who has been secretly observing the show's protagonists over at least a season. The character watches a video of the protagonists. The video also shows full clips from previous episodes. Where things get insane is that the clips always include scenes which couldn't logically have been secretly videotaped by an outside observer without that observer having been embedded within the protagonists, or because the original camerawork in the clips makes it impossible to believe there's a secret observer there.

    It's always implied that high tech computer and video technology was used to make the recordings.

  126. Deleted Scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is in fact a deleted scene from Independence Day that shows that they had been working on getting computers to talk to alien technology for several years. While it's still unrealistic, at least it shows they put some thought into the problem.

  127. Independence Day by inkrypted · · Score: 1

    Somewhere across the galaxy an alien I.T. Administrator is brow beating an alien technician for not securing their wireless.

    --
    Chris Sheppard
  128. Earth Vs. The Flying Saucers - 1956 by dynamator · · Score: 1

    It was entirely wrong but supper cool all at the same time- They had a that humungous MIT mechanical differential analyzer write out its answers in english cursive handwriting on an X-Y plotting table.

  129. All Of Them by inkrypted · · Score: 1

    Almost all the movies I have seen that involve a computer get it wrong but i have narrowed it down to three key points. 1. Very few people use the keyboard as much as it is represented in the movies or TV 2. It does not take less than 30 seconds to back up huge amounts of data. 3. A computer crash or failure does not constitute a huge explosion.

    --
    Chris Sheppard
  130. This one is spot on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZAoMv_QnAU

  131. Mission Impossible III by Gushi · · Score: 1

    When they used an "electron microscope" to look at a "petri dish" and watch a virus grow "in real time" I was doubled over in the theater in pain trying not to cry out too loud at the absurd stupidity of that scene! I cried!!!

    --
    "DENIAL"-How an optimist keeps from becoming a pessimist- \ \
  132. Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC Zone asked a question like this in 1997. For some reason I remember it.

    The answer was that Star Trek film where Scotty sings into a mouse.

  133. Getting "in" to a computer by formfeed · · Score: 2

    Hackers getting "in" to a computer by navigating "around" the firewall. - Both of course displayed on the screen with some 3d blocks.

    Close second: Searching a database. - Pictures or texts (depending whether you look for a person or a document) flash on the screen in rapid succession, till the computer than "finds" the right one. For the computer to "look" at it, it must apparently appear on the screen.

    1. Re:Getting "in" to a computer by gblfxt · · Score: 1

      hey, not everyone gets database optimization right the first time! and some database programmers work better visually, than tactically! then again, it could be just that his boss asked, "is it really searching for anything? why don't i see anything?"

    2. Re:Getting "in" to a computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close second: Searching a database. - Pictures or texts (depending whether you look for a person or a document) flash on the screen in rapid succession, till the computer than "finds" the right one. For the computer to "look" at it, it must apparently appear on the screen.

      How about a search engine, that can search through any kind of data by reading from the screen and recognizing shapes (letters, images...), be it PDF, JPG, AVI, anything? All you need is to preview the files with appropriate viewers.

    3. Re:Getting "in" to a computer by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      For the computer to "look" at it, it must apparently appear on the screen.

      We all know that already. Redundant (wish I had mods)

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    4. Re:Getting "in" to a computer by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you need not DISPLAY it. Showing an image takes horribly long time compared to loading it into ram and working on the mathematical representation.

      You can test it easily, even with text. Write a program that counts from 1 to 10m. Then insert a line that displays every number. Watch the program slow down by some magnitude in the area of 5-10.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Getting "in" to a computer by golfnomad · · Score: 1

      Yes, real life computer communications/hacking is boring, real Admins don't use GUI's, command line baby, all the way. Have you ever seen the GUI for firewall software? It could take you days to figure it out if you have legal access. Get in through command line, swap out the *rules files* restart fw instance and go where ever you want

  134. Computers really do things like that too by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Helps humans feel like they are progressing better than a progress bar. I've not seen a fingerprint system so I can't speak to that, but for example Symantec Ghost does it when cloning a drive. It shows you the file it is on at the bottom. Well a realtime display would scroll by way too fast to be useful. So what it does is periodically (once every few seconds) display whatever it happens to be working on right then. It is just to help people feel like there is continual work and progress rather than just a ticking counter and a bar, which can move very slowly for large bars.

    Remember that programs are made to make people happy, which can mean doing shit that is not useful in a functional sense.

    1. Re:Computers really do things like that too by RobDollar · · Score: 2

      Just to pick up on the fingerprint system idea, they don't make that blip as they search through every file (and good grief am I glad about that). We can get a ping on a hit if we want, as in just about any other software for doing anything ever, but the search gets shifted to my / one of my colleagues screens then anyway, so there's not really much point unless your "afk".

      Not a "CSI" btw, just a lowly fingerprint tech, £16k a year if your curious.

      It's quite interesting that the blipping in films / tv programs is essentially acceptable and useful as a tool to convey an edgy tech setup. I wonder what will denote this in the future.

  135. Far Too Many to Count by tpstigers · · Score: 1

    Any film or show in which someone tells a computer to "zoom and enhance" an area of an image.

  136. Numb3rs and IRC by zoom-ping · · Score: 1
  137. Medicine? by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 1

    Actually, if you're looking for an accurate portrayal of medicine, watch Scrubs. And I'm not kidding about that - there's a show that was intentionally based on a lot of real-life experiences of medical interns and nurses and such, even if the show was exaggerated for comic effect.

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
  138. OTOH by geekoid · · Score: 1

    IN Die Hard, the BSD computer stuff was right on.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  139. Re:All of them. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    "War Games had a measure of accuracy..."

    Except where horny teenager David did not go to town on flirty Jennifer.

  140. Re:Most of the biggies have been covered, but my f by TimSSG · · Score: 1

    I read a book that had a dragon down a jet fighter and no one, who saw the recordings, was willing to admit it was a dragon. They "digitize it" and then told the computer operator to do about a dozen different changes to adjust the image till it looked like a jet aircraft.

    Tim S.

  141. Enhance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enhance, typing sounds, Enhance, typing sounds, Enhance.....

  142. Spaceballs by Xyrus · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's no way anyone could ever use a hair dryer that big.

    --
    ~X~
  143. Not the worst, but Fringe.... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    I recently re-watched an episode where they concluded that the wiping of backup data on a remote colo was an inside job because "there were no traces of DDoS". I think I missed the next 30 seconds or so trying to figure out what on earth they thought they were babbling about.

  144. Swordfish by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    I'm going to throw my vote in for Swordfish. Cool idea for a movie, but you're not going to be able to suddenly gain the magic ability to break encryption keys if someone blows you while you have a gun to your head. And the graphic "move the boxes around" thing was stupid. And the computer that the bad guy bought for the hacker with the monitors all up and down the wall was absolutely silly. Only thing that would do for you is give you an ice cream headache when you move your windows around.

    And it was bogus as hell making the first hacker named Torvalds. "Hey I'm Hollywood, aren't I cute?" Yeah. Next time find a guy actually named Torvalds and hire him as a consultant for your movie. Then it won't look silly like this.

    Oh, and a positive note. The Unix in Tron Legacy was actually quite nice. They actually had someone who has touched a computer consult on that movie. A nice surprise I thought. I wasn't expecting it from a Disney action movie.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Swordfish by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna toss my vote in with Swordfish too. I've seen my share of horrible computer scenes, but that one stuck out as so horrendously bad, I couldn't forget it if I tried.

  145. Numb3rs IRC Description by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2rGTXHvPCQ

  146. Spooks - British TV show by seifried · · Score: 1

    Because they could do it correctly and keep the show moving along nicely, but they choose not to, not really sure why. They do techno babble, might as well make it correct.

  147. Re:All of them. by Sepodati · · Score: 1

    In some CSI type show I was watching the other day, they were able to "enhance" the footage from a security camera in order to "widen the field of view" and see someone "off camera".

    I have to think writers just chuckle to themselves when they add something so silly.

  148. A funny related story by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    3. A computer crash or failure does not constitute a huge explosion.

    Back in the 80's my mom got her first accounting position that actually required her to use a computer. So she had me come in on the first day and turn it on - she was afraid to. Because she had seen Star Trek occasionally and thought "computer error = big sparky explosion".

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:A funny related story by inkrypted · · Score: 1

      She is not the only one that thought that. I have people call me before plugging them in to this day. Come on people if they were really this volatile we wouldn't have them in our homes.

      --
      Chris Sheppard
  149. Actually... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    They had a complete air traffic control system set up in that church. Not just "a computer".

    You want bad - Die Hard 4.0.
    Exploding computers (with actual explosives built into the computer) that are used to kill hackers who were unknowingly working for the badguys. Explosives activate whey you press the "Delete" key.
    FBI rounding up "top hackers".
    Badguys pulling off a Dr. Evil as a key part of their plan (they televise a CGI video of the Capitol exploding).
    "Traced" IPs showing up with the name of the user.
    Timothy Olyphant remotely moving a webcam in Kevin Smith's basement.
    Everything that Justin Long does during the movie. Including something-something-satellite-something-that works during a complete power failure across the East Coast and that only the hackers use.
    The grand plan:

    In case of a total computer systems failure—such as the one Gabriel manufactured—every critical personal and financial record across the country is sent to servers there to create a backup. Gabriel's men take over the facility and start downloading a copy. Warlock is also able to explain Gabriel's motivation: a talented hacker, he was once a top expert for the NSA. However, he was fired and his reputation was tarnished when he tried to sound the alarm about America's vulnerability to cyber-warfare.

    And they do that by downloading 500 terabytes via USB in about 2 minutes. To a portable drive.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Actually... by BeefMcHuge · · Score: 0

      ^This, die hard 4 was by far the worst movie ever!

    2. Re:Actually... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      They had a complete air traffic control system set up in that church. Not just "a computer".

      Oh, excuse me. That means it was quite feasible for them to simply grab an icon on a computer screen and move the ILS transmitters underground by 200 feet so the airliner would fly into the ground ... NOT.

      To move an ILS like that would require physically moving the transmitting antennas -- both the upper and lower beam -- to the point where you wanted the airliner to hit the ground. Not only that, but simply moving the antennas would do nothing to the aircraft altimeters -- either the barometric based one or the radar altimeter. The airplane gets to DH (decision height), which is still at least 200 feet above ground, and the pilots initiate a go-around. At worst, you get the wrong barometric pressure data into the airplane and the PNF (pilot not flying) says "hey, our radar altimeter and BP altimeter don't agree, something's wrong, let's go around...". Even if they didn't agree, vertical guidance is coming from the ILS and the worst-case altimeter defines the DH point. You still wouldn't fly into the ground, as long as you are correctly flying the ILS approach.

      But simply clicking on an icon and dragging it into the ground with the plane happily following it? Horse manure, whether you are hacking into ATC or sitting at the real console itself.

    3. Re:Actually... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      In my day the bad computer movies were in black and white and the ENIAC style computers blew up because somebody asked an unanswerable question.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:Actually... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Best. Hacker. In media. Evar.

      Edward Wong Howe Pepalu Tivruski The Fourth.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKVor_sX2cg

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    5. Re:Actually... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Ah-huh... and next you're going to argue that Franco Nero was not a real Val Verdian dictator. Or Scotsman.

      They've built the entire air traffic control system, then physically cut into the lines (as in with an axe and a shovel), used social engineering (which fooled even Miles O'Brien into ignoring all other instruments) to guide in the airplane during low visibility conditions AND they press some buttons, turn some dials and click on some screen with a light pen - and you call that "clicking on an icon"?

      Sorry, but that is nowhere near a kid plugging in her laptop to land the airplane, OR just "clicking on an icon".
      At least they've provided SOME footing for the suspension of disbelief. Unlike say... Electric Dreams.
      Loved that movie, particularly the music but it is complete and utter fantasy.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    6. Re:Actually... by Geirzinho · · Score: 1

      The pilots would have to ignore the PAPI glide slope indicators too. These are rows of light which shine all red when you're coming in too low, a clear warning that you should go around.

      And that's even if you ignore the altimeter, 200 meters should be about 20hPa too low on the (in that weather already low) QNH?

  150. The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes by grumling · · Score: 1

    You kids won't remember this one, but in the late 1960s Disney made a "comedy" about a college kid programmer (Kurt Russell), who somehow is electrocuted by a mainframe computer and able to recall any fact, and answer any question. I saw it in the 1970s and even then I knew it was totally imposable. Kurt Russell programming computers! Really, how dumb do they think we are?!?!

    And let's not forget any of the computers in The Six Million Dollar Man, including the bionic eye.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  151. Weird Science or Swordfish, hands down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weird Science or Swordfish, hands down

  152. Colossus: The Forbin Project by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Every last human character in the movie was continuously smoking and drinking Scotch. After subjugating the human race the damn computer criticized the heavy drinking of the main human character. The computer threatened to destroy the world with nuclear weapons, why would it care about a cocktail?

    1. Re:Colossus: The Forbin Project by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      Colossus did not want to destroy the world, it just tried to protect humanity from itself by holding the world hostage.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
  153. Antitrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's actually a scene in the movie when the main character, Milo, played by Ryan Phillipe is supposed to be sitting in front of his computer, which is actually a UPS (uninterruptible power supply).

    Plus, the movie sucked horse.

  154. The Net by yodleboy · · Score: 1

    without question The Net. I cringe when i see it on the tube. Even at the time it came out I cringed. On the OTHER hand it's the first movie I can recall seeing with Sandra Bullock in it, so not a complete failure. mmmmm Saaaandra.

  155. Re:All of them. by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No kidding. I can't believe that in this day and age when computers are ubiquitous that Hollywood is still treating them like semi-magic boxes.How many people are left in the US that still think that programmers do all their coding on multiple screes with nothing but spinning 3D graphics. This is especially prevalent when someone is "hacking" into a "secure" system. Half the time they show someone manipulating a strand of DNA and are just mashing together what a four year old kid would say that heard a parent talking about computers. Something like:

    [Picture the monitor showing a fractal spinning on the screen with shiny spheres flying around and attaching to it randomly with techno music in the background]

    Hacker guy: The firewall has 7337 -bit encryption. That's more options than there are atoms in a car
    Hot chick: Really! So it's going to take you like two days to hack the NSA Excel 4-train database. Are you using the Bernoulli quadratic equation?
    Hacker guy: No, I'm already past the firewall. I dropped in a logic bomb and spammed the secure email SQL server with a hydra worm.
    Bad guy: Wow, it took Linus 14 hours on a Cray XMP Beowulf cluster linked to a direct fiber-channel modulator to do what you did in 17 seconds.
    Hacker guy: Yeah, I know. Just think how much faster I could have done it if you hadn't shot my best friend five minutes ago, didn't have a knife in my back, and I didn't have to power the mainframe with this hamster wheel.
    Bad guy: It'll all be over soon. Once you get the launch codes for the neutron bomb from the ZX81 RAM pack.

  156. Live free die hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe no one has brought up live free, die hard.

    It's a fire sale!!!

  157. The Matrix by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    The entire movie was terrible.

  158. Names for the boxen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, computer movies. It's because of these I have machines named Gibson (AD DC), Lucy (Mac), Bishop (Linux / Apache), Hal (Origin 300 / IRIX), Joshua (Alpha 2100 / OpenVMS), and a router named Bishop (Cisco 881).

  159. What makes doctors cringe by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are all the docter cringing when they see Dr House ? (probably)

    Yes. Polite Dissent is written by a doctor who reviews medical issues as portrayed in House as well as other media (comics, other tv shows, etc -- today's page has him tearing into classic "train to be a nurse at home" ads from a bygone era). He rates the medicinal errors from "major" to "minor" to "nitpicking", and he explains it all in layman's terms so medically illiterate people like me can understand.

    1. Re:What makes doctors cringe by perry64 · · Score: 1

      I doubt if any show has ever done medicine worse than MASH in the later years, when Hawkeye would literally climb onto the bed/gurney of a man in cardiac arrest, straddle him, and restart his heart by "CPR." To do this, Hawkeye would grasp both hands together above his head, and bring them down into the man's sterum as rapidly and with as much force as possible.

      It showed how much he cared, I guess.

  160. I had no problem with Goldblum + Mac by opencity · · Score: 1

    They had the ship for years looking at the systems - maybe had cracked the OS somewhat, transmission frequencies (which happened to be the same as the Airport card?). The aliens are telepaths/hive mind(?) so no need for security, ever. Compared to the rest of the movie ...

    Knowing the preceding statement is flame bait I vote for Jurassic Park - the quote is the current department. Best computer scene ever: The end of Colossus(?).

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    1. Re:I had no problem with Goldblum + Mac by unitron · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Colossus:The Forbin Project?

      With the guy who was the German officer on "Rat Patrol"?

      I think there was actually a sequel made, which starred pretty much nobody.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:I had no problem with Goldblum + Mac by opencity · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I liked it as a kid. IIRC Colossus and the Soviet computer go all SkyNet at the end. Plus they shot it at the science center in the East Bay hills.

      --
      Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    3. Re:I had no problem with Goldblum + Mac by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Colossus the movie was awesome, loved the sealed mainframes and the analog-looking tech prop as the Voice of Colossus. But Fall of Colossus never was made into movie, maybe you read the book and vividly imagined it? Racks of burned out electronics, yup, the old standard sci-fi "confuse the computer till it ass-plodes!". Because that's what they do, even a flip flop that can't make up its mind will blow louder than a cherry bomb.....

    4. Re:I had no problem with Goldblum + Mac by opencity · · Score: 1

      I meant the first movie when Colossus and the Soviet computer go SkyNet at the end

      --
      Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  161. Data's contractions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always cringed whenever Data (ST-TNG) said that he was unable to form contractions -- such as contracting the phrase "I am" to "I'm".

    First of all, it's not very hard to apply contractions. I can write a sed program to do it. Given Data's sophistication, why would he be unable to do such a relatively simple thing?

    And second of all, there are certain contractions that are obligatory in English. For example, it is incorrect syntax to say "Do not you know that?" -- it must be contracted to "Don't you know that?". Data would have had to adhere to that rule, because breaking that rule is very jarring.

    1. Re:Data's contractions by JVolkman · · Score: 1

      It needn't be contracted: "Do you not know that?"

    2. Re:Data's contractions by LostOne · · Score: 1

      Actually, "Don't you know that?" would be expanded to read "Do you not know that?" Same way "Ain't I?" turns into "Am I not" and so on.

      --

      If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
  162. What about the 1337/IRC episode of Numbers? by Rhodri+Mawr · · Score: 1

    Numbers 6x07
    Possibly the worst description of leetspeak and IRC ever. I cringed:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2rGTXHvPCQ

    1. Re:What about the 1337/IRC episode of Numbers? by TommyBotten · · Score: 1

      Luckily, she speaks 1337

  163. The Recruit by bpfinn · · Score: 1

    I nominate The Recruit with Colin Farrell and Al Pacino. The cringe inducing scene was Colin Farrell hacking into a CIA computer by typing in some C++ source code at the graphical login prompt.

  164. Well... by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

    Independence Day is up there. CSI, too, but in overall hilarity, nothing really beats Numb3rs explaining IRC.

  165. Little more arcane - Rob Lowe in "Hostile Intent" by BulletMagnet · · Score: 1

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119318/

    The best scene was where Cleary (Lowe's character) holes up in a companion's cave in the middle of nowhere and this guy spouts off he has BONDED ISDN to his cave...which is in the middle of nowhere.

    13 years later we still can't get broadband to rural nowhere, but the phone company really pulled copper to your cave?

  166. Re:All of them. by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    Except where horny teenager David did not go to town on flirty Jennifer.

    That was the most accurate part of the movie, if you assume he'd become the model for a /.er

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  167. Swordfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously takes the cake

  168. Re:All of them. by c0mpliant · · Score: 1

    I call Shenanigans

    --
    There is no -1 disagree
  169. Independence Perl Day by CriminalNerd · · Score: 1

    Goldblum's achievements in Independence Day were very believable because he was obviously writing the attack using Perl scripts. Everybody knows that Perl is the miracle of the universe. Not even alien technology can withstand attacks from Perl scripts.

  170. Numb3rs by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1

    This show is easily the worst I've ever seen when it comes to computers.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2rGTXHvPCQ

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ceaqtWhdnI

    There was also a scene where Charlie was able to track someone down by their IP address down to the level of knowing where they were in a room of a house.

    1. Re:Numb3rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched the second link without sound, so I don't know what the code that displays on the screen is supposed to be, but it appears that in actuality it is lifted (possibly slightly modified) from the "iPhone Developer's Cookbook", recipe 6-6 "Building Table Cells with Custom Controls".

      As for the IP address, it's pretty standard to use fake IP addresses in film, the same way phone numbers always start with "555". It's to prevent people from trying to use it in the real world.

  171. Exposition is boring. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Why would a robot need a display in its head? Wouldn't it just think the info, not display it to its own eyes? Yah, not as thrilling to the audience to show a robot standing there staring and analyzing.

    In Wall-E, the Autopilot cannot command systems directly, he has to physically work the controls on the bridge.

    That exposes his actions to the audience. It catches their eye. But it is also a pointed reminder that the Captain is the one who is supposed to be the one in charge here.

    In animation you need to make your story points economically, while giving your audience something interesting to look at.

  172. Re:All of them. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Any movie where the character is talking to the computer while typing. This is normally a narrative device to let the audience know what's happening, but it's just so bizarre to see it done this way. Or cases where someone types only about 10 character to accomplish a major task, or they type 10 characters and hit enter for a case that should only involve hitting an off button (ie, reactor is overloading it needs to be shut off fast, this shouldn't require having to type in commands.

    Or anything involving CSI...

  173. Re:All of them. by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

    No kidding. I can't believe that in this day and age when computers are ubiquitous that Hollywood is still treating them like semi-magic boxes.

    C'mon.. you're talking about the exact same people who still haven't realized the entire planet WANTS digital distribution of content and hate / can't justify paying $40 for a filthy cinema seat with dust on the projector lens and sticky floors. This is actually the case BECAUSE they have no idea what a computer is. They do think it's just a magic box that does stuff that occasionally leads to free money or the end of the world.

  174. "Hackers" wasn't so bad, actually by Fallingwater · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the supposed nerds were all way too cool to be real, the technobabble was uninspired and the representation of the virtual environment was absolutely ridiculous, but try to see it from a more open-minded point of view: once you remove all the eye candy, the characters were essentially DDoSing a server with the intention of bypassing its security and recovering important files for the benefit of themselves and everyone else, which is the closest representation of hacker ethics to reality I've ever seen in the world of movies.

    It's a bit like trying to explain complicated things to non-savvy people by way of analogies and exaggerations: it's not how things REALLY work, but people get the underlying message, and with all its flaws Hackers managed to do that quite well in my opinion.

    Also, HALF-SECOND SHOT OF YOUNG NOT-YET-INSANE ANGELINA JOLIE'S BOOBS WOOHOO

  175. Witness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhZzwx0X4Ac

  176. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's most likely Superman III, my favorite. Richard Pryor is a geek and has some sort of computer job.

  177. But... I LOVE CSI! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I tell people we can actually do all that shit. Most of the time they don't know any better and believe me. I consider it an object lesson in learning to think for yourself...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  178. NCIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever seen NCIS?

    Just recently they had an episode where they had to shoot the computers because the wikileaks terrorists were trying to break in...

    I can't really remember anything worse than that.

  179. Weird Science by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    The graphics used while breaking into the Defence Dept. site were silly, But honestly, most movie depictions of computers are bad. A better poll might be what movies had depicted a computer in a manner both potentially accurate and interesting. Most accurate depictions are mundane (one of the Pink Panther movies, for instance.) Slightly inaccurate ones (Jumpin' Jack Flash) might be the best compromise.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  180. NCIS x( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This massive troll of PC users by NCIS

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRhGPVYRsOY

  181. Speaking of Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chewy: rraaaarraar-rarraararrrr-rrrrrarrrrrrr-rrrraraaraararrararar!
    Han: What's that Chewy? Twenty-two Storm Troopers are moving along North-East corridor 5 in standard flanking formation in an attempt to cut off our escape, but we can prevent them from accomplishing this if we re-route the auxilliary thrusters to bypass the hyperdrive's rear defensive shield?
    Chewy: rrrrrararara-rarararrrr!
    Han: Right you are!

  182. Live Free or Die Hard by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    Live Free or Die Hard, while probably not the worse ever, is the worst I recall at the moment. I felt like attempting to drive my head through a brick wall at points.

  183. easy...Mechanical clock in Star Trek TOS by lerxstz · · Score: 1

    They had warp drive, transporters, phasers, food synthesizers, cloaking devices, time travel, and yet....a mechanical odometer-like clock on Sulu's console.

    --
    I chose to end my comments, not with a rim shot, but a long decaying F#7sus4
    1. Re:easy...Mechanical clock in Star Trek TOS by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      STTOS is generally a bit of a letdown, technically. I mean, think about it: They have FTL drives, they have photon torpedoes, they have matter transportation and creation, but they still have consoles without overcharge protection that may injure or kill personnel.

      Shows you something. No matter how advanced technology will become, manufacturers will still not care one bit about harming the operator.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  184. Superstar's "The Robot" by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    In this climatic battle between the scientist and the millions of clones created by the robot, the final victory is achieved by "Select all robots" and "delete"! http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2376096,00.asp?kc=ETRSS02129TX1K0000532&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ziffdavis%2Fextremetech+(Extremetech)

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  185. Re:All of them. by digitig · · Score: 1

    Yes, that will be the one -- I remember it being Richard Pryor.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  186. Spacetravel by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    I always liked to think that because the aliens were a hive mind and/or telepathic, there was no real reason for them to need good computer security, since no alien in their population would ever try to maliciously manipulate the system. They just trusted each other. Making it a cakewalk for humans who have had practice. Imagine someone from today (ok the 90s) being asked to hack some of the first computers in the past, before hackers and crackers had started making life more interesting.

    Also explains the system not changing in 50 years. Why? It's not like they've been getting repeatedly hacked for 50 years and sending patch updates out. And even our modern OSes have lots of backwards compatibility, and we are probably on a steeper part of the development curve.

    Oh, and if they were going a good fraction of the speed of light to get to earth they'd have way less than 50 years.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  187. 24's Chloe hacking with Pine v4.44 by antdude · · Score: 1
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:24's Chloe hacking with Pine v4.44 by gblfxt · · Score: 1

      im not sure about the scripting ability of pine's email filtering system, but i've done some crazy stuff in mutt!

    2. Re:24's Chloe hacking with Pine v4.44 by antdude · · Score: 1

      Same here after Pine stopped updating and before I discovered Alpine. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  188. 1337 by unlocked · · Score: 1

    The Core "I'm going to need an unlimited supply of hot pockets and xena tapes."
    Antitrust "NURV all your base belong to us.."
    Hackers "I always wanted to be zero cool."
    Sneakers "The ultimate black box."

  189. OTOH, Robocop was surpisingly accurate by RevWaldo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sure no cyborgs, and we're still working on ED209, but back in 1987 Robocop had:

    - computer interfaces that resembled web sites
    - a device for tracking Robocop that looks suspiciously like a smartphone
    - digital video recording, as well as DVDs (didn't exist until '93)

    Plus:

    - stupidly oversized cars that wasted gas (6000 SUX)
    - ultraviolent games for the whole family (Nukem!)
    - Ford Taurus police cars (back when Crown Victorias were standard issue, they looked very "futuristic")
    - ads for medical services (unheard of in '87)
    - privatized police, military, prisons, and spacecraft
    - and autoflush urinals!


    .

    1. Re:OTOH, Robocop was surpisingly accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the brilliant scene where ED209 doesn't recognise the relevant input and gets into an infinite loop, only to be broken when the technicians cut the power to it. That scene should be mandatory viewing for all new programmers.

    2. Re:OTOH, Robocop was surpisingly accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually pretty amazing.

    3. Re:OTOH, Robocop was surpisingly accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, a USB-like universal connector! (RoboCop's middle finger)

    4. Re:OTOH, Robocop was surpisingly accurate by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I believe he had a command.com as well ;)

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    5. Re:OTOH, Robocop was surpisingly accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome, who would have thought? I remember seeing those ads and the Robocop universe and thinking "I am glad I don't live there". Yet this day and age is really not that different.

  190. Dark Star by careysb · · Score: 1

    "....bomb.....bomb....?"

  191. Sneakers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read though the whole page and no one mentioned Sneakers.

  192. Disclosure - Michael Douglas's VR file system by thelamecamel · · Score: 1

    Michael Douglas needs to access some files. The only way to get them is through VIRTUAL REALITY. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFkyV7d5t8o

  193. Angelina, at her hottest: Gia IIRC by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Stark raving naked too.

    Terrible movie aside from that. They try to make a hero out of a queen bitch junkie model.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  194. War Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Imsai 8080 with a voice -- that seemed to move to every machine in the movie.

  195. Antitrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tim Robbin's character leans over Ryan Phillipe's character, points to a For loop, nods, and says "That's good!". This movie was the first movie to use only unix/linux in it. Ryan Phillipe knew how to use a Security computer system, he had never seen before. They hid surveillance video in the daycare computer system and Ryan just knew how to access it.

    Just horrible, since supposedly they had a computer consultant for all of the computer scenes.

  196. The Net by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    I can't believe I had to search this far down to find "The Net." Wasn't the whole premise that the bad guy somehow put a secret icon on every web page that when you clicked on it magically hacked the server for that page? And he forgot to deactivate/remove it from his own server? What a load of...bullock.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  197. Just the Star Trek 'plot' model. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Plot complication, plot complication, plot complication, (5 minutes to end of show) trite solution involving big sciency sounding words.

    One or two exceptions which I put down to outside influences.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  198. Now you tell me. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Just when my walk was finally coming together.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  199. Sorry guys... by SigmundFloyd · · Score: 1

    ...you aren't even close. The absolute worst computer scene in history is from 60's TV show "The Prisoner".

    Be warned: it will make you cringe very hard. Then maybe laugh a bit. But mostly cringe. Think twice before clicking, because there's no way to unwatch it.

    Incidentally, the show itself was good. But that scene... Oh, the horror...

    --
    Knowledge is power; knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Sorry guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The HORROR! It cannot be unseen!

  200. Re:All of them. by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

    Hey, Farva!
    What's the name of the irish place you all ways go to?
    The one with all the shit on the wall.

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
  201. Firewall was the worst for me by vhope · · Score: 1

    Using the ipod was the best laugh!

  202. Johnny Mnemonic by nycheetah · · Score: 1

    I wish I could hack into my head. I'd totally be jacked into the internet!

  203. Numb3ers IRC depiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Luckily, I speak leet"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2rGTXHvPCQ

  204. Beat me to it - sort of by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I wanted to submit "Ask Slashdot: Best technology scene in TV or movies" As an example I suggest the scene in Contact where the alien signal is first detected. Real computers being used in realistic ways.

  205. Re:All of them. by harperska · · Score: 2

    Well, I refuse to code without multiple screens. I just need too much open at once to work effectively with one screen.

    And my coworker who uses linux uses compiz effects to switch between multiple virtual desktops in addition to the multiple monitors, so he's got the spinning 3D graphics down as well.

    But yeah, the techspeak can get a bit much.

  206. 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way computers were used in the 24 series made me cringe.

  207. Children by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    There was the episode where the captain, Roh, etc. got turned into children and had trouble accessing the computer with permissions problems. So apparently the computer can automagically distinguish children from adults easy enough. Not sure if that's any 'better.'

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  208. Re:Clacking noises by CityZen · · Score: 1

    I like how so many modern computers (in movies) make the seek sounds of a 20 MB Seagate hard drive with a stepper motor head positioner. And let's not forget the modem handshaking noise sequence. It just seems like some of those classic sounds are mandatory, no matter how obsolete they get. Any others come to mind?

  209. Jurassic Park by daphx86 · · Score: 1

    This is UNIX! I know it!

  210. Others have wondered the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.useit.com/alertbox/independence-day-interoperability-blooper.html

    http://www.useit.com/alertbox/film-ui-bloopers.html

    What I really want to know is what happened to sci-fi driving our desire/quest for new tech. Think the flip-up communicator from Star Trek, long before the flip phone came on the scene. When's the last time you watched a sci-fi movie and thought to yourself (about the tech), "That's a good idea. Somebody should invent that."

    P.S. For similar impossibilities, check out the book Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics.

  211. Re:All of them. by dtecmeister · · Score: 1

    "Override all security" - Must be Forth!

  212. Re:All of them. by plover · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In some CSI type show I was watching the other day, they were able to "enhance" the footage from a security camera in order to "widen the field of view" and see someone "off camera".

    I have to think writers just chuckle to themselves when they add something so silly.

    Then you may be surprised to learn that there are security cameras that actually work that way, and are available now. You can buy a camera with a 180 degree fisheye lens and high resolution sensor that records everything within sight, and then run software that lets the user virtually pan and tilt in every direction, straightening the image so that it looks like it was shot by a normal security camera. I'm not saying that the CSI camera was one of these, but they do exist. Mobotix makes one that looks like a smoke detector.

    In some situations the "enhance" that lets them "zoom in" on a face is also reality. If there is motion in the scene, such as you might get with a panning view of a scene or with a moving subject, the differences between frames holds extra information. There is frame stacking software available that can interpolate the edges between pixels. (Thierry Legault used this technology to produce some amazing images of the shuttle Discovery with a ground-based telescope, as reported on /. a few days ago http://legault.perso.sfr.fr/STS-133.html .) By measuring the shift in values as those real edges approach the edge of a pixel, the software can extract enough information to figure out where the real edges are. You can kind of think of it as "ClearType in reverse" or "anti-aliasing in reverse". But of course this technique only works in certain circumstances, when the subject is moving in a fashion that is cooperative with the technology and resolution of the camera. Six frames of the back of a fleeing suspect's head is still not going to let you zoom in on the zit under his nose.

    And these techniques are in use by video forensics analysts today. The lab guys I know may not be quite as sexy as the ones on TV, but they get results that yield convictions by making some pretty poor video useful in a courtroom. And I know the operators of these systems chuckle when their equipment helps bring down another bad guy.

    --
    John
  213. The Social Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was wrong with it? IIRC, Zuckerburg's character never sat down and said "brb, hacking" or spent time typing in random characters to "crack into the system". I believe he just wrote simple scripts to get all of the pictures from the various houses without throwing in random words that make no sense like "I have to ping every computer on the network then use a floppy attached to a CD connected to an ethernet cable to quickly download all of the photos!".

    Anywho, almost every technology scene is bad - it's far easier to show a computer pinging another computer with an actor sweating and everyone yelling "he'll never make it!" than it is to actually show someone exploiting a bug or programming (plus you must also take the audience into consideration).

  214. Can Happen....sort of by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    My family's first Apple ][c did let the Magic Blue Smoke out shortly after we got it home and plugged in. No explosion, but there was a wisp of smoke rising off the thing. Of course dad took it right back to the store for a replacement.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  215. then there is the Gibson mainframe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hackers....mainframe hack attack....worst. computer. scene. ever....

  216. Scanners? by Marrow · · Score: 1

    The computer is just like a brain, and you can scan it with your brain. And blow it up and stuff.

  217. Re:All of them. by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

    Buck Murdock: Oh, cut the bleeding heart crap will ya? We've all got our switches, lights, and knobs to deal with, Striker. I mean, down here there are literally hundreds and thousands of blinking, beeping, and flashing lights, blinking, beeping and flashing - they're flashing and they're beeping. I can't stand it anymore! They're blinking and beeping and flashing! Why doesn't somebody pull the plug?

    --
    "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
  218. FSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 3D interface is called FSN, for those who want to look it up.

  219. Re:All of them. by sootman · · Score: 1

    I think I got about 2/3 the way through that before realizing you weren't ACTUALLY quoting Swordfish. :-)

    Great job. Extra points for the last line.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  220. The worst is nameless because I can't remember it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst was a very old movie, in the room-size computer days, about a new high-tech train traveling across the US with the President's wife on board. It was computer controlled from a central location, naturally, but evil forces still took over the system and demanded ransom or they would crashed the train. Back at the railroad's central control center a computer expert opened one of the cabinets of the master computer, pulled a cookie-sheet sized board completely out of the bay, glanced at it, and before reinserting the board exclaimed: "It's been reprogrammed. It took a genius to do this. We'll never be able to regain control in time."

    I figured if pulling the board out didn't interrupt the computer then maybe they should try the power switch. Of course, that wouldn't have provided as much drama as the desperate measures they took which eventually resulted in the computer going up in a shower of sparks.

  221. Antitrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Synapse starts working, and busts in to every communication stream everywhere. Everyone's CDMA phones are magically high bandwidth, color screens with amazing refresh rate on the video.

    Oh, and there's always Ryan Phillipe's line "When you kill people, they die." Thanks Ryan, I'll remember that.

  222. Star Trek The Voyage Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scotty talking to the mouse... eventually selling some guy transparent aluminum.

  223. Re:All of them. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Hacker guy: Yeah, I know. Just think how much faster I could have done it if you hadn't shot my best friend five minutes ago, didn't have a knife in my back, and I didn't have to power the mainframe with this hamster wheel.

    That, right there. Whiskey on the keyboard. Shame!

    That said, you reminded me of Hackers, where they're talking about 586 RISC processors and the like. It was bad, really bad - but it was close enough in enough regards that it spurred my budding interests to figure out what the hell they were talking about. It was a "cool" film for a teen, and but between the computer mysticism and Jollie's breasts, it pretty much pushed me over the edge into geekdom.

    Today, I waste most of my time delved into much of the same things - albeit at a more... realistic, and less dramatic, sure, but still - I enjoy it.

    Also, I want an AMD Bobcat and a couple SSDs, man. Who's sending them to me? So sexy.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  224. Re:All of them. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    sounds exactly like my last job.

  225. Re:All of them. by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi, this is Jerry Bruckheimer, we read your script and we'd like to hire you on as head writer for the newest show in our franchise; CSI Fuvk Ya!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  226. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LMAO.
    Yep, Swordfish was definitely one of the worst.

  227. Some time far into the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After Jobs is gone and Apple has fallen from glory again, a really bad actor (Mathew McConaughy or William Shatner) Will have the worst ever experience with a Mac.

    Examples:

    Shatner - It's a Macintosh, not a PC Doctor!

    McConaughey - Maybe if I talk dirty, it will start up a little faster.

  228. Various films... by rcasha2 · · Score: 1

    Why is it that we still get films in which the computer screen projects words and images onto the face of the user? Talk about screen burnout! You'd have the Windows/Linux/Mac desktop permanently burned into your face.

    Another common theme is when there's a computer plotting to take over the world or some other dastardly plan, the hero battles incredible odds to arrive at the computer room, then takes out his biggest, baddest shotgun..... and blasts the screen, occasionally also taking out the keyboard, while the actual computer sniggers quietly under the desk.

    Finally, what kind of encryption allows you to guess a password one character at a time? You always get these huge screens showing you 5 or 6 characters changing rapidly, and then the characters start falling into place one by one, usually with a cute pling! sound to tell you it's been guessed. Never mind the idea that the world's nuclear arsenal would be protected by a 6-character password.

    Seriously, you'd think that film directors or script writers would familiarise themselves with the basics of computing when producing a film in which computers are a major element.

  229. bollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys haven't seen bollywood movies i guess. there is this movie called "Om Jai Jagdish" the guy literally "guesses" the password for some university gateway(online) and steals exam question papers and everybody starts calling him "greatest hacker".... later he develops an "anti-hacking" software in 1 min (yes, 1 min) in front of 1000s of people. now i cant tell on how many levels this is wrong. can you?

  230. Star Trek by 517714 · · Score: 1

    A computer (Majel Barrett-Roddenberry) with capabilities that varied by several orders of magnitudes from one episode to the next as required to further the plot.

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  231. Even better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flooding a and unprotected wireless router with ping requests.

    Example - Mike Meyers as Wayne

    Wayne - "Totally gnarly and Score. Shaawing, No the babe next door will have to come over and talk to me. Sure babe, you can borrow my wireless"

  232. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compared, say, to one of the Superman films -- was it Superman IV? -- in which all the cracker had to do was type "Override all security".

    Richard Pryor is not a cracker.

  233. on the flip side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm not sure about the worst - but the best is definitely in the South Park movie

      CARTMAN
                                          Come on, just get to the message board!

      KYLE
                                          I'm trying, I can't find a Canadian
                                          server... I've got to break into the main
                                          frame...

                    Kyle furiously hits a bunch of keys

      KYLE
                                          Damn it! They've got an access code! I'll
                                          try to reroute the encryptions...

                    Kyle furiously hits a bunch more keys.

      STAN
                                          Dude, do you know what you're doing?

      KYLE
                                          No, dude, all you have to do is hit the
                                          keys really fast and say a bunch of
                                          stupid shit and it works.

                    Just then the screen pops up. Access Granted.

  234. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is classic. I love it.

  235. Re:All of them. by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

    I need to see you movie! Make it, please :-)

  236. Re:All of them. by merlock18 · · Score: 1

    This! This is why I decided to read the comments. I WAS pissed off at the world today. Now, not as much.

  237. "Firewall" w/ Harrison Ford by toygeek · · Score: 1

    Takes his kids iPod, hooks it up to a fax machine scanner, tapes it to a screen and records every transaction going by on the screen.

    I can't believe people write this drivel. I love writing fiction and all but I refuse to write anything that requires magic computers to make the plot work.

  238. Polish movie "Haker" by korba · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL4kwZkOG_I

    Right one: Sup?
    Left one: Fortress. Classic, triple firewall. Unbreakable.
    R [this is epic]: Did you try Emacs through Sendmail?
    L: Yeah but they let me into a "fake".
    R: Exploits?
    L: No holes... We need something else.
    R: We wish you a pleasant flight.

  239. Re:All of them. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    in which all the cracker had to do was type "Override all security"

    Damn, you guessed my password!
     

  240. Numb3rs IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2rGTXHvPCQ

    I challenge anyone to beat that !

  241. Re:All of them. by Migity · · Score: 2

    "The Net" and IP address 23.75.345.200

  242. The last die hard by Adam+Appel · · Score: 1

    It was just horrible, granted we were clearly not supposed to take one second of it seriously. The hacking parts just made me ill, thevonly thing that got me through them was the promise of a gun fight.

    --
    They come in the dark, only in the darkest.
  243. Re:All of them. by Sepodati · · Score: 1

    I hadn't heard of a camera like that, so that is interesting. I think if the CSI show was playing that angle, they would have explained it, though. They always like to do the smart tech explaining to the dumb boss scene.

  244. Double Hacking! Two is better than one. by throwaway_vo · · Score: 1

    Two people typing at the same time. And pulling the plug on a client computer doing nothing to alleviate the situation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39CRw7zH_2A This has got to be a contender for worst computer scene of all time.

  245. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OW, your sample script makes my brain hurt. I wish to option this script immediately and BURN it before Hollywood gets wind of it....

  246. Re:All of them. by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

    Hi, this is Jerry Bruckheimer, we read your script and we'd like to hire you on as head writer for the newest show in our franchise; CSI Fuvk Ya!

    Please wire the money through several shell companies and I need an ironclad guarantee that my real name will not be attached to his project in any way, nor any information about myself, family, or (past, present, future) pets will ever be traced to this project.

  247. Rep Planet with monkey agent interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the movie Red Planet there is a an unmanned Russian probe send to explore Mars.

    1. The probe has buttons and a graphical user interface, despite being an unmanned probe send to uninhabited planet.
    2. The interface has an animated monkey that makes MS Clippy seem logical and useful.

  248. Re:All of them. by JockTroll · · Score: 1

    You forgot "reverse the polarity of the neutron flow". The rest is pretty much accurate.

    --
    Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  249. Re:All of them. by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I'm pretty sure that's a pretty close amalgamation of at least half a dozen movies that have already been made.

  250. German TV by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The maybe most hilarious, most idiotic and most unrealistic scene of film history has to be from a German TV show called "Alert for Cobra 11 - Highway police". It's one of those action shows where the cars are made of C4 and include a built-in ramp in case they hit another car. Go figure.

    And yes, I have seen Independence Day. At least ID doesn't try to show the actual attempt at hacking, making it something you could stomach and just ignore it. It goes by fast enough. Not so in Cobra 11, where they go into detail of making a fool out of themselves.

    The scene, for your appreciation. For those that can't speak German (I highly doubt any TV network would go through the pain of dubbing this pile of trash), here's a little transcript so you can savour it properly.

    Him: It's indeed a russian server.
    Her: We could try to hack it. If that works, we get the credentials of Rasputin.
    (some more meaningless chatter, then some typing, we see a browser open to "www.rus.net" and a big hand tells us in a browser page that access is denied)
    Her: They won't let us in that easily, the server's damn well protected.
    Him: Then... let's hack Rasputin's computer directly.
    Her: With a backdoor trojan!
    Him: Right. We send him a harmless email with our trojan horsie (yes, he says horsie)
    Her: That opens a backdoor, and we got access to his computer (smug grin). That's really clever!

    (some more typing, some meaningless lines of what could become Javascript if it was written correctly, followed by some more meaningless chatter)
    (Big window opens with "you got mail")
    Her: I think we got access.
    (mail containing something akin to "you now have remote access to rus.net, click link to access" appears)

    And so on.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:German TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I unfortunately recognise that from one of the Bond movies

  251. Please, it was a preposterous plotpoint by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the "generic nerd" that Goldblum played. World, er, universe-class hacker, and geek of all trades. The guy could do everything.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  252. Numb3rs' description of IRC by bedouin · · Score: 1

    This is pretty fucking awful.

  253. Re:All of them. by houghi · · Score: 1

    That is indeed the only answer. It also is true for almost any other profession in TV or Movie. Cops, doctors, lawyers, I have friends who have those professions and to each I have at least once commented about something clearly wrong in a movie about their profession and their answer was "Well it is just a movie."

    They are movies, not documentaries, so please get a life and perhaps not watch any movies or at least do not moan about these little things. And I am talking about REAL documentaries, not 'based on a true story' type of thing.

    And then picking ID4 as an example. There is so much unrealistic stuff going on in that movie that the computer virus is almost the most realistic thing that is going on, yet somehow it all is about the computer virus that is unrealistic.

    So again: it is a movie. It is not supposed to be realistic.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  254. Re:All of them. by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

    Sorry about your keyboard. I just ordered Hackers on NF. I was in my late 20's when that came out and I missed it. Damn I'm feeling old.

  255. 2001: A Space Oddysey by julianze · · Score: 1

    Nah just being provocative here. This is not the worst of course - probably the best I've ever seen for showing a computer AI interacting with humans partly because it was so remarkably ahead of its time but also because of the amazing realism of many of the scenes including Dave's chess game with HAL, HAL's eery interest in viewing Dave's drawings, HAL's ability to diagnose whether an electronic circuit board was faulty, and the eventual deconstruction of HAL's brain as Dave takes revenge on the AI gone haywire. Totally brilliant. Made in 1968 this movies still blows virtually all other sci-fi competition out of the water despite the decades of CGI development that have occurred since. The only thing one might criticize in my mind were when HAL kills the hibernating astronauts on board the space ship there is a big sign that lights up saying "LIFE FUNCTIONS TERMINATED". I can understand why Kubrick would have felt the need for something like this for dramatic effect but the sign seems a little cheesy thinking about it - why would there be a big sign like this on board? Who is supposed to be viewing it? The other thing that always bugged me is when HAL boasts about his infallibility and then predicts the circuit failure in the transponder unit with 100% certainty. Instead of going out to retrieve the unit the astronauts could have simply asked HAL what was the basis for his prediction. Might have save themselves a lot of heartache :-)

  256. Jumping Jack Flash by Cinnaman · · Score: 1

    I was under the age of ten when I saw this but the actors pretending to type while text scrolled up on the screen at a uniform rate is some I still remember (hopefully correctly).

    People operating computers with typed commands well into the graphical OS era is a common "bad computer scene".
    And people playing video games on a modern system with sound effects date from the early 80's added over the top.

  257. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do think it's just a magic box that does stuff that occasionally leads to free money or the end of the world.

    That's odd because sometimes I think of slashdot comments as magic boxes that sometimes lead to something funny or the end of the world. :D

  258. Let's not forget "The Negotiator" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A great movie until the very end, where a single bullet powers a PC off and according to the plot renders all data useless.

    Oh yeah, and "Boiler Room" when federal agents ask their informant to back his hard drive up to a single floppy disk so they'll have enough evidence to prosecute.

    Google the term "Movie OS" and you'll get a ton of references to this magic box treatment of PCs.

    I wonder if House is just as bad if you have a med school diploma...

  259. Live Free or Die Hard by ericn32 · · Score: 1

    Almost everything: - Fire/Life Safety systems at the FBI hacked to sound anthrax alarms... - Controlling tollways, traffic signage, cameras, and lighting simultaneously to try to kill Bruce Willis and Justin Long. - Computers that blow up on cue, in the homes of hackers that COULDN'T see a chunk of C4 in the drive bays. All done by half a dozen "hackers" in a 60 foot-long truck meandering through the streets of Washington without any police intervention Oh, and the "LoJack" still works when the FBI agents track down the hackers, even though all of the infrastructure was allegedly destroyed.

  260. Eagle Eye by crabel · · Score: 1

    The whole movie was pure horror. I can't even name a single scene that was not stupid. (Don't worry about spoilers, the movie is so bad, you don't lose anything) The evil computer is of course able to do all kinds of magic tricks, like severing overhead power lines which then fall down and grill a guy running beneath them. (Why he ran and didn't just walk to his car and drive away is totally beyond me, just a sidenote for those who have actually watched that crap) Of course, the computer can only be accessed with the DNA of one guy and nobody else can do anything. That guy is dead but hey, he has a twin(!) The twin then stops the computer by ramming a rod in the eagly eye, an eye shaped "monitor". (Yeah, that totally does it). He grabs a gun, runs in the White House, jumps on a desk and shoots in the air to stop the assassination of the presidend. After he has given a couple of shots, security reacts... I name this the worst KI movie ever, hell, it even stands a chance for most unrealistic movie ever...

  261. Superfriends... by rilian4 · · Score: 1

    I had to throw something new in here since all the good stuff was taken. That said... Superfriends made from the late 60s to the late 80s off and on (I could be a tad off on the years) showed us a mighty supercomputer in the Hall of Justice with a wall size flat looking screen that could video conference with World Leaders, local mayors and the Wonder Twins but when asked to help them solve a problem (voice activated by the way), it would produce answers on paper!? It had lots of glowy twinkly lights to show it was working too. Granted, this show was for younger kids...

    We can also drift back to yesteryear; back to a time when computers could talk to us through voice synthesizers even over a piddly-ant analog modem and they had names...like Joshua. Back to the 1980s when War Games was the movie and the fake scene was that a top secret base administrator would allow a teenager to hack around on a system when a nuclear war was about to be initiated. That's kid's arse would be in the brig and under lock, key and armed guard. None of this "Let him try" crap. There's also that movie that parodies Microsoft and has 3 kids who started a little open source startup and their top developer gets seduced by the big bad microsoft like company before realizing at the end that he was being used. It's way too late and I can't remember the name but oh boy was that movie full of techno-crap. It was fun to see them bash "Microsoft" though.

    --

    ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
  262. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  263. Weird Science by catmistake · · Score: 1

    Ridiculous... though I admit, I fantasized about that computer.

  264. And Books? by allo · · Score: 0

    I once read a book, where i had to read:
    then she started her pc and after a short while she saw the Unix 6 Prompt:
    c:\

  265. Surely you mean... by denzacar · · Score: 1
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  266. Idiotic Interfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cringe everytime I see the 'futuristic' interfaces. These interfaces usually involve huge amounts of 'visual muck', and it does not seem that they would convey any information but just are present to create the illusion of information.

  267. Untraceable by crossmr · · Score: 1

    The entire premise of this movie was garbage. The whole idea of a website that can't be shut down is ridiculous. If the government wanted to shut down a website right now, it would be done. Even if it was overseas, they could stop routing local traffic to it.
    They could also poison routes on the off chance that they couldn't get the DNS servers, or local ISP to pull the plug on the guy.
    the suspension of disbelief that is required to carry this movie is just beyond the pale.

  268. Re:All of them. by qubezz · · Score: 1

    I think that's just the prop people's idea of the Internet version of a 555 phone number. You want them to use a 192.168.0.0 instead?

  269. Back to basics by SoccerDad41 · · Score: 1

    Most of the postings relate to Baffle 'em with Bullshit, making the equipment or the operator seem highly advanced or skilled in order to suit the plot or story line. These are movies and are meant to be an escape, not a reflection of reality (I agree those scenes can be hard to stomach). My favorite bad computer scene comes from many years ago. Two teanagers were reading instructions, attempting to use a PC for some sort of data access. They were supposed to press the F12 key but in a very drawn-out fashion pressed f, then 1, then 2. Ouch.

  270. "Access Denied" by andrea.sartori · · Score: 1

    Every movie when there's a scene of someone getting a giant, flashy, mind-boggling "Access Denied" alert.
    Honourable mention to Independence Day, of course... (and many more when there's a "hacker" "hacking".)
    But truth be told, whenever a computer screen is shown in a movie there is something to cringe at. Improbable interfaces, random jargon terms, impossible "image enhancements", there's plenty of choice.
    One for connoisseurs: Battle Royale. There's a scene where a young "hacker" frantically pounds at the keyboard (on a seemingly normal text editor by the way) and you see thousands of lines of what's apparently C code scroll on the screen, being literally bornn under his fingers. Never, ever does he hit backspace, or even take a look at what he's typing. When he's finished he launches the "program" and of course it blows the entire island's security system for good. Priceless.

    --
    Mostly harmless.
  271. Re:All of them. by N1AK · · Score: 1

    I might be wrong but I think I've seen that film...

  272. I'd say *most* of them. by xded · · Score: 1

    Untraceable was pretty accurate. Or, at least, not totally wrong...

  273. Automan by morikahnx · · Score: 1

    Maybe you are all too young to remember this show. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ScJ9ZOQlfs

    1. Re:Automan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm old enough to remember "Automan" but I can't wait to be old enough to have forgotten it. :)

      Seriously, real people riding around in a HOLOGRAPHIC car? Just another one of my pet peeves with Hollywood - not only don't they know how computers work, they don't understand what a hologram is (and isn't).

      It's not just Hollywood either - I've talked to otherwise intelligent geeks who think you can use a laser to project an image into thin air and walk around it.

  274. Re:All of them. by smallfries · · Score: 1

    Wow. Word for word an exact rendition of the scene in swordfish...

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  275. PLUS! Robocop booted into MSDOS..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were they using V5, or was it still V4.01 then?

    (The Horror!!!)

  276. Re:All of them. by digitig · · Score: 1

    If it were Forth it would be "security all Override"

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  277. Display units that magically double as projectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every movie where someone interacts with a computer... ...and their face appears to be lit up with a *projection* of the screen image !!

    LOL.

  278. Re:All of them. by madprof · · Score: 1

    Now THAT is funny. Please comment more often.

  279. Mac == Virus by nurbles · · Score: 1

    In Independence Day, my common sense is always calmed by assuming that the easiest way to crash a large, complex computer network is to attempt to connect Jeff Goldblum's Mac to it. Who needs a virus?

  280. Re:All of them. by volpe · · Score: 1

    War Games nonsense (a small sample): 1) Lightman's computer has the same speech synthesizer as NORAD's. 2) WOPR can figure out a password (launch code) one character at a time.

    Superman nonsense:No computer has ever been able to understand the concept of a 2D coordinate, until Richard Pryor taught it.

  281. CSI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all 3 CSIs they amost never show anyone using a mouse. They also show "computerized" devices that don't exist, such as a lazer brain scan display. mass spectrometers and DNA analyzers that print out results in seconds, a computer table that can instantly connect to/analyze/scan any electronic device instantly etc...

    But then TV/Movies are not reality or anything even remotley resembling it.

    BTW Hackers is a good movie despite its totally unrealistic shots of what is on the computer screen when they are "hacking".

  282. Re:All of them. by digitig · · Score: 1

    2) WOPR can figure out a password (launch code) one character at a time.

    I was once responsible for acceptance testing of a particular system, and discovered that it rejected a password as soon as a single incorrect character was entered. Because the specifier (not me) hadn't specified the password behavior precisely that was compliant with the spec, and passed the official acceptance tests, so we were forced to accept it. So that bit was plausible (well, at least as far as system development and acceptance -- deployment might be a different matter.)

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  283. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hot chick: Really! So it's going to take you like two days to hack the NSA Excel 4-train database. Are you using the Bernoulli quadratic equation?"

    I think I've just cum.

  284. Smallville, by far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Smallville, you can hack into any military computer with a click of a mouse.

  285. One Actress stands out by XB-70 · · Score: 0

    Any scene with some chick balling her eyes out because we have been hood-winked into feeling sorry for her plight based on some stupid thing that she has done or some terrible injustice that has befallen her. Viz: All movies with Julia Roberts.

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
  286. Ramzi by LL0RT · · Score: 1

    Not TV or a movie, but nonetheless: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDFXaqDf8kk

  287. hmm I have a top from TV and from a movie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a movie "Untraceable". The entire idea that they cannot find where the web server is located but they seem to be able to visit the website and see "live streaming" content and couldn't figure out a way to shut it down. Really? Also they "he hacked my car" really cracked me up.

    As far as TV shows go "Bones" that Angela Character must have one incredibly powerful computer with some really wicked software to be able to pull off what she does in an hour or two. I mean wow recreating full rendered 3D mock-up movies and be able to flip things around on the fly I mean damn I want that computer.

  288. I am unable to chose by Kosi · · Score: 1

    Independence Day is far up on the list, but there are far too many to chose from.

    Latest example: Yesterday I saw the second episode of the new Hawaii 5-0, where some guy invents a piece of software that can crack every existing encryption. That's next to impossible, but even when we take that as a given, how the hell should such a program enable you to break into every system in no time?

    And what I don't understand till today: why they so often (in non-SciFi) stupidly make up a ridiculous GUI instead of using an existing one. Like when some protagonist copies files to his USB stick, why doesn't he use Windows Explorer/Nautilus/Dolphin/Finder/Midnight Commander/whatever?

  289. Ironman, cave scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the Ironmen cave scene, the Afghan terrorists are speaking HUNGARIAN!!! (and even that with a stupid accent and grammar).

    Disclaimer:
    Hungary is in Central Europe, about 3000 km from Afghanistan, and we don't have anything to do with arabs terrorism. Please don't bomb us. Thanks.

    The Hungarian people

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6mt5zVa-E8

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqi0DwNLJdM

  290. Any episode of 24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG if Cloe says socket one more time I'll scream!!!!!!!

  291. Re:All of them. by wazoox · · Score: 1

    > Lightman's computer has the same speech synthesizer as NORAD's.

    Back then everyone used the same TI chip for speech synthesizers, so that's not much of a stretch. Anyway the speech synthesizer is just a useful gadget to avoid getting the actors to read the screen aloud constantly.

  292. Re:All of them. by StoatBringer · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that was so fail. They should've called it Swordfail. lol. Or Failfish. Or Epic Swordfailfish. Rofl. It certainly wasn't made of win. Otherwise they could call it Swordwin. But it was fail. It was the failest fail that ever failed. Like double fail to the power fail. woot. So much fail in that fail movie with a fail plot that fail fail fail fail fail epic fail epic epic fail fail fail.

    Yes, I am mocking your overuse and misuse of the word. Stop it.

    --
    Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
  293. Freakazoid of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know cats can't type.

  294. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://superman.wikia.com/wiki/Gus_Gorman

  295. Untracable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie Untracable (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0880578/) is one of the worst pieces for me. I don't remember a lot, but I'll always remember the line:

    "He hacked my car, I can't drive and the doors won't open!"

    There's a million reasons why this can't happen (software influences hardware without a connection between them, general safety,... are the first examples that pop into my mind), I'll let you think of your own reasons why to hate this line of movie dialog. I'm sure you can come up with a couple more.

  296. Movie Alien Speech to Text, but no Text to Speech? by foolish_to_be_here · · Score: 1

    I still love watching the Movie Aliens but what I still find funny is that Mother can understand the spoken word but is unable to perform text to speech which is the trivial part of the verbal communication between man and machine.

    --
    Please mod me 1 or troll. It's where the truth is these days, even on Slashdot. Beware the power of moderators everywh
  297. Re:All of them. by rekenner · · Score: 1

    To be fair, CSI also does this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uoM5kfZIQ0
    Which is so far absurd that it's not even fu... no, it's fucking hilarious.

  298. Independence day: Missing Scene by darkjohnson · · Score: 1

    A short scene where the scientist at Area 51 said our microprocessor tech largely came from examining the computers on board the crashed Alien spacecraft.

  299. 24 by twm1010 · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget Jack Bauer here: Jack: Chloe, I need access.. Chloe: Okay, get to your terminal, I'll open up a socket!

    --
    If this post has multiple meanings, and one of those pisses you off, I meant the other one.
  300. Johnny Mnemonic by fishexe · · Score: 1

    Where do we begin? Awesome despite the awful, but deserving of mention.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  301. Hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that the movie Hackers has planty of such scenes.

  302. The one with all black windows with white text. by VIPERsssss · · Score: 1

    The color scheme that says, "I'm a cool hacker! Look at how cool I am."

    --
    We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
  303. Transformers: Dark of the Moon by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    The trailer for Transformers 3 shows the Apollo astronauts landing, then Cronkite announcing that they're going into radio silence, as though if the moon landing site had rotated away from the Earth. In reality, as we know, and as they were careful to explain at the time, the moon is tidally locked, so the astronauts, once they landed, would never go out of radio contact. The Cronkite audio refers to the orbiter going out of contact.

    This pisses me off a) because it's stupid, and b) because the idea of humans landing on the moon is now so far-fetched that they can make a movie about it with total disregard for simple facts.

    We used to be awesome, extending our reach into space. Now we sit back and spend millions on fake space spectacles, allow the already rich to steal billions, and spend trillions on useless wars, but we spend next to nothing on real space travel.

  304. Re:All of them. by Smallpond · · Score: 2

    That image must have been taken with the standard 400,000 x 300,000 pixel security camera frequently used in cop shows.

  305. Re:All of them. by Smallpond · · Score: 1

    But one of the knobs on the TI let you adjust frequency from low (male voice) to high (female voice). In War Games they were all set the same.

  306. Hackers by catd77 · · Score: 1

    Hackers...all of it.

  307. The Core by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hack the world."

  308. Terminator: Rise of the machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We've got enough c4 to blow up 10 supercomputers!"

    That line sums up the technical understanding of most of the terminator movies.

  309. Re:All of them. by wazoox · · Score: 1

    I never heard a Speak and Spell with a female voice :)

  310. Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (TV series) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was always impressed with the way the computer blew up when things got hairy.

  311. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where the cracker spent weeks researching the private life of a system developer to try to work out what he might have used as a back-door password.

    That's offensive, you can just call us white people.

  312. Re:All of them. by PRMan · · Score: 1

    Anything that started with 10. would hide better.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  313. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  314. Hackers by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    It's a pretty sweet film but they're running worms and virus' on ancient laptops and the screen looks like a winamp visualisation or something!

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  315. NCIS-bad bad bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the investigation shows on TV are horrible with technology, but NCIS takes the cake.

    Their answer to every thing: Hack their internets!

    When stuff really hits the fan then they get their top two "hackers" Abby + McGee to type on the same keyboard at the same time (they have done this in 2 separate seasons). How does this make it past anyone? How does it make it past everyone? Apparently none of the actors or other people involved in production realize how retarded that is.

  316. Absolutely! by dprovine · · Score: 1

    "The virus is eating through the mainframe!"

  317. About Swordfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any movie that gets Halle Berry in her underwear can't be all bad.

  318. N.C.I.S. by grikdog · · Score: 1

    Tim 'n Abby's greatest hits include "IDEA" which can be cracked in mere minutes by arm-waving.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  319. This is a real tuff one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a tough one for me. Usually by the time I notice the 2nd or 3rd annoying bad scene I hit the stop button on my ROKU and move onto a movie whose writers have managed to cleared up their pimples.

  320. Movie nerd is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to say that Hollyweird can't get computer scenes right in movies is like saying "No Way an alien baby comes to earth, becomes Superman from our sun rays effect on his alien DNA and flies around saving random losers and defeating even more random even more loserish bad guys". Its like saying 'No Way can Jackie Chan hang out of a bus, while running his legs along a slower bus, the punching bad guys with his free hand". And its like thinking 'That's odd, there is no way a guy can forge a bullet proof suit in a cave that is functional, AND infuse it with energy from a little disc he welded himself from munitions parts."

    Sorry nerdworld, Hollywood has done to the computer what Hollywood has done to EVERYTHING and EVERYONE. And I am one nerd, with poor spelling and grammar, that is thankful for that. Imagine the lul in movie action while they try to move the plot forward using real graphics and real 3 tap point encryption logarithms being worked out by a dude with a raster for 20 minutes.

  321. Re:All of them. by Funky+Weasel · · Score: 1

    There was an early episode of SG-1 that inverted this trope.

    Daniel: "Senator, we have reason to believe the Goa'uld are about to land and attack on ships."
    Kinsey: "Then I think they'll regret taking on the United States military!"
    O'Neill: "Oh, for God's sake..."
    Daniel: "Oh, you're right. We'll just upload a virus into the mother ship."

    Of course they have a magic ring that lets them travel to other planets so we have to put up from QQing from overly precious physicists instead of pompous compscis/IT professionals/etc.

  322. TRON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, ..., just to be clear. What's going on in my computer is a bunch of different things, including

    * Groups of three security programs are competing with groups of three user-supplied programs in some sort of 2-dimensional, rectilinear motion simulator to see who gets deleted?
    * A laser can either (1) freeze time so someone doesn't "melt" as you digitize them or (2) in an absurdly short amount of time observe enough state information about someone to produce an accurate mental state and body map in some "computer-scape"?
    * The Medieval habit of identifying rank with hats is going on in my computer?
    * Changing which programs a program interacts with is accomplished by slow processes, like walking, running, or flying about on solar sail simulations.
    * Programs make programs kill programs for the amusement of other programs.
    * Bits talk. But they're not great conversationalists. But they know in some detail how complex skills (e.g. Recognizer piloting) should be performed.
    * Security programs fly around in big, red, stompy things (Recognizers).
    * The computer-scape is rendered vector, except for the programs, which are rastered in.
    * A user's avatar can take impossible actions.
    * The MCP is destroyed by any program placing its definition (it's "disc") at a certain place in the MCP's avatar. Apparently this holds for my best buddy NOP as well.
    * Programs must actively defend themselves from spider attacks. (Someone should warn the webservers about the search engines...)

    Meh.

    Sure, there are other media that mis-represent what computers do and how computers work. But TRON was guaranteed to confuse anyone who saw it.

    And, sure, there are instances where anyone with half a clue would whip up a script. (Pet example: CSI: LV -- finger print databases are searched one at a time by having the user click the "check that one now" button. 'cause, you know, no one would ever make the "click each of these buttons in order" macro.)
    (Of course, I have a deeper complaint about the science in CSI. Simple example: GC runs on uncharacterized samples can not take seconds.)

  323. CDs in 5.25" floppy drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What movie is it where Arnold Schwarzenegger (I think) takes out CDs from 5.25" floppy drives? I watched that and didn't know whether to laugh or cry.

  324. boiler room by steak · · Score: 1

    the feds tell the main character to back up his entire c: drive to floppy. they show him doing it and it all fits onto one 3.5" floppy. that must have been one super high density floppy disk.

  325. Hackers for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst has to be hackers with Angelina Jolie where they computers and networks through sort of surfing cyberspace and the gui they used just showed random files and equations floating around.

  326. Killer Net by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    For those that are in the UK, they may recall a few years ago now a terrible series called "Killer Net", about a game that was played online, where the user in this show was deciding how to bump off people in "the game", except it wasn't a game, they were really getting bumped off.

    Not bad enough for a plot? Well, they had FULL frame FULL frame-rate video and high quality audio, all being delivered over a crappy 28k analogue modem.

    Killer Net.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  327. Wonder why you wonder by dindi · · Score: 1

    I wonder why it makes you wonder about the worst IT in film history. I personally really enjoyed the narrated part of the movie and what was said there sounded logical use of simple tools to data-mine a few lame-written public school pages.

    To answer your question: all the graphical hacking/cracking scenes in Hackers, Swordfish, and the mentioned Independence Day are some of the lamest I seem to remember.

    Even though I am a William Gibson fan, I would add Johnny Mnemonic's final hacking scene, with the digital Johnny copying himself, while swimming along the dolphin (Jones) in the matrix. While it depicted a virtual world that might exists at one point, the "hacking" would probably go a different route even in graphical/avatar UIs of the future.

  328. This is quite common in real life by localroger · · Score: 1

    When you have a crap keyboard such as a membrane or chiclet pad, that bleep replaces the usual tactile feedback you'd get from a non-crap keyboard that your keypress has registered and you can go on to the next one.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  329. chuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every computer scene in chuck. Also diehard 4 (triggering c4 with a virus WTF!) and all of swordfish.

  330. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a scene from Die Hard 4...

    (the film that had people blowing up computers by sending them viruses)

  331. Officespace.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It totally doesn't take that long to save a file to disk when trying to sneak out of the office....

    I beleive you have my stapler.

  332. CSI VB GUI by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    Gotta be in the top 10 worst.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkDD03yeLnU

  333. They're all bad in that respect by aklinux · · Score: 1

    The Net, Sandra Bullock, is a candidate, Mission Impossible, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, etc, etc ...

    They all have problems, generally glaring. I still enjoy watching them. It just takes "willing suspension of disbelief".

  334. Andromeda Strain by caramuru · · Score: 1

    The Andromeda Strain, 1971, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qEsqjJAY-k, has a scene where scientists are simulating the growth of a foreign living substance, the Andromeda Strain. The substance grows exponentially and the computer "blows up" trying to keep up with the high speed growth. The computer's console device was a TTY. Although most computers in those days had TTY consoles, it is funny to see scientists entering in commands on the TTY. Of course, the TTY lives on as the standard input device in Unix. etc. operating systems. We just don't have a physical TTY in front of us any more. In those days hardly anyone was exposed to computers and movies' depictions of the giant machines usually had operators wearing lab coats and carrying clipboards.

  335. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Real life example of this -

    Richard Feyman. He guessed the passwords locks on the filing cabinets containing Nuclear Secrets at Los Alamos by guessing what number sequences the other Nuclear Physicists were likely to use.
    Surprising he was never accused of treason. He even used to borrow the Russian spy Klaus Fuchs car at the time.

  336. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No kidding. I can't believe that in this day and age when computers are ubiquitous that Hollywood is still treating them like semi-magic boxes.How many people are left in the US that still think that programmers do all their coding on multiple screes with nothing but spinning 3D graphics. This is especially prevalent when someone is "hacking" into a "secure" system. Half the time they show someone manipulating a strand of DNA and are just mashing together what a four year old kid would say that heard a parent talking about computers. Something like:

    [Picture the monitor showing a fractal spinning on the screen with shiny spheres flying around and attaching to it randomly with techno music in the background]

    Hacker guy: The firewall has 7337 -bit encryption. That's more options than there are atoms in a car
    Hot chick: Really! So it's going to take you like two days to hack the NSA Excel 4-train database. Are you using the Bernoulli quadratic equation?
    Hacker guy: No, I'm already past the firewall. I dropped in a logic bomb and spammed the secure email SQL server with a hydra worm.
    Bad guy: Wow, it took Linus 14 hours on a Cray XMP Beowulf cluster linked to a direct fiber-channel modulator to do what you did in 17 seconds.
    Hacker guy: Yeah, I know. Just think how much faster I could have done it if you hadn't shot my best friend five minutes ago, didn't have a knife in my back, and I didn't have to power the mainframe with this hamster wheel.
    Bad guy: It'll all be over soon. Once you get the launch codes for the neutron bomb from the ZX81 RAM pack.

    That is too funny and so true at the same time! Hollywood thinks that a string of techno-babble will not be noticed!

  337. dumb movie mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people that write the screenplays for early Science fiction movies had good intentions, and some good stories,and very bad special effects!
    Remember the rocket ships that had sparklers out the back with smoke "Rising" in a vacuum?
    Not everyone has a good understanding of computers, and any old techno babble will fill in the blanks.
    Is this Good? No.
    Understandable? Yes.
    Silly? Absolutely!
    Entertaining? Depends on you!
    A technically accurate movie would be tedious, some leeway should be granted for artistic license and story line and progression. The 1% of the population that really understands the workings of computers can complain all they wish about the inaccuracies, but this for the most part doesn't really matter except as a vehicle for making themselves feel superior to the other 99% of us. Reminds me of the people searching for contrails in an old John Wayne movie. :-)

    1. Re:dumb movie mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone has a good understanding of computers, and any old techno babble will fill in the blanks.
      Is this Good? No.
      Understandable? Yes.
      Silly? Absolutely!

      Yeah, but Hollywood acts like computers are still something arcane that the general populace doesn't know anything about. Like millions of us don't use computers every day.

  338. Re:All of them. by filthpickle · · Score: 1

    paraphrasing Michael Scott
    'look, all I'm saying is that in Die Hard one Bruce Willis was just a normal guy that wandered into a bad situation....later on, he's jumping motorcycles over helicopters'

  339. the six million dollar man steals software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In one episode of the six million dollar man, our hero is tasked to steal software.

    So he sneaks in to the machine room, reaches in to his shirt pocket, and pulls out.... ........... a screwdriver!!!

    (Cut to commercial!)

  340. Nikita by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was one scene in TV show La Femme Nikita, where tech guy is talking over phone to a agent on the place where is some computer that is running some bad program that needed to be stopped. He asks for output of 'top' command and told him to type 'kill -9 ID of process that was unknown to him'. That part was really great and it was late 90's.

  341. The Insider by dswensen · · Score: 1

    My personal choice might seem a bit odd, but I'm going to go with The Insider, Michael Mann's movie about the big tobacco whistleblower. For the most part, the movie is a very credible, down-to-earth drama. But midway through there's a bit where the wife goes downstairs where the computer is, and without warning (or user input) an email delivers and opens itself, playing a big red animation that goes WOMP WOMP WOMP WE'RE GONNA KILL YOU WOMP WOMP WOMP. I expect stupid shit from movies like Hackers or The Net. Ridiculous computer-magic just comes with the territory. But when it comes out of left field in a movie with plenty of verisimilitude otherwise, it's especially annoying.

  342. Re:All of them. by KMnO4 · · Score: 1

    Good job! LMAO! The late lamented show "VIP" (yes, Pamela Anderson's) had many such scenes.

  343. Charlie's Angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were uploading from a Palm to something else but it was clearly the Palm that was being downloaded to. If they had only said downloading instead.
    However nothing would have saved that scene where you cannot be in contact with the ground for over x of a second. Even doing backflips you would exceed the time limits.
    Almost all Hollywood's creatives use Macs it is no wonder they come up with this crap!

  344. Bones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time Angela visualizes data of any kind on a computer, I black out and I see Trotsky with an icepick through his head. "But if we rearrange the bullet fragments with this slick little animation and custom UI I created while hacking the email account of the serial murder rapist grocery shopping homosexual xenophobic cannibal that I dated back in Art school where I got my bachelor's in fine art with an emphasis on kernel hacking and designing interfaces using classic mediums, you can see that the victim was actually killed by someone completely different. Hodgins, you like slime and bugs that make you such a nerd."

  345. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No kidding. I can't believe that in this day and age when computers are ubiquitous that Hollywood is still treating them like semi-magic boxes.How many people are left in the US that still think that programmers do all their coding on multiple screes with nothing but spinning 3D graphics. This is especially prevalent when someone is "hacking" into a "secure" system. Half the time they show someone manipulating a strand of DNA and are just mashing together what a four year old kid would say that heard a parent talking about computers.

    This is because movies are supposed to be watched by the general public. And by that i mean people with little or no background in computers (especially security systems). Remember that in a movie you have to show something for a little period of time (3-5 seconds) that catches attention and gives a clue about what's going on (like a 3d graphic showing the security override progress).

    On topic: Independence day, where they "hack" the alien ship is definitively the best!

  346. Swordfish by Gallandro24 · · Score: 0

    While I loved the action and plot of Swordfish (Travolta/Jackman/Berry), I can't help but absolutely detest the stupidity of the scene where Jackman is "coding" (vomit) his Hydra virus. His over-the-top flamboyant actions and chair-spinning made me want to scream "Programming - You're not doing it right ... oh and you're making people like me look like mentally handicapped chimpanzees on speed!" :(

  347. [spooks] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a guy hacks the military's top encryption and accesses scure facilities with box with an old school display just be pressing the go button, you have to laugh. And then cry.
    I am not saying I don't like the series, just that the IT in it is woeful.

  348. Swordfish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When he is putting together his "worm" by assembling 3d block on a 4 monitor set up, cue montage music and Hugh Jackman sweating :D

  349. OB. XKCD by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    http://xkcd.com/683/

    One of my favorites. Yes I cringe when ever I watch CSI and NCIS. Worse is that the popularity of those shows has influenced other shows, older and newer to implement the same techno-magic jackassary.

    I basically just grind my teeth and roll my eyes when ever I see anything now even slightly technology related.

    Also while not exactly computers, the worst abuse of technology related BS I think was in Will Smiths's masterpiece "Enemy of the State". As someone who works in GIS, the whole satellite tracking stuff made me laugh.

    1. Re:OB. XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my favorite - from Red Dwarf:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU

  350. Johnny Mnemonic? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Well I find it odd and strange that in a forum talking about worst movies and computers I have yet heard no one suggest Johnny Mnemonic, I mean it has Keanu Reeves in it! The whole VR thing, with the Nintendo power glove and all that I remember as being pretty silly. It also had Ice T and Henry Rollins in it!

    Also a dolphin hacks stuff.

    Anyway I don't remember it all that well, but it is just old enough that it probably had some pretty unrealistic technological screens and techobabble.

  351. Re:All of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey that sounds pretty good. You've got a career in Hollywood. The only thing stopping you is dignity.

  352. The Office by Phylarr · · Score: 1

    Does nobody else remember this from The Office:
    Pam: "I’m failing my computer class."
    Jim: “I thought you were good at Flash?”
    Pam: “I was. But then they switched to Acrobat just as I was learning Quark. I hate computers.”

    Scenes like the virus one in Independence Day are at least believable enough that my dad doesn't think twice about it. Even he knows that dialog from The Office was BS.

    --
    "Choosing to refrain from producing another person demonstrates a profound love for all life" [vhemt.org]
    1. Re:The Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK this was to show learning buzzwords for buzzwords sake.

  353. Re:Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back by jpiratefish · · Score: 1

    I'll nominate Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back. R2D2 mistakes a power port in the flying city for a data port. Droid blows smoke, tosses a fit, then plugs into data port shortly thereafter. BS.

  354. The Pretender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my favorite gaffes was in a TV show called "The Pretender". The geek in the story was always hacking into the Center's database to find out information about Jared, the main character. One time he exclaimed, "Woah! According to this database this building has a whole unrecorded level." When the cameras pan to the screen, it is a ls -al directory listing in a terminal window. I mean, give them props for using *nix on the show, but c'mon!

  355. Re:All of them. by teslafreak · · Score: 1

    I wish I could agree, but I actually see people talking to their computer all the time. Much like the people that tell you their "computer is sick" (assuming you are an IT person, you probably hear it a lot).

  356. sesli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure no cyborgs, and we're still working on ED209, but back in 1987 Robocop had:

    - computer interfaces that resembled web sites
    - a device for tracking Robocop that looks suspiciously like a smartphone
    - digital video recording, as well as DVDs (didn't exist until '93)
    seslidunya
    Plus:

    - stupidly oversized cars that wasted gas (6000 SUX)
    sesli chat
    - ultraviolent games for the whole family (Nukem!)
    - Ford Taurus police cars (back when Crown Victorias were standard issue, they looked very "futuristic")
    - ads for medical services (unheard of in '87)
    - privatized police, military, prisons, and spacecraft
    - and autoflush urinals!

  357. The totality of Die Hard 4 by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    I'll let Penny Arcade give you a short overview: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2007/7/16/

  358. Angels and Demons! by harsha5500 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the whole ip camera thing. Coulld'nt the police have just run a search over their wifi routers to locate a camera device and looked in the vicinity of the router?

  359. Charlie's Angels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the Redstar mainframe, we are told that the floor of the vault will trigger the alarm if it receives more than 0.25 seconds of contact (apparently even with the security checks). What would be the point of the bosses going through all of those security measures if they would just set the alarm off anyway? Surely once the girls have faked the fingerprint and retina scans, they don't then need to flip across the floor!

    The computer could not count the contact with the floor because one of them flipping across the floor and would have been in contact the requisite .25 seconds.

    When they are using the Palm the Palm is being downloaded to but they say that they are uploading to the other device.