Slashdot Mirror


Cappuccino PC Round 2

Michael Cook writes: "Ars Technica has just posted a follow up to the review of the original Espresso PC (Slashdotted here(1), and here(2)), a review of the new and much-improved Cappuccino PC! It finally has ethernet and now it's truly possible to have a server farm in a bread box!" This is a slightly off-the-wall review of this promising machine, considering (among other things) that the review unit was stolen, but it sure sounds like a worthy non-toy toy.

33 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. Making a small PC by clasher · · Score: 2
    Actually I'm making a small living room PC right now. So far I have I also figure on getting a Pentium III 800 and underclocking to 700Mhz to have it run a little cooler. My aim is to make a family computer that I can close the case to and not have to worry about. ( Also its so small that hopefully I won't be tempted to keep switching hardware in and out every week.) As far as I can tell all the hardware on this maniboard is supported to some extent by Linux, QNX, and BeOS so I should have an easy time making a thin client for my family.

    For those that are interested here are a few other links to small case manufacturers.
    Case Manufacturer listing
    Morex/ProCase
    In Win
    Yeong Yang

  2. Re:Really cool, but... by Tet · · Score: 2
    These puppies really bring out the geek in me, but I'm not sure exactly where the practical side is. I understand the need to save space, but you don't need to get THAT small.

    Actually, these are the perfect size for home or small office firewall type machines, which you *want* to be as small and unobtrusive as possible. The only problem is that with only one ethernet port, they're not much use for that...

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  3. Re:Really cool, but... by Tet · · Score: 2
    Since when did a firewall need two ports?

    Without two ports, you can't do things like block malicious broadcasts from the outside world.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  4. Re:Reliability by Larne · · Score: 2

    I know anecdotal evidence is pretty worthless, but I've had an Espresso running for a couple of weeks continuously. It was only acting as a VPN gateway so there probably wasn't much disk activity, but it stayed up and running and it didn't have to be immersed in liquid nitrogen or anything.

  5. Re:Really cool, but... by Hanno · · Score: 2

    I understand the need to save space, but you don't need to get THAT small.

    I can think of quite a few applications for this device. As a commuting freelancer, it'd be a full portable workstation and still be easier to store and carry than a similar laptop.

    But more interesting is something I read on Slashdot a while ago. Someone used these boxes for presentations on exhibitions, sticking them right behind the LCD screen. (I have been doing such presentations, too, and with a full size computer, setting up the exhibition booth is a true pain.)

    Maybe somebody will turn one of these puppies into a time-shifting video recorder?

    It'd be nice, but the device lacks a video-in and I doubt that there is a decent video-in using USB.

    ------------------

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
  6. Re:The point? by Webmonger · · Score: 2

    I know what I'd want such a device for: live hard disk recording. I'd plug in a PCI 24-bit sound card, and lug it down to the bar where I'm playing, and plug it into the mixing board.

    Of course, these things don't support PCI, but maybe the next model will offer a single PCI slot. . .

  7. Re:The point? by powerlord · · Score: 2

    True. A single PCI slot would open the door of possibilities for the device (Firewall, Live Audio recorder, Time-Shifted Video recording, etc.)

    Of course will it be too big then?

    Maybe instead of a PCI slot they need to add two standard PCMCIA slots. There are lots of cards out there that would be available, and they'd just need to put a fan above it to keep the temperature down (they tend to get real hot which might preclude server use though). Hmmm

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  8. Not a good box for firewall use by dublin · · Score: 2

    Not only is it not well-equipped for this sort of thing, but it's nearly an order of magnitude more expensive than some of the small embedded boards that have multiple Ethernets. This sort of thing is available from several SBC vendors for $200-$600, with two or three Ethernets thrown into the bargain. (Sorry, don't have the URLs handy now, but they're out there - look around...)

    And, of course, most USB Ethernet adapters don't perform all that well, which could make them OK for connecting to the Ethernet port on your Cable or DSL box, but not much else.

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  9. Not even as good a deal as a laptop... by dublin · · Score: 2

    Although the packaging is impressive, it's not a very good deal, especially considering that you can buy a more capable laptop for less money, and get the LCD screen and a 3-hour UPS in the bargain.

    I've working in the laptop business, and despite what some here have said, the good ones are indeed built for 24x7 use. I began putting servers on laptop hardware with Novell back in 1994, and for light duty server use, I still prefer laptop hardware to "regular" PC servers. Let's face it folks, it just doesn't take much horsepower to run a basic firewall, file server, mail server, and DNS server. (I recommend e-smith for this sort of thing if you want a good open-source "appliance" approach to the basic office server needs.)

    I've run several laptop and laptop-derived servers for years now (I have an old Toshiba Libretto hopped up with a 6.4 GB disk that I use as a portable file server), and they are invariably *more* reliable than the desktop PC hardware I have, which tends to flake out every few months due to bad connections or the phase of the moon.

    I like this box, it just doesn't make much sense to buy one, given that you can get a comparable laptop (and probably, an extra hard disk to go with it, so you can turn it back into a "regular" laptop for trips in a minute or two) for about the same money. And don't underestimate the importance of that built-in UPS if you're looking to use it as a server of any kind...

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  10. Re:Reliability by dublin · · Score: 2

    I've had a Toshiba Libretto running continuously as a server for a couple of years now. As I remark elsewhere, I find laptop hardware to be *more* reliable than desktop hardware by a considerable margin. It pretty much has to be, if you think about it.

    Heat isn't that much of a problem if you avoid a few of the worst pre-Mobile Pentium room heaters, since laptops are expected to work out on oil rigs in the summer heat of the Amazon, west Texas, or worse yet, southern Louisiana. I find most desktop hardware problems are related to flakey connectors/connections - that doesn't happen nearly as often in laptop hardware, since they're designed to withstand reasonable mechanical abuse. The only real downside is if you need to plug in PCI cards, although a surprising number of the "name brand" laptops offer docking stations that make this an option. A few are even reasonably priced.

    I've used laptops in co-lo facilities to save $$$ back before 1U servers were common - the "real estate" savings more than offset the incremental cost, and gave me an effective density about twice that of 1U servers. The packets really don't care if it's a laptop, and you've got the added benefit of a console for each unit when you actually need to lay hands on the hardware. (Granted, this was driven by a rock-bottom budget, but it worked so well I'd consider the approach in other circumstances now - especially now that 100 Mb Ethernet is so widely available on the motherboard.)

    Think twice before you write laptops off for this sort of thing - they may work out much better than you think...

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  11. The Perfect Portable by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2
    It's really quite unfortunate that there's not at least an option for a battery. If it had one of those, I can think of some totally awesome applications. For instance, a truely portable, full computer comes into mind. (It'd be slicker if it had 802.11 instead of plain ol' boring ethernet, though. *sigh*)

    Take this baby, slap on an optional 4 (or so) hour battery, give it 802.11, and I'd be willing to shell out the very-expensive price for the baseline system. I don't even have half that much money right now to my name, but I'd find the funds for it. I know I certainly wanted to get one of the Espressos. Yum.

    The perfect peripherals would consist of a pair of LCD glasses (I've seen them here and there - pretty exhorbinant, but I'd say worth it with one of these puppies). For input, you could get something like a split keyboard, or one of those black IBM Model M keyboards that have the eraser pointing device that is stereotypical of IBM laptops. I personally think a split keyboard, with each half velcro'd around your upper thighs would be the best place to have it. For an independent pointer, you could quite possibly get away with something like a modified optical mouse on your stomach.... put it in a type of coral to keep it from falling off, but not hindering your use... putting a switch on the keyboard somewhere to turn input on or off would be a good idea, too. (such as most CD player's "Hold" feature.)

    As far as the actual device, that could go in a small padded (and ventelated) fabric bag on your lower back (not upper back, so as to avoid causing back pain). Under one's arm on their side would also be a good, out of the way, place to have it, allowing someone to transit on a subway, etc, giving you more comfort and the device more security. (if you're wearing a 'trench coat' or equivilant, nobody would even know it's there.

    To bed with me, argg!

    -------
    Caimlas

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  12. I hope it's complies with the protocol by Korth · · Score: 2

    I hope it complies with RFC 2324 (Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol (HTCPCP/1.0)).

    http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2324.txt

  13. Reliability by chrysalis · · Score: 4

    These boxes are very cute. So small, so powerful. But is it really ok to have them run 24/24h for a server ?
    Laptops aren't designed to run 24/24h. Too much heat, components designed to be small, not very resistant, ...
    As these boxes are looking like a laptop without screen, I'd like to know whether it's really possible to use them in a server farm, running 24/24h.

    --
    {{.sig}}
  14. ironic by sometwo · · Score: 2

    It's kind of ironic that he had the tiny computer stolen. If it had been a huge tower, then they probably wouldn't have stolen it. See! All those cables and the heavy case and heatsink are features!

  15. The point? by sometwo · · Score: 4

    Now, lest anyone get confused, this thing has to be plugged into a wall. It's not a laptop, so there's no battery.

    I can see the point of small, portable computers, but if this has to be plugged into a power socket somewhere, what makes this better to own or use than a laptop, palmtop or even a desktop PC?

  16. My only problem with it's design... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

    Actually, the first thing I thought when I saw this thing was "SET TOP BOX!"

    DVD Player, Living Room PC/Console, Browsing the web from my living room, etc. etc.

    This thing has a wide variety of uses as a PC in non-traditional PC places (such as above the Livingroom TV.)

    It ALMOST reaches an asthetic quality capable of being such a device, and by "ALMOST" I don't mean it's exactly unattractive but then, that's purely subjective anyway.

    What I mean is - who wants a device sitting on top of their TV that has cords plugged into it on 3 of the 4 sides?

    TV, mouse, and keyboard cables on one side, sound and ethernet on the other, and USB ports in the back... the port layout is just horrid!

    I could understand maybe if the USB ports were on the front or sides, but the rest really needs to hang out of the back like any other device found on an entertainment center.

    Awe well...

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  17. Mac OSX version by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    The Cocoa API is essential for any cappuccino machine

  18. A GREAT machine if you are not a gamer by wulffi · · Score: 3
    This is just what I have been looking for, a small slim almost silent machine that could be placed in my living room.

    Lets face it, towers and desktop cases won't cut it when it comes to moving computers from the workroom into other parts of the house.

    And it even runs Linux, yum yum espresso...

    Naish

    1. Re:A GREAT machine if you are not a gamer by squaretorus · · Score: 3

      Spot on. The biggest problems with modern PCs are Noise, Size and Ugliness. I only bought a notebook so I would be allowed to use it in the lounge while my lady watches ER.
      A 'proper' machine is too big, noisy, ugly and hard to hide. A notebook can be tucked away on the bookshelf when not in use and doesn't need stacks of space to operate.
      And in our small 4 man office where we have 5 machines running the noise is a real problem. I've swapped 2 machines to notebooks to reduce the noise - but having something this quiet as server would be great!
      Anyone found any other machines that are quiet, small, and able to operate 24hrs?

  19. nForce? by Helix150 · · Score: 2

    I think a good market for this would be the LAN party... you only have to velcro it to a screen and (aside from cables) you're all set. However without at least a GeForce2, or maybe a Kyro2, its worthless for 3d games.

    Now what I'd really like to see is one of these based around something like a nForce chipset. That should allow greater performance (esp. graphics!) while keeping it small.

    I wonder if it has one of those Kensington security lock slots...

    --
    --IronHelix
  20. some other machine. better in my opinion. by leuk_he · · Score: 2
    Some similar pc with cd (in dutch)
    this ,atoz-ezgo PC seems more to the job because it has integrated ethernet and a integrated cd.

    Some other people wrote a concern about heat. This thing has a (patented) special head spreader, very much like how a F1 race car.

    I know is already for sale in the netherlands. It is not cheap.... .

  21. UK Supplier by vagnerr · · Score: 2

    Looks similar (may be the same as) "The Tardis" which is being sold by Pangolin Small Computers not found a price yet though :-)

    --
    -- Vagnerr - (www.vagnerr.com) Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
  22. Umm... by Chetmurray · · Score: 2

    Its small - not portable... If I lived in a 3x3 hut it would rock, otherwise??? I must be missing something. Or I am right and the Cappuccino can say hello to all the internet appliances when it hits the scrap heap.

  23. the cube. by gagganator · · Score: 2

    been there, done that, and it doesnt even have the looks of the cube

    youre right. desktops have expandability and low price, this has neither. laptops have portability, and without a screen and battery, this doesnt have much of that. apples cube didnt sell well either

    despite claims that it would be good for presentations or an mp3 jukebox, i dont see it. presentation rooms have builtin projectors, etc and outside a room you are going to want a builtin screen. and with networked houses, there is no need to have the computer sitting next to the soundsystem or the er watcher. get a laptop instead, for the price youll get a screen too

    --
    the animal doesnt even have opposable thumbs, focker!
  24. Cappuccino? by morie · · Score: 3
    Longing for cafeine, I clicked the link.

    My mistake, I guess

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  25. From the article... by FastT · · Score: 4
    ...you'd have a powerful, space saving desktop machine with ten times the sex appeal of any beige box. And there's the added bonus that you can easily pack it up and take it with you.
    Of course, this was also exactly why it was so easy to steal. After having my computer stolen in the past, I can safely say that when it comes to desktop machines, I prefer them large, unwieldy, and bolted to the floor.
    --

    The only certainty is entropy.
  26. Sure it is small, but pricey! by baptiste · · Score: 2
    Its a neat little box, but it is not cheap! The barebones system (Celeron 700 128MB, 10GB HD, CD, Win ME) was like $1300! The top level box 1GHz PIII, 256MB, 30GB HD, DVD Rom, WIn 2K Pro) was almost $1900!

    I realize its a really small box - no question and packs a lot into a small space, but for substandard video and sound it seems a bit over priced. I mean the Beowulf cluster alone would cost more than a car :) :)

    But seriously, cool box but a bit pricey for my tastes. I'll take my butt ugly !GHz Athlon beige box anyday (cause it has LCD displays on each SCSI drive - and like the review said LCDs are just too cool :) :) )

    1. Re:Sure it is small, but pricey! by baptiste · · Score: 2
      Beats me - I know when I checked it this morning it was like $1270 something - maybe they changed the price.

      But regarding $1300 or $1100 for a similar system, um, just look at their main page:

      Today's Special (1): AMD Athlon 900 Mhz System: $459.00
      includes: Athlon T-Bird 900Mhz CPU, 256MB PC133 RAM, 30GB UDMA-100 HDD, 32MB nVidia RIVA TNT2 Video, 12x DVD-ROM, 3D Stereo Sound, 120W Stereo Speakers and more

      SO no, not all similarly priced systems in that horsepower range ARE $1300 or even $1100 :)

  27. Really cool, but... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3
    These puppies really bring out the geek in me, but I'm not sure exactly where the practical side is. I understand the need to save space, but you don't need to get THAT small. In general, laptop size is fine. Besides, you can't plug any cards into them. (Oh, that's right, USB is supposed to eliminate the need for internal cards, right?)

    I did think of one possible application: Such a device might be a good addition to my laptop. If I carried it along, I could use it as a small server to properly test those applications that require truly separate client and server machines. I could probably also store all of my less-used downloads on it, given that it has more storage capacity than my laptop.

    Maybe somebody will turn one of these puppies into a time-shifting video recorder? That would be totally cool, but still too expensive.

    GreyPoopon
    --

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    1. Re:Really cool, but... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3
      Actually, these are the perfect size for home or small office firewall type machines, which you *want* to be as small and unobtrusive as possible. The only problem is that with only one ethernet port, they're not much use for that...

      Also, they're probably a bit too expensive (at least for the home firewall). I dunno, maybe I'm just too cheap. For use as a firewall, maybe you could use both the ethernet port, and a USB -> Ethernet adaptor for the other?

      GreyPoopon
      --

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  28. Would this serve for a cluster ? by jneves · · Score: 2

    I'm starting to look for solutions for a home made cheap cluster. My first idea was to use game consoles .They seem to all be getting linux support (PS2 and Dreamcast) or to be PC based (X-Box and Nokia's media terminal). Anyone tried this ?

    1. Re:Would this serve for a cluster ? by Genoaschild · · Score: 2

      I haven't tried it but I've thought about it. The problem lies with having differnet architectures is you have a binary for each one. No one wants to do it that way so you're going to need a server(preferably something that is easily upgradeable like a PC) that stores binaries for each different machine and some type of ethernet card for every single one of them. This might be a viable solution because Sony and Dreamcast(very cheap, $99) sale hardware at below cost. The problem lies in the fact that you have to have a cross-compiler on your server and last time I've heard, they were not cheap(correct me if I'm wrong.) You also have the 32mb memory problem in the PS2 and the fact that computer prices are falling much faster then the price/ps2. In the long run, you're probably best setting up a cluster of x86s. You won't be quite as limited in the years to come.
      ----

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
  29. Cappuccino...espresso... by return+42 · · Score: 4

    So, these are some kind of Java machines?