Slashdot Mirror

It's not out of the question that China is supporting Communist rebels in Latin America to mess with the US and out of a nostalgia for the good old days when Mao was murdering millions.

E.g. they do/did in the Philippines

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/9...

China, long suspected of aiding Philippine communist rebels, is now a capitalist country from which the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), or its armed wing, New People's Army (NPA), could no longer expect support, a spokesperson for President Duterte said.

"You've been left behind. China has left you behind," said former human rights lawyer Harry Roque, now Malacañang spokesperson.

The rebellion being waged by CPP and NPA, Roque said, "has gone on for so long that China has become the best in capitalism" but Philippine communist rebels "are still Maoists."

"What is that?" Roque said. "Move on," he said, addressing himself to communist rebel leaders.

Roque said Chinese communists, who had preached the principles of revolutionary leader Mao Zedong, were now "billionaires" who have turned their backs on communism after economic reforms in the 1980s led to "socialism with Chinese characteristics."

Roque said local communist leaders were still stuck to Marxist-Leninist-Maoist principles. Communist rebels were adhering to a guerrilla strategy attributed to Mao of surrounding the capital from the countryside.

Now that China is a capitalist country, Roque said local rebels would no longer have a patron to turn to. "Who will you report to?" Roque said.

There are still some Maoist true believers in China

https://www.wikileaks.org/plus...

4. (S) Turning to the Six Party Talks, Chun said it was "a
very bad thing" that Wu Dawei had retained his position as
chief of the PRC's delegation. It had been the ROK's
expectation that Vice Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai, who was
hastily transferred from Tokyo back to Beijing, would be
taking over from Wu. Chun said it appeared that the DPRK
"must have lobbied extremely hard" for the now-retired Wu to
stay on as China's 6PT chief. The VFM complained that Wu is
the PRC's "most incompetent official," an arrogant,
Marx-spouting former Red Guard who "knows nothing about North
Korea, nothing about nonproliferation and is hard to
communicate with because he doesn't speak English." Wu was
also a hardline nationalist, loudly proclaiming -- to anyone
willing to listen -- that the PRC's economic rise represented
a "return to normalcy" with China as a great world power.

Then why the hell did he nominate a moderate like Merrick Garland and then refuse to raise hell after the Republicans refused to do their job? You characterize that as some sort of a proactive fight, do you?

What of compromises offered to the Republicans in 2011 (and his refusal to push back with tactics like the trillion dollar coin threat after they began to seriously threaten to actually default on the debt)? What of unwillingness to be proactive and open about his support gay marriage (Biden had to drag him into it with his big mouth), his refusal (like Hillary) to consider used Trump's election to be used as a springboard for electoral college reform (or conceivably even a revolt), etc. I don't know what universe you come from but our Obama was not a fighter; he opted at all times to try for compromises and then quietly complain when the Republicans spat in his face. He was not proactive; he was reactive and image-oriented instead of results-oriented. His message: All we need to do is show we're better people than the Rs and we'll win!

Again, this is isn't a theory; it's what he actually said. Go listen to his reaction to Trumps' nomination; he is clearly saying that nothing needs to be done, the Republicans are beyond the pale, the battle is already won, all we need to do is sit back, virtue signal to remind people that we're not asshat racists like he is, and reap the easy victory. And you can set those words next to the Pied Piper memo which shows, in clear black and white, an explicit Democratic policy based on encouraging Republican nutbags (such as Trump) in the primary because they would surely end up hanging themselves. The memo may have been Re: Hillary's campaign but it was part and parcel of the same D-establishment strategy that Obama subscribed to, as evidenced by those comments after Trump was nominated if nothing else.

Which is why they all colluded with the DNC right? CNN politico washington post donna brazille handing debate questions to the clinton camp before a debate and on, and on and on and on.

I get stuck on the idea of fake pron (free porn), how can you actually have fake pron. I mean, does it like pretend to be pron but get's no one off. Sort of like how soft core pron is viewed today ie not real pron and gets no one off any more, except Hollywood weirdos who like to do their business on shrubbery.

I dare say once photo realistic computer animation takes off, all pron and all other content will be computer generated, no rutting monkeys required, either on screen or on hollywoods couches required. News of course would represent a new problem or as far as the USA is concerned, a positive refinement in fake news. Apparently the latest word out of the US, any contact with wikileaks in either direction, makes you a coconspirator with the Russian government ( https://wikileaks.org/-Partner... ).

Yup, and his IT guy didn't notice the bit.ly link for change password.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...

https://motherboard.vice.com/e...

When we sent these out I was saying to Dmitry 'No one is going to be dumb enough to click on that. He'll call his IT guy and they'll tell him not to click it'. And he said to me 'Volodya, these Americans have heads full of post modernism and spirit cooking. Their precious bodily essences have been contaminated with soy milk. They'll fall for it, like traitor drinking polonium!'.

And, Hail Great Leader Putin, it worked! KGB Deep Cover Agent Donaldovich Trumpovski was successfully installed as US President.

No doubt he'll call off the confrontational 'Red Line' policies of the former accursed Imperialist administration in Syria any day now and allow our pilots to operate their unmolested.

I provided you with a whole page of links and quotes where the NYT lied. WTF more is it going to take? Did you even read what Elon Musk wrote? "When the facts didn't suit his opinion, he simply changed the facts." They have the in-car telemetry that contradicts what the New York Times printed. There are tons of graphs with the source data. The Times lied again and again in the article.

Glenn Thrush of Politico was exposed seeking Podesta's approval of articles about Clinton. Even Thrush wrote "please don't tell anyone" and "I'm such a hack". The smoking gun: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...

The consequences for Thrush? He was hired by the New York Times after the election. What does it say about a company that it does these kinds of things? How does a person like that ever find a job in journalism, much less at the NYT? What the hell?

Paul Krugman Lies. Gets 8k+ retweets. . . "Ok, It's not true". 160 retweets. It's a simple matter of psychology: post misleading news, wait for people to react, it's something known as "impression formation". Once an impression has been formed, it sticks. This is how they psyop the masses. This is how they persuade people. A lot of these people will never check the news, they'll never check the sources, they'll never look for the original testimony, and they'll never see the truth.

Too often we label whole groups from a perspective that uncritically accepts a stereotype or unfairly marginalizes them. As one reporter put it, words like moderate or centrist "inevitably incorporate a judgment about which views are sensible and which are extreme." We often apply "religious fundamentalists," another loaded term, to political activists who would describe themselves as Christian conservatives.

We particularly slip into these traps in feature stories when reporters and editors think they are merely presenting an interesting slice of life, with little awareness of the power of labels. We need to be more vigilant about the choice of language not only in the text but also in headlines, captions and display type.

-- Source: New York Times

They just better make sure their software that implicates foreign countries by impersonating their traits doesn't get discovered.

Ooops!

if the government did it with full force, Alphabet would not keep control of the workgroup.

That wouldn't be a problem if one believes Assange's theory that Google is not what it seems. As the years go by I tend to think that too, it has a symbiotic relationship with the government, to the point it can be thought of as an unofficial branch.

Pretending that it's somehow equal is totally wrong. The Left utterly banished opposing opinions from the airwaves. It got so bad that conservative opinions retreated all the way to AM radio, a terrible ghetto, to be heard. I mean, come on, AM radio? It's a wonder that it still exists, and I had that thought 30 years ago. Then Murdoch started his Fox news, but what else? Prior to the rise of citizen journalism on Youtube, there was hardly anything but tame, controlled opposition which would be allowed to say something non-controversial and then refuted by the two other talking heads and the hosts.

The recent election was the tipping point, when the mask came off and the mainstream media became a partisan force, one dedicated to the cause of electing Hillary Clinton, who we now have hard proof in the form of a confession from her campaign manager, that she was utterly corrupt. The New York Times, after its completely biased coverage, said that "We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign", a statement breathtaking in its nearsightedness. Here's a leaked email showing how the Dems colluded with the press. Glenn Thrush of Politico was exposed seeking Podesta's approval of articles about Clinton. Even Thrush wrote "please don't tell anyone" and "I'm such a hack". The consequences for Thrush? He was hired by the New York Times after the election. How can you have any sympathy with these organizations that threaten people into silence with threats of doxxing? It's like the mafia. So let's drop the "both sides do it" thing because the power levels are not even remotely the same.

Pretending that it's somehow equal is totally wrong. The Left utterly banished opposing opinions from the airwaves. It got so bad that conservative opinions retreated all the way to AM radio, a terrible ghetto, to be heard. I mean, come on, AM radio? It's a wonder that it still exists, and I had that thought 30 years ago. Then Murdoch started his Fox news, but what else? Prior to the rise of citizen journalism on Youtube, there was hardly anything but tame, controlled opposition which would be allowed to say something non-controversial and then refuted by the two other talking heads and the hosts.

The recent election was the tipping point, when the mask came off and the mainstream media became a partisan force, one dedicated to the cause of electing Hillary Clinton, who we now have hard proof in the form of a confession from her campaign manager, that she was utterly corrupt. The New York Times, after its completely biased coverage, said that "We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign", a statement breathtaking in its nearsightedness. Here's a leaked email showing how the Dems colluded with the press. Glenn Thrush of Politico was exposed seeking Podesta's approval of articles about Clinton. Even Thrush wrote "please don't tell anyone" and "I'm such a hack". The consequences for Thrush? He was hired by the New York Times after the election. How can you have any sympathy with these organizations that threaten people into silence with threats of doxxing? It's like the mafia. So let's drop the "both sides do it" thing because the power levels are not even remotely the same.

the corruption that creates and sustains that shit.

If you and the rest of america weren't so uneducated and ignorant you could all choose a correct political ideology, aka it's not right wing. The more right wing your country, the more you tell the world you don't understand you're being fucked by private power.

Crisis of democracy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYFxtNgOeiI

Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. See the manufacturing consent videos when you get the time.

Science on reasoning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHj2GaPuEhY#t=349

Wikileaks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABDiHspTJww&feature=youtu.be

Manufacturing consent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwU56Rv0OXM

https://vimeo.com/39566117

  Other important info

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/10/michael-hudson-on-parasitic-financial-capitalism.html

Michael Hudson

The real news

The Citibank memo

Citigroup memo

http://www.rdwolff.com/

Richard wolf on capitalism

US distribution of wealth

https://imgur.com/a/FShfb

http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

  This is a project of american empire, aka the rich (big business) vs the rest of mankind.

The grand chessboard

The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives

Grand chessboard user review

Reddit and intelligence agencies

  Wikileaks -- Reddit and intelligence agencies

Well it's not a secret. On their own website there's even a timeline of the NYT endorsements of Democrats candidates:

https://www.nytimes.com/intera...

But the cozy relationship between the DNC and media goes far beyond that. Look at the leaked DNC emails.

For instance, here's one email where the Clinton campaign members discuss the questions that CNN will ask Trump:

From: Dillon, Lauren
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 12:00 PM
To: Freundlich, Christina; Roberts, Kelly; Sarge, Matthew; Graham, Caroline; Walker, Eric; Bauer, Nick; Brinster, Jeremy
Subject: RE: Trump Questions for CNN

CNN said the interview was cancelled as of now but will keep the questions for the next one :(

Good to have for others as well.

Updated here:

- Who helped you write the foreign policy speech you're giving tomorrow? Which advisors specifically did you talk to? What advice did they give you? Did they give you any advice that you chose not to take?

-A number of Republicans and think tanks including the Heritage Foundation have suggested tying defense spending to GDP, most often suggesting defense should be funded at 4 percent GDP. Is that something you would do/we'll see in your plan?

- You've said you look to Ambassador John Bolton for military advice and called him "terrific," but he was one of the architects of the Iraq war. How do you explain your praise for Bolton if you also claim the war was a mistake? What advice have you taken from him?

[...]

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emai...

Another example, a CNN analyst asking the DNC to approve her editorial points:

From: Maria Cardona [mailto:Maria.Cardona@deweysquare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:21 AM
To: Patrice Taylor; Miranda, Luis
Subject: URGENT - DRAFT CNN OPED ON NV
Importance: High

I want to make sure it is not to heavy handed. Please let me know asap! Thanks!!

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emai...

Here's an email from the New York Times:

From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: nconfess@nytimes.com
Date: 2015-02-11 14:54
Subject: Re: good times

Off the record. No, mostly about Brock's eccentricities shall we say.
On Feb 10, 2015 1:36 PM, "Confessore, Nicholas"
wrote:

> Hi John,
> I am sure you have lot and lots of downtime these days to talk to
> reporters, and so this question no doubt is well-timed.
> But can you offer any wisdom on whether this contretemps between Messina
> and Brock tells us anything about the future of the other Obama alums who
> have found places, or are seeking them, in Greater Clintonland?
> To put the question more directly--is this blow up over Media Matters
> going to make it harder for the Clinton folks to bring in and use
> effectively the best of the Obama alums?
> Seems you are among the few people widely respected in both camps. So your
> opinion would count for a lot.
> thank you,
> Nick
>
>
> --
> Nicholas Confessore
> The New York Times
> W (212) 556-5911
> C (917) 456 2446
> gchat: @nconfessore
>

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...

If you don't like those examples, no need to nitpick, there's a search engine on wikileaks, it's worth doing a bit of research to see for yourself. There's so much stuff in there that is damaging to the Democrats and mainstream media, no surprise they're all using the red scare to distract people from this.

Well it's not a secret. On their own website there's even a timeline of the NYT endorsements of Democrats candidates:

https://www.nytimes.com/intera...

But the cozy relationship between the DNC and media goes far beyond that. Look at the leaked DNC emails.

For instance, here's one email where the Clinton campaign members discuss the questions that CNN will ask Trump:

From: Dillon, Lauren
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 12:00 PM
To: Freundlich, Christina; Roberts, Kelly; Sarge, Matthew; Graham, Caroline; Walker, Eric; Bauer, Nick; Brinster, Jeremy
Subject: RE: Trump Questions for CNN

CNN said the interview was cancelled as of now but will keep the questions for the next one :(

Good to have for others as well.

Updated here:

- Who helped you write the foreign policy speech you're giving tomorrow? Which advisors specifically did you talk to? What advice did they give you? Did they give you any advice that you chose not to take?

-A number of Republicans and think tanks including the Heritage Foundation have suggested tying defense spending to GDP, most often suggesting defense should be funded at 4 percent GDP. Is that something you would do/we'll see in your plan?

- You've said you look to Ambassador John Bolton for military advice and called him "terrific," but he was one of the architects of the Iraq war. How do you explain your praise for Bolton if you also claim the war was a mistake? What advice have you taken from him?

[...]

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emai...

Another example, a CNN analyst asking the DNC to approve her editorial points:

From: Maria Cardona [mailto:Maria.Cardona@deweysquare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:21 AM
To: Patrice Taylor; Miranda, Luis
Subject: URGENT - DRAFT CNN OPED ON NV
Importance: High

I want to make sure it is not to heavy handed. Please let me know asap! Thanks!!

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emai...

Here's an email from the New York Times:

From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: nconfess@nytimes.com
Date: 2015-02-11 14:54
Subject: Re: good times

Off the record. No, mostly about Brock's eccentricities shall we say.
On Feb 10, 2015 1:36 PM, "Confessore, Nicholas"
wrote:

> Hi John,
> I am sure you have lot and lots of downtime these days to talk to
> reporters, and so this question no doubt is well-timed.
> But can you offer any wisdom on whether this contretemps between Messina
> and Brock tells us anything about the future of the other Obama alums who
> have found places, or are seeking them, in Greater Clintonland?
> To put the question more directly--is this blow up over Media Matters
> going to make it harder for the Clinton folks to bring in and use
> effectively the best of the Obama alums?
> Seems you are among the few people widely respected in both camps. So your
> opinion would count for a lot.
> thank you,
> Nick
>
>
> --
> Nicholas Confessore
> The New York Times
> W (212) 556-5911
> C (917) 456 2446
> gchat: @nconfessore
>

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...

If you don't like those examples, no need to nitpick, there's a search engine on wikileaks, it's worth doing a bit of research to see for yourself. There's so much stuff in there that is damaging to the Democrats and mainstream media, no surprise they're all using the red scare to distract people from this.

Well it's not a secret. On their own website there's even a timeline of the NYT endorsements of Democrats candidates:

https://www.nytimes.com/intera...

But the cozy relationship between the DNC and media goes far beyond that. Look at the leaked DNC emails.

For instance, here's one email where the Clinton campaign members discuss the questions that CNN will ask Trump:

From: Dillon, Lauren
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 12:00 PM
To: Freundlich, Christina; Roberts, Kelly; Sarge, Matthew; Graham, Caroline; Walker, Eric; Bauer, Nick; Brinster, Jeremy
Subject: RE: Trump Questions for CNN

CNN said the interview was cancelled as of now but will keep the questions for the next one :(

Good to have for others as well.

Updated here:

- Who helped you write the foreign policy speech you're giving tomorrow? Which advisors specifically did you talk to? What advice did they give you? Did they give you any advice that you chose not to take?

-A number of Republicans and think tanks including the Heritage Foundation have suggested tying defense spending to GDP, most often suggesting defense should be funded at 4 percent GDP. Is that something you would do/we'll see in your plan?

- You've said you look to Ambassador John Bolton for military advice and called him "terrific," but he was one of the architects of the Iraq war. How do you explain your praise for Bolton if you also claim the war was a mistake? What advice have you taken from him?

[...]

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emai...

Another example, a CNN analyst asking the DNC to approve her editorial points:

From: Maria Cardona [mailto:Maria.Cardona@deweysquare.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:21 AM
To: Patrice Taylor; Miranda, Luis
Subject: URGENT - DRAFT CNN OPED ON NV
Importance: High

I want to make sure it is not to heavy handed. Please let me know asap! Thanks!!

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emai...

Here's an email from the New York Times:

From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: nconfess@nytimes.com
Date: 2015-02-11 14:54
Subject: Re: good times

Off the record. No, mostly about Brock's eccentricities shall we say.
On Feb 10, 2015 1:36 PM, "Confessore, Nicholas"
wrote:

> Hi John,
> I am sure you have lot and lots of downtime these days to talk to
> reporters, and so this question no doubt is well-timed.
> But can you offer any wisdom on whether this contretemps between Messina
> and Brock tells us anything about the future of the other Obama alums who
> have found places, or are seeking them, in Greater Clintonland?
> To put the question more directly--is this blow up over Media Matters
> going to make it harder for the Clinton folks to bring in and use
> effectively the best of the Obama alums?
> Seems you are among the few people widely respected in both camps. So your
> opinion would count for a lot.
> thank you,
> Nick
>
>
> --
> Nicholas Confessore
> The New York Times
> W (212) 556-5911
> C (917) 456 2446
> gchat: @nconfessore
>

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...

If you don't like those examples, no need to nitpick, there's a search engine on wikileaks, it's worth doing a bit of research to see for yourself. There's so much stuff in there that is damaging to the Democrats and mainstream media, no surprise they're all using the red scare to distract people from this.

Thing is...those emails are all real.

You can read Sandberg's emails in the podesta chain right here. You can read Zuckerburg coming right out to bat for Hillary and the DNC to boot, right here. You can try screeching over the source all you want, but those emails are cold hard facts. Facebook came right out to bat for her.

Thing is...those emails are all real.

You can read Sandberg's emails in the podesta chain right here. You can read Zuckerburg coming right out to bat for Hillary and the DNC to boot, right here. You can try screeching over the source all you want, but those emails are cold hard facts. Facebook came right out to bat for her.

The NSA and the security advisors have full access to every computer from the USG? I thought there were other sectors in the government.
I also thought that Wikileaks just published CIA's ExpressLane project, showing the "cyber operations the CIA conducts against liaison services", which includes the NSA, DHS and the FBI, proving that this kind of group does hack into other sectors of the USG too (and not just innocent foreigners in their own homes).
Even if they could walk in and get the computers, being able to hack gives them much more power. It's funny that when the Chinese government wants people using IE everybody knows that it is to keep people hackeable, but when the USG does similar things most Americans just fall for it, as if they had the people's best interests in mind and the habit of following the law.
How much proof that they are more interested in obtaining more power than in protecting the American people do Americans need?

so either the screen shot is fake or they also managed to get hold of a certificate for wikileaks.org

Or more likely you misinterpreted the screenshot.

I see https://wikileaks.org./ I also see an exclamation mark beside it on the left. I also see the broken security icon to the right. No where do I see the characteristic green indication that most browsers will display when a certificate chain is trusted.

I'll bet they have a self signed certificate on the site.

Depends on the browser I suppose but the link is clearly https://wikileaks.org/ and not http://wikileaks.org/ in the screen shot from the first link.

Depends on the browser I suppose but the link is clearly https://wikileaks.org/ and not http://wikileaks.org/ in the screen shot from the first link.

Wikileaks not appearing on Slashdot as usual.

Today, July 27th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes documents from the Imperial project of the CIA.
Achilles is a capability that provides an operator the ability to trojan an OS X disk image (.dmg) installer with one or more desired operator specified executables for a one-time execution.

Aeris is an automated implant written in C that supports a number of POSIX-based systems (Debian, RHEL, Solaris, FreeBSD, CentOS). It supports automated file exfiltration, configurable beacon interval and jitter, standalone and Collide-based HTTPS LP support and SMTP protocol support - all with TLS encrypted communications with mutual authentication. It is compatible with the NOD Cryptographic Specification and provides structured command and control that is similar to that used by several Windows implants.

SeaPea is an OS X Rootkit that provides stealth and tool launching capabilities. It hides files/directories, socket connections and/or processes. It runs on Mac OSX 10.6 and 10.7.

Wikileaks not appearing on Slashdot as usual.

Today, July 27th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes documents from the Imperial project of the CIA.

Achilles is a capability that provides an operator the ability to trojan an OS X disk image (.dmg) installer with one or more desired operator specified executables for a one-time execution.

Aeris is an automated implant written in C that supports a number of POSIX-based systems (Debian, RHEL, Solaris, FreeBSD, CentOS). It supports automated file exfiltration, configurable beacon interval and jitter, standalone and Collide-based HTTPS LP support and SMTP protocol support - all with TLS encrypted communications with mutual authentication. It is compatible with the NOD Cryptographic Specification and provides structured command and control that is similar to that used by several Windows implants.

SeaPea is an OS X Rootkit that provides stealth and tool launching capabilities. It hides files/directories, socket connections and/or processes. It runs on Mac OSX 10.6 and 10.7.

Well, this is too late for Podesta, whose password reset email is archived for public viewing here. If Google had had this protection back then, he would likely be Secretary of State under Hillary now. But instead he's stewing in his own juices, infuriated over the election result. Why's he so upset, though? I thought he was used to coming in a little behind...

Russia Behind Cyber-attack, Says Ukraine's Security Service

I think it's premature to jump to such conclusions since we know that our very own CIA has also been implicated...

Vault 7 and more.

OutlawCountry: project of the CIA targets computers running the Linux operating system

"Today, June 29th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes documents from the OutlawCountry project of the CIA that targets computers running the Linux operating system. OutlawCountry allows for the redirection of all outbound network traffic on the target computer to CIA controlled machines for ex- and infiltration purposes. The malware consists of a kernel module that creates a hidden netfilter table on a Linux target; with knowledge of the table name, an operator can create rules that take precedence over existing netfilter/iptables rules and are concealed from an user or even system administrator.

The installation and persistence method of the malware is not described in detail in the document; an operator will have to rely on the available CIA exploits and backdoors to inject the kernel module into a target operating system. OutlawCountry v1.0 contains one kernel module for 64-bit CentOS/RHEL 6.x; this module will only work with default kernels. Also, OutlawCountry v1.0 only supports adding covert DNAT rules to the PREROUTING chain."

https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

-- Leaked Documents :

= OutlawCountry v1.0 User Manual
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

= OutlawCountry v1.0 Test Plan
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

OutlawCountry: project of the CIA targets computers running the Linux operating system

"Today, June 29th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes documents from the OutlawCountry project of the CIA that targets computers running the Linux operating system. OutlawCountry allows for the redirection of all outbound network traffic on the target computer to CIA controlled machines for ex- and infiltration purposes. The malware consists of a kernel module that creates a hidden netfilter table on a Linux target; with knowledge of the table name, an operator can create rules that take precedence over existing netfilter/iptables rules and are concealed from an user or even system administrator.

The installation and persistence method of the malware is not described in detail in the document; an operator will have to rely on the available CIA exploits and backdoors to inject the kernel module into a target operating system. OutlawCountry v1.0 contains one kernel module for 64-bit CentOS/RHEL 6.x; this module will only work with default kernels. Also, OutlawCountry v1.0 only supports adding covert DNAT rules to the PREROUTING chain."

https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

-- Leaked Documents :

= OutlawCountry v1.0 User Manual
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

= OutlawCountry v1.0 Test Plan
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

OutlawCountry: project of the CIA targets computers running the Linux operating system

"Today, June 29th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes documents from the OutlawCountry project of the CIA that targets computers running the Linux operating system. OutlawCountry allows for the redirection of all outbound network traffic on the target computer to CIA controlled machines for ex- and infiltration purposes. The malware consists of a kernel module that creates a hidden netfilter table on a Linux target; with knowledge of the table name, an operator can create rules that take precedence over existing netfilter/iptables rules and are concealed from an user or even system administrator.

The installation and persistence method of the malware is not described in detail in the document; an operator will have to rely on the available CIA exploits and backdoors to inject the kernel module into a target operating system. OutlawCountry v1.0 contains one kernel module for 64-bit CentOS/RHEL 6.x; this module will only work with default kernels. Also, OutlawCountry v1.0 only supports adding covert DNAT rules to the PREROUTING chain."

https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

-- Leaked Documents :

= OutlawCountry v1.0 User Manual
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

= OutlawCountry v1.0 Test Plan
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

OutlawCountry: project of the CIA targets computers running the Linux operating system

"Today, June 29th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes documents from the OutlawCountry project of the CIA that targets computers running the Linux operating system. OutlawCountry allows for the redirection of all outbound network traffic on the target computer to CIA controlled machines for ex- and infiltration purposes. The malware consists of a kernel module that creates a hidden netfilter table on a Linux target; with knowledge of the table name, an operator can create rules that take precedence over existing netfilter/iptables rules and are concealed from an user or even system administrator.

The installation and persistence method of the malware is not described in detail in the document; an operator will have to rely on the available CIA exploits and backdoors to inject the kernel module into a target operating system. OutlawCountry v1.0 contains one kernel module for 64-bit CentOS/RHEL 6.x; this module will only work with default kernels. Also, OutlawCountry v1.0 only supports adding covert DNAT rules to the PREROUTING chain."

https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

-- Leaked Documents :

= OutlawCountry v1.0 User Manual
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

= OutlawCountry v1.0 Test Plan
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

OutlawCountry: project of the CIA targets computers running the Linux operating system

"Today, June 29th 2017, WikiLeaks publishes documents from the OutlawCountry project of the CIA that targets computers running the Linux operating system. OutlawCountry allows for the redirection of all outbound network traffic on the target computer to CIA controlled machines for ex- and infiltration purposes. The malware consists of a kernel module that creates a hidden netfilter table on a Linux target; with knowledge of the table name, an operator can create rules that take precedence over existing netfilter/iptables rules and are concealed from an user or even system administrator.

The installation and persistence method of the malware is not described in detail in the document; an operator will have to rely on the available CIA exploits and backdoors to inject the kernel module into a target operating system. OutlawCountry v1.0 contains one kernel module for 64-bit CentOS/RHEL 6.x; this module will only work with default kernels. Also, OutlawCountry v1.0 only supports adding covert DNAT rules to the PREROUTING chain."

https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

-- Leaked Documents :

= OutlawCountry v1.0 User Manual
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

= OutlawCountry v1.0 Test Plan
https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...
(PDF) https://www.wikileaks.org/vaul...

This is the same paper that held a clandestine fund raiser with the DNC after their own lawyers told them not to [1]. It's stories rely heavily on anonymous stories and undisclosed facts, and the people who own it are not the same any more.

Top Obama officials and intelligence agencies have told me that their sources are nonsense. Who are you to question them?

[1] To spare you trying to decode the HTML email:

Great - we were never going to list since the lawyers told us we cannot do it.

We are waiting

Jordan Kaplan
National Finance Director
Democratic National Committee
(202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c)
kaplanj@dnc.org

> On Sep 22, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Rangappa, Anu wrote:
>
> They aren’t going to give us a price per ticket and do not want their party to be listed in any package we are selling to donors. If we let them know we have donors in town who will be at the debate, we can add them to the list for the party.

Jesus Christ. How many times does the WaPo have to put up some breathless "Anonymous sources say that Trump is secretly Putin's bitch, we got him this time guys really!" story before we stop believing this crap?

Podesta. Works. For. The. WaPo. You know, this Podesta? Hillary's Campaign Chair?

These articles are DNC Cointelpro. The Liberal version of Fox News and Breitbart. Nothing more, nothing less. Stop giving them attention.

When France does this its gets spied on https://wikileaks.org/nsa-fran...
When the USA does this its essential to "security, prosperity, and economic competitiveness"

"The CIA's Remote Devices Branch's UMBRAGE group collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques 'stolen' from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the "fingerprints" of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from." link

I bet you're right. The Vault7 leaks all seem like leaks from a competent but certainly not-miracle working security team. They've got access to some remarkable vulnerabilities, and they seem well-funded, otherwise just a bunch of normal guys. The poor soul who wrote this one probably never meant it to be more than a hack for a specific project.

Some of the Vault7 stuff is funny:

https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/cms/page_14588098.html

DART: WinXP Pro SP3 English w/ Adobe VM – why you hate my unit tests?
....

2015-01-29 18:29 [User #71473]:

Ah, but lowly users can't create projects, and I find it silly to go begging an admin when I want to make a silly tasklist in Jira.

#freejira

#getoffmylawn

2015-01-29 07:55 [User #1179925]:

Some would say there is an Atlassian product to help you track this stuff....

Let's call them Everyday Americans. They have been conditioned to reject any programs with Orwellian names such as "Net Neutrality." "Net Neutrality" is very reminiscent of The Fairness Doctrine. "The Fairness Doctrine" was re-visited in 2008 as a way to suppress talk radio shows (cf, minority media) such a "The Rush Limbaugh Show."

Its not Googles job to do the governments bidding.

Other way around actually.

My compliments at your clever ad hominem.

Have you reviewed John Podesta's emails at WikiLeaks?

Date: 2015-12-21 12:09 ... Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin ...

and

The Podesta Emails; Part One

Is Julian Assange a "conspiracy theorist?"
Is John Podesta not an "insider?"
Am I using someone else's "talking points?"

My compliments at your clever ad hominem.

Have you reviewed John Podesta's emails at WikiLeaks?

Date: 2015-12-21 12:09 ... Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin ...

and

The Podesta Emails; Part One

Is Julian Assange a "conspiracy theorist?"
Is John Podesta not an "insider?"
Am I using someone else's "talking points?"

Education is one thing, but education can only fix ignorance. Nothing can stem the volcanic stupidity that led sixty million Americans to vote for Trump. Stupid people are fecund.

Pulling the FCC licenses from outlets such as Fox News affiliates wouldn't hurt, but (a) our First Amendment makes it very difficult to dictate what the press can and can't say under the rubric of news reporting; (b) Trump owes his victory as much to liberal influence over mainstream publications like the New York Times as he does to any "alt-news" outlet; and (c) it's arguably too late.

Besides, the FCC has no jurisdiction over Internet news, which has already become more important than traditional media.

So, the only option I can see is disenfranchisement based on unbiased intelligence tests. Which, of course, don't exist.

No good answers here.

Google will be intertwined with government in no time; they practically are now.

TOO LATE

Google is getting WH [White House] and State Dept support and air cover. In reality they are doing things the CIA cannot do . . . [Cohen] is going to get himself kidnapped or killed. Might be the best thing to happen to expose Google’s covert role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Gov’t can then disavow knowledge and Google is left holding the shit-bag.

captcha: miasma

> In fact, she herself did it on the advice of Colin Powell.

More precisely, she asked Colin Powell how he got away with it and he told her. You can read the exchange in the PDF attachment to this email.

Google will be intertwined with government in no time; they practically are now.

Google is Not What It Seems

Sourcewatch: International Crisis Group

When The Bad Guys Came To Town

derp derp derp BUT ITS NOT THE GOVERNMENT CENSORING YOU IT'S A PRIVATE COMPANY DERRRP

The needed distractions are to cover up our own political corruption.

Their 'conclusions' are still speculation. Something that cops do every day to close out cases, frequently getting the wrong guy (that list is much longer than what is published on that page). We already know how easy it is to fake the hack and plant evidence. I've been watching this campaign build up for a long time. So please, save your breath. The contents of the wikileaks reveal much more than your tabloids ever will. But here again people must be distracted from that. And of course we have people just following the story they want to believe. And what we really have is a big case of the proverbial sore loser after spending all that effort over the last 15 years being groomed for the job. The story you choose to ignore is the contents of the leaked info. Only there will you find something resembling the truth.

You conspiracy theorists have a good game going this time, but it's still bullshit, just like the birther thing. Don't believe the tabloids. Try your case in a public court and let's see how it turns out. Only then can you confirm the Russians did it. So far this is nothing more than*burning the witch*

Wikileaks through the efforts of Julian Assange and the rest of the Wikieleaks team https://wikileaks.org/-Partner... and http://www.wikileaks-forum.com..., we know that the US governments consider every single person on this planet as a person of interest, someone who might need to be controlled, a potential target and they did disclose their intent to specifically target political activists for thought crimes.

Lets be blunt, you idiots worry about facial recognition at a sporting venue, what the fuck do you think they have been doing with your smart phones and passwords when they leave you sight as customs, taking data off, get real, putting stuff on is their goal, total control with total data, we are talking seriously sick psychopathic fuckers and not tomorrow but yesterday, in fact operating for years and years. Want to know slavery go cashless socities with mobile monitors and controls, George Orwell could not even dream of what is actually being constructed by an extremely corrupt US government.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-...

The US does not like France winning, so the US (with 5 eye friends) spy on every part of the French economy.
https://wikileaks.org/nsa-fran...
"French contract proposals or feasibility studies and negotiations for international sales or investments in major projects or systems of significant interest to the foreign host country or $200 million or more in sales and/or services, including financing information or projects of high interest... "

Depends on the tasking https://wikileaks.org/nsa-fran...
"Report impending French contract proposals or feasibility studies and negotiations for international sales or investments in major projects or systems of significant interest to the foreign host country or $200 million or more in sales and/or services, including financing information or projects of high interest including... "
Some nations should just stop trusting any US crypto or OS.

Why is this link being routed through a twitter account and then going to thenextweb.com, rather than just going to wikileaks. This is the link without the spyware tracking and the pointless intermediate article:
https://wikileaks.org/vault7/#...

Apple's garden is walled. It keeps the users in, but also keeps the bad things out.

Keep telling yourself that fanboi.

Apple iOS Security Vulnerabilities

iOS Exploits

https://search.wikileaks.org/?...
Mebbe there's no equivalent info on russia because they have less of a corrupt, lawlessness problem with their government than we have here in America.
Some people just don't understand that there's little excuse for not knowing almost anything you want these days...