Slashdot Mirror

The Washington Post hired a friend of Osama bin Laden to write columns pushing his worldview. Until the Saudis killed him, the Washington Post was recruiting for the terrorist group that attacked the United States on September 11, 2001. And they act innocent and wonder why Trump calls them the Enemy Media. Money likely changed hands to make this happen. For more about these financial networks, go to 8chan for information because you're not getting it from the Washington Post.

Nothing, but that's not what islamophobia is. We don't call opposition to aspects of the Islamic faith islamophobia, because we recognize that it's legitimate

Who is "we"? And which critics of Islam have you deemed to not be "Islamophic"? Would it be the ex-Muslim that the SPLC gave a multi-million dollar settlement to after he sued them for smearing him as an "Islamophobe"?

Islamophobia is a general hatred of or bias against Muslims, regardless of their individual beliefs and values.

That's a lie. Anybody that criticizes Islam gets labeled "Islamophic", even when they go out of their way to only critique the religion and violent acts, and explicitly acknowledge it's not "all Muslims".

Rebel Media takes the view that Muslims are "invading" the west with the goal of "Islamifying" it, and that all Muslims living in the west are a problem.

I can almost guarantee you'll never find a statement out of Rebel Media to that effect. It's not "all Muslims", it's the mass migration. If we had a magic wand that could determine the intent of individuals, we'd use it. But we don't.

When did Europe start needing "diversity barriers" to protect their Christmas markets? When did Sweden start having grenade attacks? When did New Years Eve in Cologne become a place for mass sexual assault and gang rape? When did we have to start censoring ourselves about Islam for fear of inciting violent reprisals?

"The process of settlement is a 'Civilization-Jihadist Process' with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers..."

They're talking about useful idiots like you.

useful idiot:

"The process of settlement is a 'Civilization-Jihadist Process' with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers..."

useful idiot:

"The process of settlement is a 'Civilization-Jihadist Process' with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers..."

OK, slightly longer version, since you don't seem to make a distinction between history and religious texts:

I've made quite clear distinctions between history versus scripture. For instance, I would use phrases like, "based on the scriptures".

The Bible is not historical fact: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... and neither is the Qu'ran

No shit. By the way, quite hilarious that you chose to link to Reza "I am a scholar" Aslan, the Muslim apologist. I prefer Carrier's, "Did Jesus Even Exist?"

Additionally, how people interpret these books depends, to a great extent, on the contexts in which they're interpreted.

No shit. But there's also plain reading. And we can look at history and influential texts to see how these works were being interpreted. You're doing a lot of tap dancing and not addressing anything I've actually written.

For example, you're interpreting the Bible in a (presumably) educated, stable, safe, democratic context

Except that's bullshit. I interpreted the Bible through plain reading. I also relied on history, including the earliest history when they were a peaceful cult that eventually was adopted by the Roman empire, as opposed to Islam, which conquered all of Arabia and then spread out from there.

Did you address the basic stories from the Gospels, or the Sermon on the Mount? No, you'd rather cherry pick from some shitty countries in Africa. Did you address my "Islam has bloody borders" link? No, you'd rather deflect to CIA torture, which has jack shit to do with the history of Islam from before that point, and has jack shit to do with Islamic insurgencies wherever there are a significant number of Muslims.

If you look into the conflicts, the contexts, the motivations, the reasoning, etc., more complex, nuanced, and subtle stories start to emerge.

Funny how there's one unifying theme: ISLAM. Funny how you never address the history of Islam, from it's earliest beginnings. Funny how you never address the scriptures. Funny how you never answer my questions, like why Christians are the ones being persecuted in Muslim lands, while Muslims seek out Christian lands.

It's all interpretation according to contexts and there's nothing intrinsically more violent or non-violent about either the Bible or the Qu'ran.

You're full of shit. All you do is equivocate, hem and haw, and crank up the smog machine, while ignoring large truths staring at you in the face. In other words, you are a useful idiot:

"The process of settlement is a 'Civilization-Jihadist Process' with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers..."

Don't you also think it's interesting that both the Youtube news stories I linked to, made by award-winning American journalists, were paid for by the Kremlin? What does that say about domestic US news media?

Actually, it says more about the Kremlin media and the kind of sources you seek out, in typical anti-Western, libshit fashion.

That all you ever hear about Muslims is that presumably all 1.8 billion of them are hell-bent on destroying the world?

Yawn, "not all Muslims". You're checking all the boxes, congrats. I never said all 1.8 billion act that way. Like any religion, a great majority have their own McReligion view, and only a tiny percentage are going to act in the most extreme manner.

You realize the Americans you're calling Nazis aren't actually Nazis, right?

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Po...

https://clarionproject.org/wp-...

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws...

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0-ldnkx...

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-co...

Facebook banned Bosch Fawstin, winner of the Draw Mohammed contest that was attacked by terrorists

Facebook censored war correspondant Michael Yon

Facebook bans Arab atheist pages

Facebook banned Anonymous Germany for posting police statistics about immigrant crime

Facebook suspended a Dutch MP for criticizing Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Facebook suspended Syrian blogger PartisanGirl for making fun or ISIS

Facebook banned a guy for calling the Muslim Brotherhood liars

Facebook banned a liberal Muslim Shireen Qudosi for insulting a member of the Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR.

Facebook suspended Stop Islamization of America for opposing the massacre at an Orlando gay bar

Facebook banned Gaystream for opposing the massacre at an Orlando gay bar

Facebook banned a researcher for reporting on crime by Muslim immigrants in Sweden

Facebook censors a news article exposing the racist words of a Muslim activist.

Facebook finds that the page Stab Zionists meets their community standards and refuses to remove it.

If someone wants to look for foreign interference in Facebook, they should start with the moderation staff.

My, isn't the cognitive dissonance strong with this one.

"... enforce Sharia, why would they?"
http://www.clarionproject.org/...

"...rape women that is racist." Yes it was racist, but they did it anyway, in Köln.

"shoot up malls. This is the EU, not the US." But it happens anyway, because gun laws restrict only the law-abiding. A bad guy can always get a gun. Bad guys with the backing of Saudi princes can have all the jihadist fun they want in, say, Paris.

"traffic children. Never heard about that. To where would an immigrant traffic children?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Primatives?! ..and how are you determining that people trying to escape a shitty system/situation are "primatives" (as if you are somehow enlightened)

Open your eyes. "Germany shocked by Cologne New Year gang assaults on women"

They wouldn't be "shocked" if they were paying attention. Sweden opened their door to Muslim immigration and is now the rape capital of the Western world.

Look at what happened in the UK in Rotherham, where they covered up what was happening because they didn't want to be "racist".

Look what happened in Egypt.

Oh, no, but we don't want to be "xenophobes"! We must open our doors and welfare systems to all comers. Anybody who speaks out against it is guilty of hate speech!

Actually, their lies go far deeper than that. The terrorist group involved have a glossy color magazine called Dabiq. Apparently that magazine carried an interview with the leader of the Brussels / Paris cell where he announced that he was planning to hit Paris. Several months before the attacks. I wonder if any of the secret services read the thing, it is in English.

Hey, I downloaded and read every issue of Dabiq (the ISIL/ISIS,etc..) magazine. I want to know what the hell these people are teaching and thinking. It's called being informed, not an act of treason. http://www.clarionproject.org/...

The "surveilance is evil" guys need to propose an alternative way for intelligence agencies to work.
As an example, there are about 1 million Syrian refugees in Europe.
About 13% of them are positive about ISIS.
http://www.clarionproject.org/...

Tell me, pretty please, how you are supposed to monitor 130'000 men.

[...] except that one survey has shown that 13% of Syrian refugees support ISIS. Would you take a 1 in 8 chance that your houseguest wants to kill you?

No, it didn't.

The question was "In general, do you have a postitive or negative view of ISIL?" 4% of Syrian refugees answered "positive", and 9% said "positive to some extent". That is not the same as 13% expressing "support" for ISIS.

Moreover:

Further seeking to understand respondents’ views of ISIL, the survey included questions which asked participants to identify the factors that contributed the most to the group’s popularity amongst, and influence on, its supporters. Respondents were asked to consider such arguments regardless of whether or not they themselves accepted their validity. When asked to identify such reasons and factors, 15% of respondents cited ISIL’s “military achievements”, with the highest proportions of those citing this factor coming from Palestine, Egypt, Jordan and amongst the Syrian refugee population.

The survey didn't expand on "military achievements", but it wouldn't surprise me if the most common reason for a Syrian refugee holding a positive (or mildly positive) view of ISIS is that nobody else is trying to oust the Ba'athist regime.

Maybe you could start by opening your home to a Syrian refugee. People fleeing the "death cult" are precisely the sort of people who could do with your help.

That's very idealistic and glib, except that one survey has shown that 13% of Syrian refugees support ISIS. Would you take a 1 in 8 chance that your houseguest wants to kill you? And even the ones who aren't terror-supporters now are still Muslims (mostly), which means they carry the same memetic infection that produced ISIS (and all the other Islamic radical groups). There's a good chance that some of their kids and grandkids will be radicals, as France has learned: many of their "home-grown" radical Islamists are from Algerian families that came to France generations ago.

In short, just because they are refugees doesn't necessarily make them good people.

Sorry, but you and much of the West are being played for suckers. Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states have plenty of money and room for their co-religionists. They're all part of the ummah, right? But they don't want a bunch of poor and semi-skilled people with a heavy sprinkling of terror-supporters. Why burden their welfare rolls and strain their societies? Better to fob off the refugees on Europe (and the US), where they can spread Islam and soak up Western welfare money. It is a core Muslim belief that the entire Earth will one day be Muslim. The Muslim world is taking advantage of the Syrian war to spread Islam. We are fools to go along with it.

Oh you want precise data? Like large support across muslim countries, where terrorism is supported. 20% of muslims support the 7/7 bombings 1:4 muslims in the UK say the bombings were justified 31% of muslims in turkey support suicide bombings against westerners 32% of palestinians support the murder of jews, including children. 55% of muslims support hezbollah 26% of young muslims in america believe suicide attacks are justified 26% of egyptian muslims believe that suicide attacks are justified

You're now enlightened to this "tiny minority." Which is roughly 25% having extremist views, out of 1.6 billion that would be a "mere" 400,000,000 individuals. You know, I could keep going and posting, so again--there is something fundamentally broken with islam and muslims. And I haven't even gotten to the stuff on specific groups, which vary between 6% as a low to 51% support across muslims. Or the 50-75% that believing that killing apostates is a good idea. I guess none of that is large swaths.

100 lashes would kill a man.

Nonsense. It might do so rarely, but there are many documented cases in military history of men being sentenced to 1,000 lashes or more and surviving. Permanent disablement was an expected outcome of such a sentence, but not usually death. In a recent case of a teenage girl sentenced to 100 lashes in the Maldives, Amnesty International described the likely outcome as "long-term psychological as well as physical scars". I would imagine they had an expert on the subject make this assessment.

Well, I would presume we could add this guy to the list... http://www.clarionproject.org/news/imam-temple-mount-let-america-be-destroyed#