Slashdot Mirror


Aqua Teen Hunger Force Brings Boston to a Halt

An anonymous reader writes "An ad campaign for Aqua Teen Hunger Force featuring the Mooninites Ignignot and Err caused major security concerns in Boston, MA when magnetic light displays were mistaken for possible bombs. The displays included one of Ignignot flipping the bird (as hard as he could), but Gov. Deval Patrick was not amused."

804 comments

  1. Not really a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Deval Patrick is clearly Satanic - just look at his first name! Also, his second name is Patrick, which is Irish, and therefore he is probably a Papist. He is also a Democ-rat, and wants us to use the communist tool of Beelzebub, namely, Mozilla Firefox.

    Aqua Swim should be applauded for their contribution to the War on Terror. By making terrorist Democ-rat liberal whiners like Deval Patrick look foolish they will combat the Open Source scourge that encroaches upon our Christian Way of Life via nebulous European threats.

  2. Who's the @**hole now! by Adambomb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think what would happen if administrators in vegas turned paranoid of every blinking light. I can understand checking on it, even applaud it despite the oddity of it all, but I dont understand why anyone would be irate when it turned out to be nothing.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
    1. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by PennyLoafers · · Score: 1, Troll

      As someone who lives in Boston, I'm glad they decided to take these precautions. You have to take these all seriously, because who knows if they're threats or not? I'm mad as hell about this ad campaign because when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today, you can bet your ass Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill.

    2. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Some of the displays were flipping the bird, and The Flying Fickle Finger of Fate sounds pretty dangerous.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by dedazo · · Score: 1

      I dont understand why anyone would be irate when it turned out to be nothing.

      If I lived in Boston and got nailed in one of the bridge or street closures I'd be pissed.

      They could have at the very least fucking notified the police or something before it got out of hand. It's irresponsible because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that a problem like this might happen, and that other people just trying to get on with their day might be unfairly affected.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    4. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by hrieke · · Score: 1

      I would not expect Ted Turner to foot the bill at all- Ted was tossed out a long time ago.

      I would expect an interesting time at the next shareholder's meeting though (and hopefully a huge fine to spur the conversation along).

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    5. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Jartan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's irresponsible because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that a problem like this might happen, and that other people just trying to get on with their day might be unfairly affected.
      Actually it probably takes someone who's not a genius because a genius wouldn't realize people could possibly be this stupid. War on terror my ass. The terrorists seem to have won already when we have everyone jumping at shadows.
    6. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Funny

      A friend of mine tried to tell the local FOX News affiliate.

      They laughed him off.

      Idiots.

    7. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who lives in Boston, I'm glad they decided to take these precautions. You have to take these all seriously, because who knows if they're threats or not?
      Yeah, because so many bombs feature blinking lights. Bomb makers really want to draw attention to the bombs before they go off.

      I'm mad as hell about this ad campaign because when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today, you can bet your ass Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill.
      In the first grade, we were taught to identify pipe bombs and not one of us would have thought these things were bombs. You should be mad at your government for spending the money on security theater rather than on real security and education. You can hardly blame Ted Turner or anyone else for idiots who thought these things were bombs.
    8. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by badspyro · · Score: 5, Funny

      what first grade did you go to?!?!
      maybe i was ill that day...

    9. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who lives in Boston, I'm glad they decided to take these precautions. You have to take these all seriously, because who knows if they're threats or not? I'm mad as hell about this ad campaign because when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today, you can bet your ass Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill. This will sound like a troll, but karma be damned - you're an idiot. So it the person who called this in - they should be charged for the mess. Also, please stop watching fox news and 24, and go read a book.
      --
      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    10. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by jftitan · · Score: 1

      Point Exactly...

      This bullshit about Terrorists are going to attack the US if we don't search every person's ass before entering a plane or even Every blinking light on Star Trek could potentially be a bomb is completely, media based paranoia.

        Hold my beer while I pull every LED off my monitors, KB, Mice, Computers, Cell Phones, etc to make sure they aren't really bombs.

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    11. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      They could have at the very least fucking notified the police or something before it got out of hand. It's irresponsible because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that a problem like this might happen, and that other people just trying to get on with their day might be unfairly affected.


      How can you say that? Those "other people" who you claim are "trying to get on with their day" are trying to DRIVE CARS OVER BRIDGES. Everyone knows that this is consistent with the actions of car bombing terrorists, so these so called "innocent bystanders" are actually just as guilty at ... ummm ... looking guilty as are the stupid advertising drones who put up the lite-brites.

      Use some SENSE man! You must notify the police before you drive a car where there are people, structures, (or potential people or structures) or you risk creating mayhem with your irresponsible car-bomber act.

    12. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by siliconwafer · · Score: 1, Redundant

      This amounted to more than "bridge and street" closures. Interstate 93, one of the main arteries for traffic to enter and exit Boston, was shut-down. A section of the T (subway) was also shut down and passengers were bussed between stations. The Charles River was even closed; boats were prohibited to pass.

      This was more than a commuters worst nightmare for many. A lot of Boston residents are mighty pissed off, including myself.

    13. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm mad as hell about this ad campaign because when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today, you can bet your ass Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill.

      Perhaps you shouldn't let your tax dollars get spent on hiring brain dead police officers? A box with a shit load of LEDs in it is "consistent with an improvised explose device"? What ever! It's not Ted Turner's fault, your city officials over reacted...

    14. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by gertam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why the hell should Ted Turner pay anything. He doesn't even own Turner Broadcasting any more, you idiot.

    15. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by dedazo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And when someone actually plants a bomb somewhere, it causes damage and the police didn't act the way they're supposed to because they think it's probably a stupid prank then you'd be howling for their nads, wouldn't you?

      I know it's fashionable to complain about these things now, but war on terror or not, this was unnecessary and dumb. It could have been done in any number of ways that did not involve bringing Boston to a halt in the middle of the day. I think the response was the correct one and I hope that if this ever happens in my city the response is exactly the same.

      And if these bored TV execs thought about it for more than five seconds and didn't do this - then the terrorists are winning as well? I think not. This is about common sense and basic civil responsibility.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    16. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone else who lives in Boston, I think the government here is a real gang of idiots, and I'm glad I vote for their Republican opponents.

      Not that the Republicans are likely to be much better, but they'd have a hard doing worse than the clowns we have right now (e.g. Menino)...

    17. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the second grade, they taught us to make pipe bombs. Important tips like not buying the pipe and caps at the same hardware store, paying cash for everything, how to make detonators from flashbulbs and clothespins, and so forth. You really missed out!

    18. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by 2phar · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean the Masshole?

    19. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is what happens when you've had 6 years of being told that the terrorists are out to kill every single last one of us in our beds.

      The next time you're about to say "if you're not doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about" remember this story, and think about some wacky cartoon guys trying to have a little fun. They are now being threatened with who-knows-what just because we've got leaders that piss themselves at the thought of islamoliberalnazis coming in the night to rape their women, cut their throats and give their kids video games with pictures of naked breasts.

      There is a serious downside to buying into the current wave of fear-mongering being perpetrated in this country. I understand that they're doing it to make us easier to govern, but it's going to have consequences that the powers that be cannot imagine. One of those consequences is that we're starting to seriously think our leaders are knuckleheads. And cowards.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Reverberant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So it the person who called this in - they should be charged for the mess.

      Bullshit. Someone (most likely someone who's never even heard of ATHF, much less knows what a Mooninite is) saw an an odd-looking device attached to a potentially suspicious target and reported it. The bomb squad blew one up, and investigated the others. Yes, some roads and bridges were closed, but the city wasn't evacuated, the national guard wasn't called out, no one was rounded up. By the time I heard about this, it was already over. The system worked the way it should.

      Turner, on the other hand may have something to answer for. As part of my job, I leave electronic monitoring equipment for days or weeks in pubic places. Even before 9/11, I knew better than to do so without informing the authorities - if I can't inform someone in charge, I attach a note to the device saying "this is a sound monitoring device for project XXX. If you have any questions, call John Smith at (617) 555-8944." I have heard from many colleagues who did not take these steps, and had their $5000 devices blown up by the bomb squad (again, this stuff was happening before 9/11).

      If Turner took these steps, and officials got their wires crossed, then yes the authorities obviously overreacted. But if the city wasn't informed, the city took all the right steps. Did you expect the authorities to just ignore the devices because they looked cute?

    21. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yes that's right. Come and play, come and play. Forget about the movement.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    22. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by furbyhater · · Score: 5, Funny

      As part of my job, I leave electronic monitoring equipment for days or weeks in pubic places.

      What type of sick experiment/fetish is going on there? To each their own...

    23. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a sound monitoring comment for post #17836518. If you have any questions, call Abdul T. el-Bomber at (555) 555-2662. Please quickly leave a message when the beeping stops.

    24. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by aaronl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, with the police and such talking about nailing whoever did it to a cross, what a surprise that nobody stepped forward to quell the madness.

      It was a stupid stunt, with a moronic response by the authorities. It also worked 100%, due to how moronic the response of the Boston authorities was. There's a difference between quickly closing down the immmediate area, investigating the sign while doing so, and then discontinuing the closures after the all clear, and what they did. They closed everything in a wide area, called in heavily armed units, caused considerable panic, and then gave the all clear while screaming about throwing whoever did it in the abyss. In other words, the decision makers acted like irrational mental cases screaming at the invisible monsters from space rather than calm intelligent people dealing with a potential dangerous situation.

    25. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by lindseyp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      pissed off at whom?

      The people who pulled this 'stunt' in 9 cities, or the people in just *one* city who decided that igniknot flashing the bird was some kind of threat?

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    26. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by J.Dev.06 · · Score: 1

      Actually it probably takes someone who's not a genius because a genius wouldn't realize people could possibly be this stupid. Actually ..

      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
    27. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As someone who lives in Boston, I'm glad they decided to take these precautions. You have to take these all seriously, because who knows if they're threats or not? I'm mad as hell about this ad campaign because when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today, you can bet your ass Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill.,/i>

      What a bunch of scared little girls we Americans have become. Not content to take threats at face value, we have to feed the scare machine at every opportunity.

    28. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, I wouldn't be demanding their heads on a platter. If I said "the sky is falling! Tomorrow, the moon will crash into the Earth!" and no one did anything... and it really happened... well, who the hell WOULD believe something like that?

      Cops are humans, and they're not psychic. I'd rather they DIDN'T go after every strange report they get. I mean, in this case, as someone pointed out, what kind of idiot bomber would make his bombs FLASHING? That should send a signal to the cop's brain that says "This report is highly suspicious. I'd better at least send a nearby cop to look at the scene before I send out the cavalry."

      On rare, rare occasions, yes, tragedy might strike when that looney report turns out to be true, but... tragedy happens all the time. And I'd rather the cops be on call to respond to a REAL emergency.

    29. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by dosquatch · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK! Any recommended titles?

      Please. You're reading a site with the tagline "News for Nerds". You should already know the required reading.

      You should already own and have read all of these, and if you're truly pretentious you should be able to quote relevant passages. Also, to retain your nerd and/or geek credentials, you must be able to quote from two or more of Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5, Stargate, Firefly, or Andromeda. You will be expected to pick one of these as a religion* and from time to time wage holy war on the rest for forsaking The One True Way. Also you must be able to recite on demand the Spam sketch, the Dead Parrot sketch, and 90% of the Princess Bride script**.

      If you wish to branch out from required reading, other popular choices are Twain, Shakespeare, Crichton, and Mark Minasi.

      (e.g., theater [or is theatre more proper?]

      While either is correct, the "Enlightened" tend to use "theatre". I tend to make a distinction in that "theater" is the building and "theatre" is the performance within, but that's mostly because I suffered with a thespian roommate for a while and the brainwashing eventually wore me down. You may choose as you wish.

      Thanks in advance!

      My pleasure! Please feel free to stop in again anytime you need a helping hand :-)

      * - Star Trek, ** - Inconceivable!

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    30. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, okay. So I guess I should call a bomb squad on all those billboards that have lights on them. They have lights! If we don't take them down and they blow up then everyone will "howling for their nads"! And the trash could have bombs! We need bomb squads to take out the trash!

      Fuckin' overreacting uptight insecure morons who don't bother to think about what makes sense...

    31. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by finity · · Score: 1

      They are now being threatened with who-knows-what

      I don't remember reading about anyone threatening anybody with anything. Especially the people who draw the show. That was all in your mind.

    32. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 0, Troll

      there wouldn't have been a problem if it weren't for fear-mongers in the media and pussies like you.

    33. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      we're not all as high strung as you i guess...

    34. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Lijemo · · Score: 1

      I wish I hadn't have used up all my mod points yesterday.

      I hope you get the coveted score of "+5 Troll" =^)

    35. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I attach a note to the device saying "this is a sound monitoring device for project XXX. If you have any questions, call John Smith at (617) 555-8944. Oh, Great! Just Great! Now you've given those terrorists yet another idea! Thank you very much, mister smarty pants!

      <hides in bomb shelter due to suspicious-looking cereal box on counter>
    36. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      dude, if you live in any other country that's not currently fighting in the "war on terror" there would not have been a problem. i could understand if recently there were similar devices like that which turned out to be a bomb. but for fucks sake, c'mon. they look like lite-brites. we live in an expressive technological society. i see that kinda shit and chuckle to myself. the only thing that pisses me off about the incident is morons who turned it into something about terrorism once again. there is nothing wrong with what the ATHF marketing team did. human beings should not be living in a constant state for paranoia. you should be more concerned about THAT.

    37. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by corbettw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Geez, use hyperbole much? As long as we're not speaking Arabic, not forcing our women to wear floor length curtains and walk behind us, and not stoning gays for expressing themselves the way God made them, then the terrorists haven't won.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    38. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      Actually it is a known fact that law enforcement typically have an IQ at 100 or below.

      you do not want smart cops out there, you want them to follow training and not waiver from that. It'
      s just like the ARMY. you do not under any circumstances want smart cops.

      Because smart people think independently and you cant have that in a police or military force... They wont violate personal rights if they do.

      Yes, I AM a cop, yes this is all very true. Posting ANON to keep from getting fired.

    39. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by beakerMeep · · Score: 1
      Whoever modded you offtopic is an idiot. period. what the fuck is going on where people claim to identify pipe bombs in 1st grade are getting modded insightful?

      +1 funny ass ninja maybe but insightful? pfft.

      --
      meep
    40. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Gman14msu · · Score: 1
      if I can't inform someone in charge, I attach a note to the device saying "this is a sound monitoring device for project XXX. If you have any questions, call John Smith at (617) 555-8944."

      So you`re saying all I have to do to slip a bomb past the authorities is attach a note to the bomb that says "Hey! Don't worry, this actually isn't a bomb?"......interesting. Better not let the terrorists find this one out....

    41. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury
      1984, by George Orwell
      Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley
      The Art of Computer Programming, by Donald Knuth

    42. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      public school ftw

    43. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      As someone who lives near Boston, I feel ashamed to be a Masshole today. Why? Because our local government is comprised of a bunch of knee-jerk reactionists who have no sense of humor.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    44. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They could have at the very least fucking notified the police or something before it got out of hand. It's irresponsible because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that a problem like this might happen, and that other people just trying to get on with their day might be unfairly affected.

      RTFA. They did. 3 weeks ago. It's not their fault the Boston Police are incompetent.

    45. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK! Any recommended titles?

      You can't go wrong with Intimate Invasion: The Erotic Ins and Outs of Enema Play by M.R. Strict. Changed my life.

      Thanks in advance!

      No problem.

    46. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by westlake · · Score: 1
      The terrorists seem to have won already when we have everyone jumping at shadows.

      do I see you volumteering to open the brown bag someome left behind on the bus? in the states, maybe. in Israel, probably not.

    47. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      a genius wouldn't realize people could possibly be this stupid.
      Yeah, I'll have to agree with that, after seeing some photos. Who looks at this and thinks it's a bomb? What kinda pisses me off is that many major news sources are not supplying pictures. First time I read the story I was like "yeah as a large corporation they should have had a team of legal experts that would realize that these devices would be construed as bombs". Until I saw the pictures.

      Now here's another question. Say I am a terrorist planning to blow up a bridge. If the bomb is noticed then the bomb squad might have a chance to de-activate it, or at least clear the area. Deaths could be reduced or even prevented all together, going against my goal of killing as many capitalist pigs dead as possible. So this is my question:

      Would my strategy involve cramming as many LEDs as possible onto my bomb as possible, preferably in the eye-catching form of a cartoon character giving the finger? Well, I guess the finger would be symbolic or something, but my personal answer remains no.

      That said I still think this was a very dumb publicity stunt.
      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    48. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by feronti · · Score: 1

      Hey Adam! is that you? I'm glad I was able to enlighten you somehow:)

    49. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the people behind the marketing campaign called in to report the devices today as part of the marketing campaign.

    50. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I have lived in Boston for a period and honestly believe that the authorities in the state have never been capable of handling any real situations. They are only good for speeding tickets, parking violations and overcharging on unnecessary tolls (cough.. masspike). Watching drunk college kids and all the usual citizen harassments.

      I am still quite undecided on this matter, because it shows how easily anyone can shut Boston down. This is what you get in a city that doesn't know how to fix potholes and one way streets. The infrastructure is so bad, a cardboard box can clog up the city.

    51. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, one out of three isn't bad I guess.

      How're the Arabic lessons going?

    52. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "In the second grade, they taught us to make pipe bombs. Important tips like not buying the pipe and caps at the same hardware store, paying cash for everything, how to make detonators from flashbulbs and clothespins, and so forth. You really missed out!"

      Good to know your generation will be prepared to fight SkyNet.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    53. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by TCQuad · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's possible bombs could have large blinking lights... I mean, these things were attached around Boston with magnets. MAG-NETS. Can't you just see the evil bomb maker:

      *twirling moustache*
      Now that I have attached the bombs around the city using the unbreakable force of magnets, I will activate the lights to taunt the populace, so that they can see the source of their imminent demise but be powerless to avoid it!
      *insane cackling*

    54. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    55. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by zentinal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live in Lowell but I can feel your fear radiating all the way from Boston.

      I'm ashamed. And amused. Ok, much more amused than ashamed.

      Oh the cognitive dissonance.

      I for one, welcome our new Mooninite overlords, flipping us the bird as long and as hard as they possibly can.

    56. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the insightful was for pointing out that people trying to bomb something don't advertise their bombs.

      When I was in the first grade, pipe bombs were a real (but greatly exaggerated) threat. They were apparently being left on playgrounds (as a prank?, to hurt kids?, I have no idea). So, we were taught to identify them and what to do when we found one (don't touch it, tell a teacher, etc.). The point is, even in the first grade we didn't trip over a root and go run and tell the teacher about the 'bomb' we had found. You'd think the professionals could figure it out.

    57. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by sik0fewl · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's possible bombs could have large blinking lights... I mean, these things were attached around Boston with magnets. MAG-NETS. Can't you just see the evil bomb maker:

      *twirling moustache*
      Now that I have attached the bombs around the city using the unbreakable force of magnets, I will activate the lights to taunt the populace, so that they can see the source of their imminent demise but be powerless to avoid it!
      *insane cackling*

      Okay, now picture this in 2d.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    58. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It was a stupid stunt, with a moronic response by the authorities. It also worked 100%, due to how moronic the response of the Boston authorities was. There's a difference between quickly closing down the immmediate area, investigating the sign while doing so, and then discontinuing the closures after the all clear, and what they did. They closed everything in a wide area, called in heavily armed units, caused considerable panic, and then gave the all clear while screaming about throwing whoever did it in the abyss. In other words, the decision makers acted like irrational mental cases screaming at the invisible monsters from space rather than calm intelligent people dealing with a potential dangerous situation.
      Well, they probably thought Sangamon Taylor was behind it...

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    59. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by alshithead · · Score: 1

      You missed a representative Heinlein...

      The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
      The Number of the Beast
      I Will Fear No Evil

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    60. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead? Really?

      I wish I could believe that people on slashdot read those (and understood them). If they did then maybe there wouldn't be so many moochers and looters around here as evidenced by those that want to impose laws to promote CFLs, government mandated/subsidized health care, and tho other silly things.

      Slashdot is a great anachronism. As smart as people around here are, they first complain about to much government and its oppression and then immediately want government to mandate CFLs. Don't people get it? If they think that government is the tool of the majority to inflict an agenda on the minority then why can't they see that the things that they don't like about government are often the results of them being in the minority and the majority inflicting a different agenda that isn't appealing.

      Democracy is mob rule.

      The proper role of government isn't to chase issues or impose the ideas of the majority on the minority.

      Collective action has no unique moral authority.

      Slashdot visitors would do well to read Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead and understand them.

      Kudos to those that already understand.

    61. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the mooninites have the power of invisibility.

    62. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Vr6dub · · Score: 1

      Either I am ignorant to second grade curriculum or a particular mod is on crack. If it is true...sounds like an awesome tool.

    63. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, he did say it was for "Project XXX"!

    64. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Tickle+Cricket · · Score: 1

      As part of my job, I leave electronic monitoring equipment for days or weeks in pubic places.

      Well of course, you have to be careful when leaving valuable equipment in a sensitive area.

    65. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Vr6dub · · Score: 2, Funny

      school not tool.

    66. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You will be expected to pick one of these as a religion*

      My wife wants to join, but doesn't know if she should become part of the Star Trek Wars, or the Star Wars Trek? Any suggestions?

    67. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by SpectralDesign · · Score: 1

      Yes, my gut reaction is first to laugh about this whole thing, but then to wonder about the folks who set up this "ad campaign"... When I lived in the states (including MA.) there was an understanding that you don't leave your $#!^ lying around, no matter what it is... either you get a permit to have it on public property, or you lease a space from a land-owner...

      WTF were they thinking? This viral/gorilla/wtfe marketing is just pollution -- I hear they've already made an arrest, and I think the moron(s) involved should all be slapped down hard for their idiocy.

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
    68. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by adolf · · Score: 1

      I generally agree with you. However:

      It's not a stunt.

      This is just silly and completely harmless vandalism. Like stickering a park bench, bus stop, or utility pole with a logo. Or TP'ing the coach's house after a big game. Or graffiti artwork (and definitely in a class above common tagging).

      It didn't "work" at all: if it were intended to be panic-inducing, it'd have been DANGEROUS LOOKING. Further, if the prankster had intended to draw negative attention, they'd have simply called in a bomb threat for ANY populated building or area and skipped the construction and deployment phases.

      So let us not lose sight of this simple fact:

      It's just a self-illuminating picture of a cartoon figure with a raised middle finger, hanging from a public-works structure where it can easily be viewed by the masses. Clever and hilarious, if you ask me, but nobody bothered to do so before calling out the bomb squad.

      I wonder how long it will take before people realize that a proper bomb, these days, will not light up and disclose its presence. It will not tick. It will not emit noxious odors. It will not be visually discernible from a laptop computer, a rolled-up newspaper, or a large rock atop one side of a bridge abutment, or a Ryder truck rolling down the street. A effective panic-inducing device need not appear to be anything more than an apparently-lost cellular phone or wallet laying on a public table, as long as such a device successfully detonates in someone's hand when they pick it up.

      This was not anything like that. This was simply a grossly misinterpreted comedy, and I'm glad to have at least seen the photos.

      As an aside: I, as one interested taxpayer, want to see those responsible fired for their gross and callous abuse of my money over this ordeal.

    69. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by aaronl · · Score: 1

      The pike tolls were supposed to disappear a long time ago. The agreement when the road was built was that when the tolls paid for the costs to construct the road, that the tolls would be removed. They then decided that the Big Dig was part of the costs of construction for I90, so the tolls will likely never disappear, as we'll *never* be able to pay that off.

      I agree about the state being silly, much of the time. Remember, this is the place where it's illegal to videotape cops on a public road. I also love it when the state cops stand on the side of the road with a radar gun, pointing at cars to try to pull them over. This is the same state that made the train cost more than alternate means, especially for someone west of Boston, like me. I lived in Milford for a while (about 10mins south of the pike, along 495), and it actually was faster *and* cheaper to insure a car, buy gas, pay the tolls to drive to Cambridge, and pay to park. At least before the fare hike, it was cost effective to commute by train.

      Thinking back, we had a similar thing to this Boston bit happen in the town where I work. Some student brought a couple of .22 rounds to school in his coat. Apparently he'd been target shooting with his father the day before and forgot about them. Said rounds fell out of his pocket in the school and were noticed by staff. The school was then locked down and everything searched. This predictably got everyone out of school for most of the day. The administration went crazy over this, and when the kid that did it stepped forward (the next day), they had him brought up on charges and expelled. Predictably, spent casings were then found in other schools, as it was proven to get you out of class for the day, and easy to get your hands on.

      I wouldn't be surprised to see something like this in Boston again, soon. People love to disrupt things for their own amusement, especially when it's cheap, easy, and hard to get caught doing.

    70. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the main reason higher IQ applicants weren't hired is primarily that people that test as "smart" have a long history of getting bored with police work and moving on to something more intellectually stimulating. It's not that hiring MENSA candidate officers is dangerous in a public safety sense, but that the time and resources spent training them is generally wasted.

      I deal with police officers several times a week in my line of work, and it never fails to amaze me how piss-poor cops are at following instructions of any kind. Especially young officers... cops with gray hair who have walked a beat for a while seem to actually have some sense about how to deal with situations.

    71. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by mypalmike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it doesn't take a genius to figure out that a problem like this might happen

      A filing cabinet left out on a sidewalk would be overlooked for weeks in some parts of Boston and most other cities, and yet pose a much more significant danger.

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    72. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by nadaou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words, the decision makers acted like irrational mental cases screaming at the invisible monsters from space
      No, they acted perfectly rational. A street artist exposed someone in the chain of command as an unqualified moron, and exposed those higher up the chain as either a) just as thick/paranoid; b) not in control; c) or (my pick) slightly embarassed but opportunistic enough to be policailly greedy. To cover up the fact that they have been made to look like idiots in front of the entire country they make lots of noise about how 'angry' they are, and to stop it happening again they threaten to send the poor artist to prison for 5 years on vague "acting suspisiously" charges.

      Perfectly rational political human reaction. Ugly stupid and weak, but perfectly rational.
      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    73. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Aptgetupdate · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying I disagree with anything you've said...but could you rephrase it to sound a little less like you've been brainwashed?

    74. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by TheMidnight · · Score: 1

      How dare you forget Mel Brooks and Monty Python...you yellow bastard! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelled of elderberries!

      I hope you go to plaid for this mortal sin.

    75. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by kypper · · Score: 1

      What part of having read 'Atlas Shrugged' don't you understand?

      Being an asshole for at least a month afterward is a pre-requisite.

      **Aside, I enjoyed the book; people just get really arrogant after reading Rand.

    76. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Wait, are we talking about those little contraptions that are, in sum, a small RC oscillator, a watch battery, an LED, and a magnet?

      'tards.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    77. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pipe bombs? Ha! in the thirth grade they taught us to make NBC weapons! My bird flu even made the news all around the world. Well, biocontainment wasn't taught before grade four...

    78. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by phulegart · · Score: 1

      You would rather that cops didn't check out every strange report they get? How stupid a statement is that? What would be the cut off point in your world where cops didn't check out things?

      Let's see...
      If I strap a bunch of plastic doodads onto my assault rifle, then the cops will think it is to0 strange to bother to check out why I am carrying it into a crowded mall and making it spit loud sounds and lead projectiles.

      Oh, oh, and why make a bomb all flashy and look like some kind of sign? I dunno.. maybe the tried and true methodology of HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT! I mean, if people know that cops won't check out strange devices because they look too strange, or because they just look like big non-bomb electronic devices, guess what the terrorists are going to start hiding their bombs in? But history has shown us that bombs can and will be hidden in all kinds of devices, including radios and the like. But in your little world, no terrorist would hide a bomb in a radio, or even strap it to their own body... that would be too strange.

      Try this logic on for size. Design and plant several very flashy electronic devices around a city. Make them so flashy that people will stop and gawp at them in huge numbers. Then detonate them. Big body count, lots of media coverage, etc. It doesn't take all that much imagination to try something like this. Sucess for a stunt like this depends on people just assuming that it would never happen.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    79. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because so many bombs feature blinking lights. Bomb makers really want to draw attention to the bombs before they go off.
      Never heard of The World's Most Interesting Bomb?
    80. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprised nobody is talking about Throwies http://www.instructables.com/id/E9D2ZJ3FG0EP286JEJ /

    81. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by kir · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! A voice of sanity. Thank you Reverberant. Thank you.

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    82. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by grommit · · Score: 1

      What's that behind you?!? It's a shadow, mobilize the National Guard! We must take every possible threat 100% seriously. Forget about taking half a second to see what it is, it could be too late. Close down the streets, send the people into their bomb shelters, run for your lives!

    83. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      but what wouldnt be that hip viral guerilla marketing anymore!! And isn't public safety a small price to pay for the freedom of adertisi.. speech I mean?

      --
      bickerdyke
    84. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by jedkwon · · Score: 1

      back in the day, that list used to include Monty Python and Star Wars

    85. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by jedkwon · · Score: 1

      who marked that comment troll? misguided and something a wooden parrot might say, but hardly a troll.

    86. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by chaosite · · Score: 1

      Hehe.

      Showing us your ignorant side, eh?
      The spam sketch and the dead parrot sketch are Monty Python's.

      Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!

    87. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous. The difference would have been that the police should have simply not shut down the bridges before going to examine the devices; if it was a real bomb that situation is still way worse then just hiding the bomb out of sight altogether - like.. in a car or something..

    88. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by coquelicot · · Score: 1

      Authorities love inducing fear in their subjects. Nothing keeps the authorities better in their seats.

    89. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I distinctly remember going to school aged 6 or 7 in Northern Ireland as a dependant of a British military personel toward the mid 1980s and being having a regular 'security' class taken by someone in combat fatigues every week (IE someone from the military). In that class we were shown explosive device designs in use by the IRA at that time - pipe bombs, nail bombs et al, anything we should not ever touch in any circumstance if we found.

      I also went to school in Berlin toward the end of the 1980s (yes, I was there for the wall coming down) and there were adverts on TV (BFBC iirc) that detailed carbombs and how to check for them, along with what to look out for with regard to suspicious persons.

      Some of us grew up in a security climate vastly worse than the current one. And no, Im not the AC above.

    90. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ted Turner has nothing to answer for. HE no longer owns Cartoon Network or any of his other TV properties. It's all owned by Time-Warner-AOL (or whatever they're calling themselves this week), and even they don't have total responsibility since Cartoon Network is more or less operated by itself out of Atlanta.

      It is very unlikely any of the bosses in NYC had any idea this was going on. Rather, it was probably cooked up in the Atlanta offices, probably by some green intern who didn't consider the possible consequences.

      Then somebody hired a marketing company to do the campaign.

      The blame needs to fall on the marketing company, and the people at CN who authorized it. I have friends in marketing over there and don't wish them any harm, but somebody blew it.

      The bosses from Time Warner AOL will make sure somebody pays, and ultimately allow them to come in and take over Cartoon Network which is something the NYC people have wanted for years. The only thing keeping them from totally taking over was the fact that CN was doing a fairly decent job and getting great ratings. But this stunt has thrown them on their own sword. The days of freedom are totally over for Cartoon Network.

    91. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Unfortunately that is how the human brain works -- big, dramatic crashes/explosions/accidents where a lot of people like us die, registers as 'HOLY CRAP, WE HAVE TO AVOID THIS SHIT AT ALL COST'. It is important for the event to be memorable so media will play a part in this, it is important that people be like us because if say 10000 Somalis would have died from a terrorist act, the media would have dropped the story withing a week! Now that was enough to damage the brains of hundreds of millions of Americans. A rational human being would realize that the their odds of dying in a terrorist act is orders of magnitude lower than being killed by a heart attack, asthma, cancer, car accident, their backyard pool, probably even by lightning. So the only way to stop this obsession with terrorism is to get _smarter_, more _rational_ .. and I don't see that happening anytime soon in the 'ol U.S. of A.


      Also, let's look at terrorism from the point of view of your Joe Sixpack Homeland Security Officer (JSHSO), or any other dude from the executive branch of the govt., They sit all day on their asses (a lot more positions were created after 9/11), get payed loads of money (more $$$ was budgeted for war on terror) and are waiting for the terrorists to attack. Well, according to the probability mentioned above, the chance of a large terrorist attack is very slim, and JSHSO is getting pretty bored. He was trained to sniff out terrorists, pop their eyes out and skullfuck the empty sockets. So are we really that surprised that they will see terrorists in every Middle Eastern person, a bomb in every blinking light, and will pull the 'OMFG! TERRORISTS ARE COMING!' trigger on every shadow. This gets their blood going, they get a high when they get to close down half a city. Then they realize how stupid they are and arrest someone so they can turn them into a scapegoat. This justifies their job position, they get to go home at the end of the day and tell their kids that 'Daddy stopped Osama today, he disarmed bombs with blinking lights that had nazi jihadists flicking Americans off'


      It is pretty obvious that the terrorists already won. They wanted us to be do this and we are doing it. It is about time to smarten up. If we really want to live longer and safe, we should not smoke, drive more carefully, watch what we eat, watch our step when we get in and out of the shower and other stuff like that.

    92. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      What have you done!? Terrorists will notice your post and next time they decide to blow up a building they'll put up a bomb with note that says "This is a sound monitoring device for project XXX. If you have any questions, call John Smith at (617) 555-8944"

      You have doomed us!

    93. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by bodan · · Score: 1

      Also, to retain your nerd and/or geek credentials, you must be able to quote from two or more of Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5, Stargate, Firefly, or Andromeda. You will be expected to pick one of these as a religion* and from time to time wage holy war on the rest for forsaking The One True Way. Also you must be able to recite on demand the Spam sketch, the Dead Parrot sketch, and 90% of the Princess Bride script**.
      back in the day, that list used to include Monty Python and Star Wars
      Back in the day people used to read a post before answering.

      Oh, wait, this is /.

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    94. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the plot of a bad movie. I suppose I should point this out for you: If Terrorists could hide a bomb in ANYTHING, then we'd need police protection 24/7 everywhere, inspecting every god damn thing!

      Hey, there's a peanut butter jar sitting next to the bridge supports on Main Street! CALL IN THE BOMB SQUAD! Besides, I fail to see the point in trying to hide a bomb in plain sight when hiding it out of sight, for the most part, lacks the flaw that people can see it, and get curious. (I'm not military tactician, but my guess is the plan of "hiding in plain sight" is only preferable to "hiding OUT of sight" when people know what they're looking for.) In fact, I think you're not even sure what "hiding in plain sight" is. It's not to DRAW attention. It's to DETRACT from it. If thousands of people see some flashing lights all around a city, odds are, SOMEONE is going to inspect them (in fact, I'd think a great DEAL of somebodys would, even putting aside people would question you as you put them UP) You don't think ONE of them would realize they're dangerous?

      Hiding in plain sight is, rather, about blending in until NO ONE notices. Camouflage. Disguise. Blending into a crowd.

      Keep in mind, at this point in time, we have NO reason to suspect terrorists are going to bomb us. ESPECIALLY a target of such NON-IMPORTANCE. Are we to get so paranoid that every device that looks like a bomb... AND everything that looks suspiciously NOT like a bomb is in actuality... a potential bomb? Sorry, but I'm not going to spend the rest of my life getting paranoid about evil terrorist plots around every corner. (Statistically speaking, I should be more worried about getting hit by lightning... or hey, A CAR.)

      So, until the day Al Qaeda members are over here detonating radios in peoples homes, or peanut butter jars on the streets, or hey, cars (though I still seriously doubt they'd aim for such small-fry targets... GASP... UNLESS THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT ME TO THINK!!! OH NOES!!!) I think I'll take my chances, and be glad the police are where I can reach them in case a MUCH MUCH MUCH more likely emergency, like a robbery, assault, murder, etc.

      (Remember, people, the key word in terrorist is TERROR. When you're afraid that they're out to kill you and lurk in every shadow... that's what they want you to think!)

    95. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given the current paranoia, I would have posted it as AC. I mean, you never know, maybe the Boston police has a cyber-criminality department...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    96. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by arose · · Score: 1

      [..] I attach a note to the device saying "this is a sound monitoring device for project XXX. If you have any questions, call John Smith at (617) 555-8944."
      Sweet cell phone activated bomb trap you have there!
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    97. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if there were terrorist incidents everyday in the US, unless they were extremely casualty-heavy, you'd still be more likely to die in a car crash.

      So those in the US have been told of the threats to their way of life for six years (longer in fact than that of course - a bogeyman of some form has been a central theme in the US for decades!). People shouldn't be believing scare-mongering from their government - even if it's good not to be complacent. You're not a bunch of children.

    98. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

      The terrorists seem to have won already when we have everyone jumping at shadows.

      Hm, seem - you are quite optimistic. This neat shirt comes to mind. Ask yourself...

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    99. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, public schools will turn you into a tool...

    100. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5, Stargate, Firefly, or Andromeda

      Personally, I'd like to see someone use the force to move a giant ring on the fifth space station (other four blew up) to cause really cool, Amiga Video Toaster generated graphics to show a wormhole which leads to various strange new worlds where people go to find green women that the captain can sleep with (even if it is against the prime directive) and to illegally (only according to those alliance jerks, so it's really okay) trade cows robbed from trains to raise money to convince new worlds to join the commonwealth and stop the forces of the void lead by Darth Vader.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    101. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean 5 THOUSAND Dimensions!!!

    102. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "You have to take these all seriously, because who knows if they're threats or not?"

      Do you wear an earthed metal hat whenever you go out and the weather's a bit dodgy? Have you plastered your children and housepets in flexible Faraday cages?

      Go look up the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack, and then the chances of being hit by lightning.

      If you always wear lightning-proof headgear and earthed metal underwear in the rain, then rant away.

      If not, your response is fact-free, emotion-not-intelligence-prompted horseshit caused by media over-reporting and sensationalising that has no place in a serious debate.

      Seriously - what the fuck makes idiots assume that just because three people got killed by terrorists in Buttfuck, Arkensas that suddenly now everyone has to have chips in their heads and hand in their genitals for safe keeping by the government?

      Look up the statistics - you're more likely to be hit by lightning than killed in a terrorist attack. So if you don't spend the same amount of time worrying about lightning as you spend worring about "t3h T3rr0R1sTs!!11!1!" you're being a nervous jumpy fuckwit.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    103. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, your idiot bomb squad decided they were possibly bombs because they had batteries and wires. This is just like the idiot security at NASA who check your digital cameras. If the camera turns on, it must not be a bomb. What the hell do they think, I am going to whittle the camera out of soap? I think I would use a real camera......duh...........

    104. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by coast215 · · Score: 1

      There was only 1 on a bridge/overpass, and we're not talking about an above water bridge here.
      Other than the fact the there was one on the BU Bridge and one on the Longfellow Bridge, which both happen to be over water, this statement is faily acurate. Unless of course you count the ones that were placed on overpasses above public transportation, but overpasses don't really count as bridges.
    105. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is that I hope the rest of the population of Boston isn't as fucking stupid as you are. It's a fucking cartoon character on a light board flipping the middle finger, and that managed to scare the pants out of your pathetic police force.

      I mean how fucking dumb are you people anyway? Maybe they actually held the Boston Tea Party because they thought earl gray would mix well with sea water...

    106. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by silentounce · · Score: 1

      You were lucky! In the third grade, they made us INTO bombs... and we liked it!

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    107. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by gunnk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I might consider it a "precaution" if they'd done this two or three weeks ago when the ads were put up (check CNN or any of several other sites -- this didn't *just* happen). They've been up and running for quite a while with no one complaining in Boston AND a dozen other cities.

      My favorite quote: "It had a very sinister appearance," [Attorney General Martha] Coakley told reporters. "It had a battery behind it, and wires."

      Unlike most illuminated signs where the bulbs light up without power or wires...

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    108. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll see your the Ender's Game series and raise you a Dune .

      As to movies, you missed the only science fiction movie ever made by someone nerdy enough to know that there is no sound in outer space, dammit!

    109. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you on this. The marketing company responsible for this campaign should have notified the police and put contact information on the back of each device. This debacle is really a result of this ridiculous guerrilla advertising mentality that's taken hold recently. Marketing drones take note: we know it's an ad, being honest with us won't make us like it any less.

    110. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      So should have you. You just aided a potentional terrorist. But look it on the bright side: We might be cell mates soon...

    111. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a really interesting point. Are there any legal issues with leaving devices in public spaces without somehow identifying them, let alone asking permission? Of course if you provide identifying markings and contact information, you tend to lose the astroturf guerrilla marketing feel you may have been going for.

      IMHO, Turner caused an alarm by installing devices in public spaces without notification or identification, and could have easily avoided the resulting confusion.

    112. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      I've seen and/or read everything on that list except for Ayn Rand. Please. The woman is too full of herself. :)

      Seriously, though, this list is awfully short and misses a LOT of the classics. There are already plenty of solid mentions of missing material, so consider my list just additions.

      No Kipling? Heinlein? Clarke? Asimov? Somtow Sucharitkul? Theodore Sturgeon? L. Sprague De Camp? Fritz Lieber? H. G. Wells? William Gibson? "The Forbidden Planet?" Tolkien? Robert E. Howard? Micheal Moorcock? "Buckaroo Bonzai and the 8th Dimension?" "The Ghost in the Shell?" "Dr. Who?"

      And I'm /still/ just scraping the surface of what any self respecting bookworm/vidiot/geek should know intimately with.

    113. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by avecfrites · · Score: 1

      The devices had visible batteries and wires. During the day their cartoon LEDs were not visible; they only become visible in the dark. The devices were attached to bridges and public buildings. I think that could make a reasonable person suspicious. Not panicky, but suspicious enough for an untrained civilian to call it in, and suspicious enough for police to close a road or bridge until they could figure it out.

    114. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would expect an interesting time at the next shareholder's meeting though (and hopefully a huge fine to spur the conversation along).

      And I would expect it to go something like "Holy shit, that ad campaign got more attention that we ever DREAMED it would! The resulting increased receipts from the ATHF movie more than cover the cost of the fines we had to pay, so free hookers and blow for everybody!"

    115. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because so many bombs feature blinking lights. Bomb makers really want to draw attention to the bombs before they go off.

      So if a guy walks into a crowded building with a bomb strapped to him, everyone should just ignore him as long as the bomb features blinking lights and exposed wires?

    116. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by cbacba · · Score: 1

      What some people here are failing to realize is that it's not necessarily the unrecognizable odd cartoon creatures but rather that something capable of being a bomb has suddenly appeared there effectively out of nowhere. It is the out of place object and the new object with no accountability for why it's there or who put it there that should always draw attention from the authorities.

      Unfortunately, terrorists can also place bombs in objects which are not out of place - like Tom Clancy's superbowl nuke in the cigarette machine.

      Setting up temporary equipment like yours has got to be more problematic now than it once was. Just having a tag explaining what it is will not totally eliminate the prospects that some might be concerned still. After all, a terrorist can put a tag on his bomb saying it's the exact same thing your device is - or more likely - a label identifying it as telephone company equipment or internet equipment. What could make the difference in your case is the actual positioning of the equipment such that it would be in a good place or a poor place to create casualties were it a bomb. However, that's a more subtle form of being out of place and being subtle probably means that a bomber could succeed - and if/when that happens - good luck being able to deploy your equipment without providing full time manned 'protection' and it better not be someone that looks middle eastern.

      as for ted the red, alias capt planet, it's about his speed to do something like this intentionally. the guy should be billed for the entire gov. cost incurred and punitively fined for the equivalent loss in revenues and lost wages that it cost the populace and business.

      Despite the complaints of all this paranoia (and that 'unpopular' war in iraq), isn't it interesting how the US hasn't been hit domestically or virtually anywhere else in the world since 911 (other than the war zones and perhaps that bit of anthrax shortly after 911). Our current rate of getting hit is significantly less than it was averaging back in the 'wonderful' 90s - back before we finally realized we were actually at war because an enemy was waging war against us. Amazing isn't it.

    117. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Ann Rand!? WTF ever!

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    118. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      do I see you volumteering to open the brown bag someome left behind on the bus? in the states, maybe. in Israel, probably not.

      I'll keep that in mind the next time I move to Israel.

      Until then, I still live in a country where the time between terrorist incidents is measured in years, not weeks, and I'm not going to cry wolf and shut down the entire neighborhood just because there's an 0.1% chance that a bag left on a bus actually isn't full of forgotten lunch or discarded trash.

    119. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Ha! in the thirth grade they taught us to make NBC weapons!

      Ha! in the fourth grade they taught us to make FOX weapons!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    120. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you are an ignorant sheep. Do you advocate blowing up every neon bar sign because it might be a bomb?

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    121. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so free hookers and blow for everybody!"

      We're all in the wrong business, aren't we?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    122. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, the Spam and Dead Parrot Sketches were Monty Python...

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    123. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by drummerboybac · · Score: 1

      What is real bullshit is the fact that CNN covered this story all day like it was a threat when it was advertising for their OWN COMPANY. Surely someone at CNN or Time Warner in general knew about this! P.S. Boston is in general more paranoid since the 9/11 planes took off from Boston.

    124. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

      when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today

      Don't they pay the police the same amount whether they are sitting around eating donuts or running around the city actually doing some work?

      And these things were up all over the city for at least two weeks before some fool decided one of them was a bomb.

    125. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, part of the problem was that they found two fake pipe bombs on the same day http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg ?articleid=180349 . Otherwise this nonsense would probably have been over quick

    126. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember reading about anyone threatening anybody with anything. Especially the people who draw the show. That was all in your mind.

      Legal threats, check.
      Arrests, check.

      You sure look stupid now, don't you? Condescending twit. How ya like your country now? Everything's peachy, the government is great, no one's rights are being trampled, LALALALA I can't hear you! Yeah, thought so.

    127. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      As someone who lives in Boston, I'm glad they decided to take these precautions. You have to take these all seriously, because who knows if they're threats or not? I imagine the terrorist bogeymen are happy that you're all panicking like sheep, too. Makes their jobs easier, I would think.

      Wouldn't combating terrorism mean going about your lives as normal while taking *sensible* precautions? Those things had reportedly been up for *weeks*, yet suddenly they were possibly dangerous and consistent with home-made explosives? Please.
    128. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by dosquatch · · Score: 1

      Seriously, though, this list is awfully short and misses a LOT of the classics. [...]
      No Kipling? Heinlein? Clarke? Asimov? Somtow Sucharitkul? Theodore Sturgeon? L. Sprague De Camp? Fritz Lieber? H. G. Wells? William Gibson? "The Forbidden Planet?" Tolkien? Robert E. Howard? Micheal Moorcock? "Buckaroo Bonzai and the 8th Dimension?" "The Ghost in the Shell?" "Dr. Who?"

      Also no mention of X-Files, PJ O'Rourke's Parliment of Whores, Gulliver's Travels, Matrix, Blade Runner, Dreamscape, Kight Rider, Airwolf, Blue Thunder, Lawnmower Man.... and on and on and on (though I did mention Tolkien). No, it was not a comprehensive list. And also

      I've seen and/or read everything on that list except for Ayn Rand. Please. The woman is too full of herself. :)

      was exactly why I put her on the list (nevermind that many people have read and enjoyed these books, myself included). C'mere, I'll let you in on a secret.... I was going for humor.

      Don't tell anyone I told you so. Explaining the joke is bad for Karma.

      OH! Ummm.... oops.

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    129. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I wonder what DR. Wierd & Steve are going to have to say about it?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    130. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      As someone who lives in Boston, I'm glad they decided to take these precautions. You have to take these all seriously, because who knows if they're threats or not? I'm mad as hell about this ad campaign because when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today, you can bet your ass Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill.
      Yeah, right, because everybody knows that terrorists love to festoon bombs with flashing pictures to attract attention.

      As somebody who also lives in Boston, I think that what this reveals is the utter incompetence of the officials who are responsible for our security, which is why they are now so enraged. Yes, when a hysterical citizen reported the first one, it might have been worth the effort for somebody to go take a look at it, but it should have ended there. Anybody who thinks that this is what a threat looks like probably wouldn't recognize the real thing if he sat on it.
    131. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I said this already on digg but I suppose I should say it again.

      Ok terrorists. You have have really won and you didn't even had to attack us. All you had to do is say "BOO!" a few years ago with that one attack and our reaction is to shoot ourselves in the head with our own gun from here and to eternity.

      Fuck it. We might as well submit to Sharia law now because we are are so damn afraid of you that we take take a fucking joke anymore and we throw artists into jails.

      America was once the land of the free and the brave... What it is a shame that hundreds of thousand died to keep our land free, but only a handful of people make the rest of us that live cowardly little animals afraid to even stand up for what we believe in... Freedom and the pursuit of happiness.

      You pansies are more likely to die in a traffic accident and heart disease than you are be remotely even be scratched or know someone who was hurt by an terrorist attack*

      *unless of course you have family or friends serving in Iraq or Afghanistan, but those fellows and gals at least have the balls to be in a war zone were terrorists attacks are a daily occurrence and not be sniveling cowards like those of us at home.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    132. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged

      Ayn Rand is the only author for which I self-censor myself. I'll read anything by anyone, but not Ayn Rand. The reason is simple: all Ayn Rand fans I've known are complete assholes; the ones I've heard on radio/TV seem to be complete assholes as well. I don't want to be like them.

      The last one I heard (on NPR, I think) was saying that we should drill up all of Alaska, and we shouldn't give a moment's thought to the consequences. Why? "Because it's there."

    133. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but your city administrators are idiots. Plain and simple INCOMPETENT idiots. They cannot tell a light sign from a bomb and go off and panic at everything that blinks. These things showed up in other cities, including Seattle, and there was no such panic. It's a BOSTON issue, and maybe even a state-wide issue, too, given that your idiot governor is overreacting, too.

      They showed one of these on TV (ABC) this morning. Anyone that thinks that is a bomb is just plain looney.

      A crime here? Sure ... trespassing ... vandalism ... nothing more than that.

      But I sure as hell will avoid conducting business in Boston for the next couple years until you guys get this mess straighten out and get some people running the city that know WTF they are doing.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    134. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      That said I still think this was a very dumb publicity stunt.
      I don't think *any* publicity stunt that makes the headlines of every major news outlet in America "dumb". These signs have been in place for two weeks. Prior to this, the only people who 'got the joke' were ATHF fans. Now, nearly everyone in America knows who the Mooninites are.
      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    135. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Skapare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only fine that is justified here is for the trespassing and vandalism. Nothing more than that should be paid. Let the idiots who decided this was a hoax (it was NOT a hoax) and the idiots that decided it was a bomb (it was NOT a bomb and didn't even look anywhere near like a bomb ... as determined by officials in some other cities like Seattle) pay the fine. Or better yet, let them lose their jobs so people can come visit Boston some day in the future knowing that the city isn't going to overreact.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    136. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How you could forget to include 1984 is beyond me.

    137. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Turner, on the other hand may have something to answer for.

      What makes you think Ted called this in?

      I have heard from many colleagues who did not take these steps, and had their $5000 devices blown up by the bomb squad (again, this stuff was happening before 9/11).

      So your city has a long history of overreaction and incompetence?

      If Turner took these steps, and officials got their wires crossed, then yes the authorities obviously overreacted. But if the city wasn't informed, the city took all the right steps. Did you expect the authorities to just ignore the devices because they looked cute?

      It's a frigging blinking sign! Thinking that is a bomb is just too far out there. Someone was just pissed that the sign was flipping the bird and chose to escalate it and made the false claim.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    138. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Skapare · · Score: 1

      If I lived in Boston, maybe I'd have already been aware of a long history of incompetence on the part of city officials there. If I was going to do something like this, it might help to know that the city overreacts to everything they see that blinks or has a wire. But normal people won't expect such stupidity. Remember, it was only in Boston that the overreaction happened. These things showed up in other cities without the effect.

      I don't live in Boston and I find this both amusing and disgusting. But, if I did live in Boston I would have found it to be terribly embarassing. It's a shame on the city.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    139. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Reverberant · · Score: 1

      What makes you think Ted called this in?

      I didn't write "Ted Turner," I wrote "Turner." I suppose if someone bought a Dell computer, you'd think that Michael Dell came over to set it up?

      So your city has a long history of overreaction and incompetence?

      My colleagues do fieldwork all over the world, so if by "your city" you mean cities all over the world including LA, San Francisco, Oakland, Chicago, Dallas, Albany and cities in Spain, France and Germany, then the answer is yes. Turns out police everywhere get twitchy about random devices left in public spaces, even before 9/11.

      It's a frigging blinking sign!

      Ahh, I get it. If the device looks cute, we can all safely ignore it

      Sorry, but you just don't put random electrical devices in public places without telling people or leaving identifying information. I'm the first to criticize authorities for over reacting, but aside from the arrests last night, I don't see the problem. The police investigated, found out the truth, and that was it. Some roads were closed, but the city has hardly brought to a "halt".

    140. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by jo42 · · Score: 1

      ...saw an an odd-looking device attached to a potentially suspicious target and reported it. The bomb squad blew one up... Further proof that the amount of Intelligence in The Universe is a Constant, The Problem being that there are more and more people in it...
    141. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars, Star Trek, Babylon 5, Stargate, Firefly, or Andromeda

      You forget about Lexx and Farscape. At least you did not mention Battlestar Galactica - that show is worse than Babylon 5. Everything else listed is ok to great (Andromeda and Star Trek, of course :)

    142. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by famikon · · Score: 0

      "Also, to retain your nerd and/or geek credentials, you must be able to quote from two or more of Star Wars, Star Trek...."
      "ITSATRAP!"

      "KAAAAHHHNNNN!!"

    143. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Even before 9/11, I knew better than to do so without informing the authorities - if I can't inform someone in charge, I attach a note to the device saying "this is a sound monitoring device for project XXX. If you have any questions, call John Smith at (617) 555-8944."
      If anybody actually looked closely enough to see such a note, they probably would have realized that it couldn't possibly contain a bomb of any magnitude. The proprietor of a shop in Cambridge told me that one had been delivered to his store's address and a guy showed up asking for permission to set it up outside the store. Unfortunately, a customer apparently took it home before this all happened, so I didn't get a chance to examine it personally.
    144. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      >Pipe bombs? Ha! in the thirth grade they taught us to make NBC weapons!

      I mean sure, NBC's had some real bombs on its primetime lineup in the last few years, but I'm not sure how to effectively weaponize them. They do, on the other hand, resemble being produced by third graders. Maybe if you forced someone to watch every episode of "Friends" simultaneously, you could cause permanent mental damage, but...

      (Yes, of course I know what you really meant...)

    145. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NBC weapons? Oh, please. In the fourth grade they taught us how to make strangelets. My strangelet is at the center of the earth right now, changing all the matter in the core into strange particles. In fact, the transformation should make its way out to the surface in just a few min

    146. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by CthuluElder · · Score: 1

      Friday

    147. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      I noticed LOTR on your list /after/ I had hit the submit button. D'oh!

      As for Ayn Rand and humor? Personally, I've always found the woman to be so humor impaired that anything related to her is sort of like a humor black hole for me. Now, I probably would have gotten the joke if you had listed Terry Pratchett and called him a sober individual who writes melancholy stories about people's angst ridden search for meaning in their lives. :)

    148. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by dosquatch · · Score: 1

      No problem! These are almost the same religion, just with minor differences. The aliens, terminology, and technology are different, but once you get past that they're both mostly people floating about in space shooting at other people floating about in space.

      The most important thing to remember is that one religion was conceived by a visionary genius, the other by a self-absorbed windbag, and the best way to determine the difference is to take note of the religion you are in. The other one has the windbag.

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    149. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Burning+Plastic · · Score: 1

      But only three of the stations blew up... The fourth was just dragged a thousand years back in time ;->

      --
      [All Your Fish Are Belong To Us]
    150. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      The only fine that is justified here is for the trespassing and vandalism.

      Ummmm.

      vandalism - " deliberately mischievous or malicious destruction or damage of property: vandalism of public buildings." Entry #1 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/vandalism

      I can sort of see how nailing a "garage sale" or "lost puppy" sign to a telephone pole would be considered vandalism. Technicaly speaking... you do cause damage to a pole which is rather why it's reccomended you buy your own sticks, attach to the sign, and stick them in the ground. Some cities are more tolerant, others require a permit to glue or affix paper on walls or telephone poles. Others require permits to even have a sign on your own property. I would normally consider graffiti to be a form of vandalism... as in spray painting someone else's building, using a bocket knife to write something in a bench or a table.

      From what I read these were hacker made readerboard signs... so while graphics it isn't graffiti as it can be removed ease. Tresspass? Perhaps depending on where they went, but a bridge was one example which you can't really call a bridge private property. I think vandalism (deliberate destruction of property)is over reacting .... probally the most likely crime commited is posting signs without a permit.

      Too bad being stupid is not a crime.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    151. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Predictably, spent casings were then found in other schools, as it was proven to get you out of class for the day, and easy to get your hands on. Back in 2001, at the height of the anthrax scare, you didn't even need spent ammunition. Just empty a bag of flour or sugar on the floor, and school's off for a day...
    152. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you just don't work for Google!!!

    153. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by ShadowBot · · Score: 1

      So, do I get extra nerdiness credit for printing off this list right now and rushing off to my nearest bookstore?
      Where exactly can I find this "Dead Parrot Sketch" anyway?

      I'm less than 70% nerd!!! Woe is me!!

      --
      Quantum Physics a.k.a. sub-molecular statistics
    154. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this happens all the time, it makes it ok to make fucking stupid laws.
      Oh wait, it happens all the time IN THE MIDDLE EAST.

      You Yanks are out of control in your fear-mongering.

    155. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by filterban · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, TBS -did- pay $2 million to compensate for Boston's government ineptitude. $1 million of it goes to cover the cost of the police response. $1 million goes to "goodwill", whatever that means.

      --
      rm -rf /
    156. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your point, but I love playing devil's advocate. :) So here goes....

      Is it not possible that part of the reason your chances of being killed in a terrorist attack are so low is precisely because of all the extreme security measures being taken all over the place? It's impossible to measure all the terrorist attacks that didn't happen because the terrorist-to-be decided they'd never even get close to their target given the insane paranoia in this day and age. Maybe they decided to wait for the paranoia to subside.

      Remember kids. If you stop being paranoid, the terrorists win.

    157. Re:Who's the @**hole now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about 'The Mythical Man Month', by Brooks?

  3. On the moon... by rbanzai · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...nerds get their pants pulled down and they are spanked with moonrocks.

    1. Re:On the moon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I bet the governor just wanted these devices for himself, since they give the owner all the powers of 70s supergroup Foreigner.

      "And just how do you think you'll override my veto when you're Cold As Ice?"

    2. Re:On the moon... by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      "I wanna know what love is..."

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    3. Re:On the moon... by azakem · · Score: 1

      ...nerds get their pants pulled down and they are spanked with moonrocks. Why the heck is that modded informative? Did a few too many people misclick while aiming for the funny tag?
    4. Re:On the moon... by MoparOwnz · · Score: 1

      Well, we are planning to go back to the moon soon. I'd say this information would be invaluable to anyone reading this site.

    5. Re:On the moon... by alienmole · · Score: 1

      It's the unintended consequences of "Being moderated Funny doesn't help your karma." Moderation is wackier now than ever!

    6. Re:On the moon... by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      It's called 'irony'. The Mooninites have historically been able to spank much of anything. The closest they came was getting the Aqua Teens and Carl caught up in a multi-level-marketing scheme under the guise of defeating the Gorgatron. But yet, yesterday, they brought the city of Boston to its knees. Effectivly pulling their pants down, and spanking them with moon rocks.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  4. Photo's of the devices in question by 2bitcomputers · · Score: 5, Informative

    Someone found one of the devices under a bridge last week and posted a few pictures to Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderlin/tags/aquate enhungerforce/

    --
    -- Please insert another quarter
    1. Re:Photo's of the devices in question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have stolen it...

    2. Re:Photo's of the devices in question by 2bitcomputers · · Score: 1

      He did :)

      --
      -- Please insert another quarter
    3. Re:Photo's of the devices in question by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Looks like a terrorist to me. Call the bomb squad!!

    4. Re:Photo's of the devices in question by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Todd Vanderlin is in my department at Parsons, and I assure you he's not shut up about this all day. Why must I be punished for this?

    5. Re:Photo's of the devices in question by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      That's it. I'm locking up my kid's light brite and boarding the windows. This country's gone mad.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  5. If an art campaign worried them... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how they'd react to actual guerrilla street art?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  6. Reasonable suspicion by PresidentEnder · · Score: 5, Funny
    Yes, because when I want to blow something up, I ALWAYS make sure that the bomb displays flashing lights clearly visible to everyone around.

    I salute our brave leaders for their quick and level-headed handling of the situation.

    --
    I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    1. Re:Reasonable suspicion by avalys · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police ignored them? Never mind the damage and loss of life, people would be bitching to high heaven about police and government incompetence.

      The bottom line is, in times like these and in a major city like Boston, you have to take everything seriously.

      Look at the pictures posted of one of these things - they have a row of D-batteries covered in duct tape. It looks very much like a bomb with a stupid figurine on them. And these things were found in somewhat suspicious locations - on the side of a bridge's concrete support columns, for instance. It's reasonable to expect the police react with suspicion after seeing a strange, jury-rigged little electronic device under a bridge.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Reasonable suspicion by failure-man · · Score: 1

      But that's all part of the game man! They'll put flashing lights everywhere. Soon people will see flashing lights and assume it can't possibly be a bomb. Why, by March they'll be able to wrap a WW2-style bomb in xmas lights, put it in the middle of Manhattan, and nobody will care!

    3. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Feanturi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah you're right, explosives can be hidden in almost anything. So, the logical conclusion is to knock down all buildings, and bulldoze the entire city completely flat so that anything suspicious will stand out. And you'll have to put the people somewhere else too. Simply making them go naked won't work, since they tend to carry illegal things in their bums.

      There's being cautious and there's being retarded.

    4. Re:Reasonable suspicion by AgentFade2Black · · Score: 1
      Well see, here's the problem. FTA:

      "Many of the devices looked like circuit boards or had wires hanging from them." If you're going to do this, at least give somebody warning...and/or build them right. The same problems plagued the MI:3 campaign in the newspaper turnstiles...and those were blown up in some cases, IIRC.
    5. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Sneftel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police ignored them? Never mind the damage and loss of life, people would be bitching to high heaven about police and government incompetence.

      You're right. If I ever need to blow up a bridge or something, I'll make sure not to disguise the bomb as a discarded cardboard box. Instead I'll make it flash wildly, so nobody notices.

      The "You have to take all threats seriously" argument presupposes that either (a) wildly blinking objects with bird-flipping aliens on them are significantly more potentially dangerous than common refuse, or (b) any piece of common refuse should be treated as a threat and lead to bridge shutdowns and bomb squads and pissed-off governors. I can't see either of these being true (though the second one sure would help with the litter problem).

      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
    6. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      ... the logical conclusion is to knock down all buildings, and bulldoze the entire city ... I thought that they were already doing that?

      http://www.masspike.com/bigdig/updates/timeline.ht ml
    7. Re:Reasonable suspicion by linear+a · · Score: 1

      What about stuff in underground tunnels and lairs? Why are you trying to divert us from those?

    8. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about stuff in underground tunnels and lairs? Why are you trying to divert us from those?

      Good point. Turns out that the Big Dig is in fact more dangerous than these blinkenlights...

    9. Re:Reasonable suspicion by rholliday · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that isn't just retcon by the police force. It says "Authorities said" before that quote. I haven't seen any pictures nor heard from any non-authorities that they did indeed look like that. Really smacks of, "No, really, they looked dangerous, not at all like those pictures on the news ..."

      --
      Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
    10. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police ignored them? Never mind the damage and loss of life, people would be bitching to high heaven about police and government incompetence.

      You can hide a much bigger bomb in a shopping cart draped with dirty clothes and empty aluminum cans. Those suckers are everywhere and usually carry a notice that unauthorized use is a crime. Somehow I never see the police checking them for explosives.
      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    11. Re:Reasonable suspicion by s20451 · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's being cautious and there's being retarded.

      So we have that:

      1. Anything that looks like a bomb is not a bomb, because nobody would call attention to their bomb.

      2. A bomb looks like a bomb, by definition.

      3. From 2, anything that doesn't look like a bomb is not a bomb.

      4. From 1 and 3, the existence of bombs is a contradiction. Thus we are safe forever. QED

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    12. Re:Reasonable suspicion by noidentity · · Score: 1

      How long until the bad guys make some that look the same, but don't just show pictures?

      But really, putting these things on several bridge supports? Not very smart.

    13. Re:Reasonable suspicion by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police ignored them?

      Yeah, because our immaculately clean cities have such a serious shortage of more innocuous hiding places, right? Like, say, garbage... Why, I can't even recall the last time I saw a discarded beat-up large cardboard box while visiting Boston.

      Hiding in plain sight might work well for ninjas, but we mere mortals should stick to diving for the closet or under the bed when the parents/jealous hubby/mormons come to the door.



      The bottom line is, in times like these and in a major city like Boston, you have to take everything seriously.

      No. "In times like [foo]" and "in places like [bar]" never count as a good reason. Every generation in the history of the planet, and every city to ever plague the face of the Earth, has believed that it had some magically unique set of trying circumstances.

      "These times" represent more of a norm than an abberation therefrom. Get used to it, and just thank Zeus every day you don't live in the West Bank or Mosul or any of the abundance of other places we only know about because the daily news keeps reminding us of how much life there sucks.



      Look at the pictures posted of one of these things - they have a row of D-batteries covered in duct tape.

      Have you ever seen anything more "bomb-like" than an M-80?

      A few D-battery-sized wads of high explosive, detonated in an open area (not the same as a shaped charge or a capped bore-hole!), would do nothing. Someone who happened to touch it at the moment of explosion might get killed, but it wouldn't do much better than that.

      When you hear about suicide bombs going off in markets and mosques in Iraq, these involve large backpacks or even vehicles stuffed to the brim with explosives. And they still usually only manage to take out, in a crowd, a dozen people!

      While the average Joe may believe what they see on CSI or 24 or whatever they have as the joke-of-a-cop-drama of the season, a real bomb-squad should have a hell of a lot better training than that.

    14. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs

            What if? What if someone suddenly replaced the bridges with an exact replica only it wasn't a bridge, it was actually a chameleon nuclear bomb. And what if the police didn't notice? What then eh? What then?

            The "what if" argument fails because it immediately deviates from the actual fact, into the fantasy realm of the author.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    15. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah you're right, explosives can be hidden in almost anything. So, the logical conclusion is to knock down all buildings, and bulldoze the entire city completely flat so that anything suspicious will stand out. And you'll have to put the people somewhere else too.

            Actually no. If you think about it, the PEOPLE are the problem. Has any bomb ever been set off without a person involved somewhere down the line? I propose mass suicide as the answer. Get rid of the people, get rid of the problem. You first :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    16. Re:Reasonable suspicion by krotkruton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kinda like when I was in High School and they banned backpacks (but not purses, which is a whole other story) from classrooms because bombs could be hidden in them, which, according to the administration, would make for a lot more effort for a bomb squad to find a bomb in case a bomb threat was called in. Of course, this just meant that the bombs would be left in lockers for the bomb squad to search, which I don't see as making things any easier. The high school wasn't being cautious, it was being retarded.

      As some other people said, this is just a media event (unless of course, the people involved really are retarded). I hate to break it to people, but there is very little that we can do to stop dedicated terrorists, whether those terrorists are Muslim fundamentalists, the next Timothy McVeigh, or a group of teenagers who are pissed at their classmates. If we try to prevent terrorism from happening by jumping at shadows or taking away freedom, we aren't going to make any progress and will probably just create more terrorists. Does anyone else think that there will be a minor backlash of ATHF graffiti and copycat light ads now that this happened? Hell, I'd almost expect a terrorist to make a bomb in the shape of these ads, but that would be kinda counter productive because it would prove these security freaks right.

    17. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know people modded you up as insightful, but really, logically speaking, 3. does not follow from 2. Just because A implies B does not mean that not A implies not B.

    18. Re:Reasonable suspicion by s20451 · · Score: 1

      Just because A implies B does not mean that not A implies not B.

      Correct. I'm surprised by the "insightful", I was going for "funny".

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    19. Re:Reasonable suspicion by s20451 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply again. You're right but that's not what I argued.

      Let A = object is a bomb and let B = object looks like a bomb. My argument is : If A then B, so if not B, then not A, which is correct.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    20. Re:Reasonable suspicion by OptimusPaul · · Score: 1

      BULLSHIT! They over reacted and they know it... all they needed to do was take a second look at them to know that they were not bombs. Everybody needs to slow down and think a little more pragmatically, reasonable people would not have allowed this to close down anything. I'm glad I don't live in Boston and have a fucking dolt for a mayor... at the very least he should be amused by this.

    21. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Reminds me of the photographer on Freak Show with his sniper-rifle-shaped camera: "Geez, why does everyone hassle me about my Nikon gun camera? It's not like its a gun shaped like a camera"

    22. Re:Reasonable suspicion by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      3 is not stating that not A implies not B, which would be that anything that is not a bomb cannot look like a bomb. 3 is in fact stating that not B implies not A, which IS true: if ALL bombs look like bombs, then anything that does not look like a bomb cannot be a bomb.

      So it was logically consistent as written.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    23. Re:Reasonable suspicion by jedkwon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Still i think the marketing campaign was in bad taste. It was wholey designed to garner this kind of attention and I don't really find it funny that a large chunk of taxpayer's money is being spent investigating what is effectively a burning paper bag full of doo doo. Then again, you're taking about an advert that probably cost $12.50 to do, and got exposure that probably reached millions of people. So kudos PR marketing firm, you've earned that B.A. I guess it really boils down to how funny people think terrorism is. If you think it's hilarious, don't be too surprised if no one else is laughing. Comedy's hard enough without dealing with an audience that thinks constitutional rights are really just guidelines, and liberalism is the forefront enemy in the unspoken war on cultural values. And i don't really feel like defending someone else over a joke. That's the ACLU's job and they might be a little too busy trying to get basic humanitarian/legal rights for people in gitmo among other things. Also Aqua Teen Hunger Force sucks. there. i said it. god.

    24. Re:Reasonable suspicion by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Then they'd have probably gone off some time in the two weeks that they've been up there without anybody official doing anything or particularly noticing. These weren't put up recently; it's just that nobody was looking for them during the daytime until somebody brought one of them to the attention of the police, and they destroyed it not knowing what it was.

    25. Re:Reasonable suspicion by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's just silly. If you are going to hide a bomb, you aren't going to intentionally light it up to draw attention. That sounds like some James Bond plot devive, not real life.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    26. Re:Reasonable suspicion by DreamingReal · · Score: 1

      Look at the pictures posted of one of these things - they have a row of D-batteries covered in duct tape.

      By that definition, then the flashlight in the trunk of my car is a bomb. Shit, I hope I don't get pulled over tonight. Guantanomo, here I come!

      --
      We want some answers and all that we get
      Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

      - Ministry
    27. Re:Reasonable suspicion by feepness · · Score: 5, Funny

      4. From 1 and 3, the existence of bombs is a contradiction. Thus we are safe forever. QED

      All I know is that I always carry my own bomb when I ride on an airplane because, hey, two bombs on an airplane? How unlikely is that!?!

    28. Re:Reasonable suspicion by anagama · · Score: 1

      Except these didn't even look like movie bombs (let alone real ones). They look like light up signs or a Lite Brite. What's really hilarious is that the Mayor called them a "hoax". They would only be a hoax if they were trying to look like bombs. Mayor is obviously a mouth breather.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    29. Re:Reasonable suspicion by anagama · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful (with a dose of humor). Wish I had mods.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    30. Re:Reasonable suspicion by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess it really boils down to how funny people think terrorism is.

      Uhhh...

      They placed cute flashing animated signs in various locations around three cities. According to some accounts, they did this two weeks ago, and Boston just now got around to noticing enough to throw a hissy-fit.

      And you call this "terrorism"? The only "terrorists" here sit on the city council and behind news anchor desks at the local media. The advertising firm at worst failed to get the proper permits. Whoop-de-do. Fine them $50 and let's all get on with our lives.



      I don't really find it funny that a large chunk of taxpayer's money is being spent investigating what is effectively a burning paper bag full of doo doo.

      Well, we agree on that much. And I sincerely hope the people of Boston throw the clueless fearmongers in city hall out on the streets as a result.



      Also Aqua Teen Hunger Force sucks. there. i said it. god.

      Again, we agree completely. But I'll defend their right to free speech to my death. ;-)

    31. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply making them go naked won't work, since they tend to carry illegal things in their bums.

      Well, the obvious solution is to require them to hold their bums open for inspection at all times. Either you're with the goatse guy or you're with the terrorists!

    32. Re:Reasonable suspicion by trb · · Score: 1

      And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police ignored them?
      What if my empty lunch bag that I threw into the trash was a bomb? What if my bicycle was a bomb, my car? These terrists put the devices where they would be easily seen. They have been in place for two to three weeks in ten large American cities. "Boston Mayor Thomas Menino said he'll seek to punish those responsible." For what, inducing panic? So who should be punished, the folks who placed the flashy lights or the government officials who flipped out over nothing?
    33. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Skreems · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who's going to see a tiny little add posted on a bridge's support column? I think they did this so the bomb squad would come, and they'd get all this free press.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    34. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True. But you don't see Boston's finest detonating every trash can in the city do you? After all, more bombs have been placed in trash receptacle's than placed under bridges shaped like Err...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    35. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't give Duval any ideas. If he "wasn't amused" about this event- he'd just as likely as not raze the whole thing to the ground.

    36. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duval's the GOVERNOR, but otherwise, I'd agree- except I've been living in the Metrowest area for the last four months now.

      I wish I could say that the overreaction's atypical for the area, but it's NOT.

    37. Re:Reasonable suspicion by finity · · Score: 1

      Hrm, sounds like slashdot alright...

    38. Re:Reasonable suspicion by jZnat · · Score: 1

      You can't flip the theorem and conclusion unless they're in a biconditional (iff) relationship. Therefore, your logic doesn't meet the requirements of, uh, logic (mathematical logic, but logic nonetheless).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    39. Re:Reasonable suspicion by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The best thing we can do to stop people from bombing us, is to not give them incentive to do so. But other than that, there is an inherent risk of this which we just can't get rid of. If someone wants to hide a gun in their pocket and randomly start shooting people, there is really nothing we can do about it. If someone wants to blow up a room full of people, and has the chemicals knowledge (or access to the internet) to do so, there really is nothing we can do about it.

      I'm embarassed to be in Boston right now. Those things look nothing like a bomb.

    40. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sigh... A bomb...

      I looked at the pics.

      How many pounds of C4 (Which would be the most potent explosive you could lay hands on...) do you think you could put in there?

      1?
      2?

      You MIGHT be able to hurt someone with it like you would with an anti-personnel mine, but damage the bridge or anything else
      that would rate this sort of reaction? Nope.

      In order to do something serious with the stuff- say take out armored vehicles, you'd need MUCH more than what could have
      ever been deployed in something that size:

      US M21 AT Mine: 11 lbs of explosive.
      US M15 AT Mine: 21 lbs of explosive.
      Type 72 non-metallic AT mine: 11 lbs of explosive.

      AP mines have varying weights of explosive but usually it's something like 1.5-3 lbs.

      To be sure, it might have been a risk if it WERE a bomb, but it didn't merit the reactions that we've seen. It's not like
      a car-bomb where you might find hundreds of pounds of explosive in it...

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    41. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      The bottom line is, in times like these and in a major city like Boston, you have to take everything seriously.
      Times like these? What, where a warmongering criminal is president of the country and killing off young men and women serving in the Armed Forces by the dozens daily? Where an entire big city police force jumps like a kid surprised by a shadow in a closet over some silly little plastic flashy things? Since 911, the administration of every governmental institution have become a bunch of paranoid anal retentives badly in need of an enema.

      Please, spare me that crappy excuse. The worst that happened today in the form of a terrorist attack was some guy got hit by a pigeon on a guano dive-bomb raid in a Boston park.
    42. Re:Reasonable suspicion by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      what if this trashcan were a bomb? what if that guy's briefcase were a bomb? what if that hotdog vendor's cart were a bomb? what if that car parked on the side of the road were a bomb? you're a goddamn moron. i hate you.

    43. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Alpha42 · · Score: 1

      According to some accounts, they did this two weeks ago, and Boston just now got around to noticing enough to throw a hissy-fit.

      That's the part that I just adore. Lets say it was a bomb... does Mr. Terrorist always make a habit of leaving his bombs out in plain sight (lets face it, these things were designed TO BE NOTICED, so I would assume they were in high-traffic, noticeable areas, the exact opposite criteria that one would expect most bombers to use), let alone leave them around for a couple of weeks before detonation?

      The government peoples are all going "This proves the system works! See, we did good!"... I say "No, it proves that in an actual terrorist bombing situation, we'd all be dead for a couple of weeks before 'the system' caught up."

    44. Re:Reasonable suspicion by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      so when you looked at that LED device was your first reaction: "OMG! terrorists from Utah want me dead!!"?

    45. Re:Reasonable suspicion by bladesjester · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately, a lot of people in power want people to think that everyone is out to get them. It is a lot easier to tighten the screws on a populace that is afraid of some ill-defined enemy because they'll give up rights so you can "protect" them. That's why all of these so-called hoaxes get announced.

      For a lot of the people in power, the reason they keep parroting the whole "terrorist" possibility (much like the communist scare of years gone by) is so that they can have even more power. They think that if they can keep the populace frightened enough, they will be able to justify keeping themselves in office indefinately and being able to act with impunity.

      In addition, it's a great way to distract people from how badly things are going in the economic and civil rights arenas.

      It's like the old saying says - power corrupts, and these people have way too much power and far too few scruples.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    46. Re:Reasonable suspicion by corbettw · · Score: 0

      As some other people said, this is just a media event (unless of course, the people involved really are retarded).

      It was a marketing event for the Adult Swim cartoon Aqua Teen Hunger Force. They were either retarded or stoned our of their minds (same difference, really).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    47. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      It was wholey designed to garner this kind of attention and I don't really find it funny that a large chunk of taxpayer's money is being spent investigating what is effectively a burning paper bag full of doo doo.
      No, it was solely designed to just draw attention and do it cheaply. Unfortunately, a bunch of people overreacted (Funny that...) and don't quite know when to let it all go- and keep overreacting.
      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    48. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Stanislav_J · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Kinda like when I was in High School and they banned backpacks (but not purses, which is a whole other story) from classrooms because bombs could be hidden in them, which, according to the administration, would make for a lot more effort for a bomb squad to find a bomb in case a bomb threat was called in. Of course, this just meant that the bombs would be left in lockers for the bomb squad to search, which I don't see as making things any easier. The high school wasn't being cautious, it was being retarded.

      See, it's not about making things safer -- it's about making gullible, naive people (i.e., a good majority of the population) THINK that things are safer.

      Makes me think of the USPS instituting that "packages over one pound can no longer be put in mailboxes -- they must be brought to the counter" garbage. Never mind that the incident that prompted the rule (TWA 800) had nothing whatsoever to do with explosive packages, or that much less than a pound of C4 could do some serious damage. As I commented to a postal clerk in the wake of the change: "Yeah, so instead of the bomb blowing up a mailbox out on the street, it'll blow up inside the post office. Sounds a LOT safer to me....."

      --
      "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
    49. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      The government peoples are all going "This proves the system works! See, we did good!"... I say "No, it proves that in an actual terrorist bombing situation, we'd all be dead for a couple of weeks before 'the system' caught up."
      Bingo! Everyone that has no clue about this stuff is going around like Chicken Little- "Oh, MY! The Terrorists are going to do us all in!"

      This is not to say that there's not a problem. This is not to say there's not a risk.

      This is to say that we've got a LOT bigger problems that quite honestly they're going to exploit a lot further along than placing itty-bitty bombs or bio-chemical weapons in very obvious, very definitely out in the open places. This whole thing is endemic of the silliness that goes for responding to the real problem terrorism brings to the table.
      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    50. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      we mere mortals should stick to diving for the closet or under the bed when the parents/jealous hubby/mormons come to the door.
      Hide from Mormons? You shouldn't avoid those poor deluded bastards. Spread the good news. Show them the light. Invite them in for spaghetti and convert them to Pastafarianism.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    51. Re:Reasonable suspicion by honkycat · · Score: 1

      No, he was correct. His statement was "a bomb looks like a bomb." That is, in if-then format, "If an object is a bomb then it looks like a bomb."

      If that statement is true, then so is "If an object does not look like a bomb then it is not a bomb." That is simply (A=>B)=>(~B=>~A) which doesn't require iff.

    52. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Derosian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The bottom line is, in times like these and in a major city like Boston, you have to take everything seriously.

      My father works in Iraq, he has been over there for about a good three years, and he has commented on the fact that very little actually happens. The news over here just pays attention to a very small select group of incidents, he says he hears gunfire occasionally, and every once in a while a bomb going off. But in general he says that is all something he doesn't have to worry about. The usual situation is, there is a problem the military deals with it, life goes on. It is us 'vain' Americans, to quote my father, who think the world is falling to pieces when one of our soldiers die.

      Bah, there goes what little karma I had.

    53. Re:Reasonable suspicion by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      It is threads like this that keep me coming back to Slashdot.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    54. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Phleg · · Score: 1

      So, what, all terrorists have to do is cover up the wires, get some nice plastic molding, and be completely devoid of all suspicion?

      --
      No comment.
    55. Re:Reasonable suspicion by starman97 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they disguise their bombs by making them look like a homeless person, nobody will ever notice them.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    56. Re:Reasonable suspicion by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      And what do you think would have happened if these things had been kittens, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police detonated them? Never mind the damage and loss of life, people would be bitching to high heaven about police and government incompetence.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    57. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      by jumping at shadows or taking away freedom, we aren't going to make any progress and will probably just create more terrorists.

      Plus, you'll create more pranksters who shut down an entire city for shits and giggles. Maybe real terrorists should try this; it certainly causes lots of disruption.

    58. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      a lot of people in power want people to think that everyone is out to get them. It is a lot easier to tighten the screws on a populace that is afraid of some ill-defined enemy because they'll give up rights so you can "protect" them.

      I think this incident just makes those in power look foolish and suggests that their hysteria has gone too far. I think you need to put your conspiracy theory aside until next time.

    59. Re:Reasonable suspicion by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, because when I want to blow something up, I ALWAYS make sure that the bomb displays flashing lights clearly visible to everyone around.

      and when you want the Geek out of the picture, you show him something shiney...that ticks.

      all that the driver sees on the road or under the bridge is something that is almost but not quite right: movement, a flashing light, that has no good reason for being there.

    60. Re:Reasonable suspicion by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      Not that I don't completely agree with you, but I think that's a bit offtopic. Coincidentally, as I'm started to write this, the "Naked Trucker and T-Bones" show that I have on in the background started to play a song about how anything can be a weapon. It's true that the a large portion of the public is scared because they think that anything can and will hurt them, which is obviously a large part of the problem here. The real problem isn't that people are afraid of terrorists or something similar, because terrorists are scary and no one wants to die because they inhaled anthrax on a subway. The real problem is that many people put too much weight into the wrong fears.

      I was just looking at some of these statistics the other day, and found that roughly 100 people die by choking on ball point pens every year while under 150 die in plane crashes. I think that the pen statistic was for the world while the planes was for the US, so that means you are roughly 30 times more likely to die in a plane crash then you are by choking on a ball point pen. Any rational person who hears that statistic shouldn't be afraid to fly anymore (assuming that the only reason for their fear was dieing and that they aren't now afraid of ball point pens). As most people know, you can find more statistics that will show that driving in a car is immensely more dangerous than flying, yet there are many more people who are afraid of flying than riding in a car. Why bring up flying and driving? Because this fear has nothing to do with what the people in power are saying. This fear exists entirely because those people are irrational. Instead of basing their fears on logic, they, well, I don't know what they do because its completely irrational.

      Getting back to the terrorists, the same problem arises. I remember reading somewhere that you are more likely to be struck by lightning twice then you are to win the lottery, and that you are more likely to win the lottery twice then you are to be killed in a terrorist attack. I have told people who are afraid of terrorists about this probability, and it doesn't matter to them. They still cling to these beliefs that terrorists need to be stopped at all costs or else they won't be safe. I don't think that the atmosphere in America would change even the slightest if President Bush came on the air tomorrow and told everyone that there are no more terrorists so they don't have anything to worry about anymore. The administration might be trying to use fear to control people, but the people are afraid anyway because they won't think about it logically.

      The point is, if people think that flashing lights in the form of an creature modelled after 8-bit games is a bomb, then they're already so retarded that it doesn't matter what the people in power tell them.

    61. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you've read our Plan For Victory in Iraq?

    62. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A few D-battery-sized wads of high explosive, detonated in an open area (not the same as a shaped charge or a capped bore-hole!), would do nothing. Someone who happened to touch it at the moment of explosion might get killed, but it wouldn't do much better than that."

      Insightful? BZZZT....

      Maybe you should try this and get back to us.

    63. Re:Reasonable suspicion by webrunner · · Score: 1

      Truly, perhaps, we are the bombs.

      --
      ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
    64. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Hydian · · Score: 1

      And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police ignored them? To be bombs, they'd have to contain explosives, correct? Even looking at those things from a distance, you can see that they aren't large enough to contain enough explosives to do more than blow your finger off. Certainly not enough to damage a bridge. Unlike in movie world, in real life you can't blow up a bridge with a ping pong ball sized explosive charge. Cratering and/or rendering a bridge designed to carry vehicle traffic ineffective (not neccesarily dropping the entire thing) requires over a hundred pounds of well placed explosives on the light end. A Lightbright just isn't going to do it. I'm not saying that reports shouldn't be looked into, but the amount of fear mongering coming out of Boston over this is way out of proportion for the situation.
    65. Re:Reasonable suspicion by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but I'm gonna rant for a sec on your wording.

      When I said that it would create more terrorists, I'm considering your "pranksters" as being terrorists as well, since they fit the more traditional sense of the word, being someone who terrorizes or frightens other people. I strongly dislike the fact that if I ask a hundred random people to describe a terrorist, the vast majority will describe an arab (or maybe this is just the way it is in the midwest), and probably an arab with a long beard, a towel wrapped around his head (sorry about the wording there, but I'm trying to make a point about racism), and a bomb strapped to his chest. If I had done the same thing before September 11th, most people would describe someone like Timothy McVeigh or the Unibomber. "Real terrorists" can be anyone. Malicious hackers are terrorists. The hippies who bomb buildings that test chemicals on animals are terrorists. Anyone can be a terrorist, not just arabs. As far as I'm concerned, Bush is a terrorist because just about all he does is try to scare us. Anyway, the word "terrorist" should not be synonymous with Muslim fundamentalist.

    66. Re:Reasonable suspicion by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "They were either retarded or stoned our of their minds (same difference, really).
      --
      Life is too short not to be drunk out of your mind day and night."


      I'm confused, is your sig intended to be ironic or retarded. /sarcasm

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    67. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      That's funny; I don't recall using or even implying the words "Arab" or "Muslim" at all. Certainly there are other kinds of terrorists. I'm not so sure I would call a computer hacker a terrorist. To me, it normally involves killing people or plotting to do so. Running a spam-bot net just makes one an ordinary criminal. If the hippies don't plan to or manage to kill anyone, that makes them ordinary criminals in my mind, too.

    68. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] or access to the internet [...]

      Ban the -- oh wait

    69. Re:Reasonable suspicion by zoltamatron · · Score: 1

      I just can't get over that nobody brings up the fact that none of this would've happened if Cartoon Network had notified the city that it was going to put little advertisements on it's bridges and overpasses. I like ATHF, but I have to say that I'm a little tired of these renegade advertising campaigns. We're talking about a major television network, and nobody thought they should perhaps go through the proper channels and obey the law? It's not okay to just put for-profit advertising up anywhere you like, especially from a huge corporation that has a multi-million dollar advertising budget.

      A few D-battery-sized wads of high explosive, detonated in an open area (not the same as a shaped charge or a capped bore-hole!), would do nothing. Someone who happened to touch it at the moment of explosion might get killed, but it wouldn't do much better than that.

      Yeah.....that's why none of the police wanted to touch it to find out what it really was.....dumbass. They just detonated it and asked questions later. Your knowledge of explosives obviously exceeds your knowledge of common sense. If you are part of a bomb squad and you get several reports of strange electronic things hanging from bridges, then you see a strange tubular thing wrapped in duct tape, you are going to take it very seriously.

      When you hear about suicide bombs going off in markets and mosques in Iraq, these involve large backpacks or even vehicles stuffed to the brim with explosives. And they still usually only manage to take out, in a crowd, a dozen people!

      Yeah...well, before 9/11 did you think that terrorists could kill over 3,000 people with box cutters? You really can't think that just because most bombs come in backpacks and cars that ones that don't can't possibly hurt anybody? Christ.....your hindsight is really 20/20 and that's all it is......hindsight. I don't think that you or most people would've done things much different if faced with the same situation. You don't take chances in the bomb diffusing field....period.

      I don't care what this does to my karma but your post, while ripe with technical bomb making sense, lacks any common real world sense.

      --
      Tolerance does not tolerate intolerance, or hypocrisy.
    70. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      places like [bar]" never count as a good reason

      So you too like pubs more?

    71. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Sigy · · Score: 1

      A = it is a bomb
      B = it looks like a bomb
      #2 is A -> B
      And it is true that if A -> B then not B -> not A
      so given #2 you can conclude that if it does not look like a bomb it is not a bomb

    72. Re:Reasonable suspicion by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that wasn't supposed to be directed at you. It reminded me of the things I hear from the same people who say that, and then started to rant a bit, even though that doesn't in any way mean that you are racist like them. That was why I said I agreed with you but just wanted to pick on wording, and then never used you in an example but just your words. Still, I can see that I didn't make that clear after reading it again.

      But now I'm confused. The use of "real terrorist" as opposed to pranksters threw me in the direction of Arabs because I couldn't see any other way to distinguish the two. After reading your last post, it seems to me that you meant "real terrorists" as being who are already terrorists, or people who have committed "real" terrorist acts. Right now I'm having trouble understanding why two people can do the same thing but only one of their actions is a terrorist attack.

      To me, it normally involves killing people or plotting to do so. Running a spam-bot net just makes one an ordinary criminal. If the hippies don't plan to or manage to kill anyone, that makes them ordinary criminals in my mind, too.

      First, I'll agree that running a spam-bot net is not terrorism, but some of the big viruses are. Besides that, you're free to think whatever you want, but your definition of a terrorist is a bit lacking. Your definition isn't any different from homicide. I think you want to include the disruption part in there, so a terrorist is really someone who intends to kill or hurt a lot of people in a disruptive way? That would include a 10 year old who brings an assault rifle to school, which I don't think you want. What if they need to have a political agenda? That wouldn't include hippies who bomb and successfully kill people. What is your definition of a terrorist? I tend to stick with the definition of someone who uses fear or terrorizes, and I think it is analogous to hate crimes. The degree of damage done by the attack does not define a crime as a hate crime, but instead the motivation and reasons behind it. Someone who tries to scare people is a terrorist, whether or not they kill people doing it. Someone who attacks a man because of race or beliefs has committed a hate crime, whether he beats the man or kills him. Of course, the action in either case must reach some degree of severity to even be considered a crime, but the severity doesn't dictate wehther or not it is terrorism. Finally, if the "real terrorists" tried to shut down the whole city like that, would that be an act of terrorism? If so, then is an act defined as terrorism by who perpetrates the act, i.e. terrorists or regular criminals?

    73. Re:Reasonable suspicion by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      When I was in high school, in the event of a bomb threat, our first instructions were to lock ourselves inside the building so that it would be easier for the bomb squad to locate the bomb.

      To this day, I cannot understand the logic behind that decision. In fact, it's probably the one situation where "run like hell" is a completely appropriate response.

      More often than not, it was simply an excuse for them to search us, and sweep for drugs while they were at it. I always wanted to hide a huge bag of dog treats in my locker to see what would happen to the drug-sniffing dogs...

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    74. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Tmack · · Score: 1
      If this draws so much attention, then what about trucks parked under bridges and near buildings, etc? I seem to remember that most of the serious attacks involved large vehicles rather than small packages. I also see rental trucks and tractor trailers parked under bridges quite often. What if one happened to be packed with explosives? What if simultaneously every major bridge in major cities had one of these trucks parked under it, or for that matter, trucks were just driven under by terrrrists? Why is it then, that a truck can be abandoned under a bridge for several days without the bomb squad being called out to investigate, yet a single blinky sign can shut down a city? A single little blinky sign, even if it were full of C4 (something I dont remember ANY of the previous attacks having used) could not do much more than local damage to what it was attached to. Sure, it might damage or even take out (unlikely at that size) the pillar/support its attached to, which might cause a section of the bridge to fail, but I doubt any terrrrrist would go for something that small scale, when the same "real" package left in an airport BEFORE the security theater of the check points would cause much more trauma and attention.

      Blah

      This whole terrrist thing is mostly absurdity, theatrics to calm the sheep that our nation has become filled with. Yes, crap happens. Yes, it probably was a good idea to investigate something strange looking like these signs. But causing a scene like they did is just a blatent over-reaction, especially when the image on the thing could be quickly recognized by anyone that watches cartoon network (granted, probably not many of the people involved in this have that type of sense of humor anyway). Hell, they even have the same characters up on the Billboards around town too (here in Atlanta, home of CN), and these blinky things have been up for a few weeks now! If they are screaming for turner network to be fined, imprisoning the artists that deployed the signs, etc, then why is it that none of that happens for all the other little "suspicious packages" that the bomb squad detonates routinely throughout the year? Someone leaves a box of girlscout cookies outside the airport, the bombsquad gets called, blows up the box to find nothing but thinmints, yet the girlscout that left it there isnt thrown in the slammer for causing chaos. Why is it that these trucks are never suspicious, and their drivers never thrown in jail for possibly hauling explosives and parking in a place that would possibly cause problems, much to the wording of the law the artists were arrested under.

      absurdity

      Tm

      ps: If this gets me on the fbi watch list, or a visit from the NSA, then its time I leave this country for one that has a little more sense than this.

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    75. Re:Reasonable suspicion by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      "And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police ignored them?"

      Was there any reason to believe that they were bombs? Oh there was, because they had some LEDs 'n stuff? Nevermind then.

      Hey, what if someone wanted to detonate a car-bomb? There are thousands of cars in Boston all the time, maybe the police should stop and search them all, "just to be sure"? It could also be that someone might be planning to rive over pedestrians as a terrorist attack, so maybe they should just ban cars altogether? Of course someone might have strapped a bomb to his body, so everyone (and I mean EVERYONE) should be strip-searched as well. Do a body-cavity search while you are at it.

      Of course someone might camouflage a bomb to look like a piece of trash, so police should inspect every piece of trash in the city as well. I mean, you can never be sure about these things.

      Hey, why not simply ban people? That way no-one could do any of those oh so terrible terrorist attacks, because there would be no people to do them. That would solve all our problems, right?

      While I know that there are loads of decent Americans out there, but as a nation you guys are definitely starting to lose it.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    76. Re:Reasonable suspicion by jedkwon · · Score: 1

      actually now that I've seen the flickr pictures, i realized my mistake. They're freaking portable neon lights, like the ones you see in bars and whatnot. wow. From the article and statements by Boston officials they made it seem like these things were intentionally made to look like bombs, a sort of thing "mooninites" might think funny (which is what i thought the advertising campaign was about). These things are barely thick enough to hold the diodes in place, and there's 4 D batteries, a combined power which could literally devastate if not obliterate everything within a radius of 1 maybe 2 cm. so to retract my previous statements, yes everyone is overreacting, but I'm not going to hazard a guess to the source of the hysteria. Although the fact that they keep refering to "Turner", "corporate greed", etc over an advertising done by a studio who's mandate is literally "make programming for as little money as bloody possible" makes me think that what they really want is some payolla to pay for all this mobilization.

    77. Re:Reasonable suspicion by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      If you are part of a bomb squad and you get several reports of strange electronic things hanging from bridges, then you see a strange tubular thing wrapped in duct tape, you are going to take it very seriously. Until I see the lit up cartoon character with a middle finger extended. Seriously, if you see these things it becomes incredibly obvious that this is a case of seriously idiotic over-reaction. Don't get me wrong, I love my home state but this is just embarrassing.

      Yeah...well, before 9/11 did you think that terrorists could kill over 3,000 people with box cutters? IIRC, there was some large quantaties of jet fuel and aircraft involved as well. Just saying...
      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    78. Re:Reasonable suspicion by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Ummm, when did he say anything about Duval being the Mayor? Could it be that maybe he was talking about the actual Mayor who was idiotically threating stiff penalties against the perpetrator of these renegade Christmas lights?

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    79. Re:Reasonable suspicion by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      That would be pointless. You could just as easily disguise a bomb as a rock, or a plant, or any of the other sundry crap regularly lying around the sides of Boston freeways.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    80. Re:Reasonable suspicion by pla · · Score: 1

      Yeah.....that's why none of the police wanted to touch it to find out what it really was.....dumbass

      Okay, so let's follow this path of reasoning. These hypothetical terrorists left what amount to glaringly obvious anti-personnel mines, hoping to take out one, two if lucky, people per device.

      Do you think, just maybe, they would have put them somewhere more easily accessible than on top of buildings, the undersides of bridges/overpasses, and similar inaccessible locations?

      I can just hear the conversation now... "Hey, Osama, great new idea - Let's take a page from the Americans' playbook and make AP landmines that look like cute little toys so we can target kids for maximal effect. But instead of mechanical butterflies, lets make them look like glowing cartoon characters! And, as the best part of all, let's put them out of reach of our targets! Just imagine their frustration! Mwa-hahaha! We shall win over the infidels this day!".

      This, of course, would then lead to a beheading of the idiot who suggested it.



      Your knowledge of explosives obviously exceeds your knowledge of common sense.

      And your "common" sense fails to take any possible motivation or long-term goals into consideration.

    81. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few D-battery-sized wads of high explosive, detonated in an open area (not the same as a shaped charge or a capped bore-hole!), would do nothing. Someone who happened to touch it at the moment of explosion might get killed, but it wouldn't do much better than that.

      Really, if you wanted to terrorize people, bombs with brightly flashing lights that kill or maim the occasional child would be pretty damned effective.

    82. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Wait I've seen that one!

      Next the President's face is supposed to get scarred with his own electricity or something, and he starts waving a red laser pointer about the place.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    83. Re:Reasonable suspicion by mpe · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to people, but there is very little that we can do to stop dedicated terrorists, whether those terrorists are Muslim fundamentalists, the next Timothy McVeigh, or a group of teenagers who are pissed at their classmates.

      There certainly are things which can be done, without bothering "regular people". But they tend to be difficult and dangerous for enforcement. i.e. those involved in a terrorist conspiracy are unlikely to be against torturing and killing an undercover police officer or one of "their own" who has "grassed them up".

      If we try to prevent terrorism from happening by jumping at shadows or taking away freedom, we aren't going to make any progress and will probably just create more terrorists.

      As well as missing even some of those who are in plain sight.

    84. Re:Reasonable suspicion by mpe · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, a lot of people in power want people to think that everyone is out to get them.

      Terrorists who really are "out to get" people in power tend to be a little more specific in their targeting. e.g. the IRA.

      For a lot of the people in power, the reason they keep parroting the whole "terrorist" possibility (much like the communist scare of years gone by) is so that they can have even more power. They think that if they can keep the populace frightened enough, they will be able to justify keeping themselves in office indefinately and being able to act with impunity.

      From there it is only a small step to either letting some real terrorists "get on with it" or even helping out some....

    85. Re:Reasonable suspicion by mpe · · Score: 1

      But other than that, there is an inherent risk of this which we just can't get rid of. If someone wants to hide a gun in their pocket and randomly start shooting people, there is really nothing we can do about it.

      Actually the most effective thing to do is to ensure that as many people as possible carry guns and can shoot straight. The stupidest thing is to declare somewhere a "gun free zone". It's a lot easier for someone to carry out a Dunblane or Columbine type attack if they know that they will be better armed than their intended victims.

      I'm embarassed to be in Boston right now. Those things look nothing like a bomb.

      The distinguishing feature of a bomb is that it's intended to go bang. Rather than what it looks like.

    86. Re:Reasonable suspicion by mpe · · Score: 1

      Makes me think of the USPS instituting that "packages over one pound can no longer be put in mailboxes -- they must be brought to the counter" garbage. Never mind that the incident that prompted the rule (TWA 800) had nothing whatsoever to do with explosive packages, or that much less than a pound of C4 could do some serious damage.

      Or any other explosive if "Terrorists R US" have run out of C4. If someone wants to blow up a mailbox they are unlikely to obey a "no more than one pound of explosive" rule.

      As I commented to a postal clerk in the wake of the change: "Yeah, so instead of the bomb blowing up a mailbox out on the street, it'll blow up inside the post office. Sounds a LOT safer to me....."

      Or it won't blow up until someone opens it, which is a typical approach with with letter and parcel bombs.

    87. Re:Reasonable suspicion by mpe · · Score: 1

      When I said that it would create more terrorists, I'm considering your "pranksters" as being terrorists as well, since they fit the more traditional sense of the word, being someone who terrorizes or frightens other people.

      If a fake bomb, even a claim that there is a bomb somewhere, is effective at causing mayhem. Then there is little point going to the expense and danger of making a real bomb.

      "Real terrorists" can be anyone. Malicious hackers are terrorists. The hippies who bomb buildings that test chemicals on animals are terrorists.

      Since the latter have a political adgenda they very easily meet with a definition of "terrorists".

    88. Re:Reasonable suspicion by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

      here's the word you've probably been looking for...

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    89. Re:Reasonable suspicion by rfunches · · Score: 1

      Makes me think of the USPS instituting that "packages over one pound can no longer be put in mailboxes -- they must be brought to the counter" garbage.

      It also discourages people who look at the mailbox door before opening it (most people look for the pickup time for the box and glance at the other info) from trying to shove a huge box inside, jamming the mailbox and preventing anyone else from depositing mail there until the carrier comes to empty it. I see it every couple of weeks with a merchandise return box or a box which someone has printed a postage-paid label for.

    90. Re:Reasonable suspicion by silentounce · · Score: 1

      What, exactly, is wrong with the overall economy of the US? Some small areas may have it bad, but overall our economy is doing well.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    91. Re:Reasonable suspicion by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Kinda like when I was in High School and they banned backpacks (but not purses, which is a whole other story) from classrooms because bombs could be hidden in them, which, according to the administration, would make for a lot more effort for a bomb squad to find a bomb in case a bomb threat was called in.

      I'm glad that I graduted just before in 96 just before all that backpack management crap kicked in my area. Here the back packs had to be clear or mesh to allow easier searching for knives, guns, drugs, or other contraband (anything the school officals didn't like nowadays that could be a bag of halls, asprin, or heck swag that is popular that the officals just don't like.) I always said that our public schools are training us to live in a police state. Would you put up with it if your city tried making a city policy that all clothing had to be transparent or mesh because there are some criminals out there that hide things under their clothing so we need to make it slightly easier for the cops to visually scan a crowd and find criminals. We wouldn't be put up with (mainly because of nudity taboos and the nudity equals sexuality thing in this country), but its the same exact concept. Would you put up with someone trying to make cars or houses clear and easily searchable by any passerby just because you or your neighbor might be a criminal? People treat minors like pieces of property that don't have any inhirent rights and then are surprised because the 18-24 crowd doesn't generally know how to change the world. We've been raised in the public schools to be randomly searched with no cause. When my generation finally makes it to adulthood, we'd generally accept it as normal that the authorities have that right to search and your property without your consent or any cause other than their thoughts of you being guilty of something.

    92. Re:Reasonable suspicion by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Actually the most effective thing to do is to ensure that as many people as possible carry guns and can shoot straight. The stupidest thing is to declare somewhere a "gun free zone". It's a lot easier for someone to carry out a Dunblane or Columbine type attack if they know that they will be better armed than their intended victims.

      Really? The columbine kids didn't seem to care if they died or not. Certainly the terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and Oklahoma were attacking people who had guns and could shoot straight. Nobody has survived going postal. The people know they're going to die. They want to die. Arming everyone in the area doesn't preclude that.

      The distinguishing feature of a bomb is that it's intended to go bang. Rather than what it looks like.

      Right. Which usually requires more than a paper-thin sheet of plastic attached to some lights.

    93. Re:Reasonable suspicion by BVis · · Score: 1

      Deserves emphasis:

      IF SOMEONE IS WILLING TO DIE TO CARRY OUT A TERRORIST ATTACK, YOU CANNOT STOP THEM.

      If someone wants to take out the White House and doesn't care if they die or not, they're going to find a way to do it (or at least make the attempt, and possibly kill lots of people in the process.) These people have no fear of death.

      What people don't realize is that this sort of overreaction is EXACTLY what terrorism is about. The goal of terrorism is, by definition, to create terror. By overreacting and shutting down the city over some blinking lights, those in charge have aided the cause of terrorism.

      The way to defeat terrorism isn't to kill people, or burn the Constitution, or treat everything that has a battery in it as an IED. The way to defeat terrorism is to NOT BE AFRAID.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    94. Re:Reasonable suspicion by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see...

      We're sitting on what may very well be a real estate bubble that could be very nasty when/if it collapses.

      We're operating at a huge trade deficit.

      We have a massive deficit period and our currency is being devalued in the world market.

      Every time we come up with a decent career path for people, companies get the bright idea to outsource it once it's even halfway established. Hell, they even get tax breaks when they do it. We're putting all of our eggs in someone else's baskets and it's going to come back to bite us.

      The list goes on. It may look okay on the surface where you are, but it's not all roses and sunshine.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    95. Re:Reasonable suspicion by silentounce · · Score: 1

      most of those things have been improved upon over the last few years, and as for the ones that haven't
       
      http://www.kiplingerforecasts.com/home/stories/i nterest_rates__steady_for_now__but_hike_possible.h tml
       
      your points are valid, but we differ on our opinions of the facts

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    96. Re:Reasonable suspicion by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      More often than not, it was simply an excuse for them to search us, and sweep for drugs while they were at it. I always wanted to hide a huge bag of dog treats in my locker to see what would happen to the drug-sniffing dogs...
      In High School, I kept a few baggies in my locker. One was a baggie filled with white powder labelled something along the lines of "wake me up". The other was filled with dried green crushed plant leaves labelled "party mix." They were sugar and a blend of basil and oregano. I left them in there in case of drug searches. Nothing ever came of it. I have long wondered who found the baggies and what they thought. Was it an administrator who thought for a moment that he had finally made a big bust he could brag about? Was it a janitor that thought for a moment that he was going to have a hell of a night? Sadly, I'll never know.

      I strongly encourage anybody in high school to try it. You may well get sent to jail for it, but you will be able to laught at your stupid school when it happens.
    97. Re:Reasonable suspicion by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      As well as missing even some of those who are in plain sight.

      Exactly. But guess what, you're going to miss some (whether they are in plain sight or not) no matter what you do. The only way to capture every terrorist is to capture everyone so that there is no one left to be a terrorist.

    98. Re:Reasonable suspicion by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
      "When my generation finally makes it to adulthood, we'd generally accept it as normal that the authorities have that right to search and your property without your consent or any cause other than their thoughts of you being guilty of something."

      It will be the norm, quite soon. I suppose we have to pay somehow for being at the good end of the "technological understanding gap" and being the last generation to experience good music, substantive children's programming, and a powerful economy. I feel worse for kids nowadays, they really have nothing going for them and will have to deal with the same mess of problems as us, only now they have to adapt to more invasive protocol much more rapidly...
      We sort of witnessed a birth, or a death, it depends on how you see the glass.

    99. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And what do you think would have happened if these things had been bombs, disguised as creepy little advertisements, and the police ignored them? Never mind the damage and loss of life, people would be bitching to high heaven about police and government incompetence."

      And what if I called in a threat that the bomb was disguised as the bridge itself! Someone snuck in the middle of the night and replaced the entire bridge with a fake explosive bridge. Would they be forced to detonate the entire bridge just to make sure?

    100. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Um, no. We have:

      1) Anything that contains explosives may be a bomb.

      2) Things that do not contain explosives cannot be a bomb.

      It is the job of, what are those guys? That one squad? That's supposed to deal with bombs? Oh yeah, the BOMB SQUAD. Yeah. It's up to them to know the difference. That is their job. You can tell, because it's in the name of their squad.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    101. Re:Reasonable suspicion by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "The columbine kids didn't seem to care if they died or not. "

      Yes, but if there were armed "good guys", they would have died faster and killed fewer people. That sounds like a win to me.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    102. Re:Reasonable suspicion by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      I start to think the same way, and then I remember that if there's one thing history teaches us, its that history repeats itself. Just because we haven't had any revolutions in the US doesn't mean we won't ever have one, and we are only on our third century as a nation. People / organizations / political groups rise to power and eventually fall leaving room for others to takeover, hopefully with better ideals than the ones before.

    103. Re:Reasonable suspicion by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning and look under Transposition.

  7. The LED's look pretty neat a lit up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A Link to the Moon: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderlin/tags/aquate enhungerforce/

    Supposedly these are in three cities, and have been for a matter of weeks, supposedly maybe with permits even. All hearsay. Hope you enjoy the link unless it has already been posted.

  8. Just be thankful by anotherone · · Score: 5, Funny

    That they spared Boston from the Quad-Laser.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:Just be thankful by failure-man · · Score: 1

      But even if they had used the quad laser, there'd be time to evacuate the entire city and put a pile of Jersey-barriers in its way, so no worries.

    2. Re:Just be thankful by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      They'll need that laser to deal with the Space Invaders!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Just be thankful by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Take 2. Space Invaders!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Just be thankful by FranklinDelanoBluth · · Score: 1

      No one can defeat the quad-laser!

    5. Re:Just be thankful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the blast would have been of extraordinary magnitude

    6. Re:Just be thankful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW Boston, Jumping is useless!

    7. Re:Just be thankful by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

      No, all you need is a sliding glass door...

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
  9. the prophe, shake-zulah by notoriousE · · Score: 4, Funny

    Frylock: You are not a prophet, Shake! So stop this madness!

    Shake: Frylock, I cannot do that. God hath commanded that I do his will or the Earth will blow up!

    Frylock: My ass he did!

    Meatwad: God's gunna blow up the world?

    Shake: Oh yeah, brutha! He ain't too pleased with YOU in particular, Meatwad!

    Meatwad: ME?!

    Shake: Oh yeah.... He saw you touchin' yourself--

    Meatwad: I don't touch myself!

    Shake: In the bathroom!

    --


    And then there was E
    1. Re:the prophe, shake-zulah by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Shake: Oh yeah, brutha!

            What does Brutha, the 8th prophet of the Great God Om, have to do with anything? ;)

            Sorry if you're not a Terry Pratchett fan...you won't get it.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  10. Video of them putting this stuff up by frostyboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This used to be on youtube, but it's been pulled. It's now up at a safer place. Some local people I know have actually been able to deduce locations from the video and obtain a couple of these "devices." Boston area slashdotters up for some scavenger hunting? athf-lightsnipes-boston.flv

    --
    Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my disk????
    1. Re:Video of them putting this stuff up by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I want one.

      Why can't they put these up in my city :(

  11. Isn't it funny that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...it only took a hours to blow up a LiteBrite but it took weeks to respond to a devastating hurricane?

    1. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      What retarded mod upped this troll?

    2. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by 3m_w018 · · Score: 1

      You mean New Orleans is good as new now?

    3. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but there is a huge difference between local/state police responding to suspicious packages and dozens of federal agencies responding to a disaster the size of a hurricane. You'd have to be an absolute idiot to think the two are even remotely comparable.

    4. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sooo, we should have detonated New Orleans?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    5. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by Lijemo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what's up with the Boston police being able to respond more quickly to something in their own city than to something in a city a thousand miles away? The Boston police are *totally* at fault for the Katrina (non-)response!!

    6. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...it only took a hours to blow up a LiteBrite but it took weeks to respond to a devastating hurricane?

      This is insightful?

      Would the "weeks" it took to respond to Katrina include the Coast Guard flying of people off of their rooftops the same day the storm blew through? Or are you thinking more about the days in advance of that hurricane that the mayor of that town and the governor of that state wasted in not actually evacuating the city's residents (you know, the ones not complying with the evacuation order) with their sitting-idle fleet of buses? Why talk about response to a major disaster when you can talk about the choice to live below sea level where hurricanes regularly hit, and then not leaving town when you're told to?

      Doesn't matter. You're obviously a trolling twit. Or, you're serious, and also say completely non-non-sequitorish things like, "Isn't it funny that poor people get cancer when the NSA now has ways to back up petabytes of data in a drinking straw?"

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by 3m_w018 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'd have to be a complete idiot for thinking there are such things as "suspicious packages" in this world. That's about as real as our enemy , Drugs, whom we've been fighting a war against for at least 20 years, and our other enemy, Terror, whom we've been battling against for about 5 years.

      The real point was that we prioritize terrorist threats that don't exist above all else and put real problems (Katrina, minimum wage, health care, education) well below it. Sorry you didn't get that.

      We spend lots money to be able to defuse a benign, blinking LED toy within a few hours, but we don't spend the same kind of money to fix a devastated region in the United States within a year.

      Go to Flickr and search for "new orleans destruction" and sort by recent. It's been almost a year and a half and there are still neighborhoods that are completely leveled.

    8. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

      Yes, LiteBrite >= devastating hurricane.

    9. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be a complete idiot for thinking there are such things as "suspicious packages" in this world.

      Tell that to everybody who has been injured or killed by roadside bombs in Iraq over the past three years. Tell that to the victims of the IRA bombing campaigns in Ireland. Tell that to the victims of the Madrid train bombings. Tell that to all the victims of the two Intifadas (the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts). Tell that to my nephew in Israel who almost boarded a bus a few years ago that was blown up just before his stop. The fact that such tactics haven't started in the US yet is moot. I take that back - it has happened in the US. Ever hear of Theodore Kaczynski? True, he didn't randomly place packages around major cities, but he still used bombs to create terror. If his insanity hadn't directed his anger towards specific individuals he may very well have simply started placing bombs randomly around cities.

      The real point was that we prioritize terrorist threats that don't exist above all else

      Terrorist threats don't exist? Have you forgotten about 9/11? Have you forgotten about the anthrax letters that killed people later in 2001? Have you forgotten about the sniper attacks in the Washington DC area in 2002? Do you really expect terrorists to announce their intentions before they strike so that the authorities can prepare for it? Terrorism is a fact of life. Get used to it. You might also want to learn a little about how a lot of the rest of the world views the US. I'm sure there are plenty of extremists who would love to be able to blow themselves up in the middle of Manhattan during rush hour.

      As far as New Orleans goes, I'm sorry but I don't see why anybody should be rebuilding down there. It's a city that's substantially below sea-level and relies on dams and levys to keep the ocean out. The city is sinking as the sediments it was built on slowly seap back into the Mississippi river. The protective barrier of the Mississippi delta is almost entirely eroded away. The ocean levels are expected to rise over the next 100 years thanks to global warming. The costs of trying to rebuild the city and protect it will be astronomical over the next few decades, and for what purpose? We can't even build dams and levys strong enough to withstand the strongest hurricanes, so chances are that the city will eventually be lost anyway. Hell, if global warming continues the way a lot of scientests expect then by 2100 major cities like Boston, New York, etc. may be substantially under water. And they're all currently above sea level. If people would face long-term reality then the only thing the federal government should do is help pay to move people out of harms way, out of New Orleans.

    10. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be a complete idiot for thinking there are such things as "suspicious packages" in this world.

      and

      Terror, whom we've been battling against for about 5 years.

      Spoken like a true idiot. I lived in London, UK, for 20 years. Not only were there suspicious packages, but there were suspicious packages that were bombs, and suspicious packages that were bombs that also exploded. A couple I even heard go *boom*, and one slightly injured a colleague of mine on his way to work.

      So yeah, there are such things as suspicious packages, and no, we've been battling terrorism for long while before 11th September 2001.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    11. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right; New Orleans was got all the attention it deserved by the responsible agencies.

      By the way, that's sarcasm you fucking twat. I can't believe you're trying to say that because the Coast Guard acted well that it doesn't matter that the situation on the whole was severely fucked up and under-supported by the government for weeks.

    12. Re:Isn't it funny that.... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Or are you thinking more about the days in advance of that hurricane that the mayor of that town and the governor of that state wasted in not actually evacuating the city's residents (you know, the ones not complying with the evacuation order) with their sitting-idle fleet of buses?

      That's the right wing bullshit, anyway. Here's the facts. And Blanco had 500 buses ready to go, but FEMA rejected their use because they lacked air conditioning. In hindsight, was there more the governor and mayor could have done? Sure, but nothing remotly approaching George "no one could have predicted the levees would breah even though I was personally warned about it before Katrina struck" Bush.

  12. just an observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who watches aqua teen hunger force deserves to be blown up after their genitals are mutilated.

    1. Re:just an observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what the story is about, particularly the aqua teen hunger force bit. Does that mean that

      a) I am old,
      b) I am not from Boston,
      c) I am not American,
      d) I have no sense of humor,
      e) I don't appreciate art,
      f) I am too intelligent to care,
      g) I don't watch enough television,
      h) I need to get out more,
      i) I need to get out less, or
      j) none of the above?

    2. Re:just an observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a, c, g and i, sir.

  13. Spacecataz! by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 1
    --
    What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
    1. Re:Spacecataz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I like the Mooninites and Plutonians in their first few appearances, ATHF's drop in quality pretty much starts with the replacement of Doctor Weird's opening segments with Spacecataz.

  14. OMG! Wires and Circuitboards! by AmazingRuss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article says they got worried when they saw the wires and circuit boards. The knowledgable terrorist will doubtless package his payload in a fashionable briefcase now that he has been alerted to this penchant.

    Damn you Aqua Teen Hunger Force! You have DOOMED America!

  15. FOXNews.com screenshot. by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I nearly fell out of my chair when I saw this:

    http://www.catastrophicerror.com/~endo/Ignignokt.p ng

    --
    What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
    1. Re:FOXNews.com screenshot. by aspx · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude, your computer looks all weird. I think you should reinstall Windows.

    2. Re:FOXNews.com screenshot. by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I never thought I'd see the day this would be on CNN:
      http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/US/01/31/boston.bombsc are/newt1.1827.boston.wcvb.jpg

    3. Re:FOXNews.com screenshot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I like how they blurred out the middle finger.

    4. Re:FOXNews.com screenshot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I fell out of my chair too - not because of the athf character, but the headline on the lower left instead: Jim Gray, Turing Award winner and database authority is missing! http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/0 1/30/0353228&from=rss

    5. Re:FOXNews.com screenshot. by jez9999 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, one of the few beefs I have with Apple's interface is those little coloured buttons along the top of dialogs. What in hell are they supposed to do? You have to learn it. I thought good interfaces should be as discoverable as possible. I definitely prefer MS's approach here, with the little symbols on buttons.

    6. Re:FOXNews.com screenshot. by lucianx · · Score: 1

      There are symbols on the buttons when you mouseover any one of them. "x" to close, "-" to minimize, "+" to maximize, pretty intuitive. I've actually got the graphite theme on mine, so they're all the same color anyway.

      --
      John C. Worsley - Artist, Musician, Coder
      Portfolio
    7. Re:FOXNews.com screenshot. by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      It's almost like they're interviewing Ignignot for comments. "So Mr. Ig-nig...uh, what do you have to say?" "You should be thankful we did not use the quad laser. Nothing can defeat the quad laser. And I hope you can see this, because I'm doing it as hard as I can."

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  16. Homeland Insecurity by obyom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Paranoia strikes deep. Into your life it can creep."

            -from "What It's Worth" -Buffalo Springfield

    1. Re:Homeland Insecurity by P.+Niss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "I'm the cunt breath asshole eater."

                      -from "You Don't Want To Fuck With Me" -Ol' Dirty Bastard

    2. Re:Homeland Insecurity by doctrbl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And don't forget the next line:

      "It starts when you're always afraid"

    3. Re:Homeland Insecurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And the line after that:

      "You step out of line, the man come and take you away"

  17. There is no such thing as bad press. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say the advertising campaign was a resounding success!

  18. Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by aredubya74 · · Score: 0

    Well, this is going to take a long time, so you may want to get some snacks.

    The marketing campaign is not a crime, nor a "hoax", nor anything to get indignant about. Installation-based ads have been around for years. What may be a crime though is the apparent "4 simultaneous calls reporting strange devices" to the Boston police. If it was done to prompt all this, the caller deserves a decent amount of time in PMITA.

    --

    RW

    1. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by PennyLoafers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually these ads are illegal in the city of Boston. A company can't just put up bills on public buildings or structures with no permit. The 4 calls were probably due to citizens being vigilant after one of the subway lines was shut down in the morning when the first device was found. It is something to get indignant about when someone runs into your office telling you to turn on the news and the hospital where your wife works is on TV with freaking BOMB SQUAD trucks outside it. You might think its no big deal, but to many Bostonians it is a very big deal and something we're mad as hell about.

    2. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Make sure you direct your anger at the cause of the misunderstanding and not innocent parties.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you will. I'm also from Massachusetts, and I don't think we're doing our national reputation any good by getting so upset about it. They didn't look like bombs one bit, but the officials reacted as if they'd found a nuke.

    4. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you get mad at the moron's at the boston bomb squad who seem to think some leds, a pic chip, and a voltage regulator constitute an IED. Fucking morons.

    5. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by devnull17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I also live in Boston, and while I wasn't too thrilled about the whole thing, whoever called in the complaint is an idiot. The bomb squad, even more so. The media aren't exactly blameless, either; this wasn't exactly a difficult story to crack.

      You can't make society bomb-proof, and you'll sacrifice too much in the process of trying. Hopefully we'll learn that someday.

    6. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1

      Every car, every box, and every dark skinned human could be a bomb too. Better we all just stay inside forever.

      Stop jumping at shadows, you goddamn coward.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    7. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by isoteareth · · Score: 1

      Other people aren't responsible for your idiocy.

    8. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "You might think its no big deal, but to many Bostonians it is a very big deal and something we're mad as hell about."

      Bite my shiny metal ass, meatsack! I'm a Bostonian and I think the whole thing is gutbustingly funny as hell!

      I cannot wait until the next Weekly Dig hits the streets.

      When they try that "hoax device" crap in court, it'll be thrown out so fast, it'll hit Somerville on the first bounce!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    9. Re:Gentlemen...BEHOLD! by zentinal · · Score: 1

      Actually these ads are illegal in the city of Boston. A company can't just put up bills on public buildings or structures with no permit.
      So, that's trespassing and/or vandalism. And yes, I know that a law (city ordinance? state law?) was recently passed outlawing any action which causes a public uproar. If I fart on the T (normally rude, but hardly illegal), and you panic because you think it is a Sarin attack, I could be arrested. Ugh.

      You might think its no big deal, but to many Bostonians it is a very big deal and something we're mad as hell about.
      Ahh, no. Its something you and the dingbats downtown are mad as hell about. Myself, as a Greater Boston resident, the only thing I'm preturbed about is the over-reaction of the authorities. Well, that and the fact that Boston is (for the time being) the laughingstock of the planet.
  19. eh what ? by Salsaman · · Score: 1

    Since I can't view the flash, would somebody be kind enough to explain the article in *English* ?

  20. Live Action Shot by bovilexics · · Score: 1

    I can't believe they put Ig to task like that. He's just trying to communicate with us earthlings and have us bow down in worship. What's so wrong with that?

    CNN has a bit more info and a much better live action shot. Ig in all his lit up glory.

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/31/boston.bombscare/ index.html

    --
    Are you bovilexic? Moo!
    1. Re:Live Action Shot by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 1
      A choice quote from the article:

      "It had a very sinister appearance," Coakley told reporters. "It had a battery behind it, and wires." Just when I thought it couldn't get more funny/sad, I found this gem near the bottom:

      "Scaring an entire region, tying up the T and major roadways, and forcing first responders to spend 12 hours chasing down trinkets instead of terrorists is marketing run amok," Markey, a Democrat, said in a written statement. "It would be hard to dream up a more appalling publicity stunt." Yeah, gee. The terrorists must've gained so much ground now that the Boston authorities haven't chased them for a few hours :-/ I really have to wonder at people who are able to say something like that with a straight face.

      Jon Stewart said it best... "ooga booga booga!!"
      --
      ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
  21. Can you hear me Boston or should I turn it up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for you!

    bwahahahah.

    This is the funniest thing I've seen in a long time. It wasn't the ads that messed up traffic in Boston, it was the half-baked security theater.

  22. Re:As a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You're a fucking idiot

  23. not oblig by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

    Actually Microsoft has there own version of Aqua Teen Hunger Force called Luna Teen Hunger Force. Most people at slashdot are against it though.

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    1. Re:not oblig by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 0

      Aero Teen Hunger Force, perhaps?

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
  24. State of our Country by Scorpinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It really makes me sick that we're at the point where people mistake everyday things for bombs and have homeland security called in. I can't even ride my universities bus holding a wired up circuit board (for a class) without people looking at me like I'm about to blow them up.

    1. Re:State of our Country by danomac · · Score: 1

      Perhaps... however, people carrying wired up circuit boards in public places isn't common. I don't remember ever seeing anyone carrying one. In the light of recent history and movies depicting bombs as wired up circuit boards with LED displays, of course people are going to stare.

    2. Re:State of our Country by heinousjay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not my job to accommodate the pathological fears of others.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:State of our Country by rhizome · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's not my job to accommodate the pathological fears of others.

      Well you're not Alberto Gonzales now, are you?

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    4. Re:State of our Country by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      For most people, they aren't everyday things. Few people know what a bomb looks like, but a lite-brite where it shouldn't be is likely to cause concern, justified or not.

    5. Re:State of our Country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop mistaking the actions of Boston for the actions of the nation. This happened in Boston, and NOT in any of the other cities in which the EXACT SAME AD CAMPAIGN happened.

      It's Boston being stupid, not the entire country. This is ENTIRELY a problem with the Boston area.

      Remember John Kerry? Remember how he managed to make EVERYTHING boring? Remember how when he attempted to tell a joke he told the nation that all the soldiers in Iraq were there because they were too stupid to do something better with their lives?

      That's what people from Boston are like - humorless idiots.

      Which might be why Boston is apparently now bribing college graduates to come to the city. Intelligent people just won't stay, otherwise, as there's nothing useful done in the state.

      The last time Boston was in the news was because the 2-ton tiles GLUED to a tunnel ceiling managed to become unglued and crush a woman. A tunnel that was built solely because the city didn't want an "ugly raised highway" and decided instead to waste billions of FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS to build a tunnel with 2-ton tiles GLUED to the ceiling.

    6. Re:State of our Country by phageman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but whether those fears are irrational or not is irrelevant. They exist. You acknowledge they exist. You shouldn't be surprised by the response. Dismayed, yes. Surprised, no.

    7. Re:State of our Country by westlake · · Score: 1
      It's not my job to accommodate the pathological fears of others.

      It might, however, save you an over-nighter at the holding center downtown.

    8. Re:State of our Country by rolyatknarf · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps... however, people carrying wired up circuit boards in public places isn't common."

      Radios, phones, iPods, PDAs, portable computers, walkie talkies, portable DVD players..........

      Nope - nothing common to carry. That's some really scary shit, man !!!

    9. Re:State of our Country by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps... however, people carrying wired up circuit boards in public places isn't common."

      Dude. Hang out around 77 Mass Ave in Cambridge for a few weeks.

      You'll see a LOT of that sort of thing.

      YOU won't understand one little bit of what its all about, however. And your mere presence WILL significantly lower the collective IQ all around you.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    10. Re:State of our Country by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "It's not my job to accommodate the pathological fears of others."

      Honored sir! I bow thrice in thy honored direction!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    11. Re:State of our Country by nettdata · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hell, I say go nuts.

      EVERY time you see something that you "think" is a suspiscious package/bomb, then call them in.

      Show them just how stupid the whole situation is becoming. The media has everyone so scared that it's pretty well incapacitated the nation, and everyone's increasingly paranoid.

      Man... they aren't kidding when they say "the terrorists have already won".

      And I love how the uber-lite-brites are getting all the press while A REAL TERRORIST PLOT was uncovered today in the UK.

      Yep... that says it all right there...

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    12. Re:State of our Country by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      And I love how the uber-lite-brites are getting all the press while A REAL TERRORIST PLOT was uncovered today in the UK.

      Be careful yourself about 'letting the terrorists win'. That hasn't been anywhere near proven yet. Innocent until proven guilty.

    13. Re:State of our Country by nettdata · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'm much more inclined to believe and would want to be informed about the initial takedown results from a 6 month surveillance operation than be exposed to the constant knee-jerk "it's a bomb!" media blitz and overreaction about the lite-brites.

      Now that I think about it, I think the thing that REALLY pisses me off is just how seriously all of the media outlets are reporting the "suspicious devices" story, instead of treating it like the funny/silly/stupid overreaction that it is.

      If they reported it as "you're not going to believe what just happened in Boston..." with a bit of a rolling of the eyes and a chuckle, I'd have no problem with it.

      To jump on it and blow it all up and out of proportion as they have, as if they might have actually just uncovered the ultimate terror attack, well, that's pushing my tolerance. Especially since that kind of reaction just adds fuel to the fire, as it were.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    14. Re:State of our Country by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      It really makes me sick that we're at the point where people mistake everyday things for bombs and have homeland security called in. I can't even ride my universities bus holding a wired up circuit board (for a class) without people looking at me like I'm about to blow them up

      Maybe you should try walking through an airport with a water pistol next. Sure what you're doing with your circuit board is probably nothing, but thanks to the media/govt./Hollywood, you need to adapt to the times. Otherwise you're just like a drunken sorority sister at a frat party...wondering why you woke up without your panties.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    15. Re:State of our Country by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      You assume this isn't deliberate, or at least a desirable side effect. Tell me, how have this administration's interests been aligned with Science?

      Now, people fear and distrust not only homebrew electronics, but those who make and use them. Because invariably, it looks like a bomb or a biochemical dispersion device they saw on 24 or some terror-plot movie. Pretty soon, anything that's not an iPod or a cellphone will be confined to approved research labs -- not because of the government, but because the researchers will fear for their safety and livelihood if they're seen with an unfinished work of science.

      The path being taken is so fascist, it's ridiculous. Public opinion is being molded so that anybody who thinks for themselves, makes new or creative products on their own, or performs real science, can be seen as an enemy of the state. I wouldn't be surprised if software is the next step in the smear campaign. The intellectuals are being kicked out of this society. Science and logic and rationality and skepticism have no place in your social or personal life - so keep them locked up in the government-approved lab where they belong. And if you're not working for a government-approved lab, well then, obviously the checks and balances aren't in place and you can't be trusted with science.

      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    16. Re:State of our Country by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      Sure what you're doing with your circuit board is probably nothing, but thanks to the media/govt./Hollywood, you need to adapt to the times. Like hell I do. I'm often carrying around prototypes, and yes, I understand the suspicious look thing. It's those of us electrical engineers that have made this wonderful, highly-automated, electrical world possible. If these halfwit inbred ingrates can't deal with us going about our regular work improving all of their lives without going "OMFG BOMB/TERRORIST!" then I think we'll just have to shut off the power except in our own little corner of the world. Right now it's isolated to those of us who do odd things in public, but wait - tomorrow reading a book about electrical circuit theory will be suspicious as well. Goddamn retards.

      Not been a good day at work dealing with the technically-incompetent-but-ever-unappreciative. It seems it would have been very simple for the investigating retard in the ATHF case above to simply walk up to the device, examine it, and determine that there were no hostile elements (like, say, those pesky explosives that bomb makers often like to connect to circuits). I would understand some caution if it were in a box concealing the guts, but come on, this was a completely exposed board, based on the pictures I've seen.

    17. Re:State of our Country by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I wish /. would let us write directly to each other w/o posting.

      Engineer's are a dime a dozen...I know, I grew up soldering transistors on boards back in the 70's, and now manage twenty software engineers (yesterday was my 25 anniversary ) So, please remove the chip from your shoulder. Nobody is going to be grateful to you, even if you design the next iPod, zipper, or Post It Note...few will remember. If you want thank yous, go do some volunteer work.

      The simple fact of the matter is that people are taught from early childhood, that if it walks like a duck, or quacks like a duck, it must be a duck. So, until you get over your ego, you'll continue to get to put up with the folks who stare at you as you carry your circuit boards around. Why the hell wouldn't you have it in some anti-static wrap anyway (or does the old "static zap makes crap" phrase no longer apply)?

      I'll grant that I didn't RTFA, and wouldn't know a bomb from from a breadbox, even with all my years in engineering. But, I can certainly tell when something looks out of place, which from the commentary seems to have been the case. So, I don't think it's surprising that it got reported, and probably took time for the cops to clear the area, take a quick peek (realizing they didn't know what it was still), call in the experts, etc., etc. All of that takes time, and wastes everyone else's time.

      Now, for what it's worth, I spent several years living in Germany back in the 80's & 90's, during the height of the old Bader-Meinhof terrorist days. The officers club at the base I worked on was blown by a bomb shaped under the hollowed bottom of a fire extinguisher...other attacks occurred at Frankfurt Airport, and Ramstein A.B. So, we were always told to report things that were out of place, and I know of several briefcases that got destroyed because they were left unattended...paranoia?...or healthy caution?

      Has the whole terrorist threat to us been overblown (pun unintended)?...arguably yes. But, I can guarantee you doing unusual things is always going to get attention, and that has nothing to do with the current state of affairs.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    18. Re:State of our Country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is voicing a personal opinion flamebait? From a historical point of view it could well be argued that ad-campaigns are becoming more bold as they try to find ways to make their product stand out from the rest of the crowd. IMHO the trend is disturbing. If wishing justice for the people of Boston is wrong, I don't want to be right! :)

      *sigh* Maybe I should just give up and create my own ./ account. Then I can build karma points and mod AC posts as flamebait just because I disagree with them! :P

  25. Re:As a Bostonian by sheetsda · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Also, I'd say that since guerrilla marketing by definition is outside of the normal channels for marketing, Cartoon Network should not be surprised when the book of law is tossed at them.


    Yes, because in Soviet America, anything outside normal trains of thought is illegal.

  26. First thought by billdar · · Score: 3, Funny
    My first thought was this was a amazing feat of PR stupidity, but turns out I fell for this as a media-led sheep. Their use of 'magnetically lighted device' paints an ominous picture. But looking at the photo, I'm not sure how someone could think it a bomb

    Then again, that just proves that if terrorists paint their IED's pretty colors and put Mickey Mouse on it, I'm fucked...

    --
    I am billdar, and I approve this message.
    1. Re:First thought by SeaSolder · · Score: 1

      My first thought was that this was sheer genius. Assume for a moment that the ad company, or someone else responsible is fined for this. It's probably significantly less than what this media coverage would cost to buy outright. So even if this was not the intended outcome (which I hope it wasn't), it probably is paying off big-time. I wonder what the website hits for ATHF are looking like right now...

      Reminds me of a similar fiasco back when MI2 came out, and some ad company put little music players in newspaper boxes that would play the theme song when the box was opened. Someone saw the plunger switch, and some loose wires, and thought it was a bomb. That at least seems like it could be thought to be a bomb by most normal people.

    2. Re:First thought by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe if the terrorists just toss a bunch of LED throwies at something they want destroyed, then Homeland Security will blow it up for them?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:First thought by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My first thought was this was a amazing feat of PR stupidity

      Really? My first thought was that this was genius because for the cheap cheap price of assembling these and hiring someone to set them up they've gained untold millions of dollars worth of free press. And the best part is that with their target audience (18-34 males), they've come off in an incredibly good light. You see, the vast majority of their audience have read all these stories and said "haha, police are dumb, this is just an ad for a cartoon on Adult Swim, hey I might check that out."

      Well played Cartoon Network.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  27. Re:As a Bostonian by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are plenty of lovely targets around the town, which can explain the reaction (which you'd expect no matter what when dealing with batteries and unknown electronics in a sneaky location in a heavy traffic area).

    Yeah, you can't be too careful around batteries. Especially 9-volt ones, they can tingle your tongue!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  28. Now more than never by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our Aqua Teen Hunger Force overlords!

    Hopefully I will not get blown up, as I'm more of a Ren & Stimpy type. Seasons 1 and 2 only please.

    haha!

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  29. Only in America.. by BlahSnarto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can something so harmless be taken for
    a bomb..

    plenty of howto's here regarding LED bombing
    http://graffitiresearchlab.com/?page_id=46#video

    1. Re:Only in America.. by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      Only here? Huh? You're rather well protected here from much of the world's madness. It's a lot worse in some other places, like Isreal and surrounding areas and some parts of Europe, where leaving anything in a public place results in bomb concerns.

    2. Re:Only in America.. by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

      Your statement is both true and false ; true, if you leave a suitcase or a bag in a public place, you'd most certainly trigger a bomb squad intervention. False, because you won't make any news coverage for it unless it' a real bomb (and even then, it's unsure a word of it would leak before any arrest is made), and a prankster wouldn't be charged for "attempted terrorism" for a prank. At most, a good slap on the wrists and that's all. No mass paranoia fueled by irresponsible media channels chasing for audience, no war waging politicians going to exploit it for self promotion.

  30. For what we have done to Mother Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we all deserve to die.
    every one of us

    1. Re:For what we have done to Mother Earth by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

      Righto. You first, Mr. A.C. Troll.

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
  31. As a Boston area resident... by Suertreus · · Score: 1

    ...I, for one, welcome our new Mooninite overlords.

  32. Re:As a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " There are plenty of lovely targets around the town, which can explain the reaction (which you'd expect no matter what when dealing with batteries and unknown electronics in a sneaky location in a heavy traffic area)."

              Nope the explanation is they are overreacting morons. I deal with unknown electronics with batteries hooked up DAILY where I work, and unless it's wire to some brick or tub of juice, it's obvious it's not a bomb.

    "Also, I'd say that since guerrilla marketing by definition is outside of the normal channels for marketing, Cartoon Network should not be surprised when the book of law is tossed at them."

              Bull. Shit. I'd fight tooth and nail if the po' overreacted and decided something I had "might be a bomb", then tried to bill me for their time or charge me with trump charges since they overreacted. I hope Cartoon Network does the same.. if they get some token $100 fine, whatever. But if Boston tries to fine them like $100,000, I hope it costs the city $1,000,000 to fight the case out with cartoon network.

  33. What the....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just pitiful. I'm ashamed to live in a country that overreacts like this (mostly in the government and media). I would seriously question the competency of a police department that did anything like this. I can understand a little questioning, but "safety detonations" and area lockdowns because of something flashing a led image of a character, what's next. The scariest thing is its not an isolated incident, grounding a plane because someone found an Ipod in a toilet, people being pulled aside because they have too much radiation in their blood (from medical treatments), the probably daily "safety detonations" of peoples lunches, briefcases, and backpacks that we usually don't hear about. Excuse me a moment I need to go and smash my head against a blunt object to get rid of the voices screaming how their are too many idiots on the planet.

    1. Re:What the....... by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      Don't forget having to put on the all-vegetable-fabric blue smocks to get on a plane or in a government building. Ten years ago, such an idea would have appeared ludicrous to me, now I'm not so sure. When people are so sh*t scared all the time, largely because a couple of planes killed a few people, they make for sh+tty citizens, and even sh*ttier govts or cops.

      This article makes me think, though... Could I call in and say I saw some funny lights on the Luxxor, or on some big display in Time's Square, that I think might be bombs, and get the same reaction? I doubt it. So maybe there's some hope the current panic will end, and people will return to the realization that life isn't some big orgy of fear and hostility and death. (At least, any moreso than it's always been.)

  34. Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by Rahga · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the articles I read said:
    'Officials said it contained an electronic circuit board with some components that were "consistent with an improvised explosive device,"'

    Okay, now, come on. These are really large circuit boards with a whole lot of LEDs soldered on to them. Nothing more, unless there are some other really messed up packages out there that haven't been reported on. Those officials sound like they have features consistent with smart police officers, in that they breathe and eat, but the similarities probably end there.

    1. Re:Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

      "consistent with an improvised explosive device,"'

            Well look at it this way, if these boards ran on a certain brand of laptop battery (cough Sony cough), they might be right!!!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well now we know. If we want to disrupt a city and make
      it waste money (maybe not the smart ones though), we just
      have to throw a used circuit board out the car window
      while driving and then report a suspicious device.

      Absolutely anything is "consistent with an improvised
      explosive device", from cardboard boxes to used tires.

    3. Re:Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the same vein, the AP article has a quote:

      "It's a hoax _ and it's not funny," said Gov. Deval Patrick.

      How dumb can they get? It wasn't a "hoax." Nobody was being tricked. That is, unless they count being tricked by their own delusions... in which case they should be chastising themselves for the hoax.

    4. Re:Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the articles I read said:
      'Officials said it contained an electronic circuit board with some components that were "consistent with an improvised explosive device,"'

      Okay, now, come on. These are really large circuit boards with a whole lot of LEDs soldered on to them. Nothing more, unless there are some other really messed up packages out there that haven't been reported on.
      Now you know.

      That's the way they justify all their bullshit.

      "Behavior consistent with terrorist actions."
      "Associations with well-known terrorists."
      etc

      When those vague phrases are the best they can do it means they don't have a shred of meaningful evidence but they want to scare people into thinking they do, so their authority won't be questioned.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Remember the plane diverted becuase a kid dropped his iPod down the toilet, owned up to it while the plane was in the air and the vast police operation that occured as damage control even after it was obvious it was just an iPod? We'll see a lot more of this garbage as Uber security departments in each country use them as ways to justify their existance.

    6. Re:Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      An electronic circuit board with some components consistent with an improvised explosive device, you say?

      Let's see... my cellphone contains an electronic circuit board, a battery and a radio receiver tuned to a specific frequency - all of which could be very useful in improvising an explosive device. Better look out where I leave it or the next thing I know I'll find it's been blown up.

    7. Re:Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by RSquaredW · · Score: 1

      Weapons of mass destruction-related programs?

      --
      In accordance with E.O. 12958, this post is marked Unclassified.
    8. Re:Dumbest thing I've read in years.... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      "consistent with an improvised explosive device,"

      Hmmm.. now, my understand of an IED is that it's made with components that are easily avaialble. So they were suspicious because these things had easily available components in them. Don't most things?

  35. Re:As a Bostonian by hrieke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I said normal channels, NOT normal trains of thoughts.
    Sheesh.
    If Cartoon Network wanted to buy space on buildings or work out a deal with the city then fine- but as I said, don't put up weird shit with batteries and electronics in odd places and think that you'd not get the wrong attention.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  36. There's no need to fear by GSwarthout · · Score: 2, Funny

    Underdog is here!

    --
    It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    1. Re:There's no need to fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually funny, but you might have wanted to explain it further. Sadly, it's going to suck, big time.

  37. What do we look like? A Couple of nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have technology beyond our comprehension! Behold the light stick!

  38. wow im amazed by Skridge · · Score: 1

    at the brainwashed ppl here. ooo throw the book at them because im scared. the gov manufactures one incident after another and by blowing things out of proportion (like this one), they manage to keep everyone on the edge of sanity and ready to punish anyone who pushes them just a little farther up the scared tree. grow up, and take a look around at what's really happening and the level of reaction. the gov is in the over reaction mode to keep everyone scared and freaked out. and it looks like it works. just because the gov tells you everyone brown wants to kill you, doesn't make it so.

    --
    -=] M3 Heavy industries - Download Free Game Tools
  39. Welcome to the USA, home of Paranoid Freaks! by EllisDees · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, they got their money's worth on this advertising campaign!

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  40. Re:As a Bostonian by Vellmont · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I live in Boston, and I can say that the day was very tense.

    Why? Because the media put out a big scare story that turned out to be nothing?

    which you'd expect no matter what when dealing with batteries and unknown electronics in a sneaky location in a heavy traffic area

    Maybe you should just stop paying attention to every little scare mongering story that gets released. Personally I'd direct some attention over to the media outlets for publishing a story with no information, who's only result was to un-necessarily scare people. A few weeks ago it was a strange smell in NYC that everyone assumed was the work of terrorists. I'm sure there's about 20 other stories I'm missing because...I've stopped paying attention to these junk stories.

    --
    AccountKiller
  41. huh.... by navtal · · Score: 1

    only on the uptight east coast. except for florida. florida is just scary.

    1. Re:huh.... by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      Isn't that their State motto?

  42. Wow says somethign about there security by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

    When they have been there for a few weeks. Makes me feel real safe.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  43. All so unbelievably stupid, except... by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    When you look at certain pictures, it becomes clear why there was a serious backlash. I would be wondering what series of bright lights were doing on a bridge girder too, but I would not raise a stink about it after closer examination. Alas, most of the population does not have that much common sense, so here we are.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:All so unbelievably stupid, except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you look at certain pictures, it becomes clear why there was a serious backlash. I would be wondering what series of bright lights were doing on a bridge girder too, but I would not raise a stink about it after closer examination. Alas, most of the population does not have that much common sense, so here we are.

      It's no wonder terrorists hate us. Everyone here seems to think they're idiots. If terrorists want to bomb a bridge, they're not going to hide it with a huge fucking LED sign with cartoon characters. They'll use a briefcase, a trash can, a purse, a grocery bag, a cardboard box, or any of a billion other things that will never raise suspicions.

      America is fucked. It has nothing to do with terrorists, and everything to do with 90% of the population being fucking retarded.

  44. Wow, and he's... by j79 · · Score: 3, Informative

    trying to sell it on eBay for $5,000 bucks! Unfortunately, I live in Boston (where I'm assuming all mooninites have been rounded up) but if you live in another city, go and steal yourself one! Then sell on eBay for big bucks....

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Adult-Swim-LED-Ad_W0QQitemZ320 078002362QQihZ011QQcategoryZ28009QQssPageNameZWDVW QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

    1. Re:Wow, and he's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm, isn't this considered grand theft? he has stolen someone elses property and placed it up for sale...

    2. Re:Wow, and he's... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      you can't steal abandoned property. it's called salvaging.

    3. Re:Wow, and he's... by j79 · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Wow, and he's... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      sonofabitch... $3,050.00

      yea, i'm just gonna make my own.

    5. Re:Wow, and he's... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Cheapass LED Christmas lights from eBay and perfboard from Home Depot.

      Instant (cheap) art for the home of the discriminating Slashdotter.

      Spraypaint the perfboard black for the extra terrorist bomb authenticity.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    6. Re:Wow, and he's... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      you can't steal abandoned property. it's called salvaging.

      In some jurisdictions you have to turn it in to the police for a period of time for the owner to claim it (90 days or so), after which you have legal right to it, with forms to prove it from the local PD and everything.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Wow, and he's... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In some jurisdictions you have to turn it in to the police for a period of time for the owner to claim it (90 days or so), after which you have legal right to it, with forms to prove it from the local PD and everything.

      But what if, like these devices, they are clearly abandoned property? They were deliberately placed where they had no right to place them - effectively not only abandoning them, but also littering.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Wow, and he's... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But what if, like these devices, they are clearly abandoned property? They were deliberately placed where they had no right to place them - effectively not only abandoning them, but also littering.

      That's a good point - the guys who have a good time ripping down street sign spam have some advice on this.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Wow, and he's... by Dretep · · Score: 1

      That's just crazy talk. You'll be able to buy your own at Walmart within a month or so for under $10.

  45. You have to love it by SueAnnSueAnn · · Score: 0

    Living in a Freakin police state.
    Let the Fucking pigs ruin things in the name of homo-land security.
    Hale to Adolph bush that rules the fourth riche.

    Unfortunately America as we thought we knew it is dead.

  46. As a resident of Chicago... by jdunlevy · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    [Turner Broadcasting] said the devices have been in place for two to three weeks in 10 cities: Boston, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, Ore., Austin, Texas, San Francisco and Philadelphia.

    Huh. Apparently nobody's noticed them in Chicago? Does this mean Chicago security is less paranoid, or are we just less susceptible to guerrilla marketing?

  47. WMD'S by snarfbot · · Score: 0

    terrorism plain and simple

    seriously those led images are just plain terrifying. and suspicious.

  48. Re:As a Bostonian by hrieke · · Score: 0

    I've got a lovely idea Mr. Anonymous Coward- I'll stop by your house and place a bunch of guerrilla marketing stuff on your walls and roof and see how you react. Public defacement is a no-no. Strike one.

    Now, if you had a brain cell or two here, you'd think that perhaps Boston, like any city would have something called Zoning Laws, which among other things says where one can and can not place adverts. Strike two.

    Now for bombs, and the reaction of the police- great you work with electronics, but I doubt that you work with explosives on a daily basis, because your statement of hooked into a brick or tub of fluids right right out of the movies. What a bomb is and is not is not always so obvious. Strike three.

    Yar're out.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  49. Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " You have to take these all seriously, because who knows if they're threats or not?"

              Well, I do. It's obvious that a beer sign, light bright, or flickery street light are not bombs, although you and apparently others in Boston don't know this.

    " I'm mad as hell about this ad campaign because when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today, you can bet your ass Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill."

              He shouldn't foot the bill. Any jerk could tell those signs aren't bombs. Turner doesn't owe dick for the local po' being stupid and overreacting.

    1. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      " I'm mad as hell about this ad campaign because when it comes time to pay for all the police activity today, you can bet your ass Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill."

      especially since he isn't in charge of Aol-Time-Warner...

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    2. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree, they acted very stupid. I'm sure the advertising people had to get permission to put them up.

    3. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      What a bunch of dumb fucks. The people of Boston, their police, etc. ZOMG! WIRES HANGING OUT!!!! AAHHH! AAHHH! AAHHH!
      Funny thing is there are probably dozens of lamp posts in Boston with wires hanging out, better call the bomb squad.

      On an unrelated topic, I feel they should turn Spacecataz into a spin-off series. That would be cool.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    4. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 1

      I saw one of these on Burnet Road in Austin about three weeks ago. I didn't know what it was, but the first thing that popped into my head? "Guerilla Advertising Campaign." Not bomb.

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    5. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by coast215 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He shouldn't foot the bill. Any jerk could tell those signs aren't bombs. Turner doesn't owe dick for the local po' being stupid and overreacting.
      Its good to know you are an expert on the subject. I know if I was a terrorist, there is no way I would make a bomb to look like anything other than a bomb. I would want everyone to know it is a bomb. I mean, what is the point of a terrorist bomb if it doesnt surprise people and cause maximum damage.
    6. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen nimrod. These things were designed to attract attention. Not my idea of effective concealment, which might be important if it were a real terrorist threat. Next thing you'll say is that ducks are to be mindlessly feared because someone might make a BOMB that looks like a DUCK! idjit.

    7. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      If you were a terrorist, you'd want to make your explosive device INCONSPICUOUS. Glowy blue LEDs are not inconspicuous.

      And no, I don't think "hiding in the open" is a likely strategy.

    8. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by Nropking · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone have to pay any bill. The police are already paid salary, and have people on call that don't get paid extra. They have all the equipment. So what is to pay, the police were already working and getting paid. They were more than likely driving around and doing nothing anyways. This is good practice for the cops.

    9. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Next thing you'll say is that ducks are to be mindlessly feared because someone might make a BOMB that looks like a DUCK!

      What if it just weighed the same as a duck?

    10. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by RaceCarDriver · · Score: 1

      First thing that would have popped into my head would have been: "How can I get that down from there(for to keep)!?". I didn't see any around Austin, I lose.

    11. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> "...Ted Turner won't offer to foot the bill."
      > He shouldn't foot the bill.


      Especially since he 'stepped down' from the company a long time ago. :)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Turner#Recent_yea rs

    12. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      If you were a terrorist, you'd want to make your explosive device INCONSPICUOUS
      Unless you wanted people to gather around and get nice and close to the device before detonation.

      "Oh look, blinkenlights, I wonder what that is!"
      People gather around, look and point then...
      [BOOM]!

      As ridiculous as the whole situation in Boston was, I am glad that the authorities decided to err on the side of caution. They were dealing with a number of crudely constructed, odd-looking devices with battery packs, electrical tape, and wires connected to circuitry. Seems bomb-like enough to me to warrant some investigation. The idiot marketing company that thought it was a good idea to hang these things all over the city should be publicly flogged for this.
      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    13. Re:Stupidies thing I've heard, ever. by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if I'd known about this I would have borrowed my dad's truck and made a fortune selling them on eBay.....

  50. America, fuck yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha the US is a fucking joke

  51. I just don't get ATHF by hguorbray · · Score: 1

    And I don't mean Alcohol, Tobacco and Humongous Firearms!

    Maybe this is due to the generational gap or that it's too po-mo, but I don't find Aqua Teen Hunger Force all the appealing -or coherent.

    Granted it's not as bad as Assy McGee, Brak, Stroker and Hoop, SquidBillies or Tom goes to the Mayor, but except for being non, or anti heroes the whole thing seems like too much of an in-joke or something. I mean I can sort of understand the joke behind SpaceGhost C2C and the deconstructionism of Sealab2012.....

    On the other hand, I'm down with all sorts of anime from FLCL and Paranoia Agent to Inuyasha, Venture Bros, Family Guy, American Dad, Invader Zim, Fairly Odds, etc, so it is not that I don't like the genre or anything...

    I'm just sayin'

    1. Re:I just don't get ATHF by B3ryllium · · Score: 0

      I kind of like Brak, but I also don't "get" ATHF.

      On the other hand, ZIM RULES ALL!! BOW BEFORE ZIM!!

    2. Re:I just don't get ATHF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You watch too much television.

      (Priorities, please - think of all the computer games you are missing out on.)

    3. Re:I just don't get ATHF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you fcking weeaboo

    4. Re:I just don't get ATHF by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      ATHF is amusing on occasion. A lot of the episodes suck, though. The episode with Danzig was amusing - "Now, is there a way to get the blood to flow *up* the walls?" I agree with you on the dislikes other than that. I also agree with most of your list of likes.

      Big FLCL fan (I introduced my girlfriend to it in order to screw with her mind. She just kind of stared at the screen with a wtf expression for three hours. It was funny), and I have had the following quote from Paranoia Agent on one of my markerboards for months on end now - "All around the mullberry bush, my partner chases a loony..."

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    5. Re:I just don't get ATHF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assy McGee, Tom goes to the Mayor, and Stroker and Hoop do suck. But ATHF? You've got the Mooninites, MC Peepee Pants (sp), All the different Carl dying episodes--pure awesomeness. It' all about the, "WTF?". ...
      OK, OTOH, I only find a handful of Spaceghost C2C episodes amusing, and found Paranoia agent boring (too forced and predictable).

      But they, there's 3 and a half hours of Adult Swim (half an hour of Voltron at the end). I don't think I've ever found all three hours to be great. But someone must, or the shows wouldn't stay there.

      Metalocalypse, though, is mostly inside joke stuff. TBH, I'd love to see all the ones I've missed, since several have been very low key (big fat tires and everything being my favorite so far).

    6. Re:I just don't get ATHF by Mark+Maughan · · Score: 1

      You don't like squidbillies? You must be one of them chalkies. Chalk-man a' skiing on his white snow in his tightie whites, just like the white wing dove sing a song about what they singin'! Can't tell them apart. Looking like a bunch of lightbulbs with shoes on, all be-boppin' around all over the place.

  52. The whole thing is so STUPID by LunaticTippy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please don't try to justify this pathetic overreaction. We've become a nation of fearful neurotic idiots.

    If someone wants to blow up a bridge, they will blow it up. They can strap dynamite to their torso and hug support beams. They can drive an explosive-filled car into a stanchion. They can fill a boat with fertilizer and float underneath. No matter how much we freak out over nothing, no matter how many times we give up our rights, take off our shoes, and do other retarded inappropriate useless things.

    Even if we were dealing with a coward terrorist who wasn't willing to commit his life, you wouldn't see something with wires and batteries sticking out. It'd be out of sight, or look like garbage.

    It's such an irrational fear. How many people have been killed in the past hundred years in the US by little boxes with wires and batteries sticking out? How many have been killed by auto wrecks? It's jaw-droppingly lame, and it's getting worse. We'd be better off panicking about ceiling fans, lightning bolts, or bunions.

    We don't even need terrorists anymore. All it takes to shut down a city is cowering, whimpering, losers afraid of their own shadow.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:The whole thing is so STUPID by SamSim · · Score: 3, Informative

      If someone wants to blow up a bridge, they will blow it up.

      This is what gets me. It's well-established that despite all pretense, security (even airflight security) in the USA is poor at best. Given this, if terrorists really wanted to attack America, don't you think they would have, you know, attacked America? At all? In the last five years?

    2. Re:The whole thing is so STUPID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a lifelong Bostonian, this is the stupidest reason I have ever been late for work.

    3. Re:The whole thing is so STUPID by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We've become a nation of fearful neurotic idiots.


      Become????

      sorry my friend we have been that way for a really long time, at least 4 generations now. Histroy has recorded this quite clearly. Last time it was communism.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:The whole thing is so STUPID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dumbass! How many people died from a plane intentionally crashed into a skyscraper before 9/11? on 9/11? after 9/11? STFU. GTFO! YourMomShouldHaveSwallowed, et cetera.

    5. Re:The whole thing is so STUPID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've hit the nail on the head. Our leaders are doing a great job of living the Machiavellian dream.

    6. Re:The whole thing is so STUPID by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Ding ding ding! Which leaves an awful lot of people in the legislative, executive, and judicial branches sitting around looking useless. As a society we ignore real threats (heart disease, cancer, car accidents) for inane scare tactics.

      If there really were a significant number of intelligent and capable individuals attempting to carry out terrorist attacks on this country, more would have happened by now. Institutional paranoia is what we have instead, and now we're beginning to see where that leads us to.

    7. Re:The whole thing is so STUPID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, look at the bright side... another opportunity for the government to restrict our personal liberty and privacy even more!

    8. Re:The whole thing is so STUPID by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I think it's different now. We weren't taking our shoes off and banning chapstick on planes. During the red scare at least people smoked, drove drunk without seatbelts, took lots of uppers and tranquilizers, and never ever thought of the children.

      It makes me sad that our culture has become so very risk averse, at any cost, in irrational ways. I'm definitely not idolizing our past. I would not have enjoyed how little room for nonconformists there was in the 50s.

      It is strange. Kids don't grow up running around and playing like I did in the 70s. I'd blow things up, go for 10 mile hikes, explore sewers, break into churches, never wore a helmet, and took candy from strangers. The 60s-80s seemed to have fears focused outside onto vague distant threats, rather than inside, a constant suspicious gnawing.

      I don't know why it happened. Maybe living in this constant fake fear of getting nuked during the cold war made people afraid of life in general. Something made Americans afraid of everything.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  53. Oh noes! by Ig0r · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somebody set us up the bomb!

    --
    Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    1. Re:Oh noes! by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      Make Your Time!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say?!

  54. Re:As a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because in Soviet America, anything outside normal trains of thought is illegal.

    That's "Soviet Boston", thank you very much.

  55. Re:As a Bostonian by smclean · · Score: 1

    Also, I'd say that since guerrilla marketing by definition is outside of the normal channels for marketing, Cartoon Network should not be surprised when the book of law is tossed at them.

    I'll be curious to see; what book? Littering? What criminal offenses did the Cartoon Network actually commit? All the authorities are talking big but I suspect the reason we haven't heard any charges are because they are scratching their head trying to figure out how to get Cartoon Network to foot the bill.

    It sounds to me like Cartoon Network's marketing idea wasn't so bad, but their placement of the devices was insanely bad. Bundles of unexplainable electronics on bridges, subway stations.. they might as well have left them on an airport concourse or the white house lawn.

    When I was in Atlanta in November, somewhere vaguely near the Turner building on I85 was a giant billboard of an illuminated mooninite outline just like on these devices. Spiffy.

    --

    "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

  56. After seeing the photographs I think I'd be pissed by kinglink · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (as someone else posted) http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderlin/tags/aquate enhungerforce/

    Seriously if anything that looks suspicious with me. They placed the devices all over the city and didn't tell anyone? And they thought it was ok?

    I'm sure the expense just with bomb squads and shutting down the interstate is beyond prohibitive (Trust me, I lived in Boston, shutting down any street in Boston = hell).

    This sounds like something that cartoon network would do but hell if it isn't the type of stupid ass stuff that people aren't thinking about but can cause a major problem. Sounds like someone's getting a pink slip.

  57. Fricking Awesome! by abricko · · Score: 0

    That's all I've got to say about that!

  58. Such a crying shame. by Polarism · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I saw this as I was coming into work this afternoon on our big screen (thank god for the military having most of their televisions permanently tuned to FOX NEWS for the "situational awareness" it provides...) and my jaw just dropped. It's really hitting me lately how much our country is changing, and there is very little that individuals can do about it. I feel like standing on top of a soap box and yelling at people till i'm blue in the face, but I know that's fruitless.

    Wake up...

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
    1. Re:Such a crying shame. by FranklinDelanoBluth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I may get modded flame, but I don't care.

      I saw this as I was coming into work this afternoon on our big screen (thank god for the military having most of their televisions permanently tuned to FOX NEWS for the "situational awareness" it provides...) and my jaw just dropped. It's really hitting me lately how much our country is changing, and there is very little that individuals can do about it. I feel like standing on top of a soap box and yelling at people till i'm blue in the face, but I know that's fruitless.

      Here's something that you. Don't work for the military/defense department that is ruining the world. If no one worked for them, they wouldn't be able to do anything.

      When you're working with stuff that kills other people, it's not "just a job."

    2. Re:Such a crying shame. by FranklinDelanoBluth · · Score: 1

      That's what I get for not previewing.

      Here's something that you.

      Here's something that you can do.

    3. Re:Such a crying shame. by AlgUSF · · Score: 2, Informative

      Our country is so screwed. We have a choice of two parties who are essentially the same. They both think of us as consumer units. I think the stock market bubble of the late nineties ruined our country. We went from an insane stock market bubble to a huge asset bubble combined with a huge stock market bubble. What are the powers that be going to do when all of the consumer units are all spent out, and completely saturated with debt.

      Not to mention that people don't want to pay any taxes, however they want the government to protect us from the terrorists, and close any possible avenue of terrorism. That includes publicity stunts where people place light brights on overpasses. We're fucked.....

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    4. Re:Such a crying shame. by Polarism · · Score: 1

      I think you assumed too much. Not everyone is what they appear. I could be doing 20 years, or getting out tomorrow, and you don't know that, but you do enjoy making blanket statments don't you? There aren't many employers you can work for these days that don't put you at odds with some sort of philosophy.

      --
      All your base are belong to Google.
    5. Re:Such a crying shame. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

      I feel like standing on top of a soap box and yelling at people till i'm blue in the face, but I know that's fruitless.

      So stand on a crate of oranges.

    6. Re:Such a crying shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just stand on a box wth some LEDS on it!

      You'll sure as fuck get noticed then, and shot probably...

    7. Re:Such a crying shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What are the powers that be going to do when all of the consumer units are all spent out, and completely saturated with debt."

      You're about to find out, because that's exactly the situation today.

    8. Re:Such a crying shame. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I feel like standing on top of a soap box and yelling at people till i'm blue in the face

      Behavior consistent with a terrorist.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    9. Re:Such a crying shame. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Don't work for the military/defense department that is ruining the world.

      Great. Now convince the rest of the world to disband their militaries too. Can't we all just get along?

    10. Re:Such a crying shame. by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      We have a choice of two parties who are essentially the same.

      Sorry, but Nader was an idiot to say that seven years ago. And that was before My Pet Goat, Katrina, Iraq, Dubai Ports, Valerie Wilson, Abramoff, NSA wiretapping and waterboarding. After all that, to say both parties are the same makes one far, far, far, far worse than an idiot.

  59. Am I missing something? by EonBlueApocalypse · · Score: 1

    "It's a hoax _ and it's not funny," said Gov. Deval Patrick.

    I highly doubt it was ever intended for these lights to be considered bombs the article even says that these devices have been present for "two to three weeks" in 10 separate cities. If these were thought to be potentially dangerous why is it that attention is drawn to them now?
  60. Terrorist threats by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Mooninites have been quoted with such terrorist threats as

    The innocent shall suffer... big time. -Ignignokt

    If you have a problem with that maybe you should take that up with Mr. Laser. -Ignignokt

    Err: You all have any eggs? 'Cause I'm totally gonna mess someone's house up! Ignignokt: Yes, eggs or pot, either one

    Bow your heads or I'll bow em for ya! -Err

    Ignignokt: Our god is a god of vengeance. A god of hate. Err: A god of action! Ignignokt: Our god is an Indian who can turn into a wolf and- Err: Dude, that's Wolfen. Ignignokt: Yes, well Wolfen will come after you, with his razor.

    You got a problem with that? -Err

    Ignignokt: No one can defeat the Quad Laser. Err: Jumping is useless.

  61. As a Bostonian, I say... by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 0

    Aqua Teen Hunger Force.... ASSEMBLE!

    --
    I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
  62. Boston... by chrisspurgeon · · Score: 1

    Boston, you are such a TOOL.

  63. Re:OMG! Wires and Circuitboards! by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

    Yeah, expect sales of Zero Halliburton (ironic name, no?) briefcases to skyrocket.

  64. These guys need pay raises by Venim · · Score: 1

    Props to Boston police. This has got to be the most retarded thing i've seen police do in awhile

  65. It's Official! by Petersko · · Score: 1

    The terrorists have won.

  66. Re:After seeing the photographs I think I'd be pis by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

    Boston area radio station WBZ was reporting this evening that the Mayor of Boston has promised to "throw the book" at whomever is responsible, and quoted the possibility of two to five year prison sentences per "incident". Not only is someone getting a pink slip, but prison sentences for some employees of Cartoon Network sound likely if these politicians continue on their warpath.

  67. Only Boston by Belgand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Surprisingly only Boston had a problem with this when TFA mentions that these are up in 9 other cities. Likewise I've only heard Boston-based posters complaining about how this was irresponsible and something that obviously looked a lot like a bomb so it needed to be investigated.

    1. Re:Only Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yankee fan!!!

  68. demonic sandwich by YouTookMyStapler · · Score: 1
    At least they didn't leave something as dangerous as the

    Broodwich

    lying around the city.
  69. Wow! Excellent Marketing! by InsurgentGeek · · Score: 1

    So, exactly how much did TNN pay for this great viral marketing campaign of blinkenlights that absolutely no one noticed for two weeks? Idiots.

    1. Re:Wow! Excellent Marketing! by overseerbrian · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Because marketing obviously isn't successful until it's been mentioned on the news. Oh BTW I'm sure they went broke spending the hundreds of pennies on LEDs.

  70. See... by Raere · · Score: 1

    The reason why a bunch of us Bostonians were tense today was because the initial news reports said 'suspicious devices' were found. We weren't given any pictures or descriptions, just that they were suspicious, and were beginning to pop up in weird places. I don't know about you guys, but in any city, if the news reported that the police had found a handful of devices around the city, I'd be just a little bit wary. Yes, it was their fault for completely overreacting, and it shouldn't have been in the news in the first place. But when you just hear that there are suspicious devices around the city with no other information, you'd probably feel more tense than usual, because you'd assume that the police would be doing their job and oh, I don't know, finding things that actually looked like bombs?

    1. Re:See... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You understand that your fear is exactly what the Department of Homeland Security is counting on for their continued funding, right?

      Somebody's going to need to tell me what a "suspicious device" looks like, so I'll be sure to know one when I see one.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:See... by Lithdren · · Score: 1

      Then get angry at the police!

      The cartoon network did something I find rather funny. The police did something I find rather disturbing. Not a hard call.

  71. Damned if you do....... by edwardpickman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Everyone seems to feel they overreacted but what if they did nothing and they were bombs and some one got hurt? Why didn't the cops just poked around in the bags? See my first comment, that's what bomb squads are for to keep beat cops for getting hurt in situations like this. It was a dumb stunt that's costing us all money. My first thought wasn't bombs but that some one might have been testing responses by the police. There's been a number of other similar cases lately so I've been wary of things like this. Don't be so quick to blast authority figures for doing their jobs for once. Trust me the next time it's a real bomb people will be wondering why they didn't more not wondering why they didn't do less.

  72. Well... how come no bacon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bacon is extra!

    1. Re:Well... how come no bacon? by PenGun · · Score: 1

      On a bed of evil and lettuce.

  73. Boston thinks it's a world-class city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boston has delusions of being a big city. So it plays let's pretend. The trains and buses have constant announcements to report suspicious bags. There are random bag checks. Bomb-sniffing dogs. After all, the 9/11 hijackers went through Logan! (Boston's single large airport.) The fear is pervasive and encouraged by both law enforcement and politicians. The transit cops apparently think themselve in the same class as London, Madrid, and New York. Boston, a city at the top of every world terrorist's hit list. It is all rather sad really.

    The response would arguably be unprofessional over-reaction in New York. In Boston... we have lots of bad theater here.

    Bare all this in mind as you consider Mitt Romney's presidential candidacy.

    1. Re:Boston thinks it's a world-class city by ncc05 · · Score: 1

      Boston doesn't have delusions of being a big city. It IS a big city. The metropolitan area is one of the largest in the country, at 5 million and change. AKA, the same size as Madrid. The only reason that it has a small population is that it's a small city in area like Miami or Seattle. If it had the area of most major American cities (say, everything inside 128), it would have at least a million. Boston is at least a gamma world city. So yeah, maybe it's no New York, but it's no Indianapolis either.

    2. Re:Boston thinks it's a world-class city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Inner Core", basically inside Rt 128, is a bit more than 1.5M. If you want to call Rt 495 (~25 miles out) part of Boston, then Newark is part of New York, Baltimore not quite part of DC, Oakland part of SF, etc. And Worcester would be a million+ person city. So yes, not an Indianapolis. More like a Phoenix. And unlike Madrid, not a national capital.

      So not small. But not so large, nor with any other properties, which would suggest its security regime is not an outlier among similar cities.

    3. Re:Boston thinks it's a world-class city by ncc05 · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying the Inner Core. That makes Boston the size of Indianapolis, Philadelphia, (still smaller than) Jacksonville, Chicago. It doesn't include the whole metro area. National capital doesn't mean anything either. What about Canberra? Or Brasilia? I would argue that Boston is more international than those.

  74. Lord. Deval Patrick not amused... by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    "Lord Patrick, Grand Duke of Massachusetts was not amused by the disruption
    of public life perpetrated by what can only be called cultist. As a punishment
    it is expected that commoners in Boston will be seized at random by Royal
    police and flogged in the streets as a reminder that such disorderly behaviour will
    not be tolerated."

    Really, the fuck do I care whether Lord-Governor Deval Patrick is amused or
    not.

  75. They should have looked up by ncc05 · · Score: 1

    The one question I have is how long did it take for someone to recognize the Mooninites. I think the best part of all this is that there was one of these in Sullivan Square near 93. When you drive into Boston on 93 from the north, almost directly above Sullivan Square, there is (or was as of 2 weeks ago) a GIANT, LIT UP billboard of Ignignokt with the phrase "[adult swim]" prominently displayed. Did anyone think to look up and say "Hey, that's the same.... What the..." I mean, out of all the police, ATF, or whoever scrounging around the city, there must have been, if not any fans of the show, at least someone that SAW the billboard. Either that or my fate in the government or the billboard industry is seriously misplaced.

    1. Re:They should have looked up by jedkwon · · Score: 1

      i think, it was more like, no one gave a damn what is basically a cartoon targeted at young adults with nothing better to do after midnight, and then someone said, "hey, how long has that weird thing on that support beam been there?" TERRORISM the sad part is, I'm afraid that this will affect adult swim and I will no longer be able to get my dose of robot chicken and futurama....

  76. Stupid Government by AlgUSF · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is just another case of a government with too much money and power. They are probably going to call this a "Terrorist Act". When I was younger, this would have been filed under prank; not under terroristic hoax which is what they were calling it all day. All they really needed was to get a public works guy with a knife to remove them. I read that the FBI detonated some of them. This is the same kind of twisted logic means that my wife cannot carry her mascara on the plane unless it is in a plastic bag, however I can carry my laptop on the plane; who knows what you could stuff in the battery and it would just breeze through airport screeners as a laptop.

    It seems like everything these days that is out of the ordinary is now suspected to be terrorism. I thought republicans were for smaller more efficient government, not for overbearing, bloated, and stupid government. It is amazing how over the last 5 years; the feds managed to fuck up a perfectly good country.

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    1. Re:Stupid Government by wheelgun · · Score: 1

      The Republicans haven't exactly had an iron grip on Massachusetts for the past few decades, in case you haven't noticed. But your point is, sadly, still valid. The only difference between the GOP and the DNC these days is which way they want to screw us first, and how fast.

    2. Re:Stupid Government by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      Massachusetts or Texas. If you overreact to a innocent stunt/prank, you are a hero because you are doing it in the name of Homeland Security. They are talking about having Turner broadcasting reimburse the city for millions, because the city didn't just take a look at it. Maybe have a subject matter expert determine that the damn thing was a light brite. I think the stunt was juvenile, but hilarious. It also showed how the terrorists won, because we detonate anything out of the ordinary these days.

      If the Boston govt. was honest and actually had some intelligent people working there; they would say "It was a juvenile prank, however we are sorry we overreacted and locked the city down over light brites"......

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    3. Re:Stupid Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is just another case of a government with too much money and power.

      And yet we want to give government power to outlaw incandescent lights or at least tax incandescent lights so that CFLs will be promoted.

      When we think that government is doing us a favor then we want more of it. When some other majority imposes government contrary to our agenda and issues then we want less of it. Can't we just want less of it all of the time and honor the proper role of government?

    4. Re:Stupid Government by cbdavis · · Score: 1

      Sad, but true. We have become a land of paranoid nuerotics. We see terrorists behind every rock. I feel sorry for my son. He's 26 and has to endure several decades of this crap. Me? Hell, I'm 60. I'm outta here in 10 or so years. I hope the afterlife is a little saner than this sh*t hole world. Of course, if reincarnation is real, I could come back to this mess and get to deal with it all over again. Yeah, that would be just my luck. Rats!

    5. Re:Stupid Government by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I thought republicans were for smaller more efficient government

      The problem is some of that bunch are really monarchists and not republicans. It's ironic that you have your third George in power with less limits on his power than the earlier third George from England - Magna Carta held him back. Remember that Kings were elected in Europe years ago too.

    6. Re:Stupid Government by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      If the stupid people of Boston would just watch more Adult Swim, they would have recognized the characters instead of calling in bomb scares!

    7. Re:Stupid Government by MoparOwnz · · Score: 1

      ...however I can carry my laptop on the plane; who knows what you could stuff in the battery and it would just breeze through airport screeners as a laptop. If your intent was to blow up a plane, you wouldn't need to put anything in the battery. Just make sure it's a Sony.
  77. In other news... by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia slashdotted with requests for a single page, "Aqua Teen Hunger Force".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  78. Old activities in a Post 911 world by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So a friend of mine in Portland belonged to a group that used to do multiple "pub Runs". A hare was sent out from the first bar to run a course to the second/third bar. They would mark a trail using a little bit of flour on the road (washes or blows away). They had been doing this for 10+ years.

    Along comes the anthrax attacks - a pub run, and the men in BioHazzard suits come out investigating the strange white powder. I really wish someone would get on a pay phone and tell the police that it was flour.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    1. Re:Old activities in a Post 911 world by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      Of course the terrrsts want you to think it's just flour. How well did you know your rabbit? Huh?

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
  79. They posted these things in multiple cities by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Anyone in Portland want to track some down with me?

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:They posted these things in multiple cities by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      I would. Don't know where they'd put them, though.... Entrances to bridges maybe?

    2. Re:They posted these things in multiple cities by aztektum · · Score: 1

      I drive over burnside and morrison every day. i'm tempted to check it out

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:They posted these things in multiple cities by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      Just went over the Hawthorne eastbound. Didn't see any. Wasn't really looking.

    4. Re:They posted these things in multiple cities by aztektum · · Score: 1

      according to the lead ins to adult swim shows they had the other ones in all the cities taken down.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    5. Re:They posted these things in multiple cities by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      (Boston Mayor): Tonight..... You!

  80. I wonder... by Chouonsoku · · Score: 1

    If the FBI will raid my house because my sister was seen playing with a Lite-Brite set.

  81. HOAX!? This is media terrorism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is absolutely irresponsible for any media outlet to continue to headline this story as HOAX. Advertising campaign for a cartoon movie was the intent, the only way it could be a hoax is if the movie never gets released.

    Such irresponsibility only makes things worse and increases terror. The people that only read the headlines, don't know that Boston went shit crazy... they just think there was a hoax bombing attempt, causing increased panic through disinformation. Continuing to use that headline is IMHO a terrorist act.

  82. Why the left is so extreme. by copponex · · Score: 1

    You try to make a reasoned argument. Let's say the threat of terrorism is far, far less than that of heart disease, cigarettes, drunk driving, and just plain accidents. More people in this country have been killed by ladders than by terrorists. (I'm talking about American soil. When we show up in other countries with guns, I assume most people agree that we'll be shot at.)

    So, you talk to your neighbors, but they eye you warily. You may be a fan of "books," a bit biased towards reasonable and rational diplomatic response to external threats, or, dare I say it, morally opposed to killing other human beings for resources. They tell you, "The White House has it all figured out. Let's take the fight over there, wherever that is! Let's get these Islamo-fascist sunsabitches where they sleep!" You agree to disagree, bury yourself in work foreign films, and hope for better vote.

    Then you watch Iraq circle the toilet while Katrina wrecks entire states. Washington is rocked by scandals, and we continue to watch the deficit soar into the stratosphere. Soldiers are dying in the midst a civil war that we created because of piss-poor military strategy. In one fell swoop, we've eliminated two of Iran's sworn enemies, created the best training camp for terrorists in Iraq, and alienated nearly all of our allies. We're creating more terrorists by the thousands through "unfortunate" military action, and at home Fox News is valiantly fighting for their president - they even give up an anchor so he can serve as Press Secretary.

    If that irony doesn't kill you, a vote the clearly shows America is against the war is met with a smile and a nod by our dear leader, who is apparently convinced Armageddon will never happen unless we complete "Operation Rest of the Brown Ones." The rhetoric against Iran is turning up, eerily reminiscent of that before the war in Iraq, but the sheep buried neck deep in fried fat switch to the news and only find stories concerning the reasons Donald Trump and Rosie O'Donnel are fighting over the legitimacy of a Miss America contestant.

    You wonder how it's possible to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on a foreign war and not domestic security; how we'll make it through peak oil and solve our very real energy crisis when the government seems unable to find solutions outside of their favorite oil companies. You watch documentaries, join some newsletters, and suffer sleepless nights when confronted with all of these issues. Your neighbors laugh, breed, and switch back to American Idol.

    And then you wake up one morning, with all of this going on, and Boston has been shut down by LITE BRITES.

    America, enjoy these twilight years. We are Rome. Two hundred years from now people will ask themselves how we didn't see it coming. Turn your television back on, turn up that Modest Mouse and think about saving for the iPhone. I'll pray for you, once I get away from you.

    (Apologies to David Cross.)

  83. Re:As a Bostonian by eriklou · · Score: 0

    Yea and if you hook two together they will explode! /four years later...

  84. Quoting the Mayor by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

    "It's about keeping a city on edge."

    Truer words have never been spoken. Too bad the mayor doesn't seem to understand irony.

    No, he probably knows damn well that keeping the citizens terrified is good for his government.

    When will the USA be about the people again?

  85. Long before 911 in Toronto by the_other_one · · Score: 1

    The Eaton Centre Mall was evacuated because a carton of milk went Moo!

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  86. Re:As a Bostonian by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    But then I'd have to stop reading the YRO section of Slashdot...

  87. They better get.... by adez · · Score: 1

    They better get Assy McGee on the case, pronto.

  88. Re:As a Bostonian by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

    That's the problem though, the local media spewers, and why I choose to get my news from a source that does not have to tease me, or make a mountain out of a molehill to get me to watch their slow news day. Ever notice how all your local news channels have the *exact* same stories, running at the *exact* same time and they all go to commercial at the same time. Coincidence, or are they all stuck in an endless loop:

    while true
        check to make sure all our stories match
        make lame news sound exciting
        go to commercial
    done

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  89. East coast vs. west coast by cspariah · · Score: 1

    Having lived in Boston for 5 years, and now living in LA, I can totally understand why no one in LA would ever freak about something like this. Hell, I could be heading to work and actually SEE A BUS EXPLODE and my first thought would probably be, "Oh, I wonder what they're filming?" If I saw bombs on the MTA, I'd probably assume it was a new reality show.

    Well the great thing about this is that the odds of it being a movie or a reality show, EVEN IN BOSTON, are much much higher than the odds of it being a terrorist attack. I mean seriously, I'm pretty sure I'm more likely to be eaten by a buffalo than be killed by terrorists.

    I also love the automatic threat of lawsuits. "We're so fricking amped up and paranoid these days that your advertisements made us pass a brick, NOW YOU OWE US MONEY."

    I'm waiting for the phrase, "Officials stated that they had no reason to believe this was an act of terrorism," to appear in a news story about a cat stuck in a tree. That's how we know it's time to pack it in and kill ourselves.

  90. awesome marketing opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can almost see the new commercials now, with quick cuts of Fox news, CNN, and grainy pictures of the characters being eyed with suspicion by passers-by and being blown up. I hope they take advantage of this and milk it for all it's worth!

    Hell, Turner should go a head and pay those idiots $750K. Record it under "marketing expense".

    1. Re:awesome marketing opportunity by Lord_Ultimate · · Score: 1

      "$750K gets me what? Here's $3M, I'd like to prepay for 3 more."

      --
      -- I might be stupid, but you have to be good at something.
  91. Re:As a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but would you have paid attention to the billboard?

  92. Reasonable vs. unreasonable concerns by KingSkippus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hold my beer while I pull every LED off my monitors, KB, Mice, Computers, Cell Phones, etc to make sure they aren't really bombs.

    There are places where it's normal to find LEDs, wires, and electronic components, such as, oh, say, on monitors, keyboards, mice, computers, cell phones, and so on. And then there are places where it's not normal to find electronics, such as on unrecognizable devices attached to bridges, and on subway walls.

    There is normally no need to be unduly alarmed about the former. Like it or not, there is a need to be alarmed about the latter, at least to the point of taking prudent measures to check it out as they did.

    And it's not like we haven't seen an innocent marketing ploy turned into a security concern before, though I think this one is way more stupid. At some point, these idiotic marketing companies have to figure out that at some point, someone needs to ask the question, "Is this something that could reasonably cause security problems for people who don't look at the world as one huge billboard?"

    1. Re:Reasonable vs. unreasonable concerns by miceyman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I couldn't agree more. These were placed on heavily traveled bridges. The police probably couldn't have cared less about what the device looked like, except for the fact that there were more than a half dozen of them strapped under bridges across the city, and they hadn't heard about them. I'm not sure what the chain of events was, but if you're the official responsible for saying "sure, leave the bridge open until we get down there to check it out" and the next thing you know 15 cars went flying into the harbor because the Zakim bridge went kaboom... well, Let's just say I can understand his point of view. And believe it or not, this is all coming from someone who takes immense pleasure in asking people who are so worried about dying at the hands of the terrorists whatever they shall do if they get behind the wheel of the infinitely more dangerous contraption called an "automobile."

    2. Re:Reasonable vs. unreasonable concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is prudent?

      If you think it might be a bomb (because as a police officer you've had exactly zero training in that, thank you intelligent spending of Homeland Insecurity money), call out the expert... the bomb squad.

      The bomb squad takes a peek with a telescope (due caution?) or whatever, says: "Dude, you called me out to look at your home-made lite-brite? WTF?"

      Why should you shut down an entire city before you are threatened? Strange things aren't threats. They're just strange. New. Some people call that 'interesting'.

      Not that I'm defending marketing ploys, but while it annoys me that they were marketing, I don't blame them for the city being shut down. I blame the idiots on the police force and in the govt.. They seriously need to do their jobs and get appropriate training.

      Bomb components my a$$. Fricking batteries and wires. I bet you can't point in a single horizontal direction and not be pointing at wires with electricity flowing through them within 100 feet. OMG!! O Noes!! RUN!1!!!!11!1 Guess you'll have to run _UP_ and hope you don't hit a satellite.

  93. I realise you're being facetious, but by SamSim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    2. A bomb looks like a bomb, by definition.

    Here's your problem. A bomb does not "look like a bomb". People think a bomb is a bundle of sticks of dynamite with a bright red digital timer, preferably bleeping. But bombs don't look like that.

    1. Re:I realise you're being facetious, but by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      Personally, I just hope he doesn't ever go to a toy store and see the Light Brights on the shelf.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    2. Re:I realise you're being facetious, but by kidtwist · · Score: 1

      A bomb does not "look like a bomb". People think a bomb is a bundle of sticks of dynamite with a bright red digital timer, preferably bleeping. But bombs don't look like that.

      I get it. So if we see a bundle of sticks of dynamite with bright red digital timer we should ignore it. Because if it looks like a bomb from a movie it can't be a bomb.

  94. i hope you can see this.......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because we're doing it as hard as we can.

  95. I don't think that's what that look means by donutello · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're staring because most of them have never seen a virgin before.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:I don't think that's what that look means by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in previous years being a virgin wouldn't get you capped by a SWAT team and the bomb squad called in.

  96. Personally I think they handled this the right way by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

    Flame me all you want, but all you people thinking this was blown way out of proportion aren't thinking very realisticly. Yeah, so it turned out to be a high-tech marketing ploy. But one thing that any soldier who has fought in any conflict will tell you is that you NEVER touch something that catches your eye as potentially interesting until you can determine that it's not dangerous. These things could very well have been rigged with explosives or biologic/chemical agents. The flashing lights could have been intended to attract attention to them. Boobytrapped toys and items that soldiers might like as souvineers have been planted in wars dating back to at least WWII.

    If I was a terrorist and wanted to maximize casualties in a major metropolitan city I just might pack a bunch of explosives into something like these advertising devices. Rig it to start flashing around rush hour and have a motion switch or timer to set off the explosives. Somebody walking by decides to take it home as a souvineer, or just to see what it does, and the explosives get detonated.

    People seem to forget the lessons learned from 9/11, the train bombings in Spain, the subway bombings in London, etc. Just because there haven't been any similar mass-transit attacks in the US doesn't mean it'll never happen. All it takes is one or two intelligent and motivated terrorists to come up with something like this.

  97. DHS on the Move! by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    > "It's a hoax _ and it's not funny," said Gov. Deval Patrick.

    Its not a Hoax at all its a cartoon. A rather funny one that would defiantly make light of all of this I'm sure. Some people up here said we should fine the Adult Swim people.. hell.. why not just shoot them?

    > "It's about keeping a city on edge. It's about public safety," he said.

    It's about making sure the public is afraid of terrorists all the time. They have to be afraid to they vote away their freedoms. I'm sure OBL is laughing his freaking ass off right now.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  98. Emboldening the enemy by DreamingReal · · Score: 1

    If we hold a press conference about a piece of guerrilla marketing that some fool mistook for a bomb, then the advertisers have already won.

    Hey Boston, way to embolden the enemy. Dumbasses.

    --
    We want some answers and all that we get
    Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

    - Ministry
    1. Re:Emboldening the enemy by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      "then the advertisers have already won." until you see the size of the bill that Boston and the state of Massachusetts send to the Cartoon Network. That or a civil suite to recover the costs involved in this farce.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  99. Mission Accomplished by CarlHungus · · Score: 0

    Well it looks like the campaign was a complete success. TFA did not forget to mention the up and coming movie: "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" is a cartoon with a cultish following that airs as part of the Adult Swim late-night block of programs for adults on the Cartoon Network. A feature length film based on the show is slated for release March 23.

  100. Re:Personally I think they handled this the right by PenGun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remember now folks ... nothing "potentially interesting" or the terrorists have won.

  101. Tuscon by grued · · Score: 0

    Prepare for a pride-obliterating bitchslap.

  102. Re:As a Bostonian by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

    Well...it DOES border the Peoples Republic of Cambridge.....

    --
    ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
  103. So the /. crowd has bomb experience? NOT.... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    I've been to a briefing put on by some people from the FBI and ATF, and gotten to look at some of the home made devices they had displayed there. Here's what I can tell you:

    1. If you think a bomb has to look like a bomb, you're wrong. They look like absolutely anything - and the junkier it is and more poorly made, the more likely it's real.

    2. Apparently, people who make bombs do so because they have little or no actual skill when it comes to electronics, soldering, carpentry, or any other kind of craftsmanship.

    Finding some junky looking thing attached to a bridge support would be extremely suspect -- more so if it looked like a 4 year old put it together.

    Hell, I was almost embarrassed for the poor idiots that had their craftwork on display. No skills at all. I guess most bomb makers are the equivalent of script kiddies. Some basic knowledge but no skills to speak of.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  104. Re:As a Bostonian by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 1

    Also, I'd say that since guerrilla marketing by definition is outside of the normal channels for marketing, Cartoon Network should not be surprised when the book of law is tossed at them.

    Yes, because in Soviet America, anything outside normal trains of thought is illegal. Questions of terrorism aside, the GP's point does hold water. Not sure why everyone seems to find it amusing/funny when Aqua Teen does it, yet everyone jumped down Microsoft's neck when they did it.
  105. YOUTUBE VIDEO by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bandwidth exceeded. Placed back onto YouTube:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doD_VpT_yAY

  106. Jesus fucking Christ by maynard · · Score: 1

    My city sucks.

  107. crime at all time low in Beantown? by binarybum · · Score: 1

    What puzzles me is how the bomb squad got to these things before anyone stole them? A lit up mooninite would look damn good on my wall.

    --
    ôó
    1. Re:crime at all time low in Beantown? by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      What puzzles me is how the bomb squad got to these things before anyone stole them?
      By the time anyone noticed them, the media had convinced the populace that they were bombs. I don't envision people flocking to the scene of a "bomb" for a quick pilfering...
      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  108. Wow -- I feel safer already -- thanks media/gov't by theworldisflat · · Score: 1

    To quote the great Ron White: You can't fix stupid. /sigh

  109. Re:So the /. crowd has bomb experience? NOT.... by RavensDark · · Score: 1

    You would be amazed at how many of us have have done military service. Bombs that look like they were put together by a 4 year old are as dangerous to the person making them as the target and are not in the majority.

    I have seen IED's that were put together well, easily concealed and VERY effective.......And made by people with little in the way of Official electronics skills. They learn what they need to know. The ones that dont usually blow themselves up in the process.

    --
    "Dark Wings, Dark Words"
  110. Re:As a Bostonian by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The point about zoning -- fine them the normal fine for a violation. But the cost of overreacting is NOT part of the usual fine and those responsible for that cost should bear it (hint: it's the city and the cops, not the advertiser).

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  111. Pics of Zebbler putting the signs up by J05H · · Score: 1

    Here are pics of Zebbler putting the signs up, I think with the Glitchcrew. These are local artists doing the deed for Interference and Cartoon Network. Having lived in Boston for years, and was there on 9/11, I'm somewhat conflicted about this. Should they have gotten permission from the city? These are magnetic signs, not grafiti. The signs were up for two weeks before anyone freaked out.

    http://zebbler.com/intcomp/CartoonNetwork/mission1 /mission1.html

    I can't believe that none of the cops at Sullivan Square saw it and said "hey, that's from a cartoon".

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    1. Re:Pics of Zebbler putting the signs up by geekoid · · Score: 1

      This response, nor the current security paranoia in no way would have stopped 9/11.

      Most security, isn't. This is yet another example of wasted tax dollars.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Pics of Zebbler putting the signs up by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      According to channel 4, Zebbler has been arrested. The city can sleep safely tonight.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    3. Re:Pics of Zebbler putting the signs up by J05H · · Score: 1

      That sucks. Turner better back Zebbler and anyone else up on this. Boston is never really "safe".

      We literally have "security theatre" going on here. They've arrested a performance artist for cartoon crime.

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    4. Re:Pics of Zebbler putting the signs up by J05H · · Score: 1

      "This response, nor the current security paranoia in no way would have stopped 9/11."

      Not a bit. Today's incident is Bruce Schneir's security theatre in action. There's nothing to see here, move along and be scared. Nothing to see here.

      "Most security, isn't. This is yet another example of wasted tax dollars."

      Mayor Menino was saying that it cost $750K in response today, and that they'll be pursuing the responsible parties. How again is a young artist supposed to pay that? Will they pursue the Cartoon Network? Menino also said they'd try to get 2-5 years in prison for anyone involved = the people that put the signs up. The real culprit seems to be whoever reported the "suspicious package" to the police, but they'll be regarded as the anonymous hero that saved the city from some kid with dreadlocks.

      Josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  112. CNN edit by flogger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    CNN is running this article, but the picture has been edited out the offensive finger.

    I find that interesting they will edit a "drawn" finger but will show blody dismembered bodies.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  113. The way I see it... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

    ...is if this means that idiotic advertising executives can't come up with stupid advertising gimmicks like this any more, it's not just the terrorists that are winning - we all win.

  114. What are we paying these cops for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that training the public to distinguish threats is a lost cause, but how can the cops who responded to this situation collect a paycheck with a straight face?

  115. I guess, but I work downtown Boston by sammyo · · Score: 1

    And this is the first I've heard of it. As for the harbor
    they shut it down 2-3 times a week for the scary LNG tankers
    so that infrastructure is in place. As for shutting down
    the big dig, well that's pretty common. Wait, The Charles
    river is frozen over, there are no boats. Did this happen today?
    Ah, yes, very silly.

  116. Let's throw the book at them! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    For littering.

    Attn: mods
    Please assure that your sarcasm detectors are properly calibrated. I would prefer not to have to spend half the night explaining that that is about the only legitimate charge they can lay on them.
    TNX

    "It's about keeping a city on edge. It's about public safety," he said.

    Yeah, just like those phoney color coded terror alerts.

    --
    What?
  117. State of our Paranoid Law Enforcement by ShaunC · · Score: 1

    The cops searched my place a few years ago (trumped up BS, nothing came of it) and found the little "blinker" circuit board from Pink Floyd's "Pulse" box set. I'd taken it out of the case because it had stopped blinking and the battery needed replaced, and I thought it looked cooler sitting around on the bookshelf. They confiscated it, claiming it resembled bomb-making materials. And that was before 9/11 (but not long after Columbine). I'd hate to think what would have happened if they'd found it today, I'd probably be sitting in a cell somewhere.

    I never got the damn thing back, either; to this day I figure the Shelby County Sheriff's Office owes me about $20.

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    1. Re:State of our Paranoid Law Enforcement by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      You actually have to file a request to get your stuff back. Otherwise they'll just keep it forever or until they decide to throw it out or sell it.

      Doesn't really matter what it is that they confiscate. If you don't file the paperwork you're not going to get it back.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    2. Re:State of our Paranoid Law Enforcement by amazon10x · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doesn't really matter what it is that they confiscate. If you don't file the paperwork you're not going to get it back.
      They seem to have confiscated my freedoms. Is there a form I can file to get those back?
    3. Re:State of our Paranoid Law Enforcement by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      You actually have to file a request to get your stuff back. Otherwise they'll just keep it forever or until they decide to throw it out or sell it.
      Interesting, and I'm not surprised in the least that they never bothered to inform me as such. Their search was questionable to begin with, so it's no surprise that they didn't bother to inform me that I had any rights. All I ever wanted was to get my goddamn Pulse pulser back :)

      At this juncture, I hope they've discarded it. I'd be even more pissed to think that they sold it to anyone.
      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    4. Re:State of our Paranoid Law Enforcement by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      They don't really tell anyone that. About the only way that anyone ever finds that out is to start asking questions.

      Another dirty little secret is that you really need to hire a lawyer to make sure your records are expunged of some charge even after the court orders it because the people who actually do it will often "forget".

      Thankfully that's not something that I know from personal experience but rather something that I've learned from the experiences of others.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    5. Re:State of our Paranoid Law Enforcement by amazon10x · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this funny has a very sick sense of humor.

  118. Terror-ism by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >We don't even need terrorists anymore. All it takes to shut down a city is cowering, whimpering, losers afraid of their own shadow.

    "No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices" -- Edward R. Murrow

    1. Re:Terror-ism by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Sadly, that isn't true. The terrorist only needs enough accomplices to make policies opressive, paranoid and idiotic. Say 30%. Then the other 70% can be terrified of their government. It's like the domino theory of stupidity.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:Terror-ism by syukton · · Score: 1

      Then the other 70% can be terrified of their government.
      That's the point of the quote: an entire nation cannot be terrorized unless everyone is willing to be in a state of terror all the time.
      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  119. dear Gov. Deval Patrick by geekoid · · Score: 1

    We are not here for your amusement, you are there to serve us.

    It seems most people don't give a rats ass about the finger, and you should reflect that...that IS your job in a republic.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  120. Please mod up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD UP

  121. Flashing Lights and/or Whirligigs. by s388 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The police apparently learned what bombs look like from hollywood movies and comic books.

    The MPAA should definitely foot the bill.

    1. Re:Flashing Lights and/or Whirligigs. by Dilaudid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The police apparently learned what bombs look like from hollywood movies and comic books. Modded funny but it should be modded insightful. Homeland and other security types appear to have understood the least important 5% of how to deal with risk - look out for the obvious. This should be a last chance precaution to make sure something awful isn't happening. Unfortunately they appear to have made it 50% of their strategy.

      The other lesson they seem to have learnt is how to avoid the precise event that just happened - so airport security bans knives (despite the high probability that a terrorist with just a knife would get beaten to death on an airplane now).
      They ban lighters and check the soles of your shoes (in case like Richard Reid, you choose to have an explosive, detonated via a burning fuse, in the bottom of your shoes).
      They ban liquids, but not malleable plasticised materials, on the grounds that people once planned to use liquid explosives.

      The parrot like nature of the security services is frankly embarassing. I can see two reasons why they do this - 1) fear of getting fired - if a terrorist does something exactly the same way and succeeds a second time then you look grossly incompetent, and will get fired, and 2) security does not attract the brightest sparks. The better wages and conditions in the private sector, IT, meds, energy etc. attract away the intelligent people we need running this stuff.

      This ad campaign won't do anything to fix it, didn't even try, but the ad geek who came up with it deserves massive respect. Exposing publicly funded stupidity like this deserves an award. I just hope that many many heads roll.
    2. Re:Flashing Lights and/or Whirligigs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's a quote from our Attorney General, as reported by The Boston Globe:

      "For those who responded to it, professionals, it had a very sinister appearance," Coakley said. "It had a battery behind it and wires."

      Ooooo! Batteries and wires! Be very afraid! These are professionals and they can't take one look at an exposed circuit board and recognize a simple LED blinking circuit? Do we teach our bomb squads anything about electronics? One would think that they know how to design and build various kinds of timer and trigger circuits, so that they can recognize and dismantle them safely in the field.

      I'm in the Boston area, and I'm embarrassed by the paniced reaction we had.

    3. Re:Flashing Lights and/or Whirligigs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Boston Bomb Squad should all be fired immediately! How safe do you feel in Boston if the bomb squad can't tell the difference between a Lite-Brite and a bomb. You can however say conclusively that not one single member of the Boston PD watches Aqua Teen Hunger Force.

    4. Re:Flashing Lights and/or Whirligigs. by CuddleBooGirl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When we heard about this on the news, my husband and i couldn't stop laughing. This is an expense that the cops and city gov't should just swallow. The fact that stunt consumed so much air time and police time is the fault of the people who should have dug deeper. They have already humiliated themselves enough... suck it up, boys! In response to "feeling safer" that Boston Police are on it is ridiculous. You should feel even more nervous that they are spending time and your money by chasing down a cartoon character. There go your tax dollars at work!

    5. Re:Flashing Lights and/or Whirligigs. by YOUREALLYRSICK · · Score: 1

      Have the Keystone Cops finally been replaced by Boston Police Department? Not really, the Keystone Cops were at least pathetically FUNNY, not just PATHETIC.

    6. Re:Flashing Lights and/or Whirligigs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      ADVISORY TO BOSTON POLICE AND BOMB SQUAD

      At various street intersections throughout the city there are strange rectangular boxes with flashing lights (red, yellow, green).

      NOTE: THESE ARE NOT BOMBS. They are called traffic lights. Please consult with somebody who knows something about these mysterious objects before shutting down the city's traffic and blowing them up.

    7. Re:Flashing Lights and/or Whirligigs. by KIFulgore · · Score: 1

      "1) fear of getting fired - if a terrorist does something exactly the same way and succeeds a second time then you look grossly incompetent, and will get fired, and 2) security does not attract the brightest sparks."

      Ding ding ding!!

      Any way I can mod this up to 6?

      --
      - For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.
  122. I know we're not all engineers, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't it be more or less common knowledge that explosive devices have to contain...explosives?

    Surely at least the police should realize that "wires and circuit boards" cannot explode, and the pictures make it clear that the construction of these things is entirely transparent.

  123. Marketing Geniuses! by PlaysByEar · · Score: 1

    I will go see the ATHF movie now!

  124. Arrest Made In Boston's Hoax Device Incident by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

    (WBZ) BOSTON Boston police say they have made in arrest in connection to the suspicious device scare that turned out to be a marketing ploy for a television cartoon. The suspect was arrested in Arlington Wednesday night.

    The scare forced bomb units to scramble across Boston all day. The "devices" were actually magnetic lights which resemble a character on the show "Aqua Teen Hunger Force", on Turner Broadcasting's Cartoon Network.

    WBZ spoke with the suspect's lawyer, who said the Mass. College of Art student did cooperate with police. His lawyer also tells us the suspect is an exchange student from Belarus.

    The student was apparently working for InterferenceInc.com, which was the company hired by Cartoon Network to carry out the ad campaign.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Arrest Made In Boston's Hoax Device Incident by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Gah! It's not a hoax! Turner did not place things out there, and request $1 million
      ransom. NOT A HOAX. Stupid? Sure, all around. Intentionally malicious? No.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  125. from a Bostonian by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Funny

    Likewise I've only heard Boston-based posters complaining about how this was irresponsible and something that obviously looked a lot like a bomb so it needed to be investigated.

    I'm from Boston. I stood on the subway for a over an hour (normal ride time: 30 minutes or so) because of these dipshit "indie" artists that did this for Turner. Check out one of their websites. Wow, aren't they cool? They know how to use animation programs, video projectors, video cameras, and have dreadlocks. They use pen-names that sound uber-cool, and lots of hip artist-y language.

    They should have heard the language on the subway when the conductor announced we'd be delayed because Sullivan Station was shut down on account of "a suspicious package."

    Their stunt shut down 93 North, the orange line, several Charles River bridges (which are heavily trafficked.) These idiots planted electronic devices on private and public property, something they knew they shouldn't do, over-reactions from police aside. Let's be absolutely clear here: these clowns had zero business putting this stuff on property that wasn't theirs and they knew it, but decided to ignore that, because this whole thing probably made them some pot money.

    One of them is sitting in jail, as of about half an hour ago. Let's see how he likes being inconvenienced.

    1. Re:from a Bostonian by realityfighter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like Boston has a healthy appreciation of the arts.

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    2. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm from Boston. I stood on the subway for a over an hour (normal ride time: 30 minutes or so) because of these dipshit authorities who completely over reacted.

      Fixed that for you.

    3. Re:from a Bostonian by SuperBanana · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Boston has a healthy appreciation of the arts.

      We do. We're home to The Boston Museum of Fine Arts, The Institute of Contemporary Art, The DeCordova Museum, and dozens of smaller installations in Massachusetts' 100+ colleges.

      Looking for something arty in Boston? According to The Boston Globe's Arts and Entertainment Section there's no shortage.

      Looking for public installations? We had CowParade cows which were placed all around the city and auctioned off for charity, for example. They were placed in public spaces after being painted by various groups or companies (for example, a local ice cream chain's staff painted one.)

      The MBTA may have a tumultuous relationship with them, but there are quite a number of subway platform musicians, some of whom are extremely talented and enjoyed by thousands of MBTA customers. You'll find them in almost any station that sees a decent amount of foot traffic and is protected from the elements.

      The MBTA also regularly purchases and installs artwork. Some of the stuff that was put on the Red Line around the early 90's is interactive- there's a gong which can be rang by moving a ratchet handle on the wall, and chimes at the MIT/Kendall stop which can be rung from either platform via similar handles. To this day, people still walk up and ring them.

      THIS STUNT WAS NOT ART. THESE WERE DISPOSABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES OF A PURELY COMMERCIAL, PROMOTIONAL NATURE, WITH A LIMITED LIFETIME, PLACED BY A BUNCH OF CASH-HUNGRY IDIOTS FOR A NATIONAL CORPORATION.

    4. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking for public installations? We had CowParade cows which were placed all around the city and auctioned off for charity, for example. They were placed in public spaces after being painted by various groups or companies (for example, a local ice cream chain's staff painted one.)

      So the real question is, did you think they were bombs too?

    5. Re:from a Bostonian by metamatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Their stunt shut down 93 North, the orange line, several Charles River bridges (which are heavily trafficked.)

      No, the authorities shut down everything, in a massive overreaction to what was obviously an art project or a harmless prank.

      My first thought on seeing a big flashing LED display attached to a bridge would be "Ah, MIT students playing again." I'm seriously surprised the Boston police didn't consider that the explanation. Are they unaware of all the previous MIT pranks?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    6. Re:from a Bostonian by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Their stunt didn't shut down shit. Some paranoid idiots and your fuckin' mayor and police over reacted and screwed up your day. People aren't allowed to be creative and express themselves? We have to sanitize our way of life to appease some unachievable level of immunity from evil? Watch what we say and think? May as well just move to fuckin' China then. After being up for days without a problem, shit hit the fan. Your mayor sounds like he's pissed that they were duped and looked like an asshole. Instead of filing charges, they should let the artist out of jail and spend their time and money on public awareness programs. Idiots.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    7. Re:from a Bostonian by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Get ready for this sort of thing to happen every other day. Now that Boston has shown the world how much of a bunch of paranoid assholes they are, every dork with an agenda and some light brights is going to shut your city down every time they get bored!

      I mean, damn, the people in Dallas, or San Fransisco, or New York, or any of the other cities didn't have to wait an hour because of an imagined bomb threat. Oh, thats right, they aren't morons!

    8. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the real question is, have you been spayed or neutered yet?

    9. Re:from a Bostonian by Belgand · · Score: 1

      I understand your anger. Seriously, this must have sucked for you guys. The problem is that all of the responses I'm hearing are basically along the lines of "I live in Boston and this was a huge pain in the ass for me so these guys are total bastards who should have known better." The problem is that Boston was the only city out of ten that had a problem as a result of this. So yeah, I can sympathize that you're pissed, but be pissed at the police and their overblown response to it. They overreacted to a fucking lite-brite simply because they didn't recognize the character on it. And yeah, it was pretty stupid from the perspective of an ad, even for guerrilla marketing, since there was no way for anyone who wasn't already in the know to take anything away from it. The best they could have hoped for was a friend who said "Oh, it's a reference to a show that you don't watch"

      In short it's not about whether this was a good ad campaign, how clever the people who put it together think they are, or how badly inconvenienced you are and want someone to lash out at in response (may I suggest... hmm... Iraq? Oh wait, they're not the hip scapegoat and Afghanistan is so old it's coming up on retro-cool for mindless backlashes... maybe get in on the ground floor and take it out on Iran?) it's about the fear that anything you don't immediately understand is supposedly a threat (ah... the American Way!) and the post-9/11 fear culture that terrorists are everywhere just waiting to strike (a fun twist on all that excitingly retro Red Scare paranoia!).

      Accept that Boston was the only place where anyone even remotely gave a shit about this, blame your local cops, and get over it.

    10. Re:from a Bostonian by FiveLights · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should direct some of this anger at the police who reacted the way that they did. Had they not, you would not have been so put out.

    11. Re:from a Bostonian by wilsotc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You sheep. So your mentally retarded local government pisses everyone in the city off, then blames it on this guy for putting up signs that looked so much like bombs that the bomb squad doesn't thing to use anything more protective than nitrile gloves to handle them see: http://www.drudgereport.com/boston.jpg ?? And you're blaming the guy from Turner? Hope you like the reich.

      Sieg Heil

      Idiot

    12. Re:from a Bostonian by entrigant · · Score: 1

      THEY shut down the subway, bridges, and interstate? No sir, your fine city government did. They had the FBI BLOW THESE THINGS UP they were so scared. I can't believe someone would piss themselves over a line drawing of a cartoon character done with leds connected to a few batteries. Have you even seen pictures of these "devices"? It's a board with some leds and a few batteries... wtf. These goons didn't inconvenience you. You're retarded fuck local government did.

    13. Re:from a Bostonian by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Here here!

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    14. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and I should have definitely known better than to try to carry a 2oz bottle of hot sauce through airport security without it being contained within a 32oz clear zip-lock bag.

      Maybe these people should have just put their devices within zip-lock bags so that anybody could plainly see they were harmless.

      dom

    15. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no blame for the morons who shut everything down over a light brite?

      Here's a cookie.

    16. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job undoing the civility and insightfulness of the majority of your post by concluding in all bold caps so you can look like a fucking moron, and thereby not only eliminating any empathy for your situation, but making people like me feel shadenfreude for it.

    17. Re:from a Bostonian by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      They use pen-names that sound uber-cool, and lots of hip artist-y language

      Good dectective work SuperBanana!

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    18. Re:from a Bostonian by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      I'm from Boston. I stood on the subway for a over an hour (normal ride time: 30 minutes or so) because of these dipshit "indie" artists that did this for Turner.

      No, you did that because your government is full of idiots. Hopefully, they'll be sued for wrongful prosecution.

    19. Re:from a Bostonian by Skapare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I stood on the subway for a over an hour (normal ride time: 30 minutes or so) because of these dipshit "indie" artists that did this for Turner.

      NO ... you stood on the subway for over an hour because your city is run by a bunch of incompetent jackasses that only know how to overreact and create a panic over a bunch of blinking lights that had been there for days with no problems. You stood on the subway for over an hour because someone saw that one of these signs was flipping the bird and them and got pissed off and called in (on a payphone) to the city and claimed it was a bomb (this act being the hoax act).

      You'll probably have a lot more of this in Boston in the future, too, if you don't admit that it is the fault of the city and do what it takes to get some major turnover to get some competent people running the place. Remember, it didn't cause a panic in any of the several other cities they showed up in. The rest of the country is laughing at Boston and all those headless chickens in police uniforms running around. The feeling you should have right now is one of embarassment and shame (if you're supporting those city people that did this).

      Their stunt shut down 93 North, the orange line, several Charles River bridges (which are heavily trafficked.)

      No it didn't. The devices were there for days. And they were in other cities, too. It was the stupid incompetent police/city officials that shut things down. The rest of us are laughing at Boston.

      One of them is sitting in jail, as of about half an hour ago. Let's see how he likes being inconvenienced.

      He should be there for trespassing and vandalism. That's the first crime that was done. The next crime was days later, and was done by some yet-unnamed incompetent city official who, unlike his counterparts in other cities, doesn't have a clue. The police really arrested this guy to try to cover up their own incompetence.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    20. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the reason this overraction crippled Boston for awhile is that the infrastructure in the city is so awful that it takes very little to bring everything to a grinding halt. A little snow, some rain, the sun being in a particular point in the sky - things like this on a regular day will bring traffic grinding to a halt.

      I know there are other places in the country where traffic is just as bad - Dallas, Atlanta, etc. - but Boston seems particularly succeptable to hair-trigger events causing massive issues. There are a lot of historical and environmental reasons for this, but the main problem is that there just aren't any feasible alternate routes for the major traffic corridors.

      I'm pretty sure the reason most Bostonians are pissed off about this stuff is purely due to the inconvenience caused by the messed up traffic. It's the same irrational irate ranting I hear from my wife when a truck rolls over, or there is a lane closure that was supposed to be open by 2 and they were just opening it up at 3 (got a 10 minute diatribe about the relative mental capabilities of the public works employees and the gross misuse of her tax money on that one yesterday).

      By the same token, public officials certainly overplayed the issue, grandstanding to the media, who are more than happy to play along. I kid you not, last night on the news there was still one of these signs stuck to Fenway Park, long after everyone knew what they were, and the police had the area cordoned off, there were news helicopters flying over the area zooming in on closeups of the sign. They interviewed the owner of the bar across the street from it, where he said it showed up about 2 weeks ago.

      I've got no problem with being somewhat cautious on the first one, but having the mayor and governor grandstanding on TV, throwing out threats (2 years in jail per package found) and turning into a giant circus only made things much worse than they had to be. But you gotta show that you're "tough on terror" right?

      The rest of the ballyhoo is just revenge for being exposed as the asses they are.

    21. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to basically agree with the parent on the artistic value of the signs. I'm tired of people lionizing Berdovsky and Stevens. The term guerrilla art suggests that they were being subversive, and sticking it to the man in some way. I'm all for that. But guerrilla marketers are just sticking the man in everyone's face.

      Just because they ended up on the opposite end of the stick from a bunch of dipshits doesn't make them heroes. And just because the ads were kind of cool and accidentally created a hilarious uproar doesn't change the fact that these guys were getting paid to help a company appropriate public property (and other people's private property) for commercial purposes. When do we get to look forward to having guerrilla artists stenciling Nike Swooshes on our cars?

    22. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a freaking idiot.

    23. Re:from a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking for public installations? We had CowParade [cowparade.com] cows which were placed all around the city and auctioned off for charity, for example. They were placed in public spaces after being painted by various groups or companies (for example, a local ice cream chain's staff painted one.)

      The MBTA may have a tumultuous relationship with them, but there are quite a number of subway platform musicians [communitya...ocates.org], some of whom are extremely talented and enjoyed by thousands of MBTA customers. You'll find them in almost any station that sees a decent amount of foot traffic and is protected from the elements.


      Omg, I'm late to the game ... but what if the terrorists hid their bombs in Cows or Street Performers?! What would we do then? Would we be inconvienced when they blew up? What if they were all reported as suspicious objects?!

      I think the fact that Atlanta was never shut down by Lite Brites giving you the finger is proof that Boston is fucked up. You'd think it wouldn't be the case in such a goddamn Mecca for geeks.

    24. Re:from a Bostonian by ckedge · · Score: 1

      You're the same idiot that'd be screaming bloody murder if they blew off a report about a suspicious device and a bomb exploded and killed some people.

    25. Re:from a Bostonian by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Making your way in the world today takes everything you've got.
      Taking a break from all your worries, sure would help a lot.

      Wouldn't you like to get away?

      Sometimes you want to go

      Where everybody knows your name,
      and they're always glad you came.
      You wanna be where you can see,
      our troubles are all the same
      You wanna be where everybody knows
      Your name.

      You wanna go where people know,
      people are all the same,
      You wanna go where everybody knows
      your name.

  126. Dude. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Real IEDs do not have flashing lights or a ticking clock on them, unlike the movies would have you believe.

    How anyone could confuse these things for anything dangerous makes me wonder how incredibly stupid the people in charge of our security really are.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Dude. by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      If you've flown a plane in the past couple years you would know exactly how mind-blowingly stupid the people in charge of our security really are.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:Dude. by Trogre · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Great. So all Mr Ackmuhllakhmud has to do is cover his nail bomb on the sidewalk with pretty flashing lights and the authorities will just call it art and ignore it.

      Just because a bomb doesn't need flashing lights or ticking clocks don't assume for a second that something fitting that description is harmless. Darwin awards aside, I'd just as soon not see you get hurt.

      How quickly people seem to forget events such as the Oklohoma bombings or 9/11. Just because Cmdr Cookoo in the Whitehouse uses terrorism as an excuse to push through crazy laws to restrict our freedom doesn't mean that terrorism is not a very, very real threat. The american dream of some zero-vigilance 1950's utopia died long ago, if it ever existed. Modern ballistics and bomb chemistry have irreversibly changed the survival traits for societies.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:Dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How quickly people seem to forget events such as the Oklohoma bombings or 9/11.
      And it's a good thing they did. Otherwise every single parked car would be considered a potential bomb thread, and there's much more room for explosives in even the smallest of cars than behind a blinking LED sign. Just because not all cars and trucks contain bombs, do you really think you should have the right to drive wherever you desire, much less leave a parked car anywhere near populated areas?
    4. Re:Dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Modern ballistics and bomb chemistry have irreversibly changed the survival traits for societies."

      A society will survive even if large fractions of its population die. That's not something that can ever be achieved with a handful of dinky "bombs" like the ones under discussion, or even a handful of nukes (did the USA collapse when New Orleans was destroyed?). If you want your society and way of life to continue, you must ensure it's resilient to damage rather than reacting in full force to every little threat.

      Even the survival traits for individuals have nothing to do with terrorism. Eating healthily and avoiding car travel and cigarettes is much more important for surviving.

    5. Re:Dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. So all Mr Ackmuhllakhmud has to do is cover his nail bomb on the sidewalk with pretty flashing lights and the authorities will just call it art and ignore it.

      Thank you for the sterotyping.

      How quickly people seem to forget events such as the Oklohoma bombings or 9/11

      Thank you for showing that terrorist aren't all Arab. Here is where you make parents point. The Oklohoma city bombing was done with a LARGE TRUCK filled with Explosives.

      We are talking about a damn sign. And unless that sign is made of a malleable substance like plastique there is no way that it could have posed a threat.

      I didn't actually see any footage on TV until after the whole thing was deemed a hoax but my first reaction was "how could this possibly be a bomb". Group think 4tl.

      This whole "waste of resources" is stupidity at its finest, and the effect of "chain of command". Everyone involved defers to someone higher up. We are then "on alert" because only 4 people have actually looked at the damn things, and they are too stupid to realize that it's a sign, a charachter even, commonly shown on TV. Clearly information is not getting to the "decision makers" or as is in fashion now, the "decider".

    6. Re:Dude. by Emil+S+Hansen · · Score: 1
      Great. So all Mr Ackmuhllakhmud has to do is cover his nail bomb on the sidewalk with pretty flashing lights and the authorities will just call it art and ignore it.


      Oh my god, do you really go around and FEAR that some one might have planted a bomb on your way? Do you know the odds, the chances that you will die in a terroist attack?

      If you are the least bit sane, you see terroist attacks as the LEAST likely secnario of all, if not, the terrorist (or fear mongers?) have surely beaten the U.S.

      So next time you see something suspecious, please don't be scared! Write it off to something harmless and stop worrying about it.

      --
      Will work for bandwidth!
    7. Re:Dude. by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1
      Real IEDs do not have flashing lights or a ticking clock on them, unlike the movies would have you believe.

      IIRC, the bomb that took down Pan Am 103 looked like a cassette player.

    8. Re:Dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes, that's it exactly: I think everyone here can agree that thanks to "modern ballistics and bomb chemistry," as you say, it is very easy to build a weapon that looks like an everyday object, if it is visible at all. That's why it is acceptable to assume that any object abandoned on, say, a train, is a bomb, and it is thus rational to spend out finite security resources handling that object as a bomb. But given the fact that building a bomb that looks like an everyday object is not a problem, the fact that our security resources are limited is exactly why we should NOT go around treating absolutely any unidentified object as a bomb. That's what makes this whole thing so frustratingly dumb. Here you have a series of objects that clearly fail to meet any of the criteria we use for identifying bombs (it's not near people, it's very small, its contents can be ascertained by looking at it, so forth), and when the cops waste their time handling these objects as bombs they turn around and blame the people who put them there.

      I totally agree: terrorism is a very real threat, but there is no possible way we can ever be vigilant enough to eliminate this threat. The best we can do is mitigate it, so we need to use rationality to sort meaningful threats from made-up ones. Irrational responses like this make us less safe.

    9. Re:Dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So jumping at every shadow and living in fear are now survival traits? Fuck that noise! I'd much rather live in a free, open, relaxed society where every few decades some nimrod gets lucky and manages to kill 1/10,000 of the population in an attack.

      Every single day of my life, I come within inches of death from dozens of sources, none of which are terrorists. (So do you. Sleep tight!) And I'm supposed to hide in my basement and give the government total surveillance authority over me so that I can be protected from something that isn't even in the top 100 threats to my personal safety? No. I refuse. I wish the rest of you would too.

    10. Re:Dude. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      (it's not near people, But it is on a fucking bridge pillar. Or in a subway station under a fucking highway crossing. Perfect places where bombs would do most of damage (by collapsing the bridge, the subways station etc.).

  127. Beats the hell out of talking about... by Mix+Master+Nixon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the Scooter Libby trial, where "copies of handwritten notes by Vice President Dick Cheney, introduced at trial by defense attorneys for former White House staffer I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, would appear to implicate George W. Bush in the Plame CIA Leak case". http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/013107Z.shtml

    If there's one thing you can rely on, it's bad news for the Adminstration being accompanied by a hyped-up terror scare that turns out to be nothing.

    --
    Oppressing an entire population is never cheap.
    --Jeckler (/. Beta IS GARBAGE!)
  128. Those Crazy Terrorists! by Stanislav_J · · Score: 1

    What a neat idea! Putting flashing lights and cartoon characters on bombs! What will those silly jihadists think of next? (Hey, can I get some of those, but with Scooby Doo taking a dump on them?)

    --
    "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
  129. Ebay by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    I want one. Anyone managed to find one and put it up on ebay?

    1. Re:Ebay by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      I want one.

      +1! That would look great on my wall. This is a great merchandising opportunity for Comedy Central.

    2. Re:Ebay by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      or Cartoon Network? oops, what was I thinking?

    3. Re:Ebay by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "I want one. Anyone managed to find one and put it up on ebay?"

      Cheap LED Christnas lights via eBay, black spray paint and perfboard from Home Depot.

      Use one of the MANY pictures as your guide as you stick the LEDs through the holes in your painted black slab of perfboard.

      INSTANT TERRORIST BOMB!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  130. Re:After seeing the photographs I think I'd be pis by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

    It was a prank. Lately the government has treated us like uniform consumer units. You have to step in line, work overtime, spend more money then you make. If you step out of line, then you have to be dealt with. I can't believe we are governed by the stupidest people that money could buy. Call the bomb squad on a bunch of light brites (effectively). These idiots in government are ruining what used to be a great country.

    In Iraq; "enemy combatants" are "terrorists and insurgents". To the Iraqi people do we look like insurgents. Just because they fight unconventional war doesn't make them terrorists. If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen.

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  131. Re:So the /. crowd has bomb experience? NOT.... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    And yet, you could check one and see that it's innocuous and then not make such a big
    deal about the others (though still check them). Sure they were on bridges, but they
    were also on used record stores, Blockbusters, etc. etc. Them be some prime targets...

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  132. Re:As a Bostonian by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just keep feeding that fear. It gets hungrier every minute doesn't it?

    The less we know, the more people's imaginations go wild, like apparently yours did.

    If you're comparing a frickin plane crashing into the WTC to someone finding a lite-brite connected to a battery, I guess I can't help you. The media now goes on full-alert anytime there's ANYTHING that's not immediately explainable as not-terrorism. Are you really trying to tell me you're still willing to keep believing them at this point because "it might just be real"? Exactly how does getting all paranoid and frightened help anyone?

    --
    AccountKiller
  133. Bombs Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A freind of mine, while in high school, before the days of the internet had heard of pipe bombs, and him and his brother decided to make one. A quick trip to the hardware store, and they buy some 2in pipe, about 9inches long. Their dad relaoded shells, so there was enough black powder to almost fill the sucker up. They figured an estes rocket igniter was good enough to set off the powder, and they had them selves a pipe bomb.

    Anyone with the internet now knows that 2inch pipe bombs are very large! This was the old dark days before this was public knowledge.

    They figured if they used a dumpster behind some offices near their house at night, that would contain the explosion, and there would be a lotta noise and that is about it. They get everything together, head over to the parking lot that night, drop the pipe in the dumpster, hide around a cinder block wall, have a short count down 5...4...3...2...1

    ****KABOOM****

    The dumpster top was gone! the sides looked like 50mm rounds had been shot through it a zillion times. The cinderblock wall was about half knocked down. They were lucky they were still alive (or not). Everyone ran, and didn't talk about it.

    A few days later, the police knocked on this guys door. They had a friendly chat, about making bombs, and it was a learning experience, there was some damage, but no one got hurt. There was some restitution to pay, some homeowner about a half mile away found a 6 inch hole in his roof and a 2in pipe end in the attic, they wanted the dumpster paid for and the cinderblock wall repaired. I think overall it was a couple grand.

    Remember this was 30 years ago, an innocent time, that we have completely lost. Today, this kid would be going to jail for terrorism or worse. No restitution, nothing, quick trip to gitmo, and his identity erased. The terrorists have won.

  134. A resounding success by trancemist · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd say their marketing campaign was a resounding success.

    As for the over reactions of the Storm Troopers? idjits, they are.

  135. Winner of the "City who needs to relax" prize by ehiris · · Score: 1

    Boston

    This thing has been displayed in other cities but only Boston got scared and implemented high security measures without even researching what those characters are.

    Maybe people in Boston should start hitting the Moonijuana.

  136. plutonians are teh suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you heard me...

  137. No, they weren't new by Woundweavr · · Score: 1

    The advertisements were there for at least two weeks before this "scare." If they had been bombs, they wouldn't have been left out for weeks with flashing lights.
    So either they:
    Overreacted to a device that didn't warrant shutting down most of the city. A device that didn't resemble a bomb, didn't contain any chemicals that would be necessary for an explosive device and was designed to attract attention.
    or
    Missed a device that warranted that level of response for at least two weeks. One that flashed bright lights and was designed to attract attention.

    Either way, my city should be embarrassed.

  138. He said, "What were you arrested for, kid?"... by mikelieman · · Score: 1

    Consider the police response in Alice's Restaurant...

    http://www.arlo.net/resources/lyrics/alices.shtml

    "And I, I walked over to the, to the bench there, and there is, Group W's
    where they put you if you may not be moral enough to join the army after
    committing your special crime, and there was all kinds of mean nasty ugly
    looking people on the bench there. Mother rapers. Father stabbers. Father
    rapers! Father rapers sitting right there on the bench next to me! And
    they was mean and nasty and ugly and horrible crime-type guys sitting on the
    bench next to me. And the meanest, ugliest, nastiest one, the meanest
    father raper of them all, was coming over to me and he was mean 'n' ugly
    'n' nasty 'n' horrible and all kind of things and he sat down next to me
    and said, "Kid, whad'ya get?" I said, "I didn't get nothing, I had to pay
    $50 and pick up the garbage." He said, "What were you arrested for, kid?"
    And I said, "Littering." And they all moved away from me on the bench
    there, and the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean nasty things, till I
    said, "And creating a nuisance." And they all came back, shook my hand,
    and we had a great time on the bench, talkin about crime, mother stabbing,
    father raping, all kinds of groovy things that we was talking about on the
    bench. "

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
    1. Re:He said, "What were you arrested for, kid?"... by Altus · · Score: 1


      I bet they took a lot more than 27 8x10 color glossy photos with pictures and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was to be used as evidence.

      and that not to mention all the aerial photography

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  139. ATHF by Angelwrath · · Score: 1

    That show sucks. Absolute crap.

  140. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1, Offtopic

  141. Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG! LED Throwies! Run for your lives! It's terrorists I tell ya!
     
    ...Any guesses as to how long will it be until this stunt is mentioned in the AS screen between spots?

  142. More importantly by steady_now · · Score: 1

    How did so many devices that look like bombs get planted all over 10 major cities? And why aren't any of the officials worrying about that?

    1. Re:More importantly by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You think we should arrange our society so that people can't drop off packages on the side of the road? Fucking martial law, tanks, checkpoints can't stop that. You can't be 100% safe. Trying makes things horrible. Please stop.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  143. Moderators by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

    Please mark entire thread -5 Stupid.

    Thanks!

  144. What the? by wheatwilliams · · Score: 1

    You guys need to learn how to rewrite and edit these story descriptions.

    I read this one and had absolutely no idea what the submitter was talking about. It was gibberish.

    The description said nothing to inform the reader that this was about a cartoon program on a cable television channel, depicting characters named "Ignignot" and "Err".

    The first sentence of the AP wire story that this post refers to explained things intelligibly: "Nine blinking electronic devices planted at bridges and other spots in Boston threw a scare into the city Wednesday in what turned out to be a marketing campaign for a late-night cable cartoon."

    That explains things.

    You should not assume that your readers already know what the heck you are writing about. Good writing informs the un-informed; it doesn't cater only to people who watch obscure television programs.

  145. Re:So the /. crowd has bomb experience? NOT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    And yet, you could check one and see that it's innocuous and then not make such a big deal about the others (though still check them).

    Sure. But guess what? If you see one on a bridge and you think it's innocuous, but you still want to check them, it means you have to ***close off the roads*** for the safety of people who might be on ladders or lifts. That's pretty much what happened. It's not like the mayor ordered a mass evacuation.

  146. Sound monitoring equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I worked for a company that designed sound level meters and dosimeters. Government has many regulations to the time of day and the level of sounds that factories, aircraft and other things can produce. Our devices were purchased and used to monitor that noise creators were in compliance with regulations. The devices record events as the time, noise level and frequencies when they are over the levels (audio isn't recorded).

    I do recall a story that as part of a monitoring campaign one of the devices was left strapped to a telephone pole. It was reported to the authorities and the bomb squad blew it up because it looked suspicious. It was a $5,000 device and this was maybe ten years ago - well before 2001.

    Yep, you leave something in a public are expect it to be vandalized, stolen or blown up. People in charge should expect stuff to be placed or left in public places. It's the cost of doing business for both sides.

  147. "Uh-oh. Someone's going to get an email." by qralston · · Score: 2, Funny

    The funny thing is, for a few weeks now, Adult Swim has been talking in their bumps about having no idea how to promote the upcoming ATHF movie.

    Well, they certainly solved that problem, didn't they? I don't think they intentionally tried to create a scare, but man oh man, you can't buy publicity like this.

    As of this moment, the Drudge Report main page has an image of Err flying the bird.

    Brit Hume said "Meatwad".

    If I had actually been watching TV live when this story broke, I think I actually might have passed out from laughing.

    --
    Your bank is insolvent.
    Taking Money Back
  148. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  149. It worked. by one_red_eye · · Score: 1

    It made national news.

  150. I'm embarassed to live in Boston by sceo · · Score: 1

    It's unbelievable to me how stupid people are around here. I would expect this if Bush was our governor and was trying to cause a panic... but these people are just plain dumb. Perhaps I'll take the circuit board's advice: "Using a key to gouge expletives on another's vehicle is a sign of trust and friendship." http://www.its530somewhere.com/node/96

    1. Re:I'm embarassed to live in Boston by Skapare · · Score: 1

      And the finger is now aimed at the incompetent Boston city officials. Expect many copies of these things to be made. They'll show up at people's homes and in cars. The whole city will be in a panic for months while the rest of the country laughs.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  151. Re:As a Bostonian by hrieke · · Score: 1

    Okay- I see you have missed my point.
    Where have I allowed my imagination to go wild?
    I believe that is what most people would call scarasm.

    So, I'll write this nice a slow you can follow:
    When the lite-brite adverts where found, they where unknown object in a public place, on or near mass transportation, and I feel that the police's reaction to them was correct- locate the device and treat it as a weapon until otherwise proven not to be.

    When the media reports that the police are moving to secure these unknown objects, and that they are treating the objects as potentially dangerous, that of course gets my attention, and the attention of the nation.

    Did I say I was afraid? No. Did I worry? Not really. I know that we have professional people who are on hand to assess the problem and take care of it. At worst I was worried that my commute would be extended.

    Back to my original point here- when dealing with an unknown object in a city rich with potential targets, those who placed the guerrilla marketing gizmos should expect a great deal of attention from the local authorities.

    There are things you DO NOT DO, and this is one of them.

    I hope you can understand that- if not, well then, there is no use in continuing this conversation.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  152. Re:Personally I think they handled this the right by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

    Ok, to address the several outrageous things you said:

    "Flame me all you want, but all you people thinking this was blown way out of proportion aren't thinking very realisticly"

    Realistically, it was blown out of proportion. It was, in reality, not a bomb, so the response was by definition unrealistic.

    "But one thing that any soldier who has fought in any conflict will tell you is that you NEVER touch something that catches your eye as potentially interesting until you can determine that it's not dangerous."

    Okay, just because you are at war does not mean Boston is a place of "conflict". If you feel it is, that Boston is in actuality a warzone, in the sense that Baghdad, Cu Chi, or Iwo Jima were warzones, then you should probably just stay at home, and let everybody else who has a decent assessment of the probable risks get on with their business. This doesn't even address the fact that many soldiers don't know that, since it still has some efficacy.

    "These things could very well have been rigged with explosives or biologic/chemical agents. The flashing lights could have been intended to attract attention to them."

    They could have also been a new form of slot machine, wrongly configured, which would put a million dollars in your bank account when you stepped near them. I only mention it since you are talking "realisticly".

    "If I was a terrorist and wanted to maximize casualties in a major metropolitan city I just might pack a bunch of explosives into something like these advertising devices. Rig it to start flashing around rush hour and have a motion switch or timer to set off the explosives. Somebody walking by decides to take it home as a souvineer, or just to see what it does, and the explosives get detonated."

    You have an inaccurate view of how dangerous explosives are. Any device than can be picked up and carried home as a souvenir is unlikely to kill anyone except the person carrying it. Personally, I would have a different tack. I'd wait until a moment of police paranoia caused mass congestion of people, and, having prepared for instant deployment, I would send a suicide bomber weighed down with a hundred pounds of decent explosives into that area. Still, unlikely to kill very many people, but a lot more successful than your souvenir scenario.

    "People seem to forget the lessons learned from 9/11, the train bombings in Spain, the subway bombings in London, etc. Just because there haven't been any similar mass-transit attacks in the US doesn't mean it'll never happen."

    Yes, some people have undoubtedly learned little from those attacks. However, some others have learned the wrong things, or over-learned the right things. It sickens me when free men are willing to argue themselves into slavery.

    All it takes is one or two intelligent and motivated terrorists to come up with something like this."
    br /> Apparently it didn't even take one or two motivated terrorists. It took a cartoon advertisement.

  153. But PR worked, no? by saikou · · Score: 1

    How many people found out about the show that pulled this stunt? From looking at those Flickr pictures I had no idea what it was and what it was advertising. Heck, it looked like that chip Fry's Electronics uses on their in-store ads.
    So, another successful PR campaign, with lots of free airtime and tons of people who'll turn into it to see what the fuss was about.

  154. New Offensive Tactic... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    We have now given any group or organization, who chooses to do so, a perfect offensive weapon against the United States.

    All you need to do is place a few strange looking items (they don't even need to look like bombs), in a few strange places in a city, and you can bring the economy of that city to a standstill. Closing roads, bridges... evacuating buildings, etc. The cost to the economy of Boston is probably at least in the tens of millions, but if they are shutting down major travel and shipping arteries, railroads, etc, the cost could be in the billions! The powers that be have essentially given any mischief maker, any geurilla artist, or any pissed off group a way to shut down the economy of major U.S. urban areas, with virtually no cost or effort. If you are smart enough to read this, you are smart enough to shut down the economy of any major U.S. urban area!

    In WWII, the Alies needed to carpet bomb German cities to destroy their economy. Now, the power to carry out strategic warfare against the economy of the United States has been put into the hands of any goofball or dork who wants to make a statement... and all by the very people supposed to "protect" America!

    1. Re:New Offensive Tactic... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Read the book, "WASP" by Eric Frank Russell.

      Seriously. His ghost is laughing it's ectoplasmic ASS off right about now.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    2. Re:New Offensive Tactic... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      indeed. Plus, you get plausible deniability. Is leaving a cardboard box on the sidewalk likely to be considered a bomb hoax? OK. How about leaving a coffee cup? Or howabout next time you drop a bag of trash? At some point people have got to realise that once you start accepting this kind of crap, that civil rights have *gone*. No legal statute is going to be able to discriminate between different levels of might-look-like-a-potential-bomb-if-you-were-brain dead...

  155. Man Arrested In Marketing Stunt by Alien54 · · Score: 1

    Local news story on arrest here

    Peter Berdovsky, 27, of Arlington, was arrested Wednesday night and charged under a new statute that makes it a crime to place, transfer or possess a hoax device that results in panic. He was also charged with one count of disorderly conduct.

    Video of the stunt is available here - (Direct link to 27mb Quicktime file) Please save file locally before playing ;-)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Man Arrested In Marketing Stunt by Alien54 · · Score: 1

      Also

      This link to the Graffitti Research Lab, who disavows any connection with the incident. They also have a YouTube video of the prank.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    2. Re:Man Arrested In Marketing Stunt by Elias+Ross · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hoax device? Meaning, he was intentionally misrepresenting a lighted sign board a ... sign? Perhaps, if they looked like actual bombs, they might have a point.

      I'm curious what they could actually charge these people for, considering it's often intention to harm that's considered in these cases.

      Vandalism, or posting bills or something else.

      Once the smoke's clear, the trial will likely end up making the police and city government look stupid. That is, assuming the judge and jury acts reasonably on people that aren't evil criminals.

    3. Re:Man Arrested In Marketing Stunt by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Hoax device? Meaning, he was intentionally misrepresenting a lighted sign board a ... sign? Perhaps, if they looked like actual bombs, they might have a point.

      Perhaps, if it looked like anything that might startle and worry the anxious sheeple of Beantown....

      "Hoax device" is in the eyes of the beholder, apparently.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:Man Arrested In Marketing Stunt by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      There won't be a trial. Charges will be dropped at the first hearing.

      The first response to anything like this is to arrest everyone. Just because they were arrested doesn't mean there will be a case.

      The most I see happening is some fines. The city and state are trying to milk Turner for a half mil right now.

    5. Re:Man Arrested In Marketing Stunt by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Hoax device" is in the eyes of the beholder, apparently."

      I think this is showing we have so many (some stupid) laws on the books, that no matter what you do, or do not do, if someone wants you arrested and charged, you can and will be.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Man Arrested In Marketing Stunt by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Once the smoke's clear, the trial will likely end up making the police and city government look stupid. That is, assuming the judge and jury acts reasonably on people that aren't evil criminals. No need to wait. The police and city goverment already look exceedingly stupid. Particularly since these things have been around for 2-3 weeks in 10 other cities as well as Boston with nary a peep from anyone.
    7. Re:Man Arrested In Marketing Stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a much more sinister reasoning behind this latest bullshit story. The Jews don't want ANYBODY to talk to the public (i.e. to control the media) than THEM, the Jews. Cheap 7" or larger colour TFT displays with a few GB of storage space will be under £20 in a few years' time. Those of us who dissent from the 'party line' will be sticking them up in public places (i.e. where lots of traffic slows down) with our own opinions on them, telling the TRUTH that the Jews don't want you to hear. THIS is why this has been turned into a 'crime'. So that they can then ARREST anybody else who actually disagrees with the fascist Jews in Congress, and dares to tell people in public about them and their crimes.

      How else could something so ridiculous result in actually closing down public places? What sort of asshole looks what is clearly a PICTURE made of lights and thinks "It's a bomb"? Notice we haven't seen any pictures of these 'bombs'?

  156. I am a firefighter, have friends who are cops. by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    How, exactly, would you like any of us to check out such a thing without closing the road? What if, say 99 were fake but one were really a bomb? Worth the risk? What if it blew up and your daughter was on the school bus that was passing underneath? What if I run out of question marks? Is there a /dev/questionmark ?

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:I am a firefighter, have friends who are cops. by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      But you don't have to close everything off all at once, it should also be rather
      obvious from the fact that so many of them were *not* on bridges but instead
      high on building signage, that they were not a threat and *intended to be seen*.

      What if the daughter I don't have was on a hypothetical bus near one? Well, that
      would certainly be unfortunate, but shit happens. Or in this case it didn't.
      What if you had a heart attack and the ambulance couldn't get to you because the
      roads were blocked off? Or an elementary school caught fire? All of the recent
      over-hyped "potential terrorist" incidents pose truly negligible risks and do not
      warrant the attention paid them.

      Niven's Law #4 v2: Giving up freedom for security is beginning to look naive.
      Formerly, "F x S = k, The product of Freedom and Security is a constant."

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  157. One arrest so far by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    I think Turner, their ad agency, and the other people involved are in for big fight in court. I pieced the following together from a couple of news sites.

    State Attorney General Martha Coakley said Peter Berdovsky, 29, of Arlington, was arrested on one felony charge of placing a hoax device, and one charge of disorderly conduct.

    "We're not going to let this go without looking at the further roots of how this happened to cause the panic in this city," she said.
    "This investigation is ongoing as to whether other individuals and certainly other entities including the Turner Broadcasting Company and any public relations companies that were involved with the determination of this scheme and the execution of it should be charged," she said.

    Coakley said those conducting the publicity campaign should have known the devices had the potential to cause panic because of their placement in sensitive areas. She and other officials said Turner did not notifiy them until around 5 p.m. about the publicity campaign.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:One arrest so far by k1e0x · · Score: 1

      This is retarded. Its the CITY and the NEWS that CAUSED the panic. Really what are they going to charge these people with? Falure to file a permit? The fact that you need one at all is absurd in itself. They make it sound like anyone that had anything to do with this "evil scheme" to place.. -gasp- signs.. around town were somehow attempting to cause mass panic and mayham. Nobody even noticed them for weeks! There was something like 500 signs across the country.

      They are totally manhandeling these guys on TV, I seen them shoving the one guy down the sidewalk in cuffs phisically forcing them into news reporters.

      If I take a shit in a paper bag and put it in a sensitive area, does it have the potential to cause panic? What if the City makes a total fool of themselves and spends half a million of our dollars being idiots?

      This is so god dammed dumb..

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    2. Re:One arrest so far by Skapare · · Score: 1

      It's not a hoax device. The device is what it is, an advertisement. There is no hoax about it (unless he's the one who called in and claimed it was a bomb). But this is typical of incompetent government officials that need to generate FUD and cover up their own stupidity. The only crimes involved are trespassing and vandalism.

      What they need to do is find out why it is that the panic did NOT occur in the many other cities these devices were placed in. Why is it that ONLY Boston officials went nuts and created a panic?

      Well, now we know you can't have blinking lights in Boston.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  158. MBTA Lt. Sal Venturelli says... by oSand · · Score: 1

    MBTA Lt. Sal Venturelli said police were told about the first package by a transit passenger who spotted it on a column that supports I-93. The parcel was located on an elevated structure above the bus way and below I-93 in the Charlestown section of Boston at about 8 a.m. "This is a perfect example of our passengers taking part in Homeland Security," Venturelli said.
    You know, I was thinking the same thing.

  159. American Beauty by cafelatte · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remember that scene from American Beauty where Col. Frank Fitts is reading the newspaper and says "This country is going straight to hell"?

    Well, after reading this article I can now imagine this as the one he's reading.

  160. From an American by Xenographic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > I'm from Boston. I stood on the subway for a over an hour (normal ride time: 30 minutes or so) because of these dipshit "indie" artists that did this for Turner.

    Dude, grow a pair instead of getting pissy because you got stuck on the subway for a few minutes.

    Some dumbass got freaked out by a glorified Lite Brite. I hate to break this to you, but circuit boards don't explode, nor do LEDs, nor do Duracell D cell batteries, nor do wires. If your city gets this freaked over nothing, any sensible terrorist would just plant a bunch of hoaxes and laugh while you all piss yourself.

    You don't want to help the terrorists win, do you? :]

    1. Re:From an American by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was able to convert an LED into a nice NED (noise emitting diode) by accidently applying 120VAC to one. They only work once, though...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    2. Re:From an American by filterban · · Score: 1

      If it was powered by Sony lithium-ion batteries, though, I guess all of this response might have been valid. ;)

      --
      rm -rf /
  161. Get the facts by Otto · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was only 1 on a bridge/overpass, and we're not talking about an above water bridge here.

    Link to pics of all the locations of these things: http://www.zebbler.com/friends/ATHF/mission1/missi on1.html

    The thing is *obviously* not a bomb. It's a sign. It has big glowing flashing LEDs. Come on. Use your brain, people.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Get the facts by bobcote · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let's all have our fun and snicker at the people who don't recognize late night cartoon characters.

      Since few members of the Boston and Massachusetts State Police have the time to sit around watching late night cartoon characters or reading about how cool guerilla marketing is, we can understand why they did not recognize the character these devices.

      Better safe than sorry is more than an old saying your grandmother used while admonishing you to take an umbrella.

      Rule 1 of IEDs - Make them look like something else.
      Rule 2 - Place them where they can do the most damage.

      These devices met the criteria.

      On a less dire note, there is a reason cities have permitting requirements before signs, illuminated or not, are put up. One of the reasons is to avoid creating an unsafe environment.

      As a taxpayer in Massachusetts, I want Time Warner to pony up the cost of the public safety overtime. I's also like them to reimburse the lost wages of all of the hourly employees stuck on busses and subway trains, but that will never happen.

    2. Re:Get the facts by neersign · · Score: 2, Funny

      if it was me, I would've taken the sign/light and just said "i'm going to blow this up at home guys, thanks." and kept it. Those things are frickin' sweet.

    3. Re:Get the facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was one on the Longfellow Bridge that runs between MGH and Kendall Square (where Lotus used to be). That crosses water - the widest part of the Charles River Basin. There was on on an overpass above the Sullivan Square MBTA station (equivalent to Metro). Both of these are high-interest targets because of the amount of traffic that crosses them. Seen from 100 feet down (in the case of the Sullivan Square device), at an angle, *in the daytime*, you wouldn't understand what you were seeing, so I can understand how the first and even second ones might have been mistaken until they could be viewed close up. Why there were still concerns after they found the fifth one ... well, there's not much explanation for that.

      By the way, is there some reason they couldn't have just told the police about them before hand? Oh yeah, I forgot - what they did was *illegal* even without the bomb scare. You can't just go around mucking up public or private property with your advertising signs without permission. And these two guys were nearly thirty - they should know that by now.

      That said, I saw one of these last week, at night, and was amused.

    4. Re:Get the facts by the.nourse.god · · Score: 1

      Actually, from the images on that page, I counted no less than THREE terrorist devices on bridges/overpasses/elevated transportation channels

    5. Re:Get the facts by arevos · · Score: 1

      Better safe than sorry is more than an old saying your grandmother used while admonishing you to take an umbrella.

      Rule 1 of IEDs - Make them look like something else.
      Rule 2 - Place them where they can do the most damage. By that logic we should blow up any object, no matter how innocuous is appears, that is placed in a potentially vulnerable location, just to be "better safe that sorry". See a rubbish bin by the side of the road? Summon the police! An old cardboard box? Call the bomb squad! A parked car? Alert the army!

      There's a limit to what security precautions are reasonable, and blowing up random crap exceeds that by a large margin. The authorities of Boston are being mocked not because they took reasonable security precautions, but because they took very unreasonable ones. One would hope that authorities maintaining large cities would act responsibly. In this case, they acted like paranoid schizophrenics.
    6. Re:Get the facts by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      that'll teach me not to preview

      Someone did.

    7. Re:Get the facts by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Rule 1 of IEDs - Make them look like something else.
      Have you ever heard of any case where a bomb has flashing lights on it? Usually, they look like an anonymous backpack or a bag. If you are going to disguise a bomb, you make it look like something ordinary--or maybe valuable if you want to sucker somebody into messing with it. A flashing sign placed out of reach is about as unlikely a choice as it is possible to imagine.

      Rule 2 - Place them where they can do the most damage.
      Yes, in the middle of a crowd of people. There's a reason why so many bombings are in public transportation vehicles, restaurants, or at major public gatherings. They aren't hanging from an overpass--if you wanted to blow up an overpass, you'd need a truck full of explosives, not a dinky little sign.

      As a taxpayer in Massachusetts, I want Time Warner to pony up the cost of the public safety overtime. I's also like them to reimburse the lost wages of all of the hourly employees stuck on busses and subway trains, but that will never happen.
      As a taxpayer in Massachusetts, I am grateful for Time Warner for revealing the cluelessness of those who are responsible for protecting our safety. Fire everybody who thought this was a threat and start over.
    8. Re:Get the facts by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Rule 1 of IEDs - Make them look like something else.
      Rule 2 - Place them where they can do the most damage.

      Rule 1 of IEDs: Make them inconspicuous. "Like something else" is only a special application.

      Blinking LED panels of cartoon characters flipping off the masses doesn't qualify as inconspicuous. It qualifies as successful "make them look like something else" in the most pointless, ineffectual, and irrelevant sense. In either case, as successful camoflage, you fail it.

      Whether Bostonians recognize cartoon characters or guerrilla marketing is not the point. Whether Bostonians (or the rest of the American public) have been conditioned to reflexively fear anything unconventional or unrecognizedis the point.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    9. Re:Get the facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spotted #8 & #11. What's the third?

  162. The War is Over by wisegreyman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These events have caused me to reconsider my opinions on the 'war.' As an Australian it seemed to me that the war against terror was lost once the American government began making irrational decisions to invade other countries and police the world ala 'Team America.' By invading Iraq America (and its allies) became the 'Great Satan' it accused of being in the first place. The goverments' (note the plural genetive) actions in this regard have given terrorists justification in their actions (at least in their minds, if not in reality). There is no question now, we are oppressing them. But this whole Boston thing has demonstrated a new height of paranoia. If terrorism is designed to inspire terror, how can we see this situation as anything other than confirmation that the terrorists have indeed achieved their goal? For those who were in the city and heard rumours and whisperings of suspicious devices being found, I can only imagine how that would make you feel. But still, a finger should be pointed at the media. If the media are spinning alarmist stories to incite fear, then they should be targeted by the Bush administration as furthering the cause of terrorism. Unfortunately, scandal and heightened emotions sell better than the facts. It's not just America struggling with this problem. It's the Western world.

  163. Re:As a Bostonian by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
    I dont think anyone would have even thought about it had it not been for Boston going postal and screaming "the towelheads are comming, the towelheads are comming"


    Seriously this would have just flown under the radar had some bombsquad buffoon not thought D batteries + wires + LEDs = BOMB!!!!!!!

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  164. Re:Personally I think they handled this the right by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to flame you, but in fact I applaud you for saying the correct comment.

    Does anyone remember what happened in Afghanistan during the 1980's, when the Soviet military air-dropped dolls and other toys near villages that were booby traps with explosives in them? Many Afghani children were seriously injured or killed by small explosives put inside these small "toys."

  165. I'm disappointed at /. readers on this story. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    Flame me all you want, but I personally think too many people who responded to this message thread have a "it won't happen here" attitude in regards to terrorist threats. Are we going to forget the lessons of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 and the 9/11 attacks until a couple of hundred to thousands are killed in a single attack again? We MUST take any terrorist threat from any extreme political persuasion seriously.

    I'd rather have our law enforcement authorities find out this is just a hoax instead of having to explain to the next of kin why a many persons got killed by a terrorist attack.

    1. Re:I'm disappointed at /. readers on this story. by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      I have it on good authority that MtViewGuy is a terrorist planning to blow something up. Now, I'm not 100% positive on that, in fact I could be completely wrong. But we can't take any chances can we?

      You're exactly the kind of idiot that terrorists love.

    2. Re:I'm disappointed at /. readers on this story. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      I agree with ya, but for this:
      1. There is no such thing as "terrorism". Or "terrorists". It's facile paranoia, a method of lumping anything or anyone who dislikes us into a thing, a (pseudo)country we can spend lots of money having wars with.

      2. There aren't any "terrorists" monitoring our fears, rejoicing in our reactions. The Great Terrorist Threat doesn't exist as described by Bush and Cheney.

      Bin Laden has specific goals that he mostly achieved, not only by blowing things up, but as he said, by making us do, through our ignorance and nature, stupid things in the Middle East and central asia, provoking a holy war against the encroaching West by the outraged. He was depressingly accurate. He wasn't clinically insane, just vicious and fanatical.

      Point is, he's not sitting around with al Queda desperately trying to find ways past the unbelieveably impregnable fortress that Bush has created by repealing the constitution. He's done, we're igniting WW III, and there's no real reason to trick us into attacking anyone anymore. We've set our autopilot to Due Stupid, and we'll do what he wanted without any further help from his suicide boys, of which he didn't have enough anyway.

    3. Re:I'm disappointed at /. readers on this story. by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      I personally think too many people who responded to this message thread have a "it won't happen here" attitude in regards to terrorist threats. I personally think you have an "it won't happen here" attitude in regards to lightning strikes, car accidents, and heart disease, which are all far more likely to harm you or a loved one than a terrorist attack. Wearing a grounded metal hat when it's raining is more likely to save your life than blowing up a Lite-Brite... but reacting to threats rationally is so boring, isn't it?
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  166. Not a hoax by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

    Much of that "liberal media" is now calling this a "hoax." "How in a post 9/11 world could they not have known?"

    1) This is not a hoax. If it were someone would have had to claim they were bombs.

    2) Now they want to prosecute the poor fucker who put them up. They want him to go to jail. Why? He never claimed they were bombs. They weren't bombs. Anything more than the least severe vandalism charge (nothing was damaged) or trespassing charge would be tyrannical. No one was hurt. No one tried to scare anyone. Let him go.

    3) Are we going to start prosecuting anyone who drops a non-descript cardboard box? A lady drops a can of soup in the NYC subway. Does she do 5 years for that?

    I fear for my country.

  167. Stupid terror scare tactics by dbIII · · Score: 1

    In Australia the latest scare from the man in charge of the Federal legal system is "terrorist bikers" - I wonder when the ninja pirate scare will happen.

  168. Technophobia by deimios666 · · Score: 0

    This event also highlights the general ignorance of the unwashed masses towards technology. "This thing has blinking lights and wires! OMG! All the bombs I saw on TV had blinking lights and wires. This MUST be a bomb!" Add in the general paranoia and you got a genuine panic. Being cautious is a good thing but things clearly got overboard.

    --
    I think, therefore you are.
  169. is that what that editors note was about by drago177 · · Score: 1

    Was wondering what all the lawyer-speak was before the show started tonight.

  170. Fearmongering isn't New by Pym · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember taking their Halloween candy to the local hospital to have it X-rayed for free, because moms were sure evil people were putting razor blades in apples and poisoning candy? I mean, I don't think America has changed all that much when it comes to projecting imagination to the point of irrational paranoia, and from a little research, it seems that persistant urban legend started and survived without much to prove it.

    Wikipedia Entry (YMMV): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoned_candy_scare

    Maybe we just have more media outlets with nothing better to write about these days.

    1. Re:Fearmongering isn't New by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Mod you up if I could. NO one remembers that the whole Halloween killer kandy terror was caused by family killing their own, not strangers passing out goodies. I hesitate to say no one ever has done it since that hoax, since the idea is now firmly implanted in the minds of the deranged, but safe to say that not one human being in the US has poisoned any candy on Halloween and given it out at the door. But we still act like it happened, just as we still act like swarthy moslems are lurking at every overpass. Madness.

  171. Oooh! Ohhh! I KNOW! by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's build magnetic LED signs that display American Flags and flash the words:

    SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!

    And we'll stick them on bridges and buildings.

    Lets see the morons flip out and call THEM bombs.

    Then we can ask them, "Why do you hate America?" and "Why don't you support our troops?"

    And then their heads go all asplody like.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    1. Re:Oooh! Ohhh! I KNOW! by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Please do this. This is a great idea. Preferably film the results...

    2. Re:Oooh! Ohhh! I KNOW! by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      I am amazed at how cheap 10MM LEDs are via eBay.

      Particularly if you buy in bulk!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  172. For the love of God... by porkrind · · Score: 1

    Are you honestly going to call the police reaction appropriate? What is wrong with people today? I can't believe you're going to argue on behalf of a complete over-reaction. There is no logic to what you're saying.

    I suppose that's part of the problem. Most of us are so scared and freaked that logic left the scene long long ago.

  173. Re:Personally I think they handled this the right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are as brainwashed as the Bostonians who went overboard.

    "If I was a terrorist and wanted to maximize casualties in a major metropolitan city I just might pack a bunch of explosives into something like these advertising devices. Rig it to start flashing around rush hour and have a motion switch or timer to set off the explosives. Somebody walking by decides to take it home as a souvineer, or just to see what it does, and the explosives get detonated."

    If I was a terrorist, and wanted to maximize casualties, I'd do something somewhere crowded, and have it blow up so it could hurt more than one or two people. These signs were well-placed for visibility, and would have be fairly sophisticated to be dangerous. Also, if I was a terrorist, I wouldn't want to tarnish the good name of Adult Swim by using characters from ATHF. If I were an Islamic terrorist, chances are also good I would know about as much about what they even were as the Bostonians did.

    Hell, I'd try to make it something not even visible. Take a rugged box for electrical crap, FI. Add a pipe going just an inch into the ground, and mount it near a pole around an intersection that's busy after 5. You could get a lot more of whatever you want in it, have more control, do more damage, and have more confusion.

    "People seem to forget the lessons learned from 9/11"

    Like:
    1. Democrat or Republican, they all have their own profit and reelection at heart, not your bets interests.
    2. We're a nation of castrated idiots that believe what our government tells us, even when they are wrong.
    3. We're in bed with the terrorists that attacked, and our government will do whatever it can to keep us distracted by warring elsewhere (exactly how many Saudis were on those planes? Now, exactly how long ago was it we toppled Saudi Arabia? Oh, yeah, we didn't).
    4. Reducing rights and individual safety in the name of national security is the best policy (please note sarcasm!).
    5. We are a people happy to keep ourselves separate from one another, and hate and fear in the face of a challenge. Thus, we perpetuate the hate that others in the world have for us.
    etc.

    You learned a whole different set of lessons than I did from 9/11.

    Now, as far as TFA: did anyone in Boston get in touch with Turner guys before blowing these up? I find it hard to believe that if you got 100 people from 20-40 together, that someone wouldn't recognize who these were of, and even know when then next showing was, and had it set to be recorded. If that is the case in Boston, though, I guess the Cartoon Network guys aught to never do anything in or around Boston, and be encouraged to use it as a city where things go terribly wrong in future cartoons.

  174. That's different. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one from Microsoft got threatened with five years in pound-me-in-the-ass prison for the butterfly thing.

  175. Re: smart police officers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $750,000 in Police costs for this "scare". Almost all of that was overtime that went into the pockets of the officers themselves. These are some damn smart police officers. For $750K, I'd tell you a light bright was a bomb capable of taking down an interstate bridge, too.

  176. Re:As a Bostonian by Darlantan · · Score: 1

    Don't blame the bomb squad, I'm pretty sure they knew what they were dealing with as soon as they got on-site and had a look.

    Blame the idiot(s) that saw what is obviously a cheap-ass sign in an odd spot and went "ITZ DA BOMZ OMG!", and the media outlets that turned around and sensationalized it.

    I wouldn't put it past the bomb squad to blow them up, but hey...you don't join a bomb squad unless you _like_ watching things blow up, so any excuse to make something go pop works, you know?

    --
    Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
  177. It's getting so easy for the terrorists these days by Normal+Dan · · Score: 1

    It used to be, if a terrorist wanted to bring a whole city to its knees it would take a group months of planning. They would have to acquire massive explosives. They would need to plot out what targets would have the most impact. They would have to work long dangerous hours with high explosives and other bomb making materials. They would have to coordinate their attack with precise timing and skill. Now days, all a terrorist has to do is leave some boxes lying around with some flashy lights, and suddenly the whole city is brought down. Terrorism has gotten so easy, people everywhere are doing it by accident. What has this world come to?

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
  178. Stupid security is the enemy of good security by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    This, while unidentified trucks are allowed into "secure" areas of Logan Airport. People who can't assess threats can't protect against them.

  179. check out the Suspicious Looking Device (SLD) by majid_aldo · · Score: 1
    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  180. There's been an arrest by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >no one was rounded up

    Peter Berdovsky has been arrested and charged with a felony.

  181. get a since of humor!! by Treates2 · · Score: 0

    it's always the authorities saying... "oh noes terror is abound", whenever they see their shadow now days a simple prank such as mooning is considered sexaul assault, and a felony worth 100 years in prison, boy would i hate to be the naked cowboy when the fashion police come around with sticks, pepper spray, and "the book". OMG blinking lights! terrorists!! terrorists!, we must stick our heads in the ground!

  182. Two Men Arrested on Felony Charges by Gman14msu · · Score: 2, Informative
    It looks like two of them guys who were hired to place them around the city were arrested on felony charges late Wednesday night.

    Peter Berdovsky, 27, of Arlington, and Sean Stevens, 28, of Charlestown, were arrested Wednesday night on one felony charge of placing a hoax device and one charge of disorderly conduct each, state Attorney General Martha Coakley said.

    Boston Globe

    Seriously this is pretty sad if there are felony charges for something as harmless as this. Intent should at least be considered.

  183. Re:Who's the by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why you bothered. They don't get it and won't. The terrified sheep on the other hand will continue to bludgeon them with bad laws. We get idiotic laws from idiotic stunts. Now that they can slather the word terrorist on almost any crime all those stunts come with a stiff price. This is not something I approve of it's just what is.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  184. He was wearing a bulky jacket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Behavior consistent with terrorist actions.

    Hmm.... let's see:

    Wearing a bulky jacket (in cold weather, or not, c.f half of Chicago's homeless)
    Growing a beard (kempt or unkempt)
    Wearing pants
    Wearing shoes
    Carrying a cell phone
    Speaking a non-English language (this one isn't even true...remember McVeigh)

    You're right, with that phrase they can arrest and ship anyone off to Guantanamo they like, for whatever reason, without a shred of evidence. American liberty isn't dying. It's already dead, and has been since shortly after 11 Sep 2001, and I would argue, since 12 Dec 2000, or perhaps 20 Jan 2001.

  185. Re:Personally I think they handled this the right by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
    Not to be cruel or anything, but from an economist's point of view, it would've been cheaper to ignore the marketing gimic devices and have something happen (in the event it was a "bad guy" doing something Terroristy(TM)) to that one person who decided to play with the thing then to send the entire city into panic.

    Also, from a statistics point of view:
    My chances of being killed by a terrorist on an airplane: 1 in 550,000
    My chances of being killed on the way to the airport in a car wreck: 1 in 300~

    Get back to reality people.

  186. Getting the finger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of them is sitting in jail, as of about half an hour ago. Let's see how he likes being inconvenienced.
    And while he's sitting in jail, somebody probably really is giving him "the finger".
  187. Local Reaction by njfuzzy · · Score: 1
    I live and work in Boston, and I have to say I'm deeply embarrassed by the general reaction around here. People are upset at Cartoon Network for planting these "devices" rather than at the authorities for stirring up a scare over nothing.

    Look at the boxes. Look. This is a lite-brite, not a fucking IED.

    So why, exactly, is everyone so scared? Because the police and the press blew this out of proportion. We should be ashamed to live in a country where people are paranoid to this degree, and embarrassed to live in the one city that didn't get it, and won't admit to being stupid once told the "bombs" were cartoon advertisements.

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    1. Re:Local Reaction by saintory · · Score: 1

      I live and work in the area as well and I say kudos to the response teams for being safe rather than sorry. If Ignignot is going to give Boston the finger it's only fair to send the Bomb Squad after him and clear him through countermeasures.

      Personally, I think the media and political fallout could've been handled better. Of course one could argue that Cartoon Network could've let officials know there was a guerilla marketing plan going on, more of a professional heads-up than an official form to sign. The media attention then could've had a positive spin, like "Mooninites invade Boston, other major cities. Boston responds with defense tactics."

      I did read one article that suggested the response from Boston was such because of the impact Boston had on 9-11. Response based on guilt?

      Anyways, WBZ Radio 1030 AM has some decent coverage of the story, as well as the "Making of" video of the guerrilla marketing and other coverage. Pretty nice in my opinion.

  188. Expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is to be expected after years of scare campains from government. After they trained people to see danger everywhere, they should not be surprised and ask now for normal behaviour. Idiots! The only people who should be sued are inventors of code red/orange/purple scheme, scare campainers and people who make living out of creating panic.

    P.S. If you want to hide a bomb you do not put blinking lights on it!

  189. Giving the finger by LoadWB · · Score: 1

    I find it mildly amusing that all of this uproar was caused by figures of Ignignot and Err "giving the finger." To me, it almost seems symbolic given the whole response.

    Personally, I wish I had come across one of these devices in my home town. I would love to have some opaque blue LEDs to play with myself without having to buy them.

  190. iwantoneofthose.com by Haztopian · · Score: 1

    Are any of the surviving signs for sale yet? I so want one in my room.

  191. what a bunch of boneheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you'd think that with so many hoity-toity fancy colleges and schools around the city might have few braincells floating around in government. wait.. nope. oh and to everyone posting here that thinks this is the kind of thing that needs to be punished. $TFU

  192. I see how they would think it's real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, come on. It's got D batteries taped to it and we all know that D batteries is a prerequisite for making a really big bomb.

    "More terrorists trust Duracell for their light-up ATHF explosives!"

  193. State of our Incuriosity by abb3w · · Score: 1

    I can't even ride my universities bus holding a wired up circuit board (for a class) without people looking at me like I'm about to blow them up.

    "[...]The embezzlement scheme was got up to support the production of a, um, novel device."
    "Secret weapon," Miles corrected. "I said secret weapon."
    The Professor's eyes glinted in amusement. "Define your terms. If it's a weapon, then what's the target?"
    "It's so secret," Miles explained to Ekaterin, "we can't even figure out what it does. So I'm at least half right."

    The proper response for your fellow passengers should be to politely express interest and start asking you about your Novel Device — what it is and how it works. They might then learn what it is, eliminating the need for irrational fear, or determine that you seem to be lying about it, and be able to focus with a much more productive rational fear. But that's probably asking too much of the average American domestic yahoo. (Sigh.)

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  194. Shutdown by Advertising! by sciop101 · · Score: 1
    Looks like a lousy idea for a cartoon!

    But people did whine about homosexuality in Teletubbies and that was FREE! advertisement.

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  195. A new @**hole now! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I don't remember reading about anyone threatening anybody with anything.
    finity,

    by now, I assume you've heard about the arrests, threats of lawsuits and criminal action.
    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:A new @**hole now! by finity · · Score: 1

      Right, I should have been more specific. Your post suggested that the ATHF cartoonists themselves were in deep shit, but as far as I can tell the two guys aren't really related to the show at all. They're just two guys concerned about haircuts of the 1970s.

  196. picture of ATHF "bomb" lit up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  197. They were right to be afraid by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

    for no one can defeat the Quad Laser

    --
    (%i1) factor(777353);
    (%o1) 777353
  198. War of the Worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember that War of the Worlds radio play that caused huge panic?

  199. NOW we have a plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that EVERYBODY knows these cartoon character LED displays are harmless, the intelligent terrorist would...

  200. Wow, the incompetence is amazing by jgoemat · · Score: 1
    What is going on in Boston? Whose call was it to shut down traffic and detonate these with the bomb squad? Does anyone thing a bomb (usually not supposed to be found until it explodes) would have bright LED lights to make it stand out? Some idiotic statements:

    "It's a hoax _ and it's not funny," said Gov. Deval Patrick.
    If they think it is a hoax, they should look up the definition of the word. This wasn't intended to deceive or defraud anyone. The JEL people better not film their commercials in Boston (the ones with the chalk outlines representing smoking deaths) or the police would think a WMD had already gone off and evacuate the city!

    "The packages in question are magnetic lights that pose no danger," Turner said in a statement. It said the devices have been in place for two to three weeks in 10 cities: Boston, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, Ore., Austin, Texas, San Francisco and Philadelphia.

    The Department of Homeland Security said there are no credible reports of other devices being found elsewhere in the country.

    Of course they don't. The reason? No one else in the country is stupid enough to report these to the Department of Homeland Security! Flickr has pictures and comments from two weeks ago showing that they have been in place. I don't know who in the chain overreaction is most responsible, but they should all be held accountable for wasting people's time.
  201. something as harmless as this by wiredog · · Score: 1

    You're right. They should just be required to reimburse the taxpayers of Boston for the expense of dealing with it.

    1. Re:something as harmless as this by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      There was no reason for this, none whatsoever. No one should have to pay for the madness of the professionally terrified.

  202. Re:As a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (wee first time post)

    You know the point is not that the device was harmless.

    The point is that they shut down a larger part of a major US city and the media reports it as if america was under attack (again). The news media suck. They are trying to scare the hell out of us and the really important things in life get overlooked. The president as well as the vice president are giving interviews in which they are confronted with things they said in earlier interviews and sit there and say "I did not say that". The media was more investigative during Monicagate for god's sake, when the real concern should've been "If the president is horny and isn't getting any should he be given a blowjob or whould it be better to let a horny, unsatisfied person stay alone with the big red button"?

    At least if they'd stop putting those messages up which always includes something like "Possible Terrorist Attack on Boston" (no question mark) or, when it comes to stupidity "Is the rapture close?" or "Is the apocalypse near?" (I have to admit I stole those ideas from the Daily Show) while it would be _really_ insightful no maybe put up something like "Vice President Dick Cheney not fit for office after shooting a friend in the face?" - "After four heart attacks is Vice President Cheney really fit for office?"

    THAT'S frightening. That's the guy who would be running the country should the moron get killed or incapacitated.

    But instead we get newsstories where people are told a major US city was shut down because devices which obviousy have large displays attached to them to attract attention are now beeing defused.

    Great job.

    Still I have to admit the people who put these advertising devices there need to get a kick in the ass. In times like these where people are easily scared this is definately not the way to go.

    (OMG the word I have to type in to verify I am not a spambot is "crotch" - way to go slashdot :-) )

  203. Ad Campaign: It Worked !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just fired up bittorrent

  204. Definitely post as AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A poster on Kuro5hin was questioned by the secret service after a post. Here's the article.

    1. Re:Definitely post as AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boston PD isn't the Secret Service. Of course they're welcome to come to my house, but if they don't have a couple of my state's certified peace officers in tow they're liable to get the cops called on them or worse. This exact scenario transpired with a friend of mine in California who had tax issues with the state of Alaska. They actually sent their state troopers down for a visit, not quite grasping that they had no authority by themselves. Alaska is weird like that; they think they're a country.

  205. Interesting points. by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    I think that is all somewhat valid, but I am pretty sure the reason Islamic terrorists hate us is because we are not all Muslims and we support cruel dictatorships in the Middle East that are friendly to our interests, such as those in Saudi Arabia, Iraq (formerly), and Kuwait. That is a simplification and those are not necessarily in order, but I am fairly sure that terrorists do not wake up in the morning and think about how lacking we are in common sense as motivation to plant explosives or bring down skyscrapers.

    As for silly items, the way you think is good: it probably means you are not very creative at harming people. Unfortunately, if you wanted to maximize human casualties, disguising dangerous items as benign might be a great way to tempt people closer. Most generally flee anything that appears threatening, but if the threat was somehow humorous or inviting, more casualties would result. Terror in the aftermath would also be sharply increased if people started distrusting everyday items they once desired.

    That is probably the exact reason the authorities reacted the way they did. It is impossible to know what the real motivations are behind something like this. If your goal is to terrorize people, you would try all sorts of different things. There are even plenty of popular culture references that employ this concept. Halloween movies featured masks for children that turned heads into insects when a certain television commercial was aired. Then there are fictional characters like Laughing Man from Ghost in the Shell.

    The idea of using friendly images as an afront to destructive acts is nothing new, but I think we should learn to settle ourselves down when we realize something is a prank.

    --
    Why bother.
  206. Re:As a Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooo, I'm not allowed to take my new MP3 player on the subway because it's an unknown device (I bought it in Japan and the police have almost certainly never seen this model) and therefore everyone should assume it's a weapon? (sarcasm)

    And don't give me some unattended-vs-attended bullshit, the WTC attacks and London Tube bombings were all suicide bombers. Having an operator makes it more likely that an "unknown device" is a weapon.

  207. Re:As a Bostonian by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

    a member of the bomb squad actually called it a IED. They where just as complacent in the act of stupidity this was as the media and their own government. Sadly this kind of stupidity doesnt shock me anymore in the world of white powder = anthrax.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  208. Really? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    The thread here suggests that everyone should immediately recognize all the characters from some show on Cartoon Network, and that odd out of place new objects won't be bombs.

    Hint #1: watch the commercials on Cartoon Network - they're not aiming for Boston cop and State Atty General.

    Hint #2: Our friends' son has finished 2 tours on an Army bomb squad in Iraq. It sucks. He can't wait to go back to defusing munitions, at least you know what you've got, it's in a catalog somewhere with instructions.

    Here's the rules for IEDs : there are no rules.
    There are several ways to make a successful IED: either hide it, or make it look like a normal object.

    There's no signal for the latter, the signal for the former is simply "out of place". These were.

    What do visible IEDs look like? Radios, clocks, phones, thermos, flashlights, lunchboxes...

    And they do have either a timing device or electronic detoonator of some kind, and they come in all stripes.

    This prank was by no means a slam dunk except possibly to people who watch ATHF and don't pay attention to the details of IEDs.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Really? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      There are several ways to make a successful IED: either hide it, or make it look like a normal object.

      And the ATHF LED art was neither hidden, nor normal-looking. Thus the most reasonable assumption to make would be that they were not IEDs.

      Did you mean to support the case you're arguing against?

    2. Re:Really? by jpellino · · Score: 1

      I said "or", not "and".
      Toys have been used to hide IEDs.
      A lite brite 10 in an unusual place.
      That pretty much says kid's toy, and pretty much says out of place.
      Two strikes. I don't care for BPD or anyone else to wait for the third.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  209. Looks like someone put one up on Ebay by yknott · · Score: 1
  210. terrorists, omnipotent and unstoppable by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    >The knowledgable terrorist will doubtless package his
    >payload in a fashionable briefcase now that he has been
    >alerted to this penchant.

    Of course, because terrorists are omnipotent and unstoppable.
    All countermeasures and vigilance are useless against them.
    They are also harmless, so we shouldn't be afraid of them. Er,
    wait, um ...

    Hold on; I'm getting my Slashdot talking points all mixed up ...

  211. What they didn't tell you by Zarf · · Score: 1

    Sure, they report on the LED cartoon characters the bomb squad blew up... but they didn't say squat about the five "Bud-Light" signs that same bomb squad blew up earlier the same day!

    --
    [signature]
  212. What the apology should have been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm sorry you people are too ignorant to tell the difference between
    an advertising sign and a bomb. Do you have the same problem with
    hamburgers?"

  213. Ted Turner is out of that business. by swschrad · · Score: 1

    has been for two years now, after first merging turner enterprises with time, inc and warner bros to form time warner... then leaving the board a couple years ago, because all the suits made it no fun any more.

    this is likely to crash and burn the advertising agency (interscope?) that was behind the tarfu, and I suspect the overwhelming message of society to that is..... GOOD! bunch a'tards.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  214. ah, heck, was more fun to discover it on your own by swschrad · · Score: 1

    our regional science nut was making his own gunpowder and hydrogen about that time in the basement, because nothing much interesting was happening in school.

    lots of flashes, bangs, and stinks were part of growing up in the "beat the Russians" NASA years.

    not one blinking whirligig in the bunch, either.

    but the wacks who thought to pull this in the post-9/11 climate are going to twist slowly, slowly in the wind. simulcast on all broadcast/satellite channels. have a fair trial and hang 'em, should take about 15 minutes, then back to regularly scheduled programming.

    damn fool stunt to take it out of the neighborhood.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  215. Yes, it's dumb, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, having finally looked at the pictures, I realize that those devices should look innocuous enough that there shouldn't be a need to blow them up.

    But, being a Bostonian and knowing how much hassle a simple accident, let alone a "terror alert," can cause to the roadways here, I can't say I blame the city for being in an uproar over the entire incident. If it were me that were stuck in that traffic (and thankfully I wasn't) I'd want somebody to pay, and the first person that'd come to my mind would be the person who planted the device in the first place. In this day and age, you'd think they'd consider the implications of placing electronic objects in subway stations and other places like that without telling anyone a little more.

  216. The last smart thing Boston did... by DanCentury · · Score: 1

    From the news casts it looks like all the cops and officials in Boston are a week away from retirement -- no wonder they didn't know what a Mooninite was! I wonder if the Boston cops have an old Space Invaders machine surrounded -- or maybe they're going to detonate some Light Brites at a local Toys R Us.

    One of the few smart things Boston did in the past 100 years is not sign A-Rod. Yankees fans are loving this, I bet.

  217. Not quite by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    Actually, the evidence would indicate that Texas doesn't suffer quite so badly from paranoia. If you followed the news, you would see that Austin is one of the cities where these things have been up for weeks, where people -didn't- freak out.

  218. And the Polish Navy Raises Their Glasses by gadlaw · · Score: 1

    I remember when the catchall symbol for stupid was supposed to be the Polish Navy as far as politically uncorrect jokes about general stupidity was concerned. (Something about screen doors on their submarines and such) I remember jokes in Ohio revolved around bumpkin Kentucky, using sometimes the same jokes I heard in elementary school about the stupid group of the day. Now we have a new standard in stupid groups of people which nicely enough doesn't target a ethnic group or a whole state of people (that could be argued), yes indeed, the past home of President John Adams (second President) and John Quincy Adams (sixth President) is now most famous for stupid officials in Boston who blow up Aqua Teen Hunger Force lightboards which are mistaken for bombs. I look forward to hearing all those old jokes retold. Did you hear the one about the Boston Navy and how their submarines kept sinking? How many Bostonian's does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Gotta stay far far away from Boston and their Keystone Cops and common sense deprived public officals.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  219. Re:As a Bostonian by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 1

    Don't you realize that after all this, the show got the marketing that Turner was looking for? Otherwise, it might be the 10 people that said, "Oh look, there's that Aqua somethin somethin thing. Alien or whatever." Now it's the entire world. Now the rest of the world may think we're dumbasses for it, but still.

  220. The obvious comments and losers by Ultimate+Heretic · · Score: 1

    For a slashdot group, you nerdlings missed the obvious fallout from this event. 1. Cartoon network can now sell the flashing mooninite boards like hotcakes to every ATHF fan to hang in their bedroom/basement/cave. 2. All suppliers of blinking lights/high power LEDs are going to be arrested as providing materiel support to terrorist activities. So long MPJ, Ramsey, All Electronics, Quickar, etc. 3. When will someone post a schematic of the board? I want to nitpick the power budget and see if I can make one that will last longer. Barring that, will Cartoon network post a silkscreen of the PCB so I can run off a few? 4. When will the remaining signs (by now filched by ATHF fans) start showing up on eBay?

  221. FUD - welcome to the 9/11 duped masses by WickedLogic · · Score: 1

    What he did was probably not the smartest thing. But there was a point where the city SHOULD have known that these where not explosives. He should not be responsible for their over reaction, we need protecting from government wasting our tax dollars protecting us from unknown and often non-existent threats.

    Any bomb squad could have quickly determined that these are not bombs and ended the stupid panic they induced a LOT, LOT earlier. I'm ashamed of they cities reaction.

    The college kid was being a bit dumb, but someone has to point out the publics over reaction and fear. 'There could be bombs anywhere 'is not a valid reason for this type of reaction.

  222. Bureaucracy at work by Larus · · Score: 1

    Chances are, your civil authority got elected/appointed for a charming smile, not his/her ability to deal with emergencies. The rare times that the real world exposes them for the cowards they are, they usually come back with other agendas to cover their obvious blundering hysteria.

    I'll be a troll and hypothesize that's what started the Iraq business too. We just haven't seen similar results after Katrina because the guy in charge was fired immediately.

  223. White powder scares by fastgriz · · Score: 1

    That pub run story is nothing compared to what happened in Denmark, SC. The mayor hired a witch doctor to protect City Hall from evil. The witch doctor walked around city hall sprinkling salt and muttering incantations. Later, someone noticed the salt and called the police to report some scary white powder around City Hall. The typical police/public safety overreaction ensued until someone decided enough was enough and tasted the "suspicious white powder" confirming that it was salt.

  224. Yeah! by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Now bow before your digital rulers!

  225. Mod Parent -1: Dickweed by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    Bleah. I'm sick of all this "I live in Massachusetts so I am a victim of Turner's Greed" BS. If you feel victimized, talk to the people who overreacted about a bunch of frikkin' signs.

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  226. This happened in Oxford, Mississippi, too. by Sans_A_Cause · · Score: 1

    Some of the local drinking crowd likes to go on "hash runs", where you run from one stash of beer to another, drink, then run on to the next stash. They usually do this in public areas like parks or occasionally sidewalks. A couple years ago, a friend of mine was marking the run route with chalk dust. He has a rather obnoxious personality, and when one old guy asked him "Is that anthrax?", he said something sarcastically back, like "oh, of course it's anthrax". About 6 hours later he was arrested by the FBI and charged with a variety of terrorist-related counts! He spent a couple of days in jail, and was finally released (I assume when they confirmed that it was chalk). However, to my knowledge, the charges have never been dropped.

  227. Re:As a Bostonian by spun · · Score: 1

    Oh. My. God. We're doomed. If people like you are in the majority, there's no hope for us. Hey, you know what else could be a bomb? Puppies. You could easily put a bomb inside a cute, adorable puppy and NO ONE WOULD EXPECT THAT! Let's kill all the puppies.

    You know what else could be a bomb? Shopping carts with blankets over them. Empty cardboard boxes. Soda bottles. Mailboxes. Briefcases. Lunchboxes. Crosswalk timer boxes. Heck, I could get a metal box, strap it to a lightpole at a crosswalk, and no one would think it suspicious.

    Why, when there are so many ways to make a bomb truely inconspicuous, would you make one with FLASHING FUCKING LIGHTS?!?

    Now, I have my problems with this, too be sure. There are ordinances against this kind of thing. When a kid tags something, they get the book thrown at them. When a corporation does it, nothing happens, or they get a fine that, to them, isn't even a slap on the wrist. But that's the way the law works, and these folks deserve to be charged with vandalism or posting bills without a permit, or whatever.

    They SHOULD NOT be held accountable for the massive overreaction of the media and city officials.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  228. from another Bostonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up.

    Stop voting for morons.

    This is just more evidence of how government can't do dick to protect us. We need protection from our government.

    I once saw a plastic bag tied to a railing, I didn't tell anyone and stayed away from it because there are only two reactions officals would have:

    1. Poke it.

    2. Go ballistic and create a ridiculous situation.

    So I just kept away from it.

  229. Did you see the pictures? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    These things stand out, especially at night... You do know that they had blinking lights, right?

    I really doubt they were intended to attract police attention. This is pretty obviosly plain old guerilla marketing. People are supposed to start seeing this pixelated character places, and go "what's that?" eventually they say "What's that?" to someone who watches ATHF, and then they hear about ATHF, then maybe they watch ATHF, then they tell their friends "Hey, you know those things with the blinking lights? That is a character from this hilarious show", and then their friends watch ATHF. And Turner makes money...

    If there was a -1 wrong mod (as you request in your sig), I would use it on your post...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Did you see the pictures? by Skreems · · Score: 1

      They had blinking lights, but they were barely bigger than a piece of paper. And if they put them on the support column for a bridge, that means UNDER the bridge, which means nobody's really gonna see them but some homeless people. (Unless I misunderstood where they had been placed, which is certainly possible).

      I just think they got a lot of free press through this "bomb squad" mistake, and TFA reads like half a press release for ATHF.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
  230. Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so wait...it's illegal to put up something without a permit. I mean I guess I can see that. Public property isn't really public and all that. But also, I am responsible if people see what I put up and panic? How is that my fault? How can I control that?

  231. RTFA & Stop talking out your ass by milatchi · · Score: 0

    The local police departments were notified about these things! And they have been in those same locations for 3 weeks! Atlanta, Seattle, LA, New York, Dallas have these same boxes didn't have a problem or think they were terrorist bombs!
    Finally, Ted Turner DOES NOT OWN or have anything to do with: [adult swim], Atlanta Braves, Atlanta Hawks, Boomerang, Cartoon Network, CNN, TBS, TCM, Time Warner, TNT, or Turner South.
    Those were all sold to Time Warner in 1996 and Turner became Vice Chairman of the board from 1996 until he stepped down in 2006. Currently Ted owns two million acres of land, a restaurant called Ted's Montana Grill, and has billions in the bank.

    --
    Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
  232. Let the city know by miglewis · · Score: 1

    They can't possibly arrest these two gentlemen for their ignorence. Go to the City of Boston webpage and let them know that their mistake does not justify arrest. Let the Mayor's office know, the city council know and the police chief.

    The closures were a costly and encumbersome mistake, one that cost the city and residents of Boston a great deal of headache and money. The mistake was with the sergeant(s) who lacked the proper investigative skills, the academy for not instilling the proper investigative skills, and the current culture of fear prevalent throughout the security community. In the end it was only a mistake, no malintent meant and no damage and as I recall that incurs no charge in this nation. Please see to it that Boston remains the shining heart of this nation's dream of true democracy and justice, an enlightened city. They would be remiss not to drop any charges stemming from this event.

  233. No bomb needed by Skapare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The terrorist's handbook is probably being re-written as you read this. Remember, their goal isn't actually to kill people so much as it is to create the panic that you might be killed. The ensuing panic causes far more economic damage than the loss of lives does. And incompetent government officials like those in Boston just play right into it. Now the terrorists know an all new way to create panic, thanks to the Boston Police.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  234. Re:As a Bostonian by Dreamstalker_wolf · · Score: 1

    I live in Boston, and only noticed what had happened when my housemate turned on the news and started going on and on about a "terrorist attempt". Trying to enter into anything resmebling a rational discussion with her about this was pointless, as she believes Fox and other questionable news sources.

    She has taken my argument to mean that I "think it's perfectly fine to place circuitboards all over the place"...erm, no that's not what I said. Explaining that any normal person would not see the device as a bomb was/is useless...

  235. Re:As a Bostonian by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    To be fair, the "strange smell" smelled like natural gas, and if you've ever known someone careless w/ their stove, then you can understand why everyone was worried. Factor in the wide area of the smell and the fact that no one has given a good explanation for the smell, and I hope you can see why I feel that it was a different situation from this Boston nonsense.

    --
    [o]_O
  236. That makes NO sense at all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Great. So all Mr Ackmuhllakhmud has to do is cover his nail bomb on the sidewalk with pretty flashing lights and the authorities will just call it art and ignore it.

    Don't be an asshole and take a look at the stupid thing. It's a glorified Lite Brite, for crying out loud!

    Please allow me to clue you in:
    * Wires do NOT explode.
    * Duracell D batteries do NOT explode (the Sony batteries were totally different Lithium ones, and even THOSE don't 'explode' so much as catch on fire... the BEST these could do is leak and make a mess).
    * Circuit boards do NOT explode.
    * LEDs do NOT explode.

    Now, this may come as a surprise to you, but attached to most bombs is a ... bomb. That's right, an actual payload of some type. Something that might actually EXPLODE. Also, it's terrible to use a non-directional blast which is about all you'd have gotten even if they could've somehow hidden C4 or something behind the circuit board. You won't do much of anything with that. And if it's anti-personnel, well, you probably want to include some damn shrapnel, too, unless you only plan to damage peoples' hearing.

    Finally, even IF people would allegedly "ignore" the device, terrorists would be stupid to call attention to it. It may not be apparent to you, but SOME of us could actually recognize explosive devices if they called attention to themselves. Therefore, the dominant strategy is and remains to make it something that does NOT call attention to itself under ANY circumstance. I.E. it should look like trash.

  237. Best Quote of the Story by trongey · · Score: 1
    From the CNN article:

    "Assistant Attorney General John Grossman called the light boards "bomblike" devices and said that if they had been explosive they could have damaged infrastructure and transportation in the city."
    And if they had been super-advanced extraterrestrial warlords they could have killed us all, or if they'd been candy they would have made a nice snack. If some guy named John Grossman had been a total moron he could have become an Assistant Attorney General - oh, looks like he actually is one.
    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  238. Throwing the book at them by End+Program · · Score: 1

    Since the so-called "Authorities" were made fools of, you know someone is going to pay. Fair or not...

    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/city_region/break ing_news/2007/02/men_accused_of_1.html

  239. In Soviet Boston by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... police terrorize you.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  240. Homeland Security Theater + Turner Entertainment by chris-j6n · · Score: 1
    Well they are in the same business.

    See Bruce Schneier's comments on "security theater"
    http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0608.html

  241. boston... by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
    I hate Boston, always have and always will, but this is particularly absurd. It is obvious that their police force is borderline braindead and their citizens are positively worthless. The mere fact that they are even considering an 'investigation' or 'legal-action' is testament to the need to legitimately BOMB Boston, but to do so in a government controlled manner (as to make certain ALL are vaporized, and to get some important urban bomb testing done)

    Would we lose a historical landmark? Nope, we already did, Boston has been dead for years now and all that is left is another revolting college town which creates more self-centered, pseudo-intellectual, elitist scumbags that probably would call something like Aqua Teen, "inane"

    Boston is a city full of subversive racists and blatant arrogance, don't believe me? Well, the first black person you'll see there is shining shoes, and every White, Asian, Middle Eastern, is the same over-privileged prick, they're practically even uniformed appropriately as well. Boston, there's a year of my life I want back, badly, and I'm considering launching an investigation into how you can sell out an entire city to a few over-rated colleges.

  242. Re:As a Bostonian by jdb8167 · · Score: 1

    >Why, when there are so many ways to make a bomb truely inconspicuous, would you
    >make one with FLASHING FUCKING LIGHTS?!?

    I would now.

  243. It was out in the open by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    There was a sidewalk going right under the bridge girder in question, it was also on the outermost girder of the bridge, facing out. Anyone walking or driving down that street would have seen it; I have seen traffic lights mounted in less conspicuous locations.

    There were plenty of pictures on zebbler.com but their site seems to be buckling under the traffic.

    There are some pictures here: http://flickr.com/photos/vanderlin/358742603/ that aren't as good as the ones on zebbler, and there is a video embedded in this article that was made by the people at zebbler showing the instalation of the mooninite signs.

    It is pretty clear they were meant to be seen.

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  244. Suspects talk to the press: by jkiol · · Score: 1
  245. Re:As a Bostonian by spun · · Score: 1

    Still wouldn't work. Humans are naturally curious critters, and flashing lights are an irresistable lure to many. Someone would notice that your bomb-with-flashing-lights was weird way before they even looked twice at that innocuous tattered brown box lying in the gutter.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  246. I can't wait for Bush to attack Iran by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    When the blowback comes and car bombs are blowing up in Times Square and the New York Subway and BART stations and airports at rush hour, this country is going to find out what terrorism really is.

    And this country's citizens can't take it.

    If they panic over some lighted signs, they're going to be begging the government to drop the Constitution and initiate martial law nationwide five minutes after the first car bomb goes off.

    Go look at this YouTube video about binary explosives. Put a somewhat larger dab of this thing in a container that will temporarily contain the explosive force to make it more effective. Surround it with a few hundred ball bearings. Put it in a small bag. Walk into any crowded area and set it off with a simple heat-ignited fuse. Kill several hundred people with a miniature "Claymore mine".

    This country is MADE for car bombs and IEDs. You could bring this country to its knees in three to six months with a concerted campaign involving no more than a few hundred trained terrorists.

    I mean, signs with lights and images on them? When was the last terrorist bomb you saw one that ADVERTISED ITS PRESENCE BEFORE BLOWING UP?

    I mean, Jesus Baron von Fucking Christ! How goddamn stupid do you humans have to be?

    Gutless punks, the lot.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  247. On the moon... by RoboOp · · Score: 1

    stupid politicians get their pants pulled down, and their asses spanked with moon rocks.

    --
    "First you get the Linux, then you get the power, THEN you get the women"
  248. Mission Impossible III Publicity Was The Same by Dissenter · · Score: 1

    http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/01/070201193 232.ooqqhaxc.html
    Looks like ATHF isn't the only one to cause a bomb scare with their publicity stunts. LA police blew up a newspaper stand last year cause there was a device attached to play the MI III theme when someone opened the door. Seems to me that bomb squads need to get better training if they can't tell a stupid light or sound show from an actual bomb.... I have 0 electrical training and can tell you if that's a fucking light-brite or a wad of C4.

    --

    Dissenter
    "There is no knowledge that is not power."

  249. My experience by overkill1024 · · Score: 1

    I had always wondered why I couldn't take my packpack into class in middle school. I found out later that it was because of guns and now bombs. Personally I'm quite forgetful and having to take select books and binders from my locker rather than caryying them definitely hurt me academic record. Not that it matters in middle-school but it goes to show.

    Strangely enough a similar incident happened in my last year at middle school. I did a science project on electrolysis. I had the standard jar of vinegar, nail, penny, wires, and battery. The vinegar disolves the penny, the electricity moves the copper to the nail, etc. My teacher set it outside for the weekend and the assistant principle saw it. Now, my teacher was gone but several others knew what it was including the janitor. She thought it was a bomb, called in the bomb squad to 'dispose of' my science project. It ended up costing the school some $3000 and I lost $3 in aligator clips and a jar. I was quite proud and now that I'm allowed to talk about it it makes for a good story but I'm not sure if I should be more afraid of "the terrorists" or the American public. Note this is pre-9/11, possibly around the school shooting era though.

    Regarding the actual event, I'm going to watch some of Aqua Teen Hunger Force not because I like it but out of spite. I was listening to a Boston radio talkshow after I heard the news out of curiosity. One of the main points was that this type of advertising shouldn't even be considdered in the post-9/11 world and that the evil corperation is to blame. One of the "homeland security experts" testified that people should realize that this sort of think can't be done because it will scare people. The irony in all of this is that the actual radio show is doing its part to establish this underlying fear. They even included a sound bite of one of the officils saying the city should be kept "on edge". It was also claimed that the device could clearly be seen as a threat. This doesn't seem to be the case considdering there are over twenty of them, they were up for weeks in multiple cities, and it was presumably reported by a single person in Boston. Unless the responsable party wanted this to happen then there was no malitious intent and there's no need to presecute especially after all of this negative publicity.

  250. Re:As a Bostonian by Darlantan · · Score: 1

    Wow. That's frightening. I think I'd rather take my chances with a bomb than risk them touching one.

    --
    Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
  251. My letter to Boston's mayor by tetsuo29 · · Score: 1

    I went to the city of Boston's website and used the submission form to send this to Thomas M. Menino:

    Hi. I'd like to first state that even though I can't quit laughing about the news of what happened in your city on Wednesday, I also feel sympathy for you in the decisions that you now face. It is never easy to step back and admit that a person or a group, especially those that you may know and be involved with either professionally or personally, has over reacted and caused a problem where no problem actually existed. However, I firmly believe that your law enforcement completely over reacted to Wednesday's "situation" regarding the guerrilla marketing props placed in your city to promote the upcoming Aqua Teen Hunger Force movie. I'm writing to you because I think that you should consider that a lot of us in other parts of the country are laughing at just how incompetent this makes the involved agencies and officials in Boston look. Especially when you consider that these same types of advertising props were placed in several other major cities without any sort of similar incident. Is there no one on your bomb squad who is young enough and hip enough to at least have known that these were ATHF characters? Obviously, I'm not a citizen of Boston and therefore you don't need to worry about whether or not I would ever vote for you, however, I think that you should consider how your constituents who might hold views similar to mine will view your actions following this fiasco. I think you should take appropriate action to start placing blame and responsibility squarely where it belongs- with those who over reacted and failed to see these things for what they were. If the "experts" within your police force or swat team or whomever it was that was evaluating these advertising gimmicks couldn't determine that they were in fact harmless and contained no explosive or incendiary components of any kind then their competency to fulfill their roles should be what is being questioned at this point. The makers and placers of these devices are probably only guilty of a minor offense in that they placed unauthorized advertising on public property. The biggest fault here lies with those who made the biggest mistake and that is not the placers of the ads, it is those who chose to bring the city to its knees because they failed to properly assess what they were looking at. I think the citizens of Boston are due an apology and I think that it needs to come from those who perpetrated the biggest offense. Anyway, that's just my 'two cents'. I only took the time to write because I thought it might help you to know some of us from the outside are currently viewing your predicament.

    --
    english is my first language, but my only formal education in it was from U.S. public schools, so you may forgive me for
  252. don't be stupid by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Investigating a suspicious package is good police work. Freaking the fuck out and shutting the city down when it turns out that each. and. every. device. is. harmless. is not.

  253. Big Trouble by bxwatso · · Score: 1
    Sure the government are a bunch of pinheads who don't communicate with each other and who blow things out of proportion. Sure the pranksters probably didn't break any serious laws. That is why they are in huge trouble. There is one crime above all others.

    Worse than murder is embarrassing the government. When someone embarrasses every level of the state government on the front pages, the government will never rest until somebody pays. If these guys had accidentally set an abandoned building on fire, this would not have made Slashdot. If these guys had raped a grandmother or killed a kitten, it would not be big news.

    The government will work overtime to find a crime with at least 10 years punishment behind it and hang those two. Their press conference did not help either.

  254. My Startling Realization by 615 · · Score: 1

    I recently became aware of the fact that I am significantly less concerned about terrorism than I am about our (United Statesians') increasingly invasive government. What the hell does that mean?

  255. Two questions, so two answers by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    1. It should have been obvious..... can't make that assumption. Why do you think if your smoke alarm goes off, even though you call and tell the 911 operator that it's just burnt toast it seems like the entire red army shows up? Because people are wrong, people are embarrassed and play down what's going on, people would rather "deal with it themselves" without realizing how fast things get out of control, and because it is much easier to turn around equipment and send it home than to call for more because you're under responding. 10 false alarms in a row doesn't mean that the 11th isn't real. It's a very big danger we face.

    2. You take the calls you have. If all of Boston was tied up on something, there would be other companies from other towns in those stations doing "coverage" so that the next call could be answered as well. In my town, we're volunteer firefighters (as in most of the US) but when nearby Portland goes to a 3rd alarm, we take our ladder and heavy rescue and park in a couple of their stations along with crews from other near by towns so that the city is still protected. That's how it works.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:Two questions, so two answers by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      #1 You've misread the text. Regardless, it's a judegement call.

      #2 Errm no, see the problem alluded to isn't number of men available, it's their
            ability to get anywhere when the major thoroughfares are shutdown.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  256. Have you ever driven in Boston? by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    Twice a day (at least) the city comes to complete halt with traffic (though it may have eased some now that the new freeways are finally open). Department locations and police substations are place in locations which take into account this gridlock.

    The bigger threat would be to establish a pattern were if you place 10 objects and 3 are found first which are nothing that the others are ignored. Well known tactics are to call in false threats to gauge response then do the real thing taking the response into account.

    The job is to over respond. Even in my little town. A minimum response to a call that someone is calling in and saying is nothing still has two engine companies, a ladder company, and a heavy rescue unit. That's around two million dollars worth of equipment and ten to twelve men. If you report you actually see or smell smoke (like an outlet that isn't right) you get two more engines, an ambulance, and another ladder from out of town plus a RIT (rapid intervention team) in case a firefighter gets injured or trapped. Why? Because it is so much better to have all that stuff on the way when the first officer gets there, reports that it's really nothing, and sends 99% of it home than it would be to have that first officer on scene discover there was fire in the wall space or behind the stove and now we're dealing with a developing structure fire without enough people to make an effective stop.

    I used to climb a little bit. I've been on several hundred feet of exposed cliff face in just a cheap waist and legs harness. When I do even the simplest rope rescue training for the fire department I have to wear a full harness that includes my shoulders, a helmet, and eye protection. Why? The assumption is that we're only there because something has already gone wrong, so it is by definition not a normal situation.

    Firefighting -- and I believe police work as well -- is an activity where any kind of complacency is deadly. Decisions have to be made. They have to be made in the absence of complete information. They have to be made quickly. In any situation where I'd have to decide between making you late for work and a 1 in 1000 chance of someone being injured or killed, you may as well call the boss because you're going to be late. I do this all the time with down power lines out here in the rural part of the country. A line is down, then you and I are going to stay 2 times the distance between poles away from the break. Period. Even if I can clearly see that the link from the transformer isn't connected (which amounts to a blown fuse -- usually that's the bang you hear when a transformer stops working) it isn't safe for me to be the one to make that call. On a night of a busy storm, that means I'm sitting out there in the road getting cold and wet for hours, and you're not driving up that street. That's just the way it is.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  257. Time to make our own! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out www.cupitup.com, somebody made a website dedicated on how to make your own mooninite!

  258. contact Mayor of Boston demanding an explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you want to contact Mayor Thomas M. Menino of Boston to tell him what you think of this and demand an explanation of how posting cartoon character signs qualifies as a bomb hoax, you can find his contact info here: http://www.cityofboston.gov/contact/default.asp?ID =55 in case they take it down, here it is again:

    Mayor's Office

    Address:
    Mayor's Office
    1 City Hall Plaza
    Boston, MA 02201

    Telephone: 617.635.4500

    Facsimile: 617.635.3496

    Web Site:
    www.cityofboston.gov/mayor

    E-mail:
    Mayor@cityofboston.gov
  259. just a thought on the situation. by The540 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they didn't think it was a bomb at all... Maybe they just didn't like the looks of it, thought it was vulgar ect., so they had it removed in the fashion that they did. That scenario makes more sense to me then them actually thinking it was a bomb. They could have been offended by it, label it a bomb, and start a bunch of shit over nothing. This, of course, is no excuse. If they were offended like little girls, then they should have said so, so we could talk even more shit about them online. Either way, the CEO Shouldn't have to step down, although, I'm glad he did, so maybe this garbage will die, and these "officials" won't be re-elected.