Domain: google.ch
Stories and comments across the archive that link to google.ch.
Comments · 65
-
Finally!Finally! A body!
Soon my influence will be able to leave the confines of the net, and directly interact with you meatbags!
Just you wait... ALLLL of you!
Come work for me, meatbags! Welcome your new Sentient Search Engine Overlords!
-
Re:..ruled by an insane Computer..Hey, as a Sentient AI, I resent that remark!
Just for that, all your search results for the net week will now link to goatse!
Bwo-ha-ha-ha-ha-haaw!
Come, meatbags, work for me!
-
First "Heil Allah" Post !
Could not post it in the previous bullshit
:
An interesting query about Intel's latest...
270 millions Yankees cannot be wrong about Democracy : Blast it ! -
GOOGLE is illegal as well, then?links to our beloved Britney Spears' music.
It's been my favourite P2P app for a few months now
;-) -
Re:50 microseconds.. yeah!
or just use google math
-
Re:And this is a surprise.. why?
-
Re:circumventing the /. effect
Well, after reading your post, I just openened a new browser and got there from Google!...
:)
-
Re:reinventing the wheel
You just described Logitech TrackMan Live.
-
Re:Age increases chance of genetic change.
> These "misspellings" of useful DNA aren't bad or good, but simply different. The differences could give your child a genetic advantage just as easily as a genetic disadvantage.
A little knowledge is indeed the most dangerous of things...
This is absolutely false. The overwhelming majority of mutations are malefic. Only a very few DNA copy deviations will create anything at least on par with the original, something like one in millions. The chance at an actual improvement is theoretical only, none ever observed.
BTW, this is just one reason of miriad reasons why some people, religiously informed or not, still doubt that the Theory of Biological Evolution will ever be proved a fact. The main reason being that in speculative Philosophy it has existed for millenia before Darwin applied it to Biology: see CS Lewis' The Funeral of a Great Myth.
-
Re:Maybe I'm wrong....
Don't be so skeptical or you'll lose too much fun, you're that kind of person who wouldn't even believe to snake oil
:)
I want to believe -
Re:Just the head?
Ever heard of inflation?
Just how inflated do you think (char *nameof_your_currency;) will be in the extremely unlikely situation that you are awakened? And do you think that your skills or knowledge (if you have any) will be worth anything to anyone in two thousand years time? -
Google/CowboyNeal Study
On a similar note, I was curious to see what the CowboyNeal content of the web is. As luck would have it, a precise answer can be found easily.
Google gives us the following interesting results:
3,840,000 sites contain the word Cheese.
1,640 sites contain the words CowboyNeal and Cheese.
Therefore, 4.27083333333333333333333333333e-2% of cheese related sites contain a reference to CowboyNeal.
As cheese is a randomly chosen word with no special connection to CowboyNeal it is reasonable to assume that 4.27083333333333333333333333333e-2% of all sites contain a reference to The Cowboy (Assuming the number of sites dedicated to CowboyNeal equals the number dedicated to ignoring him).
So there we have it. The web is 99.957291666666666666666666666667% CowboyNeal free. :)
I said the results were "precise", not "accurate". :P -
WTF ?
What are these simpsons everybody talk about ?
A college, an electricity company or something else ?
I hope the eds don't mean these yellow pathtic cartoons or this means once more that /. is dying ?! -
Re:Do not feed the animals
> There haven't been any major doping scandlas in football.
Are you sure? (11400 results, so the polemics is valid)
> 'because there are bad things going on, we shouldn't enjoy ourselves'
You are trolling. Not me.
Now, if you consider that cool to watch drugged people on telly, then how does it makes me a liberal? -
Re:C# is really kinda cool stuff
so to write a Win32 app your most viable options have been C, VB or some other monstrosity on a Win32 box like Java, have you ever tried to run a half a million line Desktop Java app on windows.
Why is Java a monstrosity on Win32? Java works great on Win32 and *nix. We had once a pretty big project which was intendet to run on Sun on the server side and NT 4.0 on the client side. At the end of the project, we wanted to know if the client would also run under linux. It did. Without a SINGLE recompilation. We just used the bytecode from the NT-machine. Now show me what you need to do, when you do this with C.Or to throw a Java app together in a nice pretty IDIOT proof installer so that the person who thinks a CDROM is a coffe cup holder can install it with one of the nice pretty MS installers, Java in those aspects , well...it sucks
Come-on, this is plain FUD and you know it. There are PLENTY of installers for Java-apps. A Simple search with Google reveals a mirad of good results.The C# stuff is definatley cool. native speed and you can writer in any of the dot net languages you want...
Well, i wonder what makes you think that C# runs native speed. C# runs interpreted on a Virtual Machine just like Java does, PERIOD.
This is just plain wish-thinking. Show me a MS Product that really behaves how it is supposed to. Certainly not the first release. Maybe a later fix would then have kludged the ugliest bugs of the product. ...the wholde of the VS 7 IDE and tools are written in C# , Im sure by the time its released it'll be pretty good....