Slashdot Mirror

A nice faq on Trusted Computing.

I haven't read the article you point to, but Foundations of Physics can sometimes be a bit of a crack-pot journal (but sometimes not). There is actually other good evidence that time is not well defined in quantum theory. This bloke has done some work which I hear is rather good on quantum time. Most of the work in there was published in rather good journals, although I was never able to read through them properly.

1. You can verify that they really are charging you the amount they said.
2. It becomes MUCH harder for a rigged reader to attemp to steal your private key.

"As the Gates Cambridge Scholarship program enters its third year"... - written this year, because it refers to Cambridge's "new Vice Chancellor, Professor Alison Richard".

Cambridge:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/UoCCL/intro/
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/site-maps/gates.html

+ Washington:
http://www.law.washington.edu/GatesHall/

+ Stanford:
http://www-db.stanford.edu/pub/keller/gates-map.ht ml

+ Pennsilvania:
http://www.facilities.upenn.edu/mapsBldgs/view_map .php3?id=401

+ MIT:
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V119/N20/20lcs.20n.html

+ RIBA:
http://www.riba.org/go/RIBA/About/About_162.html

+ Southern Indiana:
http://www.usi.edu/visit/map/housing.asp

+ Michigan:
http://www.admin.mtu.edu/admin/prov/facbook/ch9/9c hap-37.htm


= University Building Monopoly !!!!

Cambridge:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/UoCCL/intro/
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/site-maps/gates.html

+ Washington:
http://www.law.washington.edu/GatesHall/

+ Stanford:
http://www-db.stanford.edu/pub/keller/gates-map.ht ml

+ Pennsilvania:
http://www.facilities.upenn.edu/mapsBldgs/view_map .php3?id=401

+ MIT:
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V119/N20/20lcs.20n.html

+ RIBA:
http://www.riba.org/go/RIBA/About/About_162.html

+ Southern Indiana:
http://www.usi.edu/visit/map/housing.asp

+ Michigan:
http://www.admin.mtu.edu/admin/prov/facbook/ch9/9c hap-37.htm


= University Building Monopoly !!!!

The computer labs at my old uni now have a shiny new William Gates Building which the Compscis moved into the year I left. The old building was too tall, weird and creaky but at least there were some good pubs nearby :-)

Sounds sort of like Xen's approach, but with hardware support.

Does Slashdot and OSN use the same time zone offset from UTC? They should, according to "International Standard Date and Time Notation"

`Trusted Computing' Frequently Asked Questions

Scary stuff...

For a slightly doom-spelling (unforunately Ross tends to be right far too often) check Cambridge University professor Ross Anderson's Trusted Computing FAQ. There is also his Cryptography and Competition Policy - Issues with `Trusted Computing' paper as well.

You can also look at documents at Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, and I recommend reading The TCPA; What's wrong; What's right and what to do about by William A. Arbaugh

For a slightly doom-spelling (unforunately Ross tends to be right far too often) check Cambridge University professor Ross Anderson's Trusted Computing FAQ. There is also his Cryptography and Competition Policy - Issues with `Trusted Computing' paper as well.

You can also look at documents at Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, and I recommend reading The TCPA; What's wrong; What's right and what to do about by William A. Arbaugh

For a slightly doom-spelling (unforunately Ross tends to be right far too often) check Cambridge University professor Ross Anderson's Trusted Computing FAQ. There is also his Cryptography and Competition Policy - Issues with `Trusted Computing' paper as well.

You can also look at documents at Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, and I recommend reading The TCPA; What's wrong; What's right and what to do about by William A. Arbaugh

1. X10 controller
   1. SmartHome.Com
   2. web-based X10 controller
   3. Complete listing of X10 software
   4. Linux-based HomeVision
2. GNU Automaton
3. an established IPv6 tunnel with your own IPv6 address subnet (it's a whole new world out there)
4. SMS server for your cell-phone (good with X10)
   1. X10 event to your SMS phone (via paging)
   2. Control X10 from your WAP cellphone
5. Mobile IP server for your roving laptop

Coffee Maker (this one needs an Java-Dispenser SNMP agent badly)

We're almost there...

well here is a great paper about it: the article

it basically says that when you use an API to access things like a DOM Node, you lose things like type checking and other advantages inherent to OO programming. They then go on and ask: "why not put that API in the language syntaxe?" The paper is great on the advantages of it has some very good examples.

If you're looking for more free online maths / physics texts, there are a great many avaliable.

Some CS people might be interested in the book on Information theory by Dave Mackay (author of Dasher). Unlike most people, he seems to have taken a truly "Open-Source" approach to book publishing.

If you're looking for more free online maths / physics texts, there are a great many avaliable.

Some CS people might be interested in the book on Information theory by Dave Mackay (author of Dasher). Unlike most people, he seems to have taken a truly "Open-Source" approach to book publishing.

disclosed on 05-01-2003

OK time for me to tilt at a few windmills. Aside from the date being off by a year (the link quotes the date as 05-01-2004), is this supposed to be 1st of May or the 5th of January?

In an international forum and for clarity, ISO 8601 dates. Therefore: 2004-01-05.

Sorry for the rant, but I work for an international company, and have spent sizable parts of meetings trying to figure out which version of a document is "most recent", 2/3/04 or 3/2/04.

• msntp - A small, simple SNTP (not SMTP) server+client to force all the machines on your LAN use the same clock time

That's why some researchers in the field of lazy functional language have developed techniques for "optimistic evaluation" -- basically, the compiler uses strict evaluation until it's determined that the object it's evaluating can't be evaluated strictly (for example, in the case of a conceptually infinite list). You still get lazy semantics, and you have most of the performance benefits of a strict language. See the work of Robert Ennals and Jan-Willem Maessen.

Dasher

It's an input method that doesn't need a keyboard, is fast, is always accurate, is fun and is GPL.

Don't forget Xen, VMWare, and Bochs (not as fast, but still cool).

There are already a ton of viable OS virtualizers out there. This news is seriously a real yawner.

This sounds like Xen for Linux...

Other university's websites often have a link to their P2P policy on them. For example my college's policy is fairly sensible.

I thought I had see something like this before from Canterbury University. A few people have tried solutions like similar to this. Check out http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~arlt1/research/third/al l3d.html.

Bugger - I could have sworn I put links in that post. John Daugman's website, and the list of results from a variety of sources.

Bugger - I could have sworn I put links in that post. John Daugman's website, and the list of results from a variety of sources.

Rmrember taht one?

You're right. It's called the Eurion Constellation.

The answer to this question was here on slashdot.

The software looks at 5 dots appearing (multiple times) on every money used in the EU.

There was even a link to a pdf file.

There was a good paper by Ross Anderson, a well known British security expert, that compared the security of open source vs closed source systems (sorry, paper is PDF). He set up a mathematical model for how quickly bugs would be found and fixed by the maintainers and testers, versus being found and exploited by attackers. His conclusion was that the two models would both be about equally successful.

A recent posting on the Unlimited Freedom blog took another look at Anderson's analysis and came up with some different results that were not as favorable. But either of these articles seem more convincing than this challenge by Russell Jones.

There was a good paper by Ross Anderson, a well known British security expert, that compared the security of open source vs closed source systems (sorry, paper is PDF). He set up a mathematical model for how quickly bugs would be found and fixed by the maintainers and testers, versus being found and exploited by attackers. His conclusion was that the two models would both be about equally successful.

A recent posting on the Unlimited Freedom blog took another look at Anderson's analysis and came up with some different results that were not as favorable. But either of these articles seem more convincing than this challenge by Russell Jones.

Talking about games and government reminds me of nomic Fun stuff.

How true!

I'm reading the presentation at the moment, but my math's a bit rusty (20 years rusty, if truth be told), so I can't comment on it.

At least they have observations. And astronomers in general are a genial bunch. Anyone who finds (and this is the most likely case) that there is dark matter, but not nearly enough of it, is assured of nothing more that a few years of ostracism before enough new scientists come into the field who don't have the same emotional investment in dark matter theories.

Compare that to the potential fate of the poor wretch who disproves the Riemann Hypothesis, and undoes almost all progress in pure mathematics since the beginning of the 20th century. I know for a fact that there is a basement in Cambridge where this person will live out their days being forced to review unsolicited "proofs" of duplicating the cube, trisecting the angle, and squaring the circle.

As has been pointed many times before, this technique *has* been introduced into the newer Euro and Sterling notes. This PDF has an explaination of how this apparently works. It's not just Americans who can't fire up Photoshop CS for an extra few drinks at the weekend.

Speaking from some experience (CS undergrad TA while in grad school)....

A few thoughts:

It's essential to teach some assembly at some point in a CS undergrad - A CS course should give full insight into the workings of a real CPU, and should give as wide a variety as possible.

At Edinburgh the first year CS course included assembly, C, and ... wait for it ... PostScript. PS sounds wacky but it's the only stack based language widely used on modern computers (APL and Forth have died out).

When I was a CS undergrad we had practical classes in no fewer than 17 languages, covering the range of imperative, declarative, functional and stack based, plus specialist toys like theorem provers and SQL.

The best starting point for a university level course is the good old procedural language - in my day it was Pascal, C++ and Modula-3, these days I'd use Java (and many CS departments do).

Also, when you do get to assembler, I don't think using a real assembler is the best teaching tool - assemblers are intended for developing real low level code, or as back end targets for compilers. For teaching at Edinburgh, we used an X11 based tool called xspim which simulated a MIPS R2000 (we actually ran it on Sun Sparc-II's, not that it matters), and it let you single step and examine registers without the complexity of adding a debugger, and had a window where you could see the registers, CPU pipeline etc. displayed.

For introducing programming concepts to a younger audience I think an interpreted language which will execute command lines, allowing them to experiment while avoiding the edit-compile-run cycle, is very important. Some are better than others; when I was a kid the 8 bit micros (Apple, Commodore, Atari, ...) had BASIC interpreters in ROM, and they were mostly OK, though the only one with a really good BASIC language (proper procedures, not GOSUB) was the Acorn BBC.

I don't like Pilot or Comal for teaching (failed experiments of the 1980's) but I think LOGO is a very commendable way to make concepts accessible to the young.

A perhaps unexpected place I was made to learn with an interpreted environment was as an undergrad at Cambridge University, where the first programming language taught is ML which for the CS people who haven't heard of is an implementation of lambda calculus with a sane syntax.

see the rest of the details HERE

Also omitted is the new coLinux, which was discussed on Slashdot, too, just the other week.

Linux runs on _current_ EFI boxen. The article mentions that EFI will be integrating "Trustworthy computing". So future versions of EFI will be capable of locking out anything except unmodified versions of signed operating systems.

There is a project in the U.K. by professionals to do this (Cambridge Optical Aperture Synthesis Telescope). This gives a pretty good description of what is necessary for setting up an optical array. Note the combining building, which is where the light path lengths are matched. The main thing is that the images are formed from light that arrives at the telescopes at the same moment. With radio frequencies, the signal can be recorded on tape, along with a time hack, allowing for multiple signals to be combined after the fact. I don't believe there is a way to do that with light.

It would be difficult. I think you're talking about interferometry. This was originally developed for radio telescopes, and is harder to do at shorter wavelengths. The Submillimeter Array, working at the shorter submm wavelengths, has just opened on Mauna Kea, although some work has already been done with linking the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope and the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. At optical wavelengths it gets harder still. An example is the Cambridge Optical Aperture Synthesis Telescope (COAST). There's also the proposed `Ohana project.

A major problem is that you have to preserve the phase information of the light when you combine the signals from the telescopes, so you can't just record images with a CCD (which only gets you the intensity) and then try to handle the rest of it in software.

Essentially this means that you'd have to combine light from the telescopes in real time and keep the path lengths between them accurate to a small fraction of the wavelength you're measuring. You can do this "off-line" at radio frequencies, for example with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) but not at optical frequencies.

So, in summary, the Internet lets amateur observers collaborate in various ways. However, combining their optical telescopes to get the resolving power of a larger telescope (the size of the distributed collection of individual telescopes) through optical interferometry is not one of them.

It would be difficult. I think you're talking about interferometry. This was originally developed for radio telescopes, and is harder to do at shorter wavelengths. The Submillimeter Array, working at the shorter submm wavelengths, has just opened on Mauna Kea, although some work has already been done with linking the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope and the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory. At optical wavelengths it gets harder still. An example is the Cambridge Optical Aperture Synthesis Telescope (COAST). There's also the proposed `Ohana project.

A major problem is that you have to preserve the phase information of the light when you combine the signals from the telescopes, so you can't just record images with a CCD (which only gets you the intensity) and then try to handle the rest of it in software.

Essentially this means that you'd have to combine light from the telescopes in real time and keep the path lengths between them accurate to a small fraction of the wavelength you're measuring. You can do this "off-line" at radio frequencies, for example with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) but not at optical frequencies.

So, in summary, the Internet lets amateur observers collaborate in various ways. However, combining their optical telescopes to get the resolving power of a larger telescope (the size of the distributed collection of individual telescopes) through optical interferometry is not one of them.

Xen has already been covered on slashdot

My university library would have hung, drawn, and quartered you for that kind of thing.

They've got quite a good webpage about the way people abuse library books.

My university library would have hung, drawn, and quartered you for that kind of thing.

They've got quite a good webpage about the way people abuse library books.

A huge list of math texts.

David MacKay has posted his book Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms on his website. (This is despite it being a recently published work available through major bookstores.)

The classic, Numerical Recipes in C, is available online for free.

Some more math texts.

Another grab bag of online texts (mostly math).

Yet even more math and CS stuff.

A huge list of math texts.

David MacKay has posted his book Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms on his website. (This is despite it being a recently published work available through major bookstores.)

The classic, Numerical Recipes in C, is available online for free.

Some more math texts.

Another grab bag of online texts (mostly math).

Yet even more math and CS stuff.