Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia CEO: We Are Working On Next Generation Surface

UnknowingFool writes "CEO Jen-Hsun Huang has told CNET that Nvidia is working with Microsoft on the next generation of Surface tablets. While sales of the first generation have been poor, Huang believes the second generation will be more successful with the inclusion of Outlook."

200 comments

  1. From the summary: by Art3x · · Score: 5, Funny

    Huang believes the second generation will be more successful with the inclusion of Outlook

    Yay, Outlook

    1. Re:From the summary: by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      And while they're at it, a battery! And a keyboard! And a start bar! And... these examples were supposed to be obvious and childish in order to make light of a rather alarming shortcoming, but I can't come up with anything that doesn't sound like a genuine putdown. Help?

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yay, Outlook
      I think Nvidia should be thinking
      ayy LookOut

    3. Re:From the summary: by alostpacket · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do I mod +1 Redundant?

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    4. Re:From the summary: by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      You need to be able to look around once in a while to have vision. So look out, its Outlook.

    5. Re:From the summary: by niftydude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yay, Outlook

      Hang on, the surface can't do e-mail properly? Just how bad was the built in mail app if they think Outlook is going to contribute massively to sales?

      I guess all those commercials with people playing badly choreographed percussion games with their surface's makes more sense now: it's the only thing you can do with the damn brick.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    6. Re:From the summary: by bobjr94 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, I would buy a surface if it had outlook..Said no one ever Hopefully Nvidia will get paid for some kind of guaranteed minimum sales from MS, so when it flops worse than the 1st model they won't be out millions in r&d and dead stock.

    7. Re:From the summary: by Gwala · · Score: 2, Informative

      Background: I've got a Surface RT - picked it up about a week ago due to the 30% price drop on impulse to replace my iPad while on holiday.

      The email app on the Surface is roughly about as functional as the iPad email app - the design is fairly close; although I find the Surface one has a slight edge since it uses screen space better, and doesn't become unusable when you switch to portrait mode.

      The big killer for me though (and why I got it to replace my iPad) is the built-in kickstand and the snap on keyboard -- I didn't flick on my laptop once to respond to a work email while away; that's a big change compared to the iPad where the onscreen keyboard (and the variety of crap external ones) are unusable for anything more than a sentence or two long; and I'd end up having to log onto a laptop to respond.

      Showing recent emails on the start screen is nice too -- I have a Win8 desktop and hate metro there; but on the Surface it actually feels appropriate and good design (although things like switching tabs in IE don't "feel" right given it involves swiping in entirely different direction to e.g. changing applications).

      --
      #!/bin/csh cat $0
    8. Re:From the summary: by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is the ipad Mail app seriously THAT bad? I haven't used it, used the surface RT mail app when it came out that it was the thing that stopped me buying a surface RT, if the Ipad one is similar that is just sad. Outlook on the RT would have made it viable for me at the time I was considering it.

    9. Re:From the summary: by symbolset · · Score: 5, Funny

      Background: I've got an AMC Pacer - picked it up about a week ago at auction.

      The weird way the stickshift works doesn't both me - it's not like I could compare it to anything.

      The big killer for me though (and why I got it to replace my Pinto) is the humungous doors. Yeah, most people don't like doors that tilt the car when they open, but I think it's cool.

      Fitting stuff in the back is nice too. It's ugly as hell, but I can get my stuff in it.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    10. Re:From the summary: by Pinkfud · · Score: 2

      Really. Outlook will make all the difference for sure. Just like a wax job will fix a car that doesn't run.

      --
      The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    11. Re:From the summary: by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Great I can now walk into any club or bar with the ultimate app to get chics. Outlook!

      Man I knew something was the last time I tried to shew them my surface

    12. Re:From the summary: by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Only one question needs to be asked and one answer sought. What are the targeted price points for each inch of screen real estate. You could ask a second question, how much will it look and feel like Android so that M$ can sue Google for patent fees.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    13. Re:From the summary: by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      The Win8 / WRT Mail app has improved hugely since release. It's still a long, long way from being a true Outlook competitor, but it's now at least as good as any other mobile client I've used (admittedly, this is nowhere near all of them, but I like it better than the one on iOS or the default on Android).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    14. Re:From the summary: by davester666 · · Score: 0

      Given the relative sizes of the previous two 'Surface' devices, the next one will either be
      -a floor or wall in your home
      or
      -a watch

      If it's a watch, it will boot into Windows, then the entire screen will be filled with a 'Start' button.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    15. Re:From the summary: by readingaccount · · Score: 1

      Wait, remind me why Outlook is bad. It's an incredibly slick product and hasn't caused me any real problems. Or do people just like to whine and enjoy complaining?

    16. Re:From the summary: by pimp0r · · Score: 1

      Wait, remind me why Outlook is bad. It's an incredibly slick product and hasn't caused me any real problems. Or do people just like to whine and enjoy complaining?

      If by slick you mean only superficially suitable for the one intended intended use it has, then yes; Outlook is really slick.

    17. Re:From the summary: by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      why the fuck does inclusion of outlook need a second generation device??

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    18. Re:From the summary: by readingaccount · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what is its one intended use? Email? Outlook does more than just email. I'd list all the other features like calendering and how well it works when integrated properly into Exchange, but it's starting to sound (for the millionth) time like someone wants to bash a Microsoft product without using it. No wonder Slashdot isn't taken seriously anymore.

    19. Re:From the summary: by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I had mod points but they're hiding on me now. +1 funny for what it's worth.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    20. Re:From the summary: by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Funniest thing I've read on /. in months. Bravo Sir!

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    21. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to get out more. Fresh air will do you good.

    22. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wait! The Blackberry Gremlin will be even better!

    23. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I try to show chicks my surface I usually get arrested.

    24. Re:From the summary: by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Funny+ And right on :) Thanks for making my day.

    25. Re:From the summary: by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Because it's linked to the NSA and nobody in their right mind would use it because not only is it illegal, but is a security risk?.

    26. Re:From the summary: by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Kid, you should actually try using a piece of software before talking shit about it. You're clueless.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    27. Re:From the summary: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Can you be more specific? Outlook is a turd for email but integrates calendars and other stuff that corporate users like.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:From the summary: by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Talk about setting the bar low? They believe the second generation will be more successful? It couldn't be less successful, could it?

    29. Re:From the summary: by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Damn, I wish mod points went to 11! That's the best response to a subjective point of view I've ever seen.

    30. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got myself an RT last week as well, for the same reasons as you, plus as a thin client to a powerful workstation, which on a good connection feels native.

      I have a gen 1 and gen 3 iPad, and outside of browsing the web or for reading, I couldn't really get any real work on them. The RT is a great hybrid, I really wish they'd advertise better.

    31. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't, its on win 8.1. I'm on 8.1 preview on a surface rt right now, and Outlook runs fine. Final release of 8.1 will be later this month I believe.

    32. Re:From the summary: by laffer1 · · Score: 2

      I tried a surface rt at a microsoft store a few weeks ago. I was thinking about replacing a kindle fire with it. Sadly, IE is a much better browser than the kindle fire has. Since I want to consume web content, it seemed like a decent idea.

      Then I tried the keyboard. It wouldn't register half my key strokes. It was very laggy when typing. I was not even remotely impressed.

      I also found the swipe gestures not intuitive in Windows RT. I've got Windows 8 on my desktop (as a secondary os) and I always assumed it would make sense in touch. It doesn't.

      As for email, I can't comment on the surface rt's email program, but the email client on my iPhone is pretty good. It's not as feature rich as Mail on a Mac, but it also runs a lot faster. Google's GMail client for iOS is very good too, but I only use it for work.

    33. Re:From the summary: by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Nothing like doubling down on teh stupid.

    34. Re:From the summary: by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Not only were there Microsoft watches previously, but there are currently Android watches, Apple watches (slightly discontinued), and a Microsoft table platform that used to be called Surface. They definitely have plans to take over walls, but so far that's still limited to projector-powered prototypes at Microsoft Research as far as I know.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    35. Re:From the summary: by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      You might be surprised at how many companies want decent Exchange integration from tablets...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    36. Re:From the summary: by pedropolis · · Score: 1

      Question: When you say "roughly" as functional as an iPad email app, are you considering that the Surface RT still doesn't support POP3? Can you let us know if that has been fixed yet?

      http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/forum/surfwinrt-surfusing/windows-rt-surface-to-support-pop3/edcf3be5-53cc-4d24-b0d4-c379cd0bed95

    37. Re:From the summary: by McGruber · · Score: 1

      Background: I've got a Surface RT - picked it up about a week ago due to the 30% price drop on impulse to replace my iPad while on holiday.

      The email app on the Surface is roughly about as functional as the iPad email app - the design is fairly close; although I find the Surface one has a slight edge since it uses screen space better, and doesn't become unusable when you switch to portrait mode.

      The big killer for me though (and why I got it to replace my iPad) is the built-in kickstand and the snap on keyboard -- I didn't flick on my laptop once to respond to a work email while away; that's a big change

      You are doing "on holiday" wrong.

    38. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The snap on keyboard is just as unusable as a screen based one, with the same amount of no tactile feedback, but without the software customization.

    39. Re:From the summary: by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If it's a watch, it will boot into Windows, then the entire screen will be filled with a 'Start' button.

      Funny, or insightful. Maybe both at the same time.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    40. Re:From the summary: by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Is the ipad Mail app seriously THAT bad? I haven't used it, used the surface RT mail app when it came out that it was the thing that stopped me buying a surface RT, if the Ipad one is similar that is just sad. Outlook on the RT would have made it viable for me at the time I was considering it.

      If the RT mail app is like the Windows 8 email, it won't even do POP mail. Someone at Redmond decided that no one does POP mail any more.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    41. Re:From the summary: by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Question: When you say "roughly" as functional as an iPad email app, are you considering that the Surface RT still doesn't support POP3?

      Ain't that special? Whe my wife's old laptop croaked, I broke down and bought her a new touch screen laptop. Setting up th email program, I hit that POP3 restriction. I think microsoft uses that as a laxative, because I about shit myself.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    42. Re:From the summary: by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      That integration is at least partially present in Windows Mail (and Calendar) as well, allowing people to accept meeting invites and have them automatically go into the calendar, for example. I think you need Outlook for the whole "what time are all these people available at once" and similar features, though.

      As an email client, the new Windows Mail has the ability to flag and unflag messages (and filter for just flagged ones), filter for Unread only, thread conversations, show all folders for a given account at once and unread count per folder, mark all mail in a folder as read, delete them all, or create new folders and subfolders. It can also mark (individual or group-selected) messages as being spam or non-spam as appropriate, and so on.

      As an app, it now has pretty smooth performance (far better than the originally released version), handles a number of resolutions and aspect ratios pretty gracefully (useful for switching between Portrait and Landscape, or for snapping the app to one side, especially with the new user-controllable split ratios). Search also works pretty well.

      It could still stand to be better - for example, it has no support at all for S/MIME (encryption or signing), could use more filtering options (show only messages with attachments, or only messages from a given time frame, or only large messages), could use more control over the number of messages to keep synced (for example, "synch up to 500MB to this device"), and so on. It's mostly usable now, though, which is a big step forward.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    43. Re:From the summary: by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well why would he do holiday right if he'd rather buy a totally new device than a keyboard for his old device...

      ah well at least he was holidaying somewhere with tables since he didn't need on-lap functionality, maybe in his cubicle.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    44. Re:From the summary: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    45. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outlook when you customise the retarded out of the box settings is by far the best email client I have used and I have used a shit ton trying to find good alternatives. Then you add on the excellent integration and with calendaring and sharing and nothing comes close.

    46. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start by not posting a comment.

    47. Re:From the summary: by metaforest · · Score: 1

      Inclusions generally make gemstones worth less.

      Magic-8-Ball says is best: "OUTLOOK NOT GOOD."

    48. Re:From the summary: by Talderas · · Score: 1

      How the fuck can something be slightly discontinued. That's a binary state.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    49. Re:From the summary: by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Which is why I think this is a smart move on MS's part. I can see companies moving to Surface over iPad just because of the Outlook feature. The gravy would be to place a view-only version of the big Office apps so that Outlook can preview spreadsheets and other documents inside. That would, in my opinion, make the surface a very good enterprise tablet.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    50. Re:From the summary: by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      It has a successor that no longer fills the same niche.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    51. Re:From the summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the ipad Mail app seriously THAT bad?

      No, it's not bad at all. I'm actually a fan of both versions of the iOS mail app.

  2. Haswell? by Pinhedd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hopefully it'll include a more power efficient Haswell chip. The Surface Pro was promising but lacked sufficient battery life.

    1. Re:Haswell? by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not sure why you think nVidia would be involved with making a Haswell Surface. Are you lost?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Haswell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is NVIDIA were talking about... so of course it won't have an x86 CPU. He's is not talking about the Surface Pro.

    3. Re:Haswell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember the Slashdot crowd does not actually read articles; just go straight to posting stupid comments.

    4. Re:Haswell? by Pinhedd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, because the NVidia Tegra based Surface sold so damn well. No one wanted an ARM version of Windows and Microsoft's recent financial results showed that. I see no reason for that to change given that the tablet market has only become more saturated in the past year.

      They could go with an 86 based processor and couple it with a low power NVidia GPU through some sort of Optimus technology. It doesn't make as much sense as a full blown SoC, but it makes a hell of a lot more sense than redoubling their efforts on a venture that resulted in a 900 million dollar writedown.

      Another Tegra based Surface is a disaster waiting to happen.

      Saying that "it didn't have outlook" is nothing more than a scapegoat.

    5. Re:Haswell? by symbolset · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, because Intel's Haswell has an integrated GPU that obviates nVidia's participation as a GPU provider. There is no point in bringing Haswell into an nVidia discussion, nor bringing nVidia into a Haswell, except for comparison. They are mutually exclusive for everything except comparison purposes. They are not going to be combined together into a product.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:Haswell? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      I would think we'll see a surface refresh, one with a Haswell chip (and potentially a 3rd party such as nVIDIA GPU, but unlikely), and one with a Tegra SOC.

      That would be what a sane person would call a Surface Pro 2, and a Surface RT 2 or 2013/2014 type thing. Given microsofts recent efforts to name things don't be surprised if it ends up being Surface Pro One, and Surface RT Compatible or some other stupid confusing assbackwards name just to make life hard for everyone.

      Without a doubt a haswell Surface would be appealing for some market segments. I'm not really sure how well an (ARM) Surface RT 2 is going to go over. I don't think business was really clamouring for one, a couple of hundred dollars here or there isn't an IT priority if you can see value for the the device. It's not like top executives are walking around with Surfaces just waiting for a price drop so us peons can get one.

    7. Re:Haswell? by symbolset · · Score: 3, Informative

      BTW: While the NVidia Tegra Surface led to $900M in writedowns for Microsoft, the device is was built on - the Asus Prime - continues to sell and make profits to this day with an Android OS. The next gen product released before Surface RT launched - the Asus Infinity - is even more successful and profitable.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:Haswell? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Will that make this next one the optimistic prime? That would be Orson!

    9. Re:Haswell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Surface in any form is a disaster. It's running Windows after all.

    10. Re:Haswell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NVIDIA is both the CPU and GPU provider. It's called an SoC.

    11. Re:Haswell? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and neither works with Intel's Haswell SOC which has an Intel CPU and Intel GPU integrated into one System On a Chip, or SOC. Are we all together on this now? Is anybody still confused? Show of hands.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    12. Re:Haswell? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope we see a Haswell refresh of the Surface. That will quit Intel of tilting at the Windows tablet windmill once and for all.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    13. Re:Haswell? by Pinhedd · · Score: 2

      I don't doubt it. It's fairly easy to port Android apps between different tablets and different ARM based SoCs. As a result, Android sells well on ARM devices. It would have the same problem as the Surface were it shipped on a device using an x86 processor. Consumers would be pissed when they found out that their favorite Google Play applications aren't available on it because they're not compatible. For most consumers, the biggest turn off of the Surface wasn't the lack of outlook, it was the fact that it was a device that ran Windows without being able to run any of the Windows applications out there. For consumers that don't read tech blogs every single day, that's going to stick for a very long time. The Surface brand is tarnished and I am very doubtful that it will be able to recover in a saturated market.

      Had Microsoft not released Windows RT at all and simply sold the Surface Pro as the Surface they most likely wouldn't be in this mess.

    14. Re:Haswell? by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft's problem with ARM is that their software is proprietary. ARM systems integrators with Linux get to try out various configurations in a simulator before the silicon even gets wet. All of the various peripheral vendors have Linux drivers that work in the simulator - they make these drivers in parallel with device development because the open nature of the OS lets them test their device in private, and then submit any changes to the OS they need before they make the device public. But most especially having drivers that work in the simulator allows them to be considered in devices with a quick time to market. Proprietary software just doesn't work that way. You have to have NDA's, and meetings, full disclosure about your plans, bilateral patents agreement in place. It's a big legal tangle with lawyers and business people who play golf and have to schedule things months in advance, not engineers who don't play ever and want to see their creations exist NOW. It takes years and years.

      Microsoft's problem with Surface is that we don't do things like they do things any more. They still live in the bad old days when progress was slow. They have to buy their development platforms at retail, and by the time they've got their software fit to publish on it that's legacy hardware and we've moved on. They can't keep up because they aren't even in the game. That's without considering that they have to put in some special hardware to make sure you can't make the device useful with good software one they blow it.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    15. Re:Haswell? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Windows tablets do have an 18 year history of failure. Their first Windows tablet failure would now be old enough to vote.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    16. Re:Haswell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary's pretty accurate (for once).

      The scary thing about reading the article is the comments section. It's like YouTube users talking about computers. Makes Slashdot look like a fucking academic symposium.

    17. Re:Haswell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP was going for the /. holy grail: not even reading the first word in the headline of the summary before crafting an opinion important enough to share with the world.

    18. Re:Haswell? by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

      ++++ Great explanation there as an open source advantage. Never thought of the "open source means no forms, meetings, bureaucracy" to do simple things angle ...

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    19. Re:Haswell? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Hopefully it'll include a more power efficient Haswell chip.

      I think upgrading the Surface with a Prescott would allow a massive increase in functionality (it could be used to keep coffee mugs warm).

    20. Re:Haswell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows tablets do have an 18 year history of failure. Their first Windows tablet failure would now be old enough to vote.

      But it still couldn't drink with all those engineers that are still drinking to try to forget it.

    21. Re:Haswell? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's problem with Surface is that we don't do things like they do things any more. They still live in the bad old days when progress was slow. They have to buy their development platforms at retail

      Wait, what? Who told you that?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Haswell? by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      Most Android apps just use Dalvik bytecode, so they don't need to be ported even if the processor architecture is different. The % of ARM native Android apps is pretty low, I think.

    23. Re:Haswell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same applies to Windows 8 modern UI apps.

    24. Re:Haswell? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 4, Funny

      The summary's pretty accurate (for once).

      The scary thing about reading the article is the comments section. It's like YouTube users talking about computers. Makes Slashdot look like a fucking academic symposium.

      No, Slashdot will never look like an academic symposium about fucking.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    25. Re:Haswell? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      ^hand^

      Teacherrr, I don't understAaannnd.

      (Memories of the annoying dumb blond girl in high school trig class.)

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    26. Re:Haswell? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      That would be what a sane person would call a Surface Pro 2, and a Surface RT 2 or 2013/2014 type thing. Given microsofts recent efforts to name things don't be surprised if it ends up being Surface Pro One, and Surface RT Compatible or some other stupid confusing assbackwards name just to make life hard for everyone.

      The Microsoft Surface 2.0 High Speed will replace the Surface 1.1 Full Speed.

      That won't be confusing at all.
      .

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    27. Re:Haswell? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Most Android apps use Java with pre-compilation at install time. For native code apps Intel has binary translation working very well. CPU architecture is not an issue for Android.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:Haswell? by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      [...] the device is was built on - the Asus Prime - continues to sell and make profits to this day with an Android OS.

      Uhh, a quick Google search shoots that "sell and make profits" claim completely spurious.

    29. Re:Haswell? by bazorg · · Score: 1

      It is an interesting comment, I just don't know how close it is to where Microsoft wants to be. In my view, the Surface is something to mimic the iPad, but with Microsoft components. In other words, When the Surface grows up it doesn't want to be Android or Linux, it wants to be iPad.

      Surface + Zune music + XBox games & TV + Live.com/Skydrive

      vs.

      iPad + iTunes music + Apple TV + mac.com

      Microsoft tries to sweeten the deal by including Office, having big games on the Xbox side and some sync and integration between Windows RT, Windows x86 and Windows Phone using Azure & Skydrive. I think there's less catch-up to be played by Microsoft since Windows 8 was released despite the overall metro-hater sentiment.

  3. I'll buy a Surface... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When it actually becomes useful. At least with the iPad you can use it to play Angry Birds.

    Yeah, I went there, boyfriend. *snaps fingers in a Z formation*

  4. Outlook? by Sorny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Magic 8-ball says "Outlook not so good".

    Just sayin'...

    --
    OSX pwns.
    1. Re:Outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Their are a billion programs that do similar things to outlook, but as of yet none of them do it as well as outlook, generally if the alternative does mail well then it sucks for calendaring or vice versa. Outlook is actually a something that makes a difference for me when buying, however for a surface RT they will need more than just Outlook, though it would be close as a viable work travel device if it did have outlook. Where I work were originally going to buy a stack of surface RT's but when we informed the management after our eval of them that their was no outlook the idea was dropped.

    2. Re:Outlook? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the saddest thing is that when Microsoft killed the Courier, the only substantial reason we heard was that its email interface wasn't Outlooky enough.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Outlook? by Totenglocke · · Score: 2

      Someone needs to take the idea for the Courier and make an Android or Ubuntu based version of it. I've never been one to get excited over Microsoft products (though Windows 7 is pretty nice), but the Courier preview they put out a few years ago had me ready and willing to fork out some cash.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:Outlook? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Well, let's get all superstitious about this, and see what the Spirits of the Dead think:

      A sales chick in Zurich thought that a handbag was too good for Oprah Winfrey to buy, but Oprah was able to buy "12 Surface RTs for her friends" last Christmas. And then she tweeted about it from her iPad.

      The Spirits of the Dead have spoken.

      . . . and . . . RT is a bad choice of a name. IBM didn't have any luck with their RT PC either: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_PC

      The Spirits of the Dead frown dolefully on that puny, cursed name.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Outlook? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Well, there are these.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  5. let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and not lock it to metro only

    1. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by symbolset · · Score: 2, Funny

      Metro apps are how Microsoft is going to let go of their Win32 legacy. They really, really need for their mobile efforts to take off so they can let go of app compat and the 30 years of spaghetti code they made to prevent competitors in that open market. Even they no longer understand how that shit works. The canonical reference for their SMB protocol is now the open source SAMBA project, which is compatible with more versions of their own software than they are. They really need a new basis where they can control who can make apps through administrative rather than technological means.

      W32 apps are going away. Get over it. Soon your ancient copies of pirated Photoshop and Quicken will not work. You can limit your search for replacements to their ecosystem if you want to, or look wider afield. Since Windows devices are only 1/5 of endpoints today, looking wider is not really a bad idea.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by Chas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Metro apps are how Microsoft is going to let go of their Win32 legacy.

      So we can revert to the multitasking equivalent of 1980's offerings.

      How about "NO"?

      How about "HELL NO"?

      How about "HELL FUCKING NO"?

      Metro apps are a colossal, leap (with rocket assist) BACKWARD in interface technology.

      You can cry all you want about "old code" and "spaghetti code". But simply being newer, possibly cleaner, code doesn't make it better.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    3. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I am also not a fan. But that is the plan.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    4. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by TonTonKill · · Score: 2

      Pushing metro apps over Win32 programs has nothing to do with the burden of legacy support. It is all about getting their hands on the same 30% of software revenue that their competitors (Apple and Google) are getting, instead of the 0% Microsoft makes on every Win32 application sold. You're never going to convince companies developing for the Win32 sales model to start giving you that money, so you have to create a new distribution network with new rules and try to convince people to switch to it.

      Did you think Microsoft just woke up one day and suddenly cared more about beautiful source code than money?

    5. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 2

      If it ain't broke... then it's harder to sell upgrades.

    6. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. It's about the retailer's portion of the app sales that they weren't getting. By taking the app store in-house and getting the same deal that Google and Apple are getting they even the score with those two. The thing that they forgot is that the retailer who sold PCs wasn't making any money at all on the sale of Windows PCs, but was carrying them to get the software and accessories money at high margin. Since that's gone now there's no reason to carry the Windows PCs any more. They can put pillows or footballs in that space and make more profit.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    7. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 5, Funny

      My friend used to be a fan, a CPU fan to be precise. His wife was a GPU fan since her chips often got a bit overheated. Sadly, my friend couldn't monitor or control her so she got burnt out and died. Eventually, after a few weeks of liquid cooling he died too. It is tough to be fan.

    8. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gah. You guys don't quit.

      That's OK. It's fun to torment you. Do you remember this phrase?: "We are going mobile and Microsoft isn't coming with us."

      Do you know why Microsoft isn't coming with us? It isn't because they don't know how to make good software (though they don't) It's because they are the obnoxious person we move the party to get away from, and then don't tell them where we went.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win32 is gonna be around forever. Like COBOL or Java. For the same reasons.

    10. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Sure it will. In a virtual machine, where it belongs. That way it can't hurt anybody.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    11. Re:let it run win 32 apps ccompiled for ARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metro is based on some parts of Win32, and most of Win32 are wrappers for NT APIs. MS wants people use Metro and .NET APIs to facilitate transition between Windows versions.

  6. Lets hope Mr.Paperclip will come back as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lets hope Mr.Paperclip will come back as well,

    1. Re: Lets hope Mr.Paperclip will come back as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you want to create an email... The NS@ can help you (not an option, they WILL help you)
      Sincerely, Clippy

  7. Surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay another generation of a product for a niche that doesn't exist.

  8. To use a deli analogy by paiute · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The public did not like our original turd sandwich, but they will like our new turd sandwich. It is on rye bread.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:To use a deli analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Rye? That's a decent bread!

      How about that foamy, fiberless, saccarine sweet, chemically laden sponge WonderBread which can only be called a bread through FDA trickery?

    2. Re:To use a deli analogy by intermodal · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be so bad if you could order just the bread and put a penguin in between the halves.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  9. Let the failure continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Eventually Microsoft will run out of money to bribe partners and will have to give up. Surely they've alienated a number of companies with all of their failed mobile hardware attempts. There is no evidence that they'll succeed. I'm sure Nvidia will be sorry in a few years.

    1. Re:Let the failure continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS aren't going to run out of money this decade, they can afford to fuck up a lot. Hopefully Nvidia had the sense to get a decent contract out of MS so they make money on it whether it is successful or not, if they did they won't be sorry, it isn't like they are putting all their eggs in Microsoft's basket.

  10. Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outlook? Sign me the fuck up!

  11. Will it run Linux? by gmuslera · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They should focus in making hardware and drivers for everything, if people don't like the included OS, should be able to change it for something else (android, ubuntu touch, plasma active, whatever). If its only for Microsoft, their are tying their ship to the Titanic, just after it hit the iceberg.

    1. Re:Will it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or how about making windows rt drivers for other tablets? And make it install on virtually any hardware. It worked for desktop windows in the 20 years.

    2. Re:Will it run Linux? by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      Right, that'll keep a few dozen nerds (who wouldn't buy an MS product anyway) happy.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:Will it run Linux? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      The goal of Nvidia should not be selling a microsoft product, is to sell an nvidia product. Whatever helps to sell it more should be promoted. Who wants to waste money in something that could have no future, like all those nokia windows 7.8 phones, with no way to give it another life? Part of what made the HP Touchpad so successful was not just the price, but also the potential of being able to run android too.

  12. Start a pool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will the unemployment rate be if you include all of Microsoft?

    1. Re:Start a pool! by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same as it currently is. Microsoft would make the workers quit, and those that somehow do get fired won't get unemployment status (and benefits) for various reasons.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Start a pool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that the Microsoft unemployment benefits portal will only work properly on IE 10 running on Windows RT? That's a sure fire way to keep people from filling out their paperwork.

  13. Dead Horse by EEPROMS · · Score: 2

    News just in vets are now using Outlook to revive dead horses.

  14. I don't need no stinking Outlook... by NuttyBee · · Score: 2

    I just got an amazing toy. It's got all these free built in applications. It comes with an e-mail client. It has a beautiful 1920x1080 display and responsive touch screen..

    It was only $229 and it was made by Asus for Google. Seriously, you intend to compete with that? The margins on the device have to be thin. How does Microsoft plan to make it up? Do I need an Office 365 subscription to go with it?

    Call me skeptical. The first iteration of tablet wasn't that good, I still hate Windows 8, and the price point you'd have to get to in order to make me consider a Win8 tablet is so low, it would be unprofitable. Those people who would buy the Win8 tablet at $200, will just as happy with the Android equivalent.

    1. Re: I don't need no stinking Outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ey.. YOU can do the same with your RT & Pro, but I don't believe you'll enjoy as WE do. ..!..

    2. Re:I don't need no stinking Outlook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the familiarity of using a Windows OS is what keeps most Windows-users using Windows. Doing a complete overhaul of the UI is like shooting yourself in the face.

  15. The only reason Nvidia could be doing this is... by Dan9999 · · Score: 1
    Because they will include several cameras and microphones and the GPU will always be building a context of where it is (neural nets married to gen algorithms, etc...), and what is going on around it so that when you use the device, it will already have a good idea about what you want.

    That, or if you drop it, about 3 inches before it hits the ground, tiny little airbags will break the fall.

    Perhaps they are creating a roll out device. 8 inches by 1 inch, but rolls out to a full 20 inches across.

    Maybe they'll integrate full android app compatibility?

    Maybe the thing will have little legs that come out so that when it's at the other side of the room, you can call it over to you because you're on the sofa.

    Is it possible that there will be no screen and there will be lasers that will just shoot the image directly into your eyes?

    Some may think that when you buy many of them, you can put them together and the screens mesh together so well that not even one pixel is out of place in the suddenly larger screen that you have.

    Maybe they will really make it 3 millimeters thick... really, that would be a pretty nice change.

    Maybe the OS will really allow you to "Operate the System", you know someone should really make one of those for a phone or tablet, I don't think they exist yet.

    well it's gotta be something good right? Not just more of the same to think they'll break the ice.

  16. Market share by kimvette · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the Surface 2.0 will sell twice as many tablets as the current product, doubling market share, to four customers.

    Unfortunately both current Windows tablet customers will feel cheated with their now-obsolete tablets.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  17. That's good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because nobody cares about or wants the current generation surface except a buncha fanboys.

  18. A real game changer... by bearded_yak · · Score: 2

    Really? Outlook's what's going to save the day? Well, there's a first time for anything.

  19. Stop by chr1st1anSoldier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Please don't, Microsoft, I deal with outlook and exchange everyday. From Office 2003 through 2013, server 2003 through 2012, exchange 2003 - 2013, noting but a giant hunk of crap taking up rack space. Nothing but problems, problems and more problems. The little linux server tucked away at the bottom of the rack with a little layer of dust on it? Never has a problem. But those windows servers? Countless hours of sleep lost by all employees because of how often they go down. Please don't include outlook, it hardly works with your own exchange server and works far worse with technologies not developed by you. For the sake of what hair is left on my head, PLEASE STOP.

    1. Re:Stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I must be doing something wrong, as Exchange and Outlook have been working nicely for me. Whether the client use Outlook 2007, 2010, 2011, 2013, OWA from Firefox or IE or Safari or Chrome... on the server Exchange 2003, 2007, 2010, and soon 2013... well... it just works.

    2. Re: Stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Very wrong indeed. IF "works" for you, then You can give thanks to the NS@ for this, is not your fault :p

    3. Re:Stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problems are what keep sysadmins employed.

    4. Re:Stop by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to go back to school or find a new career. I pay for hosted Exchange, and it's rarely down for my company at all.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:Stop by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      I pay for hosted Exchange, and it's rarely down for my company at all.

      That's the difference. Just because you can pay someone else to do something does not mean it is easy for you to do. Also since you are paying someone else for hosted services, they should keep those servers up as that's their job. I mean I pay an accountant to do my taxes; it should be easy for me to figure out the 14 forms I need right? Any CPA can do his job right?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  20. It's getting sad by jomama717 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was at a mall this evening and though it was funny that the little kiosk that used to demo the Surface Pro/RT was gone...until my wife pointed out that it's because they just opened a "Microsoft Store". I had to see it, and sure enough it was an incredibly thorough facsimile of an apple store, except the "geniuses" (I wonder what they call them...) had purple shirts, and of course there was microsoft crap on all of the extremely well-lit Ikea-esque tables instead of apple crap.

    I'm kind of a bystander in the MS/Apple flamewar (for work and personal use I have a suped-up macbook pro that runs a Windows7 VM) but the sight of this down to the wood-grain copy of an Apple store just made me feel pity for Microsoft. I mean, jesus, it was already clear that their business model since the Zune has been "do what apple does, seems to work", but this place takes it to a new level.

    I like Windows7, I loved my xbox (until I had a kid and gave it to a cousin after 2 years of non-use), they can do some shit right and should accentuate that instead of this across the board pathetic strategy of Apple emulation. After all, the sincerest form of flattery is imitation, as they say. I just don't get it.

    Microsoft are becoming the gobots to Apple's transformers.

    --
    while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
    1. Re:It's getting sad by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's more like Microsoft is the flea market transforming robot, and Apple is go-bots. We don't have any OS with the fit, finish, and quality of the original transformers toys

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:It's getting sad by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Store calls their Geniuses....not making this up...Gurus. No shame, 25+ years on.

  21. Trying to board a sinking ship? by oo_00 · · Score: 1

    Well, good luck.

  22. yea, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once brought down an entire cluster of exchange servers using a very old MIPS based mail server.. Took almost a week for the admins to clean up the mess.

    All because the servers didn't know how to reject a mail message for being too large...

    1. Re:yea, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once brought down an entire cluster of exchange servers using a very old MIPS based mail server.. Took almost a week for the admins to clean up the mess.

      All because the servers didn't know how to reject a mail message for being too large...

      Sounds like you and your admins are a bunch of idiots. Look for job postings for your positions on Dice any day now.

  23. WTF by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first version of our wine tasted like piss, but I'm sure it will improve if we mix a bit of shit into it.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahaha probably, if you live in America :(

      "Lol".

  24. Outlook? by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    OK I know millions of people use outlook hundreds of times a day BUT how many actually step outside of the core function email, calender, and contacts?

    Theres a billion and 1 programs that do what people want for email, thunderbird included, and as long as people can read an email and set an appointment reminder I doubt they would even care.

    Outlook is not a seller, hell it used to be a value added freebee

  25. Has Elop become Nvidia's CEO recently? by oo_00 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Has Elop become Nvidia's CEO recently?

    1. Re:Has Elop become Nvidia's CEO recently? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, MS is downstream of Nivida here. Tegra is a crappy chip that MS is buying quite a lot of, when no one else wants to touch them.

  26. Clinging to the boat anchor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they are going to fork windows 8 3 ways then: intel, Arm and now Tegra? It was barely functional on Arm.
    Acer is deserting Microsoft. Nokia is dead. Next up Invidia is tied to the sinking microsoft boat anchor. Google ascends to be the new mass market microsoft in the cloud and apple is still going be apple. As fake steve jobs put it, Apple is better off doing their best for the top 10% of the market than 90% of the bottom market share. Time to invest in Arm Stock and Apple stock. Google stock won't go up at all (all this will do is, in five years, it will make their P/E ratio reasonable and the stock not over valued).

    1. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, WTF are you smoking? Tegra is an ARM chip. The current Surface RT (ARM) runs on the Tegra 3. The new version will, apparently, run on Tegra 4.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    2. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sorry but in less than 3 years ARM is gonna be toast so anybody who invests in ARM is a fool. Look up the numbers, when it comes to IPC an ARM quad gets curbstomped by a Prescott P4 in all but the JavaScript bench which was tuned for ARM, its only selling point has been crazy low battery usage and its about to lose that advantage.

      You look at what AMD and Intel have cooking and you can see where the wind is blowing, AMD already has a fanless APU that maxes at 6w with all sectors of the chip maxed out, IRL it uses less than 3w under typical loads and that gives you a dual core APU with a Radeon chip capable of running 1080P over HDMI, and Intel has Haswell and the new Atom is supposedly down to a couple of watts under load and less than 1w in "functional standby" where it can still receive messages and calls.

      The simple fact is ARM just doesn't scale well and no matter how many millions Samsung and Nvidia sink into it they just can't fix this fundamental flaw. So far the only real luck either company has had is by throwing more cores (and thus using more power) at the problem, with Nvidia up to 5 cores and Samsung up to 6 and even with all those cores it'll still get curbstomped by a 3 year old AMD Bobcat or Intel Atom dual, the current chips just widen the gap. As more and more people do more and more with their phones and tablets they are gonna want that higher performance without compromising on weight and like it or not X86 has the IPC crown by a pretty damned large margin.

      I personally feel sorry for Nvidia, they are gonna be the ones left out in the cold as frankly Intel and AMD just don't need them anymore, although how Intel was able to destroy the Nvidia chipset business without getting slammed by antitrust I'll never know. Nvidia really should have partnered or bought out Via a few years back, the Via Nano is a pretty damned solid chip, decent performance with power drain that sits right in the middle of the curve, not to mention its built in crypto support would have made it a solid entry for ULV servers but now its too late. While I wish Nvidia luck as I believe in competition I just don't see a new Surface finding a niche, not with dual core Android tablets looking to be in the $100 range by Xmas, Android has the apps, the network effect that MSFT enjoyed on desktops, its gonna be damned hard for MSFT to get a toehold in there and with Nvidia locked out of the next gen consoles things don't look too good for big green.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by idunham · · Score: 1

      You look at what AMD and Intel have cooking and you can see where the wind is blowing, AMD already has a fanless APU that maxes at 6w with all sectors of the chip maxed out, IRL it uses less than 3w under typical loads and that gives you a dual core APU with a Radeon chip capable of running 1080P over HDMI, and Intel has Haswell and the new Atom is supposedly down to a couple of watts under load and less than 1w in "functional standby" where it can still receive messages and calls.

      The simple fact is ARM just doesn't scale well and no matter how many millions Samsung and Nvidia sink into it they just can't fix this fundamental flaw.

      Odd that AMD is making an ARMv8 server chip next year then.
      I'm talking about the Opteron "Seattle", which is supposed to be based on the A57, with SeaMicro Freedom chips on board.

    4. Re: Clinging to the boat anchor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy those apple stocks. They are screamin.

    5. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      AMD knows they can't compete with Intel on the IPC in the server space and have you looked at the chip in question? Its based on what we now know is the chip from the consoles which has a SPECIALIZED core from ARM built for DRM functions, this of course will give them an advantage in the server space as dedicated chips will always be better than general purpose for specific jobs.

      So just to make it clear I'm not saying there will never be another ARM chip made, merely that it will go back to being used as it was before the ARM craze hit and that is for embedded and specialty tasks. BTW I don't have the time to Google it for you but if you put in "AMD ARM DRM" I'm sure you'll find the info.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      You do realize that ARM processors are used in a *ton* of embedded devices where absolute performance doesn't matter. They are basically the last man standing in the low powered RISC wars and will continue to make their business model work well into the future.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    7. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So they are going to fork windows 8 3 ways then:

      Windows 8 is pretty well forked already.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but in less than 3 years ARM is gonna be toast so anybody who invests in ARM is a fool.

      do you have a smartphone, a tablet/iPad, an iPod/iPhone or a PS Vita? well then you must be a fool!

      ARM processors are in over one billion devices which is more chips than Intel and AMD have sold together. you dont know shit about processors. :)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    9. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      And once upon a time all Apple PCs were PPC...your point? Just because ARM is used in X NOW does NOT mean it will be used in X in the future, in fact with 3 major consoles going X86 (PS4,XBN, and Steambox) that will be a further incentive for the handhelds to go X86 as it'll make the likelihood of ports higher.

      Again i never said ARM was gonna disappear, just like there are still big iron servers out there, but they will NOT be the dominate mobile chip any longer because they can't fix the IPC problem. What you fail to grasp is with X86 having such an incredible lead on IPC frankly its a hell of a lot easier to cut a powerful chip down, see Atom and bobcat for example, than it is to get a weak chip to scale up, that is just how it is and there is nothing ARM can do about it short of throwing out the whole design and starting over.

      Why do you think Nvidia is up to 5 cores and Samsung 6? ARM doesn't scale dude, it just don't. Feel free to look up the benches yourself, an 8 year old prescott P4 curbstomps the latest ARM chips when it comes to IPC. As more and more folks do more and more with mobile they are gonna demand it perform and ARM just doesn't. The most likely future for ARM will be in cheap commodity devices like thermostats, MP3 players, all those little specialized tasks that a general purpose chip won't be good at. There is no shame in that but its gonna be a shitty margin market compared to ARM of today which is why it would make a lousy investment unless you were looking for a quick rollover.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      There's MIPS too, and other stuff used in micro-controllers like AVR.

    11. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by idunham · · Score: 1

      The consoles use a Jaguar core, which is an x86-based chip; and there's an A5 (fairly low-end 32-bit Cortex) included as a coprocessor. So far you are correct, and I've known about it.

      But you are completely wrong about the chip I mentioned.
      It's a _pure_ ARM chip not a co-processor, and it's an A57, which is currently ARM's top "aarch64" (64-bit ARM) processor.

      By the way, could you point me at the Intel chips that you referred to?

    12. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      ARM is used in X NOW does NOT mean it will be used in X in the future, in fact with 3 major consoles going X86 (PS4,XBN, and Steambox) that will be a further incentive for the handhelds to go X86 as it'll make the likelihood of ports higher

      consoles go with x86_64 because of higher clock speed and frankly, they dont give a shit about power usage. however, power matters in handhelds, something atom cant compete with at all. finally, steam box is not one of the three major consoles, whatever nintendo is coming out with is going to be it and nintendo has never use x86 chips because they are expensive.

      Again i never said ARM was gonna disappear, just like there are still big iron servers out there, but they will NOT be the dominate mobile chip any longer because they can't fix the IPC problem.

      power is really the only thing that matters in the mobile market and x86 cannot compete when it comes to power. also, ARM is gaining traction in datacenters because it uses a lot less power and is cost effective. when MS ports finally ports their server stuff to ARM, you are going to see a landslide switch to ARM.

      they can't fix the IPC problem

      funny you should mention that, the main improvement made with ARMv8 is "Advanced SIMD support" and to add insult to injury, it will use even less power than the current generation.

      As more and more folks do more and more with mobile they are gonna demand it perform and ARM just doesn't.

      ARM isnt slacking off, they continually improve their designs. ARMv8 is going to be a very large improvement in performance (and max out at 3GHz) but if a program on your mobile device needs a 3GHz+ processor, there is something very wrong with that program.

      when Win RT actually gets some decent software support (windows 9?), i'm pretty sure we will be seeing laptops that use ARM but that will probably take two or three years.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    13. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      In the middle of a job at the shop but if you'll just Google "Haswell ULV" and "New Atom 1w" I'm sure you'll find it, and AMD has a similar offering in the sub 5w space, Google "AMD embedded for tablets" and it'll point you in the right direction.

      And I'm sorry I didn't make it clear as I wasn't meaning to intend that they use the jag, just that the ARM Holdings chip they bought was original for the Jag and they are now embedding ARM chips for similar purposes in the server space. i looked up the chip you mentioned and all i could find about its usage was for crypto like TPM and server side AES functions and there was some talk about using it with Linux to have a "sleepy server" where the X86 shuts down and hands over functions to the ARM which really only monitors requests and wakes up the X86 side if anything non trivial comes along.

      But at the end of the day none of that changes the writing on the wall which is thus: Folks are living more and more on mobile devices and as they do they want more and more power and ARM just doesn't scale, its easier to cut down the IPC of X86 to meet a power requirement than to upscale ARM without blowing the power budget, hence why Samsung now makes hexacore ARM chips and Nvidia pentacore. The ARM arch was just never designed to do what the public increasingly wants which is why everything from DSPs to powerful GPUs have been bolted on as helper chips but at the end of the day it doesn't change the fact that ARM just isn't gonna scale enough to even meet a C2D from 6 years ago, much less a modern chip like the Jag or on the Intel side the Haswell.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Clinging to the boat anchor by idunham · · Score: 1

      Here's what I'm referring to, from AMD's press release:

      Seattle

      "Seattle" will be the industry's only 64-bit ARM-based server SoC from a proven server processor supplier. "Seattle" is an 8- and then 16-core CPU based on the ARM Cortex-A57 core and is expected to run at or greater than 2 GHz. The "Seattle" processor is expected to offer 2-4X the performance of AMD's recently announced AMD Opteron X-Series processor with significant improvement in compute-per-watt. It will deliver 128GB DRAM support, extensive offload engines for better power efficiency and reduced CPU loading, server caliber encryption, and compression and legacy networking including integrated 10GbE. It will be the first processor from AMD to integrate AMD's advanced Freedom(TM) Fabric for dense compute systems directly onto the chip. AMD plans to sample "Seattle" in the first quarter of 2014 with production in the second half of the year.

      Note that this is a FULL processor plus peripherals, not a coprocessor. I don't see any resemblance between this and what you describe.

  27. It worked for the RIM Playbook... by WoTG · · Score: 2

    RIM launched their first (and only) tablet without their premier email product. That worked out super-well for sales too.

    Seriously, I didn't know the RT had no Outlook! It really was useless for business.

    1. Re:It worked for the RIM Playbook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how this could be a surprise to anyone. No other version of Windows ships with Outlook installed.

      I bought an RT tablet for my designer to test with (she claims web pages need to display in IE 10). Her kids like it and think it's cool, but that may be due to the "dance and prance" advertising campaign directed towards the younger generations (her kids are gymnasts).

    2. Re:It worked for the RIM Playbook... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      I don't see how this could be a surprise to anyone. No other version of Windows ships with Outlook installed.

      The 'surprise' isn't that it's not preloaded; but that Microsoft wouldn't even sell you a copy. Any other current version of Windows has that little feature.

    3. Re: It worked for the RIM Playbook... by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I still deal with at least one customer a week screaming that Win 8 is "not suitable for purpose" because, amongst other things, it has no Outlook Express.

      --
      Do you see what I did there?
    4. Re: It worked for the RIM Playbook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 98 is not suuitable for purpose either. Where's Microsoft Exchange?

  28. Jen-Hsun Huang is like a kid by ikhider · · Score: 1

    Who happens to be into dinosaurs.

    --
    "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
  29. So Nvidia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYWzMvlj2RQ

  30. If Outlook missing was the problem... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... then they could release an Outlook app for Surface 1.0. There's no reason that it would have to wait for 2.0.

    That excuse may be the most pathetic thing I've ever heard.

    1. Re:If Outlook missing was the problem... by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They actually are doing that. The Surface RT (and all other WRT devices) is getting the 8.1 update along with x86 Win8. RT 8.1 includes Outlook.

      However, the Tegra 3 that the current Surface RT uses is a bit dated. It wasn't terribly cutting-edge even at release, and ARM chips are progressing rapidly. This is mostly just a hardware refresh much like any other.

      The Outlook comment isn't saying "these new tablets will be better because they have Outlook", it's saying "part of the reason that RT devices have sold poorly is the lack of Outlook, and by the time these new tablets arrive, they will have Outlook."

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    2. Re:If Outlook missing was the problem... by xemphimhd · · Score: 1
  31. What Jensen is really saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We'll keep taking Microsoft's money to prop up our failing Tegra business.

  32. IDGAF about.Outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just get the price down

  33. Just want Nvidia needs, another failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As long as it's Microsoft writing them off I guess there might be money to be made. Go Balmer!

  34. Outlook will be an improvement by gsgriffin · · Score: 2

    I'm writing on my Surface right now while traveling in Bolivia. I know it is fun to slam MS on everything they make and many will wet their pants when Apple comes out with a new digital tennis shoe that will record your steps and post it on Facebook someday. For me, the Surface RT beats out my ultrabook for portability and durability (beginning to get screen marks on the Samsung Series 9 from getting it mashed in the overhead bin of the planes), the battery lasts a long time, the type keyboard is great (not the touch version), and it has most of the programs I need for regular work.

    Of course, I'm not designing with CAD on this...will do that when I get home. I'm not programming either...will do that when I get home. While traveling, this is better than a tablet and laptop for the basic needs that many have. I will look forward to Outlook because that is what I use at home as well as a hundred million other people. Get that basic tool included (which should have been in the first release) and this will be even better for us power-travelers that don't need power-laptops.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    1. Re:Outlook will be an improvement by stewbacca · · Score: 2

      I just took a screen shot of your comment, as I've never seen one like it before, and it's likely I never will again.

    2. Re:Outlook will be an improvement by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      I'm writing on my Surface right now while traveling in Bolivia. I know it is fun to slam MS on everything they make and many will wet their pants when Apple comes out with a new digital tennis shoe that will record your steps and post it on Facebook someday.

      See, the problem is that both the Surface RT *AND* the iPad suck. The Surface RT is a solution in search of a problem. The iPad is an oversized Newton running a crippled version of OSX designed to imprison users with no computing skills into a walled garden of limited apps designed for users with no computing skills.

      The trend of crippling interfaces and software so retards can use it with no training is not "innovation" by any means. I would be more productive on a Mac Plus running System 7 or an old ThinkPad tablet an than an iPad or Surface.

      For me, the Surface RT beats out my ultrabook for portability and durability (beginning to get screen marks on the Samsung Series 9 from getting it mashed in the overhead bin of the planes), the battery lasts a long time, the type keyboard is great (not the touch version), and it has most of the programs I need for regular work.

      And my Macbook Air has decent battery life, can run OSX and Windows 7 and is capable of running complex useful applications without fumbling through clumsy, inadequate and VERY inefficient poke-and-drool touch interfaces.

      A cheap $200 Android tablet is perfectly adequate for lame touch "apps" and content consumption.

      The Surface RT is nothing more than the modern version of the "Handheld PC Pro" class of Windows CE devices. Instead of a real embedded OS they ported the NT kernel to ARM and locked it down a bit.

      Of course, I'm not designing with CAD on this...will do that when I get home. I'm not programming either...will do that when I get home.

      Exactly, what you bought is a toy. A content consumption device with an unpopular OS with a terrible interface. And very limited application availability. There's lots of other products out there with a better library of applications with hardware that is more open. I can run standard Linux GUI apps on an Android tablet if I root it as well.

      While traveling, this is better than a tablet and laptop for the basic needs that many have. I will look forward to Outlook because that is what I use at home as well as a hundred million other people. Get that basic tool included (which should have been in the first release) and this will be even better for us power-travelers that don't need power-laptops.

      Umm.... dude..... it IS a tablet. An oversized PDA with a keyboard attached and a version of Win8 ported to ARM.

      Outlook is an e-mail client and PIM package. It's not a "basic tool" everyone needs. There's lots of other E-Mail clients with comparable feature sets that are compatible and quite nice.

      If you're too lazy to learn to use a different eMail client and something like that is actually a challenge for you, you won't be happy with ANY product other than the one you initially memorized a few tasks on. Just because a lot of people learned about eMail and PIM apps on MS Outlook does not mean that MS Outlook is a "basic tool" and nothing else does the job as well.

      Your claims of being a skilled CAD guy and programmer sound pretty damn weak.

    3. Re:Outlook will be an improvement by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

      Boy, going around feeling superior to everyone must be great. I want to be just like you. Please, in a prideful way, show me how to make more friends like you. Oh yeh, just buy anything Apple like you and it will happen. Thanks for the tip.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    4. Re:Outlook will be an improvement by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      Um, no, I'm a UNIX/Linux/OSX guy. But please, continue to enjoy your sub-standard crappy OS, it makes people like me lots of money supporting it and fixing issues for people like you who think they know more than they do. Make no mistake, I love Windows.... precisely because it makes me LOTS of money because it's an inflexible piece of crap that requires far more money and effort than it should just to achieve a working, stable, crapware/malware-free environment.

      I don't like the iPhone or the iPad.... Surface just sucks even WORSE than those two products yet people want to try to cram it down business's throats like it'll revolutionize their workflow. The reality is the opposite. It's only useful to the computer illiterate that don't want to learn anything to compute and are happy fumbling through tasks for 20 minutes that would normally take me 30 seconds on a real OS.

      They are useful to introduce folks to computers that have no intention of learning how to use a real computer. They are content consumption devices for the masses that actually get in the way when you have real work to do.

      Today's crop of tablets are NOT very useful as actual computing devices. They are slow, clunky, finnicky PDA's that kids like to play games on and dig around on facebook because they are too lazy to learn to use a real computer. Period. Most are too locked down and restricted for real work unless your real work only involves looking at eBooks and doing minor clunky editing to word documents or spreadsheets.

      Tablets are not the "future" of computing. They are supplemental devices for people that want to look cool or simply want a toy for browsing the internet.

      Surface is a joke, the iPad is too restricted to be useful and Windows Phone 8 is a flop. The only use for tablets is basic computing needs for the computer illiterate that are happy fumbling through inefficient interfaces poking at a screen because they don't want to learn how to use a full-fledged OS properly and struggle with real computers.

      Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see ARM make inroads into desktop and laptop devices but interfaces like Windows 8, iOS and Android will NEVER displace real Linux, Windows and OSX systems for REAL WORK. You bought an overpriced toy. Sorry. Tablets have been around for years, the only thing that caused them to take off was cheap embedded 3D accelerators for games and poke-and-drool interfaces that inexperienced users can get used to. For power users and real computing professionals they are near useless except as a convenient way to browse the net on the toilet. Oh and Angry Birds or Worms Armageddon.

      Small lightweight laptops are far better for people with real jobs that involve heavy computer use. Sales monkeys that can't touch type anyway are the only people I've seen get real use out of them besides a cool toy. They are a solution in search of a problem.

      Touch screens have been around forever. There's a damn good reason they never became the sole input device. It isn't practical to have ONLY a touch interface for complex apps. It doesn't work well and ends up being less efficient. Technophobes like them more because they don't have to think or learn anything.

      For 90% of computing needs for the average joe, you're right. But the average joe does very little useful with a computer. It's an entertainment appliance. I'd be happy to get rid of that crowd in the standard computing space anyway. They are a hassle. The issue is going to be the rising cost of real computers which tablets will never displace. This fad of tablets being the future of computing is nothing more than wishful thinking and hype.

      I *AM* an IT Director with over 16 of experience in IT including mobile computing, some development experience, some graphic arts experience so I think I can speak with some actual weight on this subject. Especially considering I've developed apps for mobile platforms going back to NewtonOS 2.1, PalmOS 4 and Windows CE 2.0.

      So yes, tablets are great "

    5. Re:Outlook will be an improvement by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

      For 90% of computing needs for the average joe, you're right.

      Hillarious, Mr. IT Awesomeness, that you admit that for most people this is enough. So I guess you're real point is that only the 10% that do REAL computing need to have anything at all and the rest of the people shouldn't have any device or should have something way over-powered for their needs. You may call it a useless, but whether it is perfect of not for you (and nothing out there is), it meets a need and does so well enough for many. Sure, the Surface is not a hit, but I find it enough for basic road computing while traveling a lot to third-world countries where over-powered laptops are a bigger pain and liability than benefit in computing power. Sorry for not being power-hungry in my needs right now. I do realize that your job depends on people needing more computers and not less. Get perspective on other needs of other people around the world and see that there are places where devices outside of your inventory can be great for other people doing other things.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    6. Re:Outlook will be an improvement by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Umm.... dude..... it IS a tablet. An oversized PDA with a keyboard attached and a version of Win8 ported to ARM.

      Outlook is an e-mail client and PIM package. It's not a "basic tool" everyone needs. There's lots of other E-Mail clients with comparable feature sets that are compatible and quite nice.

      Wow.. Only a fool would run PIM software on a PDA? When PDAs were basically invented to serve as PIMs?
      Thank you for your instructive comment.

    7. Re:Outlook will be an improvement by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      Hillarious, Mr. IT Awesomeness, that you admit that for most people this is enough. So I guess you're real point is that only the 10% that do REAL computing need to have anything at all and the rest of the people shouldn't have any device or should have something way over-powered for their needs.

      For most consumers using the devices at HOME with no real need for serious computing devices, yes they're adequate. From a business standpoint..... Hell no. It's a great TOY for grandpa to get on Facebook.

      When that extra computing power comes at the same or LESS cost than a decent tablet when the laptop cost MORE to produce then yeah, I think people should learn how to use a computer. Not a content consumption appliance that cost much less to produce and will be crippling when you DO need the extra horsepower and decide you actually need to do real work.

      Stuffing crippled tablets down the throats of school children and basing their computer education on them is going to do more harm than good. People should be educated with real computing skills.

      Tablets are a burden on IT and have so far provided no additional benefit besides people thinking they hopped on the new wave of the computing future. Tablets are PDA's. Supplemental devices. NOT full computer replacements. And arrogant folks with tablets that think I'm not going to manage their devices forced upon my network because they "BYOD" have another thing coming. I manage it, or it doesn't touch my network. The end.

    8. Re:Outlook will be an improvement by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      No, what I'm saying is there are other PIM packages besides Outlook that talk to an Exchange server and don't suck. If you're too lazy to spend 5 minutes learning a new e-Mail package when Outlook isn't available then you have issues.

      And if Outlook is the only capable PIM package for WinRT, maybe your choice of platform sucks and you should look for better alternatives with a real application base.

      People like you are why substandard, buggy software continues to reign supreme because learning a few new icons to click and maybe a keyboard shortcut or two is such a horrid task.

  35. Re: 8-ball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're conveniently forgetting that it also says "Outlook good"

    (If not for that one mistake, the Magic 8-ball would have a perfect record.)

  36. Better question by onyxruby · · Score: 1

    Who's working on the next generation landfill? The last land fill is full now.

    We know there are several hundred thousand or million missing generation 1 Surface / RT's out there. No one has ever figured out where they went and Microsoft already publicly took close a billion dollar write down on them. Educational facilities are wisely resisting the dumping bait of the $199 Surface RT. That means all of those RT's were sent to a landfill. What I want to know is where Microsoft dumped their great embarassment (recycle center etc).

    1. Re:Better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're getting dumped right next to Atari's ET cartridges.

  37. oh great, Osborne effect by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

    The Surface sales were bad enough. Now they're gonna get the Osborne effect too?

    1. Re:oh great, Osborne effect by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      The difference being that the Osborne 1 was actually a decent machine in spite of the TINY little screen. Their next product was just better.

      The Surface is a piece of shit. The next one will just be a piece of shit with newer software to replace the beta release.

  38. and locking out steam and other stores is antitrus by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and locking out steam and other stores is antitrust also the censorship as well. At least give use easy side loading like android.

  39. Will it run Android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not, I can imagine that the second generation will be even less successful than the first. The problem with surface, was that it ran Windows. RT is just crap, and full Windows 8 doesn't really work well on a tablet (or, come to think of it, a desktop).
    Outlook is bloated, outdated, and tied to Windows. Email has moved onto cross platform cloud services, and can be used from any platform. Who wants to be locked into the past?

  40. "more successful" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're setting the bar awfully low - the current Surface inventory is rotting in a warehouse - hard to imagine anything being "more successful" - Microsoft ought to order some C4 plastic explosives and blow up the current inventory, since if a new generation comes out, the current ones will be even more worthless than they are now.

  41. 'tis is all boring, really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here's a idea. make the new "surface" a two piece device.
    like a piece of chocolate, you break it in half once you get it.
    one part you connect via ethernet or wireless to your internet router.
    the second part you tap on the first part (NFC).
    the first piece now is your email server.
    the second part you stick on your ... oh wait .. i mean pocket.
    surely you c an get a free "@mychocolatebar.com" from the cloud?
    nevermind.
    brown green blue

  42. NEW SURFACE? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    Outlook, not so good...

    Microsoft meets at least one of the definitions for insanity: Keep doing the same thing and expecting different results.

    Really. SO f-ing arrogant! "We weren't mistaken, and will double down."

    How's all them ZuneHD's been doing?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:NEW SURFACE? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      "We weren't mistaken, and will double down."

      Straight from Obama's NSA playbook..

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:NEW SURFACE? by ooshna · · Score: 1

      Ok I am probably going to get blasted for this but.... The ZuneHD was a great piece of hardware and gave a hell of a lot more bang for the buck than the comparable priced iPod of the time. That being said it wasn't the device itself that was horrible but the lack of any real apps or support from Microsoft that made it such a joke.

    3. Re:NEW SURFACE? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      It was a good device.

      That should never have existed.

      Not for any valid business reason, anyway.

      Microsoft hubris. There was room in the market for EXACTLY ONE massively successful strategy including a mobile player, tied to an online store for popular music and podcasts. That niche was already neatly occupied by Apple.

      The Zune v1 was a complete xeroxing of Apple's device form, function, business model and technology presentation. When it became a white-elephant, rather than own-up the obvious blunder, they made it again - harder and deeper. The usual Microsoft myopia kicked in, where they addressed any possible issue as a matter addressable by "features". I spent six years inside this maelstrom of arrogance and ignorance. This was typical, across divisions.

      Even if the ZuneHD were hotter than Jesus' underpants, it was introduced as the iPhone began to hit stride, and standalone players were going to be a sub-market. :-)

      Still, the next blunder was rubbishing ZuneHD device and UI work, in favour of WinPhone7. If MS had added a phone stack and dialpad to ZuneHD, it may have been worthwhile. Certainly better than the two generations of Nokia and HTC subbed atrocity. Again, internal politics and hubris made it impossible for Microsoft to even recognise this - much less execute against such a plan. No. The "Windows" brand was going to take command of the field, while "Zune" got pushed down the memory-hole with "Kin".

      So? An even MORE diluted Windows brand - attached to new vistas of failure, in mobile...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:NEW SURFACE? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      'Zactly.

      All beasts.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  43. Tiling window manager by tepples · · Score: 2

    As I understand it, Windows RT has one advantage over Android: a tiling window manager. Windows RT has built-in support for "snapping" an app to a side of the screen, allowing one application to run in a "tablet" size space and another in a "phone" size space. This is useful for writing a document while referring to another document. Stock Android doesn't have this because the CDD allows Android applications to assume that the screen size won't change after installation. Samsung's custom version of Android has a multi-window mode, but this works only for those few applications that opt in to Samsung multi-window because it's not a core OS feature.

  44. RT is dead- Microsoft looks for suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Surface RT is dead. At some point, Microsoft may revert back to the original plan of launching full-blown Windows for ARM, but this won't happen until Google releases Android for Desktops.

    Meanwhile, MS has no problem if suckers like Nvidia wish to waste their own time and money working on a potential Surface RT 2- after all Nvidia has found near zero customers for its late, power-hungry, expensive and unremarkable Tegra 4. Microsoft tablets tend to be bricks, so there is plenty of room for the giant battery the Tegra 4 would prefer.

    Meanwhile, the new Google Nexus 7 has a Qualcomm SoC that is faster than the Tegra 4, and half the price of anything Microsoft may sell in the near future. The Tegra 4 is stillborn, and so are any expensive tablets that appear in the future using the chip.

    Anyway, Nvidia has put the terrible Tegra 4 fiasco behind them, and are currently prepping 'Logan', the Tegra 5. This part matches AMD's Temash and Kabini parts, having a full-blown PC desktop class GPU solution for the first time in ARM space. Sadly, Tegra 5 will be a poor match for the needs of the phones and tablets produced during its run.

    Nvidia needs Google to produce Android for Desktops/laptops, so the Tegra 5 has a better place to go than just the latest Google Chromebook. Nvidia can also hope that Tegra 5 will see a proper Windows OS from Microsoft that runs on ARM.

  45. Outlook overestimation? by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    Missing outlook is the reason why the tablet did not sold? IMO in order to derive such a conclusion, one really needs to be a high ranking manager not involved in any real work beside exchanging e-mails.

  46. Something unannounced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If WinRT got third-party desktop apps in the Surface 2 timeframe, that could make them a lot less silly. Not that his comment should be interpreted as meaning that; he's got a hardware partner and is quasi-obligated to make optimistic noises about how they'll do, even though he surely knows better.

  47. Outlook? by Lorem_Ipsum · · Score: 1

    Ha ha ha ha ha! Whew. Thanks, that was a good one.
    Wait, they're serious?
    HA HA HA HA HA!

    --
    --- Void where prohibited. Your mileage may vary. ---