Slashdot Mirror


Doctor Marries Doctor's Daughter, TARDIS Explodes

techmuse writes "In a veritable Who's Who of Doctor Who, 10th Doctor David Tennant is marrying Georgia Moffett, the daughter of 5th Doctor Peter Davison, who played the Doctor's daughter in an episode of Doctor Who. Except that the Doctor's daughter was a clone of the Doctor, which meant that she really was Who. So a newer Doctor is marrying an older Doctor's daughter, who is a clone of the newer doctor, but only has half the DNA of the older Doctor."

326 comments

  1. Idle? by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 0

    Why isn't this in Idle?

    1. Re:Idle? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doctor Marries Doctor's Daughter, TARDIS Explodes

      I think the misspelled "head", and I'm sure they misspelled "asplode".

    2. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why isn't this in Idle?

      Okay normally I would agree 100%... but I've never seen a story on Slashdot that better qualifies as 'News for Nerds', and I was here for the Lone Gunmen fiasco.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Idle? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Because it's in Entertainment instead, since it's... about actors?

    4. Re:Idle? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      You say fiasco, I say popcorn tummy ache.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:Idle? by TDyl · · Score: 2

      Frohike in Lederhosen? One of the best episodes of any series I've watched.

      --
      Todd: I hope it proves as delicious as the farmers that grew them
    6. Re:Idle? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Just wait until Emma Watson hooks up with Matt Smith or Karen Gillian.

      Then you'll see some fan head asplody.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    7. Re:Idle? by mug+funky · · Score: 2

      i'll take the latter please...

    8. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 2

      This is nothing more than celebrity gossip. If such things are ok for shows that we like, then geeks are no better than the unwashed masses we so love to denigrate. Course, I believe that's always been the case.

    9. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      This is nothing more than celebrity gossip.

      The coincidences surrounding it are amusing. Of course you have to be nerdy enough to appreciate them. (ahhh... nerdy smugness!)

      If such things are ok for shows that we like, then geeks are no better than the unwashed masses we so love to denigrate...

      We're already no better than the people we criticize. Actually we're worse. It was geeks that invented the terms 'flame war' and 'fan boy'. Go look up "FIBRIR".

      You've picked a pretty useless argument against this story being here, but I'll give you credit for referring to something the Doctor says ad-nauseum.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      You've picked a pretty useless argument against this story being here, but I'll give you credit for referring to something the Doctor says ad-nauseum.

      It's not so much me arguing, but being baffled how a group who's so against following celebrity lives either think this is kewl, or are remaining silent about the news story. Like I kind of hinted at in my previous post, I don't really mind the gossip, I just having trouble understanding why people enjoy it.

      And just to note, I don't watch Doctor Who. After watching some of the new episodes, I felt it was too campy.

    11. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      It's not so much me arguing, but being baffled how a group who's so against following celebrity lives either think this is kewl, or are remaining silent about the news story.

      It's not baffling at all, the coincidences surrounding it are fun in a nerdy sort of way.

      And just to note, I don't watch Doctor Who. After watching some of the new episodes, I felt it was too campy.

      Well gee shit, no wonder you don't get it. You should be asking questions instead of making statements.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      It's not baffling at all, the coincidences surrounding it are fun in a nerdy sort of way.

      So you've already said. And though I don't get it, I not disputing it. Well, at least the fun part. I'm not seeing how it's nerdy. I'm sure no one here would claim it's nerdy to know two actors from any other genre are getting married after all. Perhaps this is a case where anything linked to a sci-fi show gives it a hint of nerdiness.

      Well gee shit, no wonder you don't get it. You should be asking questions instead of making statements.

      What would I have gotten had I liked Dr. Who? The aforementioned gossiping about celebrities is cool if I like the actor/show mindset? I didn't care when I learned two actors in "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" (Alexander Siddig and Nana Visitor) were married. I understand being interested in celebrity lives when it affects the show (like when Visitor was pregnant), but the allure of just talking about their lives still eludes me. And I believe I'll continue to remain ignorant on this topic. But thanks for trying to enlighten me.

    13. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      What would I have gotten had I liked Dr. Who? ... And I believe I'll continue to remain ignorant on this topic. But thanks for trying to enlighten me.

      The sad thing is that it took you this long to ask the right question to cure you of your ignorance, then you said you didn't want to de-ignorantify yourself. I don't really get this. I mean, you're confused about something, so instead of asking questions about it, you'd rather whinge about it then defend your decision to remain ignorant. Why is this? Are you trying to look smart? Is it because you think the original point should be defended and you don't want to take the time to consider that maybe you joined the wrong side of it? Am I just way off the mark, here?

      I didn't care when I learned two actors in "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" (Alexander Siddig and Nana Visitor) were married.

      That also story didn't (and wouldn't have) make it to Slashdot.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:Idle? by tzot · · Score: 1

      No, celebrity gossip would be that Mila Kunis intended to go on vacation with Macauley Caulkin but she absent-mindedly left him back (and even that would hide a minor geek-friendly joke).

      You see, the summarized issue here is: "Except that the Doctor's daughter was a clone of the Doctor, which meant that she really was Who. So a newer Doctor is marrying an older Doctor's daughter, who is a clone of the newer doctor, but only has half the DNA of the older Doctor", which is very geek-worthy news.

      Unless you don't see, of course.

      --
      I speak England very best
    15. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that it took you this long to ask the right question to cure you of your ignorance, then you said you didn't want to de-ignorantify yourself. I don't really get this. I mean, you're confused about something, so instead of asking questions about it, you'd rather whinge about it then defend your decision to remain ignorant. Why is this? Are you trying to look smart? Is it because you think the original point should be defended and you don't want to take the time to consider that maybe you joined the wrong side of it? Am I just way off the mark, here?

      My original post stated this piece is celebrity gossip which you haven't disagreed with. I also noted geeks are ultimately no better or worse than the so called "unwashed masses" which you also agree with. Where pray tell did I whine? What on earth is so important about understanding the desire for celebrity gossip, that you should care whether or not I remain ignorant? And since you think the question "what if I liked Dr. Who" is so important. Tell me, what if I liked it? You certainly chastised me enough for not asking it.

      Also, there's no right or wrong to something as trivial as: "is this a kewl/interesting topic."

      That also story didn't (and wouldn't have) make it to Slashdot.

      I mentioned it to note I'm well aware of fandom's desire to talk about their stars. That's the only reason I can think of for why my opinion of Dr. Who would be a factor in this.

    16. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      So, the thing that makes this beyond celebrity gossip is the coincidence? I assume then if "slutty amnesiac" #124 and "hunky guy with issues (who's the slut's secret grandfather)" #167 from some random soap opera got together in real life, then this would also elevate it from celebrity gossip?

    17. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      My original post stated this piece is celebrity gossip which you haven't disagreed with.

      Uh yes I did. I disagreed twice. You said 'just celebrity gossip'.

      Where pray tell did I whine?

      Right at the spot you had just pointed out. The whole bit about geeks and the unwashed masses was an attempt to encourage the point that this story shouldn't have been front page.

      What on earth is so important about understanding the desire for celebrity gossip, that you should care whether or not I remain ignorant?

      Because it's not about a desire for celebrity gossip.

      You certainly chastised me enough for not asking it.

      I 'chastised' you because in the same post you wanted to remain ignorant. You clearly didn't want the answer to that question, you were using it to make your point about how you didn't care. So tell me, are you truly interested in understanding it or are you just trying to be defeat me in debate, here?

      I mentioned it to note I'm well aware of fandom's desire to talk about their stars.

      Sure, and it still worked against your point. The 'nerds' obviously don't care about the goings on of celebrity lives.

      Let me know when you actually want to understand. And I really mean 'want to understand' not 'get me to write more you can attempt to argue with'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    18. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      It's not baffling at all, the coincidences surrounding it are fun in a nerdy sort of way.

      Ah, you mean the part about how "coincidences surrounding it are fun in a nerdy sort of way?" Why do you think people like gossip? Because there are cool coincidences is just one of the many reasons. Why do you think celebrities who work together (or worked in the same show) and date/marry are so much juicer than two random celebrities dating? Figured you agreed with me on that part. Well, least I know why you're pissed.

      Right at the spot you had just pointed out. The whole bit about geeks and the unwashed masses was an attempt to encourage the point that this story shouldn't have been front page.

      And how is a difference in opinion whining? Did I use a shrill tone of voice? Did I needlessly insult anyone? For the record, I also consider myself a geek, so the geeks are very much alike to unwashed masses was also directed at me. And I certainly wouldn't consider "geeks are more normal than we might admit" to be insulting. For me, it was more of an epiphany/rude awakening combo.

      I 'chastised' you because in the same post you wanted to remain ignorant.

      I added that line because when folks start repeating themselves it's generally time to end the discussion by agreeing to disagree.

      Sure, and it still worked against your point. The 'nerds' obviously don't care about the goings on of celebrity lives.

      Let me know when you actually want to understand. And I really mean 'want to understand' not 'get me to write more you can attempt to argue with'.

      This goes back to the original misunderstanding/disagreement which I covered above. We can start debating it, or end this discussion, which honestly is getting a tad too heated for such a trivial topic. I leave it up to you.

      Incidentally, I find life is a bit easier if one doesn't automatically assume the person they're talking to is attacking them. Better to ask for clarification first. It's just a thought.

    19. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Why do you think celebrities who work together (or worked in the same show) and date/marry are so much juicer than two random celebrities dating?

      I dunno, never got into gossip. Whatever the reason, it doesn't explain why this story made the front page but Nana Visitor getting married didn't.

      Well, least I know why you're pissed.

      Nah, not pissed. Just have a little extra time due to rendering combined with general bafflement of why you're so stuck on it. Oh.. I suppose there's some annoyance in there, too. I mean, I've explained myself 3 times and you still keep boiling it down to 'celebrity gossip'. 'Heated' and 'pissed' do not accurately reflect my intended tone.

      And how is a difference in opinion whining?

      Because the whole point of the thread is that this story shouldn't have been visible.

      I added that line because when folks start repeating themselves it's generally time to end the discussion by agreeing to disagree.

      I think you added it because you weren't interested in being proven wrong. I mean, really, your responses do not add up to 'agree to disagree'.

      We can start debating it, or end this discussion ... I leave it up to you.

      Ah yes, the old "I leave it up to you" debate tactic that conveniently leaves out the option of 'discussion'. Sorry, no, not my responsibility. I already offered to explain.

      Incidentally, I find life is a bit easier if one doesn't automatically assume the person they're talking to is attacking them. Better to ask for clarification first. It's just a thought.

      Ah, while we're trading tips and tricks I've picked up when talking to other people: Are people acting insanely? They have a non-sensical opinion? Are they repeating themselves over and over again? Ask questions. Try reading their post and seeing if you missed the point of what they're saying. If you take a little time to understand why their behaving in such an odd way, you may discover that they're not crazy at all! Remember back in the olden days when you first started turning into a nerd... you were inquisitive and had a desire to learn? Start nurturing that desire again. The world won't seem so wacky, you'll grow as a person, and you won't go around the bush over and over again because you're too thick to understand a critical bit of nuance.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    20. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Because the whole point of the thread is that this story shouldn't have been visible.

      And again what pray tell is so terrible about believing that? Not every negative comment is whining ya know. What, does the fact that I don't find much value in this little joke that bothersome?

      I think you added it because you weren't interested in being proven wrong. I mean, really, your responses do not add up to 'agree to disagree'.

      What do you think agree to disagree is? It's I totally don't agree with your viewpoint, but I don't feel like debating it for whatever reason.

      Ah yes, the old "I leave it up to you" debate tactic that conveniently leaves out the option of 'discussion'. Sorry, no, not my responsibility. I already offered to explain.

      What? I've responded to everything you've written so far. I've no problem continuing this little chat. I wrote that because the discussion was heading into a talk about what makes up celebrity gossip. An even more pointless and inane topic that I wasn't not sure you (or I for that matter) wanted to spend time talking about. What was it you said about asking questions, and rereading things? Physician, heal thyself...

    21. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      What, does the fact that I don't find much value in this little joke that bothersome?

      What's bothersome? Attributing it to the wrong reason... with a dash of elitism thrown in. There's also the "I don't wanna keep this going but every period I use is intended to keep it aflame" debate tactic. But, also, there's the entertainment value of going around the drain over and over again but pushing your head above water a bit and claiming you're on higher ground. It's a laugh.

      It's I totally don't agree with your viewpoint, but I don't feel like debating it for whatever reason.

      Really? You're asking this? Blimey. Look, it's real simple: "I respect your point, can't say I can hop aboard it." As opposed to: "I demonstratably don't understand your point, but you're wrong, so we agree to disagree so I can get the last word in."

      What? I've responded to everything you've written so far.

      With the intention of 'winning', sure. There's more I could put here, you'll find it scattered amongst my previous comments. Keyword: "question".

      What was it you said about asking questions, and rereading things? Physician, heal thyself...

      Oh look, your (in)actions are my fault again. Heh. Good thing ol' Doc Zimmerman gave your comment a little added ammo for dramatic effect, mm?

      So here's a summary of where you still are: Slashdot should have had a story about Doctor Who hidden away in the Idle section because it is purely celebrity gossip and you are sure of this even though you don't watch the show and Slashdot hasn't covered anything like this before so it must be as simple as you've stated it and it's all happening through a fault of mine.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    22. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1
      Sigh... if you wanna assume that I'm doing this to prove I'm the bigger "man," go right ahead. I'm doing this because you've misinterpreted a lot of what I wrote. A bit neurotic perhaps, but that's another topic. Frankly, I'd say you're being a pessimistic ass. Telling me what how I'm being elitist and insulting while ignoring me explaining there are other ways to interpret what I wrote? That I don't want, or intend to attack you, passively or otherwise? But whatever. If you MUST feel persecuted.

      Really? You're asking this? Blimey. Look, it's real simple: "I respect your point, can't say I can hop aboard it." As opposed to: "I demonstratably don't understand your point, but you're wrong, so we agree to disagree so I can get the last word in."

      What the hell did I write that made you think I meant disagreeing w/o understanding the other person?

      I totally don't agree with your viewpoint, but I don't feel like debating it for whatever reason.

      See the word "viewpoint" there? Yea, to know that ya kind of have to know the other persons POV. And yes, I understand your POV. Two celebrities are getting married, their characters in a sense played the same person, so there's a myriad of jokes. Hardy har har. Least that's all you said on that topic so far. I already responded to that.

      Finally, yes the fact that you insisted on reading everything I write in a negative light is your fault. I've hurled no insults at you. Everything you have against me, you insinuated because apparently misunderstanding someone and continuing an inane conversation equals I disrespect you, or something.

    23. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Finally, yes the fact that you insisted on reading everything I write in a negative light is your fault. I've hurled no insults at you.

      Uh, no. First there's the bit about the unwashed masses. Since I found the story amusing, that includes me. Then there's the continual oversimplification of what it is, then intentionally dodging any understanding of it. Then there's the attempt to darken my character to distract from your own behaviour. Etc, etc, etc.

      Not my fault.

      Anyway, getting past all that...

      I'm doing this because you've misinterpreted a lot of what I wrote.

      Okay. What did I misinterpret?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    24. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1
      Well, I'll do one. You believe my unwashed masses comment was an insult. To quote myself:

      "If such things are ok for shows that we like, then geeks are no better than the unwashed masses we so love to denigrate. Course, I believe that's always been the case."

      First off, I assumed you, me, and slashdot in general are geeks. There's a reason I used "we" in the post. Also, Dr. Who is generally seen as a geeky show. The "unwashed masses" geeks love to denigrate (at least on /.) are folks who like things popularly viewed as "dumb" like reality TV. Another possibility are folks who are not computer savvy.

      Then I say we're no better than the unwashed masses. The possibilities here are I'm either insulting both geeks, and everyone else (by saying we're both unwashed masses). Or, I'm saying unwashed masses are better than some give credit for (by saying geeks are not so special compared to them). Since I'd be insulting myself if I meant the former, I assumed people would think I meant the latter. But yes, I should spell things out more clearly next time.

      Then there's the continual oversimplification of what it is, then intentionally dodging any understanding of it.

      So, this slashdot article is more meaningful than two actors simply making a funny couple due to the characters they played? Then please, spell it out. You've been dancing around this topic choosing instead to constantly insist I just don't understand.

    25. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      So, this slashdot article is more meaningful than two actors simply making a funny couple due to the characters they played?

      Yup.

      Then please, spell it out. You've been dancing around this topic choosing instead to constantly insist I just don't understand.

      Ah... again I am to blame for your behaviour. Like I said before, I'm just waiting for you to ask so we can have a discussion and not a debate. It's a bit hard to do that when the tone you're putting forward is "I'm unconvinced no matter what you say."

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    26. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Ah... again I am to blame for your behaviour. Like I said before, I'm just waiting for you to ask so we can have a discussion and not a debate. It's a bit hard to do that when the tone you're putting forward is "I'm unconvinced no matter what you say."

      You do note that I asked you to explain in the previous post yes? Somehow me asking you to not dance around the topic makes you... not want to tell me, aka. dance around the topic? Anywho, to my recollection, all you've said to me to explain your position is:

      "The coincidences surrounding it are amusing. Of course you have to be nerdy enough to appreciate them. (ahhh... nerdy smugness!)"

      and

      "It's not baffling at all, the coincidences surrounding it are fun in a nerdy sort of way."

      Perhaps I missed something. Please tell me what. Also, what makes you think I want a serious clash of mind and will for a topic like this? Yes, I want a discussion. A casual one to boot.

    27. Re:Idle? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I missed something. Please tell me what. Also, what makes you think I want a serious clash of mind and will for a topic like this? Yes, I want a discussion. A casual one to boot.

      Thank you. Seriously, this is what I wanted. See how there aren't any potshots at me in there? I really don't want to argue. All I do want is to be understood. That's not. Not right, not agreed with, simply understood.

      Okay, done preaching. I'll explain this to you by writing to you the thoughts in my head as I read the article:

      In a veritable Who's Who of Doctor Who, 10th Doctor David Tennant is marrying Georgia Moffett...

      BFD.

      "...the daughter of 5th Doctor Peter Davison..."

      Heh. Weird... not long ago Peter Davison was in a Children in Need short... Hah I bet that's related to it! Dang, he was a neat guy. Haha I bet Doctor #5 wouldn't have found her attractive at all, he seemed more impressed with chicks that could fly the Tardis!

      "...who played the Doctor's daughter in an episode of Doctor Who."

      Wait.. what... really? When did that happen? The only one I can think of is back in the 60's...

      "Except that the Doctor's daughter was a clone of the Doctor, which meant that she really was Who."

      Oh... right... that dumbshit episode. Haha that's funny tho... she's the Doctor's daughter and also the Doctor's Daughter! But not really.. it's like we have a daughter and no daughter... Oh, hey, maybe I can score a +3 Funny by making a HitchHiker's reference!

      " So a newer Doctor is marrying an older Doctor's daughter, who is a clone of the newer doctor, but only has half the DNA of the older Doctor"

      Wow... We should all thank Russel Davies for kicking off events in such a way that this sentence would actually have been uttered. Good thing my fanboyish knowledge of the show made this sentence understandable... barely.

      So how's this different from other celebrity gossip? For starters.... well really, that last line doesn't utterly cover it? Seriously, you really need to be a Doctor Who nerd to fully appreciate what was said there. That bit with Nana Visitor, you wouldn't need to explain nothin. She got pregnant and they worked it into the show. You can't explain the significance of "The Doctor's Daughter" without losing people's interest by getting into the details to make it an accurate statement. Even if you explain it, you're still missing the Doctor's reaction to her throughout the entire episode. I'll give you an idea, he named her "Jen".. short for "Genetic clone". That's how legitimately he thought of her.

      Like I said, you'll notice the lack of other stories like this on Slashdot. It's all about the last line.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    28. Re:Idle? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Thanks for elaborating your POV. Though I do note I already knew all that. The reason I kept things short and said "fun couple" is because it was already obvious why the fans think they are a fun couple. You've watched the episodes so the summary could be parsed, and got an extra kick of humor. Happens all the time in fandom. Though the coincidence is unique I guess. I understood the summary thanks to watching a whole lot of other sci-fi, and knowing about the Doctor's clone/daughter, but yea wasn't as interested.

    29. Re:Idle? by tzot · · Score: 1

      Your typical random soap opera has no time-travelling paradoxes, and the typical DNA related questions in soap operas is "who's the father?", not "who's not the same person in this marriage?" so the answer to both your questions is "no". There's already a BadAnalogyGuy username here, so you might consider taking a TotallyUnfortunateAnalogyGuy username for you. Try cars next time.

      Even if you understood what almost everyone found funny and geek-worthy news, you're obviously way past the point of admitting it, and my answer here won't help either.

      --
      I speak England very best
  2. Doctor, doctor by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doctor, doctor, give me the news. I got a bad case of lovin'... who?

    1. Re:Doctor, doctor by WED+Fan · · Score: 0

      Boom chicka wow wow.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    2. Re:Doctor, doctor by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I'm staring to think that the plot line developed by Heinlein with Methuselah's Children is coming full circle.

    3. Re:Doctor, doctor by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      Marty McFly: Wait a minute, Doc, are you trying to tell me that my mother has got the hots for me?

    4. Re:Doctor, doctor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brown Chicken Brown Cow!!!

    5. Re:Doctor, doctor by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      Dr. Imhaus: Doctor.
      Austin Millbarge: Doctor.
      Dr. Imhaus: Doctor.
      Emmett Fitz-Hume: Doctor.
      [Imhaus exits]
      Dr. Marston: Doctor.
      Austin Millbarge: Doctor.
      Dr. Marston: Doctor.
      Emmett Fitz-Hume: Doctor.
      [Marston exits]
      Karen Boyer: Doctor.
      Austin Millbarge: Doctor.
      Karen Boyer: Doctor.
      Emmett Fitz-Hume: [amorously] Doctor!
      [Boyer exits]
      Jerry Hadley: Doctor.
      Austin Millbarge: Doctor.
      Jerry Hadley: Doctor.
      Emmett Fitz-Hume: Doctor.
      [Hadley exits]
      Austin Millbarge: We're not doctors!

      -later-

      Bob Hope: Ah! Mind if I play through. (Hits his golf ball) Doctor.. Doctor.. I'm glad I'm not sick.

      --
      mod me funny
    6. Re:Doctor, doctor by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      So if the doctor's (clone) daughter marries the doctor (doctor), will the doctor and doctor daughter's (doctor) son do as the doctor does?

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    7. Re:Doctor, doctor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full Circle was the serial featuring Tom Baker (Dr. 4) that introduced Adric (Matthew Waterhouse) a.k.a the "Wesley Crusher" of Dr. Who.
       

    8. Re:Doctor, doctor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of a couple of songs....

      I'm my own grandpa.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_My_Own_Grandpa
      Or
      Who made Who.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Made_Who

    9. Re:Doctor, doctor by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

      God I cant wait to see their offspring. Im thinking more Slitheen than The Rani

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    10. Re:Doctor, doctor by MrSenile · · Score: 0

      Damnit Jim! I'm a doctor, not a casanova... er...uh... huh.

    11. Re:Doctor, doctor by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Doctor, doctor, give me the news. I got a bad case of lovin'... who?

      OK, put the lime in the coconut, and drink 'em both up...

    12. Re:Doctor, doctor by Froggie · · Score: 1

      Hardly fair. There's a slight chance someone actually liked Wesley.

    13. Re:Doctor, doctor by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think that All you zombies from the same author fits better.

    14. Re:Doctor, doctor by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      God I cant wait to see their offspring. Im thinking more Slitheen than The Rani

      Maybe, but I hope they don't have the christening on Raxacoricofallapatorius. The RSVP cards are too damn small.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    15. Re:Doctor, doctor by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      that episode where Adric dies was one of the better ones.

    16. Re:Doctor, doctor by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1

      So if the doctor's (clone) daughter marries the doctor (doctor), will the doctor and doctor daughter's (doctor) son do as the doctor does?

      Or will they play doctor?

    17. Re:Doctor, doctor by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I agree. Being your own mother and father is definitely closer to this.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    18. Re:Doctor, doctor by evilandi · · Score: 1

      Oi! I loved Adric. He was a bored adolescent, who thought he was much cleverer than he actually was, with a haircut by his mum. And so was I at the time.

      Adric was my hero.

      (I liked Turlough too, though, so I realise my opinion doesn't carry much weight).

      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    19. Re:Doctor, doctor by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Full Circle was the serial featuring Tom Baker (Dr. 4) that introduced Adric (Matthew Waterhouse) a.k.a the "Wesley Crusher" of Dr. Who.

      I'm still pretty new to that era of the show - and I haven't watched all the 5th doctor episodes - but what's so bad about Adric? I never got the impression that he was a "Mary Sue" character in the vein of Wesley's more obnoxious moments - he was just one of the companions who was actually good at something instead of just being the one who gets captured all the time. Just the 1980s male counterpart of Zoe, basically.

      Certainly on the "annoying" scale I don't think Adric comes anywhere close to Peri - who was fabulous eye candy, of course, but still, she'd always be whining away in that fake American accent... And then on the one hand it'd feel great that the Sixth Doctor would yell at her for it, but on the other hand it'd mean she'd whine some more about having been yelled at...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    20. Re:Doctor, doctor by tzot · · Score: 1

      > Doctor, doctor, give me the news. I got a bad case of lovin'... who?

      Exactly.

      --
      I speak England very best
  3. HHGTTG Connection as well... by decipher_saint · · Score: 5, Informative

    She's also the daughter of Trillian

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Modding "informative" because there's no "even weirder" in the drop-down.

    2. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      universe implodes in 3, 2, 1, ...

    3. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, if we're going to get HHGTTG involved, then might as well mention that Douglas Adams introduced Lalla Ward (Romana II - my personal favorite Doctor Who companion of all time) to her husband Richard Dawkins (!!) ... I don't normally pay attention to the gossip of off-screen lives of actors, but there is something about that combination of fiercely intelligent names that just geeks me out.

    4. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by ADRA · · Score: 1

      I agree with basically everything but I still liked Jo Grant better, though Romana II would be in my top 5.

      --
      Bye!
    5. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by Triv · · Score: 1

      That would be Trillian from the TV serial, not Trillian from the original radio serial which, for Peter Davison, must've been a shame - I'd take the latter's voice over the former's everything else, any day.

    6. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by meloneg · · Score: 1

      Then you might as well mention that DNA also wrote several Dr Who episodes.

    7. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by tokul · · Score: 1

      She's also the daughter of Trillian

      Good to know that I am not that old. For me Trillian is associated not with Sandra Dickinson.

    8. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by nevillethedevil · · Score: 3, Informative

      Plus it's much easier to find naked pictures of Jo Grant.

      --
      Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
    9. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      And that would also be the Lalla Ward who was married to 4th Doctor Tom Baker. Which I think means she'll be her own ex-mother in law?

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    10. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      If we are jumping SciFi, she is also the daughter of a cow that wants to be eaten. It was her old man in the prosthetics. My I recommend my rump?

    11. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by drewness · · Score: 1

      Then you might as well mention that DNA also wrote several Dr Who episodes.

      Yeah, well, he was also the script editor for the tail-end of season 16 and all of season 17 (1979). In modern terms would be called the show runner, ike Russell T. Davies for new Who seasons 1-4.5 or Stephen Moffat currently.

    12. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but she was also an alternate Tricia McMillan in the extended radio serial, the version of the character that didn't go off with Zaphod.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    13. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Plus, the 3rd HHGTTG book Life, the Universe and Everything started life as Dr Who and the Krikkitmen, the time-travelling Cambridge don in Dirk Gently was from a Who story which was scrapped due to a strike and the exploding spaceship at the end of Dirk Gently was a lift from City of Death.

      Oh, and just to really confuse things, Doctor #10 implied that he had met Arthur Dent, somehow.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    14. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that he was listed as the writer for only one episode, but that he was involved with the editing staff for some time during the Tom Baker years.

    15. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 0

      Was a Random connection.

      --
      Responsibility is an addiction
      Virtue is a temptation
      Community is a cartel
    16. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      you just blew my mind

    17. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if we're going to get HHGTTG involved, then might as well mention that Douglas Adams introduced Lalla Ward (Romana II - my personal favorite Doctor Who companion of all time) to her husband Richard Dawkins (!!) ...

      Waitaminnit... Lalla didn't know who the guy she was married to?

    18. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by snerdy · · Score: 1

      She's the daughter of a Trillian but not the Trillian.

    19. Re:HHGTTG Connection as well... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I'd take the latter's voice over the former's everything else, any day.

      Seconded!

      While Sandra Dickinson may be, in real life, a wonderfully intelligent and subtle person, in her professional life she thoroughly succeeded in stereotyping herself as a dumb blonde with big tits and an annoying screetchy voice. Worth porking, for sure, but not worth talking to before, during or after being used as a spunk bucket. Arguably the most stupid casting decision of the Beeb for that year, if not decade.

      Trillian, the moped-cornering astrophysicist planet-jumper on the other hand, could have a face and body like a bag of spanners put through a car crusher and still be a person worth knowing.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What ?

    1. Re:What ? by JustOK · · Score: 2

      not what, who.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  5. Abbott wants to know by McGruber · · Score: 2

    Which Who is on first?

    1. Re:Abbott wants to know by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The Grinch.

    2. Re:Abbott wants to know by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      The Grinch isn't a Who; he's more of a what.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Abbott wants to know by JWW · · Score: 1

      I don't know....

      Third base!!

    4. Re:Abbott wants to know by ThePromenader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Grinch isn't a Who; he's more of a what.

      ...an oddly pernacious door, better left open than shut.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    5. Re:Abbott wants to know by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Has Horton heard about this?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:Abbott wants to know by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Is the Grinch maybe a Who in the same way Gollum is a Hobbit?

    7. Re:Abbott wants to know by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      No, no, a Pernacious door would lead to a planet inhabited by dragons who were allegedly oddly explicable without crossing the boundaries of SF and fantasy. Some of them are green whats.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re:Abbott wants to know by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      He played in The Doors ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  6. My head hurts.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:My head hurts.... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      And you thought YOU had it hard growing up...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:My head hurts.... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      And you thought YOU had it hard growing up...

      That's what she said.

  7. Have to say it. by TheL0ser · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry, but with the last line, I have to say this:

    THIRD BASE!

    1. Re:Have to say it. by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Abbott and Costello meet The Doctor.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Have to say it. by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Funny

      Q: So when David Tennant goes to get his paycheck, Who gets the money?

      A: Every dollar of it. After all, the man earns it.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Have to say it. by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      glad to see someone thought of this one already. :)

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    4. Re:Have to say it. by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Q: So when David Tennant goes to get his paycheck, Who gets the money?

      A: Every dollar of it. After all, the man earns it.

      That would be,

      "Every Pound of it. After all, the man earns it."

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    5. Re:Have to say it. by jujuju · · Score: 1

      Abbott and Costello meet The Doctor.

      Would that be Dr Who'son?

      .

      .

      . (sorry, Aussie joke, but Who can resist a 4--way pun?)

    6. Re:Have to say it. by JustOK · · Score: 1

      could be the pun ultimate joke.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    7. Re:Have to say it. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      So all her base are belong to him ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  8. And cue the screams of a million fangirls by Deathnerd · · Score: 1

    I feel a disturbance in the force... As if a million voices screamed in pain all at once. No, wait, that's my girlfriend, crying in the corner. Excuse me while I join her in fangirl agony. NOOOOOOOOO!

    1. Re:And cue the screams of a million fangirls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he didn't marry Kylie

    2. Re:And cue the screams of a million fangirls by Tekfactory · · Score: 3, Funny

      A million fangirls who only ever would have been million fangirls-1 that were still dissappointed if Tennant had chosen 1 of them.

      Of course the conventional wisdom would seem to say Clone Tennant and the fangirls can all be happy, unfortunately they DID clone Tennant, and now he's run off with the clone.

    3. Re:And cue the screams of a million fangirls by camperdave · · Score: 1

      ... unfortunately they DID clone Tennant, and now he's run off with the clone.

      O give me a clone of my own flesh and bone,
      With its Y chromosome changed to X.
      And when it is grown, then my own little clone
      Will be of the opposite sex.

      Chorus:
      Clone, clone of my own,
      With its Y chromosome changed to X
      And when I'm alone with my own little clone
      We'll both think of nothing but sex.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:And cue the screams of a million fangirls by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      This deserves its mix of Funny and Insightful mods.

      As I've said of female celebrities I'm attracted to, with a significant other is just as unaccessible in a practical sense as the celebrity without one.

      Granted, teenage fangirls don't seem generally known for this kind of calm logic. :)

      I can daydream about winning lottery jackpots too, even though that's also incredibly unlikely to happen. :P

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    5. Re:And cue the screams of a million fangirls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the doctors daughter was pretty hot. So overall it's a net loss of 2 for the whole fanboy/fangirl community.

    6. Re:And cue the screams of a million fangirls by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      That didn't work out so well for Arnold J. Rimmer.

      This of course created the most enormous moral dilemma. Technically, she would be my sister, and therefore unable to take me as her lover. After much soul searching, I reluctantly decided, "What the hell, I just wouldn't tell her."

      But then, it is implied he never managed to create a sex-changed clone.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  9. Who, now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, who is marrying who?

    1. Re:Who, now? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      The Doctor marries the doctor and who has who.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Who, now? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, who is marrying who?

      Yes.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  10. Well Said! by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

    What more can be said, we shall see.

    --
    Nate
  11. Can we have a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...diagram please?

  12. Whoops by regular_gonzalez · · Score: 0, Troll

    Uh oh CmdrTaco you posted this in Entertainment instead of Idle. How embarrassing for you.

    --
    Due to circumstances beyond my control, I am master of my fate and captain of my soul.
    1. Re:Whoops by MichaelKristopeit343 · · Score: 0

      slashdot = stagnated

    2. Re:Whoops by compro01 · · Score: 1

      What is your suggested source of technology news?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:Whoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how is this any less relevant than any other story in Entertainment? This is about the longest running science fiction show is the world. It's not like this section is the most serious topic on Slashdot. At the best of times it is only a small step away from Idle.

    4. Re:Whoops by MichaelKristopeit343 · · Score: 0

      not slashdot

    5. Re:Whoops by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      http://www.nanooze.org/

      What? It's better than slashdot. Even google agrees.

    6. Re:Whoops by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I think you forgot to call someone a coward and mock them for their use of a pseudonym. How embarrassing for you :)

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    7. Re:Whoops by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Isn't Eric a bit old for all this conubial connubiling?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    8. Re:Whoops by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 0

      /sigh of relief
      When I saw your first comment had significantly less troll in it, I feared for the status of the world!

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
  13. Well... by Abstrackt · · Score: 3, Funny

    It still makes more sense than Primer.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    1. Re:Well... by Tekfactory · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess you need the chart to watch the movie?

      That's all I ever heard about Primer was some people couldn't follow the movie without a chart. So when I found it on Netflix I tried to watch it, was completely bored by the first 20 minutes or so, but kept waiting for it to get complicated.

      By the time they were in the aircraft hangar I kept thinking it could have been a Twilight Zone episode and what a decent job they did for what was obviously no budget and 1 special effect in the beginning.

      I actually really liked it by the end.

    2. Re:Well... by tylersoze · · Score: 1

      And here's the chart for all those interested. :)

      http://www.freeweb.hu/neuwanstein/primer_timeline.html

    3. Re:Well... by tylersoze · · Score: 1

      And here's the timeline for "All You Zombies"

      http://home.windstream.net/dwrighsr/Heinlein/AllYouZombies.html

    4. Re:Well... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess you need the chart to watch the movie?

      In my defense, I never said I didn't get the movie, just that this story makes more sense. ;)

      I thought Primer was a really interesting take on time travel. The low budget really worked in the movie's favor too; you were just an observer watching two insignificant guys stumble onto something huge with no idea how to handle it instead of watching a 90 minute CGI demo.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  14. some dalek's were invited to the wedding by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    but the reception was at the top of a grand staircase

    after 3 hours of trying to figure out how to use the stairs, the dalek's leveled the entire building in frustration and anger

    the new bad blood will serve forthcoming dr. who episodes very well, so, all in all, a good wedding for fans

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      after 3 hours of trying to figure out how to use the stairs, the dalek's leveled the entire building in frustration and anger

      No, they used the ELEVATOR!

      Daleks are not challenged by stairs.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by BenoitRen · · Score: 0

      How did you get it in your head that the apostrophe is used to pluralise?! Stop abusing the apostrophe now!

    3. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by Javajunk · · Score: 0

      Typically you do use the apostrophe to pluralise if leaving it out would cause some ambiguity. That's my understanding of it at least.

      --
      "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." Douglas Adams
    4. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO NO NO NO NO !

      What people do to abuse it is not necessarily what is correct. And the case you cite is generally referring to acronyms in all capitals (DVD, CD).

      http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif

    5. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by Chris+Burke · · Score: 0

      Um, no, where did you hear that? You don't try to eliminate the ambiguity of plural/singular by adding ambiguity of plural/possessive! And much worse ambiguity, since the apostrophe doesn't mean plural!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Daleks are NO LONGER challenged by stairs.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tenth Doctor's Daleks might level the building for fun, or out of pure hate, but not out of "frustration and anger" over an inability to climb stairs. By the Tenth Doctor's time, Daleks could fly ("The Stolen Earth"/"Journey's End").

      There is a funny Dalek workout video on YouTube where an instructor Dalek suggests that "older models" might want to sit out a stair climbing / levitation exercise ...

    8. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Daleks are NO LONGER challenged by stairs.

      Were they ever, or should we assume that the modern Dr. Who has decided that doesn't need to be canonical?

      I should think that the fearsome Daleks who can already fly aren't too put off by a set of stairs. And, these Daleks have always been able to fly (the ones in this series that is), and they're remnants from the last Time War.

      Wow, the only likely thread in which this isn't off-topic. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by dwater · · Score: 1

      didn't you know Daleks can fly?

      --
      Max.
    10. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by spike1 · · Score: 1

      Daleks haven't been challenged by stairs since 1988.
      The sylvestor mccoy episode "remembrance of the daleks" had a transmat in the basement of a school used to transport daleks in.

      First time we saw one float upstairs was THEN, not in the new incarnation "Dalek" episode.

    11. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      but the reception was at the top of a grand staircase

      after 3 hours of trying to figure out how to use the stairs, the dalek's leveled the entire building in frustration and anger

      Daleks have been able to navigate stairs at least as early as 1965. Though the earliest time it happened on-screen was in 1988...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    12. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Daleks haven't been challenged by stairs since 1988.
      The sylvestor mccoy episode "remembrance of the daleks" had a transmat in the basement of a school used to transport daleks in.

      First time we saw one float upstairs was THEN, not in the new incarnation "Dalek" episode.

      And before that there were instances of Daleks getting up stairs off-screen... Like in "The Chase".

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    13. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by Javajunk · · Score: 0

      Oh. I guess I deserve the bad karma for getting that wrong then.

      --
      "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." Douglas Adams
    14. Re:some dalek's were invited to the wedding by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Naw, you deserve to be right from now on. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  15. Not necessarily important by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He got engaged to his co-star on Girl in a Fireplace, too. Come to think of it, another of his co-stars went off to make a TV mini-series about a BDSM call-girl. What the hell is he doing to these girls' minds?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Not necessarily important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Freeing them! :-D

    2. Re:Not necessarily important by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      ...a BDSM call-girl.

      Didn't the 11th Doctor date her?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:Not necessarily important by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      Diary of a London Call Girl is not BDSM. Belle experimented with it on one episode because a regular customer requested it. It was a rather interesting series about a real life call girl's experience towards fame. Of course my initial attraction was seeing Billie nude and in provocative situations.

      And yes, Matt Smith the current Doctor, was one of her clients.

  16. Who gives a flying foo? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Who cares who's daughter is who's and who's DNA is in whomever? Who really gives a hoot?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Who gives a flying foo? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Who cares who's daughter is who's and who's DNA is in whomever?

      Your sister?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  17. Wikipedia sucks again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Her Wikipedia picture is terrible. IRL, she's a total hottie. Tennant's a lucky guy. First he's bangin' Sophia Myles, now this.

    1. Re:Wikipedia sucks again by SteveFoerster · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    2. Re:Wikipedia sucks again by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      still too much clothing. do you have better?

    3. Re:Wikipedia sucks again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TITS or GTFO

    4. Re:Wikipedia sucks again by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia requires that any images be correctly licensed, and requires proof of same. Ergo most wikipedia celeb photos are fan-taken photos or similar.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  18. I believe... by UncHellMatt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...This is one of the more accurate uses of the age old expression "My head a'splode".

    1. Re:I believe... by Avatar8 · · Score: 1

      Or the Austin Powers version, "Oh dear, my eyes have gone crossed."

  19. I Knew this would Eventually Happen by withoutfeathers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why I am so against time travel.

    1. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      Negative, we NEED to go back in time to fix this ASAP! That, and the realization I had when doing a Harry Potter marathon with my daughter over the break that David Tennant was also in Goblet of Fire! My head is also assploding over here!!1!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      You'd change your mind if you knew what that eighty year old woman down the street from you looked like sixty years ago.

    3. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, now... you are either a time-lord's fan [Doctor Who] or you aren't :)

    4. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Crap, now I have to go back and watch Goblet of Fire...

    5. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Spoiler: he plays a crazy person in that one, too :) Not that the Doctor is crazy per se, but that's the way Tennant sure played him.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    6. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      Really? You had to wait for this to happen for you to hate time travel? You mean the "Temporal Cold War" from Enterprise wasn't enough to make your blood boil?

    7. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Helen Mirren... aargle... drool...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    8. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      Me too, still lookin good, anyone else seen RED?

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    9. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Really? You had to wait for this to happen for you to hate time travel? You mean the "Temporal Cold War" from Enterprise wasn't enough to make your blood boil?

      I don't know... Actually I didn't watch Enterprise when it was on TV (I was kind of tired of Next-Gen-style Trek at that point, still reeling from the first couple seasons of Voyager) - but I've started watching it recently, and I'm really enjoying it.

      It did seem a bit too convenient when they'd solve a problem by breaking the seal on Daniels's quarters - and the whole Temporal Cold War isn't really my favorite storyline on the show - but I wouldn't say it ruins the show for me or anything.

      'Course, I'm on season 2. Maybe later on it becomes more obnoxious?

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    10. Re:I Knew this would Eventually Happen by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      I don't know... Actually I didn't watch Enterprise when it was on TV (I was kind of tired of Next-Gen-style Trek at that point, still reeling from the first couple seasons of Voyager) - but I've started watching it recently, and I'm really enjoying it.

      It did seem a bit too convenient when they'd solve a problem by breaking the seal on Daniels's quarters - and the whole Temporal Cold War isn't really my favorite storyline on the show - but I wouldn't say it ruins the show for me or anything.

      'Course, I'm on season 2. Maybe later on it becomes more obnoxious?

      I agree, I don't think it ruins the show for me. But yes, by the beginning of season 4 you will wish the Vulcan Science Directorate was right about time travel.

  20. This reminds me of the early 1980s. by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

    The Doctor has tried marrying his companion before. I get the feeling that this can only end as well as the marriage between Tom Baker and Lalla Ward.

    This particular story is almost as bad as that time when the Doctor and his granddaughter were clearly checking each other out (Peter Davison, Carole Ann Ford, "The Five Doctors").

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    1. Re:This reminds me of the early 1980s. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      wasn't it Lalla Ward who once said the scariest monster on Doctor Who was Tom Baker?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:This reminds me of the early 1980s. by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      According to her page on the TARDIS Wiki, Tom Baker is her "favorite monster" on Doctor Who.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  21. Honeymoon by Old97 · · Score: 1

    Marrying a clone of yourself who's also your daughter? So is this how the Time Lords masturbate on Gallifrey?

    --
    Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    1. Re:Honeymoon by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, give me a clone
      Of my own flesh and bone
      With the Y chromosome changed to X.
      And when she is grown,
      My very own clone,
      We'll be of the opposite sex.

      Chorus:
      Clone, clone of my own,
      With the Y chromosome changed to X.
      And when we're alone,
      Since her mind is my own,
      She'll be thinking of nothing but sex.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Honeymoon by robot256 · · Score: 1

      Was I supposed to immediately start singing this to the tune of "Home, Home On the Range"? 'Cuz I totally just did.

    3. Re:Honeymoon by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      "Working as intended"

    4. Re:Honeymoon by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Since her mind is my own,
      She'll be thinking of nothing but sex.

      Except that, with the Y changed to X, the sexual-behavior structures of her brain will develop as female. So she'll be thinking of sex about as much as any other woman.

      She'll be too closely related to have a significant probability of being sexually attracted to the singer (even in the absence of being raised together). Sexual attractiveness peaks at about the relatedness of second cousins. (Reasonable, since mathematical genetics suggests that an average of marriage to third cousins within a population of about 500 and six outcrosses per generation minimizes the number of generations for new detrimental mutations to be extinguished.)

      (And, no, I didn't marry any of my cousins, first, second, third, or with any other known relatedness. Though I did attend the wedding of a second cousin who's IMHO quite a hottie. B-) )

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    5. Re:Honeymoon by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You must really be popular at parties when you over-analyze every joke told...

      And you may be a redneck if you look forward to the upcoming family reunion because it's a great place to meet girls.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Asimov did.

    7. Re:Honeymoon by rekenner · · Score: 1

      Except that, with the Y changed to X, the sexual-behavior structures of her brain will develop as female. So she'll be thinking of sex about as much as any other woman.

      True story! At various points in history, women were considered the prurient gender, the gender that always wanted sex, the gender that wanted sex more than men, etc. Current culture praises men for being very sexually active and criticizes women for the same (which has been the most dominant cultural value). I wonder if maaaaaaaaaaybe that's the cause, more than the physiological differences? Just throwing that idea out there.

    8. Re:Honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credit where credit is due - please credit Isaac Asimov for this. It's my second favorite short short of his -right after the one where he asks is friend Dawn if she used the weight machines on her trip to the Swanee river because of the song - "Weigh Dawn on the Swanee river"

    9. Re:Honeymoon by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

      You must really be popular at parties when you over-analyze every joke told...

      One form of "nerd humor" is to respond to a joke as if it's straight and analyze it deeper until something else funny shows up. (It's similar to "deadpan humor".)

      And you may be a redneck if you look forward to the upcoming family reunion because it's a great place to meet girls.

      Ha ha. But...

      You should be aware that "Redneck" is a racist (implies mixed American Indian and colonist ancestry) and culturalist epithet (coastal urban self-appointed elites looking down on other US cultural groups), on a par with "The N word" or other racial/cultural epithet of your choice.

      And given that a major fraction of, for instance, rocket scientists (and other technologists) are Rednecks, you might want to think as carefully before posting such jokes to Slashdot as you would before performing George Carlin's "nigger nigger nigger" bit to an audience in Harlem.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    10. Re:Honeymoon by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      At various points in history, women were considered the prurient gender, the gender that always wanted sex, ...

      Good point.

      But my point was not whether she'd be interested in sex, but whether she'd be interested in sex with him in particular.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    11. Re:Honeymoon by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

      She'll be too closely related to have a significant probability of being sexually attracted to the singer (even in the absence of being raised together).

      Actually that is not correct. People tend to think that people similar to oneself are more attractive. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_sexual_attraction

    12. Re:Honeymoon by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Glenn? Is that you?

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    13. Re:Honeymoon by lgw · · Score: 1

      One form of "nerd humor" is to respond to a joke as if it's straight and analyze it deeper until something else funny shows up. (It's similar to "deadpan humor".)

      Atcually, that's something socially awkward nerds sometimes mistake for humor. Really, it's not. Soory to be the one to break it to you.

      Also, Foxworthy's "you might be a redneck if" jokes go over very well in the Deep South - that's where he grew up and got his start in comedy, after all.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Honeymoon by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Atcually, that's something socially awkward nerds sometimes mistake for humor. Really, it's not.

      Humor is subjective, so positing what purports on its face to be a factual, objective statement that someone else is wrong about what is and is not humorous is kind of pointless.

    15. Re:Honeymoon by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I thought all of her work could be sung to "The Yellow Rose of Texas".

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    16. Re:Honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: the "weigh Dawn" bit you mention wasn't a short story; it was a two-line anecdote of a real-life event he retold during the intro notes to the story SHAH GUIDO G. in the anthology "Buy Jupiter and other stories."

    17. Re:Honeymoon by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 1

      I laughed. I think it just takes that extra processing power upstairs, you know? If you don't get it right away it tends to be less amusing.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
    18. Re:Honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes - it was clearly written as a filk to that tune. "Oh give me a [blank]"...

    19. Re:Honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Carlin? I think the "nigger nigger nigger" bit was popularized by Michael Richards, Seinfeld's Kramer.

    20. Re:Honeymoon by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      at various points in history, scientific method did not prevail.

      both positions are extremes. however, based purely on experience i'd say that guys want sex more than women.

      now, an ex of mine would be the exception that proves the rule (bipolar has a tendency to increase sex drive, in her case enormously), but i was more than able to keep up, and there was much rejoicing.

    21. Re:Honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really. You are just a loser.

    22. Re:Honeymoon by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      >You should be aware that "Redneck" is a racist (implies mixed American Indian and colonist ancestry)
      Maybe at one time. Meaning can change, though.

      >and culturalist epithet
      Well, yes.

      > (coastal urban self-appointed elites looking down on other US cultural groups),
      I take cracks at rednecks, and I am from rural Montana (admittedly I am in Seattle now)

      >on a par with "The N word"
      Uh, no.

    23. Re:Honeymoon by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      The referenced article might be read to imply more attraction to those more closely related and no limit on how closely (if they were first encountered when adult, thus avoiding the Westermarck effect). But it doesn't seem have any information or references to falsify an assertion that sexual attractiveness peaks at third cousin level. Neither does it give any quantitative comparison of attractiveness versus different levels of consanguinity.

      Is there perhaps something in one of the references? If so, which one?

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    24. Re:Honeymoon by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      At least one of the origin sources of the word Redneck was as a term applied to mine workers in the pre civil war era and afterwards up to the 1880's. There were people lynched by hired goons (mostly the Pinkertons) to bust up unionising efforts, who had the word "Redneck" carved into their corpses afterwards, which makes it every bit as bad as the N word in my view. (just because we're talking a few dozen lynchings instead of thousands total, doesn't mean they aren't still lynchings). People like Foxworthy were using the term just like Richard Prior or Chris Rock were using the N word, and Foxworthy has dropped it for similar reasons finding out how seriously its still taken as an insult in some places. My maternal great grandfather was a sociailst party mine organizer, and he had to throw the wife and kids into the bathtub one night as shots were fired at his house by unidentitfied people who also repeatedly called him a redneck in the process. Yeah, people might want to drop that one from the vocabulary.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    25. Re:Honeymoon by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Asimov's 'best' pun - "But how was the content of our winter's disc made spurious by this scum of cork?" "It was elementally adhered, Watson".
      No one's gonna top that.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    26. Re:Honeymoon by VShael · · Score: 1

      You should be aware that "Redneck" is a racist and culturalist epithet on a par with "The N word"

      Oh really?? I must have missed those large tracts of American history 101, where they told us about the war to free the Rednecks, the Jim-Bob Crow laws, and the Redneck-only drinking fountains....

    27. Re:Honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but I've always thought the etymology was a reference to WORKING FOR A LIVING!!!
      Dang ivy-league black adam fellers.

    28. Re:Honeymoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You liberal clothed conservative Americans and the politically correct.
      So you've been fighting for freedom of speech, equality and all those otherwise noble causes. But now you question jokes made about those very concepts? No wonder it took you so long to accept what is common knowledge in the developed world... In fact it wonders me how you have won, because you seem to be totally ignorant about what have you been fighting for.

    29. Re:Honeymoon by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      You must really be popular at parties when you over-analyze every joke told...

      One form of "nerd humor" is to respond to a joke as if it's straight and analyze it deeper until something else funny shows up. (It's similar to "deadpan humor".)

      And you may be a redneck if you look forward to the upcoming family reunion because it's a great place to meet girls.

      Ha ha. But...

      You should be aware that "Redneck" is a racist (implies mixed American Indian and colonist ancestry) and culturalist epithet (coastal urban self-appointed elites looking down on other US cultural groups), on a par with "The N word" or other racial/cultural epithet of your choice.

      Oh, no! Not the Big, Scary N-word! I hear that if you dare speak the N-word, you open a hole in your soul and the devil flies straight in! Strange men will suddenly appear at your door and give you your hood and robes and initiate you into the Klan right on the spot! In short, you will instantly and automatically be transformed into the worst sort of racist! Unless of course, you're black, in which case it's totally OK to say it.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    30. Re:Honeymoon by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      People like Foxworthy were using the term just like Richard Prior or Chris Rock were using the N word, and Foxworthy has dropped it for similar reasons finding out how seriously its still taken as an insult in some places.

      Fuckin' pussy.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    31. Re:Honeymoon by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I must have missed those large tracts of American history 101, where they told us about the war to free the Rednecks, the Jim-Bob Crow laws, and the Redneck-only drinking fountains....

      As Artifakt points out in a sibling posting to yours, look into the early days of labor unions - when machineguns were considered a necessary tool of labor relations.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    32. Re:Honeymoon by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      So you've been fighting for freedom of speech, equality and all those otherwise noble causes. But now you question jokes made about those very concepts?

      He's welcome to continue to make them. I just wanted him to be aware of what he was doing.

      "Letting other people do things you don't like is the price of freedom." - M. McClary

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    33. Re:Honeymoon by myster0n · · Score: 1

      ... on a par with "The N word" ...

      NetBSD?

      --
      Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
    34. Re:Honeymoon by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      How then do you explain the fact then that my wife is my polar opposite in virtually every way (the only thing we have in common is we like to give each other a hard time.) I'm a bearded redneck in cowboy boots, and she is an African princess. Also, I tend to be much more attracted to people without penises or other features generally associated with males, such as facial hair! My wife has another trait I didn't even know existed until long after we were married -- she doesn't shave her legs because she has no body hair; the only places she can grow hair is on top of her head or on her pubes. Coming from a family that generally resembles Hobbits, this was a shock to me.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    35. Re:Honeymoon by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

      It's a general rule, not a hard law.

  22. A sonic screwdriver should sort this out ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    ... it sounds like an accident with a contraceptive in a time machine. Move along; nothing to see here.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:A sonic screwdriver should sort this out ... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      ...So their child will be Zaphod Beeblebrox?!?

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    2. Re:A sonic screwdriver should sort this out ... by meloneg · · Score: 1

      No, no, no! Their grandfathers will be Zaphod B.

    3. Re:A sonic screwdriver should sort this out ... by demonbug · · Score: 1

      ... it sounds like an accident with a contraceptive in a time machine. Move along; nothing to see here.

      It started out as an innocent game of doctor, then things got out of control...

  23. Is she also related to Stephen Moffett? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is she also related to Stephen Moffett, the head writer of the show right now?

    1. Re:Is she also related to Stephen Moffett? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since his name is Steven Moffat , no, probably not.

    2. Re:Is she also related to Stephen Moffett? by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing that I thought of also, but they are not related. It's Steven Moffat, not Stephen Moffet.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    3. Re:Is she also related to Stephen Moffett? by maroberts · · Score: 1

      No, Peter Davison is a stage name; his real /birth name is Peter Moffett

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    4. Re:Is she also related to Stephen Moffett? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Didn't he used to run a Death Star?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:Is she also related to Stephen Moffett? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Didn't he used to run a Death Star?

      No, no, you're thinking of the guy from "Doctor Who and the Daleks".

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  24. The much stranger marrage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was when Peter Davidson married that sheep from All Creatures.

    1. Re:The much stranger marrage by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Or the time the Crock Hunter was enthusing about how beautiful a female orangutan was and said female started doing what was clearly courtship behavior toward him. The expression on his face as he gradually realized what was going on - but still has to talk for the camera - was priceless.

      (IMHO it's likely that the female, a great ape who was an orphan raised from an infant by humans, probably understood quite a bit of English and had socialized with humans so much she might have found them more attractive than members of her own species. Now here was one who says she's beautiful ...)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  25. Yow Taco.... by santax · · Score: 1

    Pass on tha blunt man. I think you got some good stuf!

  26. IT'S NOT REAL by eyenot · · Score: 1

    Wake up. This is all a simulation. It has been the entire time. You're having a deep embedded, fully immersive hallucinatory cognitive dissociation brought on by a schizophrenic episode of your favorite TV show. When the Daleks show up they will appear to you as men in white coats; this is a representation of your subconcious desire to fuck your mother. Give in to it and enter the warm embrace of drug treatments they offer. This is a hallucination of your subconcious mind "Clearing" the conflicting data and getting back to reality -- it doesn't really mean you fucked your mother or still want to, but other people might. That's the tricky part, now you get your discharge and you have to pretend you're normal, but whatever you do do not assume the Doctor Who role and attempt to recreate the process described in TFA. It will result in a disruption of the enclosing universal wormhole as described in the new item title. Just go about your business like nothing happened and keep eating the pills. Accept your hairless monkey role in life and die like a pac man caught by a hungry ghost. Do not attempt to drain your pool.

    -- Tech Support!!!!!!!

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  27. One could ponder this conundrum further by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or one could go outside for the first time.

    1. Re:One could ponder this conundrum further by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 1

      Some people are so amazing, they can do both at once.
      I am not one of those people.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
  28. Consanguinity by graveyhead · · Score: 1

    "So a newer Doctor is marrying an older Doctor's daughter, who is a clone of the newer doctor, but only has half the DNA of the older Doctor."

    Dear god, someone please think of the 12 toed children! Actually, we've already seen the doctor's granddaughter, Susan. They forgot to mention the plot point about the Doctor being her father and her grandfather ;-) OMG Susan has 12 toes!

    --
    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
    1. Re:Consanguinity by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 1

      Well at least it explains where all the other time lords went, they wiped themselves out with inbreeding.

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
  29. Amazon? by Ira+Sponsible · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long before Amazon tries to ban this?

    --
    1.Netcraft confirms:In Soviet Russia all your base welcomes a beowolf cluster of CowboyNeal overlords. 2.? 3.Profit!!1!
    1. Re:Amazon? by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      And how long until the Huffington Post or Columbia University gives him a job?

  30. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, a troll! If you don't like Doctor Who, I have a suggestion for you: GTFO of this thread.

  31. RHPS by JustOK · · Score: 1

    Incest is best! Keep it in the TARDIS.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  32. Re:Twa da Night afo' Crizzmus by sexconker · · Score: 1

    You could improve your copy-pasta troll by changing "Sh'eet, must be da law" to "Sh'eet, must be da po-po", which rhymes with "my sister wif her gurlfriend, my brother wif some ho.".

  33. Already exploded. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2

    The Universe already exploded, but the Doctor flew the Pandorica into the exploding Tardis so that the universe would be healed.

    It worked since we are still here.

    1. Re:Already exploded. by BForrester · · Score: 5, Funny

      The universe didn't explode, it's been "replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable."

      Welcome to Level 2.

    2. Re:Already exploded. by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Level 2.

      Rather, welcome to a new season!

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    3. Re:Already exploded. by Froggie · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new Time Lord overlords.

    4. Re:Already exploded. by deniable · · Score: 1

      To quote River Song, "Spoilers."

    5. Re:Already exploded. by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Something even more bizarre and inexplicable

      a new season

      I'm not seeing a distinction here.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  34. Scifi Storm by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

    Covered yesterday by Slashdot's sister site: sci-fi storm. They use slashcode also.

    Link

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  35. female clone? by chrisj_0 · · Score: 1

    How can a clone of a male be a female? No wonder I could never sit through Dr. Who

    1. Re:female clone? by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how as a clone Jenny had only half of the Doctors DNA...

      I still like Dr Who though.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    2. Re:female clone? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      The male has XY chromosomes; the female only has XX. You can make a female clone of a male, but not the other way round.

      And as a clone, the female would have two copies of the original X chromosome (making XX), i.e. half of the original DNA (XY).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:female clone? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      They explained it with the usual burst of technoblather from Tennant, an exasperated noise, and some waving of hands with "You wouldn't understand." :)

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  36. Best Summary Ever by Phantasmagoria · · Score: 1

    Best Summary Ever. But the title was too "farky". Didn't go with the summary.

    --
    Loban Amaan Rahman ==> Anagram of ==> Aha! An Abnormal Man!
    1. Re:Best Summary Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst use of hyperlinks ever. It took 30 seconds to find the actual story.

    2. Re:Best Summary Ever by aseth · · Score: 1

      I think this really is the best story summary I've ever read on Slashdot.

  37. My head hurts by BudAaron · · Score: 1

    Yup - My head hurts

  38. my mind is blown by greymond · · Score: 1

    I wanted to insert an ascii pic of my mind being blown, but instead you'll just have to settle for me telling you I was going to do that.

  39. Just answer me this: by HeckRuler · · Score: 3, Funny

    OK, skip all the crazy stuff, just answer me this:
    Who is marrying who?

    1. Re:Just answer me this: by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 3, Informative

      Answer: Who is marrying Who.

    2. Re:Just answer me this: by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    3. Re:Just answer me this: by smbell · · Score: 1

      Yes

    4. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who is marrying who?

      Exactly

    5. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, skip all the crazy stuff, just answer me this:

      Who is marrying who?

      that's correct

    6. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, skip all the crazy stuff, just answer me this:

      Who is marrying who?

      Yes.

    7. Re:Just answer me this: by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Addendum: Not Cindy Lou

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    8. Re:Just answer me this: by otherniceman · · Score: 1

      Ex-Who is marrying Baby of other Ex-Who (who is Ex-Who's favourite other ex-who)

    9. Re:Just answer me this: by volpone · · Score: 1

      OK, skip all the crazy stuff, just answer me this: Who is marrying who?

      Correct.

    10. Re:Just answer me this: by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Answer: Who is marrying Who.

      First base?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    11. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes!

    12. Re:Just answer me this: by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Yes!

      --
      This is blinging
    13. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    14. Re:Just answer me this: by Roman+Coder · · Score: 1

      Who's on First.

      --
      "The future can only affect the present if there is room to write its influence off as a mistake." - Yakir Aharonov
    15. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is marrying whom?

    16. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!

      Who is marrying Who.

    17. Re:Just answer me this: by SleazyRidr · · Score: 0

      Naturally.

    18. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

    19. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct.

    20. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, skip all the crazy stuff, just answer me this:

      Who is marrying who?

      Exactly.

    21. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you got it.

    22. Re:Just answer me this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who is marrying whom", surely?

      Sorry, couldn't let that slide - I'm surprised everyone else did.

    23. Re:Just answer me this: by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      "Who is marrying whom", surely?

      No, and don't call me Shirley*!

      Sorry, couldn't let that slide - I'm surprised everyone else did.

      Honestly, I still haven't entirely gotten the hang of "whom".

      (* One of the great injustices of the English language is that this joke does not work as intended in text form.)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  40. Reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo.

    And here is a garden-path sentence to avoid the compression filter:

    Today the farmer threw the cow over the fence some hay.

  41. Little Twelve Toes by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Hey little Twelve Toes,
    I hope you're thriving...
    Some of us ten-toed folks are still surviving.

    If you help me with my twelves,
    I'll help you with your tens.
    And we can all be friends.

    Little twelve toes....
    Please come back home.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  42. Love-y Wimey by joeszilagyi · · Score: 4, Funny

    People assume that relationships are a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... love-y wimey... stuff.

    --
    Dude, where's my packet?
    1. Re:Love-y Wimey by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2

      Turns out she just went "ding" for his stuff....

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  43. Re:Twa da Night afo' Crizzmus by Dahan · · Score: 1

    How would that be an improvement? Someone doesn't understand the AABB rhyme scheme. That line is supposed to rhyme with "... empty beer cans and all."

  44. Umm, TV = entertainment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the world already knows this intuitively.

  45. Re:Can we have a... by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

    The actor who played the previous Dr is marrying his onscreen daughter which is actually the IRL daughter of the actor that played the 5th Dr.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  46. Reminds me of another song.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm my own grandpa..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I'm_My_Own_Grandpa

  47. Nasty in the pasty. by scorp1us · · Score: 2

    Did he participate in events that made him his own grandfather? 'Cause if not, it does nothing to help our coming brain invasion problem.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  48. After I understood what he did there... by hashwolf · · Score: 1

    I want to tell the doctor to go go f*(k himself.

    But I see that he already did.

    Kind of.

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
  49. So... by JockTroll · · Score: 1

    ... The Doctor finally dances. And by the way, the Doctor's name is unknown, it's not "Who". You loserboy nerds.

    --
    Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
  50. More than a cliche by mikeraz · · Score: 1

    He is marrying his better half.

    --

    There's more to it than this.

  51. Obligatory quotes by Erbo · · Score: 3, Funny
    "I hate temporal mechanics." - Miles O'Brien (and his doppelganger)

    "Temporal mechanics always gave me a headache back at the Academy." - Kathryn Janeway

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
    1. Re:Obligatory quotes by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Typical - whenever there's a problem, the officers always blame the mechanics.

  52. Last time 10 and 5 met... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... their TARDISes merged and nearly created an explosion the... exact size of Belgium, Well, that was anticlimactic, but how big will the explosion be this time? Two Belgiums, possibly?

    1. Re:Last time 10 and 5 met... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      ... their TARDISes merged and nearly created an explosion the... exact size of Belgium, Well, that was anticlimactic, but how big will the explosion be this time? Two Belgiums, possibly?

      Belgium squared. I know that the units on that quantity (length to the fourth power) don't make sense from a conventional standpoint, it takes some complicated Gallifreyan dimensional analysis to sort it all out...

      I'll explain later.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  53. That's what I've been trying to tell you! by JavaBasedOS · · Score: 2

    Who is the doctor!

  54. Incest is relative (n/t) by Bardwick · · Score: 1

    N/T

  55. Half the DNA? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Don't they mean the same DNA, but a duplicate X chromosome?

  56. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which meant that she really was Who
    Dr. Who is NOT his name! It is a question, as in "Dr. Who?"

    1. Re:Wrong by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Which he most often answers with "Yes" So therefore it is what he goes by...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  57. Doctor Doctor, give me the news by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    Which our DNA is in you?

    On second thought, better not answer that.....

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  58. Come on now... by KingAlanI · · Score: 2

    It isn't incest of the relation is a fictional one between your characters.
    I learned that in middle school, 9 years ago. (the students playing a father/daughter pair in that year's school play were kissing; that was their response to my needling)

    I'm not a Doctor Who fan, so I can't squeeze in (or recognize) your references. :)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  59. Re:Can we have a... by inerlogic · · Score: 2

    actually..

    that actor who played the previous doctor, is marrying his onscreen daughter, who is a clone of the doctor, IRL she is also the daughter of an actor who played a previous, previous doctor.

    so the doctor, married his daughter, also the doctor, and she's the daughter of another doctor, and the doctor's daughter, THIRD BASE!

  60. time lords are WZ? by derniers · · Score: 1

    in many species the female is heterozygous for the sex chromosome not the male- the ZW system in some insects is a prominent example Time Lords may be one of these species so that a clone of a male could be female

    1. Re:time lords are WZ? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      in many species the female is heterozygous for the sex chromosome not the male- the ZW system in some insects is a prominent example Time Lords may be one of these species so that a clone of a male could be female

      Um, for a clone (well "clone-ish thing", if you are changing chromosomes its not quite what people normally mean by a clone) of a male to be female (without requiring the kind of engineering that gives you, e.g., functional XX males by placing a male sex-determining region on an X chromosome) you need the male to be heterozygous for the sex chromosome (as in the XY system) since then you take the female sex chromosome from the male (X) and make two copies of it, discarding the other sex chromosome from the male (the Y), giving a female.

      So, this works if males are heterozygous, as in the XY system used in, among other things, humans.

      If the female is heterozygous and the male is not, then you can't get all the chromosomes you need for a functional female from a male.

  61. Re:Incest is relative by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    it's also fun for the whole family

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  62. ...but only has half the DNA of the older Doctor. by inerlogic · · Score: 1

    she'll be receiving the other half, presumably at regular intervals though....

  63. Hillbilly Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you sure this isn't happening in Arkansas instead of England?

  64. "Why's it getting so warm in here?" by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    As I once said when making a snide comment about European football, "(puts on fire-resistant suit)"

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  65. Kylie? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Kylie Minogue, you mean? (I do sometimes see the first name used as a mononym)
    Many of her fans might not care - it seems someone ironic to me that gay icons tend to be beautiful women instead of other dudes.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  66. New tag needed by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    immyowngrandpa

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
  67. All you zombies! by aztec1430 · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's time the Dr Who script writers borrowed RAH's "All you Zombies" novella, and adapted it for the screen :) I'd love to see that!

  68. Actually... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    You need to catch up with Mostly Harmless! There are two parallel versions of Tricia McMillan: Trillian (who ran off with Zaphod) and Tricia (who stayed and moved to the USA). In the Radio 4 production of the later books, yes, they were played by the appropriate actresses...

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  69. Tenuous Link with the famous.. by Grumpinuts · · Score: 1

    That's nothing.. Dr Who's dad married my brother! Thats because David Tennants dad is a Church of Scotland Minister.......

  70. Three words. by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

    El Eh Vate!

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
  71. Half the original DNA? No. by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

    And as a clone, the female would have two copies of the original X chromosome (making XX), i.e. half of the original DNA (XY).

    No, that's just wrong.

    A clone of male that was engineered to replace the Y sex chromosome with an duplicate of the X would have much more than half the DNA of the original male. The sex chromosome pair is one of 23 chromosome pairs, and the Y chromosome itself has less DNA than the X chromosome. So, the XY -> XX switch would preserve more than half of the DNA of the sex chromosome pair, which is itself only a small fraction of the DNA of the entire set of chromosomes.

    1. Re:Half the original DNA? No. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      In practice they just duplicate all the chromosomes in an X sperm. So (disregarding the difference between an X and a Y chromosome – as you said, the Y does have much less genetic material than the X) it’s basically half a set.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  72. Re:Twa da Night afo' Crizzmus by sexconker · · Score: 2

    Obviously you would swap the lines, and probably rework "empty beer cans and all".

    But it's a fucking copy-pasta troll - I'm not going to do their homework for them.

  73. Christmas Day by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine the Tennants and Davidson/Moffetts getting together for Christmas lunch. Swapping stories about the good old days, complaining about these new Doctors who couldn't tell an Abzorbaloff from a Toclafane, even with dampeners on their sonic screwdrivers.

    And then they tune in to watch the new Christmas special. Ah, good times...

    --

    Cogito, ergo sig.

  74. Narcissism by CorvisRex · · Score: 1

    Wow. Marrying your own clone. That puts Narcissism on a WHOLE new level...

  75. Re:...but only has half the DNA of the older Docto by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    that's a lot to digest

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  76. Re:Can we have a... by powerlord · · Score: 1

    so the doctor, married his daughter, also the doctor, and she's the daughter of another doctor, and the doctor's daughter, THIRD BASE!

    Wait ... so Who married Who's daughter who happens to be both Who and the Daughter of Who. .... Whoa.

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  77. A douchebag says what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homo Habilis just discovering he has opposable thumbs says, "What?" by mcneely.douchebag.mike (927221) on Wednesday January 05, @07:15PM (#34771802)

    So THAT's what a douchebag says, ok! Lmao...

  78. (OT) - Does the new doctor seem... wrong? by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    I just started watching Doctor Who when Christopher Eccleston (9th doctor) was the doctor. With David Tennant, I was leery at first, and you could say I just didn't like. But after 2 episodes, he "fit" the part. I'm not quite sure how you refer to that sort of expected change.

    With Matt Smith, it just seems... wrong. I'm too lazy to search out some doctor who form to watch some flame wars. But has this sort of "change" not sat right with the public before? If so, do some of you hard core fans already know that Smith isn't going to be around much longer?

  79. Should I wait for the book by niftymitch · · Score: 0

    Should I wait for the book.
    How is it that there is a smaller and smaller
    number of good books.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  80. My my my.... by DrStoooopid · · Score: 1

    ....what an incestuous relationship. ...does this mean like Fry; he's his own Grandpa too?

    --
    There are 2 groups of people you can make fun of on the Internet without fear of attack. The illiterate, and the Amish.
  81. Simpler Graphic by cyclomedia · · Score: 1
    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  82. She's not that good looking by Snaller · · Score: 1

    But she's younger (as god intended ;) so props to the Tennant (and come back please! All is forgiven!)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  83. It depends if Horton hears the Who. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch out. If Horton hears a Who,

  84. Headline Misled Me by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    I had no idea this related to the real world until reading the details. I thought this was a tease of an upcoming episode.

    I could see the Doctor marrying his clone/daughter, they go on their honeymoon and the night of their first copulation dozens of future Timelords (their offspring) show up to witness the event.

  85. Are you a wizard? by RichiH · · Score: 1

    Modding _and_ posting? A miracle!

  86. In my country... by Tetsujin · · Score: 2

    Atcually, that's something socially awkward nerds sometimes mistake for humor. Really, it's not.

    Humor is subjective, so positing what purports on its face to be a factual, objective statement that someone else is wrong about what is and is not humorous is kind of pointless.

    On Vulcan, humor is largely considered irrelevant to our intellectual pursuits. However, there are segments of our population which do enjoy Vulcan humor, and as such there are a certain number of comedy clubs to be found. One of the more popular forms of Vulcan comedy is to posit an elaborate hypothesis containing a small logical flaw; but to proceed ahead with the hypothesis while attempting to provide arguments and calculations supporting the hypothesis which, to a careless mind, would appear sound. The hypothesis is then carried forward to its naturally absurd conclusions. I once attended such a performance: I found it rather whimsical.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  87. Or, as he said in "Curse of Fatal Death"... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    They explained it with the usual burst of technoblather from Tennant, an exasperated noise, and some waving of hands with "You wouldn't understand." :)

    "I'll explain later!"

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  88. Re:(OT) - Does the new doctor seem... wrong? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    With Matt Smith, it just seems... wrong.

    I'd like to refer you to my sig line. Those words of wisdom contain an important, life-changing message for all fans of Doctor Who.

    As for Tennant - I didn't like him at first, either. I didn't watch any of the 2005 series until around 2009, I think. In the end I think Tennant was great but I do wish Eccleston had done at least one more season.

    Personally I think regeneration is always hard for the audience. In some cases more than others: like Tom Baker, who was the Doctor for about seven years and probably the most popular of all the original seven Doctors - Who fans are used to the idea of regeneration but it's still hard, when you've mostly watched one particular doctor, to move on from that and embrace a new actor in the role.

    Tennant is, at least, the most popular Doctor since Tom Baker. He may have even surpassed him in the minds of present-day fans, I don't know.

    But I would say that's the best analogy: both Matt Smith and Peter Davison followed very popular Doctors. In the case of Tom Baker - I don't think the show ever entirely recovered after he left. He was popular enough, and his run was long enough, that it must have been very hard to try and move forward from that point. Even though Tennant's run wasn't as long, he still accounts for four of the six years of the new series at this point. It seems to me that there is some danger that his run will have the same impact.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  89. Who? by Falconne · · Score: 1

    "Who gives this woman to be married to this man?"
    "Yes."
    "No, I mean who's giving away the bride?"
    "That's right."
    "... we may be here a while."

  90. So the wedding would be attended by... by Geminii · · Score: 1

    A Who's Who? :)

  91. Re:(OT) - Does the new doctor seem... wrong? by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the reply!

    I'm going to have to go back and watch the early seasons - they sound good. I guess its probably because I sort of look like Eccleston and can relate to him more, or perhaps he's *my* first doctor, which accounts for him being my favorite, even though Tennant was a great doctor. I'm almost done with season 5, and while Smith does a decent job, he seems... Young? Something like that...

    Also, how do I see your sig? I just read /. and don't really pay attention to the bells and whistles. :shrug: