Slashdot Mirror

Civilian autopilots are not immune to interference from classified sources: http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/phikent/haarp/Haarp.ra

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/ConnectingTheDots.htm Note the underlying issue... the Iranian Oil Bourse and the ability for Middle Eastern nations to sell oil in "non-dollar denominated" currencies. Oil is the gold of the twenty-first century. Our currency here in America is completely dependent on oil, so much so that it has become known as the PetroDollar. If OPEC starts selling oil in Euros, our dollar is finished and our economy with it.

By my count, we are probably dealing with as many as eight, maybe even nine, unexplained cut or damaged undersea cables within the last week, and not the mere three or four that most mainstream news media outlets in the United States are presently reporting. Given all this cable-cutting mayhem in the last several days, who knows but what there may possibly be other cut and/or damaged cables that have not made it into the news cycle, because they are lost in the general cable-cutting noise by this point. Nevertheless, let me enumerate what I can, and keep in mind, I am not pulling these out of a hat; all of the sources are referenced at the conclusion of the article; you can click through and look at all the evidence that I have. It's there if you care to read through it all 1) one off of Marseille, France 2) two off of Alexandria, Egypt 3) one off of Dubai, in the Persian Gulf 4) one off of Bandar Abbas, Iran in the Persian Gulf 5) one between Qatar and the UAE, in the Persian Gulf 6) one in the Suez, Egypt 7) one near Penang, Malaysia 8) initially unreported cable cut on 23 January 2008 (Persian Gulf?)

The article includes the following links as references to document the above list of believed cuts:

1) http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1202064573279&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
2) http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/business/?id=24186
3) http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data/theuae/2008/February/theuae_February121.xml&section=theuae
4) http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080202132053.iohfg5ob&show_article=1
5) http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/04/2153455.htm
6) http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5i03tUdyj8wf2Xa9P4trWEjqAJdyQ
7) http://www.arabianbusiness.com/510132-internet-problems-continue-with-fourth-cable-break?ln=en
8) http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7980
9) https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/IEPM/Effects+of+Fibre+Outage+through+Mediterranean
10) http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/02/01/internet.outage/?iref=hpmostpop
11) http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/04/technology/cables.php
12) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/business/worldbusiness/31cable.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
13) http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/01/31/Cut-cable-disrupts-Internet-in-Middle-East_1.html
14)

• during the first clip at exactly 1:26 you can see a small white nub enter from the right side of the clip
• during the second clip at exactly 0:24 you can see a small white blob enter from the right as well

That nuclear material could have an unmeasureable detrimental effect on any life there is there, so NASA needs to be damn certain that this baby will not contaminate the surface even if the worst case scenario was to occur.

The possibility of contamination is precisely why the Galileo satellite was purposefully crashed into Jupiter. It was to prevent earth-based microbes (not nuclear material) from contaminating Europa, in the chance that it would eventually crash there after loosing power. Preventing biological contamination of enviroments in which life may have independently originated is of prime importance.

Concerns of biological contamination could be addressed in future missions via proper sterilization of the spacecraft. This was not done with Galileo because there was no reason to do so at the time. It may have been sterile, but had not been checked as such.

Though nuclear contamination was not the issue, Galileo did have nuclear material onboard for power (but not a fission reactor). This led to some folks speculate that NASA was trying to detonate Jupiter, which is nicely debunked here.

Europa's oceans are thought to be at least 2 times as voluminous as all of Earth's oceans combined

One of the main points of the mission is to confirm the existence of these oceans. The oceans are only inferred: we believe that there is a large liquid water ocean because of Europa's magnetic moment. The salt-water is conductive, and as Jupiter's magnetic fied varies, it induces a field in Europa. As Europa moves through various parts of Jupiter's field, the orientation varies. We detect this field and its variations, and deduce a large ocean. More information is here.

You must leave Jupiter in TWO DAYS!

So if NASA (or the Illuminati, to quote another of the conspiracy theories going around the 'net) has really decided to ignite Jupiter deliberately, then they're taking an awfully big risk...

The shuttle caused a discharge of the solar capacitor. Space IS unsafe, and is getting worse.

Columbia

More information on that page than NASA is willing to admit. The truth hurts, and sometimes it even kills.

Some real insight... and even more insight. Not that which Slash-Dot mandates as being.

Planet X!

When are we going?

Real soon!

I wonder if they can deflect Planet X (do a page search for "Planet X" or "Nibiru")?

Causality seems like coincidence until it's proven. Seen any SOHO footage lately? Lots of new stuff flying around this neck of the galactic woods.

There's some evidence that there may be inconsistencies in the collapse of the two world trade center towers.
This web site points out a cloud of smoke coming from a tower not hit by the plane in the CNN video. This is hinting of a deliberate demolition of the World Trade Center site.
This web site has information that the hijackers are actually alive.
More technical information here. And isn't it strange that weapons-grade Anthrax is mailed?

There was destruction -above- the first floor, and just FYI, the building was made of heavy re-enforced concrete. Remember when it was built there was a WAR on.

Idiot.

I've never seen a picture with a plane in it. I've seen pictures that showed up six months later that show an explosion, but despite the reporter's suggestions and stopping and looking at each frame, I don't see a plane. I have a satellite photo from that day that has resolution good enough to see cars on the highway and in the parking lot, but it shows no sign of a plane. I've seen the photos of the building still smoking and it doesn't show any sign of a plane. There was an excellent photo taken by the French press (a copy is here) and it clearly shows that, until the upper floors collapsed on the first floor, any impact hole was limited to the first floor, which makes one wonder where that big plane was when the photo was taken.

Sheep.