XFree86 Enters Wondrous World Of CVS
Quite a number of people have written with news from the USENIX annual technical conference. The news? The Xfree86 [?] folks have announced that XFree86 will now have CVS access.
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Great! With access to CVS those XFree86 folk can work smarter, not harder through the use of prescription drugs.
(for those who don't understand, "CVS" is a huge drugstore chain in New England)
--
Linux MAPI Server!
http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
(Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
I would just like to extend a BIG thanks to VA Linux for setting up SourceForge. I know that I've used it for projects and a lot of open source projects are using it to gain access to a CVS tree.
I think one of the most difficult things about X is that they rarely post any information on their web site, and their is no way to get an easy idea about the progress tht the X developers have made. I hope this begins to actract more developers, and improves the project a great deal.
Now when will it move into the 21st century and give us anti-aliasing? It's embarrasing to have Microsoft kick its ass for 10 years now.
I use CVS daily and think its excellent. However there a number useful of patches with haven't made it into the main distribution literally for years.
e.g.
* alternate port number patch
* proxy tunneling patch
* LOCAL_BRANCH patch
Is anyone reading this involved in the development of CVS itself and able to comment on when these patches will make it in?
-- Thorin sits down and starts singing about gold.
Jump on board, hackers!
Oh, wait...read only...dammit
I clap with one hand
------
------
You are in a twisty little maze of open source licenses, all different.
They don't seem to have done that the traditional Sourceforge way !
I didn't find any trace of the Sourceforge Home page, or the Bug Tracking or the forums ! too bad, as those nices features will for sure make the development more open
I don't want to start a download of the entire tree just to get a little bit of info... namely, have they fixed dga mouse support yet? This question gets asked day-in and day-out on the newsgroups by all of us l33t gamerz who need a smoother mouse to play quake under linux.
:P
So, has it been fixed in CVS, or are you guys going to make me download it to find out?
... check the DRI distro, which contains the entire xf4.0 xc/ source tree IIRC.. I've been running latest builds out of that tree on my 2.4.0test1-ac22 built box using my G400M/32 and Quake3.. I get about 5-30 minutes of stable use in 'failsafe' ?dm mode..
Root around in the site, you'll find CVS instructions...
Your Working Boy,
This is an important step for the Xfree project, however other critical events really need to occur to help this worthy project become more open. For example, what is their policy going to be on CVS commit access? The easiest way to seperate the OSS projects is on the openness of their CVS commit access granting policies.
Just simple anonymous CVS access isn't going to make that huge a difference in the openness of the project.
Intergalactics - A pretty cool strategy game in a java applet
So.. when does TOG decide to merge their changes with xfree86 and release x11r7?
... x12?
or
I'm in the midst of coding a module for the Olympus Project from Mount Linux that will handle CVS administration. This project is meant to bring all administration for an entire *nix network to a single X desktop and this new development should make it easier. If anyone is interested in helping out on the mod_CVS that I am working on, it is located on Sourceforge under the name Cerberus. Good news all around I guess.
The chains are broken
Loki is free
Ragnarok is at hand...
Along with CVS access, XFree86 has created new public mailing lists for development and support. Existing private lists will remain for NDA'd topics, but there aren't many of those anymore.
You cannot expect linux to move entirely to sourceforge since Linux is made from thousands of parts, each one developed by different people in different places etc... remember - Linux is NOT Windows!
Also, moving everything to sourceforge is definately NOT recommended. What happend if they'll have DoS tommorow? they don't have mirrors on the other coast, or outside U.S - so you actually suggest to put all the eggs in 1 place. Very bad idea (IMHO)
Hetz (Heunique)
get gCVS..
pan
I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
I think maybe you confused my .sig as being part of my post? I was talking about XFree86. At least I think I was. Maybe I need to take my pills now...
A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
No, no, no. LSD is for enlightenment. XTC/E is not to be used with a CVS, although it can be used with a LSD, IIRC, YMMV.
--
+&x
If you consider the windows line to be the same OS, then you need help. Windows NT is a 32 bit microkernel OS with roots in VAX.
Windows 95 is a 24 bit (mix of 16 and 32 bit) OS with roots in DOS. One supports DirectX, the other doesn't. One has modern features like asynchronus I/O and the other doesn't. Also, it isn't exactly a great honor be the third fastest growing desktop OS, considering that #1 and #2 are hugely far ahdead of #3. Lastly, this isn't about Linux. If X dies now, the effects won't be felt too terribly (servers don't have much use for X, and Linux isn't on that many desktops yet.) If people wait longer to kill X, we'll be stuck with a system whose capabilities still don't beat Windows GDI, much less a modern system's. If Win 3.0 were killed early and people had moved to OS/2, I think the computing world would have been much happier.
A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
Does anyone know if it is currently possible (with Xfree 4.0) to change color depth/resolution without restarting X? I know you can change resolution, and have been able to forever, but it doesn't help if your virtual console size is 4x larger then your real size :). So whats the deal, has no one just writting a X tool to change color depth/resolution properly or is it just something X can't do?
-- You can be a geeklord too
Theoretically, there is NO reason why you couln't maintain your own on SourceForge.. just download the patches as they come out, patch your local kernel, and cvs commit into your SourceForge tree.
;)
If you do, be sure to tell us
That was a joke. As in ha ha. As in funny... I know 16bit and 32bit don't make 24bit I was trying to make a joke. Some people...
A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...