For most people, Asterisk is not easy to use. Several companies are offering setups that are very easy to use. See http://www.coneenterprises.com/phone_solutions.php and http://fonality.com/ for and interesting solution based on Asterisk. The interface rivals Vonage which is great for VoIP. The next generation of the software will allow database calls based on caller id so you can launch outlook or another database and pull up information based on the caller id. This system can add users and extentions easily. You can even setup a very complex call center queue.
...are ridiculous. I don't care if they are legal, they aren't in the spirit of freedom (in the sense of living in a free country).
Duh he freely choose to work for MS. Its not like you have to work for a particular company, thats where the freedom is. Company X wants you to work under a noncompete clause then maybe you should go with Company Y instead. Unless Company X pays you enough that you don't worry about the non-compete clause.
If you freely choose to enter in to a contract (with or without a lawyers advice) then you should be required to follow the parameters of the contract.
I don't think there should be any liability for providing a service like this. Thats like saying the US government is responsible for drugs that someone sold using the US mail. Or UPS being responsible for the same thing. However this begs the question should a more dangerous item such as a bomb be the shippers responsibiliy? Personally I think it should not be. However in a good free market I think you should see some competition in this area, "our service is better because we scan your packege before you get it" which of course spawns services that are completly scan free and so everyone ends up buying home scanners. Or not;)
Slashdot: News for nerds, stuff that matters - www.slashdot.org
WhoLinksToMe.com has found 3,822 links to this site.
Blogrolling.com has found 1266 blogrolls that contain this link.
Google has found 229,000 links to this site.
Yahoo! has found 1,900,000 links to this site.
Thats not a disparity is it?
A company I work for is using RSS internally. We developed a RSS feed for checkout status of certain high use items. It works quite well, saves a good bit of time from having to go across the building to see if the item is in use or not. Just take a look @ my Live Book mark in firefox and you have instant status.
We are already seeing viruses that target cell phones, whats to stop someone from using this to create mini viruses that target the police and or other scanners that will be looking at the ID? And if the card has any writting capability at all be prepared to get the virus yourself... I have to agree with masses here, this is a horrible idea. I frown on any kind of National ID system aswell. The better the system the easier it is to track us. Do you want every big company and the government to have access to your every habit, right or wrong? Do you want them to know where you shop when you shop there and how much you spend? How about the exact amounts of time that you spend at work? The privacy implications are staggering. Write your congressperson and/or local rep... Its all great to talk about but if you don't get out and do something its a worthless waste of time!
With a small drive, you might be able to squeeze an early edition of Windows 95 onto it (I've done this but it's painful). However, Windows 3.1 will comfortable fit on such a drive just fine.
Or you can get one of the several versions of linux that can run from floppy:
well you could have a serious problem as it seems that anything goes and pulls up the.cc page, html works fine as posted and tested...could this lead to verisign themselves being vulnerable being as this is a subsidiary of them??
I have exactly the same experiance: FireFox works fine with Adsense, the only time that I cant seem to use Firefox is to display the ads from netzero:) I just keep forcing FireFox as the default browser:)
Anyone else wondering why the Supreme Court has taken over functions of legislation recently? It seems to me that this is not how the court was originally designed to operate...My understanding was that there are supposed to be three branches of governement...with good reason: keeping anyone person or group from having too much power. Now it seems to me that the Supreme Court has aquired the 'power' of legislation by 'vetoing' laws in this country...wouldn't it be better to rewrite the law ie using the process of a republic...
Slashdot Mirror
For most people, Asterisk is not easy to use. Several companies are offering setups that are very easy to use. See http://www.coneenterprises.com/phone_solutions.php and http://fonality.com/ for and interesting solution based on Asterisk. The interface rivals Vonage which is great for VoIP. The next generation of the software will allow database calls based on caller id so you can launch outlook or another database and pull up information based on the caller id. This system can add users and extentions easily. You can even setup a very complex call center queue.
...are ridiculous. I don't care if they are legal, they aren't in the spirit of freedom (in the sense of living in a free country). Duh he freely choose to work for MS. Its not like you have to work for a particular company, thats where the freedom is. Company X wants you to work under a noncompete clause then maybe you should go with Company Y instead. Unless Company X pays you enough that you don't worry about the non-compete clause. If you freely choose to enter in to a contract (with or without a lawyers advice) then you should be required to follow the parameters of the contract.
I don't think there should be any liability for providing a service like this. Thats like saying the US government is responsible for drugs that someone sold using the US mail. Or UPS being responsible for the same thing. However this begs the question should a more dangerous item such as a bomb be the shippers responsibiliy? Personally I think it should not be. However in a good free market I think you should see some competition in this area, "our service is better because we scan your packege before you get it" which of course spawns services that are completly scan free and so everyone ends up buying home scanners. Or not ;)
thats pretty much what I was wondering...I didn't figure that google was having a problem...perhaps google is blocking some of the searches they use.
Slashdot: News for nerds, stuff that matters - www.slashdot.org
WhoLinksToMe.com has found 3,822 links to this site.
Blogrolling.com has found 1266 blogrolls that contain this link.
Google has found 229,000 links to this site.
Yahoo! has found 1,900,000 links to this site.
Thats not a disparity is it?
A company I work for is using RSS internally. We developed a RSS feed for checkout status of certain high use items. It works quite well, saves a good bit of time from having to go across the building to see if the item is in use or not. Just take a look @ my Live Book mark in firefox and you have instant status.
related data: http://yro.slashdot.org/~kmanq/journal/85971 & http://nullvariable.blogspot.com/2004/10/83422785- instances-of-spyware-found.html
We are already seeing viruses that target cell phones, whats to stop someone from using this to create mini viruses that target the police and or other scanners that will be looking at the ID? And if the card has any writting capability at all be prepared to get the virus yourself... I have to agree with masses here, this is a horrible idea. I frown on any kind of National ID system aswell. The better the system the easier it is to track us. Do you want every big company and the government to have access to your every habit, right or wrong? Do you want them to know where you shop when you shop there and how much you spend? How about the exact amounts of time that you spend at work? The privacy implications are staggering. Write your congressperson and/or local rep... Its all great to talk about but if you don't get out and do something its a worthless waste of time!
http://assembler.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscod e18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_121.html see volutary and required disclosure of customer communications or records. Aswell as the unlawful access to stored communications.
- http://www.toms.net/rb/
- floppy fw
dmoz also lists several: http://dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Operating_Systtry this one: <del>.cc
well you could have a serious problem as it seems that anything goes and pulls up the .cc page, html works fine as posted and tested...could this lead to verisign themselves being vulnerable being as this is a subsidiary of them??
I have exactly the same experiance: FireFox works fine with Adsense, the only time that I cant seem to use Firefox is to display the ads from netzero :) I just keep forcing FireFox as the default browser :)
it seems that my thinking on the subject needs to be rethought :)
Anyone else wondering why the Supreme Court has taken over functions of legislation recently? It seems to me that this is not how the court was originally designed to operate...My understanding was that there are supposed to be three branches of governement...with good reason: keeping anyone person or group from having too much power. Now it seems to me that the Supreme Court has aquired the 'power' of legislation by 'vetoing' laws in this country...wouldn't it be better to rewrite the law ie using the process of a republic...