Slashdot Mirror

And yet, the UK has one of the world's highest densities of CCTV cameras, a capital police force that is one of the most aggressive in Western countries when it comes to hounding photographers, government-mandated Internet filtering, and is no slouch when it comes to excessive surveillance and implementing the worst the Americans could come up with.

Sanctimony from the British is pretty misplaced.

Can be ordered / viewed via the National Archive https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/news/prem-highlights-1983.htm, http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/s/res?_q=PREM%2019/972, http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/Details?uri=C13497591 & http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/aug/01/national-archives-cabinet-papers-1983 As for use of the lasers weapons, I can find no links but with suspicions of such weapons being deployed on the Kirov I expect it added another thing to be considered by the attacking airman.

Actually, he is. He believes that what they are doing is unconstitutional.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/14/al-gore-nsa-surveillance-unamerican

Not only that, but the interval was known as the Devil's interval and band in music for a time. ref

Watching a train wreck while you are on the train is one hell of a show, eh?

If a combination out of the methane feedback
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/jul/24/arctic-ice-free-methane-economy-catastrophe
and the lag of the temperature increase that is caused by the greenhouse effect mentioned here:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Climate-Change-The-40-Year-Delay-Between-Cause-and-Effect.html
happens, then we may have already triggered a number of positive feed backs that will be impossible to stop.

All those human actors that make the process so interesting are already poised to take action too, unfortunately I can't find any direct link to Snowden's info about military disaster preparations and action against green resistance movements, but hey there is talk about this.

OK. It doesn't sound like you're trolling, so I'll give a more useful post this time:

Check out this site. It has some really good material and references about the science behind this stuff.

You might also find this interview with one of the key scientists interesting.

I don't profess to be a climate change guru, but this stuff looks reasonably legit to me.

Well intentioned? Dotcom wouldn't know "well intentioned" if it gave him a lapdance. And he'd promise absolutely anything, including free lapdances for every Mega user, if he thought it would buy him a cheap headline.

What was the last thing he promised? That he'd use the money he makes, suing Hollywood for closing down Megaupload, to buy better broadband for the whole country of New Zealand? Cheap headlines, absolutely no intention of following through. (Vanishingly little chance that he'll ever get a cent out of that lawsuit, if he's even lodged it - which I seriously doubt.) That's his MO, it's the way he works - it's the *only* way he works.

Because it's linked to the NSA and nobody in their right mind would use it because not only is it illegal, but is a security risk?.

I found this, which I won't bother to rewrite: http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/jul/09/misue-stop-search-powers

"Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) says that most (30) of the 43 forces in England and Wales do not understand how to use stop and search powers effectively nor the impact their use has on the communities being policed."

"only 9% of the 1.2m stop-and-searches that take place every year led to an arrest"

"Office figures show that black people are still seven times more likely to be searched on the street than white people."

A different article said black people are three times more likely to be arrested (note: not charged) than white people. I suspect black people carrying small quantities of drugs (or committing other minor offences) are more likely to be arrested than white people, but I don't know. here we are: "Black people are six times more likely to be arrested than white people for drug offences and 11 times more likely to be imprisoned, according to new research claiming to show the racial bias of the criminal justice system." (the figure for the US is three times more likely to be arrested, 10 times more likely to be jailed).

(As long as drug-possession remains a crime, which is a separate topic).

It's closely related. The UK has criminalised several drugs popular among a particular community -- most recently qat. Alcohol, however, continues to cause the most trouble.

I found this, which I won't bother to rewrite: http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/jul/09/misue-stop-search-powers

"Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) says that most (30) of the 43 forces in England and Wales do not understand how to use stop and search powers effectively nor the impact their use has on the communities being policed."

"only 9% of the 1.2m stop-and-searches that take place every year led to an arrest"

"Office figures show that black people are still seven times more likely to be searched on the street than white people."

A different article said black people are three times more likely to be arrested (note: not charged) than white people. I suspect black people carrying small quantities of drugs (or committing other minor offences) are more likely to be arrested than white people, but I don't know. here we are: "Black people are six times more likely to be arrested than white people for drug offences and 11 times more likely to be imprisoned, according to new research claiming to show the racial bias of the criminal justice system." (the figure for the US is three times more likely to be arrested, 10 times more likely to be jailed).

(As long as drug-possession remains a crime, which is a separate topic).

It's closely related. The UK has criminalised several drugs popular among a particular community -- most recently qat. Alcohol, however, continues to cause the most trouble.

Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

It makes somewhat less sense given that the US spies on Germany with considerable assistance from the German BND...

I can understand why Germans would Not want their emails passing through American control; but it looks like they'll have to clean house if they want to be able to do that just by going domestic.

Did you even read the article to which you refer? It specifically talks about how the Germany's BND is making sure not to spy on German citizens and that only 2 data sets pertaining to German citizens were ever passed on.

I know this is hard to believe coming from the US, but in Germany, breaking the law generally does have consequences. The G-10 law specifically prohibits spying on citizens, and people (not all of them, but the vast majority) tend - unlike in the US - be interested in actually following the law.

What percentage of you have downloaded the source code, verified the MD5 of the source code against what is reported, then compiled it yourself using compilers that you trust aren't compromised?

The authors of those programs make it easy to verify by publishing the hash along with the source and encouraging people to verify their downloads. I expect your distribution's maintainer follows those protocols when building the released version. That build is automatically signed when built and verified upon download when installing it on your system.

As for trusting your compiler, I assume you're referring to Ken Thompson's seminal Reflections on Trusting Trust (PDF). It's an interesting academic exercise, but I'm pretty sure if such a compiler were out there and in common use, someone would have noticed. Especially now that there is a published way to detect it.

Installing the distro's version is likely safe, although you must realize you're opening up your circle of trust to include the distro's maintainer and server farm instead of just the original author(s) and their source repository.

The bad part of this is, until we get NSA's unconstitutional programs back under control, simply encrypting your emails may be enough to trigger their systems to preserve it.

Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

It makes somewhat less sense given that the US spies on Germany with considerable assistance from the German BND...

I can understand why Germans would Not want their emails passing through American control; but it looks like they'll have to clean house if they want to be able to do that just by going domestic.

Notice that they bitch about PRISM... but don't bother mentioning the UK's program, or any of the other monitoring programs run by various governments around the world. The US is hardly the only country doing it, but it's popular to bash on America and it draws attention away from their own spy programs. The purpose of "in-housing" the email is so it's easier for their own agencies to access.

Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

It makes somewhat less sense given that the US spies on Germany with considerable assistance from the German BND...

I can understand why Germans would Not want their emails passing through American control; but it looks like they'll have to clean house if they want to be able to do that just by going domestic.

Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

The NSA will probably next be cornering the market on high GPU count graphics cards.

Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

Indeed. Europe and much of N.Am already seem to be experiencing a certain amount of cooling because arctic meltwater is disrupting both the gulf stream and the jet stream... Local predictions are hard – both spatially and temporally. Hence why no one credible worries too much about them (except, e.g., weather forecasters, or modellers trying to develop better methods to deal with fine resolutions – but that's a whole other ball game).

You may prefer The Guardian, who have recently launched a US edition: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/aug/09/lavabit-email-edward-snowden-shuts-down

i'm not sure what mentioning the Obama Administration entails -- names?

12.12pm ET
Question:

  http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/17/edward-snowden-nsa-files-whistleblower

Q&A with Mr. Snowden himself:
---cut---
Mathius1
17 June 2013 2:54pm
Is encrypting my email any good at defeating the NSA survelielance? Id my data protected by standard encryption?

Answer:

Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto systems are one of the few things that you can rely on. Unfortunately, endpoint security is so terrifically weak that NSA can frequently find ways around it.
---cut---

Spread the word. FUD does not help if we agree on the fact that we must "remember, remember the 5th of november".

We should not curl down in a fetal position. We should act - as much as we could.

That spies on traders terminals?

In that case I think I'll pass.

It's been confirmed that the Doctor is now more or so immortal http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2010/oct/12/doctor-who-immortal-reveals-bbc

Have we ever sent a person where it was certain, and known to them, that they could die?

Fixed.

And yes, all the time.

In the illuminating conversation posted online on the CPA Australia website, Armstrong revealed how he thought his mission, Apollo 11, only had a 50% chance of landing safely on the moon's surface and said it was "sad" that the current US government's ambitions for Nasa were so reduced compared with the achievements of the 1960s.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/may/23/neil-armstrong-accountancy-website-moon-exclusive

And living here in New England, I have to say that plenty of people took their chances coming here in the early 17'th century, abandoning their old support networks and society without the promise of even making it through the next winter.

--
BMO

Snowden didn't give specifics, but he did say this in response to the question:

2) How many sets of the documents you disclosed did you make, and how many different people have them? If anything happens to you, do they still exist?

All I can say right now is the US Government is not going to be able to cover this up by jailing or murdering me. Truth is coming, and it cannot be stopped.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/17/edward-snowden-nsa-files-whistleblower

And in other other news: John Lewis has just said that he supported Snowden and compared his leaks to the civil disobediance during the Civil Rights era. I'll bet Obama is wishing that he didn't give him the Presidential Medal of Freedom and call him the "conscience of the United States Congress".

> Within a couple of years, the US media will be using "activist" as a synonym for "terrorist".

I am hoping and praying that it gets revealed that the NSA was feeding the FBI information as part of the nationwide crackdown on Occupy protesters. It's bad enough the FBI was involved but if the NSA can be proven to have directly fucked with a political movement like that, then the all pretense of defending against terrorism will be gone.

I wouldn't hold up the UK's socialised healthcare system as an example to follow.

Neither would I. The only country it seems to do better than is the US. Look at the "Expenditure on Health (% of GDP)" towards the bottom of this article. See the big outlier? That's the US. We have plenty of fraud too, including the institutionalized kind (aka for-profit health insurance companies and for-profit hospitals). We also kill lots of people by not giving them medical attention until they can justify going to the emergency room.

Wait for the alerts when http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/aug/06/nsa-director-cyber-terrorism-snowden and the US gov has to "grab" and "bring" in all the:
..."nihilists, anarchists, activists, ..., twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years".
"Police Alert. Wanted: Hacker in city. Has committed cyberterrorism and crimes against the State. Name: ..... Occupation: Activist. Last seen . . ."
"... watch for a man running ... watch for the running man . . . watch for a man alone, on foot . . . watch..."
(welcome to Fahrenheit 451)

If they helped get your plain text http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data and
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57593339-38/nsa-docs-boast-now-we-can-wiretap-skype-video-calls/
to Android software and..."remotely activate the microphones in phones"..
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424127887323997004578641993388259674-lMyQjAxMTAzMDAwMTEwNDEyWj.html
The tame, low cost, US OS are they way in.
Tor exit nodes and colluding fun back in the day:
http://themostboringblogintheworld.wordpress.com/2007/04/14/what-the-invisible-wahington-dc-tor-nodes-mean-to-you/

As for Obama, he surely inherited some of the problems, but — instead of alleviating them — made them worse. For the most obvious example, Obama is killing the people Bush used to try to capture... Is the Nobel Peace Prize winner really that blood-thirsty? No, he is not. But, to be able to close Guantanamo eventually, he has to stop putting new people there... And his supporters, so worked-up about people being locked-up in Gitmo, are happily ignoring his killing of the same alleged terrorists. If he thought, he could get away with simply executing all of the current detainees — so as to close the "illegal" prison down, he would've done that too...

UNLIMITED Domain Hosting, UNLIMITED GB Hosting Space, UNLIMITED GB File Transfer, UNLIMITED Email Accounts, FREE Domain, FREE Site Builder ..
vs the ~10 Gb bandwidth, 2 Gb Disk space other parts of the world offer at the low end.
The mid and high end will start to think about air gap, no cloud, encryption and trusted local staff.
The real fun is in bilateral agreements, trade deals and telcos just helping so the paperwork is signed.
http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/07/12/telstras-deal-with-the-devil-fbi-access-to-its-undersea-cables/
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/aug/02/telecoms-bt-vodafone-cables-gchq

no article?

Here's an one about Kirobo, from the Guardian.

Someone didn't follow the link in the summery...

The Guardian link in my previous comment was posted a few minutes before there were any links in the summary. RedHackTea also posted a link before the summary was corrected, choosing wisely to pick an alternative resource. Much to my surprise (not), slashdotitors are able to update a summary after it's been made public — in turn, that correction changed the original meaning to both of our comments; in my case, negatively.

If the editors had linked to a third resource, such as The Indedendent (which I intentionally avoided due to the adverts), it would have turned out differently for my comment.

no article?

Here's an one about Kirobo, from the Guardian.

Someone didn't follow the link in the summery...

no article?

Here's an one about Kirobo, from the Guardian.

Seriously. What information do they have that is at all useful? In the old days we had muckrakers telling us all the awful things our politicians were doing. These days since they're all owned by big corps they don't want to step on any toes. After all, you won't last long if you say bad things about the boss. It feels like all they have left is sports news I can get from the source, some 30 year old comics and classifieds full of H1-B bait :(.

The Guardian has recently expanded (online) to the USA and Australia. I haven't read the US edition until just now, and it looks more international than other US newspaper websites I've seen, but look roughly as international as the normal British edition.

It is independent, you can see the details of the organisation here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Trust_Limited

(I read it online, and buy a paper copy about every six months.)

Cold the UK can go the 'private' way:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/mar/03/police-blacklist-link-construction-workers
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/oct/20/police-spies-crossed-line-macdonald
or just fly you to another part of the world where UK laws 'stop'
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/aug/04/uk-allowed-interrogate-tortured-prisoners

Cold the UK can go the 'private' way:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/mar/03/police-blacklist-link-construction-workers
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/oct/20/police-spies-crossed-line-macdonald
or just fly you to another part of the world where UK laws 'stop'
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/aug/04/uk-allowed-interrogate-tortured-prisoners

Cold the UK can go the 'private' way:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/mar/03/police-blacklist-link-construction-workers
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/oct/20/police-spies-crossed-line-macdonald
or just fly you to another part of the world where UK laws 'stop'
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/aug/04/uk-allowed-interrogate-tortured-prisoners

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa

You aren't really paying much attention if this is the first time you've heard about GCHQ. Shutoff the CNN and bookmark this: http://www.theguardian.com/world/the-nsa-files

July 7: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/07/nsa-gchq-metadata-reassurances

July 2: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/02/nsa-revelations-debate-edward-snowden

July 1: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/defence-and-security-blog/2013/jul/01/gchq-nsa-eu

June 27: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/27/snoopers-charter-zero-chance-law

June 25: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/25/nsa-gchq-spy-germans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/23/mi5-feared-gchq-went-too-far

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/gchq-internet-snooping-kafkaesque

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-spying-catastrophe-german-politicans

June 22: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/22/gchq-uksecurity

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastery-internet-mastery-everyone

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/how-does-gchq-internet-surveillance-work

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-mastering-the-internet

June 21: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa