Slashdot Mirror


What Happened to Phrack?

A worried Anonymous Coward asks: "Remember phrack; the ever irrepressible hacker journal. Their site seems to be down. Does anyone know what happened to them? Phrack was a tradition. I remember the times I used to pour on the articles dissecting every bit of information. To see it go makes me sad." Pinging the primary domain name server for phrack.com also returned no results. Have they dropped off of the face of the 'net, never to be seen again?

37 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Re:They've only moved by eddieb · · Score: 2

    As I write this the links to the issues are broken due to a MySQL error. However, the FTP archives work fine.

    ftp://phrack.infonexus.com/pub/phrack/

  2. Re:They've only moved by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > > incase you're wondering when alt.2600 took the nosie dive into pure shit,
    > > I say summer of 1995. Basically USENET's commuliative quallity halved that summer.
    >
    > Windows 95. Dial-up networking. Bundled TCP/IP stack. Everybody and
    > their dog could get on the internet with a few clicks.

    Or as we old-farts like to call it: The September That Never Ended.

    It's just that it took a couple of years for September to catch up with alt.2600.

  3. cannon fodder by tru+junglist · · Score: 2


    more cannon fodder for the slashdot effect...
    another mirror for the phrack archive is here
    you can find up to issue 52

    --
    jungle is massive
  4. Re:They've only moved by Tassach · · Score: 2

    IIRC, that was about the same time AOHell & Prodigy unleased their masses of lusers onto USENET. It's never recovered. I've pretty much given up actually trying to read usenet. About all it's good for anymore is trawling for pr0n. Almost all of the intelligent discussion has moved to web forums like /. or to mailing lists, where at least there is some attempt made to keep things on-topic.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  5. What's with these AskSlashdot's? by cot · · Score: 5

    I thought the point of an Ask Slashdot was to put out a question with many possible answers, such as "Is there any way to set up a machine to do X, Y, and Z?".

    Then people can respond with a variety of solutions to the problem. This can provide a wealth of information to the person asking the question, as well as other interested parties.

    This question (and a few other recent ones) asks something that probably could have easily been answered with a quick web search. Not only that, but the answer isn't really something that requires a community response.

    "Where's X?"

    "It's over there"

    "Oh."

    ...

    It's not that I am bitter that this guy asked this question. I am bitter because we miss out other questions with potentially more interesting answers.

    --

  6. Beware of _Anarchist's Cookbook_ by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    And of course, the classic: "The Acarchists Cookbook". Check it out at your local library or get it from Amazon.com.

    I strongly recommend against trying any of the recipies in the _Anarchist's Cookbook_. They tend to have dangerous errors or omissions.

    Example: The nitroglycerine recipie neglects aparatus and processing steps necessary to keep the reaction running cool enough that it doesn't blow up during manufacture. (I understand that the original inventor of nitro blew himself up, and the compound he was working on was reconstructed - much more carefully - from the surviving fragments of his lab notes.)

    Considerably less likely to kill you are the recipies in the reprints of the US military manuals on improvised munitions (available at most gun shows).

    Reminder: The BATF is in charge of seeing that anybody who actually TRIES the recipies in these books (without filling out forms, acquiring government approvals, and paying applicable taxes) is treated harshly. And "The Revenooers" are somewhat gung-ho about their job (as they demonstrated at Waco TX.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  7. Why it's down by jesser · · Score: 2
    Remember phrack; the ever irrepressible hacker journal. Their site seems to be down. Does anyone know what happened to them?

    Of course it's down, it was linked to on the slashdot front page!

    --

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  8. One other mirror site by Teancum · · Score: 4

    I will regret doing this, because I know it will get slashdotted, but a mirror of all of the issues can be found here.

    If you want to get a good glimpse at the earlier days of computer "hacking", this is a good place to start. I especially like the "hack" to open a Master combination lock. I hope this helps a little.

  9. It's up, but it's not by swerdloff · · Score: 2

    My guess is that something got screwed during the migration - consistently gives a MySQL error when you try to pull up an article.

    And as to those of you conspiracy theorists who think that this is Operation Sundevil reincarnate, I remind you that the site changed hosts, there was no government conspiracy. Explore before you claim that the sky is falling. "I mean, that's the only reason it could have happened." Err, no, it was quite obviously not.

    1. Re:It's up, but it's not by AntiPasto · · Score: 2
      Look for the FTP links, or the latest issue is called "phrack56.zip" or "phrack56.tar" ... check your search engines...

      ----

  10. Re:Has happened more than once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    this is BS. unless you mean that the original editor's included articles on bomb making and stealing things , where as now it is more technical info, either way it is still a great zine, and accepted by a lot of people.

  11. So the website is down... by ETOUR · · Score: 2

    Big deal. Relax. Look, sometimes thingz happen that are beyond our control. And sometimes thingz happen because people are lazy. And sometimez thingz happen because lazy people can't control anything. Jeeze. Calm down. Things will be fixed. I'd hate to see what would happen to some of you if www.startrek.com went down. Phrack isn't dead.

  12. Has happened more than once... by cOdEgUru · · Score: 3

    In early 1990, the United States Secret Service carried out a nationwide crackdown on hackers which came to be known as Operation Sundevil. The sweep was highly publicized, in an effort to discourage many of the hackers whom it did not target. Naturally, this crackdown had an adverse effect on Phrack magazine. In late December of 1989, Issue 30 was released; a mere three weeks later, Phrack was shut down by the USSS during Operation Sundevil. Over the course of 1990, several attempts were made to re-establish Phrack, however, since they were not done with the consent of the original editors, they were unfocused and not generally accepted by the hacker community.

    1. Re:Has happened more than once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Wrong. There were a series of editors that did get the permission of Knight Lightning and Taran King to continue the e-zine, including Crimson Death/Dispater (with Dispater staying through 43), Eric Bloodaxe(AKA Chris Goggans of Comsec/LOD fame, through number 48), then Voyager/ReDragon/Daemon9. Daemon9 changed his handle to Route, and is the current editor. To be more exact, KL and TK handed it off to Crimson Death/Dispater, Dispater handed it off to Ericb, and so on. I'd say RTFM, but, RTFE-Z seems more appropriate. At any rate, it makes for fascinating reading, and it's amazing how similar the personalities in the computer underground now are to the people active in the 80's.

  13. Looks like they're up to issue 56 by AntiPasto · · Score: 2
    Dated May 1st... in slashdot time I can see how it might be considered old, but its good to see its still up. I remember downloading phrack from BBSes, and then getting ahold of it thru Delphi's internet services. Good time.

    My absolute favorite article is the one where they do the email around the world, using UUCP style routing, and bouncing around geographically stepping servers. Indeed a good time.

    Anyone else have a favorite article?

    ----

  14. Re:They've only moved by Suydam · · Score: 2

    I get nothing but Mysql errors from that site. Perhaps it's still under construction?

    --


    Werd.
  15. Maybe it just crashed? by LilGuy · · Score: 2

    Perhaps they had problems with the server, and are down for the time being... Is it really necessary to jump to the conclusion that the government took it down, or someone hacked it? Crashes do happen...

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  16. They not only moved... by toofast · · Score: 2

    Warning: Can't connect to MySQL server on '63.145.226.10' (111) in /var/www/vhosts/phrack/htdocs/search.phtml on line 166

    Warning: 0 is not a MySQL link index in /var/www/vhosts/phrack/htdocs/search.phtml on line 167

    hehe I love seing this kinda stuff!

  17. Re:New address by baldeep · · Score: 3

    Gosh, and I figured they just got slashdotted ;-)

  18. Another mirror of all issues of Phrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    http://the.wiretapped.net/s ecu rity/textfiles/phrack/

    All issues are there, in both compressed and uncompressed plaintext.

    http://the.wiretapped.net/security /te xtfiles/ also contains a decent slab of other stuff that might be of interest...

  19. Re:S2TD! by talesout · · Score: 2

    Goddamn it! Anytime I forget to preview. Here's the actual HTML: Sure thing dude.

    http://images.kuro5hin.org/kuro5hin_Sig11_vs_Taco. html

    If that doesn't turn your stomache, I don't know what would. As long as I'm posting more crap, here's an interesting conversation on Slashdot itself (set your threshold down to view it though).

    Thread of doom!

    Actually, I left in my settings so you can view it.

    --


    Bite my yammer.
  20. Re:They've only moved by plover · · Score: 5
    The best quote on alt.2600 from that time period was "Has anybody else noticed that the quality of the lamers has gone downhill?"

    John

    ...all downhill since 1972...

    --
    John
  21. Re:They've only moved by Snocone · · Score: 2

    some of the funniest flames I've ever read (back when flaming on usenet was an artform).

    Are there any Best Of... collections on the net anyplace still alive? The 'Hall of Flame' died years ago it seems, and I haven't found any replacements :(

  22. [OT] Re:lastfoot.com is gone too by treke · · Score: 2

    Look at the bottom of the page. http://www.lastfoot.com/about_us/news_coverage/081 000-merger.php. It was a merger.
    treke

  23. Textfiles by billh · · Score: 2

    Nice link. I was shocked to find something of mine in there. Glad I stopped using that alias a long, long, long time ago.

  24. phrack by wishus · · Score: 2

    I never saw a phrack past issue 47, and that was five or six years ago.. I did see mention of them the other day, and some quote from issue 49, which means they must have gotten over whatever problems plagued them after 47. I never knew they had a website.. We used to get it off BBSs.. hehe..
    Vote for freedom!
    ---

  25. Geeze people... by ryanr · · Score: 2

    Did you try asking Mike?

    I just called him... he should be on in a moment to comment.

  26. New address by Infernal+Pulse · · Score: 5

    The site has moved to the new address http://phrack.infonexus.com and is definatly still alive and firing out awesome articles.

    1. Re:New address by Hadean · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, things are still pointing to phrack.com on their site (forum.phrack.com for example)... I guess they're still in the process of moving...

      (*phewph* Glad it's still up)

  27. They've only moved by Gordo+Toor · · Score: 5

    http://phrack.infonexus.com/
    --
    I wrote the play & still own the script ...

    1. Re:They've only moved by coaxial · · Score: 4

      I thought that domain name looked familure. Back when in 1994-1995 (freshman in college) I went through my infatuation with cracker culture, that alot of people do. I amassed quite a collection of filez and had ran a semipopular site out of my dorm room (running Slackware).

      This was back in the day when alt.hackers still was "self-moderated" meaning you had to add a specific header saying "X-Moderator-Approved:" or something in order to get your post to propigate across USENET. And you had better include your "ObHack" or you'd get flamed. (Some where quite involved. Like hacking a garage door opener to your beer refridgerator to open the door and deliver a beer to you.)

      This was also back back in the day when alt.2600 actually had a resident population that new stuff, as opposed to being just 5cr1pT k1Ddi3z. There were two guys on alt.2600 that new the most. Will something (the FAQ maintainer) and route@infonexus.com. (I forgot his email address but his FTP site was something at ftp.cdrom.com/.../route .)

      I haven't thought about that guy in years.

      --
      The Guy Formerlly Known as "Coolness Incarnate"

      (Now I'll have to track down The Bob(c) and my walk down memory lane will be complete.)

      (Oh and incase you're wondering when alt.2600 took the nosie dive into pure shit, I say summer of 1995. Basically USENET's commuliative quallity halved that summer. Don't know exactly why though. It was after the AOL-USENET fiasco.)

    2. Re:They've only moved by dillon_rinker · · Score: 3

      Oh and incase you're wondering when alt.2600 took the nosie dive into pure shit, I say summer of 1995. Basically USENET's commuliative quallity halved that summer. Don't know exactly why though.

      Windows 95. Dial-up networking. Bundled TCP/IP stack. Everybody and their dog could get on the internet with a few clicks. I don't blame the increase in the signal/noise ratio on Microsoft or Windows per se, merely on the ease of use.

    3. Re:They've only moved by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      You're blaming a SUMMER of 1995 dive in USENET quality on an operating system that wasn't released until the end of August, and didn't bundle the dial-up networking until 1996?

      Bit of a stretch, that.

      -

  28. Re:SCAM by British · · Score: 2

    Was this the same SCAM! magazine that, in one issue, was selling a package of donuts with lye injected with them? Had its own little custom reader program?

  29. Re:phrack by ArtPepper · · Score: 4

    http://www.eff.org/pub/Misc/Publications/CuD/Phrac k/

    Includes up to issue 49.

  30. Could just be broken by oldzoot · · Score: 2

    Datalens seems to be down. Could be something as simple as a telephone guy stealing a pair from their uplink T-1. This can take days to fix, since the telco will say, " no, we havent done anything to YOUR circuit ". I have seen T-1 lines go away for 3 or 4 days from causes like this. How long has the site been down? Does anyone know how big of an ISP Datalens is ?

    --
    enough is too much
  31. EFF used to host Computer Underground Digest arch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    I dunno if it is still around, but ftp.eff.org under /CUD used to host the computer underground digest and a huge collection of hack / phrack netzines including Phrack, Lod tech manual, Cult Dead Cow, Informatic and others.