Slashdot Mirror


Mobile Wi-Fi Hot Spot

bsharma writes to let us know about a little goodie that we will be able to buy starting May 17: a battery-powered, rechargeable, cellular, Wi-Fi hot spot that you can put in your pocket. "What if you had a personal Wi-Fi bubble, a private hot spot, that followed you everywhere you go? Incredibly, there is such a thing. It's the Novatel MiFi 2200, available from Verizon starting in mid-May ($100 with two-year contract, after rebate). It's a little wisp of a thing, like a triple-thick credit card. It has one power button, one status light and a swappable battery that looks like the one in a cellphone. When you turn on your MiFi and wait 30 seconds, it provides a personal, portable, powerful, password-protected wireless hot spot. ... If you just want to do e-mail and the Web, you pay $40 a month for the service (250 megabytes of data transfer, 10 cents a megabyte above that). If you watch videos and shuttle a lot of big files, opt for the $60 plan (5 gigabytes). And if you don't travel incessantly, the best deal may be the one-day pass: $15 for 24 hours, only when you need it. In that case, the MiFi itself costs $270." The device has its Wi-Fi password printed on the bottom, so you can invite someone to join your network simply by showing it to them.

202 comments

  1. Better reception with this unit by rwwyatt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One Advantage of the MiFi unit is that the performance is better than that of a standard datacard. Laptop Noise is an issue with usb sticks especially in low coverage areas.

    Disclaimer: I work for the Manufacturer.

    1. Re:Better reception with this unit by Celeste+R · · Score: 3, Informative

      Units like this are nothing new.

      The inherent problem with these isn't the fact that they're celluar; it's the fact that they're WIFI.

      Driving around with this isn't nearly so great when you're getting interference from APs on the same channel (and there's no way to avoid it).

      This means stuttered speeds while there's interference; and until this problem is solved with either a new WIFI spec or limiting the AP to an uncommon spec (who uses A these days?) that its utility is limited.

      And when utility is limited, it's not going to be the wonder product that people would like.

      I'll stick with my USB 3G, thank you.

      --
      There are no perfect answers, only the right questions. More questions at http://foresightandhindsight.blogspot.com/
    2. Re:Better reception with this unit by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a USB extension cable eliminate laptop noise? You can get those for about $3 off Newegg. Though this is a less bulky solution, I'll admit.

    3. Re:Better reception with this unit by rwwyatt · · Score: 1

      Some cards require the use of
        2 usb ports due to current requirements so you need a y cable.

    4. Re:Better reception with this unit by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      According to the article it has a web interface (like all home wifi routers) that allows you to change the settings. If the manufacturer put any thought into the design of this product they would allow you to change the wifi channel.

    5. Re:Better reception with this unit by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      In which case, like the UM175 that is offered by Verizon and some other carriers, it's already moved away by the use of the y-cable. The one that comes with the UM175 is about 3 feet long.

    6. Re:Better reception with this unit by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For me, the biggest hinderance is the cost of service. I don't travel a lot, but $15/day is exactly what I had to pay for my last hotel's internet service, and cellular internet is generally not as good as hotel WiFi, so I don't see the point in this device. Find some way that I can get device rental + service for $10/day or less, then maybe I'm interested.

    7. Re:Better reception with this unit by rwwyatt · · Score: 1

      You are allowed to change the channel in the web ui.

    8. Re:Better reception with this unit by rwwyatt · · Score: 1

      The need for the y cable is dependent on the chipset. Other advantages to the mifi is that no driver installation is required.

    9. Re:Better reception with this unit by socsoc · · Score: 1

      One reason I love dd-wrt is that I can choose a channel that isn't approved in the states by the FCC, so I know there is going to be less interference from all my neighbors in the complex.

      Open this hardware up to support every wifi channel and those who are tech-savvy won't have that problem.

    10. Re:Better reception with this unit by scotsghost · · Score: 1

      Sounds like this type of device needs a "pick another channel" button. (Along with a touch of intelligence, so that the channel it picks isn't also suffering from interference.)

      Surfing to the web-admin page just to find yourself a clean channel sounds like it would get old fast.

    11. Re:Better reception with this unit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet would be if the device could be set to automatically pick another channel in the event of interference.

    12. Re:Better reception with this unit by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      Trade shows are where this device would be very cost effective. The last one I was at charged hundreds of dollars for a single IP address. This device would have paid for itself on the first day of the show. We could of had our two demo machines set up on it plus our sales weasels on their laptops. The only problem, as mentioned in an earlier post, might have been from interference on the wifi channel. The show floor was filled with wifi devices all competing for a signal.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    13. Re:Better reception with this unit by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      One reason I love dd-wrt is that I can choose a channel that isn't approved in the states by the FCC, so I know there is going to be less interference from all my neighbors in the complex.

      It's all fun and games until the FCC comes knocking on your door, wondering why you're interfering with the authorized user of a frequency you're not supposed to be using. DDWRT and friends (I use OpenWRT) are nice, but I'd stick to channels 1-11 if I were you.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:Better reception with this unit by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "Units like this are nothing new. "

      Exactly. There's programs that have existed for years that turned Wifi enabled cellphones into wifi hotspots. WMWifiRouter is the first one that comes to mind

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    15. Re:Better reception with this unit by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The only reason to buy a gadget like this is its simplicity. If you're having to reconfigure it constantly, that kind of defeats the purpose

      Also, unlike home routers, this puppy doesn't seem to have an ethernet port. Can the USB port provide a network connection? Otherwise, if something's blocking your WiFi connection, you have no way to reconfigure it!

  2. "simply by showing it to them" by Ant+P. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And what do you do when you no longer want to let them have access?

    1. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by macraig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I guess you get up and leave! Or yank the battery.

    2. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kick them in the nethers and run away?

    3. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You KILL -9 them

    4. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You smash their computer, of course. And you'll have get them in a headlock that cuts the blood flow from their head, to try to wipe their short-term memory (of the password and you smashing their computer).

      And you'll have to kill the witnesses, as this is all in public.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Hillview · · Score: 5, Informative

      Theoretically, you could "type 192.168.1.1 into your Web browser's address bar -- a trick well known to network gurus -- the MiFi's settings pages magically appear. Now you can do geeky, tweaky tasks like changing the password or the wireless network name, limiting access to specific computers, turning on port forwarding (don't ask)." Of course, you could also read the article.. Theoretically.

      --
      -Troll, Flamebait, and Offtopic are NOT equivalent to disagreement.
    6. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And what do you do when you no longer want to let them have access?

      Gee, I dunno Einstein, maybe stop showing them the password?

    7. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Informative

      Same thing you do with every other wifi router, you change the password. In this case using their web interface which much like every other little consumer WAP/Router on planet.

      And this would be a good example of how reading the article can save you from asking a stupid question.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if they memorized it or wrote it down?

    9. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a stupid question, more of a snide remark. The password is printed on the device. This "feature" supposedly enables the user to share the password with other people "simply by showing it to them". If you change the password, you break that feature. So really, that can't be the point of printing the password onto the device. Some marketing guy dreamed up another bullet point. In reality it's just a way of making sure that the default password doesn't get lost, without making it the same for all devices.

    10. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by tylerni7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Memorizing? Writing? Hah! I find that unlikely!

    11. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're so nerdcore.

    12. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You send them a DMCA takedown notice to stop them using your intellectual property of course!

    13. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      Several router/modems also follow this practice, like 2wire wireless router/modem combos. They work as a DSL modem and as a wireless router.

      They protect the wireless connection by default with the key printed on the bottom of the modem below the serial. Works good and helps protect ignorant people's networks from malicious use.

    14. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by ifeelswine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And what do you do when you no longer want to let them have access?

      modify your dns to redirect all of their web requests to goatse

    15. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by mlts · · Score: 1

      It would add significant cost, but perhaps a small e-paper display could have been put on the bottom or covered by a lid that would have a password, and another button on the unit to change the PW instantly. This way, one could be using their wireless connection at one location, then at some other place, push the button, configure their laptop to switch as well.

      Another idea would be adding a rudimintary RADIUS server onto the card and just use the enterprise-level authentication, and not worry about WPA passwords. However, some type of password would be needed to initially configure or reset the device, so this may not be the best of ideas.

    16. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You send them a DMCA takedown notice to stop them using your intellectual property of course!

      You make sure the passphrase is lyrics to a popular song... and have the RIAA take them to court for typing out those lyrics.

    17. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by cpicon92 · · Score: 0

      walk away

    18. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a hacker - burn him!!!1!!one!!!111

    19. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by JackSpratts · · Score: 1

      depends. you can change the password and block guests. then again maybe "guests" can access the router and block you. pogue wasn't clear on the "geeky things" privileges. but either way, problem solved.

      how cute is that?

      - js.

    20. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Technician · · Score: 1

      And what do you do when you no longer want to let them have access?

      Either hit the power button on it or surf to 192.168.1.1 and change the SSID and password.

      Did you read the article?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    21. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

      The password is printed on the device. This "feature" supposedly enables the user to share the password with other people "simply by showing it to them". If you change the password, you break that feature.

      Works perfectly for average users.

      If you're advanced enough to reconfigure the device and change the password, you're advanced enough to update the sticker on the back.

      If marketing disabled the password change to keep the feature - then you can complain.

      --
      I lost my sig.
    22. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by jseale · · Score: 1

      Well duh, everybody knows that one. Geez!

    23. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      Then don't show it to them in the first place! the thing is you you don't have to visibly deploy it. You can just put on the button, leave it in your pocket or purse and net away.

    24. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by MrPhilby · · Score: 1

      Type in the password for them on THEIR machine. Hopefully they won't know how to make the password visible after the fact.

    25. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Mechanik · · Score: 1

      You make sure the passphrase is lyrics to a popular song... and have the RIAA take them to court for typing out those lyrics.

      I now have the humorous image in my head of "The Others" on LOST getting sued for using Good Vibrations as the basis of their password for the jamming device.

    26. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Theoretically, you could "type 192.168.1.1 into your Web browser's address bar -- a trick well known to network gurus -- the MiFi's settings pages magically appear. Now you can do geeky, tweaky tasks like changing the password ...

      So once you've shown them the password couldn't THEY type 192.168.1.1 into THEIR web browser, change the password, and lock YOU out of kicking them off (or making further changes to your own WiFi card)?

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    27. Re:"simply by showing it to them" by Hillview · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't show specify this device, but a typical wifi router has separate access and admin passwords. So, no.

      --
      -Troll, Flamebait, and Offtopic are NOT equivalent to disagreement.
  3. on my E71... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use joikuspot.

    1. Re:on my E71... by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1

      I do as well.

      What does this bring to the table that JoikuSpot, Walking HotSpot, and a variety of other S60 applications don't?

      --
      I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
  4. Cash money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This will be great once someone figures out your wifi password and starts torrenting. $0.10 per megabyte? Should be a pretty impressive bill when it comes.

    1. Re:Cash money! by CarpetShark · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, I don't get how these highly-metered services even exist -- especially on "landline broadband". Even in mobile broadband, it's nowhere near justifiable, methinks. Anyone who pays $40 for half a CD per month of data transfer in 2009 is batshit insane. That probably wouldn't even cover the spam I get.

    2. Re:Cash money! by zMaile · · Score: 1

      Well, in Australia with our shitty expensive services, that's what we'd be paying telstra for the same rates with an ADSL connection. Granted it's $AUS, not $USD.

    3. Re:Cash money! by tepples · · Score: 1

      Anyone who pays $40 for half a CD per month of data transfer in 2009 is batshit insane. That probably wouldn't even cover the spam I get.

      That's why you filter the spam on the server side and don't download the bodies of messages in the junk mail folder.

    4. Re:Cash money! by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a data plan with my phone, so if I do want to use the internet on it, it costs $2/mb through Verizon. If I filled up my 1tb drive, it would cost $2 million. Needless to say, I don't use it very much.

    5. Re:Cash money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand it either. I will never pay for (monthly fee) internet access. There are enough free access points in my neighborhood and at local stores. When I'm on the road, there are free open access points in hotels or cities I visit.

      If someone created a mesh type device with a one-time fee, that would be news.

  5. Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by strredwolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Someone forgot about the battery powered Cradelpoint systems. They're at http://www.cradlepoint.com/ and aren't tied to one system or another: You provide a USB dongle for it. It provides everything else. The PRS300 or the CTR350 has been around for years now.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      This is really cool and it's only $180.00, nice find PHS300

    2. Re:Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by greenThing · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've been using a PHS300 from Cradlepoint with my Sprint USB broadband dongle for almost a year. I commute by train 50 mins each way daily. I turn it on, toss it in my backpack, and I'm online for the train ride with no problems & nothing hanging off my laptop.

    3. Re:Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by kindbud · · Score: 1

      Yep, they're great. I am posting using a PHS300 right now from my boat which is moored at Isthmus Cove on Catalina Island. 4 bars and 2.5mbit/s downloads here (670kbit/s up). That's better than the Wifi offered for boaters here at Two Harbors. I have a grandfathered unlimited Verizon 3G account with the UM175 dongle.

      When I'm commuting to work, I listen to Pandora on the bus with my iPod touch.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    4. Re:Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a Cradlepoint with WiMAX can really kick ass. An unlimited plan with T1's up and down... Just the cities eligible so far are limited, but growing! Clear and check devices.

    5. Re:Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'see, this device in the OP has already been beaten before it even existed!

      The price for this Mi-Fi is just terribly high.
      The execution of the device is just too insecure. (fixed password? If so, then it has fail written all over it)

      I believe this is doomed to fail very badly, anyone who buys this is completely nuts, especially at this moment in time. (economic depression, blah)

    6. Re:Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not necessarily. I think it's far more likely that cradlepoint isn't mentioned because the entire thing is an ad. An ad for something that /. readership outside the US probably can't use, and /. readership within the US who know what they are doing wouldn't bother using.

      Thanks kdawson, your amazing editorial skills astound me once again.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    7. Re:Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by RIC_Splinter · · Score: 1

      Yes Cradlepoint Rox! I've used a cradlepoint router with unlimited sprint access, hey it's way better than dialup and it's cool to have internet in the car. I leave access open. As far as denying access to someone ... just move, btw I've never had a problem with people leeching my network while moving down the highway.

    8. Re:Someone forgot about the Cradlepoint! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think this is not deliberate?

  6. They've finally perfected male birth control. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just what I've always wanted, a mobile wi-fi hotspot sitting in my pants pocket microwaving my genitals all day long.

    1. Re:They've finally perfected male birth control. by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think this is a problem for most /.ers

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:They've finally perfected male birth control. by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

      lol - thanks for that !!!

  7. Been there, done that. by haner · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't see the big deal in this. For those of us who run Symbian based phones, Joikuspot has a free version which allows you to use your phone as a personal wifi hotspot with encryption. I use my E71 on ATT for an instant 3G hotspot wherever a 3G connection exists.

    1. Re:Been there, done that. by ouimetch · · Score: 5, Funny

      "it provides a personal, portable, powerful, password-protected wireless hot spot."

      Clearly anything that can be described with this level of alliteration is a big deal.

    2. Re:Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us REALLY hate cell phones.

    3. Re:Been there, done that. by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Allegedly, anything able to be accounted for with this amount of alliteration is absolutely astounding"

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    4. Re:Been there, done that. by Gible · · Score: 2

      Hell, I can use my Nokia 6234 to get net access via bluetooth. Tho I can't speak for the speed or quality, I only did it to see if I could and then disconnected - I can't afford 1992 data rates anymore.

      I suppose there might be some sort of emergency where I might use it, but it hasn't happened yet.

      --
      ~/ One man's opinions is a lifetime of pain. /~
    5. Re:Been there, done that. by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      Man, that not technically alliteration (It isn't quite assonance either, as you are switching between vowel sounds there).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Been there, done that. by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he's so excited he P'd himself.

    7. Re:Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you are running a Windows Mobile based device, you can use WMWifiRouter. 0.91 or older are free, but the latest version (1.35), support secured networking, and only costs $30.

    8. Re:Been there, done that. by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1
      I use my E71 on ATT for an instant 3G hotspot wherever a 3G connection exists.

      ...Which isn't very many places unless you live in a major city.

    9. Re:Been there, done that. by socsoc · · Score: 1

      That's not true in northern California, I get great 3G reception in boondocks areas (talking 100+ miles), better than I get in some of the major cities.

    10. Re:Been there, done that. by jra · · Score: 1

      I believe the observation you were looking for was "a lot of alliteration from anxious authors placed in powerful posts."

      Or am I the only one left who remembers Broadcast News?

    11. Re:Been there, done that. by kubajz · · Score: 1

      Same thing for me in the Czech Republic (middle of Europe) - I pay approx. $5 for "basic" mobile Internet access (HTTP only), and with JoikuSpot, I get an AP on my Nokia phone.

    12. Re:Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Allegedly, anything able to be accounted for with this amount of alliteration is absolutely astounding"

      That's assonance, not alliteration.

      (That said, it was quite clever - nicely done.)

    13. Re:Been there, done that. by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      OK, now I'm curious, and you probably know: isn't it technically alliteration anyway, because of the glottal stop at the start of each "a", no matter which vowel sound follows? (Pretend I talk like Tony Danza.)

    14. Re:Been there, done that. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have no idea. I think the fact that the sounds are not consistent (regardless of their exact nature) is a bit of a deal breaker though (I speak a slightly nasal Midwestern variant of American newscaster English, so it probably isn't my accent making me think that).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  8. Cna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...you *cna* put in your pocket."

  9. Singularity use? by Sybert42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Most Singularity-research should be done on high-speed landlines. Also, the iPhone can do this. The iPhone will seem silly post-Singularity.

  10. Rooted G1 with WiFi Tether by SighKoPath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been doing this for months. http://code.google.com/p/android-wifi-tether/

    1. Re:Rooted G1 with WiFi Tether by bughunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. If I already have a device whose main function is to connect me to a network, why do I need to have *another* one because I want to send a different kind of data? It's the same network, same protocol, same everything, except for the opportunity to sell me something I already have. So explain to me again why I need a MiFi in addition to a 3G cellphone?

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    2. Re:Rooted G1 with WiFi Tether by tepples · · Score: 1

      So explain to me again why I need a MiFi in addition to a 3G cellphone?

      Because you probably live in North America, home of mobile fleecing, and you didn't pay extra for a tethering clause in your contract.

    3. Re:Rooted G1 with WiFi Tether by supercell · · Score: 1

      So multiple users/machines can access the network with one devices wirelessly.

    4. Re:Rooted G1 with WiFi Tether by dwater · · Score: 1

      and there are several solutions to this on Symbian too, that have been available for years.

      --
      Max.
    5. Re:Rooted G1 with WiFi Tether by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can pay MONEY for it! It's an ad - yep I know it's difficult to believe after all these ad free years at /.

    6. Re:Rooted G1 with WiFi Tether by SighKoPath · · Score: 1

      WiFi Tether allows exactly that. You are also able to restrict by MAC address using a nice GUI including notifications when unauthorized and authorized clients connect - it's as simple as clicking a checkbox to add a new client to the allowed list. The encryption is a bit weak for my tastes, though. It currently only supports WEP. My solution is doing everything potentially sensitive through a VPN, but not everybody has that option.

    7. Re:Rooted G1 with WiFi Tether by darjen · · Score: 1

      use voip with your wifi-enabled device (tablet or whatever), and just ditch the 3G cellphone entirely. I can't vouch for whether verzion allows voip traffic through this thing though.

  11. great again by u4ya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the story yesterday about the car-centric mobile network, and now this today... it's great to see.

    As most of you know, the Internet is at risk of being restricted. Imagine a free, global Internet mesh, where the likes of RIAA and Big Brother couldn't reach. It would be a great boon to freedom of the Internet and to humankind.

    Of course, naysayers would probably say they will always find a way to strip our freedoms... but we can all dream, can't we?

  12. Electric signal by Sybert42 · · Score: 1

    Post-singularity, it will be an electrical switch in the "brain".

  13. Enable VOIP! by Gible · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So wait... The telco's won't allow my iPhone/G1/Crackbery/etc to use VOIP over their network unless I buy one of these first?

    --
    ~/ One man's opinions is a lifetime of pain. /~
  14. Irresponsible by Sybert42 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wait until after the Singularity? This is not an artificial scarcity.

  15. Wait for Singularity by Sybert42 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Data will be better understood then, and better handled. You can try to use VOIP whenever you have IP, but latency or other problems may arise. Bandwidth is just one variable.

  16. Joikuspot by speedtux · · Score: 1

    Any Symbian S60 phone will do this with Joikuspot (a $20 software add-on).

    It's occasionally useful; most of the time, Bluetooth or a USB cable are better, because they drain the battery less.

    1. Re:Joikuspot by operator_error · · Score: 1

      This setup works well for me during my daily train commute. I use an external Nokia battery (rechargeable AA, 2500 units of power), which is essentially a 2nd, hot-swappable power source. This is a $20 Nokia part.

      Because I only have a single SIM for my account (I should inquire if I can get a 2nd, but nevermind)... It is too delicate to swap out the SIM to a USB laptop modem frequently, so using the Nokia N95 as a modem is most efficient during the commute.

    2. Re:Joikuspot by ImpShial · · Score: 1

      A Sybian Phone?

      Ewwww! I'm not putting my ear to that!

      --
      I gave up religion for Lent.
    3. Re:Joikuspot by dwater · · Score: 1

      > Any Symbian S60 phone will do this with Joikuspot (a $20 software add-on).

      Not quite. The phone has to have wifi h/w, which reduces the range quite a bit. Still, IINM, that new E71X on AT&T is available for $99 and that has wifi.

      I think $99 is pretty cheap, though I guess you might end up paying more depending on what data plan you pick and that sort of thing. Also, IINM, JoikuSpot is only free for web access (the 'Light' version?) - anything else and you have to buy the 'premium' version, which seems to be 15 Euros.

      Still, it seems to be a much more flexible solution to me - especially since you'll have it with you all the time and don't have to carry something else with you.

      There are other companies that have similar products too, iirc.

      --
      Max.
    4. Re:Joikuspot by karth500 · · Score: 1

      Joikuspot rocks, and if you have a unlimited data packages like you do in the US, there is no need to pay anything to the mobile service provider. I have a 15$ unlimited data plan from AT&T, and a Nokia N95 and I have a mobile wi-fi hotspot that doesn't cost $100, with no contract and 3 times cheaper.

  17. Three in the UK do something not too dissimilar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    but it is 15gig for £15 ($23), and the Huawei d100 is about £75 ($115). Admittedly the modem uses a mains a/c supply - but I am certain it is fairly easy to make a portable supply for it.

    If you think that is aggressively priced - you even get a third off if you are already a customer... If I had excellent reception here - I would have not bothered with a landline/adsl..

    1. Re:Three in the UK do something not too dissimilar by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      I can't see the point in this at all especially with such a lousy data plan.

      ok Netbook + USB Hsdpa Modem set ip4 port forwarding in sysctl.conf and setup a few rules for iptables the only thing you might need in addition is a dhcp server running on your laptop to give addresses out. I'm using a similar set up here but i use eth0 to wan port of a standard wifi router but the only additional bit really is the dhcp server
      if the desktop was wireless even the router would be redundant.

      I'm struggling a little to see why anyone would want to do this most people wouldnt consider it, those that would can do so without spending anything once they have a 3g modem and a reasonable data plan.
       

  18. Re:Singularity? by rwwyatt · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am not actually an RF engineer so my thoughts/explanation may be completely ludicrous(it would not be the first time). My expertise is basically layer 3 through 5 of the OSI model

    During the system test phase, a large number of measurements were performed to isolate the impact of Wifi Noise on 3G and 3G Noise on WiFi. It was found that there was actually minimal impact of Wifi on 3G and vice versa.

  19. I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its rechargable, does 802.11a/b/g, does GPRS and edge and lets me make voice calls without using some POS VoIP app that sounds like shit regardless of how much bandwidth you give it (looking at you skype).

    Hate to sound like an iPhone fan boy, but really this isn't impressive unless they pay me to buy it and cut the monthly cell data charges down to $40/month for unlimited usage like I get with my iPhone. Otherwise its just dumb to waste your money on it if the iPhone is an option.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by cbhacking · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, how well does your iPhone share out that connection to a real computer (you know, what the whole point of this little device is)? Oh wait, Apple doesn't allow tethering apps? Hmm, sorry, I think you don't quite get it. There are LOTS of Internet-capable handheld devices out there (some much more-so than the iPhone, thanks to having Flash and the option to install your own browser/mail client/whatever). The iPhone is a neat device, but until you can link it with a PC and share the wide-area connection (without jailbreaking, that is), it won't do what people buy these things for.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    2. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      No but wait, his Iphone lets him make phone calls (and apparently supports 802.11a), so it's as good or better than any other product on the market, no mater what that device does.

    3. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by Jay+L · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The iPhone is a neat device, but until you can link it with a PC and share the wide-area connection (without jailbreaking, that is), it won't do what people buy these things for.

      Good point - and I too "have one and it's called an iPhone".

      What I think this really means is that Apple can do what it's done repeatedly this decade: Create something versatile and potentially disruptive, but hold off on the disruption as long as is profitable.

      F'rinstance: Everyone else sold MP3-based music players with no DRM. Apple made an iPod that could play DRM-free music - but, instead, they turned around and partnered with every major music label to provide a locked-down but fully-stocked catalog. Gah! Where's my free music?

      In retrospect, it was pretty damned smart. Guess what they could do just as soon as "pent-up consumer demand profit" became greater than "become best buds with the RIAA profit"? Remove all the DRM.

      They did it again with the iPhone App store. Every other smartphone allowed independent development, but Apple told us we'd get nothing but WebKit-based apps, and we'd like it. Meanwhile, that let them ship the first iPhone without worrying about the public API - and create visible, vocal demand from the development community. By the following year, programmers everywhere were screaming: "Please! Let us write programs for your platform!" And what do you know... the App Store appeared, and Apple gets a cut.

      I don't know if it was truly planned this way, but it does seem to be a pattern, doesn't it? Most companies either court the rebellious-hacker base with an open API (early TiVo, some Google, Twitter), hoping to Be The Platform, or build a fortress (late TiVo, Facebook), hoping to Be The Gatekeeper. Apple seems to have a knack for being the gatekeeper as long as it possibly can - and then amazing us with the new power of the platform.

      The jailbroken apps, as well as the 3.0 betas, prove that Apple could offer iPhone tethering next week - or next year. But they'd have to annoy AT&T to do it, and probably renegotiate. Why do that before they have to?

      My hope: The MeFi will be a huge success, and there will be clamoring for Apple to offer something nearly as good. And then, one day, they'll send out a firmware update... and behold: the iPhone tethers. "It's amazing. I'm really proud of this capability, which is the first in a capacitive-touchscreen smartphone." etc.

    4. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by kalpaha · · Score: 1

      What? You don't have 3G, can't share the connection with computers and pay $40? I can do that with my Nokia E75 and JoikuSpot for less than $14 (10 EUR) / month.

    5. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      The market for this device is those who want to

          a) Use their laptop rather than their tiny phone

          b) Share their cellular data plan with multiple laptops/users

      I don't believe your iPhone lets you do either (sans hack), but I could be mistaken.

      But you're right, this is hardly something most people would care about.

      --
      -David
    6. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by TerribleNews · · Score: 1

      and behold: the iPhone tethers. "It's amazing. I'm really proud of this capability, which is the first in a capacitive-touchscreen smartphone." etc.

      I think you meant "and boom: the iPhone tethers."

    7. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by cthrall · · Score: 1

      I have an iPhone. I used to have a Treo on VZN. I really miss the ability to tether my phone to my laptop, and I really miss the great speed and coverage of VZN. It cost the same as the data plan for the iPhone, too.

      The iPhone is cool, but there's no Rhapsody client, actually doing anything in ssh with the iPhone kbd is impossible, as is remote desktop over VPN.

    8. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Fuck off, you are making us iPhone users look like a bunch of wankers (come on guys, not all of us are).

      This is a device to allow sharing to a whole bunch of computers.

    9. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple does allow this, it's ATT that is stopping it. Do a little research before making an ass of yourself.

    10. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      My iPhone shares over bluetooth or USB. I hear the rest of yours will do the same sometime in Juneish. :P

      Or you could just jailbreak the thing, which is pretty easy, and have all the functionality of this thing.

      Seriously, I think the idea is reasonably good, but the price is insane. $40 a month for half a gig? $270 for the device? Seriously?

    11. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? The iPod had always played DRM free mp3s, ever since day one. And it was Apple that pressured those big labels to drop DRM on the iTunes Store.

      Apple approve a tethering app a while ago, but ATT made them take it down.

      I'm no Apple fanboy, but get your facts straight.

    12. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by Ned+Scott · · Score: 1

      Apple does allow tethering. Take your bitching up with AT&T.

    13. Re:I already have one, its called an iPhone ... by jra · · Score: 1

      I would love to mod this as insightful, but everyone else already did.

      Is there a "most insightful comment on /. this year" mod?

  20. Not to burst your bubble... by nilbog · · Score: 2, Informative

    This isn't that revolutionary. I have an AT&T Tilt that can share its 3G connection via WiFi using a program called WMWifiRouter. Since my data plan is "unlimited" and only $15/mo, it's a way better deal than this "new" tech.

    --
    or else!
    1. Re:Not to burst your bubble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you must be mistaken. AT&T has never offered a good deal on anything ever. Are you sure this isn't somehow illegal / violating your TOS / secretly subsidized by the NSA / powered by the souls of the innocent?

    2. Re:Not to burst your bubble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same with sprint. Using HTC Touch Diamond or Pro, using WMWifiRouter. I pay $10 for unlimited, 2 mbps or greater, EVDO Rev A WiFi access.

    3. Re:Not to burst your bubble... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just wait until they figure out you are tethering.

      your "plan" will jump to $99.00 a month.

      Yes they are aggressively looking to find who is tethering, and charging them big fees.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Not to burst your bubble... by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

      cite please?

  21. Slashvertizments going downhill these days.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we at least get our spam run through a simple spell checker? that you cna put in your pocket honestly...

    Not to mention that this functionality has been possible for a decade now

  22. WMWifiRouter by doronbc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use this on my winmo htc titan. Cricket in Colorado 60/month unlimited everything, ftw.

  23. Airport Express? by v1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Obviously not useful to relay cell phone to wifi but a good thing to carry in the laptop bag. Not much larger than a power adapter, you plug it directly into the wall and run a line to the ethernet and it gives wifi. Also has a printer and a stereo port but probably not useful in this case. Heck of a lot cheaper than the MiFi too, $99

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:Airport Express? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Not much larger than a power adapter, you plug it directly into the wall and run a line to the ethernet and it gives wifi.

      So where do you get the ethernet if you don't have cable or DSL where you are?

  24. Cyborg hot spot... by rts008 · · Score: 0

    When these get small enough to be implanted in my scrotum with the UI implaned in my penis, no thanks.

    observer: 'Dude! Are you playing with yourself?'
    me: 'Nah, just...dialing...long...UrghhhAahhhh...distance! Oops, sorry about the 'pinkeye surprise', should of blinked!'

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  25. RIAA vs. MiFi Does by zifr · · Score: 1

    Since your the ISP if your sharing, how do the p2p lawsuits work?

  26. What the hell? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    Firstly, these aren't new... they've been around for 2 years at least, and are becoming relatively cheap now.

    Secondly.. 2 year contract? $40 a month for 250MB? WTF?

    I pay $7 per month for 1GB, and that isn't limited. On a 12 month contract. I could go to $14 a month for 5GB, but haven't needed to.

    I know things are more expensive in the US, but that is an *insane* difference.

    1. Re:What the hell? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      The US makes up for* the fact that our land-lines are flat-rate unlimited** by charging you through the nose for mobile data. It's annoying***, but there it is.

      * I have no idea if these are actually connected, but they could well be.
      ** Unlimited until you go over some secret limit and get cut off entirely... but up to that limit the cost never changes.
      *** The US Internet infrastructure is starting to look positively backward. We're behind other developed countries on wired bandwidth penetration, and the third world is kicking our ass on wireless connectivity.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    2. Re:What the hell? by CliffH · · Score: 1

      "I know things are more expensive in the US, "

      Really???

      Vodafone NZ

      That's just the tip of the iceberg over here. I'm sure there are more countries with higher rates but, well, I don't really feel sorry for the US if that is all that is being paid. For shits and giggles, have a look at the phone costs and plans. It's fun for the whole family. BTW, I only pick on them because I am using them at the moment, albeit, not for their data plans.

      --
      sigs are like a box of chocolates, they all suck remove the underscores to email me
  27. Why are we still on cell? by zifr · · Score: 1

    Why are we not on VoIP over 3g? Seems like the industry is fighting that. My VoIP connections sound far better than any other connection, land line or cell.

    1. Re:Why are we still on cell? by rwwyatt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can only speak for the HSPA technology on DataCard. VOIP support will be a major feature in the next generation of cards which will be out later this year or first part of next year.

      VOIP requires certain functionality called continuous packet connectivity which is introduced in a later version of the standards. In fact, there will be no circuit switch support on these data cards.

    2. Re:Why are we still on cell? by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because 'the industry' that runs the 3G typically runs the GSM and CDMA too. It's obviously not in their interest to hook you, the customer, up with data and then allow you to make unlimited voice calls over your own private SIP server running out of your basement. They want their cake, and they want yours too. Your VoIP sounds better because it typically has a metric arse load more bandwidth to work with. GSM codecs are about 13kbps, your typical land line turns digital a few hundred feet from your front door, 16 - 32kbps is not uncommon. Add an extra hundred or more kbps and this is why VoIP sounds better.

      Telco's have been about reducing bandwidth since day one. They aren't about to change this mindset, it'll take a few more generations yet.

    3. Re:Why are we still on cell? by zifr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not looking for a handout, I'm looking for better tech. Further, 3g has far better upload in my area than cable/dsl. 150kbps up 3g. 60kpbs cable (max is around 110 in my area if I wanted SuddenSuck to gut me some more). 60kpbs handles my 4 trunks perfectly. I wouldn't see it as unreasonable to dump cdma/gsm and raise the cost of packet network access assuming it cost them more.

    4. Re:Why are we still on cell? by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who said anything about a hand out? I don't think you understand the environment you are wanting to change good sir. Or the one you currently have. Dumping the voice carrying component of any mobile or cellular system is not going to happen in your lifetime. It's far too entrenched. Billions of dollars are tied up in this infrastructure, in making it as efficient as possible for the financial benefit of the telco. You'll never make any traditional voice call these days without going through some kind of digital circuit multiplication equipment. DTX-240's and up are pretty common here. This makes the whole system a nice big cash cow, you'll only ever get less bandwidth in this domain. Not only that, people don't link voice and data together - we (you and I) know these things are just bits on the wire, we also see the benefits of switching to VoIP, but your voice is already packet switched and raking in the money, it's hard to change that for a lot of technical reasons (Remember, billions of dollars). We know how cheap bandwidth is, but the majority of people do not. And no matter how much you are willing to pay, you're going to get screwed because of the aforementioned greed, but also because corporations are slow to roll with the trends.

      You can have what you want right now, but you'll pay an extortionate rate for the convenience - there are some exceptions to this though. The main problem is that if everyone wants their XXXMbps link to their MiFi, to their iPhone, to their whatever that is fed over 3G, it'll require some pretty massive upgrades on the back end - these are happening right now, but it'll be years before you reap the benefit right across the country. Your average phone on its own can't do much damage, but tethering, the 3G infrastructure isn't quite ready for that yet. I don't make the rules here, I just roll out the tech.

  28. Just an overpriced 3G card by loufoque · · Score: 1

    That's just an overpriced 3G+ card.

    And where I am, you get unlimited 3G+ for less than 40 dollars per month.
    Oh yeah, and the carriers are giving out those cards for free when you subscribe.

    1. Re:Just an overpriced 3G card by maxume · · Score: 1

      Wifi support is quite a bit more prevalent than PC Card at this point (think non-laptop devices) and it supports multiple devices at the same time.

      I agree that the data costs way too much.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  29. Ad-hoc Internet Connection Sharing by acedotcom · · Score: 0

    anyone could have done this...i have been doing it for two years...with now special equipment... I would plug my moto Q into my laptop, share the connection with my laptops wifi, turn on Internet connection sharing and create a portable Ad-hoc network. It didnt work well with PSP's and DS's, but laptop's and other computers could connect with out any problems...I even used to take it to the next level and run it to the LAN and then straight to my router and create a full blown 3G in home network that anything could connect too. anyone with a little ingenuity could have done this years ago. I would have months on Sprint where my total traffic would exceed 30GB's a month.

    --
    they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
  30. For the noobs on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similar devices have been around for years that support 3G networks other than Verizon's, and that don't require a data plan that can only be used by the wi-fi base.

  31. Clearwire already has a similar product and faster by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Informative

    Full disclosure: I work for Clearwire, and I am also not authorized to speak for the company.

    http://gizmodo.com/5192430/review-clear-spot-portable-wimax-wi+fi-hotspot

    Beats hauling around a bulky CPE device and WiFi router everywhere.

    The only downside is that WiMax coverage isn't in many markets yet.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  32. Charge by the KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you can share your 3G or EVDO wireless connection with strangers! Last week a guy racked up $62K in data roaming charges http://www.mobilewhack.com/download-wall-e-while-in-mexico-for-just-62000/. Sounds like a good idea for the cell phone companies who charge by the kilobyte. Consumers are in for a nasty surprise unless they have an unlimited plan. Personally I prefer to use my BlackBerry as a private tethered modem.

  33. Or if you've got a Windows Mobile Phone by goldcd · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://wmwifirouter.com/

    Which works like a charm. Main uses I have for it is to get my iTouch online when there's no wifi about, or when a few of us are stuck in a ransom office somewhere with no/firewalled net access.

    Main issue isn't getting a wifi available over a 3G backhaul (however you want to do it), but rather the quite horrific cost of doing so.

  34. Re:Clearwire already has a similar product and fas by rwwyatt · · Score: 1

    The overall application layer throughput is heavily dependent on a number of factors. The overall 3G Network is limited to 3.1 Mbps.

    Does Clearwire have Mobility enabled yet?

    The MiFi is a fully functional 3G (EVDO) modem with a few additional features. There is an HSPA cousin as well.

  35. What about LTE? by Sybert42 · · Score: 1

    Long-term-evolution seems more ready to become a global standard. Well, it's all pre-Singularity anyway. After the Singularity, we won't need standards.

  36. WMWifiRouter, JoikuSpot, PDANet... etc? by SirJorgelOfBorgel · · Score: 5, Informative

    "What if you had a personal Wi-Fi bubble, a private hot spot, that followed you everywhere you go? Incredibly, there is such a thing."

    Yeah, it's called a phone!

    If you have a Windows Mobile phone with an internet plan, you could use WMWifiRouter(the most advanced of the pack), which has been available since 2007, and was the very first app to do this.

    If you have a Symbian phone, you could use JoikuSpot, which has been available since 2008.

    To continue, for iPhone you could use PDANet. For Android there are also several programs available as well!

    Why would you use something like this and get another data subscription when all you need is already in your pocket? Aside from the internet plan which you are likely to have already, all of these software are available for a small one-time fee - likely lower than one month of the data package itself.

    Funny thing, none of those apps ever made it out of the firehose when I posted them. What makes this (very expensive and limited) product so special?

    1. Re:WMWifiRouter, JoikuSpot, PDANet... etc? by quizwedge · · Score: 1

      Do they make something like this for the BlackBerry?

      --
      I have no .sig
    2. Re:WMWifiRouter, JoikuSpot, PDANet... etc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What makes this (very expensive and limited) product so special?

      Whenever you ask yourself this kind of question, you know there's money involved. Plain and simple.

      Slashdot isn't about cool gadgets anymore, it's about who blows the "editors'" cock best, so that said "editors" will hawk the latest bullshit for some shitty dollars.

      ALL HAIL THE CORPORATION!

    3. Re:WMWifiRouter, JoikuSpot, PDANet... etc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is.. can you sit on a Symbian phone? *waggling eyes*

  37. Better than ANY other product? by Selanit · · Score: 3, Funny

    No but wait, his Iphone lets him make phone calls (and apparently supports 802.11a), so it's as good or better than any other product on the market, no mater what that device does.

    That's right! The iPhone really IS better than any other product on the market, regardless of function! No matter what task comes to hand, the iPhone will see me through.

    Why, I use my iPhone to puree tomatoes all the time. And it's SOOO handy when I want to brush my teeth. And just ask my girlfriend what she thinks of its penis enlargement capabilities. Truly, the iPhone is the pinnacle of technological development!

    1. Re:Better than ANY other product? by Jamamala · · Score: 1

      And just ask my girlfriend what she thinks of its penis enlargement capabilities. Truly, the iPhone is the pinnacle of technological development!

      She says that next time she'd prefer it if you operated the touchscreen with your fingers.

    2. Re:Better than ANY other product? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Yes! The iPhone slices, dices and makes hundreds of julienne fries in seconds! It's also a pocket fishing rod, a hair-cutting attachment for your vacuum cleaner and will cut a penny in half!

      But wait, there's more! Order now and we'll throw in the amazing Ginzu Knife for Free! Call now! Operators are standing by!

      Seriously--I have an iPhone and I think it's an amazing bit of technology but comparing it to the topic of TFA is comparing, uh, Apples to oranges. I suspect that the post was a troll.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
  38. Hmmmm by untg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like paid (or unpaid?) dvertising to me. -1, it's probably not as good as it's it sounds. For $60 a month I can get 80 GB with my ISP and this is, what, 5GB?? -2 to that...

  39. Re:Clearwire already has a similar product and fas by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Realistically, a USB WiMax device can see upwards of 4 megs/sec AND given the cost of dongle and clearspot, is cheaper than the MiFi device. Faster speeds are possible, as evidenced by the Gizmodo article here: http://i.gizmodo.com/5174718/exclusive-wimax-uncapped-speed-tests

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  40. Exactly by meehawl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read this and thought the same thing. Have been enjoying WMWiFiRouter for a couple of years now. Binds your Windows Phone's 3G signal to the WiFi and re-broadcasts it for association by clients over WiFi or Bluetooth. Interestingly, attached clients score a higher bandwidth (~130%) of the phone's browser running a similar speed test (~1 Mbps). Obviously CPU limited. It amused me in the days before there was a 3G iPhone to let my 2G iPhone friends associate to a Windows Mobile phone using WiFi to accelerate their web browsing.

    I have used this to downloaded GBs of torrents to my laptop. For $30/month to Sprint for phone and unlimited texts and internet it's an awesome deal.

    --

    Da Blog
  41. why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes i'm too lazy to log in. I've found though with a standard windows mobile based phone and a simple cheap software called WM Wifi Router, you can do the same thing and NOT have the limitations that i'm sure verizon have imposed on the device.

  42. Bullets after the Singularity. by Sybert42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Probably won't be as useful. Intelligence will have to find its way into even projectiles.

  43. spelling nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that you cna put in your pocket.

    Really?

  44. Joikuspot by wintermute000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    One word: Joikuspot

    Turns your mobile into a wifi hotspot.

    I've only tried with Nokia models but it works great (N82, 5800). The free version only allows port 80 and gives you a nagware screen the first website you go to but thats it. The paid version allows all ports/protocols with no nag screen.

    Beats this device hands down - you always have your phone with you . Of course your carrier charges may be another story...

  45. I see two points by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't see the big deal in this.

    I see two points:

    1. Some people don't want voice service, or they're happy with prepaid voice service that costs $10 for 60 minutes a month because they only use voice to arrange an occasional ride.
    2. Under some plans, tethering is a TOS violation. Under this plan, it's the entire point.
    1. Re:I see two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Under some plans, tethering is a TOS violation. Under this plan, it's the entire point.

      Note that $0.10 per Mb = $100/Gb. Assuming you got 1.0Mb/sec DL speeds, that's $6 a minute. It's cheaper to make a call from a plane... in 1980.

  46. One of these things is not like the other.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    $40/month for 250 megabytes and $60/month for 5 gigabytes.

    Well, that sure makes sense.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  47. But only with insane contract terms... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have checked out every last cell phone carrier's data plan, this one is no exception. You agree that the first 5 GB of data download costs you $60. The second 5 GB of download for that month cost in excess of $1,200. Only a fool would sign a contract that has no upper limit to how much it can cost you. If you sign such a contract then don't go bitching to the carrier when you get your first multi-thousand dollar bill.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:But only with insane contract terms... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      i'm usin pay as you go which really saves money no contract, no silly bills but the caps!

      one slight drawback to my 3g modem once i hit 10gb in 30 days i can either stop or pay 49 cents a mb (the modem cost 79 and i had to buy 30 euro of credit). and silly 3 won't let me buy another bundle to use in a 30 day period. (clause 5 page 12 i think of the pay as you go service contract)

      So for the cost of 250 meg over plan, my friend ahem, can buy a second modem and another 10gb 30 day plan.

      The better idea would be a 2nd sim card and no modem but 3 don't sell the sim separately buyer beware one thing to watch out for hsdpa modems being sold 2nd hand without the sim card.

      on the plus side if i think i'll regularly go over 10gb the next month i could get 10gb for the cost of 50mb over and then top up the first modem when the second modem has exhausted its current plan.

      isn't this rather silly? whats the point in refusing to sell another chunk of data when a customer wants it without stitching them on the cost, surely 10gb to last up to 30 days would be more reasonable.
      Instead i'm being pushed to create my own 10-20gb a month plan which actually is good for me in some ways.

    2. Re:But only with insane contract terms... by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1
      Rogers Wireless in Canada provides what they call "Overage Protection" I short, your bill will never be more than $100, regardless of the package that you have.

      I have a Novatel MC950D that I use quite extensively on the $30 Flex Rate plan, and I rarely go over 500MB of data using it. Having said that though:
      • I don't use it for torrents, I have a cable modem for that.
      • I don't use it for Ubuntu updates, I have a cable modem for that.
      • I don't run webservers off it, streaming media from my machine, again, I have a cable modem for that.

      I use the "Rocket Stick" primarily for browsing the web on my EEE701, as well as my HP Laptop. Anytime I want to download something bigger than about 5 megs, I just plug in. It works better, it works faster, and it saves me money.

      --
      I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
  48. Autonet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something similar, and I believe Autonet currently taps Verizon's network for access. The device itself is a small router that can be plugged into a 12V port in your car, or hardwired. It has a pretty decent range too for a hotspot. Up to 100 Feet.

    www.autonetmobile.com

    1. Re:Autonet by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

      Often not mentioned is many of these small electronics items can be powered by a small pocket inverter in the car. You don't need 12 volt appliances for mobile use. I use a $20 inverter instead of a $100 mobile laptop power supply.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  49. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't understand the point of this device. i've been teathering my laptop to my 3g phone for years. if you have a 3g phone and bluetooth on your laptop (everybody should in 2009) then you have a fast, encrypted connection. why waste money on crap like this?

  50. Re:Mobile Wi-Fi Hot Spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    You can get ... a U.S.B.-stick version, which cries out to be snapped off by a passing flight attendantâ(TM)s beverage cart.

    Personally, I think that would be pretty funny.*

    * As long as it happens to someone other than me

  51. Old news by fred911 · · Score: 1

    I have been doing this for the past 6 months. Much easier to turn my N95 into an ap to use another's notebook then to install a bluetooth or cable connect. My data plan, unlimited 3.5g @49.000COP (about 20usd) monthly.

    what, me worry?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  52. I already have one by gearloos · · Score: 1

    It's called a rooted G-1

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  53. Re:Or if you've got a Windows Mobile Phone by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

    how often do you get stuck in a ransom office? Maybe you should invest in some private security if it happens so often

    --
    I am not stubborn. I am right!
  54. Any idea what they block? by jc42 · · Score: 1

    I notice the comment "If you just want to do e-mail and the Web, you pay $40 a month for the service". When I'm online, I use ssh a lot, and from the phrasing of that and other things in the article, I'm guessing that they block ssh. After all, ssh isn't email (SMTP, etc.) or web (HTTP).

    Anyone know whether this is true? Do they actively block protocols? How about VoIP? (Not that I'd use it much, but if they do block VoIP, that's an admission that this isn't internet service, it's restricted to a set of protocols chosen by Verizon.

    So how much extra would I have to pay to use ssh? How about VPN? Does ICMP work or is it extra?

    For that matter, when they say "the Web", is this read-only access, or can I run my own web server? I would like to be able to run a web server from my laptop when I'm away from home, but most ISPs block this, including Verizon. So is it allowed with this gadget?

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  55. Insulting by gearloos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Doesn't anyone else find this insulting that Verizon has the nerve to charge their customers $15.00 a day? Thats typically what a hotel would charge a one time use guest. And lets look at that awesome data plan. 250 MEGABYTES for 40$ a month!! Jeeze, get a grip Verizon. You can only screw the general public so much(Of course there will probably be enough idiots opting into this service just for the cool factor to keep it alive as a business model). Theres always the $60.00 a month 5Gig plan-You gotta be kidding me, $60.00 a month for 5 GB! This whole thing must have been cooked up by the same bean counters that figured out the SMS rates.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:Insulting by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      The price is probably set high enough that people won't try to use this as their primary connection, but low enough that it'll work for what I suspect is their target market -- business types who can put this on their expense account. Another sixty dollars a month for your road warriors is nothing to a large corporation if they can justify it with "I'll be able to interface with the clients from a taxi, from a restaurant, from anywhere!"

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    2. Re:Insulting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really funny is that if you have a 3G Verizon phone you can use a USB cable or Bluetooth to teather it to your laptop. With my BlackBerry if I want to add teathering it costs $30/month ($15/month if you're on a corporate plan) so that works out to about $1/day. I add it to my plan when I need to, and I call Customer Service to remove it when I no longer need it. You only get charged for the days it is active on your plan.

      With BB you can also use TeatherBerry to get around the teathering charge if you don't mind violating your TOS.

    3. Re:Insulting by gearloos · · Score: 1

      Agreed. As in another post I made here, I have a G-1...rooted... and yes it's a TOS violation, but I tether wireless G with dhcp etc... through ad-hoc to my laptop. I simply turn on a script when needed and thankfully T-Mo is pretty good with the data plan. Unlimited still means unlimited in T-mobile speak. I have read they are thinking of going the data cap way in the future however. Fingers crossed.

      --
      "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  56. I've been waiting for this since December! by johnkzin · · Score: 1

    I just wish they were going to come out with an AT&T version...

    1. Re:I've been waiting for this since December! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call AT&T and tell them to go to the manufacturer and get it... These things are usually in the hands of the carrier. I'm sure the manufacturer would sell this product to anyone that wanted to buy it.

  57. Mobile Wi-Fi Cell Hot Spot? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What's much more useful is a mobile hotspot that gives cell service, connected over WiFi to a gateway to the PSTN. Because there are so many holes in cell coverage, including in my house.

    It doesn't even really need to be mobile, though that's a plus. Or WiFi - ethernet would be good. If I could just use my usual cellphone to the device, then across the broadband Net to a gateway (like Asterisk at a datacenter) to the PSTN, all would be groovy. But I've never seen any small, cheap cell transponders sold to the public, and certainly not with an 802.X interface.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Mobile Wi-Fi Cell Hot Spot? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Youv'e got to be kidding me? cell coverage is far more complete than public wifi coverage.

      And besides, if you have broadband access (and a wifi router) what on earth do you need to access a cell network for? You want to access an asterisk box, get a SPA-2000 and do it. And it would just be insane to use cell 'internet' access proxied via wifi.

      And no, since all cellular frequencies are licensed, you are never going to find any 'small, cheap cell transponders' sold to the public.

  58. Another AI by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Yet another Anonymous Idiot posts:

    The execution of the device is just too insecure. (fixed password? If so, then it has fail written all over it)

    Not nearly as much fail as someone who doesn't bother reading the article or looking up tech specs before complaining about something that's not a problem...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  59. Pretty well thanks by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    So, how well does your iPhone share out that connection to a real computer (you know, what the whole point of this little device is)?

    Quite well actually

    Yes it's jailbreaking but since you only have to download an app and run it even my mom could do so. Of course, my mom would have no use in doing so, it would be only technically sophisticated people wanting to do this... kind of like the group of people that jailbreak. Huh!

    And of course it's rumored (well, beyond rumor but not in place yet) that AT&T will support official tethering with 3.0.

    So basically, you just made yourself look like a jackass in front of the entire internet for as long as the web exists. Do you Apple Haters get off on rants with no point or what?

    What's even more delightful is the irony of your username in contrast with the mechanism used to do tethering currently, which muffles any possible complaint from you in response.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Pretty well thanks by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you've made some assumptions that just aren't true.

      First and foremost (since you seem to think it matters for some reason) my username is actually a fairly standard short form of my real, legal birth name. Personally, I think it's an awesome name for the industry I'm in, but that's purely coincidence. The only time that it bothers me is when some idiot online thinks I'll teach him to crack bank websites (or, more often, Facebook profiles) or some such shit because my name has "Hacking" in it.

      That your mom could jailbreak an iPhone is quite possible, but she would run the risk of an update bricking it, and I doubt she knows enough to determine the risks correctly and take appropriate steps.

      On the other hand, my mostly technically illiterate mother does, in fact, use a 3G modem. With a computer, to do things like Skype me (she's overseas, and yes I know that the iPhone finally has Skype, but on a real computer you can actually use the computer while you talk, too) or upload photos (she used to be a professional photographer, and wouldn't be caught dead with the kind of camera the iPhone has) to our website, or to the people who occasionally purchase them. In short, even computer-illiterate people have use for a device which connects a real computer over a 3G modem.

      Supported iPhone tethering with 3.0 would be great. I'm not holding my breath, though; these things are out now. The modem my parents use (which doesn't work as a WiFi access point, which would be convenient since they have two laptops - I showed them how to share a connection, but it's less convenient) has been in use since the iPhone first existed. Good for Apple if they got AT&T to accept tethering, though.

      My apologies if you were bothered enough by what I wrote that you had to resort to personal attacks and wild assumptions such as that I am an "Apple Hater" (I'm no fan of them, but they make some slick hardware and some great software - it's more a matter of philosophical difference). I was merely pointing out that BitZtream's post was missing the point; until the iPhone does tethering out of the box and in a supported fashion, it does not actually take the place of this little device for the general public of people ho want Internet access on a real computer without being limited to WiFi hotpots.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  60. Re:Clearwire already has a similar product and fas by adf92343414 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Beats hauling around a bulky CPE device and WiFi router everywhere.

    Did you RTFA? The article says it's similar to a triple-thick credit card. Or are you comparing the device your company makes to some heretofore unmentioned piece of hardware?

    The only downside is that WiMax coverage isn't in many markets yet.

    That's no small downside. The article you linked to says, "One big constraint, of course, is that WiMax from Sprint/Clearwire is currently limited to Baltimore and Portland, OR, but is growing this year and next to many cities." Two markets is hardly worth mentioning.

  61. Re:Clearwire already has a similar product and fas by Deanalator · · Score: 1

    Nifty, do you know what the thing runs on the inside? I spent a few days around christmas time trying to hack ndis wrappers around the windows drivers for the mobile device so I could get the mobile device working in linux.

    My CPE was just stolen a few days ago, so maybe I will look into getting one of those things. I am also curious if I can charge the device with USB, and if I can run a patch cable to it for quicker speeds etc.

  62. Another satisfied CradlePoint user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been real pleased with my CradlePoint router, but I do wish I was happier with Sprint Broadband. The speeds just ain't what I was hoping for (regardless of whether the modem is attached to the CradlePoint or my laptop directly.)

  63. great... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know if anyone else read the article, but my favorite quote was:

    Last week, I was stuck on a runway for two hours. As I merrily worked away online, complete with YouTube videos and file downloads, I became aware that my seatmate was sneaking glances.

    I am sure he was "working" on Youtube because he is a reporter. He was probably "researching" on Wikipedia too.

    Anyway, I like how they keep emphasizing how easy it is to put that thing in your pocket. Cause I need another microwave source to irradiate my testicles...

    1. Re:great... by ElAurian · · Score: 1

      Microwaves are not gamma rays, chum. All they do is gently warm your testicles, not mutate them.

  64. Not new by asCii88 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this is news in the US, since similar technologies are available here in Argentina (yeah, a third world country) from at least the begining of this year.

  65. This is news? by .-+KAREMBU+-. · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed that this is news :-) We've had this in Egypt (yes, the one in Africa) for a year or more. Just plug a 3G thumb drive-like appendix into your USB port and you're online. No latté required. The only difference seems to be that it's actually a WiFi hotspot, which really sounds like a disadvantage. You're limited by battery capacity while having a USB attachment that's powered by your laptop means you just plug the laptop in and you're good, at least till you starve.

    --
    "From here you can get an excellent view of my foot." ~ Pai Mei.
  66. get windows mobile, slackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What if you had a personal Wi-Fi bubble, a private hot spot, that followed you everywhere you go? "

    I got one, its my windows mobile phone.

  67. Joikuspot by unl0rd · · Score: 1

    I run Joikuspot on my phone for my personal WIFI bubble. It works really well, and I just pay a little more to my 3G mobile phone provider for the extra data. http://www.joikuspot.com/aboutJoikuSpot.php

  68. Its been done before by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    Granted, this device won't quite fit in your pocket (its closer to the size of a typical home router), but you aren't locked into one particular carrier or contract, which could be a deal breaker for some.

    http://www.stompboxnetworks.com/

  69. ICS Control for Windows Mobile = Free by mastagee · · Score: 1

    Or if you don't want to pay for wmwifirouter, ICS Conrol will take do the same, though it is a bit less user friendly.

    http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=377047&page=1


    I've noticed, that in ICS Control some third party wifi card drivers show up as "Cellular Line 2", though it doesn't affect functionality.

  70. Please do not confuse technical terms by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That your mom could jailbreak an iPhone is quite possible, but she would run the risk of an update bricking it

    We're talking JAILBREAKING. Not UNLOCKING. There is zero chance of bricking with jailbreaking which does not alter firmware, as opposed to baseband updates required to unlock a phone for other carriers. Have you even looked at the apps that jailbreak? You simply run an app and you are done, it's a simple process to revert at any time.

    In short, even computer-illiterate people have use for a device which connects a real computer over a 3G modem.

    Have use for, yes. Care enough to do so? Not many. I'll bet only 1% of the people (actually probably less) who technically COULD tether with a RAZR ever did so.

    As you say, most of the people that want to do so get a 3G modem for a laptop - even if the phone they have technically COULD tether!

    until the iPhone does tethering out of the box and in a supported fashion, it does not actually take the place of this little device for the general public of people ho want Internet access on a real computer without being limited to WiFi hotpots.

    Even then it will not for a lot of people if there's any difficultly at all in setting it up.

    As for "internet access on a REAL computer" that's actually why a lot of people have the iPhone, because browsing on it is more like using a real computer than not.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  71. I already have this by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    It's my "cell phone". I pay Sprint about $100/month for their simply unlimited plan. In addition to unlimited (theoretically) bandwidth - which, for the math-challenged, is a whole lot more than 250MB - I also have unlimted text, unlimited picture mail, and more minutes than I need. Best of all, since I already carry a phone around with me, I don't need another device.

    Sure, it's not wifi - it's bluetooth (you know, the short-range wireless technology designed for exactly this kind of thing). But luckily, my eeepc supports both. So I can get on the Interwebz with my miniature laptop by just firing up wvdial (pair the bluetooth stuff, set up bluetooth serial, and dial #777). Bang - I'm online. If I get a phone call, I can answer it, and as soon as I hang up, the web's back. If I want people around me to share my bandwidth, I can click a couple of buttons and the eeepc is a wireless access point (with real iptables, which can do pretty much anything). Usually I don't want everyone around me to use my connection, though. :)

    If I don't have my eeepc, I can use the browser and email client on the phone.

    So, this device costs more than my phone (a random Samsung flip), has way less bandwidth, can't do anything but provide Internet access, and the plan costs more + provides less than any phone data plan. I'm supposed to trade that off for 802.11? Who doesn't have Bluetooth in a device now /and/ doesn't have a USB port for one of those miniature $10 bluetooth dongles?

    Never mind that Verizon is the undisputed Great Satan of telephony...