Domain: wbztv.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to wbztv.com.
Comments · 15
-
Make the parents pay a required fee, yet...
This is the same high school that apparently could afford to have the prom at Fenway Park...
-
Re:Languages Change
If it's the latter, then _any_ substitution of the word still implies the word and carries the negative connotation along with it.
On that note, the word "meep" got banned in schools in Danvers, Massachusetts. Apparently enough kids were using it in situations where it could be a naughty word, so the principle banned it.
From the article I linked:
WBZ tried to contact principal Murray to find out more about why he banned the word, but we did not hear back from him.
... WBZ also reached out to the school commitee[sic], the town administrator, and the superintendent of schools for comments, but all have refused.I guess no one wants to admit how retarded that is.
-
Re:I'd be confident too if I was competing against
Paint that eats asphalt? Please, paint did not let the asphalt breathe and soak in water, which caused in issues in the winter. Should they have known that? Yes, but apparently it's a new technology. If they didn't use it, you would've been complaining that Taxachusetts is still using decades-old paint technology, instead of this newfangled thermoplastic paint that's working so great in Texas.
http://wbztv.com/curious/white.paint.lines.2.1021788.html
So yeah, now they will have to repave Rt 24 earlier than scheduled (and it was already scheduled for repaving).
-
slashdotters and their interests...
Somehow, I figured lonely slashdotters would be more interested in this article: Using Stem Cells for Breast Enhancement
... which frankly, strikes me as dangerous. If they're replicating stem cells from people who are already at high risk of breast cancer, doesn't that increase it even more (more generations == shorter telomeres)?
-l
-
Re:Sinking ship?You're still posting anonymously because you know you're full of crap.
1) http://wbztv.com/politics/jonkeller/john.kerry.vice.2.796143.html
Hey, look! A guy with a blog spouted unfounded rumor! It must be true, I read it on the internet. Did you even bother to read the random blog entry?
2) http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml
Please show me where in this article that says that Obama wishes to execute babies? THAT is why you are a troll. All the stuff you are spewing are incendiary lies at worst and unfounded rumor at best.
-
Re:Sinking ship?
1) http://wbztv.com/politics/jonkeller/john.kerry.vice.2.796143.html
2) http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml
So, as you can see, the John Kerry rumor has legs, and Obama was the only senator in the Illinois Senate to speak out on the Senate floor against the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. The first time it was put to a vote, he voted "present." Way to have balls and stand up for your beliefs, Barack.
To the parent poster, I regret to inform you that you have failed miserably in your endeavor to appear intelligent.
-
Re:Anyone up for a pool?
Since traffic counters and blinkenlights are terrorist tools in Boston, I'm surprised this guy got as far down the street as he did before Homeland Security detained him for our safety.
-
Re:Yesterday: $11b in profits for Exxon, today...?
Source on the profit margin bit please?
A 40% profit margin is reported here.
-
Re:Once the government's bitch, evermore their bit
I'm still surprised that I haven't heard more outrage about the fundamental mormon raid in Texas now that the supposed abused teen is probably a 30 something living in CO. Further the accused guy is on parole in Arizona and wasn't picked up, or even questioned before the raid. Even scarier, the police questioned the kids without lawyers or guardians present. The state will provide them lawyers in two weeks
The parents are being forced to submit DNA to start the process of getting their kids back.
It seems like the police went in with shoddy evidence for a blanket warrant, which they got. Sure the people in the compound may very well have been breaking laws, but wouldn't that be all the more reason for the authorities to wait until stronger evidence was found? It's the over the top actions that worry me, not waiting to make a case before getting gung ho.
-
Re:Depends on a context.Same for the idiot girl wearing the LEDs: handling the bricks of modelling clay out at an airport is not what a blinkenlights dork normally does Just to be clear, she was not handling "bricks" of modeling clay - there were a few (very) small pieces of clay holding components in, and she allegedly was holding some play-dough (though I haven't read any confirmation of that) - she also did in fact respond when questioned about the purpose of her device.
Remember folks, paranoia tends to lead to the distortion of facts, and leads people to mistake eccentricity for "omg terrorist!"
And to those arguing that she's lucky she didn't get shot...what sense does it make to shoot hot lead at somebody who a) might be strapped with C4, and b) is therefore clearly willing to die, and therefore would be motivated to wire a dead man's switch into their device. -
Re:Apologize??
To someone who is mired in electronics on a daily basis, a circuit board doesn't "look like a bomb" but it actually looks like homework, or a radio, or a motherboard, or something else. For this student and other students like her, when they look at a circuit board, "bomb" is the furthest thing from their mind.
A better analogy would be a butcher who goes to the airport directly from work with blood still on his clothing and thinks nothing of it because being covered in animal blood all day is completely normal for him.
So really, let's consider some common sense here: not all perspectives are equal. What is obvious to you is not obvious to the next person, because the origin of their perspective is drastically different. In the most blatant logical example: If you have three people standing in different places looking at the same large cylindrical object, one looking directly perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, one looking directly along the longitudinal axis, and one between those two positions; they will each respectively see a rectangle, a circle, and a cylinder. What is completely obvious to one is inaccessible to the others, making the "commonality" of "common sense" rather questionable.
What is unfortunate about this story is the reminder that the majority (also known as "the dumb") are seeing bombs and terrorists everywhere that there are none. -
Re:Watch out for DHMO
Yes. The idiots that put up the devices in the first place had to know that they would be inciting public panic. They knew darn well that after 9/11 the government cannot afford to get caught with its pants down, so they have to take every threat seriously. That includes panicked individuals calling in on tip lines reporting blinky signs in places that are not authorized. Personally I think those responsible for the advertising campaign should be fined 10x the amount the city spent, and the ones that installed the devices should have to spend a few weeks in a P.M.I.t.A. prison.
Yes, that response sounds entirely proportional and appropriate. And for the city workers who installed a traffic counter that was later incorrectly suspected to be an explosive device and detonated by the Boston Police Bomb Squad, those workers should have the exact same sentence right? They had to know that in this post-911 world ANYTHING with a wire, placed anywhere in the city could be a threat, even if the city itself ordered the placement of the device.
Or maybe, just maybe, you're a complete jackass who can't think for themselves and recognize that there were a lot more failures in these incidents than by the people who placed devices that were not bombs and were not intended to be interpretted as such. Even the legal definition of hoax device under MA law states that the device must be INTENDED by the placer to be interpretted as a threat in an effort to cause panic. No intent means no hoax, no matter how hard someone squints their eyes and declares something a bomb that doesn't look, function, or have anywhere near the same mass & volume as a bomb. And placement of something is not the only factor that should be used in determining if an object is an explosive, just being under a bridge does not make something a bomb, ask any homeless person. And let's say we give the bomb squad the benefit of the doubt and say the first 5 LED signs they found should have been treated like bombs, what about the next 5 that were identical, at what point do we establish a pattern of non-threat? Never? "Well, the first 99 devices we found all turned out to be harmless tape recorders afterall, but we're still treating number 100 as a live bomb because the others could have all been distractions from the real one." Yes, very plausible indeed. Putting them under bridges may not have been the smartest move by these artists, but to lay the blame 100% on them is rediculous. If we don't hold the people in power accountable for their failures as well as their successes then we only encourage incompetence.
As a resident of Boston, what I took away from this incident is that if you wanted to plant a real bomb somewhere in the city, you could easily distract the bomb squad for the entire day by leaving harmless electircal items under multiple bridges. Leaving you free to pull off a real act of terrorism while the police spend the ENTIRE DAY "defusing" the same harmless device over and over. Although you may have to wait a while since it will take them over 2 weeks to even notice that there are devices attached to bridges. Pathetic. -
Re:Curbside pickup
-
Re:slow down and think for a minute
They acted completely appropriately for the first one. What they did next is what infuriated everyone.
They found the first one at 9 (story). At noon they announced to the public that it was a false alarm. Consequently, we can infer that they likely knew it was a false alarm no later than 11. Then they find another at 1pm. Might you expect the bomb squad to notice a trend and act accordingly - maybe tone down the paranoia? They had 2 hours to think about it! THAT's the thinking that I expect public officials, the ones in the know, to do. Call the chief of police and say, "hey, let everyone know that these things are harmless."
Instead, they scream their heads off comparing Turner Broadcasting's Lite-Brite stunt to actual terrorist bombings that actually kill people, and that they got SCARED (by Lite-Brites), and that they spent $750,000 (blowing up Lite-Brites) and ohmygod who's gonna pay for it?
Land of the brave, indeed. -
Stupid security is the enemy of good security
This, while unidentified trucks are allowed into "secure" areas of Logan Airport. People who can't assess threats can't protect against them.