We dont mind them blocking porn because it is STRONGLY against our religion. The problem however lies in the fact that this is giving them the freedom to block whatever else they want. Sometimes the blocking mechanisim is just horrible...
they block *crack* *sex* *ass* etc which would just block alot of other good sites that are not porn.
Also they block any site that is against the rulers. They block some of the hacking sites.
I ran the 2.4 kernel and was suprised by an error message returned by X4.0.1 that it got a Direct rendering version higher that the one expected.
Is the Direct rendering in 2.4 kernel not compatible with X4.0.1 ?
Land of the free my ass. Talk about privacy invasion.
I changed the default font and galeon 1.0 crashed. Back to good ol' Mozilla :)
To some extent, Yes!
We dont mind them blocking porn because it is STRONGLY against our religion. The problem however lies in the fact that this is giving them the freedom to block whatever else they want. Sometimes the blocking mechanisim is just horrible...
they block *crack* *sex* *ass* etc which would just block alot of other good sites that are not porn.
Also they block any site that is against the rulers. They block some of the hacking sites.
Gaim logs to AOL, MSN, Yahoo, ICQ, and IRC together. It's one of the sweetest things I have ever seen for linux.
Makes me wonder if the gaim folks got any permitions from all these to clone them.
You're missing the point Einstein. The point is, there are some idiots out there who flame a distribution without even trying it.
Same reason why they still stick to the stupid *.tgz packages.
Does anyone know if 6.2 will have support for Supermount ? I tried Mandrake 7.0 which has support for and it works great.
Stability and freedom baby..... your NT aint worth nothing when it comes to stability.
I ran the 2.4 kernel and was suprised by an error message returned by X4.0.1 that it got a Direct rendering version higher that the one expected. Is the Direct rendering in 2.4 kernel not compatible with X4.0.1 ?