How is this a step forward? And who decides what innapropiate? and How do you even find the people committing the crimes in the first place? Does this conversation involve replying to comments left by minors? Honestly this law is as much of a trap as setting the a low speed limit and not posting the speed.
Every bit of this law smacks of more totalitarian molestation of justice. If you TRULY feel that this vague law is protecting anything but some politicians unwarranted self importance then you are sadly mistaken.
if the internet is so dangerous then children shouldn't be on it in the first place. or maybe THE PARENTS need to step up to the challenge and pusome fucking initiative in to monitoring their kids. Blanket laws like this arent used for anything but demonizing people suspected of crimes.
Just thinking about how this law will be abused makes me sick.
...i know this is a tool for n00bz, but it is seriously lacking in several areas. First of all it even says in its dox, that it is only supported by a suspects computer supporting windows XP, which is still pretty good and better then nothing. Secondly, if the suspects computer doesnt have autorun enabled you have to go to the USB drive and run the EXE on the suspects computer...meaning that if the computer is BIOS locked, encrypted on boot, or password protected, then the user must log in to execute the EXE. i downloaded it and ran it, but it is ineffective against my W7 machines (password protected, encrypted). understanding that if you dont give cops your password when they request it, they can charge you with obstruction of justice and then just move up to REAL computer forensics
I know its not perfect, and it isn't designed for the "1334", but it just seems useless if you are going up against someone who REALLY paranoid or very secure. it seems like if someone has their computer as open as it needs to be to run COFEE, you wouldn't need the tool in the first place, just someone remotely proficient in computers.
Are you high? The DMCA started with the best of intentions. Now it is used to stifle people criticism and control content. i can only assume you are some kind of troll, because you surely realize that as soon as you start blanketing one corner of the internet with "fraud protection", you move to "counterfeit assurance" and then "piracy control" until you finally get to "free speech countermeasures". if this is the internet you want, please, setup your own intranet and leave the rest of us out of it. i'll take the scammers any day over oppression.
well then, maybe he cant stop being a douche and open up his website to those of use that WANTED to hear his opinion. but now i dont give a shit, so fuck it.
i actually got a party pack and mine had streamers in the windows colors...I also got balloons (also in the windows colors). So i am either on the beta for SPP1 or they got screwed.
i made a video about it even...albeit i dont seemed thrilled. i did bet a few decorations. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rj7AdGww2-Q
Big advantage is that you can do something that that very few video cameras can do...Switch Lenses. and you can use ANY canon EOS lens with it to shoot video. If you are worried about the audio, you could also record audio with another source, although that does ad to cost.
And there arent video cameras that can take a 21MP full frame still image.
Perhaps then you should find another place to speak then, honestly. Whats the point of coming to a website that allows feedback, and then providing feedback, and then complaining about being able to provide feedback?
anyone could have done this...i have been doing it for two years...with now special equipment...
I would plug my moto Q into my laptop, share the connection with my laptops wifi, turn on Internet connection sharing and create a portable Ad-hoc network. It didnt work well with PSP's and DS's, but laptop's and other computers could connect with out any problems...I even used to take it to the next level and run it to the LAN and then straight to my router and create a full blown 3G in home network that anything could connect too. anyone with a little ingenuity could have done this years ago. I would have months on Sprint where my total traffic would exceed 30GB's a month.
Honestly, this movie as terrible. It was worse then X-Men 3. Unless this was the biggest cop out of all time the the theatrical release COMPLETELY different, then i feel bad for anyone that waste their money to see it. They couldn't even get the basic story elements they had set up in the X-Men movies right, let alone the actual Wolverine origin.
I know that to make films like this, they have to make concessions with the story, but why even bother calling it Wolverine, they could just call it "guy with claws movie". The best part of the movie comes when Wolvie spends time with a rural couple after his escape from Weapon X (which was less then 5 minutes of the film)and the opening montage. after that, its just BS. They even screw up and leave out all of the Weapon X brainwashing. Liev Schreiber was easily the best part of the movie, and was far better as Sabertooth then i could have hoped, I think the movie might have been better if it focused more on him. Ryan Renyolds was also great as Wade Wilson, even though in this version of the film he is in it for about 5 minutes (I refuse to acknowledge "Deadpool" at the end of the movie, that wasn't Deadpool, it was "Guy with Baraka's sword arms").
The only harm i see in reviewing this film so soon is that people will actually know how bad it is. Is it fair to REVIEW the movie based on the workprint? No it is not. But it is fair to base an opinion of it, given that all of the story elements are in place and most likely won't change prior to the final release, my personal opinion of it is that its pretty awful.
and, not that i care, Stan Lee doesnt show up in the workprint.
Slashdot Mirror
wow, overly literally interpretation much?
How is this a step forward? And who decides what innapropiate? and How do you even find the people committing the crimes in the first place? Does this conversation involve replying to comments left by minors? Honestly this law is as much of a trap as setting the a low speed limit and not posting the speed.
Every bit of this law smacks of more totalitarian molestation of justice. If you TRULY feel that this vague law is protecting anything but some politicians unwarranted self importance then you are sadly mistaken.
if the internet is so dangerous then children shouldn't be on it in the first place. or maybe THE PARENTS need to step up to the challenge and pusome fucking initiative in to monitoring their kids. Blanket laws like this arent used for anything but demonizing people suspected of crimes.
Just thinking about how this law will be abused makes me sick.
...i know this is a tool for n00bz, but it is seriously lacking in several areas. First of all it even says in its dox, that it is only supported by a suspects computer supporting windows XP, which is still pretty good and better then nothing. Secondly, if the suspects computer doesnt have autorun enabled you have to go to the USB drive and run the EXE on the suspects computer...meaning that if the computer is BIOS locked, encrypted on boot, or password protected, then the user must log in to execute the EXE. i downloaded it and ran it, but it is ineffective against my W7 machines (password protected, encrypted). understanding that if you dont give cops your password when they request it, they can charge you with obstruction of justice and then just move up to REAL computer forensics
I know its not perfect, and it isn't designed for the "1334", but it just seems useless if you are going up against someone who REALLY paranoid or very secure. it seems like if someone has their computer as open as it needs to be to run COFEE, you wouldn't need the tool in the first place, just someone remotely proficient in computers.
Are you high? The DMCA started with the best of intentions. Now it is used to stifle people criticism and control content. i can only assume you are some kind of troll, because you surely realize that as soon as you start blanketing one corner of the internet with "fraud protection", you move to "counterfeit assurance" and then "piracy control" until you finally get to "free speech countermeasures". if this is the internet you want, please, setup your own intranet and leave the rest of us out of it. i'll take the scammers any day over oppression.
the difference is that the Balloon Boy's family was doing it for attention.
This is probably DARPA 's first step to making a Weather Machine.
In space, no one can hear me take what i can get.
Sign me up....now.
ummmm..i dont think that this tech will help much with amputated limbs. but yeah, thats a nice soapbox you got there.
well then, maybe he cant stop being a douche and open up his website to those of use that WANTED to hear his opinion. but now i dont give a shit, so fuck it.
i actually got a party pack and mine had streamers in the windows colors...I also got balloons (also in the windows colors). So i am either on the beta for SPP1 or they got screwed.
i made a video about it even...albeit i dont seemed thrilled. i did bet a few decorations. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rj7AdGww2-Q
Big advantage is that you can do something that that very few video cameras can do...Switch Lenses. and you can use ANY canon EOS lens with it to shoot video. If you are worried about the audio, you could also record audio with another source, although that does ad to cost.
And there arent video cameras that can take a 21MP full frame still image.
Perhaps then you should find another place to speak then, honestly. Whats the point of coming to a website that allows feedback, and then providing feedback, and then complaining about being able to provide feedback?
anyone could have done this...i have been doing it for two years...with now special equipment... I would plug my moto Q into my laptop, share the connection with my laptops wifi, turn on Internet connection sharing and create a portable Ad-hoc network. It didnt work well with PSP's and DS's, but laptop's and other computers could connect with out any problems...I even used to take it to the next level and run it to the LAN and then straight to my router and create a full blown 3G in home network that anything could connect too. anyone with a little ingenuity could have done this years ago. I would have months on Sprint where my total traffic would exceed 30GB's a month.
jeez, dude, just get over it.
Honestly, this movie as terrible. It was worse then X-Men 3. Unless this was the biggest cop out of all time the the theatrical release COMPLETELY different, then i feel bad for anyone that waste their money to see it. They couldn't even get the basic story elements they had set up in the X-Men movies right, let alone the actual Wolverine origin.
I know that to make films like this, they have to make concessions with the story, but why even bother calling it Wolverine, they could just call it "guy with claws movie". The best part of the movie comes when Wolvie spends time with a rural couple after his escape from Weapon X (which was less then 5 minutes of the film)and the opening montage. after that, its just BS. They even screw up and leave out all of the Weapon X brainwashing. Liev Schreiber was easily the best part of the movie, and was far better as Sabertooth then i could have hoped, I think the movie might have been better if it focused more on him. Ryan Renyolds was also great as Wade Wilson, even though in this version of the film he is in it for about 5 minutes (I refuse to acknowledge "Deadpool" at the end of the movie, that wasn't Deadpool, it was "Guy with Baraka's sword arms").
The only harm i see in reviewing this film so soon is that people will actually know how bad it is. Is it fair to REVIEW the movie based on the workprint? No it is not. But it is fair to base an opinion of it, given that all of the story elements are in place and most likely won't change prior to the final release, my personal opinion of it is that its pretty awful.
and, not that i care, Stan Lee doesnt show up in the workprint.
a baseball bat and an animal bat are not the same, i fail to see why this so mind boggling.
other things bats are not or cannot do...
Bats cannot swallow a whole hotdog
Bats cannot follow the finer details of Neon Genesis Evangelion
Bats aren't horses, sheep or baseball bats
until the space shuttle burns up on re-entry because the bat chewed a hole in it or something.
"idk, my bff jill?"
welcome to xbox live! you must not have ever used it.
I am running: Word, firefox, outlook, bittorrent, freedownload manager, pidgin.
windows 7 starter is the biggest ripoff ever.
i lol'd...but i am surprised you made it all the way from encyclopedia dramatica to /.
sorry...i divided by zero.
i lol...but it could be...Weegee
weegie? is that like squeegee?