Slashdot Mirror


Living In A Microsoft Country (And Speaking The Language)?

WinterKnight asks: "I live in a country that's completely under Microsoft domination. My system, runs a non-Microsoft OS (lets just say its not a UNIX variant, and yes, it's a PC). It's hard. Really hard. Especialy when most e-mail from people arrive as a MS-Word attachments, or they use Excel for making even a silly, simple list of items. Its also hard when 90% of the web sites from that local country are 'designed for IE5+ and above'. What makes it even more difficult is that Netscape has difficulty reading the language, because the format is also IE-only. The country I am refering to is Israel. Microsoft seems to have it locked up here because of Hebrew, which isn't only a diffrent set of fonts, but is also written backwards - from the right to the left. Very few systems other then Windows have support for that. Mine doesn't fully support it as well, either. Living like this is very hard, and I keep asking myself if maybe I should just give up and be 'one of the crowd'?" Localization in Linux is improving, but how close is total Linux support for languages like Japanese and Hebrew that are difficult to fit into your normal, left-to-right, single byte character infrastructure?

"I am well aware that once I do something like this, I'll probably begin to neglect the computer and like it a lot less, because for me it will mean the loss of my freedom. I've never liked Windows, and for a reason. But this freedom keeps costing me a hard price of being 'not compatible' with just about all of the computing resources available. Linux does have programs that can read Word and Excel files, but unfortunately, they can't read Hebrew Word and Excel files. Same goes with the 'IE Hebrew standard' for HTML.

So, here I am, asking the Slashdot community. What can I do?"

30 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. Funny... by Danse · · Score: 3

    Some of you guys take your little anti-microsoft crusade (and yourselves) a little too seriously.

    I've found that the same people that make statements like this are also the people make flip remarks such as "Well don't buy their products then" when someone complains about Microsoft's unethical business tactics.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  2. Multiboot is the way by markhb · · Score: 3

    You say you are using a non-Unix variant PC operating system; presumably, this would mean either OS/2 or BeOS. OS/2 comes with Boot Manager, which, while it would require an FDISK to install (and then consumes a primary partition), does an excellent job of switching you from Warp to Win9x/NT (Win2k has issues) and back. I believe BeOS came with Partition Magic and maybe System Commander to enable the same functionality. Also, if you are using Warp, check with the folks at Serenity Systems to see what they have planned for DBCS BiDi support in eCommStation (their successor to OS/2). It's a full upgrade to eCS, but if you're sticking with OS/2, it's definitely worth looking into.

    --
    Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
  3. A simple analogy... by Wonko42 · · Score: 3
    You're traveling through a South American rain forest when you suddenly come upon a massive river. The river is at least 100 yards across, and the water is moving far too rapidly for safe swimming. Off to the east a short way, you see a large group of travelers like yourself boarding a ferry tethered to a rope that spans the width of the river.

    You have a choice to make:

    1. Make camp, spend months gathering materials and drawing up plans, and then spend a year or more slowly building a bridge, with the help of a few of the other travelers.
    2. Pay a small fee to the ferry operator and take the ferry to the other side like everyone else.

    Which option would you choose?

    --

  4. Or www.iconv.com by harmonica · · Score: 3

    They convert and they have a link collection to similar services: iconv.com.

  5. Why AREN'T you using Windows??? by SuperRob · · Score: 3
    You know, it seems like there are a lot of reasons you OUGHT to be using Windows. So why aren't you?

    If you're doing it just out of spite, you probably are going to need to buck up and deal with it. If you can't communicate with the rest of the country/world, then you're oinly doing yourself a disservice.

    In this case, it isn't about Microsoft being a monopoly. It's about Microsoft having added value for YOUR country, and having addressed a market that no one else cares about. That said, you might as well make the jump. You're getting nowhere by denying yourself the ability to communicate electronically with the rest of your country.

    PS: I know this will get mod'ed down as it's Pro-Microsoft, but before you pull the trigger, re-read the post. He has NO alternatives.

    1. Re:Why AREN'T you using Windows??? by Lonesmurf · · Score: 3

      I just wanted to comment on this.

      I live in Israel, I work in graphic design and I use both windows on PCs and OS9 on Macs.

      Recently I came across an apple g3 powerbook for a steal (only $600!!).. I couldn't pass that by. It didn't have OS9 or a CD-ROM, so I decided to just ask around and buy them myself.

      OS 9 in the US costs $99, in Israel, it costs $299. That is not a typo.
      A CD-ROM costs $400 dollars. That is not a typo.

      Buying a machine like the new 733Mhz ones (no, they are not even sold here yet) will cost 60% more than in the US. Guarenteed. The 500Mhz machines cost just under $5K.

      Buying a PC with windows (which is free for the most part) will cost you 900-1200.

      Unless you are some hardcore geek with mad cash, or in design, buying a mac in Israel is not a viable option.

      BTW, I use linux and bsd. I know plenty of people that do here in Israel. I wish someone would put together a project that would allow us to send hebrew mails and read the web in hebrew.

      -rami

    2. Re:Why AREN'T you using Windows??? by HeUnique · · Score: 4

      Rami,

      Both (Linux and *BSD) runs KDE with konqueror fine, and you can read 98% of Israeli web pages just fine (whatever they are logical Hebrew or Visual Hebrew).

      You can also use the Mozilla which you can download from IGLU web pages an d use it to watch the Hebrew pages..

      As far as typing in Hebrew - go to the IGLU pages and you can find there a suite of RPM's which are called "freebidi" which lets you type and use applications like XCHAT and other programs which uses the XDrawString - and get normal hebrew.

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    3. Re:Why AREN'T you using Windows??? by Otter · · Score: 5
      You know, it seems like there are a lot of reasons you OUGHT to be using Windows. So why aren't you?

      Or I could suggest you get a Mac, and have access to better versions of Office and IE than Windows users have. Or I could suggest Linux, and tell you about the great bidirectional language support in Qt/KDE, the work in progress on Pango and the Ivrix project for Hebrew and Arabic support in Linux.

      But I have no idea what your question is. You're using some other OS that you won't name and you're having trouble with Word documents? What kind of solution are you expecting?

  6. No, it's not ... by SuperRob · · Score: 3
    He doesn't have a lack of alternatives BECAUSE of Microsoft. There's simply not enough money in it to do the work. Microsoft knows that their software works best when everyone can exchange data across a common platform (especially theirs), so it was in their best intrest to locallize the code.

    This has nothing to do with monopoly. It's simply market economics. You write code for the markets with the most money. It's not a matter of convincing others that it's worth the time and effort to locallize.

    Still, this doesn't do anything to solve this particular person's problem at this time.

  7. Re:He *said* he *wasn't* using a UNIX variant! by Rader · · Score: 3
    If you do go for a dual boot, and hard drive space is a concern (as others have mentioned might be a possibility) go with Win98Lite. Smaller, lighter, faster. You might not get all the bugs one hopes for with a full version, but such are the sacrifices one has to make.

    Rader

  8. To read Word and Excel files by divec · · Score: 3

    Are you familiar with catdoc and xls2csv? I don't know how well they cope with text that is non-(8859-1) and non-unicode, though. As to the proprietory character set thing, the answer in the long run is unicode, but meanwhile mozilla 0.7 claims to have some Hebrew support.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  9. He *said* he *wasn't* using a UNIX variant! by solios · · Score: 3

    So WHY are most of the threads "blah blah blah Linux blah blah" ? If it's a Non-UNIX variant and it's not M$, that leaves QNX, Be, OS/2 and maybe one or two others. So you can stop tootling the Linux horn for the moment.

    My default suggestion would be "buy a Mac", since it's not Windows, has decent Hebrew support and M$ codes for the OS. Assuming you don't have that option, then dual booting between whatever it is you're using and Winblows would be about the only acceptable solution, as the majority of the software in question [Office], is not being ported to linux.

    Or, you could move. I wouldn't suggest the USA- with the present anal-retentiveness of the body politic going bughouse, I've been contemplating greener pastures myself. Considering my own choice of platforms, this definitely leaves Israel off the list.

  10. Wait a minute, by TheReverand · · Score: 3
    You are saying that since MS is the only software that can handle Hebrew, you would be restricting your freedom by using it?

    The fact is, if noone else has done enough, you only have one choice. Why is it so bad? At least you /have/ a choice at all.

    I was raised speaking basque, and NO operating systems support my language. SO I have been forced to learn English. But the benefits far outweigh the penalties. I say quit crying and use the best tool for the job. Even if it's the only tool. Even if it's MS.

  11. Re:The Apple Macintosh has had decent language spt by chancycat · · Score: 3
    The Score:0 AC post nearby reports that Mac OS 9x supports Hebrew. So there you go. Or maybe he is already using a Mac. A new G4 with a LinuxPPC partition and a Mac OS X partition should be good to go for a while.

    Then when Linux has superb Hebrew support and Star Office works flawlessly with it, you just have more options.

    --
    Evan - needs to hit preview before submitting
  12. What about vmware? by Electric+Angst · · Score: 3

    Well, if I'm not mistaken, you can always run Windows2000 within Linux. Sure, you need some heafty hardware to take care of it, but it can be done...
    --

    --
    Feminism is the wild notion that women are human beings.
  13. Re:What are your needs? by autocracy · · Score: 3
    Duel booting, alright! Been a long time since I did that (last person I fought used steel toes - ouch!)

    Oh... you meant dual booting... sorry...

    The problem with capped Karma is it only goes down...

    --
    SIG: HUP
  14. Obviously, there's only one solution... by mblase · · Score: 3

    Emigrate.

  15. Y'all are forgetting one thing by TheCabal · · Score: 3

    Makes me laugh... in a predictable wave of Linux-zealotry, some well meaning people forgot that the person is NOT running Linux. So suggestions like Pango and the like, while informative, aren't very helpful. Remember: There are OTHER operating systems that are alternatives to Windows that aren't Linux.

  16. You are asking the wrong crowd. by Auckerman · · Score: 3
    A LOT of Slashdot viewers are GPL proponents (and as such see it as a political decision), the rest are either BSD, MacOS, Windows, BeOS, et al. If you ask Stallman, he would first argue with you about what "free" means and what "open source" means, then tell you to use Linux. If you ask any of those kind BSD folks, they will tell you it depends on what you need, but you should use some form of BSD. If you ask a Mac kid, first they will tell you how Mac OS X will make your breakfast every mourning, then tell you to shell out for a whole new computer.... You get the point.

    It boils down to what you NEED. Computers are nothing more than tools that do a job. If you current computer does everything that you bought it for, then use it. If it doesn't, maybe you should use a different OS until your current OS supports the features that fit YOUR NEEDS. Personally, I've been using Macs since about 92. I have NEVER thought to myself, "Crap, I need to use Windows to do this" MacOS fits my needs. It may or may not fit yours.

    Don't let your OS choice be a political issue, it a matter of what you need your computer to do. If only Windows fits that need, then use it.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  17. Oversimplification... by Danse · · Score: 4

    Don't let your OS choice be a political issue, it a matter of what you need your computer to do. If only Windows fits that need, then use it.

    This is one thing that always irritates me on /. You have a bunch of people saying that you should just choose the product that works best, regardless of who makes it. Then you have a bunch of people saying that if you don't like the way a certain corporation does business, don't buy their products. These two views are mutually exclusive, yet I hear them both uttered by the same people fairly often.

    What it comes down to is that the choice of OS or any other product can very well be based on concerns other than whether the product does what you need it to do. We can't just surrender our beliefs and conscience over to unfettered capitalism and support corporations with our money regardless of how they do business or the kinds of practices they engage in. To ignore immoral acts by a corporation when they come to light and support that corporation with your money is to offer tacit support for their actions. Many people can't stomach such a thing. Too bad there aren't more people like that.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  18. Macintosh is an answer by Ranolf · · Score: 4

    The Macintosh has arguably even better support for top-down or right-to-left foreign alphabets than Windows. Also, you can run the MS applications (Word and whatnot, including IE) on it.

    And if you would like to have the power of UNIX, OS X will enable you to run things the proper *nix way. True, you'll have to wait maybe 6 months until Hebrew support is finished, and of course that you'll have to buy new hardware, but by that time you may find that you're in the market for a new machine anyway.

    In a relatively short time, there will be a BSD based OS with applications relevant to the documents you are trying to process, and support for Hebrew.

    --

    "Perfect numbers like perfect men are rare." -Descartes
  19. Suck it down. by FFFish · · Score: 5

    Face facts: Microsoft has chosen to fully support the Hebrew language. Other OS and applications companies have not. Microsoft wins this round, fair and square: you can hardly decry them for being open-minded enough to realize that a global OS/global application needs to support global languages.

    There's no end to the bad things that can be said about Microsoft.

    Poor internationalization isn't one of them.

    --

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  20. KDE2 by abelsson · · Score: 5
    KDE has excellent i18n support, probably the best of all unix desktop enviroments. It also provides most of what you need in a desktop enviroment.. I belive KDE has full support for unicode and right-left writing. So if you absolutly must avoid MS, i'd look into KDE. http://www.kde.org/il/hebrew/ is the page devoted into translating KDE into hebrew.

    [taken from that site]
    Version 2.0 of KDE featured several improvements in the field of Hebrew support in its interface. Among these improvements:

    • KDE is now based on Unicode. There is no longer a need for special fonts for Hebrew.
    • The translation of KDE applications is complete. Every part in the interface of KDE applications is translated into Hebrew, including all of the menus, messages, and quick help. All of the applications in the kdebase, kdeadmin, kdegames, kdegraphics, kdemultimedia, kdenetwork, kdepim, kdetoys and kdeutils packages are available translated into Hebrew.
    • The Konqueror web browser which comes with KDE supports displaying any type of Hebrew on the web, including logical Hebrew. However, all other KDE and KOffice applications do not yet support logical Hebrew.

      -henrik

  21. How about createpdf.adobe.com? by victim · · Score: 5

    When some numb-nut sends me a document in Word or Powerpoint of whatever and my open software won't open it I just send it up to http://createpdf.adobe.com and they mail back a nice PDF of it.

    They let you do three documents as a trial, then its $10/mo or $100/year.

    They handle many of the popular but proprietary formats.

    And for goodness sake, stop reading slashdot and get out and VOTE!

  22. or www.freeviewer.com by kervin · · Score: 5
  23. Gnome Pango by Greyfox · · Score: 5

    Check out the Pango project over on the gnome web pages. They apparently plan to incorporate support for all those funky languages that go up and down, right and left, diagonally, or however.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Gnome Pango by LionKimbro · · Score: 5
  24. I've been in your situation by firewort · · Score: 5

    I lived in Tel-Aviv for two years, and still support my in-laws computer there.

    I know *exactly* what you're going through.

    If you're looking at linux as an alternative, GTK2 is going to have right-to-left support, and KDE2 has it.

    Web browsing is perfect at handling msIE html and their version of Hebrew, if you use Konqueror.

    I believe Kword works for editing the Hebrew, but I haven't tried it recently enough to remeber how well it does right to left text entry.

    Have you gotten in touch with the Linux User Groups in Israel? You have two: Haifux and IGLU.

    go to www.iglu.org.il and join the e-groups list. They have lectures now and again, given in Hebrew, both at Technion and Tel-Aviv University.

    As for the email attachments, half the time Outlook Express in Hebrew in windows on my machine can't read emails generated by OE on another machine.

    My machines are running:
    win98 Hebrew-enabled,
    Mandrake 7.2 (KDE2 has the hebrew fonts already in it... hebrew is an install option for a completely localized system)

    and MacOsX public beta. the full release will have hebrew as an option for localization.

    My wife's laptop runs win98 localized hebrew. someday when I get the energy, I'll make her an x-client and spawn the display of my kde2 to her machine.

    I've always been surprised that Linux hasn't taken off wildly in Israel-- I expect that when right-to-left wordprocessing and presentation composing is complete, that people will jump to linux in Israel, because of its free nature.

    (Many Israelis 'warez' MS products, so much so that last year Microsoft threatened to stop localizing for Hebrew languages unless the piracy diminished. I remember reading that news item at www.globes.co.il)

    You CAN do everything you want to do, in Hebrew, without MS.

    b'hatzlecha!

    A host is a host from coast to coast, but no one uses a host that's close

    --

  25. Apple by sulli · · Score: 5
    Mac OS 9 supports Arabic and Hebrew very simply. I don't read or write either (I wish!) but my Arabic-speaking sister and Hebrew-speaking mom both tell me that it works fine. From Apple's web site:

    Multilingual support. Mac OS is world-ready. Input, display, edit and print a variety of Latin-based languages in addition to Arabic, Chinese, Hebrew, Indian, Japanese and more.

    Of course, using Apple doesn't exactly free you from MS documentation...

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  26. Well... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 5
    Here's a couple of links for you: Hope that helps! As far as the Word® documents and Excel® spreadsheets, I would ask your friends and co-workers to convert them to another format before sending them to you, or run Wine and emulate Office2000 (which works fairly well). That's what I do (although I only need to contend with English and German)

    --
    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.