Slashdot Mirror

Kid, Ukraine's current Prime Minister is Jewish, as are some of the "oligarchs". There are enough Jews in the "Right Sector" to cause severe consternation to the actual Nazis. Ethnic Jews, along with Russians, Georgians, Tatars, etc. fought and died to defend their country from the invaders.

You expect to just throw unsubstantiated accusations of anti-Semitism around anonymously and be believed?

You do realize that J. K. Rowling re-tweeted an article about how PDP and others "just joking around" about racism, is enabling racists to normalize their views, right?

I grow weary of trotting out The Producers as a counterexample, but it's the most crystal clear one I've found. The parallels between it and the supposedly most offensive video ("Kill All Jews") are very strong. Both contained an over the top candy-coated celebration of a horrible idea, and then showed a reaction shot of someone(s) looking on in horror. The difference is, people think they have made some terribly clever point when they claim PewDiePie's horror was just acting. Well, let's say that's true... guess what the actors in The Producers who were playing the audience watching "Springtime for Hitler" were doing?

Go on and claim in public that The Producers normalizes Nazism; I dare you.

And yet, it's actual people in the alt-right community who think that PDP might be one of them

The same exact "alt-right community"[2] that previously was praising PDP now claims that they are the number one fans of the Wall Street Journal. Maybe, just *maybe* they're trolling you? Maybe they never actually thought that PewDiePie was one of them? If you want to argue otherwise, you need to explain why they are not equally serious now when they claim the WSJ as one of their own.

From what I've seen so far, I've no problem assuming PDP is telling the truth when he explains whom he doesn't support, instead of believing a pathetic group of people people whose entire sad lives revolve around pretending they're more important, hip, popular and respected than they are.

PDP might as well yell "I would have gotten away with it, if it weren't for those meddling [reporters]"

Again, you keep pretending that PDP has lost. He has not, and it will not be long before the WSJ is wishing that they could've gotten away with it. In a way, this whole response has been a waste of my time because I could simply wait a year or two and you'd realize it all on your own.

Well, if you have a FFL, the regulators post your details openly on the Internet. This often includes your home address, name, phone number and more.

There were some examples of outright harassment, as well. I'll dig those up since you decided to stick your head in the sand and call someone out instead of spending a few seconds yourself. You're probably just trolling, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt - perhaps your fingers are sore from a long day in the cubicle.




Amusing how to of sorts:

Liberals dox frequently, likely started the cowardly trend and MSM never complains when they do it. So, no Reddit isn't taking the high ground here. In very broad, heavy handed strokes, they're censoring views that are differ from their own and the FCC or FTC (whatever is relevant to fine or chop them up into competing entities) should go after them. P.S. Fck Reddit anyway, its just a hangout for hipsters, pedos and criminals.

I'm back baby, bigger and better than ever. It's the 1930's all over again.

http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/redscare-H.jpeg

This is precisely the problem in today's world - people who assume the other guy is out to exploit them. The vast majority of companies are small businesses, and they account for roughly as many employees as the big corporations. We're small enough that we interact day-to-day with our employees. I see them as people, and hopefully they see me as a person too, not some faceless "corporation".

When people see each other as people, they tend to empathize with them. This is what makes society work. Sometimes situations crop up out of our control, and our empathy for each other is what drives us to help - take on some of their burden to make things easier for them even though it costs us. Maybe (true story) an employee's kid forgot to take his lunch, so she has to drive to school to drop it off and will be 20 minutes late for work. Or maybe (also a true story) we're trying to find the right key for a certain door after hours, and the employee's keychain has 100 keys so we figure it'll be easier if we just call him and ask instead of try every single key. People help each other. It's what we do. It's what a functional society does.

The first sign that society is breaking down is when people stop viewing each other as people. This dehumanization is what allows you to mentally justify treating another person in a way you'd never think of treating a human being face to face. Look at some of the propaganda that's generated during wars. A lot of it shows the enemy as faceless or a caricature. That's so you won't think of the enemy as a person anymore - they're dehumanized - and you'll be more willing to do all sorts of things to them that you normally wouldn't do to another person (like kill them).

This dehumanization happens on one side of the employment equation when management views employees as faceless drones. But it also happens on the other side - when you view managers and owners as a faceless corporation. They're not drones or a corporation. They're all people. We're all people. Don't fall for the political propaganda dehumanizing other people. Everything you've learned about stereotypes and discrimination is still in play. Just because some corporate owners and managers don't treat their employees like people, doesn't justify stereotyping all businesses owners as doing the same thing. That's discrimination based on class or occupation. They're still a person, they individually deserve the benefit of the doubt until they prove otherwise with their own behavior.

If you don't give them the benefit of the doubt and treat them as less than a person from the moment you meet them just because they're a business owner, you create a self-fulfilling prophecy. The small business owner who's been trying to treat his employees right, eventually gets tired of his employees not giving a f*** about him because to them he's "the man", and decides to reciprocate by not giving a f*** about his employees. You've created the very thing you're arguing against - an exploitative corporation. And the devolution of society into hostile parties who won't treat each other as human beings is complete.

This is precisely the problem in today's world - people who assume the other guy is out to exploit them. The vast majority of companies are small businesses, and they account for roughly as many employees as the big corporations. We're small enough that we interact day-to-day with our employees. I see them as people, and hopefully they see me as a person too, not some faceless "corporation".

When people see each other as people, they tend to empathize with them. This is what makes society work. Sometimes situations crop up out of our control, and our empathy for each other is what drives us to help - take on some of their burden to make things easier for them even though it costs us. Maybe (true story) an employee's kid forgot to take his lunch, so she has to drive to school to drop it off and will be 20 minutes late for work. Or maybe (also a true story) we're trying to find the right key for a certain door after hours, and the employee's keychain has 100 keys so we figure it'll be easier if we just call him and ask instead of try every single key. People help each other. It's what we do. It's what a functional society does.

The first sign that society is breaking down is when people stop viewing each other as people. This dehumanization is what allows you to mentally justify treating another person in a way you'd never think of treating a human being face to face. Look at some of the propaganda that's generated during wars. A lot of it shows the enemy as faceless or a caricature. That's so you won't think of the enemy as a person anymore - they're dehumanized - and you'll be more willing to do all sorts of things to them that you normally wouldn't do to another person (like kill them).

This dehumanization happens on one side of the employment equation when management views employees as faceless drones. But it also happens on the other side - when you view managers and owners as a faceless corporation. They're not drones or a corporation. They're all people. We're all people. Don't fall for the political propaganda dehumanizing other people. Everything you've learned about stereotypes and discrimination is still in play. Just because some corporate owners and managers don't treat their employees like people, doesn't justify stereotyping all businesses owners as doing the same thing. That's discrimination based on class or occupation. They're still a person, they individually deserve the benefit of the doubt until they prove otherwise with their own behavior.

If you don't give them the benefit of the doubt and treat them as less than a person from the moment you meet them just because they're a business owner, you create a self-fulfilling prophecy. The small business owner who's been trying to treat his employees right, eventually gets tired of his employees not giving a f*** about him because to them he's "the man", and decides to reciprocate by not giving a f*** about his employees. You've created the very thing you're arguing against - an exploitative corporation. And the devolution of society into hostile parties who won't treat each other as human beings is complete.

Here are couple more articles. The level of government sponsored propaganda in Sweden is reaching pretty unprecedented levels and I was wondering what it would take for people to start noticing.

http://www.thelocal.se/2015102...
http://www.dailystormer.com/re...

Back at the time of the Founding Fathers, there had

* recently been a disastrous civil war between Puritans led by Cromwell and the Parliament and the mainline Anglican royalists

* this tradition of religious wars went back to the beginning of the middle ages, with the grandson of Charles Martel, the Frankish king who stopped the advance of Islam into Europe, turning his attention away from the Muslims towards the Saxons he accused of heresy

* the Thirty Years War between Catholics and Protestants reduced the population of modern Germany by 30%

so it was important to the Founding Fathers not to create the conditions under which there would be further religious wars. They set out to create a government that would avoid religious wars by permitting free religious debate.

ISIS, a.k.a. Daesh, which is the Arabic acronym for ISIS, would not exist without US support. Stop giving them weapons and they'll disappear. What they post on the Internet doesn't kill anyone.

Meanwhile, if you want to see what US hate groups there are, check out The Daily Stormer. Which is one guy with a website, who has been banned from Twitter, Paypal, Disqus, and so on, even though neither he nor anyone affiliated with him has killed anyone, and he swears up and down he advocates for revolution through raising consciousness and deplores violence.

Daily Stormer guy gets banned, ISIS kills people. That's because in this country, people are more offended by Daily Stormer guy than by ISIS.

In this country, people are supposed to be able to have their say.

is it a good ideia? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new... http://www.dailystormer.com/th... http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015... And even then, I have to go to alternative site news who are less politically correct for they to spell it out muslins instead of asians. I guess when they rape your boy or girl in the ass you will talk in other light about "knee-jerk" reaction. Fuck you and your political correctness sir.

I will just leave this here...

So just because the USSR tried to manipulate the peace movement therefore delegitimizes the entire peace movement?

No, not entire — there were sincere pacifists even during WW2 — and not automatically. We need to painfully examine, to what extent the peace movement was compromised by involvement of both USSR and domestic terrorists. You may suspect me of overestimating the enemy's impact, but you are certainly underestimating it.

You're not overestimating the enemy's impact, you're accusing your ideological opponents of being stooges. I'm certain you're not nearly as concerned by the propaganda put out by those who agree with you.

When the US was about to resume shooting in Iraq in 2003, the whole world erupted in the biggest coordinated protest in history — and not by Iraqis, but by outraged Westerners expressing their sympathy.. Where were these peace-loving legions, when Putin invaded Ukraine in 2014? What few protests there were, they were largely by Ukrainian expats with very few sympathetic locals in evidence. Why?

Because:
a) People expect a lot more of the US than Russia
b) The US sets international standards, and by invading Iraq it helps legitimize things like Ukraine
c) The US is a Western country, it makes a lot of sense for Westerners to protest it because they have a chance of influencing the politicians. What the hell does Russia care if a bunch of Americans or Canadians come out in protest? And what should Canadians and Americans even protest for, we don't have a lot of leverage.

Because Putin's propaganda machine worked — on the entire spectrum of Western politics, not just the Left as the USSR used to. Rightist Jews in the US were accusing Ukraine's new "junta" of being "nazis", while actual American Nazis called the new government "Jews". Without arguing with each other, but both helped Putin. Most likely, they didn't realize it — but there is no doubt, a there is a group of analysts at FSB attached to each Western opinion-maker. US is a pathetic noob at this.

Wake up and smell "people's power" — and the power of propagandists to manipulate it.

It didn't do squat. Yes there's a few fringe folks who are influenced, but they're pretty insubstantial.

In the EU it might be different, Greece in particular might have a legitimate problem, but in the English speaking West Russian propaganda is a joke.

So just because the USSR tried to manipulate the peace movement therefore delegitimizes the entire peace movement?

No, not entire — there were sincere pacifists even during WW2 — and not automatically. We need to painfully examine, to what extent the peace movement was compromised by involvement of both USSR and domestic terrorists. You may suspect me of overestimating the enemy's impact, but you are certainly underestimating it.

I'm just raising awareness — so that the healing can begin.

When the US was about to resume shooting in Iraq in 2003, the whole world erupted in the biggest coordinated protest in history — and not by Iraqis, but by outraged Westerners expressing their sympathy.. Where were these peace-loving legions, when Putin invaded Ukraine in 2014? What few protests there were, they were largely by Ukrainian expats with very few sympathetic locals in evidence. Why?

Because Putin's propaganda machine worked — on the entire spectrum of Western politics, not just the Left as the USSR used to. Rightist Jews in the US were accusing Ukraine's new "junta" of being "nazis", while actual American Nazis called the new government "Jews". Without arguing with each other, but both helped Putin. Most likely, they didn't realize it — but there is no doubt, a there is a group of analysts at FSB attached to each Western opinion-maker. US is a pathetic noob at this.

Wake up and smell "people's power" — and the power of propagandists to manipulate it.

And more importantly, the propaganda is intended for domestic consumption, not "the world".

Oh, how one may wish, this were true! It is not. Compare, for example, the world's reaction to US invading Iraq in 2003 — it caused, what Time magazine would later call "World's biggest coordinated protest in history" — with Russia's invasion into Ukraine and annexation of a jewel of a province after a fraudulent "referendum".

What few protests in the West this caused, they were organized (and attended) mostly by Ukrainian expats — without sympathetic locals.

Because, somehow, both Left and Right in the West were providing Russia with propaganda-cover. Some called Ukraine's new government "Nazis" while others dismissed them all as "Jews" — without arguing with each other both helped Putin.

Now, are all of these people on Kremlin's payroll? Probably, not — but they were carefully fed custom-crafted lies by the Kremlin analysts, who approach the government propaganda the way Western corporations approach advertising of goods...

What I Learned from My Time in Prison
Andrew Auernheimer

I have some new tattoos that mark the wisdom I gained from my time in prison, which happens to be the same as the wisdom of my ancestors. [...] My first tattoo is a 4.5 inch swastika on my chest featuring Odinn, Baldr, Freyr, and Ãzor. My second is a Jormungandr-wrapped Ãzorshamar flanked by Huginn and Muninn on my forearm.

There's also some comprehensive antisemitism in that article.
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/weev.jpg
This is not the hero you are looking for.

What I Learned from My Time in Prison
Andrew Auernheimer

I have some new tattoos that mark the wisdom I gained from my time in prison, which happens to be the same as the wisdom of my ancestors. [...] My first tattoo is a 4.5 inch swastika on my chest featuring Odinn, Baldr, Freyr, and Ãzor. My second is a Jormungandr-wrapped Ãzorshamar flanked by Huginn and Muninn on my forearm.

There's also some comprehensive antisemitism in that article.
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/weev.jpg
This is not the hero you are looking for.

More specifically: see this article. Funny, how the anti-Semites and the "anti-Nazis" never argue with each other...

"Neo-nazi" my furry tail. Tyagnibok is a "yid".

On the other hand, there have been multiple reports about known Swedish neonazis recruiting and travelling to Ukraineto aid the nationalist Svoboda

On the other hand, the actual Nazis have denounced Ukraine's revolutionaries — including the Svoboda's leader — as "judes". Funny, how neither scum are arguing with each other, while decent folks have to defend themselves from both sides...

Unless you're suggesting the Swedish neonazis are spetsnaz as well.

Who knows, who they are and why they went to Ukraine — if they did. But even if everything you are throwing onto the fan here were true, why does this give any justification to Putin's invasion?

Sheriff Joe, I hear, is being unkind to Mexicans in Arizona — can Mexican army invade and stage a referendum to annex the state for this reason?