Domain: bitrock.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to bitrock.com.
Comments · 15
-
Re:You can run it on linux...
Try this link for Wine.
It was just a typo, but thanks for correcting anyway.
Incidentally, I've made a standalone installer using the BitRock InstallBuilder.
The resulting package is neat, small (318 MB), includes it's own copy of wine, and even comes with an uninstaller.
If I find a suitable hosting solution I will share the link here.
Cheers, XnPlater -
Re:Google Pack is only available for WindowsXP
Maybe they need to talk to these guys :
http://bitrock.com/ -
BitRock
BitRock.
I've not explored it much further than my own basic needs, but it seems to meet the criteria you've listed.
Screenies
Comparison to InstallShield.
Overview (highlighting some of your concerns)
Hope this helps. -
BitRock
BitRock.
I've not explored it much further than my own basic needs, but it seems to meet the criteria you've listed.
Screenies
Comparison to InstallShield.
Overview (highlighting some of your concerns)
Hope this helps. -
BitRock
BitRock.
I've not explored it much further than my own basic needs, but it seems to meet the criteria you've listed.
Screenies
Comparison to InstallShield.
Overview (highlighting some of your concerns)
Hope this helps. -
BitRock
BitRock.
I've not explored it much further than my own basic needs, but it seems to meet the criteria you've listed.
Screenies
Comparison to InstallShield.
Overview (highlighting some of your concerns)
Hope this helps. -
Re:Interesting thing is...
Of course you can make it like that. You're just ignorant. The main reason that you don't do that is that with most (pretty much all nowadays) distros the main installation path is to just open the package manager, click on the thing you want to install, and it downloads and installs (and updates on a routine basis).
However if you can't get it through the package manager, there are many solutions you can use, most notably Bitrock InstallBuilder which, though proprietary, can be used for free with open source programs. I have used it myself and find it extremely easy to use, extremely quick, and pretty well painless. The final installer also works cross-distro.
So please don't spread misinformation when you don't know for yourself, when all you're spreading is your own guesses. Ignorance is not an excuse. -
Re:Thats all well and goodwell for one there are over 500 games here that I can install by just writing "apt-get install gamename" in the console, or, alternatively, select it from synaptic. apt then will then download, install, and set up shortcuts to the game for me.
Is that straightforward enough?
I'm not badmouthing something when I don't have the information, I'm simply pointing out the accurate fact that gaming on Linux is a lot more complex than gaming on Windows and almost always involves some user input and/or configuration beyond "click, click, click, play". The fact that the example that you mention involves dropping down to the command line only proves my point.
UT2004 doesn't require going to the command line at all. I mentioned that because it is the latest commercial game I've installed for linux. There is nothing difficult at all with writing a graphical installer for linux (as you can see if you try this program. If there is need for any more work than what is required with Windows then the application developer is doing something wrong.
You state "the accurate fact" as you put it, yet you have failed to provide any game that is actually difficult to install and run. I don't see any evidence that that's anything but badmouthing something you don't have information about. -
Not for third party applications
Package managers are ok for system libraries, etc. and those are provided by the distributions themselves. For third party software (games, bug tracking, etc.) that needs to work in many different distributions, it is better to just distribute a tarball or use standalone installers such as autopackage or BitRock
-
Some links
For independent software development and running your software business:
Eric Sink
Joel on Software (read business of software newsgroup)
For inexpensive, reliable order processing:
SWREG
ShareIt
Installers:
NSIS (Windows)
BitRock (Linux, Windows)
Icons/Website:
Go to KDE Look find some artwork you like and contact the author. -
BitRock
For alternatives, checkout:
Bitrock: kind of "Installshield" for linux
Installshield multiplatform: The actual Installshield for Linux (written in Java and a bit ugly)
Autopackage: Kind of universal installer -
Re:New Linux user
This gets very close http://www.bitrock.com to what you want. Free license for open source projects
-
Re:Why and what you *should* play!Wow. That has to be the longest post I've ever seen on Slashdot! Let's see....
* Software Packaging. This is a huge pain in the ass for most commercial vendors of any Linux software
Actually it's not so bad - commercial software tends to be mostly statically linked or to come with the right DSOs included. Programs like Loki Setup or BitRock can make pretty NSIS/InstallShield type installers.
The problems we have with software packaging are mostly problems for open source projects.
* Linux Binary Portability. This is the bane of all vendors releasing any closed-source software for Linux.
I'd venture that this isn't as problematic as you think it is - having done a ton of research into this, Linux binary portability is not really any worse than the difference between Win98 and WinXP, for instance.
Yes, the rollout of NPTL is being done badly, and this is unfortunate, but the vast majority of apps don't suffer any problems at all.
-
You need easy to use installers
This one was just released : Bitrock Installer You can find many others in Freshmeat. Software developers just need to start using them
-
Linux is getting to the desktop
With stuff like : Easy to use installers Office compatibility Easy to use productivity software It is just a matter of time