Slashdot Mirror


Timothy Ney Hired As Gnome Foundation Director

Leslie Proctor writes: "The GNOME Foundation announced today that they have hired Timothy Ney as Executive Director. Tim is well known in the Free software community for his work with the FSF. More details at www.gnome.org." The actual press release is online, as well as Gnome news. Having worked/talked with Tim before, this is great news for The Gnome Foundation -- Tim's an incredible guy.

89 comments

  1. Timothy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Is that the same Timothy who takes it in the ass here on Slashdot? Surely you must know him, Hemos! You've torn his anus at least 3 times...

    1. Re:Timothy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Click here for more information on the first post stealing bug. Thank god for sourceforge

  2. Linux likes it up the ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    /| |\
    (_\__ | |
    / "-./ /
    |/^\ /^\ \_/
    |\#/ \#/ |
    / ( |
    ( /
    \`-._.-' /
    ,--._.--"\
    / ) )
    / /| / /
    /\,###,-./ /
    .#####. ,######> / )
    #####-##.#### ###\/\/#/
    ##-#(o)####### #######|
    #(o)."|\####### ######|
    `##___+/###### #######\
    `##\/###############' \
    `### ### #### ####'=<|
    `#\-'##### #####\._./
    ,##',##' /_ _\ "-"
    ,##',##' \/
    "' ##'

    Important stuff:

    • Try to keep posts on topic.
    • Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.
    • Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    • Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    • Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

    1. Re:Linux likes it up the ASS by goatse.cx+guy · · Score: -1, Troll

      Are they going to fix slashdot? Everytime I log in it logs me back out. I can't even post messages without getting some crazy error.

      --

      I'll be your brown eyed girl.

    2. Re:Linux likes it up the ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Are all FreeBSD users attracted to inter-species homosexuality? Why else would they choose a logo of unwilling anal penetration?

      I think I'll just install Slackware instead.

  3. with any luck... by Satai · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...this discussion won't degenerate into millions of posts yelling "Tim Ney! TIM NEY!!"

    1. Re:with any luck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developpers, developpers, developpers!!!

    2. Re:with any luck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

      spell check! spell check! spell check!
      (develoPers)

  4. one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    are you related to that slut from mija.nu?

  5. Very exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    You stupid niggers,

    1. Re:Very exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      "stupid nigger?" Isn't that kind of like saying 'gay faggot?'

  6. blow it out yer ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    ya fuckin nig

  7. Nice to see growth for a change by moniker_21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Between Covad, Loki, and god knows who else having financial trouble, it's really nice to see a company going in the right direction and hiring people. Especially in an area where Linux has been labeled as lacking, namely in the GUI department. I can't wait to see what GNOME has in store next. Good luck and congrats Tim!

    --
    I posted to /. and all I got was this stupid sig
    1. Re:Nice to see growth for a change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this is such an insightful comment except that Gnome Fundation is _not_ a company.

    2. Re:Nice to see growth for a change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With so much attention during the last few months
      of the fall of dotcom's and troubles in all IT
      companies, not just Linux companies, it is good
      to see a positive step forward by the Gnome Foundation board. Linux needs to promote its
      desktop ability more and Gnome is the way to go.
      Congratulations, Tim.

  8. *BSD is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    *BSD is dying

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered *BSD community when last month IDC confirmed that *BSD accounts for less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick nd its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS hobbyist dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    *BSD is dying

    1. Re:*BSD is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      inconcievable!

  9. this is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    sorry is i'm harsh but 99.999999% of the readership probably don't know who the fuck Timothy Ney is. The article writeup could have at least explained who this guy is some more.

    All I know is, most people wouldn't know him from a hole in the wall. So how is he so deserving of his job change being blasted to everyone???

  10. GNOME is shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    KDE is far superior. I will NEVER use that fucking GNOME trash!! fuck GNOME. GNOME IS GNARLY GNASTY GNIGGER SHIT.

  11. ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Nothing can save Gnome now from KDE, not even Timmy boy.

  12. Wow by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2
    More than 500 computer developers, including over 100 full-time, paid developers, contribute their time and effort to the project.

    What a cool statistic! Now I'm really interested to see this statistic for KDE. Somehow I get the impression that the number of paid KDE developers is smaller than 100.

    How is it that KDE is keeping up with them then? (surpassing, even, IMHO) Greater support from non-paid developers? Perhaps I am wrong about the number of paid KDE developers.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      500 developers and they still can't make it not suck ass. they must all be niggers banging on a keyboard or something. oh, by the way, BLOW IT OUT YER ASS

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, KDE from the beginning concentrated on developing a clean, stable, well designed object-oriented API as a platform for their desktop system. GNOME, on the other hand, basically slapped together a few bits and pieces that were lying around (gtk+, mico, imlib, etc.), then tried to replace some (mico with ORBit, imlib with their own setup, etc) halfway through development, meanwhile dumping dependency upon dependency in their mindless pursuit of "cool shit".

      The result? KDE is clean, easy to program for, and has a solid foundation for new technology to be built with, making development much quicker for them. Meanwhile, GNOME is tripping under its own weight, with hundreds of shoestring dependencies and braindead design decisions made during the project's infancy (C-only API? HA!).

      Plus, there's the well-known adage that throwing more money and people at an already-in-progress project makes the project take a proportially longer amount of time to achieve anything. :-)

    3. Re:Wow by fault0 · · Score: 1
      Well, according to this slide given by David Faure(one of the main KDE developers), KDE in June 2000 had 300 developers who had CVS write access. Now, this was the KDE 1.1.x days, and since there has been a near-rewrite of kde (kde 2.0) and two more versions (kde 2.1 and kde 2.2), I'd imagine that there'd be over at least 500-600 developers with CVS access.

      From what I've seen, there is a much smaller "core" group in GNOME development. Probably not more than 25. However, there are many more people, like with KDE, who contribute patches.

    4. Re:Wow by update() · · Score: 1
      Somehow I get the impression that the number of paid KDE developers is smaller than 100.

      Depends on how you count. Strictly speaking, the number of full-time, paid KDE developers is more like 7 -- David Faure and Laurent Montel at Mandrake, Waldo Bastian at SuSE, and probably a few more I don't know about. Browse the developer profiles and see how few paid coders there are.

      Even if you include all the guys at TrollTech working on Qt, I doubt if it's close to 100. Eazel probably spent more money and employed more workers than the cumulative history of KDE and Qt togther.

      Out of curiosity, where are all these paid full-time Gnome workers? Ximian can't be that big -- are they at Sun? Red Hat?

      It's funny how they stress how many paid devs they have. I'm wondering whether you should brag about how many or how few people work on your project...

    5. Re:Wow by Ghyl · · Score: 1
      How is it that KDE is keeping up with them then? (surpassing, even, IMHO)
      Certainly in regards to the DE itself, KDE seems quite close. However, IMO it is in apps department where GNOME has forged a large and growing lead. This is where the more numerous GNOME developers are having the most obvious effect. Just to name a few apps where GNOME has a big edge: the office apps (Gnumeric, Abiword, OpenOffice, Evolution, Gnucash) also The Gimp, Nautilus, Gstreamer, Galeon and many more. As for the major apps where KDE has he edge, there's not much more than Kdevelop.
    6. Re:Wow by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

      IMO it is in apps department where GNOME has forged a large and growing lead.

      That should change after KDE 3 is released, since the API will remain stable (binary-compatible even!) for some time, allowing an application base to build up. I think it was the big change from KDE 1 to KDE 2 that made KDE fall behind in the apps department, and GNOME will likely experience a similar phenomenon with its next major release, probably occurring within KDE 3's lifetime.

      Besides, I like Konqueror is better than Nautilus, and KOffice 1.1 is looking good (the 1.0 release was a total joke, but so much has changed since then, just try it!). Aethra is coming along well in the "Giant E-mail/PIM monstrosity" department. Also, I think aRts contains much of the functionality that is in GStreamer (but I could be mistaken). Even if GStreamer is better, it is hardly a GNOME-specific project and could be adopted as part of KDE's multimedia system.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Somehow I get the impression that the number of paid KDE developers is smaller than 100.

      I'm sure that it is, yet they always seem to put out stuff that is way better than GNOME. I wonder why that is...

    8. Re:Wow by scrytch · · Score: 2

      > How is it that KDE is keeping up with them then?

      quality over quantity perhaps?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    9. Re:Wow by bero-rh · · Score: 2
      apps where GNOME has a big edge: the office apps (Gnumeric, Abiword, OpenOffice, Evolution, Gnucash) also The Gimp, Nautilus, Gstreamer, Galeon and many more

      Have you taken a look at KDE recently?

      KSpread and KWord are about on par with Gnumeric and Abiword. OpenOffice is not a part of gnome and nowhere near usable yet.
      For Evolution, KDE has Aethera, which isn't there yet, but catching up quickly.
      For Nautilus and Galeon, there's Konqueror - which you like better is mostly a matter of taste.
      Gimp is really ahead for people who can figure out how it works (and that's all but easy) - for others, Krayon (which isn't intended as a gimp replacement - more as something easy to use and still powerful) is better.

      Off the top of my head, here's other things where KDE is ahead:
      • API
      • Kontour (formerly KIllustrator)
      • KPresenter
      • KChart
      • Kivio
      • aRts (multimedia stuff)
      --
      This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Gnumeric, Abiword, OpenOffice, Evolution,
      > Gnucash) also The Gimp, Nautilus, Gstreamer,
      > Galeon

      It is funny to see always these same name being cited as Gnome apps. Very few of them are in fact true Gnome applications.

      Gimp, Gnucash, Abiword, Openoffice and Gnumeric existed before Gnome.

      Openoffice is related to Gnome only by the hope to have a bonobo component one day.

      From what I have heard, Gimp is proud that they will never depend completely on Gnome.

      Most of these apps are mainly Gtk, but not really Gnome apps. And this is true for many applications whose name start by 'g'. Usually, they are Gtk applications, not Gnome.

      On the contrary, all the praised KDE applications (Konqueror, KWord, KSpread, KMail, Aethera, KImageShop, KDevelop, KdeStudio, Kontour, ...) were developped from scratch by KDE developers, for KDE and are purely KDE apps.

      You may wonder how KDE did to come up in 3 years with a small team of 10 core developers to stable applications equivalent to applications that have more than 5 years of development and bigger team of paid developers.

      IMHO, this is because:
      - they use a excellent toolkit : Qt
      - they use a better language : C++
      - they use a excellent toolkit : Qt
      - they use a modular language : C++
      - they use a excellent toolkit : Qt
      - they use an object oriented language : C++
      - they use a excellent toolkit : Qt
      - thank to the modularity of C++ and Qt, they build a modular and powerful framework.
      --
      "I'm a big fan of konqueror, and I use it for everything. Anti-aliased fonts won me over." - Linus Torvalds
      http://bugs.kde.org//db/27/27340.html

    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>apps where GNOME has a big edge: the office apps (Gnumeric, Abiword, >>OpenOffice, Evolution, Gnucash) also The Gimp, Nautilus, Gstreamer, >>Galeon and many more >Have you taken a look at KDE recently? Yeah and KDE apps are basically Krap. KDE apps seem to a warmed over Amiga mindset feel to them. Gnome in fact does have the better apps. In addition to the ones already mentioned, Gnome has what is quickly becoming the best graphical newsreader on any platform, Pan.

    12. Re:Wow by Ghyl · · Score: 1
      All these apps are certainly part of GNOME now and are being worked on by GNOME hackers. In the GIMPs case, GNOME is really an offshoot of that project since it was started by GIMP hackers using the GIMP Tool Kit!

      I might also point out that KDE users certainly have no hesitation in bragging about QT even though, of course, it was not originally a KDE project. ;)

    13. Re:Wow by Ghyl · · Score: 1
      Off the top of my head, here's other things where KDE is ahead:...
      API - both projects would argue about which has the better API, all we can really go on is the quality of the apps.
      Kontour - I'd definitely give GNOME the edge here with Sodipodi/Sketch.
      KPresenter - is it better than Impress from OpenOffice?
      KChart - I don't know if you'd call this a major app. These functions are subsumed by Gnumeric. Guppi offers sophisticated graphing abilities.
      Kivio - this is only semi-free/open source software. If you want anything more than the basic shapes you have to buy theKompany's proprietary stencils. Of course, the KDE project could produce their own stencils, but this would step on theKompany's toes and destroy their business model, so I can't see it ever happening. In accepting Kivio, KDE has also accepted that they'll never have a fully free diagramming program to rival the commercial offerings. Therefore, Dia is the winner here.
      aRts - it's certainly better than esound, but is it better than ASD? We'll know when they're both finished. Gstreamer, and the GTK apps like XMMS give GNOME a clear edge in multimedia.
    14. Re:Wow by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      You do if your after a corporate market.

      The reason people run things at home (now) is because they run it at work. Your average Joe who can't remember how to use Word97 since Word2000 replaced it at their office.

      So, Gnome coming standard on various OSs (even if it's only servers for now) at the office will encourage people to install it at home for consistency.

      KDE is going the other route. Trying to appease people at home, and hoping from there it works its way into the corporations..

      KDE will start out strong, but Gnome *should* (with a good product) be able to capture a significant amount of desktop space. That said, I don't think either can unroot Microsoft from the desktop.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    15. Re:Wow by fault0 · · Score: 1

      We can argue this all day but,

      > API - both projects would argue about which has the better API, all we can really go on is the quality of the apps.

      Yes, we can argue about the APIs, but which project has gone through a rewrite and two new versions over the last year. And which project has released a new version with not a whole lot of changes except for one buggy and slow app that is from a defunct company :) .

      > Kontour - I'd definitely give GNOME the edge here with Sodipodi/Sketch.

      I've tried both. Kontour seems a lot more advanced.

      > KPresenter - is it better than Impress from OpenOffice?

      Of all the KOffice apps, KPresenter is probably one of the most finished. And again, OpenOffice is NOT part of gnome.

      > KChart - I don't know if you'd call this a major app. These functions are subsumed by Gnumeric. Guppi offers sophisticated graphing abilities.

      Can't really comment on this.

      > Kivio - this is only semi-free/open source software. If you want anything more than the basic shapes you have to buy theKompany's proprietary stencils. Of course, the KDE project could produce their own stencils, but this would step on theKompany's toes and destroy their business model, so I can't see it ever happening. In accepting Kivio, KDE has also accepted that they'll never have a fully free diagramming program to rival the commercial offerings. Therefore, Dia is the winner here.

      Can't really comment on this.

      > aRts - it's certainly better than esound, but is it better than ASD? We'll know when they're both finished. Gstreamer, and the GTK apps like XMMS give GNOME a clear edge in multimedia.

      AFAIK, aRts, according to proposals at GUADEC is going to be used in GNOME 2.0? Noatun is a lot more advanced than XMMS will ever be.

      Not to risk trolling here, but GNOME development really seems stagnant compared to KDE.

    16. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've tried knode?

    17. Re:Wow by SmileyBen · · Score: 2

      So do you think it is better to start writing from scratch, rather than Gnomising or KDEifying applications? I know that's not what you mean, but surely you can't complain that this is an unfair comparison because Gnome builds on the existing free software codebase, whereas KDE goes their own way?

    18. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Office is part of Gnome ?

      Yes, Gnome originates from the Gimp Toolkit, but that doesn't make Gimp a Gnome application. Gnome has gone a long way since its start. I wish I could find the mail of a Gimp hacker stating that he will ensure that Gimp remains independant of Gnome (because he was pissed off with Gnome's attitude).

      "KDE users certainly have no hesitation in bragging about QT even though, of course, it was not originally a KDE project. ;)"

      You got a point! :-)

    19. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So do you think it is better to start writing from scratch, rather than Gnomising or KDEifying applications?

      No.

      But you can not cite these application as a proof that Gnome development is going well. These application were going well without Gnome and would still be going well without Gnome.

      On the contrary, the fact that KDE has developped such powerful and stable applications from scratch is a proof that KDE development is going very well and is easy.

    20. Re:Wow by SmileyBen · · Score: 2

      Many would think it was proof that KDE is difficult for effectively reusing old code, whereas Gnome is not. Of course you can use this as proof that Gnome is doing well.

  13. tim ney is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    nuff said

    1. Re:tim ney is a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      you're a moron you mother fucking piece of shit!! LINUX MUST BURN IN HELL!!!!!!!!!!! DIE LINUX DIE!!! FUCK YOURSELF UP THE ASS ALONG WITH CmdrTaco and Hemos!! Fuckers fuckers fuckers! Bitches bitches bitches! GOATSE.CX ROCKS THE HOUSE NIGGAZ!!!

  14. Hemos! I Love You!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    take me now, hampster boy!

  15. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE... by gik · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm having trouble believing that this Gnome-related story wasn't ended with a "Personally, I use Konqueror..." or "...even though KDE does blah blah....".

    I think this is a first, ladies and gentlemen.

    --
    ZERO
    1. Re:THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Source forge actually has an article about this: here. It is a pretty good read, and I would recommend that all of you sick Linux humping BASTARDS would read it. It talks about how Microsoft is going finish kicking the living shit out of Linux (because we all know that they are well on their way!) Linux is dead people. The only thing that is left alive is it's shit. And Microsoft is kicking alllll the living shit out of it as we speak! GO WINDOWS! GO IIS! GO PAID SOFTWARE!!!!!!!!!!!! GNU SUCKS!!

    2. Re:THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      TROLL????? WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TO CALL THAT A TROLL????? That is a mother fucking fine piece of work! The moderator that did that must be a nigger or a kike. DAMN YOU FUCKERS!

    3. Re:THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      Well, it was only a year ago everybody accused Slashdot of being GNOME-biased. Are we finally going to see a truly NEUTRAL, PROFESSIONAL Slashdot from now on?

      Well, probably not, as long as we keep getting all these stupid ASCII anuses, penes, and penguin sodomy pictures. Fix the damn lameness filter already!

    4. Re:THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Yeah, there is obviously something wrong with the lameness filter. It let a LAME ASS NIGGER LIKE YOU post! DAMN THIS THING!

    5. Re:THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I use Konqueror and this is because KDE does blah blah (err, I meant, does not suck).

    6. Re:THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE... by dan_bethe · · Score: 1
      Yeah, the blatantly juvenile and contrarian wit of the Slashdot pseudo-editors is wicked annoying.

      Poster: "Scientists build a black box enabling anyone to travel through time, cure the common cold, and make food out of dirt."

      Slashdot Pseudo-editor: This is a good start, but when it can explain my phone bill and sterilize my navel ring, maybe I'll buy one!

  16. politics impacts development by Proud+Geek · · Score: 1

    I think the reason is political. KDE has a loose policy where lots of developers contribute what they want and the kore team accepts whatever meets their standards and has a logical place in KDE.

    GNOME on the other hand is an official GNU project and subject to the squabbles that accompany that official political role. The developers get into arguments a lot more and it is much less clear to developers if their work will be applauded or ignored. Under the circumstances, they do pretty well.

    Even for paid developers, who is to say that Ximian, Sun and Red Hat want the same thing as RMS and the steering comittee.

    --

    Even Slashdot wants to hide some things

  17. NAZI PUNKS FUCK OFF. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Well, instead of posting that wonderful Dead Kennedys tune again, I think I'll throw in a little variety by lambasting you with yet another anti-racist tune, this time from everybody's favorite whiney-voice Canadian:

    Southern man better keep your head
    Don't forget what your good book said
    Southern change gonna come at last
    Now your crosses are burning fast
    Southern man

    I saw cotton and I saw black
    Tall white mansions and little shacks.
    Southern man when will you pay them back?
    I heard screamin' and bullwhips cracking
    How long? How long?

    Southern man better keep your head
    Don't forget what your good book said
    Southern change gonna come at last
    Now your crosses are burning fast
    Southern man

    Lily Belle, your hair is golden brown
    I've seen your black man comin' round
    Swear by God I'm gonna cut him down!
    I heard screamin' and bullwhips cracking
    How long? How long?

    -Neil Young

    1. Re:NAZI PUNKS FUCK OFF. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Eat shit and die, liberal nigger lover. Niggers are animals without souls and they should be treated as such.

  18. NAZI PUNKS FUCK OFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Punk ain't no religous cult
    Punk means thinking for yourself
    You aren't hardcore cos you spike your hair
    When a jock still lives inside your head

    Chorus:
    Nazi Punks
    Nazi Punks
    Nazi Punks...FUCK OFF!
    Nazi Punks
    Nazi Punks
    Nazi Punks...FUCK OFF!

    If you come to fight, get outta here
    You ain't no better than the bouncers
    We ain't tryin' to be police
    When you ape the cops it ain't anarchy

    Repeat chorus

    Ten guys jump one, what a man
    You fight each other, the police state wins
    Stab your back when you trash our halls
    Trash a bank if you got real balls

    You still swastikas look cool
    The real nazis run your schools
    They're coaches, businessmen and cops
    In the real fourth reich you'll be the first to go

    Repeat Chorus

    You'll be the first to go
    You'll be the first to go
    You'll be the first to go...unless you think!

    -Dead Kennedys

  19. +5 insightful for the man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Hit the nail right on the head. I salute you.

  20. It's QT by Davace · · Score: 1

    KDE has it's base done (very well) by a whole other group called Trolltech. They make QT, and that leaves the KDE team to focus on things like Konqueror, Koffice, and all the other things that make up the desktop.

  21. NAZI PUNKS FUCK OFF!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Punk ain't no religous cult
    Punk means thinking for yourself
    You aren't hardcore cos you spike your hair
    When a jock still lives inside your head

    Chorus:
    Nazi Punks
    Nazi Punks
    Nazi Punks...FUCK OFF!
    Nazi Punks
    Nazi Punks
    Nazi Punks...FUCK OFF!

    If you come to fight, get outta here
    You ain't no better than the bouncers
    We ain't tryin' to be police
    When you ape the cops it ain't anarchy

    Repeat chorus

    Ten guys jump one, what a man
    You fight each other, the police state wins
    Stab your back when you trash our halls
    Trash a bank if you got real balls

    You still swastikas look cool
    The real nazis run your schools
    They're coaches, businessmen and cops
    In the real fourth reich you'll be the first to go

    Repeat Chorus

    You'll be the first to go
    You'll be the first to go
    You'll be the first to go...unless you think!

    - Dead Kennedys

  22. No, Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Linux faces a bleak future. In fact there may be no future at all for Linux because Linux is dying. Things are looking very bad for Linux. As many of us are already aware, Linux continues to lose market share; red ink flows like a river of blood. Slackware Linux is perhaps the most in endangered. Let's look at the numbers.
    MandrakeSoft's CEO Henri Poole states that there are 70000 users of Linux-Mandrake. How many users of Debian GNU/Linux are there? Let's see. The number of Linux-Mandrake versus GNU/Linux posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. The refore there are about 70000/5 = 14000 GNU/Linux users. Slackware posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of GNU/Linux posts. Therefore there are about 7000 users of Slackware. A recent article put RedHat Linux at about 80 percent of the Linux market. Therefore there are (70000+14000+7000)*4 = 364000 RedHat Linux users. This is consistent with the number of RedHat Linux Usenet posts.

    Now Linux companies are consolidating, overhauling their business plans, laying off staff, scaling back expansion plans and pushing back profitability schedules. "It would seem there are too many distributions for the market to bear," said Gartner analyst Tom Henkel. (http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,269 5638,00.html)

    Red Hat, Inc., the leader in developing deploying and managing open source linux solutions, announced on a reported basis, a net loss of $24.2 million. (http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-0 3-22-010-20-PS)

    Turbolinux, based in Brisbane, Calif., a Linux-based software provider has withdrawn a $60 million initial public offering "in light of current market conditions." (http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/010320/n20215287_2.html) (http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/03/20/deals/ipo/)

    Clayton-based Linuxgruven.com, a Linux training and service company with 106 employees, laid off 100 employees (http://stlouis.bcentral.com/stlouis/stories/2001/ 03/05/daily41.html)

    Lineo withdrew its initial public offering in January. Caldera Systems delayed the acquisition of Santa Cruz Operations' Unix software by a quarter. Linuxcare laid off dozens in February, with Linuxcare co-founders Dave Sifry and Dave LaDuke are among those departing. VA Linux Systems cut 114 people in February and delayed its expected profitability by nine months. (http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,269 5638,00.html)

    Due to the troubles of Corel, abysmal sales and so on, Corel Linux is going out of business and was nearly taken over by Microsoft who sell another troubled OS. Owing to the GPL, SuSE is laying off almost all of its US staff. Major marketing surveys show that Linux has steadily declined in market share. Even LinuxWorld.com shut down "because of the economy and everything else" (http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=01/03/13/ 1720254&mode=nocomment)

    Linux is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Linux is to survive at all it will be among OS hobbyists (i.e. those who dabble with Minix, Xinu, etc). Linux continues to falter. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Linux is dead.

    1. Re:No, Linux is dying by zero2k · · Score: 1
      Why do you people insist on basing the fate of linux based on the commercialisation of the OS? And I really like the numbers you are pulling out of your ass, HTF did you get them? So you're saying that you've statistically analysed the linux base on quotes from Mandrake, Usenet, etc.? Get real!

      Linux is far from dying. As I see it, the OS is growing in popularity. There are dozens of new companies taking part in development for Linux which you don't have the slightest idea about.


      About about Linux's final survival as a hobbyist OS - it was created from there and so it ain't so bad if it were still there. It's not gonna die anytime soon, particularly it's not dead! you windoze lover.


      NB I am a FreeBSD user, but I get sick of hearing FUD like this - which I know is flaimebait

    2. Re:No, Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      another stupid fucking piece of shit takes the bait. beauty.

    3. Re:No, Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      HAHAHA it's funny to see the suckers go for the bait!

      HOW DARE YOU SIR.......

  23. Tim's an incredible guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    indeed.

    Met him in World Social Forum 2000.

  24. 1000 times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Yeah, we heard this before. This is old news, and just because someone at Slashdot hears it, it's new news.

    Yeah, it's great, as we heard last month. Thanks.

  25. GNUStep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will be better if the FSF got a team to work full time in GNUStep, IMHO, the next big thing, and technically better that gnome.

    1. Re:GNUStep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those idiots working one GNOME should have been working with GNUStep all along instead of wasting countless man hours on a piece of shit like GTK. I'm sure there is some hidden political reason why it wasn't used, there always is when GNU projects are involved.

    2. Re:GNUStep by spauldo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there is some hidden political reason why it wasn't used, there always is when GNU projects are involved.

      Yep, big political reason like the fact that there wasn't anything to GNUstep back then. I don't know if it even existed. Windowmaker may not even have existed - not sure. When gnome came out, I was using afterstep - remember when it only had one config file, suspiciously similar to fvwm?

      And look at the toolkits at the time - the only common one was motif, and it wasn't free - lesstif wasn't near completion of even the motif 1.x stuff back then. QT wasn't free (speech). Athena was ugly and unintuitive. OpenView was all right, but unpopular and difficult to control - since it was a sun creation and pretty well standardized, it wouldn't be very easy to change to fit a proper DE. Most UNIX programmers used C, so GTK was the best option at the time, even taking into account the fact it didn't do much at all besides the stuff gimp needed.

      Back when gnome started out, most people used fvwm, afterstep, or a TWM variant. Want to customize your environment? Learn your .xdefaults. No one knew what to do with a DE back then, since the ones that existed were either unknown to non-commercial UNIX users (CDE) or extremely lacking (the free OpenView stuff). No one wanted to be like windoze - redhat used fvwm95 at the time and most peoples' first act when going into X was to change it. The whole X experience was different then, and people thought differently.

      Nowdays, KDE and gnome both have turned X into a more windoze/maclike experience. This isn't necessarily bad, and you can always live without it if you want, but the people who jumped on the UNIX bandwagon later on don't remember what it was like before the free DE's existed. It's a different world now.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  26. Yes, GNUstep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the Foundation at 1.0, and the AppKit reaching it, all that GNUstep needs is a working Project Builder/Interface Builder and it will be the ultimate development environment for Linux, and hell, Unix in general. Not to mention, GNUstep is nearly source-compatible with MacOS X, so GNUstep could open a HUGE amount of software to be ported over to Unix from MacOS X.

  27. jesus fucken christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    this story's comments are 80% troll. if there were a surer sign that nobody gives a shit about this piece of news, I'd like to see it.

  28. fuck this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    this is some booooooorrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnngggggggg g and worthless shit. get real. we don't give a FUCK about petty shit like this. never have never will. FUCK OFF

  29. shut the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    god dammit you shit for brains loser... NO ONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT THIS SHIT ARTICLE!!! posting something serious about this lame shit just shows what a complete and total dumbfuck you are.

  30. NIGGERS are shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I hate niggers.

    Click on this NIGGER for a good laugh.

  31. blow it out yer ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    niggahz

  32. The author's spacebar must be broken . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example. . . "eventssuch", "anadvocate", "toorganizations"

  33. KDE 3 will break binary compatibility with KDE 2! by cpeterso · · Score: 1

    That should change after KDE 3 is released, since the API will remain stable (binary-compatible even!) for some time, allowing an application base to build up. I think it was the big change from KDE 1 to KDE 2 that made KDE fall behind in the apps department, and GNOME will likely experience a similar phenomenon with its next major release, probably occurring within KDE 3's lifetime.



    Unfortunately, KDE 3 will break binary compatibility with KDE 2, which will definitely hurt KDE's application base; KDE 3 will have both API changes and use the new TrollTech Qt 3.0.

    From the Linux Kernel Cousin archives "The Road Ahead: KDE after 2.2":

    there was concern over third party developers as Waldo Bastian noted saying, "Although I understand the advantages, in general I think that major version updates are very bad for KDE because it fragmentates the efforts of third party developers. There are plenty of applications out there that have never been ported to KDE 2, hell, even in our own CVS we have tons of applications that still have to be properly adapted. (grep for QDialog to see what I mean) In think that KDE's current strength is its framework and that actual applications are its weak points. Moving to Qt 3 is a huge improvement for the framework, but it puts a strain on application developers. Development can go too fast as well, you know. Having a great KDE 3 desktop is nice, but not if we lose all application developers in the process."

  34. Timothy Rue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    holy crap! I almost thought you said "Timothy Rue!" the delusional comp.sys.amiga.misc troll!

    (-1,Tim Rue)

  35. its the underlying libs. by kzadot · · Score: 1
    How is it that KDE is keeping up with them then? (surpassing, even, IMHO) Greater support from non-paid developers?


    Its the underlying library Qt. It supports C++ natively, and is developed by a company and a large team of paid developers. This makes people write KDE software.

    I prefered a lot of things about GNOME, but wanted to write object-oriented C++, and unfortunatley, Gtk-- is written by a single developer, and doesn't seem to develop as fast. Its possible that a product done by a company could have longer longevity than a product by a single individual too.


    So I went to Qt.

    1. Re:its the underlying libs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an avid KDE fan (I've always been disappointed by Gnome, dunno, maybe I'm just unlucky) but if you want a quality C++ framework for GTK, check out INTI at http://sources.redhat.com/inti/. It's a bit off yet, and the tutorial is skimpy, but even from my background (Java) it looks pretty funky.

    2. Re:its the underlying libs. by uchian · · Score: 1

      I had another reason for writing for QT as well - the fact that it has full support on both Windows, Linux, and (coming soon), the Mac (though I am unusure as to whether trolltech intend to release a free version as they have for Windows & Linux). Now, I'm only writing free software, but if I was to start writing code that I wished to sell, then I would want it to be cross platform (to capture as much of the market as possible), and I would want it to be easy to program (and QT is very easy to program).

      IMHO, this means that kde will in the future, when Linux gains more popularity on the desktop, have the advantage over GNOME for commercial developers, and so more "big" apps (and closed source, and non-distributable...) might appear for KDE than GNOME.

      If you consider this a good thing or a bad things I suppose depends on exactly where you stand on the Free software/open source argument.

  36. didnt' this guy... by -ryan · · Score: 1
    Didn't this guy blow up a federal building or something?


    </joke>

  37. Re:KDE 3 will break binary compatibility with KDE by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

    "Unfortunately, KDE 3 will break binary compatibility with KDE 2, which will definitely hurt KDE's application base; KDE 3 will have both API changes and use the new TrollTech Qt 3.0."



    GCC 3 also breaks binary compatibility

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  38. you're not entirerly correct by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1
    and Abiword. OpenOffice is not a part of gnome and nowhere near usable yet.

    I think the Abiword developers would disagree with you there. Abiword is part of Gnome Office. Its a testament to abiwords interoperability and cross platform status that you dont think its a gnome app, its a shame more Gnome apps dont try as hard to be cross platform.

    1. Re:you're not entirerly correct by bero-rh · · Score: 2

      Umm... Abiword is not OpenOffice. OpenOffice is
      the former Staroffice. I mentioned Abiword (which
      I agree is a great app) in a completely separate
      context.

      --
      This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
  39. GNOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://news.gnome.org/998345737/

    read this, scroll down to that big comment done by an user and read the truth behind gnome.

  40. #kde-developers by Marco+Krohn · · Score: 1

    From kde-common/accounts
    To be fair the number is slightly to large (you have to reduce the number by about 3).

    06.07.00 329
    10.08.00 344
    29.09.00 360
    06.10.00 366
    21.11.00 391
    10.12.00 402
    16.01.01 415
    23.02.01 431
    22.03.01 454
    20.04.01 471
    19.05.01 486
    18.06.01 506
    25.07.01 529
    21.08.01 546

  41. Hope he boosts Gnome... by stew77 · · Score: 1

    As much as I apreciate the KDE efforts, I don't want Gnome to be left behind. What I like about GTK+/Gnome is that in contrast to Qt/KDE it is far easier to use in non-C++ languages. There a zillion of language bindings for GTK+/Gnome out, so I have the freedom to write for it in the language of my choice - hey, I can even use Haskell do write GTK+ apps :-)

    Besides, I like the fact that Gnome performs notably faster and less memory consumpting on smaller machines (my notebook comes to mind) - as long as you don't use Nautilus.

    BTW, any news on Nautilus? Although it's very bloated, I like that thing. Don't let it fade...

    1. Re:Hope he boosts Gnome... by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2

      BTW, any news on Nautilus? Although it's very bloated, I like that thing. Don't let it fade...

      Seeing that God^H^H^HAlan Cox made some performance observations on one of the nautilus mailing lists (based on a almost complete lack of any caching for often-used fonts and file contents), I think you'll see the performance take a big leap when 1.0.5 comes out - there is still a fair amount of activity on the Nautilus code base.

      Cheers,

      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
  42. Hmmm, What About This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, this...

  43. Re:KDE 3 will break binary compatibility with KDE by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1
    Unfortunately, KDE 3 will break binary compatibility with KDE 2, which will definitely hurt KDE's application base; KDE 3 will have both API changes and use the new TrollTech Qt 3.0.

    Binary incompatibility is unavoidable, since GCC 3.0 isn't binary compatible with GCC 2.x. KDE is simply using the opportunity to break everything at once instead of having several smaller breaks which would be much worse.

    The API changes will be very minor. In fact, most KDE programs will probably be able to be ported with a Perl script or something similar. The idea is not to change the API so much as fix known problems with it in preparation for keeping it frozen for the future. This will be nothing at all like the KDE/QT 1 -> KDE/QT 2 change.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}