Slashdot Mirror


The New Athlons

An anonymous reader linked us to an article about the new batch of athlons. The story talks about the new 1.1 ghz mobile athlon 4, and also good price cuts for the older ones. I'm thinking its time to build my game machine.

207 comments

  1. ugh by teknopurge · · Score: 0, Troll

    troll me if you want, but this was onthe register yesterday

    1. Re:ugh by vbrtrmn · · Score: 0, Troll

      Isn't this RepostDot.org .. shit i think i got the wrong message board.

      What's that noise, oh yeah, that's my karma fading away.

      --
      it's a sig, wtf?
    2. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "What's that noise, oh yeah, that's my karma fading away."

      Maybe you should've checked "post annonymously" when chosing to be a dumbass, dumbass.

      Check this out!

    3. Re:ugh by core10k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, you've got a lot of great points, but you're one hell of a prick. I hope you rot doing the same job for the rest of your life.

    4. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should've checked "post annonymously" when chosing to be a dumbass, dumbass.

      Maybe you should choose to pick up a dictionary sometime, moron.

    5. Re:ugh by buttfucker2000 · · Score: 0

      +* j a c k * o f f * j a c k * o f f * j a c k * o f f *+
      * \ |\ \ *
      j | / \ \ j
      a | | \ \ a
      c | | \ \ __ c
      k / \ \ \/__|__,,..---v--. k
      o | |__,,\.--"""\/ | \ o
      f | | \ _> f
      f| | _ _ _ _ | / f
      *| | /_v_v_v_\..---""'`-' *
      j| | __,,.| | | | | j
      a| / \ \_h_h_h_/ a
      c | | | c
      k | | | k
      o \ |\ | o
      f \ | \___/ f
      f \ | f
      * \ | *
      j | | j
      a | | a
      c | | c
      k | | k
      o | | o
      f | | f
      f | | f
      * | | *
      +* j a c k * o f f * j a c k * o f f * j a c k * o f f *+

      --
      Free Anne Tomlinson!!
    6. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAYBE YOU ARE WRONG?








    7. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should realise that the people you are hiring own all your digital accounts. They own your email. Maybe not legally, but you think they don't read it and discuss it at lunch?

      I'll tell you what sysadmins are: NOSY BASTARDS. Unless you use PGP (and it seems you aren't even close to that techy) your personal messages have been read. And if you even think you're gonna start doing that, watch the system use policies change. And yeah, the real boss will fire even you when you violate his rules (You see, sysadmins only "suggest" what the boss should do. If it means "saving systems resources" which equals "money" then they'll do it -- You yourself used that tactic to enjoy those bitches after work at our expense.).

      Sysadmins know where you were when you posted that.

      Sysadmins can edit your emails. They can pretend to be you.

      Sysadmins are like overglorified telephone operators with a bad attitude. And if you don't think the operator is listening to your call, or if you think the call that was mysteriously dropped was actually an accident, I know they do and no, it wasn't.

      Do you know why sysadmins are so nosy? Because pricks like you once taunted them in school. Now they are in control of your information and you poor bastards don't even see it.

      Feel free to try to catch the sysadmins. You'll only get the morons. They don't deserve to be there anyways.

      So what's the pissed off sysadmin's long term plan? I'm not sure. Why not go the next step and find out? Afterall, they only have control of your information.

      Nope. I don't think I'm leet and I don't have all the bitches. But we do own your information, legally or not. And viewing your mail as root is neither l33t nor difficult. In fact, where I work, its soon to be a required task whenever I suspect anyone for anything on the network.

      If I was you, and I had that attitude, I'd watch out that any site you check out at work doesn't have even a banner ad to a porn site.

      But being as smart as you think you are I really didn't need to remind you of that, did I?

      Oh, and TY, HAND also.

    8. Re:ugh by core10k · · Score: 1

      You sir, do an excellent job of supporting his argument. People are people, and sysadmins are janitors with delusions of power.

    9. Re:ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* As a systems admin for the last fourteen years, I have to take offense at that statement.. Yes, we are responsible to keep the systems running under grueling conditions, but in addition I have to educate programmers on the platforms they write code for, plan and execute purchasing of new systems, keep up with my user base to keep them from doing dumb things... I'm much more than a janitor... What's your user name again?

  2. Wow by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Time for me to start building that Beowulf cluster I've always wanted...

    /fp?

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  3. are you building a gaming laptop? by Karmageddon · · Score: 2

    these are mobile chips and a Duron... I thought gamers needed top speed... do you read the articles?

    1. Re:are you building a gaming laptop? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Did you read the WHOLE article? Non-mobile Duron prices are discussed at the END.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    2. Re:are you building a gaming laptop? by Karmageddon · · Score: 1

      of course I read to the end, that's where it talks about Durons. Gamers want Athlons.

    3. Re:are you building a gaming laptop? by fiftyfly · · Score: 1

      On the contrary - 1st person shooter gamers _may_ want athalons. Virtually anything else isn't really cpu limited. A half decent video card (mine's an oc'ed radeon LE) and a reasonable cpu (D850, can be had for ~ $80C) can play nearly anything. Doesn't even stutter in Dune:Emperor.

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    4. Re:are you building a gaming laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 800MHz Duron @ 1GHz and Radeon LE @ 180MHz run 3d FPS games just fine, too.
      Gamers might want Athlons if they want to spend more than they have to, but then why not buy a 1.8GHz P4 that outpeforms the lower clocked Athlons? Some do, some don't, same with Duron/Athlon. Not every 'gamer' is a rich fuck.

    5. Re:are you building a gaming laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      hey, I'm no expert on this topic, I never play games. however, I am a clever lad... if gamers are CPU limited, then this product announcement doesn't give them the horsepower they need. if gamers are not CPU limited, then this announcement about new CPUs and pricing has no effect either because there were already cheap processors around.

      that's the point I was making: the leadin to this story way up to was mindless, and a clever person can see that even if they no nothing about gaming.

  4. Compaq & AMD by resonator · · Score: 1


    Compaq will be among the first vendors to launch systems based on the new processors, offering both new mobile processors in its Presario 1200 family of notebooks, AMD says.


    ...i thought compaq & intel were sleeping with each other. i guess i haven't been keeping up with the soap opera.

    1. Re:Compaq & AMD by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

      It is Dell that is sleeping with Intel.. and M$. I believe Compaq has been offering AMD solutions for some time now.

      --
      --------
      It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  5. Why is it... by kurowski · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...that we always see stuff like
    AMD is currently shipping the processors, and expects widespread availability in systems in conjunction with the launch of Microsoft's Windows XP operating system, which is set for Oct. 25, AMD says.
    and not
    AMD is currently shipping the processors, and expects widespread availability in systems in conjunction with the launch of Linux kernel 2.4.12, which is set for Oct. 25, AMD says.
    I mean, come on, AMD, what has Microsoft done for you lately? Linux users are your true fans, your true friends. Tell us what we want to hear!
    1. Re:Why is it... by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 1

      As much as we hate it, Windoze is still the big cash cow. Many people will buy complete new systems just to run this bloated "new version" of the OS.

    2. Re:Why is it... by tritab · · Score: 1

      AMD is currently shipping the processors, and expects widespread availability in systems in conjunction with the launch of Linux kernel 2.4.12, which is set for Oct. 25, AMD says.

      AMD is currently shipping the processors, and expects widespread availability in systems in conjunction with the launch of Linux kernel 2.4.12, which is set for Oct. 25, Oct. 30, Nov. 5, Nov. 13, Nov. 20, Nov. 29, and Dec. 3, AMD says, as long as they can find a way to change Moore's Law accordingly.

      But seriously, the 2.4.12 release hardly warrants a new CPU. Something we tend to forget is that the hardware industry is just that, an industry and needs to make money. The release of Windows XP will, as much as we hate to see it, generate a short-term increase in PC sales. Can you honestly say that Joe Q. Public will go to his local best Buy to get that new Compaq because the 2.4.12 kernel was released?

    3. Re:Why is it... by Lxy · · Score: 2

      Because there's no need for a CPU upgrade with each new kernel release. Even the latest 2.4 kernels run fine on my 486. There's no reason to upgrade my CPU to boot a new kernel. There is always a need to upgrade my entire system to load the latest Windoze. I still run Win95 on my Windoze box (yes, of course I have one, it's legacy support!) and the only reason I'd upgrade is if I REALLY wanted USB support, which I don't on the machine. The rest of the PC consumers are buying into the "I'm not 'experiencing' my PC enough so I'd better upgrade to Windoze XP" FUD. Then they need to buy all new hardware and they wonder if $700 more is really worth it to "experience" their computer the way MS says it should. AMD is just feeding off of Wintel. MS releases bloated code to make Intel happy, AMD releases faster, cheaper chips, and ends up being the winner. Nothing wrong with that. AMD is my friend.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    4. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Windows 95 had several bugs in its virtual memory architecture. Windows 98 is the best DOS based OS currently available from Redmond.

      Any complaints about 98 being a memory or cpu hog will get forwarded to /dev/null where they belong, since all the options that can be hoggy in Win98 are optional and can be turned off... thus leaving you with a better functioning 95 than 95 itself.

    5. Re:Why is it... by Dr+Fro · · Score: 1

      I don't have the numbers but I bet even though the majority of Windows users use Intel, there are still more Windows machines with AMD processors than Linux machines.

      --
      ********************
      I object to Intellect without Discipline.
    6. Re:Why is it... by reverius · · Score: 2

      Umm... "FUD" stands for "Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt". That's not exactly what I'd say they're spreading to consumers.

      I do have friends who actually want Windows XP... and are waiting to buy a computer until it comes out, no matter how much I try to convince them otherwise.

      It's not even because Microsoft says they need it.

      It's because PC Magazine says it's cool. And they listen to that crap, because since it's "PC Magazine", it must be official, and good, right?

      People don't realize that everything is biased towards making money. :)

    7. Re:Why is it... by odaiwai · · Score: 1

      re: 2.4 kernel on a 486.

      So, if there's no neet to upgrade the machine for each upgrade, can anyone tell me why RH7.1 requires 32mb to install? even for a text install?
      serious question, honest.
      dave

    8. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to the arguments already made, there is no set date for 2.4.12. Linux kernels are released at Linus's whim; I don't expect AMD to follow suit.

  6. No Kidding... by jejones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tell me about it. My current dilemma is whether to spring now for a SiS 735-based mobo, or to wait to see how the motherboards with the nForce chipset go...since the high-end nForce will be set to suck down data from two DDR DIMMs at a time (remember when you had to buy SIMMs in pairs? similar thing here...), it should pretty well obliterate the only real advantage the P4 has, namely raw bandwidth, leaving the P4 choking on the dust of a (considerably lower clock rate) Athlon.

    1. Re:No Kidding... by rosewood · · Score: 2

      DDR from Crucial is cheaper then any Pc133 Cas2 out there. SDR is now more expensive then DDR thanks to Crucial's free 2 day. Also, the nForce is more then 8mos away at the least, and when it comes out - expect it to be $250+ for a motherboard. Nvidia is way to ahead of the game on this one and the nForce is not gonna swim.

    2. Re:No Kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8 months? Care to share with us where you got that info? Depending on who you listen to (nvidia or one mobo maker), nForce will appear sometime between September and November 2001.

    3. Re:No Kidding... by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

      I've read it has been delayed as well, though I can't remember where I read it at... nor can I find it.

      --
      --------
      It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    4. Re:No Kidding... by rosewood · · Score: 1

      HardOCP talks about the delay recently due to XBox delays causing that to be nVidias main focus. Also there have been rumblings about re-adjusting the South and Northbirdge features. The office line from nVidia on the nForce has been SILENT since Compudex. There have been quite a few delay rummors on the inq. etc. tho.

    5. Re:No Kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, I can turn my CAS2 PC133 in for CAS3 PC2100 DDR! Woo!

    6. Re:No Kidding... by rosewood · · Score: 1

      It is rated 2.5 but it is well documented that it will work @ cas 2

    7. Re:No Kidding... by daanger0us · · Score: 1

      Ohhhh.. I want one of these bad mofos. I am getting ready to build a new box and am not sure if I want for this... cause I want a new box NOW... :)

      --
      Aliens? Magnetic Rings?! Bah! Who needs that when we have
  7. Re:ugh Why by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why people have to pointout when slashdot didnt get a story first.

    I understand its good to see more sources of information but to think it is a bad to post something that has been posted elsewhere is short-sighted.

    Most people, including me, come to slashdot first and dont look everywhere else, so its a good thing that slashdot posts a lot of things that matter, even if its not the first one to do so.

    --

    Sigs are dangerous coy things

  8. Good To See by Flagbrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, the price of the cpu is not the issue in building a game box. Those geForce 3's are what squeezes your pocketbook dry.

    1. Re:Good To See by Flagbrew · · Score: 1

      sorry "squeeze"

    2. Re:Good To See by CrazyBrett · · Score: 1

      The GeForce3 is listed for $290 on pricewatch, which is certainly better than the $600 it was originally.

    3. Re:Good To See by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That $600 figure was an estimate from Nvidia. I bought mine the week it appeared for $350.

    4. Re:Good To See by rosewood · · Score: 1

      Why get a GeForce 3 when you can have a Kyro II on your doorstep for $88 and it will play everything out there today more then fine and the GeForce 3 is going to play the next gen stuff (a la doom 3) @ 30FPS. ?! Buying a GeForce 3 is a very very bad idea when a Kyro II on a fast 1+GHz system is a very fast card. (Kyro II like VooDoo 5s have no T&L so they scale a lot better, see VooDoosource.net for more info on that).

  9. About the new Athlons... by cavemanf16 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    My roommate and I were just talking about this subject last night. While new chips are coming out every three months it seems, there is other hardware limiting the PC and the all powerful gaming rig. It would behoove you Taco, to get a really sweet mobo, monitor, and case, and then get the cheapest CPU chip you can find. After all, 1 year from now, the 'new' Athlon 4's will be standard fair in the chip market, and probably 1/2 the price too.

    Besides, given AMD's track record for good chips (lately), and cheaply priced, that outperform the P4's, and with P4's hitting 2GHz soon, I wouldn't be surprised if a year from now you would be able to find those Athlon 4's for under $100...

    1. Re:About the new Athlons... by rosewood · · Score: 1

      As I have pointed out, the CPU (at least when going to AMD systems) is a lot more 'flexable'. If you get say the EpoX board right now (8kHA) and a Tbird 1.4ghz for $235 shipped, you are paying less then what you would have been paying for a P3 700 2 years ago at this time. Also, when you can get a 1ghz for $68 that can be easily oc'd to higher (Some AHJHAs are hitting 1.6 w/ air cooling), come a year from now when the Athlon 4s are @ 2ghz, you can pick one of those up for $150 and slap it in your box and ebay your 1.4 or 1ghz and still not totally eat the cost.

  10. Afordability at last by slushpupie · · Score: 1

    Well, not at last.. they have been coming down in price for a while now. This should not come as a surprise to anyone

  11. I Know What Athlons Run Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the dual Athlons...

    QNX RTOS 6.1.0!!!

    Go to http://get.qnx.com/!

    This has to be the best OS I have used in years!!!

    1. Re:I Know What Athlons Run Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm....

      QNX. Troll.

      QNX Troll.

      Hey buddy, you do realize that QNX isn't open source don't you? They're in it for the money, not to make the world a better place. They don't want to give the world a distro and teach them to sing in harmony.

      Other than that, it's ok -- for a one-architecture pony.

      [The 70's ate my balls.]

  12. Intel ? by sn0wdude · · Score: 1

    I've used Intel CPU's all my life, and never had a problem with them. The offer the most Ghz, are stable, fast, and 100% compatible with common applications. Can do SMP and have the MMX.

    Why should I decide to go for AMD CPU's ?

    This is how your average joe thinks when walking into a computer store for his new computer.7

    How do you convince them, that AMD is "better" ?

    They don't care it gives 5 frames more in Quake, when you've already got 40+ @ 1024x768. Then only know the Pentium and MMX buzzwords etc.

    Besides, the new mobile Athlon is not *that* impressive, I'd definately go for a Transmeta CPU.

    --
    --sn0w
    1. Re:Intel ? by NetJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AMD does all that and does it faster while being cheaper, that's why.

      Why pay $300 for a chip when you can get a faster one for $200? Just as compatible. Has the same MMX. They do SMP.

    2. Re:Intel ? by Wiggin · · Score: 1

      Nice troll. One small point that i would like to make is that you can't do SMP with the P4s, but you can with the athlons.

      --

      "I don't need a compass to tell me which way the wind shines." - Mr. Furious, Mystery Men
    3. Re:Intel ? by Ubi_NL · · Score: 1

      "They don't care it gives 5 frames more in Quake, when you've already got 40+ @ 1024x768. Then only know the Pentium and MMX buzzwords etc."

      euh? As far as I know, Mr Joe knows the difference between 1GHZ and 1.1Ghz (more Hz = better). He probably also knows "Less Money = Good". Therefore all you need is a salesman who can tell Mr Joe that AMD is less $$ / Hz.

      There you go

      --

      If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    4. Re:Intel ? by rosewood · · Score: 1

      How much is best buy paying you these days? The P4 may hold the MHz crown but that is due to its stretched pipeline. Performance wise, the Tbirds and Athlon4s smack the living crap out of P4s. Also, currently the Athlon4MPs are the fastest Dual Proc. system available (x86). Rummor has it that the new Tuts in Dual are pretty fast but thats just rummor. Also, it is not just q3 we are talking about, and if you are only getting 40 fps, you need to upgrade, but that is the old FPS argument that is tried and trite.

      Also, since the Athlon came out, no CPU jump has shown a MASSIVE performance bennefit. The P4s are actually slower the the P3s. The Athlon 4s are about 10% faster then the Tbirds. Unless its been 2 years since your last upgrade, dont expect much. Also, don't forget that with games like Doom comming out, your system right now is not getting pushed. It will come to the point where it will be.

    5. Re:Intel ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but only the recently released AthlonMP is guaranteed to work in SMP. If you use regular Athlons it may work but there is a chance that it won't.

    6. Re:Intel ? by manly · · Score: 1
      AMD does all that and does it faster while being cheaper, that's why.

      Why pay $300 for a chip when you can get a faster one for $200? Just as compatible. Has the same MMX. They do SMP.

      AMD just barely started doing 2-way SMP, so that is one area where there is absolutely no comparison. If you need SMP, you'll almost certainly want to stick w/ Intel for now.
    7. Re:Intel ? by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

      This is how your average joe thinks when walking into a computer store for his new computer.

      The average joe I know is too computer illiterate to know that Intel has a "reputation" and go with the cheaper AMDs. I know that doesn't stand for most people, but those that I know also have me advising them to avoid the P4 at all costs (no pun intended :) )

      --
      --------
      It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    8. Re:Intel ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant:

      "Besides the new mobile Athlon is not *that* hot, I'd definately go for a Transmeta CPU."

    9. Re:Intel ? by rosewood · · Score: 1

      Tyan is the one that did the board and chipset really. Tyan knows SMP. IF you want Dual Proc. SMP go AMD. Also, you can get 1U dual 1.2GHz PaloMinos. How kinky is that? Cheaper SMP solutions that dont have everything and the kitchen sink (as well as power 3d rendering support) are on the way.

      Besides, if you want real SMP - everyone knows you stay away from the x86

    10. Re:Intel ? by toddlg · · Score: 1

      As I explained to my father-in-law's friend last weekend that when he goes with Intel, he's paying for Blue Man Group advertisements and the "doong-ding-doong-Ding" sound.
      He understood then...

    11. Re:Intel ? by BSDGeekette · · Score: 1

      haha the average Joe is thinking all that? I don't know where you live, but the average Joe here is still buying HP's from Wal-Mart and could give a shit what CPU it has (assuming they even know what a CPU is) as long as it has lots of really cool software they'll never use and comes with a monitor (actually they call them "screens") and a FREE PRINTER! WOW!

    12. Re:Intel ? by WasterDave · · Score: 1, Troll

      40?? 40 is nothing. I'm running 60-70 most of the time in 1024x and am constantly wondering if I'd be better off staying in 800x where it the video card rarely drops below 100fps and the monitor refreshes at 100Hz. 40 is too slow, by a long way.

      Ohhhhhh, sorry, just re-read the post. This was a generic troll. Is there a troll.pl knocking around I didn't know of?

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    13. Re:Intel ? by shepd · · Score: 1

      I've used Intel CPU's all my life, and never had a problem with them.

      Why should I decide to go for AMD CPU's ?

      How do you convince them, that AMD is "better" ?


      Tell them the truth; That intel makes processors that aren't guaranteed to work with your software. Translate these into "english":

      F00F
      FDIV
      Dan-0411
      Non-Booting Coppermine
      P-III PCI Bus Master Lockups
      Intel486 TR4 Register Anomaly
      386 Failure of Math Coprocessor to Trigger #GP Exception
      IRET causes a task switch to TSS (there's more to this, but it's big and I bet you can find it all on Google)

      There's at least 10 more I can see on the various sites I just surfed, but I'm tired. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  13. What will CmdrTaco do? by noz · · Score: 1

    "I'm thinking its time to build my game machine."

    Will he be using Windows (at all, perhaps dual boot)? ( :

    1. Re:What will CmdrTaco do? by The_Messenger · · Score: 1
      Of course he will... that's part of the hypocrisy that makes this site so "special." It isn't uncommon to find the usual "M$ is evil and Windows is sucks! h4w h4w!" stories followed by stories about games like Diablo 2 and The Sims. Like most of Slashdot's readers, Malda doesn't really use GNU/Linux on the desktop.

      And no one plays games on VMWare, so you devil's advocates can crawl back under your rocks. Malda's metioned his Windows boxes numerous times. Someday, when the mood strikes me, I'm going to make a phone call to an influential friend, and, the next day, OSDN/VA Itsux will get a nice letter from Redmond, asking for license documentation.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

  14. Where's my nForce??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I want my nForce!!! Where is it nVidia?? how else am I supposed to claim that gaming PC's can do everything consoles can?

    --iamnotayam

  15. 400 bucks for the 1.1ghz 100 bucks for 900mhz... by -douggy · · Score: 1

    Must resist urge to be early adopter

    Couple a few of these in a cluster with HAL and you have a machine that will refuse to install winXP! I am sorry dave i can't let you do that.

  16. A Gaming Machine? Which OS? by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm thinking its time to build my game machine.

    If you are talking the latest and greatest games for your "gaming machine", that more than likely means that its a Windows box. Now I admit that my gaming machine is a windows box, but can you, Taco???

    You always whine about quicktime movies that you can't play, yet you talk about playing "Black & White" (which I believe is only playable on a windows partition). Now, I know you have at least a small windows partition, but won't admit it. Will you admit taht you are going to have a windows gaming machine??

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  17. Morgan-based Duron by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ... or Moron?

    Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment

    thus killing the +1 Funny one-liner.

    --
    Yes, the nick is flamebait
  18. First test of 1 GHz Duron by marcustacitus · · Score: 1
    On the Heise Newsticker, they have a quick comparison of the new 1 GHz Duron with the older Durons and a 1 GHz Athlone. No need to dig out that old German dictionary since the main info is combined into a little table.

    Ciao

    M

    1. Re:First test of 1 GHz Duron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does DDR compare to these?

  19. Sounds hot! by Neorej · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, my notebook has a 566 Mhz celeron, and that things gets so hot sometimes I fear great fears for the poor DVD's I insert into all that heat to be able to watch them whilst on the move.

    A 1.13 Ghz notebook will therefore probably become standard issue survival gear since you can work, e-mail, game and toast bread on it. I wouldn't put in a DVD though, it'll probably melt.

    Wicked.

    --
    -- Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
    1. Re:Sounds hot! by rosewood · · Score: 1

      The new Athlon4 and Morgan cores are on a smaller process and are designed to be not as hot, even tho AMD Procs are notorious for their heat.

    2. Re:Sounds hot! by scumdamn · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm running a 1.13 GHz (Intel) notebook right now. What with speedstep and a couple of fans in the back it's not running hot at all. Even when docked it's nice and cool. I'll tell ya something else too, when you walk around with a 1.13 GHz notebook with a 15" LCD for some reason you just feel better than everybody else. It must be because your laptop is better than their desktop or something.

    3. Re:Sounds hot! by scumdamn · · Score: 1

      By the way, in System Properties (Windows 2000) it says the following:

      Computer:

      Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile

      CPU 1133MHz

      AT/AT COMPATIBLE

      Isn't that neat?

    4. Re:Sounds hot! by odaiwai · · Score: 1

      AT/AT compatible?

      Intel are using Imperial Technology now? Aren't they worried about them pesky Ewoks?

      dave

  20. Could you imagine... by Uttles · · Score: 1

    ... a beowolf cluster of these?

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Could you imagine... by falzer · · Score: 1

      No, that's incomprehensible.

  21. economic slowdown by perdida · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    My goodness.. this is all like rearranging chairs on the Titanic. This is a serious global recession here, folks. Do you think athlon is going to be supporting these chips or continuing development in two years?

    The weakest companies in chip manufacture ar going to be weeded out. There will be a few competitors, or maybe only one, in each tech-industry subcategory.

    I would not say that Intel makes better technology, but it has better political-action-committee hires and better schmoozing skills, and will likely come under the protection of the United States when the real economic shcink-back begins and we revive the ancient pracitice of protecting our old industries.

    AMD, athlon, etc. are unlikely to merit this protection.

    Of course, those of you who change your technology several times a year at investments of hundreds of dollars a pop might not care. I've owned the same computer since I was 14 and not 'cause I am 1337 either, it's cause I've not been able to scrape up the cash for a new one that's worth buying.

    1. Re:economic slowdown by sniglet999 · · Score: 1

      Ya young whippersnapper! My first box was a _$3200_ XT with a 30 mb harddisk.

      Can't afford a new computer. Sheesh. A _$400_ emachine runs rings around my last computer.

      And you obviously haven't been around long enough to notice that AMD's been around through a few 'recessions'.

      There'll always be room for a 'Pepsi'. The only question I have is: I can't tell if that'd be Intel or AMD...

      Whelp, there goes the last of my karma.

    2. Re:economic slowdown by Vain · · Score: 1

      LOL, I don't think you understand... Intel may have better ass-kissing skills, but they're at the low end of the dock right now. Pound for pound their processors can't kick out the power.

      Also, AMD has been around for just as long. Never seen an AMD 386/20, I take it? Or AMD imbedded processors and other chipsets? I think they have the guile to weather the storm.

      --
      "Stop saying 'Don't quote me' because if no one quotes you, you probably haven't said a thing worth saying" -KMFDM
    3. Re:economic slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you think athlon is going to be supporting these chips or continuing development in two years?
      Probably not, since they'll be too busy defending their trademark infringement lawsuit from AMD.
    4. Re:economic slowdown by baptiste · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh please - so are you sayign AMD is going to be 'weeded out' as you say? Hardly. Not only are they grabbing market share from INtel with superior products, they are also on of the TOP producers of Flash memory - that's the cash cow that is helping keep Athlon development going. So I wouldn't count out AMD just yet. Its pretty impressive for a company like AMD to grab SIGNIFICANT market share from INtel during terrible economic times. Thats a big accomplishment and shows that the Athlon is a seriosu competitor and that it IS being purchased by people. Its not going to happen overnight, but AMD is here to stay and while they may never unseat Intel as CPU king, they are here for the long run to help keep Intel on their toes.

    5. Re:economic slowdown by blair1q · · Score: 2

      AMD's already underwater on profits. Intel just needs to hold AMD's head under while it floats just above breakeven, and AMD will drown. Flash won't save AMD (Intel makes flash too; they both do well at it) if Intel can make its performance targets on the P4 roadmap.

      In a week the P4-2GHz will be out. They've already made noises about stepping to 6GHz in fab lines under construction, and someone let slip that they think the P4 design can reach 10GHz. P4 is going to be around for a very long time. AMD has nothing like that kind of roadmap; they have cute things like nForce or whatever it's called. They are broadening with no plan for going up.

      AMD doesn't have the capital to keep up with Intel in a real footrace. They only grabbed market share because Intel made a strategic error in committing itself to RDRAM instead of making it just a high-high-end option. With the new 845 chipset (SDRAM now, DDR in the near future) and some flanking help by VIA (DDR chipset now) Intel is clearly back in the driver's seat.

      You're right about how they "help keep Intel on their toes". AMD's actions are benefitting the consumer in a gigantic way. Prices are clearly moving to our benefit, and the technology choices (SDRAM, DDR-SDRAM, RDRAM, motherboards, overclocking) are multiplying. Intel is adopting all of these, giving AMD no niche it can dominate for any length of time.

      At some point, AMD's pocketbook is going to have to give. Unless they can be bought by some giant (and it could be anyone from Tyco to Texas Instruments to Warren Buffett) they will be in debt with no net income.

      --Blair

      P.S. The CPU/chipset stuff should all be pretty fresh at www.tomshardware.com [thanks for repeating that].

    6. Re:economic slowdown by BSDGeekette · · Score: 1

      hehe I love how people "let things slip" like that. It's probably bs. Just like someone from Lucent let it "slip" that they might be having to file bankruptcy, then now suddenly ISPs find out that it's going to cost them thousands of $'s in hardware and software upgrades and maintenance contracts to upgrade to v.92. I think someone just let it slip so people would think they were in such bad shape they had to start charging for things that have been free for years by all the companies they've gobbled up.

    7. Re:economic slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you obviously haven't been around long enough to notice that AMD's been around through a few 'recessions'.

      Barely. They were about to go broke 3 years ago, and that was an expansion.

      I know you are a fan boy, but face it. AMD exists in the x86 market for two reasons and two reason only:

      1) Intel has contracts that require a second source, therefore they must licence their technology to AMD.
      2) Intel doesn't have the production capacity to satisfy the entire market.

      So, AMD comes in with a compatibile solution and pricing designed to scoop up the bottom-end that Intel can't cover. This has *always* been true, even with the athlon, except for the very recent and poorly recieved introduction of the SMP chipset. AMD is not shipping a faster and cheaper solution out of love for you guys -- they are doing it because that's the only way they can carve out a marginal market for themselves -- it's going to be a long time before they have either the production capacity or the market to go toe-to-toe with Intel.

      Now, worldwide demand is way down, and Intel is looking at that bottom-end greedlily to keep their fabs open and their OEM contracts solid. Things look a little rough for AMD.

    8. Re:economic slowdown by manly · · Score: 1

      First off the 845 chipset is a POS. SDRAM just doesn't provide the memory bandwidth necessary for the P4 platform. It does allow Intel to sell budget P4 systems, so they probably won't lose due to this inferior chipset.

      And AMD grabbed market share because the Athlon was just a better CPU than P3 (at similar clock speeds, and similar dates in time). Intel designed the P4 specifically for higher clock rates, and not necessarily higher real world performance, because they know they can out-market AMD to the average consumer.

      And although AMD's margins are being squeezed dry, it's still premature to predict their demise when they still have solid designs on the way.

    9. Re:economic slowdown by q-soe · · Score: 2

      Serious global Recession ?

      In Australia our economy is buoyant and moving ahead, the eruopean economy is stable as are most asian ones - the only one in trouble is the US after the 'throw cash at any moron with a .com in his business plan feeding frenzy' that saw some of the dumbest investment decisions ever.

      AMD are one of the strongest companies - they are second only to Intel - if anyone would have to worry it would be Transmeta or the many many chipset and board manufacturers although at the prices PC components are now it could be argued that the PC is now firmly a mass market consumer product.

      Sure - being steel and suchlike - the ones that make money - the problem with tech is that so many people were gullible enough to piss money up a wall on ideas like outpost.com or pets.com etc - replacing something you do at a store with something you do online isnt guaranteed to work (and dont get me started in razorfish or some of the 'gaming' companies)

      AMD have been around as long as intel - American Micro Devices - check out your history - and BTW Athlon is a product name NOT a company (just a note)

      I suspect that you are only 15 now so its not that bad (note - opinion only im not flaming). PC's are cheap at the moment - get out and see what new technology can do for you.

      And to close and offer some help - i used to be a Journalist (A Graded - worked on daily papers) and if this is writing then you need to study.

      Check your facts
      Offer something to back up claims
      Check history of companies commenting on

      Just trying to help you man.

      --
      I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
    10. Re:economic slowdown by blair1q · · Score: 2

      The 845 is only a POS with SDRAM because SDRAM is much, much slower than DDR or RDRAM. Half and a third as fast, respectively. If it can beat the VIA DDR chipset (which is only 5-7% slower than the i850 RDRAM chipset), it will give near-RDRAM performance with DDR memory.

      The P4 was derated in order to get it to market ASAP because P3 was not going to keep up with Athlon at all. If AMD hadn't made that leapfrog (with help from some former DEC Alpha engineers), Intel would have had time to make P4 work more efficiently. But this is what they have. Not that they ever stop. They're usually doing R&D three designs out (not steppings or shrinks, but families).

      P4 will have to stay 20-30% ahead of Athlon in Clock Speed and will have to make 845 fly on DDR in order to compete box-for-box. Bus speeds will probably start ticking up with time, too.

      AMD will be in trouble nonetheless. The GHz/GHz comparisons do have a powerful marketing effect, capable of overcoming hundreds of dollars worth of valuation difference. The benchmarks are split. (It's funny to watch people argue over that, saying one side's wins are due to "biased" benchmarks. There's no such thing as a biased benchmark; there's only better performance with a given piece of software.)

      A top-end Intel chip using Rambus runs circles around the fastest possible factory-spec AMD-based system. (Overclocking works for both, and is a micro-niche, so it's economically moot.) One you buy today could hold that advantage for a year. Yes it's 50% more expensive, but that 50% is now $6-700, not the $1.5-2k that used to separate the top boxen. Hell, with the deflation in computer prices, you could buy *both* and have change left over for an Ethernet switch.

      Intel thought it could ignore AMD, and that cost it a bunch, but now it's turned to face AMD directly, and AMD's more likely to lose ground than to gain.

      --Blair

    11. Re:economic slowdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna pick a nit:

      American Micro Devices

      That would be Advanced Micro Devices.

  22. System Prices are so cheap right now by rosewood · · Score: 5, Informative

    Building a new box from scratch right now is stupid cheap...

    CPU Athlon 1.4 GHZ $120.00
    Motherboard Epox 8KHA $115.00
    Memory 256 Megs PC2100 Cas2 $37.79
    Hard Drive IBM 60GXP 40 GB 7200RPM $112.00
    CDRW 16x10x40x $87.00
    DVD 16x $49.00
    Video Kyro II $88.00
    NIC NetGear $10.00
    Sound SbLive Value $43.00
    Floppy Generic $10.00
    Case Fong Kai FK-603 $90.00
    Cooling Vanteck CKK $31
    Price* $792.79

    1. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No thanks, I've had enough Epox boards die on me not to bother with their crap again. If you're going with DDR memory to begin with, go with Abit's KG7-RAID, it rocks.

    2. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by hexx · · Score: 2

      don't forget shipping from all those cocks who advertise superlow prices on pricewatch and hit you with $20 shipping per item:

      20*12=$240 shipping

      So the total is a little over 1$k

    3. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Price* $792.79

      * ABOUT SHIPPING:
      * No price is listed either because: The dealer may not have had the time to list the price,
      * OR... shipping may be excessive. If so we want to know

    4. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by Listen+Up · · Score: 1


      I just bought a Kyro II and had to take it back because it *does not* work in Linux/X11. The SbLive is still fscked up as far as Linux Drivers are concerned. DVD *still* doesn't work in Linux, so forget that one. Get a GForce 2 or 3, and a SB256/512PCI works great (and just as cheap or cheaper).

    5. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Wait a few weeks. Intel and VIA will settle over VIA's licensing forgetfulness on the P4 connection, and VIA's P4/DDR mobos will be out.

      --Blair

    6. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by BSDGeekette · · Score: 1

      I've never used Epox because I've never heard much good about them. I really like the MSI (microstar.com.tw) boards. Only problem I've ever had with them is the built in sound kinda sucks and almost every mb they make has it. The sound works ok, just a bitch to setup the drivers sometimes.

    7. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by __aahyzr9271 · · Score: 1

      My SBLive works in linux, it's the older SBLive Value, but they use the same chipset. What problems have you been having?

      DVD drives work in linux now, older kernels that do not have DVD support will see a DVD-ROM drive as a CD-ROM drive.

      There are still problems with playing CSS encypted DVD movies on linux, but those are being worked on, and there's a variaty of linux DVD players now.

      It's worth noteing that the problems with CSS encypted movies are more about leagel issuses than technical issuses. The OpenDVD.org site has more infomation.

    8. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by sirinek · · Score: 1
      If you are in or near a reasonably populated area, you can go to a computer show and buy those parts instead. :)


      siri

    9. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by bernief · · Score: 1

      Can you tell me where I can buy these components at these prices? It looks like a great machine for the money. Please reply to my e-mail: bernief9@mindspring.com Thanks, Bernie

    10. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats of course assuming everyone here wants to run linux - some of us dont - we just want to be able to use all the hardware out there without whining about drivers or being expected to write our own.

      Remember freedom of choice - i choose win2k

    11. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by rosewood · · Score: 1

      Aparently the /. system problems ate my reply. Those prices are with shipping.

    12. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks, but i prefer to keep my power bill in the triple digits

    13. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by Night0wl · · Score: 1

      20*12 does indeed = 240$
      but if you had patience and didn't enjoy getting taken up the ass for nextday it isn't so bad.
      20*8=160.

      Still quite a bit, but still 80 in savings from your figures. You can put that 80$ into a powersupply which wasn't mentioned ;) Might I mention an Enermax? pcmods.com has them at decent prices, as well as plycon.com.

      --
      Computational Madness in a round package.
    14. Re:System Prices are so cheap right now by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but computer show prices outside of the west coast are never as low as Pricewatch or even shopper.cnet for that matter. Add a 10-15% to all of those prices and you get an accurate read on most computer show prices. You're still looking around the 1k neighborhood.

  23. No kidding, but... by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

    I was able to buy one on ubid for $260! Of course, it was part of a 200-something shipment, so everybody got them cheap.

  24. Tomshardwarepage.COM Conclusion by sn0wdude · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is what Tom says about the new CPU's:

    "AMD's newly released Athlon 1400/266 is able to beat Intel's Pentium 4 1.7 GHz in a lot of benchmarks. The Intel processor performs better in Internet content creation software and some new 3D-games. Athlon can leave Pentium 4 far behind in 3D-rendering software, because of its superior FPU-performance.

    Except for 3D-rendering software, Athlon 1400 and Pentium 4 1.7 GHz are pretty much neck on neck. However, the lower price tag of Athlon 1400/266 is clearly making it the more attractive product. It is also more versatile, as you can find inexpensive (though lower performing) PC133 platforms as well as DDR-motherboards for it, while Pentium 4 is still only supported by Intel850 platforms that require the expensive RDRAM memory. "

    The whole article is here:

    http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/01q2/010608/athl on 1400-17.html

    --
    --sn0w
    1. Re:Tomshardwarepage.COM Conclusion by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2

      Athlon can leave Pentium 4 far behind in 3D-rendering software, because of its superior FPU-performance.

      How far AMD has come. Remember when it was a universal constant that AMD had inferior floating-point across their product line?

      Mad props to AMD for pulling this together.

    2. Re:Tomshardwarepage.COM Conclusion by Glonk · · Score: 1

      On Aug 26th, the 1.8GHz Pentium 4 is $260, just $7 more than the Athlon 1.4GHz.

    3. Re:Tomshardwarepage.COM Conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      August 26?? Uh... Is that August 26 of last year, or what?
      Pricewatch as of now says:
      Athlon 1.4GHz 266 - $107
      Pentium 4 1.8GHz - $542

      I fail to see the $7 difference.

    4. Re:Tomshardwarepage.COM Conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 26th hasn't come yet...

    5. Re:Tomshardwarepage.COM Conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about adding 1G of RAM (DDR for Athlon, RDRAM to P4) to each price.

    6. Re:Tomshardwarepage.COM Conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha - well, I think u will find that most, if not all, Athlon motherboards that are DDR only have 2 memory slots. And seeing as the biggest DDR ram available is 256, u can only get 512 not 1 GB shoehorned in it.

      Nice try :)

    7. Re:Tomshardwarepage.COM Conclusion by cwebster · · Score: 1

      from pricewatch: pc2100 DDR ram 512 meg - $162

      http://www.envisioncs.net/processors_memory.cfm# Me mory even has 1Gig PC2100 ddr listed, $800 per

  25. Just grand. by Josh+Mast · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perhaps they can invest some into R&D to figure out how to keep my pants from catching on fire?

    All the speed in the world does me no good when my lap spontanously combusts from my laptop.

  26. And let the chip wars begin ... again by Genoaschild · · Score: 1

    Isn't competition great? We get better products for a lower cost. My question is, where is transmetta and their power-saving cruscoe chip in all of this. I though they would have a higher impact on the portable market. They certainly can't complete against the Athlon 4 or the Intel equivalent, they just don't have the resources. Who will win the chip wars? I'm taking bets from 9 to 5. Maximum bet of $1000 dollars and minumum of $2. We will give odds. 25:1 Transmeta, 3:1 AMD and 2:1 Intel.

    --
    Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
  27. Damn by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 1

    My Duron 750 is not even 6 months old and is already deprecated, I must really resist the temptation to buy a Giga TBird, because I know that the performance would not be noticable, but then again, everyone seems to have 1GHz+ processors these days. Oh well, I'll just lie about it.

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:Damn by Genoaschild · · Score: 1

      I don't see what the fuss is. I have an old K6-2 533 and it runs like a beauty. The only realy program I've really had problems with is Black and White. My processor is simply not fast enough once you get past the first few levels. I usually don't buy a new computer until the Mhz quadruples. Their is just no need except for bragging rights and those who must be able to play the absolutely newest games.

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
    2. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple solution... get a better video card and not tell them.

      Wow you cant run Q3 this smooth? I only have a 750 in here... you must have crappy hardware.

    3. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My origional system was a AMD k6-2 550 with 192mb of ram and a TNT 2 Ultra w/64mb of ram. Most of these new fangled games run pretty crappy at all but the lowest detail and resolution. So, I recently purchased a motherboard based of the ALi magik1 chipset supporting DDR ram. Along with it I picked up a Duron 750 and 256mb of 266mhz DDR ram. Granted the ram is clocked to 266mhz because of the lock on the Durons FSB speed, it was the same price as getting 256mb of PC133 ram from Crucial. All together I paid 147 dollars after shipping. Right now I can play MW4 at 1024/768/16 with full detail and its smooth as silk, same with Unreal Tournament, Black and White, and Quak3. When I started to need better game performance ill get a geforce2MX for 50$. Until them I am content with my current system, why spend a premium for performance I will never use.

    4. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still running a PII-400/128MB from 1998.

      It's plenty fast for me (I'm not a gamer).

  28. Dear Mr Taco by BrentRJones · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Please list all the computer you have ever owned and the ones you are currently using.

    Thanks

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  29. speed vs bloat by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    AMD is currently shipping the processors, and expects widespread availability in systems in conjunction with the launch of Microsoft's Windows XP operating system, which is set for Oct. 25, AMD says.

    This stuff drives me Schizo. I like the idea of better processors for games etc.

    But I am getting tired of propping up the bloated performance and software design practices of certain very big software software companies.

    Makes me want to bang my head against a wall.

    - - -
    Radio Free Nation
    is a news site based on Slash Code
    "If You have a Story, We have a Soap Box"
    - - -

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:speed vs bloat by pastie · · Score: 1

      But I am getting tired of propping up the bloated performance and software design practices of certain very big software software companies.


      Ah, but you are forgetting that their bloat and the faster processors to cope with that means that we can compile our freshly downloaded kernels/glibc/gcc[1] faster than ever before! :)

      [damn, and just _after_ I'd bought that new machine... *sigh*]

      [1] gcc 3.0.1 is out, btw. See your nearest mirrors for details.
    2. Re:speed vs bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[1] gcc 3.0.1 is out, btw. See your nearest mirrors for details."

      Eh. All nearest mirrors show me a picture of a handsome guy, but they all can't tell me where to get gcc.

    3. Re:speed vs bloat by BSDGeekette · · Score: 1

      I can't help but think (hope) that someday in the not so distant future this will backfire on MS. Now that we have all this extra hardware power would be the perfect time for someone to come up with an OS that isn't bloated. It wouldn't be easy, but with the right marketing scheme and support from major software vendors it could be done.

    4. Re:speed vs bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Eh. All nearest mirrors show me a picture of a handsome guy

      If that's you're definition of handsome, I'd hate to see your idea of ugly.

  30. Gaming? Get a PS2! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    Just look at PS1. It's still being actively developed on, and it was launched around '95 or so. Now let's see how many computers from 95 that can run recent games.

    Yep. You'll get MUCH more gaming for your bucks if you get yourself a console. I know it's hurting our gaming pride, but it's really dumb to upgrade your computer to play games. Get a PS2, and save 500 bucks when you get a new PC (lower specs).

    --

    Stop the brainwash

    1. Re:Gaming? Get a PS2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 words for you:
      re-sol-u-tion

    2. Re:Gaming? Get a PS2! by TummyX · · Score: 1


      Now let's see how many computers from 95 that can run recent games.


      They would if the recent games used crappy 5 year old graphics.

      How many new PS1 games do you see that have significantly better sound, graphics & videos the the ones released 6 years ago?

    3. Re:Gaming? Get a PS2! by stripes · · Score: 2
      Yep. You'll get MUCH more gaming for your bucks if you get yourself a console. I know it's hurting our gaming pride, but it's really dumb to upgrade your computer to play games.

      Yeah....except the PC games have more strategy (at least real-time strategy) games then consoles, and more kinda odd ball games (theme park simulator anyone? -- I don't think that is on any consoles, but I could be wrong).

      It also at least use to be the case that PCs had better force feedback stuff (the DreamCast's idea of force feedback is a shaker from a pager).

      Now if "all" I wanted was some Kick-Fu games (and there is nothing wrong with that -- that's why I have a DreamCast!), and a few gun games, a console makes sense. If I want Civ-III then a console isn't so hot.

    4. Re:Gaming? Get a PS2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, except better games come out on the PC (did you see the gamespot top 50 games of all time, only a couple were console games), I can upgrade my PC, it has better graphics (my GF 3 runs serious sam at 16X12 full detail with fsaa x2 enabled and still pulls better then 60fps, fraid the ps2 can't do that, ain't that right timesplitters), and I can play games over this new fangled thing called the internet (been doing that since around the time the ps1 was release thanks to kali). Sure a few dreamcast titles (like 10) support net play, but only a couple would take advantage of my broadband. Oh, sure the ps2 will eventually get a network adapter (at least the xbox got that right off) but I doubt we will see the number of true multiplayer games that we see on the computer (I am sorry, split screen just blows ass for multiplayer so I don't consider it valid). That, and there is arguably only three games worth playing on the ps2 (twisted metal black, ring of red, and dead or alive 2. Red faction would be on that list if a much better version wasn't going to be released for the pc).

    5. Re:Gaming? Get a PS2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever played a PS1 game? Idiot. The graphics improvement was pretty dramatic over the five years.

    6. Re:Gaming? Get a PS2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually more oddball games are released for consoles, since unlike PC gaming the console market is actually profitable. The major lack in the PS1 is networked mulitplayer (hence no RTS, or FPS) though there have been many strategy-type games (you just don't hear about them on Slashdot).

  31. Re:400 bucks for the 1.1ghz 100 bucks for 900mhz.. by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 1

    Actually, this question was discussed in an earlier article.

    The bottom line? Don't waste your money. Some of the comments mention a "price break", where you take a small hit in speed, but chop a lot off the price.

  32. Early benchmark: by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

    Here are some early benches of the Morgan based Duron:

    http://www.hexus.net/review.php?review=211

    It seems that the new core and its new extensions puts it far ahead of the Spitfire core and nearly up to par with the current Thunderbirds. It will be interesting seeing durons compared to P4s in the near future :)

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  33. Screw gaming... by Frequanaut · · Score: 1


    Devo machine...it's all about compile time.

    (Get yourself a good disk too)

    1. Re:Screw gaming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And 2GB ram. That and scsi raid make a much bigger difference than proc speed.

  34. Re:A Gaming Machine? Which OS? by n3m6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    actually .. IIRC he stated once that he dual boots.. about an year ago i think ..
    when he was talking of some laptop thingy ..
    whatever.. he said that he keeps the partition
    for games.. or something

    give him a break will ya !

    he's not an elitist linux zealot

    so buddy Taco .. how much will you pay me ?
    :)

  35. Re:ugh Why by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    It's like the post where the guy actually complained that Slashdot has posted two articles which contradicted each other: Apparently Slashdot must a) be the absolute first to ever link to anything, b) must stick to their guns and stand by the original posting regardless-> No contradictory findings can be presented.

  36. Do these run any cooler? by -tji · · Score: 1
    I decided against the earlier Athlons because of their extreme power requirements and heat output.


    They required an AMD Certified power supply, and the heat given off required huge heatsinks, CPU fan, case fans, etc. With all the cooling, it would make enough noise to drown out my MP3's. And, when my apartment hits the mid 90's on those hot summer days, I would not be confident in one of these staying up.


    When they shrink the die size, why don't they also release some of the lower clock speeds? Like an 800MHz chip that would only need passive cooling, and a 250W power supply.. Yes, I could underclock one of the new ones. But, I want one that's tested & confirmed to work with passive cooling.

    1. Re:Do these run any cooler? by rosewood · · Score: 1

      FYI, it is hard pressed to find a PSU that is not AMD OK. Even DEER makes AMD okay PSUs. As for cooling, you can get $20 coolers from 2CoolTek that will easily keep a sub 1.2ghz Tbird (yet alone Palomino) cool enough in a 90F environment.

    2. Re:Do these run any cooler? by msaavedra · · Score: 2
      When they shrink the die size, why don't they also release some of the lower clock speeds? Like an 800MHz chip that would only need passive cooling, and a 250W power supply.. Yes, I could underclock one of the new ones. But, I want one that's tested & confirmed to work with passive cooling.

      I'll second that. I've really been wanting to build a quiet, low-heat system, but have been hesitant to use a chip like the Via C3. Having a duron/athlon with these characteristcs would be great. Who needs a 1.4 GHz chip? Give me a quiet and cool one at 700 MHz.
      --
      "Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it."
      --Henry David Thoreau
    3. Re:Do these run any cooler? by q-soe · · Score: 2

      Nope they dont run cooler - i would love to upgrade my PC to an athlon but living in QLD in australia i have summer daytime temps of 40 degrees celsius to deal with - my brother runs a duron 950 and this hits 65 celsius just running windows - he has 4 fans and a peltier on his chip and this is still the case.

      The Intel celeron 900 runs at 38 degrees - this is much cooler and in comparison between mine and his i dont see a difference in performance times (not neither of us waste money so we are not into overclocking systems)

      Then add in a 64mb Nvidia card, burners, hdd etc etc and think about it - i have seen stats that show athlons under load hittin 100+ celsius, thats too hot.

      Pity as i would love to dump intel - the P4 is a shitheap (DDR ram my butt)

      --
      I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
    4. Re:Do these run any cooler? by rosewood · · Score: 1

      100+ C? That is 212+ in F and that is WAY out of Spec for AMD procs. The TBird 1ghz my girlfriend ran at this summer in 90F ambient while the AC was down stayed at 120F with a Vantek CKK and good case cooling. A Peltier sure isnt going to help much in that situation btw.

    5. Re:Do these run any cooler? by q-soe · · Score: 2

      True - 90 farenheit is 32.2 degrees - thats a spring day - also we get humidity of approx 90% on an average day - its hard to keep things cool - keeping yourself cool is hard enough. My point was that the ahtlons i have seen havent been any cooler - this might just be my experience - i dont know - but 4 fans in a tower case should give good cooling - i dont know what to make of figures im seeing of 60-65 degrees celsius - but i have seen them over and over and with my own eyes.

      The thing is i want a tbird - my intel processors have been disapointing me for a while - i wasnt happy with my p3500 and although i like the 900 celereon (it was cheap and i needed a PC quick) i would never go to a P4 while the DDR issue is around (i have a gb of SD 133 RAM that im not prepared to replace just cause intel says to (and i have seen talk of better performance on DDR - 10% does not equate to (in Australia) a price of double for DDR VS SD)

      Still this was always an AMD problem - i have sold PC's on and off since 386 Days and the early Cyrix and AMD processors were always hotter than an Intel - thats a fact of life i guess and something we have to live with - but i wont be happy until i see them running at the same core temp as a P4 in the same box with the same cooling (although i have seen very hot P4's as well)

      --
      I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
    6. Re:Do these run any cooler? by rosewood · · Score: 1

      One possible sollution for you is to get say a 1.2 GHz and since the AMD procs are not multiplyer locked, run it at 1.0 GHz. Also, living here in Kansas, Humidity in 60-70% is familiar. You may want to look into water cooling. The downside is condensation can be a problem in a poorly done water rig in a high humidity environment. Also, The Tbirds and old Durons dont have on die thermisters so unless your thermister is touching the CPU with some thermal goo, it is prolly not giving you a completely acurate reading.
      The P4s also have quite a bit of heat on them too and require some massive HSFs.

  37. Price Cuts by envisionary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article mentions forthcoming price cuts by Intel. Here is some info on that, describing dollar values as well as the justification for it - the demo of the Pentium IV 2GHz.

  38. OT: Kiddy proof cases by maroberts · · Score: 1

    can anyone recommend a (preferably UK based) source of cases with power/ reset switches(and even better CD drive) which can't easily be accessed by a 14 month old son who is fascinated by all the bright lights?

    i.e. power and reset behind either a sliding or locking door.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  39. It's even better than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A quick check to Pricewatch.com shows the Athlon 1.4GHz at $107 and the equally performing Pentium 4 1.8GHz for $548 (Note - OEM prices without HS/F). For that same $548 I can get the Athlon 1.4, a $300 GeForce3 and four sticks of 256MB DDR PC2100 RAM.

    1. Re:It's even better than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The P4 1.8GHz outperforms the 1.4GHz Athlon.

      *Boohoo* AMD zealot go cry!

    2. Re:It's even better than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad part is that you would have to point it out.

    3. Re:It's even better than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason you missed the point that it's 4 times as expensive.

    4. Re:It's even better than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm sure you have some benchmarks in your post to back that up... Oh, you have none? Congratulations, you are officially just another opinion.

      In most benchmarks (check Anandtech) the AMD 1.4 can beat the P4 1.7. It stands to reason that the 1.8 would be closer in performance to the Athlon.

      And thanks to the other AC who had to point out to your dumb ass that the P4 is several times more expensive.

  40. Re:A Gaming Machine? Which OS? by stx23 · · Score: 1
    you talk about playing "Black & White" (which I believe is only playable on a windows partition).
    For me, that would be reason enough to remove a Windows partition.
    If Peter Molyneux had vomited in the game box it would have been more enjoyable.
  41. Just a kind reminder. by Vain · · Score: 1

    Intel, wake up... Someone's knocking on your door.

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1515
    http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/01q3/010821/index. html
    http://www.sharkyextreme.com/news.shtml#1010821:09 35

    Oh, and by the way... Happy birthday, Athlon.

    http://arstechnica.infopop.net/OpenTopic/page?q=Y& a=tpc&s=50009562&f=77909774&m=5690986652

    --
    "Stop saying 'Don't quote me' because if no one quotes you, you probably haven't said a thing worth saying" -KMFDM
  42. Re:A Gaming Machine? Which OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B&W - worth a reboot
    crappy quicktime trailer - not worth a reboot

  43. Re:A Gaming Machine? Which OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't call the OS "Wintendo" for nothing.

  44. Anandtech Athlon Motherboard Roundup by XBL · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here posted today. Basically the SiS 735 wins:

    The real beauty of the 735 isn't its performance, especially since you'll find it quite difficult to notice a performance difference (in most cases) between it and the 760/KT266. No, the real beauty of the 735 is its price. The ECS board we used in this review retails for less than $80. We have seen it places for as low as $65 plus shipping. This makes the board and the platform the perfect companion for the very low cost Duron and Athlon processors. For less than $200 you can easily upgrade your system to a Duron on a SiS 735 board with DDR SDRAM courtesy of the very aggressive pricing from AMD, SiS and DDR SDRAM manufacturers such as Crucial.

  45. Re:A Gaming Machine? Which OS? by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Doesn't matter which OS to Taco, just as long as it makes a killer MP3 jukebox and has many, many mouse buttons.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  46. AMD/Intel by Tharald · · Score: 1

    These announcements usually turn into AMD/Intel bickering. I have lately been siding with AMD, and I figured I'd summarize the reasons for disliking Intel here:

    -CPU ID

    -False advertising (speed up the internet my arse)

    -Forcing a proprietary memory standard on us

    -Three different socket standards in the last year

    -Exploiting the consumers lack of knowledge, pushing the Ghz over performance

    Here in norway, the P4 1.8 costs NOK 3200, more than twice the price of the better performing Athlon 1.4 at NOK 1500.

    In addition we have all the problems with the Camino chipset and the botched P3 1.13 launch

    Did I miss anything?

    What reasons do we have to dislike AMD lately?

    -Tharald

    1. Re:AMD/Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reasons are mostly infantile. CPU ID can be disabled easily. The internet is faster with intel, because your browser is able to render pages faster. In comparisons between intel and AMD, (chips having the same architecture), megaherts is a valid comparator. Add to that, P4 is the supported standard for windows, which statistics show is the operating system used most widely, recently being demonstrated to have 70% of the /. market share. AMD chips suffer, because windows software is optimized to run on intel.

    2. Re:AMD/Intel by Tharald · · Score: 1

      Whoa, they're infantile, eh?

      Fact remains that the internet is not sped up by Intel P3s. Pages are rendered faster with faster processors, be they AMD or Intel (point here is that it depends what your reference is). And whatever you say about windows software being optimised for Intel, the Athlon 1.4 beats the P4 1.8 in most performance tests. By the way, the architectures are not the same, and the Athlons have significantly better floating points operations than the P4.

      As far as I can see, aside from being infantile, my arguments are all valid.

      -Tharald

      PS: The point about the CPU ID is not whether or not it can be disabled. Most consumers would never know about it even, much less how to turn it off. The problem is that it was a feature most people did not want (except for the software publishers), and it does not benefit the consumer.

    3. Re:AMD/Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we have some browser rendertime benchmarks to back that statement up?, thought not..

      as for the architecture, the P4 and the Althon are vastly different, P3 v Althon mhz comparisions are vaguely meaningfull, the P4 however, is a massive departure from traditional x86 code execution methods. (which is why a 1.2Ghz Tualatin will beat the crap out of a 1.8Ghz Xeon)

      You sir, are a poor excuse for a troll

    4. Re:AMD/Intel by wbajzek · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's right to say that a processor speeds up the internet. For most users, the problem is probably not page render time so much as content download time.

      Whether my browser renders a page in 1 or 10 seconds means little when it takes 40 to load all the banner ads, flash animations, and huge worthless gifs attempting to make a stupid web page look like a page from a magazine.

  47. Xeon? by dead+sun · · Score: 1

    Hello, Pentium 4 Xeon's do dual procs. A little more costly but they do it. And besides you need a $500 mobo to do dual Athlons currently, killing that price advantage right? Come on now...

    --
    If not now, when?
    1. Re:Xeon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pricewatch says $236 gets you a dual Athlon mobo. Can a dual P4X board be that much cheaper?

    2. Re:Xeon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the "Tyan Tiger" is a low cost version of the "Tyan Thunder", so relatively low-cost SMP will be here soon. Also, there's supposed to be one heck of a price shuffle at the end of the month, and AMD is supposed to be releasing 1.5GHz Athalons sometime next month. This waiting is killing me...

  48. Fuck off, ya queer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You suck.

    1. Re:Fuck off, ya queer. by Genoaschild · · Score: 1

      Why don't you go and do us all a favor and stick it where the sun don't shine.

      --
      Just because a bunch of people believe or do something stupid, doesn't make it any less stupid.
  49. Politically Correct by asdren · · Score: 1

    Anonymous person?? what happened to anonymous COWARDS?

  50. Re:A Gaming Machine? Which OS? by WasterDave · · Score: 2

    Oh good, it seems I'm not alone. B&W seemed to be a collection of pet projects, not a game.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  51. Re:"I have a dream..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really shouldn't delete posts you fascist fux0rs. The moderation system is supposed to take care of situations, like people spanking Taco & co for the shoddy message board mechanics.

    !Viva la trollistas!

  52. Until you want a system that doesn't suck by Evil+MarNuke · · Score: 1

    Something that has SCSI u160 and dual chips...

    CPU Athlon MP 1.2GHZ $185
    Motherboard Tyan S2510 $495
    Memory 256 megs PC21000 ECC $57
    Hard Drive IBM 18g SCSI Ultra160 $400
    CDRW 16x10x40x $87.00
    DVD 16x $49.00
    ELSA GLADIAC 920 $359.00
    Sound SbLive Value $43.00
    Floppy Generic $10.00
    Case SUPERMICRO CSE-044 $209.00
    Cooling Vanteck CKK $31
    Price* $2333

    --
    The journey is better then the end.
    1. Re:Until you want a system that doesn't suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This system is a terrible, terrible waste of money. You get 1.2ghz proccies but only 256 mb ram! You think that "SCSI doesn't suck" but yet you pay $400 for a SINGLE 18gb hard drive (if you knew anything you would realize that SCSI is only worth it in the server market). An SBLive Value in a machine that costs well over two grand? You are insane

    2. Re:Until you want a system that doesn't suck by rosewood · · Score: 1

      The AC pointed out some serious flays with this system idea. Also, if you have that Tyan board get two cpus and tool coolers obviously. Also, get more then just one SCSI drive if you are going for it. Also since you are on SCSI get SCSI CDRW and DVD so that increases the price.

    3. Re:Until you want a system that doesn't suck by Evil+MarNuke · · Score: 1

      i wasn't going over board...

      --
      The journey is better then the end.
    4. Re:Until you want a system that doesn't suck by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      There is no point to having a single MP CPU - you're paying a fortune for a feature you aren't using.

      If you desperately want SCSI, MSI do a nice board with onboard SCSI, that won't break the balance like the Tyan will. Personally though I think an IDE RAID is going to better than a single SCSI drive, for a lot less.

      Why do you want ECC RAM? Are you doing applications so incredibly critical that you cannot run the risk of memory corruption affecting it? Especially as ECC slows down the system!

    5. Re:Until you want a system that doesn't suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AMD 762 northbridge requires Registered ECC ram.

    6. Re:Until you want a system that doesn't suck by Evil+MarNuke · · Score: 1

      You're right. The SB Live Value is kinda cheesey but the motherboard doesn't have isa. :) Of course I don't play mp3's on my work station (got a server for that) and I hate the dings and dongs, peeps and beeps, wing and whiling when i do something, so what the point of having a sound card?! Video editing? Oh, I do that on Mac.

      If you knew anything a dual processor machine is it is only good in a server market. Wait... wait.. oh DAMN!!! i'm about to make a connection... Maybe I want to make this into a server when the 64bit processor cames out!!! What a thought!!

      And why only 256megs? I'm not running a database nor a hog like Winblows so what the point?

      --
      The journey is better then the end.
  53. Re:A Gaming Machine? Which OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note only llamas like you call it that.

  54. You go, girlfriend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bend over for daddy

  55. Be wary of Athlon for games by magic · · Score: 2
    I built an AMD system for gaming only to discover that the chipset for my motherboard was fundamentally incompatible with AGP. After screwing around with AGP paging size, PCI latency, 4-in-1 drivers, and all the rest, I gave up and bought a (slower) P4 system.


    I recommend Asus motherboards if you go AMD-- my research indicated that they have the fewest problems, but expect to upgrade your drivers immediately after installing your OS, or things will crash.


    -m

    1. Re:Be wary of Athlon for games by The_Messenger · · Score: 1
      I concur... Asus rocks for AMD systems. Unfortunately, most new Asus boards use VIA chipsets, which have a reputation for stablity problems and serious hardware compatability issues. (SBLive owners know what I'm talking about!) But Asus boards are a better choice than anything from Abit.

      I am currently preparing for a rather large hardware purchase (adding two rackmount servers and a workstation to my curent single server and single workstation), and since I've been a hardcore Athlon convert since last year, I'm trying to find some good, stable AMD boards for the servers. I wish that decent boards with AMD chipsets were easier to find... like the 760...

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

    2. Re:Be wary of Athlon for games by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Seems to me like your beef isn't with AMD, it's with the manufacturer of your motherboard, whom you have forgotten to mention.

      Blaming AMD for your motherboard maker's AGP woes is a bit like blaming Goodyear because the fuel injection system on your Ford doesn't work properly. Unless the manufacturer of the chipset concerned was AMD (which I doubt), you're pointing the blaming the wrong party.

      Ask a bunch of hardcore gamers what they think of AMD and their processors - I bet they have good things to say. Even the most die-hard Intel fan would have to admit that the competition from AMD has driven chip prices down to more realistic levels.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:Be wary of Athlon for games by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately, most new Asus boards use VIA chipsets, which have a reputation for stablity problems and serious hardware compatability issues. (SBLive owners know what I'm talking about!)

      Reportedly, the new crop of KT266 boards are much better than the first.

    4. Re:Be wary of Athlon for games by magic · · Score: 1
      FIC motherboard. The AMD chips are indeed fine, as near as I can tell... the problem is clearly the 3rd party chipset.


      -m

  56. Talk about 1GHz durons and their benchmarks by anethema · · Score: 1

    1GHz Durons are not only just a small ramp in clockspeed from the 950MHz Duron, they are also based on the new 'Morgan' core, which is the budget version of the Palomino. Tomshardware already has benchmarks here, and he talks about the new technology involved in the new morgan core. Worth a read.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  57. But...but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But AMD is the beloved underdog! They just *have* to win! Movies said so. The underdog always wins in the end. They aren't corporate fatcats, like intel. They appreciate technology for technologies sake. They're the friends of the little guy. They love us and we love them. They're like a cottage industry. I bet they run their fabrication plants in a real friendly way. I bet the managers have to call the techies "hackers". In the end, AMD is bound to win, as sure as linux is bound t oovercome windows, and mozilla will topple IE from it's perch. It just *has* to be this way.

    Besides, I've been buying AMD for ages. It can't have been because I'm too poor to afford top-of-the-line hardware. I made the choice because AMD is just better. My hardware is the best there is, and that's because I know what components are the best. That's just the way it is.

  58. Weird by anethema · · Score: 1

    When i previewed (before i submitted) my last comment, and added the link in there using html code in my text, it came up in the body text even though i had 'extrans' selected as my submit type. When i changed it to 'plain ole text' the link worked fine. Another bug? Looks like extrans and plain text got switched or something

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  59. Hey now! by ioman1 · · Score: 1

    I submitted this news a couple days ago. More news like this can be found here .

  60. From AMD to Intel: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All your market share are belong to us!"

  61. Also what's at the other end of that geforce... by devphil · · Score: 2


    After getting to use a flat-panel LCD at work, I won't use anything else. I can actually look at the screen for more than an hour without my eyes getting tired. No glare. No funky reflections. I'd trade a 21" monitor for a 17" flat-panel in a heartbeat.

    I'm spec'ing out a home computer. The 17" flat-panel is more than the rest of the machine put together...

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  62. Economics 101 by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1
    Perdida, "protectionist" efforts only distort the market further, they do not "protect" anything.


    A free market tends toward the most efficient and effective answers, it does not gurantee them. A company or style that YOU like is not ensured success just because YOU like it.


    When "we revive the ancient pracitice of protecting our old industries", we are thereby ensuring that the market tendency toward efficiency is destroyed, and the demonstrably better AMD chips will be relegated to the same pile as the DEC Alpha, also a demonstrably better technology than anything built at its time.


    It is perfectly normal for companies to fail as technology changes. To try to shore-up inefficient processes and corporations is hubris, the sin of pride.


    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  63. Hint: It's Red Hat! by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 1

    I have installed Debian and Turbolinux on 486s with as little as 8 MB of RAM. In fact, one is running right now as my cable modem's router/NAT box.

    It is Red Hat that is giving you grief, but then RH is designed for general desktop use, rather than the more specialized, trimmed down systems such as those for a network box. I can't think of anyone masochistic enough to run X on a 486 with less than 32 megs of RAM - that would be just painfully slow. (Hell, it's slow on my Pentium 266 with 64 megs!)

    --

    That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
  64. McDrTaco seems to be confused by thejake316 · · Score: 1

    He already made an abortive attempt at a game machine (http://cmdrtaco.net/jubei/) and n'er athlon ner duron nor itanium will help it, gigahertz notwithstanding. Unless that was one of those editorial comments that wasn't in his voice but in the voice of the 'anonymous reader.'

    McDrTaco has stated he doesn't read /., and I can think of many reasons why one wouldn't want to. It appears now he doesn't read his own website. Which reinforces my believe the real CmdrTaco was replaced with the current doppleganger sometime in late 1999 early 2000.

    --
    AC's cheerfully ignored
  65. my current dilemma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should i spend the money left over from
    taking my kid to the doctor for
    laundry, food, rent, or the phone bill?

    i guess i can wash clothes in the bathtub.
    food, well, i can go down to the college and find
    some 'free pizza' meetings they are always having.
    now if i dont pay the rent, i might get evicted,
    but if i dont pay the phone bill, i will be OK.
    because i dont REALLY need a phone to keep going to work...
    ill just have to tell my boss.

    so the rent it is. thanks slashdot! you make every decision easy!

  66. good show, old man by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    What we have here is someone new to trolling. See how lame a comment he makes? Now, he'll crawl back into his hole and think about this for a while before emerging and trying again elsewhere.

    This has been Bill Axelrod on Mutual of Omaha's Wild Troll Kingdom.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  67. Another mobo by Shin+Elendale · · Score: 1
    Asus is usually pretty good, they've had some stability issues and (more recently) huge PR blunders within the gaming community. They were releasing drivers for their GeForce variety of video cards that let unscrupulous players see through walls, lighten/darken scenes, and do a bunch of other things that really destroys enjoyment in a multiplayer gaming scenario- all completely at a driver level, without fear of reprisal. No, i can't really recommend them as a company (Two notes: this isn't the first time they've tried to do something like this, both times the backlash has hurt them badly enough they pulled everything, secondly my current system runs an A7V mobo (Asus) and works quite nicely).

    An alternative might be Abit, but i'm not really into the hardware hacking community: better to check what guys on some of the really esoteric hardware sites say first :)

    -Elendale

    --

    IANAT (I Am Not A Troll)