Slashdot Mirror


More On The Compaq iPAQ Linux Handheld

alee writes "Here's what everyone's been waiting to see: screenshots of the Compaq iPAQ (PocketPC) running Linux. No, you're not going to see it running a plain-jane shell -- you're going to actually see it running X! This project is a lot more mature than I expected. Here is Photos of iPAQ being opened, and running X and Screen captures of the iPAQ running X." Ummmm.... wow.

127 comments

  1. Re:Cool interface for graphic arts by Quarters · · Score: 3

    Why dream? The technology has been available for years.

    Wacom LCD Tablets

    I remember seeing a drawing table/screen the size of a drafting table at SIGGRAPH a few years ago. It was in the Alias/Wavefront booth and they were running Alias Sketch on it. Quite cool.

  2. Re:Cool interface for graphic arts by gardenhose · · Score: 2

    Check out Wacom's PL Series. You hook them up like a monitor and you can draw on them. Very cool, and very useful. Not positive about Linux support, but I'm sure someone is working on it.

  3. Re:Awesome by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

    Man, DREAM ON.. Perhaps a basic, stripped down theme, butcha ain't gonna be running any of the superflashy, gottaloadtheeyecandygraphics themes..

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  4. Re:Where to get the binaries/kernel from + the FAQ by philj · · Score: 1

    Forgot - The FAQ-O-Matic is Here.

  5. Re:Cool interface for graphic arts by Consul · · Score: 1
    I never knew about these Wacom's at all. Thanks for turning me on to them. And to top it all off, they're compatible with the Millenium G400 I just bought. :o)

    Life is beautiful, once again.

    --

    -----

    "You spilled my egg... I needed that egg."

  6. Mirror... by pen · · Score: 1
    http://ps6mirror.hypermart.net/ipaq/

    Beware, Hypermart popup banners ahead.

    --

  7. Re:I-paq, linux, and x-copilot by freebe · · Score: 1

    You can download Pilot ROM's from the Palm website. You don't need a ROM of your own.

    --

    Free BeOS, runs from a Linux partition

  8. Left Handers by Joe_NoOne · · Score: 2

    Looking at this the first thing I notice is its geared for right-handed people. Can you flip the screen upside-down?

    To finish my rant, many of these palmtops are geared for right handed people. How about offering left-handed models (or trade-ins), or being more neutral?

    1. Re:Left Handers by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      The X server will be modified so it can run in any orientation
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  9. Re:Xscribble? by LinuxBean · · Score: 4

    Xscribble is a part CMU part SUN graffiti like inputting stuff. It seems to recognize graffiti like inputs. Get it at handhelds.org in the download apps src directory. It needs a few tweaks for i386 and it is picky about where its config files are located.

    --
    ---------------------------------- I like fig newtons...they're tasty
  10. Possibly better than Palm/Visor: TRGPro by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 2
    You might want also to look at the TRGpro, which combines PalmOS, 8MB of RAM, and a standard CompactFlash slot that lets you use ordinary CF devices. You want 340MB of storage on your "Palm"? It's pretty expensive, but you can use the 340MB hard drive.

    It actually represents one of the "better" of the ways of running Linux on a handheld; TRG describes this... The original way of booting Linux on a PalmPilot required that you have a TRG memory board in your PalmPilot.

    The more important overreaching point here, to stay on topic with this being an alternative to iPAQ, is that I don't yet see that there is a set of PIM software to make the "Linux-running" palm-held machines useful.

    For instance, the iPAQ appears to require that you hook it up to something that pretends to be a "dumb terminal," or that you can control everything using pre-programmed apps that use the onboard buttons. In other words, if an application needs a keyboard, you're left "grasping" for that.

    There isn't perfectly suitable Linux software to run on PDAs for the PIM needs of:

    • Calendar
    • Phone list
    • To Do list
    • Note pad
    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  11. Re:On second thought... by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    What I like about the tech is that I won't be locked into some closed PDA system. I won't be limited to the apps which the manufacturer created, plus those from the few people who paid to get the SDK. (The Palm is the exception to this, as there are already many apps...)

  12. looks interesting by spectatorion · · Score: 1

    i can't wait to set up a beowulf cluster of these...

    kidding. relax.

    but in all seriousness, this looks very cool. i wonder how long it will take for vendors to offer linux as an option on their handhelds. with all the industry hype of linux, it may not be as long as you think.


    ------------------------------
    funniest slash sites:infantililsm.org

  13. Re:Cool, but functional? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    Well, it runs X, however the screen is only 1/4 VGA. Some applications happily create dialog boxes larger than the screen (duh). Apparently there are several parties working to create PDA-screen-sized X applications.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  14. Re:I-paq, linux, and x-copilot by mattdm · · Score: 2
    You can download development roms (which work fine) -- just extra debug code. I think you have to send in an agreement of some sort too.


    --

  15. Re:Its being /.-tted. by Tairan · · Score: 1
    --
    /. is a commercial entity. goto slashdot.com
  16. Re:New WM? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Yes, you're right. And if you're running Gnome, you'll notice a bunch of icons on your desktop -- those are actually panels (windows) handled by the file manager. Notice there are indeed no decorations; there already are many systems running X with undecorated windows on their screen.

  17. Re:Xscribble? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    It's a stroke recognizer. Strokes are similar to Graffiti(tm) but not identical. It's linked off www.handhelds.org. Keith Packard wrote it.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  18. Ipaq does have networking by mrnick · · Score: 1
    The Compaq iPAQ H3650 Pocket 170293-001 with the optional PC Card Expansion Pack 170338-B21 enables PCMCIA support. It is documented to work with Compaq WRLS LAN PCCRD 11MBPS US 146927-001. I am pretty sure that it would work with most wired ethernet cards as well but that defeats the purpose doesn't it? All this is based upon the CE that it comes installed with but the potential for a linux Ipaq with networking is certainly there.

    MrNick

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
  19. iPAQ. Wow, that's an original name. by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1
    Gee, I wonder what inspired the name iPAQ?

    I think Apple's next machine should be called the Paqintosh.


    ChuckleBug

    1. Re:iPAQ. Wow, that's an original name. by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I always by the machine with the most original name, because it says so much about it. It's not like the name is a marketing tool, completely irrelevant to all but the most foolish/ignorant consumers.

      An original name says almost as much about a machine as the color and translucency of the plastic in the case.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  20. Re:Xscribble? by LinuxBean · · Score: 1

    Did you fix the problem with finding the recognizers. And where does it put that libli_recog.so file?

    --
    ---------------------------------- I like fig newtons...they're tasty
  21. Re:Xscribble? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 3

    The only tweaks for i386 it needs are to run xmkmf on the IMakefiles. And you do need to edit a header file to change the config file location. Other than that, it works fine on my x86 box.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  22. Re:iPAQ and the whole Linux bit... by smatthew · · Score: 1

    This is rated 2: interesting? How about -1 flamebait? like anyone would use a version of linux from the evil empire. And like the evil empire would produce a product that they had to open source.

    Correct me if i'm wrong, but why would they even need a deal to use MS Linux (If there was such a thing) as MS Linux would keep the old free-license - unless they wrote something completely new and unrelated but liked the linux name.....

    That's my rant for the day.

    --
    slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
  23. Re:How about this one?... by orcrist · · Score: 1

    Ok, so now we make X just a little smaller and throw it on the watch that IBM put out. Then we run an X server on the watch and run X-clock.

    I particularly like this picture showing how far we've come in calculator technology ;-)

    Chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  24. Re:Sounds like you want a Hewlett Packard 200LX by PD · · Score: 2

    DOS versions of GCC require huge chunks of memory and a 386 chip. It will not run on an 8088.

    Now, your suggestion for coding on the Palm V is intriguing. What C++ compiler works on the Palm V?

  25. Re:Window management for Linux handhelds by orcrist · · Score: 1

    I think Qt/Embedded would be a good choice. It looks like it's exactly right for the job. I saw it running at Linuxtag and, though I didn't take a very detailed look at it, I had a positive first impression of it. Here's the faq if you're interested.

    Chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  26. Re:New WM? by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

    ...and since x doesn't enforce policy it should be possible to make a wm that would only show one window at a time, a single button click to call up a list of running apps (one might be an app manager). maybe the os could have the buttons on the ipaq respond as mouse buttons - x supports at least five mouse buttons.

    in fact i recall a wm called the tile wm what would tile windows and not let them overlap.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  27. Re:What I'd be interested in knowing... by darkith · · Score: 1

    Being as there has been an ssh client for Palm for ages...I'd guess no problem. (if the 16Mhz Palm can ssh, anything can...)

  28. Re:Cool interface for graphic arts by Lifewolf · · Score: 1
    I'd like to see someone integrate one of these into a notebook.

    Well, Mitsubishi has the AMiTY CP and XP. They use the WACOM technology for their LCD displays/digitizer tablets. Heck, they use standard Intel mobile Pentium chips, 2.5" notebook harddrives, and run Windows 98, so installing Linux or BSD would probably be fairly easy.

    Not using WACOM parts, but still related are the ePlates from Hitachi. These are quite interesting; however at about the same size and weight as the AMiTY tablets, and with Windows CE instead of Windows 98, they might not be as much fun. Cheaper though.

    There are a number of other tablet computers on the market. They're just a bit more difficult to track down than your standard, boring old notebook. Oh, and a little more expensive.

    --
    "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
  29. Re:Windows CE is better by spectecjr · · Score: 2

    XFree86 4.0 is even better at memory managment, and, while running under the iPaq, actually consumes *LESS* system resources then CE's explorer.

    So you're saying that the GUI takes up less resources on X than an app running on Windows CE?

    Say it ain't so!

    How about telling comparing X with how much system resources *the GUI* takes up under CE instead of an app running on top of it?

    Simon

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  30. Re:iPAQ and the whole Linux bit... by the+COW+OF+DOOM+(tm) · · Score: 1

    I work at Compaq, in the Alpha Linux group, and I've played with the iPAQ handheld.. there's no MS Linux anywhere around here. Never heard of it. Pretty sure it's a complete fabrication. So please.. ignore the troll. Move along. Thank you.

  31. Re:Sounds like you want a Hewlett Packard 200LX by PD · · Score: 1

    The problem is not that the port of GCC is bad, it's that the port is specifically intended to be the best compiler for DOS that exists. That means that it's a 32 bit compiler running with a DOS extender and full memory protection.

    Turbo C++ is a nice compiler, but it's 16-bit and no memory protection. It was an earlier, more innocent time. In other words, it was primitive, and it sucked. Just kidding... I learned C++ with Turbo C++.

  32. Re:Color Text Encoding by Tet · · Score: 2
    Hmm...need at least five vertical pixels, for 3, 8, B, E, and S, and you need at least five horizontal pixels for M. [...] I figured this sort of thing out when I was a ten-year-old larval geek

    Obviously haven't progressed much past the larval stage, then :-) The above is only true for monochrome. Using colour antialiased text, as the original poster suggested, you can do better than that. 3 vertical pixels is just about readable, although it only works well for upper case characters, and you really need some context to give your brain a helping hand. 4 vertical pixels is fine...

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  33. Re:Xscribble? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    Sorry, I made a mistake. There's an errant strcpy() prototype that needs to be deleted. You'll know it when you see the compilation barf on it. Also, edit ScribbleP.h and change the path to the classifier files. And it installs a library, so you have to make install it before you can do anything.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  34. iPAQ and the whole Linux bit... by pabstblueribbon · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who was working on that project for Compaq (he has since quit...Compaq works you like a dog)...funny bit he told me was that Compaq had signed a deal with MS for the use of..drumroll...usage of MS Linux on their machines...thats right folks...MS Linux...so prepare to be owned by MS soon....and in response to another comment..iPAQ is Compaq's name for just about any of their new "slimline" stylie computer stuff...they have an iPaq desktop and now their iPaq handheld...all in catchy black and silver cases (I think they look nice...)..anyway...thats my bit...MS Linux...muahahahahahahaha

    --
    - drink, fight, and fuck..thats all that really matters
    1. Re:iPAQ and the whole Linux bit... by pabstblueribbon · · Score: 1

      Actually I do have ahabit of bein a jackass on here...but in this case I'm not wrong. MS did make a version of linux, I don't know why, and Compaq has signed a deal to use it. I don't know any of the whys of this, I just know what I was told by my friend who was working on the project. Some people get so pissy on this board when they hear something that they don't wanna hear. Damn elitist crybabies

      --
      - drink, fight, and fuck..thats all that really matters
  35. Any other sites with pics? by bradipo · · Score: 1

    It seems that their server is not responding well to the sudden surge in traffic... Anyone have links to pictures on mirrors or something?

  36. Re:Input devices by Christopher+Biggs · · Score: 1

    There's not much to tell.

    The DT104 board holds an AVR 20-pin microcontroller. RS-232 serial interface to
    the PC. One standard LCD display (driven in 4-bit mode), up to 8 pushbuttons,
    a piezo speaker and an ultrabright LED.

    Each button push/release sends an event down the serial line. It's up to the
    master to turn that into keys (I have a chord-set defined). The speaker is there
    mostly because the micro has a nice timer output to hook it to, the LED
    is an attention-getter and also a mini-torch (I'm forever poking into dark places where a little light in hand would be helpful).

    Power is 7.2v NiCd pack. LCD is currently 16x2 but I have plans to switch to a
    128x64 graphic. As you can see, I'm into minimalist computing. I don't think anyone will be porting X to this. :-)

    My intended application is wearable computing---cpu unit lives in backpack, or
    on belt, display/chord unit is held in hand, connected via curly phone-style cord.

    --
    -- veni vidi nuclei deceri --- I came, I saw, I dumped core.
  37. Full featured palm/laptop request by tobyjaffey · · Score: 2

    I want something the size of a psion (preferably with a small keyboard) which can run gcc, has a serial port, uses AA batteries (so I can replace them with a quick visit to a newsagent), has at least a 24hr battery life, has a PCMCIA slot (probably for a 340mb IBM microdrive or an ethernet card) and fits nicely in my pocket.

    I've looked at all sorts of devices, but they all fail on some criteria. The tiny librettos don't meet the battery criteria, psions and palms don't have the horsepower, the Aero and the Cassiopeaia (sp?) and similar things don't have PCMCIA (or ethernet/HD).

    I'm thinking that a hacked lart might do the trick, but I lack the skills to build it.

    Please Santa.....

    1. Re:Full featured palm/laptop request by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1
      You are not alone in wanting this. The main things I want, (Ie: Can't live without) are tcp/ip, ethernet, and a keyboard.

      Any ideas???? Anyone????

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    2. Re:Full featured palm/laptop request by eddison_carter · · Score: 1

      Look at SH3 WinCe machines, and linuxsh.sourceforge.net. You need a cf card to boot (which i havent gotten yet), but the hardware is decent, cheep, has a keyboard, and a PMCIA slot.

      --
      I always prefer to start the year off with a bang - or, to be more precise, a series of loud hums, a crackle or two, and
    3. Re:Full featured palm/laptop request by WhyCause · · Score: 1
      I want something the size of a psion (preferably with a small keyboard) which can run gcc, has a serial port, uses AA batteries (so I can replace them with a quick visit to a newsagent), has at least a 24hr battery life, has a PCMCIA slot (probably for a 340mb IBM microdrive or an ethernet card) and fits nicely in my pocket.


      It doesn't meet all of your specs, but you can run Linux on a Psion Series 5. If you can handle the larger size, the netBook (or Series 7, I can't remember which) will take a MicroDrive.

      I also would love to try and "roll my own" with a LART, but I also lack the hardware skills to implement my dream machine.
  38. I-paq, linux, and x-copilot by zaphod4224 · · Score: 4

    What I want to know is how long before x-copilot is ported to this thing? Just think, once it's ported, you probably won't have to give up your favorite palm apps. Even under emulation, it will probably run faster than a real palm, and with better color???

    1. Re:I-paq, linux, and x-copilot by pen · · Score: 1
      The problem, I'm told, is handhelds.org can't distribute PalmPilot ROM images. If you own a Palm, no prob, but that kind of defeats the purpose.

      So just leave it for the user to find. Some already own a Palm, and some will get it from... uhh... a friend with a Palm. Yeah, that's it.

      --

    2. Re:I-paq, linux, and x-copilot by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      You just raised the eBay value of old and broken Palms...people can buy them to get the ROM license.

    3. Re:I-paq, linux, and x-copilot by bgdarnel · · Score: 3

      You can barely emulate a Palm at full speed on a 300MHz desktop machine; there's no way it would be faster on a 133MHz StrongARM. Granted, the current emulators, being mainly for debugging purposes, have a ton of extra error checks, but I don't think it'd be enough to make up the difference.

    4. Re:I-paq, linux, and x-copilot by zaphod4224 · · Score: 1

      I haven't played with x-copilot that much, and all my machines are faster than 300mhz so I probably didn't notice any speed issues. It would be interesting to see if it could be compiled without the debug code in there. Of course, this might raise all sorts of legal issues and Palm might night like this, dunno. I already have a Palm, so downloading the roms should be OK for me.

  39. Re:Input devices by quarter · · Score: 2

    I think speech recognition is where this is taking us, but the software for that is too bulky and requires too many resources to run on a PDA, for now.

    Just send the voice packets to your central server, have it convert it and send it back.

  40. Re:iPaq? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 3
    Great, they named it after a dead rapper.

    Wouldn't that be iiPaq?
    ___

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  41. Re:iPAQ? by Yam-Koo · · Score: 2

    iPaq refers to both the handheld and the slim NT workstations... confusing naming, indeed.

  42. Re:iPaq? by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Bear in mind that iPaq is also the name for a legacy-free desktop that Compaq made, with no floppy drive and only USB connectors. It didn't include a monitor, unlike Gateway and Dell's half-assed attempts to clone the iMac.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  43. Re:New WM? by Bill+Currie · · Score: 2
    Yes, a new WM will be needed. But that is the nice thing about X: you are not tied to a particular window manager (or any at all, really), and thus is very good for the job at hand (:P), which is a good thing as it means a new graphical system doesn't need to be written for the iPaq.

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

  44. Mirror located at my site. by Tairan · · Score: 1
    --
    /. is a commercial entity. goto slashdot.com
  45. Re:Window management for Linux handhelds by X-Nc · · Score: 1
    Someone just did a smal window manager (swm, it's on freshmeat) that looks like it could be exactlly what this needs.

    But what do I know... I took the blue pill.

    ---

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  46. Re:On second thought... by dial0g · · Score: 1

    Well the price of the SDK is just the price of a CD and shipping ($7.50). And this includes not only the SDK, but compilers and an IDE as well. I've considered getting an iPaq because it IS easy to develop software for them.

  47. Re:Input devices by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    There are several CE keyboards currently or about to be on the market -- they usually attach to the serial port. In fact, the keyboard from the old Apple Newton can be adapted to this purpose.

  48. Re:Windows CE is better by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    X works fine on a handheld. X applications might not work so very well. That's why some people are working on Gnome on a PDA. It was on slashdot a few weeks ago. If I were a moderator, I'd mark your post down as *redundant*.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  49. Sounds like you want a Hewlett Packard 200LX by xtal · · Score: 2

    I had one of these little guys for the longest time (Actually, it's younger brother, the 100LX). I loved it, sold it when I started using my pilot more though - I didn't have the money to get any more PCMCIA space for it, and it's built in memory was limitied at 1 meg (I belive there are people with 8 meg 200LX's, and the pcmcia card lets you expand that as big as you want!). This little gem had a wonderful keyboard - nice HP keys - and a seperate notepad. It ran DOS; I had a old version of Tubro C++ for it, although I'm sure it could run the DOS versions of gcc just fine.

    Unfortunately, HP didn't continue developing this technology, so it's stuck with an 8088 series processor (IIRC) and while snappy, it won't run linux (it did run minix, though!). The Windows CE crap devices took over.. if HP put a clocked down 486 in one of these packages, it would be an incredible piece of hardware.

    However, if you want some free advice, don't try to get an all in one unit, get a Palm V and a folding keyboard to write code on whereever, and then pick up a old Sony Vaio 505 for your breifcase and run Linux on it. This combination (although I use a Pro, not a V) has proven to work the best for me.. you get the best of both worlds.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Sounds like you want a Hewlett Packard 200LX by xtal · · Score: 2

      Wasn't aware there wasn't better porting for GCC. Borland Turbo C++ ran just fine on the 'lil guy.

      Now, your suggestion for coding on the Palm V is intriguing. What C++ compiler works on the Palm V?

      I don't need a compiler to code. :) There's lots of good text editors available. I'm working on a small program to let me design C++ objects on the fly. Then, I can take the code and debug it at a later time.. I did play around with a nifty little program called PocketC for the Palm. Nice, but restricted..

      I wonder if GCC might run in the DOS emulator that's available for WinCE machines.. although, that's why I have a vaio, it's a real computer, runs linux 100%, and isn't a lot bigger than those WinCE machines (and it wasn't even that much more expensive, if you shop around for one of the older ones w/o winmodems..)

      --
      ..don't panic
  50. What I'd be interested in knowing... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

    ...what is the feasibility of installing, and using, a SSH client on one of these palmtops (either the iPaq, or the Yopy)? It would seem an excellent way to maintain communication with your server, while on the road: use the Compaq Proliant paging functionality to page you, and then fix whatever went wrong using your palmtop. I can't see the stylus pen being the best input device, but it should do in a pinch... What about connectivity?

    1. Re:What I'd be interested in knowing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Completely feasible to run SSH on it...

      We have ssh running on skiff (a similar strongARM device). Just move the files onto the iPAQ...

      Connectivity: Ethernet via CF or PCMCIA, or 802.11b (any day now), or serial, or USB, or IR.

      - Jim

  51. Re:Awesome by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    E already runs on the Netwinder, so I expect you could just copy it over as a binary. Except, of course, it's incredibly bloated software, so you probably couldn't even fit it into 16M of flash.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  52. Re:Can we have class outside? by slmiller · · Score: 1

    You can with the Palm. If you have a Palm V and a wireless modem, you could set up your server with VNC and the palm with the client (yes, there is one) and procede to do whatever you want to your network from wherever you want. I've had TONS of fun doing this to poor unfortunant illiterates in the computer lab. The look on their face is priceless when you minimize their work and they think it has been closed w/o saving.

    I don't know if there is a VNC client or wireless modem that would work w/ the iPaq, especially an iPaq running Linux. I don't believe that a wireless modem sleeve has been developed (much less released) yet.

    --
    "Alcahol. The cause of, and solution to, most of life's problems!" - Homer J. Simpson
  53. Re:Cool! by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 3
    The hardware appears to have inherited a lot of characteristics directly from the Itsy, so it comes as no surprise that Jim Gettys and crew could proceed fairly quickly to having Linux and X working on the iPAQ.

    Note that the TRG card was not solely providing 8MB of RAM, but also supplied some flashable ROM capabilities; I'm not sure which part was critical to letting Linux boot.

    If you look at the uClinux web site, it really seems quite directed to use in embedded applications, and part of the documentation there suggests that many apps won't even need multitasking, which isn't terribly compatible with this being a "generally" useful platform.

    I don't think you'll be running a uClinux PDA any time soon, suffice it to say...

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
  54. iPaq? by kwsNI · · Score: 3

    Great, they named it after a dead rapper.

    kwsNI

    1. Re:iPaq? by cybercuzco · · Score: 1
      no.... what other computer company makes a product that has a name that sounds like iPaq? Yup, iMac, at least its a handheld and not a lame clone attempt.

      --

  55. That would be the perfect calculator ... by cfortin · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering when HP would get its thumb
    out and make a new calc on par with the 48G or
    even the old 15's.

    Now I can just run x48 on this, and back that up
    with yorick or scilab.

  56. Re:Window management for Linux handhelds by lab1701 · · Score: 1

    9wm might be a good choice, but I can't wait to try larswm on it, I don't think I'd want to actually have to move and resize windows on such a small screen. :) (larswm is at http://www.fnurt.net/larswm)

  57. Re:Input devices by quarter · · Score: 1

    IIRC G.723 is ~ 8kpbs
    And if you have a sufficiently powerful server time should be minimal

    This is a prime example of a network computer and is what I think is the future...all your home appliances could be dumb clients with wireless connections to your server

  58. PDA? Micro "laptop"? by spankenstein · · Score: 1

    This is what I've been waiting for. Tiny little portable computers that hvae some horsepower. I've read up on the Itsy and such and really liked it and couldn't wait for a real product to come out. It's starting to look like a reality.

    And Linux is a HUGE plus.

  59. New WM? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 4

    It's cool and all that they fit X onto such a small handheld, but i don't think common X window managers will work well.. i mean, look at the real estate that the title bars take up. As Palm showed us, handhelds work better with a different kind of UI.
    --

    1. Re:New WM? by Christopher+Biggs · · Score: 1
      To some degree I agree that X may not be ideal for handhelds. However, you young tykes have been misled by Enlightenment, WindowMaker et.al. in respect to the job description of a "Window Manager".

      WMs such as 9wm, wmx or flwm work very well with restricted screen and memory resources. (I use wmx on full-size systems and I don't miss the fluff of Those Other Programs).

      --
      -- veni vidi nuclei deceri --- I came, I saw, I dumped core.
    2. Re:New WM? by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 3

      I'd say this is not the case. Many window managers actually look a whole lot like the CE interface. Look at wm, twm, olvwm, etc. Use a font size meant for the system, and it functions nearly exactly like CE. CE also has title bars, don't forget. Under CE, though, normally nearly all apps are considered full screen. Palm is the same way. All apps are full screen. Window bars are A) Not always required, and B) Can be made NOT to use the same realestate as on a desktop system.

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    3. Re:New WM? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      IBM is running X11 (R6.3) on a wristwatch.
      --

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:New WM? by /dev/kev · · Score: 1

      But that is the nice thing about X: you are not tied to a particular window manager (or any at all, really)

      Yes, and the nice thing about free software is that you can base it on an existing one. (I know you know this, I'm just pointing it out, of course.)

      Normally I hate the way twm iconifies stuff, both those little boxes, the way they appear where the minimise button is clicked, and the way they can't gravitate. But I think that it might actually be fairly good on the ipaq; they look to be a nice size, and dragging them around is probably nice too. I also like twm's lightweight menus, and think they'd be good on the ipaq.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
    5. Re:New WM? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would you want to base anything on the WinCE interface? It's appauling. Don't you dare say that Palm works the same way as WinCE. Have you actually used both OSes?

    6. Re:New WM? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Maybe the interfaces that you're used to all look like that. With X you can make your own; when I make my own I'll publish them.

    7. Re:New WM? by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

      That's my point. The existing WM can be configured to run in a low resolution environment, and even tweaked to use the smallest amount of memory as possible..

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  60. Awesome by Daveamadid · · Score: 1

    But when can I run e on it?!

    --

    --Dave
  61. Nonsense by TimMann · · Score: 1

    What a ridiculous post.

  62. Visor by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

    Suddenly my Visor just doesn't seem to be the kick-ass cool gadget it used to be.

    --

    There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

  63. Voice has been done. by mr · · Score: 1

    It was done. In early 1997.

    Dragon Systems demonstrates PDA speech recognition technology on Digital Equipment Corporation's StrongARM Processor in the Apple Newton MessagePad 2000.

    http://www.dragonsystems .com/main/docs/about/milestone.html

    Amazing how you still can't get a unit to replace a Newton 2[01]00 messagepad (just yet) Someone needs to have one done by 2010, whent he messagepad has a date problem.

    --
    If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
  64. Its being /.-tted. by Numeric · · Score: 1

    Anyone have links?

    --
    -- ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space!
  65. Can we have class outside? by CrazyJoel · · Score: 2

    With wireless stuff, you could admin the network from anywhere.

    --

    Such is the infinite Grace of Popeye.
  66. Window management for Linux handhelds by Fervent · · Score: 1
    This brings an interesting question to the forefront: is there a window manager currently created (or that can be easily modified) to fit most handheld's dimensions? Like a MiniKDE or MiniGnome?

    The guy who mentioned Palm's UI has got it right: Linux needs a specific window manager tailored to the small screen.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    1. Re:Window management for Linux handhelds by askheaves · · Score: 1

      Who in the world would want to put the Palm UI on a WinCE device?!?!?! Why ruin a perfectly good 240x320 screen in brilliant color by putting a grey and green 72x14 pixel UI (or whatever)?

      One issue that could be addressed is creating a window manager that is built around vertical screens. I saw that the guy had the thing turned 90 degrees just to run the X WM. Certainly, the device is designed ergonomically to be used vertical.

      I love my Jornada, but i'm hunting the stores everyday for an Ipaq. Thank goodness for the corporate American Express card!



      "Blue Elf has destroyed the food!"

      --

      Because you can't, you won't, and you don't stop...
  67. Where to get the binaries/kernel from by philj · · Score: 3

    You can get binaries and the kernel Here (that's if you're mad enough to try :-)

  68. Re:Windows CE is better by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    X isn't nearly as 'bloated' as many people believe. XFree86 4.0 is even better at memory managment, and, while running under the iPaq, actually consumes *LESS* system resources then CE's explorer..

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  69. Re:Cool interface for graphic arts by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see someone integrate one of these into a notebook. A stylus would be so much easier to use than a trackpad or eraserhead. Maybe it's time for "pen PCs" to make a comeback?

    Every day we're standing in a wind tunnel/Facing down the future coming fast - Rush

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  70. How about this one?... by Coq · · Score: 5

    Ok, so now we make X just a little smaller and throw it on the watch that IBM put out. Then we run an X server on the watch and run X-clock.

    --
    Information wants Coq
    1. Re:How about this one?... by frantzdb · · Score: 2
      Not too bad an idea... (kinda) I just recently saw a Timex that had a ``screensaver''. The watch had a pixel-based screen rather than 7 segment display... I'm sure people would pay for a watch that did that cool Xclock morphing numbers thing :-)

      --Ben

  71. Xscribble? by freebe · · Score: 3

    What's this xscribble program I see? Where do I download it? How does it work? Does it recognise graffiti? Why isn't there a website for it (at least in google?)

    --

    Free BeOS, runs from a Linux partition

  72. Re:Scary install procedure.. by jsmaby · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you could innocently return it saying that it crashed and won't come back up. Blame microsoft for having a corruptable OS, and demand your money back. With any luck, they won't check things out and see that have a linux kernel is where the OS should be...

    --

    Sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.

  73. Re:need info by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    You can't just go buy one. They're backlogged.

    But basically what you have to do is use a Windoze machine to install CELoader and bootldr. Using CELoader, you start bootldr. Then you have to communicate over the serial port (you can convert the USB cradle into a serial interface if you know how to count pins and solder), and download new flash images using xmodem.

    Yeah, it's only for hackers right now, but jump in! The water's fine!
    -russ
    p.s. I'll have mine at LWE. Find me and ask me to show it to you.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  74. Mirror over at... by Tairan · · Score: 1
    --
    /. is a commercial entity. goto slashdot.com
  75. "Hands Off X" by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    The "Hands Off X!" which is mentioned apparently was a talk about how Scheifler had helper programs interface to X. I think the software is used in Xtalk and a2x

  76. Got one - love it it's great by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Except of course for the fact that it's equal to 10 car payments.

  77. Re:Windows CE is better by mjohnson · · Score: 1
    Actually you'd want X for when these things are networked so that you could run the app somewhere else and display it on your iPaq, not that you'd want to do this as a matter of course.

    GtkCE/QtCE/AthenaCE is what you'd want for PDA apps so that they play nice in a handheld environment. Bonus points for making it binary compatible with the "parent" widget set.

  78. Neat hack but... by Flashblade! · · Score: 2
    ...wouldn't it be neat if we could really take advantage of the power of X on a PDA?

    Imagine connecting the Xserver on your handheld to the Xclient on your PC :) All you'd need is networking support for the PDA.

    With a fast network this could really rock, you could offload all the processor intensive stuff onto your PC/whatever and just have the handheld render the graphics.

    With the coming of net appliances and such this seems to me like a really great way to run your household.

    But unless we do stuff like this, why would we run X on a handheld at all? I mean it might be better than Windows CE, but Palm OS was designed from the ground up for PDA's I can't see taking a huge piece of software like Windows or X to a handheld unless there are some inherent advantages in doing so.

    It would really be cool to see this evolve beyond just another "neat hack".

  79. Re:Input devices by slmiller · · Score: 1

    I've heard rumours (probably only vaporware) of a device being developed for the Palm V that would go in a car cup holder and dock to the Palm. It will have a cell phone and limited voice recognition abilities (ie.: "Call Bob").

    As for sending the voice packets elsewhere for analysis, wireless connections are still (for the most part) too slow to do this well. Sending the voice stream will take approx a 28.8 connection just for a clear upload. Then the command must be analyzed (not a big problem, but still a difficultie) and the command downloaded. It could work, but it would be (IMHO) too slow. If you where a patient person, it wouldn't be a problem.

    --
    "Alcahol. The cause of, and solution to, most of life's problems!" - Homer J. Simpson
  80. Re:Input devices by Christopher+Biggs · · Score: 1

    Was the data egg ever anything but vapour?
    (I've built my own using the DT104 board from www.dontronics.com).

    --
    -- veni vidi nuclei deceri --- I came, I saw, I dumped core.
  81. from the pass-me-a-tissue dept. by NRLax27 · · Score: 1

    Ha ha ha ha ha....I must be really tired, but this department line just made me crack up out loud right here at work!

  82. Cool interface for graphic arts by Consul · · Score: 4
    The idea of drawing directly on an LCD screen would make an excellent graphic arts interface. You could have your 8.5x11 inch touch tablet screen, complete with Crusoe processor running Linux and CorelDRAW 9 or Canvas 7 (this is where a port of Illustrator to Linux would be nice). All you need to do is draw straight on the syrface to put all of your illustrations together.

    Yes, I know this is somewhat offtopic, but I can't help but dream about this.

    --

    -----

    "You spilled my egg... I needed that egg."

    1. Re:Cool interface for graphic arts by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

      What you're looking for is the Fujitsu Lifebook B-series. &nbsp My roommate has one, and it's a great little subnote; a 3-pound celeron with a nice magnesium case. &nbsp If you're looking for a touchscreen notebook, I highly recommend it.&nbsp (IMHO, fingerpainting-with-photoshop is the coolest non-quake-related computer activity yet devised.)

    2. Re:Cool interface for graphic arts by great+om · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Fujitsu has done just this in one of their new lifebooks

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
  83. Cool! by suwalski · · Score: 3

    This looks very much like the screenshots of the Itsy using the pen entry system. Perhaps we can still have Linux on handhelds.

    Does anyone know what is going on with Linux on Palm hardware? Last I checked you needed a special 8-meg TRG card. But now that Palms ship with 8-megs of RAM... I'd like to hear from anyone who knows anything!

  84. Re:Input devices by dnelson · · Score: 1

    Although the software is bulky now, this thing isn't your average PDA. 200mhz, 32M? It could be done (esp if they stick in an IBM microdrive) It can run tcp/ip ppp and the others (why bother with wap?) Not such a big deal... palm already does that.

  85. need info by romco · · Score: 1

    Any one got the info on HOW it was converted to linux. I want to go our and buy one.

    --
    AdFuel
  86. Re:Scary install procedure.. by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2

    Nothing would be worse then having to stare at a 500$ doorstop a few days after buying it..

    Knowing Wince, it'd probably be more useful as a doorstep... hehe...

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  87. Neat, but... by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    I just don't see TWM being used on a PDA. For crying out loud, the text was unreadable and the title-bars enormous (relative the screen size).

    On the other hand, get a few apps (will they be called ApPaqs?) on there that can compete with the Palm and the regular user need not know that it's Linux/X. It just makes life easier for the developer (develop for X, then port).
    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  88. iPAQ? by X · · Score: 2

    Isn't an iPAQ a server appliance running NT?

    --
    sigs are a waste of space
  89. Re:Sounds like you want a morphyone by Barrow_Boy · · Score: 1

    i went the other way, used a palm for a few years then switched over to my doublespeed hp200lx 8mb, though you can get 96mb versions now. it's great, dunno about gcc but you can get perl for it. on the other hand checkout http://www.morphyone.org/ this is the hp200lx with a 486 processor. now thats what we want to see!! markj

    --
    look somewhere else for a sig... *** ** *
  90. Wow, that's pretty cool... by radiashun · · Score: 2

    wonder how long it will be until someone tries to turn one of those into a webserver?

    1. Re:Wow, that's pretty cool... by jg · · Score: 1
      Apache runs just fine, thank you very much...

      - Jim

    2. Re:Wow, that's pretty cool... by noweb4u · · Score: 1

      You know that someone developed one for the palm that serves out of the "htdocs" subject in notepad, right? I have tried it and it works. Search tucows for palm and web - I can't remember the name of it right now :-)

  91. Input devices by closedpegasus · · Score: 1

    Having Linux and X run on a PDA is certainly quite a feat, but I think it will remain impractical until a better input mechanism comes along. Having to actually write out each letter of a command is too much of a PIA to do anything useful with it.

    I think speech recognition is where this is taking us, but the software for that is too bulky and requires too many resources to run on a PDA, for now.

    And, I don't think linux is much of an improvement over other PDA OSs unless some of the networking features are involved. Can this thing run tcp/ip? PPP? WAP?

    1. Re:Input devices by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Having to actually write out each letter of a command is too much of a PIA to do anything useful with it.

      Perhaps, but the good news is that the original developers of Unix figured that typing on a teletype was a PIA too, so most Unix/Linux commands are just a few letters.

      Cryptic? Not at all, just PDA-friendly. :-)

      --
      -- Alastair
  92. Re:Windows CE is better by Chris+Hind · · Score: 1

    I agree. My iPaq has CE, and it's damn well going to stay like that --- there's only just enough room on it at the moment without hacking X in there (especially 'sideways X' which is all they have working at the moment). Didn't people learn from Palms? Palms and PalmOS took off because they were designed for handhelds (my Palm V is also cool). WinCE is also designed for handhelds --- there are major differences between it and my desktop's Win2K! If you want X on a handheld, do the damn work and design XCE, don't just kludge it over and pretend it's cool.

    PS: moderators, just because you don't agree doesn't mean I'm trolling.

    --
    nal 11
  93. Re:Windows CE is better by vsync64 · · Score: 1
    Who would want huge bloated X on a handheld. Windows CE is much better hands down.

    Putting X on a handheld does seem silly, I'll admit, but I'm doubting that WinCE is much better. I haven't used it much myself, other than store demos, but the interface seemed quite clunky. Apparently this is the most common complaint from users, that Microsoft tried to squeeze the desktop interface into a whole new paradigm. (Although the new version, not called WinCE any more, is supposed to be better.)

    Secondly, WinCE isn't what I would call stable. A friend of mine has a Jornada, and it crashed several times while we were using it. Recently, the Registry got corrupted (?!?!!!!) and it then crashed, taking his data with it.

    --
    TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
  94. Scary install procedure.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    This is the biggest issue that worries the hell outa me with all this, and one of the ONLY reasons I'm not gonna go do this untill it's more mature..

    If this installation fails then your iPAQ could become unusable.
    This procedure has been tested on less than a handful of units. This version, however, has a check sum code to validate that an uncorrupted bootlader is being installed, and is less likely than the previous installation process to result in an installation failure.

    If you install Linux at this time then you can not return to WinCE.
    Work is underway to enable you to save your WinCE image before installing an operating system, but at this time implementation is not complete.


    I'll wait at LEAST untill I have the failsafe to back to CE in worst case. Nothing would be worse then having to stare at a 500$ doorstop a few days after buying it..

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  95. Re:Color Text Encoding by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    Hmm...need at least five vertical pixels, for 3, 8, B, E, and S, and you need at least five horizontal pixels for M. That gives you a maximum resolution of 64*48. You can sort of get by with four horizontally, giving you 80x48. I figured this sort of thing out when I was a ten-year-old larval geek...ah, youth! (wipes away tear)

  96. Color Text Encoding by drenehtsral · · Score: 2

    Now we just need to wait for the hardcore geeks to make small little color bitmaps to represent text characters in a smaller space by using pixel color to squeeze extra bits out of a smaller space, so people can have large "text" screens (at least 80x50) on a 320x240 display =:-) and then we're all doomed to turn into cyborgs =:-)

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
  97. On second thought... by pb · · Score: 2
    Well, it looks really cool, and I would so love to run 'ls' with a stylus!

    ...but I'm not about to pay $500 for just that. Okay, if I had an expensive net connection I could run telnet too, or check out that GNOME article from my lean-to...

    One thing I love about Transmeta's devices is the x86 compatibility. Okay, I'm biased, but I think there's some value to being able to run DOSEmu or Wine, or for that matter RealPlayer 7...

    But also, I just can't see a lot that I'd want to use this for... Maybe I'm just not a PDA kind of person. I guess I could run 'cal', but I despise post-it notes, and I'd want to use that stylus as little as possible.

    Okay; end of useful content.

    Wow, imagine a beowulf of these things!

    Where are the warez for the StrongArm, dude?

    Hey, can it play mp3's? ;)
    ---
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  98. Re:Windows CE is better by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    Ok, I rephrase.. The X Server and the twm window manager consume less memory then the CE explorer. The Linux kernel also consumes less memory then that of the CE kernel, whcih leads to an overall reduction in memory usage over that of CE using CE's explorer..

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  99. Cool, but functional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While it is very cool to have Linux running on
    the iPaq, how functional is it? The site seems
    /.'ed so I couldn't find out for myself, but what
    apps does/can/will run?

    I'm in the market right now for a PDA. I need the
    functionality today. The two contenders I have
    come up with are the Palm Pilot and the Handspring
    Visor. The most important thing is that they can
    sync in Linux.

  100. Re:Windows CE is better by spectecjr · · Score: 2

    The X Server and the twm window manager consume less memory then the CE explorer. The Linux kernel also consumes less memory then that of the CE kernel, whcih leads to an overall reduction in memory usage over that of CE using CE's explorer..

    So what you're still saying is that:

    The X Windows GUI consumes less memory than WinCE with an App running on top of it?

    TWM is a Window Manager. Get a real app running on top of that and then you can make the comparison between that and CE with a real app running on it (namely: explorer).

    Also, presumably you have some hard data to back up your theory?

    Simon

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra