Domain: mozdev.org
Stories and comments across the archive that link to mozdev.org.
Comments · 2,936
-
Re:Better Icons (for windows users at least)
DO NOT use the grayrest.com link. Use the plugindoc link. mozdev can take the load, grayrest can't.
-
Great work, guysThanks to all the developers for making it happen, and thanks to AOL for funding an open source effort. Mozilla has been my only browser for the last few months and I'm unlikely to switch again (unless Opera becomes open source *cough*).
You can find some cool add-ons for Mozilla at Mozdev. Among these are: Annozilla, a sidebar tool for annotating websites; Forumzilla, a tool for reading web discussion forums usenet-style; Jabberzilla, a Jabber-client; MozBlog for weblog authors; OptiMoz for mouse gestures, and many many others. Not all of these work with 1.0 yet, though.
-
Re:Still need a new icon :-)
You could give these a try.
-
Better Icons (for windows users at least)
If you're sick of that curly, blue lizard icon that appears on EVERY window, try installing the icons found here:
http://www.grayrest.com/moz/resources/icons.shtml
They're nice looking, and more importantly, I can now differentiate between the browser windows and the mail windows...
Supposedly these and other icons are available from the following page, but it's really slow right now for me...
http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/icons.html -
Congratulations!OK this is going to be a bit of an incoherent ramble but... WTF...
Enormous thanks and my congratulations to everyone involved with Mozilla! And to all those doubters and cynics who've been whining about bloat, performance, features,... or indeed anything at all: you can stop it now. Mozilla is the best web browser in existence today (looking only at the browser component): it supports FAR more standards than anything else, AND it copes with old broken non-compliant HTML, AND it renders pages fast, AND it (the browser) starts up like greased lightning in -turbo mode ... in fact, it's faster than Internet Explorer on this Windows box. It's also running on the nearby Linux machine. Name me ONE browser that compiles and runs on more platforms? I think moz even gives lynx a run for it's money on that front... and tabbed browsing.... tab groups... *sigh* it just gfoes on and on... threaded news/mail reader... XUL, the coolest cross-platform GUI tools and component set EVER (that I am aware of: I'm going to be the front end to my employer's anti-virus software build and test rigs using XUL, now that the APIs are frozen XULBuilder will blossom into life once more...
Not only is it a category killer browser - irtonically hte individual apps are themselves (pretty much) category killers. mail/news easily trounces Outlook for me - apart from the secuirty stuff, it does threading. Yep, no threading in Outlook! And what's more --- no ads (Opera), no security holes (IE), and best of all, Mozilla is Free (Libre) Software.
Many thanks also to those of the rest of us who kept the faith, spending long expensive nights downloading another flakey nightly build, who never hit EXIT on a moz process until it had crashed...
Personally I feel more involved with Moz than any other Free Software project, I've been testing, logging bugs in Bugzilla, reading the docs, status reports and mozillazine ever since the news was first announced here on Slashdot. Anyone else out there coming to the London party? Gervase?
A million thanks to everyone who hacked code or helped out on the project in any way. Mozilla is the most enjoyable software I've ever used, apart from Perl that is. Oh frabjous day! Calloo, callay!!! =) *does a little dance*
PS: and a special thanks to Asa and the rest of the evangelist types who turn up here reliably and calmy refuting the FUD and bollocks that have come from Slahdotters over the years. Go back a couple of years and pick out a Slashdot moz story -- you lot
/hated/ it and it sometimes seemed no-one else believed it would ever work...) -
All IE Versions?What about the MacOS 9 and MacOS X version of Internet Explorer? Generally when the press says there is an IE security issue, it doesn't effect us but I could not gleam that info from the short! Yahoo! article!
Microsoft is so good at screwing up its own OS, thank God they seem to do a good job with Mac apps (though 90% of our security problems are due to M$).This will be moot for Mac Users anyway with Chimera looking better every day (nightly build).
-
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps?
This update lets Carbon apps use Quartz text antialiasing, which everybody knows is the very best thing about Quartz.
errrr... I assume you're referring to ATSUI text rendering, which has been available in the Carbon API for quite some time. Apps like Chimera, a Cocoa version of Navigator that uses Gecko, compile with ATSUI rendering, but apparently not before taking a healthy speed hit.
So while this has been available to developers for quite a while, not all apps enable it, and from what i've seen, that's chiefly because of speed concerns. Hopefully Apple has gotten on the ball and sped up the ATSUI rendering code, but until Jaguar, when Quartz Extreme offloads everything to a graphics card, we probably won't see any serious speed improvements in antialiased text rendering. -
Re:Quartz AA in Carbon apps?
"OmniWeb is my dad."
Really? Surely Chimera should be your dad. Or at least your mum.
-
Re:of course it's not your browser of choice, but.I hear you. Unless there's a skin for Mozilla that makes it look absolutely identical to IE, and it comes with a rendering plugin that makes it render pages in exactly the same way as IE, then I could never put it on my mom's computer.
Well here's the skin. Personally I find Mozilla renders pretty damn close to IE these days.
-
Re:What is Opera's competitive edge?
One URL: OptiMoz Gestures for Mozilla.
-
Re:Ads Don't Slow Down Opera
The Mozilla tabs are great. If you need even more tab features, there's MultiZilla.
If you want mouse gestures in Mozilla, there's OptiMoz Gestures. They work just great.
So, really, how is Mozilla blown away? -
Re:Ads Don't Slow Down Opera
The Mozilla tabs are great. If you need even more tab features, there's MultiZilla.
If you want mouse gestures in Mozilla, there's OptiMoz Gestures. They work just great.
So, really, how is Mozilla blown away? -
Re:MSIE Only....
First, let me say, this is a *BAD* thing for the Internet. It's bad enough that IE goes around telling sites it's Mozilla/4.0, having Opera or Mozilla lie about being IE who's lieing about being Netscape is just silly.
If you want to fake the browser string, you can put the following in your user.js file (in your profile directory):
user_pref("general.useragent.override", "fake agent string");
This just alters what Mozilla sends, not it's behavior.
There's also the Useragent Toolbar which lets you adjust this on the fly. -
Uh, No.I'm sorry, but Mr Hyatt is incorrect in asserting that Mozilla had tabbed browsing before Opera.
He claims that "Opera only added tabs in its newest version after Mozilla had them already in its trunk builds."
Opera introduced its 'Window Bar' (buttons for each open within the MDI) with Opera 4, wich came out in spring of 2000. Around that time Mozilla was at M14 and the first Netscape 6 Preview was being released. Neither of those had the equivalent to Opera's Window Bar. The first mention of Mozilla 'tabbed browsing' I can find is a year later, contained in this post to the Mozilla newsgroups. Implementation didn't happen until late summer or fall of 2001, possibly being beat to it by the Multizilla project.
Of course NetCaptor (A shell for the MSIE HTML rendering component) had them back in '99, maybe even earlier.
-
Re:Big scary lawyers from Apple... Mozilla developers can't use look-alike widgets because of Apple's hard-ass policy against Aqua look-alikes
Chimera seems to have succeeded in this effort just fine. Dave Hyatt made pseudo-Aqua widgets that obey CSS rules (though, actually, they don't have to), and they don't look half bad.
-
Re:Big scary lawyers from Apple... Mozilla developers can't use look-alike widgets because of Apple's hard-ass policy against Aqua look-alikes
Chimera seems to have succeeded in this effort just fine. Dave Hyatt made pseudo-Aqua widgets that obey CSS rules (though, actually, they don't have to), and they don't look half bad.
-
Re:Good News: Mozilla +3 to +6, MSIE -3 to -6
Set them up with the MSIE skin for Mozilla.
:) -
Re:finally
If you are interesting in getting help for installing plugins goto MozDev's Plugin Documentation.
-
Re:404 Page Not Found ?
And of course there's the Mozilla Google Toolbar for people who don't use IE.
-
New York City Release Party
Ack! Our party has been Slashdotted!! Anyway, for any folks who want to party, in addition to the 800,000 or so who have signed up in the past 2 hours, the gig is at Remote Lounge, in the East Village. Our web site is (graciously!) hosted at mozdev.org.
The date is currently scheduled for Friday, the 7th, but it might move to the 12th, to coincide with the bash at DNA Lounge.
Party on! -
New version of Chimera released today
David Hyatt, Chimera's principal developer, said that since he was on sabbatical no new builds were in the works until July. However, the demand for more development was so high, and the rumors were so rampant, that he released a new build this morning. See for yourself. David has denied the rumors repeatedly, and I doubt that Apple will take Chimera and rename it iBrowser or (even better) iBrowse. However, I wouldn't be surprised if it eventually became the default browser and shipped with future versions of the OS.
-
Re:OmniWeb vs. Chimera
- Nicer interface (although Chimera has Aqua interface widgets, the ones in OmniWeb are nicer).
I don't care how nice the interface is if it doesn't render pages correctly! Get the rendering right, then make it pretty. I am still eagerly awaiting CSS support... This is one of the reasons why Chimera is bound to beat out OmniWeb eventually - they're using an already standard rendering engine, so they don't have to worry about half the stuff that the OmniWeb developers have to.By the way, Omni Group wants you to pay for OmniWeb, and they give you little 'encouragements' to do so, but it's not crippleware
No, you're right, it's not crippleware, but if you leave a window alone for long enough, it gets a HUGE "unlicensed" watermark. Imagine how embarrassing that would be in an important presentation... so, I guess that's one of the encouragements. -
CSSIf OmniWeb would only support CSS correctly, it would be my primary browser.
I think the majority of people who are using OmniWeb are using it for one of these two reasons:
- Pretty anti-aliased text
- It's not microsoft made.
The first reason will disappear as soon as the next version of Mac OS X comes out - it will allow Carbon Apps to use the pretty quartz text - meaning IE will probably be as slick.
I know I keep pushing it, but once Chimera hits primetime it will be the best browser around. - Pretty anti-aliased text
-
Re:The coders are getting a bit punch though.
I posted the comment in the bug after yanking the feature; admittedly, the comment was probably a bit inappropriate.
Nevertheless, this illustrates just how easy it is to get a poorly designed, marginal feature into Mozilla, and then in short order be able to enforce "squatter's rights" to keep it there. (With wild conspiracy theoretic claims, nonetheless!)
The "feature" -- and I use the term loosely -- threw up a dialog for each image on the page before loading it. It was implemented without understanding how the layout engine worked, and caused us to crash on all but the most trivial pages.
For those who continue to thirst for this capability, note that the hooks to implement this feature well remain in Mozilla. And there is plenty of room on mozdev.org for a mixin that would take advantage of the hooks (hopefully, in a more useful way than spamming the poor user with hundreds of dialogs on each page load).
-
Fizzilla vs. Chimera
For Mac see Fizilla: or, for the boring, "Mozilla for MacOS X" http://www.mozilla.org/ports/fizzilla/
Actually, the two Fizillas are simply carbon Mozillas. For a Gecko-based browser with OS X's look and feel, you should download Chimera, a Cocoaized Mozilla-based browser. Chimera I think is a browser-only version, as is mozilla/browser (for Windows; don't have a URI).
-
Re:Netscape 7
Well, I need netscape anyway because some sites won't let you install a plugin for mozilla but only netscape or explorer.
The Mozilla PluginDoc project was created to help Mozilla users with installing their plugins. Go to that website to get instructions on how to install your favorite plug-in without needing Netscape. -
Re:Mac OS X version...
Redundant, I know. But if you want the speed of gecko, with quartz-rendering and tabbed browsing too, you can do worse than use Chimera.
-
Re:Mozilla CAN'T suck enough
*cough* Chimera *cough*
-
Re:IE...
I don't know anything about developing for Opera ("developing for" here meaning "writing extensions and plugins and such", not "writing HTML that targets a specific browser"), but IE has a very robust, very powerful extension model. You can write BHOs (Browser Helper Objects) that do anything from display a document inside the IE frame (Adobe's PDF plugin does this) to blocking pop-ups (Like this [daishar.com]) to most anything else. You can add new toolbars (like Google's bar [google.com]), new sidebars (like the vertical favorites bar, or you can make a horizontal bar), add items to the Tools menu, and more. I'm sure you can do all of this using Mozilla, too, but the beauty here is that you don't need the source for IE to be able to do all this.
Sure, I know about BHOs. The BHO interface is used by quite a bit of spyware. :-)
Speaking of features, Mozilla has built-in popup blocking. It also supports inline Acrobat, and it has an unofficial Google toolbar available for it. Mozilla also has a customizable sidebar, which the equivalent of IE's. Mozilla has extra features too, such as folders that can search the whole bookmark list and bookmarks that link into the Mozilla core via Javascript. It is even possible to enable mouse gestures with Mozilla. By the way, for all the things I listed, the source code isn't necessary for either, even though it is available, which is more than I can say for IE. -
Re:IE...
I don't know anything about developing for Opera ("developing for" here meaning "writing extensions and plugins and such", not "writing HTML that targets a specific browser"), but IE has a very robust, very powerful extension model. You can write BHOs (Browser Helper Objects) that do anything from display a document inside the IE frame (Adobe's PDF plugin does this) to blocking pop-ups (Like this [daishar.com]) to most anything else. You can add new toolbars (like Google's bar [google.com]), new sidebars (like the vertical favorites bar, or you can make a horizontal bar), add items to the Tools menu, and more. I'm sure you can do all of this using Mozilla, too, but the beauty here is that you don't need the source for IE to be able to do all this.
Sure, I know about BHOs. The BHO interface is used by quite a bit of spyware. :-)
Speaking of features, Mozilla has built-in popup blocking. It also supports inline Acrobat, and it has an unofficial Google toolbar available for it. Mozilla also has a customizable sidebar, which the equivalent of IE's. Mozilla has extra features too, such as folders that can search the whole bookmark list and bookmarks that link into the Mozilla core via Javascript. It is even possible to enable mouse gestures with Mozilla. By the way, for all the things I listed, the source code isn't necessary for either, even though it is available, which is more than I can say for IE. -
Re:No Google Toolbar...
Well, maybe it's only supported on IE, but you can get it for Mozilla.
-
Re:MacOS version X
What do you mean "use the Aqua interface"? It certainly uses Aqua to render the appearance of the buttons via the theme engine (assuming they've specified to render with the native style), and the behaviour is pretty similar too. I doubt many people would be able to tell a "native" app from Mozilla.
By saying "use the Aqua interface", I mean that the interface is not fully-Cocoa aware/compliant/whatever. Compare Mozilla to Chimera for about 30 seconds and you'll see what I mean. :^) -
Re:Why this is better than Mozilla...That's one of the problems with Mozilla -- the plug-in finder rarely sends you anywhere useful, and most plug-in installers fail to recognize Mozilla as a valid browser.
Here are some links to the java and flash plugin installers that just automatically work with mozilla (or netscape):
Java Plugin for mozilla (win32)
Also, over at mozdev there are some improved window icons worth checking out (Click the 'install icons' link and the bottom of the page) They're better than the default mozilla icon (blue lizard) because you get different icons for the different types of windows (broswer, mail/news, javascript console, etc.)
Flash Plugin for mozilla (win32) -
GoogleBar for Mozilla!
And you thought tabbed browsing in Mozilla was cool...
Check out the Google Toolbar
Awwwwe, I have found true love... Mozilla + Tabbed Browsing + Google Toolbar -
Re:Mac OS X version
See BannerBlind for blocking your in-page adds.
-
Re:Mouse Gestures are even better...
You can find a XUL-Plugin for mozilla here.
I haven't tried it with NS7 jet, but it works nice with mozilla. -
Re:Mac OS X version
Try Chimera. It's to OSX what Galeon is for Gnome.
-
Re:The Most Useful (and Missing) Shortcut...
Googlebar for Mozilla
Not a perfect implementation, but good enough for me.
S -
Re:Tabbed browsing?
FYI, there is a spell checker for Mozilla, which is suposedly to be integrated to the Mozilla source after the 1.0 release.
-
Re:MacOS version X
While it is a native OS X application in the most basic sense of the word, it does not yet use the Aqua interface. For this functionality, check out the Chimera browser.
-
Re:On Alternates To DNS/ICANN
There's a Mozilla version over at MozDev It's pretty sweet really. Hope this helps!
-
GNU Privacy Guard Anyone?Looks like it's time to switch to GNU Privacy Guard if you haven't already. Does anyone know if it will be immune to this attack?
And for those that haven't found it yet, enigmail should allow you to use GNU Privacy Guard with Mozilla, even under Windows. Haven't tried it myself yet. -
Re:I recommend Mozilla to block popunder addsBoth Chimera and Omniweb allow blocking of unwanted popups, if you're running Mac OS X.
Yes, I'm sure we all agree that popups are truly a pain, but we also run into some other issues with this: at what point do you draw the line between annoying and helpful?
What if a page is designed to use window.open() in a helpful way? Is disabling it in this scenario beneficial?
This was most of the reason why <blink> disappeared (mostly... now it's available in CSS): There weren't ANY ways to use it without being obnoxious.
-
Re:AOLinux.
Looking for http://spellchecker.mozdev.org/?
-
Re:You think that's bad?
Mozilla doesn't have a pointy-clicky way to change the useragent out of the box, but you can add that with the Mozilla Useragent Toolbar. That's what I used (on Moz 1.0 RC1) and it got me past Hotmail's browser Nazism without a problem. Many thanks to David Illsley (developer of uabar) for the nifty add-on!
-- Jason Lefkowitz
-
Re:Chimera used instead of IE
This was pretty brave considering that chimera is only at version 0.28
I'm assuming you meant 0.2.8 not 0.28... Even so, according to the Chimera Site the latest available build is 0.2.7... ;-) -
Chimera used instead of IE
I was pretty suprised when I noticed that not only was Phil Shiller not using IE for his Xserve demos durin this introduction, but he was using Chimera instead! This was pretty brave considering that chimera is only at version 0.28
;-)<conspiracy theory>Could this mean that Apple may dump IE in the future in favor of chimera once it's finished?</conspiracy theory>
Go Chimera! Go Phil! Go Steve!
-
Re:ASP support?
Knowing the mental qualities of most page-restrictors, this fools their detection scripts quite nicely. This can blow up in your face, however, if the malicious web designer chooses to intentionally exclude Opera, by denying all browsers that contain 'opera' anywhere. I have complained about this to the Opera support groups [opera.com] but they told me it wasn't possible to do a "complete" fake header. If you want that I guess you have to rewrite user-agent headers with a proxy.
Or use Mozilla and the UA Toolbar or UA Sidebar
-
Re:The choice is very hard now
But once you get used to the mousegestures and the superfast page rendering it's hard to getaway.
Mozilla _has_ mousegestures.
As far as superfast page rendering, how much faster than instant can you get??? Maybe it's just the sites that I goto, but I never have a noticable page loading lag... -
Re:Mouse Gestures In OperaDoes Mozilla have similar gesture support? I thought I remember reading about that a while ago, but I haven't been able to find it.
Try: