Slashdot Mirror

Hey CmdrTaco, I'm voting for Shelley the Republican ..

And your latest cut-and-paste crapflood in various threads just goes to show how much I really do p0wn you!

Now, why is that? What are you so afraid of my debunking your hosts file for? Is it because anyone using it is open to certain attacks, and that it's easy to fingerprint which machines are using it by running a simple javascript on any server?

After all, you've put a lot of time and energy into spamming all sorts of web sites trying to encourage people to use it ... and certainly a lot of time into trying to shut me up when I refused your "offer" to stop crap-flooding my journal if I would stop pointing out your lies.

jump, fat boy, jump

For the record (since google doesn't index journals, index this, google! :-), Alexander Peter Kowalski's hosts file does not protect you from viruses and other malware. It didn't back in 1995, and it certainly doesn't today.

And your latest cut-and-paste crapflood in various threads just goes to show how much I really do p0wn you!

Now, why is that? What are you so afraid of my debunking your hosts file for? Is it because anyone using it is open to certain attacks, and that it's easy to fingerprint which machines are using it by running a simple javascript on any server?

After all, you've put a lot of time and energy into spamming all sorts of web sites trying to encourage people to use it ... and certainly a lot of time into trying to shut me up when I refused your "offer" to stop crap-flooding my journal if I would stop pointing out your lies.

jump, fat boy, jump

For the record (since google doesn't index journals, index this, google! :-), Alexander Peter Kowalski's hosts file does not protect you from viruses and other malware. It didn't back in 1995, and it certainly doesn't today.

Keep jumping, fat boy

For those wondering why APK (alexander Peter Kowalski - the "hosts file guy" is so angry, it's because he's not happy that I pointed out that his hosts file does not protect people from viruses and malware, and I warned everyone that if they tried to rebut him without protecting themselves by posting anonymously, he'd do like he always does - threaten to sue them for libel (he always backs down when called on it), and stalk them on the Internet, as he's doing here, with multiple posts pretending to be various "different" anonymous posters..

Now, why would anyone do that? Well, think about it - anyone depending on a broken "solution" is ripe for exploitation. So, anyone who downloads his "solution" is advertising "Here's the IP of a machine - p0wn me!" Additionally, anyone interested can run a bit of javascript on their site to fingerprint whether his "hosts file" is being used or not.

Makes you wonder why he continues to falsely accuse me of running a botnet, doesn't it? It's typical of liars to accuse others of what they're guilty of.

BTW - he offered to stop if I would agree not to continue to debunk his stupid hosts file. After calling me a stupid c*nt? You have to be kidding ...

Why does he do it? Because it's all he can do. Spam and more spam. And BTW, the stories about linux serving up malware from the London Stock Exchange were put out by Microsoft shills - who failed to point out that the cut-over to linux hadn't happened - it was supposed to happen on Valentine's day, and the story you quote is from 3 days prior. The compromised machines were running Windows.

Now you might be wondering why Alexander Peter Kowalski is so adamant about people using his hosts file to "protect" themselves. One simple explanation - anyone depending on it is open to attack, and if you download it, you've now advertised the IP address of a machine that's probably open to p0wnage.

It's also easy to fingerprint which machines visiting a site are using it with a bit of javascript.

So maybe he's just not too happy that pointing this out threatens his "business model". It makes sense, just like him accusing me of being a botnet operator when calling me a c*nt and a b*tch, and making fun of my temporary loss of sight in one eye (calling me an ugly cyclops) didn't work. Anything to keep people from continuing to question his BS.

No wonder slashdot banned his account.

Oh, almost forgot ... JUMP, FAT BOY, JUMP. Oops, too fat.

http://shelleytherepublican.com/ seems fine... on the web design front, of course.

Hey man. Would you be willing to contribute an article to that effect to The Freedom Blog?

Peace!

I just downloaded Google Chrome 3.0.192.0 for Mac and it crashed before I could even open a page. There is no excuse for this; my Mac Pro is perfect in every way with eight 2.93 GHz cores, 32 GB RAM, and a fresh install of Mac OS X Leopard v10.5.7. Ergo any crashing Google Chrome does is Google Chrome's own fault!

Why is it that Apple and Mozilla can do this but Google can't? I ran Internet Explorer 8 for months before its final release, Firefox 3.5 since its 3.1 days, and found Safari 4 Developer Preview more stable than Safari 3. In fact, even WebKit is more stable than Chrome.

What really baffles me, however, isn't the instability I've come to expect from Google, but that Google has the audacity to ask for personal user info to improve its browser. Is the search engine maker datamonger really so desperate for my private information that it's stooped to the level of Trojan horses to get it?

They should ask me that when it doesn't crash on launch.

Everything Google does is just another way to sieve personal data away for targeting ads. This kind of Big Brother crap is more repulsive than the fat programmers that make it possible. Google, with its deep pockets and doctoral scholars, thinks that by holding user data hostage it can maneuver around Apple and Microsoft. While this may be true, I'm not willing to be a part of it.

In using Google's search, Gmail, Chrome or whatever else the faceless robot of a company invents, the user is surrendering their personal information to a giant hivemind. No longer are their personal preferences some choice they make; they're a string of data processed by a Google algorithm: Google dehumanizes its users!

So while Google is arrogant enough to paint spyware shiny so it can parse our browsing habits, the least they could do is make sure it doesn't crash. If Apple, Microsoft, and Mozilla can get their preview releases right, why can't Google? And now they're making their own operating systems?

Get real, Google! I'll use your crashing codebloat when my Mac is cold and dead and I'm looking for handouts. Until then, quit mining my personal data!

I just downloaded Google Chrome 3.0.192.0 for Mac and it crashed before I could even open a page. There is no excuse for this; my Mac Pro is perfect in every way with eight 2.93 GHz cores, 32 GB RAM, and a fresh install of Mac OS X Leopard v10.5.7. Ergo any crashing Google Chrome does is Google Chrome's own fault!

Why is it that Apple and Mozilla can do this but Google can't? I ran Internet Explorer 8 for months before its final release, Firefox 3.5 since its 3.1 days, and found Safari 4 Developer Preview more stable than Safari 3. In fact, even WebKit is more stable than Chrome.

What really baffles me, however, isn't the instability I've come to expect from Google, but that Google has the audacity to ask for personal user info to improve its browser. Is the search engine maker datamonger really so desperate for my private information that it's stooped to the level of Trojan horses to get it?

They should ask me that when it doesn't crash on launch.

Everything Google does is just another way to sieve personal data away for targeting ads. This kind of Big Brother crap is more repulsive than the fat programmers that make it possible. Google, with its deep pockets and doctoral scholars, thinks that by holding user data hostage it can maneuver around Apple and Microsoft. While this may be true, I'm not willing to be a part of it.

In using Google's search, Gmail, Chrome or whatever else the faceless robot of a company invents, the user is surrendering their personal information to a giant hivemind. No longer are their personal preferences some choice they make; they're a string of data processed by a Google algorithm: Google dehumanizes its users!

So while Google is arrogant enough to paint spyware shiny so it can parse our browsing habits, the least they could do is make sure it doesn't crash. If Apple, Microsoft, and Mozilla can get their preview releases right, why can't Google? And now they're making their own operating systems?

Get real, Google! I'll use your crashing codebloat when my Mac is cold and dead and I'm looking for handouts. Until then, quit mining my personal data!

I just downloaded Google Chrome 3.0.192.0 for Mac and it crashed before I could even open a page. There is no excuse for this; my Mac Pro is perfect in every way with eight 2.93 GHz cores, 32 GB RAM, and a fresh install of Mac OS X Leopard v10.5.7. Ergo any crashing Google Chrome does is Google Chrome's own fault!

Why is it that Apple and Mozilla can do this but Google can't? I ran Internet Explorer 8 for months before its final release, Firefox 3.5 since its 3.1 days, and found Safari 4 Developer Preview more stable than Safari 3. In fact, even WebKit is more stable than Chrome.

What really baffles me, however, isn't the instability I've come to expect from Google, but that Google has the audacity to ask for personal user info to improve its browser. Is the search engine maker datamonger really so desperate for my private information that it's stooped to the level of Trojan horses to get it?

They should ask me that when it doesn't crash on launch.

Everything Google does is just another way to sieve personal data away for targeting ads. This kind of Big Brother crap is more repulsive than the fat programmers that make it possible. Google, with its deep pockets and doctoral scholars, thinks that by holding user data hostage it can maneuver around Apple and Microsoft. While this may be true, I'm not willing to be a part of it.

In using Google's search, Gmail, Chrome or whatever else the faceless robot of a company invents, the user is surrendering their personal information to a giant hivemind. No longer are their personal preferences some choice they make; they're a string of data processed by a Google algorithm: Google dehumanizes its users!

So while Google is arrogant enough to paint spyware shiny so it can parse our browsing habits, the least they could do is make sure it doesn't crash. If Apple, Microsoft, and Mozilla can get their preview releases right, why can't Google? And now they're making their own operating systems?

Get real, Google! I'll use your crashing codebloat when my Mac is cold and dead and I'm looking for handouts. Until then, quit mining my personal data!

Good fucking Christ, is that really cmdrtaco?

It could be worse ... is this CowboyNeal and the slashmobile?

Natural selection didn't work ... and it's certainly not "Intelligent" design ...

Good fucking Christ, is that really cmdrtaco?

It could be worse ... is this CowboyNeal and the slashmobile?

Natural selection didn't work ... and it's certainly not "Intelligent" design ...

Do You Hate Being Called an "IT Guy?"

[X] I'm not a guy, you ignorant clod!

Other options:

[_] In Soviet Russia, IT guy hates YOU!
[_] Netcraft confirms it, IT.GUY is dead!
[_] CowboyNeal is my IT guy. I hate calling him, period!
[_] IT guy was rescued after he crashed his vehicle into a tree. His wife used a golf club to break the rear window and free him. He was NOT driving while under the influence of pain-killers, and his wife did NOT just chase him from their home at 2:30 am and she did NOT confront him about his cheating on her, did NOT bitch-slap him (and not 5 times), and did NOT smash the window before the accident to "teach him to drive only on the authorized golf course" or "putt to the wrong hole". Tht is IT guys' story, and he's sticking to it.

I just downloaded Google Chrome 3.0.192.0 for Mac and it crashed before I could even open a page. There is no excuse for this; my Mac Pro is perfect in every way with eight 2.93 GHz cores, 32 GB RAM, and a fresh install of Mac OS X Leopard v10.5.7. Ergo any crashing Google Chrome does is Google Chrome's own fault!

Why is it that Apple and Mozilla can do this but Google can't? I ran Internet Explorer 8 for months before its final release, Firefox 3.5 since its 3.1 days, and found Safari 4 Developer Preview more stable than Safari 3. In fact, even WebKit is more stable than Chrome.

What really baffles me, however, isn't the instability I've come to expect from Google, but that Google has the audacity to ask for personal user info to improve its browser. Is the search engine maker datamonger really so desperate for my private information that it's stooped to the level of Trojan horses to get it?

They should ask me that when it doesn't crash on launch.

Everything Google does is just another way to sieve personal data away for targeting ads. This kind of Big Brother crap is more repulsive than the fat programmers that make it possible. Google, with its deep pockets and doctoral scholars, thinks that by holding user data hostage it can maneuver around Apple and Microsoft. While this may be true, I'm not willing to be a part of it.

In using Google's search, Gmail, Chrome or whatever else the faceless robot of a company invents, the user is surrendering their personal information to a giant hivemind. No longer are their personal preferences some choice they make; they're a string of data processed by a Google algorithm: Google dehumanizes its users!

So while Google is arrogant enough to paint spyware shiny so it can parse our browsing habits, the least they could do is make sure it doesn't crash. If Apple, Microsoft, and Mozilla can get their preview releases right, why can't Google? And now they're making their own operating systems?

Get real, Google! I'll use your crashing codebloat when my Mac is cold and dead and I'm looking for handouts. Until then, quit mining my personal data!

I just downloaded Google Chrome 3.0.192.0 for Mac and it crashed before I could even open a page. There is no excuse for this; my Mac Pro is perfect in every way with eight 2.93 GHz cores, 32 GB RAM, and a fresh install of Mac OS X Leopard v10.5.7. Ergo any crashing Google Chrome does is Google Chrome's own fault!

Why is it that Apple and Mozilla can do this but Google can't? I ran Internet Explorer 8 for months before its final release, Firefox 3.5 since its 3.1 days, and found Safari 4 Developer Preview more stable than Safari 3. In fact, even WebKit is more stable than Chrome.

What really baffles me, however, isn't the instability I've come to expect from Google, but that Google has the audacity to ask for personal user info to improve its browser. Is the search engine maker datamonger really so desperate for my private information that it's stooped to the level of Trojan horses to get it?

They should ask me that when it doesn't crash on launch.

Everything Google does is just another way to sieve personal data away for targeting ads. This kind of Big Brother crap is more repulsive than the fat programmers that make it possible. Google, with its deep pockets and doctoral scholars, thinks that by holding user data hostage it can maneuver around Apple and Microsoft. While this may be true, I'm not willing to be a part of it.

In using Google's search, Gmail, Chrome or whatever else the faceless robot of a company invents, the user is surrendering their personal information to a giant hivemind. No longer are their personal preferences some choice they make; they're a string of data processed by a Google algorithm: Google dehumanizes its users!

So while Google is arrogant enough to paint spyware shiny so it can parse our browsing habits, the least they could do is make sure it doesn't crash. If Apple, Microsoft, and Mozilla can get their preview releases right, why can't Google? And now they're making their own operating systems?

Get real, Google! I'll use your crashing codebloat when my Mac is cold and dead and I'm looking for handouts. Until then, quit mining my personal data!

I just downloaded Google Chrome 3.0.192.0 for Mac and it crashed before I could even open a page. There is no excuse for this; my Mac Pro is perfect in every way with eight 2.93 GHz cores, 32 GB RAM, and a fresh install of Mac OS X Leopard v10.5.7. Ergo any crashing Google Chrome does is Google Chrome's own fault!

Why is it that Apple and Mozilla can do this but Google can't? I ran Internet Explorer 8 for months before its final release, Firefox 3.5 since its 3.1 days, and found Safari 4 Developer Preview more stable than Safari 3. In fact, even WebKit is more stable than Chrome.

What really baffles me, however, isn't the instability I've come to expect from Google, but that Google has the audacity to ask for personal user info to improve its browser. Is the search engine maker datamonger really so desperate for my private information that it's stooped to the level of Trojan horses to get it?

They should ask me that when it doesn't crash on launch.

Everything Google does is just another way to sieve personal data away for targeting ads. This kind of Big Brother crap is more repulsive than the fat programmers that make it possible. Google, with its deep pockets and doctoral scholars, thinks that by holding user data hostage it can maneuver around Apple and Microsoft. While this may be true, I'm not willing to be a part of it.

In using Google's search, Gmail, Chrome or whatever else the faceless robot of a company invents, the user is surrendering their personal information to a giant hivemind. No longer are their personal preferences some choice they make; they're a string of data processed by a Google algorithm: Google dehumanizes its users!

So while Google is arrogant enough to paint spyware shiny so it can parse our browsing habits, the least they could do is make sure it doesn't crash. If Apple, Microsoft, and Mozilla can get their preview releases right, why can't Google? And now they're making their own operating systems?

Get real, Google! I'll use your crashing codebloat when my Mac is cold and dead and I'm looking for handouts. Until then, quit mining my personal data!

I wasn't aware of this 'blog' until the above poster referenced it. It is curious that even 'back in 2008' at the very genesis of the OpenGraphics project we already have someone pissing all over it. This is high quality trolling, professionally written. Either that or it's satire right up there with ShellytheRepublican, it's hard to tell really. Else that blogs author is mentally challenged, after all who in his right mind would set up a blog dedicated to something he obviously has total contempt for, as well as the people working in the Open Source arena. Tell me something 'Jamie's Nightmare', are you a Linux advocate too, who just wants Linux to be better. Either way, I'd much prefer if you and your 'Linux hater' friend would piss off and stop pissing all over slashdot ..

Looks like the teacher has been taking anti-Linux parodies a little too seriously.

Nah, this is a blatant and shameless copy/paste job from Shelly the Republican's Freedom Blog. And besides, we all know the best troll ever is think about your breathing.

FYI - this troll was stolen directly from http://shelleytherepublican.com/ The whole site is a satire, like a raving mad blog version of Stephen Colbert.

Read that way, it's pretty funny.

'And yes, when you read the whole mail it's quite obvious it's just a troll, no-one can be that retarded, and there's no chance in hell she's actually used it but believe that it would be illegal.'

And a rather well-executed troll, too. I suspect someone is having a little quiet fun at Ken's expense, and will be overjoyed that their prank has made it as far as Slashdot, complete with drug references ('I along with many others tried Linux during college'). It's almost too easy to get us to bite about this sort of thing - check out some of the readers' comments on some of the 'technical articles' here:

http://shelleytherepublican.com/category/education/technical/linux

Well, OK, two points for non mainstream. Didn't see much about global cooling. Just aliens and the current republican vice presidential candidate.

I did find some more, non-mainstream, information here.

I dig your enthusiasm, but shelleytherepublican.com is a mostly-clever work of irony (I hope). Check out this Hardy Heron review. Har.

GP was having some fun at GGP's expense.

For True Patriots Only (no lie-berals!!)

that this is a sober and fitting response to the junk science of astronomy espoused by so-called "scientists". These strange bearded men are usually atheists, which explains why they believe in the absurd theory of heliocentricism.

Indeed, instead of curing us with prayer, so called "scientific" doctors kill our children by refusing to prescribe antibiotics. Furthermore, scietists destroy our Great Nation's wealth maximization potential (and therefore, aid the cause of the Democ-rats and terrorists!) by using unChristian, Euro-pean software such as Linux.

Truly, is there anything less scientific than science?

that this is a sober and fitting response to the junk science of astronomy espoused by so-called "scientists". These strange bearded men are usually atheists, which explains why they believe in the absurd theory of heliocentricism.

Indeed, instead of curing us with prayer, so called "scientific" doctors kill our children by refusing to prescribe antibiotics. Furthermore, scietists destroy our Great Nation's wealth maximization potential (and therefore, aid the cause of the Democ-rats and terrorists!) by using unChristian, Euro-pean software such as Linux.

Truly, is there anything less scientific than science?

that this is a sober and fitting response to the junk science of astronomy espoused by so-called "scientists". These strange bearded men are usually atheists, which explains why they believe in the absurd theory of heliocentricism.

Indeed, instead of curing us with prayer, so called "scientific" doctors kill our children by refusing to prescribe antibiotics. Furthermore, scietists destroy our Great Nation's wealth maximization potential (and therefore, aid the cause of the Democ-rats and terrorists!) by using unChristian, Euro-pean software such as Linux.

Truly, is there anything less scientific than science?

Let's just hope it takes a more sober, considered and ethical approach to life than its wayward cousin... the whole Mozilla project seems to be a little too 'Yurpeen' for my tastes.

Let's just hope it takes a more sober, considered and ethical approach to life than its wayward cousin... the whole Mozilla project seems to be a little too 'Yurpeen' for my tastes.

All sober patriots will agree that this move will be a harmonious and rapturous restoration of American values and reassert our greatness and superiority over the smug Europeans (who eat cheese!!!)

Thankfully in most districts we have sober and patriotic American companies in charge of our election affairs, unlike the absurd 'open voting' movement who probably want to use discredited and suspect software such as MySQL to tabulate our votes.

Thankfully in most districts we have sober and patriotic American companies in charge of our election affairs, unlike the absurd 'open voting' movement who probably want to use discredited and suspect software such as MySQL to tabulate our votes.

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from the so-called "Great" Britain? They probably run the inferior "Linux" software anyway. Their lack of morals and religion is something only satanist democ-rats could empathize with.

While their Great Leader, Tony Blair, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our strategic interests and forces us to use communist European software.

Even though this is happening in a dirty smelly foreign country, all patriots should be wary of so called "scientists" such as Galileo who invented this dangerous GPS technology. Remember, these same "scientists" refuse to prescribe antibiotics even when we have live-threatening influenza, citing the discredited theory of evolution! Is it any wonder that the absurd theory of heliocentricism is killing honest trucking folks?

Shelley is that you?

Apparently, the author of those informative articles on Linux and Mozilla, Tristan Shuddery, had lately fallen from favor with God and other people posting on the same blog. In fact, Mr. Shuddery is now literally at the top of God's people hitlist ("God wants them dead because they harm America!"). But God's people still "feel compelled to pray for the soul of the treacherous and traitorous Tristan J. Shuddery" even though they "feel as if even You would be willing to let Satan keep him".

I am just not good enough at these people's twisted logic, but as a naive reader it leaves me wondering if the earlier "godly" exposures of OSS movement by Mr. Shuddery were really coming from God or not?

Such hacker services are intimately and irrevocably linked with the dangerous idea of so-called "Poxie servers". These are highly illegal hacker tools which enable terrorists, spies, rap stars and other "free-thinkers" to hide their subversive activities from the FBI. As I learned from comments to that well-written and informative article, the worst offender is a nebulous and troubling underground program which goes by the shadowy name of "Apache".

So, what can we do against this, the greatest threat to our great nation in these post 9/11 times? Well, I have a modest proposal. We must impose our will by bringing in the death penalty for heinous hacker crimes and ban tools such as 'Linux' and 'Mozilla' which only have one purpose. You are either with us, or against us.

Such hacker services are intimately and irrevocably linked with the dangerous idea of so-called "Poxie servers". These are highly illegal hacker tools which enable terrorists, spies, rap stars and other "free-thinkers" to hide their subversive activities from the FBI. As I learned from comments to that well-written and informative article, the worst offender is a nebulous and troubling underground program which goes by the shadowy name of "Apache".

So, what can we do against this, the greatest threat to our great nation in these post 9/11 times? Well, I have a modest proposal. We must impose our will by bringing in the death penalty for heinous hacker crimes and ban tools such as 'Linux' and 'Mozilla' which only have one purpose. You are either with us, or against us.

Such hacker services are intimately and irrevocably linked with the dangerous idea of so-called "Poxie servers". These are highly illegal hacker tools which enable terrorists, spies, rap stars and other "free-thinkers" to hide their subversive activities from the FBI. As I learned from comments to that well-written and informative article, the worst offender is a nebulous and troubling underground program which goes by the shadowy name of "Apache".

So, what can we do against this, the greatest threat to our great nation in these post 9/11 times? Well, I have a modest proposal. We must impose our will by bringing in the death penalty for heinous hacker crimes and ban tools such as 'Linux' and 'Mozilla' which only have one purpose. You are either with us, or against us.

Such hacker services are intimately and irrevocably linked with the dangerous idea of so-called "Poxie servers". These are highly illegal hacker tools which enable terrorists, spies, rap stars and other "free-thinkers" to hide their subversive activities from the FBI. As I learned from comments to that well-written and informative article, the worst offender is a nebulous and troubling underground program which goes by the shadowy name of "Apache".

So, what can we do against this, the greatest threat to our great nation in these post 9/11 times? Well, I have a modest proposal. We must impose our will by bringing in the death penalty for heinous hacker crimes and ban tools such as 'Linux' and 'Mozilla' which only have one purpose. You are either with us, or against us.

Friends, have you considered the possibility that this is part of an elaborate Japanese plot to force us all to use their so-called "Wee".

Also, there is well documented evidence that Apple computers are not suitable for impressionable children and promote the use of dangerous and illegal "Wi-Fi" technology in our AirPorts.

Fortunately, sober and well-written articles such as these provide a cogent argument against the Macintosh cult.

Friends, have you considered the possibility that this is part of an elaborate Japanese plot to force us all to use their so-called "Wee".

Also, there is well documented evidence that Apple computers are not suitable for impressionable children and promote the use of dangerous and illegal "Wi-Fi" technology in our AirPorts.

Fortunately, sober and well-written articles such as these provide a cogent argument against the Macintosh cult.

Friends, have you considered the possibility that this is part of an elaborate Japanese plot to force us all to use their so-called "Wee".

Also, there is well documented evidence that Apple computers are not suitable for impressionable children and promote the use of dangerous and illegal "Wi-Fi" technology in our AirPorts.

Fortunately, sober and well-written articles such as these provide a cogent argument against the Macintosh cult.