Slashdot Mirror


X17 Solar Flare Sends 2B Tons of Plasma at Earth

Dr. Zowie writes "This morning a very large solar flare erupted from a large sunspot group that is crossing the face of the Sun. The explosion sent over 2 billion tons of material hurtling across the solar system toward Earth. Movies from the SOHO spacecraft show the flare in UV and the associated coronal mass ejection in visible light as they happened, and the impact of high energy protons that the flare launched at about half the speed of light. NOAA's Space Environment Center shows that the Sun's X-ray brightness went up 100x during the flare. Expect more aurora and geomagnetic effects in the next day or two!"

473 comments

  1. yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sun is fun :)

    1. Re:yay by Gherald · · Score: 1

      I guess this means its still shining?

      (sorry, I don't get out much)

    2. Re:yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop comparing nazi atrocities with MS products, you worthless piece of shit!

    3. Re:yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Hitler no longer poses a threat.

    4. Re:yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh.. Microsoft affects more peoples lives, than hitler did..

    5. Re:yay by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Hitler no longer poses a threat.

      Well, I guess you didn't know that He is still alive, with the Aryans inside the Earth! Ha!

  2. So will I ... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

    So will I be able to see an aurora from my latitude when it hits (40 deg. N)? And when will it hit earth, and over what time period?

    1. Re:So will I ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      spaceweather.com has an interesting service that will page you if there is an aurora in your locality. Check it out.

    2. Re:So will I ... by Donwulff · · Score: 5, Informative

      These events are already causing a slashdot effect on the solar weather sites without Slashdot even mentioning them, so here's a copy of the best report I've come across, from http://www.spacew.com/cme/index.html:

      Event #49 - 28 October 2003

      Issued: 16:30 UTC, 28 October 2003

      SOURCE EVENT

      Class X17.2 Flare in Region 486 at 11:10 UTC on 28 October 2003
      Type II: 1250 km/sec
      Estimated LASCO-derived Plane of Sky Velocity: 2125 km/sec

      ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OF SHOCK AT EARTH

      Estimated Impact Window: 00:00 UTC on 29 October to 21:00 UTC on 29 October
      Preferred Predicted Impact Time: 08:00 UTC, 29 October 2003 (3 am EST on 29 October)
      Estimated Shock Strength (0=Weakest, 9=Strongest): 9

      Predicted Behavior of IMF at Shock Impact

      At Shock Impact, the Interplanetary Magnetic Field is predicted to initially turn:
      SOUTHWARD

      IMPORTANT TIME OF ARRIVAL NOTICE FOR NORTH AMERICANS
      The preferred time of arrival is ***TONIGHT***, TUESDAY NIGHT (before you go to bed that night) near or after 3 am Eastern Standard Time).
      That's 2 am Central Standard Time on TONIGHT.
      That's 1 am Mountain Standard Time on TONIGHT.
      That's MIDNIGHT Pacific Standard Time on TONIGHT.

      EXPECT RESIDUAL ACTIVITY (LESS INTENSE) TOMMORROW NIGHT (WEDNESDAY, 29 OCT) AS WELL !

      EVENT #49 NOTES:

      This is the most energetic Earthward-directed event of the solar cycle.

      SEVERE to MAJOR geomagnetic storming is expected to abruptly commence following the arrival of the shock front from this flare.

      This flare was associated with a Ground-Level Event. It was also associated with very high energy protons at greater than 100 MeV (which are still climbing, over 5 hours after the event began). A magnetic crochet was observed over the daylit sections of the ionosphere. An exceptionally intense shortwave fadeout and polar cap absorption event are in progress. There are reports this event was observed in white-light. Intense radio bursts were associated with this event across the spectrum. The type II shock velocity is not representative of the observed velocity of this CME. The observed velocity as determined by SOHO was 2125 km/sec.

      This event has the potential to produce the strongest geomagnetic storm since 1989. Auroral activity could become visible into the deep low latitude regions. This one is worth driving a good long distance over to find clear skies. It has better potential to produce low-latitude aurora than almost any other event observed in the past decade. Keep in mind that it is also possible the disturbance may not be nearly as geoeffective as many would like. It all depends on the character of the magnetic fields imbedded within the coronal mass ejection. However, we believe it will either be very large, or only modestly large in terms of its capacity to produce disturbed geomagnetic and auroral activity. We do not expect this disturbance to be small.

      These predictions may be based on preliminary data and may be revised without warning. The predictions should not be used as a definitive indication of CME impact times or strengths and may frequently be in error. The proprietary methods used to estimate shock impact times are under continual development. Caution is advised.

    3. Re:So will I ... by KD5YPT · · Score: 0

      Not sure about when, but probably not, since it's close to winter, and most chorono mass will be pulled towards the sound, ccausing large aurora there. But, if its strong enough, maybe you can see it near horizon.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    4. Re:So will I ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must leave Jupiter in TWO DAYS!

    5. Re:So will I ... by egreB · · Score: 1

      well, I'm looking forward to it. I live at 69 deg. N, where we can watch aurora about every night.. (-: This one's going to be beatiful, tough, if the weather allows.

    6. Re:So will I ... by pi+eater · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      i'm just waiting for bush to slap economic sanctions on the sun for failing to go along with his whole "either with us or against us" thing.

      geek wear

    7. Re:So will I ... by Saeger · · Score: 1
      At Shock Impact, the Interplanetary Magnetic Field is predicted to initially turn: SOUTHWARD

      Oh God no! The poles are going to flip again! Major extinction event! Art Bell was right! Chaos will ensue!

      This is no time to be posting on slashdot - everyone should be out looting the supplies necessary to top off their fallout shelters! I've almost got me enough food to last 12 years, and enough virgins to repopulate the planet, should I be FORCED to do so.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    8. Re:So will I ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pathetic. Just pathetic. At least pick a story that you can find some tiny thread to connect it to a bash Bush joke. Solar flares?

      I guess times are tough even for the karma whores these days.

    9. Re:So will I ... by Cloud+9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm guessing nobody told you. They have to be female virgins. You and your 12 roommates won't accomplish much.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    10. Re:So will I ... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I've almost got me enough food to last 12 years, and enough virgins to repopulate the planet, should I be FORCED to do so.

      I don't know how many /.ers you imprisoned in your fallout shelter, but your plan is going to be all for naught, and humanity thusly doomed, when you realize that what you need isn't virgins but females.

      Unless you're the female, in which case what you need is a method of tolerating the shelter full of geeks you picked up. The standard solution is booze. Lots of it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    11. Re:So will I ... by dwillden · · Score: 2, Funny
      spaceweather.com has an interesting service that will page you if there is an aurora in your locality. Check it out.

      Yeah, but I tried signing up to it with my cell, but everytime there is one of these massive flares I never get the alerts, It's like the service has a hard time calling me during those events or something.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    12. Re:So will I ... by Basehart · · Score: 1

      I guess there no point installing that security update now then huh!

    13. Re:So will I ... by jxs2151 · · Score: 1

      I was just waiting for someone to associate this with Bush.

    14. Re:So will I ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to extend Godwin's Law to include references to GWB.

    15. Re:So will I ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I could, it's snowing in Edmonton right now.

    16. Re:So will I ... by egreB · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't know where Edmonton is, but in Alta, Norway, the sky is clear (-:

    17. Re:So will I ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. Overskyet + regn i Grimstad. Ingen nordlys her... :\

    18. Re:So will I ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goodwin's law already covers GWB.

    19. Re:So will I ... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Ingen nordlys her

      You nordlys her... You brought her!

    20. Re:So will I ... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Goodwin's law already covers GWB.

      That's interesting. In this case, does saying someone is covered by "Godwin's Law" then mean that you have invoked it?

    21. Re:So will I ... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      You mean in the vicinity of earth?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  3. Guess it's too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    to break out the tinfoil caps and hide the high-speed film.

    We need more warning next time!

  4. For those whose first response is "WTF?" by mandalayx · · Score: 5, Informative
    My first response to the article was "WTF?" but I decided to do something more productive than that. Perhaps you might find this more accessible to you as well:

    The Sun today unleashed what appears to be the third most powerful flare in recorded history, a storm of charged particles that could hit Earth mid-day Wednesday with more effect than any since 1989, when an entire Canadian province had its power knocked out.

    Depending on the storm's magnetic orientation, it could set off a dramatic display of colorful northern lights well into mid-latitudes of the United States and Europe.

    Meanwhile, satellite operators and power grid managers are preparing to endure a potentially damaging event. And astronauts aboard the International Space Station have taken cover from heavier radiation sent out by the flare. They are not expected to be in any serious danger.

    Kicked up at 6 a.m. EST (1100 UT) today, the major solar outburst comes on the heels of four other flares late last week and over the weekend. All were considered fairly severe, but the latest eruption makes the others seem like solar sneezes.

    Today's blast is classified as an X17, where X denotes a major flare and larger numbers are stronger. That compares to two flare-ups over the weekend that were rated less than X2.

    "The flare today may be the third strongest X-flare on record," said Paal Brekke, deputy project scientist for the SOHO spacecraft, which first spotted the event.

    A slightly stronger flare on April 2, 2001 was not pointed at Earth. Today's storm is headed directly at us and could generate fantastic colorful lights in the atmosphere, known as aurora. The storm associated with the flare is called a coronal mass ejection, an expanding bubble of charged particles that race outward.

    more
    1. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a bton?

    2. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Funny...I always thought of a sneeze as my most violent respiratory function. Chalk it up to journalism, I guess.

    3. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm sure my story submission on this topic will be rejected now, but that's why I put a copy in my journal when I posted it. Too few confusing links, I guess.

      Anyway, if you're going to be a passenger on a high-altitude airplane flight you may receive chest-x-ray-level dosages of radiation. Not typically considered harmful.

      Follow the link for some easier to view pictures and a link to spaceweather.com where they have all kinds of information.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by Xentax · · Score: 1

      A wacky way of saying "a billion tons".

      Or, as they'd say on 'All Things Scottish', FRICKIN' HUGE!

      Xentax

      --
      You shouldn't verb words.
    5. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were robbed.

    6. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by greenhide · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always thought of a sneeze as my most violent respiratory function.

      Well, obviously, you've never had a nose "flare" before. Very messy.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    7. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by jmv · · Score: 4, Informative

      with more effect than any since 1989, when an entire Canadian province had its power knocked out.

      Yes, that province was Quebec and we were in the dark for 2-3 days IIRC. A the time, the power company (Hydro Quebec) said "it's because of the sun" and everybody made fun of them.

      I wonder if this was also due to the very long power lines (>1000 km) we have from the hydro plants to the cities... I heard they also make perfect antennas for sending 60 Hz waves into space.

    8. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by chiph · · Score: 1

      The Houston Chronicle reported that the ISS astronauts/cosmonauts took shelter earlier this week from the radiation effects of the sunspots. I imagine they are doing the same with this new, stronger, storm. But seeing as how they got a week's worth of radiation in a 12-hour period earlier, I imagine they're concerned about the strength of tonights activity.

      Chip H.

    9. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      astronauts aboard the International Space Station have taken cover from heavier radiation sent out by the flare.

      And just where to you "take cover" on a space station?

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    10. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      The normal design is an inner chamber surrounded by water or lead. Not sure what they have on ISS.

    11. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by uberdave · · Score: 1
      A Few ideas:
      • They can move to the part of the habitat level that has heavy radiation shielding.
      • They can orient the IIS so that the bulk of the station lies between the sun and the habitat module.
      • They can tweak the orbit so that the space station is on the far side of the planet when the flare peaks.
    12. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      There is a short account of a similar situation provided in Carl Sagans Contact. Apparently the more densely shielded part of the ISS is the 'aft end of the Zvezda module'.

      I seem to recall somebody mentioning using Hyrogen enriched plastics for this kind of shield as well, but I have no idea if this actually works.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    13. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by Atryn · · Score: 1

      Well if this did cause such problems it could be fairly serious... Consider the following:

      2-3 day power outage in CA: During the current wildfires this could cause problems with coordination of fire-fighting efforts.

      2-3 day power outage in Iraq: As if we didn't have enough problems there... But then again, they are more or less used to power outages by now.

      2-3 day power outage in GA: This would be bad for me and therefore bad for the rest of the world. :)

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    14. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by rikkards · · Score: 1

      It is also due to a bad layout in Quebec for their electrical system. Fortunately the Ice Storm allowed Hydro Quebec to look at their system and fix it. This was also why Quebec was having problems getting back up after the storm. Chances are everything should be ok after this storm but IANAQHE (I Am Not A Quebec Hydro Employee)

    15. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      makes note:

      Atryn lives in GA.

      MUAhahah my circle draws ever tighter... ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

      Where were you living when this happened? From the the materials available on the web:

      http://www.spacetoday.org/SolSys/Sun/Sunspots.ht ml
      http://engr.calvin.edu/PRibeiro_WEBPAGE/courses/ en gr302/Samples/geomagnetic%20storms.ppt
      http://www .sec.noaa.gov/user_notes/UN30.html

      It looks as if the primary outage was closer to a day.

    17. Re:For those whose first response is "WTF?" by DrJimbo · · Score: 1

      Two glbs.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
  5. Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by Vinson+Massif · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sunspots.

    --
    "Remember, any tool can be the right tool." -- Red Green
    1. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by Valar · · Score: 1

      Sadly, enough, I actually used that this morning. Of course, it was about a radio telescope...

    2. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up sir haxalot...oh wait, sorry.

    3. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully this wasn't an X10 solar flare. A popup storm would have been much worse.

    4. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...except in Soviet Russia, where the Coronal Mass ejects you.

    5. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Strange, that's what my mechanic told me this morning. Something about sunspots having demagnetized the debigulator, which caused all my blinker fluid to leak out. I thought the $1024 repair bill excessive, but hey, what do I know about cars?

    6. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually used that the other week. Solar flares. Coincidentally there was greater solar activity at the time of the problems.

    7. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by macjohn · · Score: 1

      Fresh out of mod points or I'd toss you one. That was TOO finny.

      --
      --Hi. I'm in Portland and it's raining. This appears to be a permanent condition.
    8. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find funny in all this is the repair bill that falls exactly on a power of two.

    9. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

      You beat me to the BOFH reference.

    10. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by DestinyBWL · · Score: 1

      Nice, very nice. I think I might even throw that excuse up on my site for the half a million techs that visit my site to use :)

      --
      Bradford L.
      http://www.modemhelp.net
    11. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by cfuse · · Score: 1

      Well, you can hardly tell them the reason it doesn't work is because the user is a dumbass.

      At work the other day, the token blonde in management was standing in front of the colour copier looking confused (not unusual). The machine was doing it's best impersonation of any-star-trek-episode-where-the-warp-core-is-about -to-breach, ie. lights flashing, lots of meaningless warning sounds. She says: "Is this machine not working?". I said: "What do you think? Not to be trite, but you have eyes don't you?".

      There is a reason that Compaq included the 'any' key in it's FAQ.

    12. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by theora55 · · Score: 1

      The BOFH has made sure the helpdesk never runs out of excuses: "The Bastard Operator From Hell"-style excuse server.

    13. Re:Helpdesk Excuse-of-the-Day by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      user@smbsrv:~$ fortune -m sunspot
      (bofh excuses)
      %
      BOFH excuse #390:

      Increased sunspot activity.
      %

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  6. SUN's stock price up by irshboy · · Score: 1

    Think there is a connection?

    1. Re:SUN's stock price up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      And it's not SUN, it's Sun. It stopped being an acronymn in 1982. Get with it.

    2. Re:SUN's stock price up by public_class_name_ex · · Score: 1



      Sunoco Inc.? (SUN NYSE) Yeah those guys are doing great. Wished SUNW was looking like that....

    3. Re:SUN's stock price up by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course Sunoco's stock price is up. When the power grid collapses tonight, everyone's going to need gasoline to run their generators.

  7. Re:YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too slow! Sorry! Modding you down now.

    Kruzen! DHITB!

  8. time to bust out the tinfoil hat again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    selling tinfoil hats.. 5 dollars

  9. Well, thank goodness. by blitzoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I can put out my plasma nets and catch some of it. I was beginning to worry that I'd never be able to restock my dwindling supply!

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
    1. Re:Well, thank goodness. by haystor · · Score: 1, Funny

      This plasma discharge has been anticipated for quite some time and has been reflected in the drop of prices for plasma televisions.

      --
      t
  10. Astronomy is fun by pheared · · Score: 5, Funny

    Skinner: Ah, there's nothing more exciting than science. You get all
    the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers,
    paying attention...[chuckles] Science has it all.

  11. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's 1700 WTCs.

  12. Great... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now we can expect a lot more of those lame "no carrier" posts on Wed. Although for once, they could be for real since the interf32#@a#%$ATDT01[NO CARRIER]

    1. Re:Great... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Bah! I think that you will find that terrorists did it!

    2. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this solar flare apparently has AI embedded in it as well. It can click Preview, wait wait, then submit after it's typed "[NO CARRIER]"

    3. Re:Great... by Chester+K · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now we can expect a lot more of those lame "no carrier" posts on Wed.

      Hey, you know if you didn't like my sig, you could have just told me. :(

      --

      NO CARRIER
  13. hrmm.... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this will prolly get modded down, but it looks as if Shamash, the mesopotamian sun-god is finally voicing his opinion.....

    xao

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    1. Re:hrmm.... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      Yeah,

      On the occupation of Iraq!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  14. Welcome by N3WBI3 · · Score: 0, Funny

    And I for one welcome our new plasmotic overloards!

    --
    1. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....how is that even amusing?

      Just plain retarded. Pass me the bong...

    2. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not - stupid mods...

    3. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, which one of you knuckle dragging mouth breathers modded this parent up? You have got to be kidding me the goddamn overlord jokes were barely funny when they were fresh and now you support this garbage by modding the fucktard who wrote it up?

    4. Re:Welcome by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "And I for one welcome our new plasmotic overloards!"

      3 people found that funny, and they all had mod points? Wow.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mouth breathers?
      I have a small nose you insensitive clod. Michael Jackson spent fifteen years trying to look like me.

    6. Re:Welcome by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      hahaha, it is funny!
      you guys just don't get it: "plasmotic overloards"
      haha, get it?

      i for one welcome our new funny bad-spelling overlords!

      (let's see if it works for me)

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  15. A question about the Sun's behavior by windows · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The sunspot cycle (which takes 11 years) peaked in 2000, yet there's an unusually large amount of activity of late. There was a somewhat intense solar flare a few days ago, and now this one, which is believed to be the third-largest one on record. Are there any explanations for this large amount of activity at what should be a non-peak time?

    1. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I blame SUV's! Also at fault are Big Oil, Big Tobacco, and George Bush.

    2. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, no, but karma-whoring suddenly comes to mind.

    3. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um.. i hate to break it to you, but asking a legitimate question isn't karma whoring. go back in your hole, ac...

    4. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by KD5YPT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 11 years sunspot cycle merely means that it is almost a guarantee that the sun will have peak sunspot activity every 11 years, it doesn't mean that there wouldn't be any activity between the two peaks.>BR> Crazy explanations... 1. Black hole collided very far away, the gravity wave it generate hits the sun. 2. A hypernova occured, and a significant amount of gamma radiatiobn just happened to hit the sun and misses the earth. 3. The sun is sentient, and was throwing a tantrum. 4. An alien decided to screw up the sunspot cycle as an experiment to see human's response to it. 5. An alien, again, this time weapon testing on the sun.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    5. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I don't know how long ago the sunspot cycle was last calibrated, but our charts may be a bit off-set.

    6. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent down.. it's racist for its use of the term "brown people" and it's just flamebait anyways. do your job mods and mod this shit down...

    7. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Are there any explanations for this large amount of activity at what should be a non-peak time?

      The funniest I heard today on coach from work was from somebody reading the article in newspaper:
      "It must be because there are holes in the air, because of pollution.".

      That was for '+5, Sad', the other is for 'Ironic'

      Talk about utter cluesness (air holes?!), but on the other hand do you really want to explain him that "air" (ozone layer?) holes don't really cause solar flares, or would you just be grateful that there is at least something that scares the logic challenged to the level, where they start thinking about preserving the environment.

      Anonymous Cowards Unite

    8. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by public_class_name_ex · · Score: 1


      Shhh....

      A lot of those books haven't been discredited yet.

    9. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone is REALLY upset about SCO... :)

    10. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by isaac · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The sunspot cycle (which takes 11 years) peaked in 2000, yet there's an unusually large amount of activity of late. There was a somewhat intense solar flare a few days ago, and now this one, which is believed to be the third-largest one on record. Are there any explanations for this large amount of activity at what should be a non-peak time?

      Let's see:

      • The roughly-11-year solar cycle is just based on observation and correlation. It lets one make certain predictions about the likelihood of solar events, but that's all.
      • Recorded history isn't very long compared to the sun's age, to say nothing of the still-shorter track record of scientific solar observation. The sun may (and probably does) exhibit other epicyclic phenomena on timescales too long for us to have directly measured.

      That's a start. Just because we're past the predicted peak of current cycle doesn't mean there won't be solar activity.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    11. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are there any explanations for this large amount of activity at what should be a non-peak time?

      Yes - it's not a large amount during a non-peak time.

      It's a normal amount for this time period, the only difference is that the recent ones are actually being sent towards us, so they affect us more..

      CME's are a pretty regular occurrence, and they do follow an 11-year cycle, but most of them never affect us, because we're not in the path of the flare. (Think about it - the earth occupies a pretty small percentage of real estate around the sun - so there's a pretty small chance that a CME will send stuff our way.)

      The amount is normal for this time period, it's just that the recent ones are aimed at us.

    12. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by aschlemm · · Score: 1

      Sounds like another candidate ripe for an on-camera street interview with Jay Leno.

    13. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Are there any explanations for this large amount of activity at what should be a non-peak time?"

      I'd love to hear this question on the Art Bell show. I'm sure somebody would come up with a creative, yet strangely plausible reason that humans cause this. "It's radio man, we started using radio and the sun is allergic to it."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by .smoke · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Disaster Area are getting back together?

      B*B,
      -Smoke.

    15. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by magarity · · Score: 1

      Are there any explanations for this large amount of activity at what should be a non-peak time?

      These strong solar flares are from global warming because evil Bush not signing the Kyoto accord.

    16. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Delayed ejaculation?

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    17. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it obvious. It's just another problem caused by global warming.

    18. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On behalf of al-Qaida we claim responsibility.

    19. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Wow, looks like we've got some severely sarcasm-impaired folks here today.

      So it's ok for the loonies in other threads to claim Bush is up to all kinds of things, but it's not ok, apparently, when it's someone making fun of them instead.

      Oh well, my point is proven, regardless. =)

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    20. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Bob(TM) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Recall that the sunspot cycle actually refers to the number of sunspots visible at a given time. As someone already pointed out, flaring can occur whether or not the actual number of visible sunspots is high

      Flares occur to relax the magnet field gradiant. This gradiant is correlated with sunspot size which, in turn, is correlated with sunspot number. Larger sunspots are correlated with solar max and are anti-correlated with solar min. But, just like earth weather throws a curveball, you can get atypical sunspot sizes and activity sometimes.

      --

      The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
    21. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by DirkGently · · Score: 1

      Huh. I thought it was just another stupid IRC netsplit.

      ...explains a few things.

      --

      I keep trying to pick fights, but I can't shake this Excellent karma.

    22. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say "global warming"? (After all, global warming is the cause of all environmental abnormalities isn't it? ;)

    23. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by nepheles · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well duh. It's obviously President Bush's fault. Our increased reliance on fossil-fuels has always been a major problem. And then he goes and abandons Kyoto. Not to mention his lack of activity on curbing SUV growth. *sigh*. I'm just not surprised that this didn't happen sooner...

      --
      ((lambda x ((x))) (lambda x ((x))))
    24. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      Maybe it has something to do with that black spot on Jupiter. My God, its full of stars.

    25. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be the SCO lawsuit. McNeally does look a little ragged lately.

    26. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by jafac · · Score: 1

      H.A.A.R.P.

      try google.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    27. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Ashtead · · Score: 1
      "+5, Sad" would be about right. Unless that man on the bus was a politician for the city and would recommend draconian environmental policies because of his lack of understanding of the process.

      In which case it could be "-1, Bloody Expensive" or worse...

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    28. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by NewWazoo · · Score: 1
      Recorded history isn't very long compared to the sun's age, to say nothing of the still-shorter track record of scientific solar observation. The sun may (and probably does) exhibit other epicyclic phenomena on timescales too long for us to have directly measured.

      Thank you for this post - it brought me to an interesting(?) realization that in fact, the sun could exhibit cyclic phenomena that have periods longer than the entire existance of bipedal hominids, to say nothing of civilization.

      Nifty.

      Brandon

    29. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Explanation: Trying to find a pattern in a world created by God and realizing that things are more complicated than that reminds us we are all still human and don't know shit.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    30. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget the Mossad's role... and Microsoft... and SCO... have we covered all the usual 5-minute-hate subjects?

    31. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a church dude using a computer?

      where's logic in that?

      those people should be burned at stake, (male) witches

    32. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by 0000+0111 · · Score: 1

      Peak has been observed at ABOUT every 11 years. The last minimum was in 1997. It's also been observed that it takes only ABOUT four years to reach peak and ABOUT seven to reach minimum. So four to peak and seven down. It's still a mystery as to why this is so. 1997 + 4 would be 2001, 2003 - 2001 is 2, so there's still another 5 years left until we expect minimum.

    33. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by io333 · · Score: 1

      Recorded history isn't very long compared to the sun's age, to say nothing of the still-shorter track record of scientific solar observation. The sun may (and probably does) exhibit other epicyclic phenomena on timescales too long for us to have directly measured.

      You are correct, but it's very easy to indirectly measure the cycle with tree rings.

    34. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by pizen · · Score: 1

      Think about it - the earth occupies a pretty small percentage of real estate around the sun - so there's a pretty small chance that a CME will send stuff our way.

      Plus, we're a moving target and we all know the Sun has really bad aim. Maybe the Sun has finally figured out how to lead us properly.

    35. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm sure it'll get back in line if we ask it nicely.

    36. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by roninbix · · Score: 1
      Bad Aim?

      You try hitting something as far away as Earth. Ever played snooker? ;>

    37. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Mr_Perl · · Score: 1

      Uh yea, burning holes in the earth's ionosphere is really going to upset the sun.

      --

      My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
    38. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just repeated what he said, and tried to claim it your own idea. How pathetic.

    39. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by pizen · · Score: 1

      You'd think it would have gotten better considering its had billions of years to practice.

    40. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by jafac · · Score: 1

      One of the "fun" conspiracy theories out there about HAARP was that by altering the ionosphere, it was also altering the interaction between the earth's and sun's magnetic field, which was going to ultimately cause massive solar flares and knock the earth from it's orbit.

      But my favorite one was the "death ray" theory - that one could reflect HAARP's signals off the ionosphere, and wack an entire city.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    41. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      I never said I was Amish. I can still use technology and I'm in the CS program at a local college. I can see that if you had the chance your personal thoughts would turn into illegal persecution. (killing by burning alive) However I'm not a witch. I don't practice paganism, satanism, or witchcraft.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    42. Re:A question about the Sun's behavior by jbayes · · Score: 1

      Global warming. hth.

      --

      "It sure was strange to see something on Usenet about me that didn't involve Klingon gang rape." -- Wil Wheaton

  16. Braak out the RJ-45!!! by grocer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time to find the ethernet cables and plug in all those wireless laptops...

    No 802.11b, 1 year!

    1. Re:Braak out the RJ-45!!! by Linker3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better not risk it unless its STP - I see a mass panic purchase of coax! 10Base2/10Base5 rulez.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Braak out the RJ-45!!! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sneakernet saves the day!

    3. Re:Braak out the RJ-45!!! by ryanw · · Score: 1

      No doubt. It's been saying it would hit Wednesday sometime, but my wifi network at home has been acting wacky already since like 11:30am today (tuesday). Is it possible to be screwing things up already?

    4. Re:Braak out the RJ-45!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, linksys just sucks.

    5. Re:Braak out the RJ-45!!! by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

      Not me, Dude!

      I'm going to try to DX my network to a foreign land like I used to do with my old CB radio. Maybe, with a little luck, I'll find myself connected to some super porn network or be part of an international net party.

      RD

    6. Re:Braak out the RJ-45!!! by Donwulff · · Score: 1

      According to NOAA there's been Severa radio-blackouts associated with the event already. These are defined as "HF Radio: : HF radio communication blackout on most of the sunlit side of Earth for one to two hours. HF radio contact lost during this time.

      Navigation: Outages of low-frequency navigation signals cause increased error in positioning for one to two hours. Minor disruptions of satellite navigation possible on the sunlit side of Earth."

      In addition http://www.sec.noaa.gov/ftpdir/lists/radio/radio_b ursts.txt gives a list of the measured radio-bursts from sun. Somebody more experienced in radio-waves would have to comment, but the 2695Mhz signals seem relatively close to WLAN frequency and if sufficiently strong, could hamper it.

      Still, as noted, there are several other causes that are much more likely than solar-based for WLAN problems at this point.

  17. Eep by Pingular · · Score: 0

    The explosion sent over 2 billion tons of material hurtling across the solar system toward Earth
    When I read this my heart missed a beat. The poster of this artical should have really made it more clear what he was talking about, people with weak hearts might have a heart attack. This isn't a joke...

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
  18. Suntan by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Well suppose its time to get out the factor 5000 and lay on the beach.

    Rus

  19. next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why next day or two? At the half of speed of light, this stuff should hit us in about 16 minutes. So you can't really "prepare" for something like this. What am I missing?

    1. Re:next day or two? by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      that some of that stuff moves at speeds well below light... I suggest reading Heinlein's "Podkayne of Mars" on this subject :-)

    2. Re:next day or two? by Donwulff · · Score: 5, Informative

      They had an odd way of putting this. The proton flare caused a solar storm which hit Earth within minutes of the flare commencing. However, the associated CME is significantly slower (Still over 2000 kilometers per second) and will hit within hours. The CME will have higher total energy and is what will cause fluctuations in the gemmagnetic field, ie. a gemomagnetic storm. "Next day or two" is probably because they didn't know this was a high-speed event yet.

    3. Re:next day or two? by static+int · · Score: 1

      This is the speed that the cloud of hot gas will reach us - not the light

    4. Re:next day or two? by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that it might continue as long as that large sunspot group is directly pointed towards us. I'm not sure if sunspot activity comes in clusters or not, though.

    5. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying we need to climb inside of giant heads of lettuce?

    6. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man you are stupid.

    7. Re:next day or two? by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      Thanks for letting me know!

    8. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you really are stupid, but I know the sun rotates, so you're probably not right. Just wait, I'll get a stupid follow-up too, I'm sure.

    9. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to read the blurb three times before I figured out that the 1/2 speed of light was the protons only and not the CME. It's very poorly worded, or "Man am I stupid."

    10. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just imagine a beowulf cluster of these ... :/

    11. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there are three things. Light which travels at light speed. The protons which are going at 1/2 light speed. The gas cloud who's speed isn't list in the blurb. I'm not sure what your comment means.

    12. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid!

    13. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a corneal mass ejection. It isn't EM waves or energy that is going to hit us but dense piece of charged matter. Hence not being energy it travels realitvly slowly, much much slower then the speed of light. The electrical and magnetic effect come about because he matter that gets ejected is highly highly charged material. Not from the effect traveling to the planet from the sun.

    14. Re:next day or two? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not half the speed of light. The solar wind moves at about a million miles an hour. So about 93 hours . About four days. The satellite detected it farther out so we have less lead time.

    15. Re:next day or two? by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      Pretty much, yes :-)

  20. Northern Lights ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How far south are we going to able to see them ?

    1. Re:Northern Lights ? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      That's what I'd like to know, too, but as far as I can tell no-one knows until it hits us. At which point I can look outside myself and determine if they are visible. :)

      I'm in Northern Mexico just south of San Antonio. I'd really like to see some. They say the great solar storm of 1859 sent the Aurora's down as far as Rome and Hawaii so there's always a chance... but I'm not holding my breath. Well, maybe a little. :)

    2. Re:Northern Lights ? by schon · · Score: 1

      How far south are we going to able to see them ?

      You'll be able to see them in Principal Skinner's kitchen.

      Chalmers: What's that glow coming from your kitchen?
      Skinner: That's just the Aurora Borealis.
      Chalmers: The Aurora Borealis?
      Skinner: Yes.
      Chalmers: The Aurora Borealis, at this time of year, at this time of day, in this part of the country, located entirely within your kitchen?
      Skinner: Yes.
      Chalmers: May I see it?

  21. Re:neither is boxen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I could care less which spelling they use. As long as u understand what's said, for all intensive purposes it doesn't matter.

  22. I don't want to get my brain fried... by fejikso · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll have to take off my tinfoil hat!

    I knew it... sooner or later those evil aliens would find a way to read my mind.

  23. mutants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    watch out for mutate sunomanbitches!

    1. Re:mutants! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really shouldn't post when you're drunk.

  24. Way cool... by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have to just admit the awe I have in watching the SOHO Video... that is just totally amazing. Makes you feel teeny weenie small, doesn't it?

    Forget Iraq, the 2004 Election, the economy...

    And people question our space exploration budget!!! Silly people!

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    1. Re:Way cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Iraq, the 2004 Election, the economy...

      Ha! I knew this was a plot GWB!

      You can't fool me!

    2. Re:Way cool... by sunking2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Insightful how? Chances are that this extremely rare and incredibly powerful event will have absolutely no impact on us here in Earth. The thought of the Sun going bonkers and doing something terrible likely doesn't cause even the experts in the field to lose a winks sleep at night. Compare that to the chances of some fringe terrorist group getting a hold of a nuke or causing some other catastrophy. Where is the money better spent again? But then again, for the [b|m]illions of dollars we could get some really cool screen savers of the Sun.

    3. Re:Way cool... by donutz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Makes you feel teeny weenie small, doesn't it?

      What does the sun have to do with the size of your weiner? you're weird.

    4. Re:Way cool... by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

      you took the words straight outta my mouth.....I feel that way every single time I read up something about the universe/astronomy....just makes our problems/wars etc feel small and insignificant.

      oh well, back to work :(

      --
      An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    5. Re:Way cool... by Quarters · · Score: 2, Funny
      I want a small-office/home-office spacecraft! I didn't even know you could get those!

      (runs off to Staples...)

    6. Re:Way cool... by JHromadka · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have to just admit the awe I have in watching the SOHO Video... that is just totally amazing. Makes you feel teeny weenie small, doesn't it?

      Yeah but it's missing all of the space sounds! What a ripoff! ;)

      --
      "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
    7. Re:Way cool... by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I feel that way every single time I read up something about the universe/astronomy.

      If it makes you feel like that reading about it, imagine what it must feel like to do it yourself. I observed some wonderful sunspots Sunday afternoon. The night before I observed several star clusters, a couple of nebulae, and, for good measure, spent some quality time with Mars. It clouded over before Saturn was high enough for good observation.

      ...laura

    8. Re:Way cool... by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 0, Troll

      I see... you feel spending $86 BILLION on patting down Iraqi's in the Green Zone makes sense. My bad...

      --
      D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    9. Re:Way cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geocentricism is dead. The fact is that we're just scum on a rock revolving around one of the billions of stars in the galaxy, one of trillions in the universe. On this scale, several scum molecules dying isn't important.

    10. Re:Way cool... by Beek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this a troll, but... An event like this did knock out power in Quebec in the past, and could damage all those satellites up there that give us cell phones and stuff like that.

    11. Re:Way cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or we could get the hell off this filthy rock. That would be nice.

  25. The brightness (.Score.:+5 Funny) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ Winbloze sucks! :)

    1. Re:The brightness (.Score.:+5 Funny) by bendude · · Score: 1

      What's the deal with this post, and the ".Score." (as opposed to "Score") - not to mention the Score (+5)?

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  26. Re:neither is boxen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just hate it when my boxen get a infected by viruii!

    And the plural of beeeeeeeeotch is beeeeeeeotchae!

  27. Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just went outside and stared at the sun for ten minutes. I don't see anything.

    1. Re:Ummm by bendude · · Score: 1

      I just went outside and stared at the sun for ten minutes. I don't see anything.

      And you wont for a while.

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  28. Actually by grsiepka · · Score: 1, Redundant

    At our shop, we have dozens of E4000, E4500 Sun servers running with 400mhz processors. From what I'm told, (its sounds stupid as hell but true) some of the 400 mhz processors were not shielded correctly, so on occasions such as this (CME's) we actually had machines panic on us...

    1. Re:Actually by Sedennial · · Score: 1

      So the HG2G "Don't Panic" sticker would be appropriate for your installation then? =)

    2. Re:Actually by isaac · · Score: 2, Informative
      At our shop, we have dozens of E4000, E4500 Sun servers running with 400mhz processors. From what I'm told, (its sounds stupid as hell but true) some of the 400 mhz processors were not shielded correctly, so on occasions such as this (CME's) we actually had machines panic on us...

      Sounds like Sun (the company, not the bright thing that lights up the Big Room) blowing smoke up your ass. There's a cache coherency bug on some 400 MHz UltraSPARC II processors with 8 meg ecache that causes panics. *Maybe* this bug has a slightly higher chance of manifesting itself during a CME, but I doubt it (anything is possible). They denied this problem for a long time until some high-profile clients threw a fit and Sun offered to replace the affected processors. That free replacement program is almost certainly over now; we replaced dozens of these cpus at a previous employer.

      It's Sun's fault, not the sun's fault.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    3. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't a lack of shielding on the specific sun machines with this affliction, it is a lack of ECC on the off-chip L2 cache. Data gets corrupted but the CPU doesn't know it and still tries to use it, eventually kablooey. If you are lucky that is, you might get a whole lot of wrong answers before it finally crashes.

    4. Re:Actually by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1

      It will be the only portion of the hitchhiker's guide that will actually function during the storm, so yes it would be useful when electronics stop working.

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    5. Re:Actually by grsiepka · · Score: 1

      We were one of those high profile clients :)

  29. Knee-Jerk Response: by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Funny

    If we don't stop these constant barrages from the Sun then the terrorists will win!

    1. Re:Knee-Jerk Response: by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Funny

      If we don't stop these constant barrages from the Sun then the terrorists will win!

      The terrorists have already won. It is an X17 solar flare, it's coming our way and there's nothing we can do about it.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    2. Re:Knee-Jerk Response: by dq5+studios · · Score: 1

      Someone go find Bruce Willis!

  30. slashdot become psychic? by rritterson · · Score: 1

    I thought this story was a dupe, but it turns out that this was what I was thinking of.

    For those wondering, the link is a /. story about a huge flare in 1859 that knocked out communications across the northern hemisphere.

    --
    -Ryan
    AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    1. Re:slashdot become psychic? by gnixdep · · Score: 1

      Knocked out communications in 1859, eh?

      I didn't know the Pony Express was vulnerable to cosmic rays.

    2. Re:slashdot become psychic? by protoshoggoth · · Score: 1

      telegraphs

  31. The World Is going to end! by HillBilly · · Score: 1

    Why is the meadia scare mongering is making lots of people feel they should be hiding in underground bunkers.

    --
    "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    1. Re:The World Is going to end! by Donwulff · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.spaceweather.com lets us know "DON'T PANIC: Some rumors spreading across the internet claim that the ongoing solar storm could wreak terrible havoc on Earth. Not so. There is a slim chance of power blackouts and communication outages, but the main side effect of this solar activity will be harmless and beautiful auroras."

      However, all the predictions currently are that this event has the potential of causing a K-inded 9 geomagnetic storm (G5). NOAA's classification of G5 effects is:

      Power systems: : widespread voltage control problems and protective system problems can occur, some grid systems may experience complete collapse or blackouts. Transformers may experience damage.

      Spacecraft operations: may experience extensive surface charging, problems with orientation, uplink/downlink and tracking satellites.

      Other systems: pipeline currents can reach hundreds of amps, HF (high frequency) radio propagation may be impossible in many areas for one to two days, satellite navigation may be degraded for days, low-frequency radio navigation can be out for hours, and aurora has been seen as low as Florida and southern Texas (typically 40 geomagnetic lat.)**.

      In addition, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
      Astrophysics has issued a press-release warning that "In California, where raging wildfires have damaged many microwave communication antennas on the ground, satellite communications have been crucial to emergency efforts. Emergency personnel should be prepared for potential disruptions and communication interference."

      All of this, however, is somethign that MAY happen, while it likely won't. A lot of factors about the nature of the event and the situation in the interplanetary space between Sun and Earth affect how it'll turn out. But there's still a lot of potential for this one.

    2. Re:The World Is going to end! by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Heh...the final frame of those .mpgs look mighty scary, like the sun is ready to blow apart...

      But I think people are pretty blsae about power and communication grid issues, as long as they're resolvable once this blows over. I think people are jittery about "extinction level event" kinda stuff...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  32. X17 by October_30th · · Score: 1
    X17?

    I thought the classificatons ran only up to 9.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:X17 by Sedennial · · Score: 1

      No, they run up to X-10. Haven't you seen all the pop-unders about it? You can fry in the radiation and secretly watch your neighbor at the same time!

    2. Re:X17 by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 4, Informative

      This list is based in part on "Large Solar Flares Since 1976" compiled by IPS Radio & Space Services.

      Ranking Day/Month/Year X-Ray Class

      1 02/04/01 X20.0
      1 16/08/89 X20.0
      2 28/10/03 X17.2
      3 06/03/89 X15.0
      3 11/07/78 X15.0
      4 15/04/01 X14.4
      5 24/04/84 X13.0
      5 19/10/89 X13.0
      etc.. etc..
      "


      I would have suggested classifications go to 11, but clearly they go much higher...

    3. Re:X17 by CelloJake · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but my X scale goes to 11!

      -Jacob

    4. Re:X17 by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

      1 02/04/01 X20.0
      ...


      Did these guys sleep through Y2K? Is that 1901 or 2001?

    5. Re:X17 by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I thought the classificatons ran only up to 9.

      No, these go to 11... :)

    6. Re:X17 by FlexAgain · · Score: 1

      RoundSparrow (341175) said:

      1 02/04/01 X20.0 ...

      Did these guys sleep through Y2K? Is that 1901 or 2001?


      There was a hint in the quoted documents title "Large Solar Flares Since 1976".

      --
      Actually it is rocket science...
    7. Re:X17 by mrami · · Score: 1

      17 is less than 9 for really small values of 17

    8. Re:X17 by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

      Since the data came from a report titled Large Solar Flares Since 1976 one might make the logical leap that it is 2001.

      Funny like that...when you read the data.

  33. Can't post now, by Trigun · · Score: 1

    Gotta go tan. Look for something witty when I recover from my sunburn.

  34. No Kyoto by FrankDrebin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank god we've got all that extra CO2 in the atmosphere to protect us!

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
    1. Re:No Kyoto by KD5YPT · · Score: 0

      Just to let you know, CO2 won't help you, its the O3 that will.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:No Kyoto by juhaz · · Score: 1

      O3 absorbs UV (amount of which is not in any way increased by solar flares) so it won't help you any more than CO2 does. Both are good at blocking large particles like protons, both are rather lousy at blocking very high-energy photons like gamma, and neither will do ANYTHING at all against magnetic fields that are the cause of major problems.

      Just to let you know.

  35. Plasma by the ton? by GMontag · · Score: 1

    So, this supports the previous story! Bravo SlashDot!

  36. Patent Payback by ifreakshow · · Score: 1

    We should have let X10 keep there pop unders with out charging them the fee for patent infringement. Now there mad and have launched there improved X17 plasma at us!

  37. Check out the end of the CME mpg by southpolesammy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That blast on the last few frames of the CME mpg file is the CME that occured earlier today. The end of the movie looks like someone polka-dotted the screen, but from the NOAA's website, that's actually the high-charged protons from the CME hitting the camera's lens. This is one whopper of a storm.

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    1. Re:Check out the end of the CME mpg by OverlordQ · · Score: 1
      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Check out the end of the CME mpg by gumpish · · Score: 1

      The end of the movie looks like someone polka-dotted the screen, but from the NOAA's website, that's actually the high-charged protons from the CME hitting the camera's lens.


      Don't be fooled, that's the MPAA's anti-piracy measure.
    3. Re:Check out the end of the CME mpg by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      This is one whopper of a storm.

      Seeing as how the flare originated from a section of the Sun's surface several thousand Earth-diameters wide, I'm inclined to agree.

  38. This means WAR! by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Since the beginning of time, mankind has dreamed of striking out at the Sun!"

    This unprovoked attack on the planet Earth cannot be allowed to go unpunished! I say we take a page from the Israelis and build an orbital wall that will prevent any further such incursions in the future!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I would! My neighbor has it coming! I'd open the gate in the wall!

    2. Re:This means WAR! by SlayerofGods · · Score: 0

      Bah, a wall is neither strinking back nor punishment for the sun.
      We need action!!

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    3. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This unprovoked attack on the planet Earth cannot be allowed to go unpunished! I say we take a page from the Israelis and build an orbital wall that will prevent any further such incursions in the future!

      Or we could take a page from the palestineans and throw rocks at the sun!!!

    4. Re:This means WAR! by wass · · Score: 1
      I say we take a page from the Israelis

      That's right, it's not like the Chinese, or any other civilization, ever built a wall...

      --

      make world, not war

    5. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how all of the anti-Semite slashdotters will use any lame and stupid excuse as an avenue to vent their hatred. Grow up.

    6. Re:This means WAR! by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Might sound like a joke, but we might eventualy do just that. It's been theorized that eventualy some civilizations may build giant shperes around their suns in order to tap it's solar energy.

      --
      stuff
    7. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1
      I say we take a page from the Israelis
      That's right, it's not like the Chinese, or any other civilization, ever built a wall...
      Yeah, but like the Israeli wall, a wall to block out the sun would be a stupid idea that the sane world would be opposed to.
    8. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I love how you use any lame excuse to try to discredit any critism of the Israeli government by labeling the critic as anti-semitic. Which really only demonstrates your own ignorance. Here's a clue for free: Palestinians are Semites. So your perjorative labeling doesn't work. Why don't you complain by calling the parent what he really is: "anti-stupid-israeli-land-grab"?

    9. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that America has friends and enemies in the world. On 9/11 Israel morned. The Palestinians, on the other hand, were rejoicing in the streets and handing out free candy to children. These are the same people that the Isreali government is trying to protect it's citizens from. If you think that Isreal's citizens should not be protected and should instead be blown up by terrorists, then yes you are indeed anti-semitic. And I don't care if Palestinians are considered Semites too, you know *exactly* what I meant. Strong countries stand up for their friends and stand up to their enemies, period.

    10. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The Palestinians, on the other hand, were rejoicing in the streets and handing out free candy to children.

      Within a week of that footage being shown on TV it was discredited as being old stock footage from months and months before 9/11. Get with the times!

    11. Re:This means WAR! by alex_ant · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The Palestinians, on the other hand, were rejoicing in the streets and handing out free candy to children.

      "They" were? All of them, right? What you see on TV is all there is to know, right? Talk about racists......

    12. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new plasma-spewing overlords.

    13. Re:This means WAR! by MrIcee · · Score: 1
      Or we could take a page from the palestineans and throw rocks at the sun!!!

      Apparently you don't know about our little training camp out jupiter way... we manufaturer asteroids. A big rock with a little shove (or a little rock with a big shove, think david and golith) can do much damage.

      Aloha from this palestinian

    14. Re:This means WAR! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And I don't care if Palestinians are considered Semites too, you know *exactly* what I meant.

      Yes, what you meant was "I have a lot of strongly held opinions on a subject that not only am I so startlingly fucking ignorant about that I can't keep straight who belongs to what group, I am also such an asshat that I can't be bothered to care".

      Don't worry. Your message is coming through loud and clear, bud.

      Strong countries stand up for their friends and stand up to their enemies, period.

      ", period." is one of my favorite English expressions, since what it almost always means is "the preceding was a bunch of made-up tripe that I want you to accept without argument like I did". That's the kind of handy information I wish more people would include in their ignorance-inspired diatribes.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    15. Re:This means WAR! by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      There are no earthlings infidels attacking the Sun. Never !

      My feelings - as usual - we will burn them all out.

      Solar flames will roast their stomachs in hell.

      Be assured. The Sun is safe, protected.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    16. Re:This means WAR! by EvilLile · · Score: 1

      I say we take a page from the Israelis and build an orbital wall that will prevent any further such incursions in the future!

      We have one, it's call the atmosphere.

    17. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof? Oh shit... We don't need that...

    18. Re:This means WAR! by shroom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or maybe not. [snopes.com]

      There is no .sig, there is only ZUUL

    19. Re:This means WAR! by jerde · · Score: 1

      Here's a clue for free: Palestinians are Semites

      Oooh! Free clues being given out! Sign me up! Just make the clues accurate, please:

      Anti-semitism is an English word that means:

      1. Hostility toward or prejudice against Jews or Judaism. 2. Discrimination against Jews.

      Words' meanings aren't always derived from a literal interpretation of their parts.

      That said, I completely agree with your point that unfounded accusations of anti-semitism are terribly inappropriate. One can disagree with, nay even hate the government of Israel without harboring any anti-semitism at all.

      (Likewise, one should be able to hate the current administration of the US without being labeled anti-patriotic or an "evildoer" there.)

      Of course, that's no fun -- it's much easier just to box people into little labels.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    20. Re:This means WAR! by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 1

      Given you said "get with the times", rather than "get a clue" one could almost forgive the awful combination of hubris and ignorance you displayed. Almost.

      As pointed out by a previous poster, the footage shot of Palestinians cheering was not 'old stock footage', and it was not an isolated incident.

      From the Committe to Protect Journalists (http://www.cpj.org/), an excerpt:

      "In the aftermath of September 11, Palestinian security forces prevented several journalists from covering celebrations among Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus of the attacks on the United States. In one well-publicized incident, a PNA official told an Associated Press (AP) cameraman that his safety could not be guaranteed if footage of the rallies was aired. Fearing for the cameraman's safety, AP elected not to broadcast the images."

      Entire link is here:
      http://www.cpj.org/attacks01/mideast01/PAT. html

    21. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      planetunreal.com

      works for me at least.

      PS. Checking to make sure the link was good found some UT2k3 porn. bonus.

    22. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if you would consider the 'sane world' so sane if your county was being blown up regularly and noone showed much sympathy and said that to protect against it was stupid.

    23. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0WNED!

    24. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While they were celebrating, Israel were happily knocking down Paslintines houses and stealing more land while the world was busy looking at something else.

      Strange how people missed that.

    25. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, are you referring to Palestinians here? Seems to me they get blown up a lot. And they don't seem to get much sympathy.

      Is it somehow more ethical for a government to blow up people than for an extremist group?

    26. Re:This means WAR! by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      *ionosphere ;-)

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    27. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if I were getting attacked by apache helicopters which take out 3 homes and 12 children in order to kill one Hamas member, I wouldn't feel so bad about suicide bombing israel either.

      Both countries are acting like children, and Daddy USA needs to step in and lay down the law, and stop financing Israel.

    28. Re:This means WAR! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Daddy USA needs to step in and lay down the law

      Woah, boy. I'm usually all for the Evil American Empire (that's only slight sarcasm, BTW), but that's a pretty bad idea. That's one thing we DON'T need to do, as no matter what happens, a large part of the world will blame us for anything. There would have to be compromises and neither side is willing to do that. Then everyone will hate us for "taking the other side." I say we wait until one side is eradicated, then we blame the other side & punish them into oblivion. Both sides are ultimately punushed.

    29. Re:This means WAR! by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      My plan makes muslims happy because, currently, Israel has an artificial but certain upper hand (several billion $ from US, superior military, withholding palestinians' money). Israel, for a "developed" country, is severely over-doing it in their retaliations, not caring about civilian casualties and attacking residential areas. Palestinian fighters are no better; putting their loved ones in harms way by operating out of their private homes, etc. But someone needs to step up and do something.

      If the US goes in now and yells Halt, the muslims will appreciate it, because palestine currently is in a lousy position, and we have historically been very biased towards israel in these matters. And the US can use all the muslim support we can get these days.

  39. You mean... by BlackGriffen · · Score: 1

    "Movies from the SOHO spacecraft show the flare in UV and the associated coronal mass ejection in visible light as they happened, "

    You meant about 8 minutes after they happened, right? Or did the government finally unveil their partnership with the space aliens on faster than light communication? *pulls tin foil hat down over ears*

    BG

  40. Check your servers.... by grsiepka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We have probably 30-40 different Sun servers at our shop that actually are affected by this. I guess (it sounds stupid as hell but its true) certain models of Sun's 400 mhz processors (used in anything from Ultra 10's to E4500's) were not shielded properly and actually can panic when substantial CME's like this occur.

    1. Re:Check your servers.... by Unregistered · · Score: 4, Funny

      Headline: SUN BRINGS DOWN SUNS

      damn lamenss filter.

    2. Re:Check your servers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet irony that these CPU's were made by Sun, no?

    3. Re:Check your servers.... by jerde · · Score: 1

      were not shielded properly and actually can panic when substantial CME's like this occur.

      Not unless you're flying those servers on high-altitude aircraft or in orbit.

      High energy solar radiation is well absorbed by our atmosphere here on Earth. This is why many of our solar observations must be taken from space. We and our computers are quite safe.

      The only terrestrial effects from CMEs and the like come about because of perturbations to our magnetic field -- a change to the magnetic field can induce currents in power lines, overloading equipment connected to them.

      Your random computer crashes are a complete coincidence.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    4. Re:Check your servers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a change to the magnetic field can induce currents in power lines

      And circuit traces in inadequately protected computer equipment.

      Your random computer crashes are a complete coincidence.

      WRONG!

    5. Re:Check your servers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And circuit traces in inadequately protected computer equipment

      [giggle]

      You have to have conductors that are on the order of tens to hundreds of miles to get appreciable induced currents.

      The magnetic fields involved here are very very weak. They're just very very LARGE (in size, not strength).

      I stand by my statement that computers on earth just are not susceptible to geomagnetic storms.

      - Peter

  41. You arent supposed to stare at the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but sometimes i just cant help it, this one time i took a pair of binoculars and stared at it for over an hour

    1. Re:You arent supposed to stare at the sun by Disco+Stew · · Score: 1

      Now we all know the moon isn't made of green cheese.

      --
  42. That's harming the ozone!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to write my congresman right now, so that he can enact legislation (enforcable worldwide) to preclude the sun from spewing such trash throughout the solar system and ruining the environment. This is much greater than any SUV can produce and so we must stop the greatest offenders! This lack of responsible behavior must stop!

  43. Is it just me? by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    Is it getting warmer in here, or is it just me?

    1. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, it's probably just a brush fire.

  44. But more importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...does it run Linux? ;-)

    1. Re:But more importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solaris, I think.

    2. Re:But more importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it would be Sun Microsystems SunOS. Duh...

    3. Re:But more importantly... by YOU+ARE+SO+SUED! · · Score: 1

      Think, for a minute, what "Solaris" might actually mean.

  45. Yah! by Bombcar · · Score: 1

    This is just what California needs! And we thought the fires couldn't get any worse.....

    In other news today, California requested 3000 Intergalactic Firemen.....

  46. Taco Bell strikes again by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Funny

    I told the sun last night that those eight beef soft taco supremes were a bad idea. But did he listen to me? NOOOooooo.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Taco Bell strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to the suns enormous size, the real number of tacos consumed by it would have probably been alot closer to 800,000, rather than eight.

    2. Re:Taco Bell strikes again by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Oh, they were giant tacoes.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  47. Tin foil hat! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    And people told me my tin-foil hat wouldn't come in useful!

    1. Re:Tin foil hat! by KD5YPT · · Score: 0

      Actually, it won't be useful. For one, the Earth own magnetic field deflects the CME towards the poles. If the plasma particles manage to get pass Earth's magnetic field, it will get through a tin foil hat with no problem. Of course, if that happened, you won't have to worry about people telling you that your tin-foil hat won't work.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:Tin foil hat! by Technician · · Score: 1

      Due to the high currents in the atmosphere, I would recommend grounding the tin foil hat. It would be a great charge collector and could fry your brain. Remember the solar storm of aprox 1859? It had induced so much current on telegraph wires it started several small fires. Wouldn't want the same fate for your head now would we?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Tin foil hat! by darien · · Score: 1

      Remember the solar storm of aprox 1859?

      If you do, these people would love to hear from you.

  48. What happened.. by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

    What happened to the sunstorm from last week? space.com said it was a level 3 (out of 5) and we'd experience 12-18 hours of sporadic communication problems.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    1. Re:What happened.. by Mryll · · Score: 1

      We had some power anomalies at our office in Denver...

  49. What me worry? by nizo · · Score: 1
    The explosion sent over 2 billion tons of material hurtling across the solar system toward Earth.

    Am I the only one worried that this sounds like one big pile of something that could whack into Earth? Or is it just a bazillion tiny particles that add up to 2 billion tons?

    1. Re:What me worry? by KD5YPT · · Score: 0

      It's not even tiny particles, its ionized atoms (that totalled 2 billion tons) flying towards us.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:What me worry? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      It's too diaphanous to cause physical collision problems.

  50. Maybe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sun is probably gonna explode. That would explain the sudden overtly visible urge to get rich quick (by some factions on this Earth), and the lack of interest towards fixing global warming.

  51. No need to worry... by Canuckanuck · · Score: 1

    It's just The Hindmost adjusting our orbit from the control center hidden in Mars. Soon those bussard ramjets are going to be glowing with plasma as the push us back on course.

    Oh, and a couple million inhabitants will die in the process, but that's just collateral damage.

    1. Re:No need to worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, Niven.

      And you, I presume, would be Gil "The Arm" Hamilton? Or are you a Protector?

      Perhaps we should get ready for an invasion of parachuting baby elephants....

    2. Re:No need to worry... by kps · · Score: 1

      Niven, Inconstant Moon. Thoroughly on topic.

    3. Re:No need to worry... by Canuckanuck · · Score: 1

      Gil Hamilton?

      I'm 2/3 the way through Ringworld Throne! Are you trying to spoil it for me!?!

  52. 69 comments... by Squeebee · · Score: 1
    And nobody has quipped up about harnessing the plasma to make their own TV?

    I'm disappointed.

    1. Re:69 comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'm gonna harness the plasma to make my own TV.

      Are you still disappointed?

  53. Is the book Decipher true? by cdporter00 · · Score: 1

    If we start finding a bunch of Carbon 64 all over the world and it's resonating with these solar flares, we're in deep doodoo...

  54. X11 pop under solar flare cameras by pio!pio! · · Score: 0

    that's the first thing I thought

  55. "coronal mass ejection" by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

    Someone bring a towel

    DJCC

  56. My fair share by didjit · · Score: 1

    I just want 42" of it.

  57. "Got reading comprehension?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You must be a liberal.

    He was implying that Bush is an industrialist-Nazi.

    moron.

  58. "It's coming right for us!" *WHOOSH* "Kick Ass!" by n9fzx · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Note that as an X17, this flare is 10x the size of last week's little girly man X6 (log scale). And, unlike the X20 of two years ago, we're directly in its path. So, the resulting aurora should be on par with the 1989 event.

    Batten down those scintillation counters! Unhook the HF radios!

    --
    ...-.-
  59. SOHO sent a spacecraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SOHO London? Cool place, but I didn't think they had the resources to send their own spacecraft.
    I did get hit on by a lot of guys, though. Which was kind of wierd since I'm a guy.

  60. Flares effecting local radio and TV by contrabassoon · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may notice Radio TV, and even cell phones will be effected (briefly) by this storm. I am on a Broadcast Engineer's mailing list and there have been sporadic reports of problems in the last few days.

    The engineer at WBRC reported a rash of viewer calls in the past few days about reception problems including a call from a distant (100 miles) cable system with 4 separate headends, each exhibiting the same poor signal for minutes at a time then clears up.

    Also, NOAA describes the geomagnetic affects on radio blackouts as "severe" in the last 24 hours . http://www.sec.noaa.gov/SWN/
    Are any of you having similar listener/viewer complaints?

    1. Re:Flares effecting local radio and TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are any of you having similar listener/viewer complaints?

      Nope, slashdot is coming in crystal clear for me...

    2. Re:Flares effecting local radio and TV by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      My cable tv and cable internet have been up and down several times today, but that's more likely the fault of incompetance at my local cable company.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    3. Re:Flares effecting local radio and TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flares effecting TV? You mean the flares are broadcasting shows to us? Are they trying to tell us something? Or are they just causing extra broadcasts?

      Maybe you mean they are affecting the situation.

  61. While some might want to cast aspersions on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...NASA. I believe the power failures we've experienced world wide were not caused by a lightning strikes, terrorists or simple system failure. I believe they were caused by various events that are harbingers of the approach of Planet X. I believe that the failure in the northeastern United State in August was caused by a chunk of cometary material or a meteorite that hit the grid in Canada. The failures in Europe (Italy and Switzerland) and the UK were caused by electrmagnetic disturbances brought about by the gravitations effects of Planet X on the planet Earth and the Sun. I also believe the the two meteorites that hit in India last month are further evidence of Planet X's arrival. All of these events are just a small sampling of what is coming when Planet X arrives. It will rain oil and fire and water over the entire earth. Everything that depends on electricity will cease. Screw Bush, the Taliban or Saddam. It's not going to matter after Planet X is does it's work. Just search with Google for Planet X and the Niburu and you will find tons of info that the government and the ruling class don't want you to know. This event is just further proof. The solar flares with that volume of material can only occur because the of the massive pull of a large body in space... namely Planet X. Some of us will survive, I hope to see everyone on the other side once this is done.

    1. Re:While some might want to cast aspersions on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh come on! Will someone do something and cut it with this paranoid "Planet X' bullshit. NASA has clearly disproved the so-called "theories" of such "luminaries" as Nancy Lieder and Zecharia Sitchin again and again. It's not even funny anymore. You hacks with your "Planet X is coming" doom and gloom posts are no longer funny. The real truth is that there's nothing coming. Period. No conspiracy. Nobody got murdered in any coverups. Nothing. Just give it a rest already! Please!

    2. Re:While some might want to cast aspersions on... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      I've seen a few of the trolls post stuff from time to time about the whole planet X thing. It's interesting because while there are many reasons NOT to believe it, there are just as many to believe it. Come to think of it, the only reasons not to believe it are all derived from NASA's silence on the matter. But if you are a conspiracy nut, silence says a lot more than not. I suppose the only thing that's called for here is blind faith.

    3. Re:While some might want to cast aspersions on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Good troll. Fact is, the only evidence for Planet X is woman who claims to be a medium for aliens, and all the other "evidence" I've seen has been reflections on camera lenses and black spots caused by overloaded CCDs. http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t= 4708

    4. Re:While some might want to cast aspersions on... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Pretty good resource there. I've never found that in all two times I've looked up any Planet X info. Thanks. That clarifies things greatly.

  62. What about the ISS? by Wetware · · Score: 1

    How does this affect inhabitants of the ISS?

    1. Re:What about the ISS? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1, Informative

      ISS is moderatedly shielded for this kind of thing. And they are close enough to earth that the earth magnetic field will stop or dampen the CME enough for the ISS's shielding to work. If not, we would have a lot of dead/mutated/sterile astronauts long before now.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:What about the ISS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their entire 6 week supply of microwave popcorn will simultaneously be popped. The pop-pop-popping of the kernals will make them deaf.

    3. Re:What about the ISS? by SlayerofGods · · Score: 0

      Or it would create some sort of super mutant astronaut.....

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    4. Re:What about the ISS? by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

      This solare flare article on Space.Com has some interesting info on how the ISS caretaker crew will deal with this.

    5. Re:What about the ISS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be soooo coool
      Maybe they could merge together and get multiple eyes and turn into some cool space spider with human emotions and legs
      Watch it on FOX-TV

    6. Re:What about the ISS? by bendude · · Score: 1

      I for one....

      Naaa, forget it. I'd hate to get modded down again.

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  63. No, no, no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blame SUV's! Also at fault are Big Oil, Big Tobacco, and George Bush.

    No, no, no!

    It's all the fault of the GPL. If you don't believe me, just ask SCO!

  64. Philip Taylor Kramer died for your sins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    SEE?!

    He was right!

    They really did kill OJ!

    The Earth is going to be destroyed when the Sun goes NOVA, soon!

  65. Global Warming effected? by sailboatfool · · Score: 0

    Mars has polar ice caps that are melting.
    Recently we see articles in the media talking about glaciers melting in Chili. I never this mentioned w/respect to the sun going thru a period of increased activity. Which it does every 11 years. Are they connected? I think so. A very small increase in energy output by the sun has an effect on Earth (and Mars!). But Global Warming advocates never seem to realise this.

    --
    He is the best sailor who can steer within fewest points of the wind, and exact a motive power out of the greatest obsta
  66. This is old hat, just ask my mum! by tinrib · · Score: 1

    My mum told me about this a day or two ago - I can't believe she beat slashdot to a story! WAY TO GO MUM!

    1. Re:This is old hat, just ask my mum! by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      This flare happened today. She was likely referring to the much weaker one from last week.

    2. Re:This is old hat, just ask my mum! by tinrib · · Score: 1

      yes but she told me it was going to happen. (not that it HAD happened).

    3. Re:This is old hat, just ask my mum! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misunderstood her.. she was talking about my huge orgasm of jizz that I launched into her gaping pussy earlier today.

      We had made plans in advance, that is why she mentioned it a few days ago.

      by the way, your moms snatch smells nasty, she needs to douche

  67. Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it was already fried

    1. Re:Too Late by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      No, merely lightly steamed with a touch of grilled onions with a side of Asparagus. But that's healthy. Frying is not. All that fat? Really.

      He has to think of his health.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  68. Re Sounds like a Sun bug by public_class_name_ex · · Score: 1


    X11 popup under Solaris plasma displays?

  69. New pet theory: by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Ok, here's my new pet theory, stop me if you've heard it. It wasn't an astroid that knocked out the dinosaurs, it was a severe period of solar storms.

    Interesting, non?

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:New pet theory: by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you could find an explanation for why severe solar storms would cause a very fine layer of iridium at the K-T boundary. [Ok, I know it was a joke: THE END IS NEAR and all that, but what can I say, I'm a born pedant.]

  70. Get yer hot solar Magnetograms here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're interested in looking at the offending sunspots in question here they are...

  71. 2 billion tons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that the story is incorrect and, while the sun has indeed ejected 2 billion tons of matter, only a small proportion of it is headed _towards this planet_ and the rest of which will pass by, tens of thousands of miles or more away from us ?

    Journalists. Bah.
    Slashdot Editors. Bah Bah.

  72. REPENT, FOR THE END IS NEAR!!!!!! by doublem · · Score: 1

    The solar flares will burn all life from the Eart-

    What? You mean they already hit us and nothing happened?

    Never mind.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  73. Frequency Reality? by SkiddyRowe · · Score: 0

    Does this mean I get to talk to my father, over an old ham radio?

  74. Another big solar flare in the past couple years by suso · · Score: 1

    Check out the one that happened on July 14th, 2000:
    here

  75. This is the kind of stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Peter-head de Jaeger should be warning about and not that Abundance-crap or Y2K.

  76. Nitpicking is cool, but by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    that was the moment the space-time cone of the event touched earth, so if you are a local observer, this expression isnt wrong per se.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  77. Better simpsons quote by SlayerofGods · · Score: 0

    Astronomers from Tacoma to Vladivostok have just reported an ionic disturbance in the vicinity of the Van Allen Belt. Scientists are recommending that necessary precautions be taken

    --

    Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    1. Re:Better simpsons quote by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Yes your right that would have been far better, and i would not have had to deal with brain dead trolls calling me names ;)

      --
  78. Finally... by still+cynical · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...that tinfoil lining will come in handy.

    --
    Ignorance is the root of all evil.
  79. The last of these warnings... by BDew · · Score: 4, Informative

    Due to a fight on Capitol Hill, NOAA's Space Environment Center (which tracks these events and other 'space weather' items) will not have any funding in 2004. The part of Congress that oversees NOAA does not think NOAA should have to pay for this, and has decided to cancel its funding in hopes that they can force NASA or the Air Force to pick up the tab.

    There is a hearing on the situation on Thursday the 30th.
    http://www.house.gov/science/press/108/108- 128.htm

    --
    "Fifty million Americans can't be wrong," said Rep. Billy Tauzin. Gore - 50,999,897 Bush - 50,456,002
    1. Re:The last of these warnings... by Linux_ho · · Score: 1

      Due to a fight on Capitol Hill, NOAA's Space Environment Center (which tracks these events and other 'space weather' items) will not have any funding in 2004. The part of Congress that oversees NOAA does not think NOAA should have to pay for this, and has decided to cancel its funding in hopes that they can force NASA or the Air Force to pick up the tab.

      Actually, the Space Environment Center knew its funding was on the line, which is why they sent an antimatter containment pod into the sun last week, triggering these flares, hoping to cause a massive power crisis and ensure their funding. Not that you'll hear about this in the Liberal Media. And don't forget to wear your tinfoil.

      --
      include $sig;
      1;
  80. Re:A slashdot poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Pffft.

    2) Yawn.

    3) Been there, done that.

    4) All day every day.

    5) My hole's twice as big.

    6) The term is "slashdot janitor", thank you very much. I've had this job for quite a while now.

    - Michael Sims
    michael@slashdot.org

  81. X10 is exacting its revenge by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 5, Funny

    The mighty and powerful X10 Corporation is now exacting its revenge upon its enemies! No popunders, you say? Fine! They have now upgraded from X10 to X17, and instead of simply displaying popunder windows they will now bombard the Earth with fireballs!

    (...and the followers of Mammon shall tremble.)

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  82. Extraterrestrial terrorists! by donutz · · Score: 1

    Director James Kennedy has announced that the coronal mass ejection is the work of extraterrestrial terrorists! Run for your lives!

  83. Sun's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's official

  84. What warming effect does this by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    have on the earth and how rapid a rise would we see if it does effect us? Seems like last weekend got hotter then usual her in N.Cal. and I remember somewhere reading the sunspots while dark had a much higher temperature then the rest of the surface of the sun?

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  85. energy crisis my ass! by VAXGeek · · Score: 1

    why bother fighting over oil when there is so much free plasma to be had? 2 billion tons of plasma is enough power for 500,000 people.

    --
    this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
  86. Effect on humas by semanticgap · · Score: 1

    This may be purely coincidental, but I see myself and others around me acting much wackier than normal since friday. Included are a couple of meetings that just were completely bizzare because we couldn't focus on the subject, a strange car accident in the parking lot where an SUV drove over three other cars for whatever reason...

    Anyone else notice an elevated wackiness level?

    1. Re:Effect on humas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it just affect humas, or will baba ganoosh be affected as well?

  87. And as usual... by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's cloudy and rainy in Vancouver. :-(

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:And as usual... by gobbo · · Score: 1

      I remember '89 in Vancouver... The aurora appeared to be directly overhead, like looking up into curtains, and in full colour array, reds, whites, shades of blue and green and various indescribables. Quite awe-inspiring, we crawled out on the roof and lay there drug-free but tripping.

    2. Re:And as usual... by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      We're under a massive blanket of clouds here in Toronto too.

      It makes me sad, as I haven't seen a proper aurora since I was 7 years old...

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    3. Re:And as usual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sniff*
      I want to see the aurora.
      *sniff*

  88. Considering the magnitude of this storm... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Imagine what would happen if it hit a Beowulf Cluster?!

    See that Mr Anderson, that is the writing of the inevitable Beowulf cluster joke.

    I for one welcome the invention of foil wrap by our aluminium overlords.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  89. Obligatory by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Informative

    torrent link since the movies were getting a bit sluggish :)

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might want to fix your MIME type to be application/x-bittorrent for .torrent files - the link openned up as text for me...

  90. What W said when told of the solar flares... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    We will not be scared of these "solar evil-doers." The Sun is part of an "axis of stellar evil" that we must stamp out. We will make no distinction between solar flares, and the stars that sponsor these flares. Our nation will launch a campaign to stamp out all stellar terrorism in our galaxy. These nukyular furnaces of fear will no longer terrorize our nation, or Texas. Anybody wanna peanut?

    1. Re:What W said when told of the solar flares... by bendude · · Score: 1

      You're either with us or the solar-evil-doers!

      I'm allergic to peanuts - got any pretzels?

      http://pretzel_lib_front.tripod.com/ - hey why can't I include underscores in my links?

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  91. how to prepare by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Duck...and COVER!

    alternate plan:

    Turn off your cellphone, place your hands behind your head, put your head between your knees, and kiss your data communications goodbye. For a little while. And don't forget to stare at the pretty Northern Lights tonight! (hopefully)

  92. Damn space exploration budget cuts... by sholden · · Score: 1

    We need to be sending people to Titan to study those damn machines. We can't let the "Others" destroy us as well...

  93. Simpsons quotes for all occations! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    "Since the dawn of time, Man has yearned to destroy the Sun."
    - Montgomery Burns

    Now you know why. Stupid Sun.

    1. Re:Simpsons quotes for all occations! by elemental23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Moe: Let's go burn down the observatory so this will never happen again!

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  94. TCP/IP by Carrier Pigeons adversely affected! by Donwulff · · Score: 1

    http://solar-center.stanford.edu/solar-weather/pig eons.html

    That does it. We're back to stone age.

  95. Idolator! by lysium · · Score: 1, Funny
    Helios takes offense at your heathen blashpheming. Cease immediately!
    (Fortunately for you Ra is not paying attention, or he would certainly mod you down).

    =========

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:Idolator! by xao+gypsie · · Score: 2, Funny

      ra?? ptah...i do not heed him...(he he he)

      xao

      --


      xao
      http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
  96. Millions and Billions... by Ichijo · · Score: 1
    ...2 billion tons of material...
    How much is that in elephants?
    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Millions and Billions... by slappyjack · · Score: 1

      More that you want to have to scoop the shit for, that how many.

      Say the average elephant weighs 5 tons. (yes/no?)
      Thats about 400 million elephants.
      Thats a lot of shit.

  97. And Grandma say's by Yanray · · Score: 1

    "Must be that damn ozone layer/ greenhouse gas again."

    --
    --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
    DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
  98. Just in time to keep us toasty warm for winter by dtjohnson · · Score: 0

    Okay, for those of us in the northern hemisphere, anyway. You southern hemisphere people...well, too bad.

  99. Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those videos are amazing! It's a shame they didn't record the sound though. We all now stuff like the goes WHOOOOOSH :)

  100. The real question is by Gauchito · · Score: 1

    Is anyone geek enough to see how the Enterprise fares through this storm?

  101. Is anyone experiencing problems with cell phones? by isoga · · Score: 0

    ...not working properly?

  102. There's a face by VorpalHamster · · Score: 1

    There's a face in that sunspot! Doesn't look like Christ or the Virgin Mary. Looks kinda like T.S. Elliot. Hmmmm

    --
    If you're telekinetic raise my hand.
  103. Quick Find Me A Hot Redhead!!! by greymond · · Score: 1

    We need to get a hot red head to stand in the middle of a circle half naked and stare up at the sun before it moves and decides it wants to crash into the earth!!!!

    1. Re:Quick Find Me A Hot Redhead!!! by handorf · · Score: 1

      I was with you right up to the part after "Hot Redhead". Although I think she should instead go to dinner with me... that will clearly have more effect.

      OK, I miss the reference... what is it?

      --
      -- IANAEG - I am not an elder god.
    2. Re:Quick Find Me A Hot Redhead!!! by NoDoZ · · Score: 1

      yea, I missed it too. I had to reread it a couple times, thinking that I just read it too fast and missed something.

    3. Re:Quick Find Me A Hot Redhead!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's talking about The Fifth Element.. (although I thought it was a square, not a circle.)

      mmm.. Milla Jovovitch.. yummy.

    4. Re:Quick Find Me A Hot Redhead!!! by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      That's from [The Fifth Element] you copycat!

      Lilo (Leeloo) your half naked redhat (redhead) that stands in the circle with Bruce Willis in the end to prevent armageddon.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  104. Do the math: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    150,000,000 kilometers from sun to earth, approx

    CME moving at 2125km/second according to post #7331999

    (150,000,000km)(1second/2125km)(1min/60second)(1 hr /60min)= 20 hrs.

    Event occurred at 6 AM EST 10/28/2003, so that puts the arrival of the cloud of doom at 2 AM EST 10/29/2003, according to my rudimentary estimations.

    The claim made in #731999 is "Preferred Predicted Impact Time: 08:00 UTC, 29 October 2003 (3 am EST on 29 October)"

    Looks right to me, since there's really only one significant figure in my estimate anyway.

    1. Re:Do the math: by Donwulff · · Score: 1

      Altough, there's now talk that the CME impact speed might be 1600km/s instead. It's hard to tell, since many of the major instruments on satellites used to measure the event were overwhelmed or shut down to protect them from the high-energy proton event.

  105. Monty Burns.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that you? I knew you were out there somewhere.... Smithers

  106. Re:neither is boxen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thatz c0z u r /\ suX0r and I R l33t

  107. Aurora watching by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to hunt down some local space-watcher's group in the Boston area, who can recommend the best location/time to watch the expected Auroras tonight.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Aurora watching by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      Same, except for northern Washington. Lemme know if you find any good resources.

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    2. Re:Aurora watching by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Same, except for northern Washington. Lemme know if you find any good resources.

      Southern Washington here, let me know. I'd be interested in seeing anything at all as a result of it. Natural disasters and car accidents are a spectator sport.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  108. Help! by CommieBozo · · Score: 1

    Could I possibly harness this plasma to generate 1.21 gigawatts? If so, it could really help me out of a little jam I'm in.

  109. Re:Is anyone experiencing problems with cell phone by bbowers · · Score: 1

    Nothing as of yet...however the other day my Verizon phone went out... could this be something I'm not gonna want to look forward to? :-\

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
  110. -1, Illiterate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I could care less which spelling they use. As long as u understand what's said, for all intensive purposes it doesn't matter.

    That's "intents and purposes".

  111. Re:"It's coming right for us!" *WHOOSH* "Kick Ass! by MarkGriz · · Score: 4, Funny
    Batten down those scintillation counters! Unhook the HF radios!"

    ...and head for the liquor store. After all, the best defense against a coronal mass ejection, is a massive Corona injection.

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  112. There goes my day by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    So much for getting any work done tomorrow. I live in southern Mexico where electricity is sketchy on a good day. In fact, just about a week ago I had a transformer explode about 20 meters in front of me. I think it's safe to say that tomorrow I should stay inside and unplug the computer. Bummer.

  113. flamebait? by donutz · · Score: 1

    Makes you feel teeny weenie small, doesn't it?

    "What does the sun have to do with the size of your weiner? you're weird."

    oh c'mon moderators...it was a joke. For all we know he has a really big weiner.

    1. Re:flamebait? by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 1
      I am perfectly comfortable with my wiener size... I agree the flamebait was uncalled for!

      Maybe the moderator has an issue with his wiener size!

      --
      D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    2. Re:flamebait? by donutz · · Score: 1

      I am perfectly comfortable with my wiener size... I agree the flamebait was uncalled for!

      Maybe the moderator has an issue with his wiener size!


      Quite possible! I mean, if someone has a problem with the size of their wiener, then the thought of 2 billion tons of stuff must make their wiener seem pretty insignificant...but then, who'd want a 2 billion ton wiener anyway?

    3. Re:flamebait? by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 1
      Quite possible! I mean, if someone has a problem with the size of their wiener, then the thought of 2 billion tons of stuff must make their wiener seem pretty insignificant...but then, who'd want a 2 billion ton wiener anyway?

      I just have to say it, but did you notice how we are having this conversation about coronal mass ejections? If that doesn't smack of a double entendre, I don't know what does!

      --
      D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  114. Ohh! by bobrk · · Score: 1

    So that's why the baby monitor was buzzing last night. I thought it was the flourescent light in the kitchen.

  115. Re:"It's coming right for us!" *WHOOSH* "Kick Ass! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    The Chandra X-ray telescope is buttoning down the hatches so to speak!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  116. Look at the comet hit the sun! (or evaporate ....) by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you watch this mpeg [http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2003_10_2 8/c2cme.mpg] CME Snowstorm and watch the comet in the lower right corner zoom in, you see the major eruption.

    Pretty nifty! It states a comment should vaporize before impacting, but it is still kind of ironic!

    I bet it was an alien spaceship or missile and its doomsday! :P

  117. It's All America's Fault... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    IMPORTANT TIME OF ARRIVAL NOTICE FOR NORTH AMERICANS
    The preferred time of arrival is ***TONIGHT***, TUESDAY NIGHT (before you go to bed that night) near or after 3 am Eastern Standard Time).
    That's 2 am Central Standard Time on TONIGHT.
    That's 1 am Mountain Standard Time on TONIGHT.
    That's MIDNIGHT Pacific Standard Time on TONIGHT.

    I see America is safely facing away from the Sun when this all starts hit. It will certainly be taken by the rest of the world that America is out to get them with this new, super-weapon.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:It's All America's Fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Try and stop us"
      (homer's shirt during his visit to Brazil, with pic of Uncle Sam chewing on globe)

  118. I read this as... by cloudship_tacitus · · Score: 1

    X10 server send 2B spam messages to Earth

  119. They are NOT WORRIED ABOUT INCUSRIONS !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are worried about the Palestinians voting in a future Israeli election !!!! Better to keep dipshits like Arafat alive. If the Palestinians wake up and demand citenzenship, Zionism is doomed.

  120. If this keeps up... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    The explosion sent over 2 billion tons of material hurtling across the solar system toward Earth.

    If this keeps up, soon there won't be a Sun anymore.

    Or maybe the Sun (as opposed to "Sun") finally decided to jump on the bandwagon and go open source, and is throwing out all the old, proprietary mass.

    Aren't we an awful small target for the Sun to be hitting so regularly these days?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, it's burned us so many times in the past...WTF did we ever do to it?

  121. Seeing dark spots by Tribbin · · Score: 1

    Last friday I could clearly see one dark spot on the sun, just a little to the right from it's centre.

    I could clearly see this by looking straight into the sun through the fog in the morning.

    This morning I saw two similar black spots on the sun, one in the middle and one just below it. This time more clearly than last friday.,\

    I live in Holland.

    Does this have anything to do with the explosions?

    This is no hoax...

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    1. Re:Seeing dark spots by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      Yup. You saw the sunspots that are in the first image of the news post. The eruption came from the one you see on the left side of the image (the one on right flared, too, but it wasn't pointed right at us).

    2. Re:Seeing dark spots by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      And, actually, a more recent picture shows two enormous sunspots and a newer, largish group. The one that erupted while pointed at us is the middle lower one.

    3. Re:Seeing dark spots by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I described above!

      But I saw a smaller single one last friday; does this make me special?

      No seriously, are these things rare?

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    4. Re:Seeing dark spots by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      Sunspots? Not in the least. Sunspots this large? They're pretty uncommon, but I've seen naked-eye sunspots in foggy/thin cloud conditions before, too. They're much more common during the peak of the solar activity cycle, though (that's when I last saw naked-eye ones; conditions haven't been right where I live to see 'em recently).

    5. Re:Seeing dark spots by Donwulff · · Score: 1

      Sunspots itself are not rare, though they're much more common close to the "solar max" on the 11 year solar activity cycle. This was in 2000-2001 last time. Apparently, this many this big spots have never been visible at the same time however, and the invidual spots apepar to be second largest ever pictured.

      By the way, use extreme care when observing the sun, if even small part of the sun is uncovered (eclipse, smoke, clouds) one risks eye damage. The only generally safe method of observing the sun is taking a telescope/binocular and pointing it at a sun *without looking from the eyepiece* and using that to reflect an image of the sun on a paper. Some people point out this may damage the lenses, but unless you leave it pointed at the sun for long time this is quite unlikely. Actually looking through the binoculars/telescope at the sun will lead to instant eye-damage, ofcourse.

  122. Yippee Skippy! by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1
    Expect more aurora and geomagnetic effects in the next day or two!"
    Yay! No cell phone or wireless internet for me! Woohoooooooooooo! I'm absolutely ecstatic!
    1. Re:Yippee Skippy! by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      I told my boss that if he called and didn't get a hold of me, it was because of the solar flare. Yeah. That's it...

  123. Blinker Fluid? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    I am trying to hold my face on after that one. 'Blinker Fluid'

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:Blinker Fluid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's trying to make it less obvious that he ripped off the Red vs Blue line regarding "Headlight fluid".

    2. Re:Blinker Fluid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right. RvB came up with it first. Just keep telling yourself that.

  124. uh huh by PenguinX · · Score: 1

    yeah whatever, someone just did this in photoshop

  125. I am truly astounded... by slappyjack · · Score: 1

    ...that Media hasn't picked up on this and tried to run a weeklong series of: "scare you into being more afraid so you'll buy more shit to feel secure" reports.

    I mean lookit the possibilityes:
    "SOLAR FLARES! THE SKIN DAMAGE IT CAN DO TO THE CHILDREN"

    "WHat if THE CHILDREN need to make an emergency sell phone call! It wont go through BECAUSE OF THE SUN!"

    "Solar Flares: Terrorism?"

    oh, wait.
    this science.
    science hard to understand.
    science make channel changer change channel.
    put science in minute 29.

  126. and Seattle. Alas by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

    I lived in Juneau for a while, and got to see it a couple of times. V-e-e-e-r-y cool.

  127. Should this storm change my plans? by Cheapoboy · · Score: 1

    Johnny: "Hey Ben, /. says there is going to be a strong solar storm at the same time we have the launch planned tonight.." Ben: "Bah, don't worry about it. If there was a problem Reed would have figured it out by now." excelsior!

  128. In Volkswagens.... by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

    How much is that in elephants?

    I dunno, but in the Astronomical standard of Volkswagens, with each VW Bug weighing in at 2769 lbs, or 1.3845 tons, it ends up being 1,444,564,824.85 Volkswagens.

    In the immortal words of Keanu Reeves:

    "Whoa"

  129. I'm on my high-horse here!!! by purrpurrpussy · · Score: 1

    I'm really NOT trying to start a fight but there is still a problem here! Unfortuantley everybody said "Oh... don't worry about it" back then too! I'd rather hope this data will be around after 2101 not just 2001. What about 2201? 2801? 3001?. Then you DO have a problem.

    I mean, I'll probably be long since dead but I hope the astronomers then can rely on us recording good data now! Next thing you know someone has "sorted" the data with 2 digit years, it's completely garbled screwing up centuries - maybe millenia of data...

    Maybe....

    --
    "None of this shit works" -W.Shatner
    1. Re:I'm on my high-horse here!!! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      woohoo, and are future progrmeer brothers will havr high paying opportunities.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  130. Blackouts are Possible by rjthomas61 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The above article references the 1989 geomagnetic storm. During that storm, large blackouts occurred in Quebec due to induced currents circulating in the power grid. Transformers are built to transmit AC current and do not like it when large quasi-DC currents appear out of the sky. The transformers tend to overheat and fail, and in a fragile power grid, this can lead to cascading failures and blackouts.

    More information about this phenomenon (and an engineered solution to it) is available on my company's website.

    --
    Take off, every Hoser
    1. Re:Blackouts are Possible by rjthomas61 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the double, but I've posted a revision of the above comment under the other solar flare /. story.

      --
      Take off, every Hoser
  131. Coronal Mass Ejection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many geeky astronomers are going to go home to their wives/girlfriends tonight and ask them if they want a "Coronal Mass Ejection" of their own?

    1. Re:Coronal Mass Ejection by beavmetal · · Score: 0

      thats funny, you should have at least gotten a karma of 2.

      --
      Looks like it is time to replace your Personality Module. You are a bit to clingy, guess I better replace your fuser to
  132. Correction by ScienceInformationMi · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are no solar flares! The mass ejections have been driven out of the solar system, and are committing suicide as we speak! The rumors that the so-called flares are nuclear powered are fueled by the delusions of madmen who are sick in the head! Sick, I tell you!

  133. Rain? by garglblaster · · Score: 1
    just wondering..:

    Wouldn't that mean a lot of rain in the coming weeks?

    If you think about it: tons and tons of solar material hitting earth - this matter being mostly hydrogen.

    Hydrogen and the Oxygen of our atmosphere (boom!) => Water!

    So thats how Rain is _Really_ made!!

    --

    perl -e 'printf("%x!\n",49153)'

    1. Re:Rain? by elf-fire · · Score: 1

      Most of the material will be deflected by the earth's 'shields', so: No, not really ;-)

    2. Re:Rain? by arctuniol · · Score: 1

      I am sure alot of governments are running around yelling Shields up! The sun is attacking.

  134. And in Toronto by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Not that I'd be able to see much in this land of light pollution, but there are some relatively light-less areas I could reach... if it weren't SO DAMNED CLOUDY.

    I don't know about you, but I'm shutting off the computer tonight--just in case.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  135. Dyson Sphere by scovetta · · Score: 1

    Do you mean a Dyson Sphere? link Actually, scientists have been planning since 1991 to blow up the moon, so maybe the sun is just the next step.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    1. Re:Dyson Sphere by skzbass · · Score: 1

      Yes a excelent link and do you know waht i read as the cover article for the weekly world news (which is linked to) "Osama and Saddam Adobt Shaved Ape Baby){http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/news/index.cf m?instanceid=59610} --Good Times--

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    2. Re:Dyson Sphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you blow up the Moon, what happens to the many species that depend on the tide, which is directly affected by the Moon?

  136. Have you ever noticed the SOHO camera... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Have you ever noticed in the movies from SOHO that the camera has a disc placed to block out the sun? How then can it see what's coming directly at it?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  137. Howzabout "asshat desert dwellers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ehhhh. Palestinians are Semites too, aren't they?

  138. California Skies by Bob+the+Hamster · · Score: 1

    I am excited about the prospect of going and seeing the (possible) auroras tonight, as that is something one so rarely gets any chance to see in Los Angeles-- but so much of Southern California is on fire right now, and the air is so full of smoke and falling ash, I simply do not know which way to drive to find clear skies :(

  139. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  140. So what should I do? by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    Is this going to affect magnetic media at all? Shoud I put my laptop in the basement just in case? Or is this only going to cause large-scale problems but nothing that will personally affect my data?

    Just how strong is this really?
    -Don.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  141. Re:Is anyone experiencing problems with cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Cingular phone kept cutting out last week, probably won't be any better now...

  142. SOHO risk? by babbage · · Score: 1

    This story had me wondering if the SOHO satellite at the 1st LaGrange Point was at risk, but I guess NASA has already adressed that:

    The high level of energetic particles have caused two SOHO instruments to take precautionary measures: CDS has stopped taking science, and is continually reading out ("draining") their detectors to prevent damage. UVCS ramped down their high voltages and turned of the high voltage supply. Other instruments are less affected, although the onslaught of particles is quite noticeable for some. The "snow" in EIT and LASCO images is not just making it difficult to spot new CMEs, it is also making their on-board compression algorithm less efficient - over time, their observations lag behind the schedule because images take longer to downlink, and their buffer fills up.

    Fascinating. I suppose it makes sense to assume that any kind of space photography is mostly going to be of blackness, and so the image data should be highly compressable. But with an event like this, it must be like the satellite is being passed over by a misty fog, and the compression algorithms will break down.

    But stilll, space is big. Fantastically big. And two billion tons of material? You may think that's a lot, but to space that's just doodley squat. </bad-hhgttg>

    So with that in mind, how much of this material is likely to actually interact with SOHO? How much damage, if any, is the satellite likely to sustain in an event like this? It seems like losing that satellite would be almost as bad as losing Hubble...

    1. Re:SOHO risk? by JoeGurman · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the concern. The volume of the CME, by the time it reaches the vicinity of L1, is so enormous that the desntiy of the material is somewhat less than that in the best vacuum we can make in a laboratory on earth.

      The real concern is whether the energetic, charged particles damage spacecraft and instrument subsystems: single-event upsets in silicon (memory, CPU's, &c.), damage to solar cells (each solar energetic particle [SEP] storm cuts a small notch in the performance of the solar arrays), and potential arcing in high voltage systems if they're not powered down.

      Interestingly, some of the instruments with CCD detectors (MDI, LASCO, EIT) may keep observing just to keep flushing the electrons knocked loose by the SEP impacts.

      We have seen bigger SEP events than this one (by a little) on SOHO anf survived. We are even able to keep recording solar wind parameters when other spacecraft's solar wind detectors are saturated by the SEP's.

  143. Damn! by El · · Score: 1

    And it always happens when I just sent my lead-lined underwear out to the cleaners!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  144. sunspots visible to naked eye by rhombic · · Score: 1

    The smoke in San Diego (Pacific Beach, for locals) this afternoon was just the right density to attenuate the sun just the right amount to let you see the two giant sunspots with the naked eye. Now that makes you feel small ;) Now let me get back to hacking up a lung...

    --
    1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
  145. Will it zorch Dick Cheney's pacemaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would make up for losing cell phone service.

  146. Astronauts on the ISS? by MsWillow · · Score: 1

    I wonder what effect this, and the smaller, earlier, storm will have on the ISS and its occupants? I know, they most likely used SOS (silicon on sapphire substrate) semiconductors, so the station itself should be OK,but still, this is supposed to be a big storm. Are the astronauts going to be OK? Is there any particularly rad-hardened section they can stay in, or are they just plain SOL?

    Goddess, I hope they'll be OK. If they get a fatal dose of radiation from this, coming so soon after the shuttle disaster, I fear we might scal way back on manned space exploration in the near future, andthat would be a real shame.

    --

    Lemon curry?
    1. Re:Astronauts on the ISS? by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

      look here

  147. Fire Map by Bob+the+Hamster · · Score: 1

    Forgive me for the double-faux-paus of off-topic posting and replying to my own post, but I found the answer to my own question, and it is to cool not to share. http://activefiremaps.fs.fed.us/ has active fire maps showing the location of all current fires which might be obstructing the sky with their nasty smoke (and heartlessly burning things too) http://activefiremaps.fs.fed.us/large_fire/large.p hp

  148. Trilithium Device shot at the SUN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch the C2 movie from SOHO's website, it looks like moments before the flare errupted toward earth a Trilithium torpedo was fired toward the sun. Watch it! You can see it!

    8P

  149. Re:"It's coming right for us!" *WHOOSH* "Kick Ass! by jerde · · Score: 1

    So, the resulting aurora should be on par with the 1989 event.

    Actually, we won't know if this flare and CME will cause auroras or not. If the magentic field associated with this flare is in the same direction as the Earth's, the high energy particles are largely deflected away from and past us, with no pretty light show. :(

    But if the magnetic field is opposite to ours, then the solar wind can be funnelled directly into our upper atmosphere. I don't think there's any good predictor -- we just have to wait for it to get here.

    - Peter

    --
    INsigNIFICANT
  150. Here is the reason for the increased solar..... by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Sun is starting to get pissed at SCO too....

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  151. Locations around the Boston area by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

    I'm posting this as a reply to my message, since a couple people were interested in knowing good locations for Aurora watching around Boston:

    From what I read on the www.spacew.com website (they have a forum) before it went down, Wachussets mountain (near Princeton, MA) is a GOOD place to look for Auroras. It's on 290.

    Another good resource I found was:
    www.darksky.com, which has about 5-6 good locations for sky watching in Mass.
    I wasn't sure of the places listed there (click on Dark Sky Finder on the site), so I may stick with Wachussets Mountain. Looks like the best bet.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  152. The sun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sneezes, and we get 2B tons of sun snot.

  153. Let's go ahead and close this discussion... by Art+Tatum · · Score: 0

    It's George Bush's fault. There, I've said it, saving 99.9% of the readers from having to waste time commenting. I'm generous like that.

  154. Sun Attack Earth, Bush Says US to Invade Moon by ibi · · Score: 2, Troll

    Oct. 28, 2003 | WASHINGTON (FX) -- President Bush blamed both the Sun and Moon for the recent rash of potentially devastating solar flare attacks in and around Earth.

    "Basically what they're trying to do is cause people to run," he told a Rose Garden news conference Tuesday. "That's what terrorists, major weather phenomena, fires, and large things in space do." Bush said the United States was working closely with Papau New Guinea and Mongolia to prevent foreign fighters from going to the Sun in order to help it "cause more trouble".

    "The Sun is dangerous because it believes that we are soft, that the will of the United States can be shaken by major stellar eruptions," he said in a 45-minute exchange with reporters. However, he said that experts in his administration had warned him that, rather like North Korea, that the Sun was equipped with nukular weapons therefore to attack it would be dangerous.

    The Moon on the other hand, had clearly not provided an eclipse to shield the Earth from a solar flare. While some academic paper-pushing bureaurcrats (denounced by Bill O'Reilly as a "bunch of pansy telescope wankers") argued that this was a natural consequence of the Moon's orbit, Bush hinted that if the Moon "really wanted to" it could have protected the Earth from this attack.

    "The Moon is much weaker than the Sun and we already have people in the military who know how to get there" Bush argued. "And we have intelligence documents showing that lunar-driven tides helped a ship containing Nigerian yellowcake reach a dock in Iraq in 1991."

    1. Re:Sun Attack Earth, Bush Says US to Invade Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the f... is that moderated as "insightful?" It should be moderated as "old hat" if anything

  155. crispy? by nappingcracker · · Score: 1

    ...anyone without 2,000,000 sunblock is going to have a really bad day.

    --
    |plastic....or gasoline?|
  156. Comparison by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    The solar flare launched

    2,000,000,000 tons

    The moon weighs about

    73,500,000,000,000,000,000,000 tons

  157. I hope by OpenSourcerer · · Score: 0

    the plasma tvs will become cheaper now.

  158. In every poll taken since the start by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 1

    of the 2nd intifadah, the majority of Palestinians have supported suicide bombings. If one is talking about suicide bombings against settlers in the West Bank or Gaza, it's almost universal. If one is talking about civilians in Israel proper, the support erodes a bit, but it's still a majority. That's quite some group pathology when a majority of people think it's a perfectly good idea to have someone blow themselves up in a pizza cafe dismembering women and babies. Or hand out candy celebrating after the immediate aftermath of September 11th (when initial estimates were ranging up to 30,000 dead). What a great day for Palestinians and Muslims.

    And then the kicker...people like 'alex ant' that jump in and defend the suicide bombers and call people who criticize the Palestinians racist. Awesome. Just remember folks, killing minorities isn't racist as long as it's Shyloks and Kykes we're talking about.

    General Boykin mentions God and Satan in a speach and these guys fall into an apoplectic fit rushing over each other in the bid to be the first to condemn him and any would be Christians who dare to invoke some sort of moral imprimatur to the war in Afghanistan or Iraq. Yet criticize the Palestinians or defend the Israelis and these same people rush to defend the right of Palestinians to celebrate the death of 3000 Americans and to practice their Allah given right to blow up little Jew babies.

  159. Your right! by geekoid · · Score: 1

    they're lame.. ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Your right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My right? Speaking of lame...

  160. Low spark of the high heeled boys. by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A29819-20 03Oct28?language=printer">New Solar Flare Detected

    Well there goes the neighborhood. :-)

    IF it's a good one maybe we can see some aroura down here. I hope this doesn't effect the health of the folks on the ISS.

    I hope this doesn't trash the Ham bands for to long either.

    --
    If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
    Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  161. When will it hit? by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

    When exactly will it hit? One modded-up reply said it would hit at 8am UTC (2am CST) on the 28th, which is a few hours from now. But this news story says midday CST tomorrow. So my question is, what are some estimates of when it will strike, and who is in a position to know? Where does this data come from? Also, when will we know what the polarity of the cloud is?

    1. Re:When will it hit? by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

      should be about Midday on the 29 (in the USA) Just after I wake up.. So I think I'll shut the computer off before I go to bed tonight/tomortrow AM.

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  162. Unfortunately by nucal · · Score: 1

    It's fucking raining on almost the entire US East Coast ... maybe there will be a remnant tomorrow ...

    1. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see past all this damn smoke you insensitive clod...

  163. wow, sucks to centrino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....there are gonna be a lot of really mad wireless laptop users come mid-week

    thats why i love my T1 college internet

  164. Re:"It's coming right for us!" *WHOOSH* "Kick Ass! by glenebob · · Score: 1

    Man, if you have to go to the liquor store to get Corona, I feel sorry for you. Too late, sucka, bwahahahahahaha!!!

  165. Satellite TV by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    Anyone else been getting increased "blockiness" on digital satellite TV for the last few days, despite a strong signal and clear weather? Could be related.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  166. Damn, just my luck... by Corrado · · Score: 1

    I just got DirectTV installed on Monday. Wouldn't you know that one of the largest solar flares in history would screw up my reception.

    My personal purchasing history:
    * Bought a VW Corrado (hence the nichname) - 6 months later they stopped making them.
    * I am a "recovering" Amiga fanatic
    * Bought a copy of BeOS - 'nuff said

    *WARNING* *WARNING* *WARNING* *WARNING* *WARNING*
    I am thinking of purchasing a couch in the next few days. Who knows what will happen to the furniture business. Oh the carnage!
    *WARNING* *WARNING* *WARNING* *WARNING* *WARNING*

    --
    KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
  167. Just saw one by KUNGwill · · Score: 1

    Houdy, I just got to see a super dooper aurora in Salem, Oregon. I had to get out of town to see it, but it was worth it. First it just looked like a light blue haze in the northern sky. Then, as my roommate put it, the blue turned blood red. Anyone who's still up should really try and see it. I'm suprised I was able to see it this far south...

    1. Re:Just saw one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      St. Charles missouri here, right outside St. louis, i thought it was a shot in hell it would get this far south, but it was there, a big arched column 40,000 ft at least, blue and red lines, then it shifted to a big red mass that lasted a long while, and shifted to yellow lines, never seen one before, that was pretty cool.

  168. We saw Auroral activity as far down as S.F. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    42 degrees North lattitude is what I think we are at. About 1 hr from San Francisco and around 12:30 to 12:38 we saw an amazing light display.

    Hope others saw it as well. 8)

  169. Plasma for everyone! by t0ny · · Score: 1
    Since we have all this plasma coming our way, does that mean the price of a 50" Widescreen Plasma HDTV Monitor is going to drop?

    You will be mine, oh yes, you will be mine...

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  170. All together now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll all fry together when we fry
    We'll be french fried potatoes by and by.
    There will be no more misery
    When the world is our rotisserie,
    Yes, we will all fry together when we fry.

    1. Re:All together now... by TCaM · · Score: 1

      Tom Lehrer isn't it?

  171. attn: metamods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how is this offtopic?

  172. Hasn't seemed to happen yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an amatearu radio operator, I have not seen the effect yet? At least on the frequencies I have been on. Has it passed us by or is it still comming?