Slashdot Mirror


Swiss Bank Has 43-Page Dress Code

Tasha26 writes "The HR of Swiss bank UBS AG came up with an innovative 43-page document (French) to establish fashion 'dos' and 'don'ts' in their retail branches. Among the rules are such things as: 'neither sex should allow their underwear to appear,' perhaps Dilbert was a bit ahead of them on that. The document also mentions smells and 'avoid garlic and onion-based dishes.'"

212 comments

  1. /.ers by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Should avoid working for this bank!

    1. Re:/.ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should avoid working for ANY bank.

    2. Re:/.ers by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 1

      Who at the bank inspects the underwear ?
      and doesn't get sued for sexual harresment every few days.

    3. Re:/.ers by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Well, you know, Swiss bankers are also known as the Gnomes of Zürich.

      Perhaps they are concerned about the Underwear Gnomes of Zürich.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    4. Re:/.ers by Venik · · Score: 1

      Who at the bank inspects the underwear ?

      It's Switzerland. They do have gnomes, you know.

    5. Re:/.ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe that's exactly what /.ers should?

      *ducks*

    6. Re:/.ers by jcr · · Score: 1

      One of the NeXTSTEP gigs I did back around '96 or so was at UBS/Warburg in Chicago. The only dress code I heard about was the rule that the Chicago merc had that you must wear a tie on the trading floor. Those of us writing code wore whatever we wanted (usually jeans and long-sleeved shirts because it was COLD in Chicago.)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:/.ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you haven't been to the sperm bank for a while, have you?

    8. Re:/.ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why ? I always wear a white shirt with tie and black jeans at work... just replace the jeans and I'll fit in.

    9. Re:/.ers by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 1

      Fight against the Underwear Gnomes - wear briefs from Kmart !

      --
      while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
  2. do they have a policy against flatulence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to have to start asking that at my job interviews.

    1. Re:do they have a policy against flatulence? by PatPending · · Score: 1

      Dunno about that. However there is this, which I think is good guidance, as some people (women especially) find it necessary to marinate themselves in fragrance:

      "A scent should at first be perceptible at a distance - an arm's length - but should be discreet.""If you like wearing perfume or after-shave, remember, the scent of a perfume is more pleasant than being invaded by a fragrant cloud."

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    2. Re:do they have a policy against flatulence? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Typically it's people that dont bathe... they got told they stink and now they cover up their lazyness of bathing by covering it up. IT's a very old tradition.... Kings,Queens and noblemen stunk to high hell as the dirty bastards rarely took baths.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:do they have a policy against flatulence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're on to you, Vlad.

    4. Re:do they have a policy against flatulence? by jemtallon · · Score: 1

      Sort of. The dress code states you must smell agreeable throughout the day. They mention using extra deodorant throughout the day if you perspire excessively, that you cannot smell of cigarette smoke, and can't smell of strong foods. They recommend using perfume but just a little so as not to offend anyone who doesn't share your tastes.

    5. Re:do they have a policy against flatulence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somebody needs to invent ass-deodorant. Maybe a butt plug made of activated charcoal? Throw in some vibration and I'll wear one 24/7! (modulo shitting and playing catcher, of course).

    6. Re:do they have a policy against flatulence? by PatPending · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine worked for a Salvation Army store in Compton, California, and regularly encountered "street people." He referred to this practice as a "ghetto shower."

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    7. Re:do they have a policy against flatulence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vlad.... that takes me back. FART

    8. Re:do they have a policy against flatulence? by KudyardRipling · · Score: 0

      How about a complete anal exhaust processing system with OBD-4 computer control, a three-way catalytic converter, hydrogen sulfide sensor, air injection and exhaust gas recirculation? I figure that the Europeans needed to be Californicated where air pollution is concerned. OTOH, this would be politically incorrect because outside the USA, personal hygiene is viewed as a "cultural chauvinism". It may even conflict with some obscure EU directive more commonly known as the 'Right to Stink Law' or the the German BundesFreikoerperkulturGesetz . Heaven forbid, females will be compelled to *gasp*....shave their armpits!

      --
      time to buy more rhodium bullion...

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  3. Dress code? by TheL0ser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only dress code that should be required: 1) Do not show up to work naked. 2) If you're in a position where you need to be taken seriously, dress so that the other guy will take you seriously. 3) Seriously, noone wants to see you naked.

    1. Re:Dress code? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2

      1) Do not show up to work naked

      So that's why they fired me!

    2. Re:Dress code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you would think.. but you would me amazed, amazed i tell you! what morons are in active employement

    3. Re:Dress code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My porn studio finds your dress code far too restrictive.

    4. Re:Dress code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in porn, you insensitive clod.

         

    5. Re:Dress code? by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      It's amazing the number of people who cannot understand what kind of outfits a business person will take seriously. I've seen people with spiky hair, piercings and tatoos all over, and baggy/ripped/faded outfits unable to comprehend how someone could not take them seriously.

      Then again - relaxed dress code here:
          No holes where there shouldn't be holes
          Must wear Shoes that cover your toes, Skirt or Pants (trousers for those of you in the UK) and a Shirt

      That about sums it up.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    6. Re:Dress code? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2

      One of my favorite teachers in high school told us a story about how he managed to be fired from a job instead of quitting it. The dress code required pants, a shirt, jacket and tie. He sewed himself an outfit of those using transparent plastic. He was following the required dress to the letter while still proudly showing his underwear and bare chest.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    7. Re:Dress code? by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Must wear Shoes that cover your toes, Skirt or Pants (trousers for those of you in the UK) and a Shirt

      So open-toed women’s dress shoes would be a no-no?

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    8. Re:Dress code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're male, then yes, they would be a no-no.

    9. Re:Dress code? by egamma · · Score: 1

      Must wear Shoes that cover your toes, Skirt or Pants (trousers for those of you in the UK) and a Shirt

      So open-toed women’s dress shoes would be a no-no?

      A lot of places use this formula:

      open-toed != dress

    10. Re:Dress code? by mangu · · Score: 1

      open-toed women's dress shoes would be a no-no?

      It says so on page 9, among the instructions for women:

      "Chaussures fermées, noires et classiques"

      Translation: "closed shoes, black and classic".

    11. Re:Dress code? by h00manist · · Score: 2

      It's amazing the number of people who cannot understand what kind of outfits a business person will take seriously. I've seen people with spiky hair, piercings and tatoos all over, and baggy/ripped/faded outfits unable to comprehend how someone could not take them seriously.

      I didn't want to figure it out for years, and could never work in IT. Finally I accepted if I wanted to work for "the system", I needed the right costume, got a #!@*! suit, and got a programming job.

      Then I got a job where the bosses dressed worse than everyone. Then I never got another job. Now I'm working on how to work each time less.

      I'm not looking for a damn paycheck, I'm looking for a civilization where life is worthwhile.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    12. Re:Dress code? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      try Vulcan, you won't find that on earth that is for sure.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    13. Re:Dress code? by twidarkling · · Score: 2

      And trust me, still no one wants to see you naked.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    14. Re:Dress code? by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be fair, there are also plenty of people in suits that don't understand why the ripped jeans and t-shirt crowd doesn't think they're cool.

      If you think about it for a moment, you will see that it is kind of silly that you're only taken seriously if you tie a strip of cloth around your neck tight enough to slightly restrict blood flow to your brain.

      Beyond avoiding holes where they shouldn't be and not being offensive, it is all rather arbitrary and even childishly silly.

    15. Re:Dress code? by russotto · · Score: 1

      It's amazing the number of people who cannot understand what kind of outfits a business person will take seriously. I've seen people with spiky hair, piercings and tatoos all over, and baggy/ripped/faded outfits unable to comprehend how someone could not take them seriously.

      Hey, gotta play to the stereotype. If I'm claiming to be the guru who can build their entire new computer system in nothing flat, the hacker ponytail, sandals, and ripped jeans are an absolute necessity.

      And if you're trying to get a contract as a black hat hacker, spiky hair, tatoos, and piercings are pretty much necessary, despite the fact that at no point will the client actually see you.

    16. Re:Dress code? by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Correct

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    17. Re:Dress code? by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      If you think about it for a moment, you will see that it is kind of silly that you're only taken seriously if you tie a strip of cloth around your neck tight enough to slightly restrict blood flow to your brain.

      Usually they aren't tied that tight.

      As far as non-offensive, it does help with first impressions - can you show signs of restraint and putting effort into *something*

      It doesn't always translate, but the general opinion is, if you can't do that with your attire/appearance, you won't do that with your job.

      Actually, the individuals I referenced are also the individuals I know who cycle between jobs fairly frequently, so, at least anecdotaly, that stereotype isn't so bad.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    18. Re:Dress code? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I cant stand the recent grads... Fricking flip flops? I don't want to look at your hairy toes there johnny... Put shoes on. I dont care if you have 2 phd's... put shoes on.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:Dress code? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      They can leave their hats on as well.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    20. Re:Dress code? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And if you're trying to get a contract as a black hat hacker, spiky hair, tatoos, and piercings are pretty much necessary, despite the fact that at no point will the client actually see you.

      Unless you're trying the reformed-black-hat security consultant thing. Then they'll see you, and without the look they'd never believe you when you look around their server room and say (without actually looking at how the systems are actually set up) "Oh man, you're lucky you called me. I could have broken in here in twenty minutes and robbed everything back in the day."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:Dress code? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Usually they aren't tied that tight.

      They shouldn't be, but exactly the people who actually consider them essential (rather than merely acquiescing to a requirement) tend to think a loose knot is sloppy and so overcompensate.

      UK hospitals banned them for doctors when they were found to be a vector for infection.

      But yes, non-offensive is generally a good idea in all professional matters.

    22. Re:Dress code? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Don't want to see my feet?

      Then don't look at my fucking feet!

      Likewise. If a customer sees me long enough to notice, or face to face, someone -else- has already fucked up to the point where dress code is pointless.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:Dress code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the reason people write bloody dress codes. "Don't want to see my feet? Then don't look at my fucking feet!" is a social skill fail, whether or not you're dealing with customers. So rather than going twenty rounds trying to explain it to you, it's just easier to say "Here are the rules, written out in painstaking detail so as to avoid the tremendous 'fun' everyone has when nerds deliberately try to obey the letter, not the spirit, of the rules."

    24. Re:Dress code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a gender equality thing. You see if you let women where opened toed high heels you have to let men where opened toed sandals. This is why we need political correctness people or everyone will have to go home crying to their mommies. And since some people have to days who are they going to cry to then. You see the world will end without political correctness.

    25. Re:Dress code? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It was nice of him to wear opaque underwear XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    26. Re:Dress code? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      You would hate Seattle. Every day I see dozens of people dressed in business attire downtown who are still toting backpacks like they're in sixth grade!

      Really? You want to borrow eight million dollars from me for your next whiz-bang dot-com startup? Then grow up and stop living like you're 12, Sparky.

      Then again, I know a guy who got $15 million from T-Mobile for his startup, and he goes to work in a downtown skyscraper in flip-flops, a soiled t-shirt, and boxer shorts. Even on days when he has meetings with other businesses.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    27. Re:Dress code? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      If you're restricting the flow of blood to your brain, then you're doing it wrong.

      It does, however, explain why you don't understand why people who make so much more money than you do dress so much better than you do.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    28. Re:Dress code? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Don't want to see my feet?

      Then don't look at my fucking feet!

      Likewise. If a customer sees me long enough to notice, or face to face, someone -else- has already fucked up to the point where dress code is pointless.

      I'm glad that philosophy has worked out for you. But not everyone aspires to be the overnight mop boy at Jack-in-the-Box.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    29. Re:Dress code? by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      Only dress code that should be required: 1) Do not show up to work naked. 2) If you're in a position where you need to be taken seriously, dress so that the other guy will take you seriously. 3) Seriously, noone wants to see you naked.

      Some people do look good naked, they just do not have /. IDs.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    30. Re:Dress code? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That's nice.

      The only time I've had work outside of the tech center was my first two jobs. I'm on my forth job, which I've had for several years. I'm currently one of two sysadmins (two SAS70 datacenters - and I don't mean storage closets with a rack or two - entire buildings).

      The world isn't black and white. You don't have to choose between slave labor and corporate death. There's a comfortable middle ground.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. Backscatter scanning by 2names · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for companies to start using these to enforce dress codes. "I'm sorry, Jim, but we can't allow you to wear your pretty, pretty princess underwear to work."

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:Backscatter scanning by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You know, that's a great argument *FOR* strict dress code guidelines.

          If you know Jim is wearing pretty princess underwear, that's *WAY* more than anyone needed to know. :) Maybe if he wore pants also, it wouldn't be an issue.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Backscatter scanning by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Maybe if he wore pants also, it wouldn't be an issue.

      What can I say? I love the breezy feeling only a kilt can provide!

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Backscatter scanning by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I love my utilikilt... sadly most American men have no sense of fashion and comfort, and are not manly enough to wear one.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Backscatter scanning by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      . . . because I'm wearing the Pretty, Pretty Princess underwear and it's embarrassing if both Jim and I are both wearing it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:Backscatter scanning by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Too bad Mountain does make a Three Wolf Moon golf shirt. Could use one of those at work.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    6. Re:Backscatter scanning by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Kilts may be comfortable but paychecks are more useful.

    7. Re:Backscatter scanning by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Utilikilt? I thought those were only for 30-something unemployed Seattle douchebags who still like to play dress-up.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    8. Re:Backscatter scanning by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I have a real kilt, a fheile more (great kilt, aka big feckin blanket.) I agree about all that you said, though utilikilts are for people who can't pleat their own kilt every time they want to put it on.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    9. Re:Backscatter scanning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I'm one of those 30 year old Seattle tards, and yes I have a Utilikilt. They are comfortable, but as you said it's not exactly practical or even that good looking.

    10. Re:Backscatter scanning by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      We used to have a couple guys who would wear their kilts to work, never heard of any problems with it. But the CEO also has no problem with my pony tail, and allows casual Fridays (Jerseys allowed in the winter and Hawaiian shirts in the summers are allowed for themed casual Fridays)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    11. Re:Backscatter scanning by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I also own a great kilt... Problem is they SUCK for 90+ degree summer days. Honestly that much tartan is miserable in heat unless you wear ONLY the great kilt, and that is frowned upon along with the blue paint on the face at business meetings.. I love mine on a winter day though. Xmas season is the time I wear it most... Going to a real Irish pub in America wearing a great kilt get's you more free pints of Beamish. ( yes there ARE real Irish pubs in the States.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. huh by Anrego · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So uh a business whose employees deal with customers on a daily basis in an industry where projecting an image of professionalism is very important has developed a guide to aid their employees? This just sounds like common sense to me.

    43 pages sounds a bit insane, until you actually look at it. Large print, lots of diagrams, lots of whitespace/formatting not 43 walls of text. It actually looks pretty clean and readable.

    Financial institutions are still one of the last places where we expect people to put some effort into their appearance. Even geeks like myself who cringe when they have to put on a tie tend to expect the people dealing with our savings to look the part. If the guy I’m greeted by has a nose ring, I’m out of there. Yay for double standards I guess.

    1. Re:huh by Ephemeriis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So uh a business whose employees deal with customers on a daily basis in an industry where projecting an image of professionalism is very important has developed a guide to aid their employees? This just sounds like common sense to me.

      Yup. Every business has a dress code. Some do uniforms... Some just tell you how you need to dress... Isn't that unusual.

      43 pages sounds a bit insane

      It does. And I assumed that it was all kinds of legalese...

      until you actually look at it. Large print, lots of diagrams, lots of whitespace/formatting not 43 walls of text. It actually looks pretty clean and readable.

      Not just clean and readable, but actually useful. There's instructions on how to tie a necktie. I don't know how to tie a necktie. If I got a job at one of those banks I'd have to go dig up some instructions on-line... Or I could just use the nice document that HR provides during orientation. That'd actually be handy.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:huh by Hatta · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      So uh a business whose employees deal with customers on a daily basis in an industry where projecting an image of professionalism is very important has developed a guide to aid their employees? This just sounds like common sense to me.

      It is common sense. The interesting part is that common sense reigns here, but not in the actual operations of the bank. If they spent as much time ensuring that their employees were doing their job properly, and not just dressing the part, they may have avoided the financial crisis they find themselves in.

      43 pages sounds a bit insane, until you actually look at it. Large print, lots of diagrams, lots of whitespace/formatting not 43 walls of text. It actually looks pretty clean and readable.

      No fine print? Bet they don't offer their customers the same courtesy.

      Even geeks like myself who cringe when they have to put on a tie tend to expect the people dealing with our savings to look the part. If the guy I'm greeted by has a nose ring, I'm out of there.

      I guess if you look respectable enough, you don't actually have to act respectably. I'd be willing to bet that any UBS employee that got a nose ring would be shown the door much, much more quickly than any UBS employee that engaged in mortgage fraud.

      A suit and tie are the colors for the most powerful gang in the world. Sure, a thug in a red bandana might steal your wallet. A thug in a suit and tie will steal your entire future, and get a million dollar bonus for it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:huh by truthsearch · · Score: 2

      Exactly. My last employer (a financial institution) had a much more detailed and lengthy employee handbook. Included were which way to face in an elevator, on which side to put down your briefcase, and acceptable tie patterns. I thought it strange that it also told employees to wash their hands after using the bathroom, but at least I could appreciate that one.

    4. Re:huh by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      43 pages sounds a bit insane, until you actually look at it. Large print, lots of diagrams, lots of whitespace/formatting not 43 walls of text. It actually looks pretty clean and readable.

      Exactly. And if you read the instructions (Google Translate is your friend if you don't speak French, or even if, like me, your French is very rusty) they tell you everything your father taught when he showed you how to wear a suit: Don't stuff your pockets, make sure there is at least space for one finger between your collar and neck, tuck your shirt in properly, the jacket should "hang" on your shoulders nicely, keep your creases neat, etc.

    5. Re:huh by selven · · Score: 1

      If it's that important, why not just have uniforms? I don't pay much attention to dress but I recall at least one of the banks in my area had all their employees dressed exactly the same way.

    6. Re:huh by hpavc · · Score: 2

      Awesome, should share it.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    7. Re:huh by Snowgen · · Score: 1

      If it's that important, why not just have uniforms?

      In a way, they do have uniforms. The uniform is the method of dress spelled out in the dress code.Their uniform just has more variation allowed.

      But what would uniforms save? You still need to tell people how to wear them. The US Air Force spends about 160 pages (annoying PDF) telling people how to wear theirs.

    8. Re:huh by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Financial institutions are still one of the last places where we expect people to put some effort into their appearance. Even geeks like myself who cringe when they have to put on a tie tend to expect the people dealing with our savings to look the part. If the guy I’m greeted by has a nose ring, I’m out of there. Yay for double standards I guess.

      - I agree. If somebody is going to steal my money, they better look good doing it, otherwise I'd be majorly pissed (I mean, I'd be quite pissed if some bum with a nose ring took my cash.)

    9. Re:huh by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      So after all that quoting and posting the end result was that you have nothing to say on the actual topic?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    10. Re:huh by digitig · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It does. And I assumed that it was all kinds of legalese...

      No, it isn't. If you follow the link you'll find (as long as you can read French) that it is quite informally written. It takes so many pages because there's a lot of whitespace, lots of pictures, and lots of supplementary material explaining the reasons for the dresscode and showing different ways of tying a tie. It does essentially define a uniform (white shirt, charcoal, black or dark blue suit, plain black shoes and company tie for men), but the content that does that could probably be condensed to less than a single page.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    11. Re:huh by clone52431 · · Score: 2

      It does. And I assumed that it was all kinds of legalese...

      No, it isn't.

      You stopped reading his post a little bit too soon.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    12. Re:huh by lgw · · Score: 2

      suit and tie are the colors for the most powerful gang in the world. Sure, a thug in a red bandana might steal your wallet. A thug in a suit and tie will steal your entire future, and get a million dollar bonus for it.

      Sorry to question your off-topic rant, but did anyone actually lose their savings deposited with a bank in the recent debacle? Certainly not in the US. Investors got screwed, but that's the risk you take.

      The thug who stole (a part of) my future did wear a tie, but he was the politician that bailed out the bank with my tax dollars (mostly future), not a banker.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A suit and tie are the colors for the most powerful gang in the world. Sure, a thug in a red bandana might steal your wallet. A thug in a suit and tie will steal your entire future, and get a million dollar bonus for it.

      Not all who wear suits and ties are lawyers.

      A banker or broker can only "steal" your "fortune" if you don't do basic research and math.

    14. Re:huh by Hatta · · Score: 0

      As long as bankers are the greatest villains of our age, no discussion concerning bankers should pass without acknowledging that they are in fact the greatest villains of our age.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:huh by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So it's entirely impossible for a bank to over extend itself entirely out of its own greed, panic, and stop lending to your boss causing him to go out of business and you to lose your job? Have you been paying attention at all the last two years? The irresponsible behavior of banks affects the entire economy, whether you've been responsible with your money or not.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    16. Re:huh by holt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's instructions on how to tie a necktie. I don't know how to tie a necktie. If I got a job at one of those banks I'd have to go dig up some instructions on-line... Or I could just use the nice document that HR provides during orientation. That'd actually be handy.

      I don't know how one would get a job at a place like that without having worn a suit and tie to the interview. If they're telling people how to tie a necktie after the fact, isn't it too late?

    17. Re:huh by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The politican may have made a bad decision when dealing with the crisis, but the banker is responsible for the crisis. Neither of them have clean hands and they are both thugs in my book.

      Personally, I'm not concerned about the individual investors wiped out by the financial crisis. The people who really fucked over are the millions of people unemployed today who wouldn't be if not for the crimes of the banking industry.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    18. Re:huh by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's instructions on how to tie a necktie. I don't know how to tie a necktie. If I got a job at one of those banks I'd have to go dig up some instructions on-line... Or I could just use the nice document that HR provides during orientation. That'd actually be handy.

      I don't know how one would get a job at a place like that without having worn a suit and tie to the interview. If they're telling people how to tie a necktie after the fact, isn't it too late?

      Clip-on.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    19. Re:huh by russotto · · Score: 2

      I don't know how one would get a job at a place like that without having worn a suit and tie to the interview. If they're telling people how to tie a necktie after the fact, isn't it too late?

      You could probably get through the interview with a tie tied incorrectly, but you'd better use one of the three accepted knots if you want to work there. I am surprised they don't specify a particular one.

    20. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      43 pages of hypocrisy considering who they deal(t) "business" with.

    21. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the guy I'm greeted by has a nose ring, I'm out of there.

      I can assure you that people who wear nose rings don't work as customer service representatives in banks, although I did know a female Cobol programmer who had lots of body art that worked (and probably still does) at a large, well known bank. The funny thing is, it would be a lot easier for HER to rip somebody off than a clerk.

      Personally, I've never trusted people who have prejudices; they tend to be unreliable and dishonest. They are the type of people that project their own fears on people who don't dress like they do, and who aren't the same skin colour, and who don't worship the same god. Personally I wouldn't give a stupid, unintelligent asshole like yourself the time of day, nor the moderators who faun over your intellectualism.

    22. Re:huh by Anrego · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am surprised they don't specify a particular one.

      Different knots look better on different people (neck size has a lot to do with this) .. and with different shirts.

    23. Re:huh by LainTouko · · Score: 1

      Financial institutions are still one of the last places where we expect people to put some effort into their appearance. Even geeks like myself who cringe when they have to put on a tie tend to expect the people dealing with our savings to look the part.

      Well, if someone's wearing a tie, the part they look to me is the part of 'swindler' or 'con-man'. Someone who's genuinely honest and professional may end up wearing anything. Someone who's pretending to be honest and professional to mask a less attractive nature will always put plenty of effort into appearance.

    24. Re:huh by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      I am surprised they don't specify a particular one.

      Different knots look better on different people (neck size has a lot to do with this) .. and with different shirts.

      And if you tie a full Windsor knot, you may be asked if it is your little brother's tie.

    25. Re:huh by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      You stopped reading his post a little bit

      How do you only stop reading a post a "little bit". That doesn't make any sense, you buffoon!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    26. Re:huh by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Oh calm down.. this has nothing to do with prejudices..

      Yes, in the ideal world everyone would be free to express their finely honed sense of self image at all times in all situations. In the real world we have norms that people are expected to conform to when operating in a professional capacity.

      If you're a programmer, engineer, or any generic office worker who doesn't have to deal with customers, then you can wear as much metal and ink as you want. It's generally accepted however that when you're in a business situation, you put on a clean shirt/suit/tie, take the junk out of your face, and do the uptight suit thing. Same as when you go to (most) job interview. It shows respect and that you take your job seriously.

      Yes it's backwards and evil and makes no sense and how much stuff you have bolted to your face has no impact on the quality of your work.. but that's the society we live in, and anti-conformity for the sake of anti-conformity gets old.

    27. Re:huh by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Ho

      Who you be callin’ a ho?!

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    28. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly my thought. Mod parent up.

    29. Re:huh by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I agree pretty much entirely, but that last bit "anti-conformity for the sake of anti-conformity gets old" doesn't seem especially applicable; sure, turning up to a bank job wearing a T-shirt that says "fuck capitalism" would be doing it for the sake of it, but wanting to wear jeans and a T-shirt because they're simple, comfortable and (if worn right) can look damn good isn't contrariness, it's a perfectly logical position to take. If nobody complains, illogical rules will never get changed!

      I'd also add that while I fully understand that a business wants to control its customer-facing image, for better or worse, I reserve a special level of disdain for those who: enforce dress code regulations on non-customer-facing staff, enforce entirely arbitrary restrictions that do not affect the overall appearance of the staff, or (most frequently) both.

    30. Re:huh by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      43 pages sounds a bit insane, until you actually look at it. Large print, lots of diagrams, lots of whitespace/formatting not 43 walls of text. It actually looks pretty clean and readable.

      It's actually pretty admirable; and respectful of the people who need to dress the part. There are plenty of business situations where appearance DOES matter, and having a well put together guide helps this.

      It almost reminds me of how Disney World doesn't have employees; it has cast members.

      It also reminds me of how when I used to Google various Oracle issues; I kept coming across articles from a contracting company. They clearly stated on their "employment" page that their employees are expected to wear suits when making on-site calls at banks; but could work in their underwear when telecommuting.

    31. Re:huh by nauvillain · · Score: 1

      Even geeks like myself who cringe when they have to put on a tie tend to expect the people dealing with our savings to look the part..

      I try to make the distinction between looks & competence. I will look for signs of the latter in the person's behavior. Clothing can send a message both ways: an impeccable suit might tell you that the person is tidy and conservative, but it might also tell you that the person spends a good deal of their time looking pretty rather than working for you. You can be competent & tidy and not wear a suit. I hope people aren't basing their decision on how the bank's employees are dressed.

      You might argue that a suit nowadays does not mean anything in a bank, it's a neutral signal to the customers, so they will make their decision based on the products the banks offers. But it remains an unnecessary distinction to me, like wigs, robes, and other traditional types of clothing.

    32. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a sec. Your boss lost his business because he couldn't get a loan and the BANK is the one who is overextended? I think you need a little brush-up on thinking skills.

    33. Re:huh by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Not my boss, thankfully. Perhaps you should ask yours how commercial paper works.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    34. Re:huh by treeves · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I prefer the half Nelson knot.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    35. Re:huh by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      As a former Boy Scout, I was taught a few knots back in the day. It turns out that one of the two knots for a tie is a double half hitch. I don't know if that helps, but thought I would chime in with that.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    36. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your father taught you that? I'm quite jealous. I had to figure out how to buy, wear, and take care of a suit by myself. I even made my tie look halfway decent at the first wedding I went to.

    37. Re:huh by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Personal preference, I hate the Full Windsor. I would have to check out the knots they suggest to see the name of the one I use though. I just find the Full Windsor to be entirely too large for my neck size.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    38. Re:huh by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I suppose from the pictures I tend towards the four-in-hand knot, but would probably not mind the Windsor simple.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    39. Re:huh by digitig · · Score: 1

      Fair point.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    40. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So uh a business whose employees deal with customers on a daily basis in an industry where projecting an image of professionalism is very important has developed a guide to aid their employees? This just sounds like common sense to me.

      43 pages sounds a bit insane, until you actually look at it. Large print, lots of diagrams, lots of whitespace/formatting not 43 walls of text. It actually looks pretty clean and readable.

      Financial institutions are still one of the last places where we expect people to put some effort into their appearance. Even geeks like myself who cringe when they have to put on a tie tend to expect the people dealing with our savings to look the part. If the guy I’m greeted by has a nose ring, I’m out of there. Yay for double standards I guess.

      So how did those bankers in dry cleaned shirts and shoes and flesh colored underwear( eew) work out for ya?

  6. dress for Lady Macbeth by smoothnorman · · Score: 2

    And when opening new accounts for African dictators, "intelligence" groups, mercenaries, drug-lords, and the odd nazi, one should be sure that one's hands are kept lily white.

    1. Re:dress for Lady Macbeth by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      In Florida where the real monsters play the huge accounts are posted by South Americans. They are by far the greatest ethnic group that open accounts in the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars. And no, they are not all drug lords. Many are land barons who have held huge estates ever since Spanish colonial days. That may well mean they are even more vile and evil than the drug lords.
                      Believe it or not young women just out of high school seek jobs in banks so that they can study the holdings of potential fools and get next to and marry them. These young women actually have long running plans on harpooning and harvesting a whale.

    2. Re:dress for Lady Macbeth by Upaut · · Score: 1

      "And when opening new accounts for African dictators, "intelligence" groups, mercenaries, drug-lords, and the odd nazi"

      Actually in the last decade, the war on terror has destroyed the anonymity of Swiss banking. Which despite the Swiss stating they don't want people to use their banks for money laundering or tax evasion, the fact that many who have/had accounts there were doing just that. So being a signatory on an international banking treaty to prevent a terrorist wiring funds around to his pals, it has actually ended the golden age of Swiss banking. And more and more people are withdrawing their funds, leading to a massive downturn in their principle "export". Back in the eighties and before many Swiss banks had a before custom suite, that had their own ability to clear customs and inspect "but not stamp" passports. So you could enter the room, transfer a few bonds, and then be allowed to enter Europe without having your passport stamped. Which if you ever encountered this was a fairly terrifying indication that if you had enough money, you were essentially exempt from needing to declare yourself...

      These days China is the place to be if you are an aspiring lord. There is a reason when you read about all the new scams, the novel Malay 419 the other day, or the house sale without owner consent from months past ended with the funds entering china. They are one of th last place that advertises that the banker is always right. And are large enough to protect that.

      --
      3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  7. Wait, Swiss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean it's in three different languages??

    1. Re:Wait, Swiss? by JockTroll · · Score: 1

      Four. Rumantsch Grischun must be included. You know, James Caviezel speaks it and that's why Aramaic was no problem for him in The Passion.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    2. Re:Wait, Swiss? by treeves · · Score: 1

      I learned something today because of your post. Thanks.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  8. Tell it like it is by GerryHattrick · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Once upon a time, we all knew all this. Then they let grils in, and distractions started. Then they went multinational and USians were Puritans, and Antipodeans were simply cheerful. So - give us the guide, please. Do we have to button our jackets in China? (I didn't and it offended). But... red ties? 'dry clean' shirts? (suits, surely). Let Dilbert advise.

    1. Re:Tell it like it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swiss bankers all up in my grill.

  9. I don't know about any of you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but i tend not to wear garlic or onion-based dishes.

    lady gaga i'm looking at you

  10. Anybody remember the UBS email disclaimer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt this came from the same people who invented the longest email disclaimer.

    Thanks El Reg. for archiving this for posterity.

    This report has been prepared by the division, group, subsidiary or affiliate of UBS AG ("UBS") identified herein. In certain countries UBS AG is referred to as UBS SA, which is a translation of UBS AG, its registered legal name. UBS Warburg is a business group of UBS AG. This report is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law, including the following: This report has no regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. The report is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. The securities described herein may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. The report is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed as being accurate, nor is it a complete statement or summary of the securities, marketsor developments referred to in the report. The report should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgement. Any opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice and UBS is not under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. UBS and/or its directors, officers and employees may have or have had interests or long or short positions in, and may at any time make purchases and/or sales as principal or agent, or UBS may act or have acted as market-maker in the relevant securities or related financial instruments discussed in this report. Furthermore, UBS may have or have had a relationship with or may provide or has provided corporate finance, capital markets and/or other financial services to the relevant companies. Employees of UBS may serve or have served as officers or directors of the relevant companies. UBS may rely on information barriers, such as "Chinese Walls," to control the flow of information contained in one or more areas within UBS, into other areas, units, divisions, groups, or affiliates of UBS.

    Options, derivative products and futures are not suitable for all investors, and trading in these instruments is considered risky. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value, price or income of any security or related instrument mentioned in this report. Clients wishing to effect transactions should contact their local sales representative. UBS accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of all or any part of this report. Additional information will be made available upon request.

    EEA: This report has been issued by UBS Warburg Ltd., regulated in the UK by the Securities and Futures Authority. In the UK this report is for distribution to persons who are not UK private customers. Customers should approach the analyst(s) named on the cover regarding the contents of this report. For investment advice, trade execution or any other queries, customers should contact their London representative. Switzerland: This report is being distributed in Switzerland by UBS AG. Italy: Should persons receiving this research in Italy require additional information or wish to effect transactions in the relevant securities, they should contact either Giubergia UBS Warburg SIM SpA, an associate of UBS SA, in Milan or UBS Warburg (Italia) SIM SpA, a subsidiary of UBS SA, in Milan or its London or Lugano Branch. South Africa: UBS Warburg Securities (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd. (incorporating J.D. Anderson & Co.) is a member of the JSE Securities Exchange SA. United States: This report is being distributed to US persons by either UBS Warburg LLC or by UBS PaineWebber Inc., subsidiaries of UBS AG; or (ii) by a division, group, subsidiary or affili

  11. hmm by tudorl · · Score: 1

    44 pages considering the cover page.

  12. Dilbert by G1369311007 · · Score: 0

    How does someone remember a comic from that long ago?

    --
    "Don't blink. Don't even blink. Blink and you're dead."
    1. Re:Dilbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just knew that if I maintained prefect encyclopedic knowledge of every Dilbert strip ever penned, it would pay off one day.

  13. Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is some old-school Dilbert. In the 90s, when comic outlines were wigglier (cf Dr. Katz), and Alice's hair was less triangular.

  14. Documentation by drumcat · · Score: 1

    We should all aspire to such clean and complete documentation. This is a 5-star effort.

  15. Could be worse... by benjamindees · · Score: 2

    At least they let the French write the dress code instead of the Germans. I'd rather see co-workers wearing black socks with tennis shoes than socks and sandals.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  16. Re:Chances are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right. Clearly they shouldn't even be employing sand niggers - and should beat up any that happen to sneak in to make sure they know that *their* "culture" should be subservient to WHITE PEOPLE. I bet you're a huge hit at the local KKK rallies.

  17. Mad. Ave and Silicon Valley dress codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to leave the proper impression for clients, customers and investors, employees in creative and R&D departments should be careful not to dress like this.

  18. John Lennon: Crippled Inside by wehe · · Score: 1

    John Lennon has made an interesting song about this behaviour: "You can wear a collar and a tie, one thing you can't hide, is when you're crippled inside".

    1. Re:John Lennon: Crippled Inside by JockTroll · · Score: 1

      Blessed be Mark David Chapman.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  19. Did not RTFA, but... by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    In true /. spirit I chose to not actually read the article, but just from Tasha26's synopsis I would tend to agree that one should avoid wearing garlic- or onion-based dishes to work.

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  20. Here's a quick breakdown of the code by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    The following highlights of the booklet are provided courtesy of The Vancouver Sun:

    The list.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Here's a quick breakdown of the code by Geeky · · Score: 1

      WTF does the advice not to wear a tie "not adapted to the morphology of the face" mean?

      Is this a mistranslation? How would I know if my tie was adapted to the morphology of my face?

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    2. Re:Here's a quick breakdown of the code by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      For those who won't want to follow a link:

      Anthracite dark colors, black and dark blue symbolize competence, the formality and seriousness.

      A flawless appearance can provide an inner peace and a sense of security.

      By taking into account the fact that the first impression is a decisive factor, the Dresscode offers today was developed. This underlines the professionalism of our bank.

      -----

      Guidelines

      These guidelines are intended for all employees and PKB compliance is mandatory. Senior executives are required to ensure and monitor compliance and ensure that Dresscode that staff display a neat appearance.

      Guidelines for the Dresscode

      "UBS employees dresscode" is an integral part of the guidelines applicable to all PKB employees.

      Accessories from UBS shall under no circumstances be worn privately.

      Each employee is responsible for good behavior and cleaning his clothes.

      Obsolete UBS Accessories should be destroyed or discarded.

      -----

      The Dresscode for Women:

      Tailor plain or colored pantsuit, Anthracite dark, black or dark blue

      white blouse, preferably a shirt

      Accessories: nicky or scarf

      Closed shoes, black and classic

      Black Belt

      The suit and pantsuit - Dresscode directive:

      The classic business attire united color

      Dark Charcoal, black or dark blue.

      These pieces are very flattering, their cut is light and offer a high level of comfort. The resulting silhouette is elegant, slender and without any feeling of being cramped. The jacket must remain smooth, even when buttoned and should not be tightened. Skirts and pants are (both when seated or standing) to provide sufficient amplitude and be able to replace themselves.

      The perfect skirt length is in the middle of the knee and may go down to two inches below the knee (measured from the middle of the knee).

      Blouse

      Dresscode directive:

      The basic element of our collection of clothing: the plain white shirt with classic collar.

      Tips and Advice

      The blouse is worn generally in the pants or the skirt and indentation should be adapted to the rest of Dress-code (a few inches below the collarbone).

      Wear -colored belo underwear below the white blouses. In addition, we recommend if possible not to conceal the neck. Traces of make-up on collars are bad.

      In general, a blouse is worn with a jacket. When it very hot, and after validation of your superior, you can wear the shirt without a jacket.

      General dresscode directive:

      You are responsible for the proper maintenance and cleaning of your clothes.

      Tips and Advice

      Leave, if possible, your outfit suspended in open air for two days after wearing. The fibers will gain rest and you will prolong the life span of your clothes.

      Pants and skirts should be ironed regularly. Steam and folds pants regularly.

      Be sure to regularly bring your clothes to the dry cleaners so they benefit from a professional cleaning.

      ------

      The Dresscode for Men:

      Two-piece suit of anthracite dark, black or dark blue

      White long sleeve shirt

      Accessories, UBS tie

      Black shoes

      Black Belt

      The shirt

      At the neck, the shirt must be of sufficient magnitude to leave a space of at least one finger... The neck shirts must exceed approximately about 1 to 1.5 centimeter above the jacket collar...

      The tips of the shirt collars must meet the area under the lapel.

      Wearing short-sleeved shirts... is undesirable.

      Ties - Dresscode directive:

      Wearing a tie is absolutely imperative.

      Each time you remove your suit, untie your Tie and hang or wrap it. Give your tie at least one day of rest before reuse so that the fabric and lining can rest.

      Do not wash, nor ever iron your ties yourself.

      -----

      Check your look!

    3. Re:Here's a quick breakdown of the code by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      WTF does the advice not to wear a tie "not adapted to the morphology of the face" mean?

      I have no idea. Don't wear fall colors if you're a winter?

      Is this a mistranslation? How would I know if my tie was adapted to the morphology of my face?

      My wife is in charge of the ties. She pairs 'em with the shirts and pants. I just need to pick out sock and shoes.

      It really does simplify my life. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Here's a quick breakdown of the code by chronosan · · Score: 1

      No bolo ties for fatheads.

    5. Re:Here's a quick breakdown of the code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't wear a big fat knot if you have a tall, thin face. Don't wear a little tiny knot if you have a big round Charlie Brown face. Sheesh, no wonder they have to write guides like this.

  21. obligatory Simpsons by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    "A professional in a gorilla mask is still a professional."

  22. 43 pages by blair1q · · Score: 0

    In French it's 43 pages. Translated to English it fits on a card you can hang from your badge lanyard.

  23. Interesting reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very interesting document on professional appearance.
    I would not like to work in a firm that enforces such a dress code, but it contains some good tips to enhance your professional appearance.

  24. Plain but classy, and balanced by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've seen too many written dress codes where 99% of the don'ts apply only to women. This one is about 50/50 on what's right for both men and women. I like that it shows what's right, it's not just a shopping list of what's wrong. They want a plain but classy look. I could live with it if I worked there.

    Me? I'm showing a bit of cleavage today, and, yes, my bra is showing. If it's going to show anyway, wear a nice one.

    ...laura

    1. Re:Plain but classy, and balanced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Me? I'm showing a bit of cleavage today, and, yes, my bra is showing. If it's going to show anyway, wear a nice one.

      Why tell us if you aren’t going to show us?

    2. Re:Plain but classy, and balanced by Duradin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well men don't really have anywhere near the options women do in most dress codes (and men's clothes generally don't have clevage/cut/hemline issues) so it follows that most of the dress code would be about what the women can and can't do.

    3. Re:Plain but classy, and balanced by Geeky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Me? I'm showing a bit of cleavage today, and, yes, my bra is showing. If it's going to show anyway, wear
      a nice one.

      ...laura

      Pics or it didn't happen ;-)

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    4. Re:Plain but classy, and balanced by airdweller · · Score: 0

      ...and she's gone...

  25. For comparison by blair1q · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The U.S. Army's guide to dressing up right is 362 pages.

    And they have total control of the manufacture and issue of the clothes. They're not suffering all the randomness that the fashion and retail industries insert into civilian clothing choices.

    1. Re:For comparison by iammani · · Score: 1

      It makes sense actually, people running the military are control freaks (not that its a bad thing). People running the banks, not so much (atleast I wouldnt expect them to be).

    2. Re:For comparison by JockTroll · · Score: 3, Informative

      People running the banks in Switzerland ARE in the military. The place has a militia army. Happened to be, once upon a time you couldn't make any career in the banking business if you weren't advancing in the Swiss Army.Things have gone downhill from the moment they stopped to enforce this unwritten rule.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    3. Re:For comparison by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You don't see bank executives as controlling?

      Their entire industry is (or at least was) built on getting strangers to trust them with their money.

      Swiss banks doubly so.

      Frankly I'm surprised that a Swiss bank even needed to write down the rules.

    4. Re:For comparison by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      They're not suffering all the randomness that the fashion and retail industries insert into civilian clothing choices.

      Then how do you explain the Berrets?

    5. Re:For comparison by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, there was a unit known as the Green Berets. They were special. Every woman wanted one, every man wanted to be one.

      Then one of the more envious types grew up to be in charge of designing uniforms, and decided that if the Green Berets were so cool, the Army should spread that cool around to the rest of the enlistees.

      So now everyone has a beret, and looks like a french schoolgirl. Except this dude, who looks totally badass, and would've made a fine Green Beret.

  26. I want to see the money laundering code by h00manist · · Score: 1

    I could care less about the dress code, I want to see the money laundering policy, and the code to detect it.
    But I have a feeling it says something like "Monkey no see, monkey no hear, monkey no say", in elaborate legalese, in 38 separate policies, procedure manuals, and legal/sales dept coordinated recommendations, totaling 4392 pages of policy. They surely have huge conflicts in whose dirty money they see or inform on, and whose they don't.

    --
    Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    1. Re:I want to see the money laundering code by JockTroll · · Score: 1

      You are badly informed. Money laundering these days (and for the last 20 years) is done either through casinos or real estate front-ends.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    2. Re:I want to see the money laundering code by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 2

      Empty restaurants, man.

      This is big vs. small business. No one ever takes small businesses into account when doing national statistics. But your bread-and-butter money laundering scheme in this country is your typical empty mom and pop restaurant.

    3. Re:I want to see the money laundering code by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      In fact, any place where there are empty places and that provide services and that can be paid cash. Ski resorts, hotels/motels, cinema, campgrounds. It's always a win/win: If the place is empty, they can launder a lot of money, if the place is full, they make clean money anyway.

      With all the regulations that the banks are subject to, money laundering can only be done through "smurfing" or structuring, a scheme that involves passing relatively small amounts at a time through many individual's bank accounts, which is much less profitable than owning your motel to launder your money.

    4. Re:I want to see the money laundering code by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Why would they put stuff about foods employees should eat in a document about dress code?

      I mean, unless a significant portion of their employees are klutz's and the color/texture of the foods they mention, when spilled on their clothes clash horribly with said clothing.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re:I want to see the money laundering code by Minwee · · Score: 2

      With all the regulations that the banks are subject to, money laundering can only be done through "smurfing" or structuring [wikipedia.org], a scheme that involves passing relatively small amounts at a time through many individual's bank accounts, which is much less profitable than owning your motel to launder your money.

      I can't believe what a bunch of nerds we are. We're looking up "money laundering" in wikipedia.

    6. Re:I want to see the money laundering code by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I hate to tell you this, but banks do data mining going on to detect smurfing as well. In fact, there's whole software packages dedicated to just such detection.

    7. Re:I want to see the money laundering code by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Avoiding garlic, strong chewing gums, and smoking before meeting clients seems sensible to me. That's all the document refers to. The dress-code is really for representatives of the bank who need to meet with clients. I think I might use it as inspiration for our own new dress-code to-be. (not)

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  27. Re:Chances are by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

    Chances are they will enforce it strictly on everyone except Muslims who insist or wearing a kamize and hajib who will be told "of course wear what you want, our culture is subservient to yours"

    This is not a troll. It is a commentary on the double standards which exist in the UK and other parts of Europe. They have a double standard for driver's license photos and for airport security for muslim women.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  28. Re:Chances are by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Chances are they will enforce it strictly on everyone except Muslims who insist or wearing a kamize and hajib who will be told "of course wear what you want, our culture is subservient to yours"

    This is not a troll. It is a commentary on the double standards which exist in the UK and other parts of Europe. They have a double standard for driver's license photos and for airport security for muslim women.

    If the muslim woman can't take her mask off to have her picture taken, if it covers your face its a mask by any other name, she shouldn't be driving either.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  29. Re:Chances are by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 2

    Chances are they will enforce it strictly on everyone except Muslims who insist or wearing a kamize and hajib who will be told "of course wear what you want, our culture is subservient to yours"

    This is not a troll. It is a commentary on the double standards which exist in the UK and other parts of Europe. They have a double standard for driver's license photos and for airport security for muslim women.

    If the muslim woman can't take her mask off to have her picture taken, if it covers your face its a mask by any other name, she shouldn't be driving either.

    Just holding them to their own standards, can't claim one without the other.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  30. Re:Chances are by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    Chances are they will enforce it strictly on everyone except Muslims who insist or wearing a kamize and hajib who will be told "of course wear what you want, our culture is subservient to yours"

    This is not a troll. It is a commentary on the double standards which exist in the UK and other parts of Europe. They have a double standard for driver's license photos and for airport security for muslim women.

    Correct. Some people are so used to giving way to Islam that they see any suggestion that we should hold Muslims to the same standards as anyone else as "islamaphobic". We ban Santa because more than one Muslim might be offended, but if two non-muslims said they were offended by an "Eid Murnbarak" poster how far do you think that would get. When Muslims set off bombs in our cities the call is not to stop Muslims setting off bombs but not to allow the incident to undermine multiculturalism! Muslims frequently burn bibles but go on the rampage when someone says they will burn the Qur'an - but doesn't!

  31. you want a high class bank to have monkey suit uni by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    you want a high class bank to have monkey suit uniforms? if you want that go to white castle.

  32. Written in French?? by __aayejd672 · · Score: 1

    avoid garlic and onion-based dishes

    Aaaah now I understand

  33. tags: business idle bank dress fashion story by human-cyborg · · Score: 1

    I'm a nerd, and this does not matter to me. Nor is it news. Nor is it that outlandish. I've seen phone bills longer than that, and with far less whitespace and fancy, full-paged graphics introducing each one-page section.

    I don't care that this is idle. I just don't care.

    Seriously, what the hell

  34. Maybe I'm in the minority here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I expect professionals in the business world to dress like professionals...not like your golfing buddy or a streetwalker...unless your golfing buddy also happens to be a streetwalker, but I digress...

  35. Sorry, but... by lexidation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    dress codes are bullshit. Total bullshit. Go to a bank in Italy on a summer's day, for instance. You'll find the clerks are dressed way down from what you'd see in the US. No tie, open shirt collar. And you know what? You won't have any sense that they're "unprofessional". Whatever that means. Ride the train through Switzerland. A conductor with an earring may well greet you. He did me. And he did his work efficiently.

    What I'm saying is that the whole "dress code" is largely US-centric. That's not to say there are no rules of dress -- I've had the pleasure of getting thrown out of a store right off the beach in the South of France for not wearing a shirt. But just as hard-working Europeans still feel justified in demanding 5 weeks of holiday and are less inclined to put in 60-hour weeks, they show up for work dressed neatly but not in the uniform that's demanded of their American counterparts. The thing that's amazing to me is that most people posting here clearly feel the uniform is justified. What do you care if the guy in the bank has a tie on or not? Why should any employer have that kind of power over you?

    1. Re:Sorry, but... by lexidation · · Score: 1

      Oops, I guess this is sort of a new low in not reading TFA. In this case, even the fucking headline. Dress codes are a hot-button issue with me. I do think they're a much bigger deal back in the US than they are here. And even the Swiss -- at least the ones not working for that particular bank -- are less "uniformed" than you'd think. But the post was a bit odd. Mea culpa.

    2. Re:Sorry, but... by tjb · · Score: 1

      Having traveled extensively in Europe, I actually found people dress up much more there than in the US, at least in technical fields. Most engineers I would encounter at various customer sites in Europe would be wearing button down shirts, slacks, and nice shoes. In contrast, back in the US, I usually wear a hoodie, shorts and checkerboard Vans and many other engineers here dress similarly casually.

    3. Re:Sorry, but... by lexidation · · Score: 1

      Interesting perspective. I guess it does differ by occupation quite a bit. I've lived in Europe twenty years. In my own former field, tv news, I remember being blown away by the fact that the most popular TV meteorologist when I arrived had a ponytail halfway down to his waist. Maybe that would fly in the US now, too, but it wouldn't have at any station where I ever worked.

  36. 'don'ts' ? by lullabud · · Score: 1

    What an apostrophical disaster. It's the apostrocalypse!

  37. Page 42 is titled in English! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    The title is "Don't"

    It is French? Go figure. I could not find a page titled "Do" neither.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Page 42 is titled in English! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Francophones in Europe love to use anglicisms in their language.

      It has become part of the vernacular.

      They also love saying "shopping" and "week end", and not because french terms/words do not exist.

      Me: native french speaker of European influence living in french-speaking Quebec (Canada, where the french is different), having worked with french Canadians, the French, Swiss, Belgians, etc.

  38. Only Four-in-Hand, Windsor and DoubleW for ties? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I say chaps. Very good of you to offer instructions for Four-in-Hand, Windsor and Double Windsor for new johnnies who haven't a clue how to tie a tie but really, I am not sure I could work for a company that won't let me choose the far more elegant Prince Albert.

    (to be fair the guide doesn't say other ways of tying a tie are prohibited)

  39. My $$$ by feufeu · · Score: 1
    I, for one don't %&$! care about how the people who manage my money dress themselves, as long as it's something appropriate for public appearance with regards to place (as in country/culture) and common decency (yes, this is variable).

    In fact, every time i see those overdressed goons in their ties and stuff i keep asking myself what they DON'T have and try to cover up with this clownesque outfit.. competence ?

    1. Re:My $$$ by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      I, for one don't %&$! care about how the people who manage my money dress

      You must not have much money. People with a lot on the line tend to be more particular.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    2. Re:My $$$ by feufeu · · Score: 1

      Certainly not an awful lot but still enough to worry about who manages it. Since every time a salesperson in a classy outfit approaches me my BS-o-meter goes near the top of the scale before (s)he has even said a word, i guess i value competence more than appearance but that's just me i suppose.

      It's still nice to see a nicely dressed up female talking her a** off while trying to sell something to me but i pretty well know *why* she's dressed like that and that's not for this special occasion in the first place...

      A good product doesn't need any publicity beyond formal information, not even nekkid chix.

  40. have you ever been to switzerland? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    The swiss love rules. everyplace i went in the interlocken area was loaded with signs telling you what you can't do. They ranged from fairly benign (and obvious) like, "No Euros Accepted", to the mildly inconvenient, "Men, do not urinate standing up."

    Sure, it's a stereotype, but every time i hear about the swiss and their rules i chuckle a little bit. I also think about how incredibly gorgeous Switzerland was and i'd like to go back.

    1. Re:have you ever been to switzerland? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Not much crime in Switzerland because "Im der Schweitz das Crime ist verboten!"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  41. In my religion by Jay+L · · Score: 1

    we traditionally wear onion belts, you insensitive clod!

    (I think I got two or three points there.)

  42. Re:Chances are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  43. Bilingual input by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the presentation and it's utterly reasonable: UBS argues it is imperative for all (public-facing) people to present an impeccable, professional appearance to clients. If anything, it is a return to the dress code policies of the corporate world of yesteryear. For example, the IBM 1980s used to give their male employees precisely one choice as to what to wear, and, in fact, most Japanese companies still do so.

  44. Stupid arrogant people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had all the opportunities in my life to make a career in the corporate world, but I ignored them all from the begining.
    I always knew it was the correct thing, and now I'm more convinced than ever.
    Big egos, ambition, tripping, lying, back stabbing, hypocrisy, betrayal and the list goes on...

    I just hope Assange fulfills his promisse to leak more bombs, so I can see those yuppies carrying their carton boxes out of their office...

    1. Re:Stupid arrogant people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the fuck up and get back to cleaning the toilets!

  45. Maybe it's a response to Citi's problem.... by reedog117 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one has even mentioned the very attractive woman who's suing Citi because she was terminated for "being too much of a distraction for the male employees." And she was wearing normal business formalwear... http://abovethelaw.com/2010/06/woman-claims-she-was-fired-for-being-too-attractive/

  46. Not so bad really...I've been subjected to worse. by skogs · · Score: 1
    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  47. Why dessing professionally is important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who don't understand why it's important for people to dress well to look professional, here are some reasons why:

    1) When you work at your job, you're not here to make a statement. The people who deal with you, whether they are customers, colleagues or your boss, want to know that you are reliable and can do your work seriously. They don't care that you don't want to wear shoes because you're a hippy who wants to feel "close to the Earth", an anarchist who dislikes organization, a rapper who doesn't wear a belt because he doesn't like the police or some Lady Gaga who wants to show how unique she is. The people who deal with you want your clothes to reflect your professional qualities.

    2) Clothes that are intentionally kept dirty or damaged (with holes or ripped parts) do not show an ability to take care of yourself. Someone may think you are lazy or not responsible.
    Clothes that don't match make you look disorganized.
    Clothes that make a statement make you look like you're not focused on your job and your engagement for causes other than your jobs affect your work.
    Clothes that try to make you stand out make you look like you don't want to conform to your role in the company you work in. It's good to be creative, but employees need to do their job or otherwise no work gets done.

    3) I'm sure everyone who wears clothes to make some statement agrees - we should get to know people before judging them, not just look at their clothes. Well, if everyone at work is wearing a suit, you'll have to talk together during lunch break to get to know each other. If people wear what they want, some may be tempted to judge others by their clothing which could even lead to tensions between employees. Get other people to know you by what you have to say, not by the way you dress.

    4) Suits are not cheap. Wearing a suit means you earn a lot of money, which implies that you're good at your job.

    5) Suits are fairly neutral. If any dresscode must be enforced, then suits is something everyone can agree on. I don't think it would be so easy to make all employees adopt spiked hair or pants worn knee-height/thong sticking out the back of your skirt.

    6) Suits identify you. Janitors usually wear a uniform, security wears a uniform... You want to be able to tell who's a banker/lawyer/businessman and who's a customer or visitor as much as possible.

    7) Suits look good, period.

    8) As a famous contemporary philosopher would say, suits are LEGEEEEN- wait for it...

    1. Re:Why dessing professionally is important by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Hmm, you have some interesting points, some of which I agree with, and some of which I don't (or, rather, I just see the situation very differently). So, to go number-by-number with my thoughts---
      1) Working with customers, I can see why you'd want to avoid making certain kinds of "dislike" statements. Making some kinds of "like" statements that don't immediately imply any "dislike" statement, while a slippery slope, still seems a justifiable privelege to me. If you don't work with customers, your clothing should be expected to meet a bare minimum of occupational requirements (and, by that, I don't mean running to join any new safety or professionalism standards, formal or not). If you work with any mildly unsafe reagents in a lab, for example, requiring shoes to not be open-toed seems reasonable to me.
      2) I hate to hop onto semantics here, but if something is intentionally kept in a state that would qualify as "damaged" to an individual not wise to that intention, it isn't actually being "kept damaged." ;) Shoes that are broken-in are far more comfortable than when they are freshly bought, but broken-in shoes are clearly modified to a noticeable (at least to the wearer) degree, by definition.
      Clothing being intentionally kept dirty can be argued similarly but not to as much of an extent. Consider the case of over-washing clothes (bringing eight outfits to work every day and changing each hour, then washing them all every night): their utility is diminished (shorter life before becoming unwearable). I know, it's an extreme example, but some people who make over $200k a year keep extra (super-expensive) business suits in their office to change into during the work-day if they feel any need to change out of slightly-soiled clothing that most people would consider still fit in which to dress themselves in the morning and go to work.
      Which clothes match is a matter of ever-changing fashion. I'd also argue that wearing clothes that don't significantly stand out when contrasted against the clothing of your peers/co-workers is more of a cultural norm than a logical choice; I could argue that, as a customer, being able to distinguish one employee over another is very valuable in a customer-business relationship wherein individual employees of the business are expected to take responsibility for their individual interactions with customers.
      Making a statement on the job when working with customers is generally unhelpful to a business as a whole, though, fairly universally, so I'm agreeing on that.
      3) Sadly, people will always judge one another based on appearance. To some extent, it's hard-wired genetically; beyond that, it's cultural. (If you haven't noticed, I like to attempt to transcend human cultures in my reasoning.) ... I'm going to come back to this, I have thoughts on the rest of your points and would like to finish my reponse to #3 =)

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    2. Re:Why dessing professionally is important by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Continuing my above response---
      3) I think I would have to argue that people will still be judged on their suit; it's not a huge improvement over everyone just wearing clothing that has no printed words nor symbols, so it's not a particularly good reason to prefer suits over "business casual."
      4) I'm uncomfortable with the idea of giving others the impression that I earn a lot of money. How much I earn is my business, not my co-workers', and if I'm buying clothes with my income, I'd prefer ones that I like and have high utility. Suits are not good things to wear when cooking, cleaning, nor gardening, but I can still sit at a computer and work wearing jeans and a t-shirt. Making a lot of money doesn't necessarily signal that you're good at your job; most people would describe it as being lucky enough to get paid well for the work you do, something that is more likely but not definite if you're competent in your field. Seeing someone in a suit to me generally signals that someone wants to appear authoritative or is trying to impress someone else; a poor person can always save up for a long time to buy a suit in order to impress people.
      5) I don't feel suits are fairly neutral. In fact, by your point #4, you are saying they give someone an appearance of competence and wealth. I think you meant that suits are, at the present time in most circles in Europe and the US, viewed as unoffensive outfits in a typical man's wardrobe. I would argue that clothing free of words or symbols should be considered quite unoffensive.
      6) Suits don't make the best uniforms for the very reason that it is not uncommon for a man to go arbitrary places wearing a suit. I know that in the past I have been often classified as an employee by other customers due to my appearance. Nametags/badges with the company name/logo make a better identifier; since they usually can only be seen from the front, some sort of clothing style/color scheme is helpful for customers to recognize potential employees from a distance (which is similar to the point you're making).
      7) Eww, I don't think I look good in a suit. I'm told I do, but I'm far more comfortable with my appearance with all sorts of other outfits.
      8) Haha. Yes, wearing a suit when you're trying to pick up women does tend to get you noticed.

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  48. Simple Solution! by serutan · · Score: 1

    1. Invite the authors of that dress code to visit where I work.
    2. Their heads asplode.
    3. Profit!!

  49. Good diagrams by djlemma · · Score: 1

    They have some very nice diagrams for explaining how to tie a helf / full windsor knot in your tie.

    I actually wouldn't mind an English translation. Seems like a good style guide.

  50. everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should avoid working for this bank!

  51. It bugs me.. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    that a woman can wear a shirt in which you can see everything down to her waiste when she bends over but I get special training to avoid looking and could get a violation and coaching I did.

    I don't mind if they do this. I mind that I would get in trouble for "elevator eyes".

    They would do the same thing if I had a v neck shirt open to 3" above my belly button.

    Hell, I can see the bottom of their bra sometimes when they don't bend over and sometimes don't see the bottom of a bra.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  52. I Find That In General by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    If you dress like the guy in Assassin's Creed, people tend to assume you're important.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  53. Perhaps it's targeted at the guys by azaris · · Score: 1

    I recently opened an account in UBS and I must say, the female staff were all dressed in rather stylish form-fitting pantsuits. In comparison their male counterparts looked decidedly more homely. I wonder if this policy has not been introduced to bring some equality between the sexes.

  54. fashion 'dos' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "to establish fashion 'dos' "

    What is Fashion DOS ? Is it some sort of new operating system? Is it open source?

  55. Re:Chances are by xaxa · · Score: 1

    This is not a troll. It is a commentary on the double standards which exist in the UK and other parts of Europe. They have a double standard for driver's license photos and for airport security for muslim women.

    You're wrong for the UK. See here. In the PDF of examples there's a woman wearing a veil that covers her face, and it's marked "unaccepteble".

  56. There is science behind dress codes ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    To be fair, there are also plenty of people in suits that don't understand why the ripped jeans and t-shirt crowd doesn't think they're cool.

    Doubtful. Today's suits were yesterday 60-70s hippies with long hair and ripped jeans and t-shirts or 70-80s punk rockers with a purple mohawk and ripped jeans and t-shirts. ;-)

    If you think about it for a moment, you will see that it is kind of silly that you're only taken seriously if you tie a strip of cloth around your neck tight enough to slightly restrict blood flow to your brain. Beyond avoiding holes where they shouldn't be and not being offensive, it is all rather arbitrary and even childishly silly.

    Not at all, there is actually science behind the concept of dress codes. Basically the idea is to dress to meet the expectations of the customer, client, potential employer, etc - basically the person you are trying to influence. Non-verbal communication is an important part of building credibility and appearance is part of that communication. Dressing to expectations is just leveraging the workings of the human mind.

    1. Re:There is science behind dress codes ... by sjames · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it is never necessary or that it makes no sense to dress for some situations, just that what is considered correct is largely arbitrary and sometimes silly. It's even counter-practical in some situations.

    2. Re:There is science behind dress codes ... by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Doubtful. Today's suits were yesterday 60-70s hippies with long hair and ripped jeans and t-shirts or 70-80s punk rockers with a purple mohawk and ripped jeans and t-shirts.

      If you think those are the only types of people who existed on the planet in the last 40 years, then you should try to find a source of cultural information other than the internet.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    3. Re:There is science behind dress codes ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Doubtful. Today's suits were yesterday 60-70s hippies with long hair and ripped jeans and t-shirts or 70-80s punk rockers with a purple mohawk and ripped jeans and t-shirts. ;-)

      If you think those are the only types of people who existed on the planet in the last 40 years, then you should try to find a source of cultural information other than the internet.

      Let me draw your attention to the " ;-)" that follows the statement. Also having lived through those eras I can state that there is some truth behind the joke. I feel it would be safe to say that some of tomorrows suits will have "healed up" piercing holes that have closed and some erased tattoos underneath their button down shirts and ties.

  57. http://benchmark-lending-group.blogspot.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feel free to visit my site.
    http://benchmark-lending-group.blogspot.com/
    Merry Christmas.
    Chears.

  58. I don't see a problem... by re_organeyes · · Score: 0

    With a dress code. There are some people in this world that shouldn't be wearing the clothes they're wearing. We've all seen them. Regardless of what you look like physically (read as naked), with the proper clothing, anyone can become a real looker. UBS, being the type of company it is, expects their people to dress professionally so they attract "professional customers" (read into that what you will). I would certainly hope they pay their employees enough to keep a nice wardrobe, the type of clothes they want you to wear, you won't be buying at Walmart.

    In the long run, if the money is right, it's only part of your life. Just think, when you get home, you can dress up in the spouse's clothing and go have a blast....or not.

  59. so what's the news? by Kvasio · · Score: 1

    E&Y, PWC, Arse-enter and many more global companies also have such lengthy and strict documents describing with precision styles and shades of suites, shirts, skirts, stockings, shoes....

    1. Re:so what's the news? by Peil · · Score: 1

      I work for EY in the UK and the dress code is smart casual (whatever the hell that means)
      Most of us just go shirt & suit, or shirt & chino type trousers.

  60. Here's why you'd have such a thing in the US... by lemur666 · · Score: 1

    ... If you have exceedingly long dress code standard (and because it is so long it allows for quite a lot of leeway in terms of what you actually can wear) then what you wear to work effectively becomes a uniform.

    Uniforms purchased for work are tax deductible.

    Just sayin'

    --
    Corollary to Hanlon's razor: Any significantly advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.
    1. Re:Here's why you'd have such a thing in the US... by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live. I know in some states uniforms are only tax deductable if they have the company logo on them.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  61. Re:Only Four-in-Hand, Windsor and DoubleW for ties by Kvasio · · Score: 1

    so you're exposing your Prince Albert at work?
    What do you do for life? Test porn?

  62. Casual Fridays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for an investment bank, that had Casual Fridays, and in most cases the dress down was adopted by all very well.....till one day someone wore a French Connection T-Shirt to the office with the "FCUK" logo in six inch letters on the front....the office setup meant that client meetings were all around the building, so everyone need to be presentable all the time...and this put an end to Casual Friday's.....

  63. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have all seen AC naked. It is Goatse.

  64. Dress Codes by khr · · Score: 2

    The first company I worked for was a small software company and the dress code only listed what the men could and couldn't wear (shirts & ties every day, no jeans, the only loophole I could find was no mention of shoes, so I wore my Converse high tops with my suit...). I asked the boss how come it was only for men and since there was only one woman working there he said "Angie already knows how to dress."

    Our boss, who enforced the dress code in the office spent two to three weeks a month at our biggest client's office out of state. The client had casual Fridays and the boss would tell us on the phone how nice it was not to dress up every day while he was there, but still wouldn't relent and let us dress casual on Fridays in our own office.

    The dress code was based on the philosophy "you have to dress like an accounting to write accounting software." The next company where I worked the accounting department mostly came to work in tie dye and Birkenstock sandals, and according to someone, were out smoking dope in the parking lot during their lunch breaks...

  65. i m glad that i m IT ppl..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahahhaha..........
    'dress code' never means the same thing for IT..........

  66. I couldn't possibly comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The bank in question has several different dress codes for different staff in different locations. I don't think there is a single global dress code. Certainly the "leaked" dress code applies to many fewer people than the various news reports might lead you to believe.

    The code in question is for reception and event staff and chaffeurs/chaffeuses, not for your average trader, back office guy or IT support tech. It was drawn up specially in conjunction with a bank branch renovation programme and refers, in part, to company-provided business wear.

    Notwithstanding the above, the document is very detailed and has some excellent advice for the aspiring corporate clone, especially the slightly smellier just-out-of-college kind. The pictures and presentation style are a hoot as well.

  67. lol? by shnull · · Score: 0

    lol ! (really ... lol) (no, really ... lol, who the fuck works for a company with a dress code ...? isn't that where all the shit starts ?)

    --
    beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)
  68. Re:Clip-on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Law enforcement here requires clip-on ties so that criminals can't strangle officers with them. If bank robberies were more prevalent, I'd expect the financial sector to take the same precautions.

    Also, perhaps the bank requires all its male employees to use a double-Windsor so the handbook of instructions state how to properly execute that particular knot.

  69. Re:Chances are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kamize, hajib, burka, if it covers your face, its a mask.