Then they could all go around with working lightsabers and nobody would be subjected to abrupt limb separation. What's your point? When people are contented (which means free, well-fed and with little worries) they will not resort to violence, and that's the key to a peaceful society. Disarming them means only that your lords and masters know things will go downhill, they're perfectly OK with that, and they don't want you to be able to do anything about it.
Check the standards of living in Bavaria and Flanders, check the poverty line, the social services, homeless population, low-income population, literacy rate. Check those figures against any US state. Then get to Bern, Switzerland, to find better socio-economical conditions coupled with a large firearms availability and obtainability (although concealed carry does entail some paperwork and a though exam which should be mandatory for anyone who wants to be packing heat). But I suppose this is too difficult for your poor brain working on a 6-bit word.
Only because you're a wimp it doesn't mean everybody else has to be one. I've beaten up my fair share of bullies in my life, never had to confront the same one twice. If they formed into a gang, we would form another and strike them. Of course, you're a born loserboy and I'm a jock and that's the difference. I could probably kill you with a cold stare that would make your fat-encumbered cardiocirculatory system to explode in a shower of sweaty rotten flesh. Dismissed.
When you have heavily armed gangs around you have a big social problem that should be addressed head on, but disarming the citizens for this makes about as much sense as lobotomizing the internet and installing mandatory spyware on all computers because there are criminals around using the Net. Oh wait, that's what's happening now.
That can be explained two ways: 1) your country never had a high level of violent crime to begin with 2) your populace is so cowardly that even hardened criminals cannot bring themselves to commit a crime without a firearms. Pick your choice.
Expecting home intruders to be "reasonable" is simply idiocy. They will NOT treat you well if you're not armed and if you're cooperative: they'll rough you up badly. They're not nice guys. They will not take what they want and leave. You and your family will experience the worst experience you can imagine, and will never recover.
You mean like hooliganland?
Violent crime is a social issue. Countries with higher pro capita income and lower income divide coupled with better social services have lower crime rates, regardless of the number of guns. Of course this doesn't sit well with some people up the ladder who like their masses penniless AND powerless.
There's no irony in supporting other people's right even when one ends up on the receiving ends. If you're not prepared to do that, say goodbye to your beloved internet and computer in a few years and hello to MallCenterNet and iCantdownloadanythingmymastersdontwantmeto.
I see nothing wrong with compulsory military service and required firearms training. In fact, I'm all for it. The beauty of a militia army is that it's a very good tool to defend your country and a very bad one to use against the population - ANY population. Besides, have you seen any nerd in Switzerland, or Israel? They're all jocks. All of them. Drop one Swiss soldier in any US high school and he would beat up everybody without breaking a sweat. Drop in an Israeli soldier, and everybody would beat themselves up in fear of that the Jock from Sion could do to them.
No. Fuck them.
They want to be treated as persons? Then they can grow some and force US to recognize them as such. Want your rights? You fight for them. Like real ass-whooping strongwilled people. Like Rosa Parks. Like MLK. Beat them, you bottle-nosed squeaking little bastards.
I'm a man, I'm a goddamn human being, I can shave my balls.
"1984" is a cautionary tale and not an instruction handbook, you loserboy doubleplusungood nerd. You will be immediately escorted to Room 101 for the appropriate rat swirling.
Given that one of the best and most appreciated exports of Hungary are adult movie actresses , they should dare to denounce the lie "public morality" is. There is no "public morality", there is a set of restrictive non-laws imposed upon the people by a few self-appointed "moral guardians" who should be dragged into the streets, tarred and feathered, and fed to rabid rats on crack.
It doesn't take genetic engineering to solve this, just some good old-fashioned bloodletting by axe now and then. Nothing says "we're fed up with you" better than some dozen decapitated heads set ablaze and thrown over the walls with trebuchets made of human bones.
The goal of anyone who is in power is to get MORE power. "Democracy" and "freedom" are buzzwords used as bait to catch votes, but now "security" and "OMG teh CHILDREN" have proven to be more effective.
They want more power and they will get it. If they could put their arms up our asses and move us about like sock puppets they would do it in a millisecond. This will go on to the bitter end unless they're countered by force. It will mean losing a LOT of our creature comforts because the only way to undermine their power is to destroy a large part of the industrial complex that supports them.
I think it's worth it.
Russia is powerful enough to be an issue but they've got too many internal issue to try and make a power grab over Europe. As for Italy, they'll soon be bankrupt and the Berluscronies need to try and hold to any power they may have when the feces rain come down.
Then they could all go around with working lightsabers and nobody would be subjected to abrupt limb separation. What's your point? When people are contented (which means free, well-fed and with little worries) they will not resort to violence, and that's the key to a peaceful society. Disarming them means only that your lords and masters know things will go downhill, they're perfectly OK with that, and they don't want you to be able to do anything about it.
Yeah, it's getting so bright I need image intensifiers.
Check the standards of living in Bavaria and Flanders, check the poverty line, the social services, homeless population, low-income population, literacy rate. Check those figures against any US state. Then get to Bern, Switzerland, to find better socio-economical conditions coupled with a large firearms availability and obtainability (although concealed carry does entail some paperwork and a though exam which should be mandatory for anyone who wants to be packing heat). But I suppose this is too difficult for your poor brain working on a 6-bit word.
Only because you're a wimp it doesn't mean everybody else has to be one. I've beaten up my fair share of bullies in my life, never had to confront the same one twice. If they formed into a gang, we would form another and strike them. Of course, you're a born loserboy and I'm a jock and that's the difference. I could probably kill you with a cold stare that would make your fat-encumbered cardiocirculatory system to explode in a shower of sweaty rotten flesh. Dismissed.
When you have heavily armed gangs around you have a big social problem that should be addressed head on, but disarming the citizens for this makes about as much sense as lobotomizing the internet and installing mandatory spyware on all computers because there are criminals around using the Net. Oh wait, that's what's happening now.
That can be explained two ways: 1) your country never had a high level of violent crime to begin with 2) your populace is so cowardly that even hardened criminals cannot bring themselves to commit a crime without a firearms. Pick your choice.
Expecting home intruders to be "reasonable" is simply idiocy. They will NOT treat you well if you're not armed and if you're cooperative: they'll rough you up badly. They're not nice guys. They will not take what they want and leave. You and your family will experience the worst experience you can imagine, and will never recover.
You mean like hooliganland? Violent crime is a social issue. Countries with higher pro capita income and lower income divide coupled with better social services have lower crime rates, regardless of the number of guns. Of course this doesn't sit well with some people up the ladder who like their masses penniless AND powerless.
There's no irony in supporting other people's right even when one ends up on the receiving ends. If you're not prepared to do that, say goodbye to your beloved internet and computer in a few years and hello to MallCenterNet and iCantdownloadanythingmymastersdontwantmeto.
It happens that congresswoman supports gun rights so each and every anti-gun comment from loserboys here are null and void.
I see nothing wrong with compulsory military service and required firearms training. In fact, I'm all for it. The beauty of a militia army is that it's a very good tool to defend your country and a very bad one to use against the population - ANY population. Besides, have you seen any nerd in Switzerland, or Israel? They're all jocks. All of them. Drop one Swiss soldier in any US high school and he would beat up everybody without breaking a sweat. Drop in an Israeli soldier, and everybody would beat themselves up in fear of that the Jock from Sion could do to them.
At least two: one the kid pretends to work on, and one to make and sell kiddy porn in order to pay for a games console.
No. Fuck them. They want to be treated as persons? Then they can grow some and force US to recognize them as such. Want your rights? You fight for them. Like real ass-whooping strongwilled people. Like Rosa Parks. Like MLK. Beat them, you bottle-nosed squeaking little bastards. I'm a man, I'm a goddamn human being, I can shave my balls.
"1984" is a cautionary tale and not an instruction handbook, you loserboy doubleplusungood nerd. You will be immediately escorted to Room 101 for the appropriate rat swirling.
... The Doctor finally dances. And by the way, the Doctor's name is unknown, it's not "Who". You loserboy nerds.
Call the Balrog.
Given that one of the best and most appreciated exports of Hungary are adult movie actresses , they should dare to denounce the lie "public morality" is. There is no "public morality", there is a set of restrictive non-laws imposed upon the people by a few self-appointed "moral guardians" who should be dragged into the streets, tarred and feathered, and fed to rabid rats on crack.
It doesn't take genetic engineering to solve this, just some good old-fashioned bloodletting by axe now and then. Nothing says "we're fed up with you" better than some dozen decapitated heads set ablaze and thrown over the walls with trebuchets made of human bones.
The goal of anyone who is in power is to get MORE power. "Democracy" and "freedom" are buzzwords used as bait to catch votes, but now "security" and "OMG teh CHILDREN" have proven to be more effective. They want more power and they will get it. If they could put their arms up our asses and move us about like sock puppets they would do it in a millisecond. This will go on to the bitter end unless they're countered by force. It will mean losing a LOT of our creature comforts because the only way to undermine their power is to destroy a large part of the industrial complex that supports them. I think it's worth it.
Evil times? Did you vote for Sauron, you loserboy orc?
Russia is powerful enough to be an issue but they've got too many internal issue to try and make a power grab over Europe. As for Italy, they'll soon be bankrupt and the Berluscronies need to try and hold to any power they may have when the feces rain come down.
EU != Italy. Beluskaiser makes his own laws for his own advantage, like all petty dictators.
Revoking a Navajo would be much worse.
You said it like it were a Bad Thing.
Blessed be Mark David Chapman.