Slashdot Mirror
Apple Announces Faster G4s, Upgraded Powerbooks
yuriwho writes, "Apple has announced several upgrades: an extra 50 MHz clockspeed for G4's, as well as an upgraded powerbook with extra MHz, firewire, RAM space and airport compatibility (tech specs/marketing here). There's also an iBook special edition. Check out hotnews for the info on the various product lines. Several minor improvements added together may make quite a bit of difference especially in the mobile market - unfortunately nothing stunning. "
I think you whack off too often and it's giving you brain damage.
It has fuck all to do with Crusoe. Crusoe is a publicity stunt and is actually pretty dull.
As for AMD, well they are keeping up with Intel who just demoed their 1.5Ghz processor... I still prefer AMD tho cus it's cheap. And I never did like the big box the Intel chips came in, it looks crap on your motherboard, Supa Socket 7 rulez I tell you.
>I think you whack off too often and it's giving >you brain damage.
>It has fuck all to do with Crusoe.> >Crusoe is a publicity stunt and is actually pretty dull.
I see and in your wisdom (which your post is oozing with) you have looked at the crusoe specs and deemed it dull. So what credibility do you have to influence our opinion? hmmm?
You have a small mind. I bet you knew that already didnt you?
"It's that single hundredth of a percent which keeps mankind from armegeddon. We will hold it in safe-keeping for you." - Steve Jobs
But who cares what you think? Go tell your muma
Perhaps 'Quality Control' means not posting a story from someone who calls himself 'Shitface'?
...on a side note, am I the only one who hears a loud-pitched whining noise?
i want an ibook
Apple didn't invent much of anything, what they do is package it so people will use it. As another example, my Mac IIvx, way back when, had an internal CD-ROM drive long before it became standard equipment.
I think the $16k PC to do what you're doing on a $4k Mac is a bit extreme -- sounds like the PC vunderkin didn't know how in the world to piece together a box to save his life. But as a Mac user, I wanted to say your points are well taken. In the area for which Macs are designed, they are wonderful. It's no enterprise level server (though it should be with OS X) and it's not a great gaming platform (though it's a lot better than it was).
;)" Coward.
My only complaint would be that the iMac is the quintessential thin client short of a dumb terminal. I work on db apps using MS-SQL server and IIS with ASP extensions, and I think an iMac would be the perfect client-side companion to this apps. Even Java, with RMI, is perfect using the iMac. Anyhow, good post.
Anonymous "Who's got time to register?
the url is unavailable!
I imagine that this is the marketing url anyway.
...Or possibly those that have an interest in getting Real Work done, versus fscking around with compiling drivers or toggling E skins on and off in front of his friends.
Gee, just like a PC isn't it?
Because they are you moron. 1.5 Ghz my ass, maybe in 2003
People always compare macs to PC's running windows. To me, the real comparison is macs to SGI's. Both are visual/audio orientated OS's, which Windows (and linux) are decidedly not.
Don't get me wrong, it's just that the mac market has organically evolved into a user base that is interested in "CREATING CONTENT" not running the fastest web server. There's nothing wrong with this, and this is why comparisons between "NT/LINUX" having higer uptime for a mailserver than your G3 notebook running MacOS are flawed. That's not the point--these mac users are not stupid--if they wanted a server on their hardware, they'd be dual-booting linux/MacOS (as several highly respected hackers I know do.)
I guess my real frustration, as a person who has used Macs, Linux, SGI, and tiny bits of NT, is that I really wish Linux could do some of the things I love on the mac-- multiple high quality audio, audio mixing, video editing, AND ANTI-ALIASED FONTS FOR CHRISTSAKES! Jeeze. Even Slow-aris has anti-aliased fonts.
What about trying to make Linux a platform that is more condusive to creative efforts that don't include programming? (a task in which it shines.)
Nobody reads the article (obvious in this case, since the links are bisted) and few read the replies, but that doesn't stop them from posting their responses to both anyway!
It's not a BSD-kernel. It's Mach 3.0...
Since you're not in the market for one, why do you care?
It seriously amazes me how slashdot will eat your HTML code. Here it is again (exact same source, hopefully different result):
Try http://www.maccpu.com/ for a quick and easy upgrade fix.
There are many upgrade CPU/upgrade card vendors available for basically any Mac you might have. You can even upgrade your iMac to 466 MHz if you want.
Actually, it's dangerous to compare any x86 variant chips to G3's & G4's. They're are inherently different. Adding 66 MHz on a G3 means a lot more than on a Dell laptop. Further, at the lower notch, the increase is actually more significant. The iBook SE is 22% faster than the regular iBook (allowing for a linear extrapolation from MHz). Whereas, going from 750 to 800 MHz Athlon gives a paltry 7% increase.
PowerBook (FireWire): FireWire Target Disk Mode
Caution: Troll FUD.
Here's one place to find Apple's hardware specs:
http://www.info.apple.com/applespec/applespec.taf
[cshepher@grape ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 750
temperature : 0 C
clock : 266MHz
revision : 2.2
bogomips : 266.24
zero pages : total 0 (0Kb) current: 0 (0Kb) hits: 0/1747 (0%)
machine : iMac,1
motherboard : iMac MacRISC Power Macintosh
L2 cache : 512K unified
memory : 32MB
l2cr override : 0xa9010000
[cshepher@grape ~]$ uptime
11:02am up 26 days, 15:22, 2 users, load average: 0.32, 1.00, 0.83
Only 26 days? Jesus man, that sucks!
Actually G4's are that fast especialy if your using graphic apps. Ive run mixed environments for the last 5 years and have seen the best and worst of both platforms. While I love the admin level control on WinNt as far as a standard end user goes the MacOS kicks ass. People just are not intimidated by it,I dont know why. But with that said I feel that Mac hardware has become more unreliable in the past 2 years. Its just a tool, I would only use a mac for audio editing,its just better. On the other hand I would never serve a site from a mac. Choose your tools wisely-mojo
>But, to be positive, as long as Mac OS X's fancy animations don't bring the cpu to a grinding halt, I'm sure
>the BSD-based kernel will lend quite a bit of stability to the system (unless Linus's warnings about putting
>graphics in the kernel come to haunt them!)
OS X is based on Mach, which is a microkernel. Drivers are layered on top, sort of as 'services'. There's a new API for drivers (NeXT had the DriverKit) called IOKit. I don't know much about it, but I'd be extremely suprised to see it patch into the microkernel...
BTW:, Check out: Carmack's port of XFree to OS X!
If its so much better why is only %6 (or something like that) of the world using macs?
Well, that would be because of Microsoft's marketing bs. When it comes down to it, the 500 MHz G4 squarely outperforms a 800 Mhz Athlon. Better architecture, less overhead, no waste on x86 legacy.
Your line of reasoning also makes Linux seem shitty. And, not to get too technical, if you loathe cultists, why do you post to slashdot?
An Apple rep was a guest speaker at my mass com class, and he gave a good analogy about mHz speed comparisons between different processors. A motorcycle's engine goes, say, 7000 rpms. A pickup truck might only do 2000 rpms. But which is going to be better able to pull a huge trailer?
if unless? interesting word arrangement ... my point that RISC pays off when legacy x86 support is not required is the substantive basis for why lower clock speed PowerPC chips outperform over-hertzed x86 chips. If, somehow, you thought I was saying present x86 were not RISC, you were mistaken. I read the arstechnica article when it was originally posted to /. PowerPC, of course, is a better implementation of RISC since it was built this way from the ground up. The legacy support for old x86 CISC-type architecture does make current x86 implementations slower. Transmeta looks interesting, but that's another topic...
Get scared.
I have a 8100/80 that I've been using for 6 months. It came with no memory and no harddisk. Put in 136 MB RAM, a 32* Plextor CD-ROM, had to buy another SCSI cable to connect all the internal SCSI devices ("Apple does no recommend or endorses the use of more than 1 device on the internal SCSI bus" -- too bad), a Nubus 10/100 Mbit Ethernet Card, found a Nubus Video Card in a dig and plugged in a Newer G3 @ 220 Mhz Card. Don't get me started about the peripherals.
So far I have no need to upgrade (well I do have this itch at 3 AM during long sleepless nights but that's probably part of the general existential dread at that time)
Ok, I do not have any 3D hardware support and am therefor deprived of the productivity boost of Quake III and ok MkLinux completely phreaks out on my video card _but_ so far this machine answers all my needs adequatly (mostly flatland works) and PC users who entered my shrine are genuinly impressed that a machine of 1993 can still keep up.
So...
point 1: even this old dinosaur form the Nubusogeen could be upgraded to something that still can be used today; it al depends on what you think ("'s comes down to headology") that your computing needs are
point 2: I got to tell my specs again
The kinds of things that the DV iMac is capable of have been in the hands of the general public...for years
Sorry, there is no PC-equivalent to iMovie. You can pretend, but making a movie on a PC is not easy.
As for your concerns about video cards for gamers, the VooDoo 4 and VooDoo 5 cards will ship with native Mac drivers. If you really want to get in the game, try a Formac video card with 3D glasses and *real* 3D.
I'm sorry you feel insecure enough that the color of your computer matters.
You're saying they could give you an extra 66 MHz for the same price. I don't think it works that way. Then again, like the above AC said, I really don't think you're in the market for one so why are you so concerned about it?
Clock speed is irrelevant--it is net throughput at the processor (your Alpha sitting there whirring away waiting for buffers and pipes to refill is a classic case in point, and the early ones were cited as tyextbook examples of poor design). The PPC will outperform an Intel chip by 15% to 30+%, on a clock for clock basis: the PIII 600 is eyeball to eyeball with the G3 500 or the G4 450, assuming that you are not running M$ app. The G4e due out this fall ought to leave Intel permanently in the dust, and pull only a fraction of the power.
apple has also announced faster pouring of hot bowls of grits down their pants. thank you.
Funny thing is, I've been working with computers for 20 years. I did 4 years at a consulting company that did service on PC's and Mac's. I think I serviced maybe half a dozen Mac's in 4 years. One was at an Ad Agency. They had a seriously fouled up hard disk. I replaced the disk and was able to recover their data. They had about a dozen machines networked together, and the artists had done it all themselves, starting in the late 80's. I was their first service call.
Is this style or is it substance?
(Afterwards, they sent me a box of italian chocolates and a nice illustration as a thank-you -- that's style!)
Sorry, Delmoi, you're wrong. The G4 significantly outperforms a 800 MHz Athlon. Get use to it. RISC pays off, especially when legacy x86 support is not required.
"3. Old apps that are not recompiled must be run inside of a separate window which emulates Mac OS 9. It won't be fun to run apps this way, but at least it will be possible. "
This is not quite correct. "Classic" apps will run side by side with Carbon or native OS X apps, not in a separate window. However the "Classic" apps will not have the new OS X GUI look known as Aqua, and the "Classic" apps will all run in a single process, in a single memory partition, so if one "Classic" app crashes, all the "Classic" apps go down. Carbon and MacOS X native (Cocoa) apps will have PMT and protected memory, while the "Classic" apps will not have protected memory, and will only have cooperative multi-tasking among themselves (though the whole "Classic" process - aka "Blue Box") will be pre-emptively multi-tasked with other OS X tasks.
I saw a graph of CPU power usage in Watts of various CPUs, The G4s used a similar amount of power as the mobile PIIs. It used less power than the 604s (604s were intended to be workstation chips only) They used *way* less than standard PIIIs.
The G4 has potential to be stuffed in a laptop, it has a full compliment of power-management features as well as the power usage mentioned above. Maybe the Apple engineers are spoiled by the relatively low power usage and heat dissapation the G3 affords, and will wait for Mot to de-tune the G4 like the Mobile Pentiums are.
I'm not anti-Apple -- in fact, I'm writing this on a Powerbook G3 -- but, this is hardly a newsworthy subject. A small speedbump here, a change in color there, a new Firewire port there...so what?
Now, if they had secretly released 800mhz G4e's, or quad on-die cpus, or computers that fly, THAT would be worthy of a Slashdot article.
I'm not having a good time with multiple monitors, Windows 2000, and a Matrox G400. The tech just isn't there yet.
Makes me long for my Mac IIfx -- 10 years ago, three monitors, and it worked.
I don't think I can take the time to explain logic and reasoning to you. It is well know, particularly to those who post around here, that /. is a cultist community. I don't think it's a bad thing, but that's the way it is. I like cults. Mac's are nice to. I'm sorry you've met people who make grandiose claims that rub you the wrong way. You should be aware that MHz only have meaning within the context of the chip architecture being discussed. So while a 800 MHz Athlon is faster than a 750 MHz Athlon, a 800 MHz Athlon is not faster than a 500 MHz G4.
Here are a few of the links to info on Apple's site...
New iBook SE (graphite)
G4 Page
PowerBook
The real problem was that there was an errata in the earlier iterations of the chip which made running it above 450 MHz erratic. Thus the 500 MHz G4 had to be delayed (unexpectedly). It happens. Some companies (like Intel) just ship the chip with its errors and never look back. Motorola, on the other hand, is a bit more concerned with quality control.
(improper use of apostrophe) [improper use of parentheses]
...confusing the OS and the third party software available for it.
Take a look at these pages for a thorough explanation of why this is wrong:
http://www.apple.com/creative/design/index.html
http://www.apple.com/colorsync/
http://www.apple.com/creative/printing/index.html
So once you're through digesting that, remember that W2K is not available yet.
If you're really interested in the advantages of Apple Macintosh computers, why not explore Apple's website some more. Here's a place to start: http://www.apple.com/macos/technologies.html . You will discover that the computing experience over on the Macintosh side far surpasses that of Windows. Simple, plain, the way it should be.
apple = good mac = good g4 = good 500 mhz = good pbg3 = good everything = me want any questions?
And for another example of a recent Apple innovation, Firewire
Yep, great innovation there... And look who's using it. Apple, and... (Well, sony uses i.link, witch is based on the same spec, and a few PC's have IEEE.1394)
And apple didn't develop Firewire themselves, several companies did, including Intel.
Another product killed by apple's braindead licensing terms... (Well, not killed but severly slowed down)
I've been using the same PC since 1995, when I purchaced it, it was a p75 with 8 megs of ram, and 800meg hard drive. Now, it's a k6 400 with 128megs of ram, and 40gb of total storage space. PC's, unlike mac's can be gradualy upgraded, in the worst case you need to get a new motherboard with a CPU, but that's only like $50-$100 depending on how 'high end' it is, and only takes about 20minutes to install. Can you get an empty mac mobo for $50?
the biggest anouncement from apple is the powerbook with a rage 128 chip. this makes apple's 500 mhz g3 powerbook the fastest portable game machine out there. while the 128 is nothing all that great in the desktop world, it's gonna rock the portable. imagine, Q3 on an airplane!
I ran an iMac 266 MHz from June 6th '99 to early October '99 with no restart at all. It ran as an FTP server, Hotline server, Soft-Router, and Timbuktu for remote administration. The reason it went down in October was because a Janitor unplugged it.
Now that's a fresh idea!
Good link is here.
How hard can finding www.apple.com be?? Get a grip d00d.......
When I bought my Mac it was top of the range, about 2 months later it wasn't. Another couple of months later it's even further down.
What's the point of getting a new machine each time? Better to wait until it levels off or Apple should allow you to easily upgrade what you have.
> Don't hold your breath for G4 powerbooks. They aren't going to happen.
> The G4 simple uses too much juice and puts out too much heat to be practical.
An uninformed and/or invalid assertion.
That argument suggests that Intel laptops shouldn't even exist...
See http://www.macinfo.de/hardware/strom.html
Crack open a G4 desktop some time. I haven't seen a heatsink that big since the alpha433. Oh, I get it, they don't have a fan, so they need a big heatsink! No wait, they just cleverly placed the fan in the case, so that when you flip the motherboard up, it blows DIRECTLY onto the HUGE heatsink.
Explain to me how you're going to stuff that into a laptop? Keep in mind that Intel laptops use specialized version of this chip. Judging from mot's production problems with the desktop 500Mhz g4, I suspect a custom 'mobile' version is out of the question.
>hell, my snazzy new p3-500 laptop win2k box >hangs almost on a daily basis hmm...sure it does, what do you do? smash it on the floor? I have win2k for a while, and damn thing is faster than win98 and it never crashed so far - we are talking heavy duty work with poorly done applications. Previously I had to restart my Win98 every few hours, in case it hadnt already restarted itself :) sp
Your roommate must have had too much crap on there for it to run right. I've been a Mac man for, hell, 8 years and have never, ever had my machine crash more 4 or 5 times in a week.....except that one time I put experimental OpenGL libraries on it, but that didn't count (the disclaimer said so). I took them off and it was back to where it was.
A new laptop. Woop-te-doo!
Where's all the cool stuff? Dammit, it's the year 2000 already and we're still typing away on crappy little keyboards, looking at tiny little screens (50 year old technology!) I guess Apple thinks I'm supposed to be excited by this...
Bah! Wake me up when something GOOD happens. I'm going into cryogenic sleep.
Suggested rating: (+666, Trollgod)
Apple still keeping thier hardware specs to themselves?
Well, I won't be buying a mac anytime soon then.
It's going to be OS X that puts a *NIX on the desk of my boss...not SUSE that he ditched.
Let me get this straight. You decided to install a _very_ early, pre-release of a beta operating system on your BOSS's desk? I guess you don't like your job.
-josh
Does this have anything to do with the crusoe? And the AMD chips getting faster by the day? what do you guys think?
Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
What has happened to that infamous /. quality control? Slashdot had to call me "a reader" when they accepted my submitted story because of my name but they are willing to accepted bogus links?
My "a reader" identity can be seen at this story, I am surprised they even gave me the standard karma bonus of a submitted story.
Real men dump cores! Read my journal, I am neat.
Though I admit that the current MacOS leaves something to be desired please remember MacOS X is coming. MacOS X is a major overhaul. MacOS X is supposed to be based on some BSD (I do not remember which) and the simple gui of MacOS past has been revamped.
Even if MacOS X is not up your tree it might mean that drivers and other shit will be more readily available.
Real men dump cores! Read my journal, I am neat.
Sorry, the origional poster is right. The notebook is pretty nice, but it's not anything stellar.
For instance, how is Wireless and Firewire helpful if there are no compatable devices?
-- Erich
Slashdot reader since 1997
C.
I sometimes write stuff
I've run various servers, HTML, FTP, Hotline etc from a Mac and easily get months of uptime without a problem. There are a few appls that cause problems with Macs, Netscape is one huge example but one doesn't run those on a server.
:)
My home machine has been running for a couple of onths with the odd reboot to install system upgrades (and a new 128Mb DIMM) as the only downtime.
On the other hand if I keep my PC laptop running for ore than a few days it gently grinds to a halt and needs a reboot anyway. Unless I'm running Linux of course.
Personally I've never had real problems with macs in general - it can be a pain of you have a problem as they can be difficult to isolate but they don't go wrong that often. Just keeping a Windows PC running properly seems to take ages and for a bloke without a infinite amount of time to dedicate to Linux, keeping a linux box up to date is also somewhat time consuming (when it's a laptop anyway)
I just wish people would stop the age-old "macs are only a toy" bollocks. They might look nicer than PC but you can get at least as much productive work (and usually more) done on one.
Apple are also (often) technological leaders - with a huge R&D budget.
Ok, MacOS 9 is fairly old, but it is a fully 32bit system, something Microsoft are only just getting the hang of and with MacOS X coming fairly soon, they will have the best of both worlds - a system that's piss easy to use but unix based so power users can compile their posix apps to their heart's content
So how about we stop knocking Apple becuase their computers look nice and maybe spend some more time discussing their good points?
Oh god, that's bound to invite the "What good points? can it pour grits down N. Portman's trousers?" brigade
Hohum
troc
Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
Most of the nifty new features (scrapbooks and auction manager) aren't really working yet, but promise to be useful. The new look is ... wierd. Most of the usual Mac rumors sites have screenshots up. It is, however, not as bad as it looks in a screenshot when actually used. And the nifty little touches, like easily rearranging the toolbar buttons are very nice.
The darn thing is also more stable than any Netscape product (prior to 4.7) they've ever put on a Mac. I'll have to check the final version (March?) to see how cooperatively it multitasks (I had to turn 4.5's priority down so other apps would run properly with it in the background).
At the very least, this particular version of IE does not suck.
And as for RAM claims, Microsoft marketing and package design always claims the absolute minimum RAM partition in which the program will launch and display a blank document, this bears no resemblance whatsoever (often by an order of magnitude for intensive tasks) to what the program needs for useful work. Note especially that the default RAM allocations for all MS Office products on the Mac *will crash* the machine regularly, and must be increased (usually, IME, Apple bears the blame for this, they have had enough problems lately without being blamed for an MS mistake).
Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
Um... OK, you had a problem doing a certain action in a specific end-user application.
QED the OS sucks.
You know, I'm sorta having trouble following that logic. I could draw that conclusion about any operating system, given a significantly shitty application. It's like calling Linux an unstable operating system becuase one app crashes over and over. Just because the OS claims to be friendly, it doesn't ensure that every application on it is likewise.
What application was this, anyhow?
You're right about Airport being 802.11 but Apple's airport card is not PCMCIA. There is a custom slot (more like IDE) inside the iBooks, G4s, iMac DVs, and now Powerbooks that takes the card.
The card from Apple is $100. The PCMCIA version from Lucent is ~$200...
--hunter
RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
There are three classes of applications but they break down like this:
1. Cocoa Apps - Cocoa is the evolution of OPENSTEP using Objectice C and/or Java. Fully OO framework for building new apps. These will only run on OS X.
2. Carbon Apps - MacOS toolbox apps slightly reworked and linked against the Carbon libraries to allow running native in OS X and in OS 8.1 and above.
3. Classic apps - These are MacOS toolbox apps that run in a compatibility mode (OS 9 within OS X).
To answer the original question, Apple is not porting Cocoa or Carbon to LinuxPPC so I doubt you can get any binaries to run.
OS X is based on FreeBSD so POSIX compatible utilites should compile. We'll see.
--hunter
RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
Back in the late 80s, a boring beige boxy Mac II series computer would set you back $5000 to $10,000. This is when PCs sold for $2500 at most.
Apple doesn't have the software tech advantage anymore that could demand a price two to four times greater than their competitiors. As they proved up to about 1996, they don't even have the software tech to demand a price $500 greater than their competitors (for much faster machines). If style didn't sell they'd probably be out of business.
Of course, when they were making the 75% margins, they invested a ton of money in to R+D projects that failed (QuickDrawGX, Taligent, Copeland, OpenDoc, etc.) So luck and good managment play into it too.
--
Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
www.lucent.com
No compatible devices? AirPort is fully 802.11 compliant.
FireWire works with basically every digital camcorder out there.
Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
Don't hold your breath for G4 powerbooks. They aren't going to happen.
Take a look at the history. Back in the 68k days, powerbooks were using 68030s when the high end of the desktop had moved up to the 040. When powerbooks got around to using 040s, they used the crippled, FPU-less 68LC040. When they moved up to PowerPCs, they used 603s while the high-end desktops had 604s. Likewise, they had 603es when desktops had moved to the 604e.
The G4 simple uses too much juice and puts out too much heat to be practical. Sure, that will come down in time, but there's likely to be a faster, cheaper, and lower-power PPC chip out by then that would be used.
Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
I have no doubt that Apple's engineers are spoiled by the G3. The thing is, the PowerBook's battery life is a big deal! My iBook runs for 4.5 hours straight under heavy use, longer if I go easier on it. I would not have bought it if it didn't have that feature, and I suspect the same it true of many of Apple's portable customers. What full-featured PC notebook runs for so long on one charge?
I'm sure Apple could make a decent portable with a G4. But they can't afford to be decent, they have to be exceptional.
Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
I'm over here playing with my Mac.
Had this G3 for 18 months, had one white knuck crash, but other than that, it's been fine, it's a beige box, no style, all substance. I will buy the graphite iBook, after I set up a recording studio around a G4 and Cubase. But macs are toys. Yeah right.
Much of the independent recording done in Nashville is being done on Macs. Screw the big studios, a basement, a Mac some weed and a weekend and you're rolling. I have had demos from the best studios, and demos done on the mac. The studio time costs more that a base G4. the product you get from the Mac and Cubase is as good if not better than the stuff out of the traditional studios.
Call the Mac a toy, toys are fun.
Use windows at work. the expensive custom database I have to work with was made by an idiot. He should be flogged!!!
photosMy Photostream
Didn't Win 98 come out at the same time as the iMac?
If so, then I think Win 98 was a large reason for the sudden glut of USB devices.
Simply because Win98 was the first x86 os that, AFIAK, had passable USB support.
------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
airport is simply regular 802.11, so i'm sure you could find a cheaper pcmcia card from another manufacteror
------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
It's just my bad sense of humor (one that gets me marked down as troll from time to time) slipping through. I like what Jobs has done for the company, but it's all about his ego sometimes. :) Anyways, they are doing surprisingly well for a company in the dumper 3 years ago. kudos!
Lowmag.net
And also, it's pretty obvious that it's the PC world that determines things that are the official, percieved and unofficial benchmarks. I agree that the only thing that matters is performance. However, the perception of 500mhz v. 800 mhz makes people think that newest dell or compaq is better than a Macintosh.
However, the processing bandwidth, you'll be sure to agree, is way higher on a G4 than on an intel chip. they have 500 mhz chip with up to 1 meg backside cache running at 250mhz. While the system bus is still 100 mhz and can only pump 800MB/s, it is still powerful. I do make the following off the wall prediction:
- Apple will release a system with 200mhz bus, using the clock up/down method that athlon uses on the ev6 bus. This would make the system run at 1.6GB/s something els to put inder its belt.
- Apple will work to get some of those nifty 200 (or more) dpi flatscreens in their line. Apple known for nifty.
- They will one day cave and put an appropriately shaped mouse and keyboard on those things. (ok, so it's more of a nit)
Anyways, they still have a few chances to make announcements, so this may be their best year ever!Lowmag.net
do a bit of research before you make a blanket
statement like "$50-$100". here are the latest
cpu prices:
http://sharkyextreme.com/hardware/weekly_cpu/
note the price difference between the top and
top-1 cpus.
The original question was "does/will LinuxPPC support the airport". This does not answer the question. I don't give a rat's ass about MacOS apps.
--
Linux MAPI Server!
http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
(Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
$200 for a 66 Mhz speed bump? I think Apple expects a lot of people to pay more for a color they wouldn't be embarrassed by.
Ignoring big time enterprise needs and such, I would say a low-load server is almost certainly going to be more stable than a desktop machine. of course a Mac can run various servers. My friend's mac crashed because it ran Photoshop, Illustrator, In Design, ImageStyler, and Animation Master. Besides, heralded by many, Internet Explorer for the Mac is a *beast*. Doing absolutely nothing, hands off the keyboard and mouse, a static page in IE in the foreground will seriously interrupt a quicktime movie playing in the background. That's just silly.
These are differences between the old ibook and the new ibook. The price difference of $200 is between the new ibook and the new ibook special edition. The only technical difference there is the clockspeed.
Regardless of whether the speed increase is worth the price increase or not, I think Apple plans on some number of people actually paying more money specifically for the other color. When in reality the color of the case is totally independent of the hardware inside, it seems kind of slimy to me to force customers to upgrade in order to get something they could give them for the same price.
You're comparing the very top of the market with the notch below--that's dangerous. A 50MHz speed difference on a dell laptop, for example, is $50-$100.
I always thought Mac OS was more reliable than Windows until I moved in with a mac lover. For a year and a half I watched a new imac, and then a new G3, and then a new G4, crash four or five times a day, while my windows (admittedly not used nearly as often as my linux machine) would crash every three or four days.
Admittedly, the newer versions are much more stable. 8.6 showed a big jump in reliability and 9 looks better, but still crashes more than Windows. I used to spend 6 hours a day on a mac plus...now those things never crashed on me!
But, to be positive, as long as Mac OS X's fancy animations don't bring the cpu to a grinding halt, I'm sure the BSD-based kernel will lend quite a bit of stability to the system (unless Linus's warnings about putting graphics in the kernel come to haunt them!)
As far as I know the PC with it's VGA and BIOS wont handle multiple displays and cards plug and play. I relly love the way my PPC with OpenFirmware works. The advantages with the mac is the RISC processor and the lack of old outdated BIOS madness
De lyckliga slavarna är frihetens bittraste fiender, legalisera!!!
Apple started off as a "home" computer company, right?
No, you couldn't. Try comparing prices. Apple appears to be selling Airport hardware at cost to encourage Mac sales. This is true of the $4000 Cinema Display as well; that's why Apple won't sell you one except bundled with a G4.
--
This space unintentionally left unblank.
I think the $16k PC to do what you're doing on a $4k Mac is a bit extreme
Not as extreme as you think, although we experienced something closer to $5k-to-$10k in the Ad Agency I worked at previous to the New Year.
The iMac (and, indeed, the G4's) can indeed be thin clients, netbooting from a properly equipped Mac OS X Server machine.
woof!
All things considered... Gnome and company may have these things as projected *goals*, but exactly how far along the path are they? Apple, on the other hand, has an almost completely finished product that will give that ease of use WITH a Unix system (OS X).
/usr/bin/ping and such will work fine after recompiling... if they aren't installed by default.
Goals are good things... but they don't pay the bills. I tried installing Window Maker on my SUSE box at home (*sigh*) and, to be frank, I still don't have it quite working right. I'm busy tracking down the right versions of half a dozen required packages and fudging with Makefile's where some things are too anal about version numbers. Gnome installed (relatively) painlessly, and KDE just plain sucks.
On another note, re: your off topic note... OS X is supposed to be almost completely POSIX compliant, so it reasons a guess that your standard
woof!
The short answer is... MHz isn't a fair measure of a processor's speed when look across multiple platforms. I don't have bench marks to flaunt or anything, but up until last month I worked at an Advertising agency that used mostly macs, but had a few PCs laying around. We wrote up a scripted action for Photoshop 5.5 and ran it on a G4 @ 450MHz with 512mb of RAM, and then on a Pentium III 600MHz with 512mb of RAM. The G4 finished in a little less than half the time as the Pentium III.
It seems, <i>to me</i> that the G4 pretty much kicked the "faster" Pentium III's ass doing gaussian blurs, renderings, etc.
What this means in benchmarks and the "what's faster" war I don't really know. Nor do I care. It's all about having the right tool for the job.
woof!
Mobile-dog has various pictures taken from the MW Tokyo.
It's nice to see that apple is updating the iBook and Powerbook, moving up to 500mhz in their Lombard line. Once again they using desktop processors in those portables unlike those "mobile" intel chips. Plus the iBook is the coolest linux portable you'll ever find :)
I saw your post and was compelled to reply to it rather than meta-moderate it. What a bunch of hooey! I cannot stand zealotous behaviour unless it is my own zealotous behavior, so here it is:
The multiple suites of design, illustration, photo-manipulation, layout and print management are all Mac-based, and the people who use them are all mac users
This stone age idea was okay about 3 years ago, but I have yet to see a mainstream graphics app that hasn't been ported to NT. I worked in a hybrid Mac/NT environment for a year and a half and watched the Macs get displaced during that time. I have to say that my users were not thrilled to see their Macs go, but they wouldn't take them back now.
Show me a PC that can handle 3 different size monitors of different resolutions and refresh rates for an illustration who uses a mouse, tablet, and trackball.
I dare you to give me a real explanation for this nonsense. Are you so strapped for cash that you cannot buy real equipment? Obviously not, because you are buying Macs. Don't cry that the PC's are more expensive either. There's a reason for spending $16K on a PC. It's called DUAL PROCESSING. Your fancy G4 isn't going to stand a chance against a dual PIII 733Mhz workstation. I don't give a damn what app you're running.
You know, here's another one for you: Does Kinetix make 3D Studio Max for the Macintosh? Last I checked, no. What's been the hottest 3D animation suite going for the last year or so? 3DSMAX. Nuff said.
If you're going to defend your platform, come up with better defense. I can show you a PC that'll not only match your Mac, but it'll take it to school on how to run Photoshop. And then I show you an entire design department that switched to i386 because the Mac just wasn't up to the job...
The 500MHz G4 isn't new at all -- it's what the G4 was supposed to be from the beginning, if only Motorola's chip factory hadn't screwed things up.1
Uhh it wasn't Motorola's fabs screwing things up. Apple KNEW that Motorola couldn't get them enough 500MHz parts in time. But due to Steve Job's reality distortion field, they decided to announce it anyway. Apple KNEW they wouldn't be able to ship the 500's, but the PR department decided that they should put it out, doing so without thinking about the consequences of what would happen when the 99% chance of not getting enough chips became real.
A beak-shaped yellow sticker would be a good match. I'm staring at (well, actually, staring *past*) an ice cream scooper colored and shaped to look like a penguin. I think I got it at Walmart, maybe target. Ridiculously expensive ($12?), but it's a good shape -- that is, it's a good scooper, and right now it's standing up as a little penguin sculpture next to my computer.
If I wasn't the laziest man alive, I would take a photo and link to it. But I am, so I don't.
Now what I need is an ice-cream scoop with a USB port.
Sorry, my mind is mush.
timothy
jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
In a sense, i can agree. Apple's edge has dulled. My question is why is that surprising?
They have been roasted for years on end for being propietary and non-compatible. A good example of this is Nubus. For its time, it was awesome. The only company that supported it though was Apple and companies that depended on Apple to stay alive (monopolies suck) such as audio pros. Buying Nubus products was an expensive proposition.
So, Apple has taken out some of the whackier things and the powerpc is becoming more of a pc. But, don't forget to look ahead to what Apple is doing either. The advent of MacOS X should make Win2k look like the turkey that it is. And for another example of a recent Apple innovation, Firewire. Which from everything that i have read, blows away USB.
IMHO Apple is choosing better which areas to innovate in. They haven't stopped innovating.
Sig-"Out beyond fields of wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I will meet you there." Jelaluddin Rumi
Colour - Graphite instead of schoolchild
64Mb Ram - the old iMac had 32Mb
Larger Hard drive - 6Gb in place of 4
Better Memory expandability - you can now add 256 more.
Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
So, um...where are the REAL links?
This was a major 'oops' a while back. Apple originally had their 400/450/500 lineup when the G4's came out, but quickly discovered Motorola couldn't make enough 500 Mhz G4's to keep up at any reasonable pace, so they had to scale back to a 350/400/450 lineup... but kept the price the same. 'Oops' again. They quickly recanted and lowered the prices respectively. Now, we finally have the 400/450/500 lineup again... at the lower price. Woohoo! :) Unfortunately, I just bought an iMac, so I can't afford a nice G4... ah well.
____________________
Tension, apprehension
And dissension have begun
Actually, Macworld Tokyo is underway as we speak. The announcements came on the web a few hours or so after Steve Jobs' keynote (which was, unfortunately, not webcast).
iBook: I got to mess with the original for a bit, the keyboard didn't seem shoddy (but I've bothered with very few notebooks, so it's hard to compare). As for "delicate" hardware, I wish all notebooks had casings as strong. These things can take a serious beating (which is why all that extra plastic is there... shock absorber).
G4: This is more a symbolic release than anything. Remember when the G4s came out, they were to go to 500MHz, but Motorola found a bug that caused them to be unreliable at that and higher speeds. This says "Hey, we fixed that bug, more goodies on the way". I'd expect a highspeed chip coming out by Macworld NY.
Pismo (Powerbook): Late due to some unforseen problems with Minuet (OS9.0.1), which is needed to run the hardware. And so what if it's a month late? As you've pointed out, this thing has a definite drool-factor to it :)
Well, they call it FireWire Target Disk Mode instead. But it's in there!
That's great. it must be nice to have such a light notebook. However, the base-model 400MHz G3 will smack a watered down notebook PII silly. Ethernet is also standardon the PowerBook, and, perhaps more importantly, the PowerBook can play Quake 3 just fine with its Rage128 board (which may be lackluster in the desktop arena, but is unparalleled for notebooks.).
> People always compare macs to PC's running
> windows. To me, the real comparison is macs to
> SGI's. Both are visual/audio orientated OS's,
> which Windows (and linux) are decidedly not.
But people generally run a lot of the same software on Windows and Macintosh, though. Before I switched to a blue G3 (when they first came out), I ran Dreamweaver, Fireworks, Photoshop, Flash, Director and Cubase on a Windows box. Now I run them all on my Mac (and they run shockingly better, I was really, really surprised). You can't run Cubase (and many other multimedia apps) on NT, though. Maybe Windows 2000, but not NT. And you don't run all these things on an SGI, of course.
> Yep, great innovation there... And look who's
... anything that you'd normally use SCSI for. The 800mbs version is already ratified, and somebody has a wireless version now, but I can't remember who.
> using it. Apple, and... (Well, sony uses i.link,
> witch is based on the same spec, and a few PC's
> have IEEE.1394) And apple didn't develop
> Firewire themselves, several companies did,
> including Intel. Another product killed by
> apple's braindead licensing terms... (Well, not
> killed but severly slowed down)
You managed to be wrong on every point. I think you got all of your FireWire info from Slashdot posts.
Apple developed what became IEEE 1394. Their brand name for their implementation is "FireWire". If you want to use the name "FireWire" you pay them a licensing fee, because you benefit from their advertising. Sony's brand name for their implementation of 1394 is i.Link, but it's still the same tech. Sony just took out the power, so it uses a 4-pin instead of 6-pin connector. Not such a big deal because cables are really cheap, and you can get a 4-pin to 6-pin 10 meter cable for about $5. FireWire cables are all cheap and can be very long, one of the main advantages over SCSI, which uses parallel cables and connectors that are very expensive.
Besides being on all Macs (except the iBook) and on many Sony and Compaq PC's, 1394 is on EVERY digital camcorder and VCR, all of the hard disk based set-top boxes and on a range of peripherals including hard drives, CD-RW's, DAT's, etc.
Intel's involvement is that they said they would support the standard, and then pulled out and offered the forever-forthcoming USB 2.
It's a truly great technology. I've had to screw around with USB devices before, unplugging and plugging once in a while, and of course you need a really good hub in order to add more devices. I've never had a problem with FireWire, and you just plug the next one into the last one, up to 63 on a "branch", no hub needed. FireWire devices just have two FireWire ports on the back and sometimes a power connector and that's it. It's a dream for audio/video people to plug-and-play so many devices and add storage so easily.
Oh, yeah, FireWire support is in the 2.4 Linux kernel. A year from now Slashdot will declare FireWire un-dead and truly amazing.
Intel notebooks use heavily, heavily modified and stripped down versions of the desktop chips, and they even use a different scale in their published benchmarks that makes comparing desktop to notebook very difficult. (Desktops are rated in numbers while the notebook chips assign a 1 to the slowest chip and a 1.3, 1.4, etc. to the faster ones.) The original poster was saying the current G4 won't go in a notebook, and that's probably true, given that it was never designed to. Compare a mobile Intel chip and a G3 and a G4 and you'll see that the G4 is the odd one out.
A PIII at 1.5GHz? You are an idiot. The 1.5GHz number is the chip that comes AFTER the iTanium, which is not even out yet, itself. They demoed a 1GHz PIII at a trade show, where IBM has been demoing 1GHz PowerPC chips for two years. In other words, that has nothing to do with what you can go out and buy.
There are miserably few 700MHz PIII's available now. So what? Bus speeds are almost always 100MHz, RAM is running around 100MHz. You're better off getting a 400 or 500 with twice the RAM, which is why Apple's desktops can take up to 2 gig of RAM.
another story on slashdot about a speedbump and some new colors, yet whenever apple does something interesting (like things with OS X, Darwin, new features in OS9, etc) it gets no mention here on slashdot. i offer up my services to be the official Mac-editor here so we can run the stroies that matter and ignore the marketing speak and the minor product upgrades. i love macs but i sure wouldn't want to read about "Dell announces 50mhz speed increase and wonderful new internet keyboard" or whatever accounts for exciting new products on the wintel side.
raz
------------
DJ Raz
raz@wfnk.com
------------
DJ Raz
raz@wfnk.com
VGA and S-Video ports for dual display and video mirroring
That's it. I'm getting one of these.
Where is my mind?
mfspr r3, pc / lvxl v0, 0, r3 / li r0, 16 / stvxl v0, r3, r0
Check out Project Upper/Mute, an all-around awesome compiler fra
You miss the point. Yes, USB doesn't belong to Apple. But without Steve, USB would have remained vaporware, except for a few unused jacks gathering dust on the back of some PCs.
In July of 1998, how many USB peripherals were on the market? Five, maybe six. Manufacturers were perfectly happy to stick with EPP or maybe Serial. But then came the iMac, which threw out all the old connects (no Din8 serial, no ADB, no SCSI). Suddenly USB mice, printers, scanners, drives, etc, flooded into stores everywhere.
I agree, the Vaio subnotebooks are amazing toys, with just as much cool design & sex appeal as anything from Apple. If Steve Jobs weren't so damn stubborn about his Four Model strategy, he'd make a Duo G3. The market is there -- deep afficionados still pay big $$$ for the 2300c.
True. But... his ego does get in the way sometimes. For example:
The iBookSE is sort of new, but really just a new color and a speed bump with no new features. The 500MHz G4 isn't new at all -- it's what the G4 was supposed to be from the beginning, if only Motorola's chip factory hadn't screwed things up.
No, the truly new machine at Apple is the PowerBook . It finally matches the other modern Macs -- Firewire, Airport, AGP 2x, etc.
Sadly, my favorite amazing PowerBook feature has passed away -- SCSI Dock Mode. Just plug a PowerBook into another Mac's SCSI chain and treat it as an external hard drive -- the uses are obvious. I guess we're supposed to use ethernet file sharing instead, but I wish they could have invented FireDock mode.
In regard to the architectural advantages, I'd have to point to the current design of the average PC vs. the current Macs. The PC, while an open architecture, is dragged down by its need to be compatible with the original design.
:-)
Consider the limited amount of interrupts in your PC right now, could you really fit 3 video cards without removing/disabling a few devices? Or worse, sharing IRQs and possibly locking the computer up or burning out an IRQ controller? This limitation alone hurts the expandability of the PC, and will almost certainly have to be rectified as people require more components in their computers.
There's also the subject of the PC's BIOS. While 32 bit BIOS extensions exist, to maintain compatibility several things are harder than they need to be. For instance, the BIOS still recognizes the boot device in a certain fashion. Anyone who has added an IDE hard drive greater than 36GB knows what I mean here. BIOS translation is a hack, not a solution, and until this is rectified (Where oh where are ATAPI HDs?) it will continue to be an issue as drive sizes increase.
Further, selection of the bootable HD is done in the BIOS, and is inconsistent at best between PCs. In many implementations it's simply impossible. On a Mac this is trivial - you simply select the boot device from a control panel. This is more important than you might think, especially when one needs to boot multiple operating systems due to software compatibility issues. MacOS8, MacOS 9, LinuxPPC and OS/X on the same computer? No problem. Windows 95, 98 and NT on the same computer? Have fun, or at least be prepared to spend extra for a commercial boot manager to make the process palatable...
I realize these issues are not publishing specific, however the Macintosh does have some advantages inherent in its design. BTW, while I do own a Mac, I do most of my work on a Linux machine which dual boots 95 OSR2 for games. I believe the current MacOS lacks the stability and efficiency for general purpose use. (My old SE/30 boots faster than my current machine, there's something wrong here!) However, when I want to do some photo editing or page layout I reach for my Mac (and Wacom tablet heh.) It really does provide a great environment for these apps.
When OS/X arrives en force, don't be surprised if the Mac starts breaking out of its current niche market. With an excellent OS to go with the well designed hardware, the Macintosh will again be a force to be reckoned with. It may not replace my Linux box, but it just might replace that Windows drive
GPL: Free as in will
I have a physics teacher at my school who is a mac cultist and still says his 68040 is faster than my p2 but anyway....500MHz? So? He just told me the other day that the 450 outperformes my dual 600...get a grip! He is always saying stuff like that, I also always see apple stating that their G3 whatever can outperform a P3 2 times as fast ect ect...is there anyone that actually did real tests and not the marketing bs that apple puts out? If its so much better why is only %6 (or something like that) of the world using macs? Apple is only at 500MHz and there are proven P3s at 1.5Ghz...why does apple still insist on saying its faster and better? Is the G4 REALLY that good??? ok, enough of my rant, i just loath cultists.
I hate when people assualt apple because they don't follow traditional pc guidelines. They are the first company to realize that the look and feel of the computer matters. This is every that is missing from Linux. Linux only cares about the underlying technology and not about the experience, which will be its downfall in the commercial market. Apple supports things that people want: wireless networking, multimedia, and yes- color!
I disagree with the statement that 'Linux only cares about the underlying technology and not about the experience'. I would agree that Linux distributions as they exist today do not provide the sort of absolutely 'transparent-machine' user experience that has been a hallmark of MacOS from the beginning. But if you look at what Gnome/Enlightenment/KDE have stated as project *goals*, I for one don't think it's too much to predict that OS X will have some pretty stiff competition from a LinuxPPC distribution that is just as easy to install, GUI from start to finish, and gives the end-user more freedom to customize their environment than OS X can provide.
I agree that Apple was definitely way out in front in realizing the impact of aesthetics on physical design for their machines. But the longer I split my time between a B&W G3 running OS8.6 at home and a much weaker Intel box running WindowMaker with ETerm at work, the more strongly I consider putting LinuxPPC on my home machine, to get the WMaker/ETerm combo running as my home environment!
/*deviation from="topic"
Another reason to go Linux on the G3 would be to get a rich set of file/disk management and TCP/IP tools, not to mention a full=fledged *server* environment for http and FTP, without having to spend two hours at mac.tucows.net looking for shareware...
/deviation*/
The price difference between an 750 MHz Athlon and a 800 MHz one is bigger than $200...
The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
--Henry Kissinger
Why am I not surprised. Those iMac and iBook designs are practically made for people to whom style is everything ans substance nothing.
The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
--Henry Kissinger
If I were you, I would also be proud of having a neat portable computer like the Vaio. I've seen a few of these running around in my building and they are really cool laptops.
To compare the Vaio to the new (and older) Powerbook G3s, I'd have to say the weight of the Vaio is misleading in that the cdrom drive you mentioned is external and not included in this measurement. So too is the floppy drive, but I doubt most people would even need to carry a floppy drive around, so that's a moot point. Like the other respondent mentioned, the Powerbook G3's have ethernet built in, so you don't have to connect the cable to the pcmcia card, which is one of the most jerry-rigged looking things I've seen in a modern computing product in years-- I can't believe PC laptop makers are still doing this. It's also really great to have DVD standard, so there's no having to convince the purchasing dept. to shell out extra cash on the DVD option so you can watch movies while flying on planes.
$5 / month hosted VPS on linux = awesome!
Making fancy cases isn't very interesting to me, but it's pretty apparent that new users are very interested in the flash. And slashdot readers are as well, evidenced by the many threads that have shown up here about custom cases.
now if the canadian dollar didn't suck...
I suppose Motorola caught up. Still upgrading the processor to 500mhz doesn't help much in a world full of 800 mhz PIIIs and Athlons. Should add a boost for professional video and photoshop folks out there.*/
The speed bump in the G4 is pretty significant. The chip already blows away the pentium based competition at its current speed (being fair: in floating point intensive apps). Its the PC world which is touting this "MHz" thing as a true benchmark. PCs have nice big flashy numbers (750-800-1000) so they decide to flaunt that. Unfortunatly for Apple/Motoroloa, that means that people sit there drooling like idiots and decide that their PIII 750 will always be faster than some "lame" G4 450. (It certainly cant balance your checkbook, or do your taxes any faster, but thats a different story) Also, the G4 isnt ready for portable use, its still too much of a power hog (though, oddly enough, not as bad as a PIII) I believe that the G4e is supposed to have better power handling and will be used in powerbooks later this year (dont hold me to that, im not exactly sure)
Finally! Mac users Unite! (ducks)
I am a avid mac fac, with a g3 366. It's getting time abouts for me to get another. Any suggestions?
--__"Life is But a door, I shall return"__--
"QED the OS sucks. You know, I'm sorta having trouble following that logic" I don't know if you'll even read this, as it's way old - BUT - read my post. I never even *hinted* at that. I was begrudgingly acknowledging it's superiority over wintel boxes. I was also poking fun at MYSELF for not being able to figure out a machine that is widely considered (and I think correctly so) EASIER to use than the wintel's I consider myself a power-user on. (not flaming here, just clarifying)
mas cerveza, por favor politically incorrect stu
I have a close friend who's (whose? my grammar sucks) hubby works at an ad agency, and they SWEAR by 'em. He's got one at home too (obviously). I've always respected the things, just never liked 'em. AFAIK they don't lock up (hell, my snazzy new p3-500 laptop win2k box hangs almost on a daily basis), and you just plug stuff into them and it works. Granted, my above statements could be the result of Apple propaganda, because I've only *tried* to use a Mac ONCE. Get this - a friend needed help doing a mail-merge on his Mac. I thump my chest and say "Of course I can help" Holy-shit did I get my butt kicked by supposedly the easiest OS to use in the world. I jacked with this thing for like an hour (on my PC it would have been like 3 minutes) I could NOT adapt to it trying to help so much. I think the final solution was to drop one icon on the other (I kept opening the apps) sheesh.....
mas cerveza, por favor politically incorrect stu
Yes, the same binaries will run. There are now three classes of Mac applications:
1. The new apps written specifically for Mac OS X.
Since Mac OS X is Posix-compliant, a lot of unix utilities could be very easily ported.
2. Old apps recompiled with "carbon" - these binaries will be cross-compatible and will run identically on OS 9 and OS X, but on OS X will take advantage of modern OS features.
3. Old apps that are not recompiled must be run inside of a separate window which emulates Mac OS 9. It won't be fun to run apps this way, but at least it will be possible.
I have to agree. It seems as though it is getting harder for companies to *innovate* and break new ground. However, I've recently taken a position in a company where 95% of our installed systems are macs. I've had very little exposure to them over the years, and found that the installation and setup of one of those buggers was so easy that it was almost hard for me (kept looking for something else to setup/config with it :) We have an OS-X system installed there and I think that shows tremendous potential - slick GUI, easy install, setup and configuration while retaining the power of *BSD type boxes. I'd have to say that's the closest thing to *real* innovation I've seen in a while. Coming from the *nix world, I'll still try to set up some Linux boxes, but I'm more excited about OS-X than any slightly faster Mac with OS-9.
No thanks. I don't smoke anymore.
My PCG-N505VX weighs TWO pounds, Pentium 2 433 MHz, 64Mb RAM, 6.4Gb hd, firewire port, USB port, RS232 port, parallel printer port, internal 56 kbps modem (winmodem, I didn't say it was perfect), PCMCIA bay, wireless (IrDA) networking, runs for up to 4.5 hours on the standard battery, external floppy and CD-ROM drives.
* same award winning design * 500 and 400 MHz G3 * 100 MHz bus systems * ultra ATA66 disk drives * ATI Rage Mobility 128 * Dual Firewire ports * AirPort ready, antennas built-in * 2 models at same prices These are the things that you need to look at.
Please stop with the FUD, okay?
The wireless is, like HeghmoH says, fully 802.11 compliant. It runs at 11 Mbps instead of bluetooth's paltry 1 Mbps, and yet Apple's airport tech is still compatible with this & all IEEE standard wireless devices.
Firewire (IEEE 1394) devices which I can think of off-hand: external, internal, & network hard drives, CD-RW drives, scanners, video cameras, VCRs, hi-fi digital speakers, etc.:
http://www.firewireworld.com/
http://www.apple.com/firewire/
http://www.softacoustik.com/
http://www.sel.sony.com/clubvaio/new s0024.html
http://www.1394ta.org/
--
He lives in a world where those who do not run the client software of the omnipresent meme are unacceptable.
Are you kidding me? Can you tell me one company other than Apple that has a Notebook computer that weighs less than six pounds, runs for five hours, has a DVD-ROM and has Wireless networking *AND* Full firewire and USB support?
Tell me again that Apple doesn't have some of the coolest products on the market.
Both links in the article just point to /. Not their intended targets at Apple's site.
I have a website. It's about Macs.
No they didn't - USB technology was bought from (someone) by Intel.
I have a Lombard (1999 Bronze Keyboard) Powerbook. From what I can tell, there are frankly no real reasons for me to want to get a new PowerBook, even if my employer offered it.
The built-in SCSI port has been removed in order to install a pair of FireWire ports in the same spot where the square 30-pin SCSI connector was. Since we use scanners, CD burners, external hard drives, and other equipment, the loss of built-in SCSI isn't something I find appealing. (You can, however, use a thirdparty PC Card SCSI interface, at least...) I will be getting a PC Card Firewire interface if I need to use that system.
The DVD decoding, which is hardware on the Lombard model, is now software. Other Apple machines, particularly iMacs, have had trouble with the software-based DVD decoding in the past - including video/audio sync problems, and Apple admits that running the software DVD decoder alongside processor-intensive stuff like SETI@home is asking for trouble.
On the upside, batteries and many media bay devices will be compatible between Lombard and FireWire (though the DVD drive will not be). The main difference between the two Powerbooks, other than this, seems to be the built-in AirPort expandability.
Sorry, Apple ... I was expecting a bit more from the new PowerBook. I'll wait for the G4 portables to show up, and so will my boss.
i am a soviet space shuttle
>How did you multi-home with the mac? That's a
>task that I've needed to accomplish on several
>occasions.
IPNetRouter can do this (actually it uses Open Transport to do it, OT just does not have a user interface to enable it).
http://www.sustworks.com/
Wyatt wrote:
> Of course you could add an Airport compatible card to the PCMCIA slot of the
> old Powerbook...but it was $299 where the Airport card is $99 [...]
Not quite true - as long as you don't get suckered by Farallon's inferior (2 mbps vs. 11 mbps) SkyLINE card, you won't pay $299 for a pcmcia wireless card. I paid $170 for my Cabletron RoamAbout, which works flawlessly with AirPort Base Stations. -Toshi
FireWire has some nice features, but in the end, it's still a lot slower than SCSI and more expensive than the IDE stuff.
Now, I agree that USB is inappropriate for lots of things it's used for (esp. scanners and drives). And maybe firewire will succeed.
But, I'm not holding my breath.
-- Erich
Slashdot reader since 1997
I use Linux (Red Hat 5.2, 6.1, 6.2 and COL) at home and I use OS X Server at work on a couple of boxes, and I agree - it's going to be OS X that puts a *NIX on my three Macs, my mothers iMac, my cousins iMac, G4 and iBook. It's going to be OS X that puts a *NIX on the desk of my grandmother...not Red Hat. It's going to be OS X that puts a *NIX on the desk of my boss...not SUSE that he ditched.
I screwed around with Yellow Dog PPC Linux this summer...but just wanted my old Mac OS functionality back. Now OS 9 on my five boxes is pretty danged stable...I have a couple of issues with Adobe products...but otherwise it just works. I can't wait for OS X.
I'm sure we're gonna get flames for this...but hey.
It seems to me that a year or so ago, apple suggested that the same binaries .
.
would run on MacOs X and on ppc mac. I don't know if they meant it,
or if they still due, but it would suggest that there's at least
a possibility . .
Then again, if I can run standard X applications at the same time,
I just may ask for a Mac wherever I land next fall . .
But there's no way I'm giving up LyX . . .
Actually, Dell will sell you the Lucent version for $140.
The Apple card is also nice because it uses the laptop's built in antenna, so you don't have an ugly attena sticking out of your pcmcia card. That's got to be an easy thing to break.
sigs are a waste of space
Yeah, but for $170 you still have an external attenna to worry about.
sigs are a waste of space
Maybe it's not so much that they're focused on case design now as that they were ignoring it before (and most still are). Making computers in your living room as natural as your TV takes more than higher clock-speeds and better operating systems - although that's part of it.
Apple's not breaking ground as quickly as it could be, but they need to be able to pay for all that R&D. If millions of iMacs being sold subsidizes work done on OSX, I'm all for it.
- Jeff A. Campbell
- VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)
- Jeff
---
Looks like a nice bunch from Apple again. Hopefully they can deflate Steve's ego enough to get him out the door..
---
Why? Apple would be dead right now without him in charge.
Hell, just yesterday, the stock price topped out at its highest level ever, and they're rumored to be splitting Real Soon Now.
- Jeff A. Campbell
- VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)
- Jeff
The multiple suites of design, illustration, photo-manipulation, layout and print management are all Mac-based, and the people who use them are all mac users. I previously worked at a company where the vunderkin new-hire in the design department was a PC guy, and he needed a new fully loaded PC instead of the standard Design Mac that everyone else with his role had. $16,000 later, his machine was ready, and he went to work....
Was his computer made of solid gold? I just set up a digital video editing suite, including expensive DVMaster w/hardware codec and software for $6K. $16K? this sounds little too anecdotal to be truth. Show me the parts list!
I know for a fact, that he kept having to hand projects back to the Mac people, because his machine couldn't match the work that they produced, and in many cases, tools existed on the Mac that had no counterparts on the PC platform.
Yet another anecdote form the big pile of Mac FUD. What tools are these that don't perform as well on PC as do on Mac? What are these tools that don't exist on the PC. Names, please, and manufacturers.
I have used Macs as firewalls,
How did you multi-home with the mac? That's a task that I've needed to accomplish on several occasions.
Please respond with no malice, otherwise you'll be ignored.
by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
Show me a PC that can handle 3 different size monitors of different resolutions and refresh rates for an illustration who uses a mouse, tablet, and trackball...
There comes a time in every man's life when he must say, "No mother! I do not want any more Jell-O!"
was looking at the powerbook specs, and i found something interesting:
:) if it's among the "hottest" graphics chips ever invented, i really don't see why they'd be putting it in a laptop, do you?? Who wrote that description and what were they thinking..?
One of the hottest graphics chips ever invented, the ATI RAGE Mobility 128 graphics controller has an advanced architecture that delivers spectacular 3D graphics performance in millions of colors.
Whoa!!! now is that the best way they could have possibly worded it??
somebody in Apple Engineering, quick, go over to Apple Marketing and PR and explain to them what heat is, and why it isn't a good thing in laptops, and why computers have fans in them.. -_-
btw, while you're over there, can you go and beat the shit out of whoever it was who designed the imac keyboard that came with my G4..? thanks.
Irritable, left-wing and possibly humorous bumper stickers and t-shirts
We've been waiting for this for more than 2 years now.
Canada finally has its own Apple Store. Yippee!!!!!
http://store.apple.com /1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/canadastore
Reality has a liberal bias
Um... what do you want to see, then?
Apple pushed USB to the forefront by not including a floppy and adding the USB port to their iMacs.
Was this only a year ago? Two years? Before then, good luck finding USB peripherals, I don't know that it was such a big thing on PCs. and only *now* are Compaq(iPaq), IBM(EON devices), etc. pushing USB and dropping a bunch of the older legacy devices.
Think the same, but now insert FireWire. A year from now, I expect FireWire to be everywhere for the high speed devices.
And look at what they're doing with IEEE 802.11, aka AirPort, WaveLan, whatever.
You question how Apple is producing products which define personal computing; the answer is that with wireless, our portables are truly portable while being connected to the network. With USB and FireWire, our devices gain the PnP capabilities that is traditionally associated with SCSI, but without such a price or complexity hit since both are serial standards(less complex cabling, IDs, connectors, and chaining).
What else is Apple going to do that will redefine personal computing? Adopting BSD/NeXT in MacOS X, giving the common man the power and reliablitity of Un*x, with the svelte and suave dress of the Mac UI.
I actually can't think of many other companies trying to do similar. Sony, for one, with their Memory Sticks, FireWire, camcorders, etc.
Palm, perhaps, with their PDAs and stuff.
So perhaps Apple isn't as exciting(to you), but they haven't stopped 'innovating'.
-AS
-AS
*Pikachu*
isn't the revamped Powerbook or the notched up iBook, its the great support of the Japanese language by the Mac OS. Before, you apparantly would've had to spend $10,000 per machine for software that would provide the same functionality.
As this expo is in Tokyo, you can see why it would be a big deal.
IE is a notorious RAM and resource hog. That's why i never run it except to check my HTML coding to make sure it works. :)
I hate to see what 5.0 will do. More MS propaganda: they claim it runs in 5 Megs of RAM, yet it will automagically suck up any free RAM it can find while running. When will people learn?
Pope
It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
If I got a PowerBook and put LinuxPPC on it (I'll never use MacOS, so that's out), could I do some cool wireless networking tricks?
--
Linux MAPI Server!
http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
(Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
Your point is moot And don't even bother responding if unless you read the artical
[ c h a d o k e r e ]
ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
Here are the amended links for Hot News and the one for Marketing speak one.
--
May contain traces of nut.
First, Apple had the Apple II. With Visicalc, they had a product to kill for.
Ok, the Lisa was a bit of an expensive turkey, but in the Macintosh, they produced a product to kill for.
Now they have a box with a number of components which wouldn't be out of place in your PC. They have a proprietary OS which is nothing out of the ordinary. And they have monitor cases to kill for (if you shop at IKEA).
Somehow, I feel slightly underwhelmed. Instead of producing products which define what personal computing is about, they are making machines which don't break any ground, but will match your interior decor.
I really hope they return to form soon, and produce something more innovative and exciting than a patented case design.
Stephen Hawking has written another book. It's about time as well.
Wasn't this promised (and even available for ordering) several months ago?
Actually...
The iBookSE is the only Graphite one, the Blueberry and Tangerine are still out. But the SE is the 366MHz one. They all come with 64MB of RAM now and they all come with 6BG HDs...but the old ones only had a 3.2.
I think it's pretty sweet that every Macintosh model now has Airport capability, and 3 out of 4 models have Firewire.
Of course you could add an Airport compatible card to the PCMCIA slot of the old Powerbook...but it was $299 where the Airport card is $99 and you still have your PCMICA slots free since it goes under the keyboard.
The newer iBook:
I have to admit it is nice. It has a nice new graphite color and some internal improvements. I wonder if they have fixed that flimsy-feely keyboard. It made me think my hands weigh 10 pounds each. Very delicate hardware, and somewhat tiny keys. They doubled the ram and hdd which is of course a good thing.
It is interesting to note that it is one of the more expandable laptops I've seen recently, with a maximum 320 megs of ram. 366 is a decent speed for a portable device, especially when combined with RISC hardware. Unfortunately, you probably won't see much of an improvement until you run OSX client to take advantage of the chipset.
The G4:
I suppose Motorola caught up. Still upgrading the processor to 500mhz doesn't help much in a world full of 800 mhz PIIIs and Athlons. Should add a boost for professional video and photoshop folks out there.
The powerbook:
Late again. This was expected last month, but at least they put some polish on it. A 500mhz laptop is something to look at twice, regardless of the operating system it runs. Couple that with a max 512mb of RAM, and you have a nice little lapwarmer. I was fully expecting a G4 in this puppy, but I suppose I'll need to wait. 1 meg of backside cache is also a bonus. Oh yeah, it also has firewire ports. Nifty. One more thing: it only comes in one color. Thank the goddes for that one.
Looks like a nice bunch from Apple again. Hopefully they can deflate Steve's ego enough to get him out the door..
Lowmag.net
I like the black and white colour scheme, it would
be great to run Linux on it - the colours are
Tux-like! I wonder if you could put a yellow
beak on it or something to make it even more like
a Tux?
Nice to see the iBook in the Graphite though - I was never a fan of the iBoox colours - they seemed to suit the iMac more than theiBook.
Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
A lot of PC users snicker at the Mac as a toy and say that it can't do any real work. Well, get off your high horse and face reality... I am a tech-consultant / system technician, and my area of expertise is the Mac, over a decade of use and 6 years of the techical side.
I've worked with just about everything out there, SGI, Alpha, Data General, *nix, Linux, BeOS, Amigia... you name it, I've been called on to fix it, and by far, I prefer the Mac. Admittedly, the PC market has the larger footprint in the business world, but look at the markets where Macintosh is the de-facto standard. Graphic Design and Print Production are where the Mac's rule, and they rule with an iron fist.
I'm presently working at Putnam Financial Investments, and we have an enclave here of 140 Mac users... the only ones in the entire company, and they are here to stay. Periodically, someone in management makes some noise about standardizing on the PC's for the entire company and switching out the Macs here.
They talk about standardizing, repurposing assets and other PHB-speak, but they get squashed like a bug when word gets out to the people who manage and work the design department.
The multiple suites of design, illustration, photo-manipulation, layout and print management are all Mac-based, and the people who use them are all mac users. I previously worked at a company where the vunderkin new-hire in the design department was a PC guy, and he needed a new fully loaded PC instead of the standard Design Mac that everyone else with his role had. $16,000 later, his machine was ready, and he went to work....
I know for a fact, that he kept having to hand projects back to the Mac people, because his machine couldn't match the work that they produced, and in many cases, tools existed on the Mac that had no counterparts on the PC platform. All that work, and non-recoverably investment, was hampered by the fact that he was trying to mimic the Mac's capabilities, a sobering thought when you consider that when he leaves, his machine will be given to the CFO's assistant because none of the other designers want to touch the damn thing.
Admitedly, I'm ranting about a specialized segement of the computer-using population, but understand this. The Macintosh has not survived this long, and kept it's integrity as a cutting edge machine for creative and design work, by being second best. The Mac you see on the market today is the product of selective breeding, the machine that has evolved to fill the needs of people in high-production environments and creative positons.
The Mac was not built as and Enterprise server.
It was not made as a thin-client.
It was not made to be a gaming platform (yet!)
And people still insist on pushing it into those roles and judging it's performance against systems that are built for those tasks. I have used Macs as firewalls, servers, kiosks, data-aquisition clients, and remote access terminals. I have found the most efficient ways to use the Mac in these roles, and dealt with the issues that arise. The Macinosh isn't perfect. But don't compare Apples to Oranges and then ridicule the Mac when it isn't all things to all people... Compare the Apple to the competitors that want to take it's market share. Show me a PC that can fill the shoes of a Design Mac in a high-flow Advertising Agency. Show me a PC that can handle 3 different size monitors of different resolutions and refresh rates for an illustration who uses a mouse, tablet, and trackball. Show me a PC that matches my Mac, and I'll be impressed. but untill I see designers with Intel Inside on their desks, I'm going to keep my Mac...
"If I can't take my Mac with me to heaven when I die, I'm not going."
- Anonymous Mac-Marine
"If I wanted your input on my pet project, I'd stick my hand up your ass and use you like a sock-puppet." - Muse