Slashdot Mirror


User: Oxide+Maker

Oxide+Maker's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9

  1. Land of what ? on McAfee Will Ignore FBI Spyware · · Score: 1

    Land of the free my ass. Talk about privacy invasion.

  2. Have potential, but...... on Galeon 1.0 Released · · Score: 1

    I changed the default font and galeon 1.0 crashed. Back to good ol' Mozilla :)

  3. Re:Do THEY care? on Saudi Arabia's 'Great Firewall' · · Score: 1

    To some extent, Yes!

    We dont mind them blocking porn because it is STRONGLY against our religion. The problem however lies in the fact that this is giving them the freedom to block whatever else they want. Sometimes the blocking mechanisim is just horrible...

    they block *crack* *sex* *ass* etc which would just block alot of other good sites that are not porn.

    Also they block any site that is against the rulers. They block some of the hacking sites.

  4. Gaim on AOL May Open Instant Messaging To Other Servers · · Score: 4

    Gaim logs to AOL, MSN, Yahoo, ICQ, and IRC together. It's one of the sweetest things I have ever seen for linux.

    Makes me wonder if the gaim folks got any permitions from all these to clone them.

  5. Re:Don't you know it on Red Hat 7.0 Beta Is Out · · Score: 1

    You're missing the point Einstein. The point is, there are some idiots out there who flame a distribution without even trying it.

  6. Re:No Linux-PAM? on Slackware 7.1 Stable Released · · Score: 1

    Same reason why they still stick to the stupid *.tgz packages.

  7. Supermount ? on Red Hat 6.2 Officially Released · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if 6.2 will have support for Supermount ? I tried Mandrake 7.0 which has support for and it works great.

  8. Re:NT on Linux Last in Deja Network OS Poll · · Score: 0

    Stability and freedom baby..... your NT aint worth nothing when it comes to stability.

  9. Direct rendering (DRM) not compatibe with X4 ? on Linux 2.4.0-prerelease is Released · · Score: 1

    I ran the 2.4 kernel and was suprised by an error message returned by X4.0.1 that it got a Direct rendering version higher that the one expected. Is the Direct rendering in 2.4 kernel not compatible with X4.0.1 ?