Slashdot Mirror


Lindows becomes Lindash

Daveh writes "The Register is reporting that 'The operating system Lindows is now available as Lin---s (pronounced: Lin-dash) in those countries where Microsoft has blocked the availability of the desktop Linux distribution. The new name complies with a recent Amsterdam court ruling (PDF), the San Diego company says.' There are a few new sites to reflect the name change, including Lin---s.com and Lindash.nl."

536 comments

  1. Not that this matters... by el-spectre · · Score: 5, Funny

    But that is the stupidest name I have ever heard... I hope someone named Linda sues them :)

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:Not that this matters... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I hope McCormic and Mrs. (Lyn) Dash get in on some of the legal action! =P

    2. Re:Not that this matters... by diersing · · Score: 1
      Agreed.

      Win---s would have been much better for their name copying ways.

    3. Re:Not that this matters... by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      it's still called lindows in countries where they are allowed

    4. Re:Not that this matters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In S----t R----a, n--e c-----s y-u!

    5. Re:Not that this matters... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Funny

      So clever... It's a good way to cope with all the bulls--t.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    6. Re:Not that this matters... by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't know, mozilla's next fire* might win for stupidest name. Fire-musk-oxen, anyone? The mail client should become thunder-great-white-shark, too.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    7. Re:Not that this matters... by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

      funniest... name... ever...

      but only because they're dancing in front of microsoft, taunting them. it's like that "i'm not touching you" game wher you put you finger as close to the person without actually touching them. eventually someone punches that guy in the face though :\

    8. Re:Not that this matters... by infochuck · · Score: 1

      But that is the stupidest name I have ever heard...

      But not as stupid as "The Product Formerly Known as Lind--s" - AKA ◘

    9. Re:Not that this matters... by samsmithnz · · Score: 1

      Stupider than Lindows? I don't think so... Its lucky that MS does spend so much money on marketing, otherwise we'd be hearing about Whistler (Windows 2000/XP) and Memphis (Windows 98) exploits and code leaks. what a bunch of balony. Hire someone who can think of names, my dog could do better (which is saying a lot since I don't have a dog).

    10. Re:Not that this matters... by Frymaster · · Score: 2, Funny
      Win---s would have been much better for their name copying ways.

      i vote for:

      1. lin-dos
      2. lin-bob
    11. Re:Not that this matters... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's GNU/Lin----, dammit!

      Or even ---/Lin---- where --- stands for "---'s not ---".

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    12. Re:Not that this matters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, your opinion doesn't matter. It's a great way to say "Fuck You" to Microsoft. It says, "OK, we're complying, but just fricking barely"

    13. Re:Not that this matters... by Vargasan · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it, they'll be named "FireHippopotamus" and "ThunderOrangutan".

      --
      Putting the romance back into necromancer.
    14. Re:Not that this matters... by Myself · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pr---e isn't called that anymore, he's just:

      O(+>

      So maybe Lin---s needs to change their name to a glyph to avoid all this mess. How about this:

      `._____
      `.L_|_|
      `.L_|_|

    15. Re:Not that this matters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Teach a man to fish, you give up your monopoly on fisheries.

      Makes no sense.

    16. Re:Not that this matters... by rixstep · · Score: 1

      I hope someone named Linda sues them :)

      Better yet, everyone named --- could start a class action.

    17. Re:Not that this matters... by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Or, they could make RMS happy...

      FireGNU and ThunderGNU

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    18. Re:Not that this matters... by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, he's back to Prince now. The world breathes a collective sigh of "who gives a damn?"

    19. Re:Not that this matters... by Whyrph · · Score: 1

      What about Lindoes? Then they could change their logo to a deer! A female dear. You can shoot me now.

    20. Re:Not that this matters... by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      BTW.. did anyone see that lame pic on the home page of www.lin---s.com ? its a hangman with all the letters of the alphabet crossed out except for D O and W.

    21. Re:Not that this matters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have named it "LinShit"

    22. Re:Not that this matters... by klokop · · Score: 1

      > That's GNU/Lin----, dammit! > Or even ---/Lin---- where --- stands for "---'s not ---". ...and end up with "Snot". Nice.

      --
      Passing silhouettes of strange illuminated mannequins
    23. Re:Not that this matters... by klokop · · Score: 1

      damn formatting...

      > That's GNU/Lin----, dammit!
      > Or even ---/Lin---- where --- stands for "---'s not ---".

      ...and end up with "Snot". Nice.

      --
      Passing silhouettes of strange illuminated mannequins
    24. Re:Not that this matters... by TooLazyToLogon · · Score: 1

      I like it. I'll be pronounicing Lin---s as Lindows.

    25. Re:Not that this matters... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1
      Oh man, as someone else once noted, I wish I could mod the parent "super funny."

      I may have my excellent Karma, but my geek life won't be complete until I get a "+5 Funny" rating on my own "In Soviet Russia" post.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  2. Nice original thinking by Soukyan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess that's one way to dash Microsoft's evil plan.

    1. Re:Nice original thinking by GuyinVA · · Score: 0

      [comic book guy]Worst pun ever[/comic book guy]
      I guess it was bound to happen. Only took 2 posts to get to it...

      -no space left blank intentionally-

    2. Re:Nice original thinking by wittyesotericmoniker · · Score: 0

      By hiding their mo-dow?

  3. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's pretty f------ g--.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty f------ g--.

      fucking god?
      fucking goo?
      fucking gib?

      i know this slashdot and we don't check our spelling, but c'mon.

    2. Re:Wow by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's pretty fdash gdash?

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      f------ g-- = "finding goo"?
      f------ g-- = "forking glo"?
      f------ g-- = "farting gas"?

      It's farting gas, isn't it? Isn't it?!

    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      possible typo for:
      pretty -f -g
      ??

    5. Re:Wow by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      Fows gows?

    6. Re:Wow by bangular · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As gay as the name is, I think this is their way of protest. There are a million and one product names that sound similar to windows. Winamp, winfax, windildo. I think it's total 100% bullshit you can selectivly prosecute only those who have competing products. There's a computer repair company in my town called wintech. How MS can selectively sue trademark infringements based on their level of competition and say they aren't a monopoly with a straight face is beyond me.

    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q. How do you make an american find sex with you less enjoyable?

      A. Give consent.

    8. Re:Wow by __past__ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I tend to agree that a lot of things going on in the trademark/copyright/patent arena are horribly wrong. However, this case it a little different: Lindows chose that name because it is so similar to "Windows", and because it is a provocation. They aren't innocent victims - getting sued by microsoft, and potentially having to use another, similar, name was part of their business model from day one.

      Just because they use a Linux kernel does not mean that Lindows is somehow a "better" company. Lindows is run by weasels just like any other company, be it Microsoft, SCO, Sun, Borland or Novell. If you are a shareholder, this is good for you, if you are a thinking human being however, there is just no reason whatsoever to sympathize with them.

    9. Re:Wow by Kethinov · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news, Slashdot is renamed to Dashslot...

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you say that the name is "gay", do you mean gay as in "it makes me want to have sex with someone who has the same genital apparatus as me" or gay as in "I'm a bigot who thinks that it's ok to imply that 'gay==bad'"?

      Just wondering.

    11. Re:Wow by happy_place · · Score: 1

      I remember when the word meant, "happy."

      --
      http://www.beanleafpress.com
    12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >

      >

      Actually, the way trademark infringement works is that you can _only_ go after people whose products compete in the same arena yours do. The idea is to prevent somebody from taking a name or other identifier that's been effectively built up by one company in a particular type of business, and using it to their own benefit.

      So, for example, "Anonymous Coward Computing Solutions" would have a tough time suing "Anonymous Coward Shoe Warehouses." They're entirely different markets, and there's pretty much no way one could cause harm to the other. On the other hand, "'Nonymous Coward Shoe Warehouses" might be infringing.

      In theory, you can't own the word "windows"- you can only have rights to it in your particular trade. IMAO, it would actually be much worse if companies had to defend their trademarks against anyone using remotely similar trademarks. That would mean that people in completely other business areas would end up getting sued by Microsoft (or IBM, or whoever), just 'cause their name was similar. I'd hate to see what would happen to "Bob's Windows and Frames"...

    13. Re:Wow by psymastr · · Score: 1

      What, you want to tell them who they're gonna sue now?

      --
      Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
    14. Re:Wow by updog · · Score: 1
      Of course, it's not only the fact that the name sounds similar; but also that it's a product that directly competes with Windows.

      It's similar to selling a cola called "Pipsi" - don't you think PepsiCo would have the right to sue?

    15. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with abbreviation <->

    16. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gay is bad, you anal spelunker.

    17. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what he means is that with a name like this, he hopes they get fucked up the ass like they deserve.

    18. Re:Wow by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, our companies are run by crab people disguised as weasels disguised as executives. They do it because they have to, so please show some sympathy.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    19. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      don't you think PepsiCo would have the right to sue?

      If you're talking about my wife, well, they can have her.

    20. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Maybe it means "gay" as in "I'm already swearing, so why should I give a fuck about being politically correct?"

      If the word "gay" has shifted from its original meaning, what's wrong with it shifting in meaning again?

      What would you prefer anyway? "Dumb"? Oh no wait, that's mean to people who are unable to speak. "Retarded"? Well, that's insulting to those who are mentally impaired. "Lame"? I have a cousin with an artificial leg who'd like a word with you.

      Alright, how about "double plus ungood"?

    21. Re:Wow by LittleBigLui · · Score: 2, Funny

      he probably means that "Lin---s" wants to stick its dash into the "o" in "ows" :)

      --
      Free as in mason.
    22. Re:Wow by raidient · · Score: 1

      And the National Lottery renamed to Windosh....

      --
      My faith is expressed through Nihilism. Do you understand?
    23. Re:Wow by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

      I can't find that windildo product anywhere. Even Google turned up 0 matches.

    24. Re:Wow by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

      I think this needs more explanation... why Dashslot, exactly? I guess I'm missing some unapparent relationship between this and the story.

    25. Re:Wow by tunah · · Score: 1

      The last thing I want an operating system to remind me of is my calculus exams :-\

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    26. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it's a possibility ...

      cb
      Payant

    27. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gay = bad, period.

      If that makes me a bigot, then I take that as a compliment.

      "Pleased to meet you. My name's Coward, Anonymous Coward, and I'm a bigot."

    28. Re:Wow by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Wow, dude, I want to know where I can buy a WinDildo. You HAVE to tell me!!! :-)

    29. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.... I use the word "gay" as a nice way of say "butt fucking stupid".

    30. Re:Wow by Hadean · · Score: 1

      Why the hell do we need new words to mean "stupid", when it's quite obvious that the word has a specific, cultural meaning which means its use would, therefore, imply contempt for those people that are, in fact, gay - otherwise, it wouldn't be a swear.

      Ignoring your words, how about these other words that basically mean the same thing, but would not offend anyone:

      stupid, idiotic, asinine, daft, foolish, half-witted, hare-brained,imbecilic, inane, moronic, senseless, silly, thick-witted, unintelligent,
      foolish, illogical, irrational, nonsensical, laughable, preposterous, senseless, absurd, cracked, barmy, bonkers, cracked, demented, flaky

      Tell me again why we must create a new meaning for a word that already has several, when so many other good words exist? Saying that something "is gay" (when it's not homosexual, happy or colorful) just creates an air of childishness and bigotry on the part of the speaker.

      (And yes, I understand and partially agree on your point about PC-ness going to far, but sometimes controlling what you say and actually not insulting other people's beliefs/lifestyles/etc. is a good thing).

  4. They... by double-oh+three · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They obviously arn't happy about the change, seeing as how their current front-page picture shows a hang-man with only d, o, w left in the letter-box. (Lin_ _ _ s might be a better way to put it.)

    --
    "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    1. Re:They... by Shazow · · Score: 1

      Lin_w_o_d_s? wtf is Linwods?!

      Heh.

      - shazow

    2. Re:They... by DrXym · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dildos has a nice ring to it.

    3. Re:They... by segment · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it was likely done to reflect the domain name being they can't register Lin _ _ _ s.com. As for MS beating up on the competition, I wonder why they haven't gone after typohosting companies such as microspft.com, or microsift.com ... They're pretty much riding the MS pompouslarity bandwagon. So the argument would either be... They would lose in court being neither microsift nor microspft have anything to do with computing, nor do they have anything to do with micro*anything. Nor does Lindows to an extent. Oh well money talks

    4. Re:They... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "s" is left too. Oversight?

    5. Re:They... by rokka · · Score: 1

      My suggestion would have to be lin#, pronounced linsharp.

      --
      I could be wrong. I'm always wrong...
    6. Re:They... by yacineparis.com · · Score: 0

      That name is so stupid.
      I think they should have re-done their w Microsoft will probably sue them again. I don't even understand why MS sued them at first.
      Who could mistake Lindows for Windows?

      --
      Yacine.
    7. Re:They... by yacineparis.com · · Score: 0

      There are only 3 letters left but the man only lost a leg.

      --
      Yacine.
    8. Re:They... by kfg · · Score: 1

      I fancy releasing a distro and naming it "GUI" or maybe "Mouse." "Widget" has a nice sound to it as well. Kinda cute. Or maybe "Browser."

      "Text Box" might make a nice name for a distro aimed at writers. "Radio Button" for a multimedia distro, or perhaps "Television."

      Hey, how about "Operating System"?

      Yeah, I like that one. Simple and direct description.

      Kinda like Windows.

      KFG

    9. Re:They... by swordboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would be: Dildows

      It reads like some sort of Dilbert/Windows hybrid. I like it.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    10. Re:They... by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Mom, I'm going out to pick up Dildows.

      What?

      --
      True story.
    11. Re:They... by Burianski11 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My company, Macrohard is currently developing a new OS, to be called Doors. Macrohard Doors is obviously a superior OS to Microsoft Windows. I mean, look at it from a security standpoint alone.

    12. Re:They... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a problem with the "dildows" name.

      Some dyslexic might write it as "bilbows", and confuse everyone into thinking thin co-ax was making a comeback.

    13. Re:They... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminds me.

      Why isn't the GNU work-alike of C# called Dflat?

    14. Re:They... by BancBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      ---" Dildos has a nice ring to it."--- More of a buzz than a ring...

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    15. Re:They... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there is a d, o, s and w left in the letter box. What does that spell Lindowss, LinDOSws, Lindows's?

    16. Re:They... by frankthechicken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, considering the Amsterdam ruling, surely lin# should be pronounced lin-hash?

    17. Re:They... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonder if there was an OS named Dildows, would MS sue them?

    18. Re:They... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf is Linwods?!

      Sounds like a derogatory term for people running linux on their desktop, Linwads.

      And of course the equivalent term for those using Windows would be... Windows users. ;)

    19. Re:They... by rixstep · · Score: 1

      Lin_ _ _ s might be a better way to put it

      OK, we give up: how do you pronounce THAT?

    20. Re:They... by rixstep · · Score: 1

      Well, considering the Amsterdam ruling, surely lin# should be pronounced lin-hash?

      Nope. They've already copyrighted hash in the Netherlands.

    21. Re:They... by raidient · · Score: 1

      "To ecstasy and beyond!"

      --
      My faith is expressed through Nihilism. Do you understand?
    22. Re:They... by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Or "Dild OS".

      A software product by Dild Software, whose CEO is, uhhh, Bob Dild?

      Chris

    23. Re:They... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they choosed --- over ___ because you cannot use ___ on (DNS) domain names.

    24. Re:They... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Path-e-tech? How about Linwods? Winix, Niwix, or just "L"? There's an X (windows), why not just call the OS "L"?

    25. Re:They... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the first thing you think of when you see "dildows" is dilbert you are too far gone ...

  5. In a related story by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a related story. Bill Gates has decided to rename Windows to be close to this product. The new proposed name is Balder-Dash (in honor of Steve Ballmer)

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:In a related story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!

    2. Re:In a related story by Narphorium · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... also, Mike Rowe is looking to relocate his software company to www.---.com. However, a representative from Dash, a leading launndry detergent company, has said that they will agressively protect their copyright at all cost.

    3. Re:In a related story by switcha · · Score: 1
      The new proposed name is Balder-Dash (in honor of Steve Ballmer)

      Wouldn't that be 'Balder-Dance'?

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    4. Re:In a related story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole corporation is named after Bill's willie.

    5. Re:In a related story by innerlimit · · Score: 1

      check out the servers' name.....

      "Generated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:08:43 GMT by steveballmer (Squid/2.4.STABLE6) "

  6. about the new name by joe_bruin · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's a bit slapdash

    --
    code newbie: help for coding newbies

    1. Re:about the new name by pyros · · Score: 1
      it's a bit slapdash

      It certainly has that night-time look to it.

    2. Re:about the new name by Draknor · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh... I love Eddie Izzard :-)

    3. Re:about the new name by pyros · · Score: 1

      I was hoping for a funny or underrated mod, but as long as I know someone got the reference I'm happy. :p

    4. Re:about the new name by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      slapdash
      That so needs to be the name of a WINE-like package customised for Lindows.
    5. Re:about the new name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah yes...but what would be more surpising then the First Battalion, Lin---S Brigade, parachuting into dangerous court rooms, with a FANTASTIC SERVER, and a FANTASTIC OS, downloaded for free from the local Linux Arsenal....(Thank you Linus)
      Well remembered....;)

    6. Re:about the new name by aunti-freeze · · Score: 1

      ah yes...but what would be more surpising then the First Battalion, Lin---S Brigade, parachuting into dangerous court rooms, with a FANTASTIC SERVER, and a FANTASTIC OS, downloaded for free from the local Linux Arsenal....(Thank you Linus) Well remembered....;) sorry just made an account and wanted to get my name on this...Love Eddie Izzard and love the references used in this context!

  7. I still say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the distro formerly known as LindowsOS would have been better.

    1. Re:I still say by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft would still sue them for using a character that appeared in Windings #94.

    2. Re:I still say by spuke4000 · · Score: 4, Funny
      the distro formerly known as LindowsOS would have been better.

      How about "I can't believe it's not windows!"

      --
      This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
    3. Re:I still say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "We're not your mothers windows!"

    4. Re:I still say by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Works great. You turn up the heat, and it melts.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:I still say by macgyvr64 · · Score: 1

      "I can't believe it's not windows!"

      I can.

  8. babies... by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is infantile. If you are being forced to change your name, just do it. Having a name like Lin---s.com is just plain dumb. The graphic on the one site is hangman with D,O,W remaining.

    Other programs have had to do this before and at least they had the decency to come up with something more original. I suppose when you start out with something as unoriginal as Windows/Lindows they what do you expect?

    1. Re:babies... by leifm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree. I eagerly await the collapse of this stupid ass company that does nothing to further either operating systems in general or Linux. The Lindows name was stupid to begin with, they should have used this as an opportunity to find a name that isn't lame.

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    2. Re:babies... by LittleBigLui · · Score: 4, Funny
      This is infantile. If you are being forced to change your name, just do it.


      They should just have something that reminds users that their LINUX (obviously, symbolized by a penguin) is HOT (symbolized by fire), so i would recommend they call their product "Firebird".

      No really, it was funny when i first thought about it.
      --
      Free as in mason.
    3. Re:babies... by MisterFancypants · · Score: 0, Troll

      Despite how I may feel about Microsoft, I've never been a fan of Michael Robertson. He seems like an unprofessional toad in all areas of business, so I don't find this site that surprising.

    4. Re:babies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Give them a break, it's not like they have a product that anyone wants, so they need a gimmick.

      See? We're not successful because mean ol' MS is PICKING ON US! That's right! There's no other reason that our product hasn't taken over the world! Looooook aaaaat ussss! We are a victim, like Netscape!!!!!!

      Make a decent product like Netscape and maybe someone would give a crap.

    5. Re:babies... by Zilfondel2 · · Score: 1

      Yea, they're going to change their name just for the Netherlands? The last thing I'd want to see is some upstart anti-MS company kowtowing to the evil Dutch, which, if I might add, were the FIRST EVIL EMPIRE IN THE WORLD!!!

      *curls pinky at side of mouth

    6. Re:babies... by SpamJunkie · · Score: 1

      I've spoken with Mr. Robertson myself. Even though the circumstances were such that he was doing me a big favor I was still impressed by how abrasive he was.

    7. Re:babies... by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      Except they want to stay Lindows in countries in which they can.

    8. Re:babies... by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it would be ok to change the name to the more U.S. Southern sounding Linders.

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    9. Re:babies... by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is infantile. If you are being forced to change your name, just do it.

      No, this pokes fun at MS's insanity.

      This seems completely asinine. How many hundreds of products out there call themselves "win"foo, or foo"indows"-bar? Yet who does MS go after? a Linux company.

      Microsoft arguably has to protect their trademarks to keep them valid, but the existance of exactly the examples I gave demonstrate that they have already given up their trademark. And that doesn't even take into consideration the outright absurdity of trying to consider a common English word as a trademark in the first place.

      So, a jab at MS? Yup. Infantile? Hey, personally I would have gone even further, changing it to something like "Nanosuck Lindoors YQ", with a slogan like "what it takes them a millionth of a second to do, we do in a billionth", or "Bo and Luke may have used windows, but the rest of us prefer doors", or "A full letter ahead of the competition" (okay, those all sound really stupid, but you get the idea - Push the limits of trademarkability to their idiotic extremes).


      Earlier today, I thouht the EU came down a bit hard on MS, rejecting the very settlement they (the EU) themselves had proposed. But now? Crap like this makes me long for the revocation of a company's (not just MS's) corporate charter. If they can't all play nice, take 'em out back and put 'em all against the wall.

    10. Re:babies... by sultanoslack · · Score: 1

      Actually it's really, really smart from a marketing perspective. This stuff is great for Lindows. They're able to generate loads of PR by messing with their product name in a country that they don't have any sales in.

      Basically no losses and lots of PR.

    11. Re:babies... by __past__ · · Score: 1
      Make a decent product like Netscape
      I assume that you think of Netscape <= 4 when you say "Netscape". To wich I answer:

      Oh my god no, please do not! You can say what you want about Lindows, for example that it is an utter piece of crap and nobody would possibly want to use it if it weren't for the hype generated by the stupid name, but it stil is not as bad as the broken tag-soup interpreter we all know (but nobody loves) as Netscape.

      Nobody, not even Lindows, should try to make something "as good as Netscape". Instead, try making something that doesn't deliberately violate open standards, works more than half of the time without crashing regularly. If you care about Unix users, you might even consider not setting the default font size to half a pixel.

    12. Re:babies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amazing, 50% Insightful and 30% negative moderation. Hmmm, awfully interesting that it's at +2...

    13. Re:babies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should just have something that reminds users that their LINUX (obviously, symbolized by a penguin) is HOT (symbolized by fire)

      Baked Penguin?

    14. Re:babies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its times like this that I wish I could mod a post as stupid-poster.

    15. Re:babies... by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1
      Baked Penguin?

      Stoned Beaver!
      --
      Free as in mason.
    16. Re:babies... by x3ro · · Score: 1
      This seems completely asinine. How many hundreds of products out there call themselves "win"foo, or foo"indows"-bar? Yet who does MS go after? a Linux company.

      But how many of these pieces of software named /.*w?in(dows)?.*/ are operating systems?

      --
      [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
    17. Re:babies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Firebird".

      Or dead-roasted-penguin-on-a-stick ?

      Or dead duck? or lobster? Dead trout in a whitewine sauce?

    18. Re:babies... by pla · · Score: 1

      But how many of these pieces of software named /.*w?in(dows)?.*/ are operating systems?

      Just one - "Windows".

      Lindows just makes Linux simple enough to use for your typical Grandmother, mostly through GUI tweaks. If that provides sufficient basis for infringement, why hasn't MS shut down X-Windows yet?

      Oh, yeah - Because X existed first, providing yet another reason why MS should have no power whatsoever to enforce their so-called "trademark".

    19. Re:babies... by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      You're right, but it DID get them a hell of a lot of free publicity...

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  9. Unfortunate by andyring · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It truly is sad to think that Microsoft can block distribution of a particular flavor of Linux. I guess when you can't win in the free marketplace, you resort to sleazy underhanded tactics such as this.

    1. Re:Unfortunate by hambonewilkins · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Since we don't see Microsoft going after Red Hat, Mandrake, etc, I have to counter that they are worried about Lindows infringing on their copyright, not about "blocking" Linux.

      I know it's easy to jump on MS, but let's be honest: Lindows, as a word, doesn't mean anything. It's just Windows with an L instead of a W. It is OBVIOUSLY trying to cash in on the Windows franchise.

      Oh, and with a neat 95% of the marketplace, I think MS is winning in the free market. I think most Linux users actually dislike Lindows. Its a lame way to commercialize the OS.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    2. Re:Unfortunate by saderax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I dont think Microsoft is blocking distribution of linux (at least not with regards to this situation), but they are protecting their product name. I admit I did think the parody of windows was amusing, but I wouldn't call Microsoft's defense of their product name sleazy and underhanded. I might even go as far as to call Lindows sleazy and underhanded, by playing off a successfull (ok, ok... ^H^H^Hwidely used) product's name to gain recognition and sales.

    3. Re:Unfortunate by Ernest+P+Worrell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It truly sad to think that one company can create a very similar sounding trademark as an attempt to confuse consumers to switch to an inferior product.

      Not mentioning specifics, but this is just like me creating a sodapop called KocaKola, nd branding it in a white script font against a red background.

      Leaving generalities, MSFT is protecting their brand. Maintaining a brand is essential for anyone. How would you feel if MSFT branded its next version of Whatever with a Penguin?

    4. Re:Unfortunate by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      I know it's easy to jump on MS, but let's be honest: Lindows, as a word, doesn't mean anything. It's just Windows with an L instead of a W. It is OBVIOUSLY trying to cash in on the Windows franchise.

      Honestly (and I much prefer OS/2 to Windows or Linux), I originally read it as LIN-dows.

      So it wasn't as obvious to me as it may have been to you. As concentrating on 'Lin', instead of 'indows' gives you a different perspective.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    5. Re:Unfortunate by Ciderx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's rubbish. I know of at least one person who thinks Lindows is a version of Linux that is compatible or like Windows, just from its name. Michael Robertson knows what he's doing, and his is an attempt to cheat and con his way into the market.

    6. Re:Unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, and with a neat 95% of the marketplace, I think MS is winning in the free market.

      Um, no. The market is not free, as has been proven here ad nauseam.

      To summarise: since a lot of people do actively want Windows, no OEM can afford not to ship some computers with Windows installed. Since Microsoft have punitive pricing for OEMs which fail to ship all computers with a Windows license, it is practically impossible to buy a PC without also buying a Windows license. Since you have already bought a Windows license, you are unlikely then to pay yet more money for an alternative OS. The barrier to entry of the OS market is thus being kept artificially high by Microsoft's monopoly. The market is thus NOT FREE.

      Do you get it yet? Regardless of whether Lindows is infringing on a Microsoft trademark or not, Microsoft are also behaving if not illegally then contrary to the principals of free market capitalism.

    7. Re:Unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's just Windows with an L instead of a W. It is OBVIOUSLY trying to cash in on the Windows franchise.

      Yes, however this is the sort of situation that Microsoft ACCEPTED when they chose to use for their product name an untrademarkable word such as "Windows". If they did not want this happening they should have named their product something distinct and/or trademarkable.

    8. Re:Unfortunate by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 0, Redundant
      ...I have to counter that they are worried about Lindows infringing on their copyright, not about "blocking" Linux.

      Well, trademark to be specific, but I understand your point.

      I know it's easy to jump on MS, but let's be honest: Lindows, as a word, doesn't mean anything. It's just Windows with an L instead of a W. It is OBVIOUSLY trying to cash in on the Windows franchise.

      Microsoft has to at least share the blame. "Windows" is a terrible trademark. Trying to claim a trademark on a term that had an accepted meaning within the industry long before you named a product after it is just sleazy. "Microsoft Windows" is a good trademark, but "Windows" is a terrible trademark. "Lindows" at least created a new word, just the sort of thing that is clearly trademarkable.

      Oh, and with a neat 95% of the marketplace, I think MS is winning in the free market.

      That's a big leap of logic. I could just as easily say, "With a neat 95% of the marketplace, I think MS is clearly abusing a monopoly position." Dominant market position can mean lots of things.

    9. Re:Unfortunate by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

      Sure, the market may not be free, but Microsoft is not going after Lindows as a means to stop Linux. They are doing it because it infringes up their trademark. I was using the term "free market" because that is the term the poster who I responded to had used.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    10. Re:Unfortunate by drjimmy42 · · Score: 1

      It's just Windows with an L instead of a W.

      Hey, wait a minute... holy $#!+, you are absolutely right. Wow, that's pretty clever, the play on words, you know. Admn, it even rhymes. What will they think of next...

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the precipitate
    11. Re:Unfortunate by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Not mentioning specifics, but this is just like me creating a sodapop called KocaKola, nd branding it in a white script font against a red background.

      (1) It's more like branding you drink "Kola". Windows is a generic computer term for a GUI display, while Microsoft Windows is the product. Similarly Cola is generic term for a flavour (and is often associated with carbonated beverages), while the product is Coca Cola (as opposed to, say Pepsi Cola).

      (2) The LindowsOS logo looks very little like the the windows logo, or even the microsoft logo - oh, I'm sorry, they're both blue. How many random off brand cola drinks come in red packaging?

      Jedidiah.

    12. Re:Unfortunate by senzafine · · Score: 1

      I agree. Would anyone who would do any different if put in bill gates' shoes? Every company wants to become as close to monopoly status as possible without being illegal. Microsoft has just gotten away with crossing that line.

      Of course Microsoft is going to sue based on an operating system named "Lindows"...whoever thought they wouldn't (or that they would beat MS in the lawsuit) was smoking some serious hash.

      --
      Better than Flickr - Manage, Share, Archive
    13. Re:Unfortunate by replicant108 · · Score: 1

      The market isn't free - it's artificially constrained by Microsoft's abusive tactics.

      I believe this was proven in court.

  10. Amsterdam court ruling by Transient0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    changes name of of lindows to lind-hash.

    BSD may be forced also to change it's name to BUD.

    1. Re:Amsterdam court ruling by ktulu1115 · · Score: 5, Funny

      BSD may be forced also to change it's name to BUD.

      Nah, just change the B to a L. Talk about a way to grab attention from your co-workers: "So yeah, I installed LSD this past weekend, and man what a trip it was..." :)

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    2. Re:Amsterdam court ruling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUD/s is already taken by the navy, dont want to fuck with them. LSD would be the new name.

    3. Re:Amsterdam court ruling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Linux Software Distribution?

    4. Re:Amsterdam court ruling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Installing LSD (Formerly BSD) must be what they call
      a bad trip (Yes, I finally got NetBSD-current installed on my laptop
      and actually running).

    5. Re:Amsterdam court ruling by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, reminds me of my favourite joke:

      "LSD, UNIX, and John Searle all came from UC Berkley. This is not a concidence."

  11. Wheel of Fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lin---s? I feel like I'm on some kind of game show.

    I'd like to buy a vowel!

    1. Re:Wheel of Fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lin---s? I feel like I'm on some kind of game show.

      I'd like to buy a vowel!


      You buy a `u'... hey look! "Linuuus"

      How's that for a coincidence?
    2. Re:Wheel of Fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lin Minus Minus Minus ???

  12. What ever happen to by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Funny

    the names...

    winix
    uniwindows
    linuows
    microsnix
    lindix

    1. Re:What ever happen to by probbka · · Score: 1

      Microsnix... I like it! Sounds like it might be a cereal.

      --
      Only requirement for good karma: be pedantic as much and as often as possible.
    2. Re:What ever happen to by pyros · · Score: 1
      linuows

      Is that pronounced lin-woes? I'd like to reserve that for any future release of a Microsoft Linux distribution.

    3. Re:What ever happen to by pavon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah I was going to name my spyware removal program Windex because it, you know, cleans Windows.

    4. Re:What ever happen to by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      I got a better one, how about OpenWindows...doh

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    5. Re:What ever happen to by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      winix uniwindows linuows microsnix lindix ...

      I know where you're headed with that! =)

    6. Re:What ever happen to by prockcore · · Score: 1

      They should name the OS "FU,MS"

    7. Re:What ever happen to by fedux · · Score: 1

      How about winux ?

    8. Re:What ever happen to by emurphy42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think you're a bit late:

      WindX overview
      WindX home

  13. I heard they were going to name it dlashsot.... by big-giant-head · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    NFM

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
  14. This is a joke right? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    Because it's not funny.

    Actually, Lindows Inc. isn't very funny either.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  15. That's crazy! by ABaumann · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next on Slashdot: Microsoft is suing all companies with products that start with a W.

    1. Re:That's crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the normal modus operandi, where they sue all companies starting with letters?

    2. Re:That's crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where they sue all companies starting with letters?

      As far as I know, MS has never sued 3Com, yet. Now I know why.

    3. Re:That's crazy! by switcha · · Score: 1
      Next on Slashdot: Microsoft is suing all companies with products that start with a W.

      -00t!

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    4. Re:That's crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starting with the Republican Party?

    5. Re:That's crazy! by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

      Microsoft owns W.

  16. In related news... by trp642 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft is now known as Micro---- (pronounced: Microdash). This is to settle a lesser known lawsuit with video game maker SquareSoft.

    Lindows will now sue Microdash for trademark violations.

    Will it ever end?

    1. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought it's Micros~1

    2. Re:In related news... by kfg · · Score: 1

      And they'll both, in turn, be sued by Proctor & Gamble.

      Anderson Windows is reported to be miffed they were late to the party.

      KFG

    3. Re:In related news... by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      Better yet, SquareEnix becomes known as Square--- because they can't even say "Enix" let alone any *nix types because SCO owns "Unix" and all the *nix derrivatives.

    4. Re:In related news... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ohh, that would have been the best:

      Lindo~1

      lindo-tildy-one

      beter than
      lindash

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I get the joke, but it doesn't work because Lindows is only 7 characters.

    6. Re:In related news... by HumanTorch · · Score: 1

      or perhaps Micros__t (in lieu of the usual stars)

    7. Re:In related news... by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      As mentioned, it has only 7 characters, so it wouldn't work.

      Also, I was under the impression that the ~1 name abbreviation scheme is patented by Microsoft, as stupid as it is... (Though it's not really that difficult patent to step around of. Check out how DOSEMU reports long file names. I'll go to D:\TMP and see names like D:\TMP\ORBIT~3U and D:\TMP\GCONF~LP instead of /tmp/orbit-wwwwolf and /tmp/gconfd-wwwwolf...)

    8. Re:In related news... by LinuxTard · · Score: 1

      Close. Micro$~1 Windows

    9. Re:In related news... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Lindows is only 7 letters, ha patent avoided...

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  17. Congratulations Windows by addie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cases like this boggle the mind. Now all they had to do was change their name to something (albeit strange) catchy, and they get even more free publicity. Windows on the other hand, continues to foster its bully image and ends up really not accomplishing too much at all.

    What a waste of everyone's time and money.

    1. Re:Congratulations Windows by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1

      The lawyers don't agree.

  18. Yeah. by miseryinmotion · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Lin--s?
    Honestly, that is just a horrible name.
    I mean, it's target audience has enough problems with "dot com," how are they going to make sense out of "Lin--s" ?

    1. Re:Yeah. by azzy · · Score: 1

      They'll just call it Lindows, and roll their eyes over how stupid Microsoft is. That's the point of the new name.

  19. Here we go.... by GeckoFood · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Anyone else get the feeling that this particular distribution will end up being the 800-lb gorilla just because of the name change? I would almost be willing to wager that the forced name change will drive people to it, not from it (even though the name is dumb).

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
    1. Re:Here we go.... by IncarnadineConor · · Score: 1

      no

    2. Re:Here we go.... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      If you're right, I'm releasing a distro called "Microsoft Windows 2005", changing the name, and making BILLIONS!

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  20. As first reported on by JoeShmoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    F---edcompany maybe?

    As a double bonus is gets around any Microsoft-friendly internet censorware that has lindows.com blocked as "terrorist" or "hate speech".

    -JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  21. Hmm--- by Cyclopedian · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dis-y
    Mic--oft
    AO--ime---ner
    S-O

    This is fun!

    -Cyc

  22. That's using your imagination! by inertia187 · · Score: 4, Funny

    visionary [vi'sion'ar'y] adj 1. full of foresight: characterized by unusually acute foresight and imagination

    Microsoft(R) Encarta(R) Reference Library 2002. (C) 1993-2001 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

    Good for Lindows. Too bad being a visionary is copyrighted by Microsoft.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:That's using your imagination! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's still there, but in the front page of the DirectX 8 SDK docs there was a list of MS trademarks that were used in the document. One of them was `Natural'. Next week, expect to see the makers of any product with the word `Natural' in its name sued.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  23. They should've by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gone with something like Lindose or Lindoze.

  24. Great moments in sarcasm by 0x00000dcc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hilarious ... another great moment in sarcasm history, and yet rather thought-provoking on the question of intellectual property.

    --

    -- (Score:i, Imaginary)

    1. Re:Great moments in sarcasm by 0x00000dcc · · Score: 1
      RTFC ... that was NOT offtopic. Not the greatest comment in the history of comments, but certainly not offtopic. Unless you do not think that changing a name to Lin---s and having a hangman with the remaining letters on the webpage has anything to do with sarcasm or the question of naming practices in intellectual property. Perhaps GTTFW and see for yerself??

      --

      -- (Score:i, Imaginary)

  25. For some reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lin---s reminds me of this cartoon. Fill in the blanks? What else can we stick in those three dashes? I'd grep my /usr/dict/words if I wasn't in Windows.

  26. I think it is funny. by utahraptor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It just shows how much money Microsoft has wasted to punish this company.

  27. Well by GiveMeLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could've renamed it Linfox instead.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LinFox... A good one ! Thanks for the laugh.

      M.

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is the best laugh I've had a for a few days. Perhaps a sad commentary, but...

  28. Amsterdam court ruling huh? by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Might I suggest:

    lin-XXX.com

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  29. in other news... by hex1848 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft sues dictionary.com for trademark infringement.

    - (-) n.
    An opening constructed in a wall or roof that functions to admit light or air to an enclosure and is often framed and spanned with glass mounted to permit opening and closing.

  30. Not too bad by Savatte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lindash isn't too bad of an OS name. But why not just spell it lindash? It would be much easier

    1. Re:Not too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because excessive hyphens are k-rad leet.

      Duh.

    2. Re:Not too bad by youritadvisor.com · · Score: 1

      they did go to lindash.com the lin--- is for publicity.

    3. Re:Not too bad by grolschie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good grief no! That should be GNU/Lindash! ;-)

  31. well, i would of called it something else by FictionPimp · · Score: 0, Redundant

    www.thelinuxdistroformerlycalledlindows.com
    lindosft.com
    lindoor.com The only thing easier then a window is a door - great slogan
    msmadeuschangeourname.com
    You guys can come up with the rest. This has to be the most stupid thing I have ever read. And that includes my own posts.

  32. Better Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Should've changed it to Lackintosh.

  33. Lin---s in Amsterdam, eh? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 3, Funny

    ! up job, boys--now put on your ^s, head down to the big \ at the local # |, and party 'till you see *s!

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Lin---s in Amsterdam, eh? by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

      at the local # |

      What's a "pound bar"? :P

    2. Re:Lin---s in Amsterdam, eh? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
      #

      CROSSHATCH

      pound, pound sign, number, number sign, sharp, octothorpe, hash, (garden) fence, crunch, mesh, hex, flash, grid, pig-pen, tictactoe, scratch (mark), (garden) gate, hak, oof, rake, sink&, corridor&, unequal, punch mark

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  34. I'm confused. by Yoda2 · · Score: 1

    Sometimes its Lindash, sometimes Lin-s, sometimes Lin--s. Why the double dash? If they are replacing "dow" then it should be Lin---s. Do we pronounce the "s" (e.g. Lindashs/es)? Please help me.

    1. Re:I'm confused. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If my first impression hadnt been guided by /. I would've read it out loud as:

      Linn-ess

      Sounds like Linus, eh.

    2. Re:I'm confused. by theantipode · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing you didn't bother counting the dashes first. Otherwise you would've looked silly.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall
      With your opinion which is of no consequence at all
    3. Re:I'm confused. by faaaz · · Score: 1
      Linn-ess
      Just don't tell a certain brewery though...
      --
      we come in peace / shoot to kill
  35. Other possibilities? by mikeophile · · Score: 1

    Lingerie? Lingham? Lingering? Linched?

    1. Re:Other possibilities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      lingers

      linings

      linkers

      All fit better with lin---s.

  36. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Nick's "I can't believe it's an operating system!"

  37. Would you trust your business... by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1, Troll

    much less your personal computing to a company that engages in this sort of nonsense?

    1. Re:Would you trust your business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, why wouldn't it? dumbass. fuck off.

  38. Heh. by K.+Engel · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least they didn't rename themselves GNU/Xenix.

    *gong*

  39. Let's hope Linus doesn't press, too! by Trillan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then it would become L-----s.

    (Not that it's likely, of course. Heh.)

  40. Obligatory Homer Exclaimation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ---!

    1. Re:Obligatory Homer Exclaimation by gosand · · Score: 1
      ---!


      Technically, it should be "-'--!"

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    2. Re:Obligatory Homer Exclaimation by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1
      ---!
      Is that pronounced "D'ash!"?
      --
      ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
  41. Lindash - the marketing meeting by Zarquil · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Lindash. Lindash. I like it. It sounds fast. It will make your computer run quickly. And it's Linux, so you know it'll be stable.

    "Yeah, I like Lindash a lot. And it sounds WAY better than Laguar or Lanther."

    1. Re:Lindash - the marketing meeting by Asprin · · Score: 1


      I guess, but to MY ear, it sounds like Foster Brooks doing his "Drunk guy with the slurred speech" comedy bit again.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
  42. I suppose by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    that they also avoided renaming it to LinOS, to avoid getting scolded at by the Linux community?

  43. Missed Marketing Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They should have renamed it "Lizzle" That would hizzle bizzle the shizzle.

  44. Can Dashes Stand? by fembots · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Can the use of dashes stand in court? Imagine people start using "-indows" (Dashindows) or "l-nux".

  45. Roberts is an idiot by TioHoltzman · · Score: 1

    I'm all for the concept of a super easy to use/set up linux distro.
    He had me on board with the idea of trying to compete with Windows in terms of getting it installed on a OEM PC.
    I'm rooting for him when he takes MS on and calls a spade a spade.
    But this??? WTF!!!
    This is just mindless, infantile crap. Frankly the "Lindows" name was always stupid, and amateurish, something that you joke about over a few beers with your buddies. Now we've simply magnified the stupidity with "Lind---" or whatever it's called.
    I hope they crash and burn ASAP so this can be forgotten.

  46. Oh great, now they'll get sued by the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mrs. Dash people.

  47. Not on target.... by 222 · · Score: 1

    Much like any other marketing ive seen by lindows, it seems to reflect the tongue-in-cheek attitude towards opposition.
    Its unfortunate that in the corp market, where linux seems to actually have a strong chance of adoption, these antics seem childish and unprofessional. Lindows would be better served catering to the executive market imho, rather than people that just "hate" microsoft...
    On a positive note, looks like Robertson made good on a frontpage replacement :D ( http://www.nvu.com/ )

  48. No, it's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...pretty fucking ridiculous.

  49. Should have named it Snoop style! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lin-shizzle.

  50. OSAMA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first read that, my mind associated BIN LADEN with that name....

  51. Incorrect Hangman by wickedj · · Score: 2, Funny

    For one, they're already using S and O and neither have been crossed out. They've already missed 18 times. Unless they're counting every bone in the hangman's body, the game should be over.

    1. Re:Incorrect Hangman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, GET A L_FE!

    2. Re:Incorrect Hangman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get Alfie? Where is he?

  52. Rather it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linuendows

  53. In dutch by j_sp_r · · Score: 1

    Lindash zuigt nog erger als Lindows, en verdomme gisteren heb k lindows nog gedownload. Vertaal zelf maar :-P

    1. Re:In dutch by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      For those who can't speak the number one world language:

      Lindows sucks worse than Lindows. And he downloaded it yesterday.

    2. Re:In dutch by AlXtreme · · Score: 1
      tis allemaal gore non-free rotzooi. Troep, dat is het! Lang leve de enige echte nederlandse GNU/Linux distro!

      No, you don't want that translated, less our plan to conquer the world be discovered.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
  54. Stupid Name. by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

    They need to hire some marketing and branding people. That is the stupidest name I have heard. At least Lindows was clever. Why didn't they think about it?

    1. Re:Stupid Name. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Because Robertson - kook that he is - is stomping his little foot in the sand and making a "joke" that only 0.001% of the total computer-using population of the planet gets or cares about.

    2. Re:Stupid Name. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Stupid name or not. People are talking about it. And that's what's important for names.

  55. LodinwsSO by 4lex · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    My journal. Mainly about freedom.
  56. Why not just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Screw Mac and Microsoft and call it: iWin___s!!!!!!!

  57. Unoriginal at Heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, what more can you expect from a company that copies Apples old aqua tab-design on its website.

  58. And tomorrow.. by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    All the ones that start with "L" too.
    Just to be on the safe side.

  59. Totally Idiotic. by torpor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How'm I supposed to search for "lin---s" in google, for example? Please don't break out the meta-escape, its already past time for a headache remedy on this Lindows name issue ...

    A better name would've been "Lintel", but okay, I guess the Dutch Govt' wouldn't have seen the humor in that name-switch, eh? ;)

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Totally Idiotic. by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

      lindashdashdashs maybe??

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:Totally Idiotic. by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Lintel"

      This sounds like some sort of geek clone of a day-time talk show. Then that show sues. You just can't win!

      How about "Lintiac, the sporty operating system with a bad water pump"?

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    3. Re:Totally Idiotic. by Trejkaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was banking on Mindows myself. *jab jab*

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:Totally Idiotic. by valintin · · Score: 1

      How do you search for /.?

    5. Re:Totally Idiotic. by jelle · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like a C syntax checker with VOIP support to me.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    6. Re:Totally Idiotic. by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


      Or, when someone asks "But does it run Linux?" regarding their new-found belly button lint, we can shout back an enthousiastic "Yes!"

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    7. Re:Totally Idiotic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Lintel" -- isn't that a bean?

    8. Re:Totally Idiotic. by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Microsquash should take their lawsuits against Pella and Andersen to Belium, Luxembourg, and The Netherlands. They might win there. Just what have the judges in those countries been smoking anyway? Crack?

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    9. Re:Totally Idiotic. by ElliotLee · · Score: 2, Informative
      How'm I supposed to search for "lin---s" in google, for example?

      That's what "Lindash" is for.

    10. Re:Totally Idiotic. by Matrix9180 · · Score: 1

      You could use just that... "lin---s" (with the quotes) google treats anything between quotes (or anything after a quote if there's only one) as an exact phrase to search for.

      --
      120chars for a sig is teh suck
    11. Re:Totally Idiotic. by igny · · Score: 1

      How about 'OS formerly known as Lindows'? (reference to Prince)

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    12. Re:Totally Idiotic. by chthon · · Score: 1

      I think those are lentils.

    13. Re:Totally Idiotic. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Actually a 'lintel' is the bit around the window which keeps it from blowing away in the wind ...

      I think its a highly appropriate name, myself. I might have to go start a "Lintel" project on freshmeat, quick! ;)

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    14. Re:Totally Idiotic. by Hmmkay · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see the marketing slogan already:

      "Lintel: We're above Windows"

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lintel

  60. Po slovensko. by metulj · · Score: 1

    Drzi gobec ker bedak si.

  61. For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Just change 'Lindows' to something else. It sounds corny enough as it is and makes an otherwise pretty good distro come across as a Windows knockoff.

  62. Way to doom yourself into obscurity.. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a stupid name. Noone but a bunch of geeks (who wont pay for lindows anyways) gets the joke.

    I'd have come up with something original, and marketted it as a great commercial OS - highlighting its actual features, rather than running it as the "MS is teh ghey!!1!! lOOLOL GAYER THEN AIDS!!1!" system.

    Move over, HURD, here comes Lin---s.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Way to doom yourself into obscurity.. by kwandar · · Score: 1

      "What a stupid name."

      ... with all due respect, I disagree.

      This will cause articles to be written that will be picked up in the general press.

      Voila! Free publicity, until they change the name to "Lindash" for those markets where it matters.

      This looks like Lindows, while losing in court, have found a silver lining. You have to respect that!

  63. Oh, oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.dash.com/default.shtml

  64. Lin---s it is. Wrong you are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    random jibberish to make /. let me post&&

  65. Was "W1nd0ws" taken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely it would be "hip" and "rad" among the young "dudes" of today.

  66. Why not "LinDOHs"? by tommck · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would be a good homage to Homer Simpson too..

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    1. Re:Why not "LinDOHs"? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Informative

      but Fox would have forced them to shutdown their Simpsons Fan website

    2. Re:Why not "LinDOHs"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not linDough in homage to Caterers around the world

    3. Re:Why not "LinDOHs"? by Cryp2Nite · · Score: 1

      Or linDOWs in reference to all the money their stock is going to be worth...

    4. Re:Why not "LinDOHs"? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Get it right, it's Lin(Annoyed Grunt)s.

  67. Can you raed tihs? by ktulu1115 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rmedins me of tihs sotry...

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  68. Lindash. by bad+enema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Truly, it is the name made by geeks for geeks.
    Why is it that some geeks, who are supposed the intellectually elite, come up with the most stupid ideas ever? I say some, because that would be an insult to me and the rest of the minority of the geek population.

  69. Related irony by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

    I went to lindows.com to have a look, and followed the link to "buy one now" and followed that to a reseller of Lindows boxes.

    Nice webpage:


    Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a01c3'
    Object not a collection /customkititems.asp, line 368

  70. Only lamers use Lin----s by solidhen · · Score: 1

    Real men use Kg'#^%$&*YEJkl;j

    --
    Some things are more important than an animated rat
  71. Thundercougarfalconbird. by jwriney · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh for crap's sake. Can't they just get the Mozilla people to rattle off a few dozen name candidates? Their projects change names with every CVS commit.

    --riney

    1. Re:Thundercougarfalconbird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the same thing as a Toyota Tercelicarolla?

    2. Re:Thundercougarfalconbird. by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      Thundercougarfalconbird you missed out 'props to Futurama'. Attribute your funnies!

      --
      Burma?
    3. Re:Thundercougarfalconbird. by jwriney · · Score: 1

      (in Bender voice) Shut up baby, I know it!

      --riney

  72. Yes, this is horrible, this idea. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Yes, this is horrible, this idea." - Samir

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Yes, this is horrible, this idea. by smithwis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Samir Naga... Naga... Na, Not gonna work here anymore

    2. Re:Yes, this is horrible, this idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Samir Nainanedjar, na-i-na-ne-djar .. what is so difficult with that name?"

  73. Lindows, Inc secondary to fight with MS by blorg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They are doing this for the publicity value, and because - in fairness - the Benelux countries are a relatively small market, they haven't yet been forced to change the name in larger markets, and they intend to fight to keep the Lindows name to the end, even if it bankrupts the company. (And they would point out that they are appealing in the Netherlands, so this may be a temporary measure.)

    Michael Robertson is as much interested in the fight with MS as the future of his company, which he is using as a vehicle. I don't necessarily think this is a bad thing - Lindows is privately held, after all, so he can do what he likes, and I respect his convictions. What Robertson really would like to see, I think even *more* than the success of Lindows, would be for a US court to strip Windows of trademark protection.

  74. Not so much... by Jay9333 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think what they're doing is right on. Lindows tried protesting M$'s ridiculous assertion (that it can trademark a word common in the English language and in computing circles *before* there was ever a Microsoft Windows(tm)) in the courts. Now they can continue their protest of this ridiculous ruling via their new name... and they rightly should protest. The European ruling is idiotic.

    The US courts are more reasonable, and likely won't let Microsoft pull words from the English language/computing circles like European courts have. Lindows is a great marketing name for a linux desktop solution, combining linux, a term the average joe may be unfamiliar with, with windows, a term most people use in reference to their computer everyday (not M$ Windows(tm), but those little boxes people are used to dealing with on their desktops in *any* OS environment, when they are instructed to "close the window" etc.). Trademarking the word "windows" is like trademarking the words "mouse" or "cursor".

    I don't know much about the distro or the company... but I give them props for their name. Marketing wit is something the linux community can always use more of.

    1. Re:Not so much... by wa1ter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uhmm... you're forgetting something really big here.... Aside from in the UK english is *NOT* the people's first language in Europe so the entire 'it's a common word' doesn't hold any water here as, according to the local languages, they are both names that are only one letter apart. Aside from that, it wasn't a european ruling. It's a dutch ruling. Big difference although I'll admit there is a good chance other countries will follow the ruling. Not because they're part of the EU but because windows is not a word but just a name in the local languages.

      --
      Sig? What's this sig thing I hear people talking about?
    2. Re:Not so much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other languages than English!?

    3. Re:Not so much... by MikeXpop · · Score: 0

      Bull. Lindows knew exactly what it was doing when it chose its name. Why would they name their company after the boxes? Face it, Windows is the name of an OS. Lindows is the name of an OS. Windows was chosen when those window thingies were knew and exciting (well, not really, but more so than they are now). Why would Lindows do it now? Lindows is just trying to get a cheap ride.

      Although to me, Lindows sounds to me in the same way Folex watches and G.I. Jims do.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    4. Re:Not so much... by Tarwn · · Score: 0

      I got to do a lot of research the first time people started bandying this argument about, guess what? Command language terms are legally allowed to be trademarks as long as they fit a certain set of guidelines that make the usage distinct from the original term, guidelines that MS Windows meets.

      I'd start naming cars, but it would take to long. I'll leave it at Mustang, Yukon, Canyon, Solstice...

      Or candybars: Snickers, Milky Way, Crunch...

      Or maybe we're just talking terms that describe the product: Crunch again, Frosted Mini Wheats, etc, etc

      In fact, if Windows had not taken Lindows to court, they could have been found to be in violation of the laws for legal protection of a Trademark by not protecting it.

      Wikipedia has lots more info on Trademarks, including a little story about XEROX being forced to run commercials to tell people to call it "copying" instead of "XEROXing" because the "XEROXing" term was genericizing their trademark.
      Genericized trademark

      --
      Whee signature.
    5. Re:Not so much... by Jay9333 · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me that in European languages (specifically Dutch, if you know it) the word for a "window" in OS/2, a Mozilla/Netscape browser or mail app, or a linux graphical environment is an entirely word then the second word in "Microsoft Windows(tm)"? If it isn't different, then my point stands. If it is a different word, then you have a point... except these companies are using the English word in naming their product, so regardless the English language and this word's history in *that language* should be taken account. Again, the ruling is ridiculous.

    6. Re:Not so much... by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Informative
      Despite your research, you apparently did not uncover the difference between fanciful, descriptive, and generic trademarks.

      In the case of the car and candy trademarks you cited, they're all based on words not generic within their category - as is also the case with Apple, Amazon, etc.

      In the case of your cereals, there's some actual relevant history there - a company got a trademark on the descriptive name "Shredded Wheat" and lost it when they tried to stop another company from using it because it was found to be unprotectable. Descriptive names can only be protected if they gain some secondary meaning beyond the raw description. This also why you see so many "Raisin Bran" and "Corn Flakes" cereals out there from different companies.

      Then comes "generic" terms - you cannot trademark the single word "Apple" for apples, though you might be able to trademark the descriptive combination "Tasty Apples". "Windows" was and is a generic term used in computer science, and Microsoft is the only entity that disputes this fact. The combination "Microsoft Windows" is a valid trademark, but the single term "Windows" should not be - in fact the USPTO turned them down three times on that basis.

      The "Xerox" issue is one where a trademark term is in danger of going from protectable to unprotectable (fanciful to generic) due to lack of diligence in defending it. The Lindows/Windows case is about the exact opposite - a generic term somehow becoming protectable. The judge in the US Lindows case (IMHO correctly) found that law and case precedents did not support that notion, and Microsoft is appealing.

    7. Re:Not so much... by Jay9333 · · Score: 1

      Why would then name their company after the boxes? For the same reason Microsoft did. FYI, Microsoft Windows wasn't the first OS to use windows (the boxes). M$ didn't invent them, and cannot trademark that word (as the US courts will rule, I believe). Windows (the boxes) are one of the most well known things all modern OS's have common. But I already made that point...

    8. Re:Not so much... by Jay9333 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft hasn't taken anyone in the OSS community to court over "Xwindows". Why? Because they'd lose. Windows are common features. The difference between the word "windows" in reference to computers and the word "mustang" in reference to cars is that "windows" was used in refering to computers *before* microsoft ever came along and started using it. So Ford can trademark "Mustang" much more easily then M$ can trademark 'windows'.

      I understand how they had to take Lindows to court to protect their 'trademark', but I still believe they will lose in the US.

    9. Re:Not so much... by Corvass · · Score: 1

      In fact, yes, the Dutch word for 'window' in the GUI sense is not 'window', but 'venster' (cf, fenestre). The word 'window' is recognized as a word for the GUI element, at least by the technically-inclined, but I'm not sure about it's recognition by laypeople.

      Obviously, if I were to market an OS in the United States called CorvassSoft Vensters (tm), I would (or should) probably have a pretty good trademark case against a company calling their product LenstersOS.

    10. Re:Not so much... by Jay9333 · · Score: 1
      Obviously, if I were to market an OS in the United States called CorvassSoft Vensters (tm), I would (or should) probably have a pretty good trademark case against a company calling their product LenstersOS.

      Again, not if a "Venster" was a generic term used in computing environments long before "CorvassSoft" came around. You can trademark "CorvassSoft Vensters", but that doesn't rip the word "Venster" out of the language, nor take away the right for companies to keep using the word "Venster" in reference to computing and computer products. I could have "Jay's Vensters" if I wanted. They would by Jay's version of the generic computing "Vensters" that all computer users knew and loved even before Corvass came along.

      Lindows is short for windows under linux. It has absolutely nothing to do with M$. It has to dow with windows.

    11. Re:Not so much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Trademarking the word "windows" is like trademarking the words "mouse" or "cursor".
      But not like trademarking the word "mado" ? This word means "window(s)" in japanese, yet it would be quite uncommon that the average US citizen associate it with Windows.
      My point is that words being common in a certain language doesn't make them common in every language, hence the possible trademarking of english common words in non english speaking countries (which happen to constitute the major part of Europe, btw). Does the European ruling looks so idiotic now ? Or to put it in another way, would the US court look reasonable in a "mado" trademarking situation ?

      Note : I used the word "mado", but "fenetre" (french), "fenster" (german), "ventana" (spanish) are working as well.
    12. Re:Not so much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Again, not if a "Venster" was a generic term used in computing environments long before "CorvassSoft" came around.
      But the fact is that "windows" is not a generic term used in computing environment in Netherland (nor in France btw), since "venster" is the used one (resp. "fenetre" in french). And this is why it is a valid trademark in these countries, according to this "common words not good" principle.
    13. Re:Not so much... by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Not sure why I am bothering, but...

      A word that is merely descriptive is not a mark and therefore cannot be Trademarked. However, if a descriptive word becomes distinctive it can attain a secondary meaning. Meaning that although the mark is descriptive, it has customer recognition value for a single product/etc. The way a descriptive word gains this second level of meaning is through advertising and long use.

      All MS had to do is prove is that it has name recognition to the general public. Once that is proven then the mark is distinctive rather than just descriptive, which falls into the realm of what is allowed to be trademarked.

      Windows has gained recognition as a product, whereas windows means either the opening in the wall or type of item from a user interface. So the base meaning we can choose to use would be the interface window. Windows has spent an incrdible amount of money in marketing an advertising, and as such not only do they have name recognition from the general public, but even among a lot of tech people. In fact, many tech people would automatically assume I meant the software from MS if I mentioned "windows enviroment" in a sentance. This distinction is what makes Windows a trademarkeable word.

      I just hit up Wikipedia for the heck of it. Here's a quote concerning a trademark becoming generic:
      "When a mark stops being identified in the public mind with a product's source and instead comes to mean the general class of product, it has become generic and will likely lose protection" - Trademark - See Consumer Protection and Confusion

      The point is, as long as MS continues to pump out money and push it's name on the public, the term 'Windows' will continue to be distinctive to their product, ie it will not become generic.

      --
      Whee signature.
    14. Re:Not so much... by Jay9333 · · Score: 1

      They should recognize that the english word "windows" has been used generically in computing environments long before Microsoft's "Windows" came along. Period. I don't care if they speak Dutch. Microsoft is a company based in an English speaking country, so the European courts should take that into account.

    15. Re:Not so much... by x3ro · · Score: 0

      I don't think Lindows' choice of name is a protest, or even especially witty. You're reading too much into what seems to me to be a blatant Utterly Butterly-style attempt to muddy the waters and pretend that their distro is intechangeable with Windows.

      I personally find it unpalatable -- I wouldn't install a distro that's anything like win32! But to me, as much as to the 'average joe' or jenny, an OS called anything that ends in -indows is clearly named after win32.

      I wonder what this community's reaction would be if MicroSoft came out with Winux, or Minux.

      --
      [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
    16. Re:Not so much... by Corvass · · Score: 1

      But the point is, the Dutch court doesn't rule about the validness of Microsoft's claim in an English-speaking country, and obviously they can't. LindowsOS is, or should be, a valid name in the US and the UK, where windows is a common word.

      However, it is irrelevant to the Dutch case where Microsoft is based, because if they had been a Dutch company, they would have won the case as well, and you can't go around applying the law selectively based on where a company is based in trademark cases.

      For the record, while I think Microsoft has a valid case in non-English speaking countries, I'm not a Microsoft fan or user, and I think that the part of the ruling where Dutch users aren't allowed to visit lindows.com is censorship. But that aside

    17. Re:Not so much... by wa1ter · · Score: 1

      The language aspect has been explained so I won't go there either. As for Microsoft being a company based in an English speaking country... You're trying to see things too black/white.
      I'm pretty sure (can look it up for you if you want) that the case in the Netherlands wasn't brought to court by MS US but by Microsoft B.V. (a registered dutch company) or one of their dutch holding companies.
      This is the reason the ruling affects just the Netherlands and has nothing to do with the same case in France, Germany, the US or on the moon.

      Oh, as for not caring if we speak dutch... I don't care you speak english and don't see any reason to change our language just so you can make black/white arguments on the net ;-)

      --
      Sig? What's this sig thing I hear people talking about?
    18. Re:Not so much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that if Microsoft didn't take Lindows to court, the trademark would become unenforcable, so that everyone could start calling rectangular objects that give a view into something (a program or the garden) windows, instead of calling them "rectangular frames with glass"?

    19. Re:Not so much... by Jay9333 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft "B.V." or Microsoft, either way it shouldn't matter. The parent company (Microsoft) named its product after a commonly used English word, commonly used in computing environments long before Microsoft came around. I'm glad you don't care if I speak english. No one's asking you to change your language. We're asking you to recognize the fact the no company should be allowed to rip common computing terms out of *any* language so that other companies can no longer use them in the names of their products.

      This is like Ford creating a heavy duty towing machine called the "Ford Engine", and then trying to tradmark the word "Engine" so that a company couldn't create a product, say, called the AlphaEngine or something like that. Its ridiculous, no matter what language you speak. Maybe the Dutch judges don't speak English very well or something, in which case they should let the US courts decide if Microsoft is allowed to trademark the English word "windows" in reference to computing.

    20. Re:Not so much... by Jay9333 · · Score: 1

      No company should be allowed to rip common computing terms out of *any* language so that other companies can no longer use them in the names of their products.

      This is like Ford creating a heavy duty towing machine called the "Ford Engine", and then trying to tradmark the word "Engine" so that any other company couldn't create a product, say, called the AlphaEngine or something like that. Its ridiculous, no matter what language you speak. If Lindows was advertising themselves as "the Microsoft Windows of Linux" or something like that, I can see M$'s point. But otherwise, Lindows should not be restricted by Microsoft's choice to use a common computing term (English or not) in their product's name.

    21. Re:Not so much... by One+Louder · · Score: 1
      The particular issue in the Lindows case, and the one that has Microsoft worried, is that the judge is instructing the jury to consider whether the term "windows" was generic prior to the use by Microsoft, NOT descriptive. You're correct about what happens with a descriptive term, but that's not an issue in this case.

      If it's found to have been generic, then it is simply not defensible, even if some secondary meaning has somehow developed, because it's fruit of the poisoned tree.

    22. Re:Not so much... by wa1ter · · Score: 1

      Oops, missed the reply. I'm pretty sure the dutch judges in this case are fluent in English. Good chance they are fluent in one or two other languages but that has nothing to do with the case as it pertains, once again, to the Netherlands.
      In the Netherlands dutch is still the language spoken so regardless of how many languages a judge speaks the case is tried with Nederlands (dutch) as a base for comparison.

      If ford tried to trademark 'Engine' to prevent other people from using the word than your right, it shouldn't be allowed... In english speaking countries.
      Again, the word has no meaning in other languages and can thus be trademarked in those countries. I'm sure you would have no problems with ford patentening 'hijskraan' in the US if it decided to start building those.

      US courts should rule on whether or not Microsoft trademarking of Windows is legit... in the US.
      English courts should decided for the UK,
      Australian courts for Australia,
      etc.

      I'm sure most of them would agree the word can't be trademarked there as it's a common word in the lcoal language.
      Again, this has nothing to do with countries where English is not the native language.
      Saying they should adjust to include English words in their language (or at least in their decisions regarding trademarks based on words) is nothing but sheer arrogance.

      --
      Sig? What's this sig thing I hear people talking about?
  75. Been done before! by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I recall the case of a family vineyard in upstae new york run by a man named taylor (actually a descendant of the taylor in talyor wines). Taylor wines sued him for using his own name on the wine. Since he had already printed the labels, he hired some college kids to use a magic marker to black out the word "taylor".

    this gave the wine an underground cachet. So the next year he just had the lables printed with the black dash. This was great till Taylor wines sued him again, and arguning before the same judge, won the case that the black mark had become identified with "taylor".

    So the next year he left off the black mark and instead just put oil paintings of his deceased relatives on the bottles with the captions, joe TAYLOR. mary TAYLOR, etc....

    Taylor wines sued him again. So he once again he erased the name and left the pictures that every one now recognized as the taylor family portraits. .

    Taylor sued again and won. He was ordered to turn over the lables so he loaded them in the manure spreader and spread them around taylor wines office building.

    Finally he altered all the portraits to cyclopses and dared them to say he was related. Around then he also adopted the name "bully hill winery". ANd there it ended.

    I'd say lindash should just use a strategically placed Star or fig leaf to cover the last part of its name.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Been done before! by Enry · · Score: 5, Informative

      The web site you're looking for is http://www.bullyhill.com/

    2. Re:Been done before! by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      Wow. I drink their wine all the time. It's good, cheap, natural, and local (to me). This story makes me want to drink as much as I can. Maybe I'll give up beer...

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    3. Re:Been done before! by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently the recent labels have a picture of a goat on them. Halfway down this page is a picture from the Bully Hill Winery with an unusual quote sitting atop one of the doorways in reference to the goat labels:

      They have taken away my heritage, but they didn't get my goat.

      If only he had 0wned llamas. Excuse me, that should have read "owned."

      --
      True story.
    4. Re:Been done before! by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      From: http://www.bullyhill.com/history.asp

      "Due to the wine Industry's desire for paranoia, greed, and lack of interest in the consumers health/security; dark forces moved secretly in concert illegally to destroy forever the Family's Purity of Purpose regarding its World Leadership in Wine; while others, in adjacent facilities, producing Wine, concentrated on Deception, and the Cult of Omission.

      Predictably local Politicians, Religious icons, and Village Leaders sold our beautiful area down the river to Foreign invaders, and scavengers while our Family pulled the wagons around for the final Battle of Bully Hill. "

      I think I this guy has all the qualifications of a Linux advocate!

      (ITS A JOKE. LAUGH.)

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:Been done before! by goodchef · · Score: 5, Informative
      Basically, Taylor was ousted from the company for decrying the then-current practice of New York wineries mixing water and California juices in with their wines. He believed it was corrrupting the quality of his family's wine recipes. (Sound like any other company we know?)

      The court injunction can be found here.

      --

      "Inflammable means flammable? What a strange country!" -Dr. Nick, The Simpsons

    6. Re:Been done before! by Hettch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sort of reminds me of something that happened around here. I don't know if this is just a regional thing or not, but a gas station chain's convenience store part of the store is called "Tobacco Road."
      With some new law that was passed tv commercials were not allowed to advertise any tobacco products. So what did tobacco road do? They simply said "Tobacco Road. We can't advertise what we sell, so we will show you ____ [insert random 50's B&W short TV clip]." And at the end, "Tobacco Road. Gas and cheap prices on stuff we can't mention here." It was all quite humorous.

    7. Re:Been done before! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is so cruelly funny that I want to hit myself gruesomely over the head with an iron pan and have Metalica sue me (for being a dead head)

    8. Re:Been done before! by homerules · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in the area in which this tok place and it is fitting that his Bully Hill wine is better crafted than the taylor winery swill they sell. So yes the Linux anology works

    9. Re:Been done before! by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      Its cases like this that make me wonder why there aren't more lawsuit-related shootings in the US.

      I have similar thoughts about spam... perhaps the solution is to make sure mob bosses get more, resulting in retaliatory hits against spam gangs.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    10. Re:Been done before! by dizzyduck · · Score: 1
      There's was a article in the Independent yesterday describing a similar spat over Ugg boots.

      Note the especially fallacious argument at the end:

      He compares "Ugg" with "Biro" and "Hoover" which, although commonly used generically, are protected by trademark.

      A false comparison, say Tony Mortel. In those cases, a product was developed and marketed and a name invented and trademarked. In the case of Ugg, all the hard work was put in by others, then Deckers came along and bought the name.... Tony Watson does not have an answer to this point...He adds that Australian traders should accept reality and develop another brand. "How about Surfers' Sheepskin Boots?" he suggests.

      --
      Allergy advice: Contains eggs.
  76. When can we expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When can we expect DashSlot?

  77. This just in! by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

    OpenOffice.org will be sued next month, and forced to change their name to OpenOash.org, which not only makes no sense but is also unpronounceable.

    KDE were unavailable for comment on the issue of renaming KPaint Kash.

  78. So if we have to call windows for lindash by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    User: I can't find my mail

    Support : Press the Lindash start button.

    User: Ok, a lindash opened with a lot of icons.

    Support : Ok, now click the mail icon and you will see a lindash asking you for your password.

    User: Yes, see that lindash.

    Support: Good, now type in your password and a lindash with the mail program should open. Do you see the lindash?

  79. It does matter by Rosyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate MS, but I hate what Michael Robertson is doing more. Lindows, the name, implies 100% compatibility with Windows programs. Therefore, it does dilute the windows trademark. Even worse, it doesn't deliver on that compatibility because of a previous lawsuit MS filed.

    Sigh, someone is gonna burn, even if it is just my moderator points.

    1. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lindows, the name, implies 100% compatibility with Windows programs.

      I'm sorry, it does? Do pray explain how you're getting from "it sounds vaguely similar" to "it must be 100% compatible".

      Are you surprised when you buy a packet of tacos and they don't taste of apple? After all, "tacos" is only one letter away from "MacOS", so they must be an Apple product!

    2. Re:It does matter by nolife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lindows, the name, implies 100% compatibility with Windows programs.

      To who?

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    3. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, to me the name Lindows implies that it runs X-Windows, which, to my relief, it does!

      "Windows" is a generic term in the software industry, and WAS generic before Microsoft named its OS. Microsoft brought this on themselves by being unoriginal. Next stop: Microsoft sues Corel for WordPerfect, because the name implies 100% Word-compatibility!

    4. Re:It does matter by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " Lindows, the name, implies 100% compatibility with Windows programs. Therefore, it does dilute the windows trademark."

      I have no idea how you get the idea that it implies compatbility. However, if you go to their site and click on the "What is Lindows" link, you do get something that looks and sounds a lot like Windows. Even down to the mention of Plug n Play.

      I'm surprised the judge didn't just say "I don't care what is trademarkable, you did this malisciously. Get out!!" *Sigh* If only it had been Judge Judy.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:It does matter by MCZapf · · Score: 4, Interesting
      As I understand it...
      1. "Windows" is a generic term that cannot be trademarked.
      2. Microsoft only has a trademark on "Microsoft Windows."
      Thus, I must conclude that it's perfectly acceptable for anyone to use the term "Windows." By extension, if "Windows" itself is OK, then something that is similar is also OK (i.e. "Lindows" or "Lindows Windows").

      What wouldn't be OK is something like, "Microsoft Lindows" or "Microsoft Windowsish OS" or "Lindows Microsoft Windows".

      Side note: It occurs to me that "Linux" has been trademarked by Linus. I think he has more (not much more) of a case against the Lindows company than Microsoft does.

    6. Re:It does matter by LordDethstar · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except that it's the X Window System, not X Windows.

    7. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the official name, yes. Don't tell me you've never heard anyone say "X Windows" before. Where have you been the last 20 years?

    8. Re:It does matter by ninejaguar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Then, all Lindows would have to do is claim association with the X Window System by dropping the 's' in Lindows to be safe as Lindow. They could even keep it LindowS short for Linux Window System.

      In addition, since the X Window System is commonly referred to by ALL users of the product for as long as it has existed as X Windows, Lindows can continue referring to itself as Lindows because Linux + X Windows = Lindows.

      = 9J =

    9. Re:It does matter by Draknor · · Score: 1

      Plug & play is such a joke - I see cheap analog speakers being advertised as "plug & play". Well, duh - speakers have ALWAYS been plug & play (unless you are some kind of audiophile).

      Sorry for the rant - plug & play is just another one of those marketing gimmicks that gets so diluted it becomes meaningless.

    10. Re:It does matter by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      "Windows" is a generic term in the software industry,"

      So why is it okay for Palm to have their trademark?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:It does matter by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "So why is it okay for Palm to have their trademark?"

      Because we love Palm and hate MS!!

    12. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palm got their trademark BEFORE the word Palm was generic in the computer industry. Microsoft got their trademark AFTER Windows was generic in the industry. That's why Palm's trademark is valid and Microsoft's is not. Any other questions?

    13. Re:It does matter by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Palm got their trademark BEFORE the word Palm was generic in the computer industry."

      Bullshit. The term 'palm top' was used quite frequently long before Palm hit the market.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bullshit. The term 'palm top' was used quite frequently long before Palm hit the market.

      References, please.

    15. Re:It does matter by NanoGator · · Score: 1
      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:It does matter by NanoGator · · Score: 1
      --
      "Derp de derp."
    17. Re:It does matter by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that many of us here in /. love palm.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    18. Re:It does matter by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Overrated my ass. Palm got their name trademarked even though "Palm" was clearly established in the market all the way back to 1991. The differences between this and Windows aren't that big. Either the trademark wasn't so wrong, or both Palm and Microsoft need to lose their trademark.

      It's easier to take this case a little more seriously when it's not about a company you loathe, iddn't it?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    19. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I just read this about 30 seconds ago, not thinking anything about it, i scrolled down. Then I got the joke.

    20. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no I hope that doesn't mean they will have to change their name again, because -------s will never work.

    21. Re:It does matter by One+Louder · · Score: 1
      Microsoft only has a trademark on "Microsoft Windows."
      No, Microsoft *also* has a trademark on the single word "Windows", and this is the basis of their trademark case against Lindows.com, as well as the basis for Lindows.com's defense.

      As to your speculation about Linus having a case against Lindows.com, I guess he'd have to explain to the court why he hasn't done anything about the people using the term "Linux" unmodified in their product names, such as "Red Hat Linux", "Mandrake Linux", etc, while complaining about only three letters in common in "Lindows.com". Heck, even /.'s own parent company was called "VA Linux" for a while.

      It would be interesting though - part of Microsoft's case is that the company/product name is "windows" with a single letter difference, and therefore seem to claim ownership of "in". A Linus claim over the "Lin" prefix would conflict with that.

    22. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with loathing a company or not. It has everything to do with what is an acceptable trademark. If both Microsoft and Palm trademarked a term that is generic in their industry, then both of those trademarks are invalid. Period. Even if they're the most popular companies on the planet.

      I think what confuses the matter is that it's common knowledge that "Windows" was a generic term in the computer industry prior to Microsoft Windows, and it is not common knowledge that "palm" was a generic term prior to Palm's trademark. Solution--provide proof of the latter, educate people, and stop assuming everyone's anti-Microsoft just because they know the law well enough to know Microsoft is wrong in this particular case.

    23. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >and stop assuming everyone's anti-Microsoft just because they know the law well enough to know Microsoft is wrong in this particular case.

      Oh please. Are you really that deep in denial? If this were really about justice, you guys wouldn't be worrying about the Windows trademark. You'd be worrying about a CEO of a company trying to get Linux out there intentionally drawing legal fire from Microsoft.

    24. Re:It does matter by DebianRcksLindowsLie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lindows is an unstable bastardization of Debian. It's insecure, forcing you to run as root.

      -- For more information on dirty underhanded tricks that Lindows has pulled (worse than the name) - read my .sig.

    25. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, okay. That's a shitty way to publicise your business. They are also completely legally in the clear. Where exactly am I in denial? Did you think it was impossible to have both thoughts in your head at the same time?

      I don't see how "Lindows is an opportunistic company with a technically shoddy product" and "Microsoft's trademark on the word 'Windows' is a textbook example of an invalid trademark." are mutually exclusive concepts. Please enlighten me.

    26. Re:It does matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody said anything about mutually exclusive concepts. It's about bias. That's where you are in denial. You're so interested in getting MS to lose a legal battle that you're not even paying attention to the intentions of Lindows' CEO. You're not even looking at how MS acquired that little (R) symbol in the first place. Puppet. Oh well, at least you're not claiming to be objective.

    27. Re:It does matter by jusdisgi · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous. I can't figure out where you're reading that in, and it doesn't apper in their marketing either. That said, they did originally have a partnership with Codeweavers (IIRC) that dissolved, which is why they originally claimed some compatibility and backed off...not because of any MS lawsuit.

      And to make matters worse you can't dilute a trademark that doesn't exist. Microsoft has forever been unable to acquire trademark on the term "Windows"...it only has "Microsoft Windows." This had a lot to do with everyone in the world already calling the behavior Windows displays as "Windows" before MS ever arrived on the scene. And partly because of the pre-existing trademark on "X Window System" as well.

      So...if the courts a)wouldn't give MS trademark rights (ie rights to sue people for use of) on "Windows" and b)allowed the co-existence of a trademark on "X Window System" it stands to reason that they have rubber-stamped naming software "Windows" ...I could call my Linux distribution "Linux Windows" if I wanted. It's already been hashed out.

      Which is why the case was quickly thrown out around here. Now...as to why it has been so successful elsewhere? I'm confused....

      --
      Given a choice between free speech and free beer, most people will take the beer.
  80. My 2 by mitchell_pgh · · Score: 1

    And the new company name is: LindO'soft...

    Come on... it only took me five seconds to think that one up (I guess I may show)

  81. I LOVE THIS NAME by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    I think it's great!

    Now let me just tighten this noose here...

  82. That's the dumbest name since... by belgar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    C#.

    Seriously, how the hell are you going to market that?

    This reminds me of the case study done on white wines. Turns out that approx 75% of white wine drinkers prefer Gewertztraminer to Chardonnay grapes. Yet Chardonnay is still the top white grape in the world. Why? Because people can't pronounce Gewurtztraminer (Guh-vurtz-trah-mihn-er), and don't want to sound stupid.

    Good luck with that dash thing, folks. Let me know how it works out for you. :-)

    --
    What does it mean to wake out of a dream
    and be wearing someone else's shorts?
    BNL, Born on a Pirate Ship (1998)
    1. Re:That's the dumbest name since... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...white wine drinkers prefer Gewertztraminer ...

      Because people can't pronounce Gewurtztraminer ...

      Hell, they can't even spell it. :D

      For those who are wondering, it's German, and correctly spelled Gewurztraminer. (Strictly speaking proper German calls for an umlaut on the u, but English speakers can get away without it.) The name comes from the village of Temeno in Italy (Tramin in German) where the grape's ancestors were first grown. The original Traminer grape was tweaked through selective breeding around 1870 to give it more flavour, and so Gewurztraminer was born. "Gewurztraminer" translates approximately as "spiced/spicy [grape] from Tramin".

      Incidentally, do you have a reference for that case study? I'd be interested.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:That's the dumbest name since... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      So sayeth someone posting on a popular website called http://SLASHDOT.org :-)

  83. Further proof that MS should have... by pudge_lightyear · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is further proof that MS should have just let this one go. This is again front page news on slashdot, which they may not care about... I also bet that this is news in any of those countries (which lindows wouldn't have had)... plus all of the tech journals in the US and Europe, plus it'll probably second page news on many sites and papers... AND it's one more reason all of the geeks have to hate Microsoft for being a big dumb bully.

    Microsoft has from the beginning of this, given Roberson(SP?) (Lindows CEO) more free advertising opportunities than his product could have ever given him.

    Keep it up Microsoft... one of these shots in the foot will keep you from walking!

    1. Re:Further proof that MS should have... by thebatlab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is it further proof they should have let it go? Lindows has made themselves look ridiculous in the eyes of anyone who takes an objective and reasoned viewpoint to this whole situation.

      "Keep it up Microsoft... one of these shots in the foot will keep you from walking!"

      They've got more feet than you can imagine and even if they have to resort to crawling, they'll still surpass distros like Lindows who pull childish things like this.

  84. they forgot by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    to put a green bar over the letter S in their hangman game...

    1. Re:they forgot by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      They also forgot to put the final body parts on the hanged man. I mean, they clearly lost after 10 letters or so. Those |_||\|o|0\/\/5 guys are obviously cheating.

      --
      True story.
  85. -indows by techstar25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I emailed Micheal Robertson several months ago and asked why he is using the -indows in his company name. I flat out told him that even though it is definitely a Linux distro, using the -indows associates his product with insecure, unreliable, expensive, proprietary software. And so I asked "What's the point of using the L- if the rest is -indows?". Obviously his whole point of Lindows is create an OS clearly distinguishable from Microsoft software (and the negative connotation). It would make much more sense to come up with a nice prefix for -nix. Of course he said something about how windows is a generic term and he should be able to use however he wants. I can't find the exact email anymore. He's so hung up on if he "could" that he doesn't consider if he "should".

  86. Or maybe ... by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lindowpane. if anybody out there is old enough to get the LSD pun.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  87. This remainds me of... by Helmut+Kool · · Score: 1

    a band called Panasonic. They got harassed by Panasonic the company, changed their name to Pansonic and released an album called "A".

  88. Blocking access to website ? by thrill12 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In dutch: "Beveelt Lindows.com om binnen acht dagen na betekening van dit vonnis de toegang voor de website(s) van Lindows.com waarop zij programmatuur aanbiedt onder de naam "Lindows", "Lindows.com", en "LindowsOS", inclusief maar niet beperkt tot de website op URL http://www.lindows.com, ontoegankelijk te maken voor bezoekers uit Belgie, Nederland en Luxemburg." , which roughly translates to:
    "(The court) Orders a verdict under which Lindows.com is to block access to the website of Lindows.com where she offers software under the name of "Lindows", including but not limited to the website at URL http://www.lindows.com, to all vistors from Belgium, The Netherlands and Luxembourg."

    I can still access it, even though I'm from Holland, but I feel I still have the right to get the Lindows product from Lindows.com as I please.
    This view of the "Internet", and the websites that it houses is quite stalinistic in my humble opinion.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Blocking access to website ? by hak+hak · · Score: 1

      I'm from Holland as well, and I can't access lindows.com anymore; there's a notice that `users in these countries need to click here', a link to www.lindows.com/killchoice which is a redirect to lin---s.com.

  89. And Comic Book Guy says. by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Worst. Name. Ever.

  90. +1 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /-

    Slashdash

  91. Trademark by AzrealAO · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trademark, not copyright, but you're correct.

    All they want is the name changed, they're not trying to stop them from selling it.

  92. Throwing down the gauntlet by skinfitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, it's a stupid name, however what I think many people here are overlooking is this statement from Michael Robertson:

    "Any action from Microsoft to block Lin---s will show their true intentions are not to protect their trademark, but to eliminate competition and maintain their monopoly."

    Basically he's bear baiting.

    1. Re:Throwing down the gauntlet by TrollBridge · · Score: 1
      "Any action from Microsoft to block Lin---s will show their true intentions are not to protect their trademark, but to eliminate competition and maintain their monopoly."

      So should we assume then that Michael Robertson's true intentions are not to develop an open operating system that appeals to a wide range of users, but to antagonize Bill Gates?

      The latter sounds more and more probable every time Slashdot posts a story about this clown.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    2. Re:Throwing down the gauntlet by Tsali · · Score: 1

      And if you're wrong, you have a stupidly named product.

      Brilliant.

      --
      This space for rent.
    3. Re:Throwing down the gauntlet by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      You just figured that out? It was obvious from the beginning he just has a thing for Gates.

    4. Re:Throwing down the gauntlet by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Michael Robertson is like the schoolboy that has got sick and tired of the school bully so rallies all the other kids to come with him into the playground to face the bully en masse.

      And as Michael squares up to the bully, he takes a look over his shoulder to see none of the other kids standing behind him...

      It's fun watching Robertson strutting his stuff and puffing out his chest to Gates but when he gets beaten to the ground, we'll all just turn away and go back to doing what we were doing previously.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  93. Walmart/OS by pcs305 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seeing that Walmart pushed Lindows into the "mainstream" they should just buy it and relabel it either Walmart/OS or W/OS.
    If not what about LinBash?
    Lindows was a lame name to begin with anyway.

    1. Re:Walmart/OS by nolife · · Score: 1

      Hey, I bought one of those from Walmart! It has Mandrake on it now though..

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  94. This is why... by mattgreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you don't let engineers do your marketing.

  95. Not the best name by gone.fishing · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Kind of a cute idea and there is nothing wrong with rubbin their noses in it but how long until the name is "morphed" in to:

    LinTRASH?

  96. Lindos anyone? by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 1

    He should have changed the name to LinDOS. MS can't claim that is too similar to their trademark without reminding everyone that Windows is really WinDOS itself.

  97. gotta love their page footer by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 5, Funny

    from their news release on the topic ...

    Copyright (C) 2004 Lindows.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Lindows.com is not endorsed by or affiliated with Microsoft Corporation in any way - in fact, we don't even really like them because they are suing us.

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:gotta love their page footer by iantri · · Score: 1
      It is pretty funny and all, but I find it somewhat disturbing that this company keeps acting in such an unprofessional manner.

      This certainly won't help their chances of adoption by anyone but home users..

    2. Re:gotta love their page footer by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I dunno about unprofessional, but it sure makes them look human.

    3. Re:gotta love their page footer by DylanQuixote · · Score: 1

      I'm actually glad they're acting in such an 'unprofessional' manner. At least they have a sense of humor! :)

    4. Re:gotta love their page footer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I find it more professional than the PR departments in every other company, who keeps on lying to people and treating those who have seen through the company's deficiencies as idiots. In fact, the only things disturbing about this are every other company tries to prevent its employees from telling the truth as it is, and the moronic investors who require a company's PR department to do the thinking for them.

    5. Re:gotta love their page footer by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      It is pretty funny and all, but I find it somewhat disturbing that this company keeps acting in such an unprofessional manner.

      I agree. Microsoft's lawyers really need to relax.

    6. Re:gotta love their page footer by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Are they aiming for adoption by anyone except home users?

    7. Re:gotta love their page footer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think home users are their target audience anyway. No business is going to pick Lindash over another distro just because it can run some windows programs.

  98. Kudos! by RichiP · · Score: 1

    Kudos to M. Robertson et al. for managing to criticize with impunity but effectively the practices and prejudices in commerce that have absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with business. Lin---s ... I like it!

  99. PlaceHolder by bstadil · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The name is a placeholder (In more than one sense) until Lindows wins the case against MS.

    The judge has instructed the jury to evaluate the Trademark of Windows as it was before it was "Given" to MS. They will loose and we can call our favorite OS, Windows for Linux, Windows for BSD etc.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  100. It's a registered Trademark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they have to defend it, or they risk losing, period.

  101. Who is the baby ? by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 5, Informative
    I agree. I eagerly await the collapse of this stupid ass company that does nothing to further either operating systems in general or Linux.
    Right, like: Yeah, let's hope they go belly up. Now, who is the baby ?
    1. Re:Who is the baby ? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      So if MS sponsors an open source project they use and benefit from (let's say something from *BSD), does that make them innocent?

  102. Don't blame Microsoft for this childishness... by TrollBridge · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Lindows, or whatever you feel like calling it now, set itself up to be screwed with by Microsoft. It didn't do them any favors to present themselves as an imitation of another well-known product, and it doesn't improve their reputation in th epublic's eyes to respond to the inevitable lawsuit with juvenile antics. Is it any wonder why so many people see Linux as little more than a script-kiddie OS?

    Is THIS what you want your boss to think of when you're pitching Linux for the office? Do Linux and OSS a favor: stop supporting Lindows.

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Don't blame Microsoft for this childishness... by Namaseit · · Score: 1

      script-kiddie OS? script-kiddies are know nothing punks who just download the newest Windows vulnerability off the internet. They don't actually know jack shit. Sorry if I say but it takes a little more effort to use then most script kiddies want to put out.

      --
      75% of all statistics are made up!
    2. Re:Don't blame Microsoft for this childishness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is THIS what you want your boss to think of when you're pitching Linux for the office? Do Linux and OSS a favor: stop supporting Lindows.

      I don't think most people on here are supporting Lindows.com, per-say. Instead, they seem to be supporting the notion that Microsoft should never have been able to get a trademark on the word "Windows" like they currently do.

      I don't think people here on /. would care as much about this if MS didn't have a generic computing term as a registered trademark (R) in the US and around the world. Having the trademark on "Microsoft Windows" is fine, but the trademark on "Windows" by itself is pure bullshit, and we all know it.

      (posting anonynmously due to mod points)

    3. Re:Don't blame Microsoft for this childishness... by SA3Steve · · Score: 1

      That isn't the real basis for this case. Lindows did not name itself Lindows because it was a Linux version of a Window (trademarked by Websters Dictionary). It named itself Lindows because it is a Linux version of Microsoft Windows (trademarked by...well, you know). Their product name is intended to be similar to Microsoft Windows and not to the generic version of the word.

    4. Re:Don't blame Microsoft for this childishness... by Hobobo · · Score: 1

      I wish I had some mod points, but at least you get my kudos for being an island of sanity on Slashdot.

  103. LINL by Stavr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    LINL Is Not Lindows

  104. Quietly thinkering about buying... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    Now I am facing a dillemma. Should I buy Lindows as support from Lindows.com, or would I play M$ in it's cold hands by doing just that ?

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  105. Humm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I would have renamed it to WINGATE...wait..taken...no lawsuit there...

    humm how about LinGates!

  106. Still... by fluch · · Score: 1

    I would still pronounce "Lin---s" as "Lindows", same as "Netscape" is been pronounced "Mozilla".

  107. Windash by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    Rhymes with Wincrash.

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  108. name change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just change the name to Linios and make a nice open source cereal. Then come out with the chocolate version....Count Tuxula.

  109. i like it by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

    i actually like the new name. dash is also short for dashboard, which an os /overlay sort of imply. Hey, it makes sense, and is more original than not.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  110. Windildo? by plover · · Score: 1
    Damn, I just HAD to search google for that one:

    Did you mean: win dildo

    Your search - windildo - did not match any documents.
    No pages were found containing "windildo".

    Suggestions:

    • Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
    • Try different keywords.
    • Try more general keywords.

    Also, you can try Google Answers for expert help with your search.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Windildo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windildo, eh? It figures -- manufacturers just want to make cheaper and cheaper hardware, even although it only lasts six months. No doubt somebody will come out with a hacked Linux driver for it soon, though .....

    2. Re:Windildo? by bangular · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a self-fufilling prophecy. When google gets it in it's database from slashdot, it will then exist :)

    3. Re:Windildo? by Smartcowboy · · Score: 1

      You mean one of these things?

      I got one. Pretty neat stuff. My girl says it's really orgasmic.
      They are marketed under a name different than WinDildo though.

    4. Re:Windildo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell is this +4 funny? Are mods that dumb?

      Makes me reconsider all the funny mods I've ever gotten...

  111. bad name ? by MySt1k · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    so ... i can't start selling a new Product called Wicrosoft Mindows in amsterdam ? Wicrodash Mindash (c)2004 this is nonsense!

    --
    Doh !
  112. At least... by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    they have a sense of humor

  113. What about Longhorn Linux? by jamonterrell · · Score: 2, Funny

    It has a nice ring to it, and as far as I know... no one is marketing anything under the name longhorn.... right?

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  114. They should take a tip from Apple by Ann+Elk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Many years ago, Apple was developing a new computer under the code name "Carl Sagan". Well, Carl Sagan learned of this and had his lawyers send a C&D letter to Apple. So Apple changed the code name to "Butt-Head Astronomer". A few details are here.

    Maybe Lindows should be named Butt-Head CEO?
    1. Re:They should take a tip from Apple by Technician · · Score: 2, Funny

      kinda sounds like the lawsuit from Digital Convergance against FlyingButtMonkeys.com

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  115. Both parties are being silly. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    The case should never have even been in existence..

    Plus 'lindows' should be more adult about loosing in court.. regardless if the judgment made sense or not.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Both parties are being silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ------ What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" do you not understand ----
      Well, I'd hope anyone who can read and write English would be able to understand it. Which kind of rules you out:
      Plus 'lindows' should be more adult about loosing in court.. regardless if the judgment made sense or not.

      Good God man! What were you thinking?

  116. Toledo Lindowbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for George Carlin fans,

  117. No, I wonder what... by JamesP · · Score: 0

    the slashdash crowd will think...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  118. Linens are cleaner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are those "em" dashes or "en" dashes? They look like "ens" to me, so why not call it "Lin-ens"?

  119. ' SOFTy DANCE by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    We can dance if we want to
    We can leave your friends behind
    'Cause your friends use Linux and if they use Linux Well they're no friends of mine

    I say, we can go where we want to
    And see Ballmer lose his mind
    And see him act like he comes from out of this world
    Leave the real one far behind
    And see Steve dance..

    [Sung]
    We can dance if we want to
    We can leave your friends behind
    'Cause your friends use Macs and if they use Macs
    Well they're no friends of mine
    I say, we can go where we want to
    A place where they will never find
    And we can act like we come from out of this world
    Leave the real one far behind
    And we can dance
    Danc|e!

    I say, we can dance, we can dance
    Everything out of control
    We can dance, we can dance
    We're doing it from wall to wall
    We can dance, we can dance
    Everybody look at Steve's dome
    We can dance, we can dance
    Nobody's using GNOME....

    (micro)SOFTy dance
    Is it safe to dance
    Is it safe to dance

    M-i-c-r-o-s-o-f-t, dance!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  120. Hoped for a better name by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

    Damn. I was hoping they would go with something like:

    Lin-up-yours-billg


    Oh Well

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    1. Re:Hoped for a better name by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Or to take a page from Apple's playbook, Lin-BHC (Lin-Butt-Headed-Corporation)

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  121. So Does This Mean That... by tds67 · · Score: 1

    ...Windows viruses are now Win---s viruses?

  122. One Lind:-)ws please ... by frenchy+schnell · · Score: 1

    the smileys look (when rendered) a lot like a o... Then Lind:-)ws would be legal ? or even Lind;-)ws. M$ patented the smileys yet ? ;-)

  123. LinDash 3 in 1 ? by Quazion · · Score: 1

    Dash is a commercial cloth washing product in the netherlands or was not sure...i dont do the washin very often,but dash had a commercial "dash 3 in 1" its about the product multiple things, lindows is even more..., go figure... :)

    1. Re:LinDash 3 in 1 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like this is the first time washing powders use operating system names.

  124. More evidence that they suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This whole thing just further confirms my belief that lindows and its ceo Michael Robertson are petty and unprofessional and just out for a quick buck made off someone else's name. I'm tired of hearing about their lame publicity stunts.

  125. sorry, can't do that by dh003i · · Score: 1

    Balder-dash is a patch made by fans to Baldur's Gate. If MS renamed Windows to Balder-Dash, he'd be violating trademark, and they should sue him.

  126. I've got a suggestion for them... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How about 'lin-WeWereFrickinStupidToThinkWeWouldGetAwayWithT hatInTheFirstPlace.com'?

    1. Re:I've got a suggestion for them... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lindows isn't stupid and there is nothing to get away with in the US. All Lindows has to prove is that, at the time Microsoft decided to name its OS Windows, that the term windows was a generic term for all GUIs. The jury will not have to consider whether or not consumers will currently be confused, because that's not the issue.

      Lindows will certainly win their case against Microsoft.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:I've got a suggestion for them... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Look, it may be _technically_ legal, but it's pretty obvious to anyone with a functioning brain that they're using the name Lindows as a takeoff of someone else's product to gain name recognition. It may be legal, but it's no more ethical than some of the shit that MS has tried to pull in the past (or will pull in the future). Lindows doesn't have the moral high ground on this one, despite any win they may make in their legal battle.

    3. Re:I've got a suggestion for them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "..The jury will not have to consider whether or not consumers will currently be confused, because that's not the issue. Lindows will certainly win their case against Microsoft."

      Unfortunately, what the jury is *allowed* to consider is entirely up to the judge hearing the case. If the judge were to be so foolish as to actually allow a jury to consider what has already been decided (Windows being a legitimate trademark), he would get removed from the bench due to pressure that M$ would exert on the gov/politicians. P.S., I don't agree that Windows should be a trademarkable name. I'm just pointing out what will most likely happen.

  127. But MS doesn't own the term Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft chose a generic term, which why they only own "Microsoft Windows" and not just "Windows." They aren't calling it Microsoft Lindows, or even Licrosoft Lindows.

  128. funny you should mention that... by segment · · Score: 1

    Did you notice on Sun's new Linux version they have a drive on the desktop labeled "This Computer" I wonder if you decided to spin out a *nix free based distribution and renamed that to my computer would MS take you to court... Now considering it's a free OS you're not making money off MS' so called labor so in theory you should be able to. Again however, money talks ;)

    1. Re:funny you should mention that... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Nah, I wouldn't do that. Naming a directory or drive "My Computer" is just plain stupid.

      Although I did consider adding it to my list of prospective distro names. :)

      KFG

  129. Just when you thought... by ReadParse · · Score: 0, Redundant

    they could never have a more stupid name.

  130. Uh...no by adiposity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not "Windows" with an "L," you dolt! It's a combination of two similar words:

    LINux
    +winDOWS
    --------
    LINDOWS

    There's no question it's partially a play of "Windows", but it's as much of a play off of "Linux". And no one is going to mistake the Lindows brand as representing Windows (nor do they want people to). They want people to see it as a LINux that's winDOWS like (user friendly, etc.).

    Personally, I think Lindows is annoying, and I would never pay for it. But this isn't a ripoff of Windows's name, it's mix of two words (and the Windows name hardly deserves trademark status).

    The Lindows name is similar enough to Windows, however, that the simple fact that it was partially derived from that word means a court could find for Microsoft.

    -Dan

    1. Re:Uh...no by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

      Sorry for being such a dolt. It's just - where I come from - "Windows" minus the W and with an L is "Lindows." So, I guess we have different spelling conventions here.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
  131. because by bmajik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    wintech doesn't claim to produce a competing product to what microsoft makes, and wintech doesn't have a website that claims their product is a replacement for windows, and wintech doesn't create a product made to look and work as much like windows as possible.

    Thats the difference

    Look at it this way. is lindows the victim of an unfortuneate naming coincidence ?

    No. They're a linux distribution who's only reason for existance is to try and be as much like windows as possible, but not windows. And their name reflects exactly that purpose.

    I'm sure you'll agree that i cant stard Fjord Motor Company, a car maker.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:because by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you'll agree that i cant stard Fjord Motor Company, a car maker.

      No, but I suspect General Engines might pass.

      Jedidiah.

    2. Re:because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you'll agree that i cant stard Fjord Motor Company, a car maker.

      Fjord isn't a standard automotive term that's been around longer than Ford have. Ford have a trademark on "Ford".

      Windows is a standard computing term that's been around longer than Microsoft has. Microsoft does not have a trademark on "Windows". It has a trademark on "Microsoft Windows."

    3. Re:because by hermooz · · Score: 1

      >'m sure you'll agree that i cant stard Fjord Motor Company, a car maker. Well, I could reveal to you that a company called Fnord Motor Company DO exists, but then I should kill you. YNCFT.

  132. Even worse... by blixel · · Score: 1

    ... and I thought Lindows was the worst possible name for a Linux Distribution. Looks like they managed to come up with something even worse.

    Any inclination I might have had for holding some amount of respect for Lindows is now gone. This is a case of someone cutting off their nose to spite their face.

  133. Change it to by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

    WinLinuxPro!

  134. The Music Star formally known as Prince by FuzzyShrimp · · Score: 1

    If Prince can call himself a "sex-Symbol sign" why not just drop the "indows" and call Lindows "L"? Let's see Windows sue that.

  135. Only a matter of time... by djeaux · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...before Micro$oft goes after these guys.

    And then we'll have to refer to those household objects as casements, skylights, transoms, portholes, panes, windowpanes, or glass. (Yes, I got all those synonyms from M$ Word's "thesaurus", which interestingly did not provide "operating system" as a synonym for "windows" ;-)

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  136. Well... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1

    They could have named it Lindex. :)

  137. alternatives? by kc0re · · Score: 2, Funny

    Linsoft? Micronux TuxXP

  138. Pure genius by adiposity · · Score: 1

    It's amazing they don't sue Macrosoft. After all, it is just "Microsoft" with an "a" instead of an "i". Yes, I recognize that the spelling is only different by one letter. But you clearly implied that "Lindows" was derived by replacing the "W" with an "L". I'm saying that's not the case--it was derived by recognizing the common letters "IN" and overlapping them to make a new word.

    I'm sure you realized what I was expressing, but perhaps you really are a dolt. Originally, I had only used the term to chastise you for shortsightedness, but I guess it has more general application.

    -Dan

  139. hahahaha too funny... by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 1



    Lindashes to ashes
    Lindust to dust
    Quit tryin to play
    Micros*ft's bluff!

    Just name the fricken thing LedHat or Lebian.. or even better... Loppix!! Or how about Lackware?

    --
    Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
  140. Those other products aren't operating systems by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    As far as trademarks are concerned, you need to protect them if you want to keep them. Second, it only applies if the other product is in the same competing field. Clearly Lindows is competing against Windows. Try making processor chips under the name Lintel or I bet there would be an uproar if you created another Unix like OS called Linicks.

    1. Re:Those other products aren't operating systems by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Try making processor chips under the name Lintel or I bet there would be an uproar if you created another Unix like OS called Linicks.

      I wish I didn't hate the mod system so much, or I'd give you +5 TEH FUNNEY.

  141. Now, will they be sued by Proctor & Gamble? by ArseneLupin · · Score: 1

    hehe!

  142. How stupid by dspyder · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the name is stupid, but so was Lindows... of course is was meant to confuse and infringe... why not just pick a cool new name? Failing that, name it after a hat.

    --D

    WiFi on Linux sucks.....

  143. I don't follow... by devhen · · Score: 1

    Could someone cure my ignorance and explain to me the relationship between Lin"dash" and Lin"---s"? Thanks.

    1. Re:I don't follow... by devhen · · Score: 1

      Ok, I see. The "dow" has been -'ed out. But why keep the s? Intuitively this would spell Lindashs or Lindashes. I think the Lindows marketing team takes one in the L column for this confusing label.

  144. Wine Project? by Lispy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the Wine folks should sue him. Just for the fun of it! ;-)

  145. Asshats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would have just changed the name to "Doors".

  146. Just say it like Homer... by OECD · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just say it like Homer: Lin-DOH!

    (Does Fox have a trademark on "DOH"?)

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    1. Re:Just say it like Homer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just say it like Homer: Lin-DOH!

      (Does Fox have a trademark on "DOH"?)


      Nah, they spell it "(annoyed grunt)"
  147. That makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've referred to Windows as Win@#%$! (pronounced Win-BLEEP) for years.

  148. Microsoft should sue Homeowners by netr00t · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't microsoft sue every homeowner or construction worker for that matter. For putting "Windows" on homes? its a crazy world we live in. Btw you can't sneeze without a license because I patented it. j/k

  149. Take a hint from Apple by MacFury · · Score: 1

    They should have changed their name to dontsumi

  150. INSPIRATION HAS STRUCK! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Ok, i'm not good at flash, but yeah heres an idea for anyone who wants to do it... This, but with Balmer's head on the badgers and "developers developers developers" instead of "badger badger badger".

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:INSPIRATION HAS STRUCK! by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

      Now that's funny shit. ;)

  151. Here's how it goes with trademarks by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since we studied this in a law class last semester:

    For a company to win in a trademark case, the biggest factor is showing that the allegedly infringing trademark is likely to cause confusion in a normal consumer. So it doesn't have to be precisely the same or anything, it just has to be to the point that your normal consumer might get confused by it, and hence you'd have your bussiness hurt.

    That's why if it is two totally different products, there's usually not a problem. No one is going to mistake software called Firebird for the car called Firebird, two totally different thigns. However Windows and Lindows were both OSes, and Lindows selling point is being like Windows (similar interface, alleged compatibility, always root, etc).

    That's probably why MS had a fairly strong case, since it seemed reasonable that a normal consumer would get confused. I think that is a reasonable statement, a non-savvy user could easily buy a Lindows machine believing it to the same as Windows.

    The statements made by the developers of Lindows don't help either. As memory serves, they were touting it as a Windows replacement, and actually had to back down on some claims because they couldn't get compatibility as good as they thought. That sort of thing is factored in.

    1. Re:Here's how it goes with trademarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      we studied this in a law class last semester:

      bussiness - thigns - Lindows selling point - believing it to the same as Windows


      You're finally taking English this semester, we presume...

    2. Re:Here's how it goes with trademarks by raidient · · Score: 1

      "That's probably why MS had a fairly strong case, since it seemed reasonable that a normal consumer would get confused." But MS went to court in Europe where normal consumers are not stupid. So how does that work?

      --
      My faith is expressed through Nihilism. Do you understand?
    3. Re:Here's how it goes with trademarks by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Normal consumers globally are fscking idiots. Let's not confuse the issue.

    4. Re:Here's how it goes with trademarks by One+Louder · · Score: 1
      That's probably why MS had a fairly strong case, since it seemed reasonable that a normal consumer would get confused. I think that is a reasonable statement, a non-savvy user could easily buy a Lindows machine believing it to the same as Windows.
      However, this all presupposes that the trademark is a valid one in the first place. Lindows.com has demonstrated a substantial amount of evidence in its pre-trial motions that it isn't and it appears to be a strategy which has Microsoft on the run.

      If Lindows.com is correct in this assertion, potential or real customer confusion or Lindows.com's intentions are completely irrelevant, and the fault lies entirely with Microsoft for choosing a poor trademark.

    5. Re:Here's how it goes with trademarks by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      I think you're a little confused. One of the things that is weighted in a trademark case is how unique the trademark is. If the trademark is highly generic, it is much harder to claim that something similar will cause confusion, since yours is so generic. So something called "Joe's Auto Repair" has a pretty poor trademark, since it's so generic.

      Now Windows is a fairly generic trademark. It refers to a physical thing, as well as the name given to a function of OSes. So Microsoft can't claim a real unique or special trademark in this case.

      However the other factor, and the offsetting factor in this case, is the strength of a trademark. The stronger and more widely known a trademark is, the more defensable it is. You can have a fairly orignal, but totally unknown trademark and find yourself loosing a battle since, because it was unknown and thus there could be no confusion. Well Windows is an amazingly strong trademark. I mean it's on like 19 of every 20 desktops in the world, in the news all the time, etc. Thus, despite being generic, is quite defensable.

      As for it not being valid, that won't fly and they know it, just standard civil law tactics. You throw out every possible defense you can think of, since it costs you nothing.

      I really have to agree with MS here. Lindows delibreatly and admittedly chose a name close to Windows to try and pump themselves up. They spewed propaganda about being a Windows replacement, Windows compatible and so on. This shows clear intent to try and confuse consumers and make money off the Windows trademark, which isn't allowed.

      This is for good reason too. You don't want crappy companies (and let's face it, Lindows is crap, it's at the bottom of my list of distros) trying to pass off their stuff as being from, or the same as, good companies. I don't want to go buy a mixer that appears to be a Mackie only to find out it's a Mackee which falls apart out of the box.

      There is also an assumption in the US but ESPICALLY in Europe that there be truth in advertising. Consumers shouldn't be required to do tons of research to make sure they get what they think they are, products should be represented truly and accuratly. Part of that means that different brands be easy to tell apart. I like having GeForce and Radeon graphics cards, easy to tell what card a person is talking about when they say something about them. I'd hate it is they were GeForce and G-Force cards. Even for a geek it would be somewhat difficult to keep straight what is what witha given acard and it would be impossible for a normal user.

    6. Re:Here's how it goes with trademarks by One+Louder · · Score: 1
      Thus, despite being generic, is quite defensable.
      Under the current law, a generic term is "not subject to trademark protection under any circumstances" (Filipino Yellow Pages Inc vs Asian Journal Publications). There is substantial trademark law supporting that, much of which is cited in both Lindows.com's motions and the judge's rulings ("No amount of proof that a term has acquired secondary meaning associating the term with a particular producer can transform that generic term into a trademark."), as well as the various responses given by the USPTO to Microsoft back when they were applying for the mark ("Since the term is a generic designation for the applicant's goods, then, no amount of evidence ... can render the term registrable." - USPTO 1993) I'd be very interested if you can cite rulings or law to the contrary - with all their resources, Microsoft couldn't in their filings. I can think of a number of worried lawyers in Redmond that would love to hear from you.

      Of course "windows" is now associated so strongly with Microsoft, because they've had a government sanctioned exclusive use of the mark for ten years - anyone who wanted to use the mark couldn't.

      I agree that even if the "windows" mark is not defensible on its own, Microsoft could still make a case for trade dress infringement, given the possible confusion between the Lindows mark and the combination "Microsoft Windows", though this would still be a tough argument.

      If you read the rulings, the judge acknowledges the provocative nature of Lindows' choice of name, but also chastises Microsoft for their original choice, which had precisely the same intention - to leverage the existing meaning of the term "windows":

      Although Lindows.com certainly made a conscious decision to play with fire by choosing a product and a company name that differs by only one letter from the world's leading computer software program, one could just as easily conclude that in 1983 Microsoft made an equally risky decision to name its product after a term commonly used in the trade...

    7. Re:Here's how it goes with trademarks by dolson · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wonder why Metallica (the band) sued Cover Girl over that chrome-colored lip polish that they nicknamed "metallica"?

      Oh, probably Metallica fans got messed up when they went to Wal-Mart, and ended up walking out with lipstick instead of the Ride The Lightning album or something.

    8. Re:Here's how it goes with trademarks by dolson · · Score: 1

      lip polish? WTF was I thinking!? mod me down!

  152. This is just stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    obviously the folks at Lindows are just a little bit immature. First, the picked a name they had to have known would get them in trouble with Microsoft for obviously trying to looks like "Windows". It'd be like opening up a fast food restaurant called McDowell's with golden arcs (not arches).

    Now, picking a name like Lin---s is just stupid and childish. Grow up and pick a real name.

  153. Not only that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It's an OS. How similar a product is matters in case of trademarks. Winamp is rather dissimlar from Windows. One is a player that runs on Windows, one is the OS.

    There is also the fact that in a trademark case you are trying to prove loss or potential loss of bussiness. Winamp clearly isn't taking bussiness from Windows, it actually helps to increase bussiness by adding features. Lindows clearly tried to take bussiness from Windows, being a direct competitor.

    Before anyone shoots back, competition is perfectly legal, but not trying to confuse people with something similar to or the same as the trademark of the competing product.

    1. Re:Not only that by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Winamp is rather dissimlar from Windows.

      Agreed, but spend some time working with the average Windows consumer in techsupport, and you'll see how ridiculous these names have gotten: these people will tell you, in all seriousness, that their operating system is Dell, their browser is the Start menu, they write letters in Windows 97, and their ISP is Internet Explorer. Imagine their confusion in a couple of years when Microsoft finally gets around to releasing Windows 2005. The consumers will ask, "but what happened to Longhorn? I thought that was supposed to be the cool one..."

      That being said, Lindows is in clear violation of the trademark, since they created their name with the intention of sounding similar and taking business away from Microsoft. I didn't like Lindows' approach (always root, claiming Plug 'n Play works, etc.) and of course I think Microsoft is a bully, but the case was pretty clear.

      Bullies sueing sleazeballs -- we should sell tickets.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  154. Good publicity for Lin*** by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft has just ignored Lindows then Lindows would have been seen as just some shady characters to 'con' people into buying an inferior product (like those $9.99 SEEKO watches you can find). However, because of all the fuss they have made, Microsoft has both given Lindows publicity and credibility. Why credibility? The message being sent out is that Windows == just a name badge and has no technical merits.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  155. Heh... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Would GNU/Lindows have been enough to placate the Courts?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  156. Great New Site! by barthrh2 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is a good time to introduce my new site concept: *. (splashdot) I can't imagine anyone taking issue with that.

  157. RestartNow by BigFire · · Score: 1

    Of course, according to this article, the new name is RestartNow

  158. The OS formerly known as Lindows by DeadVulcan · · Score: 1

    Clearly, what they should have done is to follow Prince's lead and just choose a logo and say, "that's what it's called!" forcing everyone to refer to it as "the OS formerly known as Lindows."

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  159. I got an idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets all refer to it as Linux Distro formerly known as Lindows to eliminate the confusion.

  160. He has a point by bogie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because of Microsoft Bill Gates is able to give lots of financial aid to charities. Should we therefore support Microsoft in everything it does?

    Lindows helps support a few Open Source projects. I thank them. That doesn't mean we can't disagree with their vision of the future of desktop Linux. Lindows is a proprietary Linux whose goal is to get all of its users paying a monthly fee for its click-n-run program. If their model succeeds then the future of Linux is one more akin to what Microsoft offers than what backers of GNU have in mind. I'm not going to even say which one is right or wrong(although you could probably guess how I feel), but you can't blame someone for disagreeing with what Lindows represents.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  161. welcome to the year 2000. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in which The Artist stated that he should once again be referred to as Prince.

    1. Re:welcome to the year 2000. by dolson · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that I already knew that.

      I guess it's not so sad, because the only reason I knew is from watching An Evening With Kevin Smith.

  162. I wonder by he-sk · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Linus will go to court over the Lin---s.com name.

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  163. Micro---- by rixstep · · Score: 1

    Well, a California court said Micro---- can't use Win---- in a proprietary way anymore, so...

  164. Why not - Windix by used_rugs · · Score: 1

    Windix would have been much more appropriate.

  165. Re:Walmart/OS --- Lycoris by Slowtreme · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression the Walmart PCs were using the original Linux XP look alike www.lycoris.com At least they could come up with thier own name while ripping off the XP luna look.

    Buy Desktop/LX pre-loaded on PCs at WalMart.com! Check out the entire line of MicroTel Desktop/LX- Certified PCs ranging from $199 to $558.

    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
  166. thank you by codehoser · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what just happened but I haven't laughed that hard in a long time.

    Thundercougarfalconbird. I nearly split my side open.

  167. One copy of Lin--- please! by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    Would you like freedom fries with that?

  168. Serious Strategy? by DeadVulcan · · Score: 1

    I'm replying to my own posting, and maybe that's a bit gauche, but, oh well...

    Clearly, what they should have done is to follow Prince's lead and just choose a logo and say, "that's what it's called!" forcing everyone to refer to it as "the OS formerly known as Lindows."

    I originally intended this as a joke, but the more I think of it, the more I think it could be a serious marketing plan. Erase any pronounceable name from the product line, and people are forced to use its former name to refer to it. None of that would be official, and Microsoft could do nothing about it.

    Obviously, the company could not do anything that could be construed as influencing the public to use the word "Lindows," and that would be a gamble that they'd have to take, with this scheme. However, if they make a press release stating the name change (or name removal, rather), and laced it liberally with the phrase "OS formerly known as Lindows" then I suspect the informal moniker would stick.

    They would probably need some kind of name that can be rendered in a western font, for invoices and the like, so maybe they could just choose some crazy set of letters, like "XZWUQMG," a name that nobody would really want to use.

    Press releases would be kinda hard... So it's not a perfect plan, but it's far more reasonable than I thought originally!

    Then again, I'm not sure how familiar the Dutch are with "the artist formerly known as Prince," and whether that name caught on there.

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  169. CaTHUNK! by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
    That noise you just heard was yet another linux-based company with a great idea, yet piss-poor execution, landing in its grave.

    I'll be extremely surprised if anyone takes this shit seriously now.

    --
    Berto
  170. You read it here first.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windoves

    The logo would involve an open window where doves fly out.

    So, do you think this'll fly?

  171. yet another shell by shakparl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who is this Linda and her new shell?

  172. Pffmpp:Mffppp mpmfmffmpmmfmfp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mpppppmfmpmfmfffmmmfp fmppffmmmpppfmmpmfmmmfmpmffppfppp: Pmfmffpppmpmmmmfmmmfp ffpfmfmffmfmfmp pppppfmfm mpppffmfmmpppff mmmpmffmm Pmfmffpppmpmppffppfmm, mppppp fpmmpppffmpmppfppmppmmpp mfmmfffmmfmpmpppffmppppp mfpmppmmp pmp pmfmffpppmpmppffppfmm pppppfmfm mfmmppmpmppffppppppmfppfmmmmpm. Fpmmpppfffmpmmmmmmpmf ffpmpppmfmpf ppmmmmmmmpff :-Pfm

  173. sighs by shaitand · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some people still don't seem to get it. There is no operating system called windows, no product called windows, and certainly no trademark on the word windows for ANY use including operating systems or graphical windowing systems.

    There is a series of operating systems put out by a company called Microsoft. It's called "Microsoft Windows", and people have nicknamed it due to it's monopoly err prevailance to simply "windows".

    People think Lindows is similar to the nickname "Windows" and is a product line of the same type and therefore infringes. That's fine and dandy but you cannot infringe on a NICKNAME that isn't trademarked and furthermore is actually in the public domain and untrademarkable regardless.

    If Microsoft had a trademark on windows, and the name lindows could confuse customers, then they'd have a case. But since they nor any other company can trademark the term, and the term is merely a nickname to begin with, lindows and windows can be confused all day long and there is STILL no valid case for Microsoft.

  174. You seem to have forgotten 2 things here ... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

    First) What differences do you see beetween Lindow and Micro$oft??; they both try to close their products as much as they can!, they both want you to buy they software, they won't let you just download it, souirce and binary; In this case (only in this case), windoze works better than a GNU/Linux distro, why?, well, because the only reason to run Lindows is if you want to run windoze apps; and OBVIOUSLY, windoze is better for that, so, why is everyone defending Lindow$ here?
    Second) I hate when someone refers to a GNU/Linux distro as "The ---- Operating System"; The operating System is Actually GNU, using the Linux Kernel, the difference beetween an LFS, Slackware, DeadRat or Lindows is not as important as to say they are different OSes, they are different paks of precompiled packages from the GNU OS.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  175. What a horrible name by rramir16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lindows is supposed to help windows users migrate to Linux, right? So i'm supposed to tell my mom, or whoever i'm encouraging to switch, that they need to download "Lin---"? I don't care if it has the convenient "pronounciation" lindash. They won't be able to google it, or be sure that they've found the right product even if they do find the right page. I can just see a person thinking, after being recommended Lindows from a *nix fan, "Now, was that Lin--, Lin----, Lin___"??? Perhaps this name is a form of protest, but as far as a marketable name, its just horrible.

  176. Re:shiJt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goatse is no more, fuckwad. YOU FAIL IT.

  177. L as in X by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    It should just be called L. "What OS do you use? L." "I'll just startup L." "Can you open up an Lterm for me?" "L: It's like Linux only simpler."

  178. What about Lindot... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    Is there going to be a lindot...

    I look forward to hearing Microsoft go: Lindot Lindot Lindot Lindash Lindash Lindash Lindot Lindot Lindot

  179. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  180. Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gewertztraminer to Chardonnay
    It seems that even some people can't spell it right.
  181. Winblows by timpaton · · Score: 1


    Would MS claim copyright infringement if Lin---s forked into Linblows ?

  182. Judy Garland sings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somewhere over LimBOS...

  183. please MOD up parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pseudo-mod: "+1 Funny"

  184. I would have named it Lindoors! by itzdandy · · Score: 1

    Now what's wrong with Lindoors? or Winux? or just changing the nameing to Lindos or Lyndos?

    Windows and Lindows can be seen as an attempt to make linux sound more like windows because of obvious similarities in spelling and sound. But Lindos or Lindoors is not similar to windows, they might as well sue mentos(the fresh maker;) )

  185. LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    better yet...

    balmer balmer balmer balmer... devleopers Developers DEVELOPERS... balmer balmer balmer balmer, gates oh gates... its gates... balmer balmer balmer balmer

  186. LinWart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LinWart is a more suitable name.

  187. Easy Replace by Solokron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Among the obvious, it is an easy replace all within the code with the same amount of characters only replacing the last three.

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  188. WTF? Why was I modded down? by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    I really don't understand why I was Modded as flamebait! I was just expressing what I saw in the name. Seriously, I think that it kinda hurts the Linux name in the same way that TRS-80's nickname "Trash-80's" hurt Radio Shack.

  189. I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should call it Lin-doors. Microsoft can't complain that people would confuse a door with a window.

  190. McD's by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

    I live in Scotland (although I'm actually welsh). A while back I heard of a curious lawsuit. A certain fast-food joint (they're not a restaurant) tried to have a high-court injunction on a Mr John Mcdonald exercising his buisness in the highlands (I forget where)... He is a (fairly) succesfull mechanic, owner of McDonald's Garage. The aforementioned junk-food chain tried to say that Mr McDonald was infringing 'their' trademark of his name. The court eventually threw out the issue, ordering them to pay full costs to Mr Mcdonald, after it was revealed that whilst Mr Mcdonald can trace his 'right' to his name back though lineage to the mid 1300's (where the clan records stop), the fjunk food chain a) was a foreign company. b) wasn't authorised by the Clan Chief of the McDonald clan to use the name, and c) wasn't even founded, owned or ran by a McDonald........ It was also mentioned by the judge that should he see any other similar cases by them in the high court, he would advise the judge in such a case to suspend preceedings, and he would re-open this case, and order the company to pay all undue infractions costs to Mr McDonald and the Clan Chief of the McDonalds, and relinquish the name throughout the UK. He added he was reluctant to do this due to economic considerations, but would do so if the company did not cease in "frivolous and arrogant suits". Pity you don't have our judges out in the states.......I'd imagine with the kind of arrogance that Micro---t displays, Bill Gates would be paying Steve Jobs one hell of a lot of money for stealing their ideas... Not to mention the hundreds, if not thousands of companies he's forced out of buisness due to unfair buisness practice.

    --
    The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
  191. LINDOWS really means... by liberte · · Score: 1
    In addition to the obvious pun, I first thought LINDOWS was one of those recursive acrynoms for "Lindows Is Not DOS Or Windows Stupid".

    Hmm, according to Google, only one other person had the same idea. Maybe if we spread this meme around, MS will get the message that it is pointless to defend the generic "Windows" term.

    --
    Daniel LaLiberte https://www.facebook.com/daniel.laliberte
  192. MacTrademark by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Actually, the way trademark infringement works is that you can _only_ go after people whose products compete in the same arena yours do. The idea is to prevent somebody from taking a name or other identifier that's been effectively built up by one company in a particular type of business, and using it to their own benefit.
    That's the theory. The practice is a little more complicated. That's because different people define "confusion" and "arena" in different ways. And unless you have the resources to defend your definitions, you're stuck with the other guy's.

    Example. Suppose your name is McGorgghrath, and you decide to open a restaurant called McGorgghrath's Fine Haggis. You think you'd be safe, right? McGorgghrath's is "obviously" not McDonald's and a haggis is obviously not a Big Mac, right? Guess again!

    The official party line at McDonalds is that any restaurant with a "Mac" or "Mc" name dilutes their trademark. So your restaurant will get a C&D letter tell them that you have to change the name of your restaurant.

    I know what you're saying, and you're right: this is stupid and bizarre. What crazy judge would ever accept such a ridiculous legal theory? And if one did, why wasn't it reversed on appeal? The answer is, it's never gone that far. You have a right to your day in court, but that day isn't cheap. Indeed, McDonalds' lawyers will throw as much paperwork at you as they can, to ensure that it will be very expensive indeed. And, alas, the McDonalds of this world have deep pockets -- the McGorgghraths do not.

  193. Somewhat on topic... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    I hear that Angel Soft, the maker of tissue for... well you know... has also been approached by Microsoft (Soft). Seems that they will be using Angel Stuff now instead of their original name.

    "I don't understand it. Why on earth would anyone confuse toilet paper with Microsoft software."