Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars EP1 On DVD Confirmed By Lucas

Bigmell was one of several people to write about a phone call George Lucas made to KROQ Radio in Los Angeles. Ain't-it-cool-news also had a piece running with the same information. In any case, it looks like a DVD is being worked on, with a September release date. Bonus material includes unfinished scenes from Episodes 4-6. Harry @ aintitcool also had a release date of Sept 12.

47 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I Thought we already have this by turg · · Score: 2

    It has been released on videocassette (e.g. VHS) but not on DVD (i.e. disc).

    ========

    --
    <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
  2. hmm... by DrEldarion · · Score: 4

    Does anyone else find it kinda hypocritical how /. is always so much against the MPAA and telling us to boycott them and the like, but then when news like this comes up, it creates such an excitement? "WOO! The DVD! Now I can go support the people who I was just saying are trying to screw us over!"

    Pick a side, stay there... don't jump back and forth.

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

    1. Re:hmm... by SgtPepper · · Score: 5

      The Boycot MPAA page specifically lists LucasFilm Ltd as being a "freezone" film house. Because SUPRISE if you do some research you'd know that LucasFilms Ltd is NOT, yes NOT, a member of the MPAA. So why boycott them?

    2. Re:hmm... by Kagato · · Score: 3

      The Star Wars films are a bit different than most films. Usually films are pretty much owned by Fox, Disney, Paramount, etc. Even if a smaller production company did the film the bucks usually came from the large studio. The film is now their bitch so to speak. In the case of Star Wars Lucas funded the movie privately. Fox own nothing of the franchise. It has distribution rights, and takes a small skim of the box office, but most of the money goes to Lucas. Do you think if Fox owned the rights to the movie on DVD that they would let Lucas sit on it that long? Hell no. They'd have a new edition come out ever other year and milk it for all it's worth. So, the whole question is how much will fox be involved. In the world of DVD's you could go to Image Entertainment and have them distribute. Besides, if you're going to ban any one company you should go after Dreamworks. They give more Softmoney to politics than any other studio. (Source: opensecrets.org)

    3. Re:hmm... by DrEldarion · · Score: 4

      So why boycott them?

      Because it's still on DVD.

      Isn't the whole argument against DVD based on the way they're trying to control how we view the discs that *WE BOUGHT*? Now, if the S/W DVD wasn't encrypted and didn't have region codes, this wouldn't be an issue... but you can bet your pants that it will.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    4. Re:hmm... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      Do you think if Fox owned the rights to the movie on DVD that they would let Lucas sit on it that long? Hell no. They'd have a new edition come out ever other year and milk it for all it's worth.

      It is cool that George Lucas exists somewhat outside the major "studio" system. But come on, just because he wears flannel doesn't mean he's any less greedy then the guys in Armani suits. The recent announcements were a calculated, deliberate move to push hard core fans into owning two identical copies of the same film. Lucas has already proven that fans will buy another copy of a film if he makes minimal changes to it, and he wants to see how far he can go.
      My prediction is that if Episode 2 is not better than Episode 1, Mr. Lucas's quater century of glory will be over and his legions of die hard fans will start defecting en mass. Matrix prequels anyone?

      -B

    5. Re:hmm... by coaxial · · Score: 2

      Lucas also isn't a member of the Director's Guild either. He resigned his membership shortly after SW:ANH was released. Why? The guild wanted him to insert opening credits and he refused. So he quit the guild and made the film his own way.

      Also like it or not, SW:TPM is an independent film. He paid for it himself.

    6. Re:hmm... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      Actually, I don't think a web server and a bunch or Perl code is going to care one way or the other about DVD boycotts.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  3. Marketing ploy by Rurik · · Score: 2

    First they are, then they aren't, then in 2005, now in September. It seems like Lucas has dropped a line and is slowly reeling it in.

    A DVD release is customary of new movies, so how can they spice it up? They stir up their own controversy, by saying that they won't release it. Then once enough people become outraged over the news, far-off release dates are thrown out to lead us on. Once that news has settled, and everyone looks forward to waiting 5 years for it, they find out that it will actually be out in 6 months.

    Sales will probably be triple of what they would if Lucas would release the DVD customarily. And every fan feels a spirit of gratitude to the man for not waiting 5 years to release it.

    IMO, a ploy worthy of Microsoft.

  4. Feature Request... by Paranoid+Diatribe · · Score: 5
    I want a menu option to view the movie without Jar-Jar.

    And to think everyone pooh-poohed the petition!

    1. Re:Feature Request... by LocalYokel · · Score: 2

      Well, I still want the "Natalie Portman Naked and Petrified" version that Lucas promised me in this fake genuine email he sent to meB...

      --

      --

      --
      E2 IN2 IE?

    2. Re: Feature Request... by hwj · · Score: 3
      I want a menu option to view the movie without Jar-Jar.

      Or, even better:

      Using a combination of multiple audio tracks and the multi-angle feature, let the viewer choose which beloved CGI/cartoon character will accompany Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan on their wacky adventure:

      • Max Headroom
      • the T-Rex from Jurassic Park
      • Cartman
      • Buzz Lightyear
      • Jessica Rabbit (can be disabled with parental lockout)
      Are you listening, George?
  5. Lucas figures it out! by RayChuang · · Score: 3

    I think that the reason why George Lucas has decided to do a DVD version of Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace is simple: there are now enough DVD players and DVD-ROM drives out there to justify the sales that can recoup the investment necessary to master this movie onto DVD (and make a nice, handsome profit).

    With standalone players dropping under US$200 in price, DVD-ROM drives showing up on new computers AND new laptops in a big way, and this fall massive sales of Sony PlayStation 2's that can play DVD movies, not to mention lots of computer geeks wanting to see the movie just for its stunning technical details, I expect DVD sales of TPM to be at least 1 to 2 million copies in a matter of days.

    In fact, now that it appears that Sony will most likely ship the US version of PlayStation 2 on September 9, 2000, wouldn't it be a heck of a tie-in for PS2 owners to get a discount coupon to buy the TPM DVD at the same time?

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  6. A marketing Genius! by Zarf · · Score: 2

    This just goes to prove that Lucas is a genius! When I heard there was no DVD, I bought the tape. If I could have I would have avoided the tape and bought the DVD instead. Now there is a DVD and me... the poor dupe that I am... will JUST HAVE to go out and buy the DVD too. Lucas got two sales out of me even though I didn't go to the theater! I've been media-RAPED!

    Well, it's not like I didn't really expect it from George Lucas anyway.

    - // Zarf //

    --
    [signature]
    1. Re:A marketing Genius! by Zarf · · Score: 2

      BTW: my 3 year-old son loves TPM... especially Jar-Jar. Let's just face it. TPM was to catch a new batch of kids and snare them into Star Wars fandom to keep Star Wars alive. So, TPM was more for 3 year-olds than it was for 25 year-olds. So stop griping about how horrible it was... think "Dumbo", "Bambi", "Barney"... that's what TPM is.

      So, the DVD thing is really just "sauce" to Lucas, what matters is he's assimilated the kiddies for another 10 to 20 years... DVD doesn't help or hurt that much and he probably could care less.

      Genius, sheer genius... unlike the Star Trek franchise, he's managed to find a way to exploit his Star Wars fan base without overloading them so horribly that only the ultimately loyal fans will cling-on. He's also created a new generation of loyal followers to cling-on to the legacy of Star Wars since the happy-memories of a child glow in their minds beyond all reality, millions of kids will grow up with this epic story-line embedded in their brains that is far more amazing in their memories than on the screen.

      - // Zarf //

      --
      [signature]
  7. Don't Trust It by Vir · · Score: 4

    As far as the Aint-it-cool-news piece, I wouldn't put too much stock in it. First of all, this news comes second hand from a minimum-wage employee of a video store, not the greatest of sources. Also, on the very same page is someone else who seems much more reliable saying that there will be absolutely no DVD in the forseeable future. Furtheremore, Lucas has said time and time again that there will be no Star Wars DVDs until all 6 are finished, so I think it's a safe bet that we still have a long wait ahead of us.

  8. Likely reasons for his change... by eyeball · · Score: 2

    Sony (or some other bug name electronics manufacturer) probably came to him and gave him a nice suitcase of money to release the DVD sooner, in order to hook more first-time DVD player buyers for this xmas season.

    The other (slightly more far-fetched) reason could be that he wants to sell as many digital copies as he can before high bandwidth and huge harddrive space allows (even more) people to pirate movies.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  9. Not for real? by spludge · · Score: 3

    According to The Force.net article dated Mon, Apr 17, 00 04:18:47 AM EDT

    The Force.net

    ***
    Ronald Epstein, who runs the 'home theater forum' of the Digital Bits, confirmed that there won't be an Episode 1 DVD release this year (The editor of The Digital Bits, Bill Hunt, seems to have some undisclosed inside information about the upcoming Star Wars DVDs). According to Epstein, "There are specific reasons why a DVD release is still quite a ways off, though the intent has been announced". However, the final result will be worth the wait: "You will be absolutetly floored!".
    ***
  10. You are right. by (void*) · · Score: 2
    You are right that we are doing our freedoms injustice to continue to support the CSS.

    But there is one angle that I feel is understated. DVD is a significant improvement in technology over CD's and VCD's. Sound and picture quality is very much improved. To the geek community, this is kind of tech is too important to be associated with encryption technology, to be locked up and used to control access.

    Therein lies the central issue. We care enough about the tech to want to see content on it. That is why we protest against CSS and region locking. If DVD's weren't a technologically superior alternative to VCDs and current CD's nobody would care.

  11. Completely Outrageous by ecampbel · · Score: 5
    This move by Lucas is motivated purely by greed. He tells everyone that a DVD will not be released for 4-5 years and that we should all go out and buy the VHS copy bsecause he needed time to create the perfect DVD. Now, after all of his fans have bought the VHS version of his movie, he is now saying that a DVD will made. This is completely outrageous, and no one should buy this version.

    Many people believed Lucas, and bought the VHS version under the false impression that a DVD version was not forthcoming. What Lucas should be required to do is offer all the poor saps who bought the VHS version an option to upgrade their copy to the superior DVD format.

    I imagine that in 4-5 years Lucas is going to come out with a special edition DVD/VHS box set with all Star Wars movies. This means that if you listen to the marketing machine at Lucas films, and bought all of the versions of his Star Wars movies you'll have
    • 3 copies of each of Episode's 4-6 (the regular edition, the special edition, and the DVD/VHS Episodes 1-6 special edition).
    • 3 copies of the Phantom Menace (the VHS version, the DVD version, and the DVD/VHS Episodes 1-6 special edition)
    • 2 copies of Episode's 2 and 3 (the regular DVD/VHS version, and the DVD/VHS Episodes 1-6 special edition).

    If I did my addition and multiplication right, it means you'll have bought 16 copies of the various Star Wars movies for a total price of of at least $400. Pretty amazing.
    --

    Sig goes here
    1. Re:Completely Outrageous by jafac · · Score: 2

      hm. But if one bought all of those like that, then one would be a dumbass, would one not?

      Force me to buy schlocky VHS once, shame on you.
      Force me to buy schlocky VHS twice, shame on me.

      I wish I had a nickel for every time someone said "Information wants to be free".

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    2. Re:Completely Outrageous by frantzdb · · Score: 3

      ``God willing, we'll all meet again in Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money.''

  12. DVDs by Iluvatar · · Score: 2
    I remember reading somewhere that the reason Lucas did not want to release Star Wars on DVD was that he did not consider DVD to be a mature enough medium. Which, of course, sounds quite odd, given that the films were released on VHS.

    But, on second thought: DVD is definitely superior to VHS, but is DVD as it is today going to last as long as VHS did? For audio formats, there are now both SACD and DVD-Audio and it is not entirely clear which will prevail (if any). On the video side, specifications for hi-def video, as well as for recordable media are mostly nonexistent (for both technical, but mostly legal and economic reasons).

    Then there are the (somewhat ridiculus) issues of encoding and regions. The main argument for regional coding is that companies do not want to lose revenues: for instance, the same movie that sells for $20 in the US, sells for about $10 in, say, India. Even though companies do have profits in India, they want to maximize the overall profits, esp. given the high production and distribution costs of today's films. So the argument is, more or less, that if they do not do that, they won't be able to stay in business. In the meantime, India (to use the same example) produces about 3-4 films per week, at much lower costs (and keep in mind that costs for SFX etc are but a fraction of the overall costs in making and distributing a movie...).

    However, I don't think the coding schemes will last for long (even now, they seem to rely more on lawyers than on engineers to work ;-). And I do not think that Hollywood is unaware of this (even though they might seem to be). For instance, Lucas himself has been experimenting with various innovations to reduce costs. For instance, the technology for producing SFX might be an obvious one.

    Also, Lucas was the first to experiment with digital distribution of films (the movie is transmitted to a hard disk at your local cinema and then projected -- the monstrous JVC-Hughes lightvalve projectors were used in the experiments, with excellent results). This practically eliminates the costs of producing (physical) copies of the film and allows for simultanous world-wide distribution (no need to share copies etc...)

    So, I believe we will see a lot of changes in the near future and DVDs a few years from now might be entirely different from those of today. But, then again, if Lucas thinks he can make profit today as well as tomorrow... why not? In the meantime, we will satisfy our... addiction. ;-)

  13. Re:Tapes not selling as well as expected by ostiguy · · Score: 4

    What on *EARTH* are you talking about?

    Go to www.imdb.com, and see the second headline:
    Over $100 million in VHS sales in its first two days of release!

    This is ridiculous. This is informative?

    matt

  14. I love abject bitching! by beowulfMA · · Score: 2

    George Lucas made me buy seven copies of the original trilogy! What a total bastard! There I was, innocently wandering the aisles of my local video store, when in walks George Lucas, carrying a board with a nail sticking out of it! He... he... oh god, the pain... Jeezus, people. No one is making you buy every version of the Star Wars trilogy. I'm one of the uberdorks who saw Ep. 1 multiple times DESPITE the digital tomfoolery (read: Jar Jar, who reminds me of that whore in Full Metal Jacket, dont ask me why), and I have yet to buy it on VHS? Why? Because I can wait until it comes out on DVD (yeah, even if I'm 60 when it happens). Don't bitch at George Lucas because of your lack of self-restraint. Bitch at him because he desperately needs a screenwriter.

  15. Alright!! by Darrion · · Score: 2

    I had made the painful decision to buycot the VHS release of TPM. I loved the movie, Jar-Jar and all, but I was not going to pay for this AWESOME movie on crappy VHS. Looks like I may end up being one of the lucky few to not get hosed with buying both the VHS and DVD versions.

    On a side note... All of the SW movies have had annoying, to you and me, characters. Many found C3-PO very annoying, and what about those furry little Ewoks... Jar-Jar is just continueing that SW tradition. If not for Jar-Jar, my wife would have COMPLETELY hated the movie.

    --
    I think I would be in heaven if only I could find a Linux job.
  16. Re:hey support this independent filmmaker! by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Hey GL deserves much respect for his independence from the big studios
    If you're small time and then make it big without the studios 'help', then you deserve some respect, but when you have enough Liquid wealth to spend $200,000,000.00(US) on a movie, it's not that difficult. Add the fact that you're releasing a film people have been looking forward to for over 20 years, its a cinch. Hell GL could of released it as a sock puppet show, and still made $100,000,000(us):)
    The movie has grossed approx. $400,000,000 dollars, BUT, if GL had to pay Lucusstudios the same as anybody else, it would have cost $500,000,000(US) to make. So if I had made the exact same movie, and had the exact same reputation as GL, I would have lost $100,000,000(US)
    His methods are a great blueprint for "how to make art AND money without selling your soul to a huge lumbering corporation
    You mean use the studios to make you huge money, then cut them out of the picture? not much of a blueprint if you ask me.
    It must go something like this:
    1:Make movie that gross's over 10 times it's cost
    2:Be sure nobody believes it will be worth a dime so you can keep the merchindise money
    3:use your Billions to make 'Independant movies'
    There is a rule in 'the business'(and by The Business' I mean 'The industry':) ), that says never use your own money. I think TPM may have been the exception do to everybodies high hopes. I still believe that if TPM was the first to be released, then it would have been lucky to break even. The critics(in general) couldn't wait to use this opportunity to kiss his butt.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. AICN=POS by Pope · · Score: 2

    AICN is the worst of the worst when it comes to Fan-Boy hype.
    Harry has gone to premieres and given rave reviews to a flick (ie Godzilla) then come back a few days later to publish a "retraction" or not quite-so-positive review.
    AICN.com is in severe need of some Slash-style moderation. Once these raving fan-boys start getting and giving the smack, they might smarten up.

    OTOH, I'll believe this DVD crap when I see it.
    Does the first link in the story actually go anywhere? I got a big story about how much money studios are making off of DVD, nothing about Lucas phone call...


    Pope

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  18. Principles by geekoid · · Score: 2

    If you really dislike what's happening with the DeCSS issue, then it shouldn't matter what they release, you should stick to your beliefs.
    It's easy to be for/against something that doesn't directly effect you. The real challenge doesn't come until you have to give up something for your beliefs.
    If you give up a 'belief' the moment it becomes even slightly difficult or inconvenient, then you never really had those beliefs, did you?
    Lets face it, a movie coming out on DVD is hardly something to compromise your principles for, especially one that you can get in a format that you(probably) already own.
    This is in no way a flame against your beliefs, just pointing out the philosophical implications of your situation.
    The fact that you buy a DVD player that can circumnavigate the region coding, doesn't mean you made strives to help the DeCSS issue, just that you found a way to placate your guilt. Now that I said that, I hope your guilt will be more difficult to placate. Yes, I'm a mean bastard, but I have to stand up for my beliefs.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Principles by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2
      Q: Which is louder? The sound of one hand clapping, or the sound of a few dozen geeks boycotting?

      A: Neither! Both make about the same amount of noise in the real world--which is to say, very nearly none at all.

      Q: If a few dozen geeks boycott DVD and nobody's there to hear them, do they make a sound?

      A: Not very much of one! I am certain that studios and DVD producers get much more angry mail about "how dare they put these black bars over the movie I paid good money for!" than they do about the evil DVDCCA and DMCA which are preventing people from legally watching movies on Linux.

      Get with it, people. If you want to boycott DVD until the cows come home, that's your choice. But if you honestly expect it to have any impact at all on the behavior of (or funding of) the groups you're boycotting, you're fooling yourself. According to the editorial page linked in the above article, DVDs accounted for 13% of all video sales last year. That's an awful lot of DVDs bought by people who presumably couldn't care less. Unless you can get a pretty substantial amount of people to join your boycott, the only people who will be affected by it are you. (Free clue: if you want to reach the numbers of people who would actually do any good, you'd be better off buying ad space in national papers or magazines than spouting about it on Slashdot.)

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    2. Re:Principles by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      Buying a DVD does not really effect the DeCSS issue, in that there is so much money flying around already the lack of even a million people buying a particular DVD would have little impact on how much money they spend on evil lawsuits (and how would they know the million people just didn't want that movie?).

      I said it before in a previous post, but I'll repeat - I think the best way to help is to buy region free players, and support the EFF monetarily so they can continue to throw lawyers at the problem.

      Supporting a good cause has a better effect than sitting by the sidelines waiting for the game to finish (I can't believe I just used a sports metaphor. Sorry about that!).

      I still think that anyone not buying DVD's right now is only hurting themselves - the DVD industry does not miss you.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Principles by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2
      There are alot more then a few dozen geeks who are shouting about this.
      Oh, I'm sure. That's why only twenty showed up at the great anti-DMCA protest? If there are three digits' worth of protesters, I'll be mildly surprised, and if there are four, I'll be stunned.
      I believe the more we shout the more others will join us in this fight. Just because you can watch a movie in a high quality format is no reason to sarifice your rights.
      Oh, please. Shout about it on Slashdot all you like. Maybe you'll get a few dozen more geeks.
      (Free clue: a minority of people change laws all the time)
      Then I'm sure the DMCA is as good as dead. How can it possibly stand up to being ranted about on Slashdot??? (BTW, in case you missed it, that's sarcasm.)
      You want to sell out your rights and your childrens rights just so you can watch a prettier movie, go right a head. Comply like a little drone. When you're ready to fight let me know, I'll be happy to give you a list of things you can do to help.
      Dude, I'm not selling anything. The fact is, you simply don't have enough people to make a difference. Where's the acknowledgement of your boycott? Where's the news coverage (that doesn't make fun of you)? I've not seen anyone suggest a DVD boycott anywhere except Slashdot, and I would think that if you were as effective at getting the word out as you think you are, there would be articles and banner ads and such all over the place. I'll happily write my congressmen and send nasty letters to the DVD companies, as I think there's a slight chance that would help affect the DVDCCA. But simply not buying DVDs won't do anything, because there are ten thousand other people for every one of you who still will.
      If I have 0% effect at least I can stand up and say I tried. You, on the other hand, can say you help them stamp out are rights by not acting. how proud you must be.
      Good for you. Try all you like. I have confidence in the government and the courts to do the right thing, with or without a boycott, and when they do, I'll have my DVD collection already, and the enjoyment I have had and will have out of watching the movies on it.
      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:Principles by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      It is hurting you in the sense that you are not going to get some movies for a very long time. Did you want the directors cut with commentary of Army Of Darkness? You better have an e-bay account and a lot of cash. Same goes for Hard Boiled, and a number of other great movies that have either gone out of print already or are cycled out of the market on purpose (Disney).

      Those might come out again, someday - but right now they are here with really great quality and great commentary tracks besides. I've watched DVD's on my home TV, as well as projected out to about a five or six foot diagonal on the projectors at work (sometimes I bring in the DVD player and we have after hour movie shows). Frankly it's worth having a DVD player just to watch "The Matrix", and all the extra things that come with it.

      I personally also dislike the MPAA, but do not feel that my buying DVD's supports them that much compared to the actions I take against them.

      I've donated money to the EFF (and will do so again this year) so they can fight them. My next DVD player will be a player that supports MP3's and easy region free playing (Ok that's a bit of a lie in that I plan to get a PS2 as soon as they come out, just not to replace my DVD player...). I also tell as many people as I can about the evils of the MPAA, and like you find that most are outraged when they hear what is really going on.

      I also stand up, but do so in a different way that I feel is just as effective as a boycott. I don't think one has to choose between a love of movies and principals in this fight...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Principles by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      If you are really serious about that facet of the boycott, you can buy all your DVD's used.

      Hypocracy is arguing for one thing but doing another that actively contradicts what you say (I'll admit I slanted that definition to my benefit). While I admit my line is a grey one, I sumbit that most issues in life are not really clear-cut black and white issues. By taking a stance further along and saying that I vigorously support legal action against the MPAA and also region-free DVD players, I feel that in the end the weight of my actions rest firmly against the MPAA, just as I speak against them - thus there is no hypocracy.

      They may get a small sum of money (though even there I've taken to renting movies if I can, and buying only the ones likley to go away or ones that I feel compelled to watch again and again - Matrix!), but the EFF probably gets a much larger sum from me than the MPAA will ever see.

      Furthermore, if you really didn't like the MPAA and wanted to prevent any of your money from getting to them, wouldn't that mean avoiding movies altogether? Not even buying VHS tapes? I do not hear people calling for boycotts against these things as well, but I do not think of that stance as hypocritical.

      I see the non-buying of DVD's as more a symbolic action than one that can lead to change - it might be effective but the simple fact is that there is essentially no way to get enough backing for such a cause to make a difference.

      I admire the people that are purists and buy no DVD's. However, I wish more people would also advocate measures that were more proactive - like donating money to the EFF!! Not enough people seem to try spreading that message.

      One last closing argument - by not buying DVD's you are also hurting one other group of people, the movie makers! Don't you want to see the guys that made "The Matrx" do well? Especially the makers of smaller films like Pi, they could really use your money and by not buying DVD's you are hurting them a lot more than the MPAA!

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. Score +1 for Canada! by Pope · · Score: 2

    I looked around on the net for prices on the LTBX edition of PM, and here's what I found:
    Amazon.com: US$29.95
    HMV.com: CAN$31.99

    Bwah hah hah!
    Sometimes, living in Canada can be good. Not that I'm buying VHS anymore, but good to know.

    Pope

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  20. Well, thank god for that! by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2

    I simply wouldn't know what to do if Phantom Menace wasn't released on DVD. Thanks to Georgie, now all of us can be irritated and annoyed by Jar Jar in full digital sound and video! :)

    Thanks, but no thanks. I'll wait for Lucas to release a 100% Jar-Jar Free Directors Cut of the film. Oh wait, he already did. That was the 2-minute trailer. :)



    Bowie J. Poag
    Project Founder, PROPAGANDA For Linux (http://metalab.unc.edu/propaganda)

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  21. Yet more $ generating hype. by MrDalliard · · Score: 2
    Maybe I'm just a cynical old chap, but doesn't anyone out there think that this is just an exercise in fleecing the public, in particular die-hard Star Wars fans ?

    I think I must be about the only person on the planet not to have seen the film. In fact, I've deliberately chosen not to watch it. The more the Star Wars mania continues, the more it'll continue to push me away from the notion. I hate hype. My basis for this reasoning is the popular vs good theory. A thing can either be one or the other. For example, the British Tabloid papers are popular - but they are not good journalism. Over hyped films (and this most certainly was one of them) will be at the bottom of my viewing list.

    Give it 10 years, and I might watch it, on my Betamax video.....

    M.

  22. Rumor or Fact? by Wanker · · Score: 4

    Let's consider the options on whether to believe this. I figure there are two options:

    Option one, Lucas decides to release the DVD version of Episode 1. By doing this, he goes back on several years of announcing there would be no DVD version until the series was complete. In addition, he decides not to make a general announcement but instead leaks the information to one distributor, forgoing the chance to make a big deal of the fact that this will indeed be the first Star Wars DVD released.

    Option two, Suncoast messed up by announcing something that doesn't really exist, which happens all the time

    Seriously, in all likelihood this is just a misunderstanding based on a mistake made at Suncoast.

  23. Re:hey dumbass by Darchmare · · Score: 3

    What gets me is how retarded this whole thing about 'racism' is. Yeah, Jar Jar had an accent. Some people say it sounds Jamaican, but I don't see it. For the sake of argument, we'll say that it was meant to sound like that.

    Then you've got the Trade Federation, with their strange accents. These I could see as having been based on Mandarin or something.

    These characters are either considered 'bad/evil', or 'foolish/stupid'.

    So what?

    In the original trilogy, how did all of Vader's henchmen speak? In a very clear British accent. They were considered bad/evil type people. How did C3P0 speak? Something like a British butler, and he was the fool throughout the series. All of the 'good guys' more or less spoke with normal American accents - not exactly unexpected, given that these were American movies.

    Why isn't anyone complaining about the unfair treatment of the British in the original trilogy? Because they are apparently fair game according to the PC crowd, and the British actually have a sense of humor and didn't care.

    People seem intent on turning anything into a racial issue. Give me a break - there are plenty of cases of real racism and injustice out there to go after, you don't need to make them up.

    - Jeff A. Campbell
    - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

    --

    - Jeff
  24. Here is the facts by geekoid · · Score: 3

    GL was on KROQ radio(Los Angeles) and was asked about DVD. He said that it was "in the works. but Episode 2 is taking to much of his time" He said nothing about a release date, and I would presume(no fact in this at all) that it won't be released until after episode 2 at the earliest.
    If any employee, outside the highest levels of management, knew of a release date you would here about it in the news.As sad as that is.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. Re:Maybe the DVD will help me understand... by Darchmare · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure that wasn't a maze, but rather a long straight hallway with several force-fields of some sort. I'm guessing they were some sort of blast shield or something to keep fire/radiation out.

    - Jeff A. Campbell
    - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

    --

    - Jeff
  26. Re:Maybe the DVD will help me understand... by hewolf · · Score: 2

    The "Red Maze" is, in my opinion only, part of the main reactor for the city.
    Yes, I feel that it's placement next to the hangar could've been rethought, but if you look at all the bright towers all over the place, they could only be for power distribution.
    The red "doors" could very well be a timed channel for capacitance and overflow. The "pit" might well have been the heat dissipation exhaust.
    (Jedi and Sith can resist temperature extremes...)

    Mind you, this is only conjecture.

    HEWOLF

    --
    "Well, how would you like it if you woke up in a vat and told your life was a lie?" Neo
  27. In all seriousness: this is not news by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4

    Sadly, the Star Wars news needs to be laid to rest. I didn't see TPM when it was released, because there was just too much hype, and I didn't want to get sucked in by it. I have great memories of the first three movies, so I was certainly eager to see it, but I didn't. I finally saw TPM recently and, in all honesty, there's only one thing that can be said about it: It's a bad movie.

    The characters were flat; you didn't care about them at all. The acting was wooden, with no exceptions. The plot was poorly written and suspenseless. It jumped all over the place, throwing out names and terms like crazy, but I just didn't *care* about what was going on. The presentation waffled between trying to be complex--with all the diplomatic nonsense and so on--and trying to be a kids movie, with goofy characters that used comedy accents (Italian, Asian, JarJar's faux Jamaican). Nothing was played up like it should have been. Darth Maul was just sort of thrown into the plot in a casual way and didn't seem to fit. And yet he turned out to be in the climactic battle at the end? Strange. Anakin accidentally blows up the control ship to save the planet? Uh, I guess that was supposed to be the force guiding him but that was never brought up. An army is exterminating JarJar's people, yet he's making pratfalls throughout the scene. Come on, why didn't Saving Private Ryan bring out the vaudeville during battles? And that oh, so sophisticated droid army doesn't seem to have advanced beyond US revolutionary war tactics: get in a big line and march forward so to be easy targets.

    The CG effects were nice, but they didn't save the rest of the movie. I like SF, but I have to admit that TPM was abysmal. To say otherwise would be to belittle the good movies I've seen in the last few years.

  28. Young Lando plays it safe. by sammy+baby · · Score: 2

    I have this image of Lando, at age seven, as a tough-talking gansta wanna-be, before learning that you can catch more flies with honey and evolving into soopa-slick Billy Dee.

    "You say people gonna die? I'll tell you who's gonna die - it's always the white Naboo who start wars, and the black men who get killed. F**k that s**t, b***h, this n***a ain't fighting!"

    I would have paid serious money to see that.

  29. star wars is cool by Catatonic+Dismay · · Score: 2

    I like to watch star wars when I'm washing my ass out in the sink. I have the TV positioned just outside the door so I can pick poo and watch TV too, ( hehe that rhymed ). I'm happy about the dvd thing too cause I like the playstation and picking me butt at the same time too.. which means I won't have to drag the playstation, tv, AND vcr,.. just the tv and playstation and I'll be able to watch it through the play station while i pick poo. Cool stuff!

    --
    rm -rf ~/.signature
  30. URL by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

    The URL in the above post should be http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,35178,00.ht ml. Don't know why it didn't show up properly.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  31. Hypocrasy? by Cuthalion · · Score: 2

    The Slashdot community does indeed say one thing, and do another, but that is merely a subset of what really happens which is that the Slashdot community says a couple dozen different things and does a few hundred different things.

    --
    Trees can't go dancing
    So do them a big favor
    Pretend dancing stinks!