Slashdot Mirror

Not so much. Ten million a year from NBC has turned Maddow from an insightful commentator into an unholy amalgamation of Glenn Beck and Alex Jones.

How can anyone respect, admire, follow, or in any way support this overfed cesspool of ignorance and corruption defies science.

It would help if the cesspool had published this policy beforehand, so that people wouldn't get the wrong impression.

One problem with all of this is that the ranking algorithms are largely opaque - things that happen for completely legitimate and reasonable reasons can be seen to be the child of ignorance and corruption.

A very good example of the way people can take something completely innocent the wrong way is Google's treatment of Trump and Clinton in the last election. The examples show the Google suggestions for various search completions, against those same searches on Yahoo and Bing.

For example, searching for "Hillary Clinton is " shows many results of "is awesome", "is winning", and so on for Google, while that same search on Yahoo and Bing results in many disparaging completions.

All of this, despite "Hillary Clinton is a liar" versus "Hillary Clinton is awesome" shows that the former search term has a much higher relevance.

The Google search term "crooked " returned "smile", "smile lyrics", and "creek" at the time, while the same search on Yahoo and Bing returned "Crooked Hillary" despite *that* phrase having an obvious trend relevance during the election cycle.

On a more recent note, searching YouTube for "How Trump Should Deal With Cohen & Manafort – Ann Coulter", the *exact* title of a video by Anne Coulter, puts the exact match far below a list of dissenting videos that google thinks you should see instead.

It all boils down to Robert Epstein's published paper that shows that search engine results can sway an election.

Google is making use of their position in light of that paper.

Wouldn't you?

This effect has been well documented for the last couple of years or so.

Even the Google search "when is the election" shows a smiling image of Hillary Clinton, as if her presidential opponent didn't exist. That page clearly (and subliminally) associates the smiling image of Hillary with the upcoming election.

All these results *seem* to be statistically and scientifically valid.

This is the sort of thing our president is complaining about.

And it seems that there is, in fact, a problem here.

By the way, how is Alex Jones doing now? Seems like the attempts to "de-platform" him is only making him more popular.

Uh, no, they are now denying payment services to third-party sites like bitchute for carrying his content.

He was a nobody until these new media platforms tried to shut him down, and now everyone knows his name.

Are you kidding? Everybody knew who Alex Jones was. He was a laughingstock, a punchline. They targeted him because people consider him an acceptable target. Now that they have established that they can destroy one independent journalist, they will go after another.

...who was a New York Teacher Of The Year: http://www.informationliberati...
"Look again at the seven lessons of schoolteaching: confusion, class position, indifference, emotional and intellectual dependency, conditional self-esteem, surveillance -- all of these things are prime training for permanent underclasses, people deprived forever of finding the center of their own special genius. And over time this training has shaken loose from its own original logic: to regulate the poor. For since the 1920s the growth of the school bureaucracy, and the less visible growth of a horde of industries that profit from schooling exactly as it is, has enlarged this institution's original grasp to the point that it now seizes the sons and daughters of the middle classes as well.
    Is it any wonder Socrates was outraged at the accusation that he took money to teach? Even then, philosophers saw clearly the inevitable direction the professionalization of teaching would take, preempting the teaching function, which belongs to everyone in a healthy community. "

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"In the United States, the school-to-prison pipeline (SPP), also known as the school-to-prison link or the schoolhouse-to-jailhouse track, is the disproportionate tendency of minors and young adults from disadvantaged backgrounds to become incarcerated, because of increasingly harsh school and municipal policies. Many experts have credited factors such as school disturbance laws, zero tolerance policies and practices, and an increase in police in schools in creating the pipeline. This has become a hot topic of debate in discussions surrounding educational disciplinary policies as media coverage of youth violence and mass incarceration has grown during the early 21st century."

They are refugees,

No, the vast majority flooding in are economic migrants. There is a difference, legally and sensibly.

They have the same values you and I have, you fucking moron.

No, Western values are not universal. Secular government, free speech, and human rights. The polls are out there. The results of current migration are in. You can bury your head in the sand and equivocate, but it doesn't change the facts on the ground.

Most refugees coming to Europe are not 'male prime fighting sexual age' but families, grandpa, grandma, ma, pa, kids and grandkids, how damn stupid are you?

Look in the mirror. All you have to do is look at the pictures of the people on the boats. But instead, you see the story of one dead child on a beach propagated by the leftist, "progressive" media and you think that represents the whole story. By the way, that boy's father took the dangerous trip from Turkey, where he was not in war zone and had a job and a place to live. Meaning, by definition, he and his son were not refugees. If his father hadn't made that trip, his son would be alive today.

The situation is so Orwellian, they treat your sensibilities so shabbily, that they'll show you a picture of a middle-aged man as a crying child.

Well, I'm a bit confused by that. I hear people say that, and then I see stuff like this: https://www.informationliberat...

In this case, a user tested Twitter's consistency by reporting two posts from two different accounts. The first said, "I fucking hate white people and their inconsiderate asses for voting for Trump. Fuck you." The second post changed two words: "I fucking hate black people and their inconsiderate asses for voting for Clinton. Fuck you."

Twitter "carefully reviewed" the anti-white post, and determined that it did not violate their rules. The anti-black was found to be a rule violation, and the account was suspended. Why should I not take that to be a clear example of bias?

as a source of reliable news, and that probably applies to the socials as well, for obvious reasons, if you aren't a Leftist.

The so-called MNM was in the tank for Hillary during this election cycle: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...
The media dropped all appearances of journalistic standards and went ballistic in their attacks against Republican candidates, predicting that the final winner, Trump, had no chance of being elected. They started believing their own propaganda and it got echoed back and forth among the various news outlets. Hillary had a tough time filling a high school gymnasium and photos of her rallies were always up front and closely cropped, deliberately. Here is an example of but one of many:
http://thefederalistpapers.org...

Facebook, Twitter, Google and YouTube combined forces to censor "hate" speech on their sites. What they deemed hate speech became patently clear as we approached November 8th. Any posts against Hillary were shadow-baned, and if that didn't force repentance the account was suspended. If the account holder didn't conform to Leftist norms then the account was canceled. Google and Twitter did the same. Google CEO was even on Hillary's campaign team.
Here is a screen captures of an experiment testing Twitter's bias:
http://www.informationliberati...
Guess who got banned.
Here is a similar experiment testing Facebook's bias:
https://www.breakingisraelnews...

Google was just as evil. When Google first set up YouTube they encouraged EVERYONE to create content and post it. They set up provisions for sharing ad revenue. Some YT posters became so successful they quit their jobs and became full time content creators for YouTube. Some of the content was political in nature. You guessed it. Videos which were not favorable to Hillary, or were favorable to Trump got demonetized, and sometimes the account was canceled, throwing the content creator out of a job. Those videos continued to make ad revenues but Google took it all. And they mock Trump's "You're Fired!", or his defunct "university". I suspect that Google has stolen more money from demonetized videos than Trump ever made from his short-lived university. Pure thievery.

During the debate Hillary was "horrified" that Trump would not say that he would accept the outcome of the election, so confident she was of her own election. She when on to describe his attitude as anti-democratic and UN-American. Then she lost the electoral count. Now, according to her own words, SHE is being anti-democratic and UN-American. She joined Jill Stein in the recount, but only in the states she had a narrow loss, not the states she narrowly won, probably fearing the truth of the Veritas video uncovering paid Democrat operatives bragging that they've been stuffing ballot boxes for "50 years" and they "won't **** stop now". Recounting a Chicago-style count would probably be hazardous to her popular vote totals. Here are Hillary's close counts:
Nevada by only 27K votes, Colorado by 75K, Minnesota by 44K and New Hampshire by only 3,000 votes.

So, despite the fact that both wings of the Democrat party ( the Far-Left Bernie and the Far-Left Hillary, they argued over who was more "progressive" and I call it a tie), the leadership of the Republican Party and many of its members and ALL of the Alt-Left Media, as listed in Podesta's email, were against Trump he still won by 37 electoral votes, a margin Hillary would have gladly accepted. The IRS's throttling of 501c applications, which doomed Conservative PACs in the last two elections wasn't effective in stopping Trump because he funded his campaign himself, and he spent a fraction of

"Kill all white people" are ok, because fuck white people. That is perfectly acceptable statements on Twitter and are not considered racist, but everyone else demands that you bow down to their bullshit.

also:
Twitter User Replaces Word 'White' With 'Black,' Gets Banned
https://www.informationliberat...

The American Bar Association concluded:
"However, under the First Amendment, individuals do have a right to speech that the listener disagrees with and to speech that is offensive and hateful.
Think about it. It’s always easier to defend someone’s right to say something with which you agree. But in a free society, you also have a duty to defend speech to which you may strongly object."

Assault and battery.
Two charges often mentioned in news and police reports. Assault is making threats of bodily harm against someone. Battery is actually harming someone, whether you threaten them or not. The 1st Amendment does not protect assault or battery, but "offending" someone's feelings is neither.

Making offending words illegal speech puts ammunition into the hands of unstable people, who are often exploited by those with a "politically correct" agenda for the purposes of speech, thought and political control. That's what Facebook, Google and YouTube have and are doing. The owners and managers of all three corporations were "in the tank" for Hillary Clinton, and used several methods to silence opposition against her, calling Conservative view points "hate" speech. Very convenient. YouTube, after years of encouraging people to create and post video content for a share of the ad revenue, turned on those with Conservative content and demonetized them. Those videos didn't just suddenly stop drawing ad money, but Google greedily keeping ALL the revenue for itself, destroying the livelihood of some who depended entirely on ad revenues for income. When deliberate detrending, shadow banning, or even altering the content of posts on Facebook or Twitter didn't stop the opposition to Hillary those corporations deleted the accounts of the "offenders". Very Orwellian of them.

The Public Commons was, in historical times, the place where citizens of a community gathered to discuss and debate issues of the day. Being a public place everyone had free access and freedom to say what they wished, aside from assault or battery. Facebook, Twitter and Google/YouTube all began supporting free speech but ended up turning to evil and placing limits on what people could say that went beyond prohibiting that which is already illegal. Some, especially those who own the corporations, and those on the Left whom the corporations represent more than any other part of the political spectrum claim that being private corporations they do not have to honor the 1st Amendment. I disagree. ALL of the Bill of Rights applies to ALL Americans no matter where they are on every square inch of this country, regardless of who owns the soil. According to current political dogma it is a violation of the 1st Amendment for a Christian baker to NOT bake a cake for a gay couple, but it is NOT a violation of the 1st Amendment for Facebook Twitter or YouTube to censor or ban Conservatives. Both businesses depend on consumers from "off the street". An example of their double standard can be seen in a Twitter experiment testing the fairness of Twitters application of the censorship rules:
http://www.informationliberati...

In previous generations children were taught that "sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me". The lesson was "toughen up, the world is a dangerous place. Words will hurt you emotionally ONLY if you let them." Today, Social Justice "Warriors" rampage across our nation attacking people and destroying property, but if confronted in public places where their identity is not hidden behind bandannas, hoodies or balaclavas masks they retreat to their academic "safe places" to be coddled by their Marxist mentors.

The Century of Self

Inexperienced drivers don't know how much speeding is safe and that is why limits are set.

This is precisely why people crash. They are brainwashed to think as long as they are doing the speed limit they're ok. Maybe instead of teaching people to behave like robots we could teach them some real skills?

If you fear the police there's a very simple solution, follow the speed limit.

I don't fear the police. They are merely tax collectors. I drive as fast as I like, and ever once in while I pay a fee for the privilege. But this has nothing to do with road safety.

Cops don't care to stop you for a $50 ticket. They rather wait and get the next big fish. I've never been stopped for going 15km/h over the speed limit and I've driven over a million KMs in my life. Obviously I use common sense when going through construction and school areas.

You know the Internet is bigger than just your town/state/country right? Every law enforcement agency is different with different standards and tolerances. where I live you can get a ticket for 1km/h over the limit

That's the issue isn't it? Not everybody can evaluate this by themselves, instead they need to be told what speed they should go.

The math is pretty simple. More speed = more danger. You cannot argue that

If more speed = more danger then shouldn't we reduce the speed limit further? And once we've reduced them,we apply the same "math" we should then reduce them again? Then keep repeating until the speed limit is zero?
I'm guessing "math" (or logic which is what you meant) isn't your strong suit.

and that is why speed limits are set based on ministry of transportation predefined parameters.

and what are those parameters? Can you cite them? It may be different in your area, but I've had some experience in this field and can assure it's not as scientific as you think.

The dogs are consistently abused

Please cite some actual examples of police dogs being constantly abused. You have no idea what you're talking about.

I think "The doges are used in away to abuse the 'suspects'." was closer to what was meant, rather than that the dogs were being mistreated. There are numerous studdies to suggest that the potential for abuse exists:

http://nevergetbusted.com/neve...
http://www.informationliberati...
http://www.wayne-county-forfei...

Why, have you never remembered an event wrong?

Sure I have. So what? If police misremember the event, is that somehow not relevant?

The behavior of everyone will be plain to see on the video

That was actually caught on video, that is. As I explicitly pointed out. I spoke - direct quote here - about the ability "to craft a story that fits what was recorded, and leave out or invent things that weren't picked up". What happened before, or just offscreen? Police are known to claim that someone was "reaching for a gun" - even when it didn't happen. But if the camera angle is bad, they will know they can claim that regardless of what they actually remember.

every lawyer knows the trick of picking out one detail someone got wrong and spinning that into proof that everything they say is a lie

But... but... if "The behavior of everyone will be plain to see on the video", how could a lawyer get away with that?

Frankly, I consider that a feature, not a bug, anyway. Eyewitness testimony really is ureliable. 'Bout time juries learned that applies to police too.

Nor would it change the fact that people would still bring (founded and unfounded) lawsuits against the police.

This is flat out wrong. All the evidence to date shows that cop-cams result in a dramatic reduction in complaints, for two reasons:
1. Since there is a recording, there are far fewer false allegations
2. Since they are being recorded, the cops behave better, so there are fewer incidents that result in valid allegations.

Here is a typical result:

THE Rialto study began in February 2012 and will run until this July. The results from the first 12 months are striking. Even with only half of the 54 uniformed patrol officers wearing cameras at any given time, the department over all had an 88 percent decline in the number of complaints filed against officers, compared with the 12 months before the study, to 3 from 24.

But body cameras will solve all that, right?

In the case of Michael Brown, YES, a camera likely would have prevented the riots. The riots didn't occur because a white cop killed a black kid, but because there was a perception that it was unjustified and the cop "got away with it". If there was a camera, there would be much less dispute about what happened. The camera would either show that the shooting was justified, or it would show that it was not and the cop would be charged with murder. In either case, I don't think there would be a riot.

Thats all very nice idealism. Too bad reality says, fuck you and your cameras.

The tragic irony is that police in Ferguson have a stock of body-worn cameras, but have yet to deploy them to officers.

Worry less about deploying them WSJ. Worry more about the people in control of them.

Nor would it change the fact that people would still bring (founded and unfounded) lawsuits against the police.

This is flat out wrong. All the evidence to date shows that cop-cams result in a dramatic reduction in complaints, for two reasons:
1. Since there is a recording, there are far fewer false allegations
2. Since they are being recorded, the cops behave better, so there are fewer incidents that result in valid allegations.

Here is a typical result:

THE Rialto study began in February 2012 and will run until this July. The results from the first 12 months are striking. Even with only half of the 54 uniformed patrol officers wearing cameras at any given time, the department over all had an 88 percent decline in the number of complaints filed against officers, compared with the 12 months before the study, to 3 from 24.

But body cameras will solve all that, right?

In the case of Michael Brown, YES, a camera likely would have prevented the riots. The riots didn't occur because a white cop killed a black kid, but because there was a perception that it was unjustified and the cop "got away with it". If there was a camera, there would be much less dispute about what happened. The camera would either show that the shooting was justified, or it would show that it was not and the cop would be charged with murder. In either case, I don't think there would be a riot.

Insightful post. James P. Hogan, a fan of true scientific inquiry, has some good fictional examples of this process in his "Giants" novels and some others (including his last).

I can ask if the scientific process as a skill (including critical thinking and assessment of intent as you put it) is learnable to any significant degree in the day-to-say environment for most of today's kids? So many kids are caught between forced schooling and entrancing but mostly passive media consumption, while they are also generally being fed crap nutritionally and essentially denied sunlight and exercise by all the demands and distractions.

From John Taylor Gatto from around 1991:
http://www.informationliberati...
"After an adult lifetime spent teaching school, I believe the method of mass-schooling is its only real content. Don't be fooled into thinking that good curriculum or good equipment or good teachers are the critical determinants of your son's or daughter's education. All the pathologies we've considered come about in large measure because the lessons of school prevent children from keeping important appointments with themselves and with their families to learn lessons in self-motivation, perseverance, self-reliance, courage, dignity, and love -- and lessons in service to others, too, which are among the key lessons of home and community life.
Thirty years ago [in the early 60s] these things could still be learned in the time left after school. But television has eaten up most of that time, and a combination of television [[or now also computer games and the web etc.]] and the stresses peculiar to two-income or single-parent families have swallowed up most of what used to be family time as well. Our kids have no time left to grow up fully human and only thin-soil wastelands to do it in.
A future is rushing down upon our culture which will insist all of us learn the wisdom of non-material experience; a future which will demand as the price of survival that we follow a path of natural life economical in material cost. These lessons cannot be learned in schools as they are. School is a twelve-year jail sentence where bad habits are the only curriculum truly learned. I teach school and win awards doing it. I should know."

I am, to some extent, a creation of highly-regulated 1960s and 1970s TV. There was not that much on of interest to kids, and much of what was on of interest to kids often either had a moral purpose (even cartoons or comedies/dramas like Yogi's Friends or Batman or Thunderbirds or the Andy Griffith Show) or was connected to scientific or cultural literacy (PBS, Sealab 2020, Wild Kingdom). The pacing was slower then, too, making it more feasible to, say, build with blocks while sort of half-following the screen. So, a limited amount of TV could be a boon even without much parental supervision -- while still leaving plenty of time with nothing interesting on TV to trigger boredom which lead to other things to do which lead to skills connected to science and engineering and citizenship, like in my case building with TogL's (somewhat like LEGO), electronics experiments or eventually computer programming, reading Isaac Asimov novels, playing with our dog, going outside with other kids on the street or a park, going to a summer day camp for sports and arts, or going to church on Sundays. Today's distracted and overwhelmed parents (typically both working full-time, if there even are two) have a much harder (perhaps impossible) job of navigating a complex media landscape for their kids -- even as they may also have a much broader range of good stuff than ever before (including, say. a classic like Mr. Rogers Neighborhood available on-demand on Amazon alongside an amazing range of scientific documentaries and pro-social media programs and movies). The latest Kindle Fire with parental controls on specifying kids' media is perhaps a step in the right direction there, as is the OLPC tablet and pre-selected educati

I think it was more of a reference to things like This, this, this, this, and this.

11th circuit court of appeals ruled that you *CANNOT* compel somebody to decrypt their HD.

Click here for link

Iran is trying its best to be recognized by the international community as a modern Islamic democracy,

Oh for fuck's sake, give it a rest. There should be a -1 "Naive" mod for this.

I'm no apologist for the US government, they can do and continue to do terrible things, but to pretend that things in Iran are better for the average citizen than they are for the average US citizen is ridiculous.

You really should watch this video. They had things pretty good for them until we and Britian got involved.
.
Iran has not attacked a nation since 1946. In addition, they are considered a very liberal "democracy" when compared to Saudi Arabia. Likewise, do you think we truly live in a such a perfect democracy in the US? Indefinite detention, torture, civil rights abuses, constant acts of aggression against foreign countries now both virtual and physical, poverty, no health care system, domestic spying, censorship, etc... If you removed religion from the equation, are they really that much worse than us? They are far from perfect, but we aren't that much better.

Off topic, but a common misconception is that Iran is a barren desert wasteland out of Star Wars, so i'll throw this out there. http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=39048

However: http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=28187 [www.informationliberation.com]

So, remind me again, just who is cozying up to Big Oil like a latter-day Anna Nicole Smith in an attempt to get more money to further their own agenda?

The police. Not even China is immune to CCTV. "Houston's police chief on Wednesday proposed placing surveillance cameras in apartment complexes, downtown streets, shopping malls and even private homes to fight crime during a shortage of police officers."

If you have a shortage of money to hire police officers then you don't have enough money to install CCTV, unless of course you're going to force those who's property the cameras are installed on to pay for them. Even then though you still need to pay people to monitor the output.

Falcon

These are not normal private residences, but are Government housing where you are sent to live ("sin bins"). Also, the story is from October of 2005.

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=2115

Despite the fact Israel has shown great restraint in dealing with the Palestinians (if it was me, Id bulldoze the entire Gaza strip into the sea and turn it into a resort), they are still labeled as evil and a terrorist state for finally retaliating after multiple rocket attacks and suicide bombers.

And up until the point I saw that the Israeli's get their children to sign and paint the missiles they retaliate with, I had some sympathy for them too.

Happy?

thank youuu... thankyouverymuch

Right because in the US you can't be sent to jail for 10 years for having consensual sex with a minor when you are a minor yourself? (see recent case)
-> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16862643/

Because in the US you can't wear baggy pants in Louisiana without being fined and/or sent to Jail?

Because in the US you can't be sent to jail for minor possession of Marijuana when you are a Quadriplegic and die there because of poor/no healthcare?
-> http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6282

Because in the US you can't be sent to jail because you upload movies online?

Because in the US you can't be sent to jail because you used (valid!!) $2 bills in a bestbuy?

Because in the US you can't record police officers on public property without being sentenced to Jail?
-> http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id= 22471

Because you can't be jailed for life for a $2 robbery, then be controlled with Marijuana in your possession?
-> http://www.mankatofreepress.com/webextra/local_sto ry_154160920.html

and so many more... Do I _really_ need to say more...

I live in the US, I love the country, but I am sorry, the judicial system and the priorities are fucked up too... even maybe to a greater extend because you do not know WHAT will land you to jail here.

FRAUD ALERT -- FRAUD ALERT -- FRAUD ALERT

Slashdot editors apparently don't read the comments on the stories they post. Also, Slashdot editors apparently didn't listen in Physics class. This is the fifth time in 3 years that they have fallen for the same fraud, if I count correctly. Some of my other comments:

Max Planck would be very sad about this.

Distinguish between real science and junk science.

Planck's constant is so small that interactions between electromagnetic waves and molecules cannot be chemically specific. The 2,000 MHz radiation from WiFi is felt as heat, a very, very small amount of heat, almost certainly not measurable.

Anyone may have theories. Someone could say, for example, that pigs have started flying and they have been eating the bees. (The bees are dying because of bad management; the organic beekeepers aren't having problems.) The only real science, however, is based on what is already known through experimentation. That requires an understanding of what is known.

Tell you what, I am merely a middle class individual. I have to
work for the little that I can have and guess what...

I don't own a television and I consider watching television if not
vulgar, then self-defeating.

You see, my mind is precious and it's the only thing I can really
take control of in this stage of my life.

As far as the internet is concerned, I would say his Lordship is
painfully aware that it is severely interfering with the peace of the land, i.e. the ignorance of the serfs:

http://www.informationliberation.com/?multimedia
http://www.informationliberation.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.disinfo.com/
http://deoxy.ory/

are just a fair sample right off the top of my mind.

Tell you what, I am merely a middle class individual. I have to
work for the little that I can have and guess what...

I don't own a television and I consider watching television if not
vulgar, then self-defeating.

You see, my mind is precious and it's the only thing I can really
take control of in this stage of my life.

As far as the internet is concerned, I would say his Lordship is
painfully aware that it is severely interfering with the peace of the land, i.e. the ignorance of the serfs:

http://www.informationliberation.com/?multimedia
http://www.informationliberation.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.disinfo.com/
http://deoxy.ory/

are just a fair sample right off the top of my mind.

Thanks for telling me, I just updated my sig. Youtube periodically deletes 911 truth videos and then somebody puts it back up. I can be reached at my user@yahoo.com email account, just substitute the string user with geltenfloor. If you want to learn more about this then go to then do go to these sites

http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.informationliberation.com/

Watch the movies Terrorstorm, Loose Change 2nd Edition, Police State 2000, 2003 on
video.google.com (just search for them, you'll find them people make sure those
docs are up). While you're at it also enter "Global Warming Swindle" in video.google.com

Take care
JG

• Election staff convicted in recount rig in Ohio 2004 presidential election that gave President Bush the electoral votes he needed to defeat Democratic Sen. John Kerry
  
  
• Bush signs landmark executive order increasing White House power over federal agencies
  
  
• Bush's Signing Statement Dictatorship
  
  
• Senator asks Bush to explain signing statement that gives President authority to open mail without warrant
  
  
• Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
  
  
• US Attorney General Questions the Right to a Fair Trial
  
  
• The White House is replacing U.S. Attorneys throughout the country
  
  
• Attorneys for the District of Columbia argue that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies only to militias, not individuals
  
  
• U.S. citizens to be required "clearance" to leave the United States
  
  
• plenty more, regretfully...
  
  

• Election staff convicted in recount rig in Ohio 2004 presidential election that gave President Bush the electoral votes he needed to defeat Democratic Sen. John Kerry
  
  
• Bush signs landmark executive order increasing White House power over federal agencies
  
  
• Bush's Signing Statement Dictatorship
  
  
• Senator asks Bush to explain signing statement that gives President authority to open mail without warrant
  
  
• Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
  
  
• US Attorney General Questions the Right to a Fair Trial
  
  
• The White House is replacing U.S. Attorneys throughout the country
  
  
• Attorneys for the District of Columbia argue that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies only to militias, not individuals
  
  
• U.S. citizens to be required "clearance" to leave the United States
  
  
• plenty more...
  
  

• Election staff convicted in recount rig in Ohio 2004 presidential election that gave President Bush the electoral votes he needed to defeat Democratic Sen. John Kerry
  
  
• Bush signs landmark executive order increasing White House power over federal agencies
  
  
• Bush's Signing Statement Dictatorship
  
  
• Senator asks Bush to explain signing statement that gives President authority to open mail without warrant
  
  
• Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
  
  
• US Attorney General Questions the Right to a Fair Trial
  
  
• The White House is replacing U.S. Attorneys throughout the country
  
  
• Attorneys for the District of Columbia argue that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies only to militias, not individuals
  
  
• U.S. citizens to be required "clearance" to leave the United States
  
  
• plenty more...
  
  

• Election staff convicted in recount rig in Ohio 2004 presidential election that gave President Bush the electoral votes he needed to defeat Democratic Sen. John Kerry
  
  
• Bush signs landmark executive order increasing White House power over federal agencies
  
  
• Bush's Signing Statement Dictatorship
  
  
• Senator asks Bush to explain signing statement that gives President authority to open mail without warrant
  
  
• Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
  
  
• US Attorney General Questions the Right to a Fair Trial
  
  
• The White House is replacing U.S. Attorneys throughout the country
  
  
• Attorneys for the District of Columbia argue that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies only to militias, not individuals
  
  
• U.S. citizens to be required "clearance" to leave the United States
  
  
• plenty more regretfully, see Part II
  
  

• Election staff convicted in recount rig in Ohio 2004 presidential election that gave President Bush the electoral votes he needed to defeat Democratic Sen. John Kerry
  
  
• Bush signs landmark executive order increasing White House power over federal agencies
  
  
• Bush's Signing Statement Dictatorship
  
  
• Senator asks Bush to explain signing statement that gives President authority to open mail without warrant
  
  
• Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
  
  
• US Attorney General Questions the Right to a Fair Trial
  
  
• The White House is replacing U.S. Attorneys throughout the country
  
  
• Attorneys for the District of Columbia argue that the Second Amendment right to bear arms applies only to militias, not individuals
  
  
• U.S. citizens to be required "clearance" to leave the United States
  
  
• plenty more, regretfully...
  
  

The problem with allowing cameras on the streets is that next they want them in the home

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=6506

Genius. We can stop them?. How? You can't. We will never be able to STOP them completely. Theres always going to be terrorists, and always will be. But violating the constitution is not an option. To the bush administration you are the terrorist. http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id= 16337 Open your eyes.

Check out the latest power grab attempt here:
http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id= 16337

Now. Are you all still not bothered about warrentless wiretaps and monitoring of US citizens?
Are YOUR conversations at all critical of the Emperor G?

Seriously, the gubbermint is broken. How can it be repaired?